WO2009027900A1 - Pseudo-noise transmission system with direct feed-through cancellation - Google Patents

Pseudo-noise transmission system with direct feed-through cancellation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2009027900A1
WO2009027900A1 PCT/IB2008/053334 IB2008053334W WO2009027900A1 WO 2009027900 A1 WO2009027900 A1 WO 2009027900A1 IB 2008053334 W IB2008053334 W IB 2008053334W WO 2009027900 A1 WO2009027900 A1 WO 2009027900A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
receiver
signal
pseudo
transmitter
multiplier
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2008/053334
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Hugo Veenstra
Wilhelmus M. C. Dolmans
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. filed Critical Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Publication of WO2009027900A1 publication Critical patent/WO2009027900A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/03Details of HF subsystems specially adapted therefor, e.g. common to transmitter and receiver
    • G01S7/038Feedthrough nulling circuits
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/02Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
    • G01S13/06Systems determining position data of a target
    • G01S13/08Systems for measuring distance only
    • G01S13/32Systems for measuring distance only using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated
    • G01S13/325Systems for measuring distance only using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated using transmission of coded signals, e.g. P.S.K. signals

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a pseudo-noise (PN) transmission system which comprises a transmitter and a receiver, uses PN code modulation, and is capable of cancelling an effect of a direct feed-through from an output of its transmitter to an input of its receiver.
  • PN pseudo-noise
  • Transmission systems like e.g. an ultra-wideband (UWB) transmission system can be implemented using a PN code modulation.
  • UWB radar system An UWB radar system.
  • a transmitter thereof is disclosed in H. Veenstra, E. v.d. Heijden, D. v. Goor: "15-27 GHz Pseudo-Noise UWB transmitter for short-range automotive radar in a production SiGe technology", Proceedings ESSCIRC 2005, pp. 275-278, 12-16 September 2005, Grenoble, France.
  • a receiver thereof is disclosed in H. Veenstra, E. v.d. Heijden, G. Dolmans, M.G.M. Notten: "A SiGe-BiCMOS receiver for 24 GHz short-range radar applications", IMS 2007, 3-8 June 2007, Honolulu, USA.
  • Fig. 4 shows a schematic diagram of an exemplary UWB radar system.
  • the UWB radar system comprises a transmitter 1, a receiver 2, a transmit (Tx) antenna 3, a receive (Rx) antenna 4, a local oscillator (LO) 5 and a PN code generator 6.
  • the transmitter 1 includes a biphase modulator 7 and an amplifier 8.
  • the receiver 2 includes an amplifier such as e.g. a low noise amplifier (LNA) 9, a delay circuit 10, a biphase demodulator 11, a downconverter 12 and a lowpass filter 13.
  • LNA low noise amplifier
  • the LO 5 is connected to the biphase modulator 7 and the downconverter 12.
  • the PN code generator 6 is connected to the biphase modulator 7 and the delay circuit 10.
  • the biphase modulator 7 is connected to the amplifier 8.
  • the amplifier 8 is connected to the transmit antenna 3.
  • the receive antenna 4 is connected to the LNA 9.
  • the LNA 9 and the delay circuit 10 are connected to the biphase demodulator 11.
  • the biphase demodulator 11 is connected to the downconverter 12, and the downconverter 12 is connected to the lowpass filter 13.
  • the LO 5 generates a carrier signal at a radio frequency (RF) of e.g. 24 GHz.
  • the PN code generator 6 generates a pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) signal and can also be called a PRBS generator.
  • the biphase modulator 7 modulates the carrier signal generated by the LO 5 with the PRBS signal generated by the PN code generator 6.
  • a signal resulting from the modulation is amplified by the amplifier 8.
  • An output signal of the amplifier 8 is transmitted by the transmit antenna 3.
  • a signal received by the receive antenna 4 is amplified by the LNA 9.
  • An output signal of the LNA 9 is demodulated by the biphase demodulator 11 by using a delayed PRBS signal from the delay circuit 10.
  • the downconverter 12 converts an output signal of the biphase demodulator 11 to an intermediate frequency (IF) signal by using the signal generated by the LO 5.
  • the IF signal resulting from the downconversion carried out by the downconverter 12 is filtered by the lowpass filter 13 and output at an IF output of the receiver 2.
  • the receive antenna 4 also receives a direct feed- through signal due to the finite isolation between the transmit antenna 3 and the receive antenna 4. That is, the signal received by the receive antenna 4 consists of a wanted signal resulting from the reflection from the object plus an unwanted direct feed-through signal.
  • a path delay difference between the reflection path and the direct feed-through path is defined as ⁇ .
  • the maximum range of the receiver 2 is defined as a range r for which the received power due to the reflection by the object 14 is equal to the received power from the direct feed-through path.
  • a range r for which the received power due to the reflection by the object 14 is equal to the received power from the direct feed-through path.
  • EIRP designates the equivalent isotropic radiation power
  • a E is the effective aperture of the antenna
  • P T is the transmit power (usually 2 dBm (dB(l mW))
  • G T and G R are the transmit and receive antenna gains
  • is the object radar cross section in m 2
  • is the wavelength (1.25 cm for a RF of 24 GHz)
  • d is the distance to the object.
  • Fig. 5 shows a diagram indicating the receiver input power P r as a function of the object distance d for carrier frequencies of 22 GHz, 24 GHz, 29 GHz and 77 GHz, assuming a frequency- independent transmit power of 2 dBm and antenna gains of 0 dB. As depicted in Fig. 5, there is a distance-independent difference of
  • 20-log(29/22) 2.4 dB between the receiver input power P r at 22 GHz and 29 GHz. This follows directly from the wavelength difference and the equation (1).
  • additional frequency dependence in the receiver input power P r can occur due to a frequency-dependent transmit power P T and frequency-dependent antenna gains G T and G R .
  • the receiver input power P r reduces by 12 dB.
  • the receiver input power P r at 77 GHz is also shown. At 77 GHz, the path loss is 10.125 dB higher than at 24 GHz.
  • Short-range radar systems typically target a maximum range of 30 m. As depicted in Fig. 5, for a distance d of 30 m the receiver input power P r is approximately -130 dBm.
  • the digital noise in the receiver 2 is equal to the transmitted digital noise minus the direct feed-through path loss, also referred to as isolation between the Tx antenna 3 and the Rx antenna 4.
  • the transmitted digital noise can be calculated from the autocorrelation function of the PRBS code.
  • R(x) 1/65535 for x ⁇ 0.
  • Document GB 2 259 820 A discloses a noise radar in which a transmitted signal is coded by pseudo-random sequences.
  • the noise radar transmits pulses of energy so as to give an opportunity to receive a returned signal during periods between pulses. That is, the transmission is interrupted during a number of periods during each pseudo-random sequence in order to allow returns from targets to be received by the same antenna as is used for transmission during those periods of interruption. In this way a problem of leakage of a transmitted signal directly into a receiver of the noise radar as occurring when a continuous transmitted signal is coded can be eliminated.
  • a receiver for receiving a signal originating from a transmitter using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal comprises a first multiplier configured to multiply a signal generated based on the pseudorandom binary sequence signal by a programmable factor.
  • the receiver further comprises a subtractor configured to subtract a multiplication result of the first multiplier from a signal generated based on the signal received by the receiver, to thereby cancel an effect of a direct feed-through from an output of the transmitter to an input of the receiver.
  • the effect of the direct feed-through can be cancelled.
  • digital noise occurring in the receiver due to PRBS autocorrelation can be reduced.
  • the maximum range of a PN radar system provided with the receiver can be increased.
  • the receiver further comprises a delay circuit configured to delay the pseudo-random binary sequence signal and a second multiplier configured to multiply the pseudo-random binary sequence signal by a delayed pseudorandom binary sequence signal from the delay circuit, wherein the first multiplier is configured to multiply a multiplication result of the second multiplier by the programmable factor.
  • a multiplication result of the first multiplier can be subtracted from an IF signal in the receiver.
  • the first multiplier is configured to multiply a signal tapped at an output of the transmitter by the programmable factor. That is, (a fraction of) a signal transmitted by the transmitter is used to cancel the effect of the direct feed- through.
  • a precise cancellation of the influence of the direct feed-through and an efficient digital noise correction can be achieved.
  • a transmission system comprises a transmitter generating an output signal by using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal and a receiver according to one of the preceding aspects or one of other aspects as set out in dependent claims.
  • a transmission system is a radar system, then also the maximum range of this radar system can be increased.
  • a method of receiving, in a receiver, a signal originating from a transmitter using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudorandom binary sequence signal comprises the step of multiplying a signal generated based on the pseudo-random binary sequence signal by a programmable factor.
  • the method further comprises the step of subtracting a multiplication result of the multiplying step from a signal generated based on the signal received by the receiver, to thereby cancel an effect of a direct feed-through from an output of the transmitter to an input of the receiver.
  • digital noise occurring due to PRBS autocorrelation while a signal is received by the receiver can be reduced.
  • a computer program product for a computer comprises software code portions for performing the steps of a method according to the fifth aspect when the product is run on the computer. This aspect enables a reduction of digital noise occurring in a receiver due to PRBS autocorrelation and an increase of the maximum range of a PN radar system provided with the receiver.
  • Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of an UWB radar system according to a first embodiment
  • Fig. 2 shows a schematic diagram of an UWB radar system according to a second embodiment
  • Fig. 3 shows a schematic flow chart of a basic cancellation scheme in accordance with the first and second embodiments
  • Fig. 4 shows a schematic diagram of an exemplary UWB radar system
  • Fig. 5 shows a diagram indicating a receiver input power.
  • Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of an UWB radar system according to a first embodiment. Elements of this UWB radar system that are identical with elements of the UWB radar system depicted in Fig. 4 are provided with the same reference signs and will not be discussed in detail again.
  • the receiver 2 of the UWB radar system depicted in Fig. 1 additionally comprises a second multiplier 15, a first multiplier 16, a subtractor 17 and a gain control 18 as compared with the receiver 2 of the UWB radar system depicted in Fig. 4.
  • the second multiplier 15 is connected to the input and output of the delay circuit 10 as well as to the first multiplier 16.
  • the first multiplier 16 is connected to the subtractor 17.
  • the subtractor 17 is interposed between the downconverter 12 and the lowpass filter 13 and connected to both of them.
  • the gain control 18 is connected to the first multiplier 16.
  • the second multiplier 15 multiplies the PRBS signal generated by the PN code generator 6 and input to the delay circuit 10 by the delayed PRBS signal output by the delay circuit 10.
  • the first multiplier 16 multiplies a multiplication result of the second multiplier 15 by a programmable factor ⁇ . That is, an output signal of the second multiplier 15 is scaled in amplitude by the programmable factor ⁇ .
  • the gain control 18 controls the programmable factor ⁇ .
  • the subtractor 17 subtracts a multiplication result of the first multiplier 16 from the IF signal resulting from the downconversion carried out by the downconverter 12.
  • the second multiplier 15 multiplies two digital signals.
  • it can be implemented by a simple Exclusive-Or (ExOr or XOR) gate. Hence, no complicated circuit is needed.
  • Fig. 2 shows a schematic diagram of an UWB radar system according to a second embodiment. Elements of this UWB radar system that are identical with elements of the UWB radar systems depicted in Figs. 1 and 4 are provided with the same reference signs and will not be discussed in detail again.
  • the receiver 2 of the UWB radar system depicted in Fig. 2 additionally comprises a first multiplier 16, a subtractor 17 and a gain control 18 as compared with the receiver 2 of the UWB radar system depicted in Fig. 4. Further, a coupler 19 is provided at an output of the transmitter 1. The coupler 19 is connected to the first multiplier 16. The first multiplier 16 is connected to the subtractor 17. The subtractor 17 is interposed between the LNA 9 and the biphase demodulator 11. The gain control 18 is connected to the first multiplier 16.
  • the delay of the direct feed-through path from the output of the transmitter 1 to the input of the receiver 2 is significantly less than one bit time of the PRBS sequence. For example, if a distance between the transmit antenna 3 and the receive antenna is 6 cm, the delay across the direct feed-through path is 200 ps. This corresponds to 0.4 bit times when operating at a PN code rate of 2 Gb/s.
  • the coupler 19 at the output of the transmitter 1 taps (a fraction of) the transmitted signal. This fraction is fed to the first multiplier 16, where it is multiplied by a programmable factor ⁇ .
  • the gain control 18 controls the programmable factor ⁇ .
  • the subtractor 17 subtracts a multiplication result of the first multiplier 16 from an amplified receiver input signal. More specifically, an output signal of the first multiplier 16 is subtracted from the output signal of the LNA 9. The subtraction is done at the output of the LNA 9 in order to have little impact on the noise figure of the receiver 2.
  • a signal actually transmitted by the transmitter 1 is used to cancel the effect of the direct feed-through.
  • the transmitter 1 and the receiver 2 can be continuously active.
  • the invention may be applied in UWB transmission systems where the transmitter and receiver are continuously active, such as (automotive) short-range radar systems based on PN coding (regardless of the carrier frequency, e.g. 24 GHz or 77 GHz).
  • the detection time radar response time
  • the transmitter and the receiver are continuously active, the detection time (radar response time) can be reduced as compared with a case where the transmitter and the receiver are not continuously active.
  • the receiver 2 can be implemented as an integrated circuit (IC) for both the first and second embodiments.
  • IC integrated circuit
  • the cancellation schemes according to the first and second embodiments can be implemented in a receiving method.
  • the steps of such method can be performed by software code portions of a computer program product for a computer when the product is run on the computer.
  • Fig. 3 shows a schematic flow chart of a basic cancellation scheme in accordance with the first and second embodiments.
  • a signal originating from a transmitter using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal is received in a receiver.
  • a signal generated based on the pseudo-random binary sequence signal is multiplied by a programmable factor.
  • a multiplication result of the step S 102 is subtracted from a signal generated based on the signal received by the receiver, to thereby cancel an effect of a direct feed-through from an output of the transmitter to an input of the receiver.
  • Both of the above described first and second embodiments enable a cancellation of the direct feed-through from the output of the transmitter 1 to the input of the receiver 2.
  • digital noise occurring in the receiver 2 due to the direct feed-through can be reduced.
  • the maximum range of the UWB radar system provided with the receiver 2 can be increased and/or isolation requirements between the transmit antenna 3 and the receive antenna 4 can be relaxed.
  • a computer program may be stored/distributed on a suitable medium, such as an optical storage medium or a solid-state medium supplied together with or as part of other hardware, but may also be distributed in other forms, such as via the Internet or other wired or wireless telecommunication systems. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope thereof.
  • a cancellation scheme for cancelling an effect of a direct feed- through from an output of a transmitter to an input of a receiver comprises receiving a signal originating from the transmitter using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal in the receiver (SlOl), multiplying a signal generated based on the pseudo-random binary sequence signal by a programmable factor (S 102) and subtracting a multiplication result from a signal generated based on the signal received by the receiver (S 103).
  • SlOl pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal in the receiver
  • S 102 programmable factor

Abstract

In summary, a cancellation scheme for cancelling an effect of a direct feed- through from an output of a transmitter to an input of a receiver is proposed. The cancellation scheme comprises receiving a signal originating from the transmitter using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal in the receiver (S101), multiplying a signal generated based on the pseudo-random binary sequence signal by a programmable factor (S102) and subtracting a multiplication result from a signal generated based on the signal received by the receiver (S103). It enables a precise cancellation of the effect of the direct feed-through. Thus, digital noise occurring in the receiver due to the direct feed-through can be reduced. As a result, the maximum range of a radar system provided with the receiver can be increased and/or isolation requirements between transmit and receive antennas can be relaxed.

Description

PSEUDO-NOISE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM WITH DIRECT FEED-THROUGH CANCELLATION
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a pseudo-noise (PN) transmission system which comprises a transmitter and a receiver, uses PN code modulation, and is capable of cancelling an effect of a direct feed-through from an output of its transmitter to an input of its receiver.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Transmission systems like e.g. an ultra-wideband (UWB) transmission system can be implemented using a PN code modulation. One example of such transmission system is an UWB radar system. A transmitter thereof is disclosed in H. Veenstra, E. v.d. Heijden, D. v. Goor: "15-27 GHz Pseudo-Noise UWB transmitter for short-range automotive radar in a production SiGe technology", Proceedings ESSCIRC 2005, pp. 275-278, 12-16 September 2005, Grenoble, France. A receiver thereof is disclosed in H. Veenstra, E. v.d. Heijden, G. Dolmans, M.G.M. Notten: "A SiGe-BiCMOS receiver for 24 GHz short-range radar applications", IMS 2007, 3-8 June 2007, Honolulu, USA.
Fig. 4 shows a schematic diagram of an exemplary UWB radar system. The UWB radar system comprises a transmitter 1, a receiver 2, a transmit (Tx) antenna 3, a receive (Rx) antenna 4, a local oscillator (LO) 5 and a PN code generator 6. The transmitter 1 includes a biphase modulator 7 and an amplifier 8. The receiver 2 includes an amplifier such as e.g. a low noise amplifier (LNA) 9, a delay circuit 10, a biphase demodulator 11, a downconverter 12 and a lowpass filter 13.
The LO 5 is connected to the biphase modulator 7 and the downconverter 12. The PN code generator 6 is connected to the biphase modulator 7 and the delay circuit 10. The biphase modulator 7 is connected to the amplifier 8. The amplifier 8 is connected to the transmit antenna 3.
The receive antenna 4 is connected to the LNA 9. The LNA 9 and the delay circuit 10 are connected to the biphase demodulator 11. The biphase demodulator 11 is connected to the downconverter 12, and the downconverter 12 is connected to the lowpass filter 13.
The LO 5 generates a carrier signal at a radio frequency (RF) of e.g. 24 GHz. The PN code generator 6 generates a pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) signal and can also be called a PRBS generator. The biphase modulator 7 modulates the carrier signal generated by the LO 5 with the PRBS signal generated by the PN code generator 6. A signal resulting from the modulation is amplified by the amplifier 8. An output signal of the amplifier 8 is transmitted by the transmit antenna 3.
A signal received by the receive antenna 4 is amplified by the LNA 9. An output signal of the LNA 9 is demodulated by the biphase demodulator 11 by using a delayed PRBS signal from the delay circuit 10. The downconverter 12 converts an output signal of the biphase demodulator 11 to an intermediate frequency (IF) signal by using the signal generated by the LO 5. The IF signal resulting from the downconversion carried out by the downconverter 12 is filtered by the lowpass filter 13 and output at an IF output of the receiver 2.
At least a part of the signal transmitted by the transmit antenna 3 is reflected by an object 14 and then received by the receive antenna 4. If the transmitter 1 and the receiver 2 are both continuously active, the receive antenna 4 also receives a direct feed- through signal due to the finite isolation between the transmit antenna 3 and the receive antenna 4. That is, the signal received by the receive antenna 4 consists of a wanted signal resulting from the reflection from the object plus an unwanted direct feed-through signal.
A path delay difference between the reflection path and the direct feed-through path is defined as τ. An autocorrelation function R(t) of the PRBS data is unity for t=0 but not zero for t=τ, resulting in digital noise. This digital noise from the direct feed-through path may limit the maximum range of the UWB radar system.
When only the digital noise is taken into consideration, the maximum range of the receiver 2 is defined as a range r for which the received power due to the reflection by the object 14 is equal to the received power from the direct feed-through path. A practical example is given below. The receiver input power Pr received by the receiver 2 in the UWB radar system depicted in Fig. 4 can be expressed as p _ EIRP 1 Λ _ PτGτGRϋλ2 r 4πd2 4πd2 E (4πf d4 In this equation, EIRP designates the equivalent isotropic radiation power, AE is the effective aperture of the antenna, PT is the transmit power (usually 2 dBm (dB(l mW))), GT and GR are the transmit and receive antenna gains, σ is the object radar cross section in m2, λ is the wavelength (1.25 cm for a RF of 24 GHz), and d is the distance to the object.
For the object radar cross section, 1 m2 is assumed. Fig. 5 shows a diagram indicating the receiver input power Pr as a function of the object distance d for carrier frequencies of 22 GHz, 24 GHz, 29 GHz and 77 GHz, assuming a frequency- independent transmit power of 2 dBm and antenna gains of 0 dB. As depicted in Fig. 5, there is a distance-independent difference of
20-log(29/22) = 2.4 dB between the receiver input power Pr at 22 GHz and 29 GHz. This follows directly from the wavelength difference and the equation (1). In practice, additional frequency dependence in the receiver input power Pr can occur due to a frequency-dependent transmit power PT and frequency-dependent antenna gains GT and GR. When the distance to the object 14 doubles, the receiver input power Pr reduces by 12 dB. For the purpose of comparison, the receiver input power Pr at 77 GHz is also shown. At 77 GHz, the path loss is 10.125 dB higher than at 24 GHz.
Short-range radar systems typically target a maximum range of 30 m. As depicted in Fig. 5, for a distance d of 30 m the receiver input power Pr is approximately -130 dBm.
The digital noise in the receiver 2 is equal to the transmitted digital noise minus the direct feed-through path loss, also referred to as isolation between the Tx antenna 3 and the Rx antenna 4. The transmitted digital noise can be calculated from the autocorrelation function of the PRBS code. A PRBS code of, for example, 216 - 1 = 65535 bits has an autocorrelation function R(x) = 1/65535 for x ≠ 0. Thus, the power of the digital noise is 48 dB below the wanted signal. This yields an isolation requirement of 130-48 = 82 dB, which is difficult to accomplish in practice.
There are several ways to reduce the digital noise in the receiver 2: 1) Increasing the sequence length of the PRBS. This length is 2N - 1 bits, wherein N is the number of flip-flops in a shift register of the PN code generator 6. When N is increased by 1, the digital noise reduces by 3 dB. A consequence of the increased PRBS code length is a doubling of the detection time (and thus the radar response time) with every bit increase in the shift register length. 2) Improving the isolation between the transmit antenna 3 and the receive antenna 4, for example by shielding. This is typically limited because of the limited maximum physical (practical) size of a radar unit. However, extreme isolation requirements have to be met to make sure that the digital noise in the receiver 2 due to the non-zero autocorrelation of the PRBS does not limit the maximum range of an UWB radar system using the receiver 2.
3) Correcting the digital noise, originating from direct feed-through, in the receiver 2.
Document GB 2 259 820 A discloses a noise radar in which a transmitted signal is coded by pseudo-random sequences. The noise radar transmits pulses of energy so as to give an opportunity to receive a returned signal during periods between pulses. That is, the transmission is interrupted during a number of periods during each pseudo-random sequence in order to allow returns from targets to be received by the same antenna as is used for transmission during those periods of interruption. In this way a problem of leakage of a transmitted signal directly into a receiver of the noise radar as occurring when a continuous transmitted signal is coded can be eliminated.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It would be advantageous to achieve a PN receiver and transmission system which are capable of reducing digital noise occurring in the receiver due to the PRBS autocorrelation. Further, it would be desirable to provide a PN radar system with an increased maximum range.
This object is achieved by a receiver according to claim 1 and a method according to claim 14. To address one or more of these concerns, in a first aspect of the invention a receiver for receiving a signal originating from a transmitter using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal is presented. The receiver comprises a first multiplier configured to multiply a signal generated based on the pseudorandom binary sequence signal by a programmable factor. The receiver further comprises a subtractor configured to subtract a multiplication result of the first multiplier from a signal generated based on the signal received by the receiver, to thereby cancel an effect of a direct feed-through from an output of the transmitter to an input of the receiver. According to the first aspect, the effect of the direct feed-through can be cancelled. Thus, digital noise occurring in the receiver due to PRBS autocorrelation can be reduced. As a result, the maximum range of a PN radar system provided with the receiver can be increased.
In a second aspect of the invention the receiver further comprises a delay circuit configured to delay the pseudo-random binary sequence signal and a second multiplier configured to multiply the pseudo-random binary sequence signal by a delayed pseudorandom binary sequence signal from the delay circuit, wherein the first multiplier is configured to multiply a multiplication result of the second multiplier by the programmable factor. A multiplication result of the first multiplier can be subtracted from an IF signal in the receiver. Thus, a digital noise correction can be implemented at IF. Hence, no additional circuits that operate at RF are needed.
In a third aspect of the invention the first multiplier is configured to multiply a signal tapped at an output of the transmitter by the programmable factor. That is, (a fraction of) a signal transmitted by the transmitter is used to cancel the effect of the direct feed- through. Thus, a precise cancellation of the influence of the direct feed-through and an efficient digital noise correction can be achieved.
In a fourth aspect of the invention a transmission system comprises a transmitter generating an output signal by using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal and a receiver according to one of the preceding aspects or one of other aspects as set out in dependent claims. According to the fourth aspect, an effect of a direct feed-through from an output of the transmitter to an input of the receiver can be cancelled. Thus, digital noise occurring in the receiver due to PRBS autocorrelation can be reduced. If the transmission system is a radar system, then also the maximum range of this radar system can be increased.
In a fifth aspect of the invention a method of receiving, in a receiver, a signal originating from a transmitter using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudorandom binary sequence signal is presented. The method comprises the step of multiplying a signal generated based on the pseudo-random binary sequence signal by a programmable factor. The method further comprises the step of subtracting a multiplication result of the multiplying step from a signal generated based on the signal received by the receiver, to thereby cancel an effect of a direct feed-through from an output of the transmitter to an input of the receiver. According to the fifth aspect, digital noise occurring due to PRBS autocorrelation while a signal is received by the receiver can be reduced. Further, the maximum range of a PN radar system using the method can be increased. In a sixth aspect of the invention a computer program product for a computer comprises software code portions for performing the steps of a method according to the fifth aspect when the product is run on the computer. This aspect enables a reduction of digital noise occurring in a receiver due to PRBS autocorrelation and an increase of the maximum range of a PN radar system provided with the receiver.
Further advantageous modifications are defined in the dependent claims. These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from and elucidated by embodiments described hereinafter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will now be described on the basis of embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of an UWB radar system according to a first embodiment; Fig. 2 shows a schematic diagram of an UWB radar system according to a second embodiment;
Fig. 3 shows a schematic flow chart of a basic cancellation scheme in accordance with the first and second embodiments;
Fig. 4 shows a schematic diagram of an exemplary UWB radar system; and Fig. 5 shows a diagram indicating a receiver input power.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of an UWB radar system according to a first embodiment. Elements of this UWB radar system that are identical with elements of the UWB radar system depicted in Fig. 4 are provided with the same reference signs and will not be discussed in detail again.
The receiver 2 of the UWB radar system depicted in Fig. 1 additionally comprises a second multiplier 15, a first multiplier 16, a subtractor 17 and a gain control 18 as compared with the receiver 2 of the UWB radar system depicted in Fig. 4. The second multiplier 15 is connected to the input and output of the delay circuit 10 as well as to the first multiplier 16. The first multiplier 16 is connected to the subtractor 17. The subtractor 17 is interposed between the downconverter 12 and the lowpass filter 13 and connected to both of them. The gain control 18 is connected to the first multiplier 16. The second multiplier 15 multiplies the PRBS signal generated by the PN code generator 6 and input to the delay circuit 10 by the delayed PRBS signal output by the delay circuit 10. In this way a residue caused by the direct feed-through path can be reconstructed. The first multiplier 16 multiplies a multiplication result of the second multiplier 15 by a programmable factor α. That is, an output signal of the second multiplier 15 is scaled in amplitude by the programmable factor α. The gain control 18 controls the programmable factor α.
The subtractor 17 subtracts a multiplication result of the first multiplier 16 from the IF signal resulting from the downconversion carried out by the downconverter 12. Thus, an effect of the direct feed-through can be cancelled at IF. That is, a digital noise correction can be implemented at IF. Hence, no additional circuits that operate at RF (e.g. 24 GHz) are needed.
The second multiplier 15 multiplies two digital signals. Thus, it can be implemented by a simple Exclusive-Or (ExOr or XOR) gate. Hence, no complicated circuit is needed.
Fig. 2 shows a schematic diagram of an UWB radar system according to a second embodiment. Elements of this UWB radar system that are identical with elements of the UWB radar systems depicted in Figs. 1 and 4 are provided with the same reference signs and will not be discussed in detail again. The receiver 2 of the UWB radar system depicted in Fig. 2 additionally comprises a first multiplier 16, a subtractor 17 and a gain control 18 as compared with the receiver 2 of the UWB radar system depicted in Fig. 4. Further, a coupler 19 is provided at an output of the transmitter 1. The coupler 19 is connected to the first multiplier 16. The first multiplier 16 is connected to the subtractor 17. The subtractor 17 is interposed between the LNA 9 and the biphase demodulator 11. The gain control 18 is connected to the first multiplier 16.
It is assumed that the delay of the direct feed-through path from the output of the transmitter 1 to the input of the receiver 2 is significantly less than one bit time of the PRBS sequence. For example, if a distance between the transmit antenna 3 and the receive antenna is 6 cm, the delay across the direct feed-through path is 200 ps. This corresponds to 0.4 bit times when operating at a PN code rate of 2 Gb/s.
The coupler 19 at the output of the transmitter 1 taps (a fraction of) the transmitted signal. This fraction is fed to the first multiplier 16, where it is multiplied by a programmable factor α. The gain control 18 controls the programmable factor α. The subtractor 17 subtracts a multiplication result of the first multiplier 16 from an amplified receiver input signal. More specifically, an output signal of the first multiplier 16 is subtracted from the output signal of the LNA 9. The subtraction is done at the output of the LNA 9 in order to have little impact on the noise figure of the receiver 2. In the second embodiment (a fraction of) a signal actually transmitted by the transmitter 1 is used to cancel the effect of the direct feed-through. Thus, an accurate cancellation of the influence of the direct feed-through and an effective digital noise correction can be achieved.
In both of the first and second embodiments the transmitter 1 and the receiver 2 can be continuously active. Thus, the invention may be applied in UWB transmission systems where the transmitter and receiver are continuously active, such as (automotive) short-range radar systems based on PN coding (regardless of the carrier frequency, e.g. 24 GHz or 77 GHz). When the transmitter and the receiver are continuously active, the detection time (radar response time) can be reduced as compared with a case where the transmitter and the receiver are not continuously active.
The receiver 2 can be implemented as an integrated circuit (IC) for both the first and second embodiments.
The cancellation schemes according to the first and second embodiments can be implemented in a receiving method. The steps of such method can be performed by software code portions of a computer program product for a computer when the product is run on the computer.
Fig. 3 shows a schematic flow chart of a basic cancellation scheme in accordance with the first and second embodiments. In a step SlOI a signal originating from a transmitter using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal is received in a receiver. In a step S 102 a signal generated based on the pseudo-random binary sequence signal is multiplied by a programmable factor. In a step S 103 a multiplication result of the step S 102 is subtracted from a signal generated based on the signal received by the receiver, to thereby cancel an effect of a direct feed-through from an output of the transmitter to an input of the receiver. Both of the above described first and second embodiments enable a cancellation of the direct feed-through from the output of the transmitter 1 to the input of the receiver 2. Thus, digital noise occurring in the receiver 2 due to the direct feed-through can be reduced. As a result, the maximum range of the UWB radar system provided with the receiver 2 can be increased and/or isolation requirements between the transmit antenna 3 and the receive antenna 4 can be relaxed.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and the foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive. The invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments.
Variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure and the appended claims. In the claims, the word "comprising" does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article "a" or "an" does not exclude a plurality of elements or steps. A single processor or other unit may fulfil the functions of several items recited in the claims. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage. A computer program may be stored/distributed on a suitable medium, such as an optical storage medium or a solid-state medium supplied together with or as part of other hardware, but may also be distributed in other forms, such as via the Internet or other wired or wireless telecommunication systems. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope thereof.
In summary, a cancellation scheme for cancelling an effect of a direct feed- through from an output of a transmitter to an input of a receiver is proposed. The cancellation scheme comprises receiving a signal originating from the transmitter using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal in the receiver (SlOl), multiplying a signal generated based on the pseudo-random binary sequence signal by a programmable factor (S 102) and subtracting a multiplication result from a signal generated based on the signal received by the receiver (S 103). It enables a precise cancellation of the effect of the direct feed-through. Thus, digital noise occurring in the receiver due to the direct feed-through can be reduced. As a result, the maximum range of a radar system provided with the receiver can be increased and/or isolation requirements between transmit and receive antennas can be relaxed.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A receiver (2) for receiving a signal originating from a transmitter (1) using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal, said receiver (2) comprising: a first multiplier (16) configured to multiply a signal generated based on said pseudo-random binary sequence signal by a programmable factor; and a subtractor (17) configured to subtract a multiplication result of said first multiplier (16) from a signal generated based on said signal received by said receiver (2), to thereby cancel an effect of a direct feed-through from an output of said transmitter (1) to an input of said receiver (2).
2. A receiver (2) according to claim 1, further comprising: a delay circuit (10) configured to delay said pseudo-random binary sequence signal; and a second multiplier (15) configured to multiply said pseudo-random binary sequence signal by a delayed pseudo-random binary sequence signal from said delay circuit
(10), wherein said first multiplier (16) is configured to multiply a multiplication result of said second multiplier (15) by said programmable factor.
3. A receiver (2) according to claim 2, wherein said second multiplier (15) is implemented by an ExOr gate.
4. A receiver (2) according to claim 2, further comprising: an amplifier (9) configured to amplify said signal received by said receiver (2); a demodulator (11) configured to demodulate an output signal of said amplifier (9); and a downconverter (12) configured to convert an output signal of said demodulator (11) to an intermediate frequency signal, wherein said subtractor (17) is configured to subtract said multiplication result of said first multiplier (16) from said intermediate frequency signal.
5. A receiver (2) according to claim 1, wherein said first multiplier (16) is 5 configured to multiply a signal tapped at an output of said transmitter (1) by said programmable factor.
6. A receiver (2) according to claim 5, wherein said tapped signal is tapped by a coupler (19) at said output of said transmitter (1).
10
7. A receiver (2) according to claim 5, further comprising: an amplifier (9) configured to amplify said signal received by said receiver (2), wherein said subtractor (17) is configured to subtract said multiplication result of said first multiplier (16) from an output signal of said amplifier (9). 15
8 A receiver (2) according to claim 1, further comprising: a gain control (18) configured to control said programmable factor.
9. A receiver (2) according to claim 1, wherein said signal received by said 20 receiver (2) is an ultra-wideband signal.
10. A receiver (2) according to claim 1, wherein said receiver (2) and said transmitter (1) are continuously active.
25 11. A receiver (2) according to claim 1 , wherein said receiver (2) is a radar receiver and said transmitter (1) is a radar transmitter.
12. A transmission system comprising: a transmitter (1) generating an output signal by using a pseudo-noise code 30 modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal; and a receiver (2) according to any one of the preceding claims.
13. A transmission system according to claim 12, wherein said transmission system is a short-range radar system.
14. A method of receiving, in a receiver (2), a signal originating from a transmitter (1) using a pseudo-noise code modulation based on a pseudo-random binary sequence signal, said method comprising the steps of: - multiplying a signal generated based on said pseudo-random binary sequence signal by a programmable factor; and subtracting a multiplication result of said multiplying step from a signal generated based on said signal received by said receiver (2), to thereby cancel an effect of a direct feed-through from an output of said transmitter (1) to an input of said receiver (2).
15. A computer program product for a computer, comprising software code portions for performing the steps of a method according to claim 14 when said product is run on said computer.
PCT/IB2008/053334 2007-08-24 2008-08-20 Pseudo-noise transmission system with direct feed-through cancellation WO2009027900A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP07114911.6 2007-08-24
EP07114911 2007-08-24

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2009027900A1 true WO2009027900A1 (en) 2009-03-05

Family

ID=40227869

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2008/053334 WO2009027900A1 (en) 2007-08-24 2008-08-20 Pseudo-noise transmission system with direct feed-through cancellation

Country Status (2)

Country Link
TW (1) TW200925638A (en)
WO (1) WO2009027900A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104199025A (en) * 2014-09-18 2014-12-10 中国科学院电子学研究所 Ultra-wideband pseudo-random encoding radar system
CN104767568A (en) * 2015-01-27 2015-07-08 北京交通大学 Full-gloss pseudo-random code optical-signal rate multiplier
GB2544753A (en) * 2015-11-24 2017-05-31 Trw Ltd Transceiver Circuits
EP3588127A1 (en) * 2018-06-29 2020-01-01 IMEC vzw Spillover cancellation in radar systems

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1122555A1 (en) * 1994-06-30 2001-08-08 Ehsani Engineering Enterprises Inc. System and method for radar-vision for vehicles in traffic
WO2003038462A2 (en) * 2001-11-02 2003-05-08 Spectrum Target Detection Inc. Spread spectrum radar with leak compensation at baseband

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1122555A1 (en) * 1994-06-30 2001-08-08 Ehsani Engineering Enterprises Inc. System and method for radar-vision for vehicles in traffic
WO2003038462A2 (en) * 2001-11-02 2003-05-08 Spectrum Target Detection Inc. Spread spectrum radar with leak compensation at baseband

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104199025A (en) * 2014-09-18 2014-12-10 中国科学院电子学研究所 Ultra-wideband pseudo-random encoding radar system
CN104767568A (en) * 2015-01-27 2015-07-08 北京交通大学 Full-gloss pseudo-random code optical-signal rate multiplier
CN104767568B (en) * 2015-01-27 2017-07-04 北京交通大学 Full light pseudo noise code optical signal rate multiplier
GB2544753A (en) * 2015-11-24 2017-05-31 Trw Ltd Transceiver Circuits
US10103770B2 (en) 2015-11-24 2018-10-16 Trw Limited Transceiver circuits
GB2544753B (en) * 2015-11-24 2021-12-08 Trw Ltd Transceiver Circuits
EP3588127A1 (en) * 2018-06-29 2020-01-01 IMEC vzw Spillover cancellation in radar systems
US11428778B2 (en) 2018-06-29 2022-08-30 Imec Vzw System and method for performing spillover cancellation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW200925638A (en) 2009-06-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN102771055B (en) For transmitting and receiving electromagnetic wideband transmitter/receiver apparatus and the method for transmitting and receiving wideband electromagnetic ripple
KR101139222B1 (en) Method and Apparatus for generating predistortion signal
CN103634022B (en) Full-duplex transceiver in flat fading environment and method for canceling self-interference
US7456747B2 (en) Method and device for suppressing a transmitting signal in a receiver of an RFID write/read unit
US20100118922A1 (en) Wireless repeater apparatus for canceling interference signal
US11428778B2 (en) System and method for performing spillover cancellation
EP3042451B1 (en) Feed-forward canceller
JP2007003305A (en) Spread spectrum radar device
CN107005266A (en) Full duplex radio electric equipment
WO2009027900A1 (en) Pseudo-noise transmission system with direct feed-through cancellation
JP2006197545A (en) Distortion compensating amplifier
KR101222049B1 (en) Method and Apparatus for TX Leakage cancellation in FMCW Radar System
JP5696622B2 (en) Wireless transmission device
AU2005321424B2 (en) Digital radio communication method and system for mobile ground station
US6246697B1 (en) Method and system for generating a complex pseudonoise sequence for processing a code division multiple access signal
US8009718B2 (en) Wireless transmitter and receiver for use in an ultra-wideband direct spread pulse communication system
JP2016161447A (en) Radar device
WO2008108528A1 (en) Wireless repeater apparatus for canceling interference signal
US20110051843A1 (en) Transmission circuit
US10567091B2 (en) Base station for cancelling transmitter noise present in reception band and method for operating same
US10027357B2 (en) Transmitter with compensating mechanism of pulling effect
US9749005B2 (en) Wireless transmission device, wireless reception device, wireless communication system, and wireless communication method
CN104253656A (en) Phase noise restraining method and phase noise restraining device
EP2814184B1 (en) Two stage leakage cancellation in full duplex communication
Quint et al. System architecture for a compact high range resolution frequency comb OFDM radar

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 08807373

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 08807373

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1