WO2004040297A1 - A method of establishing stress relieving procedures for minimizing sulfide stress cracking in cold worked metals - Google Patents

A method of establishing stress relieving procedures for minimizing sulfide stress cracking in cold worked metals Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004040297A1
WO2004040297A1 PCT/GB2003/004517 GB0304517W WO2004040297A1 WO 2004040297 A1 WO2004040297 A1 WO 2004040297A1 GB 0304517 W GB0304517 W GB 0304517W WO 2004040297 A1 WO2004040297 A1 WO 2004040297A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
metal
dislocation density
determining
stress relieving
stress
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2003/004517
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Bruce E. Urband
Original Assignee
Grant Prideco Lp
Bailey, Richard, Alan
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Grant Prideco Lp, Bailey, Richard, Alan filed Critical Grant Prideco Lp
Priority to EP03753822A priority Critical patent/EP1570263A1/en
Priority to CA002502725A priority patent/CA2502725A1/en
Priority to MXPA05004618A priority patent/MXPA05004618A/en
Priority to AU2003271983A priority patent/AU2003271983A1/en
Publication of WO2004040297A1 publication Critical patent/WO2004040297A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N17/00—Investigating resistance of materials to the weather, to corrosion, or to light
    • G01N17/006—Investigating resistance of materials to the weather, to corrosion, or to light of metals
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/20—Metals
    • G01N33/204—Structure thereof, e.g. crystal structure
    • G01N33/2045—Defects

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to methods for establishing effective heat-treating processes and the manufacturing of products using such heat-treating process. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method for establishing optimum stress relieving procedures for reducing the susceptibility to SSC in cold worked metals and to the metal products made from materials processed by such optimized procedures.
  • Cold working metals may cause the metal to exhibit undesired physical characteristics.
  • a common effect of cold working is an increase in hardness of the material and a decrease in the ductility of the material. Cold working may also cause a decrease in the resistance of a material to the effects of corrosion and other chemical reactions.
  • NACE National Association of Corrosion Engineers
  • MR0175 addresses a minimum recommended temperature for stress relieving cold worked materials.
  • the Standard provides that if tubulars and other components are cold straightened at or below 950 degrees Fahrenheit, they shall be stressed relieved at a minimum of 900 degrees Fahrenheit.
  • the Standard also specifies that if the tubulars and tubular components are cold formed (pin nosed and/or box expanded) and the resultant permanent outer fiber deformation is greater than 5%, the cold-formed regions shall be thermally stress relieved at a minimum temperature of 1100 degrees Fahrenheit. Cold forming the connections of high strength tubulars with hardnesses above 22 HRC requires thermal stress relieving at a minimum temperature of 1100 degrees Fahrenheit.
  • Swaging or cold working of steel pipe bodies is a common procedure in the manufacture of certain tubular goods. It has been determined that stress relieving of cold worked materials at temperatures less than 1100 degrees Fahrenheit (the NACE MR0175 minimum) is effective in lowering the resistance of such materials to SSC. It has also been determined that tempering the material at higher temperatures does not necessarily return the materials SSC resistance to its original corrosion resistance prior to swaging and stress relieving. Testing for evaluating the effectiveness of tempering to improve SSC resistance has usually included either the NACE standardized test method TM0177-Double Cantilever Beam Test Method D or the less revealing NACE test TM0177-Method A-Tension Test.
  • the Method A test is a quantitative pass/fail type test, and as such does not accurately depict the deterioration in SSC resistance due to cold working. It also does not reflect the effectiveness of the stress relieving process in returning the material to its original condition of SSC resistance prior to cold working.
  • induction heating for tempering or stress relieving cold worked pipe ends has been found to be inadequate to eliminate degradation in SSC resistance.
  • Method A NACE tests is a pass/fail type, one may only deduce that the specific time and temperature applied to a test sample during the stress relieving process were adequate to achieve a desired SSC resistance. Even if the treated sample passes the SSC resistance test, the temperature employed in the stress relief process may have been higher than necessary and the time of exposure may also have been longer than necessary. Moreover, the time required to perform either of the NACE tests is extremely long, a factor, which must be considered in the production process. Passing the Method D test requires a 14-day process. Passing the Method A test requires a 30-day process. First discovering that a stress reduction process has failed to provide a desired SSC resistance as much as 30 days after the stress relieving process has occurred can pose serious manufacturing concerns.
  • Plastic deformation associated with cold working produces an increase in the number of dislocations in the material within a given area.
  • Metal that has been cold worked takes on a condition of higher internal energy than that of undeformed metal.
  • the cell structure of cold worked metal is mechanically stable and thermodynamically unstable.
  • the stability of the cold worked material becomes less stable with increasing temperatures. With sufficient heat and time of exposure, the metal softens and will revert to a stress-free condition.
  • the material of the metal goes through a recrystallization phase with accompanying grain growth.
  • the metal is said to have "recovered” when its physical properties are restored without any observable change in microstructure.
  • the overall process by which this recovery occurs is known as stress relieving.
  • the prior art is able to measure various properties of metals with procedures that provide immediate results. It is known, for example, that the electrical conductivity of a heat-treated, cold worked material increases rapidly toward the stress relieved value during recovery, and lattice strain, measured with X-rays, becomes appreciably reduced. Recrystallization of the metal may be readily detected by metallographic methods as is evidenced by a decrease in hardness or strength and an increase in ductility. The density of dislocations also decreases considerably on recrystallization and all the effects of strain hardening are eliminated.
  • dislocation densities to obtain information about the hardness of the material is an accepted procedure that produces information quickly and accurately.
  • the dislocation density of a cold worked metal and the use of the thin-film electron microscope in determining the dislocation density are well described in Mechanical Metallurgy, Third Edition, by George E. Dieter, page 230, noting "Considerable detail knowledge on the structure of the cold-worked state has been obtained from thin-film electron microscopy.
  • slip is essentially on primary glide planes and the dislocations form coplanar arrays. As deformation proceeds, cross slip takes place and multiplication processes operate.
  • the cold- worked structure forms high-dislocation-density regions or tangles, which soon develop into tangled networks.
  • the characteristic structure of the cold-worked state is a cellular substructure in which high-density-dislocation tangles form the ceil wails.
  • the cell structure is usually well developed at strains of around 10%. The cell size decreases with strain at low deformation but soon reaches a fixed size, indicating that as strain proceeds the dislocations sweep across the cells and join the tangle in the cell walls.
  • the exact nature of the cold-worked structure will depend on the material, the strain, the strain rate and the temperature of deformation”.
  • Treating a particular material to achieve desired results requires precise applications of heating and times of exposure. For these reasons, as well as others, the prior art has lacked a procedure for making an early determination that a heat-treating process has been effective in restoring the SSC resistance of a cold worked material. Testing procedures that can take up to 30 days before confirming that a treated material has adequate SSC resistance make the availability of appropriate heat-treating processes essential to efficient manufacturing practice.
  • the present invention uses the correlation between dislocation density in an stress relieved (tempered) metal having a known SSC resistance before cold working and the dislocation density of the metal after cold working and stress relieving for predicting the SSC resistance of a cold worked material following stress relieving.
  • the dislocation density of a cold worked metal that has been stress relieved is evaluated to determine the temperature and time of exposure requirements for a stress relieving process that will restore an SSC resistance level in the stress relieved material approximating that existing before the material is cold worked.
  • the effectiveness of a selected combination of temperature and time exposures during a stress relieving process for a specific material may be evaluated by examining the dislocation density of the treated material.
  • the results of the evaluation may be used to determine an optimum temperature/time relationship for stress relief to achieve a desired SSC resistance.
  • the dislocation density results for the determined optimum temperature/time relationship can be verified using conventional NACE testing.
  • the evaluation of the dislocation density provides a predictive basis for anticipating compliance of a specific temperature/time relationship for a given metal specimen with the NACE tests. Advance knowledge that the heat-treated specimen will pass the NACE test avoids the necessity for retreating the material and enduring a second extended delay for subsequent NACE testing.
  • the dislocation density of a specimen is preferably evaluated with the use of a transmission electron microscope (TEM).
  • TEM transmission electron microscope
  • the dislocation density of the metal decreases as the temperature and time of heating are increased.
  • Use of the dislocation density of the sample as an indicator of SSC resistance permits immediate prediction of compliance of the sample with the applicable NACE standards. The prolonged testing period required by the NACE procedures to confirm SSC resistance may thus be limited to a single test
  • the dislocation density of a selected material may be determined with a transmission electron microscope prior to cold working to establish a baseline for subsequent comparison. Following the cold working and heat treating procedure, the dislocation density of the selected material may be again determined with the transmission electron microscope to compare it with the base line established for the material before the initial cold working.
  • the heat treating process for the cold worked material may be varied and the dislocation density of the resulting heat treated material may be evaluated to determine the temperature and time exposure required to best bond be achieve a dislocation density most closely approximating that of the material before the cold working.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Ecology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
  • Forging (AREA)

Abstract

A method for establishing and evaluating the effectiveness of a stress relieving process in which a cold worked metal is exposed to elevated temperatures for specified times (stress relieved) to restore the metal to its resistance to sulfide stress cracking (SSC) existing before being cold worked. The process is established and evaluated by examining the “dislocation density” of the metal before the cold working and after the stress relieving process. The dislocation density is the accumulation of stress/imperfections in the metal crystal lattice of the metal. A relationship of temperature and time of exposure for the stress relieving process is established that procedures a desired dislocation density in the cold worked metal composition. The dislocation density is used to predict the resistance of the stress relieved metal to SSC.

Description

A Method Of Establishing Stress Relieving Procedures For Minimizing Sulfide Stress Cracking In Cold Worked Metals
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to methods for establishing effective heat-treating processes and the manufacturing of products using such heat-treating process. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method for establishing optimum stress relieving procedures for reducing the susceptibility to SSC in cold worked metals and to the metal products made from materials processed by such optimized procedures.
Background Setting of the Invention
Cold working metals may cause the metal to exhibit undesired physical characteristics. A common effect of cold working is an increase in hardness of the material and a decrease in the ductility of the material. Cold working may also cause a decrease in the resistance of a material to the effects of corrosion and other chemical reactions.
The effects of cold working in the steel pipe used in the construction and production of oil and gas wells and in other chemical applications are well known. Swaging or cold working steel pipe ends, or any steel product for that matter, will cause an increase in hardness, a decrease in ductility and a decrease in the resistance of the steel to the effects of sulfide stress cracking (SSC) in hydrogen sulfide (sour) environments. The presence of hydrogen sulfide in oil and gas wells dictates that preventive measures be taken to prevent SSC in the tubulars used in the construction and production of such wells.
The National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) recognizes that cold working causing a change in dimensions of the material by over 5% can be detrimental to service in hydrogen sulfide (sour) environments. NACE Standard MR0175 addresses a minimum recommended temperature for stress relieving cold worked materials. The Standard provides that if tubulars and other components are cold straightened at or below 950 degrees Fahrenheit, they shall be stressed relieved at a minimum of 900 degrees Fahrenheit. The Standard also specifies that if the tubulars and tubular components are cold formed (pin nosed and/or box expanded) and the resultant permanent outer fiber deformation is greater than 5%, the cold-formed regions shall be thermally stress relieved at a minimum temperature of 1100 degrees Fahrenheit. Cold forming the connections of high strength tubulars with hardnesses above 22 HRC requires thermal stress relieving at a minimum temperature of 1100 degrees Fahrenheit.
Swaging or cold working of steel pipe bodies is a common procedure in the manufacture of certain tubular goods. It has been determined that stress relieving of cold worked materials at temperatures less than 1100 degrees Fahrenheit (the NACE MR0175 minimum) is effective in lowering the resistance of such materials to SSC. It has also been determined that tempering the material at higher temperatures does not necessarily return the materials SSC resistance to its original corrosion resistance prior to swaging and stress relieving. Testing for evaluating the effectiveness of tempering to improve SSC resistance has usually included either the NACE standardized test method TM0177-Double Cantilever Beam Test Method D or the less revealing NACE test TM0177-Method A-Tension Test. The Method A test is a quantitative pass/fail type test, and as such does not accurately depict the deterioration in SSC resistance due to cold working. It also does not reflect the effectiveness of the stress relieving process in returning the material to its original condition of SSC resistance prior to cold working.
The use of induction heating for tempering or stress relieving cold worked pipe ends has been found to be inadequate to eliminate degradation in SSC resistance. Traditional temperatures and duration of heating in induction process can be grossly inadequate. Determining the proper combination of temperature and time exposures for a given material composition to reestablish a SSC resistance in the treated material equivalent to that existing before the material has been cold worked is a difficult and time-consuming process.
Because the Method A NACE tests is a pass/fail type, one may only deduce that the specific time and temperature applied to a test sample during the stress relieving process were adequate to achieve a desired SSC resistance. Even if the treated sample passes the SSC resistance test, the temperature employed in the stress relief process may have been higher than necessary and the time of exposure may also have been longer than necessary. Moreover, the time required to perform either of the NACE tests is extremely long, a factor, which must be considered in the production process. Passing the Method D test requires a 14-day process. Passing the Method A test requires a 30-day process. First discovering that a stress reduction process has failed to provide a desired SSC resistance as much as 30 days after the stress relieving process has occurred can pose serious manufacturing concerns.
Plastic deformation associated with cold working produces an increase in the number of dislocations in the material within a given area. Metal that has been cold worked takes on a condition of higher internal energy than that of undeformed metal. The cell structure of cold worked metal is mechanically stable and thermodynamically unstable. The stability of the cold worked material becomes less stable with increasing temperatures. With sufficient heat and time of exposure, the metal softens and will revert to a stress-free condition. During the process of reverting to its earlier stress-free condition, the material of the metal goes through a recrystallization phase with accompanying grain growth. The metal is said to have "recovered" when its physical properties are restored without any observable change in microstructure. The overall process by which this recovery occurs is known as stress relieving.
The prior art is able to measure various properties of metals with procedures that provide immediate results. It is known, for example, that the electrical conductivity of a heat-treated, cold worked material increases rapidly toward the stress relieved value during recovery, and lattice strain, measured with X-rays, becomes appreciably reduced. Recrystallization of the metal may be readily detected by metallographic methods as is evidenced by a decrease in hardness or strength and an increase in ductility. The density of dislocations also decreases considerably on recrystallization and all the effects of strain hardening are eliminated.
Various other techniques exist for evaluating the characteristics of metals without resorting to testing procedures that require extended time periods to complete. By way of example, the evaluation of dislocation densities to obtain information about the hardness of the material is an accepted procedure that produces information quickly and accurately. The dislocation density of a cold worked metal and the use of the thin-film electron microscope in determining the dislocation density are well described in Mechanical Metallurgy, Third Edition, by George E. Dieter, page 230, noting "Considerable detail knowledge on the structure of the cold-worked state has been obtained from thin-film electron microscopy. In the early stages of plastic deformation slip is essentially on primary glide planes and the dislocations form coplanar arrays. As deformation proceeds, cross slip takes place and multiplication processes operate. The cold- worked structure forms high-dislocation-density regions or tangles, which soon develop into tangled networks. Thus, the characteristic structure of the cold-worked state is a cellular substructure in which high-density-dislocation tangles form the ceil wails. The cell structure is usually well developed at strains of around 10%. The cell size decreases with strain at low deformation but soon reaches a fixed size, indicating that as strain proceeds the dislocations sweep across the cells and join the tangle in the cell walls. The exact nature of the cold-worked structure will depend on the material, the strain, the strain rate and the temperature of deformation".
While techniques exist for rapid, and accurate methods for evaluating some characteristics of treated or processed metals, the prior art has not proposed a speedy, quantitative procedure that permits establishing a stress relieving process for returning a cold worked metal to its original SSC resistance. The problem is complicated by the fact that stress relieving procedures for restoring a cold worked material's resistance to SSC vary with the composition and configuration of the material to be stress relieved. Following established heat-treating procedures for stress relieving cold worked metals does not assure that a given stress relieved material will exhibit adequate SSC resistance. It is well known, for example, that if the new strain-free grains resulting during a stress relieving process are heated at a temperature greater than that required to cause recrystallization, there will be a progressive increase in grain size. Treating a particular material to achieve desired results requires precise applications of heating and times of exposure. For these reasons, as well as others, the prior art has lacked a procedure for making an early determination that a heat-treating process has been effective in restoring the SSC resistance of a cold worked material. Testing procedures that can take up to 30 days before confirming that a treated material has adequate SSC resistance make the availability of appropriate heat-treating processes essential to efficient manufacturing practice.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention uses the correlation between dislocation density in an stress relieved (tempered) metal having a known SSC resistance before cold working and the dislocation density of the metal after cold working and stress relieving for predicting the SSC resistance of a cold worked material following stress relieving.
In another aspect of the present invention, the dislocation density of a cold worked metal that has been stress relieved is evaluated to determine the temperature and time of exposure requirements for a stress relieving process that will restore an SSC resistance level in the stress relieved material approximating that existing before the material is cold worked.
The effectiveness of a selected combination of temperature and time exposures during a stress relieving process for a specific material may be evaluated by examining the dislocation density of the treated material.
The results of the evaluation may be used to determine an optimum temperature/time relationship for stress relief to achieve a desired SSC resistance. The dislocation density results for the determined optimum temperature/time relationship can be verified using conventional NACE testing. The evaluation of the dislocation density provides a predictive basis for anticipating compliance of a specific temperature/time relationship for a given metal specimen with the NACE tests. Advance knowledge that the heat-treated specimen will pass the NACE test avoids the necessity for retreating the material and enduring a second extended delay for subsequent NACE testing.
The dislocation density of a specimen is preferably evaluated with the use of a transmission electron microscope (TEM). Within the pertinent ranges of temperature and time of during the stress relief treatment, the dislocation density of the metal decreases as the temperature and time of heating are increased. Use of the dislocation density of the sample as an indicator of SSC resistance permits immediate prediction of compliance of the sample with the applicable NACE standards. The prolonged testing period required by the NACE procedures to confirm SSC resistance may thus be limited to a single test
The dislocation density of a selected material may be determined with a transmission electron microscope prior to cold working to establish a baseline for subsequent comparison. Following the cold working and heat treating procedure, the dislocation density of the selected material may be again determined with the transmission electron microscope to compare it with the base line established for the material before the initial cold working. The heat treating process for the cold worked material may be varied and the dislocation density of the resulting heat treated material may be evaluated to determine the temperature and time exposure required to best bond be achieve a dislocation density most closely approximating that of the material before the cold working.

Claims

Claims
1. A method for evaluating the sulfide stress cracking (SSC) resistance of a cold worked metal, comprising:
determining the dislocation density of a first metal,
comparing the determined dislocation density of the first medal with that of the dislocation density of a-second metal having a known resistance to SSC, and
evaluating the SSC resistance of the first metal as a function of the comparison of the dislocation densities of the first and second metals.
2. A method as defined in claim 1 , further comprising:
determining the SSC of the first metal whereby the first metal serves as the second metal having a known resistance to SSC,
cold working the first metal,
stress relieving the first metal,
determining the dislocation density of the first metal after stress relieving the first metal, and
comparing the determined dislocation density of the first metal with that of the dislocation density of the second metal.
3. A method as defined in claim 1, further comprising determining the dislocation density of the first metal with an interpretation device that can provide information about the grain structure of the first metal.
4. A method as defined in claim 3, further comprising determining the dislocation density of the first metal with an electron microscope.
5. A method as defined in claim 3, further comprising determining the dislocation density of the first metal with a transmission electron microscope.
6. A method for establishing temperature and time of exposure parameters for stress relieving a cold worked metal to restore the metal to a state of SSC resistance existing in the metal before cold working, comprising:
determining the dislocation density of a first metal having a known SSC resistance before cold working,
cold working the first metal,
selecting a first set of temperature and time of exposure conditions for a first stress relieving process to be applied to the cold worked first metal,
stress relieving the cold worked first metal with the first stress relieving process,
determining the SSC resistance of the first metal following the first stress relieving process,
comparing the SSC resistance of the first metal following the first stress relieving process with the SSC resistance of the first metal before cold working,
repeating the stress relieving and comparing process to establish a final stress relieving process by which the first metal having a known SSC resistance may be restored to such known SSC resistance following cold working.
7. A method as defined in claim 6 further comprising, determining the dislocation density of the first metal having a known SSC resistance with an interpretation device that can provide information about the grain structure of the first metal.
8. A method as defined in claim 6 further comprising determining the dislocation density of the first metal with an electron microscope.
9. A method as defined in claim 6 further comprising determining the dislocation density of the first metal with a transmission electron microscope.
10. A method of manufacturing a threaded tubular pipe body, comprising:
determining the resistance to SSC of a first metal of the kind used in the manufacture of a threaded tubular body,
determining the dislocation density of the first metal,
swaging an axial end of a tubular pipe body constructed of the first metal,
stress relieving the swaged axial end of the tubular pipe body,
determining the dislocation density of the first metal forming the swaged axial end following stress relieving, and
evaluating the SSC resistance of the stress relieved, swaged axial end as a function of the dislocation density following stress relieving of the metal forming the swaged axial end.
11. A method as defined in claim 10 further comprising forming threads on the stress relieved, swaged axial end.
12. A method as defined in claim 10 further comprising determining the dislocation density of the first metal with an interpretation device that can provide information about the grain structure of the first metal.
13. A method as defined in claim 10 further comprising determining the dislocation density of the first metal with an electron microscope.
14. A method as defined in claim 10 further comprising determining the dislocation density of the first metal with a transmission electron microscope.
15. A method as defined in claim 10 further comprising forming threads on the stress relieved, swaged axial end.
16. A method as defined in claim 15 further comprising forming threads on the axial end opposite the stress relieved, swaged axial end.
17. A threaded tubular body made by the process of:
determining the resistance to SSC of a first metal of the kind used in the manufacture of a threaded tubular body,
determining the dislocation density of the first metal,
swaging an axial end of a tubular pipe body constructed of the first metal,
stress relieving the swaged axial end of the tubular pipe body,
determining the dislocation density of the first metal forming the swaged axial end following stress relieving,
evaluating the SSC resistance of the stress relieved, swaged axial end as a function of the dislocation density following stress relieving of the metal forming the swaged axial end, and
forming threads at each axial end of the tubular body.
PCT/GB2003/004517 2002-10-30 2003-10-20 A method of establishing stress relieving procedures for minimizing sulfide stress cracking in cold worked metals WO2004040297A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP03753822A EP1570263A1 (en) 2002-10-30 2003-10-20 A method of establishing stress relieving procedures for minimizing sulfide stress cracking in cold worked metals
CA002502725A CA2502725A1 (en) 2002-10-30 2003-10-20 A method of establishing stress relieving procedures for minimizing sulfide stress cracking in cold worked metals
MXPA05004618A MXPA05004618A (en) 2002-10-30 2003-10-20 A method of establishing stress relieving procedures for minimizing sulfide stress cracking in cold worked metals.
AU2003271983A AU2003271983A1 (en) 2002-10-30 2003-10-20 A method of establishing stress relieving procedures for minimizing sulfide stress cracking in cold worked metals

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US42237902P 2002-10-30 2002-10-30
US60/422,379 2002-10-30

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004040297A1 true WO2004040297A1 (en) 2004-05-13

Family

ID=32230347

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2003/004517 WO2004040297A1 (en) 2002-10-30 2003-10-20 A method of establishing stress relieving procedures for minimizing sulfide stress cracking in cold worked metals

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1570263A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2003271983A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2502725A1 (en)
MX (1) MXPA05004618A (en)
WO (1) WO2004040297A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2939510A1 (en) * 2008-12-08 2010-06-11 Inst Francais Du Petrole Sulfide stress cracking source detecting and locating method for high elasticity limit steel in oil environment, involves carrying out identification on map of areas on duration higher to hour as sulfide stress cracking source

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU1027585A1 (en) * 1982-02-04 1983-07-07 Всесоюзный научно-исследовательский институт по строительству магистральных трубопроводов Material corrosion resistance evaluation method
JPH05297181A (en) * 1992-04-16 1993-11-12 Hitachi Ltd Method for estimating stress corrosive cracking life of structure, and test device therefor
RU2110785C1 (en) * 1996-11-04 1998-05-10 Акционерное общество открытого типа "Гипронииавиапром" Device for corrosion tests of specimens under voltage
JPH11343519A (en) * 1998-06-01 1999-12-14 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Production of low carbon martensitic stainless steel welded tube
US6197131B1 (en) * 1997-06-24 2001-03-06 Institute Francais Du Petrole Method for controlling the behavior of a steel in an H2S medium

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU1027585A1 (en) * 1982-02-04 1983-07-07 Всесоюзный научно-исследовательский институт по строительству магистральных трубопроводов Material corrosion resistance evaluation method
JPH05297181A (en) * 1992-04-16 1993-11-12 Hitachi Ltd Method for estimating stress corrosive cracking life of structure, and test device therefor
RU2110785C1 (en) * 1996-11-04 1998-05-10 Акционерное общество открытого типа "Гипронииавиапром" Device for corrosion tests of specimens under voltage
US6197131B1 (en) * 1997-06-24 2001-03-06 Institute Francais Du Petrole Method for controlling the behavior of a steel in an H2S medium
JPH11343519A (en) * 1998-06-01 1999-12-14 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Production of low carbon martensitic stainless steel welded tube

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DATABASE WPI Section EI Week 198416, Derwent World Patents Index; Class S03, AN 1984-099252, XP002060740 *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 0180, no. 92 (P - 1693) 15 February 1994 (1994-02-15) *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 2000, no. 03 30 March 2000 (2000-03-30) *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2939510A1 (en) * 2008-12-08 2010-06-11 Inst Francais Du Petrole Sulfide stress cracking source detecting and locating method for high elasticity limit steel in oil environment, involves carrying out identification on map of areas on duration higher to hour as sulfide stress cracking source

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2003271983A1 (en) 2004-05-25
CA2502725A1 (en) 2004-05-13
EP1570263A1 (en) 2005-09-07
MXPA05004618A (en) 2005-06-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Komazai et al. Development of small punch tests for creep property measurement of tungsten-alloyed 9% Cr ferritic steels
Frick et al. Thermal processing of polycrystalline NiTi shape memory alloys
Kingklang et al. Investigation of hot deformation behavior of duplex stainless steel grade 2507
JP6354476B2 (en) Characterization method for hydrogen embrittlement of steel
Wang et al. Characterization of low cycle fatigue performance of new ferritic P92 steel at high temperature: effect of strain amplitude
Sauzay et al. Creep-fatigue behaviour of an AISI stainless steel at 550 C
Jorge‐Badiola et al. Evaluation of intragranular misorientation parameters measured by EBSD in a hot worked austenitic stainless steel
Takahashi et al. Study on creep-fatigue life prediction methods for low-carbon nitrogen-controlled 316 stainless steel (316FR)
Nie et al. Mechanical properties of steels for cold‐formed steel structures at elevated temperatures
US20050081964A1 (en) A Method Of Establishing Stress Relieving Procedures For Minimizing Sulfide Stress Cracking In Cold Worked Metals
EP1570263A1 (en) A method of establishing stress relieving procedures for minimizing sulfide stress cracking in cold worked metals
JP2007155540A (en) Method of measuring fracture toughness value of metal material
Ha et al. Effects of γ′ precipitation, dislocation density, and grain size on stress-relaxation properties of INCONEL X-750 Helical Springs
Fessler et al. Threshold-stress determination using tapered specimens and cyclic stresses
Gang et al. Modeling constitutive relationship of 6013 aluminum alloy during hot plane strain compression based on Kriging method
Belodedenko et al. Fatigue lifetime model under a complex loading with application of the amalgamating safety indices rule
Zhao et al. Study on grain boundary sensitization in heat affected zone of austenitic stainless steel and its evaluation method
Gupta et al. Effect of hardness on tensile strength of V notched SUP 9A bar
US20060266125A1 (en) Method of predicting damage of dies
JORGE‐BADIOLA et al. EBSD characterization of a hot worked 304 austenitic stainless steel under strain reversal
Roy et al. Structural integrity and uncertainty in creep damage assessment of service exposed reformer tubes
Das et al. Assessment of Hydrogen Embrittlement Susceptibility and Mechanism (s) in Quench and Tempered AISI 4135 Steel Using A Novel Fast Fracture Test in Bending
Brett et al. Pre-Straining Effect on the Creep Behavior of Impression Creep Tests for a P91 Steel at 600° C
Midha et al. Residual stress relief in cold-extruded rod
Singhb et al. Sandeep Pandrea, Ayush Morchhalea, Nitin Kotkundea

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2003753822

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2502725

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: PA/a/2005/004618

Country of ref document: MX

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2003271983

Country of ref document: AU

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2003753822

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP