WO2005118490A2 - Sludge treatment process - Google Patents
Sludge treatment process Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2005118490A2 WO2005118490A2 PCT/US2005/019174 US2005019174W WO2005118490A2 WO 2005118490 A2 WO2005118490 A2 WO 2005118490A2 US 2005019174 W US2005019174 W US 2005019174W WO 2005118490 A2 WO2005118490 A2 WO 2005118490A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- biosolids
- nitrous acid
- orp
- acid
- sludge
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F11/00—Treatment of sludge; Devices therefor
- C02F11/02—Biological treatment
- C02F11/04—Anaerobic treatment; Production of methane by such processes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/72—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation
- C02F1/76—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation with halogens or compounds of halogens
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F11/00—Treatment of sludge; Devices therefor
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/66—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by neutralisation; pH adjustment
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F11/00—Treatment of sludge; Devices therefor
- C02F11/02—Biological treatment
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2209/00—Controlling or monitoring parameters in water treatment
- C02F2209/04—Oxidation reduction potential [ORP]
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2303/00—Specific treatment goals
- C02F2303/04—Disinfection
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W10/00—Technologies for wastewater treatment
- Y02W10/20—Sludge processing
Definitions
- the present invention relates to municipal or agricultural wastewater treatment and more particularly relates to an improved method of biosolids treatment wherein pathogen reduction and stabilization is accomplished by utilizing a combination of chlorine dioxide and non-charged chemical species known to penetrate helminth eggs (Ascaris).
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,281 ,341 is incorporated herein by reference.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,936,983, entitled "Sewage Sludge Treatment With Gas Injection,” relates to an apparatus for treating sewage sludge in a hyperbaric vessel in which the sludge is oxygenated by injecting an oxygen-rich gas into the sewage sludge and then dispersing the mixture of sludge and oxygen-rich gas into the upper portion of a hyperbaric vessel for further interaction with an oxygen-rich atmosphere.
- the oxygen- rich gas is injected into the sewage sludge by delivering the gas to a combination gas and sludge mixing and dispersing assembly.
- This patent teaches a process to stabilize municipal sludge by acidifying the sludge to a pH of between 2.5 and 3.5 in the presence of 200 to 300 ppm (parts per million) of oxygen at a pressure of 60 psi and a pure oxygen stream containing 3.0% to 6.0% ozone for a period of 30-90 minutes. The process was ineffective against viruses and Ascaris eggs. These data indicate PSRP and PFRP inactivation criteria being met for bacteria only.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,936,983 is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- the problem of disinfection and stabilization of municipal and agricultural wastes is global.
- the present invention teaches a method that offers significant performance and economic advantages over known methods to make the treatment of this material practical for both municipalities and agricultural operations.
- the present invention provides an improved method of treating liquid waste or process streams that include a sludge component and that enhance sludge disinfection and stabilization.
- Chlorine dioxide is known to be a strong oxidant and a potent biocide. (ref). In testing for disinfection of biosolids, it was discovered that while capable of inactivating bacteria and viruses, chlorine dioxide alone is not able to inactivate Ascaris eggs at concentrations as high as 1000 ppm. (ref). It is known that non-charged chemical species are capable of penetrating the shell of ascaris eggs under certain conditions (ref). Patent No. 4,936,983 teaches that Nitrous acid is capable of Ascaris inactivation in biosolids at concentrations above 400 mg/L in a closed system.
- the non-ionic, or non-charged, species of a chemical in a waste stream can be maintained by controlling the pH and/or ORP of the mixture.
- Patent No. 4,936,983 teaches the use of Ozone for ORP control, and uses nitrous acid as the penetrant for Ascaris inactivation.
- Chlorine dioxide has a number of unexpected advantages over ozone for this purpose. While ozone is a more powerful oxidant than chlorine dioxide, chlorine dioxide is a more specific oxidant and is able to raise and maintain the ORP of a sludge sample for a long enough period of time to allow inactivation of bacteria, viruses, and Ascaris eggs.
- the invention relates to the use of chlorine dioxide to control ORP in sludge, thus increasing the performance of disinfection due to non-charged chemical species, as well as through the performance of the chlorine dioxide itself as a disinfectant.
- the chlorine dioxide has an added benefit of enhancing the stability of the end product.
- Figure 1 shows an illustration of Ascaris eggs inactivation at various tss and initial nitrous acid doses.
- Figure 2 is a graphical illustration of nitrous acid remaining for different tss at 500 mg/1 nitrite addition.
- Figure 3 shows nitrous acid remaining in different tss at 1000 mg/1 nitrite addition.
- Figure 4 shows nitrous acid remaining in different tss at 1500 mg/1 nitrite addition.
- Figure 5 illustrates data showing a power curve fit of remaining nitrous acid vs time required to reach PFRP.
- Figure 6 shows a prediction of nitrous acid remaining to reach PFRP in 2 hours.
- Figure 7 is an illustration of a plot of ORP verse pH indicating regions where pathogens are inactivated.
- the subject invention is directed to novel methods for treating and/or disinfecting biosolids; and particularly agricultural or municipal biosolids.
- the methods utilize chlorine dioxide and a non-charged chemical species to disinfect and stabilize biosolids.
- Stabilized sludge in general, refers to sludge that has a reduced capacity to generate odors and to undergo continued degradation, as well as sludge that has a reduced attractiveness to vectors (any living organism capable of transmitting pathogens mechanically or biologically) as demonstrated by volatile solids reduction, or other acceptable methods.
- One embodiment of the subject invention is directed to the addition of an acid, for example sodium bisulfate, to lower the pH of the sludge to a specific point at which the non-charged chemical species predominates, i.e., predominates over the charged chemical species.
- an acid for example sodium bisulfate
- the addition of the acid is carried out in a closed vessel (tank or pipe) so that the gas emitted remains in the system for the purpose of disinfection.
- the vessel must be capable of withstanding the pressure generated by the volatilization of gassed when the sludge is acidified. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the vessel must be able to withstand up to at least 15 psig.
- the chorine dioxide is added by injecting either pre-generated chlorine dioxide into the matrix. Sufficient contact time is provided to allow for the destruction of pathogens.
- the pH of the disinfected, stabilized biosolids can be adjusted after treatment to a range more suitable for disposal.
- the ORP of the treatment stream is monitored in real time to determine the dosing of ClO 2 required to maintain the proper levels.
- the resulting non-charged chemical species is nitrous acid, although ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, or other non-charged chemical species may also be used.
- the sludge is acidified to a pH of between 2.5 and 3.5.
- the nitrous acid level should be greater than 400 parts per million, and the pathogen kill is in about 2-12 hours.
- the ORP of the sludge is maintained at +200 - +600 mV.
- the solids level of the waste stream is less than 7% suspended solids.
- the nitrous acid level is in excess of 1500 milligrams per liter and the pathogen kill is in 4 hours or less.
- the disclosed embodiment of the present process may produce a Class A disinfected/stabilized biosolids within 4 hours. This process produces a disinfected/stabilized-thickened biosolid that yields a Class A biosolids product.
- the process uses a low pH (between 2 to 3, for example) utilizing a sodium nitrite/sodium bisulfate to both disinfect and stabilize.
- the controlling element of the process is based around the oxidizing potential of nitrite (NO " ).
- NO " oxidizing potential
- the acidic conditions are achieved by dosing sodium bisulfate solution into the liquid biosolids while simultaneously dosing nitrites in the form of sodium nitrite solution.
- the ORP is controlled utilizing chlorinated mixed oxidants (chlorite-hypochlorite/ chlorine dioxide). These are then mixed together for approximately 30 to 120 minutes in a batch reactor vessel where pathogenic organisms are inactivated.
- chlorinated mixed oxidants chlorinated mixed oxidants
- the Tulane process is capable of disinfecting raw or semi-stabilized biosolids.
- the process is generally more economical with thickened biosolids, but there is an increased required dosage of nitrous acid as the solids increase.
- the thickened biosolids is then ozonated so that the ORP is between +400 to 500 millvolts and the pH should be between 2.5 to 3.0.
- the ozonation/acidification step will require around 30 minutes.
- Nitrite is added to a level of greater than 1200 mg/1 as nitrous acid and this level is held for greater than 2 hours. This exposure time is required to ensure inactivation of viruses and helminth eggs. After disinfecting currently the biosolids is stabilized by one of three methods: Mesophilic composting, Alkaline stabilization, and Head drying to pellets
- Ozone was mixed with sludge in recirculation pumps in the acid-oxygen-ozone step to increase and stabilize the ORP to the 450-520 mv range.
- Tests at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill point out that microbial density can be reduced successfully by ozone treatment alone.
- Fecal coliform was reduced to a non-detectable level and the inactivation of poliovirus was at least 90% when the sludge was introduced by ozone at 20-30 mg/L at pH 3.0 for at least two hours.
- the inactivation of C. perfiingens spores i.e. Ascaris eggs
- the ORP is controlled by chlorite, chlorine dioxide and hypochlorous acid in a similar fashion.
- Ascaris ova were highly resistant to the acidification-oxygeneration-ozonation stabilization process, but they were subsequently inactivated with nitrite addition to the sludge. Sodium nitrite was used as the nitrite source.
- the inactivation dose addition curves were generated by the use of a curve fitting program. According to these exponential curves, higher doses seemed to lead to better inactivation. Higher doses of sodium nitrite were required for sludges with higher TSS concentrations. At different sodium nitrite doses, the inactivation rates at each TSS level varied only slightly. (Figure 1) The regression coefficient (r 2 ) for the fitted curves ranged from 0.91 to 0.99, which indicates that the exponential equations developed explain 91-99% of the variability in the experimental data. Under the same TSS concentration, the remaining nitrous acid concentration increased with increased sodium nitrite addition. In the first 4 hours, the concentration showed a sharp drop followed by a slow decrease in concentration for the next 18 hours.
- nitrite may be rapidly oxidized or volatilized in the first few hours during the rapid mixing phase. Regression analysis of initial nitrite concentration, remaining nitrite concentration, and time showed no significant interaction between time and remaining nitrous acid level at the 0.05 level of significance. This result was obtained by the Analysis of Variance for repeated measures (2 V) technique using Biomedical Data Processor (BMDP) computer software.
- BMDP Biomedical Data Processor
- the sludge with 2.8% TSS had a remaining nitrous acid level of approximately 200 mg/L after a retention time of 12 hours. Both the 5% TSS sludge and the 7% TSS sludge had remaining nitrous acid levels of approximately 300 mg/L after the 12 hour retention time. With nitrite addition of either 1000 or 1500 mg/L ( Figures 3 & 4), no significant relationship was observed between TSS and remaining nitrous acid at the p ⁇ 0.05 level of significance. Similar results were observed in field studies. 2
- Equation 2 The data of remaining nitrous acid required to reach PFRP criteria at different TSS levels was used to develop a predictive model Equation 2 using the data from experiments with both open an closed systems ( Figure 5).
- the units were converted from mg/L to mg/g.
- the remaining dose required, calculated from Equation 2 was incorporated into Equation 1 to determine the initial NO 2 " dose required to reach PFRP criteria at any detention time or TSS level.
- Equation 2 it is predicted that the PFRP can be reached in two hours when the remaining HNO 2 dose is at least 25.46 mg/g (Table 2). That happened with an initial dose of 1307 mg/L to 2532.58 mg/L and the remaining nitrous acid dose will be 764 mg/L to 1782.7 mg/L for TSS levels of 3% - 7% (Table 3) ( Figure 6).
- ORP and pH limitations are the most important factors which decide the success of nitrous disinfection.
- the reason for the strict condition is that the aqueous nitrous acid only exists in very small ORP range ( Figure 7) in the liquid system.
- the ORP-pH dominance diagram for nitrogen when N 2 is not redox active is composed of the lines given by the following functions: ( Figure 2)
- pH 3.0
- HNO 2 will be predominant species for N(III) group
- NO will be predominate species for N(III) group.
- pH ⁇ 9.3 the NH 4 + will be predominant species for N(-III) group
- pH > 9.3 NH 3 will be predominant species for the N(-III) group.
- the ORP data indicates that there is a stability range for the nitrous acid in municipal sewerage sludge. There are upper and lower limits which have not been determined, but the ranges where effective inactivation occurs have been observed. The importance of this observation is the need for the acid-oxidization step to raise the ORP to a range where the nitrite dosage will fall within an effective ORP range for inactivation.
- nitrous acid In our case, the existence of nitrous acid depends on a strict pH and ORP condition. Nitrous acid only exists in the system in a small amount. Besides, in the semi- closed static filled systems, the volatilization of nitrous acid is from 70 - 18%. That means that the non-charged gas form of nitrous acid volatilizes from the system before it can contact with Ascaris eggs. The partial pressure of nitrous acid is too small even if the initial nitrous acid dose is as high as 1500 mg/L. Therefore, the remaining nitrous acid is below 500 mg/L. This means that the dissolved nitrous acid gas will not volatilize in the closed system.
- the partial gas pressure of nitrous acid is obviously higher than in the open system with a volatilization of 30 - 0%. Since there is less emission of nitrous acid gas, the dissolved nitrous gas increases to levels above 1500 mg/L. By obtaining these high levels of soluble nitrous acid, the PFRP disinfection can be obtained in two hours or less. Since the Henry constant will increase with rising temperature, it is acceptable that the combination of higher temperature, controlled pH and ORP will lead to a disinfection at lower exposure times. Development of Acid Disinfection Process for Municipal Biosolids
- the revising of this process from the Synox process is the replacement zone with chlorite and hypochlorous acid (or chlorine dioxide).
- the ozone oxidant required 3 to 5 g/L and was very expensive.
- the ORP is controlled with much less oxidizing agents and cost than with the highly reactive ozone.
- Tables 5 to 9 show the ORP level verses chlorinate mixed oxidants in open system and closed system.
- the process was observed to be effective and would produce a Class A biosolids witliin 4 to 24 h depending upon the dosage of nitrous acid in the range of 1500 to 400 mg/L, respectively.
- the Synox process was approved as a PFRP process by EPA's PEC in the early 1990's.
- the problem with this process was related to the utilization of ozone to hold the ORP in the range of 300 to 600 mv.
- the ozone process was very costly and made the process not viable economically.
- the Modified Neutralizer Process is able to control the ORP under acidic conditions with chlorine dioxide, which is much less expensive and more reliable in a municipal sludge environment.
- sodium nitrite under pH at 3 was used to disinfect aerobically or anaerobically digested municipal sludges.
- the acidic conditions were achieved by dosing sodium bisulfate solution into the sludges, while simultaneously dosing mixed oxidants (sodium hypochlorite, sodium chlorite and chlorine dioxide) to control ORP levels ranging from 300 to 600 mv.
- the chlorite-hypochlorite added to the acidified sludge provides in-situ generation of chlorine dioxide.
- 1500 mg/L of nitrite in the form of sodium nitrite solution was added into the system. These were mixed together in a closed system.
- the municipal aerobically or anaerobically digested biosolids were spiked with pathogenic spikes and also monitored for indicator organisms, Aerobic endospores and Somatic bacteriophages.
- one duplicate and one control were conducted for QA/QC purposes.
- the treated sludges were collected in polyethylene bottles and neutralized using 6 N sodium hydroxide.
- the efficiency of disinfection was illustrated by percentage of viability of Ascaris eggs in the control and after the treatment.
- the controlled parameters were tested to establish a matrix of nitrous acid treatment for inactivating Ascaris eggs.
- the parameters include pH, temperature, ORP, contact time, solid content and pressure.
- the stability of treating biosolids can be controlled by the pre-digestion processes, such as aerobic or anaerobic mesosphilic digestion.
- the oxidation step can enhance the stability of the resulting biosolids since the mixed oxidants should not lyses cells. Respirometer analysis was conducted to assess stabilization of the end product.
- the ultimate goal is to produce a biosolid that meets Class A standards for disinfection and stability.
- the resulting biosolid may then be land applied or may have other uses as a fertilizer or soil amendment. If the process proves effective, it may also prove useful in the treatment of manure, waste material from agricultural applications, shipboard wastes such as grey and black water and medical waste materials.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
BRPI0511774 BRPI0511774A (en) | 2004-06-01 | 2005-06-01 | method to treat biosolids |
JP2007515513A JP2008501508A (en) | 2004-06-01 | 2005-06-01 | Sludge treatment process |
CA 2569076 CA2569076C (en) | 2004-06-01 | 2005-06-01 | Sludge treatment process |
EP05756186.2A EP1765735B1 (en) | 2004-06-01 | 2005-06-01 | Sludge treatment process |
CN2005800261250A CN101124172B (en) | 2004-06-01 | 2005-06-01 | Sludge treatment process |
MXPA06013982A MXPA06013982A (en) | 2004-06-01 | 2005-06-01 | Sludge treatment process. |
IL179779A IL179779A (en) | 2004-06-01 | 2006-11-30 | Sludge treatment process |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US57536004P | 2004-06-01 | 2004-06-01 | |
US60/575,360 | 2004-06-01 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2005118490A2 true WO2005118490A2 (en) | 2005-12-15 |
WO2005118490A3 WO2005118490A3 (en) | 2006-08-31 |
Family
ID=35463415
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2005/019174 WO2005118490A2 (en) | 2004-06-01 | 2005-06-01 | Sludge treatment process |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7279099B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1765735B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2008501508A (en) |
CN (1) | CN101124172B (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0511774A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2569076C (en) |
IL (1) | IL179779A (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA06013982A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005118490A2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102884011A (en) * | 2009-12-24 | 2013-01-16 | Bcr环境公司 | Improved digestion of biosolids in wastewater |
EP2563727A2 (en) * | 2010-04-27 | 2013-03-06 | BCR Environmental Corporation | Wastewater treatment apparatus to achieve class b biosolids using chlorine dioxide |
US20210170363A1 (en) * | 2019-12-09 | 2021-06-10 | Regenesis Bioremediation Products | Methods for the Destruction of Contaminants Adsorbed to Activated Carbon |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2893258B1 (en) * | 2005-11-14 | 2008-01-11 | Otv Sa | METHOD FOR TREATING WATER COMPRISING A DECANTATION STEP AND A FINE SAMPLE STEP, AND CORRESPONDING DEVICE. |
WO2008024445A2 (en) * | 2006-08-23 | 2008-02-28 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Sequencing batch reactor with continuous membrane filtration and solids reduction |
JP4523989B2 (en) * | 2009-05-19 | 2010-08-11 | イーエス・テクノロジー株式会社 | Sludge reduction method and reduction device |
WO2013000010A1 (en) * | 2011-06-30 | 2013-01-03 | The University Of Queensland | Pre-treatment of sludge |
JP5990706B2 (en) * | 2011-11-30 | 2016-09-14 | 株式会社片山化学工業研究所 | Method for suppressing hydrogen sulfide generation in sludge treatment process |
JP6254484B2 (en) * | 2014-05-28 | 2017-12-27 | 水ing株式会社 | Deodorized cake deodorization method and sludge treatment apparatus |
WO2017049108A1 (en) * | 2015-09-17 | 2017-03-23 | Bcr Environmental Corporation | Systems and methods for using chlorine dioxide to enhance drying |
CN114804555A (en) * | 2022-04-15 | 2022-07-29 | 中国地质大学(武汉) | Control method for killing pathogenic microorganisms and toxic byproducts in sludge by strengthening chlorine disinfection |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4277342A (en) * | 1979-10-01 | 1981-07-07 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Combined biological-chemical detoxification of organics |
US5051191A (en) * | 1990-10-31 | 1991-09-24 | Green Environmental Systems Ltd. | Method to detoxify sewage sludge |
US5281341A (en) * | 1991-08-09 | 1994-01-25 | Administrators Of The Tulane Educational Fund | Sludge treatment process |
JP3913843B2 (en) * | 1997-05-26 | 2007-05-09 | オルガノ株式会社 | Coagulation sedimentation processing equipment |
JP2000140894A (en) * | 1998-11-06 | 2000-05-23 | Nkk Corp | Equipment for treatment of sludge |
US20040180015A1 (en) * | 2002-01-07 | 2004-09-16 | Kross Robert D. | Long-acting disinfecting nitrous acid compositions and related processes |
JP4210976B2 (en) * | 2002-01-24 | 2009-01-21 | 栗田工業株式会社 | Sludge odor control agent and sludge odor control method |
CA2502836A1 (en) * | 2002-10-28 | 2004-05-13 | Ashland Inc. | A process for safely decontaminating the chill water used in meat processing |
-
2005
- 2005-06-01 WO PCT/US2005/019174 patent/WO2005118490A2/en active Application Filing
- 2005-06-01 BR BRPI0511774 patent/BRPI0511774A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2005-06-01 CN CN2005800261250A patent/CN101124172B/en active Active
- 2005-06-01 JP JP2007515513A patent/JP2008501508A/en active Pending
- 2005-06-01 EP EP05756186.2A patent/EP1765735B1/en active Active
- 2005-06-01 US US11/141,273 patent/US7279099B2/en active Active
- 2005-06-01 MX MXPA06013982A patent/MXPA06013982A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2005-06-01 CA CA 2569076 patent/CA2569076C/en active Active
-
2006
- 2006-11-30 IL IL179779A patent/IL179779A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of EP1765735A4 * |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102884011A (en) * | 2009-12-24 | 2013-01-16 | Bcr环境公司 | Improved digestion of biosolids in wastewater |
JP2016175064A (en) * | 2009-12-24 | 2016-10-06 | ビーシーアール・エンバイロンメンタル・コーポレーションBcr Environmental Corporation | Improved digestion of biosolids in wastewater |
US9758401B2 (en) | 2009-12-24 | 2017-09-12 | Bcr Environmental Corporation | Digestion of biosolids in wastewater |
EP2563727A2 (en) * | 2010-04-27 | 2013-03-06 | BCR Environmental Corporation | Wastewater treatment apparatus to achieve class b biosolids using chlorine dioxide |
EP2563727A4 (en) * | 2010-04-27 | 2014-07-23 | Bcr Environmental Corp | Wastewater treatment apparatus to achieve class b biosolids using chlorine dioxide |
AU2011248572B2 (en) * | 2010-04-27 | 2016-10-13 | Bcr Environmental Corporation | Wastewater treatment apparatus to achieve Class B biosolids using chlorine dioxide |
US10689274B2 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2020-06-23 | Bcr Environmental Corporation | Wastewater treatment apparatus to achieve class B biosolids using chlorine dioxide |
US11485659B2 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2022-11-01 | Bcr Environmental Corporation | Wastewater treatment apparatus to achieve class B biosolids using chlorine dioxide |
US20210170363A1 (en) * | 2019-12-09 | 2021-06-10 | Regenesis Bioremediation Products | Methods for the Destruction of Contaminants Adsorbed to Activated Carbon |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2569076C (en) | 2014-04-22 |
EP1765735B1 (en) | 2014-01-22 |
EP1765735A2 (en) | 2007-03-28 |
BRPI0511774A (en) | 2007-12-18 |
CA2569076A1 (en) | 2005-12-15 |
CN101124172A (en) | 2008-02-13 |
MXPA06013982A (en) | 2007-12-10 |
JP2008501508A (en) | 2008-01-24 |
IL179779A0 (en) | 2007-05-15 |
US20050279706A1 (en) | 2005-12-22 |
EP1765735A4 (en) | 2009-12-30 |
IL179779A (en) | 2011-07-31 |
CN101124172B (en) | 2013-06-26 |
US7279099B2 (en) | 2007-10-09 |
WO2005118490A3 (en) | 2006-08-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2569076C (en) | Sludge treatment process | |
CA1116759A (en) | Process for deoderizing sludges, particularly clarification sludges | |
JP6131342B2 (en) | Method for producing sterilized cultured water and method for culturing flowing water-sterilized water fish using the same | |
US5120452A (en) | Process for purifying wastewater with hypochlorous acid | |
de Luca et al. | Quality improvement of biosolids by ferrate (VI) oxidation of offensive odour compounds | |
IL125592A (en) | Water treatment | |
US5984993A (en) | Method and composition for odor control | |
Li et al. | Electrochemical wastewater disinfection: Identification of its principal germicidal actions | |
KR20130099811A (en) | Wastewater treatment apparatus to achieve class b biosolids using chlorine dioxide | |
Lee et al. | Residual chlorine distribution and disinfection during electrochemical removal of dilute ammonia from an aqueous solution | |
JP2007229646A (en) | Cleaning method of ground water | |
US20060151400A1 (en) | Biosolids stabilization process | |
Counts et al. | Lime stabilized sludge: its stability and effect on agricultural land | |
EP2496527B1 (en) | Waste sludge digestion process by sequential intermittent ozone dosing | |
KR20110080287A (en) | The treatment device and treatment method thereof to dispose of livestock wastewater by eletrochemical oxidation | |
EP3457831B1 (en) | Sanitary waste treatment method | |
JP2004160349A (en) | Water cleaning apparatus for fish and shellfish | |
JP2000210074A (en) | Acclimation of degrading microorganism, obtaining of acclimated microorganism and degradation of organic compound | |
Siegrist et al. | Treatment for Pathogen Reduction | |
Vestergård | Establishing and maintaining specific pathogen free (SPF) conditions in aqueous solutions using ozone | |
RU2288188C1 (en) | Process for disinfection of water using ozone and copper and zinc ions | |
JP2007007546A (en) | Sludge treatment method | |
JP2007216186A (en) | Treatment method of sludge | |
KR20010078879A (en) | Equipment and Method of Cleaning Wastewater by the Cultivating Microorganism with the ozone(O3) | |
CN115996894A (en) | Water disinfection apparatus, system and method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KM KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NG NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: PA/a/2006/013982 Country of ref document: MX Ref document number: 179779 Country of ref document: IL |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2007515513 Country of ref document: JP Ref document number: 2569076 Country of ref document: CA Ref document number: 7267/DELNP/2006 Country of ref document: IN |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2005756186 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 200580026125.0 Country of ref document: CN |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2005756186 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: PI0511774 Country of ref document: BR |