WO1999033041A3 - Remote computer-assisted compliance monitoring system - Google Patents

Remote computer-assisted compliance monitoring system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999033041A3
WO1999033041A3 PCT/US1998/027325 US9827325W WO9933041A3 WO 1999033041 A3 WO1999033041 A3 WO 1999033041A3 US 9827325 W US9827325 W US 9827325W WO 9933041 A3 WO9933041 A3 WO 9933041A3
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
student
response data
supervisor
stimuli
teaching process
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1998/027325
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO1999033041A2 (en
Inventor
Bret E Peterson
William M Jenkins
Michael M Merzenich
Paula Tallal
Steven L Miller
Original Assignee
Scient Learning Corp
Bret E Peterson
William M Jenkins
Michael M Merzenich
Paula Tallal
Steven L Miller
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Scient Learning Corp, Bret E Peterson, William M Jenkins, Michael M Merzenich, Paula Tallal, Steven L Miller filed Critical Scient Learning Corp
Priority to CA002281757A priority Critical patent/CA2281757C/en
Priority to JP53419999A priority patent/JP2001519957A/en
Priority to EP98964868A priority patent/EP0979498A4/en
Priority to AU20094/99A priority patent/AU2009499A/en
Publication of WO1999033041A2 publication Critical patent/WO1999033041A2/en
Publication of WO1999033041A3 publication Critical patent/WO1999033041A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B5/00—Electrically-operated educational appliances
    • G09B5/08—Electrically-operated educational appliances providing for individual presentation of information to a plurality of student stations
    • G09B5/14—Electrically-operated educational appliances providing for individual presentation of information to a plurality of student stations with provision for individual teacher-student communication
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
    • G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
    • G09B7/04—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student characterised by modifying the teaching programme in response to a wrong answer, e.g. repeating the question, supplying a further explanation

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

A student user of a client computer (102A) uses a teaching process to promote development of cognitive skills of the student, and a supervisor uses a second client computer (104) to remotely monitor the progress of the student. The teaching process (202, 208) presents various stimuli to the student and records student response data which correspond to the stimuli. Evaluation data is derived from the student response data (204) representing a correlation between the student response data for respective stimuli and predetermined correct response data for respective stimuli. The student response data is uploaded to a global student database (212) which is accessible to a supervisor user. The supervisor requests student response data (208) from the global student database and presents the student response data to the supervisor for analysis (222). The supervisor can use such analysis in direct consultation with the student at a later date or can recommend changes in the behavior of the teaching process (224, 226) to more effectively encourage development of the cognitive ability of the student.
PCT/US1998/027325 1997-12-22 1998-12-21 Remote computer-assisted compliance monitoring system WO1999033041A2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002281757A CA2281757C (en) 1997-12-22 1998-12-21 Remote computer-assisted compliance monitoring system
JP53419999A JP2001519957A (en) 1997-12-22 1998-12-21 Remote computer-aided compliance monitoring system
EP98964868A EP0979498A4 (en) 1997-12-22 1998-12-21 Remote computer-assisted compliance monitoring system
AU20094/99A AU2009499A (en) 1997-12-22 1998-12-21 Remote computer-assisted compliance monitoring system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US99596497A 1997-12-22 1997-12-22
US08/995,964 1997-12-22

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999033041A2 WO1999033041A2 (en) 1999-07-01
WO1999033041A3 true WO1999033041A3 (en) 1999-09-10

Family

ID=25542373

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1998/027325 WO1999033041A2 (en) 1997-12-22 1998-12-21 Remote computer-assisted compliance monitoring system

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0979498A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2001519957A (en)
AU (1) AU2009499A (en)
CA (1) CA2281757C (en)
WO (1) WO1999033041A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6529705B1 (en) 1999-07-12 2003-03-04 Paracomp, Inc. Computerized scientific method educational system for collecting and analyzing data from prerecorded experiments
AU6223200A (en) * 1999-07-28 2001-02-19 Erudite, Llc System and method for interactive multi-modal distance learning
US20020086275A1 (en) * 1999-07-30 2002-07-04 Boney James L. Methods and apparatus for computer training relating to devices using a resource control module
EP1208554B1 (en) * 1999-07-30 2005-06-08 Element K Online LLC Methods and apparatus for computer based training relating to devices
WO2001026074A2 (en) * 1999-10-01 2001-04-12 William Woodward Nash Method and system for implementing a learning community
EP1139300A1 (en) * 2000-03-21 2001-10-04 Gitronica S.r.l. Improved gymnasium
AU6733300A (en) * 2000-03-31 2001-10-15 Dsk Co., Ltd. A learning-assistance system
ITTO20000731A1 (en) * 2000-07-25 2000-10-25 Supersonica S R L EDUCATIONAL / OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTED BY A CALCULATOR FOR THE TRAINING OF USERS IN MATERIALS TO LEARN.
DE10058570C2 (en) * 2000-11-24 2002-11-14 Siemens Ag Automatic qualification management system
US20020169634A1 (en) * 2000-12-26 2002-11-14 Kenzo Nishi Healthcare system, healthcare apparatus, server and healthcare method
WO2014031101A1 (en) * 2012-08-21 2014-02-27 Empire Technology Development Llc Data migration management

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4759717A (en) * 1987-01-30 1988-07-26 Robotel Electronique, Inc. Teaching system using computors equipped with screens and connected in a closed loop with a teacher control station
US5597312A (en) * 1994-05-04 1997-01-28 U S West Technologies, Inc. Intelligent tutoring method and system
US5602982A (en) * 1994-09-23 1997-02-11 Kelly Properties, Inc. Universal automated training and testing software system
US5788508A (en) * 1992-02-11 1998-08-04 John R. Lee Interactive computer aided natural learning method and apparatus
US5829983A (en) * 1994-09-02 1998-11-03 Fujitsu Limited System for carrying out educational management

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5002491A (en) * 1989-04-28 1991-03-26 Comtek Electronic classroom system enabling interactive self-paced learning
US5437555A (en) * 1991-05-02 1995-08-01 Discourse Technologies, Inc. Remote teaching system
NL1000790C2 (en) * 1994-10-20 1996-04-22 Regionaal Praktijkcentrum Auto Registration and control system for computer-aided educational course

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4759717A (en) * 1987-01-30 1988-07-26 Robotel Electronique, Inc. Teaching system using computors equipped with screens and connected in a closed loop with a teacher control station
US5788508A (en) * 1992-02-11 1998-08-04 John R. Lee Interactive computer aided natural learning method and apparatus
US5597312A (en) * 1994-05-04 1997-01-28 U S West Technologies, Inc. Intelligent tutoring method and system
US5829983A (en) * 1994-09-02 1998-11-03 Fujitsu Limited System for carrying out educational management
US5602982A (en) * 1994-09-23 1997-02-11 Kelly Properties, Inc. Universal automated training and testing software system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP0979498A4 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2001519957A (en) 2001-10-23
CA2281757A1 (en) 1999-07-01
EP0979498A2 (en) 2000-02-16
WO1999033041A2 (en) 1999-07-01
EP0979498A4 (en) 2000-07-19
AU2009499A (en) 1999-07-12
CA2281757C (en) 2008-08-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Wallace Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach
Groen et al. Can preschool children invent addition algorithms?
Holden et al. Research self-efficacy: A new possibility for educational outcomes assessment
Van Orden et al. Intentional contents and self-control
GB2337844A (en) System and method for on-line essay evaluation
Highhouse et al. The validity of the Learning Style Inventory 1985 as a predictor of cognitive style and occupational preference
Totterdell et al. In situ repeated measures of affect and cognitive performance facilitated by use of a hand-held computer
WO1999033041A3 (en) Remote computer-assisted compliance monitoring system
Harvey et al. Bloom's human characteristics and school learning
Czaja et al. Stress reactions to computer‐interactive tasks as a function of task structure and individual differences
Sampson Jr et al. The Use and Development of the Career Thoughts Inventory.
Merrell Computer use in psychometric assessment: Evaluating benefits and potential problems
Stodden et al. Work evaluation and the mentally retarded
Das et al. Mental retardation and assessment of cognitive processes.
Crespi et al. Clinical supervision for school psychologists: Bridging theory and practice
Levy et al. A curriculum matrix for psychology program review.
Semmel et al. A Decision-Making Orientation: Applied To Student Teaching Supervision
Neal The data‐based instructional procedures of Precision Teaching
Brickey Normalization and behavior modification in the workshop
Dalali et al. Training of paraprofessionals—Some caveats
Horner et al. Putting behavioral units back into the stream of behavior: A consumer report
Egawa et al. A Support Method for Programming Education Based on Analysis of Each Learner’s Mental States
Fourie The development of a student rating of teaching effectiveness questionnaire
Schuerholz The use of technology and media in the assessment of exceptional children
Grusky et al. Clinical versus administrative backgrounds for mental health administrators

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2281757

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2281757

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 1999 534199

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1998964868

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20094/99

Country of ref document: AU

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1998964868

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: KR

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642