FLUORESCENT ASSAY FOR COMPOUNDS BINDING TO THE PEPTIDYL TRANSFERASE CENTER OF THE RIBOSOME
This invention relates to an assay method for determining whether a test compound binds to the peptidyl transferase centre of the ribosome, more particularly the ribosome of a bacterium.
Background to the Invention
In the cell, protein synthesis takes place on the ribosome. The ribosome is a large macromolecular assembly of several RNA molecules, and more than fifty proteins. It consists of two subunits: 30S and 50S. Both contain several functional sites for interaction with a large number of different ligands during protein synthesis. The most important, on which protein assembly takes place, is the peptidyl transferase centre of the 50S subunit.
A large number of anti-infective antibiotics act by inhibition of protein synthesis, by direct binding with high affinity to specific sites on the ribosome. There is, therefore, a need for a simple, inexpensive, straightforward, homogeneous and miniaturised high throughput screening (HTS) assay for ribosomal inhibitors. Such an assay would be useful for screening, especially HTS or ultra HTS (uHTS) of large compound libraries as potential antibiotics. Ribosomal peptidyl transferase is a target for several classes of natural and semi synthetic antibiotics, such as macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramins, chloramphenicol and ketolides. It would, therefore, be desirable to have a robust assay capable of detecting the binding of a test compound to the peptidyl transferase centre of the ribosome.
Detailed Description of the Invention
The present invention provides an assay method for determining whether a test compound binds to the ribosomal peptidyl transferase centre, which comprises determining a fluorescence characteristic of a pair of reporter molecules, namely (i) a ribosomal element which includes the ribosomal peptidyl transferase centre and (ii) a fluorophore-tagged lincosamide antibiotic,
in the presence and absence of the test compound, a change in the fluorescence characteristic being taken as indication binding of the test compound to the peptidyl transferase centre.
The assay of the invention is suitable for use with any part of the ribosome which includes the peptidyl transferase centre, for example a whole ribosome or the 50S ribosomal subunit.
The fluorophore-tagged lincosamide antibiotic is conveniently a fluorophore- tagged clindamycin or lincomycin-derived molecule, but there are other known members of the lincosamide family which are suitable including, for example, celestecetin. Suitable fluorophore tags are TAMRA and BODIPY® TMR-X, but again there are many known fluorophore alternatives available as standard laboratory chemicals, including BODIPY®-FL, Alexa Fluor®, Cy3, Cy5 and other different types of commercially available fluorophores. TAMRA is the common acronym for either 5-carboxytetramethylrhodamine, its 6-carboxy position isomer, or a mixture of the 5- and 6-position isomers. BODIPY® TMR-X is the acronym for 6-((4,4-difluoro-1 ,3-dimethyl-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-bora-3a,4a- diaza-s-indacene-2-propionyl)amino) hexanoic acid.
Thus, TAMRA-lincosamide, having either of the following structures (I) or (II) or a mixture thereof, and BODIPY® TMR-X-lincosamide, having structure (III), and salts thereof, are novel entities in their own right, and form part of the present invention:
(I) (II)
(HI)
The fluorescence characteristic determined in the assay of the invention is preferably fluorescence anisotropy or fluorescence polarisation, but fluorescence intensity can also be used.
The following non-limiting Examples describe the synthesis of two fluorophore- tagged lincosamides (structures I and III), either of which are suitable for use as the fluorescent reporter molecule in the assay of the invention. Also described is the use of each reporter in one assay format of the invention.
In Examples 1 and 2, purification and characterisation of compounds were performed using the following techniques.
1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DPX400 instrument. Chemical shifts are quoted in parts per million, and are referenced to the residual solvent peak. The following abbreviations are used: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q,
quartet; m, multiplet; br, broad. Coupling constants are quoted to the nearest 0.5 Hz.
Analytical liquid chromatography-mass spectrometrγ (LC-MS) was performed on an HP1100 instrument, using a Luna 3 μm, C18(2), 30 mm x 4.6 mm i.d. column from Phenomenex at ambient temperature. Gradient elution was performed as follows: 0-0.25 min, 5% solvent B, flow rate 2 cm3min"1; 0.25-2.5 min, 95% B, 2 cm3min"1; 2.5-2.55 min, 95% B, 3 cm3 min"1; 2.55-3.6 min, 95% B, 3 cm3 min"1; 3.6-3.65 min, 95% B, 2 cm3 min"1; 3.65-3.7 min, 5% B, 2 cm3 min"1; 3.7-3.75 min, 5% B, 2 cm3 min"1. Solvent A: 10 mM aqueous ammonium acetate + 0.08% v/v formic acid. Solvent B: 95% acetonitrile + 5% solvent A + 0.08% v/v formic acid. UV detection was performed at 230, 254 and 270 nm. Mass spectrometry was carried out on a HP1100 MSD, series A instrument. The ionisation method was positive ion electrospray and the molecular weight scan range was 150-1000.
Preparative LC-MS was performed on a Waters FractionLynx MS autopurification system using a Luna 5 μm, C18(2), 100 mm x 21.2 mm i.d. column from Phenomenex at ambient temperature. Solvent A: water + 0.08% v/v formic acid. Solvent B: 95% methanol-water + 0.08% v/v formic acid. Flow rate: 20 cm3 min-1. The instrument incorporated a photo diode array detector (210-400 nm) and a MicroMass ZQ mass spectrometer. The ionisation method was positive ion electrospray and the molecular weight scan range was 150-1000. Fraction collection was triggered by detection of the selected mass ion.
Example 1
7-(/?)-Amino-7-deoxylincomycin (IV) was prepared using the protocol of Sztaricskai, Omura and their co-workers.
1,2 5-Carboxytetramethylrhodamine (5-TAMRA) lincosamide (I) (herein called TAMRA-lincosamide) was synthesised in the form of its formate salt from 7-(
:?)-amino-7-deoxylincomycin (IV) in accordance with Scheme 1.
5-TAMRA lincosamide (I)
Scheme 1
7-( ?)-7-(3-Carboxy-4-{9-[(6-dimethylaminoxanthen-3-ylidene) dimethylammonium]}benzenecarbamoyl)-7-deoxylincomycin, diformate salt (5-TAMRA lincosamide) (I)
To a solution of 7-(r?)-amino-7-deoxylincomycin (IV)1'2 (0.015 g, 0.038 mmol) and triethylamine (0.010 cm3, 0.076 mmol) in anhydrous dimethyl formamide (2 cm3) was added 5-carboxytetramethylrhodamine, succinimidyl ester (5- TAMRA, SE) (V) (0.020 g, 0.038 mmol). After 18 h, the reaction mixture was evaporated, and the residue subjected to preparative LC-MS under a gradient elution (0 min, 5% solvent B; 0.5 min, 30% B; 7.0 min, 60% B; 7.5 min, 95% B; 9.5 min, 95% B; 10.0 min, 5% B). The eluted material (retention time 5.89 min), obtained as a purple solid (0.010 g, 31%), was identified as the title compound
(i); δH (400 MHz; d4-MeOH) 8.53 (2 H, s), 8.49 (1 H, d, J 2 Hz), 8.00 (1 H, dd, J 8 and 2 Hz), 7.35 (1 H, d, J8 Hz), 7.25 (1 H, d, J 9.5 Hz), 7.24 (1 H, d, J 9.5 Hz),
7.01 (2 H, dd, J 9.5 and 2.5 Hz), 6.92 (2 H, d, J 2.5 Hz), 5.29 (1 H, d, J5.5 Hz), 4.58-4.48 (2 H, m), 4.32 (1 H, d, J7.5 Hz), 4.12 (1 H, dd, J 10 and 5.5 Hz),
4.02 (1 H, d, J3 Hz), 3.56 (1 H, dd, J 10 and 3 Hz), 3.28 (12 H, s), 3.30-3.23 (1 H, m), 3.11 (1 H, dd, J 10.5 and 4 Hz), 2.47 (3 H, s), 2.32-2.21 (1 H, m), 2.14 (3 H, s), 2.17-2.03 (2 H, m), 1.90-1.80 (1 H, m), 1.42-1.23 (4 H, m), 1.30 (3 H, d, J6.5 Hz) and 0.91 (3 H, t, J 7 Hz),
m/z410 (ιVf2+, 100%), retention time 1.77 min.
Example 2
BODIPY® TMR-X lincosamide (III) in the form of its formate salt was synthesised from 7-(A?)-amino-7-deoxylincomycin (IV) in accordance with Scheme 2.
BODIPY® TMR-X lincosamide (III)
Scheme 2
7-( ?)-7-({6-[4,4-Difluoro-153-dimethyl-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-bora-3a,4a- diaza-s-indacene-2-propionyl]amino}hexanecarbamoyl)-7- deoxylincomycin, formate salt (BODIPY® TMR-X lincosamide) (III)
To a solution of 7-(/?)-amino-7-deoxylincomycin (IV) (0.0133 g, 0.033 mmol) and triethylamine (0.010 cm3, 0.076 mmol) in anhydrous dimethyl formamide cm3) was added 6-(4,4-difluoro-1 ,3-dimethyl-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-bora-
3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene-2-propionyl)amino) hexanoic acid, succinimidyl ester (BODIPY® TMR-X, SE) (VI) (0.020 g, 0.033 mmol). After 18 h, the reaction mixture was evaporated, and the residue subjected to preparative LC-MS under a gradient elution (0 min, 5% solvent B; 0.5 min, 60% B; 7.0 min, 95% B; 7.5 min, 95% B; 9.5 min, 95% B; 10.0 min, 5% B). The eluted material (retention time 6.78 min), obtained as a purple solid (0.011 g, 30%), was identified as the title compound (III); δH (400 MHz; d4-MeOH) 8.50 (1 H, s), 7.87 (2 H, d, J 9 Hz), 7.42 (1 H, s), 7.07 (1 H, d, J4 Hz), 6.97 (2 H, d, J 9 Hz), 6.60 (1 H, d, J4 Hz), 5.22 (1 H, d, J5.5 Hz), 4.30 (1 H, dd, J7.5 and 6.5 Hz), 4.23-4.17 (1 H, m), 4.14 (1 H, d, J 7.5 Hz), 4.07 (1 H, dd, J 10 and 5.5 Hz), 3.92 (1 H, d, J3 Hz), 3.85 (3 H, s), 3.50 (1 H, dd, J 10 and 3 Hz), 3.25 (1 H, dd, J8.5 and 6 Hz), 3.13-3.07 (3 H, m), 2.75 (2 H, t, J7.5 Hz), 2.50 (3 H, s), 2.43 (3 H, s), 2.33 (2 H, t, J 7.5 Hz), 2.25 (3 H, s), 2.30-2.17 (1 H, m), 2.14 (1 H, dd, J 10 and 8.5 Hz), 2.07 (3 H, s), 2.10-1.98 (3 H, m), 1.87-1.81 (1 H, m), 1.56-1.49 (2 H, m), 1.46-1.40 (2 H, m), 1.38- 1.32 (4 H, m), 1.21-1.18 (2 H, m), 1.09 (3 H, d, J 6.5 Hz) and 0.91 (3 H, t, J 6.5 Hz), mlz 899 (MH+, 70%) and 440 [(/W-F)2+, 100], retention time 2.13 min.
Example 3
Interference assay with TAMRA-lincosamide or BODIPY® TMR-X- lincosamide reporter and Staphylococcus carnosus or Staphylococcus aureus ribosomes
The interaction between fluor tagged-lincosamide and Staphylococcus carnosus or Staphylococcus aureus ribosomes was monitored by measuring the change in fluorescence anisotropy A [A = (///- l±)/( /// + 2 Ix), where /)/ and l±are time-independent steady state values for fluorescent intensity polarized parallel and perpendicular]. In solution, a fluorescent probe (low molecular weight ligand, MW <1 kDa) is generally rotationally free with low anisotropy. When bound to the ribosome (macromolecular target, MW >2.2 MDa), due to the huge mass change, it becomes rotationally constrained and anisotropy is
high. Displacement of the probe from the ribosome is thus associated with a reduction in anisotropy. Compounds that bind to the peptidyl transferase centre displace the fluorophore-tagged lincosamide, and the concomitant decrease in fluorescence anisotropy is determined. Some compounds, when bound to the peptidyl transferase centre, cause an increase in the interaction between tagged lincosamide and the ribosome and the concomitant increase in fluorescence anisotropy is determined.
Measurements were made on a Packard Fusion plate reader. In the titrations, increasing amounts of test compound were added to a solution of 10 nM TAMRA-lincosamide or BODIPY® TMR-X-lincosamide and 2 μM S. carnosus or S. aureus ribosomes in buffer (20 mM Tris-HCI pH 7.6, 30 mM KCI, 70 mM NH4CI, 6 mM MgCI2, 100 μg/ml bovine serum albumin). For each titration point, a fluorescence anisotropy measurement was acquired using an excitation wavelength of 535 nm with the excitation slits set to 25 nm and an emission wavelength of 580 nm with the emission slits set to 15nm. Compounds binding to the peptidyl transferase centre interfere with the binding of TAMRA-lincosamide or BODIPY® TMR-X-lincosamide and either the concomitant decrease or increase in fluorescence anisotropy is determined. Typical data are shown on Figure 1.
Chloramphenicol, erythromycin, lincomycin and clindamycin are known to bind in the peptidyl transferase centre region of the 50S ribosomal subunit and are competitors in the assay. Puromycin also binds to the peptidyl transferase centre and leads to an increase in the fluorescence polarization of the TAMRA- lincosamide or BODIPY® TMR-X-lincosamide (not shown on a Figure). Paromomycin and streptomycin, two ribosome-binding antibiotics that act on sites different from the peptidyl transferase centre, show no activity.
Hence, interference with the fluorescent label was only observed for those antibiotics known to bind to the region of the peptidyl transferase centre.
References
1. F. Sztaricskai, Z. Dinya, M. M. Puskas, G. Batta, R. Masuma and S. Omura, J. Antibiotics, 1996, 49, 941-943.
2. F. Sztaricskai, G. Batta, Z. Dinya, M. Hornyak, E. Roth, R. Masuma and S. Omura, J. Antibiotics, 1999, 52, 1050-1055.