WO2001018453A1

WO2001018453A1 - A projectile of sintered metal powder

Info

Publication number: WO2001018453A1
Application number: PCT/SE2000/001565
Authority: WO
Inventors: Åke NILSSON
Original assignee: Norma Precision Ab
Priority date: 1999-09-03
Filing date: 2000-08-10
Publication date: 2001-03-15
Also published as: SE517797C2; SE9903111D0; EP1210551A1; AU6603400A; DE60021093D1; ATE298870T1; EP1210551B1; US6776818B1; WO2001018453A8; DK1210551T3; ES2240143T3; DE60021093T2; SE9903111L

Abstract

A projectile comprises a body of sintered metal powder and has a sintered metal powder surface that faces towards the rifling in the bore of a firearm, and therewith co-acts with said rifling. At least the body layer that is deformed by said rifling has a porosity in the region of 5-25%. The powder may consist of a copper alloy, such as tombak.

Description

I

A PROJECTILE OF SINTERED METAL POWDER

The present invention relates to a projectile of the kind defined in the preamble of Claim 1.

It is well known to protect the bore of the barrel of a firearm against the effect of the exposed projectile material (for instance lead), by providing the cartridge with an outer surface of, e.g., a copper alloy, thereby minimising coating problems resulting from direct contact between the core of the projectile and the wall of the bore and/or the bore rifling, while retaining the advantages relating to a high density of the projectile core (lead).

However, it has been realised in recent years that it may be fitting to avoid the use of lead in projectiles for rifle ammunition, revolver ammunition, etc., for environmental reasons, particularly when the ammunition shall be used on a practice range, and also when the ammunition is used for hunting purposes.

Consequently, there have been proposed in recent years projectiles that consist of a less environmentally harmful material, such as steel for instance. It is also known in this respect to produce the projectile body from a sintered metal powder. One problem with many such projectile materials, however, is that they can coat, scratch and/or damage the surfaces of the bore in other ways. Because of this, it is known, e.g.. from EP-A-0 626 557. to underdimension the actual projectile body in relation to the bore of the firearm, and to produce the actual projectile body of sintered metal powder with a plastic covering whose thickness is preferably greater than the penetration depth of the bore rifling, so that the surface of the actual projectile body whose material (iron) is liable to scratch or score the barrel will not come into contact with the wall of the bore. This known solution requires, among other things, an additional manufacturing stage, i.e. a stage in which the sintered metal powder body is covered with plastic. In order to achieve good firing precision, i.e. a coherent hit pattern when using such projectiles, it is necessary for the plastic covering to be uniform and even on all projectiles. This is difficult to achieve with a plastic outer covering when applying known technology. Furthermore, if the plastic tends to coat the walls of the barrel, problems can occur with respect to precision.

It is also known to produce projectiles from copper or a copper alloy of full density. The advantages obtained in this regard that the material is considered environmentally friendlv. has a relatively high density, a high toughness and a relatively low hardness, therewith enabling the copper projectile to be provided with a hollow tip, so that it can be used for hunting purposes and therewith expand upon impact.

One problem with the use of such copper projectiles or copper-alloy projectiles of full density, however, is that the material has been found to be relatively hard despite everything else, and that the tolerance region for the engagement between projectiles of a given nominal calibre and the tolerance region for the bores of the weapons concerned can overlap each other to such an extent as to cause the gas pressure in the weapon to become unacceptably high and therewith promote the risk of the barrel bursting when using such copper projectiles. Furthermore, the precision of the weapon suffers when the gas pressure varies.

We have now found that this problem can be avoided without needing to reduce the diameter of the metallic part of the projectile and to coat the projectile with a plastic cover, by designing the projectile in accordance with Claim 1.

Further embodiments of the inventive projective are set forth in the accompanying dependent Claims.

In accordance with the invention, the sintered metal powder body of the projectile has a porosity such as to enable the body to be compressed radially with relatively slight resistance during passage of the projectile through the barrel of the weapon if the interference/tolerances require such compression, so that potentially dangerous radial interference between the bore of the barrel and the projectile can be reduced or avoided by the ensuing reduction or elimination of said porosity. Because this radial compaction of a projectile having such porosity can be effected with a lower force than if the projectile should comprise the same material but with full density, it is possible to restrict friction of the projectile through the bore of the barrel and therewith also the gas pressure in the weapon.

In particular, when the body of the projectile is comprised of copper or a copper alloy, the sintered projectile body may have a porosity in the order of 10%. or generally between 5 and 25%. The projectile may conveniently comprise 90-95% by weight copper and 5-10% by weight zinc and/or tin, preferably about 95% by weight copper and 5% by weight zinc/tin This minimises coating of the walls of the bore

This porosity can be readily achieved by producing the projectile with the aid of a conventional sinteπng technique, wherewith a powder is compacted to form a body of desired shape and of desired dimensions and also with the desired porosity, and thereafter sinteπng the compacted powder body to desired mechanical strength, for instance to an extent such that the projectile mateπal will have essentially full toughness. It is possible also in this way to obtain the advantage whereby the projectile will not normally splinter upon impact. This enables the projectile to be formed to "cushion-up" upon impact, therewith enabling the projectile to be used for hunting purposes with a fully satisfactory result. Furthermore, the projectiles can be easily collected from, e.g., the sand used in the construction of a practice fiπng range and reused when they are still substantially in one piece after stπking the embankment on the fiπng range. It will be understood, however, that the invention also includes projectiles that splinter either completely or partially upon impact with a target surface, which may be desirable m respect of, e.g., practice ammunition so that penetration of the projectile can be reduced. Particularly when the projectile shall be used as practice ammunition, a major volumetπc part of the projectile may be produced from a metal powder, e.g , iron or steel, which results in lower costs.

Naturally, the inventive projectile can be further developed within the scope of the invention For instance, the projectile may be given a core of some other mateπal, for instance hardmetal, or a heavy mateπal, such as tungsten, in order to give the projectile a relatively high density and/or certain determined ballistic properties

In one embodiment of the invention, the projectile core can be formed from a mateπal of full density In another embodiment, the core can be formed from a powder different to its peπpheral parts, wherewith the core powder may optionally be compacted, for instance in an axially exposed cavity in that part of the projectile that forms said outer parts Similarly, the powder composition of the projectile may be vaπed along the longitudinal axis thereof

It is important that the projectile has an outer layer of porous mateπal, for instance tin or a tin alloy, that can be compacted radially essentially by eliminating or reducing said porosity as the projectile passes through the bore of the barrel, even in the case of troublesome tolerance overlap, so as to enable the projectile body to be made from a material which in a solid design would cause damage to the bore wall, for instance due to hardness, or would be liable to promote a hazardous gas pressure in the weapon. In this regard, the material may also be chosen so as not to coat the lands of the rifling in the barrel, or only to a very small extent.

The inventive porosity of the projectile, at least in its radially outer parts, also enables the use of powder material which in addition to including a relatively large proportion of relatively soft basic material (copper, copper alloy) also contains a minor proportion of hard particles which can be pressed back into the porous, relatively soft material layer upon temporary contact with the wall of the bore.

When the projectile is formed from copper or alloys that have mechanical strength properties similar to those of copper and copper alloys, and densities in the same order of magnitude as that of copper, the porosity of the projectile may be in the region of 5-25%, preferably about 10%. On the one hand, the porosity of the projectile shall be sufficiently high to enable the projectile to be compacted radially with small resistance, particularly its radially outer parts upon interference between the projectile and the wall of the barrel. On the other hand, the porosity of the projectile shall be so small that the decrease in density of the projectile due to the porosity will be as small as possible.

By way of example, it can be assumed that the projectile has a solid, completely rigid core with a porous outer layer that contacts the wall of the bore directly and engages the rifling of the barrel, in which case the thickness of the porous outer covering of the projectile will preferably be such that the radial compaction of the projectile required to avoid the generation of hazardous gas pressures can be achieved by elimination of said porosity.

The projectile can be produced from a unitary powder alloy that is compacted to form the projectile body, which is then sintered and preferably pressed to the desired calibration.

However, it may be desirable in some instances to form the projectile from two or more pre-manufactured complementary projectile parts which are joined and connected, preferably by pressing and suitably in conjunction with a calibration pressing process. These parts may have different compositions/ alloying, such as to provide the projectile with a bore co-acting outer covering that has the aforementioned advantageous properties, namely a relatively high density, a radial compressiveness that is reduced by said porosity, a material selection that results in minimum coating of steel bore surfaces. The remaining parts of the projectile that do not thus co-act with the rifling of the bore, can be selected to impart other desired properties to the projectile. For instance, said other body parts may be comprised of tungsten or tungsten alloys when a high density is desired. When desiring a low cost, iron powder can be used, which also has a relatively high density. Bismuth and tin are also conceivable materials that result in a relatively low load on the environment.

In other respects, the manufacturing process is the same as that applied conventionally in the manufacture of metal objects by metal powder sintering techniques, wherewith the powder is conventionally compacted in a cold state to a desired body shape, whereafter said body is sintered at a temperature chosen to promote desired mechanical strength properties. If desired, the sintered body can be subjected to a calibration pressing process to give the body a more precise outer shape.

The inventive projectile is conveniently produced from a powder that consists mainly of a copper alloy, for instance 95% by weight copper and 5% by weight zinc. Such an alloy has been found particularly favourable with respect to minimum coating of the bore surfaces. The powder may also include minor proportions of another powder that impaπs other properties to the projectile, for instance a higher density. Even though such hard particles imply, per se, a scratching or scoring risk or the risk of elevated bore wear, the invention affords the advantage that the porosity of the body enables the hard particles to be pressed down more easily into the more resilient parts of the sintered body.

The inventive projectile may, for instance, be produced in calibre of up to 0.5 inch in diameter (heavy machine gun) or 20 mm in diameter (automatic canon), wherein the choice of material and porosity may also be used to limit the firing range of the weapon, which may be beneficial in conjunction with firing practice.

The invention will now be described with reference to an exemplifying embodiment thereof and also with reference to the accompanying drawing.

Fig. 1 is an axial section view of an inventive projectile. The projectile shown in Fig. 1 includes a primary body 1 whose outer cylindrical surface is intended to enable the projectile to engage the helical rifling in the bore of a gun.

The illustrated projectile includes a primary body 1 that has a central, preferably co-axial and rotationally-symmetrical recess 2 in one end thereof, preferably its front end. A core 3 is fastened stably in the recess 2 and conveniently has a recess-complementary shape. The body 1 is comprised of an alloy of Cu (90-95% by weight) and Zn (the remainder), and has a porosity of 10%. The core 3 does not contact the rifling of the bore and may be comprised of material that fulfils desired requirements, for instance low cost, brittleness, density, manufacturing costs, and environmentally friendliness and the like. The core 3 of the illustrated embodiment may be formed by a sintered metal powder body, for instance a body comprised of iron powder. The core 3 and the body 1 can include particles of a foreign material, for instance heavy particles that serve to increase the density of the body/core. Fig. 1 shows by way of example a so-called W.C. bullet, calibre 38, that has a diameter of 9.07 mm for correct co-action with the rifling of a corresponding bore in respect of a 38 calibre firearm.

The recess 2 in said body defines a wall thickness of about 2 mm for the front part of the body 1. The depth of the recess is about 10 mm. The total length of the body 1 is about 14 mm.

The core 3 may alternatively have a porosity of 10% by volume for example. The core 3 may be formed by cold compaction of a metal powder in a mould. The compacted, moulded core may then be sintered to obtain desired mechanical strength properties.

The body 1 is produced from a powder comprised of the aforesaid alloy, this powder being cold compacted in a mould and the compacted powder body then sintered to impart desired properties thereto. The body has a porosity of about 10%.

The core is then inserted into the recess in said body and the body and core then subjected to a calibration pressing process that imparts well-determined outer cross-sectional dimensions to the resultant projectile on the one hand, and secures the core in the body recess 2 on the other hand. The core can be diversified so that it can be deformed by the rifling in the bore of the barrel with the deformation resulting in a fragile or brittle core. The diameter of the recess in the body 1 is made slightly larger than the diameter of the core, so that the core can be easily inserted into the recess prior to the calibration pressing process, if this process is able to deform the body 1 into securing contact with the core.

In one embodiment of an inventive projectile (not shown) which is assumed to be the most common, a powder comprised of Cu-Zn alloy (95 and 5% by weight) is compacted in a mould to form a pressed body that is later sintered. The moulding and sintering conditions are chosen so that the sintered body will be somewhat overdimensioned in respect to desired final dimensions. After sintering the body, and preferably after cooling said body, the sintered projectile body is calibration pressed to impart a desired outer dimension, i.e. to eliminate shape deviations resulting from the sintering process.

The powder and the working operations are chosen to give the projectile a final porosity of about 10%, at least in its outer layer. The projectile is given standard calibre dimensions, so that its outer layer will engage with the helical rifling in the barrel, and therewith impart the correct rotation and guidance to the projectile.

Example

A projectile of .30 calibre (diameter about 7.6 mm) produced in accordance with the invention on the basis of powder comprising Cu-Zn alloy (95% by weight Cu, 5% by weight Zn) was manufactured by compacting a powder mass at a pressure of 6000 bar, to form a shaped body having a porosity of about 10%. The shape of the body conformed essentially with the desired shape of the projectile, and was sintered at a temperature of 1000-1050°C under a shielding gas for 33 minutes (30-40 min.). After cooling, the projectile was calibration pressed at 6000 bar to its final shape, said projectile then having a porosity of 10%. The hardness of the projectile was measured as being 80% of the hardness of a solid projectile comprised of said alloy.

In practical embodiments, at least the porous sintered outer layer of the projectile may include a significant proportion of a metal, such as copper for instance, that preferably has a lubricating function against the bore wall, for instance a steel wall. This metal (copper) proportion will correspond at least to 10% by weight and preferably 20% by weight. A projectile intended, for example, for practice tiring on a firing range may. for instance. comprise in at least its outer cylindrical layer a porous, sintered powder mixture that consists of a further 20% by weight copper granules and 80% by weight granules of another substance, for instance a metal or a metal alloy such as steel, whose granules or grains are covered with copper.

Projectiles whose porous outer cylindrical layers contain at least 50% by weight copper are preferred.

In another feasible embodiment, at least the porous, sintered outer cylindrical layer of the projectile may consist of tin bronze that preferably contains at least 80% by weight copper and the remainder essentially tin, preferably about 90% by weight copper and the remainder tin.

Claims

1. A projectile that includes a body comprised of sintered metal powder, characterised in that the body has a surface of sintered metal powder that faces towards the rifling in the bore of a firearm and therewith co-acts with said rifling; and in that at least the outer surface of the body deformed by said rifling has a porosity in the region of 5-25%.

2. A projectile according to Claim 1, characterised in that the whole of said body consists of sintered metal powder of essentially uniform composition.

3. A projectile according to Claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the powder consists essentially of copper.

4. A projectile according to Claim 1, characterised in that the body includes a cavity (2) which is filled with a filling (3) consisting of material other than the material of said body.

5. A projectile according to Claim 4. characterised in that the filling (3) is comprised of sintered metal powder of a composition other than the composition of the body co- acting with said rifling; in that the body and the filling are complementary shaped and joined; and in that the body and the filling are deformation bonded one to the other.

6. A projectile according to Claim 4 or 5, characterised in that the sintered porous body is given a radial thickness of such magnitude as to permit radial interference between the projectile and the rifling in the bore of the firearm to be accommodated to a substantial extent by reduction of the porosity of said body upon passage of the projectile through the bore of the firearm.

7. A projectile according to Claim 6. characterised in that the body layer co-acting with said rifling has a thickness of at least 0.2 mm and preferably of at least 0.4 mm.

8. A projectile according to any one of Claims 3-7. characterised in that the metal powder includes essentially at least 85% by weight Cu and the remainder tin and/or zinc.

9. A projectile according to Claim 8. characterised in that the body is comprised essentially of a sintered powder mass comprising an Cu-Zn alloy that contains at least 90% by weight Cu.

10. A projectile according to any one of Claims 1-9, characterised in that the body has a porosity in the range of 7-17%, preferably about 10%.