WO2008116480A1 - Channel estimation method and device for tds-ofdm systems - Google Patents
Channel estimation method and device for tds-ofdm systems Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2008116480A1 WO2008116480A1 PCT/EP2007/002632 EP2007002632W WO2008116480A1 WO 2008116480 A1 WO2008116480 A1 WO 2008116480A1 EP 2007002632 W EP2007002632 W EP 2007002632W WO 2008116480 A1 WO2008116480 A1 WO 2008116480A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- fir filter
- received data
- adaptive
- channel estimation
- channel
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/0202—Channel estimation
- H04L25/0204—Channel estimation of multiple channels
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/0202—Channel estimation
- H04L25/0212—Channel estimation of impulse response
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/0202—Channel estimation
- H04L25/0224—Channel estimation using sounding signals
- H04L25/0226—Channel estimation using sounding signals sounding signals per se
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/03—Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
- H04L25/03006—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
- H04L25/03012—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference operating in the time domain
- H04L25/03019—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference operating in the time domain adaptive, i.e. capable of adjustment during data reception
- H04L25/03038—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference operating in the time domain adaptive, i.e. capable of adjustment during data reception with a non-recursive structure
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/03—Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
- H04L25/03006—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
- H04L2025/0335—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference characterised by the type of transmission
- H04L2025/03375—Passband transmission
- H04L2025/03414—Multicarrier
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/0202—Channel estimation
- H04L25/0212—Channel estimation of impulse response
- H04L25/0216—Channel estimation of impulse response with estimation of channel length
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/0202—Channel estimation
- H04L25/024—Channel estimation channel estimation algorithms
- H04L25/025—Channel estimation channel estimation algorithms using least-mean-square [LMS] method
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/03—Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
- H04L25/03006—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
- H04L25/03159—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference operating in the frequency domain
Definitions
- the invention regards to a channel estimation method for TDS- OFDM systems according to pre-characterizing part of claim 1, and to a channel estimation device for TDS-OFDM systems.
- the Time Domain Synchronous-OFDM (TDS-OFDM) system is a specially designed OFDM system by combining both time-domain and frequency-domain processing. It is adopted in the compulsory national standard of Digital Multimedia Terrestrial Broadcasting (DMTB) in China.
- DMTB Digital Multimedia Terrestrial Broadcasting
- the TDS-OFDM offers a pseudo random (PN) sequence as guardian interval between every two frames of OFDM symbols. This special structure brings the challenge of novel channel estimation method.
- PN pseudo random
- TDS-OFDM system Being the core part of general OFDM system, the quality of channel estimates has a direct impact on the overall system performance.
- the special frame structure of TDS-OFDM system re- quires novel channel estimation methods at the receiver side, instead of ones used in general OFDM system.
- Channel estimation provides the estimate of channel impulse response to frequency domain equalizer in TDS-OFDM system. It has a direct impact on the system performance. There are several requirements for the channel estimation.
- first channel estimation has to be as accurate as possible even under low SNR situation.
- chan- nel estimation has to be able to cope with channels with long echoes.
- channel estimation has to be able to handle dynamic channels.
- FIG. 3 SHOWS THE CHANNEL ESTIMATION BLOCK IN THE OFDM system diagram. It recovers the channel response from the received data then feeds to the frequency domain equalizer.
- a transmitter TX sends out sent data via an an- tenna to an antenna of a receiver RX. Path V between these antennas provides error data and multiple effects effecting sent data to become initially received data received by antenna of receiver RX. Initially received data are provided to an automatic gain control 9. Outputted data of automatic gain control 9 are forwarded to an IQ-demodulation block 10 (IQ: In- phase/Quadraturphase) .
- IQ-demodulation block 10 IQ: In- phase/Quadraturphase
- Data outputted of IQ demodulation block 10 are inputted as the received data y(i) into a block especially comprising the channel estimation block 1.
- Data parallel with channel estimation results outputted by channel estimation block 1 are forwarded to a frequency domain equalizer 11.
- Data outputted by the frequency domain equalizer 11 are forwarded to a forward error control 12, FEC.
- Fig. 4 shows the TDS-OFDM frame structure for two different modes .
- TDS-OFDM frame structures have 4200 symbols per frame and 4725 symbols per frame, respectively.
- First part of symbols is cyclic shifted symbols and PN data between such cyclic shifted symbols.
- These PN data between cyclic shifted symbols have the length of 255 in case of 4200 frame structure or the length of 511 in case of 4725 frame structure.
- the frame is divided into two parts.
- the beginning part e.g. 420 symbols in the 4200 frame structure
- guardian interval which is a cyclic PN sequence in time domain.
- the later part e.g. 3780 in the 4200 frame structure, is the OFDM data part.
- the received signal y(n) is as following
- h(n) is an impulse response of a multipath channel
- a( ⁇ ) s are wide-sense stationary, narrow band complex Gaussian random processes modelling echoes with longest echo at L-symbol delays. It is assumed that they are constant during the transmission of one OFDM symbol, which is a general assumption in OFDM systems.
- “®” means linear convolution.
- the channel estimation problem is how to make close estimates of these a( ⁇ ) from the received signal y(n) .
- the transmitted signal is the local PN sequence and has the following property
- R pp is the auto-correlation function of the PN sequence, which is assumed to be ideal ⁇ function
- R pn is the cross- relation function of PN sequence and noise, which is zero approximately.
- Eq. 4 doesn't hold strictly. This will introduce extra estimation noise.
- the assumption of Eq. 3 cannot be made because the data section exits between two guardian intervals. This will cause performance degradation. This method will introduce extra estimation noise, when the SNR is low, because the later part of Eq. 4 cannot be ignored when the noise power is large.
- a method for adaptive channel estimation in TDS-OFDM receiver by processing received data comprising a data frame having a guard interval, wherein received data are processed in an FIR filter for an adaptive channel estimation by adapting coefficients of the adaptive FIR filter.
- a channel estimation device for TDS- OFDM systems in a receiver comprising an input for received data comprising a data frame having a guard interval, and an channel estimator device for estimation of a channel by processing the received data, wherein the channel estimator device comprises a FIR filter for an adaptive channel estimation by adapting coefficients of the adaptive FIR filter.
- guard interval is formed by a local pseudo random sequence, which is cyclic shifted to the adaptive FIR filter.
- Corresponding device comprises a cyclic shifter for cyclic shifting such local pseudo random sequence as the guard interval to the adaptive FIR filter.
- a filter output value of the adaptive FIR filter can be used for training the error generation to get an error for coefficient update.
- Corresponding device comprises an error generator adapted to get such error for coefficient update by processing a filter output value of the FIR filter.
- a part of received data is selected and used for training to error generation to get an error for coefficient update.
- Corresponding device comprises an error generator adapted to get an error for coefficient update by processing a selected part of received data for training the error generator.
- the trained coefficients are the channel estimates like in known time-domain accordingly.
- the received data are selected, which start after receiving a longest echo-length number of data upon a frame head signal.
- the longest echo-length from a Channel Length Estimation Unit is used to decide the start point of re- ceived data for training each frame adaptively.
- the longest echo-length expected to handle is set as the start point of received data for training.
- start point if the longest echo-length is not available.
- end of the received data for training can be selected, when the guard interval ends.
- coefficients of the adaptive FIR filter are updated adaptively via uncontrolled tap update method in case of a static channel thereby ignoring or bypassing a control unit for controlling function of tap update elements.
- This may be, but not exclusively, used when the channel is static. No control scheme is used and all taps can are updated normally with the error signal from the adaptive filter.
- Coefficients of the adaptive FIR filter can be updated adaptively selected via a controlled tap update method in case of a dynamic or uncertain channel.
- a control unit is enabled. This may be, but not exclusively, used when the chan- nel is dynamic or uncertain. Only selected taps will be set in normal mode and updated using the error signal. The other taps will be set in bypass mode and not updated.
- tap branches of a plurality of tap branches are adaptively selected to contribute to the FIR filter output.
- the other branches did not contribute to multiplication when providing corresponding tap values.
- the device comprises a plural- ity of tap update elements adapted to update each one of the coefficients of the adaptive FIR filter.
- an update control unit can be adapted to adaptively control updating of selected coefficients (controlled mode) or all coefficients (uncontrolled mode) .
- the method and device may not require an ideal auto-correlation function of PN sequence in guardian interval. Further, method and device provide better performance in dynamic channel or channel with low SNR.
- Time domain correlation is the usual way for simple implementation, but it introduces severe noise when the SNR is low or when the guardian interval doesn't have an ideal autocorrelation function.
- LMS least mean square error
- Method and device provide much better performance than the correlation method under low SNR or dynamic situations with little extra hardware cost. Also the method doesn't require an ideal autocorrelation of guardian interval, which is the case in the DMTB standard.
- Fig. 1 a preferred device or arrangement of components being arranged to receive data and to execute a channel estimation, (I added outputs of data y(i) and channel a(j) to clear to confusion between fig.l and fig.3)
- Fig. 2 an interval of data for training
- Fig. 3 a channel estimation block in the OFDM system diagram
- Fig. 1 shows a preferred device or a preferred arrangement of components being arranged to receive data and to execute a channel estimation. Especially, instead of hardware components there can be used a software algorithm.
- receive data y(i) There are inputted received data y(i) into such a channel estimator device 1.
- a number i of received data y(i) corresponds to data positions L, L+l, ..., 420 out of a sequence of received data y(i) for training to be used for channel estimation.
- the received data y(i) are inputted into an error generator 2.
- the error generator 2 outputs error values e.
- the error values e are inputted into each of a plurality of tap update elements 3(0), 3(1), ..., 3(254) of a coefficients update device 3.
- a number i of tap update elements 3(0), 3(1), ..., 3(254) correspond to the number i of received data y(i), i.e. 255.
- a number i of tab values a(0), a(l), ..., a (254) outputted by the plurality of tab update elements 3(0), 3(1), ..., 3(254) are inputted into a corresponding number i of multiplier elements 4(0), 4(1), ..., 4(254) of a multiplier 4.
- Multiplied data outputted of the plurality of multiplier elements 4(0), 4(1), ..., 4(254) are inputted into an adder 5.
- the adder 5 adds the data values to output a filter output value fo .
- Filter output value fo is inputted into a further input of the error generator 2.
- the error generator 2 generates the actual error value e depending from received data value y(i) and actually inputted filter output value fo.
- first shifter value p(0) has to be inputted into first tab update element 3(0) and last shifter value p(254) is inputted into last tab update element 3(254) when taking a first cycle step.
- these shifter values p(0), p(l), ..., p(254) each are inputted into a further multiplier element input of a corresponding of the multiplier elements 4(0), 4(1), ..., 4(254).
- each of the tab update elements 3(0), 3(1), ..., 3(254) is controlled by a corresponding flag signal element flag(0), flag(l) , ..., flag(254) .
- a channel length estimation device 7 provides a channel length value L.
- Such channel length value L provides the first element of received data y(i) within a greater sequence of received data elements composed of cyclic data, PN data, and data content data.
- received data (y(i)) are processed in an FIR filter (2 - 8) for an adaptive channel estimation, wherein the FIR filter (2 - 8) is composed by several components and method steps according to especially Fig. 1.
- the FIR filter (2 - 8) is composed by several components and method steps according to especially Fig. 1.
- LMS least mean square error
- the received signal y(i) data is used as decisions to update the taps and tap update elements 3 of the adaptive filter.
- this LMS based method does not require a PN sequence with ideal auto-correlation function.
- a special tap-update scheme only the taps have to be selected, where there are possibly echoes ev, to do the LMS training. This can achieve much better performance than applying LMS to all of the taps equally, because generally there are more taps to be trained than the number of training data, i.e. received date y(i), available when updating the filter taps equally during one frame.
- the controlled tap update scheme the number of tap to be trained is reduced, thus the estimation quality is improved.
- Fig. 1 shows the structure of proposed controlled LMS channel estimation.
- it is an adaptive FIR filter with 255 taps in the case of non-cyclic PN length of 255.
- the taps are updated with the error signal e between the filter output fo and the received signal y ⁇ i) according to the flags flag(i) set by update control unit 8.
- These trained taps i.e. tap values a(0), a(l), ... , a (254), are the estimates of channel responses.
- the local PN sequence at the receiver side-p(k) is cycle-shifted in the filter registers by cyclic shifter 9 upon each received data y(i) .
- the received data y(i) will be used for training of each tap update element 3(i). Instead, there should be choosed the received data y(i)/ which are supposed to contain PN and noise only.
- these received data y(i) start after receiving the longest-echo number of data upon a frame head signal, and end when the guardian interval ends as shown in Fig. 2.
- Fig. 2 presents the interval of data for training and an exem- plarily method to provide channel length value L with respect to different starting points depending from existing echo values ev within received data y(i) .
- the length of data y(i) for training can be changed dynamically according to the longest echo length detection shown in figure 1.
- the data length for training becomes shorter accordingly.
- the PN sequence in the filter register in Fig. 1 will be cycle-shifted accordingly upon each re- ceived data for training.
- the training data is not sufficient to ensure a satisfying training over one frame period.
- the controlled training method by updating the tap values a(i) where there are echoes possibly. This is based on the fact that echoes will distribute in spikes along the path V instead of being equally distributed in the practical environment.
- the flag signal flag(i) will control two operations at the same time. One is the update of corresponding tap update elements 3(i) and the other is the contribution to filter sum.
- the specific flag signal flag(i) When the Update Control Unit 8 detects that there are echoes possibly at an arbitrary tap, the specific flag signal flag(i) is set to 1, and normal adaptive operations will be carried out. That corresponding tap value a(i) will be updated and tap multiplication result from that branch will be counted into the filter sum output value fo . Once the flag signal flag(i) is set to 0, which means that there are no possible echoes, the specific tap value a(i) will neither be updated, nor contribute to the filter sum output value fo . These flag signals flag(i) are set by control unit 8 using certain fast rough channel estimation based on modified time-domain correlation method.
- This controlled LMS channel estimation method can estimate echoes up to 255-symbol delay for frame mode with 4200 symbols or 511-symbol delay for frame mode with 4725 symbols.
- the advantage of this method over time-domain correlation method is that this method provides more accurate channel estimates under low SNR or dynamic channels. Even for high SNR or static channels, it outperforms the correlation method because it does not re- quire an idea impulse auto-correlation function of the PN sequence in the guardian interval from the transmitter tx. In addition, it has low hardware cost for implementation.
- Fig. 4 shows two different TDS-OFDM frame structures having 4200 symbols per frame and 4725 symbols per frame, respectively.
- the PN data between cyclic shifted symbols have the length i of 255 in case of 4200 frame structure or the length i of 511 in case of 4725 frame structure.
- amending channel length value L and number i of received data y(i) for training other frame structure can be used within such method for channel estimation, too.
- Fig. 5 shows on left hand side data processed by present least mean square method and on the right hand side data processed by prior art time-domain correlation method. There are shown echo amplitude values over path delay in symbols. As can be seen, present LMS method provides better result. Especially, figure 5 show the performance comparison of the new method and the general time-domain correlation method under low SNR (Signal-to- Noise-Ratio) case.
- the transmitter works in the 4200 frame mode with QPSK (Quadrature Phase Shift Keying) modulation.
- the SNR is set to be 1.8dB.
- the channel model is selected to be an Additive White Gaussian Noise model.
- the channel estimate using controlled LMS method has much lower noise floor than the one using time-domain correlation method.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Cable Transmission Systems, Equalization Of Radio And Reduction Of Echo (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE112007003423T DE112007003423T5 (en) | 2007-03-26 | 2007-03-26 | Method and device for channel estimation for TDS OFMD systems |
PCT/EP2007/002632 WO2008116480A1 (en) | 2007-03-26 | 2007-03-26 | Channel estimation method and device for tds-ofdm systems |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/002632 WO2008116480A1 (en) | 2007-03-26 | 2007-03-26 | Channel estimation method and device for tds-ofdm systems |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2008116480A1 true WO2008116480A1 (en) | 2008-10-02 |
Family
ID=38698321
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/002632 WO2008116480A1 (en) | 2007-03-26 | 2007-03-26 | Channel estimation method and device for tds-ofdm systems |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
DE (1) | DE112007003423T5 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008116480A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102420788A (en) * | 2011-11-30 | 2012-04-18 | 北京泰美世纪科技有限公司 | Time-domain-random-sequence-based channel estimation method and device |
CN106664581A (en) * | 2014-08-20 | 2017-05-10 | 高通股份有限公司 | Delay spread estimation and utilization |
CN108476192A (en) * | 2016-01-26 | 2018-08-31 | 索尼公司 | device and method |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN1677908A (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-05 | 清华大学 | TDS-OFDM receiver self-adaptive channel estimation balancing method and system |
US20050286624A1 (en) * | 2004-06-28 | 2005-12-29 | Sung-Woo Park | Method and apparatus to automatically control a step size of an LMS type equalizer |
US20060002462A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-05 | Sung-Woo Park | Method and apparatus to control operation of an equalizer |
-
2007
- 2007-03-26 DE DE112007003423T patent/DE112007003423T5/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2007-03-26 WO PCT/EP2007/002632 patent/WO2008116480A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN1677908A (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-05 | 清华大学 | TDS-OFDM receiver self-adaptive channel estimation balancing method and system |
US20050286624A1 (en) * | 2004-06-28 | 2005-12-29 | Sung-Woo Park | Method and apparatus to automatically control a step size of an LMS type equalizer |
US20060002462A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-05 | Sung-Woo Park | Method and apparatus to control operation of an equalizer |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102420788A (en) * | 2011-11-30 | 2012-04-18 | 北京泰美世纪科技有限公司 | Time-domain-random-sequence-based channel estimation method and device |
CN106664581A (en) * | 2014-08-20 | 2017-05-10 | 高通股份有限公司 | Delay spread estimation and utilization |
CN106664581B (en) * | 2014-08-20 | 2019-11-05 | 高通股份有限公司 | The method and apparatus estimated and utilized for delay extension |
US10524161B2 (en) | 2014-08-20 | 2019-12-31 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Delay spread estimation and utilization |
CN108476192A (en) * | 2016-01-26 | 2018-08-31 | 索尼公司 | device and method |
CN108476192B (en) * | 2016-01-26 | 2021-07-30 | 索尼公司 | Apparatus and method |
US11296909B2 (en) * | 2016-01-26 | 2022-04-05 | Sony Group Corporation | Apparatus and method for performing radio communication |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE112007003423T5 (en) | 2010-05-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6912258B2 (en) | Frequency-domain equalizer for terrestrial digital TV reception | |
US7457231B2 (en) | Staggered pilot transmission for channel estimation and time tracking | |
JP4523294B2 (en) | Communication device | |
CN1585396B (en) | Method and apparatus for reducing impulse noise of multicarrier modulated signal | |
US8363539B2 (en) | OFDM receiver and OFDM receiving method | |
US8000417B1 (en) | Methods and OFDM receivers providing inter-carrier interference cancellation with guard interval reuse scheme | |
EP2356786B1 (en) | Receiver with ici noise estimation | |
US7864836B1 (en) | Adaptive orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) equalizers, OFDM receivers including the same, and methods thereof | |
JPH10209931A (en) | Adaptive channel equalizer for digital communication system using ofdm system | |
WO2009125599A1 (en) | Receiving apparatus, receiving method, integrated circuit, digital television receiver, and program | |
US8767844B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for multicarrier communications | |
EP0833484A1 (en) | Device and method for vector equalization of an OFDM signal | |
WO2010042809A1 (en) | Adaptive known signal canceller | |
US6563841B1 (en) | Per-bin adaptive equalization in windowed DMT-type modem receiver | |
US8447001B2 (en) | Apparatus for performing channel estimation in a receiving device | |
JP4545209B2 (en) | Orthogonal frequency division multiplexed signal receiving apparatus and receiving method thereof | |
WO2008116480A1 (en) | Channel estimation method and device for tds-ofdm systems | |
JPH11298434A (en) | Ofdm demodulator | |
CN116132236B (en) | Single-symbol self-adaptive frequency offset estimation and compensation method applied to 5G NR system | |
JP5349206B2 (en) | Intercarrier interference canceling apparatus and intercarrier interference canceling method | |
JP2000269926A (en) | Ofdm demodulator | |
JP2002344414A (en) | Ofdm demodulation apparatus and method | |
JP5645613B2 (en) | Wireless communication system, transmitter and receiver | |
JP2002344411A (en) | Ofdm modulation apparatus and method | |
US8605827B2 (en) | Timing errors |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 07723579 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1120070034238 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
RET | De translation (de og part 6b) |
Ref document number: 112007003423 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20100506 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 07723579 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |