WO2010144567A1 - Dispositif et procédé de transfert d'énergie hydrocinétique - Google Patents

Dispositif et procédé de transfert d'énergie hydrocinétique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010144567A1
WO2010144567A1 PCT/US2010/037959 US2010037959W WO2010144567A1 WO 2010144567 A1 WO2010144567 A1 WO 2010144567A1 US 2010037959 W US2010037959 W US 2010037959W WO 2010144567 A1 WO2010144567 A1 WO 2010144567A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
turbine
rotor
hydrokinetic
flexible material
base
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2010/037959
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Robert C. Houvener
Robert Edward Doyle
Tyler Nathaniel Doyle
Original Assignee
Houvener Robert C
Robert Edward Doyle
Tyler Nathaniel Doyle
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Houvener Robert C, Robert Edward Doyle, Tyler Nathaniel Doyle filed Critical Houvener Robert C
Publication of WO2010144567A1 publication Critical patent/WO2010144567A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03D—WIND MOTORS
    • F03D1/00—Wind motors with rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor 
    • F03D1/06—Rotors
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03B—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS
    • F03B3/00—Machines or engines of reaction type; Parts or details peculiar thereto
    • F03B3/04—Machines or engines of reaction type; Parts or details peculiar thereto with substantially axial flow throughout rotors, e.g. propeller turbines
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03D—WIND MOTORS
    • F03D1/00—Wind motors with rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor 
    • F03D1/06—Rotors
    • F03D1/065—Rotors characterised by their construction elements
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2250/00—Geometry
    • F05B2250/10—Geometry two-dimensional
    • F05B2250/18—Geometry two-dimensional patterned
    • F05B2250/182—Geometry two-dimensional patterned crenellated, notched
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/20—Hydro energy
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/30—Energy from the sea, e.g. using wave energy or salinity gradient
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/70—Wind energy
    • Y02E10/72—Wind turbines with rotation axis in wind direction

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to hydrokinetic energy and more particularly, relates to a device that allows the efficient capture of energy from fluid in motion, especially slow flowing fluids and to a device having an innovative blade system and design that utilizes high-strength and flexible composite materials in its construction, all of which features allow the device to be easily and innovatively deployed in position and placed in service.
  • Hydrokinetic power or energy utilizes the natural flow of water (or in the case of air this would be aerokinetic energy, such as wind turbines) such as tidal water, rivers, ocean currents, etc., to generate electricity. Hydrokinetic energy does not involve creating "head” utilizing dams or other water flow blocking structures but rather, involves extracting energy from very low velocity flows. Hydrokinetic power is therefore very ecologically friendly.
  • All the various configurations of hydrokinetic energy capture devices in the prior art suffer from one or more major flaws. First of all, efficient systems have been of very small design that do not scale well to a larger design. Those larger designs that have been tried are inefficient with a very high cost per kilowatt hour and inefficient use of the flow resource. All systems have suffered from difficult installation challenges. Moreover, most of the prior art systems need a relatively fast current (approximately 3 m/s) to be semi- viable.
  • P hy d r o hn etic-tu r b ⁇ n e Vw-w 0.5 pA t/ 3 equation (1)
  • P power in [W]
  • A is the cross-sectional area of flow intercepted by the device, i.e. the area swept by the turbine rotor in [m 2 ]
  • p is the water density (1,000 kg/m 3 for freshwater and 1,025 kg/m for seawater)
  • C/ current speed in [m/s]
  • w _ w is the "water-to-wire" efficiency, the product of all system efficiencies (rotor coefficient of performance, gearbox/generator efficiencies).
  • There are other factors such as current velocity variation with depth, turbulence, etc - but this is the fundamental driving equation for today's systems.
  • the present invention combines a novel, cost-effective hydrofoil-shaped blade and rotor system made from composite and membrane flexible materials with an innovative system design to create a large, but relatively light-weight hydrokinetic turbine that achieves disruptively low deployment cost and low Cost of Electricity (COE), in high volumetric flow rate, low velocity (1-3 m/s) marine currents.
  • COE Cost of Electricity
  • the use of flexible materials and composites in the hybrid blade design enables low cost and scalable blades.
  • the light weight system design enables a 4: 1 reduction is system capital cost versus the armor plated units that are going after 3+ meters per second flow rates.
  • the present invention solves the problem of uneven forces on the turbine blades, thereby enabling large turbines, by sensing the water current and adjusting the pitch of the blades in real-time, thereby leveling out the forces on the turbine rotor and enabling a much lower cost and more scalable rotor.
  • This automated control is accomplished by continually sensing the current via devices such as Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCP 's) located upstream from the turbine rotor and based on the current profile, increasing or decreasing the pitch of the blade, with every revolution, in the area of the rotor that needs to compensate for the varying current.
  • ADCP Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers
  • This control loop can not only adjust for the overall current changing, but by the use of a swashplate or similar device and control infrastructure, can adjust the pitch of the rotor blades at any point in the rotation, so as to compensate for the current in that exact area of the rotation where needed.
  • the present invention combines a novel, cost-effective hydrofoil-shaped blade and rotor system made from composite and membrane flexible materials with an innovative system design to create a large, but relatively light-weight hydrokinetic turbine that achieves disruptively low deployment cost and low Cost of Electricity (COE), in high volumetric flow rate, low velocity (1-3 m/s) marine currents.
  • COE Cost of Electricity
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the kinetic energy generating device in accordance with the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of the kinetic energy generating device according to the invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of yet another embodiment of the kinetic energy generating device of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a pedestal mounted embodiment of the kinetic energy generating device of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of another pedestal mounted embodiment of the kinetic energy generating device of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of yet another embodiment of the kinetic energy generating device according to the teachings of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is an illustration of the rotor blade design of the kinetic energy generating device, according to one aspect of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a close-up illustration of one rotor blade in accordance with one aspect of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram illustrating a number of kinetic energy generating devices was input current is modified by one or more current altering devices mounted upstream from the kinetic energy generating devices;
  • FIG. 10 is an illustration of multiple deployment sites of a number of kinetic energy generating devices wherein the operation of one kinetic energy generating device is controlled or effect at by one or more sensors located at the deployment sites of one or more other kinetic energy generating devices;
  • FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of yet another embodiment of a kinetic energy generating device in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of the kinetic energy generating device in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 12 A is a schematic diagram of another alternative embodiment of the kinetic energy generating device of the invention.
  • FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram of yet another alternative embodiment of a kinetic energy generating device in accordance with the teachings of the invention.
  • FIG. 13 a is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of a kinetic energy generating device in accordance with the invention.
  • FIGS 1 and 2 show one embodiment of the hydrokinetic device 100 of the present invention which includes a turbine body 74, to which is attached a turbine rotor 11. Also attached to the turbine body 74 is a hydrofoil 16 with or without ailerons 28 which serve to stabilize the hydrokinetic device 100 as will be explained in greater detail below. Similarly, weighted ballast 18 may also be provided to orient the hydrokinetic device 100 and a current in a proper and desired orientation.
  • the turbine body may include one or more ballast tanks 20, 22.
  • the turbine body 74 is a fully submergible pressure vessel that contains separate chambers, providing airtight internal environments that contain and allow the use of off- the-shelf components such as a generator 13, swashplate 10 and remote control circuitry 77, in addition to ballast tanks or compartments.
  • the turbine 74 is large enough for humans to enter through a water tight hatch 75 and occupy the central region of the turbine 74 where the generator, drivetrain, and electromechanical devices are, for maintenance purposes (much like a generator room at the top of an off shore wind turbine). It is anticipated that humans would enter the hatch 75 after the device is surfaced, but it could be done at depth under water via an air lock from a small submersible which could dock with the turbine body 74.
  • the turbine body 74 is attached to a tether 21 via a cable 27.
  • the turbine 74 maintains its altitude under water by pumping water in and out of ballast tanks 20, 22 and optionally 18, which compresses the air in the chambers and thereby increases or decreases the buoyancy of the turbine body 74.
  • Pitch control for the turbine 74 is provided by varying the amount of ballast in the fore and aft tanks 20, 22 thereby providing more or less lift in the front or rear of the turbine 74. Since the turbine rotor 11 imparts a torque on the rest of the turbine via the body 74, the hydro foil 16 provides lift, combined with the ailerons 28 which provide anti-roll and gravity weight ballast 18, providing opposing forces to the turbine body 74 to prevent it from rotating and to maintain altitude.
  • the lift provided by the hydrofoil 16 also increases, counteracting the tendency of the turbine to want to reduce its altitude due to the forces on the tether 21.
  • Utilizing the hydrofoil 16 dramatically reduces the amount of weight needed in the ballast 18 for a given amount of anti-torque (anti-roll) needed, saving on the expense of gravity ballast materials, device structural cost and making deployment less costly.
  • Support structures 24, 26 connect the hydrofoil 16 and ballast 18 to the turbine body 74, in a rigid manner, thereby creating a lever arm, which enhances the anti-rotation capability of the ballast and hydrofoil.
  • An additional feature of the present invention is a remote control receiver mechanism 77 that allows an operator to remotely control the maneuvering and other aspects of the turbine 100 during deployment, operation and maintenance. For example, an operator could remotely control the turbine's direction of travel, depth etc while being towed/positioned by a tug for installation; control deployment of the turbine 100 once at the deployment site; and control retrieval of the turbine 100 for repositioning or servicing.
  • the remote control of the turbine 100 would be done via a laptop type computer or similar device, as is well known in the art, while communication would be via RF, hardwire, acoustic modem or similar communications 79, from the laptop or other device (not shown) to the on-board turbine main controller 77 which can be connected to all the movable, programmable, changeable, etc. elements of the turbine 100.
  • This enables the device 100 to be built modularly at global locations, assembled near the deployment site, dropped in the water via a pre-existing shipyard like land based crane and towed to the deployment site, with tether and umbilical cables attached mostly at the surface, or with ROV and no divers needed. This will cut deployment costs by 10-2Ox versus current methods thereby reducing the deployment costs for megawatt scale hydrokinetic turbines from many hundreds of thousands or low millions of dollars per Mw to tens of thousands to low hundreds of thousands per Mw.
  • the hydrofoil support structures 24, 26 can fold up, thereby reducing the size of the turbine during transport, while keeping it structurally intact for ease of final assembly at the deployment site.
  • the tether 21 and power cable 23 would be attached at the front of the torpedo shaped tube 74, in line with the axis of drag.
  • An additional feature of the present invention is the ability to control when the rotor blades are attached to the rotor assembly 11. Final assembly or deployment of the blades may be made onshore, at a port, en-route to the deployment site, or at the deployment site as it may be too shallow or otherwise not be best to deploy/do final assembly of the blades to the rotor at one or more of these locations.
  • the power and tether cable(s) 23, 21 attach not only along the center of drag, but also mount behind the front of the torpedo-shaped tube 74, thereby enabling superior pitch control via the pitch control mechanisms.
  • the cables 21, 23 utilize buoyancy control devices 25, such as those from Flotation Technologies of Maine, to reduce or eliminate the downward force of the cables 23, eliminating many of the problems that cable downward force creates for submarine hydrokinetic turbines which are disclosed in the prior art.
  • at least the power cable 23 may be provided with a quick connect coupling 35, for use above or below the surface, such as those made by Teledyne ODI, allowing the device 100 to be easily and quickly deployed and retrieved.
  • the present invention includes a swashplate 10 located between the gearbox 13 and the rotor 15.
  • the swashplate 10 allows a fixed control linkage(s) to operate on a set of rotor blades (not shown) attached to a rotating shaft.
  • a swashplate is a device well known to those skilled in the art that is often typically used in a helicopter.
  • the swashplate translates input via the helicopter flight controls into motion of the main rotor blades. Because the main rotor blades are spinning, the swashplate is used to transmit three of the pilot's commands from the non-rotating helicopter fuselage to the rotating rotor hub and main blades.
  • control of the rotor blades can be accomplished by 1) sampling the incoming current velocity in a 360 degree arc, forward of the turbine utilizing one or more sensors 12, 14, that measure water speed, density and other hydro/aerodynamic attributes can be used as inputs to the control loop; 2) determine if pitch needs to be adjusted anywhere in the arc of the rotor, based on differences in the current velocity from (1); 3) check to see where each blade is in the rotation cycle; then 4) adjust the pitch of the blade, as needed, using swashplate 10 to keep the load the same on all the blades; and 5) wait some period of time, then go back to (1).
  • a flexible, rigid or a hybrid flexible/rigid foil 70 is connected to a shaft 72 that connects to the body 74.
  • the foil 70 is of variable pitch, via an on-board control system and provides anti-torque to counteract the torque from the rotor (11).
  • a similar foil 70b can be part of the structure supporting the optional gravity ballast weight 18 and can similarly be automatically adjusted based on signals from on-board sensors and control systems (not shown), thereby enabling the turbine to maintain correct attitude at all times.
  • control surfaces for the non-rotor components of the turbine are shown in various figures, in front (upstream) of the rotor 11, in some embodiments, some or all of these surfaces may be behind the rotor 11.
  • the structure of the turbine body 74 can be a membrane structure, much like a rigid or semi-rigid airship.
  • the embodiment shown in Figure 4 is especially well suited for tidal currents, where the flow of the current changes direction approximately 180 degrees regularly.
  • a gravity weight or semi-buoyant structure 92 is anchored in multiple locations to the seabed via cables 94, 96.
  • the turbine body 74 is connected to the structure 92 via a shaft 90 and at the connection point 98, the turbine body 74 can swivel on the shaft 90, ending up in position 93, aligned with the opposite flow direction, such as for use in tidal flow areas.
  • the turbine body 74 With the turbine body 74, optional hydro-foil 99 and parts of shaft 90 being (semi) buoyant, the turbine maintains level flight in the water and counteracts torques created by the rotor.
  • the body 74 optionally has a spring-like mechanism which forces the body to a position that is perpendicularly to the current when the current stops flowing. When the current restarts from the opposite direction, the drag from the rotor pulls the rotor 100 and body, down-stream. This process repeats itself, always returning the body to the same position during neutral tide and always allowing the rotor to be 'pulled' down-stream, where the current is coming from the left or the right in Figure 4.
  • This embodiment prevents electrical and other cables from wrapping themselves around the devices, as the device, due to mechanical stops in the swivel 98, can only rotate approximately 200 degrees of rotation on the swivel.
  • the device can swivel 360 degrees, but needs complex mechanisms such as slip rings to prevent cables from becoming entangled and failing, which adds to the cost of the turbine and creates maintenance problems.
  • enhanced flow is achieved into the rotor 100 via specially designed surfaces on the ballast systems 99, 92 such as the curved surface 91. This increased flow enables additional power to be generated by the turbine.
  • additional structure is provided down-stream of the rotor 100 to ensure there is sufficient drag to position the overall body 74 and rotor 100 for optimal energy conversion efficiency and to provide active control surfaces for maneuvering and stabilizing the turbine.
  • the embodiment shown in Figure 4 has significant advantage over turbines that are fixed in place and accept current from either direction, since blades can only be optimized to accept flow from one direction. In the case of the fixed mount turbines that accept flow from both directions without swiveling into the flow, they suffer efficiency losses due to not being able to optimize the blades for uni-directional flow.
  • the embodiment in Figure 4 rotates into the flow automatically and hence overcomes this problem and only needs to accommodate flow hitting the blades from one direction, even though the flow can come from multiple directions during given time periods, such as in tidal current flows. This enables the embodiment in Figure 4 to achieve significantly higher hydrodynamic efficiency and hence power output for a give rotor diameter and flow velocity, versus the fixed mount turbines that accept flow from both directions.
  • FIG. 12 The embodiment shown in Figure 12 is similar to that of Figure 4, except that the turbine rotor 100 is actually up stream of the swivel 98, thereby reducing or eliminating any turbulence from being generated in front of the rotor 100 by the turbine structure such as weathervane mount 90 impacting turbine efficiency.
  • this embodiment has an alignment fin / foil 95 which, due to induced drag from the current, pulls itself downstream of the turbine and aligns the turbine rotor 100 with the flow direction and provides active control surfaces for maneuvering and stabilizing the turbine.
  • Fig. 12a illustrates some refinements on the design of Fig. 12.
  • This design has a tail that not only allows for attitude control, but can simultaneously provide anti-torque for the rotor. This is used in advanced airships and subs for maneuvering, but has not been used in this manner before. Note that the tail fins are at 45 degrees from horizontal and vertical, which is an enabler for better axial control, including in the present case, anti-torque. This reduces the amount of ballast and hence cost and weight, while improving the ability to 'steer' the device during deployment and to point in into the flow during operations, improving energy conversion efficiency.
  • the same mechanisms described in Figure 4 can be utilized in a system that is hard mounted to the seabed floor.
  • the same mechanisms can be utilized in other embodiments, such as mounting to the underside of a barge in a tidal area, with similar benefits achieved.
  • the blades can also be utilized in applications such as wind turbines or even in propulsion applications where strength, weight, low rpm, noise reduction, large scalability and cost are important.
  • FIG. 6 an embodiment of a rotor having a flexible blade turbine with a rigid leading edge blade 52 is shown.
  • the leading edge 56 of the blade 52 is made of a rigid material such as a fiberglass and carbon fiber composite, with the sail-like composite membrane 64 being utilized for the rest of the blade 52.
  • the membrane 64 in the preferred embodiment is a composite membrane, consisting of one or more layers of materials such as Carbon, Vectran, Mylar, Teflon and other similar materials of the type utilized in the sailing and fabric building materials industries, those materials having embedded or added directional fibers, the direction of which is uniquely designed for the stresses of the turbine blade, as determined by computer modeling and designer experience.
  • Additional layers of the composite membrane 64 may be provided and utilized for rip stoppage, Ultra violet (UV) light blocking, load attachment reinforcement, anti-fouling, membrane bias and other non-primary load direction support and other necessary capabilities, in order to ensure a useful lifetime of multiple decades under water.
  • UV Ultra violet
  • This embodiment does significantly reduce the cost of the blades, but does create very significant concentration of torque at points in the blades such as where the rigid mast mounts to the rotor and where the spars mount to the leading edge of the blade, limiting the cost effectiveness and reliability of the design.
  • Figures 7 and 8 overcome the limitation of Figure 6 by designing the mast 38 in the mid part of the blade, thereby creating a more balanced torque on the mast 38 from the spars 42 and membrane 40, and also imparting much less torque on the pitch control mechanism 10 for the blade and the base of the mast.
  • this embodiment utilizes a center mast flexible blade design 30.
  • the center mast blade design has cross sectional shapes that are oriented with a twist relative to the blade tip direction that varies from the top to the bottom 36 for optimal efficiency.
  • the center mast design also utilizes battens, spars and/or ribs 42 to enable the maintenance of optimal membrane shape during loading.
  • the shape of the blade shown in Figure 7 is designed using a fully coupled Computational Fluid Dynamics / Finite Element Analysis model, which allows it to be built to a shape that forms an optimal 'flying' shape when put under load, thereby increasing the performance of the blade by many percent in efficiency when operating in its design current velocity range.
  • the center mast design significantly reduces the torque transmitted to the mast and from the mast to the pitch change mechanisms and blade mounting point, reducing the complexity and cost of the blades and increasing reliability and scalability of the blades and overall turbine. This is due to the torque from the leading and trailing portions of the blade fabric 40 canceling each other out to a significant degree within the blade structure, based upon the design.
  • the membrane of Figure 7 as with the membranes noted in other figures, utilizes similar materials construction, as noted in the description of Figure 6 above. [0054]
  • the membrane can be broken up into individual panels 35, 37, 39 that are separate and distinct from each other and that are designed separate and distinct from each other, thereby making maintenance easier, segmenting the loading of the overall blade membrane into more manageable pieces, making deployment easier and reducing mounting hardware.
  • panels 35, 37, 39 can be rolled onto a spindle or similar mechanism attached to or inside of the mast 38, which is especially useful when the blades are used in wind turbines, where the blades can get overloaded in high winds and by rolling up the membrane, the cross section of the blades can be made much lower, dramatically improving server weather survivability, while still allowing excellent low velocity wind performance when the membranes are deployed. This enables higher overall turbine generating efficiency and better return on investment.
  • Figure 8 shows an embodiment in which some or all of the backside of the blade has a membrane 140 covering it forming a two sided airfoil instead of a thin airfoil. Since the tip of the blade travels at a much higher speed relative to the water than the root of the blade, creating a two sided foil for some portion of the blade can increase the efficiency of the blade. This design allows for the optimal use of materials to gain efficiency, without using excess materials which does not have a good cost/benefit trade off.
  • Figure 8 also shows a blade tip cap 145, which increases the efficiency of the blade, by preventing the loss of lift off the end of the blade during operation.
  • the approach disclosed herein is to provide a turbine with flexible blades, similar to rig and sails used to propel sailing yachts / ships weighing 700 tons up to 20 knots.
  • the blades can be designed such that they will have optimal shape when loaded by the known flow. This loaded shape is known as "the flying shape" in sails. Designing for the flying allows the important blade design parameters such as section chord, camber and twist to be optimized for the deformation expected in the structure rather than designing for an unloaded condition and then trying to minimize the loss in performance due to deformation of structure mainly by trying to limit the deformation.
  • Such a structure saves tremendously in material and manufacturing costs as well as allows the resulting blade to be modular in design, resulting in easier transport and future maintenance.
  • the present invention discloses an approach that defines three regions of the blades on the turbine, based on Reynolds-number regimes, and individually optimizes the construction of those regions based on a heretofore un-available cost / performance tradeoff.
  • the tip of the blade 145 where higher Reynolds numbers occur, is a highly efficient semi-flexible composite hydrofoil structure; while the mid region 147 where moderate Reynolds numbers occur, is a composite frame with dual sided flexible membrane made of new, much stronger, thicker materials such as ePTFE (expanded polytetrafluorethylene), as well as custom embedded carbon and Vectran fiber layouts. These materials have been used in building construction and marine industries for over a decade.
  • Vectran One of the strongest and most durable of these materials, Vectran, has tensile strength of over 1400 pounds per linear inch and can withstand approximately 50,000 psi of stress. In addition, these materials have excellent anti-fouling properties and are guaranteed for 15-25 years, in very hostile environments, including salt water.
  • the root of the blade 149 where low Reynolds numbers occur, is a more 'sail-like' composite frame, with a single sided foil. The blade utilizes a single composite 'mast'.
  • the relatively lightweight and flexible blades can be easily attached and/or replaced when maintenance is required, much like attaching a sail on a large sail boat.
  • individual panels on blades can be changed in the field. Blade characteristics can be easily optimized by site, enabling maximum efficiency and power generation for any site conditions. This is a significant enabling breakthrough, as the ability to design to the 'flying' shape is important in order to achieve the cost and performance it seeks over wide current velocity ranges.
  • Previous industry attempts at using fully coupled CFD/FEA simulation models have not been overly successful due to excessive computational cost and stringent requirements imposed on the CFD and FEA computational grids to ensure numerical stability of the force coupling schemes.
  • the coupling scheme employed gets around this difficulty by utilizing an iterative force coupling stabilization loop thereby reducing the computational requirements on the combined system and reducing the complexity involved in transmitting forces between the fluid dynamic (CFD) and structural (FEA) computational meshes.
  • flow diverters 110-113 are strategically placed near the turbines 114-118 in a turbine farm. As shown in Figure 9, if placed upstream, these diverters increase the velocity of the water going between them (say 110 and 111) and direct the flow of current into the downstream turbines (in this case turbine 118), increasing the velocity of water hitting the rotor and hence increasing the output of the turbine. Like portions of the turbine, significant portions of the flow diverters can be made out of membrane structures, tethered to the seabed, providing a cost effective velocity acceleration mechanism that is easily deployed. An increase of just 25% in the velocity of the current hitting the rotor 100, will double the amount of power that is derived from the turbine.
  • the diverters 110-113 can be placed upstream as well as within the overall turbine farm.
  • the combination of energy extraction devices 132, 134, 136 in the form of hydrokinetic or Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) devices, combined with networked ocean sensors 130 and control station(s) 138 enable a energy extraction control loop in which the amount of heat energy going toward the polar caps can be regulated in semi -real-time.
  • OEC Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion
  • By measuring the amount of heat energy reaching the sensors 130 more or less energy can be extracted by turning on/off energy extraction devices in the major global current flows. This not only can reduce global warming impacts, but can enable the optimal level of energy extraction from global current flows, while ensuring damage does not occur from over-extracting energy.
  • Adjacent tidal farms can provide continuous power to the grid without the typical interruptions suffered by conventional hydrokinetic tidal systems.
  • ebb titanium dioxide
  • adjacent systems that are not in ebb will still power the grid, delivering what is effectively base load power to the grid in coastal areas with high volume, low speed tidal current flows.
  • this cannot be achieved with present hydrokinetic turbines because they require very fast current flow, and the areas where these exist are far too sparse to enable turning periodic flow into baseload capability.
  • membranes can also be utilized to provide a highly cost effective ducting system 150,152 as shown in Figure 11.
  • the ducts can utilize adjustable fins for anti-torque purposes, either as inflatable duct structures 154 or as structures utilizing the main duct membrane itself with spars for shape maintenance 156.
  • the mount point for the tether 158 can optimally be in line with the axis of rotation, although in some embodiments, other mount points are advantageous.
  • this design has a tail that not only allows for attitude control, but can simultaneously provide anti-torque for the rotor. This is used in advanced airships and subs for maneuvering, but has not been used in this manner before.
  • an embodiment with thrusters 170 is contemplated for attitude control and anti-torque, as well as possibly station keeping if the current dies down.
  • the present invention solves numerous deficiencies in the prior art providing a novel and non-obvious hydrokinetic or aero kinetic generating device that makes use of flexible materials and composites in the hybrid blade design enabling low cost and scalable blades and device itself which allows a significant reduction in the system capital costs and deployment costs dramatically opening up the scope of large, low velocity currents worldwide for use and cost competitive hydrokinetic (or aero kinetic) generation in ocean, tidal currents and rivers.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Other Liquid Machine Or Engine Such As Wave Power Use (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif à énergie hydrocinétique ou aérocinétique (100) comprenant un système de pale et de rotor en forme d'hydrofoil (11), constitué de matériaux composites et flexibles à membrane avec une conception innovante de système pour créer une turbine hydrocinétique grande mais relativement légère présentant un coût de déploiement fortement réduit et un coût en électricité (COE) réduit, dans des courants marins ou aériens à débit volumétrique élevé et à vitesse réduite (1 à 3 m/s). Le système (100) détecte continûment le courant (12, 14) sur le site de déploiement et sur la base du profil de courant, ajuste le pas des pales en temps réel, égalisant ainsi les forces sur le rotor de la turbine. La turbine à dispositif à énergie hydrocinétique (100) peut être assemblée sur la côte, lors du trajet jusqu'au site de déploiement ou sur le site de déploiement. En outre, la turbine peut comprendre un mécanisme récepteur télécommandé (77), permettant à un utilisateur de commander à distance la manœuvre et d'autres aspects de la turbine (100) pendant le déploiement, l'utilisation et l'entretien.
PCT/US2010/037959 2009-06-09 2010-06-09 Dispositif et procédé de transfert d'énergie hydrocinétique WO2010144567A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18546309P 2009-06-09 2009-06-09
US61/185,463 2009-06-09
US32551810P 2010-04-19 2010-04-19
US61/325,518 2010-04-19

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010144567A1 true WO2010144567A1 (fr) 2010-12-16

Family

ID=43300869

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2010/037959 WO2010144567A1 (fr) 2009-06-09 2010-06-09 Dispositif et procédé de transfert d'énergie hydrocinétique

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20100310376A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2010144567A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102498285A (zh) * 2009-06-30 2012-06-13 特纳·汉特 系泊的水动力装置的纵摇、横摇和拖曳稳定
KR101133671B1 (ko) * 2009-08-07 2012-04-12 한국전력공사 가동물체형 파력발전장치
US9328713B2 (en) 2012-04-13 2016-05-03 Steven D. Beaston Turbine apparatus and methods
CL2013001238A1 (es) * 2013-05-03 2013-08-16 Pavez Vasquez Claudio Marcelo Dispositivo de soporte y fijacion sumergible para equipamiento de generacion electrica, conformado por una capsula hermetica en cuyo interior permite la instalacion de equipamiento de control, motor generador y tablero electrico, la capsula se une a una estructura de flotacion rigida conformada por estructuras tubulares de boyantes que poseen camaras estanco inundables y de aire comprimido, valvulas y un sistema de comunicacion.
FR3006386B1 (fr) * 2013-05-31 2017-12-29 Jean Baptiste Drevet Support pivot hydrolienne
NO336693B1 (no) * 2013-11-29 2015-10-19 Deep River As Gjennomstrømningsturbin og system for kraftproduksjon
JP6448153B2 (ja) * 2014-07-15 2019-01-09 学校法人沖縄科学技術大学院大学学園 波エネルギー変換システム及び波エネルギー変換ユニット
WO2017024369A2 (fr) * 2015-08-13 2017-02-16 Johannes Hoffmann Système de séparation de matières
US11299268B2 (en) * 2016-11-02 2022-04-12 California Institute Of Technology Positioning of in-situ methane sensor on a vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) unmanned aerial system (UAS)
BR102017022462A8 (pt) * 2017-10-18 2022-10-04 Hoffmann Johannes Sistema para separação de materiais
IT201900010479A1 (it) 2019-06-28 2020-12-28 Windcity Srl Turbina a geometria variabile passiva

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4050246A (en) * 1975-06-09 1977-09-27 Gaston Bourquardez Wind driven power system
US6933623B2 (en) * 2000-05-26 2005-08-23 Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. Wave energy converters utilizing pressure differences
US20070231072A1 (en) * 2006-01-04 2007-10-04 Jennings Clifford A Submersible tethered platform for undersea electrical power generation
US20080093859A1 (en) * 2006-10-24 2008-04-24 Catlin C S River and tidal power harvester
US7436086B2 (en) * 2005-07-27 2008-10-14 Mcclintic Frank Methods and apparatus for advanced wind turbine design
US20080260514A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2008-10-23 Statoilhydro Asa Method for Damping Tower Vibrations in a Wind Turbine Installation
US20080284176A1 (en) * 2003-03-25 2008-11-20 Fraenkel Peter L Submerged water current turbines installed on a deck
US20090140524A1 (en) * 2007-11-30 2009-06-04 Kejha Joseph B Deployable submarine-hydroelectric generator for sea currents energy harvesting

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6168373B1 (en) * 1999-04-07 2001-01-02 Philippe Vauthier Dual hydroturbine unit
US6139255A (en) * 1999-05-26 2000-10-31 Vauthier; Philippe Bi-directional hydroturbine assembly for tidal deployment
US6472768B1 (en) * 2000-09-26 2002-10-29 Darwin Aldis Salls Hydrokinetic generator
US8123457B2 (en) * 2007-03-27 2012-02-28 Hydro Green Energy, Llc System and apparatus for improved turbine pressure and pressure drop control using turbine head potential
US8102071B2 (en) * 2007-10-18 2012-01-24 Catlin Christopher S River and tidal power harvester
US8337163B2 (en) * 2007-12-05 2012-12-25 General Electric Company Fiber composite half-product with integrated elements, manufacturing method therefor and use thereof
US20090257863A1 (en) * 2008-04-11 2009-10-15 Asia Power Dev. Foundation, Inc. Turbine assembly

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4050246A (en) * 1975-06-09 1977-09-27 Gaston Bourquardez Wind driven power system
US6933623B2 (en) * 2000-05-26 2005-08-23 Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. Wave energy converters utilizing pressure differences
US20080284176A1 (en) * 2003-03-25 2008-11-20 Fraenkel Peter L Submerged water current turbines installed on a deck
US7436086B2 (en) * 2005-07-27 2008-10-14 Mcclintic Frank Methods and apparatus for advanced wind turbine design
US20080260514A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2008-10-23 Statoilhydro Asa Method for Damping Tower Vibrations in a Wind Turbine Installation
US20070231072A1 (en) * 2006-01-04 2007-10-04 Jennings Clifford A Submersible tethered platform for undersea electrical power generation
US20080093859A1 (en) * 2006-10-24 2008-04-24 Catlin C S River and tidal power harvester
US20090140524A1 (en) * 2007-11-30 2009-06-04 Kejha Joseph B Deployable submarine-hydroelectric generator for sea currents energy harvesting

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20100310376A1 (en) 2010-12-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20100310376A1 (en) Hydrokinetic Energy Transfer Device and Method
EP2162618B1 (fr) Turbine a courants sous-marins
US7750491B2 (en) Fluid-dynamic renewable energy harvesting system
US9506451B2 (en) Floating, yawing spar current/tidal turbine
US20120187693A1 (en) Hydrokinetic energy transfer device and method
US8174135B1 (en) Marine energy hybrid
US9334849B2 (en) Floating tower frame for ocean current turbine system
US8937395B2 (en) Ocean floor mounting of wave energy converters
WO2008051446B1 (fr) Collecteur d'énergie fluviale et marémotrice
JP7130896B2 (ja) フローティングプラットフォーム
EP3280908B1 (fr) Turbine marémotrice/à courants à bouée à espar d'orientation du type flottant
EP2141353B1 (fr) Système submersible pour exploiter l'énergie des courants marins
JP3530872B2 (ja) 水力エネルギー変換装置
JP2013002399A (ja) 風力の一部を風上への推進力に利用することで、海底に係留しなくても風に流されない洋上風力発電用風車。
WO2019190387A1 (fr) Éolienne flottante à axe vertical dotée d'ensembles périphériques de turbine hydraulique et son procédé de fonctionnement
DK202270497A1 (en) Floating vessel for energy harvesting
CA3206374A1 (fr) Appareil generateur et/ou de stockage d'energie
US20160186723A1 (en) Revolving overhead windmill
WO2010064918A1 (fr) Système de conversion d'énergie
Raisanen et al. Unmoored: a free-floating wind turbine invention and autonomous open-ocean wind farm concept
WO2023230087A1 (fr) Plateforme de turbine à courant marin à longeron caréné
CN115539313A (zh) 一种搭载海上涡轮发电机的半潜式船体

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10786774

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

DPE1 Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 10786774

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1