WO1999021651A1 - Method for making catalysts containing silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve and catalyst thus prepared - Google Patents

Method for making catalysts containing silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve and catalyst thus prepared Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999021651A1
WO1999021651A1 PCT/US1998/021836 US9821836W WO9921651A1 WO 1999021651 A1 WO1999021651 A1 WO 1999021651A1 US 9821836 W US9821836 W US 9821836W WO 9921651 A1 WO9921651 A1 WO 9921651A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
catalyst
sapo
range
catalysts
molecular sieve
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1998/021836
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
William A. Wachter
Jeffrey T. Elks
Stephen N. Vaughn
Original Assignee
Exxon Chemical Patents Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Exxon Chemical Patents Inc. filed Critical Exxon Chemical Patents Inc.
Priority to AU98055/98A priority Critical patent/AU9805598A/en
Publication of WO1999021651A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999021651A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J29/00Catalysts comprising molecular sieves
    • B01J29/82Phosphates
    • B01J29/84Aluminophosphates containing other elements, e.g. metals, boron
    • B01J29/85Silicoaluminophosphates [SAPO compounds]
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2229/00Aspects of molecular sieve catalysts not covered by B01J29/00
    • B01J2229/30After treatment, characterised by the means used
    • B01J2229/42Addition of matrix or binder particles
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/0009Use of binding agents; Moulding; Pressing; Powdering; Granulating; Addition of materials ameliorating the mechanical properties of the product catalyst
    • B01J37/0027Powdering
    • B01J37/0036Grinding
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/0009Use of binding agents; Moulding; Pressing; Powdering; Granulating; Addition of materials ameliorating the mechanical properties of the product catalyst
    • B01J37/0027Powdering
    • B01J37/0045Drying a slurry, e.g. spray drying

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to catalysts comprising small pore silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieves for hydrocarbon conversions and oxygenate 5 conversions, and a method for making the catalysts.
  • Hydrocarbon cracking a widely practiced hydrocarbon conversion — is an endothermic conversion which commonly is practiced in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) mode or in a moving bed cracking mode. Heat must be provided for an endothermic conversion. Oxygenate conversion is an exothermic conversion.
  • FCC fluid catalytic cracking
  • Oxygenate conversion is an exothermic conversion.
  • the catalysts used in these conversions usually are fine powders with a particle size in the range of from about 20 to 250 microns in diameter, most typically averaging in the range of from about 50 to about 150 microns in diameter. If the catalyst particles are too large in diameter, then the particles will not possess the needed fluidization and other flow properties for fluidized-bed and moving-bed processes. If the particles are too small in diameter, then the particles will be carried out of the reactor by the flowing gas.
  • the catalyst is propelled upwardly through a riser reactor zone where the catalyst contacts a feed.
  • the coked or deactivated catalyst particles are disengaged from the products and any un-reacted feed.
  • the catalyst particles are transferred to a regenerator for regeneration.
  • the regenerated catalyst then flows downwardly from the regenerator to the bottom of the riser reactor, and the cycle is repeated.
  • the cycles of reaction and regeneration are carried out at high temperatures and high flow rates. Collisions and abrasions between catalyst particles themselves, between the particles and reactor walls and between the particles and other parts of the unit tend to cause physical breakdown of the original particles into smaller particles known as fines. This physical breakdown is called attrition.
  • the fines usually have particle diameters smaller than about 20 microns ⁇ much smaller than the starting particles.
  • Most commercial reactors are fitted with cyclones to recover the fines, and/or with electrostatic precipitators to prevent the fines from becoming airborne.
  • Catalysts with higher attrition resistance are desirable because, among other reasons, fewer fines are generated for disposal, less environmental impact is caused by un-recoverable airborne particulates, operating costs are lower, and less catalyst is required due to reduced catalyst consumption.
  • the present invention provides a method for making a catalyst comprising forming a mixture comprising an alumina sol, and silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieves comprising pores having a diameter in the range of from about 3 Angstroms to about 5 Angstroms, and drying said mixture.
  • Hydrocarbon and oxygenate conversion catalysts such as fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts and methanol-to-olefins (MTO) catalysts, respectively, are used most frequently in fluidized bed or moving bed systems. As a result, such catalysts constantly are exposed to harsh chemical and physical conditions both during the hydrocarbon and oxygenate conversion reactions, and during catalyst regeneration.
  • FCC fluid catalytic cracking
  • MTO methanol-to-olefins
  • the present invention relates to methods for making such catalysts to increase their attrition resistance
  • the method involves mixing molecular sieves with an alumina sol and then drying the mixture.
  • Hydrocarbon conversion catalysts and oxygenate conversion catalysts generally have several components in their formulation: a microporous zeolitic or microporous non-zeolitic molecular sieve, an inorganic oxide matrix, and optionally other materials and modifiers, such as a clay.
  • Suitable molecular sieves include small pore, non-zeolitic microporous crystalline frameworks.
  • the crystalline frameworks are three-dimensional and have well defined pore diameters.
  • Small pore molecular sieves are defined herein as molecular sieves with pores having a diameter in the range of from about 3.0 Angstroms to about 5.0 Angstroms.
  • Suitable non-zeolitic molecular sieves include, but are not necessarily limited to silicoaluminophosphates ("SAPO's"). SAPO's have a three-dimensional microporous crystalline framework of PO 2 + , AlO 2 " , and SiO 2 tetrahedral units. Suitable SAPO's include, but are not necessarily limited to SAPO-17, SAPO-18, SAPO-34, SAPO-44, and mixtures thereof. A preferred SAPO is SAPO-34, which may be synthesized according to US-A-4,440,871, incorporated herein by reference, and Zeolites, Vol. 17, pp 512-522 (1996), incorporated herein by reference.
  • SAPO's with substituents also may be used in the present invention.
  • Suitable substituted SAPO molecular sieves include, but are not necessarily limited to
  • MeAPSO's and “MeAPO's.” MeAPSO's contain at least some silicon in their framework. MeAPO's may or may not contain silicon. Examples of suitable metals (Me) are nickel, iron, cobalt, manganese and magnesium.
  • SAPO, MeAPO and MeAPSO molecular sieves can be modified further by using, for example, magnesium, calcium, strontium, barium, lanthanides, actinides and mixtures thereof.
  • a preferred modifier is strontium.
  • Preferred modified SAPO's are strontium modified SAPO- 17 (Sr-SAPO-17), strontium modified SAPO- 18 (Sr- SAPO-18) and strontium modified SAPO-34 (Sr-SAPO-34).
  • the amount of the molecular sieve used in the mixture should form a catalyst composition having in the range of from about 3 wt% to about 99 wt%, preferably from about 5 wt% to about 90 wt%, and most preferably from about 10 wt% to about 80 wt% molecular sieve.
  • an inorganic oxide matrix usually is needed in the catalyst formulation to provide physical strength and better heat transfer, among other desirable properties.
  • a preferred inorganic oxide matrix is formed from a sol comprising an alumina sol.
  • alumina sol means that the sol predominantly comprises alumina. Even an alumina sol may contain small amounts of silicon atoms.
  • the inorganic oxide sol in the catalyst essentially is a "glue" which binds the group of catalyst components together.
  • a preferred sol has a relatively low viscosity.
  • an inorganic oxide matrix is formed.
  • the individual catalyst components which are "glued” together by the matrix are in the range of about 0.3 to about 10.0 microns in size.
  • the inorganic oxide matrix formed between the individual catalyst components in the final product has a measurable diameter of less than 100 microns.
  • An alumina sol useful in the present invention typically is derived from a material selected from the group consisting of aluminum chlorohydrol, peptized boehmite, and mixtures thereof.
  • Aluminum chlorohydrol has a general formula of Al 13 O 4 (OH) 24 Cl 7 « 12H 2 O.
  • a preferred alumina sol is made by forming a solution of a starting material wherein the particle components do not form a gel.
  • the pH of the alumina sol preferably is in the range of from about 2 to about 10. More preferably, the pH is in the range of from about 3 to about 9.
  • the pH of the inorganic oxide sol can be measured using standard glass electrodes or other methods known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • the inorganic oxide sol may be made using a batch, continuous, or semi-continuous process.
  • a sufficient amount of the alumina sol is used to prepare the catalyst to cause the amount of the resultant aluminum oxide matrix in the finished catalyst to be in the range of from about 2 wt% to about 98 wt%, preferably from about 5 wt% to about 90 wt%, and more preferably from about 10 wt% to about 80 wt%.
  • alumina phases may be incorporated into the aluminum oxide matrix of the present invention.
  • Materials that can be used to form such phases include, but are not necessarily limited to aluminum oxyhydroxide, ⁇ -alumina, boehmite, diaspore, and transitional aluminas such as ⁇ -alumina, ⁇ -alumina, ⁇ -alumina, ⁇ -alumina, ⁇ -alumina, and p-alumina.
  • Aluminum trihydroxide such as gibbsite, bayerite, nordstrandite, doyelite, and mixtures thereof, also can be used.
  • Catalysts made according to the present invention also may contain other components, preferably a clay. Kaolin is a preferred clay.
  • kaolin is used in an amount sufficient to form a finished catalyst composition comprising kaolin in the range of from about 10 wt% to about 90 wt%, preferably from about 15 wt% to about 85 wt%, and more preferably from about 20 wt% to about 80 wt%.
  • the molecular sieve, an alumina sol, and optionally a clay are mixed to form a slurry.
  • the catalyst can be made using a batch, continuous, or semi-continuous mode.
  • the mixing can be carried out at a temperature in the range of from about -10°C to about 50°C. Pressure and atmosphere are not critical. In a preferred embodiment, the mixing can be carried out at a pressure in the range of from about 100 kPa to about 500 kPa, and in an atmosphere of air or nitrogen.
  • the resultant slurry may be colloid- milled in the range of from about one to about five times for a total time period in the range of from about 3 seconds to about 5 minutes to obtain a desired particle texture, particle size, and/or particle size distribution.
  • the slurry then is dried using known means.
  • the slurry is spray dried.
  • spray drying the slurry is fed into a nozzle which breaks the slurry into small particles.
  • the particles then are dried in a co-current or counter-current flow of air through the spray drier.
  • a dry powder catalyst is recovered.
  • the dry powder catalyst may be ground in the range of from about one to about five times, for a total period of time in the range of from about one to about five hours, in order to obtain a desired particle size and/or particle size distribution.
  • the spray-dried catalysts may be used without further treatment.
  • the spray-dried catalysts are calcined at an elevated temperature in the range of from about 400°C to about 1000°C, preferably in the range from about 500°C to about 850°C.
  • the calcination time depends on the catalyst formulation and the temperature of calcination. The time should be in the range of from about 0.5 hours to about 48 hours, preferably from about 2 hours to about 24 hours.
  • the pressure and the atmosphere used during calcination are not critical, and should be selected to give the desired oxidation states of any easily reducible or oxidizable elements present in the catalyst.
  • the sprayed dried catalysts also may be ion exchanged before or after the calcination.
  • aluminum chlorohydrol is used as the starting material, it is preferred to carry out the ion-exchange step, if performed, after calcination.
  • Catalysts made according to the present invention have increased attrition resistance properties. Resistance to attrition is a measurement of the hardness of a catalyst, or how well the catalyst resists wear under test or process conditions. A catalyst with good attrition resistance will last longer and is more desirable than a catalyst with poor attrition resistance. Poor attrition resistance leads to the production of more fines that may escape from the processing units and cause environmental problems.
  • the test used to measure attrition resistance according to the present invention is the "extended attrition test.”
  • a Jet Cup Attritor is used.
  • Attrition products ( ⁇ 20 microns) are measured gravimetrically and the data are used to calculate the attrition rate of the catalyst.
  • An extended attrition index is obtained by measuring the amount by weight of particles smaller than about 2.6 microns generated during the test. Generally, the fewer particles having a diameter smaller than about 2.6 Angstroms produced, the more attrition resistant the catalyst.
  • the attrition products also are analyzed for particle size distribution using a Leeds & Northrop Microtrac ® Small Particle Analyzer. Surface areas and pore volumes are measured using Coulter Omnisorb ® 610 instrument.
  • Catalysts made according to the present invention can be used for a number of purposes, preferably to convert oxygenates and/or hydrocarbons to lower molecular weight products, most preferably to lower olefins (ethylene, propylene, and butenes and mixtures thereof).
  • Suitable reactors include, but are not necessarily limited to fixed bed reactors, moving bed reactors, fluidized bed reactors, or other similar types of reactors.
  • Oxygenates can be converted to olefins by contacting a feed with a catalyst of the present invention under conditions effective to produce olefins.
  • Preferred olefins are lower olefins — ethylene, propylene, butenes, and mixtures thereof.
  • Oxygenates suitable for such conversions include, but are not necessarily limited to aliphatic alcohols, aliphatic ethers, aliphatic carbonyl compounds (aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, esters, carbonates and the like), alkyl halides, alkyl amines, and mixtures thereof.
  • Preferred oxygenates are methanol, ethanol, n- propanol, isopropanol, n-butanol, sec-butanol, dimethyl ether, methylethyl ether, diethyl ether, dimethyl carbonate, and mixtures thereof.
  • Effective conditions for oxygenate conversions are: temperature in the range of from about 200 °C to about 800°C; pressure in the range of from about 1 kPa to about 2 Mpa; Weight Hourly Space Velocity (WHSN) in the range of from about 0.01 h "1 to about 10,000 h "1 . Because the feed may contain diluents and the catalyst may contain filler and/or binder materials, WHSN is calculated on the weight of the oxygenate feed itself and the weight of the molecular sieve component in the catalyst.
  • the oxygenate feed may comprise an amount of diluent in the range of from about 0 wt% to about 95 wt% of the total feed.
  • Suitable diluents include but are not necessarily limited to water (steam), CO 2 , hydrogen, nitrogen, argon, and mixtures thereof.
  • Deactivated catalysts may be regenerated. Regeneration can be carried out in the conversion reactor or in a separate regeneration reactor. Regeneration usually is carried out at elevated temperatures, 350 °C to 950°C, and in the presence of an oxygen containing atmosphere. Treating a deactivated catalyst with hydrogen at elevated temperatures also may be effective to regenerate the catalytic performance of the oxygenate conversion catalyst.
  • the catalysts also can be used to convert hydrocarbons to products having lower molecular weights than the feedstock hydrocarbons. Hydrocarbon feedstocks include, but are not necessarily limited to naphtha and similar hydrocarbons.
  • the feedstocks comprise mostly non-aromatic compounds with at least five carbon atoms.
  • Preferred products comprise lower olefins (ethylene, propylene, and butenes) and aromatics.
  • Typical reaction conditions for hydrocarbon conversions are: temperature in the range of from about 250 °C to about 900°C; pressure in the range of from about 1 kPa to about 2 Mpa; WHSN in the range of from about 0.01 h "1 to about 10,000 h "1 .
  • WHSV is calculated on the weight of the hydrocarbon feed itself and the weight of the molecular sieve component in the catalyst.
  • Diluents such as water (steam), CO 2 , hydrogen, nitrogen, and others can be mixed with the feedstock.
  • the amount of diluent preferably comprises in the range of from about 0 wt% to about 95 wt% of the total feed.
  • the hydrocarbon feed is contacted with the catalyst in a conversion reactor under effective conditions for conversion.
  • Suitable conversion reactors are fixed bed reactors, a moving bed reactors, fluidized bed reactors, or other similar types of reactors.
  • a catalyst was prepared as follows:
  • the slurry was spray dried in an Anhydro PN Spray Drier ® at Moyno pump setting 2.1; 10,000 rpm; 288°C inlet temperature and the outlet temperature between 177°C and 160°C. 2.2 lb of coarse catalyst product and 0.9 lb of fines were collected from the spray drier. The spray dried powder was calcined at 816°C for 2 hours.
  • the resulting catalyst was subjected to the extended attrition test to determine its extended attrition index.
  • the results of this experiment and the following experiments are shown in TABLE I.
  • the test catalyst exhibited a good extended attrition index of 11.
  • Commercially available catalysts also were tested under similar attrition testing conditions.
  • the series of commercial catalysts tested were Engelhard Reduction ® , Grace Spectra ® , Grace Ramcat ® , Akzo Advance ® , and Akzo Vision ® catalysts.
  • the catalyst prepared according to this example was significantly more attrition resistant than the tested commercial catalysts.
  • a catalyst was prepared as described in EXAMPLE I, except that after spray drying, the spray-dried powder was calcined at 760°C for two hours.
  • the resultant catalyst was subjected to the extended attrition test to determine its extended attrition index. As shown in TABLE I, the catalyst exhibited a good extended attrition index of 10. The test catalyst was significantly more attrition resistant than the tested commercial catalysts. Furthermore, the catalyst calcined at the lower temperature as prepared in this EXAMPLE was more attrition resistant.
  • the slurry was spray dried in an .Anhydro PN Spray Drier at Moyno pump setting 2J; 10,000 rpm; 288°C inlet temperature and the outlet temperature between 177°C and 160°C. 2.2 lb of coarse catalyst product and 0.9 lb of fines were collected from the spray drier. The spray dried powder was calcined at 816°C for 2 hours.
  • the resulting catalyst was subjected to the extended attrition test to determine its extended attrition index. As shown in TABLE I, the catalyst exhibited a good extended attrition index of 7. The test catalyst was significantly more attrition resistant than the tested commercial catalysts.
  • a catalyst of the present invention was prepared similar to EXAMPLE I, except that after spray drying, the spray-dried powder was calcined at 760°C for two hours.
  • the resultant catalyst was subjected to the extended attrition test to determine its extended attrition index. As shown in TABLE I, the calcined catalyst exhibited a good extended attrition index of 6. The test catalyst was significantly more attrition resistant than the tested commercial catalysts. Furthermore, the catalyst calcined at the lower temperature as prepared in this EXAMPLE was more attrition resistant.
  • Attrition test results showed that catalysts of the present invention made significantly fewer microfines than commercial catalysts.
  • the catalysts of the present invention produced microfines in a range of from about 15 to about 23.
  • commercial catalysts generated microfines in the range of from about 18 to about 52.
  • the catalysts calcined at a lower temperature (760°C) were more attrition resistant than the catalysts calcined at a higher temperature (816°C).

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)

Abstract

A method for making a catalyst comprising forming a mixture comprising an inorganic sol and a silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve having pores of a diameter less than about 5 Angstroms, and drying the mixture. The present invention is also directed to a catalyst including a silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve having pores of a diameter less than 5 Angstroms; and an aluminum oxide matrix derived from an alumina sol.

Description

Method for maki ng catal ysts contai ni ng si l i coal umi nophosphate mol ecul ar si eve and catalyst thus prepared
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to catalysts comprising small pore silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieves for hydrocarbon conversions and oxygenate 5 conversions, and a method for making the catalysts.
Background of the Invention
Many hydrocarbon conversions and oxygenate conversions are used in the petrochemical, chemical and refining industries. The conversion processes produce olefms, gasoline, fuel oils, and many other valuable products. Most of the processes
10 are catalyzed by molecular-sieve containing catalysts. Hydrocarbon cracking - a widely practiced hydrocarbon conversion — is an endothermic conversion which commonly is practiced in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) mode or in a moving bed cracking mode. Heat must be provided for an endothermic conversion. Oxygenate conversion is an exothermic conversion. Different operating modes, including fixed
15 bed, fluidized bed and moving bed modes, also have been used and tested for oxygenate conversions. Heat must be removed for an exothermic conversion.
Both fluidized bed and moving bed processes commonly are carried out in a cyclic mode. The hydrocarbon and oxygenate feedstocks are contacted in a reactor with hot, active catalysts particles at an elevated temperature and a modest pressure.
20 As the feedstocks are converted to the desired valuable products, undesirable residue known as coke forms on the catalyst. The coke tends to cause the catalyst to lose its activity and become deactivated. The deactivated particulate catalysts then are disengaged from the feedstock, sometimes stripped of residual hydrocarbons, and sent to a regenerator for regeneration. Regeneration usually is carried out at elevated
25 temperature with a controlled burn of the coke in the presence of oxygen and a diluent inert gas to minimize unintended temperature surges. In some cases, regeneration is effected by hydrogen stripping at elevated temperature. The catalysts used in these conversions usually are fine powders with a particle size in the range of from about 20 to 250 microns in diameter, most typically averaging in the range of from about 50 to about 150 microns in diameter. If the catalyst particles are too large in diameter, then the particles will not possess the needed fluidization and other flow properties for fluidized-bed and moving-bed processes. If the particles are too small in diameter, then the particles will be carried out of the reactor by the flowing gas.
In most reactor designs, the catalyst is propelled upwardly through a riser reactor zone where the catalyst contacts a feed. The coked or deactivated catalyst particles are disengaged from the products and any un-reacted feed. After stripping, the catalyst particles are transferred to a regenerator for regeneration. The regenerated catalyst then flows downwardly from the regenerator to the bottom of the riser reactor, and the cycle is repeated.
The cycles of reaction and regeneration are carried out at high temperatures and high flow rates. Collisions and abrasions between catalyst particles themselves, between the particles and reactor walls and between the particles and other parts of the unit tend to cause physical breakdown of the original particles into smaller particles known as fines. This physical breakdown is called attrition. The fines usually have particle diameters smaller than about 20 microns ~ much smaller than the starting particles. Most commercial reactors are fitted with cyclones to recover the fines, and/or with electrostatic precipitators to prevent the fines from becoming airborne.
Catalysts with higher attrition resistance are desirable because, among other reasons, fewer fines are generated for disposal, less environmental impact is caused by un-recoverable airborne particulates, operating costs are lower, and less catalyst is required due to reduced catalyst consumption. Summary of the Invention
The present invention provides a method for making a catalyst comprising forming a mixture comprising an alumina sol, and silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieves comprising pores having a diameter in the range of from about 3 Angstroms to about 5 Angstroms, and drying said mixture.
Detailed Description of the Invention
Hydrocarbon and oxygenate conversion catalysts, such as fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts and methanol-to-olefins (MTO) catalysts, respectively, are used most frequently in fluidized bed or moving bed systems. As a result, such catalysts constantly are exposed to harsh chemical and physical conditions both during the hydrocarbon and oxygenate conversion reactions, and during catalyst regeneration.
The present invention relates to methods for making such catalysts to increase their attrition resistance The method involves mixing molecular sieves with an alumina sol and then drying the mixture.
Hydrocarbon conversion catalysts and oxygenate conversion catalysts generally have several components in their formulation: a microporous zeolitic or microporous non-zeolitic molecular sieve, an inorganic oxide matrix, and optionally other materials and modifiers, such as a clay.
Suitable molecular sieves include small pore, non-zeolitic microporous crystalline frameworks. The crystalline frameworks are three-dimensional and have well defined pore diameters. Small pore molecular sieves are defined herein as molecular sieves with pores having a diameter in the range of from about 3.0 Angstroms to about 5.0 Angstroms.
Suitable non-zeolitic molecular sieves include, but are not necessarily limited to silicoaluminophosphates ("SAPO's"). SAPO's have a three-dimensional microporous crystalline framework of PO2 +, AlO2 ", and SiO2 tetrahedral units. Suitable SAPO's include, but are not necessarily limited to SAPO-17, SAPO-18, SAPO-34, SAPO-44, and mixtures thereof. A preferred SAPO is SAPO-34, which may be synthesized according to US-A-4,440,871, incorporated herein by reference, and Zeolites, Vol. 17, pp 512-522 (1996), incorporated herein by reference.
SAPO's with substituents also may be used in the present invention. Suitable substituted SAPO molecular sieves include, but are not necessarily limited to
"MeAPSO's" and "MeAPO's." MeAPSO's contain at least some silicon in their framework. MeAPO's may or may not contain silicon. Examples of suitable metals (Me) are nickel, iron, cobalt, manganese and magnesium.
SAPO, MeAPO and MeAPSO molecular sieves can be modified further by using, for example, magnesium, calcium, strontium, barium, lanthanides, actinides and mixtures thereof. A preferred modifier is strontium. Preferred modified SAPO's are strontium modified SAPO- 17 (Sr-SAPO-17), strontium modified SAPO- 18 (Sr- SAPO-18) and strontium modified SAPO-34 (Sr-SAPO-34).
The amount of the molecular sieve used in the mixture should form a catalyst composition having in the range of from about 3 wt% to about 99 wt%, preferably from about 5 wt% to about 90 wt%, and most preferably from about 10 wt% to about 80 wt% molecular sieve.
To make molecular sieves useful as catalysts in fluidized bed or moving bed reactor systems, an inorganic oxide matrix usually is needed in the catalyst formulation to provide physical strength and better heat transfer, among other desirable properties. A preferred inorganic oxide matrix is formed from a sol comprising an alumina sol. The term "alumina sol" means that the sol predominantly comprises alumina. Even an alumina sol may contain small amounts of silicon atoms.
The inorganic oxide sol in the catalyst essentially is a "glue" which binds the group of catalyst components together. A preferred sol has a relatively low viscosity. Upon drying the inorganic oxide sol, an inorganic oxide matrix is formed. Preferably, the individual catalyst components which are "glued" together by the matrix are in the range of about 0.3 to about 10.0 microns in size. The inorganic oxide matrix formed between the individual catalyst components in the final product has a measurable diameter of less than 100 microns.
An alumina sol useful in the present invention typically is derived from a material selected from the group consisting of aluminum chlorohydrol, peptized boehmite, and mixtures thereof. Aluminum chlorohydrol has a general formula of Al13O4(OH)24Cl7 «12H2O.
A preferred alumina sol is made by forming a solution of a starting material wherein the particle components do not form a gel. The pH of the alumina sol preferably is in the range of from about 2 to about 10. More preferably, the pH is in the range of from about 3 to about 9. The pH of the inorganic oxide sol can be measured using standard glass electrodes or other methods known to those of ordinary skill in the art. The inorganic oxide sol may be made using a batch, continuous, or semi-continuous process.
A sufficient amount of the alumina sol is used to prepare the catalyst to cause the amount of the resultant aluminum oxide matrix in the finished catalyst to be in the range of from about 2 wt% to about 98 wt%, preferably from about 5 wt% to about 90 wt%, and more preferably from about 10 wt% to about 80 wt%.
In addition, separate alumina phases may be incorporated into the aluminum oxide matrix of the present invention. Materials that can be used to form such phases include, but are not necessarily limited to aluminum oxyhydroxide, γ-alumina, boehmite, diaspore, and transitional aluminas such as α-alumina, β-alumina, γ- alumina, δ-alumina, ε-alumina, κ-alumina, and p-alumina. Aluminum trihydroxide, such as gibbsite, bayerite, nordstrandite, doyelite, and mixtures thereof, also can be used. Catalysts made according to the present invention also may contain other components, preferably a clay. Kaolin is a preferred clay. Preferably kaolin is used in an amount sufficient to form a finished catalyst composition comprising kaolin in the range of from about 10 wt% to about 90 wt%, preferably from about 15 wt% to about 85 wt%, and more preferably from about 20 wt% to about 80 wt%.
The molecular sieve, an alumina sol, and optionally a clay are mixed to form a slurry. The catalyst can be made using a batch, continuous, or semi-continuous mode. The mixing can be carried out at a temperature in the range of from about -10°C to about 50°C. Pressure and atmosphere are not critical. In a preferred embodiment, the mixing can be carried out at a pressure in the range of from about 100 kPa to about 500 kPa, and in an atmosphere of air or nitrogen. The resultant slurry may be colloid- milled in the range of from about one to about five times for a total time period in the range of from about 3 seconds to about 5 minutes to obtain a desired particle texture, particle size, and/or particle size distribution.
The slurry then is dried using known means. Preferably, the slurry is spray dried. In spray drying, the slurry is fed into a nozzle which breaks the slurry into small particles. The particles then are dried in a co-current or counter-current flow of air through the spray drier. A dry powder catalyst is recovered. Alternately, the dry powder catalyst may be ground in the range of from about one to about five times, for a total period of time in the range of from about one to about five hours, in order to obtain a desired particle size and/or particle size distribution.
The spray-dried catalysts, with or without further grinding, may be used without further treatment. In another embodiment, The spray-dried catalysts are calcined at an elevated temperature in the range of from about 400°C to about 1000°C, preferably in the range from about 500°C to about 850°C. The calcination time depends on the catalyst formulation and the temperature of calcination. The time should be in the range of from about 0.5 hours to about 48 hours, preferably from about 2 hours to about 24 hours. The pressure and the atmosphere used during calcination are not critical, and should be selected to give the desired oxidation states of any easily reducible or oxidizable elements present in the catalyst.
The sprayed dried catalysts also may be ion exchanged before or after the calcination. When aluminum chlorohydrol is used as the starting material, it is preferred to carry out the ion-exchange step, if performed, after calcination.
Catalysts made according to the present invention have increased attrition resistance properties. Resistance to attrition is a measurement of the hardness of a catalyst, or how well the catalyst resists wear under test or process conditions. A catalyst with good attrition resistance will last longer and is more desirable than a catalyst with poor attrition resistance. Poor attrition resistance leads to the production of more fines that may escape from the processing units and cause environmental problems.
The test used to measure attrition resistance according to the present invention is the "extended attrition test." A Jet Cup Attritor is used. A sample of 6 grams of the catalyst are tested for 4 hours. Attrition products (<20 microns) are measured gravimetrically and the data are used to calculate the attrition rate of the catalyst. An extended attrition index is obtained by measuring the amount by weight of particles smaller than about 2.6 microns generated during the test. Generally, the fewer particles having a diameter smaller than about 2.6 Angstroms produced, the more attrition resistant the catalyst. The attrition products also are analyzed for particle size distribution using a Leeds & Northrop Microtrac® Small Particle Analyzer. Surface areas and pore volumes are measured using Coulter Omnisorb® 610 instrument.
Catalysts made according to the present invention can be used for a number of purposes, preferably to convert oxygenates and/or hydrocarbons to lower molecular weight products, most preferably to lower olefins (ethylene, propylene, and butenes and mixtures thereof). Suitable reactors include, but are not necessarily limited to fixed bed reactors, moving bed reactors, fluidized bed reactors, or other similar types of reactors. Oxygenates can be converted to olefins by contacting a feed with a catalyst of the present invention under conditions effective to produce olefins. Preferred olefins are lower olefins — ethylene, propylene, butenes, and mixtures thereof.
Oxygenates suitable for such conversions include, but are not necessarily limited to aliphatic alcohols, aliphatic ethers, aliphatic carbonyl compounds (aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, esters, carbonates and the like), alkyl halides, alkyl amines, and mixtures thereof. Preferred oxygenates are methanol, ethanol, n- propanol, isopropanol, n-butanol, sec-butanol, dimethyl ether, methylethyl ether, diethyl ether, dimethyl carbonate, and mixtures thereof.
Effective conditions for oxygenate conversions are: temperature in the range of from about 200 °C to about 800°C; pressure in the range of from about 1 kPa to about 2 Mpa; Weight Hourly Space Velocity (WHSN) in the range of from about 0.01 h"1 to about 10,000 h"1. Because the feed may contain diluents and the catalyst may contain filler and/or binder materials, WHSN is calculated on the weight of the oxygenate feed itself and the weight of the molecular sieve component in the catalyst.
The oxygenate feed may comprise an amount of diluent in the range of from about 0 wt% to about 95 wt% of the total feed. Suitable diluents include but are not necessarily limited to water (steam), CO2, hydrogen, nitrogen, argon, and mixtures thereof.
After conversion, the products and any unreacted feedstock are separated from the catalyst, and the products are purified. Unreacted feedstock may be recycled back to the conversion reactor or otherwise disposed. Deactivated catalysts may be regenerated. Regeneration can be carried out in the conversion reactor or in a separate regeneration reactor. Regeneration usually is carried out at elevated temperatures, 350 °C to 950°C, and in the presence of an oxygen containing atmosphere. Treating a deactivated catalyst with hydrogen at elevated temperatures also may be effective to regenerate the catalytic performance of the oxygenate conversion catalyst. The catalysts also can be used to convert hydrocarbons to products having lower molecular weights than the feedstock hydrocarbons. Hydrocarbon feedstocks include, but are not necessarily limited to naphtha and similar hydrocarbons. The feedstocks comprise mostly non-aromatic compounds with at least five carbon atoms. Preferred products comprise lower olefins (ethylene, propylene, and butenes) and aromatics.
Typical reaction conditions for hydrocarbon conversions are: temperature in the range of from about 250 °C to about 900°C; pressure in the range of from about 1 kPa to about 2 Mpa; WHSN in the range of from about 0.01 h"1 to about 10,000 h"1. Because the feed may contain diluents and the catalyst may contain filler and/or binder materials, WHSV is calculated on the weight of the hydrocarbon feed itself and the weight of the molecular sieve component in the catalyst. Diluents such as water (steam), CO2, hydrogen, nitrogen, and others can be mixed with the feedstock. The amount of diluent preferably comprises in the range of from about 0 wt% to about 95 wt% of the total feed.
The hydrocarbon feed is contacted with the catalyst in a conversion reactor under effective conditions for conversion. Suitable conversion reactors are fixed bed reactors, a moving bed reactors, fluidized bed reactors, or other similar types of reactors.
After conversion the products and any unreacted feedstock are separated from the catalyst, and the products are purified. Unreacted feedstock may be recycled back to the conversion reactor or otherwise disposed. Deactivated catalysts may be regenerated as previously described. Regeneration can be carried out in the conversion reactor or in a separate regeneration reactor.
The present invention will be better understood with reference to the following examples, which are intended to illustrate, but not to limit the scope or spirit of the invention. The invention is solely defined by the claims. EXAMPLE I
A catalyst was prepared as follows:
1.06 lb of Reheis® Chlorohydrol® (47wt% Al2O3) was dissolved in 4 lb of distilled water. To this solution was added 3.25 lb of Hydrite UF kaolin(from Dry Branch) and 1.29 lb of SAPO-34 (0.966 solids), obtained from UOP. The resultant mixture was colloid milled twice and was washed from the colloid mill with an additional 1 lb of distilled water. The pH of the colloid-milled product, a slurry, was 4.0. The slurry was spray dried in an Anhydro PN Spray Drier® at Moyno pump setting 2.1; 10,000 rpm; 288°C inlet temperature and the outlet temperature between 177°C and 160°C. 2.2 lb of coarse catalyst product and 0.9 lb of fines were collected from the spray drier. The spray dried powder was calcined at 816°C for 2 hours.
The resulting catalyst was subjected to the extended attrition test to determine its extended attrition index. The results of this experiment and the following experiments are shown in TABLE I. The test catalyst exhibited a good extended attrition index of 11. Commercially available catalysts also were tested under similar attrition testing conditions. The series of commercial catalysts tested were Engelhard Reduction®, Grace Spectra®, Grace Ramcat®, Akzo Advance®, and Akzo Vision® catalysts. The catalyst prepared according to this example was significantly more attrition resistant than the tested commercial catalysts.
EXAMPLE II
A catalyst was prepared as described in EXAMPLE I, except that after spray drying, the spray-dried powder was calcined at 760°C for two hours.
The resultant catalyst was subjected to the extended attrition test to determine its extended attrition index. As shown in TABLE I, the catalyst exhibited a good extended attrition index of 10. The test catalyst was significantly more attrition resistant than the tested commercial catalysts. Furthermore, the catalyst calcined at the lower temperature as prepared in this EXAMPLE was more attrition resistant.
EXAMPLE III
Another catalyst was prepared as follows:
1.06 lb of Reheis® Chlorohydrol® (47wt% Al2O3) was dissolved in 4 lb of distilled water. To this solution was added 2.00 lb of Hydrite® UF kaolin, 2.58 lb of SAPO-34 (0.966 solids), obtained from UOP and an additional 1.0 lb of water to form a slurry. The resultant mixture was colloid milled twice and was washed from the colloid mill with an additional 1.1 lb of distilled water. The pH of the colloid-milled product, a slurry, was 3.7. The slurry was spray dried in an .Anhydro PN Spray Drier at Moyno pump setting 2J; 10,000 rpm; 288°C inlet temperature and the outlet temperature between 177°C and 160°C. 2.2 lb of coarse catalyst product and 0.9 lb of fines were collected from the spray drier. The spray dried powder was calcined at 816°C for 2 hours.
The resulting catalyst was subjected to the extended attrition test to determine its extended attrition index. As shown in TABLE I, the catalyst exhibited a good extended attrition index of 7. The test catalyst was significantly more attrition resistant than the tested commercial catalysts.
EXAMPLE IV
A catalyst of the present invention was prepared similar to EXAMPLE I, except that after spray drying, the spray-dried powder was calcined at 760°C for two hours.
The resultant catalyst was subjected to the extended attrition test to determine its extended attrition index. As shown in TABLE I, the calcined catalyst exhibited a good extended attrition index of 6. The test catalyst was significantly more attrition resistant than the tested commercial catalysts. Furthermore, the catalyst calcined at the lower temperature as prepared in this EXAMPLE was more attrition resistant.
TABLE I
Figure imgf000014_0001
Attrition test results showed that catalysts of the present invention made significantly fewer microfines than commercial catalysts. Depending on the formulation and preparation conditions, the catalysts of the present invention produced microfines in a range of from about 15 to about 23. Under comparable conditions, commercial catalysts generated microfines in the range of from about 18 to about 52. Furthermore, the catalysts calcined at a lower temperature (760°C) were more attrition resistant than the catalysts calcined at a higher temperature (816°C).
Molecular sieves themselves generally are not considered to be good binding materials. Normally, the amount of fines produced by a catalyst increases with the molecular sieve content. It was surprising to observe that the test catalysts containing the highest amounts of SAPO-34 (Ex. Ill and Ex. IN, about 50 wt%) produced fewer microfines than the catalysts containing less S.APO-34 (Ex I and Ex. II, about 25
The foregoing results demonstrate that catalysts prepared according to the method of this invention produced fewer microfines and showed increased attrition resistance compared to commercially available catalysts. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many modifications may be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The embodiment described herein is meant to be illustrative only and should not be taken as limiting the invention, which is defined in the following claims.
What is claimed is:

Claims

1. A method for making a catalyst comprising: forming a mixture comprising an alumina sol and a silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve having pores of a diameter less than about 5 Angstroms; and drying said mixture to form a catalyst.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said drying includes spray drying at a first elevated temperature to form a spray dried catalyst.
3. The method of any one of the preceding claims further including calcining said spray dried catalyst at a second elevated temperature to form a calcined catalyst.
4. The method of any one of the preceding claims wherein said silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieves is selected from the group consisting of SAPO- 17, SAPO- 18, SAPO-34, SAPO-44, and mixtures thereof.
5. The method of any one of the preceding claims wherein said alumina sol is a compound selected from the group consisting of aluminum chlorohydrol and peptized boehmite.
6. The method of any one of the preceding claims wherein said alumina sol has a pH in the range of from about 2 to about 10.
7. The method of any one of the preceding claims wherein said catalyst comprises of an amount of aluminum oxide produced from said alumina sol in the range of from about 2 wt% to about 98 wt% of said catalyst.
8. The method of any one of the preceding claims wherein said catalyst comprises an amount of said molecular sieves, comprising in the range of from about 3 wt% to about 99 wt%.
9. The method of claim 3 wherein said second elevated temperature is in the range of from about 400┬░C to 1000┬░C.
10. A catalyst comprising: a silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve having pores of a diameter less than about 5 Angstroms; and an aluminum oxide matrix derived from an alumina sol.
11. The catalyst of claim 10 further including clay.
12. The catalyst of claim 10 wherein: said molecular sieve comprises from about 3 wt% to about 99 wt% of said catalyst; and said aluminum oxide matrix comprises from about 2 wt% to about 98 wt% of said catalyst.
13. The catalyst of claim 11 wherein said catalyst further includes from about 10 wt% to about 90 wt% of said clay.
14. The catalyst of claim 10 wherein said silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve is selected from the group consisting of SAPO-17, SAPO-18, SAPO-34, SAPO- 44 and mixtures thereof.
PCT/US1998/021836 1997-10-29 1998-10-15 Method for making catalysts containing silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve and catalyst thus prepared WO1999021651A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU98055/98A AU9805598A (en) 1997-10-29 1998-10-15 Method for making catalysts containing silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve and catalyst thus prepared

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US96002997A 1997-10-29 1997-10-29
US08/960,029 1997-10-29

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999021651A1 true WO1999021651A1 (en) 1999-05-06

Family

ID=25502706

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1998/021836 WO1999021651A1 (en) 1997-10-29 1998-10-15 Method for making catalysts containing silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve and catalyst thus prepared

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU9805598A (en)
WO (1) WO1999021651A1 (en)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002005952A2 (en) * 2000-07-13 2002-01-24 Uop Llc Attrition resistant catalyst for light olefin production
US6440894B1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2002-08-27 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents, Inc. Methods of removing halogen from non-zeolitic molecular sieve catalysts
WO2003000413A1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2003-01-03 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
WO2003068395A1 (en) * 2002-01-17 2003-08-21 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method of making molecular sieve catalyst
US6787501B2 (en) 2001-07-02 2004-09-07 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
WO2005025743A1 (en) * 2003-09-05 2005-03-24 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Low metal content catalyst compositions and processes for making and using same
US6872680B2 (en) 2002-03-20 2005-03-29 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
US7241713B2 (en) 2003-10-02 2007-07-10 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
US7271123B2 (en) 2002-03-20 2007-09-18 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion process
US7312369B2 (en) 2004-04-28 2007-12-25 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Attrition resistant molecular sieve catalyst, method of making and process for using
US7329625B2 (en) 2005-11-02 2008-02-12 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Attrition resistant molecular sieve catalyst
EP2098287A1 (en) 2008-03-03 2009-09-09 ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method of formulating a molecular sieve catalyst composition by controlling component addition
US7772337B2 (en) 2007-09-21 2010-08-10 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method of formulating a molecular sieve catalyst composition by controlling component addition
CN101157051B (en) * 2007-02-07 2010-12-15 中国科学院大连化学物理研究所 Recovery method of microspherical catalyst of fluid bed
US7947621B2 (en) 2006-02-27 2011-05-24 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method of making and process for using molecular sieve catalyst

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1315553A (en) * 1969-07-28 1973-05-02 Grace W R & Co Hydrocarbon conversion catalysts and their production
US4973792A (en) * 1987-07-07 1990-11-27 Uop Chemical conversion process
US5173463A (en) * 1988-09-06 1992-12-22 Petroleo Brasileiro, S.A.-Petrobras Kaolin containing fluid cracking catalyst
US5248647A (en) * 1991-02-28 1993-09-28 Uop Sapo catalysts and use thereof in methanol conversion processes

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1315553A (en) * 1969-07-28 1973-05-02 Grace W R & Co Hydrocarbon conversion catalysts and their production
US4973792A (en) * 1987-07-07 1990-11-27 Uop Chemical conversion process
US5173463A (en) * 1988-09-06 1992-12-22 Petroleo Brasileiro, S.A.-Petrobras Kaolin containing fluid cracking catalyst
US5248647A (en) * 1991-02-28 1993-09-28 Uop Sapo catalysts and use thereof in methanol conversion processes

Cited By (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002005952A2 (en) * 2000-07-13 2002-01-24 Uop Llc Attrition resistant catalyst for light olefin production
WO2002005952A3 (en) * 2000-07-13 2002-06-06 Uop Llc Attrition resistant catalyst for light olefin production
US6440894B1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2002-08-27 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents, Inc. Methods of removing halogen from non-zeolitic molecular sieve catalysts
WO2003000413A1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2003-01-03 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
WO2003000412A1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2003-01-03 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
WO2003000411A1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2003-01-03 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Hydrocarbon conversion processes using non-zeolitic molecular sieve catalysts
JP4781627B2 (en) * 2001-06-25 2011-09-28 エクソンモービル・ケミカル・パテンツ・インク Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its manufacture and its use in conversion methods
CN100512961C (en) * 2001-06-25 2009-07-15 埃克森美孚化学专利公司 Hydrocarbon conversion processes of oxygen compound using non-zeolitic molecular sieve catalysts
KR100886532B1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2009-03-02 엑손모빌 케미칼 패턴츠 인코포레이티드 Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
JP2004537398A (en) * 2001-06-25 2004-12-16 エクソンモービル・ケミカル・パテンツ・インク Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its production and its use in conversion processes
CN100446859C (en) * 2001-06-25 2008-12-31 埃克森美孚化学专利公司 Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
KR100854899B1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2008-08-28 엑손모빌 케미칼 패턴츠 인코포레이티드 Hydrocarbon conversion processes using non-zeolitic molecular sieve catalysts
AU2002350150B2 (en) * 2001-06-25 2008-02-07 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
US7151199B2 (en) 2001-06-25 2006-12-19 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Hydrocarbon conversion processes using non-zeolitic molecular sieve catalysts
AU2002314760B2 (en) * 2001-06-25 2007-12-06 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents, Inc. Hydrocarbon conversion processes using non-zeolitic molecular sieve catalysts
US7301065B2 (en) 2001-07-02 2007-11-27 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular-sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
US6787501B2 (en) 2001-07-02 2004-09-07 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
EP1902783A3 (en) * 2002-01-17 2008-11-19 ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method of making molecular sieve catalyst
CN1615177B (en) * 2002-01-17 2012-07-11 埃克森美孚化学专利公司 Method of making molecular sieve catalyst
US6710008B2 (en) 2002-01-17 2004-03-23 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method of making molecular sieve catalyst
WO2003068395A1 (en) * 2002-01-17 2003-08-21 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method of making molecular sieve catalyst
US7358412B2 (en) 2002-01-17 2008-04-15 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method of making molecular sieve catalyst
US7271123B2 (en) 2002-03-20 2007-09-18 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion process
US6872680B2 (en) 2002-03-20 2005-03-29 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
US7125821B2 (en) 2003-09-05 2006-10-24 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Low metal content catalyst compositions and processes for making and using same
WO2005025743A1 (en) * 2003-09-05 2005-03-24 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Low metal content catalyst compositions and processes for making and using same
US7332636B2 (en) 2003-09-05 2008-02-19 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Low metal content catalyst compositions and processes for making and using same
US7241713B2 (en) 2003-10-02 2007-07-10 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
US7312369B2 (en) 2004-04-28 2007-12-25 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Attrition resistant molecular sieve catalyst, method of making and process for using
US7329625B2 (en) 2005-11-02 2008-02-12 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Attrition resistant molecular sieve catalyst
US7947621B2 (en) 2006-02-27 2011-05-24 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method of making and process for using molecular sieve catalyst
CN101157051B (en) * 2007-02-07 2010-12-15 中国科学院大连化学物理研究所 Recovery method of microspherical catalyst of fluid bed
US7772337B2 (en) 2007-09-21 2010-08-10 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method of formulating a molecular sieve catalyst composition by controlling component addition
EP2098287A1 (en) 2008-03-03 2009-09-09 ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method of formulating a molecular sieve catalyst composition by controlling component addition

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU9805598A (en) 1999-05-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1047498B1 (en) Methods of making a molecular sieve containing catalyst
JP4362363B2 (en) Hydrocarbon conversion method using non-zeolitic molecular sieve catalyst
US7501375B2 (en) Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
JP4781627B2 (en) Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its manufacture and its use in conversion methods
US6787501B2 (en) Molecular sieve catalyst composition, its making and use in conversion processes
WO1999021651A1 (en) Method for making catalysts containing silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve and catalyst thus prepared
AU2003216248B2 (en) Catalyst compositions comprising molecular sieves, their preparation and use in conversion processes
US7166757B2 (en) Conversion of oxygenates to olefins
JP2008544941A (en) Improved molecular sieve performance
JP2003517995A (en) Heat stable and high surface area modified mesoporous aluminophosphate
US7199278B2 (en) Conversion of oxygenates to olefins
WO1986003138A1 (en) Catalytic cracking catalysts and cracking process using mixed catalyst systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase