WO2004007901A1 - Cutting tools with two-slope profile - Google Patents

Cutting tools with two-slope profile Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004007901A1
WO2004007901A1 PCT/US2003/018692 US0318692W WO2004007901A1 WO 2004007901 A1 WO2004007901 A1 WO 2004007901A1 US 0318692 W US0318692 W US 0318692W WO 2004007901 A1 WO2004007901 A1 WO 2004007901A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
ranging
substrate
face
periphery
tool insert
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2003/018692
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Thomas Charles Easley
Shan Wan
Gary Martin Flood
Eoin M. O'tighearnaigh
Rosemarie Shelly Snyder
Therese Raftery
Original Assignee
Diamond Innovations, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Diamond Innovations, Inc. filed Critical Diamond Innovations, Inc.
Priority to AU2003248688A priority Critical patent/AU2003248688A1/en
Priority to EP03764305A priority patent/EP1527251B1/en
Publication of WO2004007901A1 publication Critical patent/WO2004007901A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B10/00Drill bits
    • E21B10/46Drill bits characterised by wear resisting parts, e.g. diamond inserts
    • E21B10/56Button-type inserts
    • E21B10/567Button-type inserts with preformed cutting elements mounted on a distinct support, e.g. polycrystalline inserts
    • E21B10/573Button-type inserts with preformed cutting elements mounted on a distinct support, e.g. polycrystalline inserts characterised by support details, e.g. the substrate construction or the interface between the substrate and the cutting element
    • E21B10/5735Interface between the substrate and the cutting element

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of abrasive tool inserts.
  • An abrasive particle compact is a polycrystalline mass of abrasive particles, such as diamond and/or cubic boron nitride (CBN), bonded together to form an integral, tough, high-strength mass.
  • abrasive particles such as diamond and/or cubic boron nitride (CBN)
  • CBN cubic boron nitride
  • Such components can be bonded together in a particle-to-particle self-bonded relationship, by means of a bonding medium disposed between the particles, or by combinations thereof.
  • the abrasive particle content of the abrasive compact is high and there is an extensive amount of direct particle-to-particle bonding.
  • Abrasive compacts are made under elevated or high pressure and temperature (HP/HT) conditions at which the particles, diamond or CBN, are crystallographically stable.
  • HP/HT high pressure and temperature
  • a supported abrasive particle compact herein termed a composite compact, is an abrasive particle compact, which is bonded to a substrate material, such as cemented tungsten carbide.
  • Abrasive compacts tend to be brittle and, in use, they frequently are supported by being bonded to a cemented carbide substrate. Such supported abrasive compacts are known in the art as composite abrasive compacts. Compacts of this type are described, for example, in U.S. Pats. Nos. 3,743,489, 3,745,623, and 3, 767,371. The bond to the support can be formed either during or subsequent to the formation of the abrasive particle compact. Composite abrasive compacts may be used as such in the working surface of an abrasive tool. Composite compacts have found special utility as cutting elements in drill bits.
  • Drill bits for use in rock drilling, machining of wear resistant materials, and other operations which require high abrasion resistance or wear resistance generally consist of a plurality of polycrystalline abrasive cutting elements fixed in a holder.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,109,737 describes drill bits with a tungsten carbide stud (substrate) having a polycrystalline diamond compact on the outer surface of the cutting element. A plurality of these cutting elements then are mounted generally by interference fit into recesses into the crown of a drill bit, such as a rotary drill bit.
  • These drill bits generally have means for providing water-cooling or other cooling fluids to the interface between the drill crown and the substance being drilled during drilling operations.
  • the cutting element comprises an elongated pin of a metal carbide (stud) which may be either sintered or cemented carbide (such as tungsten carbide) with an abrasive particle compact (e.g., polycrystalline diamond) at one end of the pin for form a composite compact.
  • a metal carbide stud
  • a metal carbide such as tungsten carbide
  • an abrasive particle compact e.g., polycrystalline diamond
  • Fabrication of the composite compact typically is achieved by placing a cemented carbide substrate into the container of a press.
  • a mixture of diamond grains or diamond grains and catalyst binder is placed atop the substrate and compressed under HP/HT conditions.
  • a composite compact formed in the above-described manner may be subject to a number of shortcomings.
  • the coefficients of thermal expansion and elastic constants of cemented carbide and diamond are close, but not exactly the same.
  • thermally induced stresses occur at the interface between the diamond layer and the cemented carbide substrate, the magnitude of these stresses being dependent, for example
  • Another potential shortcoming relates to the creation of internal stresses within the diamond layer, which can result in a fracturing of that layer. Such stresses also result from the presence of the cemented carbide substrate and are distributed according to the size, geometry, and physical properties of the cemented carbide substrate and the polycrystalline diamond layer.
  • the tools are subject to delamination failures caused by thermally induced axial residual stresses on the outer diameter of the superabrasive layer. The stresses reduce the effectiveness of the tools and limit the applications in which they can be used.
  • 4,972,637 proposes a PDC having an interface containing discrete, spaced-apart recesses extending into the cemented carbide layer, the recesses containing abrasive material (e.g., diamond) and being arranged in a series of rows, each recess being staggered relative to its nearest neighbor in an adjacent row.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,007,207 proposes an alternative PDC structure having a number of recesses in the carbide layer, each filled with diamond, which recesses are formed into a spiral or concentric circular pattern.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,605,199 proposes a profile comprising an peripheral region with inclined inner surface surrounding an inner region.
  • 6,315,652 proposes an abrasive tool insert having an interface formed in a sawtooth pattern of concentric rings extending from said center to the periphery.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,484,330 suggests a saw tooth shaped cross-sectional profile and U.S. Patent No. 5,494,777 proposes an outward sloping profile in the interface design.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,743,346 proposes an interface having an inner surface and an outer chamfer that forms a 5° to 85° angle to the vertical, wherein the inner surface is other than the chamfer.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,486,137 also proposes a tool insert having an outer downwardly sloped interface surface.
  • the present invention relates to an abrasive tool insert which comprises a substrate having a support face that includes: an inner support table; an outer shoulder having a width, S w ; a downwardly sloping interface from the support table to the shoulder which interface has a slope angle, S a ; and a continuous abrasive layer integrally formed on the substrate support face, which abrasive layer includes: (a) a center having a height, D c ; (b) a diameter, D ; (c) a periphery having a height, D p , in contact with the shoulder and which periphery forms a cutting edge; wherein, (i) S w :D d ranges from between 0 and about 0.5; and (ii) for each S a and S w :Da, D C :D P is selected so as to diminish residual stress in the abrasive layer.
  • the invention relates to an abrasive tool insert formed from a substrate having an inner face that has a center, and annular face which annular face has a periphery.
  • the inner face slopes outwardly and downwardly from the center at an angle ranging from between about 5° and 30° from the horizontal.
  • the annular face surrounds by the inner face and terminates at the periphery.
  • the annular face slopes downwardly and outwardly from the inner face at an angle of between about 20° and 75° from the horizontal.
  • a continuous abrasive layer, having a center and a periphery forming a cutting edge, is integrally formed on the substrate and defines an interface therebetween.
  • the present invention further relates to a method of manufacturing abrasive tool inserts that possess diminished residual stress.
  • the invention relates to a method for forming an abrasive tool insert, which commences with providing a substrate having an inner face that has a center, and annular face which annular face has a periphery.
  • the inner face slopes outwardly and downwardly from the center at an angle ranging from between about 5° and 30° from the horizontal.
  • the annular face surrounds by the inner face and terminates at the periphery.
  • the annular face slopes downwardly and outwardly from the inner face at an angle of between about 20° and 75° from the horizontal.
  • a continuous abrasive layer, having a center and a periphery forming a cutting edge, is integrally formed on the substrate and defines an interface therebetween.
  • Fig. 1 graphically plots axial stress as a function of both slope angle and height ratio for a PCD tool insert
  • Fig. 2 graphically plots radial stress as a function of both slope angle and height ratio for a PCD tool insert
  • Fig. 3 graphically plots stress as a function of should width fraction for a PCD tool insert
  • Fig. 4 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert showing its various components: substrate having an inner support table, an outer shoulder, and a downwardly sloping interface therebetween; and a continuous abrasive layer having a center, a diameter, and a periphery;
  • Fig. 5 is a top plan view of the support of the tool insert of Fig. 4;
  • Fig. 6 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 5;
  • Fig. 7 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the support slope is slightly curved;
  • Fig. 8 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 7;
  • Fig. 9 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 8.
  • Fig. 10 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the inner support table is concentrically grooved;
  • Fig. 1 1 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 10;
  • Fig. 12 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 1 1 ;
  • Fig. 13 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the inner support table has outwardly radiating channels;
  • Fig. 14 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 13;
  • Fig. 15 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 14;
  • Fig. 16 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the inner support table has a series of generally parallel channels;
  • Fig. 17 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 16;
  • Fig. 18 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 17
  • Fig. 19 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the inner support table has a waffle pattern of channels;
  • Fig. 20 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 19;
  • Fig. 21 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 20;
  • Fig. 22 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the inner support table is concave and has outwardly radiating channels;
  • Fig. 23 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 22;
  • Fig. 24 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 21 ;
  • Fig. 25 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the inner support table has outwardly radiating rectangular ridges;
  • Fig. 26 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 25;
  • Fig. 27 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 26;
  • Fig. 28 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the shoulder has a series of radiating raised rectangular ridges;
  • Fig. 29 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 28.
  • Fig. 30 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 29.
  • Fig. 31 is a perspective view of one embodiment of the two-sloped interface configuration of the present invention.
  • Fig. 32 is a cross-sectional elevational view of the substrate of Fig. 31 ;
  • Fig. 33 graphically displays the stress (MPa) versus inner face angle for a cutter element having the profile as depicted in Fig. 32.
  • the present invention is based on several relationships regarding residual stresses in cutting tool inserts that have eluded the art.
  • Applicants have found a unique geometry for cutters, wherein a sloped profile is incorporated in the interior of the cutter.
  • the sloped profile is combined with a steeper slope on the outer edge of the cutter, further reduces the surface residual stresses.
  • the slope angle of the diamond / substrate interface which features not known in the prior art, is found to affect the overall residual stresses in the cutting tool insert.
  • the height ratio between the center diamond table thickness and the periphery thickness is found to change the overall stress as it interacts with the slope angle.
  • the diamond table thickness is found to have an effect the overall residual stresses.
  • the cutting tool insert, or cutter may be manufactured, in one embodiment by fabricating a cemented carbide substrate in a generally cylindrical shape.
  • the cemented metal carbide substrate is conventional in composition and, thus, may be include any of the Group IVB, VB, or VIB metals, which are pressed and sintered in the presence of a binder of cobalt, nickel or iron, or alloys thereof. Examples include carbides of tungsten (W), niobium (Nb), zirconium (Zr), vanadium (V), tantalum (Ta), titanium (Ti), tungsten Ti) and hafnium (Hf).
  • the metal carbide is tungsten carbide.
  • the end face(s) on the carbide substrate are formed by any suitable cutting, grinding, stamping, or etching process.
  • a sufficient mass of superabrasive material is then placed on the substrate forming the upper abrasive layer.
  • the upper layer is polycrystalline diamond (PCD).
  • the upper abrasive layer comprises at least one of synthetic and natural diamond, cubic boron nitride (CBN), wurtzite boron nitride, combinations thereof, and like materials.
  • the polycrystalline material layer (or the diamond table layer) and the substrate are subjected to pressures and temperatures sufficient to effect intercrystalline bonding in the polycrystalline material, and create a solid polycrystalline material layer.
  • chemical vapor deposition may also be used to deposit the polycrystalline material on the substrate. This is accomplished by coating the particles of the individual diamond crystals with various metals such as tungsten, tantalum, niobium, or molybdenum, and the like by chemical vapor techniques using fluidized bed procedure. Chemical vapor deposition techniques are also known in the art which utilize plasma assisted or heated filament methods.
  • FEA finite element stress analyses
  • the inventive cutter has an increased useful life with the reduced thermally induced residual radial and axial stresses in the abrasive layer.
  • the inventive cutter demonstrates increased impact performance and extended working life.
  • Figs.l and 2 display the maximum surface axial stress and radial stress dependent on the slope angle and the height ratio from one FEA study.
  • the hoop stress is not shown here because it is much smaller than axial and radial stresses.
  • the optimum range for minimum axial and radial stresses is very close.
  • a larger slope angle generally leads to smaller stress.
  • the optimum slope angle is between about 40° and about 50°, as higher angles tend to cause manufacturing difficulty. For a given slope angle, there exists a range of height ratios corresponding to minimum residual tensile stress.
  • a factor that affects residual stresses in cutting tools is the shoulder width (S w ) fraction of the radius of diamond table diameter (D d ). As illustrated in Fig. 3, the residual stress increases with shoulder width fraction. However, the shoulder can provide the better shaping capability and flexibility for post-sintering finishing. In one embodiment, the shoulder width fraction ranges from between about 0.02 and 0.05.
  • the interface can vary in a number of ways to ensure better bonding strength and manufacturing feasibility. This has been demonstrated in the art listed above.
  • the center interface can be slightly concave or convex, and some non-planar patterns can be combined with the outwardly sloped design. As long as the outwardly slope interface for the cutting tool is optimized based on the precepts of the present invention, the residual stresses can be minimized.
  • the cutting tool inserts are based on cylindrical supports having a diameter that ranges from between about 6 and 30 mm. This also is the nominal diameter, D d , of the abrasive compact upper surface. In another embodiment, the height of the abrasive particle at its periphery, D p , ranges from about 3 to about 6 mm in thickness. Using a practical S w :D d ratio of about 0.1 to about 0.5, translates into the shoulder, S w , having a width of from between about 0.003 and about 0.083 mm.
  • the slope angle, S a ranges from about 40° to 50°.
  • D C :D P ranges from between about 0.1 and 0.8.
  • the D C :D P ratio ranges from about 0.2 and 0.7.
  • the D C :D P ratio ranges from between about 0.3 and 0.6.
  • the D C :D P ratio ranges from about 0.4 and 0.5.
  • a diamond table, 8 has a diameter, D d ; a diamond table periphery thickness, D p ; a diamond table center thickness, D c ; a slope angle, S a ; and a shoulder width, S w .
  • the illustrated cutting tool insert has a substrate, 10, that has a support face, which includes an inner support table, 12, an outer shoulder, 14, and a downwardly sloping (from support table 12) interface, 16, that forms a slope angle, S a , between support table 12 and shoulder 14.
  • support table 12 and shoulder 14 are planar, while interface 16 is linear between support table 12 and shoulder 14. It will be appreciated that the interface between diamond table 8 and support 10 are mirror images. In manufacturing, the interface of diamond table 8 will confirm to the interface of support 10.
  • the cutting tool insert has a slightly curved sloping interface, 18. As shown in the figure, the interface is slightly curved both at its junction with the inner support table, 20, and with the shoulder, 22.
  • the inner support table 24 of the cutter is concentrically grooved from the center of support table 24, to the sloping interface, 26.
  • the concentric grooves are intended to provide better support for and a better bond to the diamond table, 28.
  • the cross-section of these grooves can be of a configuration other than that illustrated.
  • the inner support table 30 has a series of channels that radiate from its center to the sloping interface 32.
  • the number of such channels can be lesser or greater than the number shown. Additionally, the depth and height of each channel can vary from channel to channel. In another embodiment that is not shown, the cross-section of these channels need not be rectangular, but can consist of other geometries as well.
  • the channels in the support substrate 34 serve to provide a better bond for the diamond table 36 that it supports and to which it is bonded.
  • the sloping interface and shoulder can be in any configuration illustrated herein.
  • the cutting tool insert as in previous embodiments is like the insert of Fig. 4, except that the inner support table 38 of the substrate 40, and the diamond table 42, contain a series of substantially parallel channels across its face.
  • the number of such channels can be lesser or greater than the number shown.
  • the depth and height of each channel can also vary from channel to channel.
  • the cross-section of these channels need not be rectangular, but can consist of other geometries as well.
  • the sloping interface and shoulder can be in any configuration illustrated herein.
  • the inner support table 44 of the substrate 46 and the diamond table 48 contain a matrix of substantially parallel intersecting channels (a waffle-like pattern) across its face.
  • the number of such channels can be lesser or greater than the number shown, as can the depth and height of each channel, which can vary from channel to channel. It should be noted that the cross-section of these channels need not be rectangular, but can consist of other geometries as well.
  • the sloping interface and shoulder can be in any configuration illustrated herein.
  • the inner support table 50 of the substrate 52 is domed and contains a series of radiating channels from its center to the sloping interface 56 with the diamond table 54.
  • the number of such channels can be lesser or greater than the number shown, as can the depth and height of each channel, which can vary from channel to channel.
  • the cross- section of these channels is not rounded, but can consist of other geometries.
  • the shape of the dome also can vary.
  • the sloping interface and shoulder can be in any configuration illustrated herein.
  • the inner support table 58 of the substrate 60 contains a series of raised rectangular ridges that radiate from its center to the sloping interface 64 with the diamond table 62.
  • the number of such ridges can be lesser or greater than the number shown, as can the width and height of each ridge, which can vary from ridge to ridge.
  • the cross-section of these ridges need not be rectangular, but can consist of other geometries as well.
  • the sloping interface and shoulder can be in any configuration illustrated herein.
  • the sloping interface 72 between the inner support table 68 and the diamond table 70 is linear (as in Fig. 4), except that it has a series of radiating raised ridges that extend from support table 66 to the shoulder, 74.
  • the number of such ridges can be lesser or greater than the number shown, as can the width and height of each ridges, which can vary from ridge to ridge. In fact, the cross-section of these ridges need not be rectangular, but can consist of other geometries as well. As shown in Figs.
  • the carbide support contains 2 distinctive faces of support for the abrasive material, each face being disposed at an angle (relative to the horizontal) so as to optimized (minimize) radial stress and axial stress.
  • a cutter, 310 is formed from a lower support, 312, and an upper abrasive layer, 14 (see Fig. 32).
  • Support 312 has a central inner face 316 (support table), that extends outwardly and downwardly from an apex or center, 318.
  • Surrounding face 318 is an outer annular face, 320, that extends outwardly and downwardly from the outer periphery of face 316.
  • annular face 320 terminates in a ledge 322 of the outer periphery of annular face 320.
  • superimposed on inner face 316 can be saw tooth annuli and troughs, such as are disclosed in U. S. Patent No. 6,315,652.
  • outer annular face 320 slopes downwardly from the horizontal at an angle of between about 20° and 75°.
  • outer annular face slopes downwardly at an angle of about 45°.
  • inner face 16 slopes downwardly from the horizontal at an angle of between about 5° and 30°.
  • inner face 316 slopes downwardly at an angle of 7.5°.
  • the outer surface configuration of the diamond (upper abrasive) layer 314 is not critical.
  • the surface configuration of the diamond layer may be in the form of hemispherical, planar, conical, reduced or increased radius, chisel, or non-axisymmetric in shape.
  • all forms of tungsten carbide inserts used in the drilling industry may be enhanced by the addition of a diamond layer, and in one embodiment is further improved by the current invention by addition of a pattern of ridges.
  • the inventive cutter demonstrates an increased useful life with the reduced residual stresses (axial, radial, and hoop tensile) in the abrasive layer at locations where spalling and delamination typically occur.
  • reduced residual stresses is obtained for virtually any size tool insert.
  • the residual tensile stress in cutting tool inserts is significantly reduced with the axial tensile stress decreased by about 90%, the radial tensile stress decreased by about 60%, and the hoop stress becoming completely compressive.
  • the surface axial residual stress is reduced by 83% compared to a flat, planar interface and by 23% compared to a substrate with a single sloped rim. The reduction of the surface axial residual stress increases the impact performance and extends the working lifetime of the cutting tool.
  • Example 1 The following prior art cutters are used, a cutting tool having a flat interface, a cutting tool having a single slope interface with 19 mm diameter, 16 mm overall height, and 3 mm diamond table thickness.
  • a cutting tool with an outer annular face with an angle of 45° with respect to the horizontal, while the inner face angle varied between about 0° and 30° from the horizontal is used.
  • the cutting tool inserts are manufactured by conventional high pressure/high temperature (HP/HT) techniques well known in the art. Such techniques are disclosed, inter alia, in the art cited above.
  • HP/HT high pressure/high temperature
  • the inventive cutter is compared to a single slope tool insert of the prior art.
  • the performance of the cutter on a chamfer piece is measured, with each piece having a carbide chamfer of greater than about 0.2 mm, less than l .0 mm radial or 45° on the locating base.
  • the cutter (0.010" chamfered edge) sample is mounted in a steel holder, with Rake angle to work piece 7 deg radial/ 12 degrees axial. The cutter is rotated and cuts in an interrupted fashion at a depth of 0.150" and transverse distance of 0.010" through a granite work piece at a cutting speed of
  • the inventive cutter shows unexpected improvement in impact resistance, with a count of 12600 as opposed to 1 1500 for the prior art cutter.
  • Example 2 In this example, the prior art cutter has a flat interface, 19 mm diameter, 16 mm overall height, 3 mm diamond table thickness.
  • Table 3 display correlations of shoulder angle (Sa) and diamond table height ratio Dc:Dp as predicted by FEA models. The ratios displayed are approximate.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Polishing Bodies And Polishing Tools (AREA)

Abstract

An abrasive tool insert with diminished residual stresses. In one embodiment, the tool insert is formed from a substrate (312) having an inner face (316) that has a center (318), and annular face which annular face (320) has a periphery (322), with the inner face slopes outwardly and downwardly from the center. In another embodiment, the tool insert is form from a substrate (10) with a support face with an inner support face/table (12), and outer shoulder with a width (14), and a downwardly sloping interface (16) from the support table to the shoulder, which interface has a slope angle. A continuous abrasive layer (8), having a center having a height, a diameter, a periphery having a height, which abrasive layer being in contact with the inner face of the substrate and which periphery forms a cutting edge.

Description

CUTTING TOOLS WITH TWO-SLOPE PROFILE
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims priority on U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/395,181 , filed on July 10, 2002 and U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/395,182, filed on July 10, 2002.
FIELD THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the field of abrasive tool inserts.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Abrasive compacts are used extensively in cutting, milling, grinding, drilling and other abrasive operations. An abrasive particle compact is a polycrystalline mass of abrasive particles, such as diamond and/or cubic boron nitride (CBN), bonded together to form an integral, tough, high-strength mass. Such components can be bonded together in a particle-to-particle self-bonded relationship, by means of a bonding medium disposed between the particles, or by combinations thereof. The abrasive particle content of the abrasive compact is high and there is an extensive amount of direct particle-to-particle bonding. Abrasive compacts are made under elevated or high pressure and temperature (HP/HT) conditions at which the particles, diamond or CBN, are crystallographically stable. For example, see U.S. Pats. Nos. 3,136,615, 3,141 ,746, and 3,233,988.
A supported abrasive particle compact, herein termed a composite compact, is an abrasive particle compact, which is bonded to a substrate material, such as cemented tungsten carbide.
Abrasive compacts tend to be brittle and, in use, they frequently are supported by being bonded to a cemented carbide substrate. Such supported abrasive compacts are known in the art as composite abrasive compacts. Compacts of this type are described, for example, in U.S. Pats. Nos. 3,743,489, 3,745,623, and 3, 767,371. The bond to the support can be formed either during or subsequent to the formation of the abrasive particle compact. Composite abrasive compacts may be used as such in the working surface of an abrasive tool. Composite compacts have found special utility as cutting elements in drill bits. Drill bits for use in rock drilling, machining of wear resistant materials, and other operations which require high abrasion resistance or wear resistance generally consist of a plurality of polycrystalline abrasive cutting elements fixed in a holder. U.S. Pat. No. 4,109,737 describes drill bits with a tungsten carbide stud (substrate) having a polycrystalline diamond compact on the outer surface of the cutting element. A plurality of these cutting elements then are mounted generally by interference fit into recesses into the crown of a drill bit, such as a rotary drill bit. These drill bits generally have means for providing water-cooling or other cooling fluids to the interface between the drill crown and the substance being drilled during drilling operations. Generally, the cutting element comprises an elongated pin of a metal carbide (stud) which may be either sintered or cemented carbide (such as tungsten carbide) with an abrasive particle compact (e.g., polycrystalline diamond) at one end of the pin for form a composite compact. Fabrication of the composite compact typically is achieved by placing a cemented carbide substrate into the container of a press. A mixture of diamond grains or diamond grains and catalyst binder is placed atop the substrate and compressed under HP/HT conditions. A composite compact formed in the above-described manner may be subject to a number of shortcomings. For example, the coefficients of thermal expansion and elastic constants of cemented carbide and diamond are close, but not exactly the same. Thus, during heating or cooling of the polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC), thermally induced stresses occur at the interface between the diamond layer and the cemented carbide substrate, the magnitude of these stresses being dependent, for example, on the disparity in thermal expansion coefficients and elastic constants.
Another potential shortcoming, which should be considered, relates to the creation of internal stresses within the diamond layer, which can result in a fracturing of that layer. Such stresses also result from the presence of the cemented carbide substrate and are distributed according to the size, geometry, and physical properties of the cemented carbide substrate and the polycrystalline diamond layer. In some applications, the tools are subject to delamination failures caused by thermally induced axial residual stresses on the outer diameter of the superabrasive layer. The stresses reduce the effectiveness of the tools and limit the applications in which they can be used.
Various PDC structures have been proposed in which the diamond/carbide interface contains a number of non-planar features, e.g., ridges, grooves, or other indentations, etc., designed to increase the mechanical bond and reduce mechanical and / or thermal stresses. U.S. Patent No. 4,784,023 discloses a PDC with an interface having a number of alternating grooves and ridges, the top and bottom of which are substantially parallel with the compact surface and the sides of which are substantially perpendicular to the compact surface. U.S. Patent No. 5,351 ,772 presents various interface designs containing radial raised lands on the substrate. U.S. Patent No. 4,972,637 proposes a PDC having an interface containing discrete, spaced-apart recesses extending into the cemented carbide layer, the recesses containing abrasive material (e.g., diamond) and being arranged in a series of rows, each recess being staggered relative to its nearest neighbor in an adjacent row. U.S. Patent No. 5,007,207 proposes an alternative PDC structure having a number of recesses in the carbide layer, each filled with diamond, which recesses are formed into a spiral or concentric circular pattern. U.S. Patent No. 5,605,199 proposes a profile comprising an peripheral region with inclined inner surface surrounding an inner region. U.S. Patent No. 6,315,652 proposes an abrasive tool insert having an interface formed in a sawtooth pattern of concentric rings extending from said center to the periphery. U.S. Patent No. 5,484,330 suggests a saw tooth shaped cross-sectional profile and U.S. Patent No. 5,494,777 proposes an outward sloping profile in the interface design. U.S. Patent No. 5,743,346 proposes an interface having an inner surface and an outer chamfer that forms a 5° to 85° angle to the vertical, wherein the inner surface is other than the chamfer. U.S. Patent No. 5,486,137 also proposes a tool insert having an outer downwardly sloped interface surface. U.S. Patent No. 5,494,477 proposes a tool insert having an outer downwardly sloping interface. U.S. Patent No. 5,971 ,087 also proposes various dual and triple slope interface profiles. There is still a need in the art to minimize susceptibility to fracture and spall in the diamond layer of cutting tools, which in part arises from the internal residual stresses. Thus it would be highly desirable to provide a polycrystalline diamond compact having increased resistance to diamond spalling fractures, having reduced axial, radial, and hoop stresses. It is to such cutters that the present invention is addressed.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an abrasive tool insert which comprises a substrate having a support face that includes: an inner support table; an outer shoulder having a width, Sw; a downwardly sloping interface from the support table to the shoulder which interface has a slope angle, Sa; and a continuous abrasive layer integrally formed on the substrate support face, which abrasive layer includes: (a) a center having a height, Dc; (b) a diameter, D ; (c) a periphery having a height, Dp, in contact with the shoulder and which periphery forms a cutting edge; wherein, (i) Sw:Dd ranges from between 0 and about 0.5; and (ii) for each Sa and Sw:Da, DC:DP is selected so as to diminish residual stress in the abrasive layer.
In one aspect, the invention relates to an abrasive tool insert formed from a substrate having an inner face that has a center, and annular face which annular face has a periphery. The inner face slopes outwardly and downwardly from the center at an angle ranging from between about 5° and 30° from the horizontal. The annular face surrounds by the inner face and terminates at the periphery. The annular face slopes downwardly and outwardly from the inner face at an angle of between about 20° and 75° from the horizontal. A continuous abrasive layer, having a center and a periphery forming a cutting edge, is integrally formed on the substrate and defines an interface therebetween.
The present invention further relates to a method of manufacturing abrasive tool inserts that possess diminished residual stress. Specifically, the invention relates to a method for forming an abrasive tool insert, which commences with providing a substrate having an inner face that has a center, and annular face which annular face has a periphery. The inner face slopes outwardly and downwardly from the center at an angle ranging from between about 5° and 30° from the horizontal. The annular face surrounds by the inner face and terminates at the periphery. The annular face slopes downwardly and outwardly from the inner face at an angle of between about 20° and 75° from the horizontal. A continuous abrasive layer, having a center and a periphery forming a cutting edge, is integrally formed on the substrate and defines an interface therebetween. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 graphically plots axial stress as a function of both slope angle and height ratio for a PCD tool insert;
Fig. 2 graphically plots radial stress as a function of both slope angle and height ratio for a PCD tool insert;
Fig. 3 graphically plots stress as a function of should width fraction for a PCD tool insert;
Fig. 4 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert showing its various components: substrate having an inner support table, an outer shoulder, and a downwardly sloping interface therebetween; and a continuous abrasive layer having a center, a diameter, and a periphery;
Fig. 5 is a top plan view of the support of the tool insert of Fig. 4;
Fig. 6 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 5;
Fig. 7 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the support slope is slightly curved;
Fig. 8 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 7;
Fig. 9 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 8;
Fig. 10 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the inner support table is concentrically grooved;
Fig. 1 1 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 10;
Fig. 12 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 1 1 ;
Fig. 13 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the inner support table has outwardly radiating channels;
Fig. 14 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 13;
Fig. 15 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 14;
Fig. 16 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the inner support table has a series of generally parallel channels;
Fig. 17 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 16;
Fig. 18 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 17
Fig. 19 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the inner support table has a waffle pattern of channels;
Fig. 20 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 19; Fig. 21 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 20;
Fig. 22 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the inner support table is concave and has outwardly radiating channels;
Fig. 23 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 22;
Fig. 24 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 21 ;
Fig. 25 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the inner support table has outwardly radiating rectangular ridges;
Fig. 26 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 25;
Fig. 27 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 26;
Fig. 28 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a tool insert like Fig. 4, except that the shoulder has a series of radiating raised rectangular ridges;
Fig. 29 is a top plan view of the support of Fig. 28; and
Fig. 30 is a perspective view of the support of Fig. 29.
Fig. 31 is a perspective view of one embodiment of the two-sloped interface configuration of the present invention;
Fig. 32 is a cross-sectional elevational view of the substrate of Fig. 31 ;
Fig. 33 graphically displays the stress (MPa) versus inner face angle for a cutter element having the profile as depicted in Fig. 32.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is based on several relationships regarding residual stresses in cutting tool inserts that have eluded the art. In one embodiment, Applicants have found a unique geometry for cutters, wherein a sloped profile is incorporated in the interior of the cutter. In another embodiment of the invention, the sloped profile is combined with a steeper slope on the outer edge of the cutter, further reduces the surface residual stresses. In yet another embodiment, the slope angle of the diamond / substrate interface, which features not known in the prior art, is found to affect the overall residual stresses in the cutting tool insert. In a fourth embodiment of the invention, the height ratio between the center diamond table thickness and the periphery thickness is found to change the overall stress as it interacts with the slope angle. In yet another embodiment, the diamond table thickness is found to have an effect the overall residual stresses. The cutting tool insert, or cutter, may be manufactured, in one embodiment by fabricating a cemented carbide substrate in a generally cylindrical shape. The cemented metal carbide substrate is conventional in composition and, thus, may be include any of the Group IVB, VB, or VIB metals, which are pressed and sintered in the presence of a binder of cobalt, nickel or iron, or alloys thereof. Examples include carbides of tungsten (W), niobium (Nb), zirconium (Zr), vanadium (V), tantalum (Ta), titanium (Ti), tungsten Ti) and hafnium (Hf). In one embodiment, the metal carbide is tungsten carbide. The end face(s) on the carbide substrate are formed by any suitable cutting, grinding, stamping, or etching process. A sufficient mass of superabrasive material is then placed on the substrate forming the upper abrasive layer. In one embodiment, the upper layer is polycrystalline diamond (PCD). In another embodiment, the upper abrasive layer comprises at least one of synthetic and natural diamond, cubic boron nitride (CBN), wurtzite boron nitride, combinations thereof, and like materials.
In one embodiment, the polycrystalline material layer (or the diamond table layer) and the substrate are subjected to pressures and temperatures sufficient to effect intercrystalline bonding in the polycrystalline material, and create a solid polycrystalline material layer. In another embodiment, chemical vapor deposition may also be used to deposit the polycrystalline material on the substrate. This is accomplished by coating the particles of the individual diamond crystals with various metals such as tungsten, tantalum, niobium, or molybdenum, and the like by chemical vapor techniques using fluidized bed procedure. Chemical vapor deposition techniques are also known in the art which utilize plasma assisted or heated filament methods.
Applicants have conducted three dimensional finite element stress analyses ("FEA"), and found that for a normal diamond-cutting tool, there exist some high tensile stress zones on the diamond table surface and near the interface. Specifically, the tensile axial stress above the interface is a significant factor causing delamination, and the high radial stress on the diamond table surface can lead to center-splitting type failure. Therefore, to reduce the impact related failure and improve the useful working time of PCD cutting tool, the residual stresses should be minimized.
In one embodiment of the invention, the inventive cutter has an increased useful life with the reduced thermally induced residual radial and axial stresses in the abrasive layer. In another embodiment, the inventive cutter demonstrates increased impact performance and extended working life. These and other advantages of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art. In one embodiment of the invention, maximum axial, radial, and hoop tensile stresses can be greatly reduced by introducing the outwardly slope with proper height ratio between center diamond table thickness and periphery thickness. For a given slope angle, Sa, there is an optimized height ratio range of PCD center thickness to PCD cutting edge (periphery) thickness, DC:DP, to achieve minimized diamond table surface stresses. This is illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2. Figs.l and 2 display the maximum surface axial stress and radial stress dependent on the slope angle and the height ratio from one FEA study. The hoop stress is not shown here because it is much smaller than axial and radial stresses. As seen in Figs.l and 2, the optimum range for minimum axial and radial stresses is very close. In one embodiment for a height ratio of larger than about 0.25, a larger slope angle generally leads to smaller stress. In another embodiment, the optimum slope angle is between about 40° and about 50°, as higher angles tend to cause manufacturing difficulty. For a given slope angle, there exists a range of height ratios corresponding to minimum residual tensile stress. In another embodiment of the invention, a factor that affects residual stresses in cutting tools is the shoulder width (Sw) fraction of the radius of diamond table diameter (Dd). As illustrated in Fig. 3, the residual stress increases with shoulder width fraction. However, the shoulder can provide the better shaping capability and flexibility for post-sintering finishing. In one embodiment, the shoulder width fraction ranges from between about 0.02 and 0.05.
Besides the optimized embodiment of a planar interface between the substrate and the polycrystalline diamond table, the interface can vary in a number of ways to ensure better bonding strength and manufacturing feasibility. This has been demonstrated in the art listed above. For example, the center interface can be slightly concave or convex, and some non-planar patterns can be combined with the outwardly sloped design. As long as the outwardly slope interface for the cutting tool is optimized based on the precepts of the present invention, the residual stresses can be minimized.
In one embodiment of the invention, the cutting tool inserts are based on cylindrical supports having a diameter that ranges from between about 6 and 30 mm. This also is the nominal diameter, Dd, of the abrasive compact upper surface. In another embodiment, the height of the abrasive particle at its periphery, Dp, ranges from about 3 to about 6 mm in thickness. Using a practical Sw:Dd ratio of about 0.1 to about 0.5, translates into the shoulder, Sw, having a width of from between about 0.003 and about 0.083 mm.
In one embodiment, the slope angle, Sa, ranges from about 40° to 50°. At this slope angle, DC:DP ranges from between about 0.1 and 0.8. In a second embodiment, the DC:DP ratio ranges from about 0.2 and 0.7. In a third embodiment, the DC:DP ratio ranges from between about 0.3 and 0.6. In a fourth embodiment, the DC:DP ratio ranges from about 0.4 and 0.5. In one embodiment of a planar interface model cutting tool insert as illustrated in Figs. 4-6, wherein a diamond table, 8, has a diameter, Dd; a diamond table periphery thickness, Dp; a diamond table center thickness, Dc; a slope angle, Sa; and a shoulder width, Sw. The illustrated cutting tool insert has a substrate, 10, that has a support face, which includes an inner support table, 12, an outer shoulder, 14, and a downwardly sloping (from support table 12) interface, 16, that forms a slope angle, Sa, between support table 12 and shoulder 14. In this embodiment, support table 12 and shoulder 14 are planar, while interface 16 is linear between support table 12 and shoulder 14. It will be appreciated that the interface between diamond table 8 and support 10 are mirror images. In manufacturing, the interface of diamond table 8 will confirm to the interface of support 10.
In another embodiment as illustrated in Figs. 7-9, the cutting tool insert has a slightly curved sloping interface, 18. As shown in the figure, the interface is slightly curved both at its junction with the inner support table, 20, and with the shoulder, 22.
In yet another embodiment of the inventive cutter as illustrated in Figs. 10-12, the inner support table 24 of the cutter is concentrically grooved from the center of support table 24, to the sloping interface, 26. In this embodiment, the concentric grooves are intended to provide better support for and a better bond to the diamond table, 28. As shown, the cross-section of these grooves can be of a configuration other than that illustrated.
In yet a fourth embodiment of the interface of the inventive cutter as shown in Figs. 13-15, the inner support table 30, has a series of channels that radiate from its center to the sloping interface 32. The number of such channels can be lesser or greater than the number shown. Additionally, the depth and height of each channel can vary from channel to channel. In another embodiment that is not shown, the cross-section of these channels need not be rectangular, but can consist of other geometries as well. In this embodiment, the channels in the support substrate 34 serve to provide a better bond for the diamond table 36 that it supports and to which it is bonded. The sloping interface and shoulder can be in any configuration illustrated herein.
In a fifth embodiment as illustrated in Figs. 16-18, the cutting tool insert as in previous embodiments, is like the insert of Fig. 4, except that the inner support table 38 of the substrate 40, and the diamond table 42, contain a series of substantially parallel channels across its face. The number of such channels can be lesser or greater than the number shown. The depth and height of each channel can also vary from channel to channel. The cross-section of these channels need not be rectangular, but can consist of other geometries as well. The sloping interface and shoulder can be in any configuration illustrated herein. In a sixth embodiment as illustrated in Figs. 19-21 , the inner support table 44 of the substrate 46 and the diamond table 48, contain a matrix of substantially parallel intersecting channels (a waffle-like pattern) across its face. The number of such channels can be lesser or greater than the number shown, as can the depth and height of each channel, which can vary from channel to channel. It should be noted that the cross-section of these channels need not be rectangular, but can consist of other geometries as well. The sloping interface and shoulder can be in any configuration illustrated herein.
In a seventh embodiment as shown in Figs. 22-24, the inner support table 50 of the substrate 52 is domed and contains a series of radiating channels from its center to the sloping interface 56 with the diamond table 54. The number of such channels can be lesser or greater than the number shown, as can the depth and height of each channel, which can vary from channel to channel. In one variation, the cross- section of these channels is not rounded, but can consist of other geometries. Furthermore, the shape of the dome also can vary. The sloping interface and shoulder can be in any configuration illustrated herein.
In an eight embodiment of the inventive cutter as shown in Figs. 25-27, which is like the insert of Fig. 4, except that the inner support table 58 of the substrate 60 contains a series of raised rectangular ridges that radiate from its center to the sloping interface 64 with the diamond table 62. The number of such ridges can be lesser or greater than the number shown, as can the width and height of each ridge, which can vary from ridge to ridge. The cross-section of these ridges need not be rectangular, but can consist of other geometries as well. The sloping interface and shoulder can be in any configuration illustrated herein.
In the ninth embodiment of the cutting tool insert as shown in Figs. 28-30, the sloping interface 72 between the inner support table 68 and the diamond table 70 is linear (as in Fig. 4), except that it has a series of radiating raised ridges that extend from support table 66 to the shoulder, 74. The number of such ridges can be lesser or greater than the number shown, as can the width and height of each ridges, which can vary from ridge to ridge. In fact, the cross-section of these ridges need not be rectangular, but can consist of other geometries as well. As shown in Figs. 31 and 32 for one embodiment of the invention, the carbide support contains 2 distinctive faces of support for the abrasive material, each face being disposed at an angle (relative to the horizontal) so as to optimized (minimize) radial stress and axial stress. To that end, a cutter, 310, is formed from a lower support, 312, and an upper abrasive layer, 14 (see Fig. 32). Support 312 has a central inner face 316 (support table), that extends outwardly and downwardly from an apex or center, 318. Surrounding face 318 is an outer annular face, 320, that extends outwardly and downwardly from the outer periphery of face 316. The annular face terminates in a ledge 322 of the outer periphery of annular face 320. Superimposed on inner face 316 can be saw tooth annuli and troughs, such as are disclosed in U. S. Patent No. 6,315,652. In one embodiment of the invention to optimize (minimize) radial stress, outer annular face 320 slopes downwardly from the horizontal at an angle of between about 20° and 75°. In another embodiment, outer annular face slopes downwardly at an angle of about 45°. In another embodiment to optimize (minimize) axial stress, inner face 16 slopes downwardly from the horizontal at an angle of between about 5° and 30°. In yet another embodiment, inner face 316 slopes downwardly at an angle of 7.5°.
The outer surface configuration of the diamond (upper abrasive) layer 314 is not critical. In one embodiment, the surface configuration of the diamond layer, may be in the form of hemispherical, planar, conical, reduced or increased radius, chisel, or non-axisymmetric in shape. In general, all forms of tungsten carbide inserts used in the drilling industry may be enhanced by the addition of a diamond layer, and in one embodiment is further improved by the current invention by addition of a pattern of ridges.
In one embodiment of the invention, the inventive cutter demonstrates an increased useful life with the reduced residual stresses (axial, radial, and hoop tensile) in the abrasive layer at locations where spalling and delamination typically occur. In another embodiment, reduced residual stresses is obtained for virtually any size tool insert.
In one embodiment with optimized diamond-substrate interface, the residual tensile stress in cutting tool inserts is significantly reduced with the axial tensile stress decreased by about 90%, the radial tensile stress decreased by about 60%, and the hoop stress becoming completely compressive. In another embodiment of a tool insert having a support with a central downwardly sloping profile and an outer steeper sloping profile, the surface axial residual stress is reduced by 83% compared to a flat, planar interface and by 23% compared to a substrate with a single sloped rim. The reduction of the surface axial residual stress increases the impact performance and extends the working lifetime of the cutting tool.
EXAMPLES. In the examples, Applicants compare the inventive cutters versus the prior art polycrystalline diamond cutters through various tests and analyses, including finite element analyses (FEA).
Example 1 : The following prior art cutters are used, a cutting tool having a flat interface, a cutting tool having a single slope interface with 19 mm diameter, 16 mm overall height, and 3 mm diamond table thickness. For the inventive cutter, a cutting tool with an outer annular face with an angle of 45° with respect to the horizontal, while the inner face angle varied between about 0° and 30° from the horizontal, is used.
The cutting tool inserts are manufactured by conventional high pressure/high temperature (HP/HT) techniques well known in the art. Such techniques are disclosed, inter alia, in the art cited above.
The FEA analyses show that both radial and axial stress is minimized at about 7.5° with an optimized (minimized) range of stresses being expected at about 5° to 30° from the horizontal. The results of FEA modeling using ABACUS is set forth in
Fig. 3 and in Table 1 below.
Table 1
Figure imgf000013_0001
In a Parkson Mill Impact Resistance test to evaluate interrupted cut impact testing on a granite block in a fly cutter configuration, the inventive cutter is compared to a single slope tool insert of the prior art. In the Parkson Mill Impact Resistance test, the performance of the cutter on a chamfer piece is measured, with each piece having a carbide chamfer of greater than about 0.2 mm, less than l .0 mm radial or 45° on the locating base. The cutter (0.010" chamfered edge) sample is mounted in a steel holder, with Rake angle to work piece 7 deg radial/ 12 degrees axial. The cutter is rotated and cuts in an interrupted fashion at a depth of 0.150" and transverse distance of 0.010" through a granite work piece at a cutting speed of
320 rpm and feed rate of about 3" per min. (7.62 cm / min). The test is stopped when the diamond table fails, and the number of impacts (entries into the block) counted.
The inventive cutter shows unexpected improvement in impact resistance, with a count of 12600 as opposed to 1 1500 for the prior art cutter.
Example 2: In this example, the prior art cutter has a flat interface, 19 mm diameter, 16 mm overall height, 3 mm diamond table thickness. The cutter of the invention has an optimized interface of slope angle of 45°, a height ratio of 0.6, a shoulder width ratio = 0.025. FEA results are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Figure imgf000014_0001
The foregoing results can be extended to additional table diameters, diamond table heights, slope angles, and shoulder widths. Table 3 display correlations of shoulder angle (Sa) and diamond table height ratio Dc:Dp as predicted by FEA models. The ratios displayed are approximate. TABLE 3
Figure imgf000014_0002
Figure imgf000015_0001
The correlation between shoulder angle (Sa) and shoulder width ratio (Sw:Dd), is displayed in Table 4 below, in which the ratios are approximate.
TABLE 4
Figure imgf000015_0002
While the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, those skilled in the art will understand that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof Cutting elements according to one or more of the disclosed embodiments may be employed in combination with cutting elements of the same or other disclosed embodiments, or with conventional cutting elements, in paired or other grouping, including but not limited to, side-by-side and leading/trailing combinations of various configurations. All citations referred herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference.

Claims

1. An abrasive tool insert, which comprises:
(a) a substrate (314) having an inner face (316) which has a center (318), and annular face (320) which has a periphery, said inner face (316) sloping outwardly and downwardly from said center (318) at an angle ranging from between about 5° and 30° from the horizontal, said annular face (320) surrounding said inner face (316), which annular face (320) terminating at said periphery and sloping downwardly and outwardly from said inner face at an angle of between about 20° and 75° from the horizontal; and
(b) a continuous abrasive layer (314) having a center (318), a periphery forming a cutting edge, being integrally formed on said substrate, and defining an interface therebetween.
2. The abrasive tool insert of claim 1, wherein said annular face (320) terminates in a ledge (322) which surmounts the outer periphery of said annular face (320).
3. An abrasive tool insert, which comprises:
(a) a substrate having a support face that includes:
( 1 ) an inner support table (12),
(2) an outer shoulder ( 14) having a width, Sw,
(3) a downwardly sloping interface (16) from said support table to said shoulder which interface has a slope angle, Sa; and
(b) a continuous abrasive layer (8) integrally formed on said substrate support face, which abrasive layer includes:
( 1 ) a center having a height, Dc,
(2) a diameter, Dd,
(3) a periphery having a height, Dp, in contact with said shoulder and which periphery forms a cutting edge; wherein,
Sw:Dd ranges from between 0 and about 0.5; and for each Sa and Sw:Dd, DC:DP is selected so as to diminish residual stress in the abrasive layer.
4. A abrasive tool insert, which comprises:
(a) a cylindrical substrate having a support face that ranges from about 6 to about 30 mm in diameter and that includes:
( 1 ) an inner support table (12),
(2) an outer shoulder (14) having a width, Sw,
(3) a downwardly sloping interface (16) from said support table to said shoulder which interface has a slope angle, Sa; and
(b) a continuous abrasive layer (8) integrally formed on said substrate support face, which abrasive layer includes:
( 1 ) a center having a height, Dc,
(2) a diameter, Dd, which ranges from about 6 to about 30 mm in diameter,
(3) a periphery having a height, Dp, that ranges from about 2 to 6 mm and is in contact with said shoulder and which periphery forms a cutting edge; wherein,
Sw:Dd ranges from between 0.1 and about 0.5; and for each Sa and Sw:Dd, DC:DP is selected so as to diminish residual stress in the abrasive layer.
5. The abrasive tool insert of claim 3 or claim 4, wherein said Sa and DC:DP each has a value corresponding to one of:
Sa ranging between about 20° and 30° and DC:DP ranging from between about 0.25 and 0.85;
Sa ranging between about 25° and 35° and DC:DP ranging from between about 0.25 and 0.8;
Sa ranging between about 30° and 40° and DC:DP ranging from between about 0.25 and 0.8;
Sa ranging between about 35° and 45°and DC:DP ranging from between about 0.15 and 0.75;
Sa ranging between about 40° and 50° and DC:DP ranging from between about 0.1 and 0.8; Sa ranging between about 45° and 55° and DC:DP ranging from between about 0.1 and 0.75;
Sa ranging between about 50° and 60° and DC:DP ranging from between about 0.05 and 0.75;
Sa ranging between about 55° and 65° and Dc:Dp ranging from between about 0.05 and 0.7;
Sa ranging between about 20° and 65° and Dc:Dp ranging from between about 0.1 and 0.8.
6. The abrasive tool insert of claim 3 or claim 4, wherein said substrate inner support table (12) is planar or concave.
7. The abrasive tool insert of claim 3 or claim 4, wherein said sloping interface (16) is curved.
8. The abrasive tool insert of claim 3 or claim 4, wherein said substrate inner support table (12) comprises at least one of a) a series of concentric grooves; b) a series of outwardly radiating channels; c) a series of substantially parallel channels; d) a series of intersecting channels; e) a series of outwardly radiating ridges; f) a series of substantially parallel raised ridges that extend from said support table to said shoulder.
9. The abrasive tool insert of either claim 1 , claim 3 or claim 4, wherein said substrate comprises cemented metal carbide.
10. The abrasive tool insert of claim 9, wherein said cemented metal carbide is one or more of Group IVB, Group VB, and Group VIB metal carbides.
1 1. The abrasive tool insert of either claim 1 , claim 3 or claim 4, wherein said abrasive layer is one or more of diamond, cubic boron nitride, wurtzite boron nitride, and combinations thereof.
12. A method for forming an abrasive tool insert, which method comprises the steps of:
(a) forming a substrate (314) having an inner face (316) which has a center (318), and an annular face (320) which annular face has a periphery, said inner face (316) sloping outwardly and downwardly from said center (318) at an angle ranging from between about 5° and 30° from the horizontal, said annular face (320) terminating at said periphery and which annular face (320) sloping downwardly and outwardly from said inner face (316) at an angle of between about 20° and 75° from the horizontal; and
(b) integrally forming on said substrate a continuous abrasive layer having a center and a periphery forming a cutting edge.
13. A method for forming an abrasive tool insert, which method comprises the steps of:
(a) forming a substrate having a support face that includes:
( 1 ) an inner support table ( 12),
(2) an outer shoulder ( 14) having a width, Sw,
(3) a downwardly sloping interface (16) from said support table to said shoulder which interface has a slope angle, Sa; and
(b) integrally forming on said substrate a continuous abrasive layer (8), which abrasive layer includes:
(1 ) a center having a height, Dc,
(2) a diameter, Dd,
(3) a periphery having a height, Dp, in contact with said shoulder and which periphery forms a cutting edge; wherein,
Sw:Dd ranges from between 0 and about 0.5; and for each Sa and Sw:D , Dc:Dp is selected so as to diminish residual stress in the abrasive layer.
14. The method of either claim 12 or claim 13, wherein said substrate comprises cemented metal carbide.
15. The method of either claim 12 or claim 13, wherein said cemented metal carbide is one or more of Group IVB, Group VB, and Group VIB metal carbides.
16. The method of either claim 12 or claim 13, wherein said abrasive layer is one or more of diamond, cubic boron nitride, wurtzite boron nitride, and combinations thereof.
17. The method of claim 12, wherein said annular face angle is about 45° from the horizontal and said annular face terminates in a ledge surrounding the periphery of said annular face.
PCT/US2003/018692 2002-07-10 2003-06-12 Cutting tools with two-slope profile WO2004007901A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2003248688A AU2003248688A1 (en) 2002-07-10 2003-06-12 Cutting tools with two-slope profile
EP03764305A EP1527251B1 (en) 2002-07-10 2003-06-12 Cutting tools with two-slope profile

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US39518102P 2002-07-10 2002-07-10
US39518202P 2002-07-10 2002-07-10
US60/395,182 2002-07-10
US60/395,181 2002-07-10

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004007901A1 true WO2004007901A1 (en) 2004-01-22

Family

ID=30118481

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2003/018692 WO2004007901A1 (en) 2002-07-10 2003-06-12 Cutting tools with two-slope profile

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1527251B1 (en)
CN (1) CN100374685C (en)
AU (1) AU2003248688A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2004007901A1 (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004076800A1 (en) * 2003-02-26 2004-09-10 Element Six (Proprietary) Limited Secondary cutting element for drill bit
WO2014189763A1 (en) * 2013-05-22 2014-11-27 Us Synthetic Corporation Bearing assemblies and bearing apparatuses including thick superhard tables
GB2516359A (en) * 2013-05-31 2015-01-21 Element Six Abrasives Sa Superhard constructions & methods of making same
WO2016145318A1 (en) * 2015-03-12 2016-09-15 Baker Hughes Incorporated Cutting elements configured to mitigate diamond table failure, earth-boring tools including such cutting elements, and related methods
GB2546172A (en) * 2015-12-31 2017-07-12 Element Six (Uk) Ltd Super hard constructions & methods of making same
US10107042B2 (en) 2012-09-07 2018-10-23 Smith International, Inc. Ultra-hard constructions with erosion resistance
US10400517B2 (en) 2017-05-02 2019-09-03 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Cutting elements configured to reduce impact damage and related tools and methods
US10570668B2 (en) 2018-07-27 2020-02-25 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Cutting elements configured to reduce impact damage and mitigate polycrystalline, superabrasive material failure earth-boring tools including such cutting elements, and related methods
US10577870B2 (en) 2018-07-27 2020-03-03 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Cutting elements configured to reduce impact damage related tools and methods—alternate configurations
WO2020102016A1 (en) * 2018-11-12 2020-05-22 Smith International Inc. Non planar cutting element with non planar interface design and tools incorporating such elements
US11920409B2 (en) 2022-07-05 2024-03-05 Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc Cutting elements, earth-boring tools including the cutting elements, and methods of forming the earth-boring tools

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8858662B2 (en) * 2011-03-04 2014-10-14 Baker Hughes Incorporated Methods of forming polycrystalline tables and polycrystalline elements
US9138872B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2015-09-22 Diamond Innovations, Inc. Polycrystalline diamond drill blanks with improved carbide interface geometries
CN105127430B (en) * 2015-08-24 2017-11-24 珠海市钜鑫科技开发有限公司 A kind of superhard material with cubic boron nitride, wurtzite BN and diamond and preparation method thereof

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20010037901A1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2001-11-08 Bertagnolli Kenneth E. Polycrystalline diamond compact cutter having a stress mitigating hoop at the periphery

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5494477A (en) * 1993-08-11 1996-02-27 General Electric Company Abrasive tool insert
GB9412779D0 (en) * 1994-06-24 1994-08-17 Camco Drilling Group Ltd Improvements in or relating to elements faced with superhard materials
CN2293415Y (en) * 1996-11-08 1998-10-07 郑州新亚复合超硬材料有限公司 Diamond composite sheet
US5971087A (en) * 1998-05-20 1999-10-26 Baker Hughes Incorporated Reduced residual tensile stress superabrasive cutters for earth boring and drill bits so equipped
CN2392909Y (en) * 1999-07-14 2000-08-23 郑州新亚复合超硬材料有限公司 Diamond/hard alloy compounded sheet

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20010037901A1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2001-11-08 Bertagnolli Kenneth E. Polycrystalline diamond compact cutter having a stress mitigating hoop at the periphery

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004076800A1 (en) * 2003-02-26 2004-09-10 Element Six (Proprietary) Limited Secondary cutting element for drill bit
US10107042B2 (en) 2012-09-07 2018-10-23 Smith International, Inc. Ultra-hard constructions with erosion resistance
US9726222B2 (en) 2013-05-22 2017-08-08 U.S. Synthetic Corporation Bearing assemblies including thick superhard tables and/or selected exposures, bearing apparatuses, and methods of use
WO2014189763A1 (en) * 2013-05-22 2014-11-27 Us Synthetic Corporation Bearing assemblies and bearing apparatuses including thick superhard tables
US11015649B2 (en) 2013-05-22 2021-05-25 Us Synthetic Corporation Bearing assemblies including thick superhard tables and/or selected exposures, bearing apparatuses, and methods of use
US9080385B2 (en) 2013-05-22 2015-07-14 Us Synthetic Corporation Bearing assemblies including thick superhard tables and/or selected exposures, bearing apparatuses, and methods of use
US10422379B2 (en) 2013-05-22 2019-09-24 Us Synthetic Corporation Bearing assemblies including thick superhard tables and/or selected exposures, bearing apparatuses, and methods of use
CN105392584A (en) * 2013-05-31 2016-03-09 第六元素研磨剂股份有限公司 Superhard constructions and methods of making same
WO2014191555A3 (en) * 2013-05-31 2015-08-13 Element Six Abrasives S.A. Superhard constructions & methods of making same
GB2516359B (en) * 2013-05-31 2017-05-10 Element Six Abrasives Sa Superhard constructions & methods of making same
GB2516359A (en) * 2013-05-31 2015-01-21 Element Six Abrasives Sa Superhard constructions & methods of making same
CN105392584B (en) * 2013-05-31 2020-05-19 第六元素研磨剂股份有限公司 Superhard constructions and methods of making same
US10465447B2 (en) 2015-03-12 2019-11-05 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Cutting elements configured to mitigate diamond table failure, earth-boring tools including such cutting elements, and related methods
WO2016145318A1 (en) * 2015-03-12 2016-09-15 Baker Hughes Incorporated Cutting elements configured to mitigate diamond table failure, earth-boring tools including such cutting elements, and related methods
GB2546172A (en) * 2015-12-31 2017-07-12 Element Six (Uk) Ltd Super hard constructions & methods of making same
GB2546172B (en) * 2015-12-31 2018-11-21 Element Six Uk Ltd Super hard constructions & methods of making same
US11111728B2 (en) 2015-12-31 2021-09-07 Element Six (Uk) Limited Super hard constructions and methods of making same
US10400517B2 (en) 2017-05-02 2019-09-03 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Cutting elements configured to reduce impact damage and related tools and methods
US10914124B2 (en) 2017-05-02 2021-02-09 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Cutting elements comprising waveforms and related tools and methods
US10570668B2 (en) 2018-07-27 2020-02-25 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Cutting elements configured to reduce impact damage and mitigate polycrystalline, superabrasive material failure earth-boring tools including such cutting elements, and related methods
US10577870B2 (en) 2018-07-27 2020-03-03 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Cutting elements configured to reduce impact damage related tools and methods—alternate configurations
WO2020102016A1 (en) * 2018-11-12 2020-05-22 Smith International Inc. Non planar cutting element with non planar interface design and tools incorporating such elements
US11920409B2 (en) 2022-07-05 2024-03-05 Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc Cutting elements, earth-boring tools including the cutting elements, and methods of forming the earth-boring tools

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1527251A1 (en) 2005-05-04
EP1527251B1 (en) 2008-01-23
CN1668827A (en) 2005-09-14
AU2003248688A1 (en) 2004-02-02
CN100374685C (en) 2008-03-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6933049B2 (en) Abrasive tool inserts with diminished residual tensile stresses and their production
EP1385662B1 (en) Abrasive tool inserts and their production
US6187068B1 (en) Composite polycrystalline diamond compact with discrete particle size areas
US6601662B2 (en) Polycrystalline diamond cutters with working surfaces having varied wear resistance while maintaining impact strength
US7568534B2 (en) Dual-edge working surfaces for polycrystalline diamond cutting elements
US6196910B1 (en) Polycrystalline diamond compact cutter with improved cutting by preventing chip build up
EP1805389B1 (en) Polycrystalline cutter with multiple cutting edges
US5645617A (en) Composite polycrystalline diamond compact with improved impact and thermal stability
US7074247B2 (en) Method of making a composite abrasive compact
EP1527251B1 (en) Cutting tools with two-slope profile
CA2656913C (en) Pdc cutters with enhanced working surfaces adjacent a cavity
EP0955445B1 (en) Polycrystalline cutter element with specific interface
US7097551B2 (en) Cutting tools with two-slope profile
EP2847413A1 (en) Diamond cutting elements for drill bits seeded with hcp crystalline material
EP2961912B1 (en) Cutting elements leached to different depths located in different regions of an earth-boring tool and related methods
US20160312542A1 (en) Polycrystalline super hard construction & method of making

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2003764305

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20038163136

Country of ref document: CN

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2003764305

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 2003764305

Country of ref document: EP