DESCRIPTION
THINNER COMPOSITION FOR REMOVING PHOTOSENSITIVE RESIN
[Technical Field]
The present invention relates to a thinner composition for removing a
photoresist, and more particularly to a thinner composition capable of effectively
removing an unwanted photoresist in the manufacturing process of a semiconductor
device or a liquid crystal display device.
[Background Art]
The TFT-array process during the manufacturing process of a TFT-LCD is
similar to the silicon semiconductor manufacturing process using photolithography.
The photolithographic process is a process of obtaining an electronic circuit by coating
a photosensitive film on a substrate, forming a photomask pattern, developing, and
etching.
A TFT-array is formed on a substrate to manufacture a TFT-LCD by the
photolithographic process. In the process, if the thinner composition penetrates the
interface of the photoresist, the subsequent processes including etching, ion
implantation, etc., may be negatively affected. This may reduce productivity of the
entire process.
Such penetration into the interface of the photoresist may cause defocusing
during exposure after the baking process, and thus reduces productivity of the
TFT-LCD manufacture process.
Differently from the edge part of a silicon wafer where a centrifugal force is
exerted, the glass substrate of a TFT-LCD is a square, and thus EBR (edge bead
removing: removal of photoresist at the edge part) by rotation is impossible. Also,
because the glass substrate is fixed and the spray nozzle moves along the four planes
of the glass substrate, the penetration from the edge of the photoresist into the interface
may happen even after the photoresist at the edge part has been removed, if the
thinner does not volatilize quickly. This is different from the rotational EBR where the
silicon wafer is rotated at high speed and penetration from the edge of the photoresist
into the interface is reduced even if the thinner does not volatilize quickly. That is,
because the LCD glass substrate is fixed and only the thinner spray nozzle moves, use
of the conventional highly soluble thinner may cause penetration into the interface of
the photoresist during rinsing of the edge part, thereby reducing productivity of the
entire process.
The conventional thinner compositions are as follows.
Japanese Patent Publication No. Sho 63-69563 discloses a method of
removing unwanted photoresist by contacting a thinner with substrate. In the method,
an organic solvent for cleansing, e.g., ethers or ether acetates such as cellosolve,
cellosolve acetate, propylene glycol ether, propylene glycol ether acetate, etc.; ketones
such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, cyclohexanone, etc.; or
esters such as methyl lactate, ethyl lactate, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, butyl acetate,
etc., is used as a thinner. Japanese Patent Publication No. Hei 4-49938 discloses use
of propylene glycol methyl ether acetate as a thinner, and Japanese Patent Publication
No. Hei 4-42523 discloses use of alkyl alkoxy propionate as a thinner.
These solvents are used alone or in combination considering physical
properties and safety. Differently from the TFT-LCD process where the substrate is
fixed and a linear EBR is employed, these solvents have been used in the rotational
EBR process at an elevated rotational speed.
However, they do not solve the problem of the penetration into the interface of
the photoresist.
[Technical Problem]
It is an aspect of the present invention to provide a thinner composition for
removing a photoresist capable of preventing penetration into the interface of the
photoresist at the edge of a substrate used to manufacture a liquid crystal display
device, particularly a large-sized glass substrate for an organic EL
(electroluminescence) display device, and removing the photoresist effectively in a
short time.
[Technical Solution]
In order to attain the aspect, the present invention provides a thinner
composition for removing a photoresist comprising a) a propylene glycol monoalkyl
ether; b) an alkyl ethanoate; and c) a cycloketone.
Preferably, the thinner composition comprises a) 10 to 90 parts by weight of a
propylene glycol monoalkyl ether; b) 10 to 70 parts by weight of an alkyl ethanoate; and
c) 1 to 70 parts by weight of a cycloketone.
The thinner composition of the present invention may further comprise at least
one compound selected from the group consisting of d) a fluorinated acrylic copolymer;
and e) a polyethylene oxide condensate.
Preferably, the thinner composition may comprise a) 10 to 90 parts by weight of
a propylene glycol monoalkyl ether; b) 10 to 70 parts by weight of an alkyl ethanoate; c)
1 to 70 parts by weight of a cycloketone; and d) 0.001 to 1 part by weight of a
fluorinated acrylic copolymer.
Also, the thinner composition may comprise a) 10 to 90 parts by weight of a
propylene glycol monoalkyl ether; b) 10 to 70 parts by weight of an alkyl ethanoate; c) 1
to 70 parts by weight of a cycloketone; and e) 0.001 to 1 part by weight of a
polyethylene oxide condensate.
The thinner composition may also comprise a) 10 to 90 parts by weight of a
propylene glycol monoalkyl ether; b) 10 to 70 parts by weight of an alkyl ethanoate; c) 1
to 70 parts by weight of a cycloketone; d) 0.001 to 1 part by weight of a fluorinated
acrylic copolymer; and e) 0.001 to 1 part by weight of a polyethylene oxide condensate.
Hereinafter, the present invention is described in more detail.
The present invention is characterized by being capable of preventing
penetration into the interface of the photoresist, and thus is effective for use in
manufacturing a semiconductor device or a liquid crystal display device.
The thinner composition for removing a photoresist of the present invention
comprises a propylene glycol monoalkyl ether; an alkyl ethanoate; and a cycloketone.
The propylene glycol monoalkyl ether, the alkyl ethanoate, and the cycloketone,
which are used as solvents in the present invention, may be ultrapure and of the
semiconductor level. For a VLSI level, they are preferably ones that are filtered to the
level of 0.1 μm.
The alkyl group of the propylene glycol monoalkyl ether may have 1 to 5 carbon
atoms. To be specific, the propylene glycol monoalkyl ether is preferably at least one
selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol monomethyl ether, propylene
glycol monoethyl ether, propylene glycol monopropyl ether, and propylene glycol
monobutyl ether. Among these, propylene glycol monomethyl ether, which has an
outstanding dissolving power to polymers, is more preferable.
Propylene glycol monomethyl ether is harmless to humans when exposed to
air, and is quickly decomposed to propylene glycol and alcohol in the human body.
According to a toxicity test by oral administration into a mouse, it has an LD50 of 4.4 g/kg.
And, it is quickly decomposed by hydrolysis. It has a boiling point of 132.8 °C, a flash
point (measured by the closed cup method) of 32 °C , a viscosity (at 25 °C ) of 1.86 cps,
a surface tension of 26.5 dyne/cm2, and a solubility parameter of 10.4.
Preferably, the propylene glycol monoalkyl ether is comprised at 10 to 90 parts
by weight per 100 parts by weight of the composition. If the content of the propylene
glycol monoalkyl ether is below 10 parts by weight, dissolving power to the
photosensitive film is reduced. Otherwise, if it exceeds 90 parts by weight of, the
volatility decreases, so that the thinner may remain on the surface after drying.
Also, preferably, the alkyl group of the alkyl ethanoate has 1 to 4 carbon atoms.
To be specific, the alkyl ethanoate is at least one selected from the group consisting of
methyl ethanoate, ethyl ethanoate, isopropyl ethanoate, n-propyl ethanoate, and butyl
ethanoate. Among these, such solvents as isopropyl ethanoate, n-propyl ethanoate,
and butyl ethanoate are more preferable. They have adequate volatilities and
relatively low viscosities. Preferably, the alkyl ethanoate is comprised at 10 to 70 parts
by weight per 100 parts by weight of the composition. If the content of the alkyl
ethanoate is below 10 parts by weight, the thinner becomes less volatile, so that the
thinner may remain on the substrate after drying. Otherwise, if it exceeds 70 parts by
weight, dissolving power of the thinner may decrease.
Butyl ethanoate, one of the alkyl ethanoates, has superior dissolving power to a
variety of resins, a particularly low surface tension, and outstanding volatility, so that it
can offer superior interfacial characteristics with a small amount of addition into the
thinner composition. According to a toxicity test by oral administration into a mouse,
butyl ethanoate has an LD50of 7.0 g/kg. And, it is quickly decomposed by hydrolysis.
It has a boiling point of 126.1 °C, a flash point (measured by the closed cup method) of
23 °C , a viscosity (at 25 °C) of 0.74 cps, and a surface tension of 25 dyne/cm2.
The cycloketone may be cyclopentanone, cyclohexanone, cycloheptanone, etc.
Among these, cyclohexanone, which has superior dissolving power to a variety of
resins, is more preferable.
The cycloketone is comprised at 1 to 70 parts by weight per 100 parts by
weight of the composition. If the content of the cycloketone is below 1 part by weight,
the ability to remove several photosensitive films is reduced. Otherwise, if it exceeds
70 parts by weight, dissolving power to a specific photosensitive film is reduced.
The thinner composition of the present invention may further comprise at least
one compound selected from the group consisting of a fluorinated acrylic copolymer
and a polyethylene oxide condensate.
The fluorinated acrylic copolymer is highly soluble in water and a variety of
solvents. An example of the commercially available products is Megaface R-08 of
Dainippon Ink and Chemicals.
Preferably, the fluorinated acrylic copolymer is comprised at 0.001 to 1 part by
weight per 100 parts by weight of the composition. If the content of the copolymer is
below 0.001 part by weight, dissolving power to the photoresist is significantly reduced.
Otherwise, if it exceeds 1 part by weight, the removing capacity is improved as the
dynamic surface tension at the interface is reduced, but the liquid level sensor may
operate abnormally due to excessive foaming.
Preferably, for the fluorinated acrylic copolymer, the one having a
weight-average molecular weight ranging from 3000 to 10,000, a flash point (measured
by the open cup method) of 200 °C, a specific gravity of 1.10 g/ml (at 25 °C), a viscosity
(at 20 °C) of 2100 cst, and a surface tension on ethyl lactate of 24.0 mN/m (measured
by the Wilhermy method). Preferably, it is used diluted in ethyl lactate.
The polyethylene oxide condensate acts as a non-ionic surfactant. To be
specific, the condensate may be a condensation product of an alkyl phenol having a
linear or branched alkyl group having 6 to 12 carbon atoms, and 5 to 25 moles of
ethylene oxide per 1 mole of the alkyl phenol. The alkyl group of the alkyl phenol may
be derived from propylene, diisobutylene, octene, or nonene. Examples of the
condensate are nonylphenol obtained from condensation of about 9.5 moles of
ethylene oxide per 1 mole of phenol, dodecylphenol obtained from condensation of
about 12 moles of ethylene oxide per 1 mole of phenol, diisooctylphenol obtained from
condensation of about 15 moles of ethylene oxide per 1 mole of phenol, and so forth.
These compounds are highly soluble in water and a variety of solvents. They reduce
the gap at the interface when the thinner contacts the photoresist. An example of a
commercially available product is the non-ionic Monopol series of Dongnam Chemical.
Preferably, the polyethylene oxide condensate is comprised at 0.001 to 1 part
by weight per 100 parts by weight of the composition. If the content is below 0.001
part by weight, volatility and cleansing power of the thinner are significantly reduced at
the edge of the substrate. Otherwise, if it exceeds 1 part by weight, foaming becomes
excessive.
After a photoresist is coated on a substrate using a coater, unwanted
photoresist at the edge and back of the substrate is removed by dropping or spraying
the thinner composition. The amount of dropping or spraying of the thinner
composition of the present invention can be controlled depending on the kind of
photoresist and film thickness. Preferably, the amount is selected from the range of 5
to 100 cc/min. After the thinner composition has been sprayed, a microcircuit pattern
may be formed by the subsequent photolithographic process.
[Advantageous Effects]
As described above, the thinner composition for removing a photoresist of the
present invention is capable of effectively and quickly removing unwanted photoresist
attached at the edge and back of a substrate used in manufacturing a liquid crystal
display device, particularly a large-sized glass substrate for an organic EL display
device, reducing the gap at the interface, and especially preventing penetration into the
interface of the photoresist. Therefore, it offers an economic advantage, simplifies
manufacturing processes, and improves productivity.
[Best Mode]
Hereinafter the present invention is described in more detail through examples.
However, the following examples are only for the understanding of the present
invention and they do not limit the present invention.
EXAMPLES
A substrate sample was prepared as follows.
A silicon oxide substrate having a diameter of 8 inches was used. The
substrate was cleansed in two baths (immersed in each bath for 5 minutes) containing
hydrogen peroxide and sulfuric acid, respectively, and rinsed with ultrapure water.
This process was performed in a specially designed cleansing facility. Then, the
substrate was dried in a spin drier (SRD 1800-6 of VERTEQ). Next, a photoresist was
coated to a predetermined thickness on the substrate. The photoresist was coated
with a spin coater (EBR TRACK of Korea Semiconductor).
In the spin coating, 10 cc of the photoresist was dropped at the center of the
stationary substrate. Then, the photoresist was distributed for 3 seconds using a spin
coater at 500 rpm. Subsequently, the spinning rate was increased to about 2000 to
4000 rpm to obtain a desired thickness. The spinning time at this rate was about 20 to
30 seconds.
Examples 1 to 5 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5
Each thinner composition of Examples 1 to 5 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5
was prepared with the composition and content given in Table 1 below.
Table 1
Note)
1. PGME: propylene glycol monomethyl ether
2. PGMEA: propylene glycol monoethyl ether acetate
3. n-PE: n-propyl ethanoate
4. CXN: cyclohexanone
5. GBL: D-butyrolactone
6. OP-1015: Monopol OP-1015 of Dongnam Chemical, a condensate prepared
by condensing 5 moles of ethylene oxide per 1 mole of octylphenol
7. R-08: Megaface R-08 of Dainippon Ink and Chemicals, a fluorinated acrylic
copolymer
Removal of unwanted photoresist
Each photoresist was coated on an 8-inch silicon oxide substrate. Then,
unwanted photoresist at the edge part was removed using each thinner composition of
Examples 1 to 7 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5 (edge bead Removing test:
hereunder referred to as EBR test). During the EBR test, the same spin coater that
had been used to coat the photoresist on the substrate was used.
On each substrate coated with the photoresist given in Table 2 below, each
thinner composition of Table 1 was spayed though an EBR nozzle under the condition
given in Table 3 below. Each thinner composition was fed from a pressured container
equipped with a pressure gauge. He feeding pressure was 1.0 kgf, and the flow rate
of the thinner composition was controlled to 10 to 20 cc/min.
Evaluation of the EBR test result is given in Table 4 below.
Table 2
Photoresists and film thicknesses
EBR test condition
Table 4
Evaluation of EBR test
In Table 4, "©" means that there was no penetration into the interface of the
photoresist during the EBR test. "O" means that 80% or more of the penetration into
the interface of the photoresist had a favorable linear shape. "Δ" means that 50% or
more of the penetration into the interface of the photoresist had a favorable linear
shape. "X" means that 20% or more of the penetration into the interface of the
photoresist had a favorable linear shape and that tailing of the film occurred at the edge
part.
As shown in Table 4, all of the thinner compositions of the present invention
(Examples 1 to 7) showed superior EBR performance (prevention of penetration) for all
photoresists. Especially, the thinner compositions of Examples 5 and 7 showed very
superior EBR performance and penetration preventing capability. Therefore, the
thinner composition of the present invention, which comprises a polyethylene oxide
condensate, a fluorinated acrylic copolymer, or mixtures thereof, offers superior
photoresist removal capability.
On the contrary, the thinner compositions of Comparative Examples 1 to 5
showed much worse penetration preventing capability. This reduces productivity of a
semiconductor device or a liquid crystal display device in the subsequent processes.
While the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the
preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications
and substitutions can be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of
the present invention as set forth in the appended claims.