ELECTRONICALLY COMMUTATED POLE-CHANGING MOTOR
Field of The Invention
The field of the invention is electric motors.
Background of The Invention
Electric motors generally include both a rotor and a stator. Both the rotor and stator each have one or more means for producing magnetic poles, examples of which are permanent magnets, electrical conductors (possibly forming coils), or combinations thereof. The number of poles on the rotor and stator may be fixed, or may be variable. In many applications, it is desirable that the number of poles be variable so as to allow higher torque at lower speeds, and lower torque at higher speeds. Changing the number of poles in a motor is sometimes referred to as "pole-changing", and motors in which the number of poles can be varied are sometimes referred to as "pole-changing motors". In a pole- changing motor, it is possible to vary the number of poles on the rotor, the stator, or both the rotor and stator. Examples in which the number of poles in the stator, but not the rotor, can be varied are found in several patents by Broadway et al., such as U.S. patents numbered 3,794,970, 3,898,543, 3,927,358, and 3,973,154, and in U.S. Patent No. 4,363,984 by Matsuda et al. issued on December 14, 1982. Patents focusing on winding methods to support pole changing include several patents by Auinger such as U.S. patents numbered 4,127,787, 4,144,470 and 4,529,472.
Providing a mechanism for varying the number of poles in the rotor tends to be problematic because of the fact that the rotor generally rotates, making it difficult to communicate an electrical signal to the rotor. One method for varying the number of poles in the rotor is to vary the number of electrical signals communicated to the rotor. However, utilizing this method tends to increase the size, complexity, and potential points of failure of the motor. As an example, for a motor which utilizes slip-rings to communicate electrical signals to the rotor, increasing the number of signals to be provided requires increasing the number of slip rings used. Similarly, in a motor utilizing brushes and commutators, increasing the number of signals may require increasing the number of brushes or the number or complexity of the commutators. Examples of this
method are illustrated in U.S. Patent No. 5,311,615 by Coueteox issued on May 10, 1994 and U.S. Patent No. 5,134,351 by Msihid issued on July 28, 1992.
DC motors frequently utilize a commutator to reverse the polarity of the magnetic pole(s) of the rotor. Although some DC motors might be called "brushless", "commutatorless", or "electronically commutated", such motors generally differ from motors utilizing commutators in that there is no reversing of the polarity of the pole(s) of the rotor. Instead, the rotor frequently comprises a permanent magnet and is forced to rotate by rotating the magnetic field of the stator. Examples can be seen in U.S. Patent No. 4,554,473 by Muller issued on November 19,1985, U.S. Patent No. 4,739,240 by MacMinn et al. issued on April 19, 1988, U.S. Patent No. 4,169,990 by Lerdman, issued on October 2, 1979, and U.S. Patent No. 4,668,898 by Harms et al. issued on May 26, 1987.
Thus, there is a continuing need to improve electrical motors by providing new methods and devices for varying the number of poles of the rotor and to minimize the number of signals that must be communicated to the rotor.
Summary of the Invention
Methods and devices are provided for varying the number of poles on a rotor of an electrical motor by providing the rotor of the motor with a conductor control circuit which can control characteristics of the of the magnetic field generated by the rotor. Examples of modifiable characteristics include polarity, field distribution, and field strength.
In a preferred embodiment, both the rotor and stator of a motor have conductor control circuits which are utilized to maintain an equal number of rotor and stator poles, while varying the number of poles such that a larger number of poles are used during low speeds than during high speeds. Preferably, the rotor control circuit utilizes "H" bridge transistor switching, with the transistors mounted on the rotor, and, through electronic switching, to act as an electronic commutator for the rotor.
Various objects, features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention, along with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals represent like components.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic view of a preferred embodiment of a conductor control circuit.
Fig. 2 is a schematic of an alternate embodiment of a conductor control circuit.
Fig. 3 is a schematic depicting a pole configuration preferred when low speed and high torque are desirable.
Fig. 4 is a schematic depicting a pole configuration preferred when mid-range speed and torque are desirable.
Fig. 5 is a schematic depicting a pole configuration preferred when high speed and low torque are desirable.
Fig. 6 is a diagram indicating how power varies with RPM when poles are decreased as acceleration increases.
Detailed Description
Many of the past problems which arose in designing pole changing motors in which the number of poles on the rotor can eliminated simply by providing a control circuit on the rotor itself. Such a circuit could be fed one or more AC and/or DC signals through known methods such as slip rings or brushes, and could utilize those signals to generate and control the magnetic fields of the rotor. Controlling the magnetic field could include modifying the field's polarity, distribution, and field strength.
In a preferred embodiment, both the rotor and stator of a motor could be provided with 36 separate coils. Each coil could have a switching circuit such as that shown in Figure 1, associated with the coil. Because the switching circuit of figure 1 would allow the orientation of the pole associated with it to be reversed in polarity by reversing direction of current flow through the coil associated with it, pole configurations such as those shown in Figures 3, 4, and 5 could be obtained wherein the number of poles on the rotor and stator are kept equal, and the number of poles decreases as speed increases. It should be noted that, as shown in Figures 3, 4, and 5, although the actual number of separately actuated coils neither increases nor decreases, the grouping of like polarized coils effectively decreases the total number of magnetic poles. Thus, it is possible to obtain a pole configuration wherein any two adjacent magnetic poles have approximately equal magnitudes, but opposite polarities. Similarly, segregating poles of like polarity effectively increases the number of poles. Less preferred alternative embodiments might
involve utilizing different windings for different pole configurations wherein one or more windings might remain unused in certain configurations, and other windings might remain unused in other configurations.
Although it is preferred to utilize a single layer of independent coils to form independent poles and utilize the grouping of the poles to increase or decrease the effective number of poles, any other pole-changing method, currently known or not, could be utilized as well without departing from the inventive concepts disclosed herein. Similarly, the claimed invention need not be limited to stators or rotors size and shaped as those in figures 3, 4 and 5. As an example, the number of coils on either or both could be varied where there would be at least 2, at least 6, or at least 36 coils. Or the number of coils might equal 2, 6 or 36 or be less than 2, 6, or 36. Additionally, the number of coils on the stator may differ from the number of coils on the rotor. An alternative to focusing on number of coils would be to focus on the number of magnetic poles that could be generated. As with varying the number of coils, the number of poles could be varied such that there were at least two, two, or more than two poles.
Figure 2 illustrates an alternative switching circuit to that shown in figure 1. Moreover, any other circuit mounted on the rotor which modifies the magnetic field generated by the rotor could be utilized as well. Modification of the magnetic field might simply consist of modifying the polarity of individual coils so as to group or ungroup coils. Other methods might be to vary other characteristics of the signals being communicated to the coil such as amplitude, frequency, and/or phase.
Thus, specific embodiments and applications of an electronically commutated pole- changing motor have been disclosed. It should be apparent, however, to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. For example, known variations in winding methods could be utilized to support the ability to vary the number poles. Similarly, it is possible to utilize "smarter" circuits to improve on the control methods herein disclosed. Also, the concepts herein are equally applicable to DC an AC motors and to both single and multi-phase motors. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.