WO2000039599A1 - Method and apparatus for detecting earth leakage from a battery - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for detecting earth leakage from a battery Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000039599A1
WO2000039599A1 PCT/GB1999/004404 GB9904404W WO0039599A1 WO 2000039599 A1 WO2000039599 A1 WO 2000039599A1 GB 9904404 W GB9904404 W GB 9904404W WO 0039599 A1 WO0039599 A1 WO 0039599A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
battery
earth
fault
potential
voltage
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB1999/004404
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Andrew Simon Clegg
Original Assignee
Elliott Industries
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Elliott Industries filed Critical Elliott Industries
Priority to AU18798/00A priority Critical patent/AU1879800A/en
Publication of WO2000039599A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000039599A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M10/00—Secondary cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M10/42—Methods or arrangements for servicing or maintenance of secondary cells or secondary half-cells
    • H01M10/4285—Testing apparatus
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M10/00—Secondary cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M10/42—Methods or arrangements for servicing or maintenance of secondary cells or secondary half-cells
    • H01M10/48—Accumulators combined with arrangements for measuring, testing or indicating the condition of cells, e.g. the level or density of the electrolyte
    • H01M10/482—Accumulators combined with arrangements for measuring, testing or indicating the condition of cells, e.g. the level or density of the electrolyte for several batteries or cells simultaneously or sequentially
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/10—Energy storage using batteries

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for detecting earth leakage from a battery.
  • a technician may work on a live floating battery in safety, providing they only make contact with a single point on the battery at any one time and providing that it is totally floating and has not become earthed by some fault or leakage.
  • earth faults it is very easy for earth faults to occur; due, for example, to accidental connection with a rack, leakage of electrolyte or deposits on the surface of the battery.
  • many battery systems are installed with a floating battery and an earth fault detector.
  • a traditional detector circuit is shown in Fig.l. It functions by monitoring current flow through Re seen as voltage drop (V) .
  • the arrangement is not fail safe. It is looking for the presence of a voltage. Should a fault condition arise in the detector causing an open circuit in the Re arm of the resistor array then no fault will be detected. In short the traditional arrangement can indicate an earth fault but it cannot indicate the absence of one.
  • a method of detecting earth leakage from a battery comprising the steps of measuring the voltage across the battery, earthing the negative end of the battery and measuring the positive potential with respect to earth, earthing the positive end of the battery and measuring the negative potential with respect to earth, the three measuring steps being carried out in any order, and comparing readings from the three measurements and indicating an earth fault if all three are not equal.
  • This method offers the benefit over the conventional method in that all types of earth fault are detected as all types of earth fault will cause the measured voltages in either or both of the measurements taken with either end of the battery being earthed to be lower than the voltage measured across the battery. Also, because the method detects a fault with a change in measured voltage, faults such as open circuits, short circuits and high impedences are detected as faults. The method is therefore failsafe.
  • the step of earthing either end of the battery could involve connecting the ends of the battery to a reference voltage which is itself referenced to earth.
  • the ends of the battery it is preferable for the ends of the battery to be directly earthed, for example via a high value resistor.
  • an apparatus for detecting earth leakage from a battery comprising a first connection connectable to the positive terminal of the battery, the first connection leading to a first switch capable of switching the first connection between a voltmeter and earth; a second connection connectable to the negative terminal of the battery, the second connection leading to a second switch capable of switching the second connection between the voltmeter and earth, whereby the voltmeter can measure the potential across the battery, the potential of the positive terminal with respect to earth and the potential of the negative terminal with respect to earth; and means for comparing the three potentials and indicating an earth fault if all three are not equal .
  • Figs. 1 - 5 illustrate the method employed by a known earth leakage detector
  • Figs. 6 - 8 illustrate the method and apparatus of present invention measuring voltages under various circuit conditions without earth leakage
  • Figs. 9 - 11 illustrate the same conditions with earth leakage
  • Figs. 10A and 11A are equivalent circuits to Figs. 10 and 11 respectively.
  • FIGs. 6 - 10 an apparatus for detecting earth leakage from a battery 1 comprising a number of cells 2.
  • the apparatus comprises an A-D voltmeter.
  • Two single pole switches 3, 4 each of which can be switched between the voltmeter and a respective large value resistor 5, 6, typically of 500k ⁇ connected to earth.
  • the other end of each switch is connected to a respective pick-up wire 7, 8 each of which can be connected to a respective terminal of the battery via a current limiting resistor 9, 10, typically of 51k ⁇ .
  • Fig. 6 illustrates the measurement of the overall battery voltage where the switches 3, 4 connect the battery terminals to the voltmeter.
  • the switch 4 is switched so as to connect the negative terminal of the battery to earth so that the potential of the positive battery to earth can be measured.
  • the switches are reversed from their positions in Fig.7, thereby earthing the positive end of the battery and measuring the potential of the negative end of the battery with respect to earth. It will be appreciated, that if the battery is truly floating, then the three measured voltages from Figs. 6 - 8 should be equal .
  • Figs. 9 - 11 show the operation of the detector for the battery 1 having an earth leakage fault which is represented by an earthed resistor 11, 60% of the way along the battery from the negative end.
  • Fig.9 corresponds to Fig.6 and represents measurement of the overall battery voltage.
  • the resistive connection 11 to earth does not affect the overall voltage because batteries have a very low impedance relative to the earth fault. Therefore, the overall voltage will be correctly read as being the same as in Fig.6. If, for example, the battery 1 consists of five lOOv cells, then the measured voltage in Fig.9 will be 500v d.c.
  • Fig. 11 shows the position corresponding to Fig.8 where the positive terminal of the battery is earthed. Again, the meter V sees a lower voltage than in Fig.9. From the equivalent circuit in Fig.llA which is based on the same values as Fig.lOA, the voltage seen by the meter V can be calculated at 456.8v.

Abstract

A method and abstract detecting earth leakage from a battery (1). The voltage across the battery is measured. The ends of the battery are then earthed in turn and the potential of the unearthed end of the battery with respect to earth is measured. The three measurements are then compared and an earth fault is indicated if all three are not equal.

Description

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING EARTH LEAKAGE FROM
A BATTERY.
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for detecting earth leakage from a battery.
Safety whilst working on high voltage batteries is very important . It is very much safer to work on an isolated battery than on one that is earthed. If a battery is earthed it may have a large potential to earth in other places . To avoid this lower voltage batteries may be earthed in the centre, thus reducing the maximum potential to earth by half. The trend to higher voltage batteries, with higher voltage semiconductors makes this safety feature impossible.
A technician may work on a live floating battery in safety, providing they only make contact with a single point on the battery at any one time and providing that it is totally floating and has not become earthed by some fault or leakage. Unfortunately it is very easy for earth faults to occur; due, for example, to accidental connection with a rack, leakage of electrolyte or deposits on the surface of the battery. To this end many battery systems are installed with a floating battery and an earth fault detector.
A traditional detector circuit is shown in Fig.l. It functions by monitoring current flow through Re seen as voltage drop (V) .
Under normal, no fault conditions, current flow
(conventional) is from the positive side of the battery to the negative side via Ra & Rb (both are of high value e.g. 500k - 1MΩ) . There is no route for current flow through Re and therefore no voltage is developed across it. If an earth fault develops at the negative end of the battery (Rf as shown in Fig. 2), current flows through Ra and divides, sharing current through Rb and Re. The earth fault is detected by monitoring the voltage developed across Re. The current flow through Re is inversely proportional to the size of Rf (equivalent value of fault resistance to earth) . If an earth fault develops at the positive end of the battery (Rf as shown in Fig. 3) , current flows from the positive of the battery through Ra and Rf returning to the negative end of the battery via both Re and Rb. The earth fault is detected by monitoring the voltage developed across Re. The current flow through Re is inversely proportional to the size of Rf (equivalent value of fault resistance to earth) . A device detecting voltage drop across a resistor (Re) will therefore detect an earth fault, where the earth fault is at (or towards) one end of the battery.
If an earth fault develops in the centre of the battery (Rf) , as shown in Fig. 4 there is no potential difference between i) the junction of Ra & Rb and ii) the centre of the battery, therefore no (or very small) current flows through Rf or Re, and the fault is not detected. It is of course unlikely for a fault to develop dead in the centre of a battery. However due to the nature of batteries the spread of a fault evenly along the battery as shown in Fig.5 is far more common .
Due to the nature of the environment surrounding batteries this fault condition is common where batteries have been installed for some time. The build up of dust and moisture deposits on and around the battery can very quickly cause this condition. Under these circumstances current circulates through Ra & Rb as normal but fault current also circulates through Rf3 and returns to the battery via Rfx Once again there is no potential difference between i) the junction of Ra & Rb and ii) the centre of the battery, therefore no (or very small) current flow through Rf2 or Re. Therefore the fault is not detected.
As can be seen an earth fault at either end of the battery will cause current to flow in resistor Re. This can be easily detected and this generate an alarm, warning the technician not to attempt to touch the battery. However this circuit arrangement has a major flaw. If the earth fault is symmetrical across the battery (central, equal on both halves, or approximately equal over the whole battery) little or no current flows in resistor Re and therefore the fault is not detected. This results in a very unsafe battery and worse still, the safety equipment indicating that there is no danger.
In addition the arrangement is not fail safe. It is looking for the presence of a voltage. Should a fault condition arise in the detector causing an open circuit in the Re arm of the resistor array then no fault will be detected. In short the traditional arrangement can indicate an earth fault but it cannot indicate the absence of one.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of detecting earth leakage from a battery, the method comprising the steps of measuring the voltage across the battery, earthing the negative end of the battery and measuring the positive potential with respect to earth, earthing the positive end of the battery and measuring the negative potential with respect to earth, the three measuring steps being carried out in any order, and comparing readings from the three measurements and indicating an earth fault if all three are not equal.
This method offers the benefit over the conventional method in that all types of earth fault are detected as all types of earth fault will cause the measured voltages in either or both of the measurements taken with either end of the battery being earthed to be lower than the voltage measured across the battery. Also, because the method detects a fault with a change in measured voltage, faults such as open circuits, short circuits and high impedences are detected as faults. The method is therefore failsafe.
The step of earthing either end of the battery could involve connecting the ends of the battery to a reference voltage which is itself referenced to earth. However, it is preferable for the ends of the battery to be directly earthed, for example via a high value resistor.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for detecting earth leakage from a battery, the apparatus comprising a first connection connectable to the positive terminal of the battery, the first connection leading to a first switch capable of switching the first connection between a voltmeter and earth; a second connection connectable to the negative terminal of the battery, the second connection leading to a second switch capable of switching the second connection between the voltmeter and earth, whereby the voltmeter can measure the potential across the battery, the potential of the positive terminal with respect to earth and the potential of the negative terminal with respect to earth; and means for comparing the three potentials and indicating an earth fault if all three are not equal .
An example of a method and apparatus in accordance with the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figs. 1 - 5 illustrate the method employed by a known earth leakage detector;
Figs. 6 - 8 illustrate the method and apparatus of present invention measuring voltages under various circuit conditions without earth leakage;
Figs. 9 - 11 illustrate the same conditions with earth leakage; and
Figs. 10A and 11A are equivalent circuits to Figs. 10 and 11 respectively.
In Figs. 6 - 10 an apparatus is shown for detecting earth leakage from a battery 1 comprising a number of cells 2. The apparatus comprises an A-D voltmeter. Two single pole switches 3, 4 each of which can be switched between the voltmeter and a respective large value resistor 5, 6, typically of 500kΩ connected to earth. The other end of each switch is connected to a respective pick-up wire 7, 8 each of which can be connected to a respective terminal of the battery via a current limiting resistor 9, 10, typically of 51kΩ.
Fig. 6 illustrates the measurement of the overall battery voltage where the switches 3, 4 connect the battery terminals to the voltmeter. In Fig.7, the switch 4 is switched so as to connect the negative terminal of the battery to earth so that the potential of the positive battery to earth can be measured. In Fig.8, the switches are reversed from their positions in Fig.7, thereby earthing the positive end of the battery and measuring the potential of the negative end of the battery with respect to earth. It will be appreciated, that if the battery is truly floating, then the three measured voltages from Figs. 6 - 8 should be equal .
Figs. 9 - 11 show the operation of the detector for the battery 1 having an earth leakage fault which is represented by an earthed resistor 11, 60% of the way along the battery from the negative end. Fig.9 corresponds to Fig.6 and represents measurement of the overall battery voltage. The resistive connection 11 to earth does not affect the overall voltage because batteries have a very low impedance relative to the earth fault. Therefore, the overall voltage will be correctly read as being the same as in Fig.6. If, for example, the battery 1 consists of five lOOv cells, then the measured voltage in Fig.9 will be 500v d.c.
On the other hand, when the negative terminal is earthed as in Fig.10, which corresponds to Fig.7, the meter V will see a voltage significantly lower than the voltage seen in Fig.9. This is demonstrated in the equivalent circuit shown in Fig.lOA. This circuit is based on the battery 1 having five lOOv cells, the is based on the battery 1 having five lOOv cells, the resistors 5, 6 being 500kΩ, the resistors 9, 10 being 51kΩ and the fault resistant 11 being 2MΩ. In this case, the voltage detected at the meter V is 435.2v.
Fig. 11 shows the position corresponding to Fig.8 where the positive terminal of the battery is earthed. Again, the meter V sees a lower voltage than in Fig.9. From the equivalent circuit in Fig.llA which is based on the same values as Fig.lOA, the voltage seen by the meter V can be calculated at 456.8v.
By comparing these voltages and determining that they are unequal, the presence of an earth fault is detected. Even for a fault spread along the length of the battery, although the readings from Figs.10 and 11 will be equal, they will be different from the reading of Fig.9 so that a fault is recognised even under these conditions.

Claims

1. A method of detecting earth leakage from a battery, the method comprising the steps of measuring the voltage across the battery, earthing the negative end of the battery and measuring the positive potential with respect to earth, earthing the positive end of the battery and measuring the negative potential with respect to earth, the three measuring steps being carried out in any order, and comparing readings from the three measurements and indicating an earth fault if all three are not equal.
2. An apparatus for detecting earth leakage from a battery, the apparatus comprising a first connection connectable to the positive terminal of the battery, the first connection leading to a first switch capable of switching the first connection between a voltmeter and earth; a second connection connectable to the negative terminal of the battery, the second connection leading to a second switch capable of switching the second connection between the voltmeter and earth, whereby the voltmeter can meaure the potential across the battery, the potential of the positive terminal with respect to earth and the potential of the negative terminal with respect to earth; and means for comparing the three potentials and indicating an earth fault if all three are not equal .
PCT/GB1999/004404 1998-12-29 1999-12-23 Method and apparatus for detecting earth leakage from a battery WO2000039599A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU18798/00A AU1879800A (en) 1998-12-29 1999-12-23 Method and apparatus for detecting earth leakage from a battery

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9828774A GB2345550A (en) 1998-12-29 1998-12-29 Battery earth leakage detection system
GB9828774.1 1998-12-29

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000039599A1 true WO2000039599A1 (en) 2000-07-06

Family

ID=10845128

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1999/004404 WO2000039599A1 (en) 1998-12-29 1999-12-23 Method and apparatus for detecting earth leakage from a battery

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (1) AU1879800A (en)
GB (1) GB2345550A (en)
WO (1) WO2000039599A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9783060B2 (en) * 2014-05-15 2017-10-10 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Traction battery leakage detection system for electrified vehicle

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2721407A1 (en) * 1994-06-21 1995-12-22 Renault HVDC circuit insulation esp. in electric vehicle monitoring method
US5561380A (en) * 1995-05-08 1996-10-01 Chrysler Corporation Fault detection system for electric automobile traction system having floating ground
DE19618897A1 (en) * 1996-05-10 1997-11-13 Varta Batterie Circuit for determining insulation resistance of accumulator battery in sole use
US5811976A (en) * 1997-01-03 1998-09-22 Joy Mm Delaware, Inc. Method and apparatus to determine the location and resistance of an electrical leak within a battery without measuring individual battery cells
WO1999005537A2 (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-02-04 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company In-situ fault detection apparatus and method for an encased energy storing device

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH08163704A (en) * 1994-11-30 1996-06-21 Fujikura Ltd Leakage detector

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2721407A1 (en) * 1994-06-21 1995-12-22 Renault HVDC circuit insulation esp. in electric vehicle monitoring method
US5561380A (en) * 1995-05-08 1996-10-01 Chrysler Corporation Fault detection system for electric automobile traction system having floating ground
DE19618897A1 (en) * 1996-05-10 1997-11-13 Varta Batterie Circuit for determining insulation resistance of accumulator battery in sole use
US5811976A (en) * 1997-01-03 1998-09-22 Joy Mm Delaware, Inc. Method and apparatus to determine the location and resistance of an electrical leak within a battery without measuring individual battery cells
WO1999005537A2 (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-02-04 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company In-situ fault detection apparatus and method for an encased energy storing device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2345550A (en) 2000-07-12
GB9828774D0 (en) 1999-02-17
AU1879800A (en) 2000-07-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
TWI398660B (en) Detecting device and detecting method for monitoring battery module
US20150088438A1 (en) Ratio metric current measurement
US5171091A (en) Temperature measuring circuit
US3982180A (en) Apparatus for testing multiconductor cables for continuity, correct connections, and the absence of short circuits between conductors
CA2898377C (en) Sensor interface circuits
US5416470A (en) Contact judging circuit and contact judging method for impedance measuring apparatus
CN108445361B (en) System and method for measuring grounding resistance of direct current system for electric power
US5757197A (en) Method and apparatus for electrically determining the presence, absence or level of a conducting medium, contamination notwithstanding
EP0133748B1 (en) Method for detecting and obtaining information about changes in variables
EP0418321B1 (en) A system and a method for detecting and locating liquid leaks
EP3206041A1 (en) A system and a method for monitoring transformer bushings
JP2018164358A (en) Disconnection discrimination device and wiring discrimination device of DC power supply circuit
US20150048840A1 (en) Neutral grounding resistor monitor
WO2000039599A1 (en) Method and apparatus for detecting earth leakage from a battery
HU225928B1 (en) Method and device for localising single-pole earth faults
JP2008232737A (en) Electric leakage detection method and digital tester used in the same method
US7116110B1 (en) Sensorless protection for electronic device
JPH01502391A (en) Cable failure detection device
JP4712594B2 (en) Method for determining erroneous connection of outlet with ground electrode and tester for determining erroneous connection of outlet with ground electrode
US3975683A (en) In-circuit diode tester
JPH08247857A (en) Input device for temperature detecting resistor
US4871972A (en) Apparatus for detecting faulty power line insulator
CN109141495B (en) Sensor interface device
KR102297426B1 (en) Controller internal resistance measuring apparatus and controller internal resistance measuring method
US20230396095A1 (en) Current Distribution Device Comprising A Load Detection Unit For Measuring A Detection Voltage

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase