WO2006130815A2 - Crossflow membrane filtration module - Google Patents

Crossflow membrane filtration module Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006130815A2
WO2006130815A2 PCT/US2006/021418 US2006021418W WO2006130815A2 WO 2006130815 A2 WO2006130815 A2 WO 2006130815A2 US 2006021418 W US2006021418 W US 2006021418W WO 2006130815 A2 WO2006130815 A2 WO 2006130815A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
membrane filtration
filtration module
module
set forth
flow channel
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2006/021418
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2006130815A3 (en
Inventor
Philip Chuen Yung Wong
Robert N. Brown
Craig S. Criddle
Original Assignee
The Board Of Trustees The Leland Stanford Junior University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by The Board Of Trustees The Leland Stanford Junior University filed Critical The Board Of Trustees The Leland Stanford Junior University
Publication of WO2006130815A2 publication Critical patent/WO2006130815A2/en
Publication of WO2006130815A3 publication Critical patent/WO2006130815A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/14Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
    • B01D61/18Apparatus therefor
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/02Reverse osmosis; Hyperfiltration ; Nanofiltration
    • B01D61/08Apparatus therefor
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/02Reverse osmosis; Hyperfiltration ; Nanofiltration
    • B01D61/10Accessories; Auxiliary operations
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/02Reverse osmosis; Hyperfiltration ; Nanofiltration
    • B01D61/12Controlling or regulating
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/14Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
    • B01D61/20Accessories; Auxiliary operations
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/14Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
    • B01D61/22Controlling or regulating
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D63/00Apparatus in general for separation processes using semi-permeable membranes
    • B01D63/08Flat membrane modules
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D63/00Apparatus in general for separation processes using semi-permeable membranes
    • B01D63/08Flat membrane modules
    • B01D63/081Manufacturing thereof
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D65/00Accessories or auxiliary operations, in general, for separation processes or apparatus using semi-permeable membranes
    • B01D65/08Prevention of membrane fouling or of concentration polarisation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2315/00Details relating to the membrane module operation
    • B01D2315/10Cross-flow filtration
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2321/00Details relating to membrane cleaning, regeneration, sterilization or to the prevention of fouling
    • B01D2321/10Use of feed

Abstract

The present invention provides a membrane filtration module with an inlet and outlet design that provides a more uniform fluid flow than conventional modules. The new membrane filtration module was designed and optimized based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The membrane filtration module contains a flow channel with width w and inlet and outlet ports that are collinear with the flow channel. The inlet and outlet ports each have a fanned section, with one end of the fanned section equal to width w. In addition, the inlet and outlet ports each have an inclined section that is in fluid connection with the flow channel. This inclined section is preferably at about a 45 degree angle relative to the flow channel. The new membrane filtration module is well suited for cross-flow filtration.

Description

CROSSFLOW MEMBRANE FILTRATION MODULE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to membrane filtration. More particularly, the present invention relates to a crossflow filtration module with improved hydrodynamic characteristics.
BACKGROUND Crossflow membrane filtration is a separation process frequently encountered in chemical engineering, bioprocess engineering, environmental engineering and related fields for the retention of solids, segregation of different sized particles, water purification, concentration of bacterial cells, proteins etc. Prior to scale up, membranes are tested in laboratory scale membrane modules for experimentation with various membrane types and in the investigation of operating conditions on filtration performance. Another common use of small modules is in the running of laboratory scale reactors.
The conventional laboratory membrane module contains 3 main components: two thick cover plates, a permeate plate and gaskets for sealing. The permeate plate, with membranes placed on its two faces, is positioned between the two cover plates. Each face of the permeate plate has a series of narrow grooves aligned laterally, allowing the permeate to be drained and collected. The membranes are secured in place by the surrounding gaskets, which are compressed by the cover plates, thus activating a seal. The thickness of the gasket after compression defines the depth of the flow channel. Conventional membrane filtration modules have inlets and outlets that are orthogonally positioned with respect to the main flow direction. Thus, the incoming fluid has to maneuver through two 90° turns before reaching the flow channel. This unfavorable inlet condition results in a large entrance length that far exceeds the longitudinal dimension of the device, creating a flow field that is non-unidirectional and highly heterogeneous. There are many consequences of this hydrodynamic heterogeneity. For instance, different positions on the membrane will have different local permeabilities and fouling rates and therefore, the reported average permeate flux will have to be interpreted with this in mind. It also means experimental results will be partly dependent on the filter module used. Complication also arises when performing selective sampling for further analysis as the sampling area could have been subjected to quite a different flow condition than assumed.
In the filtration of concentrated particulates such as activated sludge, hydrodynamic heterogeneity becomes an even more critical problem. Regions experiencing low velocities, which are more susceptible to particle deposition, rapidly form a cake layer, fouling the membrane or even clogging the flow channel, forming dead zones. The useful membrane area is thus reduced. This phenomenon is common and has been recognized as a significant imperfection in module design. Accordingly, there is a need in the art to develop membrane filtration modules with inlet and outlet designs that promote a more hydrodynamically homogeneous fluid flow. The present invention provides a membrane filtration module with an inlet and outlet design that provides a more uniform fluid flow than conventional modules. The new membrane filtration module was designed and optimized based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The membrane filtration module contains a flow channel with width w and inlet and outlet ports that are collinear with the flow channel. The inlet and outlet ports each have a fanned section, with one end of the fanned section equal to width w. In addition, the inlet and outlet ports each have an inclined section that is in fluid connection with the flow channel. This inclined section is preferably at about a 45 degree angle relative to the flow channel. The new membrane filtration module is well suited for cross-flow filtration.
According to the present invention, the flow channel and inlet and outlet ports are made from a cover plate and a permeate plate. The cover plate is preferably symmetric about the transverse axis, such that the inlet and outlet ports can be interchanged. Also preferably, the cover plate is fabricated from three attached sections. In a preferred embodiment, the cover plate contains a view port, which may be made of any optically clear material, including but not limited to glass and fused silica. The permeate plate preferably has longitudinal or transverse grooves, depending on the application. These grooves are preferably adjacent to the exit of the inclined section of the port. Preferably, the membrane filtration module also includes spacers to prevent over-compression of the module. fabricated from acrylic or polycarbonate. The dimensions of the module are preferably about 158 mm x 60 mm x 37 mm, but may have any dimensions that retain this ratio (i.e. about 4.3:1.6:1 length: width: height). The membrane filtration module also preferably accommodates a membrane with a length in the range of about 86 to about 94 mm and a width in the range of about 27 to about 34 mm. Additionally, the membrane filtration module can preferably support a flow rate of between about 0-20 liters per minute (LPM) and will maintain structural integrity at a pressure up to about 400 kPa.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
The present invention together with its objectives and advantages will be understood by reading the following description in conjunction with the drawings, in which: FIG. 1 shows a cover plate according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 shows a permeate plate according to the present invention. FIG. 3 shows a membrane filtration module according to the present invention.
FIG. 4 shows fabrication of a cover plate according to the present invention.
FIG. 5 shows a simulated flow domain (A) and a simulated longitudinal velocity field (B) according to the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Structure of Membrane Filtration Modules
The present invention provides a membrane filtration module including a cover plate and a permeate plate. FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional (A) and a top (B) view of an example of a cover plate 100 according to the present invention. The cover plate has an inlet port 110 as shown, such that inlet port 110 and outlet port 120 are interchangeable. Inlet port 110 and outlet port 120 each contain a section to receive a tubing adapter (112 and 122, respectively), a fanned section (114 and 124, respectively), and an inclined section (116 and 126, respectively) that ends in an opening (118 and 128, respectively) to a flow channel (not shown). The tubing may be connected to cover plate 100 by any means, including but not limited to via hose barbed adapters or compression fittings.
Inlet port 110 and outlet port 120 are sized such that they are large enough to ensure a low inflow/outflow velocity relative to the crossflow velocity. This is necessary to prevent a momentum jet-like behavior from affecting the channel flow field. In addition, the end of the fanned section (114 and 124) that connects to the inclined section (116 and 126) is fanned to a width that corresponds to the width of the main flow. This further reduces the velocity of the inflow prior to entering the inclined section. The inclined section (116 and 126) is preferably at about a 45 degree angle relative to the flow channel formed from attaching the cover plate 100 to the permeate plate. Directing fluid to the membrane surface at this angle minimizes flow separations.
The cover plate 100 may also contain a depression 130 in the top of the plate. The cover plate 100 also has holes 150 for attaching cover plate 100 to the permeate plate.
FIG. 2 shows a cross-sectional (A) and a top (B) view of an example of a permeate plate 200 according to the present invention, where dashed lines indicate features below the surface of permeate plate 200. The permeate plate 200 preferably has a depression 210, as grooves 220 for permeate drainage aligned in the longitudinal direction, as shown, to reduce perturbations in the flow. Alternatively, grooves 220 may be aligned laterally to induce turbulence, useful for long term operation of the module and in cases for which a consistent flow field is not critical. Grooves 220 drain into channel 230, which ends in section 232, designed to receive a tubing adapter. The tubing may be connected to permeate plate 200 by any means, including but not limited to via hose barbed adapters or compression fittings. Permeate plate 200 also contains holes 250 for attaching permeate plate 200 to the cover plate. Holes 250 contain a section 252 for receiving the body of a screw, and a section 254 for receiving a head of a screw. (For simplicity, only one hole 250 is shown in the cross-sectional view). Section 254 ensures that the screw head is flush with the bottom of permeate plate 200.
FIG. 3 shows a cross-sectional view of an example of a membrane filtration module 300 according to the present invention. Module 300 includes cover plate 100 and permeate plate 200, which are secured, preferably by a nut and bolt action, through holes 150 and 250, pictured in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2. (Holes 150 and 250 are out of the plane of the section shown in FIG. 3). Sealing of the membrane filtration module 300 is activated by compression of a sheet gasket 310 surrounding flow channel 320. Preferably, spacers 330 are situated between cover plate 100 and permeate plate 200 to prevent over compression of module 300. The actual depth of flow channel 320 can be precisely estimated by measuring the thickness of module 300 before and after compression. The depth of flow channel 320 can be altered by using gaskets/spacers of different thickness. This is especially valuable in experiments where vertical mass transport is important. Solid arrows 340 illustrate the direction of flow through module 300. Fluid flows into module 300 through inlet 110, into flow channel 320 and then out of module 300 through outlet 120. The design of the different parts of the flow path ensures a smooth flow transition across the membrane module, resulting in a low longitudinal pressure gradient. This implies a smaller variation in the localized transmembrane pressure (TMP) across the membrane. In addition, the low pressure gradient simplifies scale up. Permeate that flows through a membrane (not shown) situated in depression 210 drains through grooves 220 into channel 230, and out of module 300 through section 232.
Membrane filtration modules according to the present invention may be any size, but preferably have dimensions of about 158 mm x 60 mm x 37 mm. Modules preferably can accommodate a membrane with a length in the range of about 86 to about 94 mm and a width in the range of about 27 to about 34 mm. Any type of membrane can be used according to the present invention, including but not limited to polysulfone, polyethersulfone, polyvinylidene fluoride, regenerated cellulose, nylon and polycarbonate. In addition, different membranes can be used at different times due to the ease of disassembling the module. Modules may be scaled up or down from the above dimensions, where the ratios of the described dimensions are preferably maintained. A vertically stacked system using membrane filtration modules according to the present invention may be constructed if higher permeate flux is desired. Any fluid may be filtered using a module according to the present invention. Examples include activated sludge, dairy products, yeast suspensions and contaminated water. Membrane filtration modules of acrylic or polycarbonate.
Membrane filtration modules according to the present invention preferably support a flow rate of between about 0-20 LPM before the membrane will collapse. In addition, modules preferably maintain structural integrity at a pressure of up to about 400 kPa. The entire module can be placed flat on a horizontal surface, minimizing the possibility of vibrations affecting the flow or membrane attached foulants.
Membrane filtration modules according to the present invention also preferably include an optically clear view port at the center to allow the entrance of a microscopic objective lens for a close-up view of the flow channel or the membrane surface. The view port contains a window that is preferably made of glass, more preferably fused silica. Proper engineering and designing of this view port enables the thickness of the port to be reduced to a dimension suitable for imaging yet retain sufficient structural integrity to withstand up to 400 kPa of working pressure. The sizing of the window thickness is determined based on:
Figure imgf000009_0001
where the use of an undamped window is implied in the leading coefficient. D denotes the unsupported window diameter, P is the internal pressure, and F represents the apparent elastic limit. For a fused silica view port of 20 mm diameter, this represents a thickness of about 2 mm. as membrane fouling and flow velocity. This creates possibilities for utilizing sophisticated imaging techniques such as confocal microscopy, 2-photon microscopy, micro Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV), etc. Imaging by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is also possible as the width of the module is small enough to fit into an animal MRI scanner.
Membrane filtration modules according to the present invention can function in a non- filteration mode for studying particle deposition and adsorption on surfaces. The permeate plate can be flipped such that the membrane is in contact with the flat surface without grooves thereby preventing permeation and the creation of transmembrane pressure. Moreover, porous membranes can be substituted with non-porous membranes or films with specific surface properties. In addition, membrane separation by reverse osmosis can be performed with this invention by constructing the body with stainless steel. This is to confer structural strength in order to withstand the high pressures involved.
Although filtration modules according to the present invention are intended for use in carefully controlled experimental work on membrane filtration, they are equally suitable for general low volume filtration applications and as a flow through device for research work on particle attachment onto surfaces. The particles can be colloids, bacteria cells, nanosized particles, larger particulates etc. The attachment surfaces can have a variety of properties such as porosity, charge, roughness, hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity, chemical reactivity and so on limited only by the availability of the materials. The permeate plate is manufactured using standard techniques and will not be described here. The cover plate is preferably fabricated from three sections as shown in FIG. 4. First a block 400 of the material of choice is drilled on the bottom at an angle to create inclined channels 410. Next, the top of block 400 is milled to give fanned sections 420 of the inlet/outlet ports. The milled block is then attached to sections 430 and 440, which form the top of the cover plate. Sections 430 and 440 may be angled, as shown, or have squared edges. Alternatively, sections 430 and 440 may be combined into one section. Sections 430 and 440 may be attached to milled block 440 using solvent welding. Once the three sections have been attached, they are drilled on both sides to make the tubing adapter receiving ends 450 of the inlet/outlet ports. If it is desired for the flow channel to be larger, the bottom of block 400 may be milled at this point.
EXAMPLE Design of a membrane filtration module
The design of the interior geometry of the module was initiated based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Only geometries that produced hydrodynamically satisfactory results were further evaluated in terms of viability and simplicity in fabrication. Structural integrity and a pressure rating commensurate with MF/UF were also given due consideration.
Several other factors were taken into account. These included an option for the placement of a glass view port that allows in situ microscopic examination of the membrane surface as well as MRI compatibility. The interior geometry was modeled and meshed using GAMBIT 2.1 (Fluent Inc.) while the computation was performed with FLUENT 6.1 (Fluent Inc.). The simulated domain was an exact replica of the final product down to the details such as curvatures created by the machining process. Such details are necessary due to the small length scale of the flow. Only half the channel was simulated, taking advantage of the symmetry of the module.
The domain was subdivided into a number of connected sections so that hexahedral mapping and the coopering scheme could be applied as much as possible. Tetrahedrals were packed in the remaining volumes. In this way, the number of skewed elements can be minimized. Attention was paid on meshing the region at and close to the inclined channel as that directly influences the entrance length. The unstructured grid had an initial size of over 240,000 elements.
As the inlet is connected to a tubing through an adapter, the actual inlet condition should be based on separate simulations of the chosen connector. Due to the multitude of possibilities, a laminar pipe flow profile was applied at the inlet as an approximation.
To assess the computed results in a meaningful manner and to enable comparison with theoretical solutions, all simulations were performed under a baseline condition. That is, a Newtonian fluid with a kinematic viscosity of 7 x 10"6 m2/s flowing through a 1.5 mm channel with impermeable walls. The viscosity was chosen to be comparable to that of such viscosity.
Several simulations were performed in the laminar regime at Reynolds Number (Re) ranging from 107 to 857, where Re was calculated based on the channel depth and average crossflow velocity. The segregated solver was used together with the SIMPLEC (Semi- Implicit Method for Pressure-Linked Equation Consistent) algorithm for pressure-velocity coupling, a standard pressure interpolation scheme and the QUICK (Quadratic Upwind) scheme for momentum discretization. During the computational runs, the grid was adapted to resolve finer details. Convergence was assessed based on the area-weighted longitudinal velocity and static pressure at the half depth of the main flow channel. This was in addition to monitoring the drop in residuals of the velocity components. Each run was terminated only when a grid converged solution was obtained.
FIG. 5 A illustrates a simulated flow domain resulting from running the above algorithms. The geometry of this flow domain is an exact replica of a prototype membrane filtration module. FIG. 5B illustrates the longitudinal velocity field at the plane of symmetry and half depth of the crossflow channel. The scale in FIG. 5B is in m/s. The average crossflow velocity is 1 m/s. The velocity field demonstrates that a relatively uniform velocity can be obtained using the model membrane filtration module.
As one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate, various changes, substitutions, and alterations could be made or otherwise implemented without departing from the principles the following claims and their legal equivalents.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A membrane filtration module, comprising:
a) a flow channel with width w; and
b) an inlet port and an outlet port, wherein said inlet port and said outlet port are
collinear with said flow channel and wherein said inlet port and said outlet
port each comprise:
i) a fanned section, wherein one end of said fanned section is equal to
width w;
ii) an inclined section in fluid connection with said flow channel.
2. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 1, wherein said module is
designed for cross-flow filtration.
3. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 1, further comprising a
cover plate.
4. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 3, wherein said
cover plate comprises a view port.
5. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 4, wherein
said view port comprises glass.
6. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 5,
wherein said glass is fused silica.
7. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 3, wherein said
cover plate is symmetric about the transverse axis.
8. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 3, wherein said
cover plate comprises three attached sections. permeate plate.
10. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 9, wherein said permeate plate comprises longitudinal or transverse grooves.
11. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 9, wherein said groves are adjacent to the exit of said inclined section of said inlet port.
12. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 1, wherein said module comprises acrylic or polycarbonate.
13. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 1, wherein said module has dimensions of about 158 x 60 x 37 mm.
14. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 1, wherein said module has dimensions with a ratio of about 4.3 (length): 1.6 (width): 1 (height).
15. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 1, wherein said module supports a flow rate of between about 0 — 20 LPM.
16. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 1, wherein said module maintains structural integrity at a pressure up to about 400 kPa.
17. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 1, further comprising spacers to prevent over compression of said module.
18. The membrane filtration module as set forth in claim 1, wherein said inclined section is at an angle of about 45° relative to said flow channel. accommodates a membrane with a length in the range of about 86 to about 94 mm and a width in the range of about 27 to about 34 mm.
PCT/US2006/021418 2005-06-02 2006-06-02 Crossflow membrane filtration module WO2006130815A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US68719805P 2005-06-02 2005-06-02
US60/687,198 2005-06-02

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006130815A2 true WO2006130815A2 (en) 2006-12-07
WO2006130815A3 WO2006130815A3 (en) 2007-02-22

Family

ID=37482334

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2006/021418 WO2006130815A2 (en) 2005-06-02 2006-06-02 Crossflow membrane filtration module

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2006130815A2 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007087578A2 (en) * 2006-01-24 2007-08-02 The Regents Of The University Of California Method and system for monitoring reverse osmosis membranes
WO2015148548A3 (en) * 2014-03-24 2015-12-10 Lockheed Martin Corporation Large area membrane evaluation apparatuses and methods for use thereof
WO2017171638A1 (en) * 2016-03-28 2017-10-05 Nanyang Technological University Cross-flow membrane filtration with inclined filtration channel
WO2019058865A1 (en) * 2017-09-25 2019-03-28 株式会社村田製作所 Filtration device
US10864483B2 (en) 2018-11-16 2020-12-15 Integrated Protein Technologies, Snc. Molecular weight filtration system and apparatus
US10960357B2 (en) 2018-04-23 2021-03-30 Noria Water Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for real-time direct membrane monitoring
EP4014961A1 (en) * 2020-12-17 2022-06-22 Helixpharma S.r.l. Process for the depyrogenation of a snail secretion and related production plant
US11786847B2 (en) 2017-09-19 2023-10-17 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Filtration device and filtration method

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4197206A (en) * 1978-09-13 1980-04-08 Karn William S Heat sealable ion permeable membranes
US4797211A (en) * 1985-12-24 1989-01-10 Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gmbh Cross flow microfilter
US20030222012A1 (en) * 2001-12-06 2003-12-04 Purdue Research Foundation Mesoporous membrane collector and separator for airborne pathogen detection

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4197206A (en) * 1978-09-13 1980-04-08 Karn William S Heat sealable ion permeable membranes
US4797211A (en) * 1985-12-24 1989-01-10 Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gmbh Cross flow microfilter
US20030222012A1 (en) * 2001-12-06 2003-12-04 Purdue Research Foundation Mesoporous membrane collector and separator for airborne pathogen detection

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007087578A2 (en) * 2006-01-24 2007-08-02 The Regents Of The University Of California Method and system for monitoring reverse osmosis membranes
WO2007087578A3 (en) * 2006-01-24 2007-10-18 Univ California Method and system for monitoring reverse osmosis membranes
US7910004B2 (en) 2006-01-24 2011-03-22 The Regents Of The University Of California Method and system for monitoring reverse osmosis membranes
WO2015148548A3 (en) * 2014-03-24 2015-12-10 Lockheed Martin Corporation Large area membrane evaluation apparatuses and methods for use thereof
WO2017171638A1 (en) * 2016-03-28 2017-10-05 Nanyang Technological University Cross-flow membrane filtration with inclined filtration channel
US11786847B2 (en) 2017-09-19 2023-10-17 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Filtration device and filtration method
CN111107920A (en) * 2017-09-25 2020-05-05 株式会社村田制作所 Filter device
JPWO2019058865A1 (en) * 2017-09-25 2020-07-30 株式会社村田製作所 Filtration device
US11529579B2 (en) 2017-09-25 2022-12-20 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Filtration device
WO2019058865A1 (en) * 2017-09-25 2019-03-28 株式会社村田製作所 Filtration device
US10960357B2 (en) 2018-04-23 2021-03-30 Noria Water Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for real-time direct membrane monitoring
US11826708B2 (en) 2018-04-23 2023-11-28 Noria Water Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for real-time direct membrane monitoring
US10864483B2 (en) 2018-11-16 2020-12-15 Integrated Protein Technologies, Snc. Molecular weight filtration system and apparatus
EP3881051A4 (en) * 2018-11-16 2022-10-26 Integrated Protein Technologies, Inc. Molecular weight filtration system and apparatus
EP4014961A1 (en) * 2020-12-17 2022-06-22 Helixpharma S.r.l. Process for the depyrogenation of a snail secretion and related production plant

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2006130815A3 (en) 2007-02-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Qasim et al. Reverse osmosis desalination: A state-of-the-art review
WO2006130815A2 (en) Crossflow membrane filtration module
US7805983B2 (en) Method for measuring the number of fine particles in ultrapure water and method for manufacturing a filtration device for measuring the number of fine particles in ultrapure water
Eykamp Microfiltration and ultrafiltration
Alhadidi et al. Silt density index and modified fouling index relation, and effect of pressure, temperature and membrane resistance
US9005441B2 (en) Filtering membrane module and filtering apparatus having the same
JP2007126341A (en) Anisotropic porous material
US20150209731A1 (en) Permeate channel alterations for counter current filtration for use in cross-flow filtration modules useful in osmotic systems
Salama Investigation of the critical entry pressure values associated with the permeation of an oil droplet through a cascade of pore throats and pore bodies: A quasistatic analysis
Zou et al. Design and efficient construction of bilayer Al2O3/ZrO2 mesoporous membranes for effective treatment of suspension systems
EP2794077B1 (en) Distribution plate for crossflow filtration cassettes
JP6422032B2 (en) Flow separation type pore diffusion membrane separation module for concentration
JP5970988B2 (en) Membrane module manufacturing method
Ducom et al. Possible effects of air sparging for nanofiltration of salted solutions
Ghaffour Modeling of fouling phenomena in cross-flow ultrafiltration of suspensions containing suspended solids and oil droplets
Parasyris et al. Computational modeling of coupled free and porous media flow for membrane-based filtration systems: A review
CN103240001A (en) Method for measuring point flux of hollow fiber film
CN113518655A (en) Method for filtering biological fluids using track-etched membranes
Huisman et al. Design of a crossflow microfiltration unit for studies of flux and particle transport
Royce et al. Filtration Methods for Use in Recovery Processes
Neal An examination of the nature of critical flux and membrane fouling by direct observation
Sarbatly Membrane Technology for Water and Wastewater Treatment in Rural Regions
Polyakov Membrane separation in deadend hollow fiber filters at constant transmembrane pressure
Subir et al. Fundamentals of particle fouling in membrane processes
Archibong et al. Modular microfluidic filters based on transparent membranes

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 06771919

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2