WO2011134011A1 - Production of nitrite - Google Patents

Production of nitrite Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2011134011A1
WO2011134011A1 PCT/AU2011/000482 AU2011000482W WO2011134011A1 WO 2011134011 A1 WO2011134011 A1 WO 2011134011A1 AU 2011000482 W AU2011000482 W AU 2011000482W WO 2011134011 A1 WO2011134011 A1 WO 2011134011A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
reactor
nitrite
ammonium
range
level
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/AU2011/000482
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Zhiguo Yuan
Original Assignee
The University Of Queensland
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2010901787A external-priority patent/AU2010901787A0/en
Application filed by The University Of Queensland filed Critical The University Of Queensland
Publication of WO2011134011A1 publication Critical patent/WO2011134011A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/006Regulation methods for biological treatment
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B21/00Nitrogen; Compounds thereof
    • C01B21/20Nitrogen oxides; Oxyacids of nitrogen; Salts thereof
    • C01B21/50Nitrous acid; Salts thereof
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/02Aerobic processes
    • C02F3/12Activated sludge processes
    • C02F3/1236Particular type of activated sludge installations
    • C02F3/1263Sequencing batch reactors [SBR]
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12PFERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P3/00Preparation of elements or inorganic compounds except carbon dioxide
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2101/00Nature of the contaminant
    • C02F2101/10Inorganic compounds
    • C02F2101/16Nitrogen compounds, e.g. ammonia
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2209/00Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment
    • C02F2209/001Upstream control, i.e. monitoring for predictive control
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2209/00Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment
    • C02F2209/06Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment pH
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2209/00Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment
    • C02F2209/07Alkalinity
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02WCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W10/00Technologies for wastewater treatment
    • Y02W10/10Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for producing nitrite. In another aspect, the present invention relates to a method for producing free nitrous acid.
  • Microbial processes play a central role in wastewater management. In particular, they underpin biological treatment of wastewater, the most cost-effective and environmentally friendly method for wastewater treatment.
  • a typical advanced wastewater treatment plant receives wastewater from sewage mains.
  • the wastewater is first treated to remove large particulates (by screening, or passing through a primary settler, or both).
  • the liquor then passes to bioreactors, where bacteria mineralise organic carbon (often referred to as biological oxygen demand or BOD) to C0 2 and convert ammonia to nitrate, and in some cases further to nitrogen gas.
  • BOD biological oxygen demand
  • Some bioreactors also achieve biological phosphorus removal. This process results in the growth of biomass.
  • the biomass is then separated from the liquor, typically in a secondary settler.
  • the sludge from the secondary settler (which includes most of the separated biomass) is then treated in an anaerobic digester, sometimes together with primary sludge resulting from the settling process in the primary settler.
  • anaerobic digester the BOD of the sludge is converted to methane.
  • Products from the anaerobic digester also include solids that may be disposed of and a liquid stream.
  • the liquid stream from the anaerobic digester typically contains ammonium at concentrations of 1 .0 to 1.5 gN/L. Aerobic digestion liquors typically have limited alkalinity. For example, bicarbonate is typically present with a molar ratio with ammonium of approximately 1 : 1. This water stream is presently treated either by returning it to the mainstream aerobic bioreactor or by a sidestream treatment process. Processes that have been used to treat the liquid stream from an anaerobic digester using sidestream treatment include:
  • Nitrogen is removed through nitrification and denitrification with nitrite as the intermediate.
  • This technology involves oxidising approximately 50% of the ammonium to nitrite with an aerobic process, which is followed by denitrification where nitrite is reduced to nitrogen gas with externally supplied carbon sources.
  • the denitrification process re-generates alkalinity to support further ammonium oxidation to nitrite.
  • the aerobic and anoxic cycle is repeated for a few times, after which most of the ammonium is converted to nitrogen gas;
  • Nitrogen is removed via nitrification followed by the ANAMMOX process.
  • the present invention provides a method for producing nitrite comprising the steps of providing a liquid stream containing ammonia to a nitritation reactor, the reactor containing ammonium oxidising bacteria, and controlling the reactor to convert ammonia to nitrite at a yield in excess of 60%.
  • the reactor is controlled such that the yield of conversion of ammonium to nitrite is in excess of 70%, more suitably in excess of 80%, ' more suitably in excess of 90%, even more suitably within the range of 90% to 95%.
  • the method further comprises removing a nitrite containing liquid from the reactor.
  • the reactor is controlled by maintaining the pH above 4, or above 5.5. In other embodiments, the pH is maintained at a level above 6.0. In other embodiments, the pH is maintained at a level of 6.2 or, above, or even a level of 6.5 or above.
  • the pH of the reactor is controlled by monitoring the pH of the liquid in the reactor and adding an alkaline material to the reactor if the pH drops below a predetermined level.
  • the predetermined level falls within the range of 6.0 to 6.5.
  • the pH of the reactor is controlled by adding a bicarbonate containing material to the reactor.
  • Bicarbonate materials are alkaline in nature and adding the bicarbonate materials to the reactor results in an increase in the pH of the liquid in the reactor. Adding bicarbonate also secures supply of inorganic carbon that is required for autotrophic growth by ammonia oxidising bacteria, which could reduce to low levels due ' to C0 2 stripping.
  • the reactor is operated such that minimum formation or accumulation of nitrate takes place.
  • the reactor is operated such that negligible conversion of nitrogen containing compounds to N 2 occurs.
  • Aqueous streams that contain nitrite (N0 2 " ) will also contain free nitrous acid (HN0 2 ) with the ratio between N0 2 " and HN0 2 determined by pH and temperature, among other factors. A lower pH favours the formation of HN0 2 .
  • the liquid stream leaving the reactor (which is an aqueous stream containing nitrite) will also contain free nitrous acid.
  • the method of the present invention may further comprise the steps of removing a liquid stream from the reactor and reducing the pH of the liquid stream to form more free nitrous acid.
  • This aqueous stream containing free nitrous acid may be used in other parts of the water treatment process.
  • the present invention provides a method for producing nitrite comprising the steps of providing a liquid stream containing ammonia to a nitritation reactor, the reactor containing ammonium oxidising bacteria, and controlling pH of a liquid phase in the reactor to fall in the range of from 4.0 to 7.5 to thereby convert ammonium to nitrite.
  • the present invention provides a method for producing nitrite comprising the steps of providing a liquid stream containing ammonia to a nitritation reactor, the reactor containing ammonium oxidising bacteria, and controlling pH of a liquid phase in the reactor so that the pH is maintained above a predetermined value, said predetermined value falling within the range of from 4,0 to 7.5, to thereby convert ammonium to nitrite.
  • the pH may fall within the range of from 5 to 7, or from 6.0 to 6.5.
  • Figure 1 shows (A) the profiles of influent NH 4 + and effluent NFLf, N0 2 " and N0 3 ' concentrations during 200 day operation and (B) the mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) and volatile suspended solids (VSS) concentrations during the operation of the Example. Synthetic wastewater was used until Day 1 70, after which real anaerobic sludge digestion liquor was used; and
  • Figure 2 shows profiles of dissolved oxygen, pH (A) and ammonium, nitrite and nitrate concentrations (B) during the cycle study implemented on Day 133 of the Example.
  • the nitritation reactor it was an objective to convert greater than 90% of the ammonium in the water stream taken from an anaerobic digester (hereinafter referred to as "digestion liquor") to nitrite with minimum accumulation of nitrate or negligible conversion to N 2 .
  • the digestor liquor contains ammonium and alkalinity.
  • the ammonium and alkalinity are present in the digestion liquor at a molar ratio of about 1 : 1 .
  • conditions in the nitritation reactor are controlled by:
  • Adding additional alkalinity to the reactor was achieved by adding bicarbonate.
  • bicarbonate For example, sodium bicarbonate could be added to -the reactor.
  • bicarbonate was added in two steps:
  • an additional amount of bicarbonate that is approximately 50% of the bicarbonate already present in the anaerobic digestion liquor is directly added to the liquor.
  • This additional amount along with the bicarbonate already present, allows for the oxidation of approximately 75% of the ammonium to nitrite.
  • the amount of this addition of bicarbonate can vary between 0- 100% (of the additional amount required to achieve complete conversion of ammonium to nitrite) with 50% being one example.
  • adding too much alkalinity in this step may result in overdosing, incurring unnecessary chemical costs. On the other hand, adding too little could slow down the biological reaction.
  • bicarbonate is added through a pH controller, for example, during an SBR (sequencing batch reactor) cycle.
  • SBR sequencing batch reactor
  • alkalinity is consumed and pH decreases.
  • the pH controller is initiated, and this adds bicarbonate to the reactor to keep pH at or above this preset or predetermined pH level. This ensures that alkalinity is replenished while being consumed until (almost) full oxidation of ammonium is achieved. In this period, the ammonium oxidation rate is lower, likely limited by alkalinity.
  • adding an amount of bicarbonate in Step 1 is beneficial in terms of increasing the reaction rate and hence reducing the cycle time.
  • alkalinity addition may occur by either step 1 alone or step 2 alone.
  • the pH set-point -in Step 2 at which additional alkalinity is added is suitably in the range of 4.0 to 7.5. such as from 6.0 to 6.5. It will be understood that the production of nitrite under acidic conditions also results in the formation of free nitrous acid.
  • Free nitrous acid (FN A) has been found to be an inhibitor of microorganisms and it has a stronger inhibitory effect on nitrite oxidising bacteria than on ammonia oxidising bacteria. It is important that FNA is maintained in a range that allows the growth of ammonia-oxidising bacteria (AOB) but inhibits the growth of nitrite-oxidising bacteria (NOB). It is believed that an optimal pH should be in the range of 6.0 to 6.5. A pH of 6.2 was selected for this example.
  • An 8L reactor was seeded using sludge taken from the Luggage Point wastewater treatment plant (Brisbane, Australia), which contained ammonia-oxidising bacteria, nitrite-oxidising bacteria as well as many other microorganisms, judged from the function of the plant.
  • Synthetic wastewater that mimics anaerobic digester liquor was initially used as a feed to the reactor.
  • the ammonium concentration in the feed was 500 mg NH + -N/L.
  • the bicarbonate to ammonium ratio was 1.5: 1 (mole/mole).
  • the ammonium concentration in the feed was increased to 750 mg NH 4 + -N/L between Day 42 and 48, and l g NH 4 + -N/L from Day 49 onwards, which is similar to the ammonium concentration in anaerobic digestion liquor.
  • the bicarbonate concentration was also increased proportionally.
  • a one-way pl controller was implemented, which adds bicarbonate when the measured pH drops below a pre-selected pH set-point. This value was set at 6.2 to keep the concentration of FNA at a desirable level.
  • Figure 1 A shows the influent ammonium and effluent ammonium, nitrite and nitrate concentrations over the 200 day experimental period.
  • the ammonium oxidation rate was close to zero.
  • the ammonium oxidation rate gradually increased and nitrite was the main final product of the conversion.
  • the ammonium concentration in the feed was increased to 750 mg NFI 4 + -N/L between Day 42 and 48, and l g NH 4 + - N/L from Day 49 onwards.
  • more than 90% of the ammonium feed was converted to nitrite, while less than 5% of the loaded ammonium was oxidized to nitrate.
  • the volatile suspended solid concentration (VSS) increased gradually, reaching 1.5 g/L on Day 133 and remained- around 1.3g/L during the real wastewater test period (see Figure I B).
  • Figure 2 shows the profiles of ammonium, nitrite and nitrate concentrations measured during a cycle study.
  • the liquid volume was 6 L at the start of cycle.
  • the 1 L feed containing lg NH 4 + -N, was pumped into the reactor as the first feed. The same feed was added again at 3.6 hours.
  • nitrite varied between 800- 1000 mg N/L
  • nitrate varied between 20-30 mg N/L and dissolved oxygen level between 2.5 and 3.5 mg/L.
  • With the 50% extra bicarbonate supplied most of the ammonium feed was consumed within I hour. More bicarbonate was dosed to remove residual ammonium, and control the pH at about 6.2 at the same time.
  • the present invention allows for the conversion of ammonium in an anaerobic digestion liquor to nitrite at high yields.
  • the nitritation reactor is controlled by controlling pH to (a) ensure that there is adequate alkalinity to take part in the oxidation reaction of ammonium to nitrite and (b) obtain a level of free nitric acid in the reactor that allows ammonium oxidising bacteria to grow but inhibits the growth of nitrite oxidising bacteria.
  • the present inventors believe that if the level of free nitric acid is too low (resulting from a pH that is too high), adequate inhibition of nitrite oxidising bacteria will not occur, thereby resulting in excessive oxidation of nitrite to nitrate. If the level of free nitric acid is too high (resulting from a pH that is too low), growth of ammonium oxidising bacteria will also be inhibited, thereby reducing the rate of production of nitrite.
  • An aqueous liquid stream containing nitrite and free nitrous acid is withdrawn from the reactor.
  • This stream may be used in other parts of the wastewater treatment process. If it is required to increase the concentration of free nitrous acid in this stream, it is a simple matter to add additional acid to this stream to ' enhance the amount of free nitrous acid in the stream.
  • the product stream from the reactor contains little or no alkalinity (and thus has little buffering capacity), addition of only a small amount of acid can be used to cause significant reductions in the pH of the stream, thereby resulting in a significant increase in the free nitrous acid concentration in this stream.
  • the additional acid that is added may be an inorganic acid or an organic acid. HC1 may typically be used.
  • the maximum daily production of nitrite can be up to 10-20% of the total nitrogen loading to the wastewater treatment plant, representing an almost unlimited supply of FNA.
  • the production is biological, with little additional costs in comparison to the current methods used for the treatment of this stream.
  • FNA thus produced is "green", renewable and plentiful.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Purification Treatments By Anaerobic Or Anaerobic And Aerobic Bacteria Or Animals (AREA)

Abstract

A method for producing nitrite comprising the steps of providing a liquid stream containing ammonia to a nitritation reactor, the reactor containing ammonium oxidising bacteria, and controlling the reactor to convert ammonia to nitrite at a yield in excess of 60%. The pH in the reactor is maintained to (a) ensure that there is adequate alkalinity to take part in the oxidation reaction of ammonium to nitrite and (b) obtain a level of free nitric acid in the reactor that allows ammonium oxidising bacteria to grow but inhibits the growth of nitrite oxidising bacteria. The pH may fall within the range of from 4 to 7.5, preferably 5 to 7, more preferable 6.0 to 6.5.

Description

PRODUCTION OF NITRITE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a method for producing nitrite. In another aspect, the present invention relates to a method for producing free nitrous acid.
BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
Microbial processes play a central role in wastewater management. In particular, they underpin biological treatment of wastewater, the most cost-effective and environmentally friendly method for wastewater treatment.
A typical advanced wastewater treatment plant receives wastewater from sewage mains. The wastewater is first treated to remove large particulates (by screening, or passing through a primary settler, or both). The liquor then passes to bioreactors, where bacteria mineralise organic carbon (often referred to as biological oxygen demand or BOD) to C02 and convert ammonia to nitrate, and in some cases further to nitrogen gas. Some bioreactors also achieve biological phosphorus removal. This process results in the growth of biomass. The biomass is then separated from the liquor, typically in a secondary settler.
The sludge from the secondary settler (which includes most of the separated biomass) is then treated in an anaerobic digester, sometimes together with primary sludge resulting from the settling process in the primary settler. In the anaerobic digester, the BOD of the sludge is converted to methane. Products from the anaerobic digester also include solids that may be disposed of and a liquid stream.
The liquid stream from the anaerobic digester typically contains ammonium at concentrations of 1 .0 to 1.5 gN/L. Aerobic digestion liquors typically have limited alkalinity. For example, bicarbonate is typically present with a molar ratio with ammonium of approximately 1 : 1. This water stream is presently treated either by returning it to the mainstream aerobic bioreactor or by a sidestream treatment process. Processes that have been used to treat the liquid stream from an anaerobic digester using sidestream treatment include:
1. Nitrogen is removed through nitrification and denitrification with nitrite as the intermediate. This technology involves oxidising approximately 50% of the ammonium to nitrite with an aerobic process, which is followed by denitrification where nitrite is reduced to nitrogen gas with externally supplied carbon sources. The denitrification process re-generates alkalinity to support further ammonium oxidation to nitrite. The aerobic and anoxic cycle is repeated for a few times, after which most of the ammonium is converted to nitrogen gas;
2. Nitrogen is removed via nitrification followed by the ANAMMOX process.
Similar to the above process, approximately 50% of the ammonium is firstly converted to nitrite. The resulting liquor that contains ammonium and nitrite with a molar ratio of approximately 1 : 1 will be transferred to an ANAMMOX reactor, where the ANAMMOX bacteria will oxidise ammonia with nitrite as the electron acceptor. The ANAMMOX reaction produces nitrogen gas and also some nitrate as the final products.
Both of the above processes require additional capital costs and increased operational costs.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for producing nitrite comprising the steps of providing a liquid stream containing ammonia to a nitritation reactor, the reactor containing ammonium oxidising bacteria, and controlling the reactor to convert ammonia to nitrite at a yield in excess of 60%.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the reactor is controlled such that the yield of conversion of ammonium to nitrite is in excess of 70%, more suitably in excess of 80%,'more suitably in excess of 90%, even more suitably within the range of 90% to 95%. In one embodiment, the method further comprises removing a nitrite containing liquid from the reactor.
In some embodiments, the reactor is controlled by maintaining the pH above 4, or above 5.5. In other embodiments, the pH is maintained at a level above 6.0. In other embodiments, the pH is maintained at a level of 6.2 or, above, or even a level of 6.5 or above.
In some embodiments, the pH of the reactor is controlled by monitoring the pH of the liquid in the reactor and adding an alkaline material to the reactor if the pH drops below a predetermined level. In some embodiments, the predetermined level falls within the range of 6.0 to 6.5.
In some embodiments, the pH of the reactor is controlled by adding a bicarbonate containing material to the reactor. Bicarbonate materials are alkaline in nature and adding the bicarbonate materials to the reactor results in an increase in the pH of the liquid in the reactor. Adding bicarbonate also secures supply of inorganic carbon that is required for autotrophic growth by ammonia oxidising bacteria, which could reduce to low levels due 'to C02 stripping.
Suitably, the reactor is operated such that minimum formation or accumulation of nitrate takes place. Suitably, the reactor is operated such that negligible conversion of nitrogen containing compounds to N2 occurs.
Aqueous streams that contain nitrite (N02 ") will also contain free nitrous acid (HN02) with the ratio between N02 " and HN02 determined by pH and temperature, among other factors. A lower pH favours the formation of HN02. In some embodiments of the present invention, the liquid stream leaving the reactor (which is an aqueous stream containing nitrite) will also contain free nitrous acid.
The method of the present invention may further comprise the steps of removing a liquid stream from the reactor and reducing the pH of the liquid stream to form more free nitrous acid. This aqueous stream containing free nitrous acid may be used in other parts of the water treatment process. In a second aspect, the present invention provides a method for producing nitrite comprising the steps of providing a liquid stream containing ammonia to a nitritation reactor, the reactor containing ammonium oxidising bacteria, and controlling pH of a liquid phase in the reactor to fall in the range of from 4.0 to 7.5 to thereby convert ammonium to nitrite.
In a third aspect, the present invention provides a method for producing nitrite comprising the steps of providing a liquid stream containing ammonia to a nitritation reactor, the reactor containing ammonium oxidising bacteria, and controlling pH of a liquid phase in the reactor so that the pH is maintained above a predetermined value, said predetermined value falling within the range of from 4,0 to 7.5, to thereby convert ammonium to nitrite.
In the second and third aspects of the present invention the pH may fall within the range of from 5 to 7, or from 6.0 to 6.5.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows (A) the profiles of influent NH4 + and effluent NFLf, N02 " and N03 ' concentrations during 200 day operation and (B) the mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) and volatile suspended solids (VSS) concentrations during the operation of the Example. Synthetic wastewater was used until Day 1 70, after which real anaerobic sludge digestion liquor was used; and
Figure 2 shows profiles of dissolved oxygen, pH (A) and ammonium, nitrite and nitrate concentrations (B) during the cycle study implemented on Day 133 of the Example. DETAILED DESCRIPTIO OF THE INVENTIO
Example
In this embodiment, it was an objective to convert greater than 90% of the ammonium in the water stream taken from an anaerobic digester (hereinafter referred to as "digestion liquor") to nitrite with minimum accumulation of nitrate or negligible conversion to N2. The digestor liquor contains ammonium and alkalinity. The ammonium and alkalinity are present in the digestion liquor at a molar ratio of about 1 : 1 . In order to obtain a high yield of conversion of ammonium to nitrite, conditions in the nitritation reactor are controlled by:
1 . Adding additional alkalinity to satisfy the demand of alkalinity by ammonium oxidation; and
2. providing appropriate conditions that allow ammonia-oxidising bacteria to proliferate while 'the growth of nitrite-oxidising bacteria is minimised.
Adding additional alkalinity to the reactor was achieved by adding bicarbonate. For example, sodium bicarbonate could be added to -the reactor. In one embodiment, bicarbonate was added in two steps:
1 . In the first step, an additional amount of bicarbonate that is approximately 50% of the bicarbonate already present in the anaerobic digestion liquor is directly added to the liquor. This additional amount, along with the bicarbonate already present, allows for the oxidation of approximately 75% of the ammonium to nitrite. The amount of this addition of bicarbonate can vary between 0- 100% (of the additional amount required to achieve complete conversion of ammonium to nitrite) with 50% being one example. As the alkalinity to ammonium ratio in the anaerobic digestion liquor may vary, adding too much alkalinity in this step may result in overdosing, incurring unnecessary chemical costs. On the other hand, adding too little could slow down the biological reaction.
2. In the second step, bicarbonate is added through a pH controller, for example, during an SBR (sequencing batch reactor) cycle. When ammonium oxidisation proceeds, alkalinity is consumed and pH decreases. When the pH drops to a preset or predetermined value, the pH controller is initiated, and this adds bicarbonate to the reactor to keep pH at or above this preset or predetermined pH level. This ensures that alkalinity is replenished while being consumed until (almost) full oxidation of ammonium is achieved. In this period, the ammonium oxidation rate is lower, likely limited by alkalinity. Hence, adding an amount of bicarbonate in Step 1 is beneficial in terms of increasing the reaction rate and hence reducing the cycle time.
A combination of the above two steps ensures that an adequate amount of alkalinity is made available for the full oxidation of ammonium without overdosing. However, in some embodiments, alkalinity addition may occur by either step 1 alone or step 2 alone.
The pH set-point -in Step 2 at which additional alkalinity is added is suitably in the range of 4.0 to 7.5. such as from 6.0 to 6.5. It will be understood that the production of nitrite under acidic conditions also results in the formation of free nitrous acid. Free nitrous acid (FN A) has been found to be an inhibitor of microorganisms and it has a stronger inhibitory effect on nitrite oxidising bacteria than on ammonia oxidising bacteria. It is important that FNA is maintained in a range that allows the growth of ammonia-oxidising bacteria (AOB) but inhibits the growth of nitrite-oxidising bacteria (NOB). It is believed that an optimal pH should be in the range of 6.0 to 6.5. A pH of 6.2 was selected for this example.
Experimental results
Reactor operation
An 8L reactor was seeded using sludge taken from the Luggage Point wastewater treatment plant (Brisbane, Australia), which contained ammonia-oxidising bacteria, nitrite-oxidising bacteria as well as many other microorganisms, judged from the function of the plant.
Synthetic wastewater that mimics anaerobic digester liquor was initially used as a feed to the reactor. In the start-up phase (first 41 days), the ammonium concentration in the feed was 500 mg NH +-N/L. The bicarbonate to ammonium ratio was 1.5: 1 (mole/mole). Based on the satisfactory reactor performance, the ammonium concentration in the feed was increased to 750 mg NH4 +-N/L between Day 42 and 48, and l g NH4 +-N/L from Day 49 onwards, which is similar to the ammonium concentration in anaerobic digestion liquor. The bicarbonate concentration was also increased proportionally.
From Day 1 71 , real anaerobic digestion liquor taken from the Luggage Point wastewater treatment plant was used as the feed.
An SBR cycle of 8 hours, consisting of 7.5 hours aerobic period followed by 0.5 hour wasting, settling and decanting periods, \vas used. During the aeration period, the dissolved oxygen concentration in the reactor was maintained between 2.5 and 3.5 mg/L through the use of an ON/OFF controller of air sparging. Wastewater was pumped into the reactor as two pulses at 0 and 3.7 hours, respectively. In each feeding period, 1 L of feed was added in 2.8 minutes. To maintain a desirable volatile suspended solid (VSS) concentration, certain amount of mixed liquor was removed at the end of the aeration period. From Day 126 onwards, 500 mL mixed liquor was wasted in each cycle, resulting in a sludge retention time of 16 days. In the decanting period, 2 L of effluent was discharged.
A one-way pl controller was implemented, which adds bicarbonate when the measured pH drops below a pre-selected pH set-point. This value was set at 6.2 to keep the concentration of FNA at a desirable level.
Long-term performance
Figure 1 A shows the influent ammonium and effluent ammonium, nitrite and nitrate concentrations over the 200 day experimental period. In the first 10 days, the ammonium oxidation rate was close to zero. During Days 10-30, the ammonium oxidation rate gradually increased and nitrite was the main final product of the conversion. With the satisfactory reactor performance, the ammonium concentration in the feed was increased to 750 mg NFI4 +-N/L between Day 42 and 48, and l g NH4 +- N/L from Day 49 onwards. At steady operation conditions, more than 90% of the ammonium feed was converted to nitrite, while less than 5% of the loaded ammonium was oxidized to nitrate. On Day 171 , the feed was switched to real digestion liquor with 822 mg NH -N/L in the influent. After 5 day operation, the rector achieved steady performance with more than 92% ammonium conversion to nitrite. The effluent nitrite concentration was steadily above 760 mg NCV-N/L.
The volatile suspended solid concentration (VSS) increased gradually, reaching 1.5 g/L on Day 133 and remained- around 1.3g/L during the real wastewater test period (see Figure I B).
Cycle study
Figure 2 shows the profiles of ammonium, nitrite and nitrate concentrations measured during a cycle study. The liquid volume was 6 L at the start of cycle. The 1 L feed, containing lg NH4 +-N, was pumped into the reactor as the first feed. The same feed was added again at 3.6 hours. Over the cycle, nitrite varied between 800- 1000 mg N/L, while nitrate varied between 20-30 mg N/L and dissolved oxygen level between 2.5 and 3.5 mg/L. With the 50% extra bicarbonate supplied, most of the ammonium feed was consumed within I hour. More bicarbonate was dosed to remove residual ammonium, and control the pH at about 6.2 at the same time.
The present invention allows for the conversion of ammonium in an anaerobic digestion liquor to nitrite at high yields. The nitritation reactor is controlled by controlling pH to (a) ensure that there is adequate alkalinity to take part in the oxidation reaction of ammonium to nitrite and (b) obtain a level of free nitric acid in the reactor that allows ammonium oxidising bacteria to grow but inhibits the growth of nitrite oxidising bacteria. The present inventors believe that if the level of free nitric acid is too low (resulting from a pH that is too high), adequate inhibition of nitrite oxidising bacteria will not occur, thereby resulting in excessive oxidation of nitrite to nitrate. If the level of free nitric acid is too high (resulting from a pH that is too low), growth of ammonium oxidising bacteria will also be inhibited, thereby reducing the rate of production of nitrite.
An aqueous liquid stream containing nitrite and free nitrous acid is withdrawn from the reactor. This stream may be used in other parts of the wastewater treatment process. If it is required to increase the concentration of free nitrous acid in this stream, it is a simple matter to add additional acid to this stream to ' enhance the amount of free nitrous acid in the stream. As the product stream from the reactor contains little or no alkalinity (and thus has little buffering capacity), addition of only a small amount of acid can be used to cause significant reductions in the pH of the stream, thereby resulting in a significant increase in the free nitrous acid concentration in this stream. The additional acid that is added may be an inorganic acid or an organic acid. HC1 may typically be used.
Recent laboratory studies by the present inventors have demonstrated that almost all the ammonium contained in a digestion liquor can be converted to nitrite at a pH of approximately 6.0. This readily gives rise to an FNA concentration of 2.0-4.0 ppm in the liquor leaving the nitritation reactor, which is already strongly biocidal. The nitrified liquor has a very low level of alkalinity and hence its pH can be easily reduced to 2-4 (or even lower if required) through moderate acid dosage (experimentally determined as 0.008 and 0.08 mol/L to reach pH 4 and 2, respectively), giving rise to FNA concentrations of hundreds to over a thousand ppm depending on the need. The maximum daily production of nitrite can be up to 10-20% of the total nitrogen loading to the wastewater treatment plant, representing an almost unlimited supply of FNA. The production is biological, with little additional costs in comparison to the current methods used for the treatment of this stream. FNA thus produced is "green", renewable and plentiful.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be susceptible to variations and modifications other than those specifically described. It will be appreciated that the present invention encompasses all such variations and modifications that fall within its spirit and scope.
Throughout this specification, the term "comprising" and its grammatical equivalents shall be taken to have an inclusive meaning unless the context of use indicates otherwise.

Claims

1. A method for producing nitrite comprising the steps of providing a liquid stream containing ammonia to a nitritation reactor, the reactor containing ammonium oxidising bacteria, and controlling the reactor to convert ammonia to nitrite at a yield in excess of 60%.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the reactor is controlled such that the yield of conversion of ammonium to nitrite is in excess of 70%, more suitably in excess of 80%, more suitably in excess of 90%, even more suitably within the range of 90% to 95%.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 further comprising removing a nitrite containing liquid from the reactor.
4. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the reactor is controlled by maintaining the pH above 4, or the pH is maintained at a level above 5.5, or the pH is maintained at a level above 6.0, or the pH is maintained at a level of 6.2 or above, or even a level of 6.5 or above.
5. A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein the pH is maintained to fall within the range of 6.0 to 6.5.
6. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the pH of the reactor is controlled by monitoring the pH of the liquid in the reactor and adding an alkaline material to the reactor if the pH drops below a predetermined level.
7. A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the predetermined level falls within the range of 6.0 to 6.5.
8. A method has claimed in any one of claims 5 to 7 wherein the pH of the reactor is controlled by adding a bicarbonate containing material to the reactor.
9. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the pH in the reactor is maintained to (a) ensure that there is adequate alkalinity to take part in the oxidation reaction of ammonium to nitrite and (b) obtain a level of free nitric acid in the reactor that allows ammonium oxidising bacteria to grow but inhibits the growth of nitrite oxidising bacteria.
10. A method for producing nitrite comprising the steps of providing a liquid stream containing ammonia to a nitritation reactor, the reactor containing ammonium oxidising bacteria and controlling pH of a liquid phase in the reactor to fall in a range of 4.0 to 7.5 to thereby convert ammonium to nitrite.
1 1 . A method for producing nitrite comprising the steps of providing a liquid stream containing ammonia to a nitritation reactor, the reactor containing ammonium oxidising bacteria and controlling pH of a liquid phase in the reactor so that the pH is maintained above a predetermined value, said predetermined value falling within the range of 4.0 to 7.5, to thereby convert ammonium to nitrite.
12. A method as claimed in claim 10 or claim 1 1 wherein the pH falls within the range of from 5 to 7.
13. A method as claimed in claim 12 wherein the pH falls within the range of from 6.0 to 6.5.
14. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the liquid stream containing ammonia is an anaerobic digestion liquor.
PCT/AU2011/000482 2010-04-28 2011-04-27 Production of nitrite WO2011134011A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2010901787 2010-04-28
AU2010901787A AU2010901787A0 (en) 2010-04-28 Production of Nitrite

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2011134011A1 true WO2011134011A1 (en) 2011-11-03

Family

ID=44860667

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/AU2011/000482 WO2011134011A1 (en) 2010-04-28 2011-04-27 Production of nitrite

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2011134011A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2726418A1 (en) * 2011-06-30 2014-05-07 The University of Queensland Pre-treatment of sludge
WO2017136561A1 (en) * 2016-02-02 2017-08-10 Microvi Biotech Inc. Aerobic nitritation of ammonia and integrated anammox processes
EP3255016A1 (en) * 2016-06-10 2017-12-13 FCC Aqualia, S.A. Method for starting up and controlling a biological process for ammonium removal at low ammonium concentrations and low temperature through the use of a two stage autotrophic nitrogen removal process
CN108726677A (en) * 2017-04-25 2018-11-02 湖南大学 A kind of new process promoting low-carbon-source wastewater treatment
WO2020237283A1 (en) * 2019-05-24 2020-12-03 The University Of Queensland Method for treating wastewater or sludge
CN113772807A (en) * 2021-10-20 2021-12-10 广西博世科环保科技股份有限公司 Method for domesticating and operating ammonia oxidation biofilm reactor
IT202100002915A1 (en) * 2021-02-10 2022-08-10 Univ Degli Studi Di Verona PROCESS AND RELATED PLANT FOR THE REMOVAL AND RECOVERY OF AMMONIA NITROGEN FROM WASTE CONTAINING NITROGEN

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003024983A (en) * 2001-07-17 2003-01-28 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Nitrification treatment method
JP2003326297A (en) * 2002-05-09 2003-11-18 Hitachi Plant Eng & Constr Co Ltd Nitrification method for waste water
JP2006088057A (en) * 2004-09-24 2006-04-06 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method for treating ammonia-containing water
WO2009046415A1 (en) * 2007-10-04 2009-04-09 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Systems and methods for achieving partial nitrification in a biological nitrogen removal reactor
ES2334321A1 (en) * 2009-06-11 2010-03-08 Universitat Autonoma De Barcelona Procedure for partial nitrification in continuous waste water and corresponding installation. (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003024983A (en) * 2001-07-17 2003-01-28 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Nitrification treatment method
JP2003326297A (en) * 2002-05-09 2003-11-18 Hitachi Plant Eng & Constr Co Ltd Nitrification method for waste water
JP2006088057A (en) * 2004-09-24 2006-04-06 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method for treating ammonia-containing water
WO2009046415A1 (en) * 2007-10-04 2009-04-09 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Systems and methods for achieving partial nitrification in a biological nitrogen removal reactor
ES2334321A1 (en) * 2009-06-11 2010-03-08 Universitat Autonoma De Barcelona Procedure for partial nitrification in continuous waste water and corresponding installation. (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2726418A4 (en) * 2011-06-30 2015-02-25 Univ Queensland Pre-treatment of sludge
US9242883B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2016-01-26 The University Of Queensland Pre-treatment of sludge
EP2726418A1 (en) * 2011-06-30 2014-05-07 The University of Queensland Pre-treatment of sludge
US10584047B2 (en) * 2016-02-02 2020-03-10 Microvi Biotech, Inc. Aerobic nitritation of ammonia and integrated anammox processes
WO2017136561A1 (en) * 2016-02-02 2017-08-10 Microvi Biotech Inc. Aerobic nitritation of ammonia and integrated anammox processes
GB2562965B (en) * 2016-02-02 2021-09-29 Microvi Biotech Inc Aerobic nitritation of ammonia and integrated anammox processes
GB2562965A (en) * 2016-02-02 2018-11-28 Microvi Biotech Inc Aerobic nitritation of ammonia and integrated anammox processes
US20190039926A1 (en) * 2016-02-02 2019-02-07 Microvi Biotech Inc. Aerobic nitritation of ammonia and integrated anammox processes
EP3255016A1 (en) * 2016-06-10 2017-12-13 FCC Aqualia, S.A. Method for starting up and controlling a biological process for ammonium removal at low ammonium concentrations and low temperature through the use of a two stage autotrophic nitrogen removal process
CN108726677A (en) * 2017-04-25 2018-11-02 湖南大学 A kind of new process promoting low-carbon-source wastewater treatment
WO2020237283A1 (en) * 2019-05-24 2020-12-03 The University Of Queensland Method for treating wastewater or sludge
CN113767073A (en) * 2019-05-24 2021-12-07 昆士兰大学 Method for treating waste water or sludge
IT202100002915A1 (en) * 2021-02-10 2022-08-10 Univ Degli Studi Di Verona PROCESS AND RELATED PLANT FOR THE REMOVAL AND RECOVERY OF AMMONIA NITROGEN FROM WASTE CONTAINING NITROGEN
EP4043409A1 (en) * 2021-02-10 2022-08-17 Università Degli Studi Di Verona Process and corresponding plant for the removal and recovery of ammonical nitrogen from nitrogen-containing wastewater
CN113772807A (en) * 2021-10-20 2021-12-10 广西博世科环保科技股份有限公司 Method for domesticating and operating ammonia oxidation biofilm reactor
CN113772807B (en) * 2021-10-20 2023-03-14 广西博世科环保科技股份有限公司 Method for domesticating and operating ammonia oxidation biofilm reactor

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ahn et al. ANAMMOX and partial denitritation in anaerobic nitrogen removal from piggery waste
RU2640767C2 (en) Method and device for removing nitrogen at wastewater treatment
EP3255016A1 (en) Method for starting up and controlling a biological process for ammonium removal at low ammonium concentrations and low temperature through the use of a two stage autotrophic nitrogen removal process
JP2016512169A5 (en)
WO2011134011A1 (en) Production of nitrite
US20140360933A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for nitrogen removal from wastewater
AU2014236539A1 (en) Method and apparatus for maximizing nitrogen removal from wastewater
WO2014133997A2 (en) Process for treating municiple wastewater employing two sequencing biofilm batch reactors
Udert et al. Effect of heterotrophic growth on nitritation/anammox in a single sequencing batch reactor
US20160207807A1 (en) Wastewater treatment system
US7404897B2 (en) Method for nitrogen removal and treatment of digester reject water in wastewater using bioaugmentation
Dobbeleers et al. Performance of aerobic nitrite granules treating an anaerobic pre-treated wastewater originating from the potato industry
WO2006129132A1 (en) Biological nitrogen removal from wastewater in a sbr reactor without nitrate production
Marcelino et al. A two-sludge system for simultaneous biological C, N and P removal via the nitrite pathway
Ma et al. Achieving nitritation and phosphorus removal in a continuous-flow anaerobic/oxic reactor through bio-augmentation
Erşan et al. The effects of aerobic/anoxic period sequence on aerobic granulation and COD/N treatment efficiency
CN111406036A (en) Method for treating nitrogen in wastewater by nitrosation organisms
Zafarzadeh et al. Performance of moving bed biofilm reactors for biological nitrogen compounds removal from wastewater by partial nitrification-denitrification process
Li et al. Advanced nitrogen and phosphorus removal by the symbiosis of PAOs, DPAOs and DGAOs in a pilot-scale A2O/A+ MBR process with a low C/N ratio of influent
Bernat et al. The treatment of anaerobic digester supernatant by combined partial ammonium oxidation and denitrification
Udert et al. Biological nitrogen conversion processes
Gee et al. Nitrite accumulation followed by denitrification using sequencing batch reactor
JP5055670B2 (en) Denitrification method and denitrification apparatus
EP1630139A1 (en) Process for the biological denitrification of ammonium containing wastewater
Miao et al. The effect of oxygen supply on nitrogen removal via nitrite using stored substrate (PHB) as the electron donor in SBRs

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 11774192

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 11774192

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1