WO2003032683A1 - Device for presenting acoustical and vibratory stimuli and method of calibration - Google Patents

Device for presenting acoustical and vibratory stimuli and method of calibration Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2003032683A1
WO2003032683A1 PCT/US2002/031074 US0231074W WO03032683A1 WO 2003032683 A1 WO2003032683 A1 WO 2003032683A1 US 0231074 W US0231074 W US 0231074W WO 03032683 A1 WO03032683 A1 WO 03032683A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
transducer
transfer function
calculated
sound pressure
pressure level
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2002/031074
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Shawn X. Gao
Daniel J. Freed
Original Assignee
House Ear Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/972,407 external-priority patent/US6980662B1/en
Application filed by House Ear Institute filed Critical House Ear Institute
Publication of WO2003032683A1 publication Critical patent/WO2003032683A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/12Audiometering
    • A61B5/121Audiometering evaluating hearing capacity
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R29/00Monitoring arrangements; Testing arrangements
    • H04R29/001Monitoring arrangements; Testing arrangements for loudspeakers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/70Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R3/00Circuits for transducers, loudspeakers or microphones
    • H04R3/04Circuits for transducers, loudspeakers or microphones for correcting frequency response

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to the field of equipment for testing hearing.
  • the invention pertains to a hearing test device that is capable of presenting a variety of acoustical or vibratory stimuli and that can be easily calibrated.
  • Audiometers must present stimuli over a range of levels in excess of 100 dB.
  • Attenuators are provided for controlling output level. Attenuators may be placed before or after the power amplification stage. When presenting stimuh at low levels, however, applying purely pre-amplification attenuation results in a poor signal-to-noise ratio. Therefore, audiometers must provide post-amplification attenuators. The amount of signal attenuation
  • G H ⁇ kew provided by a post-amplification attenuator depends on the transducer impedance. Therefore, audiometers are typically designed to accommodate transducers of a specified nominal impedance.
  • HINT Hearing In Noise Test
  • RTS Sentences
  • the system can only be calibrated for a specific externally provided stimulus. If a different stimulus is presented from the outboard audio playback device, the stimulus presentation level cannot be predicted.
  • the system is designed to be used with transducers of a specified nominal impedance. This reduces the flexibility of the system by preventing its use with transducers of different nominal impedance.
  • the present invention provides a hearing test device that supports the use of arbitrary stimuli, along with a method for calibrating the device.
  • the device is capable of performing a wider variety of hearing tests than existing audiometers, thereby improving the diagnosis and treatment of hearing disorders.
  • the calibration method permits compensation for frequency-dependent characteristics of any transducer, thereby improving the accuracy and flexibility of the device.
  • the cahbration method is largely automated, thereby improving the speed and ease of calibration and reducing the likelihood of operator error.
  • Figure 1 is a block diagram of a hearing test apparatus in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a more detailed block diagram of the programmable amplifier shown in
  • Figure 3 is another block diagram of the apparatus shown in Figure 1 identifying the transfer functions.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a hearing test device in accordance with the present invention.
  • the principal components of the device are as follows:
  • Output transducers may be selected or deselected under computer control.
  • a computer such as a PC, is required for operation of the device.
  • a Universal Serial Bus (USB) interface is used to provide the computer interface for control signals and for digital audio I/O, and control signals are encoded using the EC protocol.
  • Figure 2 shows more detail of the programmable amplifier, which comprises digitally-controlled analog attenuators ("input attenuators”) located before each channel of the fixed-gain amplifier.
  • the programmable amphfier subsystem also includes the fixed-gain amplifier and the output attenuators.
  • GWHXkew 1 The computer obtains a digital audio signal, either by reading a signal from memory or by generating a signal algorithmically. This allows automated presentation of arbitrary stimuli.
  • the computer applies digital filtering and attenuation to the digital audio signal.
  • the filter and attenuation are determined by the desired stimulus presentation level together with the cahbration data, as described in the next section.
  • the computer sends control signals to the device in order to configure the programmable amphfier appropriately. Appropriate settings are determined by the desired stimulus presentation level together with the calibration data, as described in the next section.
  • the computer sends the digital audio signal to the device, where it is converted to an analog signal by the codec and sent through the attenuators and fixed-gain amphfier to the output transducer(s).
  • H A2E (f) There are two approaches to determining H A2E (f). If the microphone and preamplifier are provided with the device, then H A2E (/) can be determined in advance by performing suitable measurements. Alternatively, if the microphone and preamplifier are to be provided by the user, then an approximation of H A2E (/) can be derived at the time of use. This is done by assuming that the microphone and preamplifier both have flat frequency responses, and requesting the user to make a single SPL measurement to determine the microphone sensitivity.
  • This method allows H AC (f) to be determined for a particular transducer and a particular setting of the programmable amplifier. Separate measurements must be made for each transducer that will be used. As described thus far, this method also would require separate measurements to be made for every possible setting of the programmable amplifier. This would be time-consuming and impractical, especially for settings that involve a large amount of attenuation, where the acoustical signal would be too quiet to accurately record.
  • This problem can be avoided by noting that the attenuation provided by the input attenuators and the gain provided by the fixed- gain amphfier are known a priori; the only unknown is the attenuation provided by the output attenuators, since this depends on the transducer impedance. If the transducer impedance is known, then the output attenuation can be calculated, since the values of the output attenuator resistors (R A as shown in Figure 2) are known a priori.
  • transducer impedance In order to calculate the transducer impedance, two sets of two-channel recordings are made, using two different output attenuator settings. By combining the results of these two measurements with knowledge of the output attenuator resistor values, the transducer impedance can be derived.
  • the transfer function of the output attenuator is a function of the transducer impedance Z L (f) and the output attenuator resistor value R A :
  • H E2A (f, A, Z L ) is the electroacoustic transfer function of the transducer (voltage to sound pressure).
  • Equation 12 Equation 12
  • the method allows the prediction of the frequency-dependent attenuation provided by the post-amplification attenuators, thereby improving the accuracy of stimulus presentation level.
  • the method allows the prediction of attenuation provided by large post-amplification attenuators, where it is impractical to make direct measurements due to the low level of the output signal.
  • the method allows the design of an equahzation filter, thereby improving control over the magnitude and phase of the presented stimulus.
  • the method is largely automated, thereby improving the speed and ease of cahbration and reducing the likelihood of operator error.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
  • Otolaryngology (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Abstract

A hearing test device is capable of presenting a variety (Fig. 3) of acoustical or vibratory stimuli (B) and can be easily calibrated. Transfer functions for the device are calculated at two different attenuation levels (Output Attenuation) to derive the characteristic impedance and sensitivity of the acoustic or vibratory transducer (Transducers). The predicted sound pressure level emitted by the transducer (Transducers) may then be calculated as a function of input signal and attenuation.

Description

DEVICE FOR PRESENTING ACOUSTICAL AND VD3RATORY STIMULI
AND METHOD OF CALIBRATION
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This application claims priority of provisional patent application Serial No.
60/238,749 filed October 6, 2000.
1. FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates generally to the field of equipment for testing hearing.
More particularly, the invention pertains to a hearing test device that is capable of presenting a variety of acoustical or vibratory stimuli and that can be easily calibrated.
2. BACKGROUND
[0003] To perform a hearing test, it is necessary to present acoustical or vibratory stimuli at precisely controlled levels. Devices that perform this function, called audiometers, have been available for many years. Audiometers are optimized for presenting certain types of stimuli, such as pure tones and noise, which are used in traditional hearing tests. These stimuli are typically generated internally. All other stimuli must be provided by an outboard audio playback device, such as a tape player or CD player, which is supplied by the user and connected to the audiometer's external audio input.
[0004] Conventional audiometers are calibrated using a manual procedure. For each type of internally generated stimulus, a separate calibration step is required; for example, a separate step is required for each pure tone frequency. Each step requires presenting the stimulus at a specified nominal level, measuring the system output with a sound level meter or vibration meter, and adjusting a calibration control until the measured output matches the expected output. The external audio input is calibrated by presenting a stimulus from the outboard audio playback device and adjusting a calibration control in a similar fashion.
[0005] Audiometers must present stimuli over a range of levels in excess of 100 dB.
Programmable attenuators are provided for controlling output level. Attenuators may be placed before or after the power amplification stage. When presenting stimuh at low levels, however, applying purely pre-amplification attenuation results in a poor signal-to-noise ratio. Therefore, audiometers must provide post-amplification attenuators. The amount of signal attenuation
G H\kew provided by a post-amplification attenuator depends on the transducer impedance. Therefore, audiometers are typically designed to accommodate transducers of a specified nominal impedance.
[0006] Newer hearing tests require presentation of alternative stimuli. One such newer hearing test is the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT). Originally developed to assess the benefit of hearing aids, HINT is useful for the measurement of functional hearing ability. HINT is a prerecorded adaptive speech test that measures the Reception Threshold for Sentences (RTS) in quiet and in noise. Each of the 12 alternate forms of the test consists of a 20-sentence hst. The sentences are short (5-7 syllables) and simple (first grade reading level).
[0007] As mentioned above, conventional audiometers provide only limited support for presenting alternative stimuli. In particular, when using alternative stimuli, stimulus presentation is not easily automated, stimulus level control may be inaccurate, and compensation for frequency- dependent transducer characteristics is not possible. More tests which use alternative stimuli are likely to be developed as audiological science progresses. Therefore, a useful hearing test device should provide full support for the use of arbitrary stimuli.
[0008] There are several drawbacks to the design of conventional audiometers implemented as described above:
• There is no easy way to automatically control an outboard audio playback device, so presentation of externally provided stimuli cannot be automated.
• Calibration is time-consuming and susceptible to operator error.
• The system can only be calibrated for a specific externally provided stimulus. If a different stimulus is presented from the outboard audio playback device, the stimulus presentation level cannot be predicted.
• While the calibration procedure for internally generated pure-tone stimuli effectively compensates for the frequency-dependent response of the transducer, no such compensation is possible for broad-band or externally provided stimuli.
• The system is designed to be used with transducers of a specified nominal impedance. This reduces the flexibility of the system by preventing its use with transducers of different nominal impedance.
• The system is designed with the assumption that the actual impedance of a transducer is equal to its nominal impedance and is constant across frequency. In practice, either of these assumptions may be false, with the result that the system may present incorrect stimulus levels.
-2- GWHM ew SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] The present invention provides a hearing test device that supports the use of arbitrary stimuli, along with a method for calibrating the device. The device is capable of performing a wider variety of hearing tests than existing audiometers, thereby improving the diagnosis and treatment of hearing disorders. The calibration method permits compensation for frequency-dependent characteristics of any transducer, thereby improving the accuracy and flexibility of the device. The cahbration method is largely automated, thereby improving the speed and ease of calibration and reducing the likelihood of operator error.
[0010] The principal, but not exclusive, objects of the invention are to:
• Present arbitrary acoustical or vibratory stimuli
• Present stimuli over a wide range of levels, with good signal-to-noise ratios at each level
• Provide precise control over stimulus level
• Present stimuli over any transducer of reasonable quality, regardless of the impedance of the transducer
• Compensate for frequency-dependent modification of magnitude and phase due to the transducer and the device
• Automate the presentation of stimuli
• Automate the cahbration of the system
-3- GWHM ew BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] Figure 1 is a block diagram of a hearing test apparatus in accordance with the present invention.
[0012] Figure 2 is a more detailed block diagram of the programmable amplifier shown in
Figure 1.
[0013] Figure 3 is another block diagram of the apparatus shown in Figure 1 identifying the transfer functions.
G HXkew ___
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0014] In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not Umitation, specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from these specific details. In other instances, detailed descriptions of well-known methods and devices are omitted so as to not obscure the description of the present invention with unnecessary detail.
[0015] Figure 1 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a hearing test device in accordance with the present invention. The principal components of the device are as follows:
• An interface for sending/receiving 2-channel digital audio signals to/from a computer.
• An interface for receiving control signals from a computer.
• Computer memory for storing digital audio signals and calibration data.
• A 2-channel digital audio codec (D/A and A/D converters).
• Programmable amplifier consisting of:
> A fixed-gain 2-channel amphfier A set of resistors located after each channel of the fixed-gain amphfier ("output attenuators"). Each resistor can be switched in or out of the signal path under computer control.
• Analog outputs for one or more acoustic and/or vibratory output transducers. Output transducers may be selected or deselected under computer control.
• Analog inputs for 2 external line-level signals. One of the two input channels must be capable of being connected to one of the two D/A converter output channels.
[0016] A computer, such as a PC, is required for operation of the device. In the illustrated embodiment, a Universal Serial Bus (USB) interface is used to provide the computer interface for control signals and for digital audio I/O, and control signals are encoded using the EC protocol. [0017] Figure 2 shows more detail of the programmable amplifier, which comprises digitally-controlled analog attenuators ("input attenuators") located before each channel of the fixed-gain amplifier. The programmable amphfier subsystem also includes the fixed-gain amplifier and the output attenuators.
[0018] All stimulus presentation is controlled by the computer, as follows:
GWHXkew 1. The computer obtains a digital audio signal, either by reading a signal from memory or by generating a signal algorithmically. This allows automated presentation of arbitrary stimuli.
2. The computer applies digital filtering and attenuation to the digital audio signal. The filter and attenuation are determined by the desired stimulus presentation level together with the cahbration data, as described in the next section.
3. The computer sends control signals to the device in order to configure the programmable amphfier appropriately. Appropriate settings are determined by the desired stimulus presentation level together with the calibration data, as described in the next section.
4. The computer sends the digital audio signal to the device, where it is converted to an analog signal by the codec and sent through the attenuators and fixed-gain amphfier to the output transducer(s).
[0019] The external line-level inputs and the A/D converter are required by the cahbration method, as described below.
CALIBRATION METHOD
Overview
[0020] Figure 3 shows how the device is configured for calibration. A digital signal is sent from the computer to the D/A converter (point A), where it is converted to analog (point B). From this point, the signal splits into two paths. The first path goes directly from the D/A converter output to one input channel (point E). The second path goes through the programmable amplifier and the transducer, resulting in an acoustical output (point C) which is picked up by a microphone and amplified by a microphone preamplifier (point D), after which it is routed to the other input channel (point F). The signals from the two input channels are converted to digital by the A/D converter and sent back to the computer to be recorded.
[0021] One goal of calibration is to make it possible to predict the sound pressure level
(SPL) for a given digital signal. This requires knowledge of HAC(/), the electroacoustical transfer function of the path from point A to point C. By comparing the spectra of the two recorded signals, we can compute HBD( )> the transfer function of the path from point B to point D, since this is the portion of the path which differs between the two recorded signals. HAB( ), the transfer function of the D/A converter, is known a priori. If we know HA2E(/)> the electroacoustical transfer function of the microphone and microphone preamphfier, then we have all the information required
-6- GWΗλkew to derive HAC(f). This also allows us to design an equalization filter to flatten the transducer response.
[0022] There are two approaches to determining HA2E(f). If the microphone and preamplifier are provided with the device, then HA2E(/) can be determined in advance by performing suitable measurements. Alternatively, if the microphone and preamplifier are to be provided by the user, then an approximation of HA2E(/) can be derived at the time of use. This is done by assuming that the microphone and preamplifier both have flat frequency responses, and requesting the user to make a single SPL measurement to determine the microphone sensitivity.
[0023] This method allows HAC(f) to be determined for a particular transducer and a particular setting of the programmable amplifier. Separate measurements must be made for each transducer that will be used. As described thus far, this method also would require separate measurements to be made for every possible setting of the programmable amplifier. This would be time-consuming and impractical, especially for settings that involve a large amount of attenuation, where the acoustical signal would be too quiet to accurately record. This problem can be avoided by noting that the attenuation provided by the input attenuators and the gain provided by the fixed- gain amphfier are known a priori; the only unknown is the attenuation provided by the output attenuators, since this depends on the transducer impedance. If the transducer impedance is known, then the output attenuation can be calculated, since the values of the output attenuator resistors (RA as shown in Figure 2) are known a priori.
[0024] In order to calculate the transducer impedance, two sets of two-channel recordings are made, using two different output attenuator settings. By combining the results of these two measurements with knowledge of the output attenuator resistor values, the transducer impedance can be derived.
[0025] The following table defines the symbols that will be used in the description of the cahbration method:
Figure imgf000008_0001
GWHXkew
Figure imgf000009_0001
Calculating Transducer Characteristics
[0026] The transfer function of the output attenuator is a function of the transducer impedance ZL(f) and the output attenuator resistor value RA:
H*™(f>R*'Z< - ZL(f) + RA (1)
GWHM ew [0027] HE2A(f, A, ZL) is the electroacoustic transfer function of the transducer (voltage to sound pressure). To compute it, first note that:
Figure imgf000010_0001
[0028] where:
SP(f): sound pressure at frequency f p0: 20 μPascal
N(f): voltage (rms magnitude) applied to the transducer
Z^Cf): impedance of transducer
Lsen(f): transducer sensitivity, dB SPL per Watt
[0029] Then HE2A(f, A, ZL) can be computed as follows:
„ (fs_____l __________ _____ n.
[0030] where:
LSEN (/)
A(/) = p0 x l0 20 (4)
[0031] From Figure 3, it can be seen that the transfer function from point B to point D is:
Figure imgf000010_0002
[0032] The transfer function can be calculated with Y(f) and Youτ(f) measured at point E and point F:
Figure imgf000010_0003
[0033] The transfer function can be derived from the time-domain acquired signals by any of several known methods. For example, the Welch method may be used as described in P. D. Welch, "The Use of Fast Fourier Transform for the Estimation of Power Spectra", IEEE
-9- GWΗMcew Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, Vol. AU-15, June 1970, pp. 70-73. It is crucial that Y-n and Youτ be measured simultaneously in order to obtain accurate phase measurements. This is why 2-channel recording capability is required in the device.
[0034] The input signal Yx(f) used to make the measurements can be any broadband signal.
The precise spectrum is not important to the calibration of the device, since frequency divides out in the transfer function calculation. However, the input signal must contain sufficient energy at all relevant frequencies.
[0035] In order to calculate A(f) and ZL(f), we obtain two transfer functions, HBD(f,R,,A,ZL) and HBD(f,R2,A,ZL), measured with RA=R, and R^ We know that these transfer functions are equal to:
^(M.ΛZL) = JϊΛff(/) ffiBW( Λi ,z1) x iϊm( Z1)xflΛ.(/)
HBD( f,R2, A,ZL) = HAMP(f) X HATΓN{ f,R2,ZL) x H A(f, A,ZL) x HA2E(f)
[0036] where:
Figure imgf000011_0001
HATrN^'Rl'Z^ = ZL(f) + R1
Figure imgf000011_0002
[0037] We can now solve for Z^f) and A(f):
H^RjΛZ x^ -H^jfiR Z x R,
ZL(f) = (8)
HBD(y;R2,A,z ) - HBD(^R;,A,zL)
Figure imgf000011_0003
[0038] Rv R2, and ΗAMP(f) are all known a priori. Note that for calculating ZL(f), it is not necessary to know HE2A(f) or HA2E(f). It is only necessary to know HBD(f,R1,A,ZL) and
-10- GWH\kew HBD(f,R2,A,ZL). By contrast, knowledge of HA2E(f) is required in order to calculate A(f) and to predict sound pressure level (see next section).
[0039] If the microphone and preamplifier are provided with the device, then HA2E(f) is known a priori. If the microphone and preamphfier are provided by the user, then HA2E(f) can be approximately derived at the time of use by the following method.
[0040] First, we assume that HA2E(f) is a constant, HA2E. In order to determine HA2E, we send a known reference signal YXREF(f) to the A/D, set RA to R1; and ask the user to measure the resulting sound pressure level N (in dB SPL) of the signal Y^f). HA2E can then be calculated as follows:
Figure imgf000012_0001
[0041] where M is the number of frequency points in the spectra. If the transducer is vibratory rather than acoustic, the user measures the force level rather than the sound pressure level.
[0042] The reference signal YXREF(f) can be any signal. It does not need to be broadband.
Predicting Sound Pressure Level
[0043] During normal operation, for any given signal Yx(f) and RA, the sound pressure level can be predicted as:
Figure imgf000012_0002
[0044] where HA,(f) is the transfer function from point B to point D with the chosen RA and
ZL, HD2E(f) is the frequency response of the D/A converter (which is known a priori), and M is the number of frequency points in the spectra. HA.(f) can be calculated as:
Figure imgf000012_0003
-11- GWHλ ew [0045] It follows that the sound pressure level is equal to:
Figure imgf000013_0001
[0046] In the special case where the microphone and preamphfier are provided by the user,
HA2E(f) is assumed to be a constant HA2E, which is calculated according to Equation 10. Then the sound pressure level is equal to:
Figure imgf000013_0002
[0047] which can be simplified to:
Figure imgf000013_0003
[0048] Note that A(f) does not appear in this equation, so it is not necessary to calculate
A(f) in order to predict sound pressure. A(f) should only be calculated if it is desirable to know the transducer sensitivity for some other application.
[0049] We can also predict A-weighted sound pressure level. A-weighting is described in
Allan D. Pierce, Acoustics: An Introduction to its Physical Principles and Applications, Acoustical Society of America, Woodbury, NY, 1989, p. 66.
-12- GWH\kew [0050] In the case where the microphone and preamphfier are provided with the device, we modify Equation 12 as follows:
Figure imgf000014_0001
[0051] In the case where the microphone and preamplifier are provided by the user, we modify Equation 14 as follows:
Figure imgf000014_0002
Equalizing the Transducer
[0052] The previous sections have described how to calculate the output attenuator transfer function HATm(f, RA, ZL) and the transducer transfer function HE2A(f, A, ZJ. Once these transfer functions are known, standard filter design techniques may be used to design an inverse filter to equahze one or both of them. Applying an equalization filter can result in improved fidehty for presentation of broadband stimuli.
Benefits of Calibration Method
[0053] The key element of the calibration method is the derivation of impedance as a complex function of frequency. This has several benefits:
• The method allows the use of transducers of arbitrary impedance, thereby increasing the flexibility of the device.
• The method allows the prediction of the frequency-dependent attenuation provided by the post-amplification attenuators, thereby improving the accuracy of stimulus presentation level.
-13- GWHλ e • The method allows the prediction of attenuation provided by large post-amplification attenuators, where it is impractical to make direct measurements due to the low level of the output signal.
• The method allows the design of an equahzation filter, thereby improving control over the magnitude and phase of the presented stimulus.
• The method allows precise prediction and control of presentation level for arbitrary stimuh, thereby widening the scope of application of the device.
[0054] The method is largely automated, thereby improving the speed and ease of cahbration and reducing the likelihood of operator error.
[0055] It will be recognized that the above-described invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics of the disclosure. Thus, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited by the foregoing illustrative details, but rather is to be defined by the appended claims.
-14- GWHMcew

Claims

CLAIMSWHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. In a system for presenting an audio stimulus having an input, an amplifier, an attenuator and a transducer, a method of predicting a sound pressure level emitted by the transducer comprising: applying a broadband audio signal to the input; inserting a first attenuation between the amplifier and the transducer; measuring a first output from the transducer; calculating a first transfer function for a signal path from the input to the measured first output; inserting a second attenuation between the amplifier and the transducer; measuring a second output from the transducer; calculating a second transfer function for a signal path from the input to the measured second output; combining the first and second transfer functions to solve for a characteristic impedance and sensitivity of the transducer; calculating a sound pressure level emitted by the transducer as a function of input signal and attenuation.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising measuring the broadband audio signal applied at the input simultaneously with measuring the first and second outputs from the transducer.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the first and second transfer functions are calculated as respective ratios of the first and second measured outputs to the corresponding measured inputs.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein each of the first and second transfer functions is expressed as a product of an amplifier transfer function, an attenuator transfer function, an electrical-to-acoustical transfer function and an acoustical-to-electrical transfer function.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the characteristic impedance of the transducer is calculated as:
-15- G HX ew z ( _HBD(f,R1 ZL)xR1-HBD(f,R2,A,ZL)xR2 L[S) H " ,(f,R2ΛZL)-HBD(f,R1,A,ZL)
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the sensitivity of the transducer is calculated as:
HBD(f,R1,A,ZL)x[zIj) + R1]
A(f) = H AMP (f)HA2E(f) z )
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the sound pressure level is calculated as:
Figure imgf000017_0001
8. The method of claim 6 wherein the sound pressure level is calculated as:
Figure imgf000017_0002
9. The method of claim 6 wherein the sound pressure level is calculated as:
Figure imgf000017_0003
10. The method of claim 6 wherein the sound pressure level is calculated as:
-16- GWΗXkew
Figure imgf000018_0001
11. The method of claim 1 wherein the transducer is an acoustic transducer.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein the transducer is a vibratory transducer.
13. The method of claim 1 wherein the transducer is characterized by a transfer function and further comprising inserting an inverse filter to equalize the transducer transfer function.
14. The method of claim 1 wherein the attenuator is characterized by a transfer function and further comprising inserting an inverse filter to equahze the attenuator transfer function.
15. The method of claim 1 wherein the solution for the characteristic impedance of the transducer is expressed as a function of frequency.
16. The method of claim 1 wherein the solution for the sensitivity of the transducer is expressed as a function of frequency.
-17- GWΗVkew
PCT/US2002/031074 2001-10-05 2002-10-01 Device for presenting acoustical and vibratory stimuli and method of calibration WO2003032683A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/972,407 US6980662B1 (en) 2000-10-06 2001-10-05 Device for presenting acoustical and vibratory stimuli and method of calibration
US09/972,407 2001-10-05

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2003032683A1 true WO2003032683A1 (en) 2003-04-17

Family

ID=25519627

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2002/031074 WO2003032683A1 (en) 2001-10-05 2002-10-01 Device for presenting acoustical and vibratory stimuli and method of calibration

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2003032683A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8437479B2 (en) 2006-04-04 2013-05-07 Cleartone Technologies Limited Calibrated digital headset and audiometric test methods therewith
CN106658327A (en) * 2015-10-28 2017-05-10 音乐集团公司 Sound level estimation

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4109107A (en) * 1977-07-05 1978-08-22 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Method and apparatus for frequency compensation of electro-acoustical transducer and its environment
US4586194A (en) * 1983-03-09 1986-04-29 Hitachi, Ltd. Earphone characteristic measuring device

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4109107A (en) * 1977-07-05 1978-08-22 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Method and apparatus for frequency compensation of electro-acoustical transducer and its environment
US4586194A (en) * 1983-03-09 1986-04-29 Hitachi, Ltd. Earphone characteristic measuring device

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8437479B2 (en) 2006-04-04 2013-05-07 Cleartone Technologies Limited Calibrated digital headset and audiometric test methods therewith
CN106658327A (en) * 2015-10-28 2017-05-10 音乐集团公司 Sound level estimation
CN106658327B (en) * 2015-10-28 2021-02-09 音乐集团公司 Sound level estimation

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8983081B2 (en) Systems and methods for logging acoustic incidents
US8126156B2 (en) Calibrating at least one system microphone
US6447461B1 (en) Method and system for conducting a hearing test using a computer and headphones
US8175284B2 (en) Method and apparatus for calibrating sound-reproducing equipment
US4615007A (en) Audiologic testing method and apparatus with compensating means for soundwave attenuation through a transmitting medium
US8831244B2 (en) Portable tone generator for producing pre-calibrated tones
US8059833B2 (en) Method of compensating audio frequency response characteristics in real-time and a sound system using the same
FI122089B (en) Calibration method and equipment for the audio system
US20120230501A1 (en) auditory test and compensation method
US10734964B2 (en) Apparatus and method for controlling personalised audio frequency equalizer
US20050053246A1 (en) Automatic sound field correction apparatus and computer program therefor
US6980662B1 (en) Device for presenting acoustical and vibratory stimuli and method of calibration
WO2003032683A1 (en) Device for presenting acoustical and vibratory stimuli and method of calibration
Henning et al. Compression-dependent differences in hearing aid gain between speech and nonspeech input signals
US7143031B1 (en) Determining speech intelligibility
CN111862924B (en) Audio frequency adjusting method for active noise reduction and related audio frequency adjusting device
US7149684B1 (en) Determining speech reception threshold
Bauer et al. A loudness-level monitor for broadcasting
Ballou A Sound Engineers Guide to Audio Test and Measurement
CN114286252B (en) Method for calibrating frequency response of playing equipment
Martin et al. Headphone measurements and their interpretation
Ueda et al. Frequency response of headphones measured in free field and diffuse field by loudness comparison
JPH10260077A (en) Acoustic characteristic measuring device
Adnadjevic et al. Development, validation and application of a generator for distortion product otoacoustic emissions
Völk Threshold-Based Headphone Equalization

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TZ UA UG UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC PT SE SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2003535505

Country of ref document: JP

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP