WO2009140338A2 - Interference cancellation under non-stationary conditions - Google Patents
Interference cancellation under non-stationary conditions Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2009140338A2 WO2009140338A2 PCT/US2009/043718 US2009043718W WO2009140338A2 WO 2009140338 A2 WO2009140338 A2 WO 2009140338A2 US 2009043718 W US2009043718 W US 2009043718W WO 2009140338 A2 WO2009140338 A2 WO 2009140338A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- symbols
- burst
- subset
- midamble
- timing
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W56/00—Synchronisation arrangements
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/01—Reducing phase shift
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
Definitions
- optimal timing and frequency are jointly obtained in a wireless communication system by parametrizing the subspace into possible timing and frequency hypotheses and searching through them.
- Joint Max Likelihood of frequency and timing may be performed sequentially or in parallel.
- an interference suppression filter is tuned to various parameters, and then optimal pairs (of time and frequency) are picked by minimizing the prediction error using a known sequence (midamble or quasi-midamble, e.g., data aided).
- the algorithm boosts the received signal quality under strong interference whereas non-coherent estimation would degrade significantly.
- the method further comprises the steps of determining one of the plurality of timing offsets to be a preferred timing offset based upon the first performance metric thereof, iteratively rotating the subset of the burst of symbols by a plurality of frequency offsets and calculating, for each frequency offset, a second performance metric corresponding to the rotated subset, and determining one of the plurality of frequency offsets to be a preferred frequency offset based upon the second performance metric thereof.
- a method for timing and frequency synchronization in a wireless system comprises the steps of receiving a burst of symbols, selecting a subset of the burst of symbols, iteratively adjusting the subset of the burst of symbols by a plurality of timing offsets and a plurality of frequency offsets, calculating, for each combination of timing and frequency offsets, a performance metric corresponding to the adjusted subset, and determining one of the combination of timing and frequency offsets to be a preferred combination based upon the performance metric thereof.
- a wireless apparatus comprises a receiver configured to receive a burst of symbols, and a processor.
- the processor is configured to select a subset of the burst of symbols, iteratively adjust the subset of the burst of symbols by a plurality of timing offsets and calculate, for each timing offset, a first performance metric corresponding to the adjusted subset.
- a wireless apparatus comprises means for receiving a burst of symbols, means for selecting a subset of the burst of symbols, means for iteratively adjusting the subset of the burst of symbols by a plurality of timing offsets and for calculating, for each timing offset, a first performance metric corresponding to the adjusted subset, means for determining one of the plurality of timing offsets to be a preferred timing offset based upon the first performance metric thereof, means for iteratively rotating the subset of the burst of symbols by a plurality of frequency offsets and calculating, for each frequency offset, a second performance metric corresponding to the rotated subset, and means for determining one of the plurality of frequency offsets to be a preferred frequency offset based upon the second performance metric thereof.
- a computer-program product for use in a wireless communication system comprises a computer readable medium having a set of instructions stored thereon, the set of instructions being executable by one or more processors and the set of instructions comprising instructions for receiving a burst of symbols, instructions for selecting a subset of the burst of symbols, instructions for iteratively adjusting the subset of the burst of symbols by a plurality of timing offsets and for calculating, for each timing offset, a first performance metric corresponding to the adjusted subset, instructions for determining one of the plurality of timing offsets to be a preferred timing offset based upon the first performance metric thereof, instructions for iteratively rotating the subset of the burst of symbols by a plurality of frequency offsets and for calculating, for each frequency offset, a second performance metric corresponding to the rotated subset, and instructions for determining one of the plurality of frequency offsets to be a preferred frequency offset based upon the second performance metric thereof.
- a computer-program product for use in a wireless communication system comprises a computer readable medium having a set of instructions stored thereon, the set of instructions being executable by one or more processors and the set of instructions comprising instructions for receiving a burst of symbols, instructions for selecting a subset of the burst of symbols, instructions for iteratively adjusting the subset of the burst of symbols by a plurality of timing offsets and a plurality of frequency offsets, instructions for calculating, for each combination of timing and frequency offsets, a performance metric corresponding to the adjusted subset, and instructions for determining one of the combination of timing and frequency offsets to be a preferred combination based upon the performance metric thereof.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating a method for suppressing interference in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology
- FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a method for suppressing interference in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology
- FIG. 4 illustrates a receiver for use in a wireless communication system in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology
- FIG. 5 illustrates a subset of symbols, including the first midamble symbol, that a receiver selects in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology
- FIG. 6 illustrates a method for suppressing interference in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology
- FIG. 7 illustrates a receiver for use in a wireless communication system in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology
- FIG. 8 illustrates a method for suppressing interference in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology
- FIG. 9 illustrates a receiver for use in a wireless communication system in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology
- FIG. 10 illustrates a receiver for use in a wireless communication system in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology.
- FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating a computer system with which certain aspects of the subject technology may be implemented.
- FIG. 1 shows exemplary frame and burst formats in GSM.
- the timeline for downlink transmission is divided into multiframes.
- each multiframe such as exemplary multiframe 101, includes 26 TDMA frames, which are labeled as TDMA frames 0 through 25.
- the traffic channels are sent in TDMA frames 0 through 11 and TDMA frames 13 through 24 of each multiframe, as identified by the letter "T” in FIG. 1.
- a control channel, identified by the letter "C,” is sent in TDMA frame 12.
- No data is sent in the idle TDMA frame 25 (identified by the letter "I”), which is used by the wireless devices to make measurements for neighbor base stations.
- Each burst such as exemplary burst 103, includes two tail fields, two data fields, a training sequence (or midamble) field, and a guard period (GP).
- the number of bits in each field is shown inside the parentheses.
- GSM defines eight different training sequences that may be sent in the training sequence field.
- Each training sequence, such as midamble 104, contains 26 bits and is defined such that the first five bits are repeated and the second five bits are also repeated.
- Each training sequence is also defined such that the correlation of that sequence with a 16-bit truncated version of that sequence is equal to (a) sixteen for a time shift of zero, (b) zero for time shifts of ⁇ 1, ⁇ 2, ⁇ 3, ⁇ 4, and ⁇ 5, and (3) a zero or non-zero value for all other time shifts.
- One approach to locating a midamble in a burst of symbols serially compares hypotheses regarding the midamble position to determine which hypothesis provides the highest correlation energy between the known midamble sequence and the hypothesized position in the burst of symbols. This method is very sensitive to interference from multi-paths of the same midamble sequence, which can cause the correlation energy of inaccurate hypotheses to be affected by time-delayed copies thereof.
- Non-Coherent Frequency and Timing estimation suffers from performance degradation under presence of strong interference. According to one aspect of the subject technology, by semi-coherently estimating the optimal timing and frequency, performance in the presence of interference can be greatly improved.
- optimal timing and frequency are jointly obtained by parametrizing the subspace into possible hypotheses and searching through them.
- Joint Max Likelihood of frequency and timing may be further simplified to a sequential search to provide optimal performance.
- an interference suppression filter is tuned to various parameters, and then optimal pairs (of time and frequency) are picked by minimizing the prediction error using a known sequence (midamble or quasi-midamble, e.g., data aided).
- the algorithm boosts the received signal quality under strong interference whereas non-coherent estimation would degrade significantly.
- s k is the midamble / quasi-midamble signal at time k
- s_ k is a (t> + l)x l midamble / quasi-midamble vector
- x t is a Mx l received midamble / quasi- midamble vector
- a spatial/temporal structured matrix can be constructed, such that
- [X] is a M (I + 1)X /J - D matrix
- p is the length of the midamble or quasi- midamble (data aided).
- a suppression filter W SAIC can be computed according to one aspect of the subject disclosure by estimating a reference sequence of symbols at the channel input:
- the interference suppression filter can be serially tuned to each of a plurality of timing hypotheses, and the hypothesis corresponding to the lowest prediction error (using any known sequence, such as the midamble or a data aided quasi-midamble) is selected. Then the filter is serially tuned to each of a plurality of frequency hypotheses to determine which frequency hypothesis corresponds to a lowest prediction error.
- This serial approach is illustrated in accordance with one aspect of the subject disclosure in FIG. 2.
- the method begins by initializing a number of variables in block 201, including k (the frequency hypothesis number), ⁇ (the timing hypothesis number), ⁇ 1111n (the lowest measured error), ⁇ (n) (the optimal timing hypothesis number) and f ⁇ n)
- the method proceeds to the timing loop 202 (as k is initialized to a zero value).
- a set of spatial temporal samples are selected corresponding to timing hypothesis number ⁇ .
- Filter weights for a filter W A are calculated based upon the timing hypothesis, as set forth in greater detail above, and the filter is applied to the symbols to estimate a midamble S& .
- the error ⁇ ( ⁇ ) in the estimated midamble is determined based upon the previously known values for the midamble S .
- the error is smoothed, and is compared to ⁇ 1111n , the lowest calculated error thus far. As ⁇ mm is initially set to ⁇ , the first iteration will necessarily involve redefining ⁇ 1111n to the first calculated error value.
- one drawback of using this algorithm for frequency synchronization is that the training sequence may be too short to reliably estimate small frequency offsets (e.g., on the order of few hundred Hz), as the curvature over midamble is essentially flat.
- the need for an error smoothening filter which makes the implementation more complicated in the field where the frequency offset between interferer and the desired signal can change from burst to burst.
- the signal to noise ratio may be used over the entire burst instead of the midamble estimation error, in accordance with one aspect of the subject disclosure.
- the burst is equalized (post MLSE) and the signal to noise ratio is determined using the hard decisions.
- This approach is illustrated in accordance with one aspect of the subject disclosure in FIG. 3.
- the timing loop includes an estimation of the signal to noise ratio (E b /N 0 ), which estimation is used to
- the method illustrated in FIG. 3 includes a timing loop 301 and a frequency loop 302.
- a set of spatial temporal samples are selected corresponding to timing hypothesis number ⁇ .
- Filter weights for a filter W ⁇ are calculated based upon the timing hypothesis, as set forth in greater detail above, and the filter is applied to the symbols to estimate a midamble S ⁇ .
- the error ⁇ ⁇ in the estimated midamble is determined based upon the previously known values for the midamble S .
- the error is smoothed, and is compared to £ mn , the lowest calculated error thus far.
- ⁇ mm is initially set to ⁇ , the first iteration will necessarily involve redefining ⁇ 1111n to the first calculated error value. Accordingly, At ML (n) , the optimal timing hypothesis yet calculated, will be set to ⁇ .
- timing loop 301 repeats. Once timing loop 301 has iteratively calculated errors for each timing hypothesis ⁇ , an optimal hypothesis At ML (n) will have been selected, and the method proceeds to frequency loop
- Frequency loop 302 iteratively calculates a signal to noise ratio for each frequency hypothesis (at the optimal timing delay), and determines the optimal frequency hypothesis. In this manner, an optimal timing/frequency pair are serially determined from the parameterized timing/frequency subspace, and are used in the processing of the symbols to minimize errors arising from interference.
- the signal to noise ratio EjN 0 determined in frequency loop 302 is based upon hard decisions.
- the SNR may be equal
- Il “ Il /ll” II 2 to ViHVi / VJVX -HSl , where S is a Toeplitz matrix of estimated symbols after the equalization of the entire burst, which also includes the known training sequence S.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a receiver for use in a wireless communication system in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology.
- Receiver 400 includes an antenna 410 configured to receive a wireless signal. While receiver 400 may be used in various communication systems, for clarity, receiver 400 is specifically described herein with respect to a GSM system.
- the received signal is provided to a pre-processor 420 which demodulates the signal to generate received samples.
- Pre-processor 420 may include a GMSK-to-BPSK rotator that performs phase rotation on the received samples.
- Timing estimator 430 receives the samples from pre-processor 420 and generates a plurality of timing hypotheses regarding where a training sequence of symbols (i.e., midamble) begins in the burst of data.
- Interference suppressor 440 iteratively performs single antenna interference cancellation on the symbols for each timing hypothesis, calculating different filter weights for each timing hypothesis, and midamble estimator 450 generates a midamble estimation error for each hypothesis, as described in greater detail above.
- Timing decision circuit 460 compares the midamble estimation errors for each hypothesis and selects the hypothesis with the lowest midamble estimation error. The selection of a hypothesis by timing decision circuit 460 represents the position in the burst of symbols where the midamble is estimated to begin.
- Frequency estimator 470 receives the samples from timing decision circuit 460 and generates a plurality of frequency hypotheses regarding a frequency on which symbols are transmitted.
- Interference suppressor 440 iteratively performs single antenna interference cancellation on the symbols for each frequency hypothesis, calculating different filter weights for each frequency hypothesis, and midamble estimator 450 generates a midamble estimation error for each hypothesis, as described in greater detail above.
- Frequency decision circuit 480 compares the midamble estimation errors for each hypothesis and selects the hypothesis with the lowest midamble estimation error. The selection of a hypothesis by frequency decision circuit 480 represents the optimal frequency at which to receive the burst of symbols.
- the signal is then provided to data processor 490, which processes the received symbols based upon the selected timing and frequency hypotheses, and outputs the data corresponding to the received symbols.
- timing estimator may generate a plurality of timing hypotheses by opening a "window" around the estimated beginning of the midamble sequence.
- the position of the first symbol of the midamble sequence can be estimated for a given burst, based upon the known structure of each burst. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 1, the beginning of midamble 104 in burst 103 begins in the 62nd bit of the burst.
- timing estimator 430 selects a window 105 of bits representing a series of hypotheses regarding where the first midamble symbol may be located. Exemplary window 105 is illustrated in greater detail in FIG. 5.
- midamble estimator 450 determine estimated midamble symbols corresponding thereto, in order to determine a midamble estimation error therefor.
- window 105 has been illustrated as consisting of exactly 11 symbols, the scope of the present invention is not limited to such an arrangement. Rather, as will be readily apparent to one of skill in the art, any window size (up to the size of the entire data burst) may be selected.
- the size of the search window may be chosen to be twice the size of the expected minimum propagation delay.
- the search window size may be parameterized based on any other metric known to those of skill in the art.
- a channel estimate h may be generated by timing estimator 430 by correlating the received samples (corresponding to the hypothesized delay) with the reference samples (i.e., the known midamble sequence) for each hypothesis. Based on the correlation R ys ( ⁇ ) between received signal y and midamble sequence s for a hypothesized delay ⁇ , the channel estimate may be calculated as follows:
- interference suppressor 440 performs SAIC on each estimated channel.
- SAIC is a method by which oversampled and/or real/imaginary decomposition of a signal is used to provide virtual antennas with separate sample sequences, such that weights may be applied to the virtual antennas to form a beam in the direction of a desired transmitter and a beam null in the direction of an undesired interference source.
- SAIC may be achieved with one or multiple actual antennas at the receiver by using space-time processing, where "space” may be virtually achieved with inphase and quadrature components, and "time” may be achieved using late and early samples.
- s k is the midamble / quasi-midamble signal at time k
- s_ k is a ( ⁇ + 1) x 1 midamble / quasi-midamble vector
- x k is a M x 1 received midamble / quasi- midamble vector
- J t is a Af x(l + l)x l vector of spatial temporal samples with a spatial length of
- a spatial/temporal structured matrix can be constructed, such that
- [ ⁇ ] ... ⁇ k r
- [X] is a M (I + 1)X /J - D matrix
- p is the length of the midamble or quasi- midamble (data aided).
- a suppression filter W SAIC can be computed according to one aspect of the subject disclosure by estimating a reference sequence of symbols at the channel input:
- the output of interference suppressor 440 is in the form S , where S represents an estimate of the midamble sequence.
- S represents an estimate of the midamble sequence.
- Equation 7 The difference between the estimated and known midamble sequences is determined according to Equation 7, below:
- timing decision block 460 determines which hypothesis corresponds to the lowest estimation error e m , and the other hypothesized timing values are discarded.
- the foregoing method for interference suppression enjoys a number of benefits when compared to a method utilizing channel output beamforming. For example, as can be seen with reference to Equation 4, the interference suppression filter weights are calculated by minimizing the cost function
- the suppression filter weights (of Equation 6) have the dimensionality of t>xM(L + l) , and the filtered output has the dimensionality of ⁇ x (/? - ⁇ ) . Accordingly, the size of the filter weights grows linearly with the number of antennas (whether real or virtual), and the size of the filtered output sample matrix remains constant even as the number of antennas (or virtual antennas) grows. This offers dramatic improvements in computational simplicity and storage requirements over a channel output setup, in which the interference suppression filter weights are calculated by minimizing the cost function
- FIG. 6 illustrates a method for suppressing interference in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology.
- the method begins in step 601, in which a burst of symbols are received.
- step 602 a subset of the burst of symbols is selected.
- the subset of the burst of symbols includes a first midamble symbol.
- step 603 the subset selected in step 602 is iteratively adjusted by a plurality of timing offsets.
- a plurality of weights for an interference filter are calculated for each timing offset, based upon the burst of symbols.
- step 605 the burst of symbols are filtered, for each timing offset, using the interference suppression filter with the corresponding plurality of weights to determine an estimated midamble sequence.
- step 606 the estimated midamble sequence for each timing offset is compared to a previously known midamble sequence to determine a midamble estimation error for that timing offset.
- One of the plurality of timing offsets is determined, in step 607, to be a preferred timing offset, based upon the midamble estimation error thereof.
- the preferred midamble timing offset is the timing offset corresponding to the lowest midamble estimation error.
- step 608 the subset of the burst of symbols are iteratively rotated by a plurality of frequency offsets.
- a plurality of weights for an interference filter are calculated for each frequency offset, based upon the burst of symbols.
- the burst of symbols are filtered, for each frequency offset, using the interference suppression filter with the corresponding plurality of weights to determine an estimated midamble sequence.
- the estimated midamble sequence for each frequency offset is compared to a previously known midamble sequence to determine a midamble estimation error for that frequency offset.
- One of the plurality of frequency offsets is determined, in step 612, to be a preferred frequency offset, based upon the midamble estimation error thereof.
- a parallel approach to locating an optimal frequency/timing hypothesis pair may be utilized, with a corresponding increase in computational complexity over a serial approach (e.g. , where there are 5 frequency hypotheses and 7 timing hypotheses, a serial approach may involve determining a prediction error 12 times, whereas a parallel approach will involve determining a prediction error 35 times). Nevertheless, a parallel approach may provide even more accurate estimation of timing and frequency for improved performance.
- FIG. 8 illustrates a method for suppressing interference in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology.
- the method begins in step 801, in which a burst of symbols are received.
- step 802 a subset of the burst of symbols is selected.
- the subset of the burst of symbols includes a first midamble symbol.
- step 803 the subset selected in step 802 is iteratively adjusted by a plurality of timing and frequency offsets.
- a plurality of weights for an interference filter are calculated for each timing and frequency offset pair, based upon the burst of symbols.
- step 805 the burst of symbols are filtered, for each pair of offsets, using the interference suppression filter with the corresponding plurality of weights to determine an estimated midamble sequence.
- step 806 the estimated midamble sequence for each offset pair is compared to a previously known midamble sequence to determine a midamble estimation error for that timing offset.
- One of the plurality combination of timing and frequency offsets is determined, in step 807, to be a preferred combination, based upon the midamble estimation error thereof.
- the preferred combination is the combination corresponding to the lowest midamble estimation error.
- FIG. 9 illustrates a receiver for use in a wireless communication system in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology.
- Receiver 900 includes an antenna module 910 configured to receive a wireless signal. While receiver 900 may be used in various communication systems, for clarity, receiver 900 is specifically described herein with respect to a GSM system.
- the received signal is provided to a pre-processor module 920 which demodulates the signal to generate received samples.
- Pre -processor module 920 may include a GMSK-to-BPSK rotator that performs phase rotation on the received samples.
- Timing estimator module 930 receives the samples from pre-processor module 920 and generates a plurality of timing hypotheses regarding where a training sequence of symbols (i.e., midamble) begins in the burst of data.
- Interference suppressor module 940 iteratively performs single antenna interference cancellation on the symbols for each timing hypothesis, calculating different filter weights for each timing hypothesis, and midamble estimator module 950 generates a midamble estimation error for each hypothesis, as described in greater detail above.
- Timing decision circuit 960 compares the midamble estimation errors for each hypothesis and selects the hypothesis with the lowest midamble estimation error. The selection of a hypothesis by timing decision module 960 represents the position in the burst of symbols where the midamble is estimated to begin.
- Frequency estimator module 970 receives the samples from timing decision module 960 and generates a plurality of frequency hypotheses regarding a frequency on which symbols are transmitted. Interference suppressor module 940 iteratively performs single antenna interference cancellation on the symbols for each frequency hypothesis, calculating different filter weights for each frequency hypothesis, and midamble estimator module 950 generates a midamble estimation error for each hypothesis, as described in greater detail above. Frequency decision circuit 980 compares the midamble estimation errors for each hypothesis and selects the hypothesis with the lowest midamble estimation error. The selection of a hypothesis by frequency decision module 980 represents the optimal frequency at which to receive the burst of symbols. The signal is then provided to data processor module 990, which processes the received symbols based upon the selected timing and frequency hypotheses, and outputs the data corresponding to the received symbols.
- FIG. 10 illustrates a receiver for use in a wireless communication system in accordance with one aspect of the subject technology.
- Receiver 1000 includes an antenna module 1010 configured to receive a wireless signal. The received signal is provided to a pre-processor module 1020 which demodulates the signal to generate received samples.
- Pre-processor module 1020 may include a GMSK-to-BPSK rotator that performs phase rotation on the received samples.
- Timing and frequency estimator module 1030 receives the samples from pre-processor module 1020 and generates a plurality of timing and frequency hypotheses regarding where a training sequence of symbols (i.e., midamble) begins in the burst of data (timing) and at which frequency the symbols can be optimally received (frequency).
- a training sequence of symbols i.e., midamble
- Interference suppressor module 1040 iteratively performs single antenna interference cancellation on the symbols for each timing and frequency hypothesis pair, calculating different filter weights for each hypothesis pair, and midamble estimator module 1050 generates a midamble estimation error for each hypothesis pair, as described in greater detail above.
- Timing and frequency decision module 1060 compares the midamble estimation errors for each hypothesis pair and selects the pair with the lowest midamble estimation error.
- the selection of a hypothesis pair by timing and frequency decision module 1060 represents the position in the burst of symbols where the midamble is estimated to begin, and the optimal frequency at which to receive the burst of symbols.
- the signal is then provided to data processor module 1070, which processes the received symbols based upon the selected timing and frequency hypotheses, and outputs the data corresponding to the received symbols.
- FIG. 11 is a block diagram that illustrates a computer system 1100 upon which an aspect may be implemented.
- Computer system 1100 includes a bus 1102 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, and a processor 1104 coupled with bus 1102 for processing information.
- Computer system 1100 also includes a memory 1106, such as a random access memory (“RAM”) or other dynamic storage device, coupled to bus 1102 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 1104.
- Memory 1106 may also be used for storing temporary variable or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed by processor 1104.
- Computer system 1100 further includes a data storage device 1110, such as a magnetic disk or optical disk, coupled to bus 1102 for storing information and instructions.
- Computer system 1100 may be coupled via I/O module 1108 to a display device (not illustrated), such as a cathode ray tube ("CRT") or liquid crystal display (“LCD”) for displaying information to a computer user.
- a display device such as a cathode ray tube ("CRT") or liquid crystal display (“LCD”) for displaying information to a computer user.
- An input device such as, for example, a keyboard or a mouse may also be coupled to computer system 1100 via I/O module 1108 for communicating information and command selections to processor 1104.
- timing and frequency estimation is performed by a computer system 1100 in response to processor 1104 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in memory 1106.
- Such instructions may be read into memory 1106 from another machine-readable medium, such as data storage device 1110.
- Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 1106 causes processor 1104 to perform the process steps described herein.
- processors in a multi-processing arrangement may also be employed to execute the sequences of instructions contained in memory 1106.
- hard- wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement various aspects. Thus, aspects are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.
- machine-readable medium refers to any medium that participates in providing instructions to processor 1104 for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including, but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media, and transmission media.
- Non- volatile media include, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as data storage device 1110.
- Volatile media include dynamic memory, such as memory 1106.
- Transmission media include coaxial cables, copper wire, and fiber optics, including the wires that comprise bus 1102. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio frequency and infrared data communications.
- Machine-readable media include, for example, floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, DVD, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM, a FLASH EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, a carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020107027900A KR101247479B1 (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2009-05-13 | Interference cancellation under non-stationary conditions |
JP2011509633A JP2011524115A (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2009-05-13 | Interference cancellation under unsteady conditions |
CA2723730A CA2723730A1 (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2009-05-13 | Interference cancellation under non-stationary conditions |
EP09747422A EP2294716A2 (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2009-05-13 | Interference cancellation under non-stationary conditions |
CN2009801170948A CN102027692A (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2009-05-13 | Interference cancellation under non-stationary conditions |
RU2010150761/08A RU2481742C2 (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2009-05-13 | Interference cancellation under non-stationary conditions |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US5297308P | 2008-05-13 | 2008-05-13 | |
US61/052,973 | 2008-05-13 | ||
US12/464,311 US20100046660A1 (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2009-05-12 | Interference cancellation under non-stationary conditions |
US12/464,311 | 2009-05-12 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2009140338A2 true WO2009140338A2 (en) | 2009-11-19 |
WO2009140338A3 WO2009140338A3 (en) | 2010-05-06 |
Family
ID=41066029
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/043718 WO2009140338A2 (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2009-05-13 | Interference cancellation under non-stationary conditions |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20100046660A1 (en) |
EP (2) | EP2472734A1 (en) |
JP (2) | JP2011524115A (en) |
KR (2) | KR20120082942A (en) |
CN (1) | CN102027692A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2723730A1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2481742C2 (en) |
TW (2) | TWI393396B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009140338A2 (en) |
Cited By (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2010141791A3 (en) * | 2009-06-04 | 2011-04-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Iterative interference cancellation receiver |
WO2012092149A2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2012-07-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Apparatus and methods for estimating an unknown frequency error of a tone signal |
US8503591B2 (en) | 2008-08-19 | 2013-08-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced geran receiver using channel input beamforming |
US8509293B2 (en) | 2008-08-19 | 2013-08-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Semi-coherent timing propagation for GERAN multislot configurations |
US8619928B2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2013-12-31 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Multi-stage interference suppression |
US8831149B2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2014-09-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Symbol estimation methods and apparatuses |
US8995417B2 (en) | 2008-06-09 | 2015-03-31 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Increasing capacity in wireless communication |
US9055545B2 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2015-06-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Interference cancellation for wireless communications |
US9071344B2 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2015-06-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Reverse link interference cancellation |
US9160577B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2015-10-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Hybrid SAIC receiver |
US9237515B2 (en) | 2008-08-01 | 2016-01-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Successive detection and cancellation for cell pilot detection |
WO2016025204A1 (en) * | 2014-08-11 | 2016-02-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Segmented data-aided frequency estimation in td-scdma |
US9277487B2 (en) | 2008-08-01 | 2016-03-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Cell detection with interference cancellation |
US9509452B2 (en) | 2009-11-27 | 2016-11-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Increasing capacity in wireless communications |
US9673837B2 (en) | 2009-11-27 | 2017-06-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Increasing capacity in wireless communications |
EP3198954A4 (en) * | 2014-09-24 | 2018-05-02 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Method and wireless communication device for estimating frequency offset of received signal |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7933256B2 (en) * | 2008-02-27 | 2011-04-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Coherent single antenna interference cancellation for GSM/GPRS/EDGE |
US20100046660A1 (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2010-02-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Interference cancellation under non-stationary conditions |
US20100097955A1 (en) * | 2008-10-16 | 2010-04-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rate determination |
WO2010121155A1 (en) * | 2009-04-17 | 2010-10-21 | Marvell World Trade Ltd. | Segmented beamforming |
CN103918206B (en) * | 2011-11-08 | 2018-09-21 | 马维尔国际贸易有限公司 | Method and apparatus for alleviating known disturbances |
US8811546B2 (en) * | 2012-06-08 | 2014-08-19 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Adaptive reference symbol method and apparatus for a receiver |
US9628212B2 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2017-04-18 | Fujitsu Limited | Signal timing in device-to-device communication |
US9184775B2 (en) * | 2013-07-03 | 2015-11-10 | Raytheon Company | Methods and apparatus for adaptive nonlinear coincident interference cancellation |
US8922401B1 (en) | 2013-09-25 | 2014-12-30 | Raytheon Company | Methods and apparatus for interference canceling data conversion |
WO2015113183A1 (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2015-08-06 | Intel IP Corporation | Information processing in mobile devices |
CN106487723B (en) * | 2015-08-31 | 2020-02-21 | 联芯科技有限公司 | Channel estimation method and device suitable for single-antenna interference elimination technology |
EP4201037A1 (en) * | 2020-08-18 | 2023-06-28 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Methods and arrangements for supporting estimation of latency over a communication path in a communication network |
Family Cites Families (151)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1569399A (en) * | 1926-01-12 | Gbating ob slicing machine | ||
US396403A (en) * | 1889-01-22 | jacquemier | ||
US969608A (en) * | 1908-12-14 | 1910-09-06 | Westinghouse Electric & Mfg Co | Dynamo-electric machine. |
US1411693A (en) * | 1919-06-16 | 1922-04-04 | Weber Engine Company | Muffling-breather-valve attachment |
US1347611A (en) * | 1919-08-02 | 1920-07-27 | Walter J Blenko | Support for fire-extinguishers |
US1404047A (en) * | 1919-10-03 | 1922-01-17 | Nichols Henry | Wheel |
US1681775A (en) * | 1926-06-22 | 1928-08-21 | Frank Z Mathieu | Cooling and filling cap for radiators |
US1736101A (en) * | 1926-09-16 | 1929-11-19 | Walter B Stone | Storage-battery separator and retainer |
US1699194A (en) * | 1927-02-24 | 1929-01-15 | Junkers Hugo | Liquid-fuel pump |
US1699195A (en) * | 1928-03-01 | 1929-01-15 | Clarence M Knapp | Rail anchor |
US1928138A (en) * | 1930-02-28 | 1933-09-26 | Cutler Hammer Inc | Motor controller |
US1906862A (en) * | 1931-08-17 | 1933-05-02 | Mullins Mfg Corp | Wringer |
US2067444A (en) * | 1932-05-05 | 1937-01-12 | Gewertz Charles M Son | Electrical network |
US2211531A (en) * | 1938-11-04 | 1940-08-13 | Solvay Process Co | Decomposition of nitrosyl chloride |
US2233033A (en) * | 1939-05-01 | 1941-02-25 | Floyd W Robison | Process of treating coffee |
US2319307A (en) * | 1941-07-05 | 1943-05-18 | Michael S Striker | Process of preventing curling of the edges of knitted fabrics |
US2280329A (en) * | 1941-08-25 | 1942-04-21 | Osgood Company | Excavator |
US3047124A (en) * | 1960-05-05 | 1962-07-31 | Mandell S Wexler | Examining apparatus |
US3872408A (en) | 1974-05-03 | 1975-03-18 | Lindsay Specialty Prod Ltd | Signal directional tap |
GB8910255D0 (en) | 1989-05-04 | 1989-06-21 | Stc Plc | Data stream frame synchronisation |
US5267249A (en) * | 1991-05-09 | 1993-11-30 | Codex Corporation | Device and method for asynchronous cyclic redundancy checking for digital receivers |
US6147543A (en) | 1996-01-19 | 2000-11-14 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for selecting from multiple mixers |
US5933768A (en) | 1997-02-28 | 1999-08-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget L/M Ericsson | Receiver apparatus, and associated method, for receiving a receive signal transmitted upon a channel susceptible to interference |
FI105306B (en) | 1997-06-10 | 2000-07-14 | Nokia Networks Oy | Radio |
FI103618B (en) | 1997-07-04 | 1999-07-30 | Nokia Telecommunications Oy | Interpreting the received signal |
DE19733120A1 (en) | 1997-07-31 | 1999-02-18 | Siemens Ag | Method and radio station for data transmission |
US5930366A (en) * | 1997-08-29 | 1999-07-27 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Synchronization to a base station and code acquisition within a spread spectrum communication system |
US5887035A (en) * | 1997-10-31 | 1999-03-23 | Ericsson, Inc. | Method for joint equalization and detection of multiple user signals |
US20030112370A1 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2003-06-19 | Chris Long | Adaptive expanded information capacity for communications systems |
GB2339120B (en) | 1998-06-30 | 2003-03-19 | Nec Technologies | Channel estimation device for digital telecommunications stations |
US6259730B1 (en) * | 1998-11-10 | 2001-07-10 | Lucent Technologies, Inc. | Transmit diversity and reception equalization for radio links |
US6590881B1 (en) * | 1998-12-04 | 2003-07-08 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Method and apparatus for providing wireless communication system synchronization |
JP3386738B2 (en) | 1999-03-09 | 2003-03-17 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Frame synchronization circuit and frame timing extraction method |
US6480558B1 (en) | 1999-03-17 | 2002-11-12 | Ericsson Inc. | Synchronization and cell search methods and apparatus for wireless communications |
JP3210915B2 (en) | 1999-06-14 | 2001-09-25 | 株式会社ワイ・アール・ピー移動通信基盤技術研究所 | Direct spread receiver |
JP2001257626A (en) | 2000-03-13 | 2001-09-21 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Communication unit and communication method |
US6765894B1 (en) * | 1999-07-05 | 2004-07-20 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co, Ltd. | Communication terminal apparatus and base station apparatus |
JP3573039B2 (en) * | 1999-12-10 | 2004-10-06 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Wireless terminal position measuring method, terminal device using the same, and terminal position management station device |
EP1242764B1 (en) * | 1999-12-13 | 2004-11-10 | Peter Kessler | Bending and retaining device for tubes, cables and pipes |
JP2001267987A (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2001-09-28 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Radio base station device and radio communication method |
JP4316761B2 (en) * | 2000-02-09 | 2009-08-19 | 株式会社日立コミュニケーションテクノロジー | Mobile communication system and radio base station apparatus |
JP3844934B2 (en) | 2000-03-03 | 2006-11-15 | 株式会社日立コミュニケーションテクノロジー | Base station apparatus, mobile communication system, and transmission power control method |
EP1229472A4 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2004-12-15 | Toshiba Kk | Mri system center and mri system |
EP1681775A3 (en) | 2000-03-15 | 2008-12-03 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Multi-user detection using an adaptive combination of joint detection and successive interference cancellation |
US6744814B1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2004-06-01 | Agere Systems Inc. | Method and apparatus for reduced state sequence estimation with tap-selectable decision-feedback |
SE517039C2 (en) * | 2000-05-31 | 2002-04-02 | Bjoern Ottersten | Device and method for channel interference suppression |
US6907092B1 (en) * | 2000-07-14 | 2005-06-14 | Comsys Communication & Signal Processing Ltd. | Method of channel order selection and channel estimation in a wireless communication system |
JP3522678B2 (en) | 2000-09-27 | 2004-04-26 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Communication terminal device and demodulation method |
CA2323164A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2002-04-11 | Ramesh Mantha | Method, system and apparatus for improving reception in multiple access communication systems |
US7116735B2 (en) * | 2000-11-01 | 2006-10-03 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Adaptive equalization apparatus and method |
US6985516B1 (en) | 2000-11-27 | 2006-01-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for processing a received signal in a communications system |
US6931030B1 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2005-08-16 | Arraycomm, Inc. | Training sequence with a random delay for a radio communications system |
US6750818B2 (en) * | 2000-12-04 | 2004-06-15 | Tensorcomm, Inc. | Method and apparatus to compute the geolocation of a communication device using orthogonal projections |
US6865394B2 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2005-03-08 | Hitachi, Ltd | Location detection method, location detection system and location detection program |
US6470047B1 (en) | 2001-02-20 | 2002-10-22 | Comsys Communications Signal Processing Ltd. | Apparatus for and method of reducing interference in a communications receiver |
JP3714910B2 (en) | 2001-02-20 | 2005-11-09 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Turbo receiving method and receiver thereof |
EP1255368A1 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2002-11-06 | Siemens Information and Communication Networks S.p.A. | Method to perform link adaptation in enhanced cellular communication systems with several modulation and coding schemes |
US6628707B2 (en) * | 2001-05-04 | 2003-09-30 | Radiant Networks Plc | Adaptive equalizer system for short burst modems and link hopping radio networks |
JP3394530B2 (en) * | 2001-08-07 | 2003-04-07 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Cell search apparatus and cell search method |
US7031411B2 (en) | 2001-09-19 | 2006-04-18 | Telefonaktiebolaget L.M. Ericsson | Methods and apparatus for canceling co-channel interference in a receiving system using spatio-temporal whitening |
US7346126B2 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2008-03-18 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method and apparatus for channel estimation using plural channels |
KR100426623B1 (en) * | 2001-12-22 | 2004-04-13 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Apparatus and Method for Receiver for Cancelling Interference Pilot Signals from Neighboring Basestations |
US7092436B2 (en) | 2002-01-25 | 2006-08-15 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Expectation-maximization-based channel estimation and signal detection for wireless communications systems |
JP4105567B2 (en) | 2002-03-13 | 2008-06-25 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | MIMO receiver and receiving method thereof |
EP1347611A1 (en) | 2002-03-20 | 2003-09-24 | Siemens Information and Communication Networks S.p.A. | Data aided frequency synchronisation |
US7123663B2 (en) * | 2002-06-04 | 2006-10-17 | Agence Spatiale Europeenne | Coded digital modulation method for communication system |
US7139340B2 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2006-11-21 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Robust OFDM carrier recovery methods and apparatus |
JP3972755B2 (en) | 2002-07-11 | 2007-09-05 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Position measuring method, and terminal device and server used therefor |
TWI335735B (en) | 2002-07-19 | 2011-01-01 | Interdigital Tech Corp | Groupwise successive interference cancellation for block transmission with reception diversity |
JP2004112094A (en) | 2002-09-13 | 2004-04-08 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Mobile station apparatus and method for controlling cell searching |
US20040116122A1 (en) * | 2002-09-20 | 2004-06-17 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Enhancing reception using intercellular interference cancellation |
KR101011942B1 (en) * | 2002-09-23 | 2011-01-31 | 램버스 인코포레이티드 | Method and apparatus for selectively applying interference cancellation in spread spectrum systems |
JP4412926B2 (en) | 2002-09-27 | 2010-02-10 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Adaptive equalization apparatus and program thereof |
GB2394389B (en) | 2002-10-15 | 2005-05-18 | Toshiba Res Europ Ltd | Equalisation apparatus and methods |
CN100438640C (en) * | 2002-12-30 | 2008-11-26 | Nxp股份有限公司 | Sampling method and its device for down synchronous tracking in TDD radio communication |
US7783312B2 (en) * | 2003-01-23 | 2010-08-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Data throughput improvement in IS2000 networks via effective F-SCH reduced active set pilot switching |
US7627021B2 (en) | 2003-01-30 | 2009-12-01 | The Mitre Corporation | Interference canceling CDMA mobile station receiver |
US7187736B2 (en) * | 2003-02-13 | 2007-03-06 | Motorola Inc. | Reducing interference in a GSM communication system |
US7200172B2 (en) * | 2003-02-27 | 2007-04-03 | Nokia Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining components of a channel impulse response for use in a SAIC equalizer |
US7346103B2 (en) * | 2003-03-03 | 2008-03-18 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Multi user detection using equalization and successive interference cancellation |
JP4121407B2 (en) | 2003-03-20 | 2008-07-23 | 富士通株式会社 | Receiver for demodulating OFDM symbols |
US7295636B2 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2007-11-13 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Linear single-antenna interference cancellation receiver |
US7889804B2 (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2011-02-15 | Mohammad Jaber Borran | Partially coherent constellations for multiple-antenna systems |
US20070063897A1 (en) * | 2003-07-31 | 2007-03-22 | Nec Corporation | Terminal location specification method and system of the same |
JP4247532B2 (en) | 2003-08-20 | 2009-04-02 | 国立大学法人東京工業大学 | MIMO-OFDM reception system and receiver with high-precision timing recovery |
US6944245B2 (en) * | 2003-10-17 | 2005-09-13 | Motorola, Inc. | Multi-pass interference reduction in a GSM communication system |
KR20050040988A (en) * | 2003-10-29 | 2005-05-04 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Communication method for frequency hopping ofdm based cellular system |
US7058378B2 (en) * | 2003-11-18 | 2006-06-06 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for automatic frequency correction of a local oscilator with an error signal derived from an angle value of the conjugate product and sum of block correlator outputs |
US20050111408A1 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2005-05-26 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Selective interference cancellation |
KR100547723B1 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2006-01-31 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and Method for Recognizing Adjacent Cell Boundaries in Mobile Communication Systems |
US7308056B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2007-12-11 | Nokia Corporation | Joint channel estimator for synchronous and asynchronous interference suppression in SAIC receiver |
US7298806B1 (en) * | 2004-01-15 | 2007-11-20 | Hellosoft Inc. | Method and system for data-aided timing offset estimation for frequency selective fading channels |
US7565111B2 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2009-07-21 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Single-antenna interference cancellation receiver in time slot communication system |
EP1723731A1 (en) * | 2004-03-09 | 2006-11-22 | Thomson Licensing | Hybrid rake/equalizer receiver for spread spectrum systems |
CN1934838B (en) * | 2004-03-25 | 2011-09-07 | 棕榈公司 | Method and communication device for interference cancellation in a cellular communication system |
US7450924B1 (en) * | 2004-03-25 | 2008-11-11 | At&T Mobility Ii Llc | Interference cancellation and receive diversity for single-valued modulation receivers |
KR100724989B1 (en) * | 2004-04-14 | 2007-06-04 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for control transmission power in a communication system using orthogonal frequency division multiple access scheme |
US20050232174A1 (en) * | 2004-04-19 | 2005-10-20 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Linear interference cancellation receiver for edge systems |
US7724832B2 (en) | 2004-05-27 | 2010-05-25 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | MIMO decoding |
US7711377B2 (en) | 2004-06-10 | 2010-05-04 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Efficient paging in a wireless communication system |
US7801248B2 (en) * | 2004-11-19 | 2010-09-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Interference suppression with virtual antennas |
US7331189B2 (en) * | 2004-11-24 | 2008-02-19 | Hoshizaki Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Cooling device |
US7764726B2 (en) | 2004-12-01 | 2010-07-27 | Qualomm Incorporated | Systems, methods, and apparatus for jammer rejection |
KR100600817B1 (en) * | 2004-12-09 | 2006-07-18 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Apparatus and method for timing error detection using implementation of cyclic correlator |
US8422955B2 (en) | 2004-12-23 | 2013-04-16 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Channel estimation for interference cancellation |
US7330524B2 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2008-02-12 | Atheros Communications, Inc. | Joint synchronization and impairments estimation using known data patterns |
US20060146953A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2006-07-06 | Balaji Raghothaman | Method and apparatus for estimating transmit weights for multiple antennas |
US7508864B2 (en) | 2005-02-14 | 2009-03-24 | Intel Corporation | Apparatus and method of canceling interference |
US7706430B2 (en) * | 2005-02-25 | 2010-04-27 | Nokia Corporation | System, apparatus, and method for adaptive weighted interference cancellation using parallel residue compensation |
US7512199B2 (en) | 2005-03-01 | 2009-03-31 | Broadcom Corporation | Channel estimation method operable to cancel a dominant disturber signal from a received signal |
US7529297B2 (en) | 2005-03-01 | 2009-05-05 | Broadcom Corporation | Equalizer training method using re-encoded bits and known training sequences |
WO2006096865A2 (en) * | 2005-03-09 | 2006-09-14 | Sabeus, Inc. | Multivariable control system with state feedback |
US7567635B2 (en) * | 2005-03-10 | 2009-07-28 | Comsys Communication & Signal Processing Ltd. | Single antenna interference suppression in a wireless receiver |
US8126066B2 (en) * | 2005-06-09 | 2012-02-28 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Time and frequency channel estimation |
US8199865B2 (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2012-06-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method and device for synchronization and channel estimation in a radio receiver |
WO2007029958A1 (en) | 2005-09-05 | 2007-03-15 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Apparatus for generating down link signal, and method and apparatus for cell search in cellular system |
KR100767312B1 (en) * | 2005-09-05 | 2007-10-17 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Apparatus for generating down link signal, and method and apparatus for cell search in cellular system |
US7724816B2 (en) * | 2005-09-13 | 2010-05-25 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Dynamic switching between maximum likelihood sequence estimation (MLSE) and linear equalizer for single antenna interference cancellation (SAIC) in a global system for mobile communications (GSM) system |
US20070071145A1 (en) | 2005-09-23 | 2007-03-29 | Yona Perets | Method and apparatus to correct channel quality indicator estimation |
US7929411B2 (en) * | 2005-09-28 | 2011-04-19 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Methods and systems for obtaining data from networks of sources |
GB2432484B (en) | 2005-11-22 | 2007-12-27 | Ipwireless Inc | Cellular communication system and method for broadcast communication |
US7545893B2 (en) | 2005-11-28 | 2009-06-09 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Single antenna interference cancellation via complement subspace projection in spatial-temporal expansion of noise estimation |
US8396141B2 (en) * | 2005-11-29 | 2013-03-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Efficient cell selection |
US7539272B2 (en) * | 2005-11-30 | 2009-05-26 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Frequency error estimation and correction in a SAIC linear equalizer |
US20070127608A1 (en) * | 2005-12-06 | 2007-06-07 | Jacob Scheim | Blind interference mitigation in a digital receiver |
US8884972B2 (en) * | 2006-05-25 | 2014-11-11 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Graphics processor with arithmetic and elementary function units |
US7599454B2 (en) | 2006-07-24 | 2009-10-06 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and apparatus for symbol alignment in diversity signal reception |
US20100016682A1 (en) * | 2006-12-21 | 2010-01-21 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N. V. | Patient monitoring system and method |
JP4954720B2 (en) * | 2007-01-09 | 2012-06-20 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Base station, user terminal, and transmission channel quality measurement signal transmission control method |
US8805369B2 (en) * | 2007-03-12 | 2014-08-12 | Nokia Corporation | Techniques for reporting and simultaneous transmission mechanism to improve reliability of signaling |
US7852915B2 (en) * | 2007-03-21 | 2010-12-14 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Adaptive equalizer for communication channels |
JP2008278338A (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2008-11-13 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Mimo receiver |
US7796698B2 (en) | 2007-06-04 | 2010-09-14 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Interference suppression in a multicarrier receiver |
US7961782B2 (en) | 2007-06-04 | 2011-06-14 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Interference suppression processing unit and a method of suppressing interference in wireless data communication |
US7907685B2 (en) * | 2007-08-23 | 2011-03-15 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | GMSK-receiver with interference cancellation |
US7912113B2 (en) * | 2007-10-05 | 2011-03-22 | Motorola Mobility, Inc. | Techniques for estimating received signal strength and carrier to interference and noise ratio in OFDM systems |
US8059767B2 (en) * | 2007-12-12 | 2011-11-15 | Harris Corporation | Communications device and related method that detects symbol timing |
EP2071785B1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2021-05-05 | Vodafone Holding GmbH | Blind channel estimation |
US7933256B2 (en) * | 2008-02-27 | 2011-04-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Coherent single antenna interference cancellation for GSM/GPRS/EDGE |
US20100046660A1 (en) | 2008-05-13 | 2010-02-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Interference cancellation under non-stationary conditions |
US9237515B2 (en) * | 2008-08-01 | 2016-01-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Successive detection and cancellation for cell pilot detection |
US9277487B2 (en) * | 2008-08-01 | 2016-03-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Cell detection with interference cancellation |
US8031762B2 (en) * | 2008-08-04 | 2011-10-04 | Redpine Signals, Inc. | Stream weight estimation and compensation in SIMO/MIMO OFDM receivers |
US8509293B2 (en) * | 2008-08-19 | 2013-08-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Semi-coherent timing propagation for GERAN multislot configurations |
US8503591B2 (en) | 2008-08-19 | 2013-08-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced geran receiver using channel input beamforming |
EP2328670B1 (en) * | 2008-08-26 | 2017-04-12 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | System and method for wireless communications |
US9160577B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2015-10-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Hybrid SAIC receiver |
US8787509B2 (en) | 2009-06-04 | 2014-07-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Iterative interference cancellation receiver |
US8831149B2 (en) * | 2009-09-03 | 2014-09-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Symbol estimation methods and apparatuses |
US8619928B2 (en) * | 2009-09-03 | 2013-12-31 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Multi-stage interference suppression |
US8396440B2 (en) * | 2010-06-22 | 2013-03-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Signal reception method and apparatus for non-stationary channels |
-
2009
- 2009-05-12 US US12/464,311 patent/US20100046660A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2009-05-13 TW TW098115882A patent/TWI393396B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2009-05-13 KR KR1020127014772A patent/KR20120082942A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2009-05-13 EP EP12150520A patent/EP2472734A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2009-05-13 RU RU2010150761/08A patent/RU2481742C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2009-05-13 JP JP2011509633A patent/JP2011524115A/en not_active Ceased
- 2009-05-13 CA CA2723730A patent/CA2723730A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2009-05-13 CN CN2009801170948A patent/CN102027692A/en active Pending
- 2009-05-13 TW TW101144327A patent/TW201320664A/en unknown
- 2009-05-13 WO PCT/US2009/043718 patent/WO2009140338A2/en active Application Filing
- 2009-05-13 KR KR1020107027900A patent/KR101247479B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2009-05-13 EP EP09747422A patent/EP2294716A2/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2011
- 2011-08-23 US US13/215,984 patent/US8675796B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2012
- 2012-10-29 JP JP2012238170A patent/JP2013070384A/en active Pending
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
None |
See also references of EP2294716A2 |
Cited By (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9071344B2 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2015-06-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Reverse link interference cancellation |
US9055545B2 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2015-06-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Interference cancellation for wireless communications |
US9014152B2 (en) | 2008-06-09 | 2015-04-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Increasing capacity in wireless communications |
US8995417B2 (en) | 2008-06-09 | 2015-03-31 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Increasing capacity in wireless communication |
US9408165B2 (en) | 2008-06-09 | 2016-08-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Increasing capacity in wireless communications |
US9277487B2 (en) | 2008-08-01 | 2016-03-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Cell detection with interference cancellation |
US9237515B2 (en) | 2008-08-01 | 2016-01-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Successive detection and cancellation for cell pilot detection |
US8509293B2 (en) | 2008-08-19 | 2013-08-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Semi-coherent timing propagation for GERAN multislot configurations |
US8503591B2 (en) | 2008-08-19 | 2013-08-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced geran receiver using channel input beamforming |
US9160577B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2015-10-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Hybrid SAIC receiver |
US8787509B2 (en) | 2009-06-04 | 2014-07-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Iterative interference cancellation receiver |
WO2010141791A3 (en) * | 2009-06-04 | 2011-04-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Iterative interference cancellation receiver |
US8619928B2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2013-12-31 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Multi-stage interference suppression |
US8831149B2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2014-09-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Symbol estimation methods and apparatuses |
US9509452B2 (en) | 2009-11-27 | 2016-11-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Increasing capacity in wireless communications |
US9673837B2 (en) | 2009-11-27 | 2017-06-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Increasing capacity in wireless communications |
US10790861B2 (en) | 2009-11-27 | 2020-09-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Increasing capacity in wireless communications |
CN103283198B (en) * | 2010-12-28 | 2015-04-01 | 高通股份有限公司 | Apparatus and methods for estimation of the frequency error of a tone signal with widened acquisition range |
JP2014507839A (en) * | 2010-12-28 | 2014-03-27 | クアルコム,インコーポレイテッド | Apparatus and method for estimating an unknown frequency error of a tone signal |
US8576743B2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2013-11-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Apparatus and methods for estimating an unknown frequency error of a tone signal |
CN103283198A (en) * | 2010-12-28 | 2013-09-04 | 高通股份有限公司 | Apparatus and methods for estimating an unknown frequency error of a tone signal |
WO2012092149A3 (en) * | 2010-12-28 | 2012-10-04 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Estimation of the frequency error of a tone signal with widened acquisition range |
WO2012092149A2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2012-07-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Apparatus and methods for estimating an unknown frequency error of a tone signal |
WO2016025204A1 (en) * | 2014-08-11 | 2016-02-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Segmented data-aided frequency estimation in td-scdma |
EP3198954A4 (en) * | 2014-09-24 | 2018-05-02 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Method and wireless communication device for estimating frequency offset of received signal |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TWI393396B (en) | 2013-04-11 |
TW201004234A (en) | 2010-01-16 |
US20110305303A1 (en) | 2011-12-15 |
JP2013070384A (en) | 2013-04-18 |
WO2009140338A3 (en) | 2010-05-06 |
KR20110009697A (en) | 2011-01-28 |
KR101247479B1 (en) | 2013-03-29 |
TW201320664A (en) | 2013-05-16 |
CA2723730A1 (en) | 2009-11-19 |
US8675796B2 (en) | 2014-03-18 |
JP2011524115A (en) | 2011-08-25 |
US20100046660A1 (en) | 2010-02-25 |
RU2481742C2 (en) | 2013-05-10 |
RU2010150761A (en) | 2012-06-20 |
EP2294716A2 (en) | 2011-03-16 |
EP2472734A1 (en) | 2012-07-04 |
CN102027692A (en) | 2011-04-20 |
KR20120082942A (en) | 2012-07-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8675796B2 (en) | Interference cancellation under non-stationary conditions | |
CA2713407C (en) | Coherent single antenna interference cancellation for gsm/gprs/edge | |
US8509293B2 (en) | Semi-coherent timing propagation for GERAN multislot configurations | |
US8503591B2 (en) | Enhanced geran receiver using channel input beamforming | |
US8787509B2 (en) | Iterative interference cancellation receiver |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 200980117094.8 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 09747422 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A2 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2723730 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2011509633 Country of ref document: JP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2009747422 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20107027900 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2663/MUMNP/2010 Country of ref document: IN |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2010150761 Country of ref document: RU |