WO2000006986A1 - Method for monitoring closed containers - Google Patents
Method for monitoring closed containers Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2000006986A1 WO2000006986A1 PCT/EP1999/005533 EP9905533W WO0006986A1 WO 2000006986 A1 WO2000006986 A1 WO 2000006986A1 EP 9905533 W EP9905533 W EP 9905533W WO 0006986 A1 WO0006986 A1 WO 0006986A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- internal pressure
- closure
- closures
- containers
- measured
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01L—MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE
- G01L17/00—Devices or apparatus for measuring tyre pressure or the pressure in other inflated bodies
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
- B07C5/00—Sorting according to a characteristic or feature of the articles or material being sorted, e.g. by control effected by devices which detect or measure such characteristic or feature; Sorting by manually actuated devices, e.g. switches
- B07C5/34—Sorting according to other particular properties
- B07C5/3404—Sorting according to other particular properties according to properties of containers or receptacles, e.g. rigidity, leaks, fill-level
- B07C5/3408—Sorting according to other particular properties according to properties of containers or receptacles, e.g. rigidity, leaks, fill-level for bottles, jars or other glassware
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
- B07C5/00—Sorting according to a characteristic or feature of the articles or material being sorted, e.g. by control effected by devices which detect or measure such characteristic or feature; Sorting by manually actuated devices, e.g. switches
- B07C5/34—Sorting according to other particular properties
- B07C5/3412—Sorting according to other particular properties according to a code applied to the object which indicates a property of the object, e.g. quality class, contents or incorrect indication
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M3/00—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures
- G01M3/02—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum
- G01M3/04—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by detecting the presence of fluid at the leakage point
- G01M3/24—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by detecting the presence of fluid at the leakage point using infrasonic, sonic, or ultrasonic vibrations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M3/00—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures
- G01M3/02—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum
- G01M3/36—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by detecting change in dimensions of the structure being tested
Definitions
- the internal pressure characteristic is typically the oscillation frequency of the closures; in the case of flexible containers, such as PET bottles, the fill level.
- Rigid containers for example glass bottles containing fruit juice or beer, have so far been checked for leaks by measuring the internal pressure. This test was carried out about 5 minutes after filling and closing. In the case of fruit juices which are filled in hot, a negative pressure is formed within this period by cooling, while in beer a slight excess pressure of 0.6 to 1.5 bar builds up due to the released CO 2 . A higher pressure builds up in fruit juices that are heated in a pasteurizer after sealing. It is known to determine this pressure by measuring the oscillation frequency of the container closure (DE-A-40 04 965 and DE-A-196 46 685). The measurements are subject to great uncertainty, since the measured frequency is obviously influenced by further parameters, which is why the international patent application "Method for testing closed-loop devices", which was filed at the same time
- the invention is therefore based on the object of improving the reliability of the leak test or the closure in a method of the type mentioned at the beginning.
- a criterion for the tightness or the correctness of the closure is derived from the determined value of the internal pressure.
- the internal pressure does not need to be measured numerically. It is sufficient to determine a variable that is representative of the internal pressure, or only to determine whether this variable is above or below an empirically determined threshold value.
- the time period between the attachment of the closures and the measurement of the internal pressure feature can be so great that a large number of containers are conveyed on the conveyor within this time period.
- the measurement takes place after 10 minutes, for example.
- the internal pressure characteristic can be measured after the pasteurizer.
- this feature is measured twice, namely the first time when the closures are attached to the containers and the second time in the aforementioned time interval.
- the deviation of the value obtained in the second measurement from the value obtained in the first measurement is therefore practically exclusively due to the change in the internal pressure, so that the difference in measured values indicates directly and generally even linearly the increase or decrease in the internal pressure.
- closure parameters closure parameters
- the internal pressure characteristic is measured from the measured value of this characteristic, based on empirical values which are given in value tables for which parameters are saved.
- the measured values of the feature and the parameters can be attached directly to the container by means of the marking.
- Another possibility is to number the containers by means of the marking and then to store in a computer for each container number the internal pressure feature measured when the closure was applied or the recorded closure parameters.
- the numbering can be done periodically, because on the whole the containers are moved one after the other or come out of the pasteurizer. If the containers are already numbered consecutively or periodically, this numbering can be used to assign the recorded value or the parameters to the containers.
- the marking preferably only contains information about the oscillation frequency of the closure, which was determined in the first measurement, the first measurement generally taking place immediately after the closure.
- the second measurement for example if an overpressure has built up in a beer bottle sealed with a crown cap, a different frequency is measured, and usually a higher frequency. The increase in frequency is exclusively due to the excess pressure that has now built up.
- the frequency is, for example, between 7 and 8 kHz, the differences between the individual bottles being caused by deviations in the thickness of the material of the crown cap and the different closing force of the closure heads (closure parameters). are conditional.
- an overpressure of 1 bar has built up, which means that a frequency which is 0.7 kHz higher is measured in the second measurement which is then carried out.
- This frequency increase is within the range of fluctuation, which is due to differences in the closure parameters.
- a frequency measurement only after the internal pressure has built up would therefore not allow a reliable statement about the tightness of the bottle cap; one could not safely differentiate between frequency deviations caused by differences in the closure parameters and those due to the increase in internal pressure.
- the marking can take the form of a barcode or barcode. In practice, this type of marking can be difficult since a barcode would then have to be affixed to the container or the closure, which is sometimes not accepted by consumers.
- the marking can also be applied with UV ink.
- the marking i.e. the assignment of certain recorded sizes to the containers can be done by transponders.
- the container or the closure can also be magnetically marked. This can be done via the material of the container or closure, for example in the case of ferromagnetic material, or by using a magnetizable one Lacquer similar to that of computer disks. Basically, there is the possibility of proceeding analog or digitally, i.e. via the strength of the magnetic field or only via the direction. Both methods can also be combined.
- Magnetic marking can be done in three different ways:
- a disadvantage of the analog method is that you have to control effects that affect the strength of the magnetization. These include e.g. the inevitable fluctuations in the material thickness and composition of the closure.
- This can be corrected by first impressing a writing pulse of a defined strength on the cover and reading it out.
- the magnetizability of the lid can then be concluded from the height of the reading signal.
- the necessary strength of the write pulse for information storage is then calculated on the basis of this information.
- Another possibility of correction is to carry out the magnetization in several directions simultaneously. For example, in the cover plane and perpendicular to it.
- the magnetization is then read out again in all three spatial directions and from the magnetization in two of the three directions the magnetization in the cover plane becomes e.g. calculated in the center of the lid.
- the information is then in the angle of the vector of the total magnetic field strength above the cover plane. So no alignment of the bottle is necessary.
- the effects of the magnetizability of the individual lids are eliminated.
- the height tolerance is corrected at the same time.
- Height tolerances of the bottles and thus the distance of the closure from the write or read head can also be actively measured and integrated into the evaluation of the magnetic field strength.
- the distance between the read and write heads can also be actively tracked to the bottle height.
- the digital method naturally has a better signal-to-noise ratio, since only the direction of the magnetic field is used as an information unit.
- Different areas of the cover must therefore be magnetized in different directions.
- the closure can be magnetized orthogonally to the cover plane in different orientations.
- Simple patterns for magnetization are stripes of different polarity or, to maintain rotational symmetry, concentric rings of different polarity.
- an increase in information density can also be achieved through a combination of analog and digital driving possible. For example, concentric rings of different orientations are applied to the closure and these are then added in several easily distinguishable levels of magnetic field strength. Each additional level then increases the number of the maximum possible amount of information (ie the different states).
- both the magnetization and the readout of the closures are direction-independent, i.e. the pattern of the magnetization is rotationally symmetrical to the axis of rotation of the containers, e.g. of glass beverage bottles with crown caps or screw caps.
- the closure can be magnetized in concentric rings. Another possibility is to store the information in the direction of the magnetization. Because of the required directional independence or rotational symmetry, only an angular range of 180 ° is available.
- a current-carrying coil possibly with a highly permeable core, is sufficient for writing analog signals.
- the strength of the analog signal is regulated by the coil current.
- a field formation can be generated by suitable pole pieces of the soft magnetic core of the coil. If the rotational symmetry is to be preserved, it is easiest to apply the magnetizing pulse perpendicular to the lid plane.
- the information is then contained in the amount and in the sign of the magnetization.
- the coil is to be attached as a write head above the passing containers and a current pulse of corresponding strength is to be generated when a container is under the write head.
- Simultaneous magnetization in several directions can be achieved by attaching two or more coils that are triggered at the same time.
- magnetic field strength and magnetic field shape can of course be optimized by means of appropriately shaped pole shoes.
- Magnetization patterns in concentric rings on the closure can be realized by nested coils, the direction and intensity of which are variable.
- the magnetic field of a current-carrying wire is sufficient to align electron spins of the sealing material.
- stripe patterns can be applied to the closures by parallel current-carrying wires. Patterns of ten stripes, for example, can be created in this way. Rotation-symmetrical magnetization patterns can be generated by wires in the form of a ring.
- Points made of highly permeable material can be used to generate high magnetic field strengths that can align the orientation of the electron spins of the lid material locally.
- the read head consists of one or more magnetic field sensors.
- the information is reconstructed from their output signals using analysis software.
- Hall sensors are sufficient for simple magnetization patterns. Magnetoresistive sensors which are significantly more sensitive than Hall sensors are preferably used. Of course, the much more expensive SQUIDs or the so-called GMRs (Giant Magnetic Resistivity Detectors) can also be used, but in general magnetoresistive sensors are sufficient and provide sufficient resolution to read out the magnetization patterns even at intervals of a few millimeters. Their output signals provide spatially resolved information about the amount and direction of the measured magnetic field.
- the magnetic flux density B that can be achieved in the material does not only depend on the impressed external magnetic field strength H ext , but also from the history of the material.
- Saturation magnetization and demagnetization of the closures are suitable as defined output magnetization.
- Saturation magnetization is achieved through a very strong external magnetic field.
- Demagnetization can be achieved by an alternating magnetic field of decreasing intensity, which is generated by a coil through which alternating current flows. If the container closure is moved past the extinguishing head, it automatically experiences a decreasing magnetic field, even if the coil current is constant.
- an extinguishing head is therefore sufficient, which is attached at a short distance above the container closures passing underneath it and is fed with alternating current of constant strength.
- the diameter of the erase head should be larger than the diameter of the closure to be demagnetized in order to be able to demagnetize it over the entire surface.
- Pulse duration decreases to zero (see Fig. 1).
- Pulse height is interrupted (see Fig. 2).
- the coding or marking of the individual bottles is not only for checking the tightness of the closure of glass bottles, but also for measuring the tightness of
- PET bottles can be used.
- the fill level is measured immediately after the PET bottle has been closed and then at a later point in time and from the comparison it can then be determined very precisely whether the bottle is tight. Normally, the pressure builds up after closing, since C0 2 is released. The PET bottle expands a little and this causes the apparent level to drop by a certain amount. If the PET bottle leaks in the area of the liquid phase, the fill level drops more. On the other hand, if the leak is in the upper area, i.e. where the air bubble is located, the level does not decrease. In the case of plastic bottles, one can therefore compare the level at two points in time apart Leakage can be found.
- the invention is explained in more detail below on the basis of an exemplary embodiment which relates to the testing of the tightness of beer bottles which are closed with a crown cap made of steel.
- the bottles are transported at a short distance or even under dynamic pressure on a conveyor belt with a throughput of up to 80,000 bottles per hour.
- the frequency of the mechanical vibrations of the closure of a filled bottle and fed on a link chain conveyor is measured. This is done in a known manner in that the closure is triggered by a short magnetic pulse and then the frequency of the oscillations of the closure is recorded by a microphone. This frequency is in the range of e.g. 7 to 8 kHz.
- the closure is then demagnetized using an erase head.
- a coil with a soft magnetic iron core serves as the quenching head, which is operated with a continuous alternating current of a frequency of approximately 100 Hz and a current of several amperes.
- the diameter of the coil is 3 cm and is therefore slightly larger than the diameter of the closures to be described.
- the coil has about 50 turns.
- the erase head erases all existing signals on the lock; So completely demagnetizes all closures of the bottles that are passed 5 mm below it.
- the write head is identical to the erase head and is supplied with a short direct current pulse between 1 and 10 amperes when the closure to be written is located directly below it at a distance of approximately 3 mm.
- the write head aligns the Weiss areas of the ferromagnetic material perpendicular to the closure plane and the strength of the direct current pulse can be used to control the remaining magnetic field strength (remanence) of the closure material.
- the right time for the magnetization pulse is determined by a light barrier that indicates the arrival of a container.
- the closures are marked in the same way.
- the closures are magnetized perpendicular to their surface.
- Bottles whose closures have a frequency outside the range of 7 to 8 kHz are immediately discarded because they are obviously defective.
- the range from 7 to 8 kHz is represented in analog form by the strength of the magnetization applied.
- a frequency of 7 kHz is represented by a field strength of 1 Gauss measured at a distance of 3 mm from the shutter when the magnetic field is directed downwards and a frequency of 8 kHz is represented by a field strength of 1 Gauss when the magnetic field is directed upwards.
- a total of 2 Gauss is therefore available for the reproduction of the frequency range from 7 to 8 kHz.
- the intermediate area is interpolated approximately linearly.
- the bottles then run through a labeler and after 5 minutes the magnetically encrypted information is first read out of the closure by means of the reading head.
- An inductive distance meter also measures the vertical position of the shutter and thus the distance between the reading head and the shutter.
- the read head is used in a uniaxial, magnetoresistive sensor.
- the reading axis is aligned perpendicular to the closure plane, the distance to the closures is about 5 mm and the bottles are with the closures in the middle under the sensor carried out.
- the sensor output signals of a few mV must then be electronically processed and amplified.
- the differences in the height of the individual bottles are also corrected at this point, for which the signal from the inductive distance meter is processed. Both the deviations in the strength of the magnetization or in the read out signal that result during reading and during reading are corrected.
- the transmitted information is then in the maximum stroke of the magnetic field strength of the closure just measured. This stroke is determined from the output signals of the magnetic sensor by the evaluation software and indicates the frequency of the mechanical vibrations of the closure determined during the first frequency measurement.
- the readout is in turn triggered by a light barrier.
- the current frequency of the mechanical vibrations of the closure is determined again.
- the same procedure is used for this second measurement as for the first measurement. From the difference between the values for the mechanical vibrations of the closure obtained in the first and in the second measurement, the pressure built up in the bottle between the two measurements can now be determined.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (11)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DK99940100T DK1101090T3 (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1999-07-29 | Method of checking container closures |
PL345571A PL192886B1 (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1999-07-29 | Method for monitoring closed containers |
BRPI9912558-7A BR9912558B1 (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1999-07-29 | process for testing container closures. |
HU0103118A HU223990B1 (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1999-07-29 | Method for monitoring tightness or proper closure of a container |
JP2000562729A JP2002521287A (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1999-07-29 | Method for testing container closures |
EP99940100A EP1101090B1 (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1999-07-29 | Method for monitoring closed containers |
US09/744,524 US6494083B1 (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1999-07-29 | Method for monitoring closed containers |
DE59907384T DE59907384D1 (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1999-07-29 | METHOD FOR CHECKING CONTAINER LATCHES |
AT99940100T ATE252227T1 (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1999-07-29 | METHOD FOR TESTING CONTAINER CLOSURES |
CA002336969A CA2336969C (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1999-07-29 | Method for monitoring closed containers |
AU54169/99A AU5416999A (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1999-07-29 | Method for monitoring closed containers |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE19834185A DE19834185A1 (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1998-07-29 | Procedure for checking container closures |
DE19834185.7 | 1998-07-29 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2000006986A1 true WO2000006986A1 (en) | 2000-02-10 |
Family
ID=7875736
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP1999/005533 WO2000006986A1 (en) | 1998-07-29 | 1999-07-29 | Method for monitoring closed containers |
Country Status (16)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6494083B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1101090B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2002521287A (en) |
KR (1) | KR100604996B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE252227T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU5416999A (en) |
BR (1) | BR9912558B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2336969C (en) |
DE (2) | DE19834185A1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1101090T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2209482T3 (en) |
HU (1) | HU223990B1 (en) |
PL (1) | PL192886B1 (en) |
PT (1) | PT1101090E (en) |
RU (1) | RU2224230C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2000006986A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102004054349A1 (en) * | 2004-11-09 | 2006-05-11 | Heuft Systemtechnik Gmbh | Checking the integrity of products in containers |
DE102005048653A1 (en) * | 2005-10-08 | 2007-04-19 | Lindenau, Andreas | Article e.g. drinking cup, has electronic circuit additionally to its body given by its intended purpose whereby article is formed by a packing preferably article of daily use |
US8191726B2 (en) * | 2006-07-20 | 2012-06-05 | Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. | Can end having curved end panel surfaces |
US7559222B2 (en) * | 2006-07-20 | 2009-07-14 | Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. | Method for testing can ends |
US7552612B2 (en) * | 2006-07-20 | 2009-06-30 | Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. | Systems for making can ends |
ITPC20060033A1 (en) * | 2006-08-01 | 2008-02-02 | Ft System Srl | CORRECT FILLING LEVEL CONTROL AND SEALING SYSTEM FOR BOTTLES AND CONTAINERS WITH FLEXIBLE WALLS |
FR2949893A1 (en) * | 2009-09-09 | 2011-03-11 | Sidel Participations | METHOD FOR AIDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF NON-COMPLIANT PRODUCTS MANUALLY SORTED AND INSTALLATION FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION |
DE102011083007B4 (en) | 2011-09-20 | 2022-12-01 | Zf Friedrichshafen Ag | Method and control device for controlling an electromagnetic actuator |
DE102012214381A1 (en) | 2012-08-13 | 2014-02-13 | Krones Ag | Marking device for marking containers, container treatment device and a method for marking containers |
DE102014109804A1 (en) * | 2014-07-11 | 2016-01-14 | Krones Aktiengesellschaft | Method and device for checking sealed beverage containers |
CN109433650A (en) * | 2018-12-29 | 2019-03-08 | 天津神菱燃气设备有限公司 | A kind of components air-tightness digital detection system |
CN113494901B (en) * | 2020-03-18 | 2023-12-05 | 北京京东振世信息技术有限公司 | Object placement direction detection system, method, device and medium |
CN111451175B (en) * | 2020-04-09 | 2021-12-24 | 台州市路桥自强喷雾器厂 | Facial mask packaging bag air leakage accurate detection device based on Bernoulli principle |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE4224540A1 (en) * | 1992-07-24 | 1994-01-27 | Heye Hermann Fa | Monitoring glass containers in manufacturing machine - thermally coding randomly selected containers and detecting thermal markings |
DE19646685A1 (en) * | 1996-11-12 | 1998-05-14 | Heuft Systemtechnik Gmbh | Methods for determining parameters, e.g. B. level, pressure, gas composition in closed containers |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3591944A (en) * | 1969-03-03 | 1971-07-13 | Safeway Stores | Method and apparatus for detection of leaks in seals of packages |
DE2839819A1 (en) * | 1978-09-13 | 1980-03-27 | Reutlinger Wolf Dieter | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR APPLYING A READABLE REFERENCE BRAND TO A BODY TO BE BALANCED |
DE4004965A1 (en) * | 1990-02-19 | 1991-08-22 | Sensys Gmbh & Co Kg | Testing of containers, esp. of foodstuffs, for closure sealing - applying and removing strong magnetic field, evacuating closure vibrations to determine underpressure in container |
US5392636A (en) * | 1992-12-30 | 1995-02-28 | Blackwell; Robert S. | Apparatus and method for leak testing pressure regulated LPG systems |
US5528925A (en) * | 1993-01-19 | 1996-06-25 | Luigino's, Inc. | Method and apparatus for testing the seal between a container and a flexible lid |
DE4308324C1 (en) * | 1993-03-16 | 1994-04-28 | Khs Masch & Anlagenbau Ag | Continuous inspection of reusable plastic bottles - involves sealing bottle mouth, increasing internal pressure, measuring pressure, remeasuring pressure and comparing with first reading |
DE19651924A1 (en) * | 1996-12-13 | 1998-06-18 | Dieter Olschewski | Container glass test methods and devices |
-
1998
- 1998-07-29 DE DE19834185A patent/DE19834185A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
1999
- 1999-07-29 WO PCT/EP1999/005533 patent/WO2000006986A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1999-07-29 AU AU54169/99A patent/AU5416999A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1999-07-29 ES ES99940100T patent/ES2209482T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-07-29 RU RU2001105544/28A patent/RU2224230C2/en active
- 1999-07-29 AT AT99940100T patent/ATE252227T1/en active
- 1999-07-29 PL PL345571A patent/PL192886B1/en unknown
- 1999-07-29 JP JP2000562729A patent/JP2002521287A/en active Pending
- 1999-07-29 US US09/744,524 patent/US6494083B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-07-29 HU HU0103118A patent/HU223990B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1999-07-29 CA CA002336969A patent/CA2336969C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-07-29 BR BRPI9912558-7A patent/BR9912558B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-07-29 DE DE59907384T patent/DE59907384D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-07-29 KR KR1020017001013A patent/KR100604996B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1999-07-29 EP EP99940100A patent/EP1101090B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-07-29 DK DK99940100T patent/DK1101090T3/en active
- 1999-07-29 PT PT99940100T patent/PT1101090E/en unknown
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE4224540A1 (en) * | 1992-07-24 | 1994-01-27 | Heye Hermann Fa | Monitoring glass containers in manufacturing machine - thermally coding randomly selected containers and detecting thermal markings |
DE19646685A1 (en) * | 1996-11-12 | 1998-05-14 | Heuft Systemtechnik Gmbh | Methods for determining parameters, e.g. B. level, pressure, gas composition in closed containers |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2336969A1 (en) | 2000-02-10 |
KR100604996B1 (en) | 2006-07-26 |
RU2224230C2 (en) | 2004-02-20 |
KR20010079557A (en) | 2001-08-22 |
PL192886B1 (en) | 2006-12-29 |
PT1101090E (en) | 2004-01-30 |
EP1101090B1 (en) | 2003-10-15 |
DE19834185A1 (en) | 2000-02-03 |
ATE252227T1 (en) | 2003-11-15 |
ES2209482T3 (en) | 2004-06-16 |
DK1101090T3 (en) | 2004-02-16 |
US6494083B1 (en) | 2002-12-17 |
HU223990B1 (en) | 2005-04-28 |
BR9912558A (en) | 2001-05-02 |
AU5416999A (en) | 2000-02-21 |
CA2336969C (en) | 2007-11-13 |
HUP0103118A2 (en) | 2001-12-28 |
JP2002521287A (en) | 2002-07-16 |
HUP0103118A3 (en) | 2004-01-28 |
EP1101090A1 (en) | 2001-05-23 |
BR9912558B1 (en) | 2013-03-05 |
DE59907384D1 (en) | 2003-11-20 |
PL345571A1 (en) | 2001-12-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1101090B1 (en) | Method for monitoring closed containers | |
DE2041853C3 (en) | Device for determining the validity of identification cards | |
DE2101906C3 (en) | ||
DE2712016A1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS | |
DE3535117C1 (en) | Method and device for measuring ferromagnetic objects laid in non-magnetic materials | |
DE3043810A1 (en) | Monitoring ink supply in ink printer - using metallic sensor changing magnetic field induced by ring coil | |
DE2834287C2 (en) | Device for checking the authenticity of ferromagnetic security threads in value prints | |
AT511332B1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DISCRIMINATORY DETECTION OF CONTAINERS FOR THE PREPARATION OF FOODS IN EXTRACTION MACHINES USING MAGNETIZABLE MATERIALS | |
DE3937881C2 (en) | ||
DE3152919C2 (en) | Method and device for magnetic testing mechanical properties | |
DE1623577C2 (en) | Magnetometer with direct time coding | |
EP1101089B1 (en) | Method for monitoring closed containers | |
DE19638776A1 (en) | Process for the non-destructive testing of a test object with a weld seam made of magnetizable material | |
AT398497B (en) | CODING SYSTEM AND CODE CARRIER | |
DE3028410A1 (en) | MEASURING METHOD FOR THE HYSTERESIS CURVE OF MAGNETIC MATERIALS | |
DE102019118767A1 (en) | Method for position detection of a rail vehicle on a rail traffic route and rail traffic route, set up to carry out such a method | |
DE4415592A1 (en) | Method and arrangement for testing metal threads, strips and particles | |
DE4031899C2 (en) | ||
DE2552685C2 (en) | Method for registering operating status information of a movable object, in particular a vehicle, on a multi-track magnetic tape | |
DE3919954C2 (en) | Device for transmitting data to ferromagnetic wheels of rail vehicles and for reading out the data stored in the wheels | |
DE19603355B4 (en) | Identification element and method for its production and method and device for its detection | |
EP3274924A1 (en) | Method and system for preventing forgery | |
DE3930946A1 (en) | Magnetic marking system for articles - has strip markings that pass through AC field to generate detector output | |
DE3728912A1 (en) | Measuring device for measuring electrical current intensity | |
DE4339844A1 (en) | Measurement appts. determining temp.-dependent magnetisation of pigments |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2336969 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1020017001013 Country of ref document: KR |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 09744524 Country of ref document: US |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP Ref document number: 2000 562729 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: PA/a/2001/001040 Country of ref document: MX |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1999940100 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1999940100 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1020017001013 Country of ref document: KR |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: CA |
|
WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 1999940100 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 1020017001013 Country of ref document: KR |