WO2000034864A2 - Timeout object for object-oriented, real-time process control system and method of operation thereof - Google Patents

Timeout object for object-oriented, real-time process control system and method of operation thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000034864A2
WO2000034864A2 PCT/US1999/027659 US9927659W WO0034864A2 WO 2000034864 A2 WO2000034864 A2 WO 2000034864A2 US 9927659 W US9927659 W US 9927659W WO 0034864 A2 WO0034864 A2 WO 0034864A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
timeout
time
client
information
request
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US1999/027659
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2000034864A3 (en
Inventor
Thomas A. Clarke
Ellen B. Hawkinson
Ziad M. Kaakani
Christian R. Thomas
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Honeywell Inc
Original Assignee
Honeywell Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Honeywell Inc filed Critical Honeywell Inc
Priority to CA002353388A priority Critical patent/CA2353388A1/en
Priority to EP99962820A priority patent/EP1133727A2/en
Priority to JP2000587257A priority patent/JP2002532777A/ja
Publication of WO2000034864A2 publication Critical patent/WO2000034864A2/en
Publication of WO2000034864A3 publication Critical patent/WO2000034864A3/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/46Multiprogramming arrangements
    • G06F9/54Interprogram communication
    • G06F9/543User-generated data transfer, e.g. clipboards, dynamic data exchange [DDE], object linking and embedding [OLE]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/46Multiprogramming arrangements
    • G06F9/465Distributed object oriented systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/46Multiprogramming arrangements
    • G06F9/52Program synchronisation; Mutual exclusion, e.g. by means of semaphores

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed, in general, to process control systems employing object-oriented software and, more specifically, to a timeout object for an object-oriented real-time process control system and a method of operating the same.
  • Real-time process control systems were first implemented within a single computer system. As the need to monitor and control more physical devices increased, the complexity and size of the process control systems also increased. Shortly thereafter, single computer real-time process control systems were unable to process all the information within a timely manner as required by the real-time process control environments. To correct this processing problem, real-time process control systems evolved into multiple computer systems that were connected to each other with proprietary communication interfaces. The multiple computer systems processed data locally and communicated the information to the other computer systems over the proprietary communication interfaces . Since, the computer systems did not use a standard communication interface nor a standard protocol between each of the computer systems, modifications and additions to the systems were difficult, if not impossible.
  • Ethernet and TCP/IP allowed various computer systems the ability to communicate to each other without using proprietary communication interfaces.
  • the next evolution in real-time process control systems was object oriented distributed processing.
  • object oriented distributed processing requesting programs (“clients”) call resource programs (“objects”) to process a request.
  • clients and objects are located on different computers on the network .
  • Microsoft Corporation developed the Component Object Model (“COM") protocol.
  • COM Component Object Model
  • the COM protocol incorporated into software libraries called “COM libraries,” defines a standardized interface for locating and communicating to objects over the network without requiring the clients to know the location of the desired objects.
  • the process control industry incorporated the COM standard and Object Linking and Embedding ("OLE") in its real-time process control standard, calling the resulting standard OLE for Process Control (“OPC”).
  • OPC OLE for Process Control
  • the OPC standard defined the interface and architecture for distributed real-time process control object processing.
  • the new OPC and COM standards used the standard network protocol processing features, the standard network protocols did not allow programs to control requests based upon time. If the computer which contained the object died or was not available, the standard network protocols suspended execution indefinitely or for a very long time. Thus, the new OPC and COM standards did not meet the basic time processing requirements of real-time process control systems.
  • Real-time process control systems cannot afford to be suspended indefinitely if they use OPC or COM compliant programs. What is needed in the art is a way to prevent clients and objects from suspending indefinitely or suspending for a long period of time.
  • the present invention provides, for use in time-limiting a request for information from a client to a resource, a timeout object, a method of operating the same and a real-time process control system employing the timeout object or the method.
  • the timeout object includes: (1) a client interface that receives, from the client, the request and a time-based parameter and (2) a resource interface that forwards the request to the resource and waits for the information an amount of time that is a function of the time- based parameter, the client interface: (2a) returning the information to the client if the timeout object receives the information within the amount of time and (2b) returning a timeout indicator to the client if the timeout object fails to receive the information within the amount of time.
  • the present invention therefore introduces the broad concept of interposing an intermediary object between a client and a resource to channel requests and information flowing between the client and the resource to allow time-limits to be placed on the requests. This avoids the unacceptably long wait that can occur in prior art systems by virtue of their lack of timeout control.
  • the timeout indicator indicates whether the resource was available to provide the information. In a related embodiment, the timeout indicator indicates whether the resource successfully processed the request. The timeout indicator may therefore assume different values representing codes for such conditions.
  • the amount of time terminates when the timeout object receives the information from the resource.
  • the time-based parameter may be set to a null value. This charters the timeout object to wait an indefinite amount of time (subject to other kinds of timeout) until the resource returns the information.
  • the client interface is capable of receiving a subsequent request from the client to extend the amount of time.
  • the client may generate the subsequent request to extend the amount of time in response to receipt of a timeout indicator indicating that the resource is processing the earlier request, but did not return information within the originally-allotted amount of time.
  • the timeout object is a Component Object Module (COM)-compliant object.
  • the resource is an Object Linking and Embedding (OLE) for Process Control (OPC)-compliant object.
  • FIGURE 1 illustrates a block diagram of a real-time process control system that forms one environment within which the present invention can operate;
  • FIGURE 2 illustrates a block diagram of a real-time process control software architecture
  • FIGURE 3 illustrates a block diagram of a client, a resource and a timeout object constructed according to the principles of the present invention
  • FIGURES 4A and 4B illustrate a flow diagram of a method of time-limiting a request from the client of FIGURE 3 to the resource of FIGURE 3.
  • FIGURE 1 illustrated is a block diagram of a real-time process control system, generally designated 100, that forms one environment within which the present invention can operate.
  • the real-time process control system 100 comprises a network 110 that interconnects a server 102, an operator interface 104 and a field unit 106.
  • the real-time process control system 100 may comprise any number of servers 102, operator interfaces 104 and field units 106.
  • the network 110 comprises an industry standard network and industry standard network protocols.
  • the industry standard network is "10 base T,” employing twisted pair cables.
  • Other embodiments of the present invention use other networks comprising "10 base 2" employing coaxial cables, fiber optic cables or a combination of the two.
  • Wireless communications may also be used for all or part of the network communications.
  • the industry standard network protocols in one embodiment of the present invention, are ETHERNET® and Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol ("TCP/IP").
  • the server 102 comprises software programs that monitor, process information, and control the physical devices within the real-time process control system 100.
  • the software programs comprise a requesting program "client,” and a resource program “object” and other miscellaneous programs.
  • the client program sends requests to object programs to perform specific functions.
  • the object programs receive requests and perform the appropriate functions based upon the type of requests sent.
  • the client programs and object programs communicate over the network 110 or internally within the server 102.
  • the operator interface 104 comprises a computer and a display.
  • the operator interface 104 displays information concerning the current state of the system 100.
  • the operator interface 104 also accepts operator input to perform functions such as controlling a physical device or requesting other information to be displayed on a display associated with the operator interface 104.
  • the operator interface 104 may comprise both client programs and object programs.
  • the operator interface 104 communicates to other programs over the network 110.
  • the field unit 106 comprises object programs that perform tasks related to the physical devices that make up the real-time process control system 100.
  • the field unit's object programs collect status information, process data and control the physical devices.
  • the field unit 106 may perform more or less functions than described above.
  • the field unit 106 responds to client's requests over the network 110.
  • the real-time process control software architecture 200 comprises an operator display software 202, a data processor software 204, an alarm processor software 206, a trend processor software 208, a scan processor software 220, a historical processor software 222, a report processor software 224, a field unit software 230, a database software 240 and the network 110 of FIGURE 1.
  • the real-time process control software architecture 200 may comprise a plurality of the above software types.
  • the operator display software 202 displays the real-time process control system 100 information on a display or a plurality of displays.
  • the operator display software 202 also processes the operator requests and communicates to other real-time process control software over the network 110.
  • the data processor software 204 processes the data collected and the data generated from the real-time process control system 100.
  • the data processor software 204 stores and retrieves data to the database software 240 and communicates to other real-time process control software over the network 110.
  • the alarm processor software 206 performs alarm processing on the data collected.
  • the alarm processor software 206 notifies the operator display software 202 and the report processor software 224 of any alarm conditions or non-alarm conditions that exist in the real-time process control system 100.
  • the alarm processor software 206 also stores and retrieves information from the database software 240 over the network 110.
  • the trend processor software 208 performs trending functions for the real-time process control system 100.
  • the trend processor software will collect operator selected data, generate the desired trend information and distribute the trend data to the operator display software 202 and the database software 240 over the network 110.
  • the scan processor software 220 collects data from a plurality of field units 230 and converts the data into the appropriate form usable by the real-time process control system 100.
  • the scan processor software 220 distributes, over the network 110, the collected data to the other software processors so the software processors can perform their associated functions.
  • the scan processor software 220 also stores and retrieves information from the database software 240.
  • the field unit 230 collects the specific data from the physical devices attached to the field unit 230.
  • the physical devices are not shown since there are multitude of physical devices that can be monitored by a real-time process control system.
  • the field unit 230 sends the physical device data to the scan processor software 220.
  • the field unit 230 also processes control requests.
  • the historical processor software 222 collects and processes historical information about the real-time process control system 100.
  • the historical processor software 222 also performs archival functions and stores information to the database software 240.
  • the report processor software 224 generates the reports for the real-time process control system 100.
  • the report processor software 224 sends the generated reports to the operator display software 202, the historical processor software 222, the database software 240 and to printing devices if attached to the system 100.
  • the database software 240 processes all request for retrieval and storage of information for the real-time process control system 100.
  • the system 100 comprises a plurality of database software units contained on a plurality of computers.
  • embodiments of the present invention may include a plurality of processing software described above. Also, other embodiments of the present invention may include more or less processing software types and contain more or less functional capabilities then described above.
  • FIGURE 3 illustrated is a block diagram of a client 310, a resource 330 and a timeout object 320 constructed according to the principles of the present invention.
  • the client 310 is a software program that sends a request to the resource 330 to perform some function.
  • the resource 330 receives requests, performs a specific function and returns the results of the function performed to the client 310.
  • the client 310 Prior to the present invention, the client 310 would send a request directly to the resource 330. Then the client 310 suspends execution until the resource completes the required function. If the resource 330 never completes the required function or the resource 330 terminates for some reason, then the client 310 will be suspended indefinitely or until the network protocol software times out after a long period of time.
  • the client 310 uses a timeout object 320 to prevent the client 310 from suspending forever or for a long period of time.
  • the client 310 sends a request to the timeout object 320.
  • the timeout object 320 creates a thread.
  • a thread is a Microsoft Windows® NT operating system feature that allows a separate flow of execution within the same program.
  • the thread sends the client's 310 request to the resource 330 and waits for a response.
  • the timeout object 320 waits for a period of time specified by the client 310.
  • the timeout object 320 Upon completion of the request or expiration of the timeout period, the timeout object 320 returns execution control to the client 310.
  • the timeout object 320 also returns a status indicating if the request completed or the timeout period expired before completion. The returned status also indicates if the resource was not found, if the resource ceased operation while completing the request, or if the timeout object was unable to gain access to the network.
  • the timeout object 320 may return more or less information to the client 310.
  • the client 310 can initiate another request to the timeout object 320 to check on the status of the previous request.
  • the timeout object 320 may perform more functions than those described above.
  • Table 3-1 shows an example of the pseudo code for a timeout object.
  • the timeout object or code For each untimed method, the timeout object or code will have a corresponding timeout method and a timeout thread to perform the call on behalf of the client. There will also be an associated structure with each method to pass parameters between the timed method and timeout thread.
  • This pseudo code represents a snapshot of the required timeout code to support an untimed method. There is also a host of supporting code such as:
  • VB support - In other words, for every timed method and associated thread function, there is another chunk of code, which also has a timed method with an associated thread function to support the NB flavor of all calls.
  • Threading model identification There is code in place through out the code to identify if the client is either free threaded (multi threaded) or apartment threaded
  • BOOL bCleanupResults // indicator as to whether the timeout // object is responsible for cleanup
  • InterfaceX *plf // pointer to the actual interface within The server
  • Thread completed before timeout retrieve the returned data (from thread) as well as results set transaction ID to zero
  • FIGURE 4A and FIGURE 4B illustrated is a flow diagram of a method of time-limiting a request from the client 310 of FIGURE 3 to the resource 330 of
  • FIGURE 3 the timeout object 320 first performs initialization in a step 402.
  • the timeout object 320 receives the client's 310 request to be processed in a step 404.
  • the timeout object is not limited to the timeout object
  • the timeout object 320 processes new requests and pending requests.
  • the timeout object 320 determines if the request is a new request in a decisional step 406. If the request is a new request, the timeout object 320 builds a timeout structure used to keep track of information associated with the particular request in a step 408.
  • the timeout object 320 determines if the request is to be a timed request in a decisional step 410.
  • the timeout object 320 creates a thread and the thread performs the request in a step 420.
  • the timeout object 320 then waits until the specified timeout period expires or until the thread completes the client's request in a step 422.
  • the timeout object 320 determines if the timeout period expired before completing the request in a decisional step 424. If the timeout period expired, then the timeout object 320 returns to the client 310 a status indicating the request is still pending in a step 426. If the timeout period has not expired, then the request has completed. Then the timeout object 320 obtains the results from the thread and returns the results to the client 310 in a step 428.
  • the timeout object 320 performs the request and waits for the request to complete in a step 430. During this wait period, the client 310 suspends until the timeout object 320 completes the request. Once the timeout object 320 completes the request, the timeout object 320 sends the results of the request to the client 310 in a step 432.
  • the timeout object 320 also processes requests that are pending.
  • the timeout object 320 determines if the request is a pending request in the decisional step 406. If the request to be processed is a pending request, the timeout object 320 checks if the pending request has completed in a decisional step 440. (See FIGURE 4B).
  • the timeout object 320 obtains the results from the thread and returns the results to the client 310 in a step 450. If the pending request has not completed, then the timeout object 320 determines whether the request is a valid request in a decisional step 460.
  • the present invention provides, for use in time-limiting a request for information from a client to a resource, a timeout object, a method of operating the same and a real-time process control system employing the timeout object or the method.
  • the timeout object includes: (1) a client interface that receives, from the client, the request and a time-based parameter and (2) a resource interface that forwards the request to the resource and waits for the information an amount of time that is a function of the time-based parameter, the client interface: (2a) returning the information to the client if the timeout object receives the information within the amount of time and (2b) returning a timeout indicator to the client if the timeout object fails to receive the information within the amount of time.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer And Data Communications (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
PCT/US1999/027659 1998-12-04 1999-11-22 Timeout object for object-oriented, real-time process control system and method of operation thereof Ceased WO2000034864A2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002353388A CA2353388A1 (en) 1998-12-04 1999-11-22 Timeout object for object-oriented, real-time process control system and method of operation thereof
EP99962820A EP1133727A2 (en) 1998-12-04 1999-11-22 Timeout object for object-oriented, real-time process control system and method of operation thereof
JP2000587257A JP2002532777A (ja) 1998-12-04 1999-11-22 オブジェクト指向リアルタイム・プロセス制御システムのためのタイムアウト・オブジェクト、およびその操作の方法

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/205,769 US6279026B1 (en) 1998-12-04 1998-12-04 Timeout object for object-oriented, real-time process control system and method of operation thereof
US09/205,769 1998-12-04

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000034864A2 true WO2000034864A2 (en) 2000-06-15
WO2000034864A3 WO2000034864A3 (en) 2000-08-17

Family

ID=22763576

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1999/027659 Ceased WO2000034864A2 (en) 1998-12-04 1999-11-22 Timeout object for object-oriented, real-time process control system and method of operation thereof

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (2) US6279026B1 (enExample)
EP (1) EP1133727A2 (enExample)
JP (1) JP2002532777A (enExample)
CA (1) CA2353388A1 (enExample)
WO (1) WO2000034864A2 (enExample)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013086554A1 (de) * 2011-12-13 2013-06-20 Fts Computertechnik Gmbh Verfahren zur integration von edv-systemen in ein system-of-systems
EP3683636A1 (de) * 2019-01-18 2020-07-22 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Kontextsensitives audit trail eines technischen systems

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6279026B1 (en) * 1998-12-04 2001-08-21 Honeywell International Inc Timeout object for object-oriented, real-time process control system and method of operation thereof
US7444197B2 (en) 2004-05-06 2008-10-28 Smp Logic Systems Llc Methods, systems, and software program for validation and monitoring of pharmaceutical manufacturing processes
CN100505796C (zh) * 2004-11-24 2009-06-24 中兴通讯股份有限公司 一种手机显示时间的方法
US7774779B2 (en) * 2005-11-18 2010-08-10 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Generating a timeout in a computer software application
US9754265B2 (en) * 2006-05-01 2017-09-05 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Systems and methods to automatically activate distribution channels provided by business partners
JP5022141B2 (ja) * 2007-08-22 2012-09-12 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション データ通信を中継する中継装置、中継方法及び中継用プログラム
US8234331B2 (en) * 2008-02-01 2012-07-31 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for shielding open process control client applications from bad quality initial data
JP2009282907A (ja) * 2008-05-26 2009-12-03 Seiko Epson Corp データベースアクセスサーバおよびデータベースアクセスシステム
US9996443B2 (en) * 2014-11-03 2018-06-12 Entit Software Llc User action duration
US10401836B2 (en) 2016-03-21 2019-09-03 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Methods and apparatus to setup single-use equipment/processes
US10585696B2 (en) * 2016-11-08 2020-03-10 International Business Machines Corporation Predicting transaction outcome based on artifacts in a transaction processing environment
CN110099009B (zh) * 2018-01-31 2021-01-26 北京易真学思教育科技有限公司 基于接口响应时间趋势的动态限流方法及计算机可读介质
US10552081B1 (en) * 2018-10-02 2020-02-04 International Business Machines Corporation Managing recall delays within hierarchical storage
US10992808B1 (en) * 2020-05-14 2021-04-27 Nice Ltd Upfront customer time consideration along with optimized agent desktop in a contact center

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5726984A (en) * 1989-01-31 1998-03-10 Norand Corporation Hierarchical data collection network supporting packetized voice communications among wireless terminals and telephones
JP3516344B2 (ja) * 1990-10-22 2004-04-05 株式会社日立製作所 分散処理システムの多重データ処理方法
EP0514972B1 (en) * 1991-05-22 1996-03-27 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Multinode distributed data processing system for use in a surface vehicle
US6279026B1 (en) * 1998-12-04 2001-08-21 Honeywell International Inc Timeout object for object-oriented, real-time process control system and method of operation thereof

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
CHEN Y -J ET AL: "An Object-Based Model for Dependable Real-Time Distributed Systems" PROCEEDINGS OF WORDS'96. THE SECOND WORKSHOP ON OBJECT-ORIENTED REAL-TIME DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS (CAT. NO.96TB100036), LAGUNA BEACH, CA, USA, [Online] 1 - 2 February 1996, pages 192-200, XP002138880 Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, USA ISBN: 0-8186-7570-5 IEL Online Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://iel.ihs.com:80/cgi-bin/iel_cgi?sess=257281639&prod=IEL&page=%2fiel3%2f3783%2f11042%2f00506283%2epdf> [retrieved on 2000-05-24] *
FRAGA J ET AL.: "A Programming Model for Real-Time Applications in Open Distributed Systems" PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY WORKSHOP ON FUTURE TRENDS OF DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CAT. NO.95TB8106), CHEJU ISLAND, SOU, [Online] 28 - 30 August 1995, pages 104-111, XP002138879 1995, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, USA ISBN: 0-8186-7125-4 IEL Online Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://iel.ihs.com:80/cgi-bin/iel_cgi?sess=257281639&prod=IEL&page=%2fiel3%2f3998%2f11508%2f00524974%2epdf> [retrieved on 2000-05-24] *
MOON HAE KIM ET AL: "Modeling of a highly reliable real-time distributed system using the RTO.k model and the monitor object" PROCEEDINGS. THIRD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OBJECT-ORIENTED REAL-TIME DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS (CAT. NO.97TB100132), PROCEEDINGS THIRD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OBJECT-ORIENTED REAL-TIME DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS, NEWPORT BEACH, CA, USA, 5-7 FEB. 1997, [Online] pages 48-55, XP002138881 1997, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Comput. Soc, USA ISBN: 0-8186-8046-6 IEL Online Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://iel.ihs.com:80/cgi-bin/iel_cgi?sess=266914193&prod=IEL&page=%2fiel3%2f4830%2f13357%2f00609925%2epdf> [retrieved on 2000-05-25] *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013086554A1 (de) * 2011-12-13 2013-06-20 Fts Computertechnik Gmbh Verfahren zur integration von edv-systemen in ein system-of-systems
EP3683636A1 (de) * 2019-01-18 2020-07-22 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Kontextsensitives audit trail eines technischen systems
WO2020148171A1 (de) 2019-01-18 2020-07-23 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Kontextsensitives audit trail eines technischen systems
CN113302566A (zh) * 2019-01-18 2021-08-24 西门子股份公司 技术系统的上下文敏感的审计追踪
CN113302566B (zh) * 2019-01-18 2024-08-06 西门子股份公司 技术系统的上下文敏感的审计追踪

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20010018700A1 (en) 2001-08-30
JP2002532777A (ja) 2002-10-02
CA2353388A1 (en) 2000-06-15
EP1133727A2 (en) 2001-09-19
US6279026B1 (en) 2001-08-21
WO2000034864A3 (en) 2000-08-17
US6687730B2 (en) 2004-02-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6279026B1 (en) Timeout object for object-oriented, real-time process control system and method of operation thereof
Gaspar et al. DIM, a portable, light weight package for information publishing, data transfer and inter-process communication
EP1027796B1 (en) Distributed web application server
AU746391B2 (en) Method and system for facilitating distributed software development in a distribution unaware manner
US6618817B1 (en) System and method for providing a fault tolerant distributed computing framework
EP1025497B1 (en) Method and apparatus for performing transactions in a stateless web environment which supports a declarative paradigm
US6225995B1 (en) Method and apparatus for incorporating state information into a URL
US6710786B1 (en) Method and apparatus for incorporating state information into a URL
US7673029B2 (en) Grid automation bus to integrate management frameworks for dynamic grid management
EP0956687B1 (en) Web request broker controlling multiple processes
EP0912014B1 (en) A method, apparatus and program product for accessing a management information service provided by a server
WO2000007101A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for processing administrative requests of a distributed network application executing in a clustered computing environment
WO1999023558A1 (en) Method and apparatus for conducting a transaction in a stateless web environment
EP0598534B1 (en) Data processing system
EP0807884B1 (en) Method and apparatus for disposing of objects in a multi-threaded environment
CA2353414C (en) System and method for constructing an ole process control compliant data server from a noncompliant user application
Richner et al. Architecture of an MMS event manager
EP1533697B1 (en) Systems and methods for external service administration
JPH08191336A (ja) プロトコル管理方式
HK1028690B (en) Method and system for facilitating distributed software development in a distribution unaware manner
HK1029001B (en) Method and apparatus for performing transactions in a stateless web environment which supports a declarative paradigm

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): CA JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): CA JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1999962820

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2353388

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2353388

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 2000 587257

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1999962820

Country of ref document: EP

REF Corresponds to

Ref document number: 10083341

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20021205

Format of ref document f/p: P