WO2005083449A2 - Method for continuous sensor self-test - Google Patents

Method for continuous sensor self-test Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005083449A2
WO2005083449A2 PCT/US2005/002183 US2005002183W WO2005083449A2 WO 2005083449 A2 WO2005083449 A2 WO 2005083449A2 US 2005002183 W US2005002183 W US 2005002183W WO 2005083449 A2 WO2005083449 A2 WO 2005083449A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
sensor
signal
stimulation
test
self
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2005/002183
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2005083449A3 (en
Inventor
Harvey Weinberg
John A. Geen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Analog Devices Inc
Original Assignee
Analog Devices Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Analog Devices Inc filed Critical Analog Devices Inc
Publication of WO2005083449A2 publication Critical patent/WO2005083449A2/en
Publication of WO2005083449A3 publication Critical patent/WO2005083449A3/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01D—MEASURING NOT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR A SPECIFIC VARIABLE; ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEASURING TWO OR MORE VARIABLES NOT COVERED IN A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS; TARIFF METERING APPARATUS; MEASURING OR TESTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01D3/00—Indicating or recording apparatus with provision for the special purposes referred to in the subgroups
    • G01D3/08—Indicating or recording apparatus with provision for the special purposes referred to in the subgroups with provision for safeguarding the apparatus, e.g. against abnormal operation, against breakdown
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01D—MEASURING NOT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR A SPECIFIC VARIABLE; ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEASURING TWO OR MORE VARIABLES NOT COVERED IN A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS; TARIFF METERING APPARATUS; MEASURING OR TESTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01D18/00—Testing or calibrating apparatus or arrangements provided for in groups G01D1/00 - G01D15/00
    • G01D18/002—Automatic recalibration
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01D—MEASURING NOT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR A SPECIFIC VARIABLE; ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEASURING TWO OR MORE VARIABLES NOT COVERED IN A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS; TARIFF METERING APPARATUS; MEASURING OR TESTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01D21/00—Measuring or testing not otherwise provided for

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods of self-test for sensors and, particularly, for micromachined capacitive sensors
  • Micromachined accelerometers can be used to sense acceleration for a variety of applications, including sensing the acceleration that occurs as a result of an automobile accident in order to trigger an air bag, or sensing the acceleration resulting from an earthquake in order to automatically shut off a gas line to prevent fires.
  • a polysilicon mass is suspended over a substrate by supporting tethers.
  • the mass which is essentially parallel to the substrate, has a beam elongated along an axis, and a number of fingers that extend away from the beam in a direction perpendicular to the axis of the beam.
  • the beam and fingers are movable laterally relative to the substrate along the axis.
  • Each of these movable fingers is positioned between two polysilicon fingers that are in the plane of the mass and are fixed relative to the substrate.
  • Each movable finger and the fixed fingers on either side of the movable finger form a differential capacitor cell.
  • the cells additively form a differential capacitor.
  • a structure of this type is shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,345,824.
  • Different approaches can be used to sense acceleration with such a differential capacitor.
  • One approach is to use force feedback, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,345,824.
  • the movable fingers i.e., movable with the mass
  • All the fixed fingers on one side of the movable fingers are electrically coupled together, and all the fixed fingers on the other side of the movable fingers are also electrically coupled together.
  • the two sets of fixed fingers are at different DC potentials and are driven with AC carrier signals that are 180 degrees out of phase with respect to each l other.
  • movable fingers moves toward one or the other set of fixed fingers.
  • the signal on the beam is amplified, demodulated, and provided to an output terminal.
  • a feedback network connects the output terminal and the beam. The feedback causes the movable fingers to be re-centered between the two sets of fixed fingers.
  • the signal at the output terminal is a measure of the force required to re-center the beam, and is therefore proportional to acceleration.
  • a method and device for determining a parameter value using a sensor while performing sensor self-test.
  • the sensor is stimulated by self-test inputs at a stimulation frequency.
  • the output of the sensor is then compared to the sensor response expected from the stimulation. If an unexpected response is detected from the sensor, a malfunction of the sensor may be identified. If the sensor output is as expected, the sensor output may be filtered to remove the effects of the stimulation and sensed parameter values may be determined based on the filtered signal.
  • the stimulation of the sensor may be repeated over a range of duty cycles from a low duty cycle to a 100% duty cycle.
  • sensor self-test may be performed with minimal hardware support by using a system processor to control and monitor the sensor output.
  • a system processor may cause self-test stimuli to be injected into the sensor at a low duty cycle and may determine sensed parameter values when the self-test stimuli are not injected.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of sensor self-test according to an embodiment of the invention
  • Fig. 3 shows alternative exemplary waveforms for the embodiment of fig. 1
  • Fig. 4 illustrates a sensor assembly that provides self-test in a fashion that is transparent to a user
  • Fig. 5 illustrates a further sensor assembly that allows a user to generate a self-test capability using software and/or hardware that is external to the assembly.
  • a method of continuously testing sensors is provided. The method includes stimulating a sensor at high frequency and looking for appropriate sensor output response. A subsequent low pass filter can remove the response to the high-frequency self-test signal from the sensor output and allow a sensed parameter to be determined.
  • Fig. 3 shows alternative exemplary waveforms for the embodiment of fig. 1
  • Fig. 4 illustrates a sensor assembly that provides self-test in a fashion that is transparent to a user
  • Fig. 5 illustrates a further sensor assembly that allows a user to generate a self-test capability using software and
  • a sensor 101 for example, an accelerometer or a gyroscopic sensor, is provided that includes complementary self-test inputs.
  • complementary self-test inputs will mean inputs where a self-test stimulus input 102 causes an increase in sensor output while another self-test stimulus 104 causes a decrease in output.
  • These complementary self-test stimuli may be toggled at high speeds, using for example, square waves inputs to the sensor that are 180 degrees out of phase.
  • a wide bandwidth output 106 of the sensor is monitored and the sensor output signal 106 is compared to the sensor output expected from the self-test stimulus inputs.
  • Fig. IB shows sample waveforms for the test stimulation inputs and the wideband sensor output. The comparison may be made by a variety of means as are ]
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of performing sensor self-test using the sensor assembly 100 shown in fig. 1. When the sensor becomes operational 200, stimulation signals are injected 210 at the self-test inputs 102, 104. If the sensor output differs sufficiently from the expected sensor output 220, 230 a sensor malfunction is declared 240 and sensor processing may be terminated 270.
  • the output of the sensor is filtered 250 to remove the sensor response due to the self-test stimulation and a sensed parameter signal is generated 260.
  • the process may be repeated and the duty cycle of the self-test stimulus signals may be varied from a low duty cycle up to a 100% duty cycle.
  • the sensor assembly of fig. 1 is employed with a low duty cycle for the self-test stimuli.
  • Fig. 3 shows exemplary input and output waveforms for this embodiment of the invention. Any of the above mentioned embodiments can be realized substantially in hardware and be transparent to the user as shown in the sensor assembly 400 in fig. 4.
  • the sensor assembly 400 includes self-test logic 402 that generates complementary self-test signals that are input to the sensor 401.
  • the sensor output is filtered by a low pass filter 406 to strip out the effects of the self-test stimuli on the sensor output and to generate a sensed parameter output 412.
  • the unfiltered sensor output 414 is monitored by a comparator 408 to determine if the sensor response to the self-test stimuli matches the expected sensor response.
  • a resultant self-test output 410 is generated whose value shows the result of the comparison.
  • a user need only monitor output signal 410 to determi sensor 401.
  • a system 500 uses minimal hardware features to provide continuous self- test of a sensor 501.
  • a system processor 502 such as, for example, a microprocessor, performs self-test control and monitoring of the sensor 501.
  • the processor can generate output signals 504 and 506 that provide self-test stimuli for the sensor 501.
  • the processor can filter the output 510 of the sensor to remove the effects of the self-test stimuli.
  • the processor can then determine a sensed parameter value. Further, the processor can monitor the high frequency portion of the sensor output to determine if the actual sensor output matches the expected sensor output. If the sensor output differs from the expected output by a threshold amount, a sensor malfunction may be detected and the system processor may signal an alarm or take other action.
  • a self- test stimulus can be provided to the sensor at a low duty cycle and the sensed parameter can be determined when the sensor response due to the self-test stimulus is substantially absent (the "stimulation off- period").
  • a sensor malfunction can be detected by comparing the sensor output to the expected sensor output when the sensor signal output from the self-test stimulus is expected (the "stimulation on-period").
  • sensor control and monitoring may be performed using a combination of software processing and additional support hardware. For example, a filter may be added to the output 510 of the sensor 501 to perform the filtering function and a wideband sensor output 508 may be monitored by the processor to determine if the sensor is malfunctioning.
  • logic blocks e.g., programs, modules, functions, or subroutines
  • logic elements may be added, modified, omitted, performed in a different order, or implemented using different logic constructs (e.g., logic gates, looping primitives, conditional logic, and other logic constructs) without changing the overall results true scope of the invention.
  • the present invention may be embodied in many different forms, including, but in no way limited to, computer program logic for use with a processor (e.g., a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, or general purpose computer), programmable logic for use with a programmable logic device (e.g., a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other PLD), discrete components, integrated circuitry (e.g., an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC)), or any other means including any combination thereof.
  • a processor e.g., a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, or general purpose computer
  • programmable logic for use with a programmable logic device
  • FPGA Field Programmable Gate Array
  • ASIC Application Specific Integrated Circuit
  • Source code may include a series of computer program instructions implemented in any of various programming languages (e.g., an object code, an assembly language, or a high-level language such as Fortran, C, C++, JANA, or HTML) for use with various operating systems or operating environments.
  • the source code may define and use various data structures and communication messages.
  • the source code may be in a computer executable form (e.g., via an interpreter), or the source code may be converted (e.g., via a translator, assembler, or compiler) into a computer executable form.
  • the computer program may be fixed in any form (e.g., source code form, computer executable form, or an intermediate form) either permanently or transitorily in a tangible storage medium, such as a semiconductor memory device (e.g., a RAM, ROM, PROM, EEPROM, or Flash-Programmable RAM), a magnetic memory device (e.g., a diskette or fixed disk), an optical memory device (e.g., a CD-ROM), a PC card (e.g., PCMCIA card), or other memory device.
  • a semiconductor memory device e.g., a RAM, ROM, PROM, EEPROM, or Flash-Programmable RAM
  • a magnetic memory device e.g., a diskette or fixed disk
  • an optical memory device e.g
  • the computer program may be fixed in any form in a signal that is transmittable to a computer using any of various communication technologies, including, but in no way limited to, analog technologies, digital technologies, optical technologies, wireless technologies, networking technologies, and internetworking technologies.
  • the computer program may be distributed in any form as a removable storage medium with accompanying printed or electronic documentation (e.g., shrink wrapped software or a magnetic tape), preloaded with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk), or distributed from a server or electronic bulletin board over the communication World Wide Web.)
  • Hardware logic including programmable logic for use with a programmable logic device) implementing all or part of the functionality previously described herein may be designed using traditional manual methods, or may be designed, captured, simulated, or documented electronically using various tools, such as Computer Aided Design (CAD), a hardware description language (e.g., VHDL or AHDL), or a PLD programming language (e.g., PALASM, ABEL, or CUPL.)

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Testing Or Calibration Of Command Recording Devices (AREA)
  • Testing Electric Properties And Detecting Electric Faults (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

A method and device for self-test of a sensor. The method includes stimulating the sensor with signals that generate sensor outputs at a frequency that differs from the frequency of expected sensed parameter signals. The sensor output is filtered to remove the effects of the stimulation inputs, generating a sensed parameter signal. The unfiltered sensor output is compared to the expected output of the sensor with the stimulus input. A malfunctioning sensor may be detected by the comparison and appropriate action may then be taken.

Description

Method for Continuous Sensor Self-Test
Technical Field The present invention relates to methods of self-test for sensors and, particularly, for micromachined capacitive sensors
Background Micromachined accelerometers can be used to sense acceleration for a variety of applications, including sensing the acceleration that occurs as a result of an automobile accident in order to trigger an air bag, or sensing the acceleration resulting from an earthquake in order to automatically shut off a gas line to prevent fires. In one type of micromachined device, a polysilicon mass is suspended over a substrate by supporting tethers. The mass, which is essentially parallel to the substrate, has a beam elongated along an axis, and a number of fingers that extend away from the beam in a direction perpendicular to the axis of the beam. The beam and fingers are movable laterally relative to the substrate along the axis. Each of these movable fingers is positioned between two polysilicon fingers that are in the plane of the mass and are fixed relative to the substrate. Each movable finger and the fixed fingers on either side of the movable finger form a differential capacitor cell. The cells additively form a differential capacitor. A structure of this type is shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,345,824. Different approaches can be used to sense acceleration with such a differential capacitor. One approach is to use force feedback, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,345,824. The movable fingers (i.e., movable with the mass) are each centered between two fixed fingers. All the fixed fingers on one side of the movable fingers are electrically coupled together, and all the fixed fingers on the other side of the movable fingers are also electrically coupled together. The two sets of fixed fingers are at different DC potentials and are driven with AC carrier signals that are 180 degrees out of phase with respect to each l other. In response to an external force/acceleration along . movable fingers moves toward one or the other set of fixed fingers. The signal on the beam is amplified, demodulated, and provided to an output terminal. A feedback network connects the output terminal and the beam. The feedback causes the movable fingers to be re-centered between the two sets of fixed fingers. The signal at the output terminal is a measure of the force required to re-center the beam, and is therefore proportional to acceleration. Self-test by means of electro-static activation of a sensor's mechanical system has been used by many sensors, such as the accelerometer described above, but only at discrete periods of time when actual parameter measurement cannot take place. For example in an automotive safety system the inertial sensors may be tested at key-on when it is assumed that the vehicle is not moving. However, it may be desirable to test sensor integrity continuously, so that the safety system can be alerted to the malfunctioning of a sensor in real time and can take appropriate action.
Summary of the Invention In a first embodiment of the invention, a method and device are provided for determining a parameter value using a sensor while performing sensor self-test. The sensor is stimulated by self-test inputs at a stimulation frequency. The output of the sensor is then compared to the sensor response expected from the stimulation. If an unexpected response is detected from the sensor, a malfunction of the sensor may be identified. If the sensor output is as expected, the sensor output may be filtered to remove the effects of the stimulation and sensed parameter values may be determined based on the filtered signal. In other embodiments of the invention, the stimulation of the sensor may be repeated over a range of duty cycles from a low duty cycle to a 100% duty cycle. In another embodiment of the invention, sensor self-test may be performed with minimal hardware support by using a system processor to control and monitor the sensor output. In a further embodiment of the invention, a system processor may cause self-test stimuli to be injected into the sensor at a low duty cycle and may determine sensed parameter values when the self-test stimuli are not injected. Brief Description of the Drav The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Fig. 1 A is a block diagram for a self-testing sensor assembly according to an embodiment of the invention; Fig. IB shows exemplary waveforms for the embodiment of fig. 1A; Fig. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of sensor self-test according to an embodiment of the invention; Fig. 3 shows alternative exemplary waveforms for the embodiment of fig. 1; Fig. 4 illustrates a sensor assembly that provides self-test in a fashion that is transparent to a user; and Fig. 5 illustrates a further sensor assembly that allows a user to generate a self-test capability using software and/or hardware that is external to the assembly. Detailed Description of Specific Embodiments In various embodiments of the present invention, a method of continuously testing sensors is provided. The method includes stimulating a sensor at high frequency and looking for appropriate sensor output response. A subsequent low pass filter can remove the response to the high-frequency self-test signal from the sensor output and allow a sensed parameter to be determined. Fig. 1A shows an exemplary sensor system 100 according to an embodiment of the invention. A sensor 101, for example, an accelerometer or a gyroscopic sensor, is provided that includes complementary self-test inputs. As used in this specification and in any appended claims, "complementary self-test inputs" will mean inputs where a self-test stimulus input 102 causes an increase in sensor output while another self-test stimulus 104 causes a decrease in output. These complementary self-test stimuli may be toggled at high speeds, using for example, square waves inputs to the sensor that are 180 degrees out of phase. A wide bandwidth output 106 of the sensor is monitored and the sensor output signal 106 is compared to the sensor output expected from the self-test stimulus inputs. Fig. IB shows sample waveforms for the test stimulation inputs and the wideband sensor output. The comparison may be made by a variety of means as are ]
A malfunctioning sensor should become apparent when the actual and expected wideband sensor outputs are compared. An error condition may be signaled or an alarm may be made or other action may be taken if the divergence between the actual and the expected wideband sensor output exceeds a threshold level. A subsequent low pass filter stage 110 may remove the sensor response due to high-frequency self-test signal, leaving only the sensed parameter signal 108. Fig. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of performing sensor self-test using the sensor assembly 100 shown in fig. 1. When the sensor becomes operational 200, stimulation signals are injected 210 at the self-test inputs 102, 104. If the sensor output differs sufficiently from the expected sensor output 220, 230 a sensor malfunction is declared 240 and sensor processing may be terminated 270. Otherwise, the output of the sensor is filtered 250 to remove the sensor response due to the self-test stimulation and a sensed parameter signal is generated 260. The process may be repeated and the duty cycle of the self-test stimulus signals may be varied from a low duty cycle up to a 100% duty cycle. In another embodiment of the invention, the sensor assembly of fig. 1 is employed with a low duty cycle for the self-test stimuli. One advantage of such a system is that even if the responses to the complementary self -test inputs are not tightly matched, little apparent null shift in the sensor output will occur. Fig. 3 shows exemplary input and output waveforms for this embodiment of the invention. Any of the above mentioned embodiments can be realized substantially in hardware and be transparent to the user as shown in the sensor assembly 400 in fig. 4. In this embodiment, all of the above mentioned self-test functions are carried out by logic internal to the sensor assembly and a resultant self-test output 410 is available to the user. The sensor assembly 400 includes self-test logic 402 that generates complementary self-test signals that are input to the sensor 401. The sensor output is filtered by a low pass filter 406 to strip out the effects of the self-test stimuli on the sensor output and to generate a sensed parameter output 412. The unfiltered sensor output 414 is monitored by a comparator 408 to determine if the sensor response to the self-test stimuli matches the expected sensor response. A resultant self-test output 410 is generated whose value shows the result of the comparison. Thus, a user need only monitor output signal 410 to determi sensor 401. In another embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in fig. 5, a system 500 is provided that uses minimal hardware features to provide continuous self- test of a sensor 501. A system processor 502, such as, for example, a microprocessor, performs self-test control and monitoring of the sensor 501. The processor can generate output signals 504 and 506 that provide self-test stimuli for the sensor 501. The processor can filter the output 510 of the sensor to remove the effects of the self-test stimuli. The processor can then determine a sensed parameter value. Further, the processor can monitor the high frequency portion of the sensor output to determine if the actual sensor output matches the expected sensor output. If the sensor output differs from the expected output by a threshold amount, a sensor malfunction may be detected and the system processor may signal an alarm or take other action. In a further specific embodiment of the invention, a self- test stimulus can be provided to the sensor at a low duty cycle and the sensed parameter can be determined when the sensor response due to the self-test stimulus is substantially absent (the "stimulation off- period"). A sensor malfunction can be detected by comparing the sensor output to the expected sensor output when the sensor signal output from the self-test stimulus is expected (the "stimulation on-period"). In other specific embodiments of the preceding embodiment, sensor control and monitoring may be performed using a combination of software processing and additional support hardware. For example, a filter may be added to the output 510 of the sensor 501 to perform the filtering function and a wideband sensor output 508 may be monitored by the processor to determine if the sensor is malfunctioning. It should be noted that a flow diagrams is used herein to demonstrate various aspects of the invention, and should not be construed to limit the present invention to any particular logic flow or logic implementation. The described logic may be partitioned into different logic blocks (e.g., programs, modules, functions, or subroutines) without changing the overall results or otherwise departing from the true scope of the invention. Oftentimes, logic elements may be added, modified, omitted, performed in a different order, or implemented using different logic constructs (e.g., logic gates, looping primitives, conditional logic, and other logic constructs) without changing the overall results true scope of the invention. The present invention may be embodied in many different forms, including, but in no way limited to, computer program logic for use with a processor (e.g., a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, or general purpose computer), programmable logic for use with a programmable logic device (e.g., a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other PLD), discrete components, integrated circuitry (e.g., an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC)), or any other means including any combination thereof. Computer program logic implementing all or part of the functionality previously described herein may be embodied in various forms, including, but in no way limited to, a source code form, a computer executable form, and various intermediate forms (e.g., forms generated by an assembler, compiler, linker, or locator.) Source code may include a series of computer program instructions implemented in any of various programming languages (e.g., an object code, an assembly language, or a high-level language such as Fortran, C, C++, JANA, or HTML) for use with various operating systems or operating environments. The source code may define and use various data structures and communication messages. The source code may be in a computer executable form (e.g., via an interpreter), or the source code may be converted (e.g., via a translator, assembler, or compiler) into a computer executable form. The computer program may be fixed in any form (e.g., source code form, computer executable form, or an intermediate form) either permanently or transitorily in a tangible storage medium, such as a semiconductor memory device (e.g., a RAM, ROM, PROM, EEPROM, or Flash-Programmable RAM), a magnetic memory device (e.g., a diskette or fixed disk), an optical memory device (e.g., a CD-ROM), a PC card (e.g., PCMCIA card), or other memory device. The computer program may be fixed in any form in a signal that is transmittable to a computer using any of various communication technologies, including, but in no way limited to, analog technologies, digital technologies, optical technologies, wireless technologies, networking technologies, and internetworking technologies. The computer program may be distributed in any form as a removable storage medium with accompanying printed or electronic documentation (e.g., shrink wrapped software or a magnetic tape), preloaded with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk), or distributed from a server or electronic bulletin board over the communication World Wide Web.) Hardware logic (including programmable logic for use with a programmable logic device) implementing all or part of the functionality previously described herein may be designed using traditional manual methods, or may be designed, captured, simulated, or documented electronically using various tools, such as Computer Aided Design (CAD), a hardware description language (e.g., VHDL or AHDL), or a PLD programming language (e.g., PALASM, ABEL, or CUPL.) Embodiments of the invention are not limited to any particular type of sensor such as the above described capacitive sensor. Further, the techniques described above may be applied to a wide range of sensor assemblies for sensing parameters beyond acceleration, rotation and the like. Other variations and modifications of the embodiments described above are intended to be within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A method for determining a sensed parameter using a sensor, the sensor generating a signal, the method comprising: a. stimulating the sensor; b. filtering the sensor signal; and c. determining the sensed parameter based on the filtered sensor signal. d. comparing the sensor signal to an expected signal and generating a sensor self-test signal based at least in part on the comparison. e. periodically repeating steps a through d.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the sensor stimulation is characterized by a stimulation frequency and the stimulation frequency and the signal frequency of the sensed parameter differ substantially.
3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the sensor includes complementary self-test inputs.
4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the sensor stimulation is characterized by a stimulation on-period and a stimulation off-period and the sensed parameter value is determined substantially during the sensor stimulation off-period.
5. A method according to claim 4, further including comparing the sensor signal to an expected sensor signal during the sensor stimulation on-period and generating a sensor self- test signal based at least in part on the comparison.
6. A method according to claim 1 wherein the sensed parameter is at least one of an acceleration and a rotation.
7. A sensor assembly for determining a sensed parameter while testing a sensor, the sensor assembly comprising: a. the sensor, the sensor including an output for generating an output signal; b. a stimulator connected to the sensor for injectin c. a filter connected to the sensor output, such that the filter substantially removes the portion of the output signal due to the stimulation signal; and d. a comparator connected to the sensor output, the comparator generating a sensor self-test signal.
8. A sensor assembly according to claim 7, wherein the sensor includes complementary self- test stimulation inputs.
9. A sensor assembly according to claim 7, wherein the stimulation signal is characterized by a stimulation frequency and the stimulation frequency and the signal frequency of the sensed parameter differ substantially.
10. A sensor assembly according to claim 7 wherein the stimulation signal is characterized by an on-period and an off-period; and the filter transmits the sensor output only during the stimulation off-period.
11. A sensor assembly according to claim 7 wherein the sensed parameter is at least one of an acceleration and a rotation.
12. A sensor assembly according to claim 7 wherein the assembly includes a self-test output signal.
13. A computer program product for use on a computer system for determining a sensed parameter value while performing sensor self-test, the system including a sensor, the computer program product comprising a computer usable medium having computer readable program code thereon, the computer readable program code including program code for: a. stimulating the sensor; b. filtering a sensor output signal; c. determining the sensed parameter value based on the filtered sensor signal; and d. comparing the sensor signal to an expected signal and generating a sensor self-test signal based at least in part on the comparison.
14. A computer program product according to claim 13 further including program code for: e. periodically repeating steps a through d.
15. A computer program product according to claim 13 wherein the sensor includes complementary self- test inputs.
16. A computer program product according to claim 13 wherein the sensed parameter is at least one of an acceleration and a rotation.
357633.1
PCT/US2005/002183 2004-02-24 2005-01-24 Method for continuous sensor self-test Ceased WO2005083449A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/785,828 2004-02-24
US10/785,828 US7086270B2 (en) 2004-02-24 2004-02-24 Method for continuous sensor self-test

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005083449A2 true WO2005083449A2 (en) 2005-09-09
WO2005083449A3 WO2005083449A3 (en) 2005-10-13

Family

ID=34861693

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2005/002183 Ceased WO2005083449A2 (en) 2004-02-24 2005-01-24 Method for continuous sensor self-test

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US7086270B2 (en)
TW (1) TWI289669B (en)
WO (1) WO2005083449A2 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102006032911A1 (en) * 2006-07-15 2008-01-24 Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh Sensor`s e.g. acceleration sensor, mechanical fixation evaluation method for motor vehicle, involves evaluating signals detected by sensor regarding strength in preset frequency areas for concluding quality of mechanical fixation
DE102010029903A1 (en) 2010-06-10 2011-12-15 Robert Bosch Gmbh Sensor arrangement for detecting e.g. pressure of micro electromechanical system of motor car, has sensor for detecting physical quantity, and device for online monitoring sensitivity of arrangement
US9346441B2 (en) 2010-09-24 2016-05-24 Infineon Technologies Ag Sensor self-diagnostics using multiple signal paths
US9638762B2 (en) 2014-02-24 2017-05-02 Infineon Technologies Ag Highly efficient diagnostic methods for monolithic sensor systems
US9874609B2 (en) 2010-09-24 2018-01-23 Infineon Technologies Ag Sensor self-diagnostics using multiple signal paths
US10145882B2 (en) 2010-09-24 2018-12-04 Infineon Technologies Ag Sensor self-diagnostics using multiple signal paths

Families Citing this family (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2003276913A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2004-04-08 Carnegie Mellon University Built-in self test of mems
JP2005016975A (en) * 2003-06-23 2005-01-20 Denso Corp Inspection method for semiconductor acceleration sensor and semiconductor acceleration sensor
US7032430B1 (en) * 2005-06-07 2006-04-25 Texas Instruments Incorporated Systems and methods for self test for a slowly varying sensor
DE102006011138B4 (en) * 2006-01-16 2022-09-29 Continental Automotive Technologies GmbH Process for functional testing of an assembly
US7543473B2 (en) * 2006-08-01 2009-06-09 Analog Devices, Inc. Sensor self-test transfer standard
US20090241634A1 (en) * 2008-03-28 2009-10-01 Cenk Acar Micromachined accelerometer and method with continuous self-testing
RU2388999C1 (en) * 2008-09-01 2010-05-10 Открытое акционерное общество "Концерн "Центральный научно-исследовательский институт "Электроприбор" Micromechanical gyroscope (versions) and adjustment methods thereof, based on using amplitude-modulated quadrature testing effect
US8466700B2 (en) * 2009-03-18 2013-06-18 Infineon Technologies Ag System that measures characteristics of output signal
DE102009031182A1 (en) * 2009-06-29 2010-12-30 Brüel & Kjaer Vibro GmbH Method and device for monitoring a piezoelectric sensor system
IT1397594B1 (en) 2009-12-21 2013-01-16 St Microelectronics Rousset MICROELETTROMECHANICAL GYROSCOPE WITH CONTINUOUS SELF-TEST FUNCTION AND METHOD OF CONTROL OF A MICROELECTRANOMIC GYROSCOPE.
US20120096290A1 (en) * 2010-10-14 2012-04-19 Keynetik, Inc. Distributed Architecture for Situation Aware Sensory Application
EP2919646B8 (en) 2012-11-14 2019-06-12 Vectorious Medical Technologies Ltd. Drift compensation for implanted capacitance-based pressure transducer
DE102012222724A1 (en) * 2012-12-11 2014-06-12 Robert Bosch Gmbh Redundant signal acquisition
US9383425B2 (en) 2012-12-28 2016-07-05 Allegro Microsystems, Llc Methods and apparatus for a current sensor having fault detection and self test functionality
EP2986252B1 (en) 2013-04-18 2018-07-25 Vectorious Medical Technologies Ltd. Remotely powered sensory implant
US10205488B2 (en) 2013-04-18 2019-02-12 Vectorious Medical Technologies Ltd. Low-power high-accuracy clock harvesting in inductive coupling systems
EP3080627B1 (en) 2013-12-26 2020-10-14 Allegro MicroSystems, LLC Methods and apparatus for sensor diagnostics
US9739846B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2017-08-22 Allegro Microsystems, Llc Magnetic field sensors with self test
WO2016178197A1 (en) 2015-05-07 2016-11-10 Vectorious Medical Technologies Ltd Deploying and fixating an implant across an organ wall
US10694604B2 (en) 2015-05-29 2020-06-23 Signify Holding B.V. Lighting controller, lighting system and configuration method
US10088315B2 (en) 2015-12-10 2018-10-02 Invensense, Inc. Two frequency gyroscope compensation system and method
US10139229B2 (en) 2015-12-10 2018-11-27 Panasonic Corporation Gyroscope with auxiliary self-test
US11206988B2 (en) 2015-12-30 2021-12-28 Vectorious Medical Technologies Ltd. Power-efficient pressure-sensor implant
US10073115B1 (en) 2016-04-18 2018-09-11 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of National Aeronautics And Space Administration Self diagnostic accelerometer field programmable gate array (SDA FPGA)
DE102019132356A1 (en) * 2019-11-28 2021-06-02 Tdk Electronics Ag Dual channel detector
US11194004B2 (en) 2020-02-12 2021-12-07 Allegro Microsystems, Llc Diagnostic circuits and methods for sensor test circuits
EP3957953A1 (en) * 2020-08-19 2022-02-23 Aptiv Technologies Limited System and method for self-test of inertial measurement unit (imu)
US12560923B2 (en) * 2020-10-13 2026-02-24 Rahul Varma Kalidindi Automated self-precision validation accelerometer and system for machine diagnosis
FR3135050B1 (en) * 2022-05-02 2024-03-15 Faiveley Transp Tours Access door to a transport vehicle comprising means for diagnosing correct detection of the presence of passengers, vehicle and corresponding implementation method

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0715722B1 (en) * 1993-08-24 1998-06-03 A/S BRÜEL & KJAER An apparatus for detecting the malfunctioning of an accelerometer
US5900529A (en) * 1997-07-10 1999-05-04 Trw Inc. Apparatus and method for testing an acceleration sensor
DE19739903A1 (en) * 1997-09-11 1999-04-01 Bosch Gmbh Robert Sensor device
DE19845185B4 (en) * 1998-10-01 2005-05-04 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Sensor with resonant structure and device and method for self-test of such a sensor
US6629448B1 (en) * 2000-02-25 2003-10-07 Seagate Technology Llc In-situ testing of a MEMS accelerometer in a disc storage system
US6698269B2 (en) * 2001-04-27 2004-03-02 Oceana Sensor Technologies, Inc. Transducer in-situ testing apparatus and method
JP3861652B2 (en) * 2001-10-16 2006-12-20 株式会社デンソー Capacitive physical quantity sensor

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102006032911A1 (en) * 2006-07-15 2008-01-24 Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh Sensor`s e.g. acceleration sensor, mechanical fixation evaluation method for motor vehicle, involves evaluating signals detected by sensor regarding strength in preset frequency areas for concluding quality of mechanical fixation
DE102010029903A1 (en) 2010-06-10 2011-12-15 Robert Bosch Gmbh Sensor arrangement for detecting e.g. pressure of micro electromechanical system of motor car, has sensor for detecting physical quantity, and device for online monitoring sensitivity of arrangement
US9346441B2 (en) 2010-09-24 2016-05-24 Infineon Technologies Ag Sensor self-diagnostics using multiple signal paths
US9874609B2 (en) 2010-09-24 2018-01-23 Infineon Technologies Ag Sensor self-diagnostics using multiple signal paths
US10145882B2 (en) 2010-09-24 2018-12-04 Infineon Technologies Ag Sensor self-diagnostics using multiple signal paths
US10514410B2 (en) 2010-09-24 2019-12-24 Infineon Technologies Ag Sensor self-diagnostics using multiple signal paths
US9638762B2 (en) 2014-02-24 2017-05-02 Infineon Technologies Ag Highly efficient diagnostic methods for monolithic sensor systems
US10353018B2 (en) 2014-02-24 2019-07-16 Infineon Technologies Ag Highly efficient diagnostic methods for monolithic sensor systems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW200602640A (en) 2006-01-16
TWI289669B (en) 2007-11-11
US20050183489A1 (en) 2005-08-25
WO2005083449A3 (en) 2005-10-13
US7086270B2 (en) 2006-08-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7086270B2 (en) Method for continuous sensor self-test
US8056389B2 (en) Sensor self-test transfer standard
US9238580B2 (en) Spread-spectrum MEMS self-test system and method
EP3391061B1 (en) Accelerometer sense path self-test
US8797047B2 (en) Method and device for checking a sensor signal
US20100145660A1 (en) Mems sensor with built-in self-test
US6308554B1 (en) Electronic device having an acceleration-sensitive sensor
US11184690B2 (en) Embedded system for vibration detection and analysis
EP2762894B1 (en) Acceleration sensor circuit
EP3387449A1 (en) Accelerometer common mode self-test
Enisz et al. Reconfigurable real-time hardware-in-the-loop environment for automotive electronic control unit testing and verification
US20110041614A1 (en) Circuit for a micromechanical structure-borne sound sensor and method for operating a micromechanical structure-borne sound sensor
US12227409B2 (en) Robust inertial sensor self-test
US20130125651A1 (en) Fail safe test for a bandwidth check on inertial sensing components
Campolo et al. Inertial/magnetic sensors based orientation tracking on the group of rigid body rotations with application to wearable devices
CN104569626A (en) Electrostatic field sensor and electrostatic alarm system and method based on electrostatic field sensor
Nur’aidha et al. Implementation of MEMS accelerometer for velocity-based seismic sensor
Chikhalikar et al. Design of real-time acquisition and filtering for MEMS-based accelerometer data in microcontroller
GB2239096A (en) Signal processing circuits
Kok et al. DEVELOPMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A WIRELESS MEMS INERTIAL SYSTEM FOR HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURES PART 1: DESCRIPTION OF SENSOR AND DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM.
CN104024144B (en) Micromechanical component, there are the parts of micromechanical component and for the method manufacturing parts
US20250341539A1 (en) Method for Measuring the Response of an Accelerometer at Accelerations Greater than 1 G
Jairam et al. Verification of a MEMS based adaptive cruise control system using simulation and semi-formal approaches
Dereli et al. Development and Performance Analysis of a Hybrid Filtering Method for IMU-Based Dynamic Tilt Sensor
Fujiyoshi et al. A new micro jerk sensor with viscous coupling

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase