Acoustic / Visual Barrier. Ridge like. Hollow Structure.
Array of invention.
The present invention deals with a system for acoustic and/or visual barrier, to be
used for division between noisy transport arteries or industry zones and between
5. dwelling zones. The hollow structure of b-arrier enables to use the area and inside
thereof .as a major duct for infrastructures -and other use.
Background.
As a result of constant rise of motorization rates, combined with surge of
environment values and with growing density of metropolitan regions - the need
10. and use of acoustic and other barriers is rapidly growing.
Concrete and metal walls, as well as earth and stone ridges, are popping in land
strips dividing between road and rails to domestic quarters.
The common solutions are of two basic types, and some combination thereof.
A. Upright walls , made of reinforced concrete, blocks, metal, plastic, glass etc.
15. The walls are situated adjacent to the noise origin as close as possible. Common
height of walls: 3-7 Meters.
B. Earth ridges, usually with vegetation, with or with no stone terraces. Common
top of ridges 3-7 M. from highway level. Width of ridge base: 14-30 M. A
variant of this solution may be a ridge of earth / rocks confined with boards or
20. mesh of any material. This kind of ridge is less land consuming, but still
consumes some meters of a strip.
C. Combined barriers: e.g. a small earth ridge, with an upright wall on top of it.
This kind of combination consumes about 15 M. width of land, while top of
barrier is located 8-9 m. off the curb of the road.
5. Analysis: Advantages of upright walls are:minimal land consumption, good
acoustic effectiveness.
Disadvantages: Imprisonment feeling of protected people, stress on drivers close
to wall, high costs, radiating of noise in direction of the road.
Advantages of using ridges as barriers: Good visual integration in environment,
ιo. keeping options to add lanes to road, using ridge as dump area to fill surplus earth.
Possible planting gardens, better noise absorption. Disadvantages of ridges: Large
land consumption (see above), no space for infrastructures, distance of ridge peak
from origin of noise reduces effectiveness, high maintenance costs.
Brief description of the invention.
The presented invention provides a different and improved solution compared to
existing methods described above. The invention deals with an acoustic - visual
barrier especially to be used for separation between high capacity roads and rails
5. and between residential areas. The barrier consists of two inclined walls
connected to each other on top. The structure is hollow and empty except infra
structures installed inside, and in some cases structural elements. Cross section
of the structure may be triangle, trapezoid and similar. The .angle of the wall
facing the source of noise should be about 15% for best radiation of noise
ιo. towards the sky.
Walls may be made of concrete, metal, plastic material or else, all within
required standards.
Using barriers as ducts for metropolitan infrastructures depends heavily in
efficient town planning authorities and land developers to provide long and
15. consecutive stripes for this purpose.
Barriers may also be installed on top of existing underground pipes and conduits,
provided they are strait enough, keeping possible maintenance afterwards. In
suitable locations / cases the hollow barrier may be utilized for special crops (e.g.
growing of mushrooms) or for dwelling of animals (e.g. sheep, goats, turkeys.).
20. A/M options for utilization of space are not conditional for the invention.
Detailed description of invention.
The present invention deals with an acoustic - visual barrier especially utilized to
separate between noisy transport .arteries or noisy industries and between
residential - education - health structures.
5. The barrier consists of two inclined walls connected to each other on top. The
structure is hollow and empty except infra structures installed inside, and in some
cases structural elements. Cross section of the structure may be triangle,
trapezoid and similar. The angle of the wall facing the source of noise should be
about 15% for best radiation of noise towards the sky.
ιo. Walls may be made of concrete, metal, plastic material or else, all within
required standards.
Common preferred structure is triangular, dimensions: base 2-5 meters wide,
height 3-10 m.
Walls may be made of concrete, metal, plastic material or else, all within
15. required standards. It is possible to attach to walls racks / containers with plants,
or to plant special clinging vegetation that might cover the walls with green
appearance. Addition of vegetation is optional only.
Following is a description of three samples of numerous possibilities to
implement a barrier. Users may choose any of them, or others, as found fit to
local conditions or architectonic preference. Using the following samples does
not limit the extent of patent cover.
5. Fig. 2 & 6 describe barrier made of large pre-fabricated boards based on proper
foundations, connected to each other by the top. Boards may be of different
materials as mentioned above.
Fig. 3 & 10 describe barrier made of small pre-fabricated boards installed on kind
of pillars that , in turn, are based on proper foundations. The pillars are shaped as
ιo. triangles, thus resulting with a similar view of structure. Boards may be of
different materials as mentioned above.
Fig. 13 & 17 describe barriers similar to the former, but using only one wall
towards the source of noise. On the other side a wire mesh may be installed, to
enable vegetation to climb and cover the inside, whatever is there.
15. Important note: If barrier need to be located along curved road, boards of
different sizes should be fabricated to offset the different lengths required, if
curving is vertical, steps should be designed for foundations, accordingly.
The innovation and advantages combined in the proposed invention is summarized
as follows:
a) Minimal land requirement as compared to earth ridges. By the same token the
angling of the walls + the climbing plants offer to the spectators, drivers and
dwellers alike, a lesser threatening view. On top of it, the narrow land stripe used
may be utilized for some very good uses.
5. In some cases, where no public land exists between the road .and private property,
it may be found possible to construct the barrier on private land and let the
owners to utilize the structure for storage or else.
b) The barrier system according the invention is a light and cheap structure due to
the leaning of the 2 walls on one another.
ιo. c) The barrier may be designed of relatively light units, 400-500 kgs. each.
Therefor it may be manufactured in industrial plants and assembled in site by light
truck borne cranes. Thus minimizing labor time in field and possible obstruction
for traffic. In the case of barriers of complete segments, with no poles- larger
cranes are required - but assembly time is reduced.
15. d) The proposed barrier system, avoiding noise penetration to protected areas.
also contributes considerably to reduce resonance of noise in opposite direction.
This due to the inclined walls reflecting resonance toward sky, and partly to
"clinging" plants attached to the walls.
e) The pipes, cables and other infrastructures installed inside the barrier benefit
better defence from impact of weather , at the same time are better accessible
for maintenance and alterations. Thus reducing public expenditure and adding to
profits of utilities owners.
General Description of Drawings
Fig. 1 - Generalized scheme of hollow barrier.
Fig. 2 - Generalized scheme of hollow barrier, flat walls..
Fig. 3 - Generalized scheme of hollow barrier, stepped walls.
5. Fig. 4 - Side angled view of hollow barrier, flat walls, with planted containers.
Fig. 5 - Front view of hollow barrier, stepped walls, with planted containers.
Fig. 6 - Option for erection of complete segments, no poles, on top of ditch.
Fig. 7 - Option for erection of segments, with temporary stands.
Fig. 8 - Option for erection of segments, temporary pole, detail.
ιo. Fig..9 - Another option , with a top beam for reinforcement.
Fig.10 - Another option , step like walls with concrete pillars.
Fig. l 1 - Step like walls, concrete pillar, detail.
Fig.12a - Detail of (Fig.10) interface between step and flower box.
Fig.12b - Detail of (Fig.14) interface between step and flower box.
15. Fig. 13 - Single inclined wall, concrete pillar.
Fig. 14 - Step option, resting on metal poles.
Fig. 15 - Step option, metal poles, detail of pole.
Fig. 16 - Combined option, flat walls, resting on metal poles.
Fig. 17 - Combined option, stepped wall, metal poles, single wall.
20. Fig. 18 - Combined option, flat walls, concrete pillars.
Fig. 19 - Combined option, flat single wall, metal poles.
Fig. 20 - Combined option, stepped single wall, concrete pillars.
Fig. 21 - Combined option, flat wall, concrete pillars.
Fig. 22a - Detail: pre fabricated concrete wall section, notched.
5. Fig. 22b - Detail: pre fabricated stressed concrete wall section, notched.
Fig. 22c - Detail: pre fabricated concrete wall section, perforated, absorbing..
Detailed description of drawings.
Fig. 1 - Generalized scheme of hollow barrier.
The barrier , with inclined walls (3), separates between highway (a) and housing
ιo. area. The empty space inside the structure (1) is to be used as conduit for pipes,
cables and other infrastructure .
Fig. 2 - Generalized scheme of hollow barrier, flat walls..
Typical section of barrier with flat walls. In between the source of noise (a) and
receptor (b) , two inclined walls (2) are connected by leaning on each other. On
15. the walls planted boxes may be fixed, or any other decoration. The structure is
based on longitudinal or traverse foundations (4) to meet local ground
requirements. Along the structure (some times inside) a drainage ditch (c).
Fig. 3 - Generalizes scheme of hollow barrier, stepped walls.
Sample of barrier with step like walls. As described above (Fig.2 ), but walls (2)
may be shaped as steps for convenience of construction or for architectonic
reasons.
Fig. 4 - Side angled views of hollow barrier, flat walls, with planted containers. 4a
5. shows the inside of the barrier with spacing adjustable rods (28), two walls (1),
and two planted boxes (3). 4b show the connecting gadgets (26) and the planted
boxes (1).
Fig. 5 - Front view of hollow barrier, stepped walls, with planted containers.
The wall plates (2) may be made of any material with acoustic properties, 25-40
ιo. kgs per sq.m. Poles, if required, are shown by broken lines (5). On the wall are
attached planted garden boxes (3). Flowers and clinging plants (6) soften the
otherwise harsh view of barren walls. Location of foundations, if required, is
marked by (4).
Fig. 6 - Option for erection of complete segments, no poles, on top of ditch. The
15. barrier is manufactured in plant of complete segments containing two walls (2a),
connected to each other by metal rods (25,26) on top and adjustable telescopic
rods (29) down. The segments to be placed on foundations (27), that may be used
as a drainage ditch (28) for rain water coming from road (31), through release
cells (30). The placing notches (27b) on top of foundation to be filled with
cement grout after segments are placed and offset correctly. Beneath the
5. foundation (27a) a flattening layer of concrete should be placed. Close to the top
(32) rods should be attached for placing of cables or pipes, as well as the
spacing rods (29). The main advantages of this option: saving space by using the
same space for ditch and barrier, closer placing of barrier to source of noise,
minimal work along existing roads.
ιo. Fig. 7 - Option for erection of segments, with temporary stands.
This option is also for assembly of segments using a temporary stand (5) to lean
the segments against during erection. Again a segment of two walls (1, 2 ),
connected to each other on top by flexible metal connectors (26) . In this specific
option the walls may be transported to site , flat, like a closed folder. The
15. temporary stand (5) helps to open the closed "folder" while being lowered to
place. After fixing the segment to foundation (4), the telescopic legs (6) may be
lowered and stand moved to next segment. Then connection rods may be installed
for stabilization of the structure and for pipes and cables installation.
Fig. 8 - Option for erection of segments, temporary pole, detail.
Detailed drawing of temporary stand. Item (6) stresses the legs to be lowered or
dismantled to move the stand forward.
Fig..9 - Another option , with a top beam for reinforcement.
All previous described options may have a beam on top (8) to improve acoustic
5. effectiveness and add a planting box on top. Two more boxes (3) may be added on
foundations (4), while connecting trusses (4a) should be cast between
foundations. Inside a metal structure (5) is used to bear the walls (2) and any
other loads. Foundations (4, 4a, 4b). An opening for men to pass, (6).
Fig.. 10 - Another option , step like walls with concrete pillars.
ιo. The walls of barrier (1) are supplied as small panels (1) approximate. 4.00 by
1.00 by 0.12 m. The panels are assembled in site on concrete pillars (2) that are
stepped for this purpose.on top of each panel (1) a plant box (3) may be attached.
The pillars (2) have holes (5) to place through the cables and pipes. A large
opening (6) in the pole enables employees to move inside barrier while installing
15. and servicing the cables and pipes. The panels (1) may be made of reinforced or
pre stressed concrete or else. Panels may be decorated, or left to be covered with
plants.
A topping plate (8) serve the same function as described in fig. 9. The pillar
includes a hook (7) for lifting and assembly by crane.
The pillar (2) stands and is connected to a basis (4a) which is cast or placed on a
levelling layer (4b). The pillar should be designed according the height required
by the barrier. More details for the pole - fig. 11.
Fig.. 11 - Step like walls, concrete pillar, detail.
5. Most details are described un fig. 10. (4a) shows concrete parts of basis that are
cast in plant together with pillar, while the rest of basis should be cast in site
after putting the pillar in place.
Fig.. 12a - Detail of (Fig.10) interface between step and flower box.
The interface between the plant box (3) and two adjacent panels (1). Means of
ιo. connecting the box to structure should be designed to fit size of box -and material
of panel.
Fig. 12b - Detail of (Fig.14) interface between step .and flower box.
S-ame as above (12a), but corresponding to metal pole, fig.14.
Fig. 13 - Single inclined wall, concrete pillar.
15. A cheaper solution to replace kind of barrier in fig. 10. Pre fabricated concrete
panels (1) attached to concrete pole (2). Holes (5) for pipes and concrete
foundation (4). On top a roof panel (8) with plant box (3).
Fig. 14 - Stepped option, resting on metal poles.
Basic idea similar to fig. 10. except that poles ( 9, 10 ) are metal, not concrete.
The poles to be placed on foundations (4). The panels (1) placed on special racks
welded to poles, and the panels also fixed to poles -welded or screwed.
5. Top panel (8) , plant boxes (3), described earlier (fig. 10). Interface between wall
panels and internal structure (11) - see in Fig. 12b, opening (6) for men.
Fig. 15 - Stepped option, metal poles, detail of pole.
This drawing describes the metal pole to lean on it the barriers described in fig.
14 and 16. A structure made of two metal profiles (9), connected by smaller
ιo. profiles (10). The small profiles are serving two purposes: a. bearing the load of
walls leaning on the main ones (9), and b. bearing the infra - structures (pipes-
cables) that reside inside the barrier, opening (6) for men.
Eight variants, various combinations of the main options described above, are
shown in the next drawings 16-21.
15. Fig. 16 - Combined option, flat walls, resting on metal poles.
This combination , include flat walls (1) on metal structure. Vegetation boxes (3)
used only on top and at the bases. This combination is somewhat cheaper to make
and will last longer to be covered with vegetation. The poles (9,10) are as
described in fig. 15.
SUBSTΓΓUTE S ULE
Fig. 17 - Combined option, stepped wall, metal poles, single wall.
This variant may be even cheaper than the previous one. Based on fig. 14, but
includes only one inclined wall (1), to be towards the source of noise. On the
opposite side a wire mesh may be fixed to help vegetation climb. Center pole
5. (9, 10) is described in fig.15.
Fig. 18 - Combined option, flat walls, concrete pillars.
This variant is combined of flat walls (1), concrete pillars (2) , as few vegetation
boxes (3) as needed, plus topping board (8).
Fig. 19 - Combined option, flat single wall, metal poles.
ιo. Similar to that described in fig. 16. Flat single wall (1), metal poles (9,10). The
missing wall substituted by a mesh for vegetation planted in boxes (3) plus
concrete bases.
Fig. 20 - Combined option, stepped single wall, concrete pillars.
Again "half structure" is described, vegetation only on the single inclined wall.
15. This most economized variant uses half size of ground, and still may host some
infrastructure.
Fig. 21 - Combined option, flat wall, concrete pillars.
Similar to fig. 20, but flat wall. Concrete pole (2a), plant boxes (3) only on top
(8) and bottom. The pillar (2a) still has holes for pipes (5) and was described in
20. fig.s 10, IT.
Fig. 22a - Detail: pre fabricated concrete wall section, notched.
Fig. 22b - Detail: pre fabricated stressed concrete wall section, notched.
Fig. 22c - Detail: pre fabricated concrete wall section, perforated, absorbing..
These 3 drawings illustrate 3 possibilities, of numerous others, to manufacture
5. wall panels for the various barriers described.
22a, may be cast on site. 10-15 cm. thick. If required will have notches (12) to
enable fixing on poles with some overlap, (see fig. 14).
Stressed concrete panel (22b), will be manufactured in plant, 7.5-12.5 thick, may
also be notched (12), for a/m reasons.
ιo. Perforated panel (22c -13) should also be manufactured in plant. 10-15 cm. thick.
With an absorbing layer (14) attached if required.
In summary it need to be said that this invention include many variations, mostly
combined of 2 basic ones - those described in fig.s 2 .and 5. Human imagination
may add many more. Nevertheless, the basic ideas "starring" in this invention are:
15. Ridge-like green barriers friendly to drivers, passengers and residents without
waste of precious ground.
Barriers are hollow, to be used as conduits, saving more land and making
maintenance easier. Also help prevent mishaps of breaking lines through
negligence of contractors and heavy equipment operators.
Most, sometimes all, components may be manufactured in plants. Thus achieving
high quality and low cost at any weather. Erection in site is simple, easy and fast.
Most variants of barriers may be dismantled and components reused at any time in
future days when roads are to be widened.