WO2006100484A2 - Deliver of molecules to a li id bila - Google Patents

Deliver of molecules to a li id bila Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006100484A2
WO2006100484A2 PCT/GB2006/001057 GB2006001057W WO2006100484A2 WO 2006100484 A2 WO2006100484 A2 WO 2006100484A2 GB 2006001057 W GB2006001057 W GB 2006001057W WO 2006100484 A2 WO2006100484 A2 WO 2006100484A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
lipid bilayer
probe
carrier surface
membrane protein
molecule
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2006/001057
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2006100484A3 (en
Inventor
Matthew Alexander Holden
John Hagan Pryce Bayley
Original Assignee
Isis Innovation Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Isis Innovation Limited filed Critical Isis Innovation Limited
Priority to US11/884,927 priority Critical patent/US7939270B2/en
Priority to EP06726479A priority patent/EP1861071B1/en
Priority to AT06726479T priority patent/ATE473438T1/en
Priority to DE602006015292T priority patent/DE602006015292D1/en
Priority to JP2008502471A priority patent/JP5253148B2/en
Publication of WO2006100484A2 publication Critical patent/WO2006100484A2/en
Publication of WO2006100484A3 publication Critical patent/WO2006100484A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12MAPPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
    • C12M35/00Means for application of stress for stimulating the growth of microorganisms or the generation of fermentation or metabolic products; Means for electroporation or cell fusion

Definitions

  • the present method has particular application to insertion of a membrane protein, as the molecule, into a lipid bilayer.
  • the method may be applied to a stochastic sensing technique, for example in which the molecule is a membrane protein which is a pore or a channel and the apparatus further comprises an electrical circuit capable of measuring an electrical signal across the lipid bilayer
  • an apparatus for performing stochastic sensing with a membrane protein comprising: a chamber body defining a chamber capable of containing an aqueous solution, a wall of the chamber having an aperture capable of supporting a lipid bilayer across the aperture; a probe capable of holding the molecule on a carrier surface thereof, the probe being movably mounted on the chamber body to allow movement of the carrier surface against the aperture for engagement of the carrier surface against a lipid bilayer supported across the aperture.
  • the probe 10 is moved to engage the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 against the lipid bilayer 9 extending across the aperture 7 as shown by the arrow in Fig. 3. This movement of the probe 10 is performed simply by manual manipulation of the boom 16.

Abstract

A method of delivering a molecule, such as a membrane protein, to a lipid bilayer (9) uses a probe (10) capable of holding the molecule on a carrier surface (15) thereof. The molecule is deposited on the carrier surface (15) and the probe (10) is moved to engage the carrier surface (15) against the lipid bilayer (9). The carrier surface (15) may be the surface of a drop of hydrogel (14) which adsorbs the molecule. The molecule may be a membrane protein which is thus inserted into the lipid bilayer (9). The method is fast and simple to perform thereby allowing high throughput experimentation.

Description

Delivery Of Molecules To A Lipid Bilayer
The present invention relates to the delivery to a lipid bilayer of molecules, for example membrane proteins for insertion into the lipid bilayer.
Lipid bilayers having membrane proteins inserted therein constitute membranes in several types of biological system, most notably as cell membranes. Inspired by such natural membranes, a number of technologies have been developed which involve a membrane protein inserted in a lipid bilayer. These technologies require delivery of the membrane protein or another molecule to the lipid bilayer. One such technology is stochastic sensing in which the response of a membrane protein to a molecule or physical stimulus is used to perform sensing of that molecule or stimulus. The nature of the response depends on the nature of the membrane protein which may be a naturally occurring protein or in many useful applications an engineered protein. In one type of sensing, the membrane protein is a protein pore or a channel which responds to an analyte by affecting an electrical signal developed across the lipid bilayer, for example by changing the ionic current flowing across the lipid bilayer. In this case, sensing of the analyte maybe performed by detecting the electrical signal across the lipid bilayer. Stochastic sensing allows sensing of a wide range of biological molecules and systems, for example sensing of ions, organic molecules, or peptides, characterisation of DNA, investigation of ligand-receptor interactions and investigation of multi-step reaction pathways.
Despite the versatility of technology such as stochastic sensing, the practical process is cumbersome, expensive and needs to be performed by a skilled scientist. A significant difficulty lies in the techniques used to insert the membrane proteins into the lipid bilayer for performance of the sensing. The most common technique is to suspend the membrane protein in a purified form into solution and subsequently to wait while the membrane protein diffuses to the lipid bilayer and is inserted by binding to the lipid bilayer and assembling into a functional state. However, in practice the insertion of a single membrane protein into the lipid bilayer can be agonisingly slow and unreliable. In the case of stochastic sensing, it is preferable to have a single pore, as multiple pores prevent or at least complicate kinetic analysis. Low concentrations of the membrane protein in solution are used to prevent multiple pore insertion. Typically the time taken for a membrane protein to be inserted into the lipid bilayer is many minutes or tens of minutes. Apart from being slow and frustrating for the scientist, this is detrimental to any commercial application of the technology.
A related problem occurs with newly engineered proteins. In this case, when there is a lack of activity it is unclear whether this is due to a functional inability of the engineered membrane protein to be inserted into a lipid bilayer, or whether this is due to some other factor such as insufficient concentration, different adsorption properties or simply not having allowed enough time to elapse.
Furthermore, once a single pore has been inserted and monitoring begins, the experiment can be disrupted by the subsequent insertion of another membrane protein from solution into the lipid bilayer. One possible solution to this problem is to perfuse the apparatus to remove excess proteins from solution after insertion of a single pore, but this is a laborious and unreliable step which often results in rupture of the lipid bilayer.
In practical terms, to minimise the time taken for insertion of a membrane protein requires the use of lipid bilayers of relatively large area. However, it would be desirable to reduce the area of the lipid bilayer to lower the electrical noise and to increase stability.
Practical difficulties such as those described above also limit the possibility of applying the membrane proteins in array format as would be desirable for some applications.
It would be desirable to develop a technique which alleviates at least some of these problems.
According to the present invention, there is provided a method of delivering a molecule to a lipid bilayer, the method comprising: providing a probe capable of holding the molecule on a carrier surface thereof; depositing the molecule on the carrier surface of the probe; moving the probe to engage the carrier surface against the lipid bilayer. This method of delivering a molecule, for example a membrane protein, to a lipid bilayer produces a number of advantages over the known technique described above of simply putting the membrane protein into solution and waiting. The main advantages are that the method is quick and simple to carry out. The steps of putting the molecule on the probe and moving the probe to engage against the lipid bilayer are very simple to perform experimentally and do not require great skill and expertise. The probe is a macroscopic element which allows it to be manipulated manually or by a mechanical system such as a micro-manipulator. These steps may also be performed very quickly.
When applied to a molecule which is a membrane protein, the step of moving the probe to engage the carrier surface against the lipid bilayer causes the membrane protein to be inserted into the lipid bilayer. In practice, the insertion occurs very quickly after engagement of the carrier surface against the lipid bilayer. Typically the insertion occurs within a few seconds of the engagement. This speed is very significant in practical terms as it allows repeated performance of an experiment at a rate which is many times greater than that achievable by adding the membrane protein to the solution and waiting for insertion into the bilayer. Relative to that known technique, the present invention provides the capability of very high throughput experimentation. Furthermore, the speed may be achieved with a much lower skill level on the part of the user. For example, the method may be applied to provide high through-put screening of different membrane proteins and/or analytes. , for example screening of different membrane proteins and/or analytes. Examples where the high speed of the invention would be particularly useful include, inter alia: (1) functional investigation of channels, pores or other membrane proteins and (2) determination of the function or activity of a membrane protein in the presence of an analyte, which may provide for identification of either or both of the membrane protein and the analyte.
Further advantages of the present method are as follows. The ease and speed of performance provide the method with the capability of facilitating the generation of arrays of membrane proteins e.g. to act as a sensor array for high throughput screening. This might be achieved either by insertion of respective proteins in separate lipid bilayers or by sequential insertion of multiple proteins in a single bilayer. The proteins may be of the same or different type, hi particular, the method could readily be automated for use in preparing such arrays. Such arrays of membrane proteins especially engineered proteins with different structures have to date been difficult to implement but are expected to be very useful, for example as tools allowing the recognition of a particular analyte of interest or for recognition of complex mixtures of analytes. For example a range of compounds could be added to the sensor array and the changing function monitored.
The direct nature of the method may allow the investigation of membrane proteins which have previously been difficult to reconstitute in artificial lipid bilayers.
The high speed of the method means that it may be applied to lipid bilayers of relatively small area, which in turn allows reduction of the electrical noise and improvement in the stability of the lipid bilayer.
A number of advantages derive from the use of a probe in itself. One advantage is to simplify preparation of the molecule to be delivered. For example, the molecule may be obtained from media other than aqueous solution. One option is for the probe to be rubbed over a sample. The sample may be for example a cell culture, a bacterial colony or a fungal system. Li these cases the sample may be unlysed. Also, the sample may be non-cellular, for example a "synthetic" ribosomal system.
This allows the proteins to be easily transferred to the lipid bilayer for study without requiring complicated extraction and purification techniques for the proteins, such as IWT and plasmid preparation, or DNA amplification and protein assembly and purification. Furthermore, the bacterial colony is an ideal storage system for proteins. Since there are no additional processes between protein expression in bacteria and delivery to the bilayer, the exposure of more delicate proteins to potentially denaturing conditions is minimised. Alternatively, another possible advantage is that the probes may be capable of storage after deposition of the molecules on the carrier surface, under proper conditions for example low temperatures and appropriate humidity.
Prior techniques for delivering molecules to a lipid bilayer tend to avoid engagement with a macroscopic object, presumably because of an expectation that the lipid bilayer would not withstand the mechanical impact of the engagement.
However, it has been appreciated by the present inventors that in fact it is possible for a probe to engage the lipid bilayer without causing rupture or damage. In experiments described in more detail below, it has been demonstrated that the method is in fact very robust. The lipid bilayer was capable of being engaged by moving the probe manually without the need for any special measures to control the applied force
(although such control or even automation is feasible and within the scope of the invention).
Contrary to the probe damaging the lipid bilayer, in the case of a probe having a carrier surface with an area which is greater than the area of the lipid bilayer, it has been found that the probe actually enhances the mechanical stability of the lipid bilayer whilst in engagement. In general, very little pressure is needed to. hydrostatically burst a lipid bilayer. There are types of experiment which subject the lipid bilayer to hydrostatic pressure, for example in microfluidic applications where pressure driven chemical delivery is of paramount importance, or in other experiments where there is a flow of fluid past the lipid bilayer. In such types of experiment the probe may be used to support the lipid bilayer and reduce the risk of rupture.
As already mentioned, the present method has particular application to insertion of a membrane protein, as the molecule, into a lipid bilayer. hi this case, the method may be applied to a stochastic sensing technique, for example in which the molecule is a membrane protein which is a pore or a channel and the apparatus further comprises an electrical circuit capable of measuring an electrical signal across the lipid bilayer
The method is applicable to any type of membrane protein. This has been demonstrated for integral membrane proteins, but is equally expected for peripheral membrane proteins. The present method applies to any membrane proteins including the two major classes of a β-barrel or an α-helical bundle. An important application is a membrane protein which is a pore or a channel. Besides a protein pore or channel, further possible membrane proteins include, but not exclusively, a receptor, a transporter or a protein which effects cell recognition or a cell-to-cell interaction. As already mentioned, a lipid bilayer into which a membrane protein has been inserted in accordance with the method of the invention may be used in a stochastic sensing technique. The lipid bilayer may also be used to study the properties of the membrane protein inserted therein. For example, the voltage dependence of the properties of the membrane protein may be determined. Techniques for studying membrane proteins in lipid bilayers are well known in the art. The function of a channel or pore may be determined by measuring, for example, an ionic current flowing across the lipid bilayer in a similar manner to the stochastic sensing technique. The function of a transporter may be determined by measuring the amount of a molecule translocated across the lipid bilayer, for example by mass spectrometer or ELISA or by using a substrate which is tagged fluorescently or radioactively.
As well as molecules which are membrane proteins, it is expected that the present invention will be applicable to other types of molecule which it is desired to deliver to a lipid bilayer. One example is that the molecule is an analyte which is to be delivered to a lipid bilayer which already has a membrane protein inserted therein so as to perform analysis of the analyte. A further good example is an analyte which is scarce such as unamplified DNA. This embodiment is useful for studying the analyte dependence of a membrane protein. The analyte may be a ligand for the membrane protein present in the lipid bilayer, for example a receptor or a ligand- gated pore channel. In this case the movement of the probe to engage to the carrier surface allows the analyte to interact with the membrane protein. The method of the invention may therefore be used to provide a receptor or ligand-gated pore or channel with its ligand.
It is also expected that the probe may be used to capture molecules which have translocated through or have been transported across a lipid bilayer having a membrane protein inserted therein, for example by diffusive transport through a protein pore or by membrane protein-mediated transport across lipid bilayers. With such transport using a single membrane protein, with conventional techniques the time required to reach an amount of translocated molecule in solution which is capable of being detected is well beyond the expected lifetime of a lipid bilayer. However, by using a probe to capture translocated molecules, it is expected that a sufficient amount of the transported molecule could be captured much sooner. The probe could subsequently be removed and taken elsewhere for analysis (for example by mass spectrometer or ELISA). Where different molecules are being delivered and/or captured it is possible to use an apparatus having plural probes, for example one in respect of each molecule being delivered or captured. The probes might be arranged on the same side, or opposite sides, of the lipid bilayer as convenient.
The lipid bilayer may be a bilayer of any membrane lipid, including a phospholipid, a glycolipid or cholesterol and including mixtures. The present method is of particular application to technologies using a planar lipid bilayer, for example in an apparatus comprising a chamber body defining a chamber, a wall of the chamber having an aperture in which the lipid bilayer is formed, the chamber containing an aqueous solution. Therefore, according to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for performing stochastic sensing with a membrane protein, the apparatus comprising: a chamber body defining a chamber capable of containing an aqueous solution, a wall of the chamber having an aperture capable of supporting a lipid bilayer across the aperture; a probe capable of holding the molecule on a carrier surface thereof, the probe being movably mounted on the chamber body to allow movement of the carrier surface against the aperture for engagement of the carrier surface against a lipid bilayer supported across the aperture.
The method is expected to be equally applicable to other types of lipid bilayer including but not exclusively a membrane of a cell, a membrane of an organelle or a liposome. Insertion of a membrane protein into intact cells allows the membrane protein to be studied under conditions similar to its native environment. For example, the functioning of a pore, channel or transporter may be studied in the presence of a normal intracellular environment. Receptors inserted into the membrane of intact cells may also be studied in the presence of their associated proteins, for example G- proteins and other second messenger system components.
The carrier surface is capable of holding the molecule. As the molecule is held on the surface, this allows it to interact with the lipid bilayer, for example in the case of a molecule which is a membrane protein by insertion of the lipid bilayer into the lipid bilayer. In general, the carrier surface may be any type of surface which allows the molecule in question to be held for delivery to the lipid bilayer. Some examples are as follows.
Preferably, the probe is capable of holding the molecule by adsorbing the molecule on said carrier surface. One option which allows adsorption to occur is that the probe comprises a body having a drop of gel, such as a hydrogel, protruding from the body, the gel being capable of holding the molecule on a protruding surface thereof which protruding surface constitutes said carrier surface. However, the use of a gel is not essential. For example, the carrier surface may alternatively be the surface of a fluid or a solid which adsorbs the molecule. Suitable solids include polymers or glasses, either of which may be selected to have suitable properties to assist the adsorption of the molecule.
Furthermore, the molecule may be held by other types of physical or chemical bond. For example, the carrier surface may be chosen to specifically bind to the molecule in question. The carrier surface may also be treated to achieve suitable surface properties, for example by coating or by chemical modification. This ability to adapt the chemistry of the carrier surface is a particular advantage of a carrier surface made of a solid. One type of coating which may be applied is polyethylene imine, or any polyelectrolyte which increases or decreases the affinity for a membrane protein or other molecule of interest. One type of chemical modification which may be applied is a silane modification.
In one type of method, the carrier surface is capable of holding the membrane protein less strongly than the lipid bilayer, and the method further comprises, after said step of moving the probe to engage the carrier surface of the probe with the lipid bilayer, moving the probe to disengage the carrier surface of the probe against the lipid bilayer, thereby leaving the inserted the membrane protein in the lipid bilayer. With this type of method the membrane protein is released from the carrier surface of the probe. This may be desirable in some practical situations, because it allows the probe to be removed without interfering with the procedure. However, such removal of the probe is not essential. As an alternative, the probe may remain engaged with the lipid bilayer during performance of an experimental technique. This is acceptable provided that the probe does not interfere with the experiment. For example, in the case of a stochastic sensing, this may be achieved by use of a probe in which the carrier surface is the surface of a material through which the aqueous solution may diffuse, for example a hydrogel. This allows flow of the ionic current to the membrane protein even while remaining held on the probe.
In one type of embodiment, the carrier surface has an area which is greater than the area of the lipid bilayer, advantageously by at least an order of magnitude. In this case, the probe preferably uses the surface of a drop of gel as the carrier surface. This provides the advantage of reducing the pressure on the lipid bilayer because the applied force is spread over the entire area of the carrier surface. This provides for easy engagement of the probe with the lipid bilayer as the probe may simply be moved against the lipid bilayer until the movement is resisted by the element supporting the lipid bilayer. The reduced pressure also assists in preventing the probe from damaging the lipid bilayer. In addition, the use of a relatively large probe assists in aiming it at the lipid bilayer during the movement of the probe, as well as having the capability of enhancing the mechanical stability of the lipid bilayer as discussed above. In another type of embodiment, the carrier surface is smaller than the lipid bilayer. In this case, the carrier surface is typically the surface of a solid. The nature of the solid is not critical provided the probe is capable of holding the molecule as described above. One possible solid is glass, although experiments have successfully been carried out even with the needle of a cactus plant. TMs type of probe provides a number of advantages as follows. As a result of the carrier surface being smaller than the lipid bilayer, contact with the lipid bilayer can be guaranteed, although there is a corresponding disadvantage as compared to a probe having a carrier surface of large area that careful control of the movement of the probe is needed to bring it to the correct position for engagement with the lipid bilayer. The small probe also causes a lesser amount of the molecules in question to be delivered to the lipid bilayer which has advantages in many cases, for example by requiring a lesser amount of the molecules.
To allow better understanding, an embodiment of the present invention will now be described by way of non-limitative example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is an exploded view of a first apparatus for performing stochastic sensing;
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of the electrical circuit of the first apparatus of Fig. 1; Fig. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the carrier portion of the probe of the first apparatus of Fig. 1;
Fig. 4 is a perspective view of a second apparatus for performing stochastic sensing;
Fig. 5 is an expanded view of the probe of the second apparatus of Fig. 4. Figs. 6 A to 6D are graphs of typical electrical current signal outputs during insertion of a protein pore into a lipid bilayer;
Fig. 7 is a graph of the electrical current signal output with a WT αHL protein pore inserted into a lipid bilayer;
Fig. 8 is a graph of the electrical current signal output with a WT KcsA protein channel inserted into a lipid bilayer; Fig. 9 is a graph of the electrical current signal output with a WT leukocidin pore inserted into a lipid bilayer; and
Figs. 1OA and 1OB are graphs of the electrical current signal output with a WT αHL protein pore and an αHL mutant Ml 13F/K147N protein pore, respectively, inserted into a lipid bilayer.
A first apparatus 30 which may be used to perform the present method is illustrated in Fig. 1. The first apparatus 30 includes an electrophysiology cell 1 which is of a conventional type and construction for the performance of stochastic sensing using a membrane protein inserted in a lipid bilayer. The electrophysiology cell 1 comprises two chamber body portions 2 having constructions which are mirror images of each other. The chamber body portions 2 may be made from Delrin (trademark). The chamber body portions 2 each define a chamber portion 3 having an opening in the upper surface 4 of the respective chamber body portion 2. The chamber portions 3 each have a volume of a few millilitres, for example 1.5 ml. The chamber portions 3 have no wall on a side surface 5 of the respective chamber body portion 2. To form a chamber body, the two chamber body portions 2 are assembled together with their side surfaces 5 facing one another so that the respective chamber portions 3 are aligned and together form a chamber. The chamber body portions 2 may be attached by any suitable means, typically a clamp or an adhesive.
The electrophysiology cell 1 further comprises a septum 6 made of polycarbonate or any other suitable polymer. Each face of the septum 6 may be coated in a conventional manner, for example with 10% (V /V) hexadecane in pentane. The septum 6 is positioned between the facing side surfaces 5 of the two chamber body portions 2, for example by adhering both chamber body portions 2 to the septum 6. Accordingly, the septum 6 forms a wall which divides the chamber formed by the two chamber portions 3.
The septum 6 has an aperture 7 which is aligned with the chamber portions 3 when the electrophysiology cell is assembled. In use, a lipid bilayer 9 is formed across the aperture 7 as shown in Fig. 3. The septum 6 is sufficiently thin to facilitate formation of the lipid bilayer 9, for example being 25 μm thick. The aperture 7 may in general be of any shape or size which is capable of supporting the lipid bilayer 9, but might preferably be circular with a diameter of around 100 μm.
The electrophysiology cell 1 further includes respective electrodes 8 provided in each chamber portion 3 of each one of the chamber body portions 2. The electrodes 8 may be Ag/ AgCl electrodes. The electrodes 8 form part of an electrical circuit 20 which is capable of measuring an electrical signal across a lipid bilayer 9. The electrical circuit 20 is illustrated schematically in Fig. 2 and is of a conventional type for performing stochastic sensing by detecting the current flowing across the lipid bilayer 9.
The electrodes 8 are connected to an amplifier 21 such as a patch-clamp amplifier (eg an Axopatch 200B supplied by Axon Instruments) which amplifies the current signal output from the electrodes 8.
The current signal output by the amplifier 21 is supplied through a low-pass filter 22, such as a Bessel filter (eg with characteristics 80dB/decade with a corner frequency of 2kHz).
The current signal output by the low-pass filter 22 is supplied to an A/D converter 23, such as a Digitata 1320 A/D converter supplied by Axon Instruments. The A/D converter 23 might typically operate with a sampling frequency of 5kHz. The A/D converter 23 converts the current signal into a digital signal which is then supplied to a computer 24 for analysis. The computer 24 may be a conventional personal computer running an appropriate program to store the current signal and display it on a display device.
The electrophysiology cell 1 may be used to form the lipid bilayer 9 in a conventional manner. A typical experimental technique to form the lipid bilayer 9 is as follows.
After assembly of the electrophysiology cell 1, both chamber portions 3 are filled with an appropriate buffer solution which is chosen having regard to the membrane protein which is being inserted into the lipid bilayer 9. Then, a solution of a desired membrane lipid is added into the buffer solution in each chamber portion 3. In general, any membrane lipid may be used including a phospholipid, a glycolipid or cholesterol. A typical example used in the experiments reported below is diphytanoylphosphocholine which may be dissolved in pentane, for which a typical amount might be a volume of 8μl of the solution at a concentration of 10 mg/ml. Subsequently the solvent, for example pentane, is allowed to evaporate to form a monolayer of the membrane lipid on the surface of the buffer solution.
To form the lipid bilayer 9, the liquid level in each chamber portion 3 is lowered below the aperture 7 and subsequently raised above the aperture 7. Such formation of a lipid bilayer 9 can be repeated to perform new experiments. After insertion of the membrane protein into the lipid bilayer 9 (using the technique described in detail below), an electrical signal developed across the lipid bilayer 9 is monitored by the electrical circuit 20 in a conventional manner.
There will now be described the modifications to the conventional electrophysiology cell 1 which allow the present method to be performed. The first apparatus 30 of Fig. 1 further comprises a probe 10 which may be mounted on the electrophysiology cell 1 and is a macroscopic element. This allows the probe 10 to be manipulated manually.
The probe 10 has a carrier body 11 which is shown in cross-section in Fig. 3. The carrier portion 11 has at a distal end thereof a cupped portion 12 which defines a recess 13. A drop of gel 14 is deposited in the recess 13. The gel is a hydrogel, for example agarose gel or a synthetic gel such as polyacrylamide. For example, in the experiments reported below, the gel 14 was 5% low melt agarose gel. The gel 14 protrudes from the carrier portion 11 so that the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 is gently curved. The cupped portion 12 is circular in this embodiment but may in general have any shape.
The area of the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14, which is principally controlled by the area of the opening of the recess 13 in the cupped portion 12, is preferably at least lmm2, more preferably at least 10mm2. For example, the cupped portion 12 might typically have a diameter of around 3 mm. Thus, the area of the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 is greater than the area of the aperture 7 by at least an order of magnitude or more preferably by at least two orders of magnitude. The carrier body 11 is supported in the chamber portion 3 of one of the chamber body portions 2 with the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 facing the aperture 7 across which the lipid bilayer 9 is formed. To provide such support, the probe 10 comprises a boom 16. A stub axle 17 protrudes from the boom 16. The stub axle 17 fits in a hole 18 formed in the upper surface 4 of one of the chamber body portions 2. The stub axle 17 and hole 18 act as a pivotal mounting for the boom 16 allowing the boom 16 to be rotated over the upper surface 4 of the chamber body portion 2. The carrier body 11 is supported from the boom 16 with the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 aligned with the aperture 7 by an arm 19 which extends from the carrier body 11 out of the chamber portion 3 through the opening in the upper surface 4 to the boom 16. Accordingly, manual manipulation of the boom 16 about the pivot formed by the stub axle 17 and the hole 18 causes movement of the carrier body 11 towards and away from the aperture 7 and the lipid bilayer 9. The method of using the first apparatus 30 will now be described.
The protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 is used as a carrier surface to carry a molecule and deliver it to the lipid bilayer 9. There will first be described the case that the molecule is a membrane protein which is delivered to the lipid bilayer 9 for insertion therein. As a preliminary step, the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 is surface dried and partly dehydrated by holding it briefly under a stream of nitrogen. The membrane protein is then deposited onto the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14. This may be achieved by simply dropping a solution of the membrane protein using a pipette. The solution may be an in vitro transcription/translation mix. Equally the deposition may be carried out in any other way, for example by rubbing the gel 14 over a sample such as a cell culture or, a bacterial colony. In such cases, the process of extracting a viable membrane protein is considerably shortened and simplified by skipping purification steps completely.
When the membrane protein is deposited in solution, the solvent is absorbed into the gel 14. Deposition of the membrane protein causes the membrane protein to be adsorbed onto the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14. Thus, the membrane protein is held on the protruding surface 15 which acts as a carrier surface for the membrane protein.
After deposition of the membrane protein, the probe 10 is mounted on the electrophysiology cell 1. Then the lipid bilayer 9 is formed across the aperture 7 using the conventional technique described above.
Next, the probe 10 is moved to engage the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 against the lipid bilayer 9 extending across the aperture 7 as shown by the arrow in Fig. 3. This movement of the probe 10 is performed simply by manual manipulation of the boom 16.
Engagement of the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 against the lipid bilayer 9 in the aperture 7 causes the membrane protein supported on that protruding surface 15 to be inserted into the lipid bilayer 9. Such insertion typically takes a few seconds. The insertion may be monitored by observation of the electrical signal measured by the electrical circuit 20, for example by monitoring a representation of the current signal on the display of the computer 24. In the case that the membrane protein is a protein channel, a characteristic increase in the detected current is observed.
For example, Figs. 6A to 6D show graphs of typical electrical current signals outputs during insertion of a membrane protein which is a pore into the lipid bilayer 9. In each of the graphs of Figs. 6A to 6D, the first arrow indicates the point of time in which engagement of the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 against the lipid bilayer 9 occurs. In each case this is followed within a few seconds by a sharp increase in the current, from 0 pA to the current of magnitude 50 pA under an applied voltage of minus 5OmV. The graphs were produced with the electrophysiology cell 1 in a metal box (not shown) to reduce ambient noise. However, during the movement of the probe 10, the box was open, so the initial current signal is very noisy. After insertion of the membrane protein into the lipid bilayer 9 the box was closed causing a large pulse of noise. However, after that there is a sharp reduction in noise to a typical value as indicated by the second arrow in each of the graphs of Figs. 6A to 6D. After insertion of a membrane protein into the lipid bilayer 9, the probe 10 may be maintained in position with the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 engaging the lipid bilayer 9. This is entirely acceptable provided that the probe 10 does not interfere with the experiment which is to be performed. In this case, the use of a gel 14 to provide the carrier surface of the probe 10 is particularly advantageous because the gel 14 is porous and therefore allows the aqueous solution in the chamber portion 3 to diffuse through the gel 14. This allows the flow of ionic current through the gel 14 to the membrane protein. Leaving the probe 10 engaged with the lipid bilayer 9 generally causes membrane proteins to be repeatedly inserted and is therefore advantageous for gating channels and the like, such as KcsA potassium channel, which open transiently.
As an alternative, the probe 10 may be moved away from the aperture 7 to disengage the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 from the lipid bilayer 9. In this case, so that the membrane protein is left inserted in the lipid bilayer 9, the carrier surface of the probe 10 must hold the membrane protein less strongly than the lipid bilayer 9. This requirement is met by the use of a gel 14 to provide the carrier surface of the probe 10.
After insertion of the membrane protein into the lipid bilayer 9, the experimental process appropriate to the membrane protein in question may be performed in a conventional manner. For example, to perform stochastic sensing, the electrical signal detected by the electrical circuit 20 is monitored.
Although the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 engages the lipid bilayer 9,' the precise nature of the interaction between the protruding surface 15 and the lipid bilayer 9 is currently unknown. It is clear that the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 is very close to the lipid bilayer 9 but it is not clear whether there is actual physical contact or whether, for example, there remains a thin layer of aqueous solution therebetween. That being said, during the engagement it is apparent that the gel 14 does touch the septum 6. Accordingly, it is thought that the gel 14, being flexible, probably conforms with and extrudes slightly into the aperture 7, perhaps slightly deforming the lipid bilayer 9. Despite the fact that the physical nature of the mechanical probing is not fully understood, from the point of view of the insertion of membrane proteins into the lipid bilayer 9, the method is highly reproducible and reliable. This has been demonstrated experimentally. The entire method as described above is very quick to perform. The method may be performed repeatedly, for example by breaking and reforming the lipid bilayer 9. New membrane proteins may be inserted repeatedly without the need to deposit new amounts of the membrane protein on the probe 10. Furthermore, it is notable that simply leaving the probe 10 immersed in solution in the chamber portion 3 does not cause insertion of pores into the lipid bilayer 9 even if the probe 10 is left there for several hours. Thus insertion of the membrane protein only occurs when the probe 10 is moved to engage the carrier surface against the lipid bilayer 9.
The method is also very easy to perform. The probe 10 may be moved by simple manual manipulation of the probe 10. No special measures are needed to control movement of the probe 10. Indeed the technical method is very robust and rupture of the lipid bilayer 9 occurs very rarely. In particular, no automation of the movement is necessary, although of course such automation would be possible.
A second apparatus 40 which may be used to perform the present method is illustrated in Fig. 4. The second apparatus 40 has a fundamental difference from the first apparatus 30 in that it uses a different form of probe 41 as illustrated in Fig. 5.
The second apparatus 40 includes an electrophysiology cell 1 which is substantially identical to the electrophysiology cell 1 used in the first apparatus 30 and so for brevity a description thereof will not be repeated.
In addition, the second apparatus 40 comprises a probe 41 which takes the form of a rod of solid material having an end surface 42 which is gently rounded and contiguous with the side surfaces 47 of the probe 41. The end surface 42 and perhaps part of the side surface 47 act as a carrier surface for a molecule to be delivered to the lipid bilayer 9. The cross-section of the probe 41 at the end surface 42 is smaller than the lipid bilayer 9. This cross-section is preferably no more than 70%, more preferably no more than 50% of the area of the lipid bilayer 9. This is because the . outer portion of the lipid bilayer 9 adjacent the septum 6 typically is not fully formed. Accordingly the small size of the end surface 42 of the probe 41 allows the probe to be aligned with the central portion of the lipid bilayer 9 which has the best properties for insertion of a membrane protein. Typically, the diameter of the end surface 42 of the probe 41 is in the range from 5μm to 50 μm.
The probe 41 is formed as the tip of a rod 43 which may be a solid rod or may be a capillary. This facilitates manufacture by drawing the probe 41 using a capillary puller which is readily available commercially for example from the company Narishige. Using this puller process, the shape and sharpness of the probe 41 can be controlled by controlling the settings of the puller. After pulling the tip of the rod 43 to form the probe 41, the end surface 42 is heated to flatten out the roughness of the end surface 42. The conduit through the rod 43 is closed by the pulling process and does not have any consequence to the use of the probe 41 in the present method. Although this manufacturing process is convenient, the manufacturing process and the nature of the resultant probe 41 are not essential. In general, it is possible to replace the probe 41 by any form of probe which has an end surface which is smaller than the lipid bilayer 9. Successful experimental results have even been achieved by replacing the probe 41 by the needle of a cactus plant which, it has been discovered, happens to be of the correct size. The end surface 42 of the probe 41 may be treated to increase the affinity of the material of the probe 41 for the membrane protein or other molecule to be delivered to the lipid bilayer 9.
One option is to treat the end surface 42 by coating it. One possible coating is an adsorbed layer of polyethylene imine (PEI). For example, this may be achieved by a solution of PEI (e.g. at a concentration of 50% w/w) onto the end surface 42 and subsequently removing the excess PEI using a cotton wool bud. PEI advantageously increases the affinity for negatively charged membrane proteins such as αHL. Other polyelectrolytes and other materials are equally suitable.
Another possible treatment is chemical modification of the end surface 42. An example of a suitable modification is a silane modification, such as an alkyl- silane modification. An example of such a silane modification is disclosed in "Silane-modified surfaces for biomaterial immobilization", Shriver-Lake, Lisa C, Naval Research Laboratory, Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Washington DC, USA5 Editor(s): Cass, Tonly; Ligler, Frances S. Immobilized Biomolecules in Analysis (1998), 1-14., Oxford University Press.
Accordingly, the probe 41 is a microscopic element which allows it to be manipulated by a mechanical system. In particular the probe 41 is manipulated by a micro-manipulator 50 as will now be described. The rod 43 is mounted on a column 44 suspended from a block 45 which is itself mounted on a link arm 46 of the micro- manipulator 50. The block 45 is transparent to allow the probe 41 to be seen inside the chamber portion 3 of the electrophysiology cell 1. The micro-manipulator 50 is of a conventional type, for example as supplied by the company Narishige. The micromanipulator 50 provides controlled movement of the probe 41 in three dimensions. The method of using the second apparatus 40 will now be described. It is noted that the small size of the probe 41 in the second apparatus 40 requires there to be greater control over the movement of the probe 41 than is needed for the probe 10 in the first apparatus 30. The micro-manipulator 50 provides such control, hi fact two types of control are necessary.
The first type of control is to align the probe 41 with the lipid bilayer 9 by moving the probe 41 parallel to the lipid bilayer 9. This alignment may be achieved by viewing the probe 41 as it moves towards the lipid bilayer 9, for example using a stereo-microscope while the electrophysiology cell 1 is illuminated under a bright light. After this alignment has been performed once, the position settings on of the micro-manipulator 50 may be fixed to maintain this alignment. The second type of control is control of the movement of the probe 41 towards the lipid bilayer 19. The small size of the probe 41 enables it to stretch the lipid bilayer 9 by a significant amount, and perhaps even to penetrate the lipid bilayer 9 without causing rupture (although this currently remains unclear).
It is necessary to stop the movement with the end surface 42 in engagement with the lipid bilayer 9. This control of the movement of the probe 41 is carried out by performing an initial calibration step during which the capacitance of the lipid bilayer 9 is monitored. To monitor the capacitance, there is applied across the electrodes 8 and hence across the lipid bilayer 9 a voltage waveform in the shape of an oscillating ramp having a slope of constant magnitude but alternating in sign. The output current is then monitored. The magnitude output current is proportional to the slope of the ramp of the voltage signal (which is a constant) and is also proportional to the capacitance of the lipid bilayer 9. The current changes between a positive and negative current as the sign of the ramp voltage changes. As a result, the output current signal is a square wave having an amplitude proportional to the capacitance of the lipid bilayer 9. Thus the output current signal is monitored to monitor the capacitance of the lipid bilayer 9.
During the calibration step, the probe 41 is moved at a slow rate towards the lipid bilayer 9. When the probe 41 comes into engagement with the lipid bilayer 9, this causes the monitored capacitance to change. When this is detected from the output current signal, the movement of the probe 41 is stopped. At this point of engagement, at least part of the end surface 42 is in engagement with the lipid bilayer 9. The probe 41 may locally deform the lipid bilayer 9 so that in increased area of the end surface 42 and even part of the side surfaces 47 engage the lipid bilayer 9.
The position of the probe 41 is noted. Subsequently the micro-manipulator 50 may be used to return the probe 41 to the same position determined during this calibration step without the need to monitor the capacitance again.
Whilst the micro-manipulator 50 is effective to provide the necessary degree of control, such control may be achieved in other ways, for example by using mechanical stops or by driving the movement of the probe 41 using a robot controlled by a microprocessor running an appropriate program.
After the alignment of the probe 41 with the lipid bilayer 9 and the calibration step have been carried out, the probe 41 may be used to deliver a membrane protein (or other type of molecule) to the lipid bilayer 9 as follows.
Firstly, the membrane protein is deposited on the end surface 42 of the probe 41. This may be achieved simply by pushing the end surface 42 of the probe 41 into a drop of a solution of the membrane protein. This causes the membrane protein to be adsorbed onto the end surface 42 and has the advantage of requiring only a small amount of the solution. Alternatively, the deposition could be carried out in any other way, for example as described above with reference to the first apparatus 30. After deposition of the membrane protein, the probe 41 is mounted in place in the second apparatus 40. Then, the lipid bilayer 9 is formed across the aperture 7 using the conventional technique described above.
Next, the probe 41 is moved to engage the end surface 42 of the probe 41 against the lipid bilayer 9, using the micro-manipulator 50 to achieve the correct alignment and to move the probe 41 to the correct position determined in the calibration step or as seen in a stereo-microscope.
Engagement of the end surface 42 against the lipid bilayer 9 causes the membrane protein supported on the end surface 42 to be inserted into the lipid bilayer 9. Such insertion typically takes a few seconds and may be monitored as described above with reference to the first apparatus 30.
After insertion of a membrane protein into the lipid bilayer 9, the probe 41 may be maintained in position or disengaged from the lipid bilayer 9 as described above with reference to the first apparatus 30. Subsequently, an experimental process appropriate to the membrane protein in question may be performed in a conventional manner.
By way of example, the method described above has been performed to insert a number of different membrane proteins into a lipid bilayer 9. The results of these experiments will now be described with reference to Figs. 7 to 10 which are each a graph of the electrical current signal output with a different membrane protein inserted into lipid bilayer 9.
The following methods were performed using the first apparatus 30 of Fig. 1.
The method was performed to insert WT (wild type) αHL protein pores which were deposited from solution onto the probe 10. The detected current signal is shown in Fig. 7 for an applied voltage of minus 5OmV. In this case, the buffer solution used in the chamber portions 3 was IM KCl, 10 mM MOPS at pH 7.00. The form of the detected current signal and the current v. voltage relationship for the signal were indistinguishable from those obtained using the same protein pores inserted by the conventional technique of simply placing the protein pore in solution and waiting for insertion. This type of protein pore binds γ-cyclodextrin. The binding kinetics and current attenuation of γ-cyclodextrin binding (15μM) was the same for the protein pore inserted using the present method as for pores inserted by the conventional method. On the basis of these results, it is understood that the use of the probe 10 achieves proper insertion of the membrane protein without altering the properties of the lipid bilayer 9 or the membrane protein itself. The method has also been performed to insert WT αHL protein pores firstly from an in vitro translation/transcription mix containing rRNA, tRNA, DNA, buffer, amino acids robosomes and lipids and secondly deposited onto the probe 10 by rubbing the probe 10 over a bacterial colony. In the latter case an E. CoIi bacterial colony was lysed on an agar plate by applying 0.5μL of lysis buffer, including surfactants and other components to break the cell membranes, hi both cases, results were achieved similar to that shown in Fig. 7 thereby demonstrating insertion of the WT αHL protein pores rather than any other components of the in vitro translation/transcription mix or the bacterial colony.
The method was also performed to insert a WT KcsA channel (a K+ channel from Streptomyces lividans). In this case the solution in the chamber portions 3 was 15OmM KCl buffered with 10OmM potassium phthalate at pH 4.0. Fig. 8 shows the detected current signal with the channel gating under an applied potential of minus 15OmV. Since the opening events of these channels was rare, the probe 10 was left with the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 engaged with the lipid bilayer 9 during the entire electrical recording in order to maximise the number of channels inserted into the lipid bilayer 9. As can be seen from Fig. 8, the detected current signal shows events which are characteristic of the opening of the channel.
Subsequently, the probe 10 was moved to disengage the protruding surface 15 of the gel 14 from the lipid bilayer 9. In this case, the same events were observed in the detected current signal. On this basis, it is understood that the engagement of the protruding surfaces 15 of the gel 14 with the lipid bilayer 9 did not interfere with the experimental process.
The method was also performed to insert a leukocidin pore using a buffer solution IM KCl, 1OmM MOPS at pH 7.00. The detected current signal after disengagement of the probe 10 is shown in Fig. 9 with an applied potential of minus 4OmV. The level of the detected current signal shows that the pore is open.
The following methods were performed using the second apparatus 40 of Fig.
4 and demonstrate the effectiveness of the method as applied to high- throughput screening. The method was performed to insert αHL protein pores from αHL-expressing bacterial colonies disposed on an agar plate. Each time, the plate was arranged with
100 colonies of which around 95 to 99 colonies expressed WT αHL and the remainder expressed αHL mutant Ml 13F/K147N. The number and location of the different types of colonies were not revealed to the plate screener. The method was performed in respect of each colony. The αHL protein pore was deposited on the probe by rubbing the probe over the colony.
Although the proteins were expressed in the cytoplasm of bacteria, it was not necessary to lyse or chemically treat the colonies. It is likely that enough protein was supplied by a fraction of bacteria in a colony that spontaneously lysed. Probe tips could be cleaned after screening a colony by dragging through fresh agar and the cleaned tips did not produce pores.
The protein pore was inserted into the lipid bilayer 9 and the detected current signal was monitored. After recording from a pore, it was not necessary to clean the cell 1 before moving to the next sample. Instead, the system was reset by breaking ' and reforming the lipid bilayer 9. These manipulations improved the speed of screening.
The probe 41 was fixed to the micro-manipulator 50, lowered into the cis chamber portion 3 of the cell 1 and engaged with the lipid bilayer 9. The probe 41 could be engaged with the lipid bilayer 9 while recording. The time needed for single or multiple pores to insert varied. The availability of protein from different colonies was not consistent. Generally, αHL colonies (WT or mutant) were potent, meaning that even a brief engagement (~0.5 sec) of the probe 41 with the lipid bilayer 9 caused multiple pores to insert. To record single pores from these colonies, the lipid bilayer 9 was broken with an electrical pulse, reformed and the probe 41 reengaged. This process was repeated until the amount of pore-forming protein on the probe 41 was reduced enough to allow the insertion of single pores. Engagement/withdrawal of the probe 41 and reformation of the lipid bilayer 9 could be repeated at least 5 times per minute. However, typically, only two to four iterations were needed to obtain single functional pores. The detected current signal allowed the two types of αHL protein pore to be distinguished. Both types of αHL form pores of similar ionic conductance. However, only the mutant αHL binds the molecular adapter βCD from the cis side. The plate was screened by the probe method. Both cis and trans chamber portion 3 contained 1OmM MOPS, IM KCl, pH 7.0, and the lipid bilayer 9 was held at -50 mV. Recording was performed with 90 μM βCD in the cis chamber portion 3. βCD bound to the mutant pores but not the WT pores.
WT αHL showed a stepwise increase in current with each pore that inserted into the bilayer. An example for the case of four pores is shown in Fig. 1OA. However, the Ml 13F/K147N mutant bound the βCD, giving a characteristic attenuation of the current. An example in the case of two pores is shown in Fig. 1 OB. After screening all 100 colonies, the mutant-expressing colonies were found at positions that corresponded exactly to those subsequently revealed by the plate preparer.
This experiment demonstrates rapid screening for rare instances of novel function in a background of WT pores.
Next, the method was performed to deposit two protein subunits which combined to yield an active protein pore, in particular leukocidin which is composed of two different monomers, four Luk F and four Luk S subunits, arranged in alternating fashion around a central axis to give an octameric pore. Separate E. coli colonies expressing WT Luk F and WT Luk S were scraped from agar plates, placed together on a fresh agar surface and mixed thoroughly with a scalpel blade but were not lysed. Remarkably, it was found that the probe 41 could be dipped into the bacterial mixture and engaged with the lipid bilayer 9 to produce WT leukocidin pores. Thus, it was possible to assemble fully functional bi-component membrane pores from separate components without purification. The insertion of single leukocidin pores usually required longer probe engagements than those used for αHL colonies, which might be expected because leukocidin has a much lower activity than αHL in hemolytic assays. Typically, using freshly mixed colonies, the probe 41 might be engaged with the lipid bilayer 9 for several seconds before a single pore inserted. However, mixed colonies often became more potent with time, some yielding as many pores per second as αHL colonies. Mixtures of leukocidin colonies could be stored for at least one month at 4°C on agar plates and still produce protein pores by the probe method.
Previously, it has been shown that certain amino acids in the β barrel of αHL can be mutated to enhance the binding of βCD (both αHL and βCD have 7-fold axial symmetry).
For example, when the Ml 13 residue of αHL is mutated to phenylalanine, the duration of binding of βCD is ~3 x 104 times longer in comparison to WT αHL. The permethylated form of βCD, TRIMEB, binds to Ml 13F αHL ~4 times longer than βCD. Based on these findings, it was hypothesized that similar modifications could be made in the β barrel of leukocidin, such that the mutant proteins would bind permethylated γCD, TRIMEG (both leukocidin and TRIMEG have 8-fold axial symmetry).
Based on sequence homology, the crystal structure of the αHL heptamer and the crystal structures of the Luk F (HIgB), Luk F (PV) and Luk S (PV) monomers, the alignment of amino acids in the β strands of the barrel was modelled for all three monomers. Mutations were made that replaced natural amino acids at various positions along the β strands of Luk F and Luk S with phenylalanine. Inside the β barrel, the mutated residues might align to form a ring of eight phenylalanines or two separated rings of four phenylalanines. By anology with αHL Ml 13F, it was hypothesized that the aligned phenylalanine residues would create a form of leukocidin that binds TRIMEG.
Previously, mutant leukocidins were prepared by expressing individual monomers of Luk F and Luk S by IVTT. The monomers were then assembled on rabbit red blood cell membranes to obtain octamers. The octamers were subsequently gel purified.
In contrast, in the present method, the far more rapid probe procedure was used to obtain functional leukocidin pores from mutant subunits. For each of thirty- five new combinations of the two subunits, three individual pores were examined and the kinetic data were averaged. The Luk F Ql 12F/Luk S S 108 F combination bound TRIMEG longer than any other combination by at least two orders of magnitude, while WT leukocidin bound TRIMEG with the shortest dwell time. These data suggest that the amino acids at Ml 13, Ql 12, and S108 share similar locations and orientations in αHL, Luk F and Luk S respectively. This experiment supports the idea that the βPFT from the colonies is monomelic. In this case, the water-soluble monomers must assemble after mixing. The bacterial strains- used in these experiments must have endogenous membrane channels and pores. However, interference from these was not observed in the electrical recordings. The transfer of over-expressed proteins from bacterial colonies to planar bilayers is inefficient and it is reasonable to expect that the insertion of endogenous proteins will occur infrequently. While inefficient transfer would be undesirable in bulk assays, it is ideally suited for screening by single-channel recording.
While this massive data collection would have been laborious by alternative approaches, the application of mixed Luk colonies with the glass probe allowed efficient screening. This clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of the present method in allowing high through-out screening.
The experimental results reported above demonstrate insertion of examples from the two major classes of membrane protein, that is β-barrels (eg the αHL pore and the leukocidin pore) and α-helical bundles (eg the K+ channel) can be inserted using the present method. On this basis, it is understood that any membrane protein could similarly be inserted into a planar lipid bilayer 9. The method is expected to allow delivery of any material, including cell lysates or fractions, containing insoluble membrane proteins directly from their native environment to the lipid bilayer 9.
Similarly, it is expected that the same technique could be applied to insert membrane proteins into any other lipid bilayer 9, for example a cell membrane, an organelle membrane or a liposome.
It is expected that the present method could be applied to deliver molecules other than membrane proteins to a lipid bilayer 9. One example is that the method could be applied to deliver an analyte to a lipid bilayer 9 in which a membrane protein is already inserted. This would have the advantage of increasing the local concentration of the analyte adjacent to the membrane protein. It would also improve the ability to analyse analytes which are relatively insoluble in an aqueous solution.

Claims

Claims
1. A method of delivering a molecule to a lipid bilayer, the method comprising: providing a macroscopic probe capable of holding the molecule on a carrier surface thereof; depositing the molecule on the carrier surface of the probe; moving the probe to engage the carrier surface against the lipid bilayer.
2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the molecule is a membrane protein, the method comprises a method of inserting the membrane protein into the lipid bilayer, and said step of moving the probe to engage the carrier surface against the lipid bilayer causes the membrane protein to be inserted into the lipid bilayer.
3. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the lipid bilayer has a membrane protein inserted therein, the molecule is an analyte, and said step of moving the probe to engage the carrier surface against the lipid bilayer allows the analyte to interact with the membrane protein.
4. A method according to claim 2, wherein the carrier surface is capable of holding the membrane protein less strongly than the lipid bilayer, and the method further comprises, after said step of moving the probe to engage the carrier surface of the probe with the lipid bilayer, moving the probe to disengage the carrier surface of the probe against the lipid bilayer, thereby leaving the inserted membrane protein in the lipid bilayer.
5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the probe is capable of holding the molecule by adsorbing the molecule on said carrier surface.
6. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the probe comprises a body having a drop of gel protruding from the body, the gel being capable of holding the molecule on a protruding surface thereof which protruding surface constitutes said carrier surface.
7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the gel is a hydrogel.
8. A method according to claim 7, wherein the gel is either agarose gel or a synthetic gel.
9. A method according to claim 8, wherein the gel is polyacrylamide.
10. A method according to any one of claims 6 to 9, wherein the body has a recess and the drop of gel is in the recess.
11. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the carrier surface is the surface of a material through which an aqueous solution may diffuse
12. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein said carrier surface is a surface of a solid.
13. A method according to claim 12, wherein the carrier surface is treated to increase the affinity for the membrane protein.
14. A method according to claim 13, wherein the carrier surface is treated by a silane modification.
15. A method according to claim 12, wherein the carrier surface has a coating of material.
16. A method according to any one of claims 11 to 15, wherein said solid is glass.
17. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 11 , wherein said carrier surface has an area which is greater than the area of the lipid bilayer.
18. A method according to claim 18, wherein said carrier surface has an area which is greater than the area of the lipid bilayer by at least an order of magnitude.
19. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said carrier surface has an area which is at least lmm2.
20. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 5 or 11 to 15, wherein said carrier surface is smaller than the lipid bilayer.
21. A method according to claim 20, wherein said carrier surface has an area which is at most 70% of the area of the lipid bilayer.
22. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said step of depositing the molecule on the carrier surface of the probe comprises depositing a solution containing the molecule on the carrier surface of the probe.
23. A method according to any one claims 1 to 21, wherein said step of depositing the molecule on the carrier surface of the probe comprises rubbing the carrier surface of the probe over a sample containing the molecule.
24. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the molecule is a membrane protein which is a pore or a channel.
25. A method according to claim 24, wherein the membrane protein is a β-barrel or an α-helical bundle.
26. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the lipid bilayer is a planar lipid bilayer.
27. A method according to claim 26, wherein the lipid bilayer is formed in an apparatus comprising a chamber body defining a chamber, a wall of the chamber having an aperture in which the lipid bilayer is formed, the chamber containing an aqueous solution.
28. A method according to claim 27, wherein the molecule is a membrane protein which is a pore or a channel and the apparatus further comprises an electrical circuit capable of measuring an electrical signal across the lipid bilayer.
29. A method according to claim 27 or 28, wherein the probe is mounted on the chamber body to allow movement of the probe to engage the carrier surface against the lipid bilayer.
30. A method according to any one of claims 27 to 29, wherein the chamber has an opening in the upper surface of the chamber, the wall having an aperture being formed in a side surface of the chamber, and the probe comprises: a body having said carrier surface, and an arm supporting the body in said chamber and extending out of the chamber through said opening to allow manipulation of the probe.
31. A method according to claim 30, wherein the probe further comprises a boom mounted on the chamber body and supporting the arm.
32. A method according to claim 29 or 31, wherein the probe is pivotally mounted on the chamber body.
33. An apparatus for performing stochastic sensing with a membrane protein, the apparatus comprising: a chamber body defining a chamber capable of containing an aqueous solution, a wall of the chamber having an aperture capable of supporting a lipid bilayer across the aperture; a macroscopic probe capable of holding the molecule on a carrier surface thereof, the probe being movably mounted on the chamber body to allow movement of the carrier surface against the aperture for engagement of the carrier surface against a lipid bilayer supported across the aperture.
34. A method of inserting a membrane protein into a lipid bilayer, the method comprising: providing a macroscopic probe capable of holding the membrane protein on a carrier surface thereof; depositing the membrane protein on the carrier surface of the probe; moving the probe to engage the carrier surface of the probe against the lipid bilayer, thereby causing the membrane protein to be inserted into the lipid bilayer.
PCT/GB2006/001057 2005-03-23 2006-03-22 Deliver of molecules to a li id bila WO2006100484A2 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/884,927 US7939270B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2006-03-22 Delivery of molecules to a lipid bilayer
EP06726479A EP1861071B1 (en) 2005-03-23 2006-03-22 Deliver of molecules to a lipid bilayer
AT06726479T ATE473438T1 (en) 2005-03-23 2006-03-22 DELIVERY OF MOLECULES TO A LIPIDE DOUBLE LAYER
DE602006015292T DE602006015292D1 (en) 2005-03-23 2006-03-22 INTRODUCTION OF MOLECULES TO A LIPID DOUBLE LAYER
JP2008502471A JP5253148B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2006-03-22 Delivery of molecules to the lipid bilayer

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0505971.2 2005-03-23
GBGB0505971.2A GB0505971D0 (en) 2005-03-23 2005-03-23 Delivery of molecules to a lipid bilayer

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006100484A2 true WO2006100484A2 (en) 2006-09-28
WO2006100484A3 WO2006100484A3 (en) 2008-05-29

Family

ID=34531741

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2006/001057 WO2006100484A2 (en) 2005-03-23 2006-03-22 Deliver of molecules to a li id bila

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US7939270B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1861071B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5253148B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE473438T1 (en)
DE (1) DE602006015292D1 (en)
GB (1) GB0505971D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2006100484A2 (en)

Cited By (117)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2446823A (en) * 2007-02-20 2008-08-27 Oxford Nanolabs Ltd Formulation of lipid bilayers
WO2008102121A1 (en) * 2007-02-20 2008-08-28 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Formation of lipid bilayers
GB2447043A (en) * 2007-02-20 2008-09-03 Oxford Nanolabs Ltd Lipid bilayer sensor system
WO2010086602A1 (en) 2009-01-30 2010-08-05 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Hybridization linkers
US8124191B2 (en) * 2007-11-30 2012-02-28 Electronic Bio Sciences, Llc Method and apparatus for single side bilayer formation
WO2012033524A2 (en) 2010-09-07 2012-03-15 The Regents Of The University Of California Control of dna movement in a nanopore at one nucleotide precision by a processive enzyme
WO2012095660A2 (en) 2011-01-12 2012-07-19 Isis Innovation Limited Method using fluorinated amphiphiles
WO2012107778A2 (en) 2011-02-11 2012-08-16 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant pores
WO2012164270A1 (en) 2011-05-27 2012-12-06 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Coupling method
WO2013014451A1 (en) 2011-07-25 2013-01-31 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Hairpin loop method for double strand polynucleotide sequencing using transmembrane pores
WO2013057495A2 (en) 2011-10-21 2013-04-25 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme method
WO2013098561A1 (en) 2011-12-29 2013-07-04 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method for characterising a polynucelotide by using a xpd helicase
WO2013098562A2 (en) 2011-12-29 2013-07-04 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme method
WO2013121224A1 (en) 2012-02-16 2013-08-22 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Analysis of measurements of a polymer
WO2013121201A1 (en) 2012-02-15 2013-08-22 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Aptamer method
WO2013153359A1 (en) 2012-04-10 2013-10-17 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant lysenin pores
EP2682460A1 (en) 2008-07-07 2014-01-08 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme-pore constructs
WO2014013262A1 (en) 2012-07-19 2014-01-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme construct
WO2014013259A1 (en) 2012-07-19 2014-01-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Ssb method
WO2014013260A1 (en) 2012-07-19 2014-01-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modified helicases
WO2014064444A1 (en) 2012-10-26 2014-05-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Droplet interfaces
WO2014072703A1 (en) 2012-11-06 2014-05-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Quadruplex method
US8784929B2 (en) 2007-08-21 2014-07-22 Isis Innovation Limited Bilayers
US8785211B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2014-07-22 Isis Innovation Limited Methods using pores
US8822160B2 (en) 2007-10-05 2014-09-02 Isis Innovation Limited Molecular adaptors
WO2014135838A1 (en) 2013-03-08 2014-09-12 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme stalling method
WO2015055981A2 (en) 2013-10-18 2015-04-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modified enzymes
WO2015056028A1 (en) 2013-10-18 2015-04-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of characterizing a target ribonucleic acid (rna) comprising forming a complementary polynucleotide which moves through a transmembrane pore
WO2015081178A1 (en) 2013-11-26 2015-06-04 Illumina, Inc. Compositions and methods for polynucleotide sequencing
EP2886663A1 (en) 2013-12-19 2015-06-24 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Nanopore sequencing using replicative polymerases and helicases
WO2015110813A1 (en) 2014-01-22 2015-07-30 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method for attaching one or more polynucleotide binding proteins to a target polynucleotide
WO2015150787A1 (en) 2014-04-04 2015-10-08 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of target molecule characterisation using a molecular pore
WO2016055778A1 (en) 2014-10-07 2016-04-14 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant pores
WO2016055777A2 (en) 2014-10-07 2016-04-14 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modified enzymes
WO2016059375A1 (en) 2014-10-17 2016-04-21 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Methods for delivering an analyte to transmembrane pores
WO2016059363A1 (en) 2014-10-14 2016-04-21 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
US9415422B2 (en) 2006-03-10 2016-08-16 Siemens Industry, Inc. Mail sorting system
WO2016132123A1 (en) 2015-02-19 2016-08-25 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Hetero-pores
WO2016132124A1 (en) 2015-02-19 2016-08-25 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
US9551023B2 (en) 2012-09-14 2017-01-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Sample preparation method
US9562887B2 (en) 2008-11-14 2017-02-07 Oxford University Innovation Limited Methods of enhancing translocation of charged analytes through transmembrane protein pores
WO2017098322A1 (en) 2015-12-08 2017-06-15 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Ku Leuven Research & Development Modified nanopores, compositions comprising the same, and uses thereof
US9732381B2 (en) 2009-03-25 2017-08-15 Oxford University Innovation Limited Method for sequencing a heteropolymeric target nucleic acid sequence
WO2017149316A1 (en) 2016-03-02 2017-09-08 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant pore
WO2017174990A1 (en) 2016-04-06 2017-10-12 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant pore
US9797013B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2017-10-24 The Regents Of The University Of California Compositions, devices, systems, and methods for using a nanopore
WO2017203269A1 (en) 2016-05-25 2017-11-30 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of nanopore sequencing of concatenaded nucleic acids
US9927398B2 (en) 2007-12-19 2018-03-27 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Formation of layers of amphiphilic molecules
WO2018060740A1 (en) 2016-09-29 2018-04-05 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method for nucleic acid detection by guiding through a nanopore
WO2018073604A1 (en) 2016-10-21 2018-04-26 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
WO2018100370A1 (en) 2016-12-01 2018-06-07 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Methods and systems for characterizing analytes using nanopores
US10006905B2 (en) 2013-03-25 2018-06-26 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Nanopore biosensors for detection of proteins and nucleic acids
WO2018146491A1 (en) 2017-02-10 2018-08-16 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modified nanopores, compositions comprising the same, and uses thereof
WO2018203071A1 (en) 2017-05-04 2018-11-08 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of determining the presence or absence of a target analyte comprising using a reporter polynucleotide and a transmembrane pore
US10131943B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2018-11-20 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Analysis of a polynucleotide via a nanopore system
WO2018211241A1 (en) 2017-05-04 2018-11-22 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Transmembrane pore consisting of two csgg pores
GB201818216D0 (en) 2018-11-08 2018-12-26 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Pore
US10167503B2 (en) 2014-05-02 2019-01-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Mutant pores
WO2019081442A1 (en) * 2017-10-23 2019-05-02 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag Removing and reinserting protein nanopores in a membrane using osmotic imbalance
US10338056B2 (en) 2012-02-13 2019-07-02 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Apparatus for supporting an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules and method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules
US10337060B2 (en) 2014-04-04 2019-07-02 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Method for characterising a double stranded nucleic acid using a nano-pore and anchor molecules at both ends of said nucleic acid
GB201907246D0 (en) 2019-05-22 2019-07-03 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Method
GB201907244D0 (en) 2019-05-22 2019-07-03 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Method
US10343350B2 (en) 2010-02-08 2019-07-09 Genia Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods for forming a nanopore in a lipid bilayer
US10392658B2 (en) 2014-01-22 2019-08-27 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Method for controlling the movement of a polynucleotide through a transmembrane pore
US10400014B2 (en) 2014-09-01 2019-09-03 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Mutant CsgG pores
GB201913997D0 (en) 2019-09-27 2019-11-13 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Method
WO2019224558A1 (en) 2018-05-24 2019-11-28 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method for selecting polynucleotides based on the size in a globular form
US10501767B2 (en) 2013-08-16 2019-12-10 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Polynucleotide modification methods
WO2019234432A1 (en) 2018-06-06 2019-12-12 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
US10519499B2 (en) 2014-07-31 2019-12-31 Illumina, Inc. Hybrid nanopore sensors
GB201917060D0 (en) 2019-11-22 2020-01-08 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Method
WO2020016573A1 (en) 2018-07-16 2020-01-23 Oxford University Innovation Limited Molecular hopper
US10549274B2 (en) 2014-10-17 2020-02-04 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Electrical device with detachable components
WO2020025909A1 (en) 2018-07-30 2020-02-06 Oxford University Innovation Limited Assemblies
WO2020095052A1 (en) 2018-11-08 2020-05-14 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Pore
GB202004944D0 (en) 2020-04-03 2020-05-20 King S College London Method
US10669578B2 (en) 2014-02-21 2020-06-02 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Sample preparation method
US10689697B2 (en) 2014-10-16 2020-06-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Analysis of a polymer
WO2020128517A1 (en) 2018-12-21 2020-06-25 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of encoding data on a polynucleotide strand
US10712254B2 (en) 2013-09-23 2020-07-14 Oxford University Innovation Limited Method of analyzing post-translational modifications
WO2020183172A1 (en) 2019-03-12 2020-09-17 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Inc. Nanopore sensing device and methods of operation and of forming it
WO2020188235A1 (en) 2019-03-19 2020-09-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Current measurement apparatus, molecular entity sensing apparatus, method of measuring a current, method of sensing a molecular entity
WO2020208357A1 (en) 2019-04-09 2020-10-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Pore
US10814298B2 (en) 2012-10-26 2020-10-27 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Formation of array of membranes and apparatus therefor
WO2021078971A2 (en) 2019-10-25 2021-04-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Improved nanopore sensing device, components and method of manufacture
WO2021111139A1 (en) 2019-12-04 2021-06-10 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
WO2021111125A1 (en) 2019-12-02 2021-06-10 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of characterising a target polypeptide using a nanopore
GB202107192D0 (en) 2021-05-19 2021-06-30 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Method
GB202107354D0 (en) 2021-05-24 2021-07-07 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Method
US11169138B2 (en) 2015-04-14 2021-11-09 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Nanopores with internal protein adaptors
WO2021255477A1 (en) 2020-06-18 2021-12-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of repeatedly moving a double-stranded polynucleotide through a nanopore
WO2021255414A1 (en) 2020-06-17 2021-12-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Nanopore support structure and manufacture thereof
WO2021255475A1 (en) 2020-06-18 2021-12-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited A method of selectively characterising a polynucleotide using a detector
WO2021255476A2 (en) 2020-06-18 2021-12-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
WO2022013551A1 (en) 2020-07-17 2022-01-20 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Nanopore sensing device
WO2022074397A1 (en) 2020-10-08 2022-04-14 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modification of a nanopore forming protein oligomer
GB202204919D0 (en) 2022-04-04 2022-05-18 Oxford Nanopore Tech Plc Method
US11352664B2 (en) 2009-01-30 2022-06-07 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Adaptors for nucleic acid constructs in transmembrane sequencing
EP4063521A1 (en) 2016-05-25 2022-09-28 Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC Method of nanopore sequencing
WO2022243692A1 (en) 2021-05-19 2022-11-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Methods for complement strand sequencing
US11572387B2 (en) 2017-06-30 2023-02-07 Vib Vzw Protein pores
WO2023026056A1 (en) 2021-08-26 2023-03-02 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Nanopore
US11596940B2 (en) 2016-07-06 2023-03-07 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Microfluidic device
US11649480B2 (en) 2016-05-25 2023-05-16 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method for modifying a template double stranded polynucleotide
WO2023118404A1 (en) 2021-12-23 2023-06-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Pore
WO2023118891A1 (en) 2021-12-23 2023-06-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method of characterising polypeptides using a nanopore
WO2023118892A1 (en) 2021-12-23 2023-06-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method
GB202307486D0 (en) 2023-05-18 2023-07-05 Oxford Nanopore Tech Plc Method
US11725205B2 (en) 2018-05-14 2023-08-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Methods and polynucleotides for amplifying a target polynucleotide
WO2023198911A2 (en) 2022-04-14 2023-10-19 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Novel modified protein pores and enzymes
WO2023222657A1 (en) 2022-05-17 2023-11-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method and adaptors
WO2024033421A2 (en) 2022-08-09 2024-02-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Novel pore monomers and pores
WO2024033443A1 (en) 2022-08-09 2024-02-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Novel pore monomers and pores
WO2024033422A1 (en) 2022-08-09 2024-02-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Novel pore monomers and pores
WO2024033447A1 (en) 2022-08-09 2024-02-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc De novo pores
US11965183B2 (en) 2014-10-07 2024-04-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Modified enzymes

Families Citing this family (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4159298B2 (en) 2001-09-04 2008-10-01 シャープ株式会社 Vacuum cleaner and equipment
US9233846B2 (en) 2005-10-14 2016-01-12 The Regents Of The University Of California Formation and encapsulation of molecular bilayer and monolayer membranes
WO2007146158A1 (en) * 2006-06-07 2007-12-21 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Dna sequencing by nanopore using modified nucleotides
US8772041B2 (en) * 2008-05-22 2014-07-08 The Regents Of The University Of California Membrane precursors and membranes formed therefrom
US9678055B2 (en) 2010-02-08 2017-06-13 Genia Technologies, Inc. Methods for forming a nanopore in a lipid bilayer
US8324914B2 (en) * 2010-02-08 2012-12-04 Genia Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods for characterizing a molecule
CN107083421A (en) 2010-12-17 2017-08-22 纽约哥伦比亚大学理事会 The DNA detected using the nucleotides through modification and nano-pore is sequenced in synthesis
WO2012088341A2 (en) 2010-12-22 2012-06-28 Genia Technologies, Inc. Nanopore-based single dna molecule characterization, identification and isolation using speed bumps
US8962242B2 (en) 2011-01-24 2015-02-24 Genia Technologies, Inc. System for detecting electrical properties of a molecular complex
US9110478B2 (en) 2011-01-27 2015-08-18 Genia Technologies, Inc. Temperature regulation of measurement arrays
US8968539B2 (en) 2011-03-08 2015-03-03 Electronic Biosciences, Inc. Methods for voltage-induced protein incorporation into planar lipid bilayers
US9150598B2 (en) * 2011-10-05 2015-10-06 The Regents Of The University Of California Masking apertures enabling automation and solution exchange in sessile bilayers
GB201119032D0 (en) 2011-11-03 2011-12-14 Isis Innovation Multisomes: encapsulated droplet networks
US8986629B2 (en) 2012-02-27 2015-03-24 Genia Technologies, Inc. Sensor circuit for controlling, detecting, and measuring a molecular complex
ES2906186T3 (en) 2012-04-09 2022-04-13 Univ Columbia Method for the preparation of nanopore and uses thereof
CA2876095A1 (en) 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 Genia Technologies, Inc. Chip set-up and high-accuracy nucleic acid sequencing
EP3674412A1 (en) 2012-06-20 2020-07-01 The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York Nucleic acid sequencing by nanopore detection of tag molecules
GB201219201D0 (en) 2012-10-25 2012-12-12 Isis Innovation Hydrogel network
GB201219196D0 (en) 2012-10-25 2012-12-12 Isis Innovation Droplet assembly method
US9605309B2 (en) 2012-11-09 2017-03-28 Genia Technologies, Inc. Nucleic acid sequencing using tags
JP6416772B2 (en) * 2012-12-07 2018-10-31 オックスフォード ユニヴァーシティ イノヴェーション リミテッド Droplet collection by 3D printing
EP2746772B1 (en) 2012-12-20 2016-03-23 AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH Lipid membrane enveloped particles with membrane proteins
US9759711B2 (en) 2013-02-05 2017-09-12 Genia Technologies, Inc. Nanopore arrays
WO2014144898A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Method for detecting multiple predetermined compounds in a sample
US9551697B2 (en) 2013-10-17 2017-01-24 Genia Technologies, Inc. Non-faradaic, capacitively coupled measurement in a nanopore cell array
CA2926138A1 (en) 2013-10-23 2015-04-30 Genia Technologies, Inc. High speed molecular sensing with nanopores
US9322062B2 (en) 2013-10-23 2016-04-26 Genia Technologies, Inc. Process for biosensor well formation
MA39774A (en) 2014-03-24 2021-05-12 Roche Sequencing Solutions Inc CHEMICAL PROCESSES TO PRODUCE LABEL NUCLEOTIDES
KR20170135824A (en) 2015-01-26 2017-12-08 셀렉티스 T cell receptor knockout engineered immune cells that are believed to have chimeric antigen receptors that bind to CD123 for the treatment of dendritic cell neoplasms or recurrent / intractable acute myelogenous lymphoma of germ plasm cells.
JP2018059786A (en) * 2016-10-04 2018-04-12 住友化学株式会社 Device and method for detecting target material using olfactory receptor complex and method for manufacturing the detector

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6479288B1 (en) * 1998-02-17 2002-11-12 University Of Wales College Of Medicine Method and apparatus for introducing substances into the cell plasma membrane and/or cytosol

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3799743A (en) * 1971-11-22 1974-03-26 Alexander James Stable lysis responsive lipid bilayer
US6327410B1 (en) * 1997-03-14 2001-12-04 The Trustees Of Tufts College Target analyte sensors utilizing Microspheres
GB9712386D0 (en) * 1997-06-14 1997-08-13 Univ Coventry Biosensor
JP2002527358A (en) * 1998-08-31 2002-08-27 グリフォン サイエンシーズ Lipid matrix assisted chemical ligation method and synthesis of membrane polypeptide
JP3665720B2 (en) * 1999-09-24 2005-06-29 株式会社東芝 Sensor device
EP1352245B1 (en) * 2001-01-18 2006-08-16 Newcastle University Ventures Limited Biosensor with covalently attached membrane-spanning proteins
EP1504114B1 (en) 2002-05-10 2017-07-12 The Texas A & M University System Stochastic sensing through covalent interactions
JP4394916B2 (en) * 2003-09-19 2010-01-06 独立行政法人科学技術振興機構 Artificial lipid bilayer membrane formation apparatus, artificial lipid bilayer membrane formation method, and use thereof
WO2005071405A1 (en) * 2004-01-21 2005-08-04 Japan Science And Technology Agency Method of forming planar lipid double membrane for membrane protein analysis and apparatus therefor

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6479288B1 (en) * 1998-02-17 2002-11-12 University Of Wales College Of Medicine Method and apparatus for introducing substances into the cell plasma membrane and/or cytosol

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
HEGINBOTHAM LISE ET AL: "Single Streptomyces lividans K+ channels: Functional asymmetries and sidedness of proton activation" JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY, vol. 114, no. 4, October 1999 (1999-10), pages 551-559, XP002474003 ISSN: 0022-1295 *
HOLDEN MATTHEW A ET AL: "Direct introduction of single protein channels and pores into lipid bilayers" JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, vol. 127, no. 18, May 2005 (2005-05), pages 6502-6503, XP002474004 ISSN: 0002-7863 *
MOUNEIMNE Y ET AL: "Electroinsertion of xeno proteins in red blood cell membranes yields a long lived protein carrier in circulation" BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA. BIOMEMBRANES, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 1066, no. 1, 1 July 1991 (1991-07-01), pages 83-89, XP002977991 ISSN: 0005-2736 *

Cited By (255)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8785211B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2014-07-22 Isis Innovation Limited Methods using pores
US9415422B2 (en) 2006-03-10 2016-08-16 Siemens Industry, Inc. Mail sorting system
GB2446823A (en) * 2007-02-20 2008-08-27 Oxford Nanolabs Ltd Formulation of lipid bilayers
WO2008102121A1 (en) * 2007-02-20 2008-08-28 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Formation of lipid bilayers
GB2447043A (en) * 2007-02-20 2008-09-03 Oxford Nanolabs Ltd Lipid bilayer sensor system
US20100196203A1 (en) * 2007-02-20 2010-08-05 Gurdial Singh Sanghera Formation of Lipid Bilayers
US10215768B2 (en) 2007-02-20 2019-02-26 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Lipid bilayer sensor system
US10208342B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2019-02-19 The Regents Of The University Of California Compositions, devices, systems, and methods for using a nanopore
US10196688B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2019-02-05 The Regents Of The University Of California Compositions, devices, systems, and methods for using a nanopore
US10081835B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2018-09-25 The Regents Of The University Of California Nucleotide sequencing using an array of independently addressable nanopores
US10059988B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2018-08-28 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods for using a nanopore
US9797013B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2017-10-24 The Regents Of The University Of California Compositions, devices, systems, and methods for using a nanopore
US10202645B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2019-02-12 The Regents Of The University Of California Compositions, devices, systems, and methods for using a nanopore
US10344327B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2019-07-09 The Regents Of The University Of California Compositions, devices, systems, and methods for using a nanopore
US8784929B2 (en) 2007-08-21 2014-07-22 Isis Innovation Limited Bilayers
US8822160B2 (en) 2007-10-05 2014-09-02 Isis Innovation Limited Molecular adaptors
US8707892B2 (en) 2007-11-30 2014-04-29 Electronic Biosciences, Inc. Method and apparatus for single side bilayer formation
US8334024B1 (en) 2007-11-30 2012-12-18 Electronic Bio Sciences, Llc Method and apparatus for single side bilayer formation
US8124191B2 (en) * 2007-11-30 2012-02-28 Electronic Bio Sciences, Llc Method and apparatus for single side bilayer formation
US9927398B2 (en) 2007-12-19 2018-03-27 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Formation of layers of amphiphilic molecules
US10416117B2 (en) 2007-12-19 2019-09-17 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Formation of layers of amphiphilic molecules
US11898984B2 (en) 2007-12-19 2024-02-13 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Nanopore arrays for sequencing nucleic acids
US11859247B2 (en) 2008-07-07 2024-01-02 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Enzyme-pore constructs
US10077471B2 (en) 2008-07-07 2018-09-18 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Enzyme-pore constructs
US9885078B2 (en) 2008-07-07 2018-02-06 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme-pore constructs
EP2682460A1 (en) 2008-07-07 2014-01-08 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme-pore constructs
US11078530B2 (en) 2008-07-07 2021-08-03 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Enzyme-pore constructs
US9562887B2 (en) 2008-11-14 2017-02-07 Oxford University Innovation Limited Methods of enhancing translocation of charged analytes through transmembrane protein pores
WO2010086602A1 (en) 2009-01-30 2010-08-05 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Hybridization linkers
US11352664B2 (en) 2009-01-30 2022-06-07 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Adaptors for nucleic acid constructs in transmembrane sequencing
WO2010086603A1 (en) 2009-01-30 2010-08-05 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme mutant
US11459606B2 (en) 2009-01-30 2022-10-04 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Adaptors for nucleic acid constructs in transmembrane sequencing
EP3677691A1 (en) 2009-03-25 2020-07-08 Oxford University Innovation Limited Method for sequencing a heteropolymeric target nucleic acid sequence
US10669581B2 (en) 2009-03-25 2020-06-02 Oxford University Innovation Limited Method for sequencing a heteropolymeric target nucleic acid sequence
US9732381B2 (en) 2009-03-25 2017-08-15 Oxford University Innovation Limited Method for sequencing a heteropolymeric target nucleic acid sequence
US11027502B2 (en) 2010-02-08 2021-06-08 Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for forming a nanopore in a lipid bilayer
US10926486B2 (en) 2010-02-08 2021-02-23 Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for forming a nanopore in a lipid bilayer
US10456993B2 (en) 2010-02-08 2019-10-29 Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for forming a nanopore in a lipid bilayer
US10343350B2 (en) 2010-02-08 2019-07-09 Genia Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods for forming a nanopore in a lipid bilayer
WO2012033524A2 (en) 2010-09-07 2012-03-15 The Regents Of The University Of California Control of dna movement in a nanopore at one nucleotide precision by a processive enzyme
WO2012095660A2 (en) 2011-01-12 2012-07-19 Isis Innovation Limited Method using fluorinated amphiphiles
WO2012107778A2 (en) 2011-02-11 2012-08-16 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant pores
US9751915B2 (en) 2011-02-11 2017-09-05 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Mutant pores
US11041194B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2021-06-22 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Coupling method
EP3633370A1 (en) 2011-05-27 2020-04-08 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Coupling method
US11959135B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2024-04-16 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Coupling method
WO2012164270A1 (en) 2011-05-27 2012-12-06 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Coupling method
EP4273092A2 (en) 2011-05-27 2023-11-08 Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc Method and apparatus for determining the presence, absence or characteristics of an analyte
EP3848706A1 (en) 2011-05-27 2021-07-14 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Coupling method
US11946102B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2024-04-02 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Coupling method
US11136623B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2021-10-05 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Coupling method
US10246741B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2019-04-02 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Coupling method
US11261487B2 (en) 2011-07-25 2022-03-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Hairpin loop method for double strand polynucleotide sequencing using transmembrane pores
US10597713B2 (en) 2011-07-25 2020-03-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Hairpin loop method for double strand polynucleotide sequencing using transmembrane pores
US10851409B2 (en) 2011-07-25 2020-12-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Hairpin loop method for double strand polynucleotide sequencing using transmembrane pores
US11168363B2 (en) 2011-07-25 2021-11-09 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Hairpin loop method for double strand polynucleotide sequencing using transmembrane pores
WO2013014451A1 (en) 2011-07-25 2013-01-31 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Hairpin loop method for double strand polynucleotide sequencing using transmembrane pores
US9957560B2 (en) 2011-07-25 2018-05-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Hairpin loop method for double strand polynucleotide sequencing using transmembrane pores
US9758823B2 (en) 2011-10-21 2017-09-12 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme method
US10724087B2 (en) 2011-10-21 2020-07-28 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Enzyme method
EP2987870A1 (en) 2011-10-21 2016-02-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of characterizing a target polynucleotide using a transmembrane pore and molecular motor
WO2013057495A2 (en) 2011-10-21 2013-04-25 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme method
US11634763B2 (en) 2011-10-21 2023-04-25 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Enzyme method
WO2013098562A2 (en) 2011-12-29 2013-07-04 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme method
US9617591B2 (en) 2011-12-29 2017-04-11 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Method for characterising a polynucleotide by using a XPD helicase
WO2013098561A1 (en) 2011-12-29 2013-07-04 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method for characterising a polynucelotide by using a xpd helicase
US10385382B2 (en) 2011-12-29 2019-08-20 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Enzyme method
US11913936B2 (en) 2012-02-13 2024-02-27 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Apparatus for supporting an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules and method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules
US10338056B2 (en) 2012-02-13 2019-07-02 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Apparatus for supporting an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules and method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules
US11561216B2 (en) 2012-02-13 2023-01-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Apparatus for supporting an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules and method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules
WO2013121201A1 (en) 2012-02-15 2013-08-22 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Aptamer method
US10739341B2 (en) 2012-02-15 2020-08-11 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Aptamer method
US11959906B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2024-04-16 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Analysis of measurements of a polymer
WO2013121224A1 (en) 2012-02-16 2013-08-22 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Analysis of measurements of a polymer
EP3736339A1 (en) 2012-02-16 2020-11-11 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Analysis of measurements of a polymer
WO2013153359A1 (en) 2012-04-10 2013-10-17 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant lysenin pores
EP3192804A1 (en) 2012-04-10 2017-07-19 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant lysenin pores
US10882889B2 (en) 2012-04-10 2021-01-05 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Mutant lysenin pores
US11845780B2 (en) 2012-04-10 2023-12-19 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Mutant lysenin pores
US9777049B2 (en) 2012-04-10 2017-10-03 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Mutant lysenin pores
WO2014013260A1 (en) 2012-07-19 2014-01-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modified helicases
US11155860B2 (en) 2012-07-19 2021-10-26 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. SSB method
US9797009B2 (en) 2012-07-19 2017-10-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme construct
US10808231B2 (en) 2012-07-19 2020-10-20 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modified helicases
EP3741847A1 (en) 2012-07-19 2020-11-25 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modified helicases
US11525126B2 (en) 2012-07-19 2022-12-13 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Modified helicases
WO2014013262A1 (en) 2012-07-19 2014-01-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme construct
WO2014013259A1 (en) 2012-07-19 2014-01-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Ssb method
US9551023B2 (en) 2012-09-14 2017-01-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Sample preparation method
US10814298B2 (en) 2012-10-26 2020-10-27 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Formation of array of membranes and apparatus therefor
WO2014064444A1 (en) 2012-10-26 2014-05-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Droplet interfaces
WO2014072703A1 (en) 2012-11-06 2014-05-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Quadruplex method
US9995728B2 (en) 2012-11-06 2018-06-12 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Quadruplex method
US11085077B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2021-08-10 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Analysis of a polynucleotide via a nanopore system
US10131943B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2018-11-20 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Analysis of a polynucleotide via a nanopore system
WO2014135838A1 (en) 2013-03-08 2014-09-12 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Enzyme stalling method
US11560589B2 (en) 2013-03-08 2023-01-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Enzyme stalling method
US10221450B2 (en) 2013-03-08 2019-03-05 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Enzyme stalling method
US10006905B2 (en) 2013-03-25 2018-06-26 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Nanopore biosensors for detection of proteins and nucleic acids
US11761956B2 (en) 2013-03-25 2023-09-19 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Nanopore biosensors for detection of proteins and nucleic acids
US10802015B2 (en) 2013-03-25 2020-10-13 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Nanopore biosensors for detection of proteins and nucleic acids
US10976311B2 (en) 2013-03-25 2021-04-13 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Nanopore biosensors for detection of proteins and nucleic acids
US10514378B2 (en) 2013-03-25 2019-12-24 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Nanopore biosensors for detection of proteins and nucleic acids
US11186857B2 (en) 2013-08-16 2021-11-30 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Polynucleotide modification methods
US10501767B2 (en) 2013-08-16 2019-12-10 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Polynucleotide modification methods
US10712254B2 (en) 2013-09-23 2020-07-14 Oxford University Innovation Limited Method of analyzing post-translational modifications
US11592382B2 (en) 2013-09-23 2023-02-28 Oxford University Innovation Limited Method of analyzing post-translational modifications
US10724018B2 (en) 2013-10-18 2020-07-28 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Modified helicases
US11525125B2 (en) 2013-10-18 2022-12-13 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Modified helicases
EP4006168A1 (en) 2013-10-18 2022-06-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC Method of characterizing a target ribonucleic acid (rna) comprising forming a complementary polynucleotide which moves through a transmembrane pore
US11111532B2 (en) 2013-10-18 2021-09-07 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Method of characterizing a target ribonucleic acid (RNA) comprising forming a complementary polynucleotide which moves through a transmembrane pore
WO2015055981A2 (en) 2013-10-18 2015-04-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modified enzymes
WO2015056028A1 (en) 2013-10-18 2015-04-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of characterizing a target ribonucleic acid (rna) comprising forming a complementary polynucleotide which moves through a transmembrane pore
EP3575410A2 (en) 2013-10-18 2019-12-04 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modified enzymes
US11041196B2 (en) 2013-11-26 2021-06-22 Illumina, Inc. Compositions and methods for polynucleotide sequencing
US10364462B2 (en) 2013-11-26 2019-07-30 Illumina, Inc. Compositions and methods for polynucleotide sequencing
US11879155B2 (en) 2013-11-26 2024-01-23 Illumina, Inc. Compositions and methods for polynucleotide sequencing
US9689033B2 (en) 2013-11-26 2017-06-27 Illumina, Inc. Compositions and methods for polynucleotide sequencing
EP4282983A2 (en) 2013-11-26 2023-11-29 Illumina, Inc. Compositions and methods for polynucleotide sequencing
WO2015081178A1 (en) 2013-11-26 2015-06-04 Illumina, Inc. Compositions and methods for polynucleotide sequencing
EP3556869A1 (en) 2013-11-26 2019-10-23 Illumina Inc. Compositions and methods for polynucleotide sequencing
EP2886663A1 (en) 2013-12-19 2015-06-24 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Nanopore sequencing using replicative polymerases and helicases
US10392658B2 (en) 2014-01-22 2019-08-27 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Method for controlling the movement of a polynucleotide through a transmembrane pore
WO2015110813A1 (en) 2014-01-22 2015-07-30 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method for attaching one or more polynucleotide binding proteins to a target polynucleotide
US11725235B2 (en) 2014-01-22 2023-08-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method for attaching one or more polynucleotide binding proteins to a target polynucleotide
US11542551B2 (en) 2014-02-21 2023-01-03 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Sample preparation method
US10669578B2 (en) 2014-02-21 2020-06-02 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Sample preparation method
US11649490B2 (en) 2014-04-04 2023-05-16 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method of target molecule characterisation using a molecular pore
US11236385B2 (en) 2014-04-04 2022-02-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Method for characterising a double stranded nucleic acid using a nano-pore and anchor molecules at both ends of said nucleic acid
WO2015150787A1 (en) 2014-04-04 2015-10-08 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of target molecule characterisation using a molecular pore
US10774378B2 (en) 2014-04-04 2020-09-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Method of target molecule characterisation using a molecular pore
US10337060B2 (en) 2014-04-04 2019-07-02 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Method for characterising a double stranded nucleic acid using a nano-pore and anchor molecules at both ends of said nucleic acid
US10167503B2 (en) 2014-05-02 2019-01-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Mutant pores
US11739377B2 (en) 2014-05-02 2023-08-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method of improving the movement of a target polynucleotide with respect to a transmembrane pore
US10844432B2 (en) 2014-05-02 2020-11-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Ltd. Method of improving the movement of a target polynucleotide with respect to a transmembrane pore
US10443097B2 (en) 2014-05-02 2019-10-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Method of improving the movement of a target polynucleotide with respect to a transmembrane pore
EP3702780A1 (en) 2014-07-31 2020-09-02 Illumina, Inc. Hybrid nanopore sensors
EP3982121A1 (en) 2014-07-31 2022-04-13 Illumina, Inc. Hybrid nanopore sensors
US10519499B2 (en) 2014-07-31 2019-12-31 Illumina, Inc. Hybrid nanopore sensors
US11732301B2 (en) 2014-07-31 2023-08-22 Illumina, Inc. Hybrid nanopore sensors
US10961576B2 (en) 2014-07-31 2021-03-30 Illumina, Inc. Hybrid nanopore sensors
EP4053150A1 (en) 2014-09-01 2022-09-07 Vib Vzw Mutant csgg pores
US10400014B2 (en) 2014-09-01 2019-09-03 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Mutant CsgG pores
US11034734B2 (en) 2014-09-01 2021-06-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Mutant pores
US11965183B2 (en) 2014-10-07 2024-04-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Modified enzymes
US11180741B2 (en) 2014-10-07 2021-11-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Modified enzymes
EP4108679A1 (en) 2014-10-07 2022-12-28 Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc Modified enzymes
WO2016055778A1 (en) 2014-10-07 2016-04-14 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant pores
WO2016055777A2 (en) 2014-10-07 2016-04-14 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modified enzymes
US10266885B2 (en) 2014-10-07 2019-04-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Mutant pores
US10570440B2 (en) 2014-10-14 2020-02-25 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Method for modifying a template double stranded polynucleotide using a MuA transposase
US11390904B2 (en) 2014-10-14 2022-07-19 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Nanopore-based method and double stranded nucleic acid construct therefor
WO2016059363A1 (en) 2014-10-14 2016-04-21 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
US10689697B2 (en) 2014-10-16 2020-06-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Analysis of a polymer
US11401549B2 (en) 2014-10-16 2022-08-02 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Analysis of a polymer
US10549274B2 (en) 2014-10-17 2020-02-04 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Electrical device with detachable components
US10760114B2 (en) 2014-10-17 2020-09-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Methods for delivering an analyte to transmembrane pores
WO2016059375A1 (en) 2014-10-17 2016-04-21 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Methods for delivering an analyte to transmembrane pores
US11613771B2 (en) 2014-10-17 2023-03-28 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Methods for delivering an analyte to transmembrane pores
US11307192B2 (en) 2015-02-19 2022-04-19 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method for producing a hetero-oligomeric pore comprising two different monomers in a specific stiochiometric ratio
WO2016132123A1 (en) 2015-02-19 2016-08-25 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Hetero-pores
WO2016132124A1 (en) 2015-02-19 2016-08-25 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
EP4019535A1 (en) 2015-02-19 2022-06-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc Hetero-pores
US10472673B2 (en) 2015-02-19 2019-11-12 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Hetero-pores
US11169138B2 (en) 2015-04-14 2021-11-09 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Nanopores with internal protein adaptors
US10976300B2 (en) 2015-12-08 2021-04-13 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Modified nanopores, compositions comprising the same, and uses thereof
WO2017098322A1 (en) 2015-12-08 2017-06-15 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Ku Leuven Research & Development Modified nanopores, compositions comprising the same, and uses thereof
EP4015531A2 (en) 2016-03-02 2022-06-22 Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC Mutant pore
EP4019542A1 (en) 2016-03-02 2022-06-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc Mutant pores
WO2017149316A1 (en) 2016-03-02 2017-09-08 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant pore
US11685949B2 (en) 2016-03-02 2023-06-27 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Mutant pore
US10995372B2 (en) 2016-03-02 2021-05-04 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Mutant pores
US11597970B2 (en) 2016-03-02 2023-03-07 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Mutant pores
US11186868B2 (en) 2016-03-02 2021-11-30 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Mutant pore
WO2017149317A1 (en) 2016-03-02 2017-09-08 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant pore
WO2017149318A1 (en) 2016-03-02 2017-09-08 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant pores
US10975428B2 (en) 2016-03-02 2021-04-13 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Mutant pore
EP4019543A1 (en) 2016-03-02 2022-06-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc Mutant pore
EP4122949A1 (en) 2016-04-06 2023-01-25 Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc Mutant pore
US11939359B2 (en) 2016-04-06 2024-03-26 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Mutant pore
WO2017174990A1 (en) 2016-04-06 2017-10-12 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Mutant pore
US11104709B2 (en) 2016-04-06 2021-08-31 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Mutant pore
US11649480B2 (en) 2016-05-25 2023-05-16 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method for modifying a template double stranded polynucleotide
EP4063521A1 (en) 2016-05-25 2022-09-28 Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC Method of nanopore sequencing
US11098355B2 (en) 2016-05-25 2021-08-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd. Method of nanopore sequencing of concatenated nucleic acids
WO2017203269A1 (en) 2016-05-25 2017-11-30 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of nanopore sequencing of concatenaded nucleic acids
US11596940B2 (en) 2016-07-06 2023-03-07 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Microfluidic device
US11739379B2 (en) 2016-09-29 2023-08-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method for nucleic acid detection by guiding through a nanopore
US11085078B2 (en) 2016-09-29 2021-08-10 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method for nucleic acid detection by guiding through a nanopore
WO2018060740A1 (en) 2016-09-29 2018-04-05 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method for nucleic acid detection by guiding through a nanopore
WO2018073604A1 (en) 2016-10-21 2018-04-26 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
US11390910B2 (en) 2016-10-21 2022-07-19 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method
US11466317B2 (en) 2016-12-01 2022-10-11 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Methods and systems for characterizing analytes using nanopores
WO2018100370A1 (en) 2016-12-01 2018-06-07 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Methods and systems for characterizing analytes using nanopores
EP4269617A2 (en) 2016-12-01 2023-11-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc Methods and systems for characterizing analytes using nanopores
US11840556B2 (en) 2017-02-10 2023-12-12 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Modified nanopores, compositions comprising the same, and uses thereof
WO2018146491A1 (en) 2017-02-10 2018-08-16 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modified nanopores, compositions comprising the same, and uses thereof
US11789014B2 (en) 2017-05-04 2023-10-17 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method of determining the presence or absence of a target analyte comprising using a reporter polynucleotide and a transmembrane pore
WO2018203071A1 (en) 2017-05-04 2018-11-08 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of determining the presence or absence of a target analyte comprising using a reporter polynucleotide and a transmembrane pore
EP3892627A1 (en) 2017-05-04 2021-10-13 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Transmembrane pore consisting of two csgg pores
WO2018211241A1 (en) 2017-05-04 2018-11-22 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Transmembrane pore consisting of two csgg pores
US11945840B2 (en) 2017-06-30 2024-04-02 Vib Vzw Protein pores
US11572387B2 (en) 2017-06-30 2023-02-07 Vib Vzw Protein pores
CN111225744A (en) * 2017-10-23 2020-06-02 豪夫迈·罗氏有限公司 Protein nanopores removal and reinsertion into membranes using osmotic imbalance
WO2019081442A1 (en) * 2017-10-23 2019-05-02 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag Removing and reinserting protein nanopores in a membrane using osmotic imbalance
US11725205B2 (en) 2018-05-14 2023-08-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Methods and polynucleotides for amplifying a target polynucleotide
WO2019224558A1 (en) 2018-05-24 2019-11-28 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method for selecting polynucleotides based on the size in a globular form
WO2019234432A1 (en) 2018-06-06 2019-12-12 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
US11920193B2 (en) 2018-06-06 2024-03-05 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method of characterizing a polynucleotide
WO2020016573A1 (en) 2018-07-16 2020-01-23 Oxford University Innovation Limited Molecular hopper
WO2020025909A1 (en) 2018-07-30 2020-02-06 Oxford University Innovation Limited Assemblies
WO2020095052A1 (en) 2018-11-08 2020-05-14 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Pore
GB201818216D0 (en) 2018-11-08 2018-12-26 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Pore
WO2020128517A1 (en) 2018-12-21 2020-06-25 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of encoding data on a polynucleotide strand
WO2020183172A1 (en) 2019-03-12 2020-09-17 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Inc. Nanopore sensing device and methods of operation and of forming it
US11789006B2 (en) 2019-03-12 2023-10-17 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Nanopore sensing device, components and method of operation
WO2020188235A1 (en) 2019-03-19 2020-09-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Current measurement apparatus, molecular entity sensing apparatus, method of measuring a current, method of sensing a molecular entity
WO2020208357A1 (en) 2019-04-09 2020-10-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Pore
WO2020234612A1 (en) 2019-05-22 2020-11-26 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
GB201907244D0 (en) 2019-05-22 2019-07-03 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Method
GB201907246D0 (en) 2019-05-22 2019-07-03 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Method
GB201913997D0 (en) 2019-09-27 2019-11-13 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Method
WO2021058975A1 (en) 2019-09-27 2021-04-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Methods and systems for preparing a nucleic acid construct for single molecule characterisation
WO2021078971A2 (en) 2019-10-25 2021-04-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Improved nanopore sensing device, components and method of manufacture
GB201917060D0 (en) 2019-11-22 2020-01-08 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Method
WO2021099801A1 (en) 2019-11-22 2021-05-27 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method for double strand sequencing
WO2021111125A1 (en) 2019-12-02 2021-06-10 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of characterising a target polypeptide using a nanopore
EP4270008A2 (en) 2019-12-02 2023-11-01 Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC Method of characterising a target polypeptide using a nanopore
WO2021111139A1 (en) 2019-12-04 2021-06-10 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
GB202004944D0 (en) 2020-04-03 2020-05-20 King S College London Method
WO2021198695A1 (en) 2020-04-03 2021-10-07 King's College London Method of detecting an analyte in a medium comprising a light scattering constituent
WO2021255414A1 (en) 2020-06-17 2021-12-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Nanopore support structure and manufacture thereof
WO2021255476A2 (en) 2020-06-18 2021-12-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method
WO2021255477A1 (en) 2020-06-18 2021-12-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Method of repeatedly moving a double-stranded polynucleotide through a nanopore
WO2021255475A1 (en) 2020-06-18 2021-12-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited A method of selectively characterising a polynucleotide using a detector
WO2022013551A1 (en) 2020-07-17 2022-01-20 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Nanopore sensing device
WO2022074397A1 (en) 2020-10-08 2022-04-14 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited Modification of a nanopore forming protein oligomer
US11970738B2 (en) 2020-11-13 2024-04-30 The Regents Of The University Of California Compositions, devices, systems, and methods for using a nanopore
WO2022243692A1 (en) 2021-05-19 2022-11-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Methods for complement strand sequencing
WO2022243691A1 (en) 2021-05-19 2022-11-24 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Multiplex methods of detecting molecules using nanopores
GB202107192D0 (en) 2021-05-19 2021-06-30 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Method
GB202107354D0 (en) 2021-05-24 2021-07-07 Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd Method
WO2023026056A1 (en) 2021-08-26 2023-03-02 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Nanopore
WO2023118404A1 (en) 2021-12-23 2023-06-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Pore
WO2023118891A1 (en) 2021-12-23 2023-06-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method of characterising polypeptides using a nanopore
WO2023118892A1 (en) 2021-12-23 2023-06-29 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method
GB202204919D0 (en) 2022-04-04 2022-05-18 Oxford Nanopore Tech Plc Method
WO2023194713A1 (en) 2022-04-04 2023-10-12 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method
WO2023198911A2 (en) 2022-04-14 2023-10-19 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Novel modified protein pores and enzymes
WO2023222657A1 (en) 2022-05-17 2023-11-23 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Method and adaptors
WO2024033422A1 (en) 2022-08-09 2024-02-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Novel pore monomers and pores
WO2024033447A1 (en) 2022-08-09 2024-02-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc De novo pores
WO2024033443A1 (en) 2022-08-09 2024-02-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Novel pore monomers and pores
WO2024033421A2 (en) 2022-08-09 2024-02-15 Oxford Nanopore Technologies Plc Novel pore monomers and pores
GB202307486D0 (en) 2023-05-18 2023-07-05 Oxford Nanopore Tech Plc Method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20080153150A1 (en) 2008-06-26
DE602006015292D1 (en) 2010-08-19
ATE473438T1 (en) 2010-07-15
JP5253148B2 (en) 2013-07-31
EP1861071B1 (en) 2010-07-07
WO2006100484A3 (en) 2008-05-29
US7939270B2 (en) 2011-05-10
JP2008537106A (en) 2008-09-11
EP1861071A2 (en) 2007-12-05
GB0505971D0 (en) 2005-04-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7939270B2 (en) Delivery of molecules to a lipid bilayer
US20190242913A1 (en) Lipid bilayer sensor system
Fertig et al. Activity of single ion channel proteins detected with a planar microstructure
Choi et al. Cell immobilization using self-assembled synthetic oligopeptide and its application to biological toxicity detection using surface plasmon resonance
US20210283598A1 (en) Multi-well separation apparatus and reagent delivery device
US20030082632A1 (en) Assay method and apparatus
EP1517752A2 (en) Fast electrical lysis of cells and rapid collection of the contents thereof using capillary electrophoresis
Holden et al. Direct transfer of membrane proteins from bacteria to planar bilayers for rapid screening by single-channel recording
JP2005528102A (en) Methods for cell-based high-throughput assays using versatile survival microarrays
WO2016168301A1 (en) Compositions and methods for disaggregation of biological tissue samples
GB2446823A (en) Formulation of lipid bilayers
JP2015221034A (en) Devices and methods for observing cell division
JP2012517234A5 (en)
US20150024429A1 (en) Method and device for the homogeneous distribution of suspended cell components
WO2020175526A1 (en) Microstructure, method for manufacturing same, and molecule detection method using same
US20110300618A1 (en) Semi-automated device for single parameter and multi-parameter phenotyping of cells
US20080213748A1 (en) Method for Detection and Analysis of Macromolecular Complexes
CN110146353B (en) Biochemical sample in-situ processing device and mass spectrum imaging method of phosphorylated protein
CN113167793A (en) Method for seeding cells on a sensor surface
WO2022082025A1 (en) Cellular response analysis method
Patil et al. Automated Reactor For Extraction And Manipulation Of Sub-Megabase Fragments Of Genomic DNA With Flow-Focusing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2006726479

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2008502471

Country of ref document: JP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: RU

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: RU

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 11884927

Country of ref document: US

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2006726479

Country of ref document: EP