WO2012109375A2 - Procédés pour la culture trophique mixte améliorée d'algues - Google Patents

Procédés pour la culture trophique mixte améliorée d'algues Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012109375A2
WO2012109375A2 PCT/US2012/024358 US2012024358W WO2012109375A2 WO 2012109375 A2 WO2012109375 A2 WO 2012109375A2 US 2012024358 W US2012024358 W US 2012024358W WO 2012109375 A2 WO2012109375 A2 WO 2012109375A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
production
biomass
organism
bioproduct
bioreactor
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2012/024358
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2012109375A3 (fr
Inventor
Bradley Lynn Postier
Andrew Keith Swanson
Mark Scott Abad
George William Lauderdale
Ben Ami KESSLER
F C Thomas ALLNUTT
Jonathan D. Park
Margaret SPOO-CHUPKA
David Joseph SLOMCZYNSKI
Jason Richard Kwiatkowski
Original Assignee
Phycal Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Phycal Inc. filed Critical Phycal Inc.
Publication of WO2012109375A2 publication Critical patent/WO2012109375A2/fr
Publication of WO2012109375A3 publication Critical patent/WO2012109375A3/fr

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01G—HORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING
    • A01G33/00—Cultivation of seaweed or algae
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/12—Unicellular algae; Culture media therefor
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P39/00—Processes involving microorganisms of different genera in the same process, simultaneously
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P7/00—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds
    • C12P7/64—Fats; Fatty oils; Ester-type waxes; Higher fatty acids, i.e. having at least seven carbon atoms in an unbroken chain bound to a carboxyl group; Oxidised oils or fats
    • C12P7/6436—Fatty acid esters
    • C12P7/6445—Glycerides
    • C12P7/6463—Glycerides obtained from glyceride producing microorganisms, e.g. single cell oil
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P2203/00—Fermentation products obtained from optionally pretreated or hydrolyzed cellulosic or lignocellulosic material as the carbon source
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A40/00—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production
    • Y02A40/80—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production in fisheries management

Definitions

  • the disclosed embodiments of the subject application are in the field of algal biomass, fermentable sugars, and biofuel production.
  • Biofuel production from microalgae was determined to have the greatest yield per acre potential of any of the organisms screened. Microalgal biofuel production was estimated to be 8 to 24 fold greater than the best terrestrial biofuel production systems. Current estimates of the potential productivity for algal biofuel production range from 2,000 to 10,000 gallons/acre. According to the DOE, microalgae yield "30 times more energy per acre than land crops such as soybeans.” Although existing technologies are promising, there is still a need for systems and methods that create even greater efficiencies in biofuel production from microalgae to meet economic targets needed for successful commercialization.
  • microalgae in heterotrophic conditions for the production of oil has been commercialized for use as a nutraceutical.
  • Many algae have the capability for heterotrophic growth and can be utilized in multiple trophic modes for production of useful products.
  • Algae are known to be able to grow using photoautotrophic, mixotrophic, and heterotrophic modes.
  • Another mode, referred to as photoheterotrophic has also been elucidated but has strong similarities to mixotrophic growth.
  • Purely heterotrophic growth has been documented as useful for production of lipids for biofuel production.
  • Mixotrophic growth has been used for production of Chlorella for the nutraceutical market in large open ponds and photobioreactors supplemented with carbon source to enhance growth in the presence of light.
  • microalgae have been variously defined through the ages and it is prudent to describe the microalgae to which this invention could apply.
  • microalgae include the traditional groups of algae described in Van Den Hoek et al. (Please add full cite to article).
  • This invention can be used in the photosynthetic, heterotrophic, and mixotrophic culturing of microalgae.
  • Heterotrophic boost and “Hetero boostTM” refer to the process wherein a large inoculum of existing biomass is placed into a bioreactor and fed a fixed carbon source to produce rapidly a specific bioproduct or set of bioproducts.
  • the term is used broadly enough to refer to the inoculum originating from biomass produced by any phototrophic organism grown either phototrophically or mixotrophically. Additionally, the term refers to the production of any bioproduct produced in this method.
  • Bioreactor or “fermentor” are used to refer to the same device herein.
  • the use of fermentor is a term of art that generally does not limit the ensuing bioreaction contained therein to a fermentative (i.e., anaerobic) process; this application also makes this distinction as the bioreactors and fermentors herein are used primarily for aerobic processes.
  • Heterotrophic means growing on fixed organic carbon without need for light.
  • Photoheterotrophic means growing on fixed organic carbon but requiring, or being advantageous, to have some light present as a trigger or photochemical leaver for improved heterotrophic growth.
  • Phototrophic and “photoautotrophic” are used interchangeably and refer to growth on simple medium without the use of fixed organic carbon, wherein all carbon is supplied by inorganic carbon (e.g., carbon dioxide, bicarbonate, or carbonate).
  • inorganic carbon e.g., carbon dioxide, bicarbonate, or carbonate.
  • Matotrophic growth is growth in the presence of a fixed carbon source in the light, with inorganic carbon also present, wherein improved productivity is achieved due to the presence of the fixed organic carbon.
  • Lean biomass is used to describe algal biomass produced with a minimum level of lipid.
  • Lipid extracted algae or “LEA” is used to describe the residual biomass left after the lipid is extracted from the algae. This is the same as delipidated biomass.
  • compositions, systems, and methods disclosed herein improve the process of producing biofuels from microalgae.
  • the present application involves method for production of a bioproduct wherein the organism is first grown in mass culture at low density, the organism is harvested non-destructively, the inoculum is introduced to the bioreactor at high density and the bioreactor produces the bioproduct at high productivity using a fixed carbon source.
  • the organism in the above embodiment is grown in mass culture in the light.
  • This light can be provided either by natural or artificial lighting.
  • Such mass culturing is suitably done fully phototrophically or mixotrophically.
  • the mixotrophy can be done in the full lighted pond acreage or ponds can be combined in a deeper pond and treated mixotrophically before being harvested.
  • the organism is suitably a microalga.
  • This microalga can be a green alga. Additionally, it can be selected from strains of Chlorella and, more specifically, can be C lorella kessleri, C. sorokiniana, C. vulgaris, and C. zofingiensis.
  • the photosynthetic organisms are suitably chosen from any algae, cyanobacteria, or photosynthetic bacteria capable of combined trophic states selected from phototrophic, mixotrophic, photoheterotrophic and, required, heterotrophic boost.
  • the organism producing the bioproduct suitably uses simple or complex sugars.
  • These sugars can be selected from monosaccharides (such as glucose), polysaccharides (such as polyxylose, starch) and complex mixtures such as crude sugars and biomass hydrolysates.
  • the heterotrophic boost will generate bioproducts such as, but not limited to, lipids, polymeric compounds, pigments, nutraceuticals, secondary metabolites, and other high value compounds.
  • the production organism is engineered to have improved utilization of sugars common to biomass hydrolysates.
  • sugars are galactose, arabinose, xylose, mannose, and polymers of the same.
  • Such recombinant organisms can have introduction of genes selected from D-xylose isomerase, D-xylose kinase, transaldolase, transketolase, and mannose isomerase either expressed constitutively or inducible in the heterotrophic boost bioreactor.
  • genes are introduced into the production organism under tight inducible control such that enzymes are induced in the heterotrophic boost bioreactor that breakdown the cell wall releasing additional sugars to enhance lipid production and improve lipid harvesting.
  • the heterotrophic boost reaction is exposed to metabolic inhibitors subject in the biomass hydrolysate that are either added as the biomass hydrolysates are added or are added as partially purified or purified chemicals to shift the metabolism to favor bioproduct production rather than growth.
  • Another embodiment of the subject application uses a recombinant organism that is induced in the heterotrophic boost to express a thioesterase or series thereof, that induces production of hydrocarbons specific to that esterase such as terpenes and alkanes.
  • Another embodiment utilizes the heterotrophic boost under the previous embodiments but as a secondary production organism for a co-fermentation, wherein the secondary organism produces more or an additional useful product, but removes sugars that are not used by the primary production strain. This reduces the viscosity of the growth medium while improving the overall yields of the process.
  • Yet another embodiment is a heterotrophic boost process wherein the bioreactor is provided small amounts of light to act in a stimulatory method, defined as photoheterotrophic, where additional metabolism is possible using light controlled genes that are not available without this small amount of light.
  • Another embodiment uses cultures produced either phototrophical!y or mixotrophically which are harvested non-destructively and cryopreserved for future use as inoculum for the heterotrophic boost bioreaction. Such a system would disconnect inoculum production from the heterotrophic boost to allow all season production of the bioproduct at latitudes where winter production is not possible.
  • Another embodiment is a method for production of algal biomass in which an algal culture is fed a fixed carbon source in a single addition step and all of the added fixed carbon is consumed rapidly and predominantly by the algal strain of interest to maximize algal production.
  • the algal culture can be between 0.01 and 1 g dry weight per liter of medium with the fixed carbon added at between 0.05 and 3 grams per liter of medium.
  • the fixed carbon source is suitably added at the beginning of the dark cycle and thereby offsets the removal of photosynthesis to either equal or exceed the use of energy by the algae in the dark cycle (thereby either preventing biomass decrease at night or adding additional biomass).
  • the algal culture is suitably fed a fixed carbon source under mixotrophic, photoheterotrophic, or heterotrophic growth conditions.
  • Another embodiment is a method for production of algal biomass wherein an algal culture is fed a fixed carbon source in a continuous or semi-continuous fashion, such that all of the fixed carbon is consumed rapidly and predominantly by the algal strain of interest to maximize algal production.
  • Another embodiment is a method for production of algal biomass wherein an algal culture is fed a complex carbohydrate mixture in the presence of enzymes which release sugars that can be directly utilized by the alga for growth or product synthesis.
  • the complex carbohydrate is suitably a liquefied starch or plant hydrolysate.
  • Suitable plants include, but are not limited to, cassava, corn, sweetpotatoes, soybean, sunflower, rapeseed, or algae.
  • Suitable enzymes suitably include, but are not limited to, alpha-amylase, glucoamylase, and granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme.
  • the algal culture is grown in an enclosed bioreactor with or without light provided. It can further be carried out in open systems, such as open ponds or raceways.
  • the algae biomass or plant biomass can be first extracted prior to treatment with the enzymes, for example delipidated algal biomass or soybean meal.
  • Figure 1 is a diagram illustrating a system for the production of biofuel using mixotrophic growth according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • Figure 2 is a diagram illustrating a system for the production of biofuel using phototrophic growth according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • Figure 3 is a diagram illustrating a bioreactor used in the production of bioproduct according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • Figure 4 is a graph illustrating the three phases of growth in an algal fed batch fermentation.
  • Figure 5 is a diagram illustrating the catabolic pathways for xylose and mannose.
  • Figure 6 is a diagram illustrating a mixotrophic to heterotrophic growth plan according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • Figure 7 is a graph illustrating a preliminary growth profile for heterotrophic boost batch run through the ponds (photosynthetically grown) and HeteroboostTM (heterotrophically grown) according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • Figure 8 is a diagram illustrating a batch night supplement feed operation for a mixotrophic pond according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • Figure 9 is a graph illustrating glucose supplemented Chlorella protothecoides batch cultures in 5.2 L aquaria with a daily dilution according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • Figure 10 is a graph illustrating operation data from a 400L pond growing Chlorella protothecoides supplemented with glucose during dark cycles according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • Figure 1 1 is a graph illustrating glucose uptake of dark cycle supplemented organic carbon supplemented Chlorella protothecoides culture according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • Figure 12 is a diagram illustrating a continuous night supplement feed operation for a mixotrophic pond according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • Figure 13 is a graph illustrating the effect of dark cycle organic carbon supplement on chlorophyll content of Chlorella protothecoides according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • Figure 14 is a graph illustrating simultaneous saccharification and growth of algae according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • the example embodiments described herein are directed to methods for improved mixed trophic state algal cultures.
  • the example embodiments are particularly applicable to improved methods for producing biofuels from microalgae.
  • the subject application is directed to methods for production of a bioproduct.
  • the method comprises producing a biomass phototrophically or mixotrophically in a mass culture system, concentrated to an appropriate density without harming the cells.
  • the biomass or inoculum is then harvested and placed in a bioreactor.
  • the bioreactor is continuously fed a fixed carbon source to provide energy to the cells as they make the bioproduct in large excess.
  • the C02 is removed while oxygen is pumped into the reaction, either from the atmosphere or in concentrated form.
  • the bioreactor is commonly referred to in the art as fermentation in a fermentor but is supplied with oxygen to maintain a respiratory rather than a fermentative (anaerobic) state.
  • a fermentor and bioreactor are referred to interchangeably and, unless otherwise stated, respiratory metabolic state.
  • the addition of carbon source after phototrophic growth or mixotrophic growth, concentration, and placing in a fermentor is referred to as a heterotrophic boost or Heteroboost, herein used interchangeably.
  • FIG. 1 there is shown a diagram illustrating a process for biofuel production using mixotrophic growth according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • a mixotrophic pond 100 is used to produce algae.
  • the mixotrophic pond suitably is at ambient temperature, has a pH ranging from approximately 5 to approximately 9, and has a depth ranging from 0.I m to 0.5 m.
  • Suitable nutrients such as nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, and C02 are fed into the pond at 102 via a suitable feed inlet.
  • a suitable fixed carbon source feed such as glucose, glycerol, or acetate, is also fed into the pond at 104 via a suitable feed inlet.
  • a carbon source sensor 106 is employed for determining the appropriate supplementation of fixed carbon to be fed into the mixotrophic pond based on a desired set point.
  • the sensor suitably monitors parameters such as culture density, temperature, dissolved oxygen and ambient light levels (surface and bottom) in order to maintain optimal rates of lean biomass generation.
  • the fixed carbon concentration set point is suitably between 0 to 12 g of carbon per liter.
  • Clarified water is also feed into the mixotrophic pond at 108 via a suitable feed inlet.
  • the algae is produced in the mixotrophic pond to a set concentration, preferably between 0.1 to 3 g/L.
  • the algae is harvested continuously from the mixotrophic pond as shown at 1 10 via a suitable outlet and subjected to a dewatering process 1 12 to concentrate the algae to an appropriate density without harming the algae.
  • the concentrated algae is fed into heteroboost bioreactor 1 16 as shown at 1 14 via a suitable feed inlet.
  • a suitable fixed carbon source is fed into the heteroboost bioreactor as shown at 118 via a suitable feed inlet as well as desired amounts of nutrients, antifoam materials, and pH control solution as shown at 120 via a suitable feed inlet.
  • Living delipidated algae may also suitably be fed into the heteroboost bioreactor as shown at 122 via a suitable feed inlet.
  • the harvested algae fed into the heteroboost bioreactor produces a bioproduct, high lipid algae, under suitable conditions in the bioreactor.
  • the bioreactor maintains a temperature ranging from about 22° C to about 32° C, a pH ranging from about 5 to about 9, and a biomass concentration ranging from about 20 to about 200 g/L.
  • the high lipid algae is output from the heteroboost bioreactor as shown by 124 via a suitable outlet and subjected to a suitable non-destructive extraction process 126.
  • the non-destructive extraction process produces live delipdated algae, which may be fed back into the heteroboost reactor as shown at 122, and algae oil as shown at 128.
  • the high lipid algae may suitably also be subjected to a suitable aqueous extraction as shown at 130.
  • the aqueous extraction process is in the presence of suitable extraction chemicals fed into the extraction process as shown at 132.
  • the aqueous extraction process produces algae oil as shown at 128.
  • FIG. 2 there is shown a diagram illustrating a process for biofuel production using phototrophic growth according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • a phototrophic shallow pond 200 is used to produce algae.
  • the phototrophic pond suitably is at ambient temperature, has a pH ranging from approximately 5 to approximately 9, and has a depth ranging from 0.I m to 0.3 m.
  • Suitable nutrients such as nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus, and C02 are fed into the pond at 202 via a suitable feed inlet.
  • Clarified water is also feed into the phototrophic pond at 204 via a suitable feed inlet.
  • the algae is produced in the phototrophic pond to a set concentration, preferably between 0.1 to 3 g/L.
  • the algae is harvested continuously from the phototrophic pond as shown at 206 via a suitable outlet and subjected to a dewatering process 208 to concentrate the algae to an appropriate density without harming the algae.
  • the concentrated algae is fed into the heteroboost bioreactor 212 as shown at 210 via a suitable feed inlet.
  • a suitable fixed carbon source is fed into the heteroboost bioreactor as shown at 214 via a suitable feed inlet as well as desired amounts of nutrients, antifoam materials, and pH control solution as shown at 216 via a suitable feed inlet.
  • Living delipidated algae may also suitably be fed into the heteroboost bioreactor as shown at 218 via a suitable feed inlet.
  • the harvested algae fed into the heteroboost bioreactor produces a bioproduct, high lipid algae, under suitable conditions in the bioreactor.
  • the bioreactor maintains a temperature ranging from about 22° C to about 32° C, a pH ranging from about 5 to about 9, and a biomass concentration ranging from about 20 to about 200 g/L.
  • the high lipid algae is output from the heteroboost bioreactor as shown by 220 via a suitable outlet and subjected to a suitable non-destructive extraction process 222.
  • the non-destructive extraction process produces live delipdated algae, which may be fed back into the heteroboost reactor as shown at 218, and algae oil as shown at 224.
  • the high lipid algae may suitably also be subjected to a suitable aqueous extraction as shown at 226.
  • the aqueous extraction process is in the presence of suitable extraction chemicals fed into the extraction process as shown at 228.
  • the aqueous extraction process produces algae oil as shown at 224.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example heteroboost bioreactor 300 according to one embodiment of the subject application.
  • the bioreactor is of a typical bubble column reactor design.
  • the bioreactor 300 is generally in the shape of an elongated column having a top 302 and a bottom 304, and having a height of approximately 30 feet and a width of approximately 5 feet.
  • the bioreactor is supported by a skirt design support mechanism at the bottom of the bioreactor.
  • the bioreactor suitably includes a cooling jacket 306 comprised of components having suitable cooling properties and surrounding a least a portion of the bioreactor.
  • the bioreactor includes a mount 308 for mounting a mixing apparatus for mixing the constituents contained within the reactor.
  • the mount is located at the top of the bioreactor and is preferably 8 inches in diameter.
  • the bioreactor also includes an algae feed 310 for receiving the algae from the pond.
  • the algae feed 310 is located near the top of the bioreactor and is preferably 2 inches in diameter.
  • the bioreactor further includes an off gas port 312 for releasing gas, such as C02, produced in the bioreactor.
  • the off gas port 312 is located near the top of the bioreactor and is preferably 4 inches in diameter.
  • An algae outlet port 314 is located at the bottom of the bioreactor for the output of the algae produced in the bioreactor.
  • the algae outlet port has a diameter of 4 inches.
  • An air feed inlet 316 is also located at the bottom of the bioreactor for introducing air into the bioreactor.
  • the air feed inlet 316 is preferably 2 inches in diameter.
  • the cooling jacket 306 includes a cooling inlet feed 318 for introducing a cooling material into the cooling jacket and a cooling outlet feed 320 for removing the cooling material from the cooling jacket.
  • the cooling inlet feed 318 has a diameter of 2 inches and the cooling outlet feed 320 has a diameter of 2 inches.
  • a manway 322 is located on one side the bioreactor near the top of the bioreactor for allowing access into the bioreactor.
  • the manway 322 has a diameter of 24 inches.
  • a glucose feed inlet 324 is located on the side of the bioreactor near the top of the bioreactor for feeding glucose into the bioreactor.
  • the glucose feed inlet 324 preferably has a diameter of 2 inches.
  • the bioreactor also includes several glass viewing ports 326 down the side of the bioreactor for viewing the reaction inside the bioreactor. Preferably, the glass viewing ports having a diameter of 6 inches.
  • An antifoam feed inlet 328 is located near the top of the bioreactor for introducing antifoam material into the bioreactor. Preferably, the antifoam feed inlet is 2 inches in diameter.
  • a pH control feed inlet 330 is located near the top of the bioreactor for introducing a pH control material or base into the bioreactor.
  • the pH control feed inlet has a diameter of 2 inches.
  • High cell density inoculum creates an environment that retards contaminating microbial growth preventing costly run shortages due to contamination.
  • Mixotrophically grown high cell density inoculum will also create an environment that will retard microbial growth to act similarly to that described above for purely phototrophically grown biomass.
  • High Quality triacylglyceride containing oil is extracted from high density heteroboosted biomass generated from phototrophically grown inoculum. Control of nutrient feed and other reactor environmental parameters in the heterotrophic boost reactor enables the reduction of bacterial contamination (on a per weight basis) during the production of oil free of impurities that could impact quality.
  • volumetric productivity and yield of product from glucose This same draw and fill process will provide similar results for other carbon sources.
  • heterotrophic boost process changes the economics for oil production, significantly improving it when compared to conventional heterotrophic fermentation.
  • Heterotrophic boost uses pond grown biomass as the starting inoculum providing a 57% improvement in the oil yield from glucose and a 35% increase in volumetric productivity over conventional algal fermentation process using the same strain.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates the impact of growth rate on productivity when the fermentation culture shifts from log phase growth to linear growth.
  • the heterotrophic boost process starts at high cell densities (targeting 50 g/L) eliminating the exponential growth phase and yielding much higher cumulative volumetric productivity.
  • the algal biomass to microbial contamination ratio is low creating an environment that suppresses contaminating microbial growth for certain strains.
  • Xylose and Mannose utilization will be improved based on incorporating genes known to be involved in these pathways from other organisms that are absent in C. protothecoides genome.
  • Xylose and mannose were targeted, being the most abundant hemicellulosic sugars in softwood hydrolysates.
  • both xylose and mannose induced some lipid production in shake flasks, although the increase in biomass was negligible and lipid accumulation was less than 10% of that found with glucose.
  • a list of purified sugars used to test substrates for growth and oil production in C. protothecoides is shown in Table 2. Substrate utilization can be improved using identified genes and pathways involved in substrate utilization. Two pathways for each sugar substrate are described in Figure 5.
  • D-xylose Isomerase XI
  • XK D- xylulokinase
  • TAL transaldolase
  • TKT transketolase
  • Ml mannose isomerase
  • Substrate transport for both xylose and mannose in Chlorella is well characterized and paralogus transporters will be sufficient for xylose and mannose utilization.
  • DNA sequences are optimized to match the codon preferences of C. protothecoides or other target strain. Regulatory elements (5' and 3' UTRs) are tested to optimize expression and best activity is used for the production strain. Both constitutively expressed and heterotrophic growth specific gene promoters are suitable. Increases in productivity (growth rate and lipid yield) of 5-20 % are provided with this approach. With optimization up to 50% improvement will be provided by the subject method. Delivery of strains that suitably efficiently utilize xylose and mannose, the most abundant hemicellulosic sugars from softwood biomass, will enable utilization of a wider range of sugar sources and introduce new opportunities for locating the algal lipid production operations.
  • a hurdle for the fermentation of crude biomass hydrolysates is the presence of growth inhibitors in the feedstocks.
  • Acetate, furan, furfural, and 5 hydroxy-methyl furfural are all toxic compounds found in biomass hydrolysates. These compounds inhibit fermentation by traditional organisms; however their impact on green algae and other microalgal bioproduct production strains is unknown except for acetate.
  • Acetate is a viable substrate for heterotrophic growth and lipid production in Chlorella and other microalgae (e.g., Chlamydomonas). On a per carbon basis, acetate performs as well as glucose both in yield and response time.
  • Inhibitors to ethanolic fermentations impact heterotrophic boost production of lipid but will have a positive impact on the algal bioproduct being produced in the heterotrophic boost and also inhibit contaminating organisms. Incorporation of these crude hydrolysates and/or inhibitors extracted from crude hydrolysates provides a process improvement to the heterotrophic boost process. Inhibitors reduce or inhibit biomass production, but not oil or other bioproduct accumulation (other bioproducts could include pigments, secondary metabolites, nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals). In an ideal production scenario, lean biomass growth would be limited to 10% with the remainder of the biomass increase coming from lipid production. Previous studies with E.
  • coli indicate that the strong electrophiles (furfural and 5-MHF) inhibit sulfur assimilation and pyruvate dehydrogenase. This was originally identified through whole genome transcript analysis, wherein an increase in transcript abundance for genes related to cysteine and methionine biosynthesis was identified. Alterations in metabolic or proteomic profiles help identify alternative sites of inhibition.
  • the hydrocarbons would be excreted in the growth medium of the bioreactor and harvested in a non-invasive method, such as by skimming of the top of the culture or by capture using resins or hydrophobic membranes.
  • a non-invasive method such as by skimming of the top of the culture or by capture using resins or hydrophobic membranes.
  • Use of inducible promoters to turn on lethal, or inappropriate for the pond, genes in the heterotrophic boost bioreactor allows expression of genes that improve processing of the biomass or crude sugar (amylases, cellulases, pectinases, chitinases, and etc) in situ.
  • a method is used to produce healthier cultures by using a small amount of fixed organic carbon in open pond culture to stimulate better growth.
  • the open pond cultures can preferably remain very shallow to maximize light penetration and the addition of fixed organic carbon will act in either an additive or synergistic mode to improve the growth in these cultures. Since light only penetrates a few centimeters in a normal culture due to the phenomenon called self-shading (algal cells above preventing light from getting to cells below) the cells are often in a non-productive state due to lack of light. Having small amounts of fixed carbon allows the cells to remain active while out of maximal light. Additionally, even at very low levels (submillimolar) these fixed carbon compounds have a beneficial effect on the cells, adding additional growth and mobilizing metals and minerals required for growth.
  • FIG. 6 A diagram of mixotrophic to heterotrophic growth plan is shown in Figure 6.
  • cells are added to shallow ponds to stimulate enhanced growth of the culture as discussed above with respect to Figure 1 .
  • the culture is grown to a fairly low concentration ( ⁇ 1-3 g/L) then transferred with concentration as shown at 602 to the bioreactor 600 where purely heterotrophic growth is initiated.
  • a continuous substrate feed is fed into the bioreactor as shown at 604 as is an oxygen supply as shown at 606.
  • Carbon dioxide produced in the bioreactor is output back to the pond as shown at 608.
  • a high oil algae is produced which is output from the bioreactor as shown at 610.
  • the use of mixotrophic or photoheterotrophic growth in the earlier stage poises this culture for better heterotrophic boost and production of lipid.
  • transgenic improvements there are numerous transgenic improvements that may be incorporated into the production methods set forth in the subject application. Examples of transgenic improvements are discussed below, wherein it is understood that such examples are not an exhaustive list, and other transgenic improvements may be incorporated into the production methods set forth in the subject application.
  • siRNAs Extracellular siRNAs (or functionally analogous pieces of nucleic acids e.g. , hairpins, short RNA tandems, PNA/RNA duplexes and etc) are allowed to permeabilize the cell membranes (such as, microwave power or rapid mixing with impellers to make the cell membranes more porous to the siRNA).
  • the heterotrophic lipid production step is suitably performed under acidic conditions as this improves substrate transport (through hexose/H+ symporters) and inhibit growth of contaminating species.
  • Production strains are suitably engineered with genes conferring efficient xylose (xylose isomerase and xylulose kinase), mannose (mannose isomerase) utilization. Use multiple strains in Heteroboost to enable co-utilization of multiple substrates. For example, one strain will use glucose, one will use mannose (glucose deficient), and one will use xylose (glucose deficient).
  • a glucose deficient strain that can use mannose or xylose is suitably engineered by conditionally repressing expression of glucose 6 phosphate isomerase or mutagenize to reduce activity.
  • a strain is suitably engineered to suppress/alter/utilize the glucose suppression mechanism for alternate substrates. (In yeast engineered xylose utilization is still subject to glucose suppression.)
  • PDH engineered pyruvate dehydrogenase
  • the PDH from Galdieria sulphuraria or from other extremophiles may be more resistant to these compounds as they are likely to be present in its natural environment of high temp and low pH.
  • Engineer proteins involved in xylose or mannose utilization such they will bind to a scaffolding protein. This will improve flux of metabolites through the pathway.
  • [00116] Increase oil production in the Heteroboost step by engineering hydrolytic enzymes to digest and degrade algal cell wall polysaccharide components into sugars that can be metabolized into lipid.
  • Transformation constructs capable of expressing a transgene expressing an active hydrolytic enzyme is made, such as lysozyme, chitinase, glucanase, cellulase, hemicellulase, pectinase, or glucuronidase that is able to digest and degrade the polysaccharide components of the algal cell wall into simple sugars.
  • the promoter and other regulatory elements used to drive expression of the transgene will enable controlled expression in transgenic algae via a small molecule inducing agent.
  • the inducing agent is suitably introduced at a late stage of the Heteroboost phase, a point at which the great majority of the lipid has already been produced by the algal cells.
  • the hydrolytic enzyme Upon inducing expression of the transgene, the hydrolytic enzyme will be synthesized and secreted into the periplasmic space where it can begin to hydrolyze cell wall components. Progressive digestion of cell walls will liberate sugars that will be available for uptake by cells that are still intact, providing more carbon substrate for the production of additional lipid. Addition of the inducing agent is suitably done at a rate that allows optimal production of additional lipid from the newly available sugar substrates generated from the cell walls.
  • Chlorella protothecoides other Chlorella species, Nannochloropsis species, Ostreococcus species, Ankistrodesmus species, Dunaliella species, Haematococcus species, Neochloris species, Phaeodactylum species, Scenedesmus species, Spirulina species, Tetraselmis species and other microalgae.
  • RNAi inhibitory RNA
  • a method that introduces synthetic, specific inhibitory RNA species into the concentrated algal cell biomass during the HeteroBoost is suitably employed.
  • the target of these RNAi species will be endogenous messenger RNA species required for expression of enzymes required for starch synthesis (i.e. starch synthetase, starch branching enzymes, amylopectin synthase, glucanotransferase, isoamylase, 3-phosphoglycerate, ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase, etc.).
  • RNAi will be synthesized in vitro and introduced to cells during the HeteroBoost® phase.
  • a partial cell disruption technique is suitably employed to facilitate entry of RNAi species into cells where they can have the inhibitory effect on gene expression.
  • the following cell disruption techniques are suitably used independently and/or in combinations: ultrasonication, microwave radiation, rapid mixing with impellers and electroporation.
  • Chlorella protothecoides other Chlorella species, Nannochloropsis species, Ostreococcus species, Ankistrodesmus species, Dunaliella species, Haematococcus species, Neochloris species, Phaeodactylum species, Scenedesmus species, Spirulina species, Tetraselmis species and other microalgae.
  • any of these methods to prepare algae for heterotrophic growth requires that the method meet the following criteria: insignificant damage to cells, preserved cell viability and optimal or near optimal performance under heterotrophic conditions; and ability to re-use clarified water for algae growth (either as a single unit process or series of processes). This is a critical requirement for a successful and economic production facility due to the high cost of the nutrients and the large water demand that algae projects naturally have. Options that meet these criteria include centrifugation, dissolved air floatation (DAF), autoflocculation, membrane filtration, rotary vacuum drum filtration (RVDF), and magnetic separation.
  • DAF dissolved air floatation
  • RVDF rotary vacuum drum filtration
  • Bench scale data confirms the use of centrifugation as a concentration method for algae cells as an inoculum for a heterotrophic growth reactor vessel (0.2 g/L to 80 g/L).
  • the high energy costs associated with running centrifuges and the likelihood that further processing will be required to prepare the clarified water for continued growth make centrifugation unlikely to succeed in a full scale oil production facility.
  • Technologies like dissolved air floatation, autoflocculation, and magnetic separation may have similar issues with recycling water for phototrophic growth, and require significant additional research to prove the capable of cells concentrated by these methods to perform as expected under heterotrophic conditions. Each of these methods implements the strategy of forming clusters of cells to make them easier to separate from the surrounding water.
  • Hollow fiber membranes while high in CapEx and OpEx, are suitable for this application.
  • This technology employs the concept of tangential flow filtration, where particles move tangentially across the membrane, which provides a physical barrier for the algae cells. Water is able to permeate across the membrane without requiring a large pressure force. Flux maintenance techniques can be employed to prevent fouling and maintain consistent flow across the membranes over time. It is currently used in the wastewater treatment, biotechnology, and pharmaceutical industries as a way to concentrate cells. Hollow fiber membrane filtration has the added benefit of removing the vast majority of the bacteria and other organisms that could be an issue in the clarified water stream.
  • Empirical data has shown that this type of filtration is capable of concentrating phototrophic algae from 0.2 g/L to >50 g/L in a repeatable and predictable fashion. Economically, this process is less expensive compared to centrifugation due to lower energy costs and the secondary water treatment step required of a centrifugation dewatering to make the water reusable. Additionally, hollow fiber filtration could also be used to condition a medium prior to heterotrophic growth by means of diafiltration. Temperature and shear forces can also be carefully controlled using this type of filtration to ensure cell viability.
  • Microfiltration or ultrafiltration allow control of key parameters such as temperature, medium buffer, and optimal transfer cell density for heterotrophic performance.
  • the culture can be conditioned from a photosynthetic to heterotrophic metabolism while being concentrated resulting in improved productivity and yields of product from glucose. Microfiltration allows the control of both C02 and dissolved oxygen preventing lags in performance at transfer.
  • Nutrients from the filtered pond broth can be recycled back to the ponds free of microbial contaminants. Pond broth can be concentrated in stages slowing growth and conditioning the medium for increased fatty acid productivity before being transferred to Heteroboost.
  • the heterotrophic boost as described in the subject application provides for the production of a bioproduct in a bioreactor using a large inoculum from either a mixotrophic or phototrophic production of biomass.
  • the use of these crude sugars presents difficulties in that not all production organisms can utilize polymeric sugars, and monomeic sugar use is also dependent on the organism.
  • the current C. protothecoides strain KRT1007 is not capable of use of polymeric sugars and some of the sugars from cellulose and hemicellulose degradation.
  • the fermentor is allowed to progress until the viscosity of the liquid increases to a level that inhibits mass flow to an economically detrimental level. This level will vary with the bioproduct being produced.
  • the bioproduct is a commodity one can calculate using a cost model, the level of air that can economically be pushed through the bioreactor and when this level is exceeded this secondary step would be applied.
  • the secondary treatment to the heterotrophic boost is to add native or recombinant oleaginous yeast or fungal strains that use the sugars and produce oil that can be either coextracted with the algal or separated and extracted separately.
  • Such an approach allows one to more efficiently use the sugars provided by the biomass hydrolysates or crude sugar preparations lowering the cost of the overall process. Additionally, this could tailor the lipid profile generated by the process to more closely fit that needed for further refining.
  • the algal heterotrophic boost is run to high viscosity, and a culture of recombinant yeast is added that uses xylose and polymeric xylose that is not used by C. protothecoides KRT1007.
  • This yeast rapidly multiplies over a 24 hour period and consumes the xylose and lowers the viscosity of the culture medium.
  • the algae continues to grow and use glucose.
  • the yeast also uses glucose as well as xylose. Both produce additional lipid and are harvested using the same procedures and processed in batch.
  • the algae are harvested when the viscosity of the medium reaches too high of a level.
  • the remaining culture medium is retained and transferred to a new bioreactor and the yeast added to this medium.
  • the yeast converts the remaining sugars into biomass and additional lipid for extraction in a separate process than the algal lipids.
  • This step can also be used to make alternative bioproducts using yeast that are engineered to produce the specified product, but use these alternative sugars for growth.
  • a filamentous fungus is used for the processes described above (either cofermentation or separate fermentation).
  • the fungus can produce any of a number of bioproducts including oil, pigments, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals and the like.
  • the filamentous fungi used in a cofermentation will also serve to simplify the dewatering of the culture medium by providing a mat and collection surface, as has been seen with other algal systems using filamentous cyanobacterial.
  • Photoheterotrophic growth within reactors [00130]
  • a dim light source ⁇ 20 umol/m 2 /s; incandescent, fluorescent, or LED
  • Light photons allows (triggers) use of certain lignocellulosic carbon sources, including xylose, arabinose and other C5s, by some algae species.
  • C5 sugar feedstocks are available at lower comparative cost as compared to C6s, do not compete with food supply, and reduces overall cost to produce useful biomass and lipids for bioenergy products.
  • C5 sugars could also be used as a supplement for daytime mixotrophic growth, generating biomass and lipids in open ponds.
  • cryoprotectants such as glycerol or glucose (ex 0.1 to 200 g/L), or none at all.
  • sugars and sugar alcohols would have the benefit of future use as a fixed carbon source for organisms like C. protothecoides that can use glucose or glycerol to produce lipid or other bioproducts. Freezing is done via flash freezing (e.g., plunge liquid nitrogen baths), or gradual freezing in a chilling device. Necessary target temperatures for stable long-term storage (weeks to months) are comparatively high (4 to -20°C) thus reducing electrical costs associated with long-term storage and could use existing large-scale freezer technologies. Algae frozen without cryoprotectants are viable in high numbers by rapid or gentle thawing. Frozen material would be stored in vessels (barrels, tubs) or stacked as frozen bricks sealed in thin plastic sheeting.
  • Frozen cell mass can be inoculated as a thawed concentrate into heterotrophic reactor with supplemented carbon and aeration of a fermentor to generate lipids.
  • Cryoprotectants present in frozen biomass such as glycerol or glucose, are used as carbon source in future processing.
  • the advantage is that phototrophic growth and heterotrophic growth are disconnected in time, and can be run in separate campaigns rather than continuously. This allows plant construction (downstream processing) to be reduced in size and full year operation of the said plant at higher latitudes where year round algal biomass growth is not possible economically.
  • seed materials for fermentation can be stocked stable for long-term storage until available resources or desired inoculum volumes are present to run a fermentation cycle.
  • Such operation utilizes existing paddlewheel driven raceways (10 to 100 cm deep) and temporarily converts them into fermentation reactors to generate algal biomass and lipid in situ, or alternatively switch reactor gradually over to full heterotrophy.
  • Once ponds achieve biomass >0.8 g/L parasitic drawdown of supplemented fixed carbon by other microorganisms (e.g., fungi, bacteria) is controllable.
  • temporary modification to raceways would involve switching gas feed line from C02 to air to augment dissolved oxygen levels in the medium.
  • Aeration could also be augmented with alternative mixing technologies like those employed by aeration beds in wastewater treatment plants.
  • Raceways would be shaded with light blocking cloth, and surface covered with hollow dark colored floating plastic (e.g., polypropylene, polyethylene) spheres (1-10 cm in diameter) for fully heterotrophic growth. Clear colored spheres and/or sheeting is used when mixotrophic growth is more preferred, depending on the production strain and bioproduct to be produced.
  • Spheres darken growth medium, as well as limit atmospheric release of oxygen, maintaining higher aeration levels in medium driven by submerged injected gas feeds and paddlewheel forward motion. Spheres do not interfere with paddlewheel operation, since they are carried over wheel without entrapment.
  • surface ponds are mixed more vigorously by temporarily placing submerged gas injector pumps, and extra gas injection locations.
  • Supplementation with fixed carbon source and augmented oxygenation is monitored in situ to maintain optimal heterotrophic fermentation conditions, while sampling of lipid levels would determine harvest cycle.
  • a gradual switch from phototrophic to heterotrophic strategy in PBRs involves a gradual increase in supplementation feed of fixed carbon (e.g., 0.1 to 1 , 1 to 10, 10 to 20 g/L glucose) as illustrated in Figure 7.
  • the incremental increases in supplementation are determined by pigmentation changes associated with carbon supplementation.
  • Incremental increases in carbon supplementation also support mixotrophic condition that would generate biomass much quicker than pure phototrophy, as well as a phototrophy to heterotrophy.
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a batch night feed supplement operation.
  • a mixotrophic pond 100 is used to produce algae.
  • the mixotrophic pond suitably is at ambient temperature, has a pH ranging from approximately 5 to approximately 9, and has a depth ranging from 0.I m to 0.5 m.
  • Suitable nutrients such as nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus, and recycled medium are fed into the pond at 802.
  • a suitable fixed carbon source feed such as glucose, glycerol, or acetate, is also fed into the pond at 804 in one or more batches.
  • C02 and/or air is fed into the pond at 806.
  • the algae is produced in the mixotrophic pond to a set concentration, preferably between 0.1 to 3 g/L.
  • the algae is harvested continuously during phototrophic growth as shown at 810 and in batches after carbon growth as shown at 812.
  • Figure 9 illustrates glucose supplemented Chorella protothecoides batch cultures in 5.2 liters aquaria with a daily dilution. Glucose was supplemented at the beginning of the dark cycle. Cultures were then sampled and diluted to 0.3 gdw/L at the end of the dark cycle. The glucose was provided at either 0.375g/L as represented by the triangles or at 0.5 g/L as represented by the X symbol.
  • Figure 10 illustrates operation data from a 400 L pond growing Chorella protothecoides supplemented with glucose during dark cycles. The pond was cut at the start of each light cycle with a biomass concentration set point of 0.3 gdw/L. Glucose was added in batch doses of 0.5 g/L concentrations and C02 was sparged into the pond only during light cycles.
  • fixed carbon supplemented open ponds are operated as a continuous turbidostat with a maximal biomass density set point designed to maintain an appreciable penetration of light into pond. This is achieved by daily batch or continuous dilution with fresh medium and supplemented with fixed carbon as prior additions are completely utilized by the algae. Harvested biomass and spent medium would be replaced and re-grown for the next harvest interval.
  • the advantages of such a system include a superior lean biomass accumulation rate than that which can be accomplished in photoautotrophic growing conditions (Figure 9). Diurnal batch supplementation may be applied prior to nightfall to maintain or to grow algal biomass overnight, thereby gaining higher yields and making better use of capital pond infrastructure.
  • This strategy or combinations of these could also be applied to periods when weather or light conditions are non-optimal for photoautotrophic growth, as occurs daily (e.g., early morning, late afternoon), inclement weather (e.g., cloudy days), or seasonally (e.g., late fall, winter, early spring) in mid to high latitudes. Ponds operated in this fashion would be partially dewatered with a concentrator and sent to a fermentor where purely heterotrophic growth is initiated.
  • FIG. 12 Another configuration is to supplement open ponds with variable levels of fixed carbon, as illustrated in Figure 12.
  • a mixotrophic pond 1200 is used to produce algae.
  • the mixotrophic pond suitably is at ambient temperature, has a pH ranging from approximately 5 to approximately 9, and has a depth ranging from 0.I m to 0.5 m.
  • Suitable nutrients such as nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus, and recycled medium are fed into the pond at 1202.
  • a suitable fixed carbon source feed such as glucose, glycerol, or acetate, is also fed into the pond at 1204.
  • a carbon source sensor 1206 is employed for determining the appropriate supplementation of fixed carbon to be fed into the mixotrophic pond based on a desired set point.
  • the fixed carbon concentration set point is suitably between 0 to 12 g of carbon per liter.
  • C02 and/or air is fed into the pond at 1208.
  • the algae is produced in the mixotrophic pond to a set concentration, preferably between 0.1 to 3 g/L.
  • the algae is harvested continuously from the mixotrophic pond as shown at 1210 while algae grows in light or on the carbon source.
  • Supplementation would be controlled by real-time sensors monitoring parameters such as culture density, temperature, dissolved oxygen and ambient light levels (surface and bottom) in order to maintain optimal rates of lean biomass generation.
  • the type of fixed carbon fed to ponds could also be alternated in time to further reduce competitive microorganisms.
  • rapid dewatering technologies such as microfiitration or centrifugation, permeate, or centrate, with unused fixed carbon from the medium would be continuously recycled back to the pond to support further growth.
  • the medium could be periodically or continuously treated by UV sterilization, subjected to mechanical filtration of debris and contaminants, and/or passed through activated carbon to remove growth inhibitors.
  • Envisioned is a system where biomass is only partially, but rapidly (to reduce parasitic utilization), dewatered by a decentralized concentrating unit dedicated to each production pond. Partially dewatered biomass would be transferred to a centralized concentrator for more complete dewatering, medium recapture, and sent to a fermentor where purely heterotrophic growth is initiated.
  • algae cultures can be manipulated to preferentially generate lean biomass densities (approximately 3 g/L) much higher than what can be achieved through purely photoautotrophic culture. Due to partial depigmentation of algae grown with carbon supplements, penetration of light through ponds is greater allowing use of deeper ponds (15-100 cm), further increasing area productivity of ponds as illustrated in Figure 13.
  • Advantages of this system include superior areal and volumetric productivity, growth rate and densities that would be able to maintain a more consistent source of biomass. Such a system would be relatively independent of diurnal, seasonal, and latitudinal light conditions. Other benefits include the ability to run dewatering systems continuously on high concentrations of algae culture, both reducing the capital costs needed for higher through-put dewatering systems, as well as reducing the overall pond areas needed to generate an equivalent biomass with pure photoautotrophy. Cost impacts from evaporation would also be mitigated by a higher volume to surface area ratio. The C02 generated by the heterotrophic and mixotrophic growth on the carbon supplement could also offset some of the need for C02 input during photoautotrophic growth.
  • Use of simple monomers, such as glucose, in industrially grown algae processes allows for the rapid generation of biomass and bio-compounds.
  • competing organisms present in mixotrophic ponds or present as contaminates in fermentation vessels are often more effective at monomer utilization. This fact can reduce overall process yields or foul resulting bioproducts if not controlled with additions of antibiotics or other control technologies.
  • One solution to this problem is through the use of a simultaneous saccharification and conversion (SSC) process.
  • SSC simultaneous saccharification and conversion
  • algae would be grown in open ponds or fermentors in the presence of raw or liquefied polysaccharide (e.g., starch) as discussed above and an appropriate industrial grade hydrolytic enzyme (e.g. , for starch alpha-amylase, glucoamylase or granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme). Input rates of substrate and enzyme would be kept sufficient to catalyze the generation of smaller polysaccharides and glucose from added starch or other sugar polymer to support growth rates of algae biomass and associated bio-compounds.
  • polysaccharide e.g., starch
  • an appropriate industrial grade hydrolytic enzyme e.g. , for starch alpha-amylase, glucoamylase or granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme.
  • Input rates of substrate and enzyme would be kept sufficient to catalyze the generation of smaller polysaccharides and glucose from added starch or other sugar polymer to support growth rates of algae biomass and associated bio-compounds.
  • Benefits of this system would include a lower input feed cost (e.g., unrefined starch) as compared to more refined concentrate sources (e.g., glucose syrups; dextrose powders), superior long term storage stability, and lower associated costs to transport (i.e., syrups approximately 33% water).
  • a lower input feed cost e.g., unrefined starch
  • more refined concentrate sources e.g., glucose syrups; dextrose powders
  • superior long term storage stability e.g., syrups approximately 33% water.
  • the conversion of starch from cassava tuber or sweet potato uses raw starch hydrolyzing enzymes simultaneously inoculated with algae for a simultaneous saccharification and conversion (SSC) to lipid process.
  • SSC simultaneous saccharification and conversion
  • Use of an SSC process may present less stress to the algae, which may not be able to handle the osmotic stress of very concentrated sugar solutions.
  • the overall level of sugar will be kept low, with monomeric sugar (e.g. , glucose) released by enzyme action being taken up by algae, reducing the chance for growth by contaminant bacteria.
  • Feed solutions of potential sugars provided to the SSC process may need to undergo pre- hydrolysis to produce a less viscous solution for better mass transfer and higher overall titer of lipid from sugar.
  • Example conditions for hydrolysis comprise:
  • Particle size 1.5 to 2.5mm screen hole diameter
  • Pretreatment/Hydration prior to SSC recommended at least 48°C, higher for complete liquefaction of polysaccharides
  • Particle size 1.5 to 2.5 mm screen hole diameter
  • H drolvzed lipid extracted algae (LEA) meal as fixed carbon feedstock for mixotrophic or heterotrophic biofeed
  • Costs associated with fixed carbon (e.g., glucose) used to generate algae bioproducts are a major factor affecting scaling of algae based biofuels.
  • Algae are capable of utilizing a variety of fixed carbon sources including glycerol, organic acids, and various sugars (C6 and C5).
  • Industrial sources of these compounds are largely fermentatively or agriculturally derived, traded actively on commodity exchange markets and, thus, often subject to abrupt and uncontrollable price changes due to market speculations.
  • issues associated with diverting fixed carbon to biofuels may affect food security, price instability is the predominate issue that makes scaled biofuel production particularly challenging.
  • One significant by-product generated by algae based biofuel producers is the residual lipid extracted algae (LEA).
  • LEA After removing lipids, LEA is predominately composed of carbohydrates and, to a lesser extent, proteins and minerals. With minimal processing, LEA can be used as an internally generated feed source of fixed carbon used to supply or supplement existing fixed carbon feed sources to generate further algal biomass generated in open or closed bioreactors, either heterotrophically or mixotrophically.
  • Methods available to transform LEA meal to a more bio-available sugar source include enzymatic digestion with amylases, or acid hydrolysis using liquids or solid acid (beads) catalysts. In this process, LEA meal, deproteinated LEA meal, or algae rich in starch, would be allowed to contact a catalyst (e.g., enzymes, liquid or solid acid), generating an algal hydrolysate.
  • a catalyst e.g., enzymes, liquid or solid acid
  • algae hydrolysate could be substituted directly as a fixed carbon feed used for generating further algae biomass, or to support yeast growth (e.g., ethanol processes), or bacteria (e.g., butanol, lipids) or other bio-based products.
  • yeast growth e.g., ethanol processes
  • bacteria e.g., butanol, lipids
  • bio-based products e.g., butanol, lipids

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Marine Sciences & Fisheries (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne des procédés, des conceptions et des outils pour l'amélioration de la production de bioproduits à partir d'organismes photosynthétiques utilisant de multiples états trophiques en combinaison afin d'obtenir une meilleure production d'un bioproduit ou d'une série de bioproduits. La présente invention permet d'obtenir des améliorations de coût en ce qui concerne la production de ces bioproduits dans une étape auxiliaire hétérotrophe, dans un bioréacteur fermé, alimenté par une source de carbone fixe en tant qu'intermédiaire dans le procédé de production.
PCT/US2012/024358 2011-02-08 2012-02-08 Procédés pour la culture trophique mixte améliorée d'algues WO2012109375A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161440686P 2011-02-08 2011-02-08
US61/440,686 2011-02-08
US201161442261P 2011-02-13 2011-02-13
US61/442,261 2011-02-13
US201161532745P 2011-09-09 2011-09-09
US61/532,745 2011-09-09

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012109375A2 true WO2012109375A2 (fr) 2012-08-16
WO2012109375A3 WO2012109375A3 (fr) 2012-11-08

Family

ID=46639191

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2012/024358 WO2012109375A2 (fr) 2011-02-08 2012-02-08 Procédés pour la culture trophique mixte améliorée d'algues

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2012109375A2 (fr)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014074769A2 (fr) 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 Heliae Development, Llc Procédés de culture de microorganismes dans des conditions mixotrophes non axéniques
WO2014074772A1 (fr) 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 Heliae Development, Llc Procédés et systèmes de combinaisons de mixotrophes, phototrophes et hétérotrophes
WO2014144270A1 (fr) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Heliae Development, Llc Systèmes de production mixotrophe à grande échelle
WO2014074770A3 (fr) * 2012-11-09 2014-12-18 Heliae Development, Llc Procédés à mixotrophie équilibrée
CN110129399A (zh) * 2019-05-14 2019-08-16 河南农业大学 一种利用小球藻生物质促进hau-m1光合菌群高效产氢的方法
US20200231923A1 (en) * 2017-10-10 2020-07-23 Gicon Grossmann Ingenieur Consult Gmbh Method and System for Heterotrophic and Mixotrophic Cultivation of Microalgae
DE202021004352U1 (de) 2021-05-12 2023-11-29 Koralo Gmbh Fisch- und Meeresfrüchte-Ersatzprodukte aus fibrösen Myzel und Mikroalgen

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6607900B2 (en) * 2000-01-28 2003-08-19 Martek Biosciences Boulder Corporation Enhanced production of lipids containing polyenoic fatty acid by very high density cultures of eukaryotic microbes in fermentors
US20090298159A1 (en) * 2008-05-27 2009-12-03 Tsinghua University Method for producing biodiesel from an alga
WO2010009284A2 (fr) * 2008-07-17 2010-01-21 Agoil International, Llc Culture de masse de micro-algues pour la production de lipides
US20100184197A1 (en) * 2009-01-22 2010-07-22 Longying Dong Methods For Harvesting Biological Materials Using Membrane Filters
WO2010132413A1 (fr) * 2009-05-11 2010-11-18 Phycal Llc Production de lipides d'algues

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6607900B2 (en) * 2000-01-28 2003-08-19 Martek Biosciences Boulder Corporation Enhanced production of lipids containing polyenoic fatty acid by very high density cultures of eukaryotic microbes in fermentors
US20090298159A1 (en) * 2008-05-27 2009-12-03 Tsinghua University Method for producing biodiesel from an alga
WO2010009284A2 (fr) * 2008-07-17 2010-01-21 Agoil International, Llc Culture de masse de micro-algues pour la production de lipides
US20100184197A1 (en) * 2009-01-22 2010-07-22 Longying Dong Methods For Harvesting Biological Materials Using Membrane Filters
WO2010132413A1 (fr) * 2009-05-11 2010-11-18 Phycal Llc Production de lipides d'algues

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014074769A2 (fr) 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 Heliae Development, Llc Procédés de culture de microorganismes dans des conditions mixotrophes non axéniques
WO2014074772A1 (fr) 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 Heliae Development, Llc Procédés et systèmes de combinaisons de mixotrophes, phototrophes et hétérotrophes
WO2014074769A3 (fr) * 2012-11-09 2014-07-17 Heliae Development, Llc Procédés de culture de microorganismes dans des conditions mixotrophes non axéniques
WO2014074770A3 (fr) * 2012-11-09 2014-12-18 Heliae Development, Llc Procédés à mixotrophie équilibrée
US9758756B2 (en) 2012-11-09 2017-09-12 Heliae Development Llc Method of culturing microorganisms using phototrophic and mixotrophic culture conditions
US10240120B2 (en) 2012-11-09 2019-03-26 Heliae Development Llc Balanced mixotrophy method
WO2014144270A1 (fr) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Heliae Development, Llc Systèmes de production mixotrophe à grande échelle
US10865371B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2020-12-15 Heliae Development Llc Large scale mixotrophic production systems
US20200231923A1 (en) * 2017-10-10 2020-07-23 Gicon Grossmann Ingenieur Consult Gmbh Method and System for Heterotrophic and Mixotrophic Cultivation of Microalgae
CN110129399A (zh) * 2019-05-14 2019-08-16 河南农业大学 一种利用小球藻生物质促进hau-m1光合菌群高效产氢的方法
CN110129399B (zh) * 2019-05-14 2022-05-27 河南农业大学 一种利用小球藻生物质促进hau-m1光合菌群高效产氢的方法
DE202021004352U1 (de) 2021-05-12 2023-11-29 Koralo Gmbh Fisch- und Meeresfrüchte-Ersatzprodukte aus fibrösen Myzel und Mikroalgen

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2012109375A3 (fr) 2012-11-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
da Maia et al. Microalgae starch: A promising raw material for the bioethanol production
Dahman et al. Biofuels: Their characteristics and analysis
Anwar et al. Recent advancement and strategy on bio-hydrogen production from photosynthetic microalgae
de Farias Silva et al. Bioethanol from microalgae and cyanobacteria: a review and technological outlook
Voloshin et al. Biofuel production from plant and algal biomass
Hernández et al. Saccharification of carbohydrates in microalgal biomass by physical, chemical and enzymatic pre-treatments as a previous step for bioethanol production
US9670454B2 (en) Methods of microalgae cultivation for increased resource production
Dragone et al. Third generation biofuels from microalgae
Zhou et al. Microalgae cultivation and photobioreactor design
US10160989B2 (en) System and method of co-cultivating microalgae with fungus
Jin et al. Ultrahigh‐cell‐density heterotrophic cultivation of the unicellular green alga Chlorella sorokiniana for biomass production
WO2012109375A2 (fr) Procédés pour la culture trophique mixte améliorée d'algues
US8986962B2 (en) Organism co-culture in the production of biofuels
US20130309757A1 (en) Method and apparatus for producing cells and fat soluble materials by cell culture
Bastos Biofuels from microalgae: Bioethanol
Kim et al. Continuous cultivation of photosynthetic bacteria for fatty acids production
KR20180011192A (ko) 미생물로부터의 산물을 연속 생산하는 방법
Burgstaller et al. The influence of different carbon sources on growth and single cell oil production in oleaginous yeasts Apiotrichum brassicae and Pichia kudriavzevii
Pinto et al. Cultivation techniques
Connelly Second-generation biofuel from high-efficiency algal-derived biocrude
Zhang et al. Microbial biodiesel production—oil feedstocks produced from microbial cell cultivations
US20080124767A1 (en) Production and Secretion of Sucrose in Photosynthetic Prokaryotes (Cyanobacteria)
de Lima Araújo et al. Bioethanol from microalgae
Dey et al. Biofuel production from algal biomass: Technologies and opportunities addressing the global energy crisis
de Lima Araujo et al. Bioethanol from microalgae 20

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12744674

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12744674

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2