WO2012123913A2

WO2012123913A2 - Process for producing metallic or ceramic moulded bodies

Info

Publication number: WO2012123913A2
Application number: PCT/IB2012/051237
Authority: WO
Inventors: Johan Ter Maat; Martin Blömacher; Hans Wohlfromm
Original assignee: Basf Se; Basf (China) Company Limited
Priority date: 2011-03-16
Filing date: 2012-03-15
Publication date: 2012-09-20
Also published as: CN103517886A; WO2012123913A3; EP2686286A4; EP2686286B1; CN103517886B; JP2014514183A; KR101902038B1; EP2686286A2; KR20140017607A; JP5965928B2

Abstract

What is described is a process for producing a metallic or ceramic moulded body from a thermoplastic composition, comprising A) 40 to 65% by volume of at least one inorganic sinterable powder A, B) 35 to 60% by volume of a mixture of B₁) 50 to 95% by weight of one or more polyoxymethylene homo- or copolymers; B₂) 5 to 50% by weight of a polymer which is homogeneously dissolved in B₁) or is dispersed in B₁) with a mean particle size of less than 1 μm, as a binder, and C) 0 to 5% by volume of a dispersing aid, where the sum of components A), B) and C) adds up to 100% by volume, by injection moulding or extrusion to give a green part, removing the binder and sintering, characterized in that the binder is removed by a) treating the moulded part with a solvent which extracts the binder component B₂) from the moulded part and in which the binder component B₁) is insoluble, b) then removing the solvent from the moulded part by drying, and c) then treating the moulded part in an acid-containing atmosphere which removes the binder component B₁) from the moulded body.

Description

Process for the production of metallic or ceramic moldings Description

The present invention relates to a process for the production of metallic or ceramic moldings from thermoplastic molding compositions comprising powdered metals, powdered metal alloys or powdered ceramics and organic binders.

Metallic or ceramic moldings can be produced by injection molding, extrusion or compression of thermoplastic materials which, in addition to metal powders and / or ceramic powders, have an organic binder. These are highly filled organic polymer molding compounds. After forming the thermoplastic mass into a green part, the organic binder is removed and the resulting debindered green part (= brown part) is sintered.

The first binders for the powder injection molding process were generally based on blends of polyethylene or polypropylene and wax. The green body is first liberated from the wax by melting and the residual binder burned out by a slow pyrolysis. For melting, the green parts must be stored in a powder bed, because the green strength is practically not given by the melting. Later binder systems for thermal debinding dispensed with the melting, because the elaborate embedding of the green parts in powder and subsequent excavation are far too time-consuming.

Usually, an improved binder system for complete thermal debindering consists of several components, e.g. in DE 1992 5197. These components are released successively during heating at different temperatures from the molding, so that the usually lower binder component is still present at least 400 ° C and can be seen as a residual binder. A purely thermal debinding takes 1 to 3 days and is thus extremely slow.

A still further improved process is solvent debindering which employs binder systems containing binder components of varying solubility. To debind the green part, a binder component is first removed by solvent extraction, after which the remaining, not or very poorly soluble in the solvent residual binder component is again removed by a slow thermal decomposition of the molded part (eg US 4,197.1 18 or EP 501 602). The melt area of the residual binder is Steps and a plastic deformation of the powder molded part is therefore inevitable.

WO 201 1/016718 A1 describes a powder injection molding process in which a binder mixture of a polymer, e.g. POM and a non-polymeric solvent (molecular weight <300 g / mol, melting point> RT) is used for the polymer. Initially, the aforementioned solvent is dissolved out or evaporated. The remaining polymer is removed by thermal debinding. A disadvantage of this method is that such binders already evaporate the non-polymeric solvent when mixed with powder and during processing on the injection molding machine. The low molecular weight component is sweated out on the green part surface and pollutes the injection mold. In addition, the green part strength is significantly reduced.

R.M. German in his handbook "Powder Injection Molding", MPIF 1990, Chapter 4, page 1 15, writes about the solvent removal:

The two components in the binder are often in the same proportions Binder Breaths therefore contain 70 to 30% by volume of a major component. "

Another method for debinding the green part according to the prior art is based on a catalytic debindering by treatment of the green part in a gaseous, acidic atmosphere at elevated temperature. EP-A 0 413 231 discloses, for example, a process for producing an inorganic sintered molding in which a mixture of a sinterable inorganic powder and polyoxymethylene as a binder is formed into a green body and the binder is then treated by treating the green body in a gaseous, acidic, eg boron trifluoride or HN0 ₃ , containing atmosphere is removed. Subsequently, the thus treated green body is sintered. Examples of sintered powders are both oxide ceramic powders such as Al ₂ O ₃ , Zr0 ₂ , Y ₂ O ₃ and non-oxide ceramic powders such as SiC, S13N4, and metal powder.

With a binder phase consisting exclusively of POM, however, satisfactory results are not obtained in practice because the sintering densities are too low. EP-A 0 444 475 describes binder compositions which are suitable for ceramic molded articles and which, in addition to polyoxymethylene, comprise poly-1,3-dioxolane, poly-1,3-dioxane or poly-1,3-dioxepane as additional soluble polymer or as polymer dispersible in POM aliphatic polyurethanes, aliphatic polyepoxides, poly (C ₂ -C ₆ alkylene oxides), aliphatic polyamides or polyacrylates or mixtures thereof.

EP 0 465 940 A1 and DE 100 19 447 A1 describe thermoplastic molding compositions for the production of metallic moldings which, in addition to a sinterable pulverulent metal or a pulverulent metal alloy, contain a mixture of polyoxymethylene homopolymers or copolymers and a polymer which is immiscible therewith as binder. Suitable additional polymers include polyolefins, in particular polyethylene and polypropylene, as well as polymers of methacrylic esters such as PMMA (EP 0 465 940 A1). DE 100 19 447 A1 describes a binder for inorganic material powder for producing metallic and ceramic shaped bodies, said binder copolymers, a mixture of polyoxymethylene homo- or and a polymer system of polytetrahydrofuran and at least one polymer is selected from C _2- 8-olefins, vinylaromatic rule monomers Vinylestern aliphatic Ci _-8- carboxylic acids, vinyl-Ci _-8 -alkyl ethers or Ci-12-alkyl (meth) acrylates.

WO 2008/006776 A1 describes a binder for inorganic material powder for producing metallic shaped bodies, said binder copolymers or a blend of polyoxymethylene and a polymer system selected from C _2- 8-olefins and poly-1, 3-dioxepane or poly-1, 3- Dioxolane are.

The debindering of the green parts is carried out catalytically using the aforementioned POM binder systems by treating the green part in a gaseous, acidic atmosphere of e.g. Hydrogen halides, formic acid or nitric acid at elevated temperature. The Polyoxymethylenhomo- or copolymers are depolymerized residue-free, followed by a slow thermal Restentbinderung the remaining polymer. Here, too, the melt area of the residual binder is passed through and plastic deformation of the powder molded part is thereby inevitable. The residual binder content in the catalytic removal is generally about 10%. Because of the lower residual binder content, the plastic deformation is usually less pronounced than in the solvent debinder, where the residual binder content is usually 30 to 70%.

In reactive powder surfaces can in the catalytic debindering with the aforementioned acids, in particular with nitric acid, problems by a reaction the acid with the surface occur. This reaction can be so pronounced that debinding by pore clogging comes to a standstill after a few tenths of a millimeter of penetration. For example, the HN0 ₃ Entbinderung with copper and copper-containing alloys not, or, with low Cu content, only limited possible because the bulky nitrates block access to the molding interior. A similar behavior is known by Kobalt.

But in other metals, where a reaction with HN0 _{3 is} not obvious and the debinding is completely normal, experience can still experience problems. In these cases, only a superficial reaction may take place, and the rate of debinding is hardly or not negatively affected. Nevertheless, in the sintered product an increase in the oxygen content such as in titanium, or in carbonaceous alloys, such as iron, a loss of carbon by the reaction to form gaseous carbon oxides.

Further examples of powders in which reactions with HNO ₃ are not directly apparent are W, V, Mg, Mn and ceramic powders such as AIN and Si ₃ N ₄ . In particular, in alloys containing reactive metals, for example Al- and / or Ti-containing superalloys such as IN713C, MAR 246, GMR 235 and IN 100, such superficial reactions are not disturbing to the progress of debindering, but the resulting Al - and Ti-containing oxide layers are no longer reducible in the further course of the sintering step and then these alloying elements are not or only partially available for alloying; the material properties of the sintered product are worse or even unusable.

A catalytic debinding with oxalic acid, also for oxidation-sensitive sintered materials such as WC / Co and Cu, described in WO 94/25205. The catalytic debinding with oxalic acid, however, is significantly slower in direct comparison with HN0 ₃ and oxalic acid is problematic as a solid in the dosage, so that it has not yet come to industrial use.

All available literature of the past 30 years about powder injection thus shows that the organic binder must consist of several components; As a rule, these are at least two components from which one component is removed in a first debinding step and a second component remains as a residual binder in the molded part.

The function and importance of this residual binder, this so-called "backbone", is explained by the fact that the "backbone" must provide for a basic strength in the brown part, in order to transport the brown parts (for example to control measurements, or from the debinding oven into the sintering furnace). In addition, the residual binder should guarantee the integrity of the molded parts during the early stage of the sintering process, because usually the diffusion processes, which initially lead to contact formation between the powder particles and later to compaction, only at about 600 - 1000 ° C. Below this temperature, a debindered molding without residual binder would correspond to a pure packing of powder particles, quasi a sand castle, ie without any strength.

R.M. German in his handbook "Powder Injection Molding", MPIF 1990, Chapter 4, page 99: "The binder is a temporary vehicle for homogeneously packing the powder into the desired shape and then holding the particles in that shape until the beginning of sintering. "

The content of the residual binder varies from about 10 to at most 70% by weight of the binder phase, the content being dependent on the primary binder removal method chosen and the type of polymer.

The residual binder is removed according to the prior art without exception by thermal decomposition. The temperature at which the residual binder leaves the brown part is dependent on the polymer chosen and on the choice of furnace protection gas, but is usually in the temperature range 300 to 600 ° C, in particular 400 to 500 ° C.

A disadvantage of the usual thermal Restentbinderung is that this is an additional source of undesirable reactive substances. During thermal debinding polymer chains are usually cracked and split into shorter chains. In many polymers carbon is produced as a by-product and this carbon is very finely dispersed and reactive. This reactive carbon can in turn be bound by the reactive metals or alloying elements and form further undesirable secondary phases (carbides).

The residual binder is still of considerable disadvantage for the operation of the sintering furnace, in the heating rate always the thermal decomposition of the residual binder must be taken into account and often there are problems with the control of the carbon content by charring the residual binder.

The sintering furnace must therefore fulfill a special task in a temperature range (300 to 600 ° C), where the furnace is not easy to control; The sintering furnaces are built from the power output for the high temperature range above 1200 ° C. Since sintering furnaces, in particular batch sintering furnaces for MIM, because of the used very expensive, it would be an important cost advantage not to have to take into account the thermal decomposition. The higher heating rate possible without residual binder could reduce the cycle time by 20 to 40%.

A further disadvantage is that the sintering furnace is burdened by decomposition products of the residual binder, which are led out by elaborate constructions of the furnace and usually must be condensed out, causing considerable maintenance is required.

It is therefore the object to develop an improved process for the production of metallic or ceramic moldings, which makes it possible to provide a substantially restbinder-free molded part which can be sintered without the aforementioned limitations and is also suitable for reactive powders.

The object is achieved in that the debindering takes place in two steps, wherein in a first binder removal step, a first binder fraction is dissolved out of the green parts with a solvent and in a second debinding step the remaining binder fraction is removed by acid catalysis.

The invention relates to a method for producing a metallic or ceramic molding of a thermoplastic composition containing

A) 40 to 65% by volume, of at least one inorganic sinterable powder A

B) 35 to 60 vol .-% of a mixture of

B-i) from 50 to 95% by weight of one or more polyoxymethylene homopolymers or copolymers;

B ₂ ) from 5 to 50% by weight of a polymer homogeneously dissolved in Bi) or having a mean particle size of less than 1 μm in Bi), as binder, and

C) 0 to 5 vol .-% of a dispersing aid, wherein the sum of the components A), B) and C) 100 vol .-% results, by injection molding or extrusion into a molding, removing the binder and sintering, characterized in that for removing the binder a) the molding is treated with a solvent which extracts the binder component B ₂ ) from the molding and in which the binder component Bi) is insoluble,

b) then the solvent is removed by drying from the molding, and c) then the molding is treated in an acidic atmosphere which removes the binder component B1 from the molding.

The polyoxymethylene homopolymers or copolymers (POM) are known as such and are commercially available. The homopolymers are usually prepared by polymerization of formaldehyde or trioxane, preferably in the presence of suitable catalysts. Polyoxymethylene copolymers which are preferred in the context of the invention also contain trioxane and other cyclic or linear formals or other formaldehyde sources as main monomers. The term main monomers is intended to express that the proportion of these monomers in the total amount of monomers, ie the sum of main and comonomers, is greater than the proportion of comonomers in the total amount of monomers. In general, such POM polymers have at least 50 mole percent of recurring units -CH ₂ O- in the polymer backbone. Suitable polyoxymethylene copolymers are described in EP-A 0 446 708 (page 3, lines 39 to page 4, line 31).

The proportion of component B-i) is preferably 50 to 95 wt .-%, particularly preferably 70 to 90 wt .-%, based on the total amount of the binder B).

The proportion of component B ₂ ) is preferably from 5 to 50% by weight, particularly preferably from 10 to 30% by weight, based on the total amount of binder B).

As component B ₂ ) are in principle polymers which are homogeneously soluble in Polyoxymethylenhomo- or copolymers Bi) or dispersible therein in the required particle size.

Preferred polymers B ₂ ) of this type are polyolefins, aliphatic polyurethanes, aliphatic uncrosslinked polyepoxides, polyethers, aliphatic polyamides and polyacrylates, and mixtures thereof. The abovementioned preferred polymers B ₂ ) are likewise described in EP-A 0 446 708 (page 4, line 34 to page 7, line 12).

Particularly preferred among the abovementioned polymers B ₂ ) are polyethers, in particular poly (C ₂ -C ₆ ) -alkylene oxides, such as polyethylene oxide (PEO), polypropylene oxide, poly-1,3-dioxepane (PDP), poly-1, 3 Dioxolane and polytetrahydrofuran or mixtures thereof, preferably with mean molecular weights (weight average) in the Range of 600 to 50 000 g / mol, more preferably 2000 to 30 000, most preferably 5000 to 20 000 g / mol. Corresponding products are commercially available or the corresponding production processes are known to the person skilled in the art, so that further details are unnecessary here. It is also possible to use mixtures of different polyethers and / or polyethers of different molecular weights.

The inorganic sinterable powder A can be selected from all known suitable inorganic sinterable powders, in particular also reactive and / or oxidation-sensitive powders. Preferably, it is selected from metal powders, metal alloy powders, metal carbonyl powders, ceramic powders, and mixtures thereof, with metallic powders being particularly preferred.

Examples of metals which may be present in powder form are aluminum, iron, in particular carbonyl iron powder, chromium, cobalt, copper, nickel, silicon, titanium, tungsten and rare earths such as Nd, Sm and Y. Examples of powdery metal alloys are high or low alloy steels and metal alloys based on aluminum, iron, titanium, copper, nickel, tungsten or cobalt. Both powder of finished alloys and powder mixtures of the individual alloy components can be used. The metal powders, metal alloy powders and metal carbonyl powders may also be used in admixture. Suitable inorganic powders are also oxide ceramic powders such as Al ₂ O ₃ , Zr0 ₂ , Y ₂ O ₃ but also non-oxide ceramic powders such as SiC, S13N4, and more complex oxide powders such as NiZnFe ₂ 0 ₄ , and inorganic color pigments such as C0AI2O4. Among the reactive and oxidation-sensitive powders are in particular those of copper, cobalt, Ti, W, V, Mg, Mn, Nd, Sm, Y and their alloys, ceramic powders such as AIN and Si ₃ N ₄ and alloys of aluminum and / or titanium, so-called superalloys such as IN713C, MAR 246, GMR 235 and IN 100 and to name the alloys known from the magnet technology with the main components Nd-Fe-B and Sm-Co.

The particle sizes of the powders are preferably from 0.1 to 50 μm, more preferably from 0.3 to 30 μm. The metal powders, metal alloy powders, metal carbonyl powders, ceramic powders can also be used in a mixture.

The optionally present as component C) dispersing agent may be selected from known dispersing aids. Examples are oligomeric polyethylene oxide having an average molecular weight of 200 to 600, stearic acid, stearic acid amide, hydroxystearic acid, fatty alcohols, fatty alcohol sulfonates and block copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, and also polyisobutylene. Particularly preferred the dispersing aid in an amount of 1 to 5% by volume, based on the components A), B) and C) is used.

In addition, the thermoplastic compositions may also contain conventional additives and processing aids which favorably influence the rheological properties of the mixtures during shaping.

The preparation of the thermoplastic composition used in the process according to the invention can be carried out in a conventional manner in a kneader or extruder at temperatures of 150 to 200 ° C (see, EP-A-0413231). After cooling the mass, it can be granulated. According to a preferred embodiment, the preparation of the thermoplastic mass to be formed by melting the components B) and mixing the components A) and optionally C) take place. For example, component B) can be melted in a twin-screw extruder at temperatures of preferably 150 to 220 ° C., in particular 170 to 200 ° C. Component A) is then metered at temperatures in the same range in the required amount to the melt stream of component B). Advantageously, component A) contains on the surface the dispersant (s) C). However, the preparation of the thermoplastic compositions can also be carried out by melting the components B) and C) in the presence of component A) at temperatures of 150 to 220 ° C.

For the molding of the thermoplastic molding composition by injection molding, the usual screw and piston injection molding machines can be used. The molding is generally carried out at temperatures of 175 to 200 ° C and pressures of 3,000 to 20,000 kPa in molds having a temperature of 60 to 140 ° C.

The demolded green compacts are then treated by the process according to the invention according to step a) with a solvent. The choice of solvent depends on the chemical nature of the binder component B ₂ ). Solvents for some binder components B ₂ ) are given below by way of example only; the solvents for other binder components B ₂ ) should be known to the person skilled in the art. Mixtures of suitable solvents can also be used.

Polyolefins are preferably dissolved in apolar solvents such as pentane, hexane, cyclohexane, octane or benzene, and also in aromatic solvents such as benzene.

Polyacrylates (eg PMMA) and polyamides are generally soluble in the following solvents: ethers such as diethyl ether or tetrahydrofuran, ketones such as Methyl ethyl ketone or acetone, esters such as butyrolactone and CrC ₄ alcohols such as ethanol.

Polyethers such as polytetrahydrofuran, poly-1, 3-dioxepane, poly-1,3-dioxolane, polyethylene oxide or polypropylene oxide can be dissolved, for example, in solvents such as tetrahydrofuran or acetone and in CrC ₆ -alcohols such as ethanol and isopropanol; Polyethylene oxide could also be dissolved in water.

If water can be used as the solvent for the binder component B ₂ ), it is particularly preferred because water provides much easier and more environmentally friendly handling because of its incombustibility.

For reactive and / or oxidation-sensitive sintered powder A, when using water as the solvent, this is preferably a conventional corrosion inhibitor, for example modified phosphonates such as amino-tris (methylenephosphonic acid), hydroxyethylamino-di (methylenephosphonic acid) or phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid , available eg from Zschimmer & Schwarz.

Extremely reactive sintering powders A are preferably mixed with aprotic organic solvents such as ethers, esters, amides or ketones, e.g. Tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, butyrolactone, dimethylformamide, methyl ethyl ketone or preferably acetone.

The treatment of the molding with a solvent according to step a) of the process according to the invention can be carried out in commercially available systems with closed solvent circuit for the purification of machined, contaminated with lubricants workpieces, described by way of example in DE-A 4337129. Preferably in order to accelerate the dissolution process is carried out step a) at elevated temperature, d, h. a temperature above room temperature to the boiling point of the solvent, in particular at a temperature of 40 to 120 ° C. Particularly preferably, step a) takes place at the boiling point of the solvent under reflux.

The polyoxymethylene homopolymers and copolymers (POM) used as binder component B -I) or secondary binder for step a) of the process according to the invention are resistant to virtually all common solvents up to 120 ° C. and still guarantee a very high temperature of up to 120 ° C. high strength.

It is advantageous if, during extraction, a large difference in concentration between the soluble binder component in step a) of the process according to the invention is obtained. component B2) in the molding and the solvent. The latter can be achieved by replacing the loaded solvent often with fresh solvent and / or the dissolved extract is quickly carried away, for example by a circulation of the surface of the extraction material.

The treatment with a solvent according to step a) of the process according to the invention is preferably carried out until the binder component B ₂ ) is at least 75%, preferably 85%, particularly preferably 90%, removed from the molded part. This condition is generally reached after 4 to 30 hours. The required duration of treatment depends on the treatment temperature, on the quality of the solvent for the binder component B _2, the molecular weight of the component B _2, as well as the size of the molding.

After extraction, the green parts, which are now porous and saturated with solvent, have to be dried according to step b) of the process according to the invention. The drying takes place in a conventional manner, for example with the aid of a vacuum drying oven or a heating cabinet. The drying temperature is based on the boiling point of the solvent, but should be chosen slightly lower, in order to avoid the risk of a sudden or too fast drying process with possible negative consequences for the quality of the green part. Usually, the drying is completed in 0.5 to 8 h.

The acid treatment in step c) of the process according to the invention is preferably carried out at temperatures in the range from 80 to 180 ° C. over a period of preferably 0.1 to 24 hours, more preferably 0.5 to 12 hours. The required treatment time depends on the treatment temperature, the concentration and the type of acid in the treatment atmosphere as well as on the size of the molding. Under the usual conditions, generally results in an acid concentration of about 4 to 5% by volume in the atmosphere (i.a., Nitrogen). In order to carry out the catalyzed debindering particularly gently, it may be advantageous to reduce the amount of acid, resulting in a content of about 0.1 to 1% by volume.

Suitable acids for the treatment in step c) of the process according to the invention are, for example, inorganic gases which are already gaseous at room temperature but at least evaporable at the treatment temperature. Examples are hydrohalic acids and nitric acid. Suitable organic acids are formic acid, acetic acid, or trifluoroacetic acid. Also suitable as acid are BF ₃ or its adducts of organic ethers. If a customary carrier gas (inert gas, for example nitrogen) is used for the abovementioned acids, this is generally conducted beforehand through the acid and charged with it. The thus loaded carrier gas is then brought to the treatment temperature, which is suitably higher than the loading temperature in order to avoid condensation of the acid. Preferably, the acid is admixed to the carrier gas via a metering device and the mixture is heated to such an extent that the acid can no longer condense.

Further suitable and preferred acids for the treatment in step c) of the process according to the invention, in particular for reactive and / or oxidation-sensitive sinterable powders A, are those acids which are solid at room temperature and sublimate or melt and evaporate at higher temperatures, including preferably those with a sublimation or melting point between 80 and 200 ° C. Particularly preferred are oxalic acid, preferably anhydrous oxalic acid, or oxalic acid dihydrate. It is preferably used a solution of anhydrous oxalic acid in formic acid, acetic acid or mixtures thereof.

Furthermore, glyoxylic acid is suitable. Also suitable are benzenesulfonic acid, naphthalenesulfonic acids and maleic acid or mixtures thereof. These can be used alone or together with a carrier gas such as air, nitrogen or a noble gas in the debindering.

In the latter embodiment, the acids used generally reach the debinding temperature initially in the gas phase, act from here on the remaining binder and desublimate or solidify after cooling on the walls of the binder removal device. In a subsequent debinding process, they return to the gas phase, i. the acid practically does not leave the device.

To facilitate the dosage, it may be appropriate to use the abovementioned acids, which are solid at room temperature and sublimate or melt and evaporate at higher temperatures, as a solution in polar solvents, preferably having boiling points below 200 ° C to use. As such, especially acetone, dioxane, ethanol and acetonitrile are suitable, but especially organic acids such as formic acid and / or acetic acid.

The acid treatment in step c) of the process according to the invention is carried out in the variant with acids which are solid at room temperature and sublimate at higher temperatures or melt and evaporate, preferably at temperatures in the range of 100 to 160 ° C. The acid treatment in step c) of the process according to the invention is preferably carried out until the residual binder content in the molding is less than 0.5% by weight, preferably less than 0.3% by weight, very particularly preferably less than 0.2% by weight .-% is.

The acid treatment in step c) of the process according to the invention is often also referred to as catalytic debinding and can likewise be carried out in commercially available plants which function according to the principles described in EP-A 0 413 231.

The product thus freed from the binder by the process according to the invention can be converted in a customary manner by sintering into the desired shaped body, in particular metallic or ceramic shaped body. The sintering may optionally be carried out at an accelerated heating rate of 5 to 10 ° C / min in the temperature range of 200 to 600 ° C. respectively.

By the method according to the invention also green parts of reactive metallic or ceramic powders can be debound almost residue-free, whereby the molded body obtained by the method according to the invention have better material properties. The inventive method also allows shorter cycle times of the sintering furnace and reduces its maintenance requirements.

The invention is explained in more detail below with reference to examples:

In the following examples, test compounds were homogenized in a cone mixer and homogenized and granulated in a laboratory extruder heated to 190 ° C.

example 1

The molding compound 1 had the following composition:

56.75% by volume of a mixture of 98% by weight of carbonyl iron powder and 2% by weight

carbonyl nickel

43.25% by volume of binder containing

+ 90 wt% polyoxymethylene with 2 mol% 1,3-dioxepane

+ 10% by weight polyethylene oxide with a molecular weight of 2000, end-capped by methylation Example 2

The molding compound 2 had the following composition:

carbonyl nickel

43.25% by volume of binder containing

+ 80 wt% polyoxymethylene with 2 mol% 1,3-dioxepane

+ ..20% by weight of polyethylene oxide with a molecular weight of 2000, end-capped by methylation

Example 3

The molding compound 3 had the following composition:

carbonyl nickel

43.25% by volume of binder containing

+ 50 wt% polyoxymethylene with 2 mol% 1,3-dioxepane

+ 50% by weight polyethylene oxide with a molecular weight of 2000, end-capped by methylation

Example 4

The molding composition had the following composition:

carbonyl nickel

43.25% by volume of binder containing

+ 90 wt% polyoxymethylene with 2 mol% 1,3-dioxepane

+ 10% by weight of polytetrahydrofuran having a molecular weight of 2000

Example 5

The molding compound 5 had the following composition:

64% by volume of a metal powder of the composition 17-4PH (DIN 1 .4542) with an average particle size of 7 μm

36 vol% binder containing

+ 80 wt% polyoxymethylene with 2 mol% 1,3-dioxepane

+ 20% by weight polyethylene oxide with a molecular weight of 2000, end-capped by methylation

Example 6

The molding compound 6 had the following composition:

47% by volume of a ceramic powder of the composition Zr0 ₂ - 5 wt% Y ₂ 0 ₃ with an average particle size of 0.3 μm 51 vol% binder containing

+ 80 wt% polyoxymethylene with 2 mol% 1,3-dioxepane

+ 20% by weight of poly-1,3-dioxepane with a molecular weight of 34,000

2% by volume dispersant, an ethoxylated fatty alcohol with molecular weight 500

Injection molding tests on real components

The investigation of the general suitability of the molding compositions for the practice was carried out with a complex and heavy component (FIG. 1), a hinge of complex geometry injection molded with two band hinges at the positions 1.

Figure 1 above shows a view of the component, Figure 1 below shows a plan view of the component, wherein the position 1 marks the sprue and the position 2 the breaking point by its own weight.

The length of the component was 100 mm, the weight of the obtained sintered part was about 34 g in the metal powder examples 1 to 5; in Example 6 about 26 g.

This ensures that the results of the tests are also relevant to practice because the weight of this component makes above-average demands on the strength after debindering.

Examination of the processing on the injection molding machine

The molding compositions 1 to 5 were melted in the cylinder of the injection molding machine at 190 ° C, the injection mold was heated to 135 ° C. The ceramic molding compound 6 was processed at 175 ° C cylinder temperature. In general, the required injection pressure was about 1900 bar, only molding compound 3 with a high PEO content and the lower molecular weight 2000 could be processed with 1 100 bar.

The molding compositions 1 to 6 differed in the cooling time required before demolding. The molding compositions with a higher proportion of secondary binders (20% and higher) were somewhat softer and required a longer cooling time in order to be able to demold the green part intact.

The processing of all molding materials 1 to 6 was possible without any special problems. Examination of debinding and sintering

The green parts produced from the molding compositions 1 to 6 were pretreated in a solvent, then subjected to catalytic debinding and sintering. For solvent debinding, the green parts were refluxed in a three-necked flask with a boiling solvent and stirred. Green parts of Examples 1 to 4 were removed after 7 h, 14 h, 21 h and 28 h storage in the solvent, dried and weighed. The green parts of Examples 5a and 6 were reweighed only at the end of storage (28 hours).

Table 1 shows the results in terms of weight loss as a percent of theory for the solvent primary debinding with acetone:

Table 1

It can be seen that even with a binder content of 20% by weight of component B ₂ ) in the molding composition, the maximum debinding rate in the boiling solvent is achieved; Example 3 with the highest PEO content in the molding composition is no longer significantly faster with respect to the solution process. Even at 10% by weight of component B ₂ ) in the molding composition (Example 1), the removal is still surprisingly rapid.

For the molding composition of Example 6, the percent weight loss was based on the total amount of poly-1,3-dioxepane plus dispersant.

Further green parts of the molding compound 5 were debind in water as solvent according to Example 5b (see Table 2):

Table 2 shows that the removal of the PEO binder fraction contained in the molded part is also successful in boiling water, albeit at a slower rate than in acetone. Table 2

Catalytic acid debinding carried out after solvent debinding was carried out with the components of Examples 1 to 6 in a 50 L laboratory oven at 110 ° C. It was purged for inerting with 500 L / h of nitrogen, after 1 h 30 ml / h HN0 _{3 were} dosed into it and further purged with 500 l / h of nitrogen oven and evaporated. After 6 h debindering time of all components of the polyacetal portion was at least 98% removed.

The powder moldings of Examples 5a and 5b were not quite perfect, the lever on the right (position 2 in Figure 1) on the view of the figure was broken off. By reducing the acid dosage to 15 ml / h at 8 h acid treatment time for slower, more gentle debindering intact, completely unbound moldings were obtained.

The powder molded articles of Examples 1 to 4 obtained after the two-stage debindering were sintered in 30-L sintered molybdenum-clad molybdenum sintered sintered element under nitrogen.

The sintering curve was as follows:

Room temperature up to 600 ° C at 3 ° C / min

Holding time at 600 ° C: 1 h

600 ° C to 1280 ° C at 5 ° C / min.

Holding time at 1280 ° C: 1 h

Cool at 5 ° C / min to 1000 ° C

Oven off, natural refrigeration.

With this standard sintering program for brown parts with residual binder, it was possible for all molding compositions according to Examples 1 to 4 to achieve a good sintering density of at least 7.59 g / cm ³ .

Thereafter, sintering tests were carried out with the higher heating rates 5 and 10 ° C / min and without holding step at 600 ° C. Even under these extreme conditions, it was possible to obtain flawless sintered parts from the brown parts of Examples 1 to 4. To obtain parts with sintering densities of at least 7.59 g / cm ³ from the residual binder-free powder molding.

The powdered articles of the molding compound 5 according to Examples 5a and 5b (Example 5a acetone, Example 5b water) obtained after the two-stage, slowed debindering were sintered under hydrogen in a 30 L sintered molybdenum cladding molybdenum sintered sintered element. The sintering curve was as follows:

Room temperature up to 1280 ° C at 5 ° C / min

Holding time at 1380 ° C: 1 h

Cool at 5 ° C / min to 1000 ° C

Oven off, natural refrigeration

Even with the moldings according to Example 5 could be easily worked with the faster sintering program. The resulting sintered parts achieved a good sintering density of 7.68 g / cm ³ .

The powder molded articles of Example 6 obtained after the two-stage debindering were sintered in air in a commercial ceramic sintering furnace. The sintering curve was as follows and also without holding steps:

Room temperature up to 1500 ° C at 5 ° C / min

Holding time at 1500 ° C: 1 h

Cool at 5 ° C / min to 1000 ° C

Oven off, natural refrigeration

The obtained sintered parts were completely intact, free of defects and had a good sintering density of 6.05 g / cm 3.

Examples 1 to 6 show that it is possible to produce intact sintered parts without the presence of a residual binder. Due to the now possible abandonment of the usual, slow Ausbrennprogramme a much shorter sintering cycle can be achieved.

In the following Examples 7 and 8, a process variant suitable in particular for reactive powders is described.

Comparative Example 1

The molding compound 7 had the following composition:

54% by volume of a mixture of 97% by weight of aluminum powder and 3% by weight of magnesium powder, both with an average particle size of 18 μm

46% by volume of binder containing + 87% by weight of polyoxymethylene with 2 mole% 1,3-dioxepane

+ 13% by weight of an ethoxylated Ci ₃ -Ci ₅ -Oxoalkohol with

7 ethylene oxide units

From this molding compound, tensile bars according to ISO 2740 were produced on an injection molding machine.

The tensile bars were conventionally catalytically debinded in a 50-liter oven with 4% by volume HN0 ₃ in 500 l / h of nitrogen (technically pure) at 140 ° C for 10 h. After binder removal, small, bead-like outgrowths appeared on the surface of the debonded tensile specimens, presumably due to the reaction of magnesium with HN0 ₃ .

Example 7

The same tension rods from the molding compound 7 were pre-binder for 24 h in boiling acetone under reflux to dissolve the ethoxylated fatty alcohol. After 24 hours, 92% of the ethoxylated fatty alcohol was removed.

This was followed by catalytic debinding using 80 g of anhydrous oxalic acid on a Sublimierschale at 140 ° C for 24 h. After this two-stage debindering, no outgrowths appeared on the surface of the debonded tensile bars.

Then the brown parts were sintered from the molding compound 7 with the following program:

Room temperature to 420 ° C at 3 ° C / min in oxygen

Holding time at 420 ° C: 1 h, then change to nitrogen (dew point -50 ° C)

420 ° C to 665 ° C at 3 ° C / min.

Holding time at 665 ° C: 1 h

Cool at 5 ° C / min to 400 ° C

Oven off, natural refrigeration.

The following analytical results were obtained for the sintered part (Table 3):

Table 3

Sintered part Comparative Example 1 Example 7

Sintered density 2.36 g / cm ³ 2.42 g / cm ^J

Carbon content 0.045% 0.039%

Oxygen content 0.30% 0.24% The sintered parts of Comparative Example 1 had as a result of the outgrowths a significantly rougher surface than the sintered parts according to Example 7. In addition, the sintered parts obtained in Example 7 in comparison to the sintered parts of Comparative Example 1 have a reduced carbon and oxygen content and a higher sintering density. As a result, less brittle materials can be produced from the sintered parts produced according to Example 7, which can be processed more easily.

Comparative Example 2

The molding compound 8 had the following composition:

64% by volume of a titanium powder Grade 2 (DIN 17862 - 3.7035) with a medium

Grain size of 25 μηη

36 vol% binder containing

+ 90 wt% polyoxymethylene with 2 mol% 1,3-dioxepane

+ 10% by weight of poly-1,3-dioxolane having a molecular weight of 35,000

The tensile bars were conventionally catalytically debinded in a 50-liter oven with 4% by volume HN0 ₃ in 500 l / h of nitrogen (technically pure) at 140 ° C for 6 h.

Example 8

The same tension rods of the molding compound 8 were pre-bindered for 24 h in boiling acetone under reflux. After 24 hours, 84% of the poly-1,3-dioxolane was removed. Thereafter, the tensile bars, as described in Example 7, catalytically debindered with oxalic acid and sintered under the following program under argon of quality 5.0:

Room temperature up to 600 ° C at 3 ° C / min

Holding time at 600 ° C: 1 h

600 ° C to 1200 ° C at 5 ° C / min

Holding time at 1200 ° C: 1 h

Cool at 5 ° C / min to 1000 ° C

Oven off, natural refrigeration

The following analytical results were obtained for the sintered part (Table 4): Table 4:

Conclusion:

The sintered parts according to the invention obtained in Example 8 have in comparison to the sintered parts of Comparative Example 2 a reduced carbon and oxygen content and a higher sintering density. The sintered part obtained according to Comparative Example 2 corresponds in the elements C and O only the standard DIN 3.7065, while the sintered part obtained according to the invention according to Example 8 still meets the much stricter standard DIN 3.7035.

As a result, less brittle materials can be produced from the sintered parts produced according to Example 8, which can be processed more easily.

Claims

claims

Process for the preparation of a metallic or ceramic shaped article from a thermoplastic composition containing

A) 40 to 65% by volume, of at least one inorganic sinterable powder A

B) 35 to 60 vol .-% of a mixture of

B ₂ ) from 5 to 50% by weight of a polymer homogeneously dissolved in Bi) or dispersed in Bi) with an average particle size of less than 1 μm,

as a binder, and

C) 0 to 5 vol .-% of a dispersing aid, wherein the sum of the components A), B) and C) 100 vol .-% results, by injection molding or extrusion to a green part, removal of the binder and sintering, characterized in that for removing the binder a) the molding is treated with a solvent which extracts the binder component B ₂ ) from the molding and in which the binder component Bi) is insoluble,

Process according to claim 1, characterized in that in step c) acids which are solid at room temperature and which sublimate or melt and evaporate at higher temperatures are used.

A method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that anhydrous oxalic acid is used in step c).

Method according to one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that step a) is carried out at a temperature above RT up to the boiling temperature of the solvent.

Process according to one of Claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the inorganic sinterable powder A) used is a reactive and / or oxidation-sensitive powder.

6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the proportion of the binder component B ₂ ) is 10 to 30% by weight.

7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the binder component B ₂ ) is selected from the group comprising: polyolefins, aliphatic polyurethanes, aliphatic uncrosslinked polyepoxides, polyethers, aliphatic polyamides and polyacrylates and mixtures thereof.

8. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the binder component B ₂ ) is a polyether selected from the group consisting of polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide, poly-1, 3-dioxepane, poly-1, 3-dioxane, poly-1 , 3-dioxolane, polytetrahydrofuran (poly (tetramethylene) oxide) and mixtures thereof.