WO2011015880A2

WO2011015880A2 - Rotor drive assembly for a rotorcraft

Info

Publication number: WO2011015880A2
Application number: PCT/GB2010/051307
Authority: WO
Inventors: Christopher Patrick Jarvis; Guy Jonathan James Rackham
Original assignee: Christopher Patrick Jarvis; Guy Jonathan James Rackham
Priority date: 2009-08-07
Filing date: 2010-08-06
Publication date: 2011-02-10
Also published as: WO2011015880A3; GB0913835D0; GB2472452A

Abstract

A rotor assembly (5) for a rotorcraft, such as a helicopter, comprises a plurality of rotors (7) rotatable about a hub (17), and a drive means arranged to drive the rotors (7) at a radial distance away from the hub (17).Each rotor (7) may be mounted on the hub (17) via a mounting (29) and the drive means may be arranged to drive the rotors (7) at a location radially outward of the mounting (29). The mounting may be slideably moveable around the circumference of the hub (17).

Description

Rotor drive assembly for a rotorcraft

Technical Field The present invention relates to rotorcraft, and more particularly to rotor assemblies for rotorcraft.

Background of the Invention It is desirable to be able to rapidly accelerate the rotors in a rotor assembly as this may enable a quick takeoff. A rapid acceleration of the rotors may also reduce the need for the rotors to be rotated up to an idling speed long before take off (for example when crew and/or passengers are embarking), thereby improving safety. It can also be

desirable to be able to quickly decelerate the rotors in a rotor assembly, for example so that the rotors can be

stationary during disembarkation of the crew/passengers.

Rotor assemblies on known rotorcraft typically comprise a rotating hub having a plurality of rotors fixed thereto. The rotor assemblies tend to include a complex hinge mechanism for varying the pitch of rotors as the hub rotates. There is a limit to how quickly these known rotor assemblies can change their rotational speed. In particular, the maximum torque such arrangements can withstand tends to be limited by the need to keep the weight and complexity of the hinge mechanism within certain practical limits.

Summary of the Invention

According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a rotor assembly for a rotorcraft, the assembly comprising a plurality of rotors rotatable about a hub, and a drive means, the drive means being arranged to drive the rotors at a radial distance away from the hub. Driving the rotors around a hub at a radial distance from that hub has been found to give rise to a number of benefits. For example, the assembly may be able to withstand a greater torque than some known assemblies and may therefore be operable to more quickly accelerate or decelerate the rotor blades. Rapid acceleration of the rotors may also be used in combination with pitch variation of the rotors to quickly manoeuvre the rotorcraft.

Known rotorcraft rotor assemblies tend to comprise a plurality of rotors that are fixedly mounted to the

circumference of a rotatable hub. In contrast, according to the first aspect of the invention, the assembly comprises a plurality of rotors rotatable about a hub. Preferably the hub is fixed, for example it is fixedly mounted on the rotorcraft.

The assembly preferably comprises a clutch for engaging and disengaging rotation of the drive means from a power source for powering the drive means (for example an engine) . The power source for driving the drive means may therefore be switched on (for example to warm up and/or allow safety checks to be performed) without rotating the rotors. This enables certain advantages, for example, passengers or crew can be loaded whilst the engine is running without being subjected to the noise and vibration of the rotating blades. In

embodiments of the invention in which the rotor assembly is arranged to withstand relatively high torque, the power source may be able to be run to a relatively fast operating speed before engaging with the drive means, thereby rapidly

accelerating the rotors.

Each rotor may be mounted on the hub via a mounting. The drive means is preferably arranged to drive the rotors at a location radially outward of the mounting. The mounting may be slideably moveable around the circumference of the hub. The hub may comprise a track in which the mounting is

slideably received. The assembly may be arranged such that the mountings of adjacent rotors may, at least partially, overlap around the circumference of the hub. For example, the hub may comprise two circumferential tracks; an outer track and an inner track located within the outer track. Adjacent mountings may be received in inner and out tracks

respectively. The mountings may be arranged such that the mounting on the inner track is receivable, at least partially, within the mounting on the outer track. The adjacent

mountings are preferably differently configured.

The drive means is preferably arranged to drive the rotors by applying a drive force at the radial distance from the hub. The drive means are preferably arranged to drive the rotor at a radial distance from the surface of the hub. The drive means are preferably arranged to drive the rotor at at least 5%, and more preferably 10%, and yet more preferably 15% of the length of the rotor. The drive means may be arranged to drive the rotor at at least 0.2m, and more preferably at least 0.5m along the length of the rotor.

During forward motion of a conventional rotorcraft there is a difference between the relative air speed of an advancing rotor and a retreating rotor. As the lift generated by a rotor is dependent on the speed the rotor passes through the air, this imbalance in relative air speed tends to shift the centre of lift to one side of the rotorcraft. To maintain a balanced lift profile across the rotorcraft, the higher lift generated by the faster-moving advancing rotor is typically offset by decreasing its pitch (i.e. its angle of attack) relative to the retreating rotor. Nevertheless, the maximum forward speed of a rotorcraft may still be limited because the retreating blade may approach stall and/or the tip region of the advancing blade may approach a supersonic speed. The pitch control on known rotor assemblies may also enable the rotorcraft to be manoeuvred by moving the centre of lift away from the axis of rotation. Known pitch control mechanisms can give rise to a number of disadvantages. For example: the mechanisms tend to be extremely complex and typically comprise various hinges and levers which have high maintenance costs and onerous safety requirements; excessive noise and vibration can occur because the pitch of the blade is altered, at relatively high frequency, during revolution of the rotors; and/or the rotor hub must be extremely strong as it is subjected to the intertial loads of the rotors and the loads associated with pitching the rotors, and it also transmits the lift force from the blades to the rotorcraft fuselage.

The assembly of the present invention may be operable to vary the angular speed of the rotors about the hub, relative to one another. Varying the relative angular speed of the rotors around the hub changes the lift distribution around the hub and shifts the centre of lift towards the faster moving blades. The lift imbalance caused by the differing relative air speed of the advancing and retreating blades in forward flight, can therefore be offset. This may allow a higher maximum forward speed to be attained. Varying the relative angular speed of the rotors (and therefore the lift

distribution around the hub) may also be used to manoeuvre the rotorcraft .

When there is a difference in the relative angular speed of the rotors, the angular spacing between the rotors will vary accordingly. A change in lift may also be generated by this angular imbalance in the spacing of rotors around the hub. As the lift of the rotors is approximately proportional to the square of their speed, the increase in lift as a result of their speed increase tends to more than offset any decrease increase in lift caused by a reduced lifting surface (the rotors will tend to be further apart when travelling faster and closer together when travelling slower) .

The angular speed of the rotors around the hub is

preferably arranged to vary in a cyclic manner. The angular speed of the rotors may be arranged to vary in a sinusoidal manner. A sinusoidal variation has been found to facilitate a particularly smooth acceleration/deceleration of the rotors around the hub. The rotors may be independently controllable but are preferably all arranged to follow the same cyclic variation in angular speed around the hub. The cycle is preferably repeated once every revolution of the rotors around the hub .

The rotors are preferably arranged in substantially the same plane of rotation.

The drive means may be operable to drive each of the plurality of rotors at a different radial distance from the hub. Driving the rotors at different radial distances may facilitate a relatively simple arrangement for varying the angular speed of the rotors. For example, if the rotors are driven about different radii at the same tangential speed, the relative angular speed between the blades will be varied.

The drive means may comprise a rotatably driven drive ring, the rotors being coupled to the circumference of the drive ring. The drive ring is preferably circular. The drive ring may be in the form of a disc, but is preferably in the form of an annulus . The rotors are preferably coupled to the

circumference of the drive ring such that the circumferential spacing between the rotors around the circumference of the drive ring is fixed. It will be appreciated that due to the thickness of the rotors, there may be a small change in the circumferential spacing of the rotors if the angular spacing of the rotors changes during rotation of the drive ring. It will be appreciated however, that the circumferential spacing between at least part of each rotor (for example the central axis of the rotor that typically passes along the length of the shaft and through the centre of lift of the rotor) is fixed.

The rotor assembly is preferably arranged to be operable between a first, neutral lift, configuration in which the axis of rotation of the rotors is co-axial with the axis of the hub, and a second, offset lift, configuration in which the axis of rotation of the rotors is spaced apart from the axis of the hub. The axes of rotation may be parallel in both the first and second configurations.

The drive ring may be moveable, preferably laterally moveable, relative to the hub, such that the drive ring is operable to drive each of the plurality of rotors at a

different radial distance from the hub. The drive ring is preferably laterally moveable to move the axis of rotation of the drive ring from a configuration in which it is co-axial with the hub, to a configuration in which it is spaced apart from the axis of the hub. The assembly may comprise an actuator for moving the drive ring. The assembly may comprise a plurality of actuators (for example a pair of orthogonally positioned actuators) for moving the drive ring forward/back, left/right, or a combination of the two. The drive ring may be rotatable around a track. The track may be laterally moveable. It will be appreciated that a lateral movement may be any movement in any direction within the horizontal plane containing the drive ring (for example forward/aft,

left/right, or a combination thereof) . The movement is preferably transverse to the axis of the drive means.

The drive means may be coupled to a drive shaft via a belt arrangement. In embodiments in which the drive ring is rotatable around a track, the belt may be arranged to rotate the drive ring in the track.

The assembly may be arranged such that the tangential speed of the rotors at each radial distance is equal. For example, by having the rotors coupled to the circumference of the drive ring such that the circumferential spacing between the rotors around the circumference of the drive ring is fixed, the tangential speed of each rotor at the circumference of the drive ring, is equal. In an embodiment in which the rotors are being driven around the fixed hub at different radial

distances around the hub, the relative angular speed of the rotors will vary accordingly around the hub.

The rotors may be slideably moveable through the

circumference of the drive ring in a direction along the length of the rotor, such that lateral movement of the drive ring alters the angular spacing of the rotors. This

arrangement allows the driving force from the drive means to be applied at different radial distances along the rotor. The drive ring may comprise a plurality sleeves through which the rotors pass. The location of the sleeves on the circumference of the drive ring is preferably fixed, but the sleeves may be pivotably mounted to enable the angle of the sleeve to vary during rotation of the drive ring.

Some known rotor assemblies in which the rotors are fixed to a rotatable hub, and limited to having relatively few rotors due to the complexity of the hub mechanism.

Embodiments of the present invention may provide a simplified arrangement and therefore enable more rotors to be mounted on the rotor assembly. The assembly may comprise at least 4 rotors, and more preferably at least 6 rotors. The assembly may comprise at least 10, or even 12 rotors. The assembly may comprise up to 20 rotors. Having a relatively large number of rotors may reduce imbalances and/or vibrations that may arise in embodiments in which there is a shift in the relative spacing between the blades.

The more rotors, the higher the lift for a given rotational speed. Accordingly, to achieve a given lift with an assembly comprising a relatively large number of rotors, the rotational speed may be reduced. By running the rotor assembly at a lower speed the vibration and sound (which increase

logarithmically or in a squared relationship with speed) may be reduced. The impact of forward motion on the relative speed difference between the advancing and retreating rotors is proportionally more significant at lower rpm. Arrangements in which the relative angular speed of the rotors may be varied are therefore particularly advantageous when used in conjunction with rotor assemblies operating at low rpm.

Alternatively or additionally, other parameters of the rotors (such as the length of the rotors, their area or their lift co-efficient) may be changed to offset the increase in lift caused by a higher number of rotors.

Preferably the rotor assembly comprises load transferring assembly, located radially outward of the junction between the rotor and the hub, the load transferring assembly being

arranged to transfer at least some of the lifting force

generated by the rotors, to a location away from the hub. The load transferring assembly may therefore reduce certain loads on the hub. In embodiments of the invention comprising a housing, the lifting force is preferably transferred to the housing.

The variation of pitch of a rotor blade is achieved in many known helicopter configurations by the use of a swash-plate mechanism; a circular planar surface centered perpendicular to the main drive shaft that can be tilted and in some cases moved vertically with respect to the central drive shaft about which the rotor blades rotate. The pitch of each rotor blade is typically governed by the height of the surface of the swash plate at the corresponding position about the

circumference of the central drive shaft. A further aspect of the invention provides an alternative method to vary the rotor pitch. According to this further aspect of the invention there is provided a rotor assembly comprising a plurality of rotors and a pitch controller for varying the pitch of the rotors, wherein the pitch controller comprises a guide means and a linkage moveable along the guide means, the linkage being connected to the rotor such that the pitch of the rotor is variable in dependence on the separation between the rotor and the guide means. The pitch controller may be arranged on the rotor assembly according to the first, or any other, aspect of the invention. Each rotor may comprise a blade having a tip and a root, and a shaft extending from the root of the blade to the hub. The shaft may be coupled to the blade in a variety of ways; for example the blade may be fixedly coupled to the shaft, or the blade may be rotatable relative to, and for example about the longitudinal axis of, the shaft. The linkage may be connected to the blade of the rotor.

The pitch controller may comprise an actuator arranged to vary the separation between the rotor and guide means. The pitch controller may comprise a plurality of independently actuatable actuators arranged to vary the separation between the rotor and guide means. The actuators may, for example, be hydraulic actuators. The actuators may be arranged to vary the height of the guide means relative to the rotors.

Known swash-plate assemblies typically comprise a rigid, planar, plate that is tilted at an angle to the axis of rotation of the rotors. In an embodiment of the present invention, the guide means may be flexible such that the guide means may be deformed from a planar configuration to a non- planar configuration. By deforming the guide means to a non- planar configuration, the pitch controller may provide a greater variation in pitch during one revolution of the rotors. This is particularly of benefit in an arrangement in which the angular speed of the rotors can be varied, because it can be used in conjunction with the speed variation to control the lift distribution. Adjustments may be made that support complex variations of the pitch about the

circumference. This may facilitate more refined

maneuverability, counteract vibration and might improve or resolve other behaviors.

The guide means may comprise a ring member. The ring member may comprise a circumferential track along which the linkage is moveable. The linkage may be arranged in relation to the guide means such that both tensile and compressive loads in the linkage are reacted through the pitch controller, For example, the track may be in the form of a groove along the outer edge of the ring member and an end of the linkage may be received in the groove, the tensile and compressive loads being reacted against the upper and lower surfaces of the groove respectively.

The guide means may be located at substantially the same radial distance from the hub as the root of each rotor. The guide means may be located at a radial distance of at least 0.5m, and more preferably at least Im, from the centre of the hub. The guide means is located at a radial distance of at least 10% and more preferably at least 20% of the length of the rotor, from the centre of the hub. By moving the pitch control away from the hub, the loads on the hub may be

reduced. The loads generated by varying the pitch of the blade are preferably de-coupled completely from the hub. The mechanical complexity of the hub may be simplified thereby facilitating different configurations of the rotor assembly. The guide means may be fixed such that the linkage rotates with the rotors relative to the guide means. Having the guide means fixed and the linkage rotating in the guide means, may enable the pitch controller to be simplified. The guide means is preferably de-coupled from the hub. The guide means may be arranged to react loads through the actuators at a radial distance away from the hub.

The guide means may be located radially outward of the radial distance at which the drive means is arranged to drive the rotors.

As well as varying the pitch of the rotors, or

alternatively thereto, the rotor assembly may be arranged to vary the flap angle of the rotors. This provides another way of varying the lift distribution of the rotor assembly and therefore also facilitates better control and manoeuvrability using the rotor assembly. The assembly may comprise a flap controller, the flap controller comprising a second guide means and a second linkage moveable along the guide means, the linkage being connected to the rotor such that the flap angle of the rotor blade is variable in dependence on the separation between the rotor and the second guide means. The flap controller may comprise any of the features described above with reference to the pitch controller. It will be

appreciated that the presence of the second guide and the second linkage does not necessarily mean that the first guide and first linkage of the pitch control are essential. There may be embodiments of the invention in which there is no pitch controller, and only a flap controller. The flap angle of the blade may be varied by simply bending the rotor, but more preferably the rotor comprises a hinge about which the flap angle of the rotor blade may vary.

The rotor assembly preferably comprises both a pitch controller and a flap controller. In such an embodiment the pitch controller is preferably mounted on the flap controller. For example an actuator of the pitch controller may be mounted on the second guide means of the flap controller. Such an arrangement allows the pitch and flap controller to be stacked above one another and therefore provides a relatively compact arrangement. Mounting the pitch and flap controllers on one another may avoid the need to have the controllers on opposite sides of the plane of rotation of the rotors (which would require especially strong mountings both below and above the rotors) .

According to another aspect of the invention there is provided a rotor assembly comprising a plurality of rotors, each rotor comprising a blade for generating lift, the blade having a tip and a root, and a shaft extending from the root of the blade to a hub, wherein the length of the shaft is at least 10%, and more preferably 20%, of the length of the rotor, such that the innermost region of the rotor generates substantially no lift. The length of the shaft may be more than 25% of the length of the rotor. The shaft may be at least 0.5m and preferably at least Im long. The inner region of a rotor blade generates relatively little lift in

comparison to the outer regions of a rotor (which travel much faster) . Moving the rotor blade further from the hub has been found to produce a relatively small decrease in lift with the advantage that the downdraft close to the hub (which is typically in the region above the rotorcraft cabin) is

significantly reduced. This, in turn, has been found to reduce the noise and vibration caused by the rotor assembly.

The above-described rotor arrangement may be incorporated in the rotor assembly according to the first, or any other aspect of the invention.

The assembly may comprise a housing. The housing may have an upper cover portion extending over the shafts of the rotors, the housing being fixed such that the rotors rotate relative to the housing. The housing may be a disc structure located above the rotor shafts. The radius of the disc structure is preferably greater than or equal to the radius at which the shaft meets the root of the rotor blade. Thus, the housing preferably covers the shafts when view directly from above .

The housing may substantially enclose the shafts of the rotors. The housing preferably comprises a barrier. The rotors preferably pass through the barrier. The assembly is preferably arranged such that the barrier substantially isolates the inside of the housing from the environment outside the housing. Such an arrangement protects the complex moving parts inside the rotor assembly from the environment outside the assembly, thereby reducing the need for

maintenance and cleaning. The rotor assembly may comprise a means for maintaining a positive pressure inside the housing, relative to outside the housing.

According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided a rotor assembly comprising a plurality of rotors, a hub and a housing, each rotor comprising a blade for

generating lift, the blade having a tip and a root, and a shaft extending from the root of the blade to the hub, the housing substantially enclosing the shafts of the rotors and further comprising a barrier such that the inside of the housing is substantially isolated from the environment outside the housing. The barrier may comprise a plurality of plates, slideably mounted relative to one another. The housing is preferably on the rotor assembly as described herein with reference to any aspect of the invention.

According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a rotorcraft including the rotor assembly according to any aspect described herein. The rotorcraft is preferably a helicopter. The rotorcraft is preferably at least 10kg dry weight, more preferably at least 50kg dry weight, and yet more preferably considerably more than 50kg dry weight. The rotorcraft is preferably suitable for carrying at least 1 person, and more preferably at least 2 persons, and yet more preferably at least 4 persons. The rotorcraft may be suitable for carrying more than 10 persons.

According to yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of driving a rotor assembly, the method comprising the steps of rotating a plurality of rotors about a hub by applying a driving force at a radial distance away from the hub .

It will be appreciated that any features described with reference to one aspect of the invention may be equally applicable to another aspect of the invention. For example, features describe with reference to any aspect of the rotor assembly may be equally applicable to the method of the invention . Description of the Drawings

Various embodiments of the invention will now be

described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings of which:

Figure 1 is schematic side view of a helicopter according to a first embodiment of the invention;

Figure 2 is a schematic plan view of the helicopter of Figure 1 ;

Figure 3 is a plan view of the rotor assembly on the helicopter of the first embodiment of the invention;

Figure 4 is a section view through the line A-A in Figure 3; Figure 5 is a partial plan view of the rotor assembly of Figure 3,

Figures 6a and 6b are sectional view of the rotor

mounting trolleys in the rotor assembly of Figure 3;

Figure 7 is a schematic plan view of the rotor assembly of Figure 3 showing the drive mechanism for driving the drive ring;

Figure 8 is a plan view of the rotor assembly of Figure 3 with the drive ring laterally shifted to one side;

Figure 9 is a partial plan view of the drive ring in the rotor assembly of Figure 3;

Figure 10 is a schematic plan view of the rotor assembly of Figure showing the variable spacing of the rotors;

Figure 11 is a sectional view of part of a rotor assembly according to a second embodiment of the invention;

Figure 12 is a perspective view of the rotor assembly of Figure 11;

Figure 13 is a sectional view of part of a rotor assembly according to a third embodiment of the invention;

Figure 14 is a view of part of the rotor assembly of Figure 13; and

Figures 15a and 15b are views of the part of the rotor assembly in two different configurations. Detailed Description

According to a first embodiment of the invention, a helicopter 1 comprises a fuselage 3 and a rotor assembly 5 mounted on the top of the fuselage 3. The rotor assembly carries twelve rotors 7, each rotor comprising a 3m long blade 9 having an aerofoil section (the full length of only the forward and aft rotors is shown in Figure 2, only the inner region of the other rotors being shown) . The blade 9 extends from a root 11 to a tip 13. For the sake of clarity, each rotor blade 9 is shown having a uniform chord and zero

twist/washout. In practice, the chord and twist of the blade 9 vary along the length of the blade as is well known in the art. A Im long shaft 15, aligned with the centre of lift of the blade 9, extends from the root 11 of the blade to a hub 17. The rotor assembly 5 comprises a disc-shaped cover portion 19 which is fixedly attached to the top of the hub 17. The cover portion extends outwardly to the root 11 of the rotor blades 7. A dome-shaped cowling 21 is attached to the top of the cover portion 19.

The rotor assembly 5 is shown in more detail in Figure 3 (a plan view of the rotor assembly with the cover portion 19 removed) and Figure 4 (a sectional view along the line A-A of Figure 3) . Referring to Figure 3 and 4, the twelve rotors 7 are rotatable about the central hub 17. The hub 17 is fixedly mounted on the helicopter fuselage 3.

The cover portion 19 extending out from the top of the hub 17 has a lip 23 extending downwardly from its

circumference and the lip 23 has a semi-circular groove 25 in its underside. A free-coasting wheel 27 is positioned on the shaft of each rotor close to the junction of the shaft 15 and blade root 11. The wheel 27 is arranged to run in the groove 25. In this manner much of the lift force from each rotor 7 is transmitted to the cover portion 19 and hence to the helicopter fuselage 3.

The free end of each rotor shaft 15 is held in a mounting trolley 29 which is, in turn, received in a circumferential track 31 extending round the hub. Each trolley 29, and hence each rotor 7, is freely rotatable around the fixed hub 17. This is in contrast to conventional rotorcraft rotor

assemblies, where the rotors are typically fixed to the hub and the hub is rotatably driven. In order to allow a plurality of rotors to rotate about the same fixed hub, various different mechanisms can be employed. The hub 17 and track 31 arrangement of the first embodiment of the invention will now be described in more detail: Referring to Figures 5 and Figures 6a and 6b, the hub 17 comprises a circumferential track 31 with an opening 33 through which the rotor shaft 15 extends. Radially innermost in the track 31, there is an outer pair of circumferentially extending notches 35a and an inner pair of circumferentially extending notches 35b. Radially outermost in the track 31 there are a single pair of semi-circular circumferential grooves 37.

The assembly comprises two types of mounting trolley 29a and 29b. Each type of mounting trolley 29a, 29b is positioned adjacent to one of the other type. Each trolley comprises a set of wheels 39 received in the pair of semi-circular

circumferential grooves 37, but the different types of trolley have wheels in the outer 35a and inner 35b pairs of notches respectively. Thus the trolley 29a for the outer notches 35a has a generally wedge-shaped support structure whereas the trolley 29b for the inner notches 35b has a generally box- shaped support structure. The box-shaped support structure can be at least partially received in the wedge-shaped support structure and thus the adjacent mounting trolleys 29a and 29b are operable to overlap around the circumference of the hub 15 (the benefits of which are discussed later) . In addition, the arrangement in the first embodiment of the invention can sustain significant rotational and lift forces.

As discussed above, the rotors 7 are freely rotatable around the fixed hub 17. In the first embodiment of the invention, the rotors 7 are driven by applying a driving force at a radial distance along the shaft 15, close to the root 11 of the blade 9. To drive the rotors 7 in this fashion, the assembly 5 comprises a drive ring 39. Referring back to

Figure 3 and 4, the drive ring 39 is received in, and is freely rotatable in, a circular track 41 fixed to the top of the helicopter fuselage 3. The mechanism for driving the drive ring 39 is not shown in Figures 3 and 4 for the sake of clarity. Instead, Figure 7 shows the drive mechanism by way of a schematic plan view of the rotor assembly 5. The drive ring 39 is rotated by way of a belt 43 engaging a groove 45 in the outer edge of the drive ring 39, the belt 43 also passing round a roller 47, which is in turn driven by a second belt 49 engaged with the output shaft 51 of an engine 53. By driving the rotors by the drive ring, thereby applying a drive force at a radial distance from the hub, the rotor assembly is able to withstand a relatively large torque (in comparison to an arrangement in which the rotors are fixed to a rotating hub) . This enables a large torque to be safely applied and enables the rotors to be rapidly accelerated.

The belt drive arrangement enables the drive ring 39 to be rotated even when it is laterally repositioned. Figure 7 shows the drive ring laterally repositioned to the right and lateral movement of the ring is indicated by the double-headed arrow. The mechanism for laterally moving the drive ring, and its effects, are described below.

The circular track 41 in which the drive ring 39 is received is moveable laterally by way of a hydraulic actuators 55 fixedly mounted on the hub (the actuator is not shown in Figure 3 for clarity) . At maximum extension, the actuator 55 positions the track 41, and hence the drive ring 39, over the far right-hand side of the assembly. Figure 8 is a schematic plan view of the rotor assembly showing the drive ring 39 at close to maximum displacement to the right-hand side.

The structure of part of the drive ring is shown in more detail in Figure 9. The drive ring 39 comprises a ring-shaped base portion 57 on which twelve sleeves 59 are pivotably mounted. For the sake of clarity, Figure 9 only shows one half of the drive ring and only one of the sleeves. Each sleeve 59 comprises hollow tube portion 61. The tube portion 61 is connected to a protruding flange 63 through which a vertical spindle 65 passes. The spindle 65 defines an axis that is parallel to the axis of rotation of the drive ring 39. The shaft 15 of a rotor 7 passes through each respective sleeve 59 and is slideably received therein. Relative

movement between the rotor 7 and drive ring 39 along the length of each rotor is therefore enabled, but circumferential movement between the rotor 7 and drive ring 39 at the point the rotor 7 passes through, and is coupled to, the

circumference drive ring 39, is prevented.

Figure 10 is a highly schematic plan view of the rotor assembly showing how the rotors are arranged when the drive ring has been laterally shifted to the right. As explained above with reference to Figure 9, the circumferential spacing (c) of the rotors around the drive ring is fixed, but the rotors are arranged such that they are slideably moveable along their length relative to the drive ring. This means the angular spacing (al, a2 and a3) is varied when the drive ring is moved laterally.

When the drive ring 39 and the hub 17 are co-axial, the shafts 15 of the rotors 7 all pass through the sleeves 59 on the drive ring 39 at the same radius. In this case, when the drive ring 39 is driven at a constant angular speed, all the rotors 7 rotate at this same angular speed. When the drive ring is laterally repositioned (for example to the right of the hub as shown in Figure 10), the angular speed of each point on the drive ring is still constant, but that angular speed occurs at a different radius rl, r2 and r3 (from the hub) along each rotor. In the example shown in Figure 10, the radius at which each rotor is being driven is greater on the right-hand side than the left-hand side. The rotational speed of each rotor therefore varies throughout one revolution of the blades. In the schematic diagram shown in Figure 10 the radius of the drive ring is 0.75m and the offset from the axis of the hub is 0.25m. The drive ring is rotating at an angular speed of Ω. The tangential local speed of the left-hand rotor at the point at which it passes through the drive ring must be equal to the tangential local speed of the right-hand rotor at the point at which it passes through the drive ring as

circumferential spacing of the rotors at these points is fixed. In the example in Figure 10, both those speeds are equal to 0.75*Ω. However, the rotors are rotating around the hub, and are therefore being driven at different radii. The angular speed of the left-hand rotor is therefore

0.75*Ω/ (0.75-0.25) = 1.5Ω, whereas the angular speed of the right-hand rotor is 0.75*Ω/ (0.75+0.25) = 0.75Ω. The angular speed of each rotor is therefore different. In the above- mentioned example, the rotor is driven at 430rpm, and the rotor assembly is arranged to compensate for a forward speed of around 150mph without needing to resort to pitch control. In the first embodiment of the invention, the angular speed of the rotors varies sinusoidally within each revolution of the drive ring. The maximum speed differential between the rotors occurs between rotors on opposing sides of the hub in a direction that is parallel to the direction of the lateral shift of the drive ring.

By laterally moving the drive ring to one side, the retreating rotors can be rotated faster than the advancing rotors. This can offset any difference in relative airspeed caused by forward motion of the rotorcraft, and therefore increases the maximum forward speed of the rotorcraft and reduces the need for pitch control of the advancing/retreating blades. The speed of rotors can also be varied in order to manoeuvre the rotorcraft. For example, by increasing the speed of rotors on the left-hand side, the net lift force moves to the left, causing the helicopter to bank right. By way of another example, the drive ring may be moved laterally to the front of the rotor assembly, thereby increasing the speed and the lift on the rear rotors, causing the helicopter to pitch forward.

When the drive ring is moved laterally, the rotor assembly is subjected to significant inertial loads. To reduce

rotational speed at which the rotor assembly operated (and therefore the inertial loads) , the rotor assembly is provided with a relative high number of rotors (twelve in the first embodiment of the invention) . Furthermore the rotors are relatively short (approximately 4m, with a 3m blade) and light.

Although the ability to vary the relative speed of the rotors may reduce the need to have a pitch control, in a preferred embodiment the rotor assembly still comprises a pitch control mechanism. Referring back to Figures 3 and 4, the rotor assembly 5 comprises a pitch control guide ring 67 mounted on four equally spaced hydraulic actuators 69. The ring 67 is concentric with the hub 17, and when all the actuators 69 are at the same height the ring 67 is level

(relative to the fuselage 3 of the rotorcraft 1) and co-axial with the hub 17. The actuators 69 are independently

controllable to change the total elevation and/or the angle of the guide ring 67. The pitch control guide ring 67 comprises a circumferential channel 71 passing around the outer edge of the ring 67.

A pitch control linkage 73 is connected, at one end, to the trailing edge of the rotor blades 9. The other end of the linkage 73 includes a rotatable wheel 75 located in the channel 71 passing around the circumference of the guide ring 67. As the rotors rotate, the wheel 75 on the end of the linkage 73 is pulled around the channel 71. When the guide ring 67 is horizontal relative to the hub (i.e. is generally in the plane of rotation of the rotors) , the pitch of all the rotor blades 9 is equal throughout one revolution of the rotor assembly. However, when the angle of the guide ring 67 is altered, the pitch control linkage 73 pushes or pulls the trailing edge of the blade up or down as it passes round the guide ring 67 thereby altering the pitch (i.e. angle of attack) of each blade 9 as it passes through one revolution.

In the first embodiment of the invention, the pitch control linkage 73 is located around Im from the axis of rotation of the rotors. This is in contrast to known rotor assemblies where the pitch control mechanism tends to be located on, or very close to, the hub of the rotor assembly. By positioning the pitch control away from the hub, the mechanical complexity of the hub is reduced. The loads to which the hub is subjected are also reduced because at least some component of the lift may be transmitted to the

helicopter fuselage via the guide ring 67 (located well away from the hub) and the hydraulic actuators 69 to which it is attached.

The helicopter of the first embodiment of the invention has twelve rotors, which is more than a typical helicopter (which tend to have between 2 and 4 rotors) . Due to the greater number of rotors, the blade length can be reduced relative to a typical helicopter, without decreasing the lift at a given rotational speed. As discussed above, each rotor comprises a relatively long shaft 15 extending from the hub to the root 11 of the rotor blade 9. This shaft 15 is of

circular cross section and does not generate a significant, if any, amount of lift. The downdraft in the region of the hub 17 is therefore reduced relative to arrangements in which the rotor blade extends close to the hub. This has been found to reduce the operating noise of the rotor assembly in the cabin of the helicopter which is positioned below the rotor

assembly.

Figures 11 and 12 show a second embodiment of the

invention. The second embodiment of the invention is

generally the same as the first embodiment except for the differences described below. The equivalent features are numbered with the same reference numerals except for a prefix of 1, or 10 as appropriate. According to the second

embodiment, the rotor assembly comprises a flap controller and a pitch controller. The pitch controller is arranged in similar manner to that in the first embodiment of the

invention, except that the pitch guide ring 167 is located above the blade and the actuators 169 are not attached to the fuselage. Instead, the actuators 169 are mounted on a second guide ring 177 which is part of a flap controller.

The flap controller comprises the flap guide ring 177 attached to the flap actuators 179. A linkage 181 links the flap guide ring 177 to the shaft of each rotor at a position close to the root 111 of the blade 109, and radially outward of a flap hinge 183. The linkage 181 is moveable around the circumference of the guide ring 179 as the rotors rotate about the hub. To change the flap angle of the rotor blades the actuators 179 move the guide ring 177 up or down as

appropriate. This changes the separation between the guide ring 177 and the shaft 115, causing the rotor to rotate about the hinge 183.

The rotor assembly of the second embodiment of the invention comprises only four rotors 107 rotatable about the fixed hub 117. Figure 12 is a perspective view of the rotor assembly showing an arrangement in which the flap angle on one side of the rotor assembly is increased. By increasing the flap angle, a lateral thrust is generated over this side of the rotor assembly. The flap controller may therefore be used to manoeuvre the rotorcraft. Of course, the second embodiment of the invention also allows independent or complimentary pitch control via the pitch controller. If it is desirable to keep the pitch constant, whilst varying the flap angle, the flap actuator 179 and the pitch actuator 169 are controlled such that there is no net movement of the pitch linkage 173.

Figure 13 is a close up view of part of a rotor assembly according to a third embodiment of the invention. The rotor assembly is generally the same as the first embodiment except for the differences described below. The equivalent features are numbered with the same reference numerals except for a prefix of 2, or 20 as appropriate.

Upper and lower support surfaces 289a and 289b are located at the outer circumference of the rotor assembly housing. The support surfaces have opposing grooves for receiving the upper and lower lengths of a circumferential plate 291. The plate 291 is made of flexible plastic and is constrained within the grooves such that the plate curves around with the circumference of the housing.

Figure 14 shows a side view of the plate (the plate is shown as being flat for the sake of clarity) . The plate 291 includes a hole 293 through which the shaft 215 of the rotor passes. A curved slot 295 is also cut-out below the hole 293 to accommodate the pitch linkage 273. Each end of the plate comprises further cut-outs 297 to accommodate the shaft and/or pitch linkage of adjacent rotors.

As the rotor passes through the hole 293 the rotation of the rotor pulls the plate about the circular path between the two grooves 289a, 289b. The spacing between the hole 293 and the cut-outs 297 on either side of the plate is such that when adjacent rotors are at their closest, the adjacent rotor shafts are received in the cut-outs 297 of the central plate, and the rotor shaft of the central plate is received in the cut-outs 297 of the adjacent plates (as shown in Figure 15a) . The spacing is also such that when adjacent rotors are at their furthest apart, the adjacent rotors are received in only the cut-outs of the central plate (see Figure 15b) . In this embodiment of the invention, the ratio between the smallest and greatest separation is 2:1. This is the maximum variation that can work with a single sliding plate per blade, but for larger ratios, further plates may be provided.

As demonstrated in Figures 15a and 15b, there is always a degree of overlap between adjacent plates. This maintains a barrier between the inside of the rotor assembly and the outside environment. The hub, drive and pitch mechanisms are therefore protected, to some degree, from hostile operating environments outside the rotor assembly.

In a further embodiment, that is a variation on the third embodiment, the rotor assembly further comprises a filtered air duct for ducting air flow into the region within the plates. A positive pressure is therefore established in the chamber that further reduces the exposure of moving parts to the outside environment. According to another embodiment (not shown) , the rotor assembly comprises two perpendicular actuators for moving the drive ring. At maximum extension the left/right actuator positions the drive ring as described with reference to the first embodiment. At maximum contraction, the left/right actuator positions the drive ring over the far left-hand side of the assembly. A front/back actuator is operable to

position the drive ring forward or aft of the hub centre. Of course, a combination of front/back and left/right positioning on the ring is also possible. It will be appreciated that a lateral movement is any movement in any direction within the horizontal plane containing the drive ring. The above- mentioned arrangement is especially useful for varying the rotor speed in order to manoeuvre the rotorcraft. For

example, by increasing the speed of rotors on the left-hand side, the net lift force moves to the left, causing the helicopter to bank right. By way of another example, the drive ring may be moved laterally to the front of the rotor assembly, thereby increasing the speed and the lift on the rear rotors, causing the helicopter to pitch forward.

Whilst the present invention has been described and illustrated with reference to particular embodiments, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the invention lends itself to many different variations not specifically illustrated herein. For example, in a further embodiment, a rotor assembly comprises a set of rotors fixedly attached to a rotatable hub and the rotor assembly comprises the pitch control mechanism substantially as described herein with reference to the first embodiment. In another embodiment of the invention the assembly comprises a plurality of independently controllable motors for moving the rotors around the hub. The angular speed of the rotors around the hub, relative to one another can be varied by independently

controlling the speed of the different motors. Where in the foregoing description, integers or elements are mentioned which have known, obvious or foreseeable equivalents, then such equivalents are herein incorporated as if individually set forth. Reference should be made to the claims for

determining the true scope of the present invention, which should be construed so as to encompass any such equivalents. It will also be appreciated by the reader that integers or features of the invention that are described as preferable, advantageous, convenient or the like are optional and do not limit the scope of the independent claims.

Claims

1. A rotor assembly for a rotorcraft, the assembly

comprising a plurality of rotors rotatable about a hub, and a drive means, the drive means being arranged to drive the rotors at a radial distance away from the hub.

2. An assembly according to claim 1 wherein each rotor is mounted on the hub via a mounting, the drive means being arranged to drive the rotors at a location radially outward of the mounting.

3. An assembly according to claim 2 wherein the mounting is slideabiy moveable around the circumference of the hub.

4. An assembly according to any preceding claim, further comprising a clutch for engaging and disengaging rotation of the drive means from a power source for powering the drive means .

5. An assembly according to any preceding claim wherein the drive means is coupled to a drive shaft via a belt

arrangement .

6. An assembly according to any preceding claim wherein the drive means comprises a rotatably driven drive ring, the rotors being coupled to the circumference of the drive ring.

7. An assembly according to claim 6 wherein the drive ring is co-axial with the hub.

8. An assembly according to claim 6 or claim 7 wherein the circumferential spacing between the rotors around the

circumference of the drive ring is fixed.

9. An assembly according to any preceding claim wherein the assembly is operable to vary the angular speed of the rotors about the hub, relative to one another.

10. An assembly according to claim 9 wherein the drive means is operable to drive each of the plurality of rotors at a

different radial distance from the hub, the tangential speed of the rotors at each radial distance being equal.

11. An assembly according to claim 9 or 10, wherein the drive means is laterally moveable relative to the hub, such that the drive means is operable to drive each of the plurality of rotors at a different radial distance from the hub.

12. An assembly according to any preceding claim comprising at least 6 rotors.

13. An assembly according to any preceding claim, each rotor comprising a blade having a tip and a root, and a shaft extending from the root of the blade to the hub, wherein the assembly further comprises a pitch controller for varying the pitch of the blade, the pitch controller comprising a guide means and a linkage moveable along the guide means, the linkage being connected to the rotor such that the pitch of the blade is variable in dependence on the separation between the rotor and the guide means.

14. An assembly according to claim 13 wherein the pitch controller further comprises a plurality of independently actuatable actuators arranged to vary the separation between the rotor and guide means.

15. An assembly according to claim 13 or claim 14 wherein the guide means is flexible such that the guide means may be deformed from a planar configuration to a non-planar

configuration.

16. An assembly according to any of claims 13 to 15 wherein the linkage is arranged in relation to the guide means such that both tensile and compressive loads in the linkage are reacted through the pitch controller.

17. An assembly according to any of claims 13 to 16 wherein the guide means is located at substantially the same radial distance from the hub as the root of each rotor.

18. An assembly according to any of claims 13 to 17 wherein the guide means is located at a radial distance of at least 20% of the length of the rotor from the centre of the hub.

19. An assembly according to any of claims 13 to 18 wherein the guide means is fixed such that the linkage rotates with the rotors relative to the guide means.

20. An assembly according to any of claims 13 to 19, wherein the guide means is located radially outward of the radial distance at which the drive means is arranged to drive the rotors .

21. An assembly according to any preceding claim further comprising flap controller, the flap controller comprising a second guide means and a second linkage moveable along the guide means, the linkage being connected to the rotor such that the flap angle of the rotor blade is variable in

dependence on the separation between the rotor and the second guide means.

22. An assembly according to claim 21 wherein the rotor comprises a hinge about which the flap angle of the rotor blade may vary.

23. An arrangement according to claim 21 or claim 22 when dependent on any of claims 13 to 20 , wherein the pitch

controller is mounted on the flap controller.

24. An assembly according to any preceding claim, each rotor comprising a blade for generating lift, the blade having a tip and a root, and a shaft extending from the root of the blade to the hub, wherein the length of the shaft is at least 20% of the length of the rotor such that the innermost region of the rotors generates substantially no lift.

25. An assembly according to claim 24 wherein the length of the shaft is at least 1 metre.

26. An assembly according to any of claims 13 to 25 further comprising a housing having an upper cover portion extending over the shafts of the rotors, the housing being fixed such that the rotors rotate relative to the housing.

27. An assembly according to claim 26, the housing

substantially enclosing the shafts of the rotors, and

comprising a barrier such that the inside of the housing is substantially isolated from the environment outside the housing.

28. A rotorcraft comprising the rotor assembly according to any preceding claim.

29. A method of driving a rotor assembly, the method comprising the steps of rotating a plurality of rotors about a hub by applying a driving force at a radial distance away from the hub.

30. A rotor assembly as described herein with reference to the Figures .