WO2008144356A1 - Method and system for detecting an anomaly and determing its size - Google Patents
Method and system for detecting an anomaly and determing its size Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2008144356A1 WO2008144356A1 PCT/US2008/063639 US2008063639W WO2008144356A1 WO 2008144356 A1 WO2008144356 A1 WO 2008144356A1 US 2008063639 W US2008063639 W US 2008063639W WO 2008144356 A1 WO2008144356 A1 WO 2008144356A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- anomaly
- wave
- wave data
- size
- scattered wave
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/04—Analysing solids
- G01N29/06—Visualisation of the interior, e.g. acoustic microscopy
- G01N29/0654—Imaging
- G01N29/069—Defect imaging, localisation and sizing using, e.g. time of flight diffraction [TOFD], synthetic aperture focusing technique [SAFT], Amplituden-Laufzeit-Ortskurven [ALOK] technique
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M5/00—Investigating the elasticity of structures, e.g. deflection of bridges or air-craft wings
- G01M5/0066—Investigating the elasticity of structures, e.g. deflection of bridges or air-craft wings by exciting or detecting vibration or acceleration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/04—Analysing solids
- G01N29/07—Analysing solids by measuring propagation velocity or propagation time of acoustic waves
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/44—Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
- G01N29/4409—Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor by comparison
- G01N29/4427—Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor by comparison with stored values, e.g. threshold values
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/04—Wave modes and trajectories
- G01N2291/044—Internal reflections (echoes), e.g. on walls or defects
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/26—Scanned objects
- G01N2291/269—Various geometry objects
- G01N2291/2694—Wings or other aircraft parts
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates to detecting anomalies in a structure, such as an aircraft or other structure, and more particularly to a method and system for detecting an anomaly, such as a delamination or other defect, and estimating or determining its size, shape and location.
- New, lightweight composite materials and designs are being used more extensively in the aerospace industry for commercial aircraft and other aerospace vehicles, as well as in other industries.
- the structures using these composite materials may be formed using multiple plies or layers of material that may be laminated together to form a lightweight, high strength structure. Similar to traditional materials, these structures may be subject to extreme stresses, such as during flight operations for aerospace vehicles or other operations, or damage from an impact or other cause.
- the multiple plies of material can separate or become delaminated as a result of these stresses or impact.
- new and traditional materials are being designed in more optimized manner, there is also the need in the aerospace industry to quickly identify and maintain all structures with better efficiency - improving the dispatch reliability and increasing the in-service use of aircraft and any other similar expensive equipment. As such, there is a need to quantify damage or delamination size in plate-like structures using permanently attached piezoelectric actuators/sensors but such efforts have failed to successfully demonstrate feasibility of actual implementation on
- Page l of22 real aircraft structures due to heavy dependency on simplified analytical models and lack of simple but robust interpretation techniques relating complex signal responses to damage information and the like. Accordingly, a means to non-destructively inspect for damage and monitor the health or condition of such structures and to determine or measure a size, shape and location of any anomalies or delaminations is needed. Similar needs also exist and similar benefits may be realized for more traditional materials such as metallic structures requiring quick, frequent or infrequent inspections, periodically over time to status the known state of the structures health.
- a method for detecting an anomaly and measuring its size may include generating a wave signal into a structure being evaluated and collecting at least one of any front and back scattered wave data and any side scattered wave data caused by the wave signal impacting an anomaly.
- the method may also include processing the at least one front and back scattered wave data and side scattered wave data to measure a size, location, and shape of the anomaly.
- a system for detecting an anomaly and measuring its size may include an actuator for generating and introducing a wave signal into a structure being evaluated.
- the system may also include a sensor for collecting at least one of any front and back scattered wave data and any side scattered wave data caused by energy of the wave signal being at least partially reflected by an anomaly.
- the system may further include hardware, such as a structural health management unit for processing the at least one of any front and back scattered wave data and any side scattered wave data to measure a size of the anomaly.
- Figures 1 is a flow chart of an example of a method for detecting and determining the size of an anomaly in a structure in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- Figure 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary system for detecting and determining the size of an anomaly in a structure in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- Figure 3 is an illustration of waveforms for detecting and determining the size of an anomaly in a structure in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- Figure 4 illustrates an example of a pitch-catch actuator- sensor configuration for detecting and determining the size of any anomaly in a structure when the anomaly is not in a direct path between an actuator and a sensor in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- Figure 5 illustrates an example of a pitch-catch actuator- sensor configuration for detecting and determining the size of any anomaly in a structure when the anomaly is on a direct path between an actuator and a sensor in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- Figure 6 illustrates an example of a pitch-catch actuator- sensor configuration for detecting and determining the size of any anomaly in a structure when the anomaly is on a direct path between an actuator and a sensor in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- Figures 7 A and 7B illustrate an example of a sensor- actuator configuration operable in either a pitch-catch mode (Figure 7A) or a pulse-echo mode (Figure 7B) for detecting any anomaly and determining the anomaly's size and shape in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- Figures 1 is a flow chart of an example of a method 100 for detecting and determining the size of an anomaly in a structure in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- a signal, pulse wave, lamb wave or similar wave signal may be generated and directed into a structure being monitored.
- Figure 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary system 200 for detecting and determining the size of an anomaly 202 in a structure 204 in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- a structural health monitoring unit 206 may be used to generate the signal, pulse wave, or other wave signal, and an actuator or combination actuator and sensor 208 may generate, transfer or direct the wave signal, illustrated by arrow 210 in Figure 2, into the structure 204 or object being monitored.
- the structural health monitoring unit 206 may be a lamb wave generator or transceiver, data acquisition unit capable of transmitting and receiving signals for structural health monitoring as described herein or the like.
- the actuator or combination actuator-sensor 208 may be an electromechanical actuator/sensor capable of generating or directing a signal for structural health monitoring, such as a lamb wave or similar signal or wave, into the structure 204.
- An example of the actuator or combination actuator-sensor 208 may be a piezoelectric actuator/sensor or similar device attachable to the structure 204.
- the structure 204 or object may be formed by a plurality 212 of plies or layers of composite material, a solid metallic material, or other similar solid or laminated material.
- the structure 204 or object may be a vehicle, such as an aerospace vehicle, terrestrial vehicle, watercraft, civil structure, such as a bridge, building or other structure, or any object were monitoring the structural health or condition is desired.
- any front and back scattered wave data caused by the wave signal 210 impacting an anomaly may be collected.
- the front and back scattered waves or wave data are illustrated in Figure 2 by broken or dashed arrows 214 and 216, respectively.
- the front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 or signal may be collected by the combination actuator-sensor 208 if the actuator-sensor 208 is self- sensing.
- the front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 or signal may also be collected by a sensor 21 8 capable of receiving such wave data or pulses and transmitting the received or collected wave data to the structural health monitoring unit 206 for analysis to measure the size of the anomaly 202 or delamination.
- the sensor 21 8 may also be an electromechanical device, such as a piezoelectric sensor or similar device capable of sensing the front and back scattered waves 214 and 216.
- side scattered waves or wave data may be collected or may be collected in addition to the back and front scatter waves.
- An example of collecting side scattered waves will be described with reference to Figure 5.
- the system 200 may include actuators 208 without a sensing capability and sensors 21 8 in what may be referred to as a pitch-catch arrangement or pitch-catch actuators/sensors and may operate in a pitch-catch mode.
- the actuators 208 may transmit or pitch wave signals 210 into the structure 204 and the sensors 218 may receive or catch any front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 from any anomaly 202.
- the devices 208 and 21 8 may both be combination actuator and sensor devices for both transmitting the wave signal 210 and receiving the front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 and sending the data to the structural health monitoring unit 206 to determine or measure the size of the anomaly 202.
- the arrangement may be referred to as a pulse-echo arrangement or pulse-echo actuators/sensors and may operate in a pulse-echo mode. Any combination of multiple pitch-catch actuators/sensors or pulse-echo actuators/sensors that may be positioned at predetermined locations to measure the size and location of the anomaly 202.
- the combination actuator and sensor devices may also operate in a pitch-catch mode.
- a plurality of actuators or combination actuator-sensors similar to actuator/sensor 208, and a plurality of sensors, similar to sensor 21 8, may be positioned at selected locations on the structure 204 relative to one another to measure the size, shape and location of any anomaly or delamination in the structure 204.
- baseline wave data for the structure 204 may also be collected.
- the baseline wave data may be collected (a) before the structure 204 or object is placed in service, (b) at some point in time before beginning a structural health monitoring program on the structure 204, or (c) anytime during the monitoring process before the damage anomaly is created.
- a velocity of propagation of waves or signals in the structure 204 may be calibrated using the baseline wave data or other sources for velocity, such as theoretical velocity in the particular structure, previously measured velocity in the structure 204 or similar structures or other sources for velocity.
- the calibrated velocity of propagation of the waves may be used in measuring the size of any anomaly or delamination from the front and back scattered wave data 214 and 21 6 as described herein.
- An example of a baseline waveform 300 is illustrated in Figure 3.
- Figure 3 also illustrates an example of a waveform 302 illustrating detection of an anomaly and a waveform 304 illustrating front scattered wave data 306 and back scattered wave data 308.
- signal processing may be performed on the front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 using the collected baseline wave data for the structure 204.
- the scattered waves 214 and 216 induced by the anomaly 202 can be decoupled or separated from any other waves, such as directly transmitted waves from the actuator 208 to sensor 21 8 and/or other possible reflected waves from any structural boundaries present in the structure 204, by subtracting other reflected waves that are not being reflected from the anomaly 202.
- One method to do this is by subtracting post damage data from pristine (baseline) wave data.
- the front and back scattered waves 214 and 216 may be separated or separately identified.
- the front and back scattered waves 214 and 216 may be separated or identified using signal processing to isolate each wave signal.
- Examples of signal processing techniques that may be used may include mode decomposition or mode conversion, noise cancellation or reduction or other known signal processing techniques. Applying mode decomposition to the reflected wave signals will help decompose the combined scatter wave which consists of both front scatter and back scatter into individual components that can then be identified into front scatter and back scatter components and the individual time of flight for each wave and be uniquely measured. Other signal processing techniques such as noise cancellation can also be used to more clearly identify the true front scatter and back scatter waves signals.
- the size of the delamination or other anomaly may be measured from the front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 (and/or side scattered wave data in other embodiments of the present disclosure).
- the size of the delamination or anomaly may be measured based on a difference in arrival time of the front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 at the sensors 208 and 21 8 or a Time-of-Flight (TOF) of the wave and based on a calibrated velocity of the wave propagation (V) in the structure 204.
- the TOF may be defined as the time from when a signal or wave is transmitted and the front and back scattered waves are respectively received.
- the measurement of the size of the delamination or other anomaly may be presented to a user.
- the size of the delamination or other anomaly may be presented on a user interface 220 ( Figure 2), such as a display.
- the user interface 220 may also include a keyboard, computer pointing device or other means for interfacing with and controlling operation of the structural health monitoring unit 206.
- a representation of the measured size, shape, and location of the delamination or other anomaly may be presented. Similar to that previously describe, multiple actuators and sensors may be attached or mounted to a structure at selected locations on the structure. The multiple actuators may send wave signals into the structure. The sensors may receive front and back scattered wave data from any anomaly in the structure to measure and present the representation of the measured size, shape and location of the anomaly.
- An example of a configuration operable in either a pitch-catch mode or a pulse-echo mode for detecting any anomaly and measuring the anomaly's size and shape will be described with reference to Figures 7 A and 7B.
- the structural health monitoring unit 206 (which may be a ultrasonic wave generator) may include a data storage element 222 to store the baseline wave data and any other data for analyzing the front and back scatter wave data 214 and 21 6.
- the structural health monitoring unit 206 may also include a module 224 to determine the size of the anomaly 202 or delamination.
- the module 224 may be adapted to determine the size, shape and location of the anomaly if multiple actuators and sensors are used similar to that previously described.
- the elements of the method 100 may be embodied in the module 224.
- Figure 4 illustrates an example of a pitch-catch actuator- sensor configuration 400 for detecting any anomaly 402 or damage in a structure and determining the size of the anomaly 402 when the anomaly 402 is not in a direct path between an actuator 404 and a sensor 406 in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the size of the anomaly or damage may be determined by equation 1 :
- D is the distance between the front boundary 408 and the back boundary 410 of the anomaly as represented by the difference between bl and b2, the respective distances from the actuator 404 and sensor 406 and the front and back boundaries 408 and 410 or edges of the anomaly 402.
- TOFb is the Time-of- Flight of a wave signal represented by arrow 41 1 in Figure 4 from the actuator 404 to the sensor 406 scattered from the back boundary 410 of the anomaly 402 as represented by arrow 41 1 '.
- TOFf is the Time-of-Flight of the wave signal represent by arrow 41 2 from the actuator 404 to the sensor 406 scattered from the front boundary 408 of the anomaly as represented by arrow 41 2'.
- V is the velocity of the wave signal propagating through the material and may be the calibrated velocity of the wave or signal in the particular material or structure. Equation 1 assumes an isotropic structure or material and therefore V is constant. The V may be described as being an angle dependent variable in the case of an anisotropic structure. Accordingly, V may vary with angle of the actuator 404 and sensor 406 relative to the anomaly 402 in an anisotropic structure. Module 224 in Figure 2 may be adapted or modified to compensate for the structure under evaluation being anisotropic. In equation 1 , the variable c represents the distance between the actuator 404 and sensor 406.
- the substantially elliptically shaped broken or dashed lines 414 and 416 illustrate boundaries of an area associated the actuator 404 and sensor 406 within which any anomaly or damage may be detected and its size determined by the actuator 404 and sensor 406 operating in the pitch-catch mode, as described above, wherein the actuator 404 generates a wave or signal and the sensor 406 senses any of the wave signal scattered by the boundaries of the anomaly 402 or delamination.
- Figure 5 illustrates an example of a pitch-catch actuator- sensor configuration 500 for detecting and determining the size of any anomaly 502 in a structure when the anomaly 502 is on a direct path between an actuator 504 and a sensor 506 in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the size of the anomaly 502 or damage may be determined by equation 2:
- Equation 2 assumes the structure is isotropic and therefore V will be constant.
- the velocity V may vary with an angle of the anomaly 502 relative to the actuator 504 and sensor 506 in anisotropic structures.
- the broken or dashed lines 514 and 516 illustrate boundaries of an area associated the actuator 504 and sensor 506 where any anomaly or damage may be detected and its size measured by the actuator 504 and sensor 506 operating in the pitch-catch mode similar to that previously described.
- the paths 51 1 and 51 2 represent a signal being sent from the actuator 504.
- the paths 51 1 ' and 51 2' represent the signal being scattered from respective sides 510 and 508 of the anomaly 502, and being received at the sensor 506. In this scenario, the scatter of primary interest is scattered from the sides 508 and 510 of the anomaly 502.
- Figure 6 illustrates an example of a pulse-echo (self- sensing) configuration 600 for detecting and measuring the size any anomaly 602 in a structure in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- At least one device 604 or combination actuator-sensor device that is capable of both generating a wave signal and receiving back scattered wave data may be provided.
- the size of the anomaly 602 may be determined by equation 3:
- Equation 3 may be the same as those in Equations 1 and 2.
- the velocity V may vary with an angle relative to the device 604 and the anomaly 602 in an anisotropic structure.
- the broken or dashed lines 606 and 608 illustrate boundaries of areas associated the device 604 where any anomaly or damage may be detected and its size measured by the device 604 operating in the pulse-echo mode.
- Figures 7 A and 7B illustrate an example of a configuration
- the configuration 700 may include multiple devices 706 or combination actuators/sensors capable of both generating a signal or wave and receiving front and back scattered waves or data from any anomaly 702.
- the devices 706 may also be separate actuators for generating a signal or wave and sensors for receiving the front and back scattered wave data.
- the devices 706 or separate actuators and sensors may be positioned at predetermined locations on an object to be tested or evaluated. In Figure 7 A the devices 706a may be operated in a pitch- catch mode or configuration similar to that previously described.
- selected devices 706a may generate or pitch a wave signal and other devices 706a may receive or catch any front and back scattered waves or data from any anomaly 702 or damage.
- the substantially elliptically shaped broken or dashed lines 708 in Figure 7A illustrate boundaries of areas associated with each device 706a where any anomaly or damage may be detected and its size determined by the respective device 706a in the configuration 700a operating in the pitch-catch mode.
- the devices 706b may be operated in a pulse- echo mode or configuration similar to that previously described.
- each device 706b may generate or pulse a wave or signal and the same device 706b may also receive any front and back scattered waves or data from any anomaly 702.
- the substantially circular broken or dashed lines 710 associated with each device 706b in Figure 7B illustrate boundaries of areas where any anomaly or damage may be detected by the respective devices 706b in the configuration 700b operating in the pulse-echo mode. Damage volume may also be determined when multiple devices 706 or actuator-sensors are used by utilizing multiple scattered wave data and scatter imaging techniques.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Abstract
A method for detecting an anomaly and measuring its size may include generating a wave signal into a structure being evaluated and collecting at least one of any front and back scattered wave data and any side scattered wave data caused by the wave signal impacting an anomaly. The method may also include processing the at least one front and back scattered wave data and side scattered wave data to measure a size, location, and shape of the anomaly.
Description
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING AN ANOMALY AND
DETERMINING ITS SIZE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present disclosure relates to detecting anomalies in a structure, such as an aircraft or other structure, and more particularly to a method and system for detecting an anomaly, such as a delamination or other defect, and estimating or determining its size, shape and location.
New, lightweight composite materials and designs are being used more extensively in the aerospace industry for commercial aircraft and other aerospace vehicles, as well as in other industries. The structures using these composite materials may be formed using multiple plies or layers of material that may be laminated together to form a lightweight, high strength structure. Similar to traditional materials, these structures may be subject to extreme stresses, such as during flight operations for aerospace vehicles or other operations, or damage from an impact or other cause. The multiple plies of material can separate or become delaminated as a result of these stresses or impact. As new and traditional materials are being designed in more optimized manner, there is also the need in the aerospace industry to quickly identify and maintain all structures with better efficiency - improving the dispatch reliability and increasing the in-service use of aircraft and any other similar expensive equipment. As such, there is a need to quantify damage or delamination size in plate-like structures using permanently attached piezoelectric actuators/sensors but such efforts have failed to successfully demonstrate feasibility of actual implementation on
Page l of22
real aircraft structures due to heavy dependency on simplified analytical models and lack of simple but robust interpretation techniques relating complex signal responses to damage information and the like. Accordingly, a means to non-destructively inspect for damage and monitor the health or condition of such structures and to determine or measure a size, shape and location of any anomalies or delaminations is needed. Similar needs also exist and similar benefits may be realized for more traditional materials such as metallic structures requiring quick, frequent or infrequent inspections, periodically over time to status the known state of the structures health.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for detecting an anomaly and measuring its size may include generating a wave signal into a structure being evaluated and collecting at least one of any front and back scattered wave data and any side scattered wave data caused by the wave signal impacting an anomaly. The method may also include processing the at least one front and back scattered wave data and side scattered wave data to measure a size, location, and shape of the anomaly.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure, a system for detecting an anomaly and measuring its size may include an actuator for generating and introducing a wave signal into a structure being evaluated. The system may also include a sensor for collecting at least one of any front and back scattered wave data and any side scattered wave data caused by energy of the wave signal being at least partially reflected by an
anomaly. The system may further include hardware, such as a structural health management unit for processing the at least one of any front and back scattered wave data and any side scattered wave data to measure a size of the anomaly. Other aspects and features of the present disclosure, as defined solely by the claims, will become apparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon review of the following non-limited detailed description of the disclosure in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE
DRAWINGS
Figures 1 is a flow chart of an example of a method for detecting and determining the size of an anomaly in a structure in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Figure 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary system for detecting and determining the size of an anomaly in a structure in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Figure 3 is an illustration of waveforms for detecting and determining the size of an anomaly in a structure in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Figure 4 illustrates an example of a pitch-catch actuator- sensor configuration for detecting and determining the size of any anomaly in a structure when the anomaly is not in a direct path between an actuator and a sensor in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Figure 5 illustrates an example of a pitch-catch actuator- sensor configuration for detecting and determining the size of any
anomaly in a structure when the anomaly is on a direct path between an actuator and a sensor in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Figure 6 illustrates an example of a pitch-catch actuator- sensor configuration for detecting and determining the size of any anomaly in a structure when the anomaly is on a direct path between an actuator and a sensor in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Figures 7 A and 7B illustrate an example of a sensor- actuator configuration operable in either a pitch-catch mode (Figure 7A) or a pulse-echo mode (Figure 7B) for detecting any anomaly and determining the anomaly's size and shape in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The following detailed description of embodiments refers to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate specific embodiments of the disclosure. Other embodiments having different structures and operations do not depart from the scope of the present disclosure.
Figures 1 is a flow chart of an example of a method 100 for detecting and determining the size of an anomaly in a structure in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. In block 1 02, a signal, pulse wave, lamb wave or similar wave signal may be generated and directed into a structure being monitored.
Referring also to Figure 2, Figure 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary system 200 for detecting and determining the size of an anomaly 202 in a structure 204 in accordance with an embodiment
of the present disclosure. A structural health monitoring unit 206 may be used to generate the signal, pulse wave, or other wave signal, and an actuator or combination actuator and sensor 208 may generate, transfer or direct the wave signal, illustrated by arrow 210 in Figure 2, into the structure 204 or object being monitored. The structural health monitoring unit 206 may be a lamb wave generator or transceiver, data acquisition unit capable of transmitting and receiving signals for structural health monitoring as described herein or the like. The actuator or combination actuator-sensor 208 may be an electromechanical actuator/sensor capable of generating or directing a signal for structural health monitoring, such as a lamb wave or similar signal or wave, into the structure 204. An example of the actuator or combination actuator-sensor 208 may be a piezoelectric actuator/sensor or similar device attachable to the structure 204.
The structure 204 or object may be formed by a plurality 212 of plies or layers of composite material, a solid metallic material, or other similar solid or laminated material. The structure 204 or object may be a vehicle, such as an aerospace vehicle, terrestrial vehicle, watercraft, civil structure, such as a bridge, building or other structure, or any object were monitoring the structural health or condition is desired.
Referring back to Figure 1 , in block 104, any front and back scattered wave data caused by the wave signal 210 impacting an anomaly, such as anomaly 202, crack or delamination in the example of Figure 2, may be collected. The front and back scattered waves or wave data are illustrated in Figure 2 by broken or dashed arrows 214 and 216, respectively. The front and back
scattered wave data 214 and 216 or signal may be collected by the combination actuator-sensor 208 if the actuator-sensor 208 is self- sensing. The front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 or signal may also be collected by a sensor 21 8 capable of receiving such wave data or pulses and transmitting the received or collected wave data to the structural health monitoring unit 206 for analysis to measure the size of the anomaly 202 or delamination. The sensor 21 8 may also be an electromechanical device, such as a piezoelectric sensor or similar device capable of sensing the front and back scattered waves 214 and 216. In another embodiment of the present disclosure, side scattered waves or wave data may be collected or may be collected in addition to the back and front scatter waves. An example of collecting side scattered waves will be described with reference to Figure 5. The system 200 may include actuators 208 without a sensing capability and sensors 21 8 in what may be referred to as a pitch-catch arrangement or pitch-catch actuators/sensors and may operate in a pitch-catch mode. The actuators 208 may transmit or pitch wave signals 210 into the structure 204 and the sensors 218 may receive or catch any front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 from any anomaly 202. Alternatively, as described above, the devices 208 and 21 8 may both be combination actuator and sensor devices for both transmitting the wave signal 210 and receiving the front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 and sending the data to the structural health monitoring unit 206 to determine or measure the size of the anomaly 202. The arrangement may be referred to as a pulse-echo arrangement or pulse-echo actuators/sensors and may operate in a pulse-echo mode. Any combination of multiple pitch-catch actuators/sensors
or pulse-echo actuators/sensors that may be positioned at predetermined locations to measure the size and location of the anomaly 202. The combination actuator and sensor devices may also operate in a pitch-catch mode. In accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure, a plurality of actuators or combination actuator-sensors, similar to actuator/sensor 208, and a plurality of sensors, similar to sensor 21 8, may be positioned at selected locations on the structure 204 relative to one another to measure the size, shape and location of any anomaly or delamination in the structure 204.
Also in block 104 of Figure 1 , baseline wave data for the structure 204 may also be collected. The baseline wave data may be collected (a) before the structure 204 or object is placed in service, (b) at some point in time before beginning a structural health monitoring program on the structure 204, or (c) anytime during the monitoring process before the damage anomaly is created.
In block 106, a velocity of propagation of waves or signals in the structure 204 may be calibrated using the baseline wave data or other sources for velocity, such as theoretical velocity in the particular structure, previously measured velocity in the structure 204 or similar structures or other sources for velocity. The calibrated velocity of propagation of the waves may be used in measuring the size of any anomaly or delamination from the front and back scattered wave data 214 and 21 6 as described herein. An example of a baseline waveform 300 is illustrated in Figure 3.
Figure 3 also illustrates an example of a waveform 302 illustrating detection of an anomaly and a waveform 304 illustrating front scattered wave data 306 and back scattered wave data 308.
In block 108, signal processing may be performed on the front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 using the collected baseline wave data for the structure 204. The scattered waves 214 and 216 induced by the anomaly 202 can be decoupled or separated from any other waves, such as directly transmitted waves from the actuator 208 to sensor 21 8 and/or other possible reflected waves from any structural boundaries present in the structure 204, by subtracting other reflected waves that are not being reflected from the anomaly 202. One method to do this is by subtracting post damage data from pristine (baseline) wave data.
In block 1 10, the front and back scattered waves 214 and 216 (and/or side scattered wave waves in other embodiments of the present disclosure) may be separated or separately identified. The front and back scattered waves 214 and 216 may be separated or identified using signal processing to isolate each wave signal. Examples of signal processing techniques that may be used may include mode decomposition or mode conversion, noise cancellation or reduction or other known signal processing techniques. Applying mode decomposition to the reflected wave signals will help decompose the combined scatter wave which consists of both front scatter and back scatter into individual components that can then be identified into front scatter and back scatter components and the individual time of flight for each wave and be uniquely measured. Other signal processing techniques such as noise cancellation can also be used to more clearly identify the true front scatter and back scatter waves signals.
In block 1 12, the size of the delamination or other anomaly may be measured from the front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 (and/or side scattered wave data in other embodiments of
the present disclosure). In an embodiment of the present disclosure, the size of the delamination or anomaly may be measured based on a difference in arrival time of the front and back scattered wave data 214 and 216 at the sensors 208 and 21 8 or a Time-of-Flight (TOF) of the wave and based on a calibrated velocity of the wave propagation (V) in the structure 204. The TOF may be defined as the time from when a signal or wave is transmitted and the front and back scattered waves are respectively received. Examples of measuring damage size for different actuator/sensor configurations based on the measured Time-of-Flight information of the back scattered wave (TOFb), the measured Time-of-Flight information of the front scattered (TOFf) and the calibrated velocity V within the structure will be described with reference to Figures 4- 6. In block 1 14, the measurement of the size of the delamination or other anomaly may be presented to a user. The size of the delamination or other anomaly may be presented on a user interface 220 (Figure 2), such as a display. The user interface 220 may also include a keyboard, computer pointing device or other means for interfacing with and controlling operation of the structural health monitoring unit 206.
Also in block 1 14, in another embodiment of the present disclosure, a representation of the measured size, shape, and location of the delamination or other anomaly may be presented. Similar to that previously describe, multiple actuators and sensors may be attached or mounted to a structure at selected locations on the structure. The multiple actuators may send wave signals into the structure. The sensors may receive front and back scattered wave data from any anomaly in the structure to measure and
present the representation of the measured size, shape and location of the anomaly. An example of a configuration operable in either a pitch-catch mode or a pulse-echo mode for detecting any anomaly and measuring the anomaly's size and shape will be described with reference to Figures 7 A and 7B.
Referring again to Figure 2, the structural health monitoring unit 206 (which may be a ultrasonic wave generator) may include a data storage element 222 to store the baseline wave data and any other data for analyzing the front and back scatter wave data 214 and 21 6. The structural health monitoring unit 206 may also include a module 224 to determine the size of the anomaly 202 or delamination. In another embodiment of the present disclosure the module 224 may be adapted to determine the size, shape and location of the anomaly if multiple actuators and sensors are used similar to that previously described. The elements of the method 100 may be embodied in the module 224.
Figure 4 illustrates an example of a pitch-catch actuator- sensor configuration 400 for detecting any anomaly 402 or damage in a structure and determining the size of the anomaly 402 when the anomaly 402 is not in a direct path between an actuator 404 and a sensor 406 in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. The size of the anomaly or damage may be determined by equation 1 :
Eq. 1 : D = b2 -bχ = f\_ T0Fb . vf - c 2 -^TOFr vf -c2
In equation 1 , D is the distance between the front boundary 408 and the back boundary 410 of the anomaly as represented by
the difference between bl and b2, the respective distances from the actuator 404 and sensor 406 and the front and back boundaries 408 and 410 or edges of the anomaly 402. TOFb is the Time-of- Flight of a wave signal represented by arrow 41 1 in Figure 4 from the actuator 404 to the sensor 406 scattered from the back boundary 410 of the anomaly 402 as represented by arrow 41 1 '. TOFf is the Time-of-Flight of the wave signal represent by arrow 41 2 from the actuator 404 to the sensor 406 scattered from the front boundary 408 of the anomaly as represented by arrow 41 2'. V is the velocity of the wave signal propagating through the material and may be the calibrated velocity of the wave or signal in the particular material or structure. Equation 1 assumes an isotropic structure or material and therefore V is constant. The V may be described as being an angle dependent variable in the case of an anisotropic structure. Accordingly, V may vary with angle of the actuator 404 and sensor 406 relative to the anomaly 402 in an anisotropic structure. Module 224 in Figure 2 may be adapted or modified to compensate for the structure under evaluation being anisotropic. In equation 1 , the variable c represents the distance between the actuator 404 and sensor 406.
The substantially elliptically shaped broken or dashed lines 414 and 416 illustrate boundaries of an area associated the actuator 404 and sensor 406 within which any anomaly or damage may be detected and its size determined by the actuator 404 and sensor 406 operating in the pitch-catch mode, as described above, wherein the actuator 404 generates a wave or signal and the sensor 406 senses any of the wave signal scattered by the boundaries of the anomaly 402 or delamination.
Figure 5 illustrates an example of a pitch-catch actuator- sensor configuration 500 for detecting and determining the size of any anomaly 502 in a structure when the anomaly 502 is on a direct path between an actuator 504 and a sensor 506 in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. The size of the anomaly 502 or damage may be determined by equation 2:
Eq. 2 : D = b2 +bx = ^TOFb > n2 -c2 + ^(±7rø> . n2 -c2
The elements of equation 2 are the same as those described with respect to equation 1 above. Equation 2 assumes the structure is isotropic and therefore V will be constant. The velocity V may vary with an angle of the anomaly 502 relative to the actuator 504 and sensor 506 in anisotropic structures. The broken or dashed lines 514 and 516 illustrate boundaries of an area associated the actuator 504 and sensor 506 where any anomaly or damage may be detected and its size measured by the actuator 504 and sensor 506 operating in the pitch-catch mode similar to that previously described. The paths 51 1 and 51 2 represent a signal being sent from the actuator 504. The paths 51 1 ' and 51 2' represent the signal being scattered from respective sides 510 and 508 of the anomaly 502, and being received at the sensor 506. In this scenario, the scatter of primary interest is scattered from the sides 508 and 510 of the anomaly 502.
Figure 6 illustrates an example of a pulse-echo (self- sensing) configuration 600 for detecting and measuring the size any anomaly 602 in a structure in accordance with an embodiment of
the present disclosure. At least one device 604 or combination actuator-sensor device that is capable of both generating a wave signal and receiving back scattered wave data may be provided. The size of the anomaly 602 may be determined by equation 3:
Eq. 3 D = -{TOFb - TOFf) . Vg
The elements of equation 3 may be the same as those in Equations 1 and 2. The velocity V may vary with an angle relative to the device 604 and the anomaly 602 in an anisotropic structure. The broken or dashed lines 606 and 608 illustrate boundaries of areas associated the device 604 where any anomaly or damage may be detected and its size measured by the device 604 operating in the pulse-echo mode. Figures 7 A and 7B illustrate an example of a configuration
700a and 700b operable in either a pitch-catch mode (Figure 7A) or a pulse-echo mode (Figure 7B) for detecting any anomaly 702 and determining or measuring the anomaly's size and shape in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. The configuration 700 may include multiple devices 706 or combination actuators/sensors capable of both generating a signal or wave and receiving front and back scattered waves or data from any anomaly 702. The devices 706 may also be separate actuators for generating a signal or wave and sensors for receiving the front and back scattered wave data. The devices 706 or separate actuators and sensors may be positioned at predetermined locations on an object to be tested or evaluated.
In Figure 7 A the devices 706a may be operated in a pitch- catch mode or configuration similar to that previously described. In the pitch-catch mode, selected devices 706a may generate or pitch a wave signal and other devices 706a may receive or catch any front and back scattered waves or data from any anomaly 702 or damage. The substantially elliptically shaped broken or dashed lines 708 in Figure 7A illustrate boundaries of areas associated with each device 706a where any anomaly or damage may be detected and its size determined by the respective device 706a in the configuration 700a operating in the pitch-catch mode.
In Figure 7B, the devices 706b may be operated in a pulse- echo mode or configuration similar to that previously described. In the pulse-echo mode, each device 706b may generate or pulse a wave or signal and the same device 706b may also receive any front and back scattered waves or data from any anomaly 702. The substantially circular broken or dashed lines 710 associated with each device 706b in Figure 7B illustrate boundaries of areas where any anomaly or damage may be detected by the respective devices 706b in the configuration 700b operating in the pulse-echo mode. Damage volume may also be determined when multiple devices 706 or actuator-sensors are used by utilizing multiple scattered wave data and scatter imaging techniques.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising," and "includes" and/or "including" when used in this specification, specify
the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, those of ordinary skill in the art appreciate that any arrangement which is calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown and that the disclosure has other applications in other environments. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the present disclosure. The following claims are in no way intended to limit the scope of the disclosure to the specific embodiments described herein.
Claims
What is claimed is: 1 . A method for detecting an anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) and measuring its size, comprising: generating a wave signal (210) into a structure (204) being evaluated; collecting at least one of any front and back scattered wave data (214, 21 6) and any side scattered wave data caused by the generated wave signal (210) impacting an anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702); and processing the at least one of front and back scattered wave data (21 4, 21 6) and side scattered wave data to measure a size of the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702).
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating baseline wave data for the structure (204).
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising calibrating a velocity of propagation of waves in the structure (204) by using the baseline wave data.
4. The method of claim 2, further comprising performing signal processing on the at least one front and back scattered wave. data
(214, 216) and side scattered wave data using the baseline wave data for the structure (204).
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: identifying the at least one of front and back scattered wave data (214, 216) and side scattered wave data; and separating anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) scattered wave signals from any other wave signals.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein separating the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) scattered wave signals from any other wave signals comprises subtracting any other wave signals from the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) scattered wave signals using data collected before any anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) or using known structural features of the structure (204).
7. The method of claim 5, further comprising using signal processing to isolate each wave signal.
8. The method of claim 5, further comprising using at least one of mode conversion and noise conversion to identify the at least one of front and back scattered waves (214, 216) and side scattered waves and to separate each signal.
9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising presenting the measurement of the size of the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702).
10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising presenting a representation of the measured size of the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) and an estimated shape of the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) and location of the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) in the structure (204).
1 1 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising positioning a multiplicity of actuators (208, 404, 504) for generating a wave signal and a multiplicity of sensors (21 8, 406, 506) for collecting at least one of front and back scattered wave data (214, 216) and side scattered wave data at selected locations on the structure (204) relative to one another to determine the size, shape and location of the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) or other anomalies.
12. The method of claim 1 1 , wherein at least some of the multiplicity of actuators (208, 404, 504) and sensors (218, 406, 506) may be combination actuator/sensors for self sensing.
1 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the structure (204) is one of an aircraft, a terrestrial vehicle, a watercraft, and a civil structure.
14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) comprises a delamination in a material used to form the structure.
1 5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising measuring the size of the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) based on a difference in arrival time of the at least one of front and back scattered wave data (214, 216) and side scattered wave data at a sensor (21 8, 406, 506) and based on a calibrated velocity of wave propagation in the structure (204).
16. The method of claim 1 , further comprising measuring the size , of the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) based on a time-of-flight of the at least one of front and back scattered wave data (214, 216) and side scattered wave data and a calibrated velocity of wave propagation in the structure (204).
1 7. The method of claim 16, wherein the calibrated velocity comprises a varying calibrated velocity of wave propagation in response to the structure (204) being anisotropic.
1 8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising operating in one of a pitch-catch mode and a pulse-echo mode to detect the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) and measure its size.
19. A system for detecting an anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) and measuring its size, comprising: an actuator (208, 404, 504) for generating a wave signal into a structure (204) being evaluated; a sensor (21 8, 406, 506) for collecting at least one of any front and back scattered wave data or signals (214, 216) and side scattered wave data or signals caused by energy of the wave signal being at least partially reflected or scattered by an anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702); and a structural health monitoring unit (206) for processing the at least one of any front and back scattered wave data or signals (21 4, 216) and side scattered wave data or signals to measure a size of the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702).
20. The system of claim 19, further comprising a module to identify and separate anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) scattered wave signals from any other wave signals.
21 . The system of claim 20, wherein the module is adapted to use signal processing to isolate each wave signal.
22. The system of claim 1 9, further comprising a module to separate each of the at least one of front and back scattered wave signals (214, 216) and the side scattered wave signals.
23. The system of claim 22, further comprising a database for storing baseline wave data for the structure (204).
24. The system of claim 23, further comprising a module to calibrate a velocity of propagation of waves in the structure (204) using the baseline wave data for the structure (204).
25. The system of claim 24, further comprising a module to measure the size of the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) from a time-of-flight of the at least one of front and back scattered waves (214, 216) and side scattered waves based on the calibrated velocity of propagation of waves in the structure (204).
26. The system of claim 1 9, wherein the structural health monitoring unit (206) comprises an ultrasonic wave generator.
27. The system of claim 19, wherein the actuator (208, 404, 504) comprises a combination actuator/sensor capable of self-sensing the at least one of front and back scattered wave data (214, 216) and side scattered wave data.
28. The system of claim 27, further comprising a plurality of actuators (208, 404, 504) and sensors (218, 406, 506) or combination actuator/sensors positionable at selected locations on the structure (204) relative to one another to measure, size, shape and location of the anomaly (202, 402, 502, 602, 702) or other anomalies.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP08769468A EP2150808A1 (en) | 2007-05-16 | 2008-05-15 | Method and system for detecting an anomaly and determing its size |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/749,539 | 2007-05-16 | ||
US11/749,539 US7891247B2 (en) | 2007-05-16 | 2007-05-16 | Method and system for detecting an anomaly and determining its size |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2008144356A1 true WO2008144356A1 (en) | 2008-11-27 |
WO2008144356A4 WO2008144356A4 (en) | 2009-03-12 |
Family
ID=39683607
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/063639 WO2008144356A1 (en) | 2007-05-16 | 2008-05-15 | Method and system for detecting an anomaly and determing its size |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7891247B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2150808A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008144356A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10914711B2 (en) | 2015-04-16 | 2021-02-09 | Alma Mater Studiorum-Universita Di Bologna | Device, method and system for real time structural diagnostics with guided elastic waves |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8015877B2 (en) * | 2007-05-16 | 2011-09-13 | The Boeing Company | Imaging an anomaly using backscattered waves |
US8042397B2 (en) * | 2007-05-16 | 2011-10-25 | The Boeing Company | Damage volume and depth estimation |
US8489255B2 (en) * | 2008-03-17 | 2013-07-16 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | Method and device for compensation of mechanical stresses in an aircraft structure |
EP2542884A4 (en) * | 2010-03-05 | 2017-04-19 | Socpra-Sciences Et Génie S.E.C. | Method and apparatus for providing a structural condition of a structure |
US8914244B2 (en) | 2010-08-04 | 2014-12-16 | The Boeing Company | Apparatus and method for inspecting laminated structure |
US9797867B2 (en) | 2010-08-04 | 2017-10-24 | The Boeing Company | Apparatus and method for inspecting a laminated structure |
US8499632B1 (en) | 2010-08-23 | 2013-08-06 | The Boeing Company | Characterizing anomalies in a laminate structure |
US8521446B2 (en) * | 2010-11-23 | 2013-08-27 | Olympus Ndt Inc. | System and method of conducting refraction angle verification for phased array probes using standard calibration blocks |
US8677825B1 (en) | 2011-06-29 | 2014-03-25 | The Boeing Company | Identification of lamb wave modes |
US9038469B2 (en) | 2011-12-06 | 2015-05-26 | The Boeing Company | Reference free inconsistency detection system |
US11519816B2 (en) | 2019-02-18 | 2022-12-06 | The Boeing Company | Composite ply-by-ply damage assessment using correlation factors between finite element models (FEMs) and non-destructive evaluations (NDEs) |
CN111924117B (en) * | 2020-08-14 | 2024-04-09 | 西安应用光学研究所 | Automatic switching method for wave bands of optical sensors built in photoelectric nacelle |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4187725A (en) * | 1978-07-06 | 1980-02-12 | Vsesojuzny Nauchno-Issledovatelsky Institut Po Razrabotke Nerazrushajuschikh Metodov I Sredsv Kon-trolya Kachestva Materialov | Method for ultrasonic inspection of materials and device for effecting same |
US4658649A (en) * | 1985-06-06 | 1987-04-21 | Combustion Engineering, Inc. | Ultrasonic method and device for detecting and measuring defects in metal media |
US5841031A (en) * | 1996-03-07 | 1998-11-24 | E-Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for evaluation and inspection of composite-repaired structures |
JP2001215218A (en) * | 2000-02-02 | 2001-08-10 | Imc:Kk | Ultrasonic flaw detector |
US6311565B1 (en) * | 1999-01-11 | 2001-11-06 | Westinghouse Savannah River Company | Techniques and equipment for assessing the structural integrity of subterranean tower anchor rods |
US20040206181A1 (en) * | 1999-03-22 | 2004-10-21 | Betriebsforschungsinstitut Vdeh Institut Fur Angewandte Forschung Gmbh | Defect type classifying method |
JP2005300274A (en) * | 2004-04-08 | 2005-10-27 | Central Res Inst Of Electric Power Ind | Automatic ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus and method of thick-wall structure |
WO2006009669A1 (en) * | 2004-06-21 | 2006-01-26 | The Boeing Company | Laminate material testing method and systems |
Family Cites Families (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4299128A (en) * | 1980-04-21 | 1981-11-10 | Gruber George J | Ultrasonic satellite-pulse technique for characterizing defects of arbitrary shape |
US4546652A (en) * | 1981-12-22 | 1985-10-15 | Materials Research, Inc. | In-situ on-line structural failure detection system, its preparation and operation |
US4574637A (en) * | 1984-08-03 | 1986-03-11 | Univ Ohio | Method for measuring surface and near surface properties of materials |
US4817016A (en) * | 1986-05-21 | 1989-03-28 | Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Non-destructive evaluation means and method of flaw reconstruction utilizing an ultrasonic multi-viewing transducer data acquistion system |
US5184516A (en) * | 1991-07-31 | 1993-02-09 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Conformal circuit for structural health monitoring and assessment |
US5760309A (en) * | 1996-05-24 | 1998-06-02 | Drexelbrook Engineering Company | Ultrasonic method for material monitoring |
US5760904A (en) * | 1996-07-26 | 1998-06-02 | General Electric Company | Method and system for inspecting a surface of an object with laser ultrasound |
US6128092A (en) * | 1999-07-13 | 2000-10-03 | National Research Council Of Canada | Method and system for high resolution ultrasonic imaging of small defects or anomalies. |
AU2002255518A1 (en) * | 2001-02-08 | 2002-08-19 | University Of South Carolina | In-situ structural health monitoring, diagnostics and prognostics system utilizing thin piezoelectric sensors |
US6772638B2 (en) * | 2001-10-30 | 2004-08-10 | Framatome Anp, Inc. | UT detection and sizing method for thin wall tubes |
DE10325406B4 (en) * | 2003-06-05 | 2005-04-28 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Damage determination on structures to be tested by means of ultrasound |
JP3782410B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-06-07 | 甫 羽田野 | Ultrasonic flaw detection method and apparatus using Rayleigh wave |
US7263888B2 (en) * | 2003-10-16 | 2007-09-04 | General Electric Company | Two dimensional phased arrays for volumetric ultrasonic inspection and methods of use |
JP2006105960A (en) * | 2004-09-13 | 2006-04-20 | Jeol Ltd | Sample inspection method and device |
US7231304B2 (en) * | 2005-06-30 | 2007-06-12 | The Boeing Company | Interference pattern testing of materials |
US7367236B2 (en) * | 2005-07-21 | 2008-05-06 | The Boeing Company | Non-destructive inspection system and associated method |
US7333898B2 (en) * | 2006-06-05 | 2008-02-19 | The Boeing Company | Passive structural assessment and monitoring system and associated method |
-
2007
- 2007-05-16 US US11/749,539 patent/US7891247B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2008
- 2008-05-15 EP EP08769468A patent/EP2150808A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2008-05-15 WO PCT/US2008/063639 patent/WO2008144356A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4187725A (en) * | 1978-07-06 | 1980-02-12 | Vsesojuzny Nauchno-Issledovatelsky Institut Po Razrabotke Nerazrushajuschikh Metodov I Sredsv Kon-trolya Kachestva Materialov | Method for ultrasonic inspection of materials and device for effecting same |
US4658649A (en) * | 1985-06-06 | 1987-04-21 | Combustion Engineering, Inc. | Ultrasonic method and device for detecting and measuring defects in metal media |
US5841031A (en) * | 1996-03-07 | 1998-11-24 | E-Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for evaluation and inspection of composite-repaired structures |
US6311565B1 (en) * | 1999-01-11 | 2001-11-06 | Westinghouse Savannah River Company | Techniques and equipment for assessing the structural integrity of subterranean tower anchor rods |
US20040206181A1 (en) * | 1999-03-22 | 2004-10-21 | Betriebsforschungsinstitut Vdeh Institut Fur Angewandte Forschung Gmbh | Defect type classifying method |
JP2001215218A (en) * | 2000-02-02 | 2001-08-10 | Imc:Kk | Ultrasonic flaw detector |
JP2005300274A (en) * | 2004-04-08 | 2005-10-27 | Central Res Inst Of Electric Power Ind | Automatic ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus and method of thick-wall structure |
WO2006009669A1 (en) * | 2004-06-21 | 2006-01-26 | The Boeing Company | Laminate material testing method and systems |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10914711B2 (en) | 2015-04-16 | 2021-02-09 | Alma Mater Studiorum-Universita Di Bologna | Device, method and system for real time structural diagnostics with guided elastic waves |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2008144356A4 (en) | 2009-03-12 |
US7891247B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 |
US20080283332A1 (en) | 2008-11-20 |
EP2150808A1 (en) | 2010-02-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7891247B2 (en) | Method and system for detecting an anomaly and determining its size | |
US8042397B2 (en) | Damage volume and depth estimation | |
Ricci et al. | Guided waves for structural health monitoring in composites: A review and implementation strategies | |
Memmolo et al. | Guided wave propagation and scattering for structural health monitoring of stiffened composites | |
US9719967B2 (en) | Structural health monitoring system | |
US7263446B2 (en) | Structural health management system and method for enhancing availability and integrity in the structural health management system | |
US8015877B2 (en) | Imaging an anomaly using backscattered waves | |
US8285495B2 (en) | Corrosion inspection and monitoring system | |
Banerjee et al. | A wave propagation and vibration-based approach for damage identification in structural components | |
US7246514B2 (en) | Method for verifying sensors installation and determining the location of the sensors after installation in a structural health management system | |
EP2602615A2 (en) | Reference free inconsistency detection system | |
Rathod et al. | Lamb wave based monitoring of plate-stiffener deboding using a circular array of piezoelectric sensors | |
EP1471350A2 (en) | Apparatus for in-situ nondestructive acoustic measurement of young's modulus of plate structures | |
GB2581019A (en) | Method and device for detecting an impact event and vehicle therefor | |
Sharif-Khodaei et al. | Lamb-wave based damage detection in anisotropic composite plates | |
Kessler et al. | Structural health monitoring of composite materials using piezoelectric sensors | |
Kessler et al. | In-situ sensor-based damage detection of composite materials for structural health monitoring | |
Carrino et al. | Development and application of an in-flight structural health monitoring system | |
US8127610B2 (en) | Compensating for temperature effects in a health monitoring system | |
Salmanpour et al. | Damage detection with ultrasonic guided wave under operational conditions | |
Bullen et al. | Detecting Damage and Damage Location on Large Composite Parts using RFID Technology | |
Banerjee et al. | A vibration and wave propagation based methodology for near real-time damage monitoring of composite structures | |
Jarmer | PAPER LENGTH:** 8 PAGES MAXIMUM** INQUERIES TO: Seth Kessler Metis Design Corporation 205 Portland St 4th Floor | |
Su et al. | Looking Forward | |
Niri | Damage Localization in Complex Structures by Built-in Ultrasonic Transducers |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 08769468 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2008769468 Country of ref document: EP |