WO1998035052A1 - Production of self-compatible brassica hybrids using a self-incompatible pollination control system - Google Patents
Production of self-compatible brassica hybrids using a self-incompatible pollination control system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1998035052A1 WO1998035052A1 PCT/CA1998/000089 CA9800089W WO9835052A1 WO 1998035052 A1 WO1998035052 A1 WO 1998035052A1 CA 9800089 W CA9800089 W CA 9800089W WO 9835052 A1 WO9835052 A1 WO 9835052A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- self
- plant
- brassica
- cell
- dna sequence
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
- C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
- C12N15/8287—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for fertility modification, e.g. apomixis
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/415—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from plants
Definitions
- This invention relates to cells of a self-compatible hybrid plant , the parents of which are a homozygous self-incompatible female parent and a homozygous male parent.
- the nuclear genome of the male parent contains a vector comprising a DNA sequence which, when expressed in a plant cell, imparts self-incompatibility to the plant and a promoter capable of directing the expression of the DNA sequence in the cell.
- the invention includes the vector, a plant comprising the cells, a plant transformed with the vector, the seed of such plants, and a method for conferring the self-compatible phenotype on progeny of the self-incompatible female parent and self-compatible male parent.
- the invention comprises an improved self- incompatibility pollination control system for hybrid seed production or breeding which, by using a knockout transgene to eliminate the self-incompatibility phenotype in hybrids, can result in increased yields.
- Seed from Brassica plants is an increasingly important crop. As a source of vegetable oil, it presently ranks behind only soybeans and palm in commercial importance and it is comparable with sunflowers. The oil is used both as a salad oil and as a cooking oil.
- Brassica oil known as rapeseed oil
- Erucic acid is commonly present in native cuitivars in concentrations of 30 to 50 percent by weight based upon the total fatty acid content. This problem was overcome when plant scientists identified a germplasm source of low erucic acid rapeseed oil (Stefansson, 1983).
- the goal of plant breeding is to combine in a single variety or hybrid various desirable traits of the parental lines.
- these traits may include resistance to diseases and insects, tolerance to heat and drought, reducing the time to crop maturity, greater yield, and better agronomic quality.
- uniformity of plant characteristics such as germination and stand establishment, growth rate, maturity, and size, is important.
- Field crops are bred through techniques that take advantage of the plant's method of pollination.
- a plant is self-pollinating if pollen from one flower is transferred to the same or another flower of the same plant.
- a plant is cross-pollinating if the pollen comes from a flower on a different plant.
- Plants that have been self-pollinated and selected for many generations become homozygous at almost all gene loci and produce a uniform population of true breeding progeny.
- a cross between two homozygous lines produces a uniform population of hybrid plants that may be heterozygous for many gene loci.
- a cross of two plants each heterozygous at a number of gene loci will produce a population of hybrid plants that differ genetically and will not be uniform.
- Pedigree breeding and recurrent selection are two of the breeding methods used to develop inbred lines from populations. Breeding programs combine desirable traits from two or more inbred lines or various broad-based sources into breeding pools from which new inbred lines are developed by selfing and selection of desired phenotypes. The new inbreds are crossed with other inbred lines and the hybrids from these crosses are evaluated to determine which have commercial potential. Pedigree breeding starts with the crossing of two genotypes, each of which may have one or more desirable characteristics that is lacking in the other or which complement the other. If the two original parents do not provide all of the desired characteristics, other sources can be included in the breeding population.
- a hybrid variety is the cross of two inbred lines, each of which may have one or more desirable characteristics lacked by the other or which complement the other.
- the hybrid progeny of the first generation is designated F In the development of hybrids, only the F, hybrid plants are sought.
- the F ⁇ hybrid is more vigorous than its inbred parents. This hybrid vigor, or heterosis, can be manifested in many ways, including increased vegetative growth and increased yield.
- the development of a hybrid variety involves three steps: (1) the selection of superior plants from various germplasm pools; (2) the selfing of the superior plants for several generations to produce a series of inbred lines, which although different from each other, each breed true and are highly uniform; and (3) crossing the selected inbred lines with unrelated inbred lines to produce the hybrid progeny (F ).
- F the hybrid progeny
- the vigor of the lines decreases. Vigor is restored when two unrelated inbred lines are crossed to produce the hybrid progeny (F .
- An important consequence of the homozygosity and homogeneity of the inbred lines is that the hybrid between any two inbreds will always be the same.
- a single cross hybrid is produced when two inbred lines are crossed to produce the F1 progeny.
- a double cross hybrid is produced from four inbred lines crossed in pairs (A x B and C x D) and then the two F hybrids are crossed again (A x B) x (C x D).
- Much of the hybrid vigor exhibited by hybrids is lost in the next generation (F 2 ). Consequently, seed from hybrid varieties is not used for planting stock.
- F 2 next generation
- it is very important in the production of hybrid seed to avoid self-pollination of the inbreds and the production and sale of inbred seed to end users. Hybrid production among self-pollinated crops can be difficult because of the close association of the male and female reproductive organs.
- SI cytoplasmic male sterile
- NMS nuclear male sterile Brassica plants as the female parent.
- SI cytoplasmic male sterile
- NMS nuclear male sterile
- the stigma papillae cells In SI pollination control systems in Brassica, the stigma papillae cells must be able to differentiate between self-pollen and pollen derived from parents carrying different alleles associated with the expression of the SI phenotype. Once this recognition event occurs, it sets in motion a train of physiological events that prevents the germination of self- pollen, while allowing the germination and subsequent fertilization by pollen from a plant carrying different alleles associated with the expression of the SI phenotype. This event happens when both types of pollen are present on the stigma surface (see WO94/09139, for example). SI Alleles
- Brassica napus is an amphidiploid plant which is normally self-compatible while its presumptive progenitors, Brassica oleracea and Brassica rapa, are diploid self- incompatible species. Self-incompatible alleles can be transferred into Brassica napus from the progenitor species via inter-specific crosses (Goring et al, 1992a; 1992b) creating self-incompatible lines. These are then repeatedly back-crossed to the Brassica napus parent (Goring et al, 1992a; 1992b).
- SLG S-locus glycoprotein
- SRK S-Receptor Kinase
- the receptor portion has some similarity in sequence to immunoglobulin-like receptor domains in animal cells (Glavin et al, 1994) and shows a similar sequence heterogeneity between genes derived form different alleles as that seen for the SLG. This gene is also expressed in the stigma papillae cells (Stein et al, 1991 ; Goring and Rothstein, 1992).
- the SRK protein forms a receptor complex in the stigma pappilae cells which recognizes an allele specific ligand present on the pollen surface.
- the SLG is either involved in bringing the ligand into contact with the SRK or serve as part of the receptor complex.
- the pollen ligand might be a protein coded for by a separate linked gene and be recognized only by the receptor complex coded for by the same allele.
- the ligand could be the SLG itself activated in the pollen by the binding of another molecule.
- the male parent possesses a fertility restoring gene.
- the fertility restoring gene (IM-B) is for MS-N1 -derived cytoplasm with male sterility (CMS) and was derived from a winter variety (IM line). This was then crossed with a spring double-low line (62We). This restorer is derived from traditional breeding techniques rather than from a construct containing a transgene.
- the sequence is useful for screening the progeny for the SI phenotype or to confer the SI phenotype on a self-compatible plant.
- the invention is directed towards determining the presence of the self- incompatibility phenotype rather than eliminating the self-incompatibility phenotype in hybrids.
- the invention is directed towards determining the presence of the self-incompatibility phenotype rather than eliminating the self-incompatibility phenotype in hybrids.
- Ciba-Geigy AG relates to an isolated DNA molecule encoding an SRK polypeptide having an S-locus binding domain, a transmembrane domain and a protein kinase domain, a method of isolating and identifying an SRK gene. Again, this invention does not attempt to improve SI pollination control systems.
- Toriyama et al., 1992 reported that the introduction of an SLG gene into a self- incompatible hybrid perturbed the self-incompatibility phenotype of stigma and pollen and resulted in the production of a self-compatible phenotype.
- SI Pollination control systems production of F-, hybrids includes crossing an SI Brassica female parent, with a pollen producing male Brassica parent.
- the pollen phenotype is derived from the genotype of the diploid pollen parent and not from the haploid pollen genotype.
- a hybrid produced from a homozygous SI female parent and a homozygous self-compatible male parent is heterozygous for SI.
- This invention relates to such a method in species of plants which use an SRK gene to knock out their self-incompatibility, including plants of the genera Brassica. It also discloses cells and seeds of the self-compatible hybrid plants produced, the plants comprising the cells, the vectors transformed into the self- incompatible parent plant and the plants transformed with such vectors.
- FIG. 1 illustrates the regulatory regions used to construct A10-mutant SRK and SLR1 -mutant SRK as described in Example 1
- FIG. 2 illustrates an analysis of the expression of the 910 SRK, 910-SLG and A10 SLG transcripts in the A10-mutant SRK self-compatible line.
- FIG. 3 illustrates the expression of the A14 allele that is present in the T2 line and is also decreased.
- FIG. 4 illustrates an analysis of the 910 SRK , 910 and A10 SLG transcripts -in the SLR1 -mutant SRK self-compatible line.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the A10-antisense SRK, the SLR1-antisense SRK and the TA39-antisense chimeric genes as described in Example 7.
- FIG. 6A-C present the nucleotide sequence and predicted amino acid sequence of the SRK-910 gene.
- the underlined sections represent the signal peptide and transmembrane domain. conserveed cysteine residues are marked by a dash above the amino acid residue. Potential N-glycosylation sites are represented by bold-italic type.
- FIG. 6C shows the SRK-910 gene with additional untranslated nucleotides.
- Example 1 Self-Incompatible Lines Brassica napus is an amphidiploid plant which is normally self-compatible while its presumptive progenitors, Brassica oleracea and Brassica rapa, are diploid self- incompatible species. Self-incompatible alleles can be transferred into Brassica napus from the progenitor species via inter-specific crosses (Goring et al 1992a; 1992b) creating self-incompatible lines. These were then repeatedly back-crossed to the Brassica napus parent (Goring et al, 1992a; 1992b).
- the kinase coding region of the 910 SRK gene was modified so that the codon at position 557 coded for an alanine instead of a lysine. This substitution had earlier been shown to prevent kinase activity completely when it was expressed in E. coli (Goring and Rothstein, 1992).
- the mutated 910-SRK was then reconstructed so that the only difference between the wild-type and mutant versions was this one base pair substitution. Our assumption was that this mutant version would be able to be assembled into a receptor complex, but that the deficiency in kinase activity would prevent it from functioning.
- the mutant 910-SRK Two regulatory regions were used to express the mutant 910-SRK as shown in Figure 1.
- the promoter for this gene was isolated using standard molecular techniques (Sambrook et al, 1989) and includes 1.7 kb of the region upstream of the transcription initiation site.
- the second was the promoter from the SLR1 gene which is also expressed at high levels in stigma tissue, which we called the "SLR1 -mutant SRK” (Franklin et al, 1996) and had been shown to work well in transgenic plants.
- SLR1 -mutant SRK Frranklin et al, 1996)
- Example 3 Phenotype of the lines transformed with the mutant SRK gene The transformed lines were analyzed for their ability to set self-seed, the level of fertility when cross-pollinated with the W1 line and the ability of the pollen to germinate and form pollen tubes.
- the A10-mutant SRK transformed line had virtually the same level of seed set as the SC line Westar when it was self-pollinated (Table 1).
- Seed pods were uniformly full for this line and with regard to self-fertilization, it was virtually indistinguishable from an SC line.
- W1 line pollen from W1 was able to fertilize the transgenic line.
- pollen from the transgenic line was rejected by the W1 line with virtually no seed set (see Table 1).
- An analysis of pollen germination and tube growth corresponded exactly with the seed set results with self-pollen and pollen from W1 both being able to germinate and their pollen tubes growing normally.
- pollen from the transgenic line would not germinate on W1 stigmas. Therefore, only the stigma side of the SI phenotype was affected by the transgene, with no noticeable change in the pollen phenotype.
- the SLR1 -mutant SRK transformed line did not show a complete restoration of self-fertility.
- the seed pods on any individual plant were quite variable and the average seed set, while much higher than for the SI W1 line, was lower than for the SC Westar line (Table 1). Therefore, in this case there was only a partial breakdown in the SI phenotype.
- Crosses between this line and W1 again demonstrated that only the stigma phenotype was affected with seed only being formed when the W1 pollen was used to fertilize the transgenic line with the reciprocal cross giving no seed set (Table 1). In this case, when either self pollen or W1 pollen was germinated on stigmas from the transgenic line, only a small percentage of pollen would germinate and form pollen tubes. This supports the notion that this line is intermediate in phenotype between SC and SI lines in the stigma, with the pollen phenotype not being affected at all.
- Example 4 The expression of the SLG and SRK genes in the A10-mutant SRK line
- Example 5 Transfer of the A10-mutant SRK transgene into a line with a different functional S-allele
- the Brassica napus line carries the A14 S-allele (Goring et al, 1992a). Progeny from the original transgenic line carrying the A10-mutant SRK chimeric gene was used as a pollen donor in a cross with T2. Progeny from this cross would be expected to have the transgene, the 910 S-allele present in the W1 line and the A14
- the A10-mutant SRK prevent the functioning of the 910 S- allele, but can also prevent the phenotypic expression of a different allele.
- Example 6 Effect of the SLR1 -mutant SRK transgene on expression of the SLG and SRK genes
- the expression of the 910-SLG and 910-SRK was analyzed in the line carrying the SLR1-mutant transgene which set self seed. In this case, there was no significant decrease in the expression of these genes (see Figure 4).
- the mutant SRK transgene is expressed in this case (see Figure 5). Therefore, in this case, co-suppression is clearly not the mechanism involved in the breakdown of the SI phenotype. Instead, the expression of the transgene and presumably the production of the mutant 910 SRK protein must be having an effect.
- the kinase mutant transgene can work either by suppressing expression of the wild-type gene or through expression of the mutant SRK.
- Example 7 Construction of an SRK antisense gene A 1.6 kb portion of the 910-SRK cDNA clone between a Sail site at position 1123 and a Hindlll site at the end of the gene (Goring and Rothstein, 1992) was cloned next to the regulatory regions in an orientation that would lead to the production of antisense RNA (see Figure 5). The A10-SLG, the SLR1 and the TA39 promoters were used for this purpose. These chimeric genes were transformed into the W1 line and self- compatible lines were selected as described in Example 2. Materials and Methods
- clones are constructed in accordance with standard molecular techniques (Sambrook et al, 1989).
- the 910-SRK mutant gene construct was made in the following fashion. The mutation in the kinase portion of the gene changing codon 557 from a lysine to an alanine codon is described in Goring and Rothstein, 1992. This portion of the mutated SRK cDNA was joined together with the rest of the SRK cDNA to make a clone that is identical to the wild-type 910 SRK cDNA except for that it codes for an alanine instead of a lysine at codon 557. This mutated 910 SRK was then placed adjacent to the A10 SLG and SLR1 promoters in the correct orientation for the expression of the 910 mutant SRK.
- the antisense genes were constructed by inserting a Sall-Hindlll fragment from the 910-SRK cDNA clone (nucleotides 1123-2755- Goring and Rothstein, 1992) adjacent to the A10 SLG, the SLR1 and the TA39 promoters. The orientation of this fragment relative to the promoters was such that antisense RNA would be made once these chimeric genes were transformed into plants.
- Transformation Several methods are known in the art for transferring cloned DNA into plants. These include the use of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens system (Bevan et al, 1994), electroporation-facilitated DNA , treatment of protoplasts with polyethylene glycol and bombardment of cells with DNA laden microprojectiles. Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages. For Brassica transformation, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is normally used (Moloney et al, 1989). In each of the techniques, DNA from a plasmid is genetically engineered such that it contains not only the gene of interest, but also selectable and screenable marker genes.
- a selectable marker gene is used to select only those cells that have integrated copies of the plasmid (the construction is such that the gene of interest and the selectable and screenable genes are transferred as a unit).
- the screenable gene provides another check for the successful culturing of only those cells carrying the genes of interest.
- a commonly used selectable marker gene is neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPT II). This gene conveys resistance to kanamycin, a compound that can be added directly to the growth media on which the cells grow. Plant cells are normally susceptible to kanamycin and, as a result, die. The presence of the NPT II gene overcomes the effects of the kanamycin and each cell with this gene remains viable.
- Another selectable marker gene which can be employed in the practice of this invention is the gene which confers resistance to the herbicide glufosinate (Basta).
- a screenable gene commonly used is the ⁇ -glucuronidase gene (GUS). The presence of this gene is characterized using a histochemical reaction in which a sample of putatively transformed cells is treated with a GUS assay solution. After an appropriate incubation, the cells containing the GUS gene turn blue.
- the plasmid will contain both selectable and screenable marker genes.
- the plasmid containing one or more of these genes is introduced into plant cells by any of the previously mentioned techniques. If the marker gene is a selectable gene, only those cells that have incorporated the DNA package survive under selection with the appropriate phytotoxic agent. Once the appropriate cells are identified and propagated, plants are regenerated. Progeny from the transformed plants must be tested to insure that the DNA package has been successfully integrated into the plant genome.
- the gene engineered in the foregoing manner is introduced into the plant through known transformation techniques.
- the appropriate plant types are selected.
- the plants are selfed to recover that genotype.
- the construct containing the transgene can be introduced into Brassica inbred lines by repeated backcrosses of the Brassica plant. For instance, the resulting seed may be planted in accordance with conventional Brass/ca-growing procedures and following self-pollination Brassica seed are formed thereon. Again, the resulting seed may be planted and following self- pollination, next generation Brassica seed are formed thereon.
- the initial development of the line (the first couple of generations of the Brassica seed) preferably is carried out in a greenhouse in which the pollination is carefully controlled and monitored. This way, the desirable characteristics of the Brassica seed for subsequent use in field trials can be verified.
- planting of the Brassica seed preferably is carried out in field trials. Additional Brassica seed which are formed as a result of such self-pollination in the present or a subsequent generation are harvested and are subjected to analysis for the desired trait, using techniques known to those skilled in the art.
- Brassica plants may be regenerated from the parents of this invention using known techniques. For instance, the resulting seed may be planted in accordance with conventional Srass/ca-growing procedures and following cross-pollination Brassica seed are formed on the female parent. The planting of the Brassica seed may be carried out in a greenhouse or in field trials. Additional Brassica seed which are formed as a result of such cross-pollination in the present generation are harvested and are subjected to analysis for the desired trait. Brassica napus, Brassica campesths, and Brassica juncea are Brassica species which could be used in this invention using known techniques.
- the hybrid may be a single-cross hybrid, a double-cross hybrid, a three-way cross hybrid, a composite hybrid, a blended hybrid, a fully restored hybrid and any other hybrid or synthetic variety that is known to those skilled in the art, using this invention.
- Generating Plants from Plant Parts - Brassica plants may be regenerated from the plant parts of the Brassica plant of this invention using known techniques. For instance, the resulting seed may be planted in accordance with conventional Brassica- growing procedures and following self-pollination Brassica seed are formed thereon. Alternatively, doubled haploid plantlets may be extracted to immediately form homozygous plants.
- the desired traits can be transferred between the napus, campesths, and juncea species using the same conventional plant breeding techniques involving pollen transfer and selection.
- the transfer of traits between Brassica species, such as napus and campestris, by standard plant breeding techniques is already well documented in the technical literature. (See, for instance, Tsunada et al., 1980).
- the improved Brassica plant of the present invention is capable of production in the field under conventional Brassica growing conditions that are commonly utilized during seed production on a commercial scale. Such seed of Brassica exhibits satisfactory agronomic characteristics and is capable upon self- pollination of forming seed and meal providing satisfactory agronomic characteristics.
- "satisfactory agronomic characteristics” is defined as the ability to yield an seed harvest under standard field growing conditions meet the standards required for registration of canola varieties (suitable for commercial use).
- the human fibroblast growth factor genes a common structured arrangement underlies the mechanisms for generating receptor forms that differ in their third immunoglobulin domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11 , 4627-4634.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Catalysts (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU59770/98A AU736220B2 (en) | 1997-02-07 | 1998-02-04 | Production of self-compatible (brassica) hybrids using a self-incompatible pollination control system |
EP98902888A EP0981634A1 (en) | 1997-02-07 | 1998-02-04 | PRODUCTION OF SELF-COMPATIBLE $i(BRASSICA) HYBRIDS USING A SELF-INCOMPATIBLE POLLINATION CONTROL SYSTEM |
CA002279496A CA2279496A1 (en) | 1997-02-07 | 1998-02-04 | Production of self-compatible brassica hybrids using a self-incompatible pollination control system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US3771997P | 1997-02-07 | 1997-02-07 | |
US60/037,719 | 1997-02-07 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1998035052A1 true WO1998035052A1 (en) | 1998-08-13 |
Family
ID=21895918
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA1998/000089 WO1998035052A1 (en) | 1997-02-07 | 1998-02-04 | Production of self-compatible brassica hybrids using a self-incompatible pollination control system |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0981634A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU736220B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2279496A1 (en) |
PL (1) | PL335072A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1998035052A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105145333A (en) * | 2013-05-10 | 2015-12-16 | 李晓方 | Commercial population breeding method |
CN112118731A (en) * | 2018-02-23 | 2020-12-22 | 坂田种苗株式会社 | Self-compatible cabbage plant and cultivation method thereof |
CN112931187A (en) * | 2021-03-30 | 2021-06-11 | 山西省农业科学院蔬菜研究所 | Breeding method of Chinese cabbage hybrid with high virus disease resistance |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0436467A2 (en) * | 1989-12-29 | 1991-07-10 | Ciba-Geigy Ag | Expression of S-locus specific glycoprotein gene in transgenic plants |
EP0519869A2 (en) * | 1991-06-19 | 1992-12-23 | Ciba-Geigy Ag | A receptor protein kinase gene encoded at the self-incompatibility locus |
WO1994009139A1 (en) * | 1992-10-08 | 1994-04-28 | University Of Guelph | S-locus receptor kinase gene in a self-incompatible brassica napus line |
WO1995021913A1 (en) * | 1994-02-09 | 1995-08-17 | The Penn State Research Foundation | Alteration of plant self-compatibility using genetic manipulation of the s-genes |
CA2123751A1 (en) * | 1994-03-11 | 1995-09-12 | Daphne R. Goring | Self-incompatibility genes associated with the a10 allele |
WO1996023401A1 (en) * | 1995-02-03 | 1996-08-08 | University Of Guelph | Improved process for producing seeds capable of forming f1 hybrid plants utilizing self-incompatibility |
JPH08322412A (en) * | 1995-05-26 | 1996-12-10 | Saishiyu Jitsuyou Gijutsu Kenkyusho:Kk | Plant to which anti-sense gene is introduced and its creation |
-
1998
- 1998-02-04 EP EP98902888A patent/EP0981634A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1998-02-04 AU AU59770/98A patent/AU736220B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1998-02-04 CA CA002279496A patent/CA2279496A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-02-04 PL PL33507298A patent/PL335072A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1998-02-04 WO PCT/CA1998/000089 patent/WO1998035052A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0436467A2 (en) * | 1989-12-29 | 1991-07-10 | Ciba-Geigy Ag | Expression of S-locus specific glycoprotein gene in transgenic plants |
EP0519869A2 (en) * | 1991-06-19 | 1992-12-23 | Ciba-Geigy Ag | A receptor protein kinase gene encoded at the self-incompatibility locus |
WO1994009139A1 (en) * | 1992-10-08 | 1994-04-28 | University Of Guelph | S-locus receptor kinase gene in a self-incompatible brassica napus line |
WO1995021913A1 (en) * | 1994-02-09 | 1995-08-17 | The Penn State Research Foundation | Alteration of plant self-compatibility using genetic manipulation of the s-genes |
CA2123751A1 (en) * | 1994-03-11 | 1995-09-12 | Daphne R. Goring | Self-incompatibility genes associated with the a10 allele |
WO1996023401A1 (en) * | 1995-02-03 | 1996-08-08 | University Of Guelph | Improved process for producing seeds capable of forming f1 hybrid plants utilizing self-incompatibility |
JPH08322412A (en) * | 1995-05-26 | 1996-12-10 | Saishiyu Jitsuyou Gijutsu Kenkyusho:Kk | Plant to which anti-sense gene is introduced and its creation |
Non-Patent Citations (9)
Title |
---|
BIOLOGICAL ABSTRACTS, vol. 102, Philadelphia, PA, US; abstract no. 116909, FRANKLIN T M ET AL: "SLR1 function is dispensable for both self-incompatible rejection and self-compatible pollination processes in Brassica." XP002070007 * |
CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS, vol. 124, no. 15, 9 April 1996, Columbus, Ohio, US; abstract no. 198279, ROTHSTEIN, STEVEN J. ET AL: "Self-incompatibility genes associated with the A10 allele and their use in the generation of self-incompatible Brassica" XP002070008 * |
DATABASE WPI Section Ch Week 9708, Derwent World Patents Index; Class C06, AN 97-080946, XP002070001 * |
MCCUBBIN A G ET AL: "A mutant S-3 RNase of Petunia inflata lacking RNase activity has an allele-specific dominant negative effect on self- incompatibility interactions.", PLANT CELL 9 (1). 1997. 85-95. ISSN: 1040-4651, XP002069998 * |
MURFETT J ET AL: "Antisense suppression of S-RNase expression in Nicotiana using RNA polymerase II- and III-transcribed gene constructs.", PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 29 (2). 1995. 201-212. ISSN: 0167-4412, XP002069997 * |
SEXUAL PLANT REPRODUCTION 9 (4). 1996. 203-208. ISSN: 0934-0882 * |
SHIBA, HIROSHI ET AL: "Breakdown of self-incompatibility in Brassica by the antisense RNA of the SLG gene", PROC. JPN. ACAD., SER. B (1995), 71B(2), 81-3 CODEN: PJABDW;ISSN: 0386-2208, XP002069996 * |
STAHL R J ET AL: "The self-incompatibility phenotype in Brassica is altered by the transformation of a mutant S locus receptor kinase.", PLANT CELL 10 (2). 1998. 209-218. ISSN: 1040-4651, XP002070000 * |
TORIYAMA, K., ET AL.: "Transformation of Brassica oleracea with an S-locus gene from B.campestris changes the self-incompatibility phenotype", THEORETICAL APPLIED GENETICS, vol. 81, 1991, pages 769 - 776, XP002069999 * |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105145333A (en) * | 2013-05-10 | 2015-12-16 | 李晓方 | Commercial population breeding method |
CN112118731A (en) * | 2018-02-23 | 2020-12-22 | 坂田种苗株式会社 | Self-compatible cabbage plant and cultivation method thereof |
CN112931187A (en) * | 2021-03-30 | 2021-06-11 | 山西省农业科学院蔬菜研究所 | Breeding method of Chinese cabbage hybrid with high virus disease resistance |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
PL335072A1 (en) | 2000-04-10 |
AU5977098A (en) | 1998-08-26 |
EP0981634A1 (en) | 2000-03-01 |
AU736220B2 (en) | 2001-07-26 |
CA2279496A1 (en) | 1998-08-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP6109991B2 (en) | Brassica plant containing a mutant INDEISCENT allele | |
US6005167A (en) | Male-sterile plants, method for obtaining male-sterile plants and recombinant DNA for use therein | |
HU215494B (en) | Process for the preparation of dna sequence imparting cytoplasmatic male sterility, mitochondrial genome, nuclear genome, mitochondria and plant containing said sequence and hybrids | |
JPH02503988A (en) | Plants with modified stamen cells | |
JP2000116258A (en) | Binary cryptocytotoxic method of hybrid seed production | |
Goring et al. | Use of the polymerase chain reaction to isolate an S-locus glycoprotein cDNA introgressed from Brassica campestris into B. napus ssp. oleifera | |
JP2000510342A (en) | Creating ApoMic Seeds | |
CA2042447C (en) | Control of microsporogenesis by externally inducible promoter sequences | |
EP0983371A1 (en) | Method for enhancement of naturally occurring cytoplasmic male sterility and for restoration of male fertility and uses thereof in hybrid crop production | |
AU642454B2 (en) | Expression of S-locus specific glycoprotein gene in transgenic plants | |
JP2023547548A (en) | parthenocarpic watermelon plant | |
Goring et al. | Identification of an S‐locus glycoprotein allele introgressed from B. napus ssp. rapifera to B. napus ssp. oleifera | |
US20060123514A1 (en) | Self-fertile apple resulting from S-RNAase gene silencing | |
AU2003222566A8 (en) | Genes for altering mitochondrial function and for hybrid seed production | |
AU736220B2 (en) | Production of self-compatible (brassica) hybrids using a self-incompatible pollination control system | |
US20020170082A1 (en) | Gene affecting male fertility in plants | |
Gradziel et al. | Multiple genetic factors control self-fertility in almond | |
AU2018203532A1 (en) | Reversible genic male sterility in compositae | |
MXPA99007284A (en) | Production of self-compatible brassica | |
CZ258699A3 (en) | Isolated plant cell, isolated vector, autocompatible plant, isolated DNA sequence, seed and method of introducing autocompatibility into the plant | |
CA3152291A1 (en) | Brassica juncea line nubj1207 | |
OA21301A (en) | Parthenocarpic watermelon plants. | |
JP2000300273A (en) | Gene participating in dehiscence of anther | |
JP4562127B2 (en) | Modification of plant crossing characteristics by gene transfer | |
Mahe | Import of chimeric proteins into plant mitochondria |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AU CA CZ JP MX NO NZ PL US |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: PV1999-2586 Country of ref document: CZ |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 337001 Country of ref document: NZ |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 59770/98 Country of ref document: AU |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2279496 Country of ref document: CA Kind code of ref document: A Ref document number: 2279496 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: PA/a/1999/007284 Country of ref document: MX |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1998902888 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: PV1999-2586 Country of ref document: CZ |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1998902888 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWR | Wipo information: refused in national office |
Ref document number: PV1999-2586 Country of ref document: CZ |
|
WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 59770/98 Country of ref document: AU |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 1998902888 Country of ref document: EP |