WO2002030406A2

WO2002030406A2 - Use of antagonists or partial agonists of 5ht1a receptors for the preparation of a medicament for treatment and prevention of gastrointestinal diseases

Info

Publication number: WO2002030406A2
Application number: PCT/IB2001/002759
Authority: WO
Inventors: T. G. Dinan; P. W. N. Keeling
Original assignee: Royal College Of Surgeons Ie; Dinan T G; Keeling P W N
Priority date: 2000-10-13
Filing date: 2001-10-11
Publication date: 2002-04-18
Also published as: EP1408937A2; CA2425910A1; JP2004510814A; WO2002030406A3

Abstract

The present invention provides a method for preventing and treating gastrointestinal diseases such as dyspepsia, irritable bowel disease and chemotherapy-associated nausea by administering an antagonist or partial agonist of 5HT1a receptors.

Description

Treatment and Preventio of Gastrointestinal Disease using Antagonists or Partial Agonists of 5HTla Receptors

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a method for preventing and treating gastrointestinal diseases such as dyspepsia, irritable bowel disease and chemotherapy-associated nausea by administering an antagonist or partial agonist of 5HTla receptors.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Dyspepsia is a common symptom ranging in prevalence from 26% in the United States to 41% in England (1). Whilst only 1 in 4 patients seek medical help (2) the condition results in significant health care costs (3) and an organic cause is found in only 40% of patients. The

Rome criteria for diagnosing idiopathic or nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) were put forward in 1991 and consist of chronic or recurrent upper abdominal pain or discomfort in the absence of obvious pathology (4). The Rome group suggested subcategorising NUD into ulcer-like, reflux-like, dysmotility-like and non-specific dyspepsia. This classification has been questioned on the grounds that there is a marked overlap of symptoms and an overlap between the symptoms and those of the irritable bowel syndrome (5).

Conventional diagnostic evaluation (endoscopy, ultrasonography, 24h ambulatory pH monitoring) does not reveal a structural or biochemical abnormality to explain NUD. Attempts at elucidating the pathophysiology of the condition have produced inconsistent findings (6) and a wide array of theories are currently put forward (7).

Serotonin (5HT) is a neurotransmitter both in the enteric nervous system (8) and in the brain (9). It plays a key role in regulating gut physiology, including peristalsis and intestinal tone (10). Animal studies have shown that intracerebro ventricular injection of fenfluramine (a serotonin releasing agent) inhibits gastric emptying (11). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, such as fluoxetine and sertraline, are widely used in the treatment of depression and produce a transient syndrome similar to NUD in up to 30% of patients treated (12).

Studies indicate that a central 5HTla receptor hypersensitivity may be involved in the pathophysiology of NUD (13,14). The release of prolactin from the anterior pituitary is under dopamine inhibition and under 5HT stimulation, probably at the level of the hypothalamus (15). Buspirone is an azaspirodecanedione, which acts as a partial agonist at the 5HTla receptor (16) and stimulates prolactin release. We have established that prolactin release following buspirone challenge is enhanced in NUD indicating 5HTla receptor supersensitivity in this condition.

We have demonstrated this in a clinical study that extends our previous findings reported in U.S. Patent No. 5,403,848.

A total of 109 subjects, 50 NUD patients (39 female/11 male) and 59 healthy comparison subjects (32 female/28 male) gave fully informed consent to take part in the study, which had

Ethics Committee approval. The mean±SD age of the patients was 35.6+12.2 years (Range 20-

62) and of the comparison group 27.2±7.6 years (Range 20-52). At 0830h subjects had a

cannula inserted in a forearm vein. Buspirone (30mg) or matching placebo was administered orally at 0900h (Time 0). Blood was taken at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 and ISOmin. Prolactin levels

rose in all subjects challenged with buspirone. The mean±SD AUC in patients was 46±35 and

in healthy subjects 24+35. A 2-way repeated measures ANOVA yields a significant group X

time interaction, with differences significant at 60min (p<0.05), 90 min (p<0.01) and 120 min (p<0.05). Prolactin concentration at 90 min provided the best discrimination between the two groups.

According to the present invention, what is required to treat non-ulcerative dyspepsia is the administration of effective amounts of a substance that reduces the sensitivity of 5HTla receptors and we have discovered that pindolol, which has affinity for 5HTla receptors has beneficial effects in subjects suffering from non-ulcerative dyspepsia.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a means for prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal disease by administration of a substance that reduces the sensitivity of 5HTla receptors. A preferred means is the administration of RS pindolol or a salt thereof. An especially preferred means is the administration of S (-) pindolol or a salt thereof.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As noted earlier, this invention can use any substance that is an antagonist or a partial agonist of 5HTla receptors such that the sensitivity of 5HTla receptors described above is reduced.

Pindolol is a beta adrenergic antagonist, used in the treatment of hypertension and angina. It also has affinity for 5HTla receptors of a similar magnitude as its affinity for beta adrenergic receptors. Until now, no therapeutic applications of this phenomenon have been discovered. Pindolol is used therapeutically in hypertension and angina as the racemic substance, RS pindolol. Most or all of the pharmacological effects of pindolol are possessed by the isomer S (- ) pindolol. The present invention utilizes pindolol to reduce the sensitivity of 5HTla receptors and as a result to provide the means for prevention and treatment certain gastrointestinal diseases, including non-ulcerative dyspepsia. A preferred embodiment of the invention is the isomer S (-) pindolol or salts thereof. Another method utilizes the administration of cyproheptadine, described in U.S. Patents 5,324,738 and 5,403,848. The latter also describes a method for diagnosis of non-ulcerative dyspepsia by measuring the responsiveness of 5HTla receptors. RS pindolol has an advantage over cyproheptadine of greater selectivity for the 5HTla receptor and S (-) pindolol has further advantages of greater potency and specificity. The invention is likely to be effective in various presentations of gastrointestinal disease in which there is altered sensitivity of 5HTla receptors. We have specific demonstration of the role of 5HTla receptors in non-ulcerative dyspepsia, but there is likely to be also benefit in certain cases of irritable bowel syndrome, especially that occurring in the upper intestinal region and in certain cases of motility disorders (including nausea) caused by cancer chemotherapy.

Various pharmaceutical presentations are possible, including (but not limited to) tablets, capsules, oral solutions and suspensions and parenteral solutions. Included are also pharmaceutical formulations for oral use in which the active substance is released in a controlled and slower fashion such that the treatment may be administered less frequently.

The usual doses of RS pindolol and S (-) pindolol will be in the range of 2.5mg to 50mg daily in single or divided doses, depending upon the therapeutic response and the pharmaceutical form. The usual doses of S (-) pindolol will be lesser than those of RS pindolol since the former will be more potent because it is responsible for most or all of the pharmacological effects.

The invention is intended for the treatment of mammals, including humans.

The ability of the invention to treat gastrointestinal disease has been demonstrated in a clinical study. EXAMPLE

Eleven patients suffering from non-ulcerative dyspepsia were recruited to a clinical study and gave informed consent. All were treated with pindolol 5mg three times daily. Seven of the 11 patients showed a significant improvement in symptoms within 1 week of commencing treatment. A further patient improved in the second week. Their responses were quantified using a standard rating scale (GSRS scores). The results demonstrated a substantial improvement with a reduction in average symptom severity of approximately 68% in three weeks, with the greatest improvement observed within one week.

Table 1. Mean symptom score (average of 11 patients)

Week Mean GSRS Score

0 9

1 4.2

2 3.5

3 2.9

EXAMPLE 2

An example of an immediate-release formulation of S (-) pindolol is as follows. Quantities for 100,000 tablets

S (-) pindolol 0.25kg

Avicell pH 101 3.5kg

Lactose 4.55kg

Aerosil 200 0.1kg

Maize Starch 1.0kg

Povidone 30 0.3kg

Magnesium stearate 0.1kg

Crospovidone 0.2kg

Total weight 10.0kg

Manufacturing process Blend in a suitable mixer the starch, lactose and half of the Aerosil for 10 minutes

Add the pindolol and half of the Avicel and mix for a further 10 minutes

Dissolve the Povidone in ethanol and add to the powders.

Mix to a suitable consistency. Dry the granules.

Pass the granules through a No 12 mesh.

Blend in a suitable mixer the granules with the magnesium stearate, crospovidone and the remaining Aerosil and Avicel for 30 minutes.

Compress tablets at lOOmg on a rotary compression machine.

The above example is not intended to exclude the many other possible formulations, including both immediate-release and controlled-release formulations. REFERENCES TO PREVIOUS PATENTS

T.G. Dinan and P.W.N. Keeling U.S. Patent No. 5,324,738 T.G. Dinan and P.W.N. Keeling U.S. Patent No. 5,403,848

OTHER REFERENCES

1. Fisher RS, Parkman HP. Management of nonulcer dyspepsia. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1376-81.

2. Brown C, Rees EWE. Dyspepsia in general practice. BMJ 1990;300:829-30.

3. Nyren O, Adami HO, Gustavsson S, Loof L. Excess sick-listing in nonulcer dyspepsia. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986;8:339-45.

4. Talley NJ, Colin- Jones D, Koch Kl, Koch M, Nyren O, Stranghellini V. Functional dyspepsia: a classification with guidelines of diagnosis and management. Gastroenterol Int 1991;4:145-60. 5. Talley NJ, Zinsmeister AR, Schleck CD, Melton LJ. Dyspepsia and dyspepsia subgroupings: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 1992;102:1259-68.

6. Talley NJ, Philips SF. Non-ulcer dyspepsia: potential causes and pathophysiology. Ann Intern Med 1988;108:865-79.

7. Dotevall G. Psychosomatic gastroenterology today and some ideas for tomorrow. Gastroenterol Int 1989;2:96-100.

8. Gershon MD, Erde SM. The nervous system of the gut. Gastroenterology 1981;80;1571-94.

9. Baumagarten HG, Grozdanovic Z. Neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of central serotonergic systems. J Serotonin Res 1994;1:171-81.

10. Lundgren O, Svanvik J, Jivegard L. Enteric nervous system: 1. Physiology and pathophysiology of the intestinal tract. Digest Dis Sci 1989;34:264-83.

11. Rowland N, Carlton J. Inhibition of gastric emptying by peripheral and central fenfluramine in rats: correlation with anorexia. Life Sci 1984;34:2495-9. 12. Thakore JH, Berti C, Dinan TG. Treating depression with specific serotonergic acting agents. J Serotonin Res 1996;3:145-160.

13. Dinan TG, Yatham LN, Barry S, Chua A, Keeling PWN. Serotonin supersensitivity: the pathophysiologic basis of non-ulcer dyspepsia? A preliminary report of buspirone/prolactin responses. Scand J Gastroenterol 1990;25:541-44.

14. Chua A, Keating J, Hamilton D, Keeling PWN, Dinan TG. Central serotonin receptors and delayed gastric emptying in in-ulcer dyspepsia. BMJ 1992;305:280-2. 15. Lamberts SWJ, Macleod RM. Regulation of prolactin secretion at the level of the lactrotroph. Physiol Rev. 1990;70:279-318.

16. Meltzer HY, Maes M. Effects of buspirone on plasma prolactin and cortisol levels in major depressed and normal subjects. Biol Psychiat.l994;35:316-323.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A method for preventing and treating gastrointestinal disease by means of administration of an effective amount of an antagonist or partial agonist of 5HTla receptors.

2. A method according to claim 1 employing an effective amount of the racemic substance RS ^•pindolol or a salt thereof.

3. A method according to claim 1 employing an effective amount of one of the enantiomers, S (-) pindolol of claim 2 or a salt thereof.

4. A method according to claim 1 in which effective amounts of RS-pindolol or S(-) pindolol or their salts are administered in a pharmaceutical dosage form that permits rapid release of the active substances.

5. A method according to claim 1 in which effective amounts of RS pindolol or S(-) pindolol or their salts are administered in a pharmaceutical dosage form that releases the active substances in a slow or controlled fashion that in turn permits administration of the active substances at lesser frequency than in claim 4.

6. A method according to claim 1 in which the gastrointestinal diseases are characterised as non-ulcerative dyspepsia or irritable bowel syndrome or chemotherapy-associated disorders of motility, including nausea.