WO2003072305A1 - Method and system for controlling the chemical mechanical polishing of substrates by calculating an overpolishing time and/or a polishing time of a final polishing step - Google Patents
Method and system for controlling the chemical mechanical polishing of substrates by calculating an overpolishing time and/or a polishing time of a final polishing step Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2003072305A1 WO2003072305A1 PCT/US2002/041668 US0241668W WO03072305A1 WO 2003072305 A1 WO2003072305 A1 WO 2003072305A1 US 0241668 W US0241668 W US 0241668W WO 03072305 A1 WO03072305 A1 WO 03072305A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- time
- oveφolish
- material layer
- substrate
- polishing
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B49/00—Measuring or gauging equipment for controlling the feed movement of the grinding tool or work; Arrangements of indicating or measuring equipment, e.g. for indicating the start of the grinding operation
- B24B49/02—Measuring or gauging equipment for controlling the feed movement of the grinding tool or work; Arrangements of indicating or measuring equipment, e.g. for indicating the start of the grinding operation according to the instantaneous size and required size of the workpiece acted upon, the measuring or gauging being continuous or intermittent
- B24B49/03—Measuring or gauging equipment for controlling the feed movement of the grinding tool or work; Arrangements of indicating or measuring equipment, e.g. for indicating the start of the grinding operation according to the instantaneous size and required size of the workpiece acted upon, the measuring or gauging being continuous or intermittent according to the final size of the previously ground workpiece
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B37/00—Lapping machines or devices; Accessories
- B24B37/04—Lapping machines or devices; Accessories designed for working plane surfaces
- B24B37/042—Lapping machines or devices; Accessories designed for working plane surfaces operating processes therefor
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to the field of fabrication of integrated circuits, and, more particularly, to the chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) of material layers, such as metallization layers, during the various manufacturing stages of an integrated circuit.
- CMP chemical mechanical polishing
- Chemical mechanical polishing is of particular interest for the formation of so-called metallization layers, that is, layers including recessed portions such as vias and trenches filled with an appropriate metal to form metal lines connecting the individual semiconductor elements.
- metallization layers that is, layers including recessed portions such as vias and trenches filled with an appropriate metal to form metal lines connecting the individual semiconductor elements.
- aluminum has been used as the preferred metallization layer, and in sophisticated integrated circuits, as many as twelve metallization layers may have to be provided to obtain the required number of connections between the semiconductor elements.
- Semiconductor manufacturers are now beginning to replace aluminum with copper - due to the superior characteristics of copper over aluminum with respect to electromigration and conductivity. Through use of copper, the number of metallization layers necessary to provide for the required functionality may be decreased since, in general, copper lines can be formed with a smaller cross-section due to the higher conductivity of copper compared to aluminum.
- planarization of the individual metallization layers remains of great importance.
- a commonly used technique for forming copper metallization lines is the so-called damascene process in which the vias and trenches are formed in an insulating layer with the copper subsequently being filled into the vias and trenches. Thereafter, excess metal is removed by chemical mechanical polishing after the metal deposition, thereby obtaining planarized metallization layers.
- CMP is successfully used in the semiconductor industry, the process has proven to be complex and difficult to control, especially when a great number of large-diameter substrates are to be treated.
- substrates such as the wafers bearing the semiconductor elements, are mounted on an appropriately formed carrier, a so-called polishing head, and the carrier is moved relative to the polishing pad while the surface of the wafer is in contact with a polishing pad.
- a slurry is supplied to the polishing pad, wherein the slurry contains a chemical compound that reacts with the material or materials of the layer to be planarized by, for example, converting the metal into an oxide, and the reaction product, such as copper oxide, is mechanically removed by abrasives contained in the slurry and the polishing pad.
- the insulating layer material for example silicon dioxide, as well as the copper and copper oxide
- the composition of the slurry is selected to show an optimum polishing characteristic for a specified material.
- the different materials exhibit different removal rates so that, for example, the copper and copper oxide are removed more rapidly than the surrounding insulating material. As a consequence, recessed portions are formed on top of the metal lines compared to the surrounding insulating material.
- the insulating material is also removed, although typically at a reduced removal rate compared to the copper, and thus the thickness of the initially deposited insulating layer is reduced.
- the reduction of the thickness of the insulating layer is commonly referred to as “erosion.” Erosion and dishing, however, not only depend on the differences in the materials that comprise the insulating layer and the metal layer, but may also vary across the substrate surface and may even change within a single chip area in correspondence with the pattern that is to be planarized.
- the removal rate of the metal and the insulating material is determined based upon a variety of factors such as, for example, the type of slurry, the configuration of the polishing pad, structure and type of the polishing head, the amount of the relative movement between the polishing pad and the substrate, the pressure applied to the substrate while moving relatively to the polishing pad, the location on the substrate, the type of feature pattern to be polished, and the uniformity of the underlying insulating layer and of the metal layer, etc.
- the polishing head is configured to provide two or more portions that may exert an adjustable pressure to the substrate, thereby controlling the frictional force and thus the removal rate at the substrate regions corresponding to these different head portions.
- the polishing platen carrying the polishing pad and the polishing head are moved relative to each other in such a way that as uniform a removal rate as possible is obtained across the entire surface area, and so that the lifetime of the polishing pad that gradually wears during operation is maximized.
- a so-called pad conditioner is additionally provided in the CMP tool that moves on the polishing pad and reworks the polishing surface so as to maintain similar polishing conditions for as many substrates as possible.
- the movement of the pad conditioner is controlled in such a manner that the polishing pad is substantially uniformly conditioned while, at the same time, the pad conditioner will not interfere with the movement of the polishing head.
- the first condition may not be fulfilled without significantly adversely affecting other parameters of the manufacturing process, such as throughput, and thus cost-effectiveness. Accordingly, in practice, a plurality of substrates are subjected to the CMP process until the first measurement result of the initially processed substrate is available. That is, the control loop contains a certain amount of delay that must be taken into consideration when adjusting the process parameters on the basis of the measurement results.
- a predictive model is desired such as the model described in the paper cited above and/or a set of experimental data to extract process variables, such as pressure applied to the substrate, slurry composition, etc., that may be manipulated to obtain the desired output of the CMP process.
- the present invention is directed to a method that may solve, or at least reduce, some or all of the aforementioned problems.
- the present invention is directed to a method and a controller that allow the control of a CMP process by manipulating a process parameter that is readily accessible, whereby the process-specific characteristics are described by an empirically determined parameter whose accuracy is, however, not critical for the proper control function.
- a method of controlling the chemical mechanical polishing of substrates comprises empirically obtaining a first sensitivity parameter quantitatively describing a relationship between an overpolish time for a first material layer and a control variable related to the first material layer, and empirically obtaining a second sensitivity parameter quantitatively describing a relationship between the control variable related to a second material layer and a control variable related to a second material layer of a preceding substrate.
- the method includes the calculation of the overpolish time of the first material layer from a linear model including the control variable related to the second material layer, the first sensitivity parameter, the second sensitivity parameter, a command value for the control variable, the overpolish time of the second material layer, the control variable of the second material layer and the control variable related to the second material layer of the preceding substrate, wherein the overpolish time is determined by a weighted moving average. Additionally, the overpolish time of the first material layer is adjusted to the calculated overpolish time.
- a method of controlling the chemical mechanical polishing of a first metallization layer in a substrate comprises empirically determining a sensitivity parameter ⁇ that quantitatively describes an effect of an overpolishing time T op on a control variable E ⁇ n , related to the first metallization layer.
- a sensitivity parameter ⁇ is empirically determined that quantitatively describes an effect of the control variable E second of a second metallization layer of the substrate and of the control, variable E P:Second of the second metallization layer of the preceding substrate on the control variable E ⁇ rs ,.
- the method comprises calculating the overpolish time T op for the first metallization layer from a linear model that at least includes the following terms: E ⁇ rsh E pf ⁇ rsl , (T op - T p.op ), y(E secoumble d - E p _ second ), wherein T p.op is the overpolish time of the preceding substrate. Additionally, the actual overpolish time of the chemical mechanical polishing process is adjusted to the calculated overpolish time T op .
- a controller for the chemical mechanical polishing of substrates comprises an input section for entering at least one of a sensitivity parameter and a measurement value of a control variable, and an output section for outputting at least one of an overpolish time and a final polishing time as a manipulated variable.
- the controller further comprises a calculation section configured to calculate the overpolish time of a first material layer from a linear model, wherein the linear model includes the control variable related to a second material layer other than the first material layer, a first sensitivity parameter, a second sensitivity parameter, a command value for the control variable, the overpolish time of the second material layer, a control variable related to the second material layer, and the control variable of the second material layer of a preceding substrate.
- the calculation section is configured to determine the manipulated variable by means of a weighted moving average.
- a controller for the chemical mechanical polishing of a first metallization layer in a substrate comprises an input section for entering a sensitivity parameter , a sensitivity parameter ⁇ , and at least one measurement value of a control variable E ⁇ rsl , wherein the control variable E ⁇ rs , represents one of erosion and dishing.
- the controller comprises an output section for outputting at least an overpolish time T op as a manipulated variable to be used to control the chemical mechanical polishing.
- the controller comprises a calculation section configured to at least calculate the overpolish time T op for the first metallization layer from a linear model of the CMP process.
- the linear model at least includes the following terms: E ⁇ rsh E p , rsh (T op - T p _ op ), y(E second - E p . seco court d ), wherein E pJlrst represents the control variable related to the first metallization layer of a preceding substrate, T pop represents the overpolish time of the preceding substrate, E second represents the control variable of a second metallization layer of the substrate and E p.sacond represents the control variable related to the second metallization layer of the preceding substrate.
- Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of an exemplary CMP tool, in which an illustrative embodiment of the present invention is implemented
- Figure 2 depicts a flow chart representing one embodiment of the method for controlling the CMP
- Figure 3 is a flowchart representing details of the embodiments shown in Figure 2
- Figure 4 is the flowchart illustrating further details in calculating the manipulated variable according to the embodiment shown in Figure 2. While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. MODE(S) FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
- the embodiments described so far and the embodiments that will be described in the following are based on the finding that it is possible to maintain dishing and erosion of material layers in a substrate, such as metallization layers, within tightly set tolerances by appropriately adjusting the overpolish time in a CMP process.
- the overpolish time indicates that time period for which the CMP process is continued after a measurement has indicated that the material is removed at a predefined region on the substrate.
- the process of detecting the clearance of a specified region is also referred to as endpoint detection and is usually employed in CMP processes used for manufacturing metallization layers.
- CMP process for damascene metallization layers in high-end integrated circuits is often designed as a multi-step process, where, for example, as the last step of the process, after the metal is removed, polishing operations are performed on the dielectric layer. Accordingly, by adjusting the process time of the final polishing step, the degree of erosion and dishing may be controlled.
- the inventors suggest a linear model of the CMP process that is based on the erosion and/or the dishing and/or layer thickness of a previous metallization layer of the same and a preceding substrate.
- the process inherent mechanisms are expressed by two or more sensitivity parameters, which may be determined by experiment and/or calculation and experiment, wherein in some embodiments, the accuracy of the sensitivity parameters is not critical for a successful control operation due to a "self-consistent" design of the control function.
- readily accessible and precisely adjustable process parameters are selected as the manipulated variables of the control operation.
- FIG. 1 a schematic view of a CMP system 100 is depicted, the system 100 comprising a CMP tool 110, a metrology tool 130 and a CMP controller 150.
- the CMP tool 110 includes an input portion 111 for receiving the substrate to be processed and an output portion 112 for receiving and storing substrates after the CMP process is completed.
- the CMP tool 110 further comprises a process chamber 113 including three polishing platens 114, 115 and 116, which are also referred to as platen I, platen II, and platen III, respectively.
- a pad conditioner 117 At each of the platens 114, 115, and 116, a pad conditioner 117, a slurry supply 118 and a polishing head 119 are provided.
- a measurement means 120 is arranged and configured to detect the endpoint of a CMP process.
- any further means required for conveying substrates from the input portion 111 to platen I, or from platen I to platen II, and so on, as well as any means for feeding gases, liquids, such as water, slurry, and the like, are not depicted in the drawing.
- a substrate 121 which comprises one or more metallization layers, is attached to the polishing head of platen I.
- the substrate 121 represents a "current" substrate for which a manipulated variable of the control process to be described will be established, that is, the manipulated variable represents a process parameter whose value is varied so as to obtain the desired value of a control variable, such as dishing, erosion and the final layer thickness.
- a metallization layer of the substrate 121 ' that is to be immediately treated by the CMP tool 110 is also referred to as a first metallization layer, whereas any metallization layer of the substrate 121 underlying the first metallization layer and already subjected to the CMP process is referred to as a second metallization layer.
- any substrate that has already been subjected to CMP is referred to as a preceding substrate and the metallization layers of the preceding substrate corresponding to the metallization layers of the current substrate 121 are also referred to as first and second metallization layers, as in the current substrate 121.
- the substrate 121 After the substrate 121 has completed the CMP process on platen I with predefined process parameters such as a predefined slurry composition, predefined relative movement between the polishing head 119 and the platen 114, duration of the CMP process, and the like, the substrate 121 is passed to platen II for a second CMP step, possibly with different process parameters, until the measurement device 120 indicates that the end of the process is reached. As previously explained, and as will be discussed in detail with reference to Figure 2, the polishing of the substrate 121 is continued on platen II for an overpolish time T op that is determined by the controller 150.
- predefined process parameters such as a predefined slurry composition, predefined relative movement between the polishing head 119 and the platen 114, duration of the CMP process, and the like.
- the substrate 121 is conveyed to platen III, where polishing of the insulating material of the first metallization layer is carried out with appropriate process parameters, such as slurry composition, relative movement between the platen 116 and the polishing head 119, bearing pressure applied to the substrate 121, and the like.
- process parameters such as slurry composition, relative movement between the platen 116 and the polishing head 119, bearing pressure applied to the substrate 121, and the like.
- the process time at platen III also referred to as T m
- the substrate 121 is conveyed to the output portion 112 and possibly to the metrology tool 130, at which measurement results are obtained related to the first metallization layer, such as layer thickness, erosion and dishing.
- the layer thickness, erosion and dishing will be considered as control variables of the CMP process, whereas T op and/or T m will act as manipulated variables.
- T op and/or T m will act as manipulated variables.
- the measurement results of the control variables are obtained by well-known optical measurement techniques and the description thereof will therefore be omitted.
- sensitivity parameters are determined which, in one embodiment, are obtained by experiment on the basis of previously processed test substrates or product substrates.
- a first sensitivity parameter ⁇ is thereby determined and describes the effect of the overpolish time T op on the control variable, e.g., the degree of erosion, dishing, metallization layer thickness, and the like.
- a second sensitivity parameter ⁇ may also be determined specifying the influence of polish time T m of the CMP process performed on platen III on the control variable.
- a third sensitivity parameter ⁇ is determined that quantitatively describes how the control variable of a preceding metallization layer, for example the dishing and/or erosion of the preceding layer, which will also be referred to as the second metallization layer as previously noted, influences the control variable of the current, i.e., the first metallization layer.
- the sensitivity parameters ⁇ and ⁇ include the inherent CMP mechanisms, such as the removal rate, and thus may vary during the actual CMP process owing to, for example, degradation of the polishing pad, saturation of the slurry, and the like.
- the sensitivity parameters ⁇ and ⁇ may be selected so as to depend on time, i.e., on the number of substrates that have already been processed or that are to be processed.
- step 220 intermediate values for the manipulated variables (referred to as E , T m ) are calculated from a linear CMP model.
- a linear model is to be understood as a mathematical expression describing the relationship of various variables, such as the manipulated variables T op , Tm and the control variables, wherein the variables appear as linear terms without any higher order terms such as T , T , etc.
- step 220 is sub-divided into a first sub-step 221, depicting a linear model of the CMP process.
- the control variable of the first metallization layer is denoted E ⁇ rsh wherein it should be borne in mind that a control variable may represent any one of erosion, dishing, metallization layer thickness and the like, and E ⁇ rst is given by the following equation:
- E f Ep tm + okf op ⁇ T pfiP )+ ⁇ ( ⁇ m - T p III )+ [r)(E second - E p>s ⁇ 0)ld ) (1)
- the index p indicates a variable referring to a preceding substrate and the index first and second, respectively, refer to the first metallization layer that is to be processed and the second metallization layer that has already been processed.
- the sign of ⁇ is selected as positive, whereas the sign of ⁇ is selected to be negative.
- the magnitude and sign of ⁇ is determined by experiment.
- a single manipulated variable such as T op
- T op a single manipulated variable
- E ⁇ rs ⁇ the erosion of the first metallization layer
- T Pt0p the overpolish time
- the parameters ⁇ and ⁇ may be selected as time-dependent parameters or, more appropriately, as parameters depending on the number of substrates to be processed.
- the general tendency of degradation of the polishing pad, the slurry composition and the like may be taken into account so that systematic variations in ⁇ and/or ⁇ may be compensated for. That is, a systematic reduction of the polishing rate over time may be taken into account by correspondingly increasing ⁇ and/or decreasing ⁇ as the number of processed substrates increases.
- sub-step 223 intermediate values for the manipulated variables overpolish time and polish time on platen III are obtained in correspondence with the model of step 221.
- the reason for determining the intermediate variables T 0 , T ] ⁇ resides in the fact that the control operation should "smooth" any short fluctuations in the CMP process and should respond to measurement results of previously processed substrates in a "soft” manner without showing excessive undershootings and overshootings.
- This behavior of the control operation may be convenient when only a small number of measurement results per substrate is available so that the measurement results from one preceding substrate to another preceding substrate may show a significant fluctuation. That is, the measurement result representing, for example, E P ⁇ rs , is obtained by a single measurement of a predefined single location on the preceding substrate.
- the intermediate manipulated variables T and T m are determined prior to the actual manipulated variables T op , T ⁇ .
- T and T m are calculated for the case:
- the ove ⁇ olish time for the current substrate has to be equal or larger than the ove ⁇ olish time of the preceding substrate and the polish time on platen III has to be equal or less than the polish time of the preceding substrate.
- polish time on platen III T m , T m may be set in advance, corresponding to process requirements. These limits for the ove ⁇ olish time and the platen III polish time may be determined by experiment or experience. For example, the maximum and minimum ove ⁇ olish times T op , T , respectively, may be selected to approximately 30 seconds and 5 seconds, respectively. The maximum and minimum polish times on platen III T ⁇ I , T m , respectively, may be selected to approximately 120 seconds and 20 seconds, respectively.
- the intermediate ove ⁇ olish time T op and the platen III polish time T ⁇ are simultaneously used as manipulated variables, it is desirable to determine the intermediate values T and T ⁇ such that the values- are well within the allowable ranges given- by the minimum and maximum ove ⁇ olish times and platen III polish times, respectively.
- the intermediate ove ⁇ olish time T and platen III polish time T ⁇ are determined to be centered around the middle of the corresponding allowable range, wherein at the same time T and T m have to be selected such that the CMP model provides the command value E largel , thus T and T m are determined by:
- T and T I that are centered in the respective allowable ranges may be obtained by calculating a minimum of the following expression:
- the intermediate ove ⁇ olish time has to be selected equal or less to the ove ⁇ olish time of the preceding substrate and the intermediate platen III polish time has to be selected equal or greater than the platen III polish time of the preceding substrate. Consequently,
- the intermediate polish times are determined such that the values are centered around the middle of the allowable ranges while, at the same time, fulfilling the secondary conditions (5) and (6), i.e., the intermediate polish times must yield to the desired erosion E l ⁇ rge , and must also obey the conditions (4) and (8).
- the secondary conditions (4) and (8) ensure that any shift of T is not compensated by a corresponding change of the platen III polish time. A corresponding behavior might possibly lead to a simpler solution in determining the minimal values according to
- any statement regarding the solving of equations is, of course, subject to a certain degree of "variation,” depending on the algorithms and the tolerable degree of "impreciseness.” Therefore, the results of calculations described herein are to usually be taken as approximate numbers, with the degree of approximation being determined by factors such as available computational power, required accuracy and the like. For example, in many applications, a precision in the order of one second for the ove ⁇ olish time and the platen III time is sufficient, since a polishing activity within a second leads to a change in erosion of an amount that may be well within measurement fluctuations.
- the weighting factor in determining the minimal value in the expression (6) may be selected as:
- the weighting factor w may also be determined on an empirical basis.
- the determination of the intermediate values by calculating the minimum values is not required when merely one manipulated variable, for example the ove ⁇ olish time T op , is used.
- step 230 the actual output values for the ove ⁇ olish time and the platen III polish time are calculated from the intermediate ove ⁇ olish time and the intermediate platen III polish time and the ove ⁇ olish time and platen III polish time of the preceding substrate. This ensures, depending on the algorithm used, a relatively smooth adaptation of the ove ⁇ olish time and the platen III polish time to the
- a first sub-step 231 it may be checked whether or not T and/or T m are within predefined ranges that may be different from the ranges defined by the minimum and maximum ove ⁇ olish times and platen III polish times. By these predefined ranges, it may be detected whether or not there is a tendency that the control operation systematically moves out of a well-defined range indicating that the parameters and ⁇ , and thus the CMP conditions, have changed significantly.
- sub-step 232 it may be indicated that the linear model of the CMP process is no longer valid or may become invalid in the "near future" of the CMP process run under consideration. This indication is to be taken as evidence that any unforeseen change of the CMP inherent mechanisms has taken place. It is to be noted that the sub-step 231 is optional and may be omitted.
- the ove ⁇ olish time and the platen III polish time are calculated by means of a weighted moving average from the ove ⁇ olish time of the preceding substrate and the intermediate ove ⁇ olish time T
- the platen III polish time is calculated as a weighted moving average from the platen III polish time of the preceding substrate and the intermediate platen III polish time T j ⁇ .
- the ove ⁇ olish time T op is given by:
- ⁇ is a parameter in the range of 0-1.
- the "speed" of adaptation of the control swing with respect to the foregoing development of the ove ⁇ olish times may be adjusted.
- the platen III polish time may be obtained by:
- a corresponding embodiment including the EWMA is especially suited when no significant delay of the measurement results from the preceding substrate is present, that is, only few or none substrates have been processed between the current substrate 121 and the preceding substrate.
- step 240 the ove ⁇ olish time and the platen III time calculated in step 230 are transmitted to the CMP tool 110 in Figure 1 to adjust the corresponding process times of the substrate 121 that is currently processed.
- step 250 the substrate is conveyed to the metrology tool 130 to obtain measurement values for the control variable. These measurement results may then serve as E second , E psacond , E p for the calculation for a following substrate.
- the embodiment described with reference to sub-step 222 may be used in which the sensitivity parameters ⁇ and ⁇ are given as parameters depending on the number of substrates that have been processed and that are to be processed, since then the controller 150 shows a "predictive" behavior and may output reliable values for the ove ⁇ olish time and the platen III polish time even for a considerable delay in the control loop. Moreover, the number of measurement operations may be significantly reduced when such a predictive model is employed.
- the substrate currently to be processed and the preceding substrate are referred to as single substrates, but, in one illustrative embodiment, the current substrate and the preceding substrate may represent a plurality of substrates, such as a lot of substrates, wherein the control variables E ⁇ rs disturb E p f, rsl , E second , E psecond and the manipulated variables T op and Tm represent the mean values for the corresponding plurality of substrates.
- a corresponding arrangement has been proven to be particularly useful in production lines in which an already well-established CMP process is installed and the deviation from substrate to substrate within a defined plurality is well within the acceptable process parameters. Accordingly, process control can be carried out on a lot-to-lot basis for a large number of substrates in a simple, yet efficient manner.
- the controller 150 performing a control operation comprises an input section 151, a calculation section 152 and an output section 153, wherein the input section 151 is operatively connected to the metrology tool 130 and the output section 153 is operatively connected to the CMP tool 110.
- the metrology tool 130 and the controller 150 are implemented as inline equipment so as to minimize transportation of the substrates and accelerate input of measurement results into the input section 151.
- the metrology tool 130 and/or the controller 150 may be provided outside the production line.
- the controller 150 may be implemented as a single chip microprocessor, as a microcontroller having inputs to which analogous or digital signals may directly be supplied from the metrology tool 130, or may be part of an external computer, such as a PC or a work station, or it may be a part of a management system in the factory as is commonly used in semiconductor fabrication.
- the calculation steps 220 and 230 may be performed by any numerical algorithms including an analytical approach for solving the involved equations, fuzzy logic, use of parameters in tables, especially for the EWMA, and corresponding operation codes may be installed in the controller 150.
- the above-described embodiments may easily be adapted to any known CMP tool since it is only necessary to obtain the sensitivity parameters ⁇ and/or ⁇ , which describe the inherent properties of the corresponding CMP tool and the basic CMP process performed on this tool.
- the particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. For example, the process steps set forth above may be performed in a different order.
- no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Treatment Of Semiconductor (AREA)
- Finish Polishing, Edge Sharpening, And Grinding By Specific Grinding Devices (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2003571039A JP4740540B2 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2002-12-20 | Method and system for controlling chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) of a substrate by calculating overpolishing time and / or polishing time of a final polishing step |
EP02798618A EP1478494B1 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2002-12-20 | Method and system for controlling the chemical mechanical polishing of substrates by calculating an overpolishing time and/or a polishing time of a final polishing step |
DE60206660T DE60206660T2 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2002-12-20 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REGULATING THE POST-POLISHING TEMPERATURE AND / OR POLISHING TIME IN FINISHING IN CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING |
KR1020047013401A KR100941481B1 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2002-12-20 | Method and system for controlling the chemical mechanical polishing of substrates by calculating an overpolishing time and/or a polishing time of a final polishing step |
AU2002364041A AU2002364041A1 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2002-12-20 | Method and system for controlling the chemical mechanical polishing of substrates by calculating an overpolishing time and/or a polishing time of a final polishing step |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10208165.4 | 2002-02-26 | ||
DE10208165A DE10208165C1 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2002-02-26 | Method, control and device for controlling the chemical mechanical polishing of substrates |
US10/261,612 | 2002-09-30 | ||
US10/261,612 US7268000B2 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2002-09-30 | Method and system for controlling the chemical mechanical polishing of substrates by calculating an overpolishing time and/or a polishing time of a final polishing step |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2003072305A1 true WO2003072305A1 (en) | 2003-09-04 |
Family
ID=27766677
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2002/041668 WO2003072305A1 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2002-12-20 | Method and system for controlling the chemical mechanical polishing of substrates by calculating an overpolishing time and/or a polishing time of a final polishing step |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1478494B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN100366386C (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002364041A1 (en) |
TW (1) | TWI267156B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003072305A1 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102005000645B4 (en) * | 2004-01-12 | 2010-08-05 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon | Apparatus and method for treating substrates |
CN105563301A (en) * | 2014-10-14 | 2016-05-11 | 中芯国际集成电路制造(上海)有限公司 | Chemical-mechanical polishing method, setting method of polishing time process of chemical-mechanical polishing and wafer |
CN105700468A (en) * | 2016-01-13 | 2016-06-22 | 新维畅想数字科技(北京)有限公司 | Method of optimizing three-dimensional sculpture losses through increment precomputation |
WO2021257124A1 (en) | 2020-06-18 | 2021-12-23 | Genentech, Inc. | Treatment with anti-tigit antibodies and pd-1 axis binding antagonists |
WO2023010094A2 (en) | 2021-07-28 | 2023-02-02 | Genentech, Inc. | Methods and compositions for treating cancer |
WO2023056403A1 (en) | 2021-09-30 | 2023-04-06 | Genentech, Inc. | Methods for treatment of hematologic cancers using anti-tigit antibodies, anti-cd38 antibodies, and pd-1 axis binding antagonists |
WO2023240058A2 (en) | 2022-06-07 | 2023-12-14 | Genentech, Inc. | Prognostic and therapeutic methods for cancer |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7542880B2 (en) * | 2006-04-06 | 2009-06-02 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Time weighted moving average filter |
CN106312792B (en) * | 2016-11-09 | 2018-06-26 | 上海华力微电子有限公司 | A kind of method that dynamic adjusts safe milling time limit |
CN112233975B (en) * | 2020-09-04 | 2024-02-09 | 北京晶亦精微科技股份有限公司 | Grinding time control method, device, equipment and readable storage medium |
CN113192829B (en) * | 2021-05-13 | 2023-04-18 | 上海芯物科技有限公司 | Method, apparatus, device and storage medium for dynamically adjusting wafer polishing time |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1120194A2 (en) * | 2000-01-18 | 2001-08-01 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Optical monitoring in a two-step chemical mechanical polishing process |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH1174235A (en) * | 1997-08-29 | 1999-03-16 | Sony Corp | Polishing simulation |
US5880007A (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 1999-03-09 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Planarization of a non-conformal device layer in semiconductor fabrication |
US6230069B1 (en) * | 1998-06-26 | 2001-05-08 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | System and method for controlling the manufacture of discrete parts in semiconductor fabrication using model predictive control |
-
2002
- 2002-12-20 AU AU2002364041A patent/AU2002364041A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-12-20 EP EP02798618A patent/EP1478494B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-12-20 CN CNB028283295A patent/CN100366386C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-12-20 WO PCT/US2002/041668 patent/WO2003072305A1/en active IP Right Grant
-
2003
- 2003-02-21 TW TW092103618A patent/TWI267156B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1120194A2 (en) * | 2000-01-18 | 2001-08-01 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Optical monitoring in a two-step chemical mechanical polishing process |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
CHAMNESS, CHERRY ET AL.: "A Comparison of R2R Control Algorithms for the CMP with Measurement Delays", AEC/APC VIII SYMPOSIUM 2001, PROCEEDINGS, XP001098911 * |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102005000645B4 (en) * | 2004-01-12 | 2010-08-05 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon | Apparatus and method for treating substrates |
CN105563301A (en) * | 2014-10-14 | 2016-05-11 | 中芯国际集成电路制造(上海)有限公司 | Chemical-mechanical polishing method, setting method of polishing time process of chemical-mechanical polishing and wafer |
CN105700468A (en) * | 2016-01-13 | 2016-06-22 | 新维畅想数字科技(北京)有限公司 | Method of optimizing three-dimensional sculpture losses through increment precomputation |
CN105700468B (en) * | 2016-01-13 | 2018-02-27 | 新维畅想数字科技(北京)有限公司 | A kind of method for optimizing three dimensional sculpture loss by increment precomputation |
WO2021257124A1 (en) | 2020-06-18 | 2021-12-23 | Genentech, Inc. | Treatment with anti-tigit antibodies and pd-1 axis binding antagonists |
WO2023010094A2 (en) | 2021-07-28 | 2023-02-02 | Genentech, Inc. | Methods and compositions for treating cancer |
WO2023056403A1 (en) | 2021-09-30 | 2023-04-06 | Genentech, Inc. | Methods for treatment of hematologic cancers using anti-tigit antibodies, anti-cd38 antibodies, and pd-1 axis binding antagonists |
WO2023240058A2 (en) | 2022-06-07 | 2023-12-14 | Genentech, Inc. | Prognostic and therapeutic methods for cancer |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TWI267156B (en) | 2006-11-21 |
CN100366386C (en) | 2008-02-06 |
EP1478494B1 (en) | 2005-10-12 |
AU2002364041A1 (en) | 2003-09-09 |
TW200305240A (en) | 2003-10-16 |
EP1478494A1 (en) | 2004-11-24 |
CN1620357A (en) | 2005-05-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP4799817B2 (en) | Semiconductor wafer surface flattening device | |
EP1090335B1 (en) | System and method for controlling the manufacture of discrete parts in semiconductor fabrication using model predictive control | |
US6540591B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for post-polish thickness and uniformity control | |
US8417362B2 (en) | Advanced process control for semiconductor processing | |
US6379980B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for monitoring material removal tool performance using endpoint time removal rate determination | |
US8005634B2 (en) | Copper wiring module control | |
US7540800B2 (en) | Rough polishing method of semiconductor wafer and polishing apparatus of semiconductor wafer | |
US7175505B1 (en) | Method for adjusting substrate processing times in a substrate polishing system | |
EP1478494B1 (en) | Method and system for controlling the chemical mechanical polishing of substrates by calculating an overpolishing time and/or a polishing time of a final polishing step | |
JP2005518654A (en) | Wafer characteristic control method and control system therefor | |
JP2005518285A (en) | Feedforward and feedback control for conditioning chemical mechanical polishing pads | |
US7268000B2 (en) | Method and system for controlling the chemical mechanical polishing of substrates by calculating an overpolishing time and/or a polishing time of a final polishing step | |
KR100471184B1 (en) | System and method for controlling polishing time of multi-layer in chemical mechanical polishing process | |
US6957997B2 (en) | Method and system for controlling the chemical mechanical polishing by using a sensor signal of a pad conditioner | |
US6665623B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for optimizing downstream uniformity | |
US6745086B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining control actions incorporating defectivity effects | |
US6534328B1 (en) | Method of modeling and controlling the endpoint of chemical mechanical polishing operations performed on a process layer, and system for accomplishing same | |
US20040063224A1 (en) | Feedback control of a chemical mechanical polishing process for multi-layered films | |
WO2005032763A1 (en) | A method and system for controlling the chemical mechanical polishing by using a sensor signal of a pad conditioner |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2002798618 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 20028283295 Country of ref document: CN |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1020047013401 Country of ref document: KR Ref document number: 2003571039 Country of ref document: JP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1020047013401 Country of ref document: KR |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2002798618 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 2002798618 Country of ref document: EP |