WO2011063432A2 - Pre-authorization transaction system - Google Patents

Pre-authorization transaction system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2011063432A2
WO2011063432A2 PCT/ZA2010/000073 ZA2010000073W WO2011063432A2 WO 2011063432 A2 WO2011063432 A2 WO 2011063432A2 ZA 2010000073 W ZA2010000073 W ZA 2010000073W WO 2011063432 A2 WO2011063432 A2 WO 2011063432A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
authorization system
card transactions
transactions according
transaction
information
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/ZA2010/000073
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2011063432A3 (en
Inventor
Selvanathan Narainsamy
Grant Paul Weideman
Original Assignee
Radio Surveillance Security Services Sa (Pty) Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Radio Surveillance Security Services Sa (Pty) Ltd filed Critical Radio Surveillance Security Services Sa (Pty) Ltd
Publication of WO2011063432A2 publication Critical patent/WO2011063432A2/en
Publication of WO2011063432A3 publication Critical patent/WO2011063432A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07FCOIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS
    • G07F19/00Complete banking systems; Coded card-freed arrangements adapted for dispensing or receiving monies or the like and posting such transactions to existing accounts, e.g. automatic teller machines
    • G07F19/20Automatic teller machines [ATMs]
    • G07F19/203Dispensing operations within ATMs
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q20/00Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
    • G06Q20/22Payment schemes or models
    • G06Q20/28Pre-payment schemes, e.g. "pay before"
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q20/00Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
    • G06Q20/30Payment architectures, schemes or protocols characterised by the use of specific devices or networks
    • G06Q20/32Payment architectures, schemes or protocols characterised by the use of specific devices or networks using wireless devices
    • G06Q20/322Aspects of commerce using mobile devices [M-devices]
    • G06Q20/3223Realising banking transactions through M-devices
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q20/00Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
    • G06Q20/30Payment architectures, schemes or protocols characterised by the use of specific devices or networks
    • G06Q20/32Payment architectures, schemes or protocols characterised by the use of specific devices or networks using wireless devices
    • G06Q20/325Payment architectures, schemes or protocols characterised by the use of specific devices or networks using wireless devices using wireless networks
    • G06Q20/3255Payment architectures, schemes or protocols characterised by the use of specific devices or networks using wireless devices using wireless networks using mobile network messaging services for payment, e.g. SMS
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q20/00Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
    • G06Q20/38Payment protocols; Details thereof
    • G06Q20/40Authorisation, e.g. identification of payer or payee, verification of customer or shop credentials; Review and approval of payers, e.g. check credit lines or negative lists

Definitions

  • This invention relates to pre-authorization of card transactions by means of single or multiple transaction signing events.
  • a transaction card includes a credit, debit or any other card adapted to receive value which can be deducted by use of a normal card transaction terminal.
  • Transactions of this nature will further be understood to include remote purchasing with a card such as tele-sales or online sales, and also automated teller machine (ATM) cash withdrawals.
  • ATM automated teller machine
  • a seed can be defined as one or more parameter/s included in a encryption string which is used to add unique characteristics to the encryption algorithm, thus when decryption of the encrypted string takes place, the seeds are retrieved along with further information.
  • This type of fraud can be committed in a number of ways, the simplest being to use a card to make a transaction without being authorized to do so. This may be accomplished with a stolen card to make a telephone or online purchase.
  • Another flaw in this method is that it is of no use during remote card purchases - which accounts for most card related fraud.
  • This invention describes the use of separate, parallel communication channels to authorize and authenticate transactions.
  • a user receives a text message on a registered mobile telephone before a transaction is authorized by the financial institution. If the transaction is not authorized it will simply fail, whereas if the transactions is desired the user will return a text message to authorize the transaction.
  • the user authorizes the transaction be returning a unique code or PIN (personal identification number).
  • PIN personal identification number
  • this system Although extremely effective, this system also has a number of disadvantages including the fact that the system makes performing a transaction with a card take a longer time than usual. This is due to the fact that a user needs to receive and transmit a text message during the authentication and/or authorization of a transaction.
  • a further disadvantage of the current credit card system is often encountered when a user travels internationally.
  • the client Before leaving the country in which the credit card was issued, the client needs to advise the bank of their itinerary, usually by informing a bank employee verbally that one will not be home for a period of time. This is not a desirably or safe option.
  • the bank then makes a note of one's itinerary on the relevant bank records. If the itinerary changes afterwards and one fails to inform the bank or one makes purchases that do not match the purchasing profile, the credit card is automatically blocked.
  • the telephone call to the bank also does not guard clients against possible fraud that could be perpetrated in the country which forms part of their itinerary.
  • a pre-authorization system for card transactions includes a mobile communication device, one or more servers including databases, the servers being in communication with one or more financial institutions connected with/linked to the card, the mobile communication device being adapted in use to transmit a message to a receiver in communication with the servers, the message containing a multi factor authentication code interpretable by the server in order to pre- authenticate a transaction up to a predetermined maximum value.
  • the message contains multiple information seeds encapsulated in the multifactor authentication code.
  • the multifactor authentication code may include information seeds relating to the value of the proposed transaction. Other factors which may be included as seeds in the code are the transaction date, time, expiration time of code, information regarding the mobile communication device, the user account, country in which transaction is taking place, transaction comments and the like.
  • the code is generated and transmitted in the form of an alpha numerical code.
  • the code is received and interpreted by the authentication server which will then allow a transaction for any value lower than the selected maximum value, provided there are sufficient funds in the account linked to the card.
  • the server is adapted to transmit a message to the originating mobile communication device and/or a vendor containing information in which the pre-authorization, and possibly information regarding the available funds, is communicated.
  • the system may include a function to cancel an authorization, for instance by sending another message to the server informing it of such cancelation.
  • the cancellation is also a multifactor authentication code to prevent tampering.
  • the system may also be adapted to allow a predetermined time window in which the transaction needs to be completed failing which the authorization is cancelled automatically.
  • the system is simplified for use by illiterate persons.
  • the mobile phone may include an icon for instance an image of an ATM. The user selects this icon which causes a message to be transmitted as described above to pre-authorise the proposed withdrawal of cash from the ATM.
  • This form may also have the option of pre-approval without specifying the intended value in an effort to make it more user friendly.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a pre-authorisation system according to the invention
  • Figure 2 is a schematic representation of an alternative form of the invention.
  • a user 10 who wishes to make a purchase using a card 12 either at a retail outlet 14 or for an online purchase 16 accesses an application 18 on a mobile telephone 20.
  • the application provides the user with a number of preselected maximum upper values for transactions, for instance:
  • the user selects one of these options which causes a code 22 to be generated and transmitted to a server 24 which contains a database.
  • the server is connected to the financial institution 26 where the user account which is linked to the card is held.
  • the option which the user selects authorises any amount up to that selected maximum upper value, therefore any transaction for a value lower than the selected option will be authorised.
  • the code is a multifactor authentication code containing information regarding the time, date, originating phone, selected maximum value and the like.
  • the server is adapted to interpret this information and, provided that the funds are available for the transaction, to allow the transaction as authorised by the user/account holder.
  • a message 30 may be transmitted from the financial institution to the vendor to this effect.
  • a further message 31 may be transmitted to the mobile phone to confirm the pre- authentication.
  • the application may further include a cancelation option 32 which a user may select at any time to cancel a pre-authorised transaction.
  • This cancellation message may follow the same route as an authorization.
  • a user 40 who wishes to use a card 42 to withdraw cash from an ATM 44 is provided with an icon 46 on his mobile telephone 48.
  • Selecting this icon causes a multifactor authentication code 50 to be generated and transmitted 52 to a server 54 located at the financial institution 56 where the account connected to the card is held.
  • a value is not selected so the user effectively authorises a withdrawal without specifying an intended value. It may however be possible to provide the user with a list of options to select a value as in Figure 1 above, or even to allow a user to enter his own desired value which will then be factored into the code and interpreted by the server.
  • the server then transmits a signal 60 to the ATM to allow the proposed withdrawal.
  • the pre-authorization may also be communicated 62 to the mobile device.
  • this form includes a cancellation function.
  • this form may be an icon 64 to indicate a wish to cancel a pre-authorization for an ATM withdrawal.
  • the system may be adapted to automatically cancel a pre-authorization after a predetermined time has elapsed without the transaction realising.

Abstract

A pre-authorisation system for card transactions is provided. The system includes a mobile communication device and one or more servers including databases which are in communication with one or more financial institutions linked to the card in question. The mobile communication device is adapted to transmit a message containing a multi factor authentication code to a receiver in communication with the server. The code is interpretable by the server in order to pre-authenticate a transaction up to a pre-determined maximum value.

Description

PRE- A UTHORIZA TION TRANSACTION SYSTEM
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to pre-authorization of card transactions by means of single or multiple transaction signing events.
For purposes of this patent specification a transaction card includes a credit, debit or any other card adapted to receive value which can be deducted by use of a normal card transaction terminal.
Transactions of this nature will further be understood to include remote purchasing with a card such as tele-sales or online sales, and also automated teller machine (ATM) cash withdrawals.
A seed can be defined as one or more parameter/s included in a encryption string which is used to add unique characteristics to the encryption algorithm, thus when decryption of the encrypted string takes place, the seeds are retrieved along with further information.
BACKGROUND ART
Card related transaction fraud has been a major issue for some time.
This type of fraud can be committed in a number of ways, the simplest being to use a card to make a transaction without being authorized to do so. This may be accomplished with a stolen card to make a telephone or online purchase.
In an effort to combat this type of fraud a number of inventions have been proposed and implemented to a limited degree. One of the most successful of these was to integrate an electronic chip into the card - upon use of the card the user is required to enter an authorization code (EMV smart cards). Although this method is successful to help prevent the physical use of stolen cards, the method still has a number of disadvantages and flaws which are exploited by criminals. These include the fact that the code may be electronically intercepted during authorized use after which a copy or 'clone' of the card is made and used with the intercepted code.
Another flaw in this method is that it is of no use during remote card purchases - which accounts for most card related fraud.
In an effort to overcome these disadvantages the applicant has devices a pre- authentication method as described in WO2005/001670 entitled Transaction Verification System (Narainsamy er a/.).
This invention describes the use of separate, parallel communication channels to authorize and authenticate transactions. In its simplest form a user receives a text message on a registered mobile telephone before a transaction is authorized by the financial institution. If the transaction is not authorized it will simply fail, whereas if the transactions is desired the user will return a text message to authorize the transaction.
In a refinement of this invention the user authorizes the transaction be returning a unique code or PIN (personal identification number).
Although extremely effective, this system also has a number of disadvantages including the fact that the system makes performing a transaction with a card take a longer time than usual. This is due to the fact that a user needs to receive and transmit a text message during the authentication and/or authorization of a transaction.
Another issue with this system is that it still relies on a financial institution to authorize a transaction and not on the individual himself. This leaves scope for misuse by would-be fraudsters.
Despite the fact that one cannot entirely remove the financial institution from this type of transaction since an enquiry into available funds will always be necessary before a transaction is approved, it is desirable to provide the user with as much authority as possible to reject or approve transactions.
In an effort to make this system more practical, a pre-authorization was envisioned in which the user contacts his financial institution to inform them of a transaction before it is made. The obvious disadvantage of such a system is that a user is not always certain of the exact amount of his proposed transaction.
A further disadvantage of the current credit card system is often encountered when a user travels internationally. Before leaving the country in which the credit card was issued, the client needs to advise the bank of their itinerary, usually by informing a bank employee verbally that one will not be home for a period of time. This is not a desirably or safe option. The bank then makes a note of one's itinerary on the relevant bank records. If the itinerary changes afterwards and one fails to inform the bank or one makes purchases that do not match the purchasing profile, the credit card is automatically blocked. The telephone call to the bank also does not guard clients against possible fraud that could be perpetrated in the country which forms part of their itinerary.
It is an object of this invention to provide an alternative to the above systems which does not have the abovementioned disadvantages and which will place the onus to pre-authorise a transaction with the user and not with the financial institution, thus placing the client in control.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
According to the invention a pre-authorization system for card transactions includes a mobile communication device, one or more servers including databases, the servers being in communication with one or more financial institutions connected with/linked to the card, the mobile communication device being adapted in use to transmit a message to a receiver in communication with the servers, the message containing a multi factor authentication code interpretable by the server in order to pre- authenticate a transaction up to a predetermined maximum value. In the preferred form the message contains multiple information seeds encapsulated in the multifactor authentication code.
The multifactor authentication code may include information seeds relating to the value of the proposed transaction. Other factors which may be included as seeds in the code are the transaction date, time, expiration time of code, information regarding the mobile communication device, the user account, country in which transaction is taking place, transaction comments and the like.
In use software containing the code or capable of generating the code is saved on the mobile device, usually a mobile telephone. The user selects a predetermined maximum value of a proposed transaction from a list of options and transmits this option to the authentication server.
The code is generated and transmitted in the form of an alpha numerical code. The code is received and interpreted by the authentication server which will then allow a transaction for any value lower than the selected maximum value, provided there are sufficient funds in the account linked to the card.
In the preferred form of the invention the server is adapted to transmit a message to the originating mobile communication device and/or a vendor containing information in which the pre-authorization, and possibly information regarding the available funds, is communicated.
The system may include a function to cancel an authorization, for instance by sending another message to the server informing it of such cancelation. In the preferred form the cancellation is also a multifactor authentication code to prevent tampering.
The system may also be adapted to allow a predetermined time window in which the transaction needs to be completed failing which the authorization is cancelled automatically.
In a refinement of the invention, the system is simplified for use by illiterate persons. In this form the mobile phone may include an icon for instance an image of an ATM. The user selects this icon which causes a message to be transmitted as described above to pre-authorise the proposed withdrawal of cash from the ATM.
This form may also have the option of pre-approval without specifying the intended value in an effort to make it more user friendly.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
An embodiment of the invention is described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a pre-authorisation system according to the invention;
and
Figure 2 is a schematic representation of an alternative form of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In the drawing a user 10 who wishes to make a purchase using a card 12 either at a retail outlet 14 or for an online purchase 16 accesses an application 18 on a mobile telephone 20.
The application provides the user with a number of preselected maximum upper values for transactions, for instance:
1. 100
2. 200
3. 300
4. 400
5. 500
6. 600
7. 700
8. 800
9. 900 10. 1000
11. 5000
12. 10 000
13. 30 000
14. 50 000
15. 100 000
This is merely an indication and the preferred amounts can be amended according to the financial institution or the customer's specifications.
A transaction of 100 000 will be highly unusual.
The user selects one of these options which causes a code 22 to be generated and transmitted to a server 24 which contains a database. The server is connected to the financial institution 26 where the user account which is linked to the card is held. The option which the user selects authorises any amount up to that selected maximum upper value, therefore any transaction for a value lower than the selected option will be authorised.
The code is a multifactor authentication code containing information regarding the time, date, originating phone, selected maximum value and the like.
The server is adapted to interpret this information and, provided that the funds are available for the transaction, to allow the transaction as authorised by the user/account holder.
A message 30 may be transmitted from the financial institution to the vendor to this effect. A further message 31 may be transmitted to the mobile phone to confirm the pre- authentication.
The application may further include a cancelation option 32 which a user may select at any time to cancel a pre-authorised transaction. This cancellation message may follow the same route as an authorization. In another form of the invention a user 40 who wishes to use a card 42 to withdraw cash from an ATM 44 is provided with an icon 46 on his mobile telephone 48.
Selecting this icon causes a multifactor authentication code 50 to be generated and transmitted 52 to a server 54 located at the financial institution 56 where the account connected to the card is held.
In this form a value is not selected so the user effectively authorises a withdrawal without specifying an intended value. It may however be possible to provide the user with a list of options to select a value as in Figure 1 above, or even to allow a user to enter his own desired value which will then be factored into the code and interpreted by the server.
The server then transmits a signal 60 to the ATM to allow the proposed withdrawal. The pre-authorization may also be communicated 62 to the mobile device.
As with the above example this form includes a cancellation function. In this form it may be an icon 64 to indicate a wish to cancel a pre-authorization for an ATM withdrawal.
In both form the system may be adapted to automatically cancel a pre-authorization after a predetermined time has elapsed without the transaction realising.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A pre-authorization system for card transactions includes a mobile communication device, one or more servers including databases, the servers being in communication with one or more financial institutions connected with/linked to the card, the mobile communication device being adapted in use to transmit a message to a receiver in communication with the servers, characterised in that the message contains a multi factor authentication code interpretable by the server in order to pre-authenticate a transaction up to a predetermined maximum value.
2. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 1 characterised in that the message contains multiple information seeds encapsulated in the multifactor authentication code.
3. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 2 characterised in that the information sees relates to the value of the proposed transaction.
4. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 2 characterised in that the information such relate to the transaction date.
5. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 2 characterised in that the information such relate to the transaction time.
6. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 2 characterised in that the information such relate to the expiration time of the authentication code.
7. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 2 characterised in that the information such relate to the mobile communication.
8. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 2 characterised in that the information such relate to the user's bank account.
9. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 2 characterised in that the information such relate to the country in which the transaction is taking place.
10. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 2 characterised in that the information such relate to the transaction comments.
11. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 1 characterised in that the authentication code is contained within or generated by software saved on the mobile device.
12. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 1 1 characterised in that the code is generated in response to selection by a user of a predetermined maximum value of a proposed transaction from a list of option, the selected option being transmitted to the authentication server in the form of an alpha- numerical code, the code being received and interpreted by the authentication server which will permit a transaction for any value lower than the selected maximum value, provided that there are sufficient funds in the account limited to the card.
13. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 12 characterised in that the server is adapted to transmit a message to the originating mobile communication device and/or a vendor, the message containing information communicating the pre-authorisation.
14. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 13 characterised in that the message further contains information regarding available funds.
15. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 1 characterised in that a predetermined time window is provided within which the transaction must be completed failing which the authorisation is cancelled automatically.
16. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 1 characterised in that a function is provided for cancelling an authorisation.
17. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 16 characterised in that the cancellation takes place by means of sending of a second message to the server informing it of the cancellation, the message also containing a multifactor authentication code.
18. A pre-authorization system for card transactions according to claim 1 characterised in that the mobile communication device includes one or more icons representing possible transactions.
PCT/ZA2010/000073 2009-11-23 2010-11-23 Pre-authorization transaction system WO2011063432A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ZA200908235 2009-11-23
ZA2009/08235 2009-11-23

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2011063432A2 true WO2011063432A2 (en) 2011-05-26
WO2011063432A3 WO2011063432A3 (en) 2013-06-06

Family

ID=44060426

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/ZA2010/000073 WO2011063432A2 (en) 2009-11-23 2010-11-23 Pre-authorization transaction system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2011063432A2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018111425A1 (en) * 2016-12-12 2018-06-21 Citibank, N.A. Systems and methods for pre-staging atm transactions
US10373248B1 (en) 2016-12-16 2019-08-06 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Context aware predictive activity evaluation
US20210150511A1 (en) * 2019-11-14 2021-05-20 Mastercard International Incorporated Electronic methods and systems for faster checkout in an e-commerce transaction
US11144927B1 (en) 2017-03-27 2021-10-12 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Intelligent authorization system

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001065500A1 (en) * 2000-03-01 2001-09-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft System and method for confirming a credit card payment transaction via a mobile radio telephone network
US20050184145A1 (en) * 2004-02-05 2005-08-25 Simon Law Secure wireless authorization system
US20070203850A1 (en) * 2006-02-15 2007-08-30 Sapphire Mobile Systems, Inc. Multifactor authentication system

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001065500A1 (en) * 2000-03-01 2001-09-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft System and method for confirming a credit card payment transaction via a mobile radio telephone network
US20050184145A1 (en) * 2004-02-05 2005-08-25 Simon Law Secure wireless authorization system
US20070203850A1 (en) * 2006-02-15 2007-08-30 Sapphire Mobile Systems, Inc. Multifactor authentication system

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018111425A1 (en) * 2016-12-12 2018-06-21 Citibank, N.A. Systems and methods for pre-staging atm transactions
US11348077B2 (en) 2016-12-12 2022-05-31 Citibank, N.A. Systems and methods for pre-staging ATM transactions
US10373248B1 (en) 2016-12-16 2019-08-06 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Context aware predictive activity evaluation
US11087396B1 (en) 2016-12-16 2021-08-10 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Context aware predictive activity evaluation
US11144927B1 (en) 2017-03-27 2021-10-12 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Intelligent authorization system
US20210150511A1 (en) * 2019-11-14 2021-05-20 Mastercard International Incorporated Electronic methods and systems for faster checkout in an e-commerce transaction
US11880783B2 (en) * 2019-11-14 2024-01-23 Mastercard International Incorporated Electronic methods and systems for faster checkout in an e-commerce transaction

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2011063432A3 (en) 2013-06-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR102416954B1 (en) Methods for prepaid, debit and credit card security code generation systems
US10037516B2 (en) Secure transactions using a point of sale device
US8615468B2 (en) System and method for generating a dynamic card value
US20130346223A1 (en) Processing point-of-sale transactions using a mobile card and mobile phone
US10210716B2 (en) Communications system facilitating cash transfer
US20160239833A1 (en) Methods and systems for processing an electronic payment
US11308481B1 (en) Cardless ATM authentication
US11948135B2 (en) Casino cash system, apparatus and method utilizing integrated circuit cards
US11900345B2 (en) Financial terminal that automatically reconfigures into different financial processing terminal types
WO2014108916A1 (en) A computer implemented system and method for cashless and cardless transactions
EP3761248A1 (en) Transaction device management
WO2011063432A2 (en) Pre-authorization transaction system
CA2640357A1 (en) A system for managing and facilitating financial transactions locally or remotely made
AU2013101298A4 (en) Payment authorisation method and system
AU2015100350A4 (en) Payment authorisation method and system
WO2011058376A1 (en) Payment authentication system and processing method
GB2522235A (en) Cashless payment system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10832389

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 10832389

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 10832389

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

32PN Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established

Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 112(1) EPC (EPO FORM 1205A DATED 31/01/2013)

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 10832389

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2