CRYSTALLINE FGF9 DIMER AND METHODS OF USE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to certain crystallized fibroblast growth
factor 9 (FGF9) dimers. This invention also relates to computational methods for
using structure coordinates of the protein complex to screen for and design compounds
that interact with FGF9 or homologs thereof and methods of using the crystal stracture
of FGF9 to design pharmaceuticals.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) constitute a family of at least twenty
structurally related, heparin binding polypeptides which are expressed in a wide
variety of cells and tissues. They stimulate the proliferation of cells from
mesenchymal to epithelial and neuroectodermal origin. FGFs share structural
similarity, but differ in their target specificity and spatial and temporal expression
pattern. The biological response of cells to FGF is mediated through specific, high
affinity (Kd 20-500 pM) cell surface receptors that possess intrinsic tyrosine kinase
activity and are phosphorylated upon binding of FGF (Coughlin et al 1988). A lower
affinity (Kd 2 x 109 M), large capacity (106 sites/cell), class of binding sites has also
been identified as heparin sulfate moieties of proteoglycans. Heparin sulfates are
ubiquitous polysaccharides, composed of repeating disaccharides of variably sulfated,
either glucoronate or iduronate and glucosamine residues, ananged in distinct domains which greatly vary in length and sulfation levels. A unique role for these molecules is
in the formation of distinct complexes, essential for high affinity binding and
activation of FGF in particular and of other heparin-binding growth factors in general (Yayon et al, 1991; Rapraeger et al 1991).
Ligand and receptor dimerization is a key event in the transmembrane signaling of receptor tyrosine kinases. Receptor dimerization leads to an increase in kinase activity, resulting in autophosphorylation and the induction of diverse biological responses (Schlessinger et al, 1992). Several models have been proposed for the interaction between FGF2-heparin and its receptor (Yayon et al, 1991; Ruoslahti 1991; Spivak-Kroizman et al; 1994, Kan et al; 1993, Guimond 1993; Pantoliano et al, 1994). Previous work utilizing NMR demonstrated that FGF dimers in a symmetric tetramer are formed in the presence of an active heparin decasaccharide (Moy et al, 1997), suggesting that a cis-oriented dimer is the minimal, biologically active stractural unit of FGF2. Using defined heparin fragments and soluble FGF receptors further demonstrated that ligand dimerization can significantly enhance binding of FGF2 to FGFR1, dimerization of the receptor and induction of downstream signal transduction pathways. More recently, several studies (Plotnikov et al, 1999; Stauber et al, 2000; Plotnikov et al, 2000) exploring the crystal stracture of a complex between FGF2 and FGF1 with the extracellular domains of FGFR1 and FGFR2 have shown a 1 :2 molecular ratio of ligands to receptors with no evidence for ligand dimerization, the biological relevance of which has still to be determined. FGFs share in their primary sequence a homology core of around 120 amino acids, including four cysteine residues, one of which is conserved in all members of the family. The core stracture contains 12 antiparallel β strands, organized into a threefold internal symmetry. Equivalent folds have been observed for
the soybean trypsin inhibitor and interleukin IL-1 a and b. The best characterized
members of the family are FGF1 (aFGF) and FGF2 (bFGF), the structures of which
have been determined (Zhang et al, 1991; Zhu et al, 1991). Both are potent mitogens that stimulate proliferation, migration and differentiation of a large variety of cells
(Folkman et al, 1987; Rifkin et al, 1989).
FGF9, a recently identified member of the FGF family was originally
discovered as a heparin binding glia activating factor (Miyamoto et al, 1993; U.S.
patents 5,622,928 and 5,512,460). Human FGF9 codes for a 208 amino acid protein.
It shares a 30% overall sequence identity with other FGFs but has a unique spectrum
of target cell specificity as it stimulates the proliferation of glia and other fibroblast-
like cells but is not mitogenic for endothehal cells (Naruo et al, 1993). The basis for
such cell selectivity resides in its differential capacity to bind the different FGF
receptors. Recombinant FGF9 binds with high affinity and in a heparin dependent
manner to FGFR3, with somewhat less affinity to FGFR2 and with considerably less
to FGFR1 (Hecht et al, 1995).
Mutations in FGFR3 have been shown to be responsible for
achondroplasia, the most common form of genetic dwarfism. Examination of the sequence of FGFR3 in achondroplasia patients identified a mutation in the
transmembrane domain of the receptor.
As reported in WO 96/41523, the entire contents of which are hereby
incorporated herein by reference, FGF9 not only specifically binds to the FGFR3, but
also specifically activates this receptor without activating the FGFR1 and FGFR4 receptors and, if appropriate concentrations are chosen, without significantly activating
FGFR2. Thus, a pharmaceutical composition comprising a pharmaceutically
acceptable canier and, as an active ingredient, a therapeutically effective amount of
FGF9, may be used for stimulating the activity of FGFR3. Similarly, if antagonists of
FGF9 could be found, pharmaceutical compositions containing such antagonists could
be used to attenuate the activity of FGFR3.
Normal cartilage and bone growth and repair of damage to the cartilage
and bone requires a specific and delicate balance between up regulation and down
regulation of the activity of the FGFR3. It has been theorized that active FGFR3 is
necessary in the initial stages of cartilage-bone differentiation, and, after
differentiation, is required for cartilage-bone repair. Thus, a pharmaceutical
composition comprising as an active ingredient FGF9, which stimulates the activity of
FGFR3, may be used in order to encourage cartilage and bone repair, for example by
administration to the site of injury. Furthermore, FGFR3 exists usually temporarily on
mesenchymal stem cells and usually disappears after differentiation. Administration of FGF9 may serve to stabilize FGFR3 and thus prolong the period in which it is
active prior to differentiation. FGF9 has also a chemotactic affect of FGFR3 -carrying
cells and can promote migration of such FGFR3 carrying cells, typically mesenchymal
stem cells, to a desired site, for example, by injection of FGF9 to the growth plate top
of the column.
According to this theory, overactivation of FGFR3 after the stage of initial differentiation of bone and cartilage cells, leads to halted growth, and is
probably the cause of achondroplasia. Thus, a pharmaceutical composition
comprising as an active ingredient an antagonist of FGF9 which attenuates the activity
of FGFR3, or comprising an FGF9 binding agent (such as an antibody against FGF9), which neutralizes native circulating FGF9, should be used in cases of overactivity of the FGFR3 receptor in differentiated tissues, which causes bone and cartilage growth arrest. Such bone and cartilage growth anest may lead to achondroplasia dwarfism, or other abnormalities of bone and cartilage growth, for example, multiple hereditary exostosis, solitary hereditary exostosis, hallux valgus deformity, synovial chondromatosis and endochondromas.
The above conditions may be treated with a pharmaceutical composition comprising either an antagonist of FGF9, or an FGF9 binding agent capable of neutralizing native circulating FGF9, which both serve to attenuate the activity of FGFR3.
Thus, FGF9 agonists can be used for the purpose of repair and regeneration of defective articular cartilage, for treatment of achondroplastic patients, for treatment of patients suffering from other growth disturbances and for treatment of physical injuries with poor predicted rate of cartilage and bone growth. They may also be used as interventions for manipulating the rate of growth within growth plates in order to increase the growth rate and/or prevent premature differentiation; or may be used for direct injection into the nucleus pulposus of the fine vertebrae in order to enhance the healing of spine injuries. FGF9 antagonists can be used to suppress the activity of a wild type FGFR3 receptor, for example, in the cases of various types of tumors and the like. See WO 96/41620.
As there is a need for compounds that selectively inhibit FGFR3 or act as a selective agonist for FGFR3, it would be desirable to have improved methods that facilitate the design of such compounds.
The concept of rational drag design involves obtaining the precise three-dimensional molecular stracture of a specific protein to permit design of drags that selectively interact with and adjust the function of that protein. Theoretically, if the structure of a protein having a specified function is known, the function of the protein can be adjusted as desired. This permits a number of diseases and symptoms to be controlled. For example, CAPTOPRJL is a well known drag for controlling hypertension that was developed through rational drug design techniques.
CAPTOPRIL inhibits generation of the angiotension-converting enzyme, thereby preventing the constriction of blood vessels. The potential for controlling disease through drugs developed by rational drag design is tremendous. The power of rational drag design has been reviewed by Bugg et al (1993). A requirement of rational drag design is the production of crystals of the desired target protein which provide for the determination of the detailed atomic stracture of both the parent protein and its complex with the pharmaceutical. For this purpose, knowledge of the three-dimensional stracture coordinates of FGF9 would be useful. Such information would aid in identifying and designing potential inhibitors and agonists of FGFR3 that in turn are expected to have therapeutic utility.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides crystallized FGF9. The stracture
coordinates reveal that the crystalline FGF9 shows a symmetric dimer with unique
receptor and heparin binding surfaces. FGF9 crystallized in the tetragonal space group
I4ι with lattice constants a=151.9 A, c=l 17.2 A. The structure has been refined to an
R-value of R=22.0% (Rfree = 252%) at 2.6 A resolution. The four molecules in the
asymmetric unit are ananged in two non-crystallographic dimers with the dimer
interface composed partly of residues from N- and C-terminal extensions from the
FGF-core stracture. Most of the receptor-binding residues identified in FGF1- and
FGF2-receptor complexes are buried in the dimer interface with the β8/β9 loop
stabilized in a particular conformation by an intramolecular hydrogen bonding
network. The potential heparin binding sites are in a pattern distinct from FGF1 and
FGF2. The carbohydrate moiety attached at N79 has no stractural influences.
The use of the crystal stracture to design candidate agonists and
antagonists of the FGFR3 may be accomplished in the following fashion. Once the
crystal stracture of the target (i.e., FGF9) is determined, computer modeling is
conducted (using such programs as DOCK (Kuntz et al, 1982) or Multiple Copy
Simultaneous Search (MCSS)(Mirankev et al, 1991)) to construct candidate agonist or
antagonist compounds based on the crystal stracture. These compounds are
chemically synthesized and their biological activity is assayed. Preferably, such agonists or antagonists are mutants or fragments of FGF9 itself. For example, a
prefened antagonist would be a mutant of FGF9 designed by computer modeling
based on the crystal stracture of FGF9, which mutant bonds to the FGFR3 receptor without activating it.
Furthermore, once the three-dimensional stracture of a crystal comprising the FGF9 protein is determined, a potential ligand (antagonist or agonist) is examined through the use of computer modeling using a docking program such as GRAM, DOCK, or AUTODOCK (Dunbrack et al, 1997). This procedure can include computer fitting of potential ligands to the FGF9 dimer to ascertain how well the shape and the chemical structure of the potential ligand will complement or interfere with the dimer-dimer interaction (Bugg et al, 1993; West et al 1995)). Computer programs can also be employed to estimate the attraction, repulsion, and stearic hindrance of the ligand to the dimer-dimer binding site. Generally, the tighter the fit (e.g., the lower the stearic hindrance, and/or the greater the attractive force), the more potent the potential drug will be since these properties are consistent with a tighter binding constant. Furthermore, the more specificity in the design of a potential drag, the more likely that the drag will not interfere with other properties of the FGF9 protein. This will minimize potential side effects due to unwanted interactions with other proteins.
Initially a potential ligand could be obtained by screening a random peptide library produced by recombinant bacteriophage for example, (Scott et al, 1990; Cwirla et al, 1990; Devlin et al, 1990) or a chemical library. A ligand selected in this manner could then be systematically modified by computer modeling programs until one or more promising potential ligands are identified. Such analysis has been shown
to be effective in the development of HIV protease inhibitors (Lam et al, 1994; Wlodawer et al, 1993; Appelt, 1993; Erickson, 1993).
Such computer modeling allows the selection of a finite number of rational chemical modifications, as opposed to the countless number of essentially random chemical modifications that could be made, and of which any one might lead to a useful drug. Each chemical modification requires additional chemical steps, which while being reasonable for the synthesis of a finite number of compounds, quickly becomes overwhelming if all possible modifications needed to be synthesized. Thus, through the use of the three-dimensional stracture disclosed herein and computer modeling, a large number of these compounds can be rapidly screened on the computer monitor screen, and a few likely candidates can be determined without the laborious synthesis of untold numbers of compounds.
Once a potential ligand (agonist or antagonist) is identified it can be either selected from a library of chemicals as are commercially available from most large chemical companies including Merck, Glaxo Welcome, Bristol Meyers Squib, Monsanto/Searle, Eli Lilly, Novartis and Pharmacia Upjohn, or alternatively the potential ligand may be synthesized de novo. As mentioned above, the de novo synthesis of one or even a relatively small group of specific compounds is reasonable in the art of drug design. The prospective drag can be physically tested to confirm its projected activity. For example, if the activity sought for such a potential ligand is its ability to prevent the binding of FGF9 to its receptor FGFR3, the potential ligand can be placed into any standard binding assay described below to test its effect on the FGF9-FGFR3 interaction. A prefened ligand for the purpose of this assay would be
one which is capable of binding to FGFR3 with a greater affinity than that of FGF9 for
FGFR3. If the assay is conducted with FGFR3 on the surface of living cells, then one
can determine whether or not the ligand which binds to FGFR3 causes signaling by the
receptor. If it binds but does not cause signaling, then it is an antagonist. If it binds and causes signaling, then it is an agonist.
If the activity sought for such a potential ligand is its ability to bind
directly to FGF9, this activity can be detected by means of a standard binding assay
whereby the potential ligand may be selected on the basis of its having the capability of binding to FGF9. An antagonist may also be a ligand which binds to FGF9 so as to
prevent FGF9 from binding to FGFR3. The ability of the potential antagonist to have
this activity may also be detected by means of a simple assay for binding to FGF9 in
the presence of FGFR3, as is well known in the art.
Other assays which can be conducted for potential ligands relate to the effect of heparin on FGF9. Potential ligands which interact with the heparin binding
pockets of FGF9 may have a significant effect on the activity of FGF9, such as by
preventing the heparin-dependent oligomerization thereof. Thus, once a potential
ligand which may affect the heparin binding property of FGF9 is selected by means of computer modeling, the ability of the potential ligand to actually interfere with such
binding may be determined in a standard binding assay to test its effect on the FGF9-
heparin interaction.
When a suitable drag is identified, a supplemental crystal can be grown
which comprises a protein-ligand complex formed between the FGF9 protein and the
drag. Preferably the crystal effectively diffracts X-rays allowing the determination of
the atomic coordinates of the protein-ligand complex to a resolution of greater than 5.0
As, more preferably greater than 3.0 A, and even more preferably greater than 2.0 A.
The three-dimensional stracture of the supplemental crystal can be determined by
Molecular Replacement Analysis. Molecular replacement involves using a known
three-dimensional stracture as a search model to determine the stracture of a closely
related molecule or protein-ligand complex in a new crystal form. The measured X-
ray diffraction properties of the new crystal are compared with the search model
structure to compute the position and orientation of the protein in the new crystal.
Computer programs that can be used include: X-PLOR and AMORE (Navaza, 1994).
Once the position and orientation are known an electron density map can be calculated
using the search model to provide X-ray phases. Thereafter, the electron density is
inspected for stractural differences and the search model is modified to conform to the
new stracture. Other computer programs that can be used to solve the structures of
such crystals include QUANTA, CHARMM, INSIGHT, SYBYL, MACROMODE,
and lCM.
For all of the drag screening assays described herein further
refinements to the stracture of the drag will generally be necessary and can be made by the successive iterations of any and/or all of the steps provided by the particular drag
screening assay.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a ribbon representation of the FGF9 dimer composed of
chains A and D showing the carbohydrate moiety bound to each of the chains.
Figure 3 shows the hydrogen bond network stabilizing the β8/β9 loop.
Molecule D is represented with the light colored chain on the left side of the figure,
molecule A with darker chain trace on the right side of the figure.
Figure 4 shows a diagram of a system used to cany out the instructions
encoded by the storage medium of Figure 4 A and 4B.
Figure 5 A shows a cross-section of a magnetic storage medium.
Figure 5B shows a cross-section of an optically-readable data storage
medium.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Overall Stracture Description
The core unit of the FGF9 stracture (Fig. 1) is formed by residues 62 to
193 and is very similar to the structures of FGFl and FGF2, as expected from the
sequence alignment (Plotnikov et al. 1999). Further features of the schematic representation of the FGF9 dimer are expanded upon in the inventors' recent
publication (Hecht et al. 2001 Acta Cryst. D57). The rms difference to Ca-atoms of
FGFl (Blaber et al, 1996, and pdb-id 2afg) and FGF2 (Zhang et al, 1991, and pdb-id
2FGF) is 0.8 A. Major differences (rmsd > 1.5 A) occur at Thr70/Gly71, where FGFl
and FGF2 have an additional glycine, at the loop Asp88/Ser90, which may be
conelated with the C-terminal extension in FGF9, and at Tyrl53/Argl61, where in
FGF9 an insertion of three (relative to FGFl) or five (relative to FGF2) residues
occurs. The loop Glul41/Asnl46 shows some variability already in FGFl and FGF2.
Compared to FGFl the largest difference in Ca-positions in this loop is 3.9 A (at Alal42) while the largest difference is 1.9 A (at Alal42) compared to FGF2. The loop
containing in FGF9 the glycosylation site at Asn79 is identical to that of FGFl and
FGF2. N-terminal sequencing and Maldi-mass-spectrometry indicated heterogeneity of the crystallized protein with the major components starting at residues 19, 34, 38,
and 42. In the stracture, residues become visible in one of the molecules at residue 45
with three flexible residues in an extended conformation turning into a helix between
residues 48-62. In the other three molecules of the asymmetric unit the helical part is
visible only from residue 52 onward. The C-terminal residues starting from residue
193 form an inegular helix which shows some variability in the four molecules of the
asymmetric unit. Together these N- and C-terminal parts form an extension clearly
separate from the core stracture.
Quaternary Stracture
There is increasing evidence for the capacity of FGFs to undergo either
spontaneous or heparin induced oligomerization, although the relation of such dimers
and higher order oligomers to receptor binding and activation is still unclear. For
FGFl a heparin-linked dimeric structure has been reported (DiGabriele et al, 1998)
while for FGF2 in the presence of heparin both monomeric and dimeric structures were observed (Faham et al, 1996). Moreover, chemical cross linking,
ultracentrifugation experiments (Hen et al, 1997) and mass spectrometric techniques
(Davis et al, 1999) provided evidence of self-oligomerization for FGF2 in the presence
and in the absence of heparin. Nevertheless, in the stractures of the FGF2 receptor complex (Plotnikov et al, 1999) and the FGFl receptor complex (Stauber et al, 2000)
both FGF molecules are separate and only linked via the receptor molecules. In these
structures heparin is postulated to bind into a positively charged groove, created in the
receptor dimer with the two termini bound to the heparin-binding domains of the
FGF2 molecules (Plotnikov et al, 1999, Stauber et al, 2000).
FGF9 readily dimerizes under physiological conditions, probably more
easily than other FGFs, and dimers of FGF9 are frequently observed by
immunoblotting lysates of RCJ3.1C5.18 mesenchymal cells (Garofalo et al, 1999) and
L-8. Accordingly, the FGF9 stracture, crystallized in the absence of heparin, shows
the four molecules of the asymmetric unit organized in two dimers related by non-
crystallographic symmetry. The solvent accessible surface area, calculated with Grasp
(Nicholls et al, 1991), varies between 8848 A^ and 9306 A^ for the individual
molecules, depending on the length of the extensions. The surface areas of the dimeric
molecules, chains AD and BC, are 15826 A^ and 15481 A^, yielding buried surface
areas of 2422 k7- and 2420 A^ or approximately 1200 A^ per chain, well above the
cutoff value of 400 A^ per chain used as one of the classification criteria by the
Protein Quaternary Structure server PQS (http://pqs.ebi.ac.uk/pqs-doc/pqs-doc.shtml).
More than half of this buried surface of the dimer is contributed by the N- and C-
tenninal extensions, as the buried area per dimer is reduced to 1040 A^ and 853 A^
when only the residues 62-193 of the FGF-core stracture are used in the calculation.
The lack of these structured terminal extensions therefore can be one of the reasons
why similar dimer formation has not been observed, in the absence of heparin, in the
FGFl and FGF2 stractures. For FGF2 the crystal structure with the highest resolution
(pdb-id lbgf) showed disorder for the N-terminal first 19 to 20 residues (Ago et al,
1991), confirmed by NMR studies of complete FGF2 (Lozano et al, 1998; pdb-id
lrml) which showed disorder for the N-terminal 28 residues (Moy et al 1996). For
FGFl the crystal stracture with the highest resolution (Blaber et al, 1996) showed disorder for the N-terminal 9-10 residues (Blaber et al, 1996; pdb-id 2afg) and for the
NMR structure a N-terminally at residue 25 truncated molecule was used (Lozano et
al, 1998; pdb-id lrml).
Dimer Interface
The dimer interface in FGF9 consists mainly of hydrophobic contacts
but includes 4 hydrogen bonds and two salt bridges, related by non-crystallographic
two-fold symmetry. The hydrogen bonds connect the side chain of Y67 with the side
chain of N 143 and the side chain of R64 with the backbone carbonyl of VI 92 where
the C-terminal extension starts, while the salt bridges connect R62 with D193, also at
the start of the C-terminal extension. The hydrophobic contacts are concentrated in a
prominent hydrophobic cluster of the residues L54, L57, 160, L61, PI 94, VI 97 and
L200 at the base of the stracture, close to where the terminal extensions join the core.
At the center and top of the core structure P191, L188 together with PI 89 and the
hydrophobic parts of the side chains of R190, W144 and Y145 form an additional,
though less pronounced hydrophobic patch. A potentially important stractural
difference between FGF9 and FGFl and FGF2 occurs in the dimer interface with the noticeable shift of the β-turn linking β8 and β9 (residues 139-146, conesponding to
96-104 in FGF2). In FGF9, the loop conformation is fixed by a hydrogen bond
network involving residues H181, H186, E141 and E142 (Fig. 3). The anangement is
stabilized further by a salt bridge between El 42 and R69. Residues from this loop have been implicated in receptor binding (Venkataraman et al, 1999) and in the
experimental FGF receptor complexes, where residues from this loop make extensive
contacts to the receptor, the loop has been found to undergo some conformational
change upon receptor binding (Plotnikov et al, 1999; Stauber et al, 2000). This
conformational adaptation is likely to be much reduced in FGF9 due to the hydrogen
bonding network. Stabilization of this loop in a particular conformation by residues
not directly involved in receptor binding, as in FGF9, therefore could have significant
implications on receptor affinity. In the structure of FGF7 (Ye et al, 1999, pdb-id
1QQK), where El 42 and R69 are conserved, the loop is in a conformation similar to
FGFl and FGF2 but lacks the salt bridge. Most likely the loop conformation in FGF9
is influenced by the hydrogen bond between E141 and HI 81, which is unique to FGF9 and FGFl 6. Similar interactions could occur in FGF5, which has two glutamines in
these places, and in FGF 10, which has glutamic acid and lysine.
With the exception of residues from the terminal extensions most of the
residues (Fig. 1) involved in the dimer interface in FGF9 conespond to residues identified as belonging to the major receptor binding sites in FGF2 (Venkataraman et
al, 1999; Plotnikov et al, 1999; Stauber et al, 2000; Plotnikov et al, 2000). This is
particularly true for residues Y67, Y145, LI 88, 160 and HI 86, conesponding in FGF2
to Y24, Y103, L140, F17 and L138 and in FGFl to residues Y15, Y94, L133, Y8 and
LI 31 which were found by Plotnikov et al, 1999, and Stauber et al, 2000, to be in
contact with the receptor. These residues are almost completely buried (less than 10
A2 solvent accessible surface, calculated with Areaimol (CCP4, 1994)) in the FGF9
dimer interface and, in order for them to become accessible to the receptor molecule,
dissociation of these pre-formed dimers has to occur at least in FGF9.
In the experimental FGF receptor complexes (Plotnikov et al, 1999;
Stauber et al, 2000) both the FGF ligand molecules are separate and linked only by
heparin via the receptor molecules. A complete separation of the FGF9 dimer requires
the separation of the extensive hydrophobic interactions at the N- and C-terminal
extensions. As it seems unlikely that these hydrophobic residues remain exposed to
solvent, at least three alternative scenarios can be proposed.
1. At present there is no experimental evidence that residues outside of
the core-FGF stracture participate in receptor binding although in the FGF1/FGFR2
complex both FGF termini are in the vicinity of the receptor. In addition, preliminary
results suggest that a complete deletion of both termini may have no apparent
functional implications as evidenced by the capacity of a truncated fonn to both bind
receptor and induce cell proliferation (Adar et al, in preparation). The function of
these terminal residues could be therefore to provide stability to the unliganded FGF-
molecules, probably conelated with the function as a non-cleaved secretion signal
attributed to the 60 N-terminal residues by Revest et al (1999), but become redundant
and flexible at receptor binding. It is intriguing to suggest that the observed heparin-
independent self association of FGF9 could have physiological significance by
rendering the non-receptor bound FGF in a protected, non active form by utilizing the
same residues defined for receptor binding for a homotypic dimer interface.
2. These residues remain as a connecting region between the FGF molecules after a conformational change that exposes the buried receptor binding
residues. Preliminary modeling suggests that this could be possible with hinge regions
probably in the area of residues 62 and 190-192. In this case the terminal extensions
could connect adjacent ligand/receptor complexes to form multimeric assemblies.
3. In the experimental receptor/ligand complexes (Plotnikov et al,
1999, Stauber et al, 2000) the secondary receptor binding sites are different from the
sites identified by site directed mutagenesis as influencing receptor binding (Springer
et al, 1994, Zhu et al, 1997, Zhu et al, 1998). This discrepancy presently is not clear
and may point to the involvement of other determinants in FGF in receptor binding
and activation.
At least some of the FGFs, especially FGF3 and FGF 16, show in the
sequence alignment a similar pattern of hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues in these
terminal extensions. However, due to the high sequence diversity and the stractural
flexibility, still more stractural investigations of these homologs is yet required.
Potential Heparin Binding Sites
Heparin binding sites have been structurally identified in the heparin
linked FGFl dimer (DiGabriele et al, 1998; pdb-id 2axm) and in heparin complexes
with FGF2 monomers (Faham et al, 1996; pdb-id lbfb) where prominently
interactions of basic residues with the sugars, sulphate or carboxylate groups are
involved. The surface of FGF9 contains three clusters of basic residues potentially
suitable for heparin binding. At least one of these sites contains a bound sulphate
molecule while in the other cases the discrimination between bound water and
sulphate is less certain due to the limited resolution. The first site is in a pocket
created by the insertion at Tyrl53/Argl61 and the sulphate ion is bound to R180, Y163 and the backbone nitrogen of R161. This pocket is at approximately 14 A
distance from the nearest heparin binding site in FGFl and FGF2 but could occur also in FGF 16, FGF 13 and FGFl 1 which have a highly homologous insertion and identical
or homologous residues in position 163 and 180. The second site, where R137, K154
and R161 form a cluster highly suggestive of sulphate binding, is even further away
from the FGFl and FGF2 homologous sites and is located almost on the opposite side
of the molecule. A similar anangement could occur in FGF 16 as well, where R161 is
replaced by a glutamine. The third site is formed by R173 and R177 which
conespond to KI 18 and R122 in the heparin binding loop in FGFl (DiGabriele et al,
1998; pdb-id 2axm) and to K125 and K129 in FGF2 (Faham et al, 1996; pdb-id lbfb).
Fitting the heparin stractures observed in FGFl (DiGabriele et al, 1998) and FGF2
(Faham et al, 1996) to FGF9, however, shows that the high affinity heparin binding
site described by the residues N28, K126 and Q135 in FGF2 (Faham et al, 1996) is
partially blocked in FGF9 by the side chain of F 184 which makes the backbone
nitrogen atoms less accessible for sulphate binding as observed for FGF2 and FGFl.
In the experimental FGF2/FGFR1 complex, this site contains a bound sulphate ion and
is proposed to bind the terminal part of heparin (Plotnikov et al, 1999). Sulphate ions
visible in the experimental FGF1/FGFR2 complex (Stauber et al, 2000; pdb-id 1DJS),
however, seem to conespond well with the potential heparin binding sites on FGF9.
In this complex three sulphate ions are bound to FGFl, K128, KI 18, and R122,
probably with contributions by KI 12 and Rl 19. In FGF9 KI 83 conesponds to FGFl
K128 and, in addition, R69 is directed very close to the sulphate bound to FGFl K128. FGF9 R173 and R177 conespond to FGFl KI 18 and R122 and only a small
adjustment due to F 184 would be necessary for similar sulphate binding to the
complex. These fine adjustments in the spatial organization of the heparin binding residues in FGF9 may well coordinate with the distinct stractural variants of sulfated domains on heparin sulfates, required for binding and activation of different members of the FGF family as well as of other heparin binding growth factors (Ornitz, 2000). Computer Representation
The FGF9 X-ray coordinate data, when used in conjunction with a computer programmed with software to translate those coordinates into the 3- dimensional stracture of FGF9 may be used for a variety of purposes, especially for purposes relating to drug discovery. Such software for generating 3 -dimensional graphical representations are known and commercially available. The ready use of the coordinate data requires that it be stored in a computer-readable format. Thus, in accordance with the present invention, data capable of being displayed as the 3- dimensional stracture of FGF9 and portions thereof and their structurally similar homologs is stored in a machine-readable storage medium, which is capable of displaying a graphical 3 -dimensional representation of the stracture.
Therefore, another embodiment of this invention provides a machine- readable data storage medium, comprising a data storage material encoded with machine-readable data which, when used by a machine programmed with instructions for using said data, displays a graphical 3 -dimensional representation of a molecule or molecular complex comprising FGF9, or a homolog of said molecule or molecular complex, wherein said homolog comprises a binding pocket that has a root mean square deviation from the backbone atoms of said amino acids of not more than about 1.15A.
Even more prefened is a machine-readable data storage medium that is
capable of displaying a graphical 3 -dimensional representation of a molecule or
molecular complex that is defined by the stracture coordinates of all of the amino
acids in Figure 2 or a homolog of said molecule or molecular complex, wherein said
homolog has a root mean square deviation from the backbone atoms of all of the
amino acids in Figure 2 of not more than about 1.15 A.
According to an alternate embodiment, the machine-readable data
storage medium comprises a data storage material encoded with a first set of machine-
readable data which comprises the Fourier transform of the stracture coordinates set
forth in Figure 2, and which, when using a machine programmed with instructions for
using said data, can be combined with a second set of machine-readable data
comprising the X-ray diffraction pattern of another molecule or molecular complex to
determine at least a portion of the stracture coordinates conesponding to the second
set of machine-readable data.
For example, the Fourier transform of the stracture coordinates set forth
in Figure 2 may be used to detennine at least a portion of the structure coordinates of
FGF9.
According to an alternate embodiment, this invention provides a
computer for producing a 3 -dimensional representation of a molecule or molecular
complex, wherein said molecule or molecular complex comprises all of the FGF9
amino acids, wherein said computer comprises:
(a) a machine-readable data storage medium comprising a data storage material encoded with machine-readable data, wherein said machine-readable data comprises the stracture coordinates of FGF9 or portions thereof;
(b) a working memory for storing instractions for processing said machine-readable data;
(c) a central-processing unit coupled to said working memory and to said machine-readable data storage medium, for processing said machine-readable data into said 3 -dimensional representation; and
(d) an output hardware coupled to said central processing unit, for receiving said 3 -dimensional representation.
Figure 4 demonstrates one version of these embodiments. System 10 includes a computer 11 comprising a central processing unit ("CPU") 20, a working memory 22 which may be, e.g., RAM (random-access memory) or "core" memory, mass storage memory 24 (such as one or more disk drives or CD-ROM drives), one or more cathode-ray tube ("CRT") display terminals 26, one or more keyboards 28, one or more input lines 30, and one or more output lines 40, all of which are interconnected by a conventional bidirectional system bus 50.
Input hardware 36, coupled to computer 11 by input lines 30, may be implemented in a variety of ways. Machine-readable data of this invention may be inputted via the use of a modem or modems 32 connected by a telephone line or dedicated data line 34. Alternatively or additionally, the input hardware 36 may comprise CD-ROM drives or disk drives 24. In conjunction with display terminal 26, keyboard 28 may also be used as an input device.
Output hardware 46, coupled to computer 11 by output lines 40, may
similarly be implemented by conventional devices. By way of example, output
hardware 46 may include CRT display terminal 26 for displaying a graphical
representation of a binding pocket of this invention using a program such as
QUANTA as described herein. Output hardware might also include a printer 42, so
that hard copy output may be produced, or a disk drive 24, to store system output for later use.
hi operation, CPU 20 coordinates the use of the various input and
output devices 36, 46 coordinates data accesses from mass storage 24 and accesses to
and from working memory 22, and determines the sequence of data processing steps.
A number of programs may be used to process the machine-readable data of this
invention. Such programs are discussed in reference to the computational methods of
drug discovery as described herein. Specific references to components of the
hardware system 10 are included as appropriate throughout the following description
of the data storage medium.
Figure 5 A shows a cross section of a magnetic data storage medium 100 which can be encoded with a machine-readable data that can be canied out by a
system such as system 10 of Figure 4. Medium 100 can be a conventional floppy
diskette or hard disk, having a suitable substrate 101, which may be conventional, and
a suitable coating 102, which may be conventional, on one or both sides, containing magnetic domains (not visible) whose polarity or orientation can be altered
magnetically. Medium 100 may also have an opening (not shown) for receiving the
spindle of a disk drive or other data storage device 24. The magnetic domains of
coating 102 of medium 100 are polarized or oriented so as to encode in manner which may be conventional, machine-readable data such as that described herein, for execution by a system such as system 10 of Figure 4.
Figure 5B shows a cross-section of an optically-readable data storage medium 110 which also can be encoded with such a machine-readable data, or set of instractions, which can be canied out by a system such as system 10 of Figure 4. Medium 110 can be a conventional compact disk read only memory (CD-ROM) or a rewritable medium such as a magneto-optical disk that is optically readable and magneto-optically writable. Medium 100 preferably has a suitable substrate 111, which may be conventional, and a suitable coating 112, which may be conventional, usually of one side of substrate 111.
In the case of CD-ROM, as is well known, coating 112 is reflective and is impressed with a plurality of pits 113 to encode the machine-readable data. The anangement of pits is read by reflecting laser light off the surface of coating 112. A protective coating 114, which preferably is substantially transparent, is provided on top of coating 112.
In the case of a magneto-optical disk, as is well known, coating 112 has no pits 113, but has a plurality of magnetic domains whose polarity or orientation can be changed magnetically when heated above a certain temperature, as by a laser (not shown). The orientation of the domains can be read by measuring the polarization of laser light reflected from coating 112. The anangement of the domains encodes the data as described above.
As mentioned above, the FGF9 X-ray coordinate data is useful for screening and identifying drags that inhibit FGF9. For example, the structure encoded
by the data may be computationally evaluated for its ability to associate with putative
substrates or ligands. Such compounds that associate with FGF9 may inhibit FGF9,
and are potential drag candidates. Additionally or alternatively, the stracture encoded
by the data may be displayed in a graphical 3 -dimensional representation on a computer screen. This allows visual inspection of the stracture, as well as visual
inspection of the structure's association with the compounds.
Thus according to another embodiment, the method evaluates the
potential of a chemical entity to associate with a molecule or molecular complex
defined by the stracture coordinates of all of the FGF9 amino acids, as set forth in Figure 2, or a homolog of said molecule or molecular complex having a root mean
square deviation from the backbone atoms of said amino acids of not more than 1.1 A.
This method comprises the steps of:
a) creating a computer model of the molecular or molecular complex using the structure coordinates as set forth in Figure 2, or a homolog of said molecule
or molecular complex having a root mean square deviation from the backbone atoms
of said amino acids not more than about 1.15 A;
b) employing computational means to perform a fitting operation
between the chemical entity and said computer model of the binding pocket; and c) analyzing the results of said fitting operation to quantify the
association between the chemical entity and the binding pocket model.
The term "chemical entity", as used herein, refers to chemical compounds or ligands, complexes of at least two chemical compounds, and fragments of such compounds or complexes.
More prefened is the use of the atomic coordinates of all the amino acids of FGF9 according to Figure 2 ± a root mean square deviation from the backbone atoms of said amino acids of not more than 1.15 A, to generate a 3- dimensional stracture of FGF9.
For the first time, the present invention permits the use of molecular design techniques to identify, select or design potential inhibitors of FGF9, based on the structure of thereof. Such a predictive model is valuable in light of the high costs associated with the preparation and testing of the many diverse compounds that may possibly bind to the FGF9 protein.
According to this invention, a potential FGF9 inhibitor may now be evaluated for its ability to bind a FGF9-like binding pocket prior to its actual synthesis and testing. If a proposed compound is predicted to have insufficient interaction or association with the binding pocket, preparation and testing of the compound is obviated. However, if the computer modeling indicates a strong interaction, the compound may then be obtained and tested for its ability to bind.
A potential inhibitor of a FGF9-like binding pocket may be computationally evaluated by means of a series of steps in which chemical entities or fragments are screened and selected for their ability to associate with the FGF9-like binding pockets.
One skilled in the art may use one of several methods to screen chemical entities or fragments for their ability to associate with a FGF9-like binding pocket. This process may begin by visual inspection of, for example, a FGF9-like binding pocket on the computer screen based on the FGF9 structure coordinates in Figure 2 or other coordinates which define a similar shape generated from the machine-readable storage medium. Selected fragments or chemical entities may then be positioned in a variety of orientations, or docked, within that binding pocket as defined above. Docking may be accomplished using software such as Quanta and Sybyl, followed by energy minimization and molecular dynamics with standard molecular mechanics force fields, such as CHARMM and AMBER.
Specialized computer programs may also assist in the process of selecting fragments or chemical entities. These include:
1. GRID (Goodford, 1985), which is available from Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
2. MCSS (Miranker et al, 1991), which is available from Molecular
Simulations, San Diego, CA.
3. AUTODOCK (Goodsell et al, 1990), which is available from Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA.
4. DOCK (Kuntz et al, 1982), which is available from University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Once suitable chemical entities or fragments have been selected, they can be designed or assembled into a single compound or complex. Assembly may be preceded by visual inspection of the relationship of the fragments to each other on the
3 -dimensional image displayed on a computer screen in relation to the stracture
coordinates of FGF9. This would be followed by manual model building using
software such as Quanta or Sybyl (Tripos Associates, St. Louis, MO). Useful programs to aid one of skill in the art in connecting the individual chemical entities or
fragments include:
1. CAVEAT (Bartlett et al, 1989; Lauri et al, 1994), which is available
from the University of California, Berkeley, CA.
2. 3D Database systems, such as ISIS (MDL Information Systems, San
Leandro, CA). This area is reviewed in Martin, 1992.
3. HOOK (Eisen et al, 1994), which is available from Molecular
Simulations, San Diego, CA.
Instead of proceeding to build an inhibitor of a FGF9-like binding
pocket in a step-wise fashion one fragment or chemical entity at a time as described above, inhibitory or other FGF9 binding compounds may be designed as a whole or
"de novo" using either an empty binding site or optionally including some portion(s) of
a known inhibitor (s). There are many de novo ligand design methods including:
1 1. LUDI (Bohm, 1992), which is available from Molecular Simulations
Incorporated, San Diego, CA.
2. LEGEND (Nishibata et al, 1991), which is available from Molecular
Simulations Incorporated, San Diego, CA.
3. LeapFrog (available from Tripos Associates, St. Louis, MO).
4. SPROUT (Gillet et al, 1993), which is available from the University of Leeds, UK.
Other molecular modeling techniques may also be employed in accordance with this
invention (see, e.g., Cohen et al, 1990; Navia et al, 1992; Balbes et al, 1994; Guida,
1994).
Once a compound has been designed or selected by the above methods,
the efficiency with which that entity may bind to a FGF9 binding pocket may be tested and optimized by computational evaluation. For example, an effective FGF9 binding
pocket inhibitor must preferably demonstrate a relatively small difference in energy
between its bound and free states (i.e., a small deformation energy of binding). Thus,
the most efficient FGF9 binding pocket inhibitors should preferably be designed with
a deformation energy of binding of not greater than about 10 kcal/mole, more
preferably, not greater than 7 kcal/mole. FGF9 binding pocket inhibitors may interact
with the binding pocket in more than one of multiple conformations that are similar in
overall binding energy. In those cases, the deformation energy of binding is taken to
be the difference between the energy of the free entity and the average energy of the
conformations observed when the inhibitor binds to the protein.
An entity designed or selected as binding to a FGF9 binding pocket may be further computationally optimized so that in its bound state it would preferably
lack repulsive electrostatic interaction with the target enzyme and with the sunounding
water molecules. Such non-complementary electrostatic interactions include repulsive
charge-charge, dipole-dipole and charge-dipole interactions.
Specific computer software is available in the art to evaluate compound deformation energy and electrostatic interactions. Examples of programs designed for
such uses include: Gaussian 99, revision C (M. J. Frisch, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh,
PA, ©1995); AMBER, version 4.1 (P. A. Kollman, University of California at San
Francisco, ©1995); QUANTA/CHARMM (Molecular Simulations, Inc., San Diego,
CA ©1995); Insight II/Discover (Molecular Simulations, Inc., San Diego, GA ©1995);
DelPhi (Molecular Simulations, Inc., San Diego, CA ©1995); and AMSOL (Quantum
Chemistry Program Exchange, Indiana University). These programs may be
implemented, for instance, using a Silicon Graphics workstation such as an Indigo
with "IMPACT" graphics. Other hardware systems and software packages will be
known to those skilled in the art.
Another approach enabled by this invention, is the computational
screening of small molecule databases for chemical entities or compounds that can
bind in whole, or in part, to a FGF9 binding pocket. In this screening, the quality of fit
of such entities to the binding site may be judged either by shape complementarity or by estimated interaction energy (Meng et al, 1992).
According to another embodiment, the invention provides compounds
that associate with a FGF9-like binding pocket produced or identified by the method set forth above.
The stracture coordinates set forth in Figure 2 can also be used to aid in
obtaining stractural information about another crystallized molecule or molecular complex. This may be achieved by any of a number of well-known techniques,
including molecular replacement.
In order that this invention be more fully understood, the following example is set forth. This example is for the purpose of illustration only and is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any way.
EXAMPLE:
Materials and Methods
The full-length coding region for human FGF9 (Miyamoto et al, 1993)
cDNA was isolated as a BamHI/blunt fragment from pET vector (Kuriyama et al,
1995) and subcloned into the vector pBacPAK9 digested with Bglll and Smal.
Plasmids containing the cDNA species in proper orientation were isolated from
bacteria, used for transfection into Sf9 cells with purified linearized baculovirus DNA.
Screening for recombinant viruses, cloning and propagation or rec. viruses were
perfonned as described (Fiebich et al, 1993). For purification of FGF9 protein from
the insect cell serum-free supernatant, it was adjusted to 0.6 M NaCl and purified over
a 5 ml HiTrap heparin column (Pharmacia Amersham). FGF9 containing samples
were pooled, diluted 1 :3 with 20 mM Tris/Cl pH 7.4 and applied to a 5-ml TSK-
heparin-affinity FPLC column (TosoHaas). Bound proteins were eluted with a 20ml
gradient of 0.4- 1.5 M NaCl in buffer A (20 mM Tris/Cl, pH 7.4). Aliquots of 1 ml
fraction containing FGF9 were used for SDS/PAGE and for silver staining of the gel.
The protein concentration was measured with a standard assay (BCA,
Pierce). For amino-terminal sequencing of glycosylated rh FGF9, 20 mg protein from
the biological active fractions (estimated with BALBc-3T3 cells, not shown) were
loaded onto a Applied Biosystems 473 A gas-phase protein sequenator. Twenty rounds of Edman degradation were canied out using standard protocols and chemicals
supplied by Applied Biosystems (ca. 50% pos. 19 and 50%) pos. 34 of the coding
region).
Crystals were grown with the sitting drop method to a typical size of
0.2x0.2x0.2 mm from solutions containing FGF9 at a concentration of 2.1 mg/ml and
2.0 M ammonium sulphate, buffered at pH 5.2 with 0.1 M MES/Tris buffer. The
statistics of the native data set, collected at the MPG-GBF beamline BW6 of the
DES Y synchrotron from a shock-cooled crystal to a resolution of 2.6 A, are given in
Table 1. Indexing and scaling the data set with Mosflm (CCP4, 1994) and Scala
(CCP4, 1994) proved the space group to be tetragonal 14 with lattice constants
a=151.9 A, c=l 17.2 A. The asymmetric unit contains four molecules showing clear two-fold symmetry in a pseudo-14122 anangement and in addition a pseudo-cubic
three-fold axis in the self-rotation function calculated with Glrf (Tong et al, 1997).
The stracture was solved by molecular replacement. The successful run of EPMR
(Kissinger et al, 1999) used the coordinates of FGFl (Blaber et al, 1996; pdb-id 2afg),
modified by replacement of all non-glycine residues by alanine, and identified clearly
three of the four molecules in the asymmetric unit with a conelation factor of 0.296.
The fourth molecule was placed manually by complementing the third molecule to a
dimer identical to the first two molecules. The stracture was refined using CNS (Brunger et al, 1998), Refinac (CCP4, 1994), and O (Jones et al, 1991). Water
molecules were added using Arpp/Refinac (CCP4, 1994) until the decrease of the free
R-factor stopped. In the last stages of the refinement positional restraints for the non-
crystallographic symmetry were dropped, but, due to the limited resolution, only
grouped temperature factors for main chain and side chain atoms were refined.
TABLE 1 Data Set and Refine Statistics
Space Group I4ι
Unit Cell Parameters a (A) 151.9 c (A) 117.2
Resolution Range (A) 39.5-2.6
Unique Reflections 40985
Completeness (%) 99.9 (99.9)
I/sigma(I) 9.5 (3.4)
Rall (%) 22.0 Rfree (%) 25.0
Resolution 40-2.6 nr. residues 624 nr. sugars 10 m. sulfates 8 nr. waters 141
Coord. Enor * 0.18
Core Region (%)$ 90.0 ncs-rms (A)f 0.58 values in parenthesis are for the highest resolution shell 2.74 A-2.6 A
Rmerge = (∑Ii;(hkl) " <I(hkl)>) / (∑L/hkl),
Ra„ = (∑Fo(hkl) - Fc (hl ) / (∑F0(hkl)
* calculated with SIGMAA (CCP4) and J calculated with PROCHECK (CCPR) f rms deviation of Cα protein atoms related by non-crystallographic symmetry calculated with LSQMAN (Kleywegt et al, 1997)
N-terminal sequencing and Maldi-mass-spectrometry indicated
heterogeneity of the crystallized protein with the maj or components starting at residues
19, 34, 38, and 42 (Swissprot id FGF9_HUMAN). The glycoconjugate is, according to Maldi-mass-spectrometry, of the three-mannosyl insect type with 2 N- acetylglucosamines, 3 mannose and one fiicose moiety, a minor component having two fiicose molecules, as expected from the expression system. The structure shows clearly in all four molecules at the N79 glycosylation site density for the two N- acetylglucosamines together with one fiicose molecule, the rest of the carbohydrate is disordered. In the crystal all four molecules of the asymmetric unit show flexibility of the N-terminal and, to a lesser extent, the C-terminal residues.
The first residue visible in the electron density is in one molecule Leu45 and in the others Thr52, C-terminal residues are visible up to 208, the native C- terminus, in one molecule, to 206 in two others, and to 204 in the last molecule. The average rmsd between all Ca-atoms common to the four molecules in the asymmetric unit is 0.6 and 0.3 for the residues 62 to 193. The final refinement statistics for the model consisting of 623 amino acid residues, 10 carbohydrate, 141 water and 8 sulphate molecules are given in Table 1. The coordinates are set forth in Figure 2. The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the invention that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments without undue experimentation and without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adaptations and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. The means, materials,
and steps for canying out various disclosed functions may take a variety of alternative forms without departing from the invention. Thus the expressions "means to..." and "means for...", or any method step language, as may be found in the specification above and/or in the claims below, followed by a functional statement, are intended to define and cover whatever structural, physical, chemical or electrical element or structure, or whatever method step, which may now or in the future exist which canies out the recited function, whether or not precisely equivalent to the embodiment or embodiments disclosed in the specification above, i.e., other means or steps for carrying out the same functions can be used; and it is intended that such expressions be given their broadest interpretation.
REFERENCES
Ago et al, "Crystal stracture of basic fibroblast growth factor at 1.6 A resolution", J Biochem (Tokyo) 110:360-363 (1991)
Appelt, Perspectives in Drufi Discovery and Design 1:23-48 (1993)
Balbes et al, "A Perspective of Modern Methods in Computer- Aided Drag Design", in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 5, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH, New York, pp. 337-380 (1994)
Bartlett et al, "CAVEAT: A Program to Facilitate the Structure-Derived Design of Biologically Active Molecules", in Molecular Recognition in Chemical and Biological Problems", Special Pub., Royal Chem. Soc, 78:182-196 (1989)
Blaber et al, "X-ray crystal stracture of human acidic fibroblast growth factor", Biochemistry 35:2086-2094 (1996)
Bohm, "The Computer Program LUDI: A New Method for the De Novo Design of Enzyme Inhibitors", J Comp Aid Molec Design 6:61-78 (1992)
Brunger et al, "Crystallography and NMR system (CNS): A new software system for macromolecular stracture determination", Acta Cryst D54:905-921 (1998) Bugg et al (1993), "Drags by Design", Scientific American. 269(6):92-98
CCP4 Collaborative Computational Project, No. 4, "The CCP4 Suite: Programs for Protein Crystallography" Acta Cryst D50:760-763 (1994)
Cohen et al, "Molecular Modeling Software and Methods for Medicinal Chemistry" J
Med Chem 33:883-894 (1990)
Coughlin et al, "Acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors stimulate tyrosine kinase activity in vivo" J Biol Chem 263:988-93 (1988)
Cwirla et al, "Peptides on phage: a vast library of peptides for identifying ligands", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.. 87(16):6378-6382 (1990),
Davis et al, "Oligomeric self-association of basic fibroblast growth factor in the absence of heparin-like glycosaminoglycans", Biochem J 341 :613-20 (1999)
Devlin et al, " Random peptide libraries: a source of specific protein binding molecules", Science. 249(4967) -.404-406 (1990)
DiGabriele et al, "Stracture of a heparin-linked biologically active dimer of fibroblast growth factor", Nature 393:812-817 (1998)
Dunbrack et al, "Meeting review: the Second meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Stracture Prediction (CASP2), Asilomar, California, December 13-16, 1996", Fold Des 1997;2(2):R27-42 (1997)
Eisen et al, "HOOK: A Program for Finding Novel Molecular Architectures that Satisfy the Chemical and Steric Requirements of a Macromolecule Binding Site", Proteins: Struct Funct Genet. 19, pp. 199-221 (1994) Erickson, Perspectives in Drag Discovery and Design, 1:109-128 (1993)
Faham et al, "Heparin stracture and interactions with basic fibroblast growth factor", Science 271 :1116-1120 (1996)
Fiebich et al, "Synthesis and assembly of functionally active human vascular endothehal growth factor homodimers in insect cello", Eur J Biochem 211:19-26 (1993)
Folkman et al, "Vascular physiology. A family of angiogenic peptides", Nature 329:671- 672 (1987)
Garofalo et al, "Skeletal Dysplasia and Defective Chondrocyte Differentiation by Targeted Overexpression of Fibroblast Growth Factor 9 in Transgenic Mice", J Bone Miner Res 14:1909-1915 (1999)
Gillet et al, "SPROUT: A Program for Stracture Generation", J Comput Aided Mol
Design 7: 127-153 (1993)
Goodford, "A Computational Procedure for Determining Energetically Favorable Binding Sites on Biologically Important Macromolecules", J Med Chem 28:849-857 (1985)
Goodsell et al, "Automated Docking of Substrates to Proteins by Simulated Annealing", Proteins: Struct. Funct. and Genet 8:195-202 (1990)
Guida, "Software For Structure-Based Drag Design", Cun Opin Struct Biology 4:777-
781 (1994)
Guimond et al, "Activating and inhibitory heparin sequences for FGF-2 (basic FGF). Distinct requirements for FGF-1, FGF-2, and FGF-4", J Biol Chem 268:23906-23914 (1993)
Hecht et al, "Identification of fibroblast growth factor 9 (FGF9) as a high affinity, heparin dependent ligand for FGF receptors 3 and 2 but not for FGF receptors 1 and 4", Growth Factors 12:223-233 (1995)
Hecht et al., "Stracture of fibroblast growth factor 9 shows a symmetric dimer with unique receptor- and heparin-binding interfaces" Acta Cryst. D57: (2001)
Hen et al, "Heparin-induced self-association of fibroblast growth factor-2. Evidence for two oligomerization processes", J Biol Chem 272:16382-16389 (1997)
Jones et al, "Improved Methods for Building Protein Models in Electron Density Maps and the Location of Enors in these Models", Acta Cryst A47:l 10-119 (1991)
Kan et al, "An essential heparin-binding domain in the fibroblast growth factor receptor kinase". Science 259:1918-21 (1993)
Kissinger et al, "Rapid automated molecular replacement by evolutionary search", Acta Cryst D55.484-491 (1999)
Kleywegt et al, "Detecting folding motifs and similarities in protein stractures", Methods in Enzymology 277:525-545 (1997)
Kuntz et al, "A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions", J Mol Biol 161(2):269-288 (1982)
Kuriyama et al, Fermentation and Bioengineering 80:327-333 (1995)
Lam et al (1994), Science. 263:380-384;
Lauri et al, "CAVEAT: a Program to Facilitate the Design of Organic Molecules", J Comput Aided Mol Des 8:51-66 (1994)
Lozano et al, "Solution stracture of acidic fibroblast growth factor bound to 1,3,6- naphthalenetrisulfonate: a minimal model for the anti-tumoral action of suramins and suradistas", J Mol Biol 281:899-915 (1998)
Martin, "3D Database Searching in Drag Design", J Med Chem 35:2145-2154 (1992)
Meng et al, J Comp Chem 13:505-524 (1992)
Miranker et al, Functionality Maps of Binding Sites: A Multiple Copy Simultaneous Search Method", Proteins: Struct. Funct and Genet 11 :29-34 (1991) Miyamoto et al, "Molecular cloning of a novel cytokine cDNA encoding the ninth member of the fibroblast growth factor family, which has a unique secretion property", Mol Cell Biol 13:4251-4259 (1993)
Moy et al, "High-resolution solution structure of basic fibroblast growth factor determined by multidimensional heteronuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy", Biochemistry 35:13552-13561 (1996)
Moy et al, "Properly oriented heparin-decasaccharide-induced dimers are the biologically active form of basic fibroblast growth factor", Biochemistry 36:4782-4791 (1997)
Nauro et al, "Novel secretory heparin-binding factors from human glioma cells (glia- activating factors) involved in glial cell growth. Purification and biological properties", J Biol Chem 268:2857-2864 (1993)
Navaza. Acta Crystal 157-163 (1994)
Navia et al, "The Use of Stractural Information in Drag Design", Current Opinions in Stractural Biology 2:202-210 (1992)
Nicholls et al, "Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons", Proteins: Struct Funct and Genet 11(4):281 (1991)
Nishibata et al, Tetrahedron 47:8985 (1991) Ornitz, "FGFs, heparin sulfate and FGFRs: complex interactions essential for development", BioEssavs 22:108-112 (2000)
Pantoliano et al, "Multivalent ligand-receptor binding interactions in the fibroblast growth factor system produce a cooperative growth factor and heparin mechanism for receptor dimerization", Biochemistry 33:10229-10248 (1994)
Plotnikov et al, "Stractural basis for FGF receptor dimerization and activation", Cell 98:641-650 (1999)
Plotnikov et al, "Crystal stractures of two FGF-FGFR complexes reveal the determinants of ligand-receptor specificity", Cell 101:413-424 (2000)
Rapraeger et al, "Requirement of heparin sulfate for bFGF -mediated fibroblast growth and myoblast differentiation", Science 252:1705-1708 (1991)
Revest et al, "Fibroblast growth factor 9 secretion is mediated by a non-cleaved amino- terminal signal sequence". J Biol Chem 275:8083-8090 (1999)
Rifkin et al, "Recent developments in the cell biology of basic fibroblast growth factor", J Cell Biol 109:1-6 (19891
Ruoslahti et all, "Proteoglycans as modulators of growth factor activities", Cell 64:867-9 (1991)
Schlessinger et al, " Growth factor signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases", Neuron 9:383- 391 (1992)
Scott et al, "Searching for peptide ligands with an epitope library", Science 249:386-390 (1990)
Spivak-Kroizman et al, "Heparin-induced oligomerization of FGF molecules is responsible for FGF receptor dimerization, activation, and cell proliferation", Cell 79:1015-1024 (1994)
Springer et al, "Identification and concerted function of two receptor binding surfaces on basic fibroblast growth factor required for mitogenesis", J Biol Chem 269:26879-26884 (1994)
Stauber et al, "Structural interactions of fibroblast growth factor receptor with its ligands", Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:49-54 (2000)
Tong et al, "Rotation function calculations with GLRF program", Methods in Enzymology 246:594-611 (1997)
Venkataraman et al, "Molecular characteristics of fibroblast growth factor-fibroblast growth factor receptor-heparin-like glycosaminoglycan complex", Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:3658-3663 (1999)
West et al, TIPS, 16:67-74 (1995)
Wlodawer et al, " Structure-based inhibitors of HIN-1 protease", Ann Rev Biochem, 62:543-585 (1993)
Yayon et al, "Cell surface, heparin-like molecules are required for binding of basic fibroblast growth factor to its high affinity receptor", Cell 64:841-848 (1991)
Ye et al, "The Crystal Stractures of Rat Fibroblast Growth Factor 7 and Rat/Human Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 Chimera", To be Published (Pdb-id 1QQK) (1999)
Zhang et al, "Three-dimensional stracture of human basic fibroblast growth factor, a stractural homolog of interleukin 1 beta", Proc Νatl Acad Sci 88:3446-3450 (1991)
Zhu et al, "Three-dimensional stractures of acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors", Science 251:90-93 (19911
Zhu et al, "Analysis of high-affinity binding determinants in the receptor binding epitope of basic fibroblast growth factor", Protein Eng 10:417-421 (1997)
Zhu et al, "Identification of two new hydrophobic residues on basic fibroblast growth factor important for fibroblast growth factor receptor binding", Protein Eng 11 :937-940 (1998)