WO2004043756A1

WO2004043756A1 - Electronic control apparatus for a vehicle

Info

Publication number: WO2004043756A1
Application number: PCT/GB2003/004799
Authority: WO
Inventors: Matthew Fry
Original assignee: Knorr-Bremse Systems For Commercial Vehicles Ltd
Priority date: 2002-11-12
Filing date: 2003-11-06
Publication date: 2004-05-27
Also published as: CA2505790A1; CN1723144B; GB0226386D0; CN1723144A; JP2006508845A; WO2004043756A8; HUE035340T2; MXPA05005066A; GB2395241B; EP1562813A1; AU2003279459A1; GB2395241A; JP2011136691A; US20040093143A1; EP1562813B1; JP5335837B2; US7133759B2; CA2505790C

Abstract

Electronic control apparatus for a vehicle, in particular a heavy goods vehicle, which apparatus comprises an electronic control unit (ECU) adapted to control actuation of vehicle brakes. The ECU has non volatile storage memory means for storing braking related control parameters particular to the vehicle and discretely programmable storage means to carry operating data for one or more auxiliary functions of the vehicle. This is operable to check one or more incoming and outgoing variables and control algorithms against a predefined list such as to safeguard the braking function against error modes.

Description

Electronic Control Apparatus for a Vehicle

The invention relates to electronic control apparatus for a vehicle and in particular, but not exclusively, to control equipment for commercial vehicles.

Heavy commercial vehicles are now designed and built with electronic control units (ECU's). These are responsive to control signals initiated by the drive of a towing vehicle to control valves of a pneumatic circuit to apply braking pressure from a compressed air reservoir to brake actuators of braked wheels. Such an ECU may include anti-lock brake pressure modulation means (ABS) operable to adjust braking pressure according to sensed wheel adhesion loss on respective sides of the vehicle.

One such ECU is described in EP1 167147 in which the ECU comprises a main data memory and electronics for specific braking related vehicle parameters. The memory is parameterized by the trailer builder using specialised equipment to enable the function of the ECU to be matched to the particular vehicle. This is analogous to the setting up of a conventionally mechanically operable variable load valve in a purely pneumatic system.

Customers and operators of trailer vehicles are increasingly requiring trailer electronic control apparatus to be adapted to control other functions. Different operators require different functions according to the manner of use of their trailers. Provision of special controls for different customers can be relatively costly for trailer builders and suppliers and in each case due consideration has to be given to the safety critical nature of the core system which controls the brakes.

The present invention seeks to provide a control apparatus for a vehicle which addresses the above problem

According to the invention there is provided control apparatus for a vehicle, which apparatus comprises an electronic control unit adapted to control actuation of vehicle brakes, which ECU has non volatile storage memory means for storing braking related control parameters particular to the vehicle, wherein the ECU further comprises discretely programmable storage means to carry operating data for one or more auxiliary functions of the vehicle is operable to check one or more incoming and outgoing variables and control algorithms against a predefined list such as to safeguard the braking function against error modes.

Exemplary embodiments of the invention will now be described in greater detail with reference to the drawings, in which:

Fig. 1 shows a schematic of an ECU for a commercial vehicle brake system Fig. 2 shows a generic method according to the invention.

Figure 1 shows a schematic of an electronic control unit (ECU) for a commercial vehicle brake system, comprising a plurality of wheel speed sensors 1 with one sensor associated with each of the vehicle wheels. The output of the wheel speed sensors 1 is fed to the ECU via a respective input stage 6. which is then fed to a respective one of two microcomputers 7. which microcomputers comprise a RAM for volatile memory storage and an EEPROM for programmable non-volatile memory storage. The two microcomputers 7 are adapted to talk to one another for reasons of redundancy. The microcomputers 7 then communicate with output stages 8. which output stages 8 are in turn adapted to control a respective pressure control valve, which in use will control the application of pressure to the vehicle brakes. A warning lamp 1 1 is also provided to inform the driver when the system is operating.

Such an ECU is also often used to provide elements of traction control. In the example shown in Figure 1. the ECU is provided with a Traction Control System (TCS) engine-management interface 2 and self diagnosis means 3. The output of the microcomputers 7 can then be fed to the TCS solenoid valve 10. TCS warning lamp 12. The ECU also comprises a power supply 5 driven from the vehicle battery 4 and a retarder relay 13 and valve relay 14.

The ECU will also be fed input from a variety of sensors on the vehicle including various pressures in the brake system such as: driver demand pressure, main system pressure and actual output brake pressure: vehicle reference speed, pad wear sensors and others. The permitted values for these detected sensor outputs are stored in a table, which the control software for the ABS calls to ensure that the system is working correctly.

The ECU comprises an EEPROM as a non-volatile storage memory means in which the memory is divided into two blocks. The first block comprises the main safety critical control parameters in particular those related to the actuation and operation of the vehicle brakes. The second block of memory comprises a discretely programmable storage means for carrying operating data relating to one or more auxiliary functions. To be able to take the real data from the vehicle wheels

As the electronic control apparatus control a safety critical system, the design language and interpreter should not cause any failures that would result in a loss of system performance or availability.

The following design constraints upon the language and interpreter are desirable to avoid such problems.

Loops and iterations should not be allowed to avoid the risk that the program can end up in an endless loop, which could potentially affect or even disable brake functions. Process and control variables from the main control algorithms should only be accessed through a predefined list. The main control algorithms are designed to control such auxiliary functions as Lift Axle Control, the Integrated Speed Switch and Reset to Ride functions. The control language shall not be able to write to any area of memory other than the one reserved for the language interpreter. The language interpreter shall range check all input and output variables. Ideally, the language shall only allow simple constructs and if more complex constructs are required they should be made up of multiple simple constructs. To help ensure simplicity, all instructions could have the same number of bytes.

The auxiliary design language/interpreter (ADL) is a sub-process of the auxiliary function subsystem and is stored on the EEPROM. This subsubsystem comprises the language interpreter which is designed to process the input data from a measured value table, which is defined in a diagnostic system of the brake system and from a CAN bus interface and from an auxiliarv subsvstem. The ADL program is split into a number of processes. The instruction set or op codes comprise the set of Boolean operators (AND. OR etc) and certain simple mathematical operators (greater than, equals etc.). The first process is ADL_control which is adapted to initiate the program and read the process operating code and control the other processes. The other processes include put operands, convert operands, timer controls, counter controls, set-reset latch (SRLatch) control.

The ADL interpreter has a duplicity of timers, each having the elements (Read) TimerValue/(Write) Timer Preset: Run; Reset; Output. The Timer Value is incremented once per 50ms if the Run bit is set. The output bit is set if the timer exceeds the Timer Preset. The counter control has a duplicity of counters each comprising the elements: Counter Value; Increment; Decrement; Reset.

A duplicity of SRLatches with a clock are provided, each comprising the elements: Set; Reset; Clock; Output. The Output is set on the rising edge of the "Set" input. The Output is set on the rising edge of the Reset input. The Output is toggled on the rising edge of the "Clock^" Input. The process ConvertOperands converts the two input operands into three real values. If the op code has the immediate bit set, then the input operands need no conversion. If not then the operand is used as an index in the register table. The Put Operand process returns the result into the register table.

Figure 2 shows the main processes of the language interpreter in use. In step 100, the ADL control process is initially loaded into RAM from the EEPROM by a load module until the process is complete. This process is called from the 50ms Task. As each instruction is conveniently four bytes in length, the program takes 2.5 s to load. Once the program is loaded into RAM. the program init complete flag is set and processing of instructions can begin. As an initial step, step 101 , the timer, counter and SRLatch controls are called in order for the control elements to be updated.

In the next step 102 the process call the next instruction. This consists of the op code followed by a three operands. The next step is to call the convert operand process 103. which process converts operand 1 and 2 into "real^" data. The actual type of instruction is then decoded to an op code and the required instruction is called via a jump table 104. In step 105, the result of the instruction is processed and if the op code has a return value, then the Put Operand process is called at step 106 to return operand 3 to the required location. If the op code indicates that the instruction is the last instruction of the sequence, then the inteφreter exits at 107, otherwise the inteφreter then returns to step 102.

In view of the safety critical nature of the application, the inteφreter, when processing the instruction in step 104 checks to see if the requested function in the jump table falls within an allowed range. If the requested function falls outside the range, then an InstructionError flag is set and the process exits at 107 to ensure that braking remains unaffected. If the InstructionError flag is not set then the instruction is processed at step 106 as described above.

Although the process has been described with each instruction having four bytes, it would be possible for the instructions to be longer than this depending on the processor speed and configuration. Four bytes was chosen to provide a useful amount of data whilst keeping run time to a minimum.

The example below shows how the inteφreter can be used to solve the problem of operating a integrated speed switch (1SS). A typical application of an 1SS is to control steering axles on a trailer or semi-trailer, which are to be locked at certain speeds. Whenever the speed rises or falls below a certain threshold then the switching condition of the output will change and can be used to control solenoid valves, for example. In general an ISS will require an hysterisis of lkm/h.

No OP Code Operand Notes

SUB 10 REG1 REG1 = 10 - 1 , REG1 contains the Switch speed - hys (lKm/h)

MULT REG1 OP! REG1 REG1 = REG1 * OP1

REG1 contains the Switch speed value required for switch off if the output is on.

NOT OP1 NULL REG2 REG2 = !OPl

Load Register with the opposite state of OPl

MUL REG2 REG3 REG3 = 10 * REG2

10 REG3 contains the Switch speed value required for switch on if the output is off.

SLH REG1 REG3 REG4 Reg4 contains the highest value of

REG! And REG3.

GT V REF REG4 OP1 If V REF > REG4 OP1 = TRUE, else OP1 = FALSE

The next example is a reset to ride function (RTR). The RTR function is used to reset the air suspension of a trailer to the normal (ride) position. When the vehicle velocity exceeds lOKm/h an output is switched on for 10 seconds, once complete the function is suspended until the vehicle velocity is zero for 30 seconds. P Code Operand Notes

INIT 200 NULL T1_TAR During the first cycle initialize Timer

1 target value

INIT 625 NULL T2_TAR During the first cycle initialize Timer

2 target value

GT V REF 10 SRL1_S If V REF > 10 SRLl _S = TRUE

EQLS SRL1_0P NULL T1_RUN T1 ST = SRL1 OP

Start Timer if SRLl OP is non zero

XOR-L SRLl OP T1 OP OP1 OP1 =SRLl_OP ORTl_OP

The output is on while SRL OP = true and the timer has not timed out the output will be on.

NEQL V REF 0 T2_R If V REF != 0 reset timer 2

EQL V REF 0 T2 RUN IfV REF == 0 start timer 2

EQL T2_OP 1 SRLl R Reset SRLl

EQL T2_OP 1 Tl R Reset Timerl

Claims

1. Control apparatus for a vehicle, which apparatus comprises an electronic control unit adapted to control actuation of vehicle brakes, which ECU has non volatile storage memory means for storing braking related control parameters particular to the vehicle, characterised in that the ECU further comprises discretely programmable storage means to carry operating data for one or more auxiliary functions of the vehicle is operable to check one or more incoming and outgoing variables and control algorithms against a predefined list such as to safeguard the braking function against error modes.

2. Control apparatus according to Claim 1 , wherein the discretely programmable storage means carries a control language and an inteφreter for the control language.

3. Control apparatus according to Claim 2, wherein the inteφreter is adapted to range check input and/or output variables against a predefined list of allowable values and if the value of the input and/or output variables lies outside allowable limits, the inteφreter terminates the instruction.

4. Control apparatus according to any one of Claims 2 to 3, wherein the control language can only write to an area of memory reserved to the inteφreter.

5. Control apparatus according to any one of Claims 2 to 4, wherein the control algorithms comprise predefined instruction sets.

6. Control apparatus according to Claim 5, wherein each instruction has the same number of bytes.