WO2009109052A1

WO2009109052A1 - Emission treatment process from natural gas dehydrators

Info

Publication number: WO2009109052A1
Application number: PCT/CA2009/000282
Authority: WO
Inventors: Gaetan Noel; Pierre Lucien Cote
Original assignee: Vaperma Inc.
Priority date: 2008-03-07
Filing date: 2009-03-06
Publication date: 2009-09-11
Also published as: EP2250240B1; CA2716870A1; US20110126707A1; EP2250240A4; EP2250240A1

Abstract

The off-gas from the still and flash tank of an existing glycol-based dehydration unit (containing water vapor, methane, BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene), VOCs (volatile organic compounds)) is sent directly to a gas separation membrane system for dehydration. The gas separation membrane has a high selectivity for water over organic compounds (for example, the membrane described in WO2005/007277A1). The driving force for water permeation is established by applying a vacuum on the permeate side of the membrane unit or by flowing a sweep gas, for example warm, dry air through the permeate side of the unit.

Description

EMISSION TREATMENT PROCESS FROM NATURAL GAS

DEHYDRATORS

[0001] This is a non-provisional of, and claims priority from, US application serial number 61/034,559, filed on March 7, 2008 by Gaetan Noel and Pierre Cote entitled EMISSION TREATMENT PROCESS FROM NATURAL GAS DEHYDRATORS, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference to it.

Field

[0002] This specification relates to the treatment of emissions related to the dehydration of natural gas.

Background

[0003] The following is not an admission that anything discussed below is citable as prior art or part of the common general knowledge of persons skilled in the art.

[0004] Natural gas must be dehydrated before transportation in pipelines to avoid hydrate formation and corrosion. Most dehydrators use a TEG (tri-ethylene glycol) solvent or other glycol solvent to remove the water in the gas, and a gas re-boiler is used to boil the water off the glycol. The dehydrator releases waste gases and vapors, principally through venting, flaring or incineration.

[0005] US 6,010,674 (National Tank Company) describes a combustor to incinerate the organics from the off-gas mixture.

[0006] US 6,789,288 (Membrane Technology & Research) describes a pervaporation process for glycol drying.

[0007] US 6,984,257 (RT. Heath and F.D. Heath) and US

5,766,313 (RT. Heath) describe a process in which off-gas from a re-boiler is condensed and re-injected to the burner. However the quantity of off-gas is normally larger than the requirement of the burner. [0008] US 6,551 ,379 and RE39.944 (RT. Heath) describe using a portion of the TEG flow through an ejector to create a vacuum to improve the separation of non-condensable gases.

[0009] International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2004/001047 to Cranford et al., filed on July 16, 2004 and published as WO 2005/007277 A1 on January 27, 2005, describes an asymmetric integrally skinned membrane comprising a polyimide and another polymer selected from the group consisting of polyvinylpyrrolidone, sulfonated polyetherketones and mixtures thereof. The membrane is substantially insoluble in an organic solvent, substantially defect free and is useful as a vapor separation membrane. Methods for preparing asymmetric integrally skinned polyimide membranes are also disclosed. The membranes can have a vapor permeance to water at least 1 x 10^~7 mol/m²sPa at a temperature of about 30 ⁰C to about 200 ⁰C. The membrane may have a vapor permeance selectivity of at least 50, preferably at least 250, for water/ethanol at a temperature of about 140 ⁰C. This International publication number WO 2005/007277 A1 is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference to it.

Introduction

[0010] The following introduction is not intended to limit or define any claim. One or more inventions may reside in any combination of one or more process steps or apparatus elements drawn from a set of all process steps and apparatus elements described below or in other parts of this document, for example the detailed description, claims or figures.

[0011] The off-gas, for example from the stripping system of an existing glycol-based dehydration unit, contains water vapor, methane, BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene), and VOCs (volatile organic compounds)). This off-gas is sent to a gas separation membrane system for dehydration. The gas separation membrane has a high selectivity for water over organic compounds and may be an integrally skinned asymmetric polyimide membrane as described in WO2005/007277A1. The driving force for water permeation is established by applying a vacuum on the permeate side of the membrane unit or by flowing a sweep gas, for example warm and dry air, through the permeate side of the unit. The basic glycol based dehydration process components such as the contactor and stripping system, for example still and flash tanks, are still used on the front end. The dehydrated off-gas is recycled to the product natural gas stream, for example to the inlet of the pipeline compressor or in its gas fuel line, to the inlet of the dehydrator or directly into the pipeline. This process reduces, or substantially eliminates, the emission of toxic organic compounds and green-house gases from the dehydrator, recovers valuable methane gas and ultimately reduces operating costs. The membrane unit can be retro-fitted to existing glycol dehydrators or made as part of a new system.

Figures

[0012] Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a dehydration system with a membrane unit.

[0013] Figure 2 shows a prior art natural gas dehydrator.

[0014] Figure 3 shows a process flow diagram of a system as in Figure

1 as used in a 10 MMSCFD natural gas dehydration system.

Detailed Description

[0015] Various apparatuses or processes will be described below to provide an example of an embodiment of each claimed invention. No embodiment described below limits any claimed invention and any claimed invention may cover processes or apparatuses that are not described below. The claimed inventions are not limited to apparatuses or processes having all of the features of any one apparatus or process described below or to features common to multiple or all of the apparatuses described below. It is possible that an apparatus or process described below is not an embodiment of any claimed invention. [0016] The key elements of a prior art natural gas glycol (or TEG) dehydrator are illustrated in Figure 2. Natural gas is dehydrated in a contactor, counter-current with a glycol solution. The glycol solution is regenerated in a stripping system (still and flash tank) and recycled. Water vapor, methane, BTEX and other VOCs are emitted from the stripping system and released to the atmosphere. Glycol dehydrators are described in Chapter 20 of the Engineering Data Book published by the Gas Processors Supply Association (2004) which is incorporated herein by this reference to it. The emissions of BTEX, VOCs and methane are health and environmental hazards. The emitted methane is a greenhouse gas and also a product that could otherwise be sold.

[0017] Methane emissions and consumption come from gas-driven

TEG pumps, fuel-process consumption, instrument gas consumption and stripping gas as described in Table 1. The total amount of methane emitted represents about 0.5% of the methane treated. Hydrocarbons and BTEX which are carried by TEG from the contactor to the stripping system are also emitted with the off-gas. Water vapor is also present in the off-gas which makes the off-gas very corrosive and difficult to treat.

TABLE 1

Estimated consumption/emission of methane for a 10 MMscfd dehydrator

[0018] Because of the health and environmental impacts of glycol dehydrator emissions, regulations are becoming more stringent and address both the emission of health-related contaminants such as BTEX and greenhouse gases such as methane. There is a need to improve existing installations to design new dehydrators to have lower emissions.

[0019] A dehydration system 10 using a gas or vapor separation membrane unit 14 is shown in Figures 1 and 3. The vapor separation membranes in the membrane unit 14 may be as described in WO2005/007277A1. A module suitable for use with such membranes is described in US Patent Application serial number 12/117,007, filed on May 8, 2008, entitled HOLLOW FIBRE MEMBRANE MODULE, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference to it. Such membranes and membrane separation units 14 are available under the trade-mark SIFTEK from Vaperma Inc.

[0020] The system 10 is based on a conventional TEG dehydration unit

12 having a TEG contactor 6 and a TEG regeneration unit 8. Wet natural gas 9 flows into an inlet 38 of the dehydration unit 12. Rich TEG 4 flows from the TEG contactor 6 to the regeneration unit 8. Lean TEG 2 flows from the regeneration unit 8 to the contactor 6. Gases leave the dehydration unit 12 through an outlet 3 optionally after passing through a heat exchanger 5 which the lean TEG 2 also flows through.

[0021] The gas that would ordinarily be released from the dehydration unit 12 as a contaminated off-gas 16 is sent to a membrane unit 14 for dehydration. Gas 16 to be sent to the membrane unit 14 can be taken from the still, the flash tank, both the still and flash tank, or another part of the dehydrator where these gases are collected and can be released. A collector 15 may be used to collect, for example, flash tank emissions 17 and TEG regenerator emissions 19. A vacuum can be applied to the permeate outlet 18 of the membrane unit 14 by a permeate compressor 20, or vacuum pump, as shown in Figure 3, to withdraw water vapor 26 from the gas stream and thereby produce a dehydrated gas 28 at the retentate outlet 30 of the membrane unit 14. Optionally, a sweep gas 22 can be passed into an inlet 24 on the permeate side of the membrane unit 14, through the permeate side of the membrane unit 14, and out of the permeate outlet 18, as shown as an option in Figure 1 , if desired to assist with water vapour removal. The flow of dehydrated gas 28 may be driven by a retentate compressor 32. The off-gas 16 from the dehydration unit 12 contains a large portion of the water vapour present in the wet natural gas 9 fed to the inlet 38 of the dehydration unit, but in a much smaller gas flow. The concentration of water vapour in the off-gas 16 may be twenty times or more than the concentration of water vapour in the wet natural gas 9. A pump or compressor capable of handling the off-gas 16 would be very expensive because water vapour in high concentration tends to condense when pressurized in a pump or compressor. Placing retentate compressor 32 downstream of the membrane unit 14, where the water content is low, avoids operation in a high water vapour concentration. Permeate compressor 20 operates in a high water vapour concentration but operates at or below atmospheric pressure where the problems of condensation are not as significant. If necessary, a condenser may be added in line between the membrane unit 14 and the permeate compressor 20.

[0022] The dehydrated gas 28 can be sent to an inlet 38 of the dehydration unit 12, the inlet of a pipeline compressor upstream of the dehydration unit, directly into the product natural gas pipeline or otherwise reused for example by burning it to generate steam or electricity. In Figure 3, the outlet 30 from the membrane unit 14 is connected to the inlet 34 of a contactor inlet compressor 36. The dehydrated recovered emission gas (REG) 28, which is the retentate from the membrane unit 14, is compressed by a retentate compressor 32 to the inlet pressure of a contactor inlet compressor 36. Compared to an alternative connection of the membrane unit 14 retentate line to the gas outlet 3 from the contactor 6, this reduces the required pressure gain through retentate compressor 32. The water content of the REG 28 also only needs to be reduced sufficiently to be able to compress the REG 28 to mix into the natural gas upstream of the dehydrator 12 rather than to the specifications of the pipeline.

[0023] All or substantially all of the off-gas can be sent to the membrane unit 14. Because the dehydrated gas is recycled, the system 10 reduces emissions, preferably bringing the emissions close to zero. A side- by-side comparison of a conventional dehydrator using an electric glycol pump and stripping gas and the process and apparatus of Figure 3 is presented in Table 2 below, showing a 97.7% reduction of emissions and a 3 year pay-back. Various operating parameters for the system 10 are shown in Table 3 below. The stream numbers 1 to 5 in Table 3 correspond to the flows through pipes in Figure 3 marked with a diamond having the corresponding stream number inside of the diamond.

Table 2

Value Proposition - 10 MMSCFD Dehydration Plant

Conventional Membrane

Capital Cost, k$ 0 250

Operating Gas 56.5 0.2 cost (k$/yr)

Electricity 0.0 6.9

Membrane replacement 0.0 3.3

Water disposal 0.0 1.0

Maintenance & Labour 0.0 2.0

Miscellaneous 0.0 2.0

Total Annual Cost 56.5 15.4

Emissions BTEX 2.4 0.0

(mt/yr)

HAP 3.5 0.0

VOC 19.2 0.1

Methane-ethane-others 153.3 0.4

GHG equivalent CO2 (mt/yr) 2673 emission reduction

Carbon Trading @ 15 $US/ton CO2 (k$/yr) 44.1 profitability Capital, k$ 250

Savings, k$/yr Gas Recovered 41

GHG credits 44 total 85

Payback, years 2.9 Table 3

[0024] The membrane unit 14 removes water vapor selectively from the off-gas. The water vapor may be discharged to the atmosphere. The selective removal of water from the off-gas enables recompression of the methane and BTEX since compressors are sensitive to water vapor. The water is released as vapour and so the process does not produce a liquid discharge.

Claims

Claims: We claim

1. A process comprising the steps of, collecting a gas containing water vapor and one or more of BTEX, VOCs or methane from a natural gas dehydrator; and, extracting water vapor from the gas through a vapor separation membrane to produce a dehydrated gas still containing one or more of BTEX, VOCs or methane.

2. The process of claim 1, further comprising returning the dehydrated gas to a product natural gas stream.

3. The process of claim 2 further comprising compressing the dehydrated gas before returning the dehydrated gas to the product natural gas stream.

4. The process of any of claims 1 to 3 wherein the dehydrated gas is recycled to the natural gas dehydrator.

5. The process of claim 4 wherein the dehydrated gas is mixed with wet product natural gas before the wet product natural gas is compressed upstream of the natural gas dehydrator.

6. The process of any of claims 1 to 5 wherein the water vapor is extracted from the gas through a vapour separation membrane.

7. An apparatus comprising, a) a natural gas dehydration unit having a wet gas inlet, a product dry gas outlet, and a second gas outlet; and, b) a vapor separation membrane unit having a feed inlet, a retentate outlet, and a permeate outlet, wherein the second gas outlet of the dehydration unit is connected to the feed inlet of the membrane unit.

8. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the retentate outlet of the membrane unit is connected in communication with a pipe carrying product natural gas.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the retentate outlet is connected to a pipe carrying product natural gas upstream of the natural gas dehydration unit.

10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the retentate outlet is connected to a pipe carrying product natural gas upstream of a compressor feeding into the natural gas dehydration unit.

11. The apparatus of any of claims 7 to 10 further comprising a compressor in communication with the retentate upstream of where the retentate is connected to the pipe carrying product natural gas.