WO2010035555A1

WO2010035555A1 - Liquid additive for improving engine performance

Info

Publication number: WO2010035555A1
Application number: PCT/JP2009/060689
Authority: WO
Inventors: 龍一鈴木
Original assignee: 片柳良和; 久保田昌治
Priority date: 2008-09-26
Filing date: 2009-06-11
Publication date: 2010-04-01
Also published as: JP2010077291A

Abstract

A liquid additive for improving engine performances is provided with which performances of an automotive engine can be improved, e.g., the values of the power and torque of the motor vehicle are increased. As a result, gentle stepping on the accelerator suffices and this can lead to fuel cost saving, etc. The additive is characterized by containing 5-50 mg/L calcium, 0.05-0.5 mg/L cobalt, 0.5-5 mg/L potassium, 0.5-5 mg/L magnesium, 1-10 mg/L sodium, 1-10 mg/L silicon, and 0.05-0.5 mg/L zinc, the contents being determined through qualitative analysis by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES).

Description

Additive for improving engine performance

The present invention relates to an engine performance improving additive liquid, and more specifically, an engine which is added to cooling water or the like in a radiator in order to improve the performance of an automobile engine, such as increasing the power or torque of the automobile. It is related with the additive liquid for performance improvement.

Various researches have been conducted as technologies for improving the fuel efficiency of automobiles, and various patent applications have been filed. For example, the invention described in the following Patent Document 1 is an invention relating to an additive for lubricating oil containing at least one of polytetrafluoroethylene and boron nitride and ceramics. Only.

Further, the invention described in the following Patent Document 2 has a groove formed on the outer surface of a cylindrical molded body made of plastic, ceramics, etc., and a permanent magnet is fitted into the groove, between the fuel and the fuel flow path. The fuel is charged by generating static electricity, and then a magnetic field is generated, and the high capacity of the fuel reformer is derived by performing the generation of static electricity and the processing by magnetism at the same place. However, although the proposal of the technique which improves the combustion efficiency of gasoline by the effect | action by static electricity or a magnetic field was made before the application of this patent document 2, the effectiveness of the effect is not certain. The device of Patent Document 5 is intended to be smaller than the conventional device, but it is not always easy to manufacture an instrument made of a cylindrical molded body, such as forming a groove or fitting a permanent magnet. There is no such thing.

Furthermore, the invention described in the following Patent Document 3 is a method in which a ceramic powder that emits weak electromagnetic waves and generates negative ions and a plate-like soft foam or fibrous body are attached to an aluminum adhesive tape via an adhesive. It is attached to the intake duct and the oil supply pipe to increase the efficiency of combustion. However, in this patent document 3, the objective effect is not supported by a test or the like. Although not limited to Patent Document 3, there are many applications in the technical field related to improving the fuel efficiency of automobiles that merely disclose the idea as well as the water reforming.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2004-18555 Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2003-214266 Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2003-148708

The present invention can improve the performance of an automobile engine, for example, by increasing numerical values of the power and torque of the automobile, and as a result, the accelerator can be gradually depressed, and thus fuel consumption can be reduced. It is an object of the present invention to provide an additive liquid for improving engine performance.

The present invention has been made to solve the above-described problems. In a qualitative analysis by high frequency inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), 5-50 mg / l calcium, 0.05-0. 5 mg / l cobalt, 0.5-5 mg / l potassium, 0.5-5 mg / l magnesium, 1-10 mg / l sodium, 1-10 wt mg / l silicon, 0.05-0. An additive solution for improving the performance of an engine, characterized by containing 5 mg / l of zinc.

As described above, the additive solution for improving the performance of the engine of the present invention is 5 to 50 mg / l calcium, 0.05 to 0.5 mg by qualitative analysis by high frequency inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). / L cobalt, 0.5-5 mg / l potassium, 0.5-5 mg / l magnesium, 1-10 mg / l sodium, 1-10 mg / l silicon, 0.05-0.5 mg / l Therefore, for example, power (horsepower) and torque values can be obtained by injecting such an engine performance improving additive into a radiator and adding it to cooling water in the radiator. As a result, the engine performance is improved.

As a result, the accelerator can be depressed gradually. Although it is not possible to immediately reduce fuel consumption by gradually depressing the accelerator in this way, gradually depressing the accelerator makes the driving itself suitable for labor saving, which results in This will help to save fuel.

The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of one Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the measured value of the power and torque accompanying the change of the rotation speed of the engine of another Example. The graph of the specific heat change measured value with the temperature change of one Example.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described.

(Embodiment 1)
The chemical composition of the engine performance improving additive liquid of this embodiment is water (H ₂ O), and the components of the inorganic substance in the additive liquid are as follows.
Component Content (mg / l)
Ca 19.0
Co 0.06
K 0.74
Mg 0.91
Na 5.4
Si 2.5
Zn 0.05

The additive for improving the performance of the engine of the present embodiment is a soil sampled in a mountainous area of altitude of about 500 to 1000 m in Kaminoyama City, Yamagata Prefecture, where the medicinal herb grows in the vicinity. It was obtained by filtering water with a granular material (powder) fired at a temperature of 5 ° C.

In other words, a filter is installed in the container, and the above-mentioned ground fired powder is placed on the filter, and in that state, water from which chlorine or the like has been removed is placed in the container as necessary. It is obtained by passing water through the powder of the fired product and filtering with the filter.

The engine performance improving additive liquid thus obtained is used by being injected into a radiator. That is, it is used by being added to the cooling water previously stored in the radiator. Here, the cooling water refers not only to the cooling water injected into the radiator, but also includes a mixture of such cooling water and an antifreeze liquid. In the present invention, the term “cooling water” means that it includes cooling water and liquid obtained by mixing the water with an antifreeze liquid or the like.
It should be noted that the engine performance improving additive liquid as described above may be mixed with water or antifreeze liquid in advance, and the liquid prepared by mixing in that way may be injected into the radiator.

As the antifreeze, any commercially available antifreeze such as alcohol, glycerin, or ethylene glycol can be used.

(Other embodiments)
In addition, in the said Embodiment 1, what consists of the above components and content was used as an additive liquid for engine performance improvement, However, A component and content are not limited to the said embodiment.

Further, in the first embodiment, a filter on which a powder of the fired product of the earth as described above is placed is placed in a container, and water that has been passed through the container and filtered through the filter is used for improving engine performance. Although used as an additive liquid, the method of obtaining the engine performance improving additive liquid is not limited to this embodiment.

For example, the above-mentioned ground fired powder is filled into a bag made of a water-permeable material such as a nonwoven fabric or synthetic fiber, and the bag filled with the powder is put into a container and water is put into the container. It is also possible to leave the filling immersed in water and leave it in that state for a certain period of time, then remove the bag filling from the container and use the water after taking out the bag filling as an additive for improving engine performance. It is.

Furthermore, the firing temperature of the soil as described above is not limited to 600 ° C. as described above, but it is preferable to perform firing at a temperature of about 400 to 700 ° C.

Hereinafter, examples of the present invention will be described.

Example 1
In this example, both qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis were performed on the chemical analysis of the engine performance improving additive solution used in the above embodiment.

[Qualitative analysis]
Qualitative analysis was performed by high frequency inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) using ULTIMA2 manufactured by Horiba. However, Na and K were analyzed by atomic absorption photometry.

The results of qualitative analysis of the engine performance improving additive liquid of the above embodiment were as follows.

Component Content (mg / l)
Ca 5-50
Co 0.05-0.5
K 0.5-5
Mg 0.5-5
Na 1-10
Si 1-10
Zn 0.05-0.5

Ag, Al, As, Au, B, Ba, Be, Bi, Cd, Ce, Cr, Cs, Cu, Dy, Er, Eu, Fe, Ga, Gd, Ge, Hf, Hg, Ho, In, Ir, La, Li, Lu, Mn, Mo, Nb, Nd, Ni, Os, P, Pb, Pd, Pr, Pt, Rb, Re, Rh, Ru, Sb, Sc, Se, Sm, Sn, Sr, Ta, The respective elements Tb, Te, Th, Ti, Tl, Tm, U, V, W, Y, Yb, and Zr were below the lower limit of detection.

[Quantitative analysis]
The quantitative analysis was also performed by high frequency inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) using ULTIMA2 manufactured by Horiba. However, Na and K were analyzed by atomic absorption photometry.

Quantitative analysis results of the engine performance improving additive solution of the above embodiment were as follows.

Component Content (mg / l)
Ca 19.0
Co 0.06
K 0.74
Mg 0.91
Na 5.4
Si 2.5
Zn 0.05

Meanwhile, the average chemical composition of river water in Japan is shown in the following table 1. The unit of numerical values in Table 1 is mg / l.

As is clear from the results of the above qualitative and quantitative analysis, seven elements of Ca, Na, Si, K, Mg, Co, and Zn were detected in this example. Compared to the average chemical composition of river water in our country in Table 1 above, there are more Ca, less Si, and even less content, but it contains Co and Zn.

(Example 2)
In this embodiment, the engine performance improving additive liquid as described above is injected into the radiator of the automobile and added to the cooling water, the power (horsepower) and torque of the automobile are measured, and the power before the additive liquid is injected. It was compared with the measured value of torque.

The power and torque were measured using a New Zealand chassis dynamo called Dynapack. Specifically, the tire is removed from the body of the vehicle to be measured, and the Dynapack measurement dedicated part is attached to the drive bearing so that it is connected to the drive bearing, and in the same manner as in actual driving The power (horsepower) accompanying the change in the engine speed was measured by rotating the driving wheel, and the torque accompanying the change in the engine speed was measured and graphed. In the following Examples 2-1 to 2-24, tests were performed on different vehicles.

[Example 2-1]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Honda Model: Civic Year: September 1997 Displacement: 1600cc
Model: E-EK9

Before injecting the additive liquid into the vehicle radiator of the present embodiment, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 15 ml of the additive solution was injected into the radiator, and similarly the power and torque accompanying the change in the engine speed were measured. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 1 (a) shows a change in measured value of torque accompanying a change in engine speed, and FIG. 1 (b) shows a change in measured value of power accompanying a change in engine speed. The vertical axis of (a) shows torque in kg · m, and the vertical axis of (b) shows power (horsepower) in PS units. In both (a) and (b), the horizontal axis indicates the number of revolutions per minute of the engine in units of rpm. Further, in the graph of FIG. 1, a prior injection of the additive liquid measurement line indicated by A, showed the two measurements results line after injection of additive liquid in B _1, B _2.

Table 2 also shows the peak values of power (horsepower) and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 1, the two measured values of the power and torque after the injection of the additive liquid indicated by B ₁ and B ₂ are both measured by the power and torque before the injection of the additive liquid indicated by A. Excellent compared to the value. In particular, when the engine speed was about 1500 to 5000 rpm, the difference in measured values of power and torque before and after injection of the additive solution was large. As is clear from Table 2, the peak value of the torque was about 0.5 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, but the peak value of the power was before the injection of the additive solution. There was a difference of about 11.4 PS after injection.

[Example 2-2]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Nissan Car: Skyline GT-R
Year: March 1994 Displacement: 2600cc
Model: E-BNR32

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 20 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 2A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 2B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 2, the measurement result line before injection of the additive liquid is indicated by A, and the measurement result line after injection of the additive liquid is indicated by B.

Table 3 also shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is apparent from FIG. 2, at the engine speed of 3800 rpm or higher, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid indicated by B are all the power and torque before injection of the additive liquid indicated by A. It was superior to the measured value. As is clear from Table 3, the peak value of torque was about 0.8 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, but the peak value of power was before the injection of the additive solution. There was a difference of about 14.0 PS after injection.

[Example 2-3]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Mazda Model: RX-7
Year: April 1999 Displacement: 2000cc
Model: GF-FD3S

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. The measurement was performed twice. After the measurement, 15 ml of additive liquid was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. Further, after this measurement, 1 ml of the additive solution was added to the radiator, and a second measurement was performed with a total addition amount of 16 ml. These measurement results are shown in FIG.

FIG. 3A shows a change in measured value of torque accompanying a change in engine speed, and FIG. 3B shows a change in measured value of power accompanying a change in engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 3, the measurement result lines before injection of the additive liquid are indicated by A ₁ and A ₂ , the measurement result line after injection of 15 ml of the additive liquid is indicated by B ₁ , and the injection amount of the additive liquid is 16 ml. the measurement results of the line in the case of the indicated B _2.

Table 4 shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 3, the measured values of power and torque after injection of 15 ml of additive liquid indicated by B ₁ are compared with the measured values of power and torque before injection of additive liquid indicated by A ₁ and A _2. excellent Te, measurement of power and torque indicated by B ₂ after further adding the additive solution of 1ml were further improved. Further, as is clear from Table 4, the peak values of power and torque were also excellent after the injection of the additive solution as compared to before the injection.

[Example 2-4]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Nissan Car: Silvia Year: December 1996 Displacement: 2000cc
Model: ES14

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. The measurement was performed twice. After the measurement, 13 ml of additive liquid was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement after injection of the additive solution was also performed twice. These measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 4A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 4B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 4, the measurement result lines before injection of the additive solution are indicated by A ₁ and A ₂ , and the measurement result lines after injection of the additive solution are indicated by B ₁ and B ₂ .

Table 5 also shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 4, the measured values of power and torque after the injection of the additive liquid indicated by B ₁ and B ₂ are the measured values of power and torque before the injection of the additive liquid indicated by A ₁ and A _2. It was better than that. Further, as is clear from Table 5, the peak values of power and torque were also excellent after the injection of the additive solution compared to before the injection.

[Example 2-5]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Honda Model: Civic Year: November 1998 Displacement: 1500cc
Model: GF-EK3

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 10 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 5A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 5B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 5, the measurement result line before injection of the additive liquid is indicated by A, and the measurement result line after injection of the additive liquid is indicated by B.

Table 6 shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 5, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive solution indicated by B were superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive solution indicated by A. As is clear from Table 3, the torque peak value is a difference of about 0.7 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, and the power peak value is also injected before and after the injection of the additive solution. Although it was a difference of about 3.3 PS later, at any engine speed, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid are generally superior to those before injection. It was clear from the result of FIG.

[Example 2-6]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Mazda Model: Eunos Roadster Year: December 1994 Displacement: 1800cc
Model: NA8C

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 15 ml of additive liquid was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 6A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 6B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 6, a measurement result line before injection of the additive liquid is indicated by A, and a measurement result line after injection of the additive liquid is indicated by B.

Table 7 shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 6, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive solution indicated by B were superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive solution indicated by A. Further, as is clear from Table 7, the torque peak value is a difference of about 0.5 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, and the power peak value is also injected before and after the injection of the additive solution. Although it was a difference of about 2.4 PS later, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid are generally superior to those before injection at any engine speed. It was clear from the result of FIG.

[Example 2-7]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Nissan Car: Skyline GT-R
Year: March 1995 Displacement: 2600cc
Model: E-BCNR33

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 20 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 7A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 7B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 7, the measurement result line before injection of the additive liquid is indicated by A, and the measurement result line after injection of the additive liquid is indicated by B.

Table 8 shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 7, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive solution indicated by B were superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive solution indicated by A. Further, as apparent from Table 8, the peak value of torque was about 0.6 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, but the peak value of power was before the injection of the additive solution. There was a difference of about 6.8 PS after injection.

[Example 2-8]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Nissan Car: Skyline GT-R
Year: December 1991 Displacement: 2600cc
Model: E-BNR32

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 20 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 8A shows a change in measured value of torque accompanying a change in engine speed, and FIG. 8B shows a change in measured value of power accompanying a change in engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 8, a measurement result line before injection of the additive liquid is indicated by A, and a measurement result line after injection of the additive liquid is indicated by B.

Table 9 shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 8, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid indicated by B were superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive liquid indicated by A. As is clear from Table 9, the torque peak value has a difference of about 1.0 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive liquid. There was a difference of about 17.7 PS after injection.

[Example 2-9]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Suzuki Model: Jimny JA11
Year: 1995 Displacement: 660cc
Model: JA11 modified

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 7 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. Furthermore, after this measurement, 3 ml of additive solution was added to the radiator, and a second measurement was performed with a total addition amount of 10 ml. These measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 9A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 9B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 9, the pre-injection of the additive liquid measurement line indicated by A, it shows the measurement results of the line after the additive solution were 7ml injected with B _1, in the case where the injection amount of the additive solution was 10ml It showed measurement results line B _2.

Table 10 shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is apparent from FIG. 9, the measured values of power and torque after injecting 7 ml of the additive solution indicated by B ₁ and the measured values of power and torque after injecting 10 ml of the additive solution indicated by B ₂ are both indicated by A. It was superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive solution. In particular, the measured values of power and torque were better when 10 ml of the additive solution was injected than when 7 ml was injected.

Further, as is clear from Table 10, the torque peak value is a difference of about 0.6 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, and the power peak value is also injected before and after the injection of the additive solution. Although it was a difference of about 3.6 PS later, at any engine speed, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid are generally superior to those before injection. It was clear from the result of FIG.

[Example 2-10]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Suzuki Model: Jimny JA11
Year: 1995 Volume: 660cc
Model: JA22W

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 7 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. Furthermore, after this measurement, 3 ml of additive solution was added to the radiator, and a second measurement was performed with a total addition amount of 10 ml. These measurement results are shown in FIG.

FIG. 10A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 10B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 10, the measurement result line before injection of the additive liquid is indicated by A, the measurement result line after 7 ml of the additive liquid is injected is indicated by B ₁ , and the injection amount of the additive liquid is 10 ml. It showed measurement results line B _2.

Table 11 shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 10, the measured values of power and torque after injecting 7 ml of the additive liquid indicated by B ₁ and the measured values of power and torque after injecting 10 ml of the additive liquid indicated by B ₂ are both indicated by A. It was superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive solution. In particular, the measured values of power and torque were better when 10 ml of the additive solution was injected than when 7 ml was injected.

Further, as is clear from Table 11, the peak value of the torque is a difference of about 0.4 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, and the peak value of the power is also injected before and after the injection of the additive solution. Although it was a difference of about 2.5 PS later, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid are generally superior to those before injection at any engine speed. It was clear from the result of FIG.

[Example 2-11]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Suzuki Model: Jimny JA11
Year: 1992 Displacement: 660cc
Model: TA-JB23W

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 7 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. Furthermore, after this measurement, 3 ml of additive solution was added to the radiator, and a second measurement was performed with a total addition amount of 10 ml. These measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 11A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 11B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 11, the prior injection of additive liquid measurement line indicated by A, shows the measurement results of the line after the additive solution were 7ml injected with B _1, in the case where the injection amount of the additive solution was 10ml It showed measurement results line B _2.

Table 12 also shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 11, the measured values of power and torque after injecting 7 ml of the additive solution indicated by B ₁ and the measured values of power and torque after injecting 10 ml of the additive solution indicated by B ₂ are both indicated by A. It was superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive solution. In particular, the measured values of power and torque were better when 10 ml of the additive solution was injected than when 7 ml was injected. Further, as is clear from Table 12, the torque peak value is a difference of about 0.7 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive liquid, and the power peak value is also injected before and after the injection of the additive liquid. Although it was a difference of about 3.4 PS later, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid are generally superior to those before injection at any engine speed. It was clear from the result of FIG.

[Example 2-12]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Suzuki Model: Cappuccino Year: 1992 Displacement: 660cc
Model: EA-11R

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 7 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. Furthermore, after this measurement, 3 ml of additive solution was added to the radiator, and a second measurement was performed with a total addition amount of 10 ml. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 12A shows a change in measured value of torque accompanying a change in engine speed, and FIG. 12B shows a change in measured value of power accompanying a change in engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 12, the prior injection of additive liquid measurement line indicated by A, shows the measurement results of the line after the additive solution were 7ml injected with B _1, in the case where the injection amount of the additive solution was 10ml It showed measurement results line B _2.

Table 13 shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 12, the measured values of power and torque after injecting 7 ml of the additive liquid indicated by B ₁ and the measured values of power and torque after injecting 10 ml of the additive liquid indicated by B ₂ are both indicated by A. It was superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive solution. In particular, the measured values of power and torque were better when 10 ml of the additive solution was injected than when 7 ml was injected. As is clear from Table 13, the peak value of the torque is a difference of about 0.2 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, and the peak value of the power is also injected before and after the injection of the additive solution. Although it was a difference of about 2.0 PS later, at any engine speed, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid are generally superior to those before injection. It was clear from the result of FIG.

[Example 2-13]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Chrysler Model: TJ Wrangler Year: 1997 Displacement: 4000cc
Model: TJ40

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 18 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. Furthermore, after this measurement, 2 ml of additive solution was added to the radiator, and a second measurement was performed with a total addition amount of 20 ml. These measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 13A shows a change in measured value of torque accompanying a change in engine speed, and FIG. 13B shows a change in measured value of power accompanying a change in engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 13, the prior injection of additive liquid measurement line indicated by A, shows the measurement results of the line after 18ml injected additive liquid in B _1, in the case where the injection amount of the additive solution was 20ml It showed measurement results line B _2.

Table 14 shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is apparent from FIG. 13, the measured power value after injecting 18 ml of additive liquid indicated by B ₁ and the measured power value after injecting 20 ml of additive liquid indicated by B ₂ are both injected by the additive liquid indicated by A. Compared to previous power measurements. On the other hand, the measured value of the torque was not so different until the engine rotation speed was about 4000 rpm, but when the rotation speed exceeded 4000 rpm, the measured value of the torque after injection of the additive solution was the measured value of the torque before injection. Improved compared to In particular, when 20 ml of the additive solution was injected, the measured value of the torque when the engine speed exceeded 4800 rpm was improved compared to the case where 18 ml was injected. Further, as is clear from Table 14, the peak value of torque is reduced by about 0.2 kg · m after injection compared to before injection of the additive solution, and the peak value of power is also compared with that before injection of the additive solution. Although it was increased, it was a difference of about 3.6 PS. However, at any engine speed, the measured power value after injection of the additive solution was generally superior to that before injection. It was clear from the result of FIG. In addition, it is clear from the result of FIG. 13 that the measured torque value after the injection of the additive solution is superior to that before the injection at a high speed exceeding 4800 rpm.

[Example 2-14]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Honda Model: Accord Euro R
Year: December 2003 Displacement: 2000cc
Model: LA-CL7

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 15 ml of additive liquid was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. Further, after this measurement, 2 ml of additive solution was added to the radiator, and a second measurement was performed with a total addition amount of 17 ml. These measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 14A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 14B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 14, the prior injection of additive liquid measurement line indicated by A, shows the measurement results of the line after the additive solution was 15ml injected with B _1, in the case where the injection amount of the additive solution was 17ml It showed measurement results line B _2.

Table 15 shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 14, the measured power value after injecting 15 ml of additive liquid indicated by B ₁ and the measured power value after injecting 17 ml of additive liquid indicated by B ₂ are both injected by the additive liquid indicated by A. Compared to previous power measurements. On the other hand, the measured value of the torque was not so different until the engine speed was about 4000 rpm, but when the engine speed exceeded 6000 rpm, the measured value of the torque after injection of the additive solution was the measured value of the torque before injection. Improved compared to In particular, when 17 ml of the additive liquid was injected, the measured value of the torque when the engine speed exceeded 7000 rpm was improved as compared with the case where 15 ml was injected. Further, as apparent from Table 15, the torque peak value was only about 0.1 kg · m before and after injection of the additive solution, but the power peak value was before injection of the additive solution. There was a difference of about 5.2 PS after injection.

[Example 2-15]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: BMW E60 M5
Model: BMW
Year: October 2005 Displacement: 5000cc
Model: ABA-NB50

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 25 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement after injection of the additive solution was performed twice. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 15A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 15B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 15, the measurement result line before injection of the additive solution is indicated by A, and the measurement result line twice after injection of the additive solution is indicated by B ₁ and B ₂ .

Table 16 also shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 15, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid indicated by B ₁ and B ₂ are both superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive liquid indicated by A. It was. Further, as is clear from Table 16, the torque peak value has a difference of about 2.1 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive liquid, and the power peak value is the same as that before the injection of the additive liquid and the injection. Later there was a significant difference of 22.9 PS.

[Example 2-16]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: BMW E92 M3
Model: BMW
Year: February 2008 Displacement: 4000cc
Model: ABA-WD40

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 25 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 16A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 16B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 16, the measurement result line before injection of the additive liquid is indicated by A, and the measurement result line after injection of the additive liquid is indicated by B.

Table 17 also shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 16, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive solution indicated by B were superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive solution indicated by A. Further, as apparent from Table 17, the peak value of torque was about 0.9 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, but the peak value of power was the injection of the additive solution. There was a difference of 13.0 PS before and after injection.

[Example 2-17]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Honda Model: Step Wagon Revision Year: July 1997 Displacement: 2000cc
Model: E-RFI modified

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. The measurement was performed twice. After the measurement, 20 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. These measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 17A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 17B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 17, the measurement result lines before injection of the additive solution are indicated by A ₁ and A ₂ , and the measurement result line after injection of the additive solution is indicated by B.

Table 18 also shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 17, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid indicated by B were superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive liquid indicated by A ₁ and A ₂ . . Further, as apparent from Table 18, the peak value of the torque was about 0.5 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, but the peak value of the power was before the injection of the additive solution. And 11.4 PS after injection.

[Example 2-18]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Nissan Car: Skyline GT-R
Year: January 1999 Displacement: 2600cc
Model: E-BER34

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. The measurement was performed twice. After the measurement, 20 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 18A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 18B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 18, the measurement result lines before injection of the additive liquid are indicated by A ₁ and A ₂ , and the measurement result line after injection of the additive liquid is indicated by B.

Table 19 shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 18, the measurement values of power and torque after addition injection indicated by B was superior compared to the measured value of power and torque before injection of the additive solution shown by A ₁ and A ₂ . As is clear from Table 19, the torque peak value was about 0.8 kg · m before injection of the additive solution and after injection, but the power peak value was before injection of the additive solution. There was a difference of 12.4 PS after injection.

[Example 2-19]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Toyota Model: Aristo Year: July 2000 Displacement: 3000cc
Model: E-JZS161

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 25 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement after injection of the additive solution was performed twice. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 19A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 19B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 19, the measurement result line before injection of the additive solution is indicated by A, and the measurement result line twice after injection of the additive solution is indicated by B ₁ and B ₂ .

Table 20 also shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 19, in the rotational speed of the engine is up to about 4500 rpm, 1 th measurement values of power and torque after addition injection indicated by B _1, the prior injection of additive solution shown by A power And it was inferior to the measured value of torque. This is because, during the first measurement, the accelerator is not fully depressed, and the measured values of power and torque up to about 4500 rpm are inadvertently reduced. However, when the rotation speed exceeded 4500 rpm, a full accelerator state was obtained, and excellent results of measured values of power and torque were obtained. On the other hand, the second measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid did not differ until the engine speed reached about 4200 rpm, but when the engine speed exceeded 4500 rpm, the measured values of power and torque were Compared to before injection of the additive solution. Further, as apparent from Table 20, the torque peak value has a difference of 2.9 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, and the power peak value is before and after the injection of the additive solution. There was a significant difference of 21.8 PS.

[Example 2-20]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Nissan Car: Skyline GT-R
Year: July 1992 Displacement: 2600cc
Model: E-BER32

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 25 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement after injection of the additive solution was performed twice. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 20A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 20B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 20, a measurement result line before injection of the additive liquid is indicated by A, and two measurement result lines after injection of the additive liquid are indicated by B ₁ and B ₂ .

Table 21 also shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 20, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive solution indicated by B ₁ and B ₂ are slight when the engine speed exceeds 4000 rpm, but the additive solution indicated by A is small. It was superior to the measured power and torque before injection. Further, as apparent from Table 21, the peak value of the torque was a difference of about 0.3 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, but the peak value of the power was before the injection of the additive solution. There was a difference of 7.9 PS after injection.

[Example 2-21]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Toyota Model: Sprinter Trueno Year: December 1985 Displacement: 1600cc
Model: E-AE86

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 10 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. Further, after this measurement, 3 ml of additive solution was added to the radiator, and a second measurement was performed with a total addition amount of 13 ml. These measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 21A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 21B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 21, the prior injection of additive liquid measurement line indicated by A, shows the measurement results of the line after the additive solution was 10ml injected with B _1, in the case where the injection amount of the additive solution was 13ml It showed measurement results line B _2.

Table 22 shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 21, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid indicated by B ₁ and B ₂ are the power before injection of the additive liquid indicated by A when the engine speed exceeds 4000 rpm. And it was superior to the measured value of torque. Further, as apparent from Table 22, the peak value of the torque was about 0.1 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, but the peak value of the power was before the injection of the additive solution. There was a difference of 5.2 PS after injection.

[Example 2-22]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Suzuki Model: Carry Truck Year: 1990 Displacement: 660cc
Model: DA52T

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 7 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 22A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 22B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 22, the measurement result line before injection of the additive liquid is indicated by A, and the measurement result line after injection of the additive liquid is indicated by B.

Table 23 also shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 22, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid indicated by B were superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive liquid indicated by A. Further, as apparent from Table 17, the peak value of torque was about 0.1 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, but the peak value of power was the injection of the additive solution. There was a difference of 5.2 PS before and after injection.

[Example 2-23]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Toyota Model: Sprinter Van Year: August 1995 Displacement: 1500cc
Model: R-EE103V

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 10 ml of additive solution was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 23A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 23B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 23, the measurement result line before injection of the additive liquid is indicated by A, and the measurement result line after injection of the additive liquid is indicated by B.

Table 24 also shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 23, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive liquid indicated by B were superior to the measured values of power and torque before injection of the additive liquid indicated by A. Further, as is clear from Table 24, the torque peak value is a difference of about 0.2 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive liquid, and the power peak value is the same as that before the injection of the additive liquid. Although the difference was about 2.1PS after injection, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive solution are generally superior to those before injection at any engine speed. It was clear from the result of FIG.

[Example 2-24]
In this example, the following vehicle was tested.
Manufacturer: Mitsubishi Model: JEEP
Year: Showa 56 Displacement: 2500cc
Model: J57

As in Example 2-1, before injecting the additive liquid into the radiator, power and torque accompanying changes in engine speed were first measured. After the measurement, 12 ml of additive liquid was injected into the radiator, and the power and torque were measured in the same manner. The measurement results are shown in FIG. FIG. 24A shows a change in the measured value of torque accompanying a change in the engine speed, and FIG. 24B shows a change in the measured value of power accompanying a change in the engine speed. The unit display is the same as in FIG. In the graph of FIG. 24, the measurement result line before injection of the additive liquid is indicated by A, and the measurement result line after injection of the additive liquid is indicated by B.

Table 25 also shows the peak values of power and torque, the engine speed when the peak values are shown, and the vehicle speed corresponding to the engine speed.

As is clear from FIG. 24, when the engine speed exceeds 3000 rpm, the measured values of power and torque after injecting the additive liquid indicated by B are measured by the power and torque before injecting the additive liquid indicated by A. Excellent compared to the value. As is clear from Table 25, the peak value of the torque is a difference of about 0.1 kg · m before and after the injection of the additive solution, and the peak value of the power is the difference between before and after the injection of the additive solution. Although it was a difference of about 1.1 PS later, at rotation speeds exceeding 3000 rpm, the measured values of power and torque after injection of the additive solution are generally superior to those before injection. It was clear from the result of FIG.

(Example 3)
In this embodiment, the engine performance improving additive liquid as described above is added to the cooling water and the change in specific heat accompanying the temperature change is measured, and the temperature change of only the cooling water is not added without adding the additive liquid. It was compared with the measured value of change in specific heat.

The measurement was performed under the following conditions, and the measurement was performed 10 times under the same conditions while changing the addition amount of the sample (addition liquid). *

Measuring method: DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) Measuring device: Pyris Diamond DSC manufactured by PerkinElmer
Temperature increase rate: 20 ° C / min
Sample amount: 4mg
Atmosphere: Helium 20 ml / min

In the first, third, fourth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth measurements, the additive solution was added to the cooling water so that the amount of the additive solution was 0.25% by volume, In the second measurement, the additive solution is added to the cooling water so that the amount of the additive solution is 2.5% by volume. In the fifth measurement, the additive solution is added so that the amount of the additive solution is 0.2% by volume. The liquid was added to cooling water and each measurement was performed. The temperature was measured in the range of 20 ° C to 90 ° C.

For each of the case of cooling water alone and the case of adding the additive liquid to the cooling water, the average value of the measured values of all 10 times of specific heat every 10 ° C. in the range of 20 ° C. to 90 ° C. was obtained.

The measured values are shown in Table 26, and the measured values are graphed in FIG. In FIG. 25, the curve indicated by A is a graph of the measured value of only the cooling water, and the curve indicated by B is a graph of the measured value when the additive liquid is added to the cooling water.

As is clear from FIG. 25 and Table 26, it was recognized that the specific heat tended to decrease by adding the additive liquid in any temperature range as compared with the case of only cooling water.

As described above, the total heat was measured 10 times, and as a result, the specific heat decreased by adding the additive liquid as compared with the case of only cooling water. Therefore, by adding the additive liquid, It is estimated that the cooling efficiency of the radiator is improved and the power and torque are increased, thereby improving the fuel consumption.

Claims

5 to 50 mg / l calcium, 0.05 to 0.5 mg / l cobalt, 0.5 to 5 mg / l potassium, qualitative analysis by high frequency inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), An additive for improving engine performance, characterized by containing 5 to 5 mg / l magnesium, 1 to 10 mg / l sodium, 1 to 10 mg / l silicon and 0.05 to 0.5 mg / l zinc .