WO1998032843A2 - Compositions and method for modulation of alkaloid biosynthesis and flower formation in plants - Google Patents

Compositions and method for modulation of alkaloid biosynthesis and flower formation in plants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1998032843A2
WO1998032843A2 PCT/US1998/000738 US9800738W WO9832843A2 WO 1998032843 A2 WO1998032843 A2 WO 1998032843A2 US 9800738 W US9800738 W US 9800738W WO 9832843 A2 WO9832843 A2 WO 9832843A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
nucleic acid
cugauga
gaa
plant
gene
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1998/000738
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO1998032843A3 (en
Inventor
Michael G. Zwick
James A. Mcswiggen
Original Assignee
Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed Critical Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Priority to AU59183/98A priority Critical patent/AU5918398A/en
Publication of WO1998032843A2 publication Critical patent/WO1998032843A2/en
Publication of WO1998032843A3 publication Critical patent/WO1998032843A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • C12N15/113Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing
    • C12N15/1137Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing against enzymes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8242Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits
    • C12N15/8243Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits involving biosynthetic or metabolic pathways, i.e. metabolic engineering, e.g. nicotine, caffeine
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8262Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield involving plant development
    • C12N15/827Flower development or morphology, e.g. flowering promoting factor [FPF]
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/10Type of nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/12Type of nucleic acid catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes
    • C12N2310/121Hammerhead
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/10Type of nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/12Type of nucleic acid catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes
    • C12N2310/122Hairpin

Definitions

  • the present invention concerns compositions and methods for the modulation of gene expression in plants, specifically using enzymatic nucleic acid molecules.
  • the following is a brief description of regulation of gene expression in plants. The discussion is not meant to be complete and is provided only for understanding of the invention that follows. This summary is not an admission that any of the work described below is prior art to the claimed invention.
  • Naturally occurring antisense RNA was first discovered in bacteria over a decade ago (Simons and Kleckner, 1983 Cell 34, 683-691). It is thought to be one way in which bacteria can regulate their gene expression (Green et al . , 1986 Ann. Rev. Biochem. 55: 567-597; Simons 1988 Gene 72: 35-44). The first demonstration of antisense- ediated inhibition of gene expression was reported in mammalian cells (Izant and eintraub 1984 Cell 36: 1007-1015) . There are many examples in the literature for the use of antisense RNA to modulate gene expression in plants. Following are a few examples:
  • Transgenic potato plants have been produced which express RNA antisense to potato or cassava granule bound starch synthase (GBSS) . In both of these cases, transgenic plants have been constructed which have reduced or no GBSS activity or protein. These transgenic plants give rise to potatoes containing starch with dramatically reduced amylose levels (Visser et al . 1991, Mol . Gen. Genet. 225: 2889-296; Salehuzzaman et al. 1993, Plant Mol. Biol. 23: 947-962).
  • GBSS cassava granule bound starch synthase
  • Homologous transgene inactivation was first documented in plants as an unexpected result of inserting a transgene in the sense orientation and finding that both the gene and the transgene were down-regulated (Napoli et al., 1990 Plant Cell 2: 279-289). There appears to be at least two mechanisms for inactivation of homologous genetic sequences. One appears to be transcriptional inactivation via methylation, where duplicated DNA regions signal endogenous mechanisms for gene silencing. This approach of gene modulation involves either the introduction of multiple copies of transgenes or transformation of plants with transgenes with homology to the gene of interest (Ronchi et al 1995 EMBO J. 14: 5318-5328) .
  • WO 94/19476 and WO 9503404 Atkins et al., 1995, J. Gen. Virol. 76, 1781- 1790; Gruber et al., 1994, J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl . 18A, 110 (Xl-406) and Feyter et al., 1996, Mol. Gen. Genet. 250, 329-338], that propose using hammerhead ribozymes to modulate: virus replication, expression of viral genes and/or reporter genes. None of these publications report the use of ribozymes to modulate the expression of plant genes . Mazzolini et al . , 1992, Plant. Mol. Bio. 20, 715- 731; Steinecke et al., 1992, EMBO. J.
  • Certain plants contain undesirable alkaloid compounds which, when present in excess, are undesirable for human or animal consumption (Valkonen et al . 1996 Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 15, 1-20) .
  • Potatoes and other sola- naceous plants contain steroidal glycoalkaloids, whose level is regulated by genetic, developmental and environmental signals (Bergenstrahle et al. 1992 J. Plant Phys. 140, 269-275; Sinden, 1984 Am. Potato J. 61, 141- 156) .
  • Potato tubers synthesize the alkaloids solanine and chaconine in response to wounding, temperature, light and sprouting.
  • glycoalkaloids are thought to be responsible for preventing insect predation and resistance to infection by pathogenic fungi (Valkonen et al. supra) .
  • the enzyme solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl- transferase is implicated as the enzyme primarily responsible for the biosynthesis of both these alkaloid compounds (Stapleton et al. 1992 Prot . Exp. Purif. 3, 85- 92, 6; Stapleton et al . 1991 J. Agri . Food Chem. 39, 1187-1193) .
  • the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle enzyme citrate synthase is implicated in the formation of flower buds in plants (Landshutze et al . , 1995 EMBO J. 14, 660-666).
  • TCA mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid
  • antisense constructs have shown that inhibition of the expression of the gene for this enzyme can delay or eliminate flower bud formation. There were no visible effects on plant growth or yield. The ovaries in the transgenic antisense plants disintegrated, indicating that citrate synthase and the TCA cycle are important in the transition from vegetative to generative phase of plant growth.
  • Cytoplasmic male sterility has been associated with mitochondrial gene expression, but typically affects the ability of the plant to produce viable pollen, not affecting female fertility (Levings et al., 1993 Plant Cell 5, 1285-1290; Chaudhury, 1993 Plant Cell 5, 1277-1283) . Inhibition of expression of the citrate synthase gene by ribozymes should result in the delay or elimination of flower formation in plants. This would be very useful in preventing flowering in plant species that are vegetatively propagated or where the primary consumable part of the plant is root, stem or leaf.
  • the enzyme is mitochondrial, but is encoded by a nuclear gene (Landshutze et al.,1995 Planta 196, 756-764) .
  • the invention features modulation of gene expression in plants specifically using enzymatic nucleic acid molecules.
  • invention features inhibiting the expression of genes involved in the biosynthesis of certain alkaloid compounds using enzymatic nucleic acid molecules. That is, the inhibition of the gene product
  • RNA results in a lowering of the production of alkaloid in the plant.
  • Limiting the levels of certain alkaloid compounds in commercial cultivars, especially reductions in alkaloid content in the tuber by use of tissue-specific promoters is disclosed.
  • the isolation of the gene encoding solanidine glucosyltransferase now allows evaluation of the phenotype that results from down-regulation of this gene (Moehs et al . , 1997 Plant J. 11, 100-110) .
  • This application further deals with methods to produce cultivars such as, potato, tomato, pepper, eggplant, ditura, and others, with low levels of the toxic alkaloids.
  • the invention features inhibiting the expression of genes involved in flower formation using enzymatic nucleic acid molecules. That is, the gene product (e.g., RNA) is inhibited to prevent formation of a flower by the plant modulating the expression of citrate synthase in commercial cultivars by use of enzymatic nucleic acid is disclosed as one example. Inhibition of expression of the citrate synthase gene by ribozymes may result in the delay or elimination of flower formation in plants. This would be very useful in preventing flowering in plant species that are vegetatively propagated or where the primary consumable part of the plant is root, stem or leaf.
  • the gene product e.g., RNA
  • Inhibition of expression of the citrate synthase gene by ribozymes may result in the delay or elimination of flower formation in plants. This would be very useful in preventing flowering in plant species that are vegetatively propagated or where the primary consumable part of the plant is root, stem or leaf.
  • This application further deals with methods to produce cultivars such as, lettuce, spinach, cabbage, brussel sprouts, arugula, kale, collards, chard, beet, turnip, potato, sweet potato and turfgrass, with delayed or elimination of flower formation. Any gene in the flower formation pathway that does not effect vegetative growth can be targeted in this manner.
  • the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity may be in the form of, but not limited to, a hammerhead, hairpin, hepatitis delta virus, group I intron, group II intron, RNaseP RNA, Neurospora VS RNA and the like.
  • the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity may be encoded as a monomer or a multimer, preferably a multimer.
  • the nucleic acids encoding_for the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity may be operably linked to an open reading frame.
  • Gene expression in any plant species may be modified by transformation of the plant with the nucleic acid encoding the enzymatic nucleic acid molecules with RNA cleaving activity.
  • technologies for transforming a plant include but are not limited to transformation with Agrobacterium, bombarding with DNA coated microprojectiles, whiskers, or electroporation.
  • Any target gene may be modified with the nucleic acids encoding the enzymatic nucleic acid molecules with RNA cleaving activity.
  • Ribozymes can be used to modulate flower formation of a plant, for example, by modulating the activity of an enzyme involved in a biochemical pathway. It may be desirable, in some instances, to decrease the level of expression of a particular gene, rather than shutting down expression completely: ribozymes can be used to achieve this. Enzymatic nucleic acid-based techniques were developed herein to allow directed modulation of gene expression to generate plant cells, plant tissues or plants with altered flowering phenotype.
  • the invention features Ribozymes that can be used to modulate a specific trait of a plant cell, for example, by modulating the activity of an enzyme involved in a biochemical pathway. It may be desirable, in some instances, to decrease the level of expression of a particular gene, rather than shutting down expression completely: ribozymes can be used to achieve this. Enzymatic nucleic acid-based techniques were developed herein to allow directed modulation of gene expression to generate plant cells, plant tissues or plants with altered phenotype.
  • Ribozymes are nucleic acid molecules having an enzymatic activity which is able to repeatedly cleave other separate RNA molecules in a nucleotide base sequence-specific manner.
  • Such enzymatic RNA molecules can be targeted to virtually any RNA transcript, and efficient cleavage has been achieved in vitro and in vivo (Zaug et al., 1986, Nature 324, 429; Kim et al., 1987, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 8788; Dreyfus, 1988, Einstein Quarterly J. Bio. Med.
  • trans- cleaving ribozymes may be used as efficient tools to modulate gene expression in a variety of organisms including plants, animals and humans (Bennett et al. , supra; Edington et al . , supra; Usman & McSwiggen, 1995 Ann. Rep. Med. Chem. 30, 285-294; Christoffersen and Marr, 1995 J. Med. Chem. 38, 2023-2037).
  • Ribozymes can be designed to cleave specific RNA targets within the background of cellular RNA. Such a cleavage event renders the mRNA non-functional and abrogates protein expression from that RNA.
  • Figure 1 is a diagrammatic representation of the hammerhead ribozyme domain known in the art.
  • Stem II can be > 2 base-pairs long.
  • Each N is any nucleotide and each • represents a base pair.
  • Figure 2a is a diagrammatic representation of the hammerhead ribozyme domain known in the art
  • Figure 2b is a diagrammatic representation of the hammerhead ribozyme as divided by Uhlenbeck (1987, Nature, 327, 596-600) into a substrate and enzyme portion
  • Figure 2c is a similar diagram showing the hammerhead divided by Haseloff and Gerlach (1988, Nature, 334, 585-591) into two portions
  • Figure 2d is a similar diagram showing the hammerhead divided by Jeffries and Symons (1989, Nucl. Acids. Res., 17, 1371-1371) into two portions.
  • FIG 3 is a diagrammatic representation of the general structure of a hairpin ribozyme.
  • Helix 2 (H2) is provided with a least 4 base pairs (i.e. , n is 1, 2, 3 or 4) and helix 5 can be optionally provided of length 2 or more bases (preferably 3 - 20 bases, i.e., m is from 1 - 20 or more) .
  • Helix 2 and helix 5 may be covalently linked by one or more bases (i.e., r is > 1 base) .
  • Helix 1, 4 or 5 may also be extended by 2 or more base pairs (e.g. , 4 - 20 base pairs) to stabilize the ribozyme structure, and preferably is a protein binding site.
  • each N and N' independently is any normal or modified base and each dash represents a potential base-pairing interaction.
  • These nucleotides may be modified at the sugar, base or phosphate. Complete base- pairing is not required in the helices, but is preferred.
  • Helix 1 and 4 can be of any size (i.e. , o and p is each independently from 0 to any number, e.g., 20) as long as some base-pairing is maintained.
  • Essential bases are shown as specific bases in the structure, but those in the art will recognize that one or more may be modified chemically (abasic, base, sugar and/or phosphate modifications) or replaced with another base without significant effect.
  • Helix 4 can be formed from two separate molecules, i.e., without a connecting loop. The connecting loop when present may be a ribonucleotide with or without modifications to its base, sugar or phosphate.
  • q is > 2 bases.
  • the connecting loop can also be replaced with a non-nucleotide linker molecule.
  • H refers to bases A, U, or C.
  • Y refers to pyrimidine bases.
  • Figure 4 is a representation of the general structure of the hepatitis ⁇ virus ribozyme domain known in the art.
  • Figure 5 is a representation of the general structure of the self-cleaving VS RNA ribozyme domain.
  • the present invention concerns compositions and methods for the modulation of gene expression in plants specifically using enzymatic nucleic acid molecules.
  • inhibitor or “modulate” is meant that the activity of enzymes, such as solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase, potato citrate synthase, or level of mRNAs encoded by these genes is reduced below that observed in the absence of an enzymatic nucleic acid and preferably is below that level observed in the presence of an inactive RNA molecule able to bind to the same site on the mRNA, but unable to cleave that RNA.
  • enzymes such as solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase, potato citrate synthase, or level of mRNAs encoded by these genes is reduced below that observed in the absence of an enzymatic nucleic acid and preferably is below that level observed in the presence of an inactive RNA molecule able to bind to the same site on the mRNA, but unable to cleave that RNA.
  • enzymatic nucleic acid molecule it is meant a nucleic acid molecule which has complementarity in a substrate binding region to a specified gene target, and also has an enzymatic activity which is active to specifically cleave that target. That is, the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule is able to intermolecularly cleave RNA (or DNA) and thereby inactivate a target RNA molecule. This complementarity functions to allow sufficient hybridization of the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule to the target RNA to allow the cleavage to occur. One hundred percent complementarity is preferred, but complementarity as low as 50-75% may also be useful in this invention.
  • the nucleic acids may be modified at the base, sugar, and/or phosphate groups.
  • the term enzymatic nucleic acid is used interchangeably with phrases such as ribozymes, catalytic RNA, enzymatic RNA, catalytic DNA, nucleozyme, DNAzyme, RNA enzyme, RNAzyme, polyribozymes, molecular scissors, self-splicing RNA, self-cleaving RNA, cis-cleaving RNA, autolytic RNA, endoribonuclease, minizyme, leadzy e, oligozyme or DNA enzyme. All of these terminologies describe nucleic acid molecules with enzymatic activity.
  • the term encompasses enzymatic RNA molecule which include one or more ribonucleotides and may include a majority of other types of nucleotides or abasic moieties, as described below.
  • complementarity is meant a nucleic acid that can form hydrogen bond(s) with other RNA sequences by either traditional Watson-Crick or other non-traditional types (for example, Hoogsteen type) of base-paired interactions.
  • vectors any nucleic acid- and/or viral-based technique used to deliver and/or express a desired nucleic acid.
  • gene is meant a nucleic acid that encodes an RNA.
  • plant gene is meant a gene encoded by a plant.
  • endogenous gene is meant a gene normally found in a plant cell in its natural location in the genome.
  • flanking or “heterologous” gene is meant a gene not normally found in the host plant cell, but that is introduced by standard gene transfer techniques.
  • nucleic acid is meant a molecule which can be single-stranded or double-stranded, composed of nucleotides containing a sugar, a phosphate and either a purine or pyrimidine base which may be same or different, and may be modified or unmodified.
  • genomic is meant genetic material contained in each cell of an organism and/or a virus.
  • RNA that can be translated into protein by a cell.
  • cDNA DNA that is complementary to and derived from a mRNA.
  • dsDNA is meant a double stranded cDNA.
  • RNA transcript that comprises the mRNA sequence.
  • antisense RNA an RNA transcript that comprises sequences complementary to all or part of a target RNA and/or mRNA and that blocks the expression of a target gene by interfering with the processing, transport and/or translation of its primary transcript and/or mRNA.
  • the complementarity may exist with any part of the target RNA, i.e., at the 5' non-coding sequence, 3' non-coding sequence, introns, or the coding sequence.
  • Antisense RNA is normally a mirror image of the sense RNA.
  • expression is meant the transcription and stable accumulation of the enzymatic nucleic acid molecules, mRNA and/or the antisense RNA inside a plant cell.
  • Expression of genes involves transcription of the gene and translation of the mRNA into precursor or mature proteins.
  • cosuppression is meant the expression of a foreign gene, which has substantial homology to an gene, and in a plant cell causes the reduction in activity ⁇ ft of the foreign and/or the endogenous protein product.
  • altered levels is meant the level of production of a gene product in a transgenic organism is different from that of a normal or non-transgenic organism.
  • promoter nucleotide sequence element within a gene which controls the expression of that gene. Promoter sequence provides the recognition for RNA polymerase and other transcription factors required for efficient transcription. Promoters from a variety of sources can be used efficiently in plant cells to express ribozymes.
  • promoters of bacterial origin such as the octopine synthetase promoter, the nopaline synthase promoter, the manopine synthetase promoter
  • promoters of viral origin such as the cauliflower mosaic virus (35S)
  • plant promoters such as the ribulose-1, 6- biphosphate (RUBP) carboxylase small subunit (ssu) , the beta-conglycinin promoter, the phaseolin promoter, the ADH promoter, heat-shock promoters, and tissue specific promoters.
  • Promoter may also contain certain enhancer sequence elements that may improve the transcription efficiency.
  • nucleotide sequence element which can stimulate promoter activity (Adh) .
  • constitutive promoter is meant promoter element that directs continuous gene expression in all cells types and at all times (actin, ubiquitin, CaMV 35S) .
  • tissue-specific promoter is meant promoter element responsible for gene expression in specific cell or tissue types, such as the leaves or seeds (zein, oleosin, napin, ACP) .
  • development-specific promoter is meant promoter element responsible for gene expression at specific plant developmental stage, such as in early or late embryogenesis .
  • inducible promoter is meant promoter element which is responsible for expression of genes in response to a specific signal, such as: physical stimulus (heat shock genes) ; light (RUBP carboxylase) ; hormone (Em) ; metabolites; and stress.
  • a “plant” is meant a photosynthetic organism, either eukaryotic and prokaryotic.
  • angiosperm is meant a plant having its seed enclosed in an ovary (e.g. , coffee, tobacco, bean, pea) .
  • an ovary e.g. , coffee, tobacco, bean, pea
  • ovary e.g., pine, spruce
  • seed leaf By “monocotyledon” is meant a plant characterized by the presence of only one seed leaf (primary leaf of the embryo). For example, maize, wheat, rice and others.
  • cotyledon is meant a plant producing seeds with two cotyledons (primary leaf of the embryo) .
  • cotyledons primary leaf of the embryo
  • coffee canola
  • peas and others.
  • transgenic plant is meant a plant expressing a foreign gene.
  • open reading frame is meant a nucleotide sequence, without introns, encoding an amino acid sequence, with a defined translation initiation and termination region.
  • the invention provides a method for producing a class of enzymatic cleaving agents which exhibit a high degree of specificity for the RNA of a desired target.
  • the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule may be targeted to a highly specific sequence region of a target such that specific gene inhibition can be achieved.
  • enzymatic nucleic acid can be targeted to a highly conserved region of a gene family to inhibit gene expression of a family of related enzymes.
  • the ribozymes can be expressed in plants that have been transformed with vectors which express the nucleic acid of the present invention.
  • ribozyme The enzymatic nature of a ribozyme is advantageous over other technologies, since the concentration of ribozyme necessary to affect a therapeutic treatment is lower. This advantage reflects the ability of the ribozyme to act enzymatically . Thus, a single ribozyme molecule is able to cleave many molecules of target RNA.
  • the ribozyme is a highly specific inhibitor, with the specificity of inhibition depending not only on the base-pairing mechanism of binding to the target RNA, but also on the mechanism of target RNA cleavage. Single mismatches, or base-substitutions, near the site of cleavage can completely eliminate catalytic activity of a ribozyme.
  • enzymatic nucleic acids act by first binding to a target RNA. Such binding occurs through the target binding portion of an enzymatic nucleic acid which is held in close proximity to an enzymatic portion of the molecule that acts to cleave the target RNA.
  • the enzymatic nucleic acid first recognizes and then binds a target RNA through complementary base-pairing, and once bound to the correct site, acts enzymatically to cut the target RNA. Strategic cleavage of such a target RNA will destroy its ability to direct synthesis of an encoded protein. After an enzymatic nucleic acid has bound and cleaved its RNA target, it is released from that RNA to search for another target and can repeatedly bind and cleave new targets .
  • the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule is formed in a hammerhead or hairpin motif, but may also be formed in the motif of a hepatitis ⁇ virus, group I intron, group II intron or RNaseP RNA (in association with an RNA guide sequence) or Neurospora VS RNA.
  • Group II introns are described by Griffin et al . , 1995, Chem. Biol. 2, 761; Michels and Pyle, 1995, Biochemistry 34, 2965; and of the Group I intron by Cech et al . , U.S. Patent 4,987,071.
  • These specific motifs are not limiting in the invention and those skilled in the art will recognize that all that is important in an enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of this invention is that it has a specific substrate binding site which is complementary to one or more of the target gene RNA regions, and that it have nucleotide sequences within or surrounding that substrate binding site which impart an RNA cleaving activity to the molecule.
  • the enzymatic nucleic acid molecules of the instant invention will be expressed within cells from eukaryotic promoters [e.g. , Gerlach et al. , International PCT Publication No. WO 91/13994; Edington and Nelson, 1992, in Gene Regulation: Biology of Antisense RNA and DNA, eds . R. P. Erickson and J. G. Izant, pp 209-221, Raven Press, NY.; Atkins et al . , International PCT Publication No. WO 94/00012; Lenee et al., International PCT Publication Nos. WO 94/19476 and WO 9503404, Atkins et al., 1995, J. Gen. Virol.
  • eukaryotic promoters e.g. , Gerlach et al. , International PCT Publication No. WO 91/13994; Edington and Nelson, 1992, in Gene Regulation: Biology of Antisense RNA and DNA, e
  • any ribozyme can be expressed in eukaryotic plant cells from an appropriate promoter.
  • the ribozymes expression is under the control of a constitutive promoter, a tissue- specific promoter or an inducible promoter.
  • the ribozyme RNA is introduced into the plant.
  • plants can be transformed using the gene gun (US Patents 4,945,050 to Cornell and 5,141,131 to DowElanco) ; plants may be transformed using Agrobacterium technology, see US Patent 5,177,010 to University of Toledo, 5,104,310 to Texas A&M, European Patent Application 0131624B1, European Patent Applications 120516, 159418B1 and 176,112 to Schilperoot, US Patents 5,149,645, 5,469,976, 5,464,763 and 4,940,838 and 4,693,976 to Schilperoot, European Patent Applications 116718, 290799, 320500 all to MaxPlanck, European Patent Applications 604662 and 627752 to Japan Tobacco, European Patent Applications 0267159, and 0292435 and US Patent 5,231,019 all to Ciba Geigy, US Patents 5,463,174 and 4,762,785 both to Cal
  • tissue which is contacted with the foreign material (typically plasmids containing RNA or DNA) may vary as well.
  • tissue would include but would not be limited to embryogenic tissue, callus tissue type I and II, and any tissue which is receptive to transformation and subsequent regeneration into a transgenic plant.
  • Another variable is the choice of a selectable marker. The preference for a particular marker is at the discretion of the artisan, but any of the following selectable markers may be used along with any other gene not listed herein which could function as a selectable marker.
  • selectable markers include but are not limited to chlorosulfuron, hygromyacin, PAT and/or bar, bromoxynil, kanamycin and the like.
  • the bar gene may be isolated from Strptomuces, particularly from the hygroscopicus or viridochromogenes species.
  • the bar gene codes for phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) that inactivates the active ingradient in the herbicide bialaphos phosphinothricin (PPT) .
  • PPT phosphinothricin acetyl transferase
  • numerous combinations of technologies may be used in employing ribozyme mediated modulation.
  • the ribozymes may be expressed individually as monomers, i.e., one ribozyme targeted against one site is expressed per transcript. Alternatively, two or more ribozymes targeted against more than one target site are expressed as part of a single RNA transcript. A single RNA transcript comprising more than one ribozyme targeted against more than one cleavage site are readily generated to achieve efficient modulation of gene expression. Ribozymes within these multimer constructs are the same or different.
  • the multimer construct may comprise a plurality of hammerhead ribozymes or hairpin ribozymes or other ribozyme motifs.
  • the multimer construct may be designed to include a plurality of different ribozyme motifs, such as hammerhead and hairpin ribozymes. More specifically, multimer ribozyme constructs are designed, wherein a series of ribozyme motifs are linked together in tandem in a single RNA transcript. The ribozymes are linked to each other by nucleotide linker sequence, wherein the linker sequence may or may not be complementary to the target RNA. Multimer ribozyme constructs (polyribozymes) are likely to improve the effectiveness of ribozyme-mediated modulation of gene expression.
  • ribozymes can also be augmented by their release from the primary transcript by a second ribozyme (Draper et al . , PCT WO 93/23569, and Sullivan et al. , PCT WO 94/02595, both hereby incorporated in their totality by reference herein; Ohkawa, J. , et al., 1992, Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser., 27, 15-6; Taira, K. , et al . , 1991, Nucleic Acids Res., 19, 5125-30; Ventura, M. , et al. , 1993, Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 3249-55; Chowrira et al. , 1994 J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25856).
  • Ribozyme-mediated modulation of gene expression can be practiced in a wide variety of plants including but not limited to potato, lettuce spinach, cabbage, brussel sprouts, arugula, kale, collards, chard, beet, turnip, sweet potato and turfgrass. Following are a few non- limiting examples that describe the general utility of ribozymes in modulation of gene expression.
  • the invention concerns compositions (and methods for their use) for the modulation of genes involved in the biosynthesis of undesirable alkaloid compounds in plants. This is accomplished through the inhibition of genetic expression, with ribozymes, which results in the reduction or elimination of certain gene activities in plants, such as solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase. Such activity is reduced in plants, such as potato and other solanaceous plants.
  • ribozyme molecules contain substrate binding domains that bind to accessible regions of the target RNA.
  • the RNA molecules also contain domains that catalyze the cleavage of RNA.
  • the RNA molecules are preferably ribozymes of the hammerhead or hairpin motif.
  • the ribozymes cleave the target mRNAs, preventing translation and protein accumulation.
  • levels of undesirable alkaloids is reduced or inhibited. Specific examples are provided below in the Tables III and IV.
  • the ribozymes have binding arms which are complementary to the substrate sequences in Tables III and IV.
  • RNA synthetic UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase
  • similar ribozymes can be made complementary to other genes in other plant's RNA.
  • complementary is thus meant that the binding arms of the ribozymes are able to interact with the target RNA in a sequence- specific manner and enable the ribozyme to cause cleavage of a plant mRNA target. Examples of such ribozymes are typically sequences defined in Tables III and IV.
  • the active ribozyme typically contains an enzymatic center equivalent to those in the examples, and binding arms able to bind plant mRNA such that cleavage at the target site occurs. Other sequences may be present which do not interfere with such binding and/or cleavage.
  • the invention features compositions (and methods for their use) for the modulation of genes involved in the flower formation in plants. This is accomplished through the inhibition of genetic expression, with ribozymes, which results in the reduction or elimination of certain gene activities in plants, such as citrate synthase. Such activity can be reduced in plants, such as lettuce, spinach, cabbage, brussel sprouts, arugula, kale, collards, chard, beet, turnip, potato, sweet potato and turfgrass.
  • These endogenously expressed ribozyme molecules contain substrate binding domains that bind to accessible regions of the target RNA.
  • the RNA molecules also contain domains that catalyze the cleavage of RNA.
  • the RNA molecules are preferably ribozymes of the hammerhead or hairpin motif.
  • the ribozymes Upon binding, the ribozymes cleave the target mRNAs, preventing translation and protein accumulation. In the absence of the expression of the target gene, and/or if the level of expression of the target gene is significantly reduced, levels of undesirable alkaloids is reduced or inhibited. Specific examples are provided below in the Tables V and VI. In a non-limiting example, ribozymes have binding arms which are complementary to the substrate sequences shown in Tables V and VI are disclosed. Those in the art will recognize that while such examples are designed to one gene RNA (citrate synthase) of one plant (e.g. , potato) , similar ribozymes can be made complementary to other genes in other plant's RNA.
  • binding arms of the ribozymes are able to interact with the target RNA in a sequence-specific manner and enable the ribozyme to cause cleavage of a plant mRNA target.
  • ribozymes are typically sequences defined in Tables V and VI.
  • the active ribozyme typically contains an enzymatic center equivalent to those in the examples, and binding arms able to bind plant mRNA such that cleavage at the target site occurs. Other sequences may be present which do not interfere with such binding and/or cleavage.
  • ribozyme sequences listed in the Tables are representative only of many more such sequences where the enzymatic portion of the ribozyme (all but the binding arms) is altered to affect activity.
  • stem-loop II sequence of hammerhead ribozymes listed in Table III and V (5'- GGCGAAAGCC-3 ' ) can be altered (substitution, deletion, and/or insertion) to contain any sequences, preferably provided that a minimum of a two base-paired stem structure can form.
  • stem-loop IV sequence of hairpin ribozymes listed in Table IV and VI can be altered (substitution, deletion, and/or insertion) to contain any sequence, preferably provided that a minimum of a two base-paired stem structure can form.
  • Such ribozymes are equivalent to the ribozymes described specifically in the Tables.
  • the recombinant vectors capable of stable integration into the plant genome and selection of transformed plant lines expressing the ribozymes are expressed either by constitutive or inducible promoters in the plant cells. Once expressed, the ribozymes cleave their target mRNAs and reduce alkaloid production in their host cells.
  • the ribozymes expressed in plant cells are under the control of a constitutive promoter, a tissue-specific promoter or an inducible promoter.
  • Modification of undesirable alkaloid profile is an important application of nucleic acid-based technologies which are capable of reducing specific gene expression.
  • a high level of undesirable alkaloid compounds is undesirable in plants that produce products of commercial importance.
  • hairpin and hammerhead ribozymes that cleave solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl- transferase RNA are described.
  • ribozymes that cleave target RNAs required for solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase activity may now be readily designed and are within the scope of the invention.
  • RNA While specific examples to potato RNA are provided, those in the art will recognize that the teachings are not limited to potato. Furthermore, the same or equivalent target may be used in other plant species.
  • the complementary arms suitable for targeting the specific plant RNA sequences are utilized in the ribozyme targeted to that specific RNA.
  • the examples and teachings herein are meant to be non-limiting, and those skilled in the art will recognize that similar embodiments can be readily generated in a variety of different plants to modulate expression of a variety of different genes, using the teachings herein, and are within the scope of the inventions.
  • HH ribozyme cleavage sites and approximately 20 HP sites were identified in the potato solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase RNA.
  • a HH site consists of a uridine and any nucleotide except guanosine (UH) .
  • UH guanosine
  • Tables III and IV have a list of HH and HP ribozyme cleavage sites. The numbering system starts with 1 at the 5 ' end of a solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase RNA having the sequence shown in Moehs et al. , supra.
  • Ribozymes such as those listed in Tables III and IV, can be readily designed and synthesized to such cleavage sites with between 5 and 100 or more bases as substrate binding arms (see Figs. 1 - 5). These substrate binding arms within a ribozyme allow the ribozyme to interact with their target in a sequence- specific manner.
  • solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase RNA was assessed by computer analysis using algorithms, such as those developed by M. Zuker (Zuker, M., 1989 Science, 244, 48-52). Regions of the mRNA that did not form secondary folding structures with RNA/RNA stems of over eight nucleotides and contained potential hammerhead ribozyme cleavage sites were identified.
  • HH and HP hairpin ribozymes are subjected to analysis by computer folding and the ribozymes that had significant secondary structure are rejected.
  • RNA synthesis is chemically synthesized.
  • the general procedures for RNA synthesis have been described previously (Usman et al. , 1987, J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 109, 7845-7854 and in Scaringe et al., 1990, Nucl. Acids Res., 18, 5433-5341; Wincott et al . , 1995, Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 2677) .
  • Small scale syntheses are conducted on a 394 Applied Biosystems, Inc. synthesizer using a modified 2.5 ⁇ mol scale protocol with a 5 in coupling step for alkylsilyl protected nucleotides and 2.5 min coupling step for 2' -O-methylated nucleotides.
  • Table II outlines the amounts, and the contact times, of the reagents used in the synthesis cycle.
  • oligonucleotide synthesis reagents for the 394 Detritylation solution was 2% TCA in methylene chloride (ABI) ; capping was performed with 16% N-Methyl imidazole in THF (ABI) and 10% acetic anhydride/10% 2,6- lutidine in THF (ABI); oxidation solution is 16.9 mM I2,
  • RNA Deprotection of the RNA is performed as follows.
  • the polymer-bound oligoribonucleotide, trityl-off, is transferred from the synthesis column to a 4 mL glass screw top vial and suspended in a solution of methylamine (MA) at 65°C for 10 min. After cooling to -20°C, the supernatant is removed from the polymer support. The support is washed three times with 1.0 mL of EtOH:MeCN:H2 ⁇ /3: 1: 1, vortexed and the supernatant is then added to the first supernatant.
  • the combined super- natants, containing the oligoribonucleotide are dried to a white powder.
  • the base-deprotected oligoribonucleotide is resuspended in anhydrous TEA ⁇ F/NMP solution (250 ⁇ L of a solution of 1.5 L N-methylpyrrolidinone, 750 ⁇ L TEA and 1.0 mL TEA»3HF to provide a 1.4 M HF concentration) and heated to 65°C for 1.5 h.
  • the resulting, fully deprotected, oligomer is quenched with 50 mM TEAB (9 mL) prior to anion exchange desalting.
  • the TEAB solution is loaded onto a Qiagen 500 anion exchange cartridge (Qiagen Inc.) that is prewashed with 50 mM TEAB (10 mL) . After washing the loaded cartridge with 50 mM TEAB (10 mL) , the RNA is eluted with 2 M TEAB (10 mL) and dried down to a white powder.
  • Qiagen 500 anion exchange cartridge Qiagen Inc.
  • Inactive hammerhead ribozymes are synthesized by substituting a U for G5 and a U for A 4 (numbering from
  • the hairpin ribozymes are synthesized as described above for the hammerhead RNAs .
  • Ribozymes can also synthesized be from DNA templates using bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase (Milligan and Uhlenbeck, 1989, Methods Enzymol. 180, 51) .
  • Ribozymes are purified by gel electrophoresis using general methods or are purified by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC; See Wincott et al. , 1996, supra, the totality of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference) and were resuspended in water.
  • HPLC high pressure liquid chromatography
  • Ribozymes targeted to cleave solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase RNA can be endogenously expressed in plants, either from genes inserted into the plant genome (stable transformation) or from episomal transcription units (transient expression) which are part of plasmid vectors or viral sequences. These ribozymes can be expressed via RNA polymerase I, II, or III plant or plant virus promoters (such as CaMV) . Promoters can be either constitutive, tissue specific, or developmentally expressed.
  • HH ribozyme cleavage sites Approximately 398 HH ribozyme cleavage sites and approximately 25 HP sites were identified in the potato citrate synthase RNA.
  • a HH site consists of a uridine and any nucleotide except guanosine (UH) .
  • UH guanosine
  • Tables V and VI have a list of HH and HP ribozyme cleavage sites.
  • Ribozymes such as those listed in Tables III and IV, can be readily designed and synthesized to such cleavage sites with between 5 and 100 or more bases as substrate binding arms (see Figs. 1 - 5) . These substrate binding arms within a ribozyme allow the ribozyme to interact with their target in a sequence- specific manner.
  • HH and HP hairpin ribozymes are subjected to analysis by computer folding and the ribozymes that had significant secondary structure are rejected.
  • the ribozymes are synthesized as described above.
  • the sequences of the chemically synthesized ribozymes used in this study are shown below in Tables V and VI.
  • Ribozymes targeted to cleave potato citrate synthase RNA can be endogenously expressed in plants, either from genes inserted into the plant genome (stable transformation) or from episomal transcription units (transient expression) which are part of plasmid vectors or viral sequences. These ribozymes can be expressed via RNA polymerase I, II, or III plant or plant virus promoters (such as CaMV) . Promoters can be either constitutive, tissue specific, or developmentally expressed.
  • the device consists of a high pressure helium source, a syringe containing the DNA/gold suspension, and a pneumatically-operated multipurpose valve which provides controlled linkage between the helium source and a loop of pre-loaded DNA/gold suspension.
  • tissue targets Prior to blasting, tissue targets are covered with a sterile 104 micron stainless steel screen, which holds the tissue in place during impact.
  • targets are placed under vacuum in the main chamber of the device.
  • the DNA-coated gold particles are accelerated at the target 4 times using a helium pressure of 1500 psi. Each blast delivered 20 ⁇ l of DNA/gold suspension.
  • the targets are placed back on maintenance medium plus osmoticum for a 16 to 24 hour recovery period.
  • This strategy involves bombardment of plant cells with minute (1-2 microns in diameter) metal particles (for example tungsten or gold particles) using a "gene” gun (also referred to as "Biolistics" or "particle” gun) .
  • the metal particles, coated with genetic material can penetrate the cell wall, without causing any irreversible damage to the cell, and deliver the genetic material to the cytoplasm.
  • Agrobacterium-mediated transformation This method uses a disarmed (disease causing genes are deleted) species of Agrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rizogenes (Potrykus, 1991 Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 205-225; Gasser and Fraley, 1992 Scientific American June 1992 pp 62-69) . This organism transfers part of its DNA into plant cells (T-DNA) . Ribozyme genes can be cloned into T-DNA fragments and Agrobacterium containing the recombinant T-DNA can be generated. Agrobacterium will infect and release the recombinant T- DNA into maize cells. The integration of T-DNA into host DNA will result in a transformed phenotype.
  • sequence-specific enzymatic nucleic acid molecules of the instant invention might have many of the same applications for the study of RNA that DNA restriction endonucleases have for the study of DNA (Nathans, D. and Smith, H. 0., (1975) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 44:273).
  • the pattern of restriction fragments could be used to establish sequence relationships between two related plant RNAs, and large plant RNAs could be specifically cleaved to fragments of a size more useful for study.
  • the ability to engineer sequence specificity of the ribozyme is ideal for cleavage of RNAs of unknown sequence.
  • Ribozymes of this invention may be used as tools to examine genetic drift and mutations within plant cells.
  • the close relationship between ribozyme activity and the structure of the target RNA allows the detection of mutations in any region of the molecule which alters the base-pairing and three-dimensional structure of the target RNA.
  • multiple ribozymes described in this invention one may map nucleotide changes which are important to RNA structure and function in vitro, as well as in cells and tissues.
  • Cleavage of target RNAs with ribozymes may be used to inhibit gene expression and define the role (essentially) of specified gene products in the synthesis of undesirable alkaloids in plants. In this manner, other genetic targets may be defined as important mediators of alkaloid production.
  • Reaction mechanism attack by the 3' -Oil of guanosine to generate cleavage products with 3' -OH and 5'- guanosine .
  • RNAse P RNA (Ml RNA) • Size: -290 to 400 nucleotides.
  • RNA portion of a ubiquitous ribonucleoprotein enzyme • RNA portion of a ubiquitous ribonucleoprotein enzyme.
  • RNAse P is found throughout the prqkaryotes and eukaryotes. The RNA subunit has been sequenced from bacteria, yeast, rodents, and primates.
  • Reaction mechanism 2 ' -OH of an internal adenosine generates cleavage products with 3' -OH and a "lariat" RNA containing a 3' -5' and a 2' -5' branch point.
  • RNA RNA as the infectious agent.
  • HDV Hepatitis Delta Virus
  • Folded ribozyme contains a pseudoknot structure [36] .
  • Reaction mechanism attack by 2 ' -OH 5' to the scissile bond to generate cleavage products with 2, 3 '-cyclic phosphate and 5 ' -OH ends.
  • Oligonucleotides Elucidation of Reaction Mechanism and Structure/Function Relationships. Biochemistry (1995), 34(9), 2965-77.
  • AAAUUUUUU AUGCUCUU AAGAGCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAAUUU
  • X represents stem II region of a HH ribozyme (Hertel et al . , 1992 Nucleic Acids Res. 20 3252).
  • the length of stem II may be > 2 base-pairs.
  • X represents stem II region of a HH ribozyme (Hertel et al., 1992 Nucleic Acids Res. 20 3252).
  • the length of stem II may be > 2 base-pairs.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Nutrition Science (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Enzymes And Modification Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

An enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity, wherein the nucleic acid molecule modulates the expression of a gene involved in the biosynthesis of alkaloid compounds and flower formation in a plant. A transgenic plant comprising nucleic acids encoding for an enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity, wherein the nucleic acid molecule modulates the expression of a gene involved in the biosynthesis of alkaloid compounds of flower formation in a plant. An enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity, wherein the nucleic acid molecule modulates the expression of solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase gene or citrate synthase in plants.

Description

DESCRIPTION
Compositions And Method For Modulation Of Alkaloid Biosynthesis And Flower Formation In Plants
Background of the Invention
The present invention concerns compositions and methods for the modulation of gene expression in plants, specifically using enzymatic nucleic acid molecules. The following is a brief description of regulation of gene expression in plants. The discussion is not meant to be complete and is provided only for understanding of the invention that follows. This summary is not an admission that any of the work described below is prior art to the claimed invention.
There are a variety of strategies for modulating gene expression in plants. Traditionally, antisense RNA (reviewed in Bourque, 1995 Plant Sci 105, 125-149) and co-suppression (reviewed in Jorgensen, 1995 Science 268, 686-691) approaches have been used to modulate gene expression. Insertion utagenesis of genes have also been used to silence gene expression. This approach, however, cannot be designed to specifically inactivate the gene of interest. Applicant believes that ribozyme technology offers an attractive new means to alter gene expression in plants.
Naturally occurring antisense RNA was first discovered in bacteria over a decade ago (Simons and Kleckner, 1983 Cell 34, 683-691). It is thought to be one way in which bacteria can regulate their gene expression (Green et al . , 1986 Ann. Rev. Biochem. 55: 567-597; Simons 1988 Gene 72: 35-44). The first demonstration of antisense- ediated inhibition of gene expression was reported in mammalian cells (Izant and eintraub 1984 Cell 36: 1007-1015) . There are many examples in the literature for the use of antisense RNA to modulate gene expression in plants. Following are a few examples:
Shewmaker et al. , U.S. Patent Nos . 5,107,065 and 5, 453,566 disclose methods for regulating gene expression in plants using antisense RNA.
It has been shown that an antisense gene expressed in plants can act as a dominant suppressor gene. Transgenic potato plants have been produced which express RNA antisense to potato or cassava granule bound starch synthase (GBSS) . In both of these cases, transgenic plants have been constructed which have reduced or no GBSS activity or protein. These transgenic plants give rise to potatoes containing starch with dramatically reduced amylose levels (Visser et al . 1991, Mol . Gen. Genet. 225: 2889-296; Salehuzzaman et al. 1993, Plant Mol. Biol. 23: 947-962).
Kull et al., 1995, J. Genet. & Breed. 49, 69-76 reported inhibition of amylose biosynthesis in tubers from transgenic potato lines mediated by the expression of antisense sequences of the gene for granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS) . The authors, however, indicated a failure to see any in vivo activity of ribozymes targeted against the GBSS RNA. Antisense RNA constructs targeted against Δ-9 desaturase enzyme in canola have been shown to increase the level of stearic acid (C18:0) from 2% to 40% (Knutzon et. al., 1992 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89, 2624). There was no decrease in total oil content or germination efficiency in one of the high stearate lines. Several recent reviews are available which illustrate the utility of plants with modified oil composition (Ohlrogge, J. B. 1994 Plant Physiol. 104, 821; Kinney, A. J. 1994 Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5, 144; Gibson et al. 1994 Plant Cell Envir. 17, 627) .
Homologous transgene inactivation was first documented in plants as an unexpected result of inserting a transgene in the sense orientation and finding that both the gene and the transgene were down-regulated (Napoli et al., 1990 Plant Cell 2: 279-289). There appears to be at least two mechanisms for inactivation of homologous genetic sequences. One appears to be transcriptional inactivation via methylation, where duplicated DNA regions signal endogenous mechanisms for gene silencing. This approach of gene modulation involves either the introduction of multiple copies of transgenes or transformation of plants with transgenes with homology to the gene of interest (Ronchi et al 1995 EMBO J. 14: 5318-5328) . The other mechanism of co-suppression is post-transcriptional, where the combined levels of expression from both the gene and the transgene is thought to produce high levels of transcript which triggers threshold-induced degradation of both messages (van Bokland et al., 1994 Plant J. 6: 861-877). The exact molecular basis for co-suppression is unknown.
Unfortunately, both antisense and co-suppression technologies are subject to problems in heritability of the desired trait (Finnegan and McElroy 1994 Bio/Technology 12: 883-888) . Currently, there is no easy way to specifically inactivate a gene of interest at the DNA level in plants (Pazkowski et al., 1988 EMBO J. 7: 4021-4026) . Transposon mutagenesis is inefficient and not a stable event, while chemical mutagenesis is highly non-specific.
Applicant believes that ribozymes present an attractive alternative and because of their catalytic mechanism of action, have advantages over competing technologies. However, there have been difficulties in demonstrating the effectiveness of ribozymes in modulating gene expression in plant systems ( Mazzolini et al., 1992 Plant Mol. Biol. 20: 715-731; Kull et al., 1995 J. Genet. & Breed. 49: 69-76) . Although there are reports in the literature of ribozyme activity in plants cells, almost all of them involve down regulation of exogenously introduced genes, such as reporter genes in transient assays (Steinecke et al., 1992 EMBO J. 11:1525- 1530; Perriman et al., 1993 Antisense Res. Dev. 3: 253- 263; Perriman et al., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 6165) .
There are also several publications, [e.g., Lamb and Hay, 1990, J. Gen. Virol. 71, 2257-2264; Gerlach et al., International PCT Publication No. WO 91/13994; Xu et al . , 1992, Science in China (Ser. B) 35, 1434-1443; Edington and Nelson, 1992, in Gene Regulation: Biology of antisense RNA and DNA, eds . R. P. Erickson and J. G. Izant, pp 209-221, Raven Press, NY.; Atkins et al., International PCT Publication No. WO 94/00012; Lenee et al. , International PCT Publication Nos. WO 94/19476 and WO 9503404, Atkins et al., 1995, J. Gen. Virol. 76, 1781- 1790; Gruber et al., 1994, J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl . 18A, 110 (Xl-406) and Feyter et al., 1996, Mol. Gen. Genet. 250, 329-338], that propose using hammerhead ribozymes to modulate: virus replication, expression of viral genes and/or reporter genes. None of these publications report the use of ribozymes to modulate the expression of plant genes . Mazzolini et al . , 1992, Plant. Mol. Bio. 20, 715- 731; Steinecke et al., 1992, EMBO. J. 11, 1525-1530; Perriman et al., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 92, 6175-6179; Wegener et al., 1994, Mol. Gen. Genet. 245, 465-470; and Steinecke et al., 1994, Gene, 149, 47-54, describe the use of hammerhead ribozymes to inhibit expression of reporter genes in plant cells.
Bennett and Cullimore, 1992 Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 831-837 demonstrate hammerhead ribozyme-mediated in vitro cleavage of glna, glnb, glng and glnd RNA, coding for gluta ine synthetase enzyme in Phaseolus vulgaris.
Certain plants contain undesirable alkaloid compounds which, when present in excess, are undesirable for human or animal consumption (Valkonen et al . 1996 Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 15, 1-20) . Potatoes and other sola- naceous plants contain steroidal glycoalkaloids, whose level is regulated by genetic, developmental and environmental signals (Bergenstrahle et al. 1992 J. Plant Phys. 140, 269-275; Sinden, 1984 Am. Potato J. 61, 141- 156) . Potato tubers synthesize the alkaloids solanine and chaconine in response to wounding, temperature, light and sprouting. These glycoalkaloids are thought to be responsible for preventing insect predation and resistance to infection by pathogenic fungi (Valkonen et al. supra) . The enzyme solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl- transferase is implicated as the enzyme primarily responsible for the biosynthesis of both these alkaloid compounds (Stapleton et al. 1992 Prot . Exp. Purif. 3, 85- 92, 6; Stapleton et al . 1991 J. Agri . Food Chem. 39, 1187-1193) .
The mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle enzyme citrate synthase is implicated in the formation of flower buds in plants (Landshutze et al . , 1995 EMBO J. 14, 660-666). Experiments with antisense constructs have shown that inhibition of the expression of the gene for this enzyme can delay or eliminate flower bud formation. There were no visible effects on plant growth or yield. The ovaries in the transgenic antisense plants disintegrated, indicating that citrate synthase and the TCA cycle are important in the transition from vegetative to generative phase of plant growth. Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) has been associated with mitochondrial gene expression, but typically affects the ability of the plant to produce viable pollen, not affecting female fertility (Levings et al., 1993 Plant Cell 5, 1285-1290; Chaudhury, 1993 Plant Cell 5, 1277-1283) . Inhibition of expression of the citrate synthase gene by ribozymes should result in the delay or elimination of flower formation in plants. This would be very useful in preventing flowering in plant species that are vegetatively propagated or where the primary consumable part of the plant is root, stem or leaf. The enzyme is mitochondrial, but is encoded by a nuclear gene (Landshutze et al.,1995 Planta 196, 756-764) . Chemical inhibition of mitochondrial respiration is harmful (Kromer et al.,1991 Plant. Phys . 95, 1270-1276), thus the ribozyme genetic approach is potentially advantageous over other methods. The references cited above are distinct from the presently claimed invention since they do not disclose and/or contemplate the use of ribozymes to down regulate genes involved in the plant alkaloid biosynthesis in plant cells, let alone plants.
Summary Of The Invention
The invention features modulation of gene expression in plants specifically using enzymatic nucleic acid molecules. Preferably, invention features inhibiting the expression of genes involved in the biosynthesis of certain alkaloid compounds using enzymatic nucleic acid molecules. That is, the inhibition of the gene product
(e.g., RNA) results in a lowering of the production of alkaloid in the plant. Limiting the levels of certain alkaloid compounds in commercial cultivars, especially reductions in alkaloid content in the tuber by use of tissue-specific promoters is disclosed. The isolation of the gene encoding solanidine glucosyltransferase now allows evaluation of the phenotype that results from down-regulation of this gene (Moehs et al . , 1997 Plant J. 11, 100-110) . This application further deals with methods to produce cultivars such as, potato, tomato, pepper, eggplant, ditura, and others, with low levels of the toxic alkaloids.
In another aspect, the invention features inhibiting the expression of genes involved in flower formation using enzymatic nucleic acid molecules. That is, the gene product (e.g., RNA) is inhibited to prevent formation of a flower by the plant modulating the expression of citrate synthase in commercial cultivars by use of enzymatic nucleic acid is disclosed as one example. Inhibition of expression of the citrate synthase gene by ribozymes may result in the delay or elimination of flower formation in plants. This would be very useful in preventing flowering in plant species that are vegetatively propagated or where the primary consumable part of the plant is root, stem or leaf. This application further deals with methods to produce cultivars such as, lettuce, spinach, cabbage, brussel sprouts, arugula, kale, collards, chard, beet, turnip, potato, sweet potato and turfgrass, with delayed or elimination of flower formation. Any gene in the flower formation pathway that does not effect vegetative growth can be targeted in this manner.
The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity may be in the form of, but not limited to, a hammerhead, hairpin, hepatitis delta virus, group I intron, group II intron, RNaseP RNA, Neurospora VS RNA and the like. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity may be encoded as a monomer or a multimer, preferably a multimer. The nucleic acids encoding_for the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity may be operably linked to an open reading frame. Gene expression in any plant species may be modified by transformation of the plant with the nucleic acid encoding the enzymatic nucleic acid molecules with RNA cleaving activity. There are also numerous technologies for transforming a plant: such technologies include but are not limited to transformation with Agrobacterium, bombarding with DNA coated microprojectiles, whiskers, or electroporation. Any target gene may be modified with the nucleic acids encoding the enzymatic nucleic acid molecules with RNA cleaving activity.
Ribozymes can be used to modulate flower formation of a plant, for example, by modulating the activity of an enzyme involved in a biochemical pathway. It may be desirable, in some instances, to decrease the level of expression of a particular gene, rather than shutting down expression completely: ribozymes can be used to achieve this. Enzymatic nucleic acid-based techniques were developed herein to allow directed modulation of gene expression to generate plant cells, plant tissues or plants with altered flowering phenotype.
In a preferred embodiment the invention features Ribozymes that can be used to modulate a specific trait of a plant cell, for example, by modulating the activity of an enzyme involved in a biochemical pathway. It may be desirable, in some instances, to decrease the level of expression of a particular gene, rather than shutting down expression completely: ribozymes can be used to achieve this. Enzymatic nucleic acid-based techniques were developed herein to allow directed modulation of gene expression to generate plant cells, plant tissues or plants with altered phenotype.
Ribozymes (i.e., enzymatic nucleic acids) are nucleic acid molecules having an enzymatic activity which is able to repeatedly cleave other separate RNA molecules in a nucleotide base sequence-specific manner. Such enzymatic RNA molecules can be targeted to virtually any RNA transcript, and efficient cleavage has been achieved in vitro and in vivo (Zaug et al., 1986, Nature 324, 429; Kim et al., 1987, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 8788; Dreyfus, 1988, Einstein Quarterly J. Bio. Med. , 6, 92; Haseloff and Gerlach, 1988, Nature 334 585; Cech, 1988, JAMA 260, 3030; Murphy and Cech, 1989, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 86, 9218; Jefferies et al., 1989, Nucleic Acids Research 17, 1371) .
Because of their sequence-specificity, trans- cleaving ribozymes may be used as efficient tools to modulate gene expression in a variety of organisms including plants, animals and humans (Bennett et al. , supra; Edington et al . , supra; Usman & McSwiggen, 1995 Ann. Rep. Med. Chem. 30, 285-294; Christoffersen and Marr, 1995 J. Med. Chem. 38, 2023-2037). Ribozymes can be designed to cleave specific RNA targets within the background of cellular RNA. Such a cleavage event renders the mRNA non-functional and abrogates protein expression from that RNA. In this manner, synthesis of a protein associated with a particular phenotype and/or disease state can be selectively inhibited. Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments thereof, and from the claims. Brief Description of the Figures
Figure 1 is a diagrammatic representation of the hammerhead ribozyme domain known in the art. Stem II can be > 2 base-pairs long. Each N is any nucleotide and each • represents a base pair.
Figure 2a is a diagrammatic representation of the hammerhead ribozyme domain known in the art; Figure 2b is a diagrammatic representation of the hammerhead ribozyme as divided by Uhlenbeck (1987, Nature, 327, 596-600) into a substrate and enzyme portion; Figure 2c is a similar diagram showing the hammerhead divided by Haseloff and Gerlach (1988, Nature, 334, 585-591) into two portions; and Figure 2d is a similar diagram showing the hammerhead divided by Jeffries and Symons (1989, Nucl. Acids. Res., 17, 1371-1371) into two portions.
Figure 3 is a diagrammatic representation of the general structure of a hairpin ribozyme. Helix 2 (H2) is provided with a least 4 base pairs (i.e. , n is 1, 2, 3 or 4) and helix 5 can be optionally provided of length 2 or more bases (preferably 3 - 20 bases, i.e., m is from 1 - 20 or more) . Helix 2 and helix 5 may be covalently linked by one or more bases (i.e., r is > 1 base) . Helix 1, 4 or 5 may also be extended by 2 or more base pairs (e.g. , 4 - 20 base pairs) to stabilize the ribozyme structure, and preferably is a protein binding site. In each instance, each N and N' independently is any normal or modified base and each dash represents a potential base-pairing interaction. These nucleotides may be modified at the sugar, base or phosphate. Complete base- pairing is not required in the helices, but is preferred. Helix 1 and 4 can be of any size (i.e. , o and p is each independently from 0 to any number, e.g., 20) as long as some base-pairing is maintained. Essential bases are shown as specific bases in the structure, but those in the art will recognize that one or more may be modified chemically (abasic, base, sugar and/or phosphate modifications) or replaced with another base without significant effect. Helix 4 can be formed from two separate molecules, i.e., without a connecting loop. The connecting loop when present may be a ribonucleotide with or without modifications to its base, sugar or phosphate.
"q" is > 2 bases. The connecting loop can also be replaced with a non-nucleotide linker molecule. H refers to bases A, U, or C. Y refers to pyrimidine bases.
" " refers to a covalent bond.
Figure 4 is a representation of the general structure of the hepatitis Δ virus ribozyme domain known in the art.
Figure 5 is a representation of the general structure of the self-cleaving VS RNA ribozyme domain.
Detailed Description Of The Invention The present invention concerns compositions and methods for the modulation of gene expression in plants specifically using enzymatic nucleic acid molecules.
The following phrases and terms are defined below: By "inhibit" or "modulate" is meant that the activity of enzymes, such as solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase, potato citrate synthase, or level of mRNAs encoded by these genes is reduced below that observed in the absence of an enzymatic nucleic acid and preferably is below that level observed in the presence of an inactive RNA molecule able to bind to the same site on the mRNA, but unable to cleave that RNA. By "enzymatic nucleic acid molecule" it is meant a nucleic acid molecule which has complementarity in a substrate binding region to a specified gene target, and also has an enzymatic activity which is active to specifically cleave that target. That is, the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule is able to intermolecularly cleave RNA (or DNA) and thereby inactivate a target RNA molecule. This complementarity functions to allow sufficient hybridization of the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule to the target RNA to allow the cleavage to occur. One hundred percent complementarity is preferred, but complementarity as low as 50-75% may also be useful in this invention. The nucleic acids may be modified at the base, sugar, and/or phosphate groups. The term enzymatic nucleic acid is used interchangeably with phrases such as ribozymes, catalytic RNA, enzymatic RNA, catalytic DNA, nucleozyme, DNAzyme, RNA enzyme, RNAzyme, polyribozymes, molecular scissors, self-splicing RNA, self-cleaving RNA, cis-cleaving RNA, autolytic RNA, endoribonuclease, minizyme, leadzy e, oligozyme or DNA enzyme. All of these terminologies describe nucleic acid molecules with enzymatic activity. The term encompasses enzymatic RNA molecule which include one or more ribonucleotides and may include a majority of other types of nucleotides or abasic moieties, as described below.
By "complementarity" is meant a nucleic acid that can form hydrogen bond(s) with other RNA sequences by either traditional Watson-Crick or other non-traditional types (for example, Hoogsteen type) of base-paired interactions.
By "vectors" is meant any nucleic acid- and/or viral-based technique used to deliver and/or express a desired nucleic acid. By "gene" is meant a nucleic acid that encodes an RNA.
By "plant gene" is meant a gene encoded by a plant.
By "endogenous" gene is meant a gene normally found in a plant cell in its natural location in the genome.
By "foreign" or "heterologous" gene is meant a gene not normally found in the host plant cell, but that is introduced by standard gene transfer techniques.
By "nucleic acid" is meant a molecule which can be single-stranded or double-stranded, composed of nucleotides containing a sugar, a phosphate and either a purine or pyrimidine base which may be same or different, and may be modified or unmodified.
By "genome" is meant genetic material contained in each cell of an organism and/or a virus.
By "mRNA" is meant RNA that can be translated into protein by a cell.
By "cDNA" is meant DNA that is complementary to and derived from a mRNA. By "dsDNA" is meant a double stranded cDNA.
By "sense" RNA is meant RNA transcript that comprises the mRNA sequence.
By "antisense RNA" is meant an RNA transcript that comprises sequences complementary to all or part of a target RNA and/or mRNA and that blocks the expression of a target gene by interfering with the processing, transport and/or translation of its primary transcript and/or mRNA. The complementarity may exist with any part of the target RNA, i.e., at the 5' non-coding sequence, 3' non-coding sequence, introns, or the coding sequence. Antisense RNA is normally a mirror image of the sense RNA.
By "expression", as used herein, is meant the transcription and stable accumulation of the enzymatic nucleic acid molecules, mRNA and/or the antisense RNA inside a plant cell. Expression of genes involves transcription of the gene and translation of the mRNA into precursor or mature proteins. By "cosuppression" is meant the expression of a foreign gene, which has substantial homology to an gene, and in a plant cell causes the reduction in activity ÷ft of the foreign and/or the endogenous protein product.
By "altered levels" is meant the level of production of a gene product in a transgenic organism is different from that of a normal or non-transgenic organism.
By "promoter" is meant nucleotide sequence element within a gene which controls the expression of that gene. Promoter sequence provides the recognition for RNA polymerase and other transcription factors required for efficient transcription. Promoters from a variety of sources can be used efficiently in plant cells to express ribozymes. For example, promoters of bacterial origin, such as the octopine synthetase promoter, the nopaline synthase promoter, the manopine synthetase promoter; promoters of viral origin, such as the cauliflower mosaic virus (35S) ; plant promoters, such as the ribulose-1, 6- biphosphate (RUBP) carboxylase small subunit (ssu) , the beta-conglycinin promoter, the phaseolin promoter, the ADH promoter, heat-shock promoters, and tissue specific promoters. Promoter may also contain certain enhancer sequence elements that may improve the transcription efficiency.
By "enhancer" is meant nucleotide sequence element which can stimulate promoter activity (Adh) .
By "constitutive promoter" is meant promoter element that directs continuous gene expression in all cells types and at all times (actin, ubiquitin, CaMV 35S) . By "tissue-specific" promoter is meant promoter element responsible for gene expression in specific cell or tissue types, such as the leaves or seeds (zein, oleosin, napin, ACP) . By "development-specific" promoter is meant promoter element responsible for gene expression at specific plant developmental stage, such as in early or late embryogenesis .
By "inducible promoter" is meant promoter element which is responsible for expression of genes in response to a specific signal, such as: physical stimulus (heat shock genes) ; light (RUBP carboxylase) ; hormone (Em) ; metabolites; and stress.
By a "plant" is meant a photosynthetic organism, either eukaryotic and prokaryotic.
By "angiosperm" is meant a plant having its seed enclosed in an ovary (e.g. , coffee, tobacco, bean, pea) .
By "gymnosperm" is meant a plant having its seed exposed and not enclosed in an ovary (e.g., pine, spruce) .
By "monocotyledon" is meant a plant characterized by the presence of only one seed leaf (primary leaf of the embryo). For example, maize, wheat, rice and others.
By "dicotyledon" is meant a plant producing seeds with two cotyledons (primary leaf of the embryo) . For example, coffee, canola, peas and others.
By "transgenic plant" is meant a plant expressing a foreign gene.
By "open reading frame" is meant a nucleotide sequence, without introns, encoding an amino acid sequence, with a defined translation initiation and termination region.
The invention provides a method for producing a class of enzymatic cleaving agents which exhibit a high degree of specificity for the RNA of a desired target. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule may be targeted to a highly specific sequence region of a target such that specific gene inhibition can be achieved. Alternatively, enzymatic nucleic acid can be targeted to a highly conserved region of a gene family to inhibit gene expression of a family of related enzymes. The ribozymes can be expressed in plants that have been transformed with vectors which express the nucleic acid of the present invention.
The enzymatic nature of a ribozyme is advantageous over other technologies, since the concentration of ribozyme necessary to affect a therapeutic treatment is lower. This advantage reflects the ability of the ribozyme to act enzymatically . Thus, a single ribozyme molecule is able to cleave many molecules of target RNA.
In addition, the ribozyme is a highly specific inhibitor, with the specificity of inhibition depending not only on the base-pairing mechanism of binding to the target RNA, but also on the mechanism of target RNA cleavage. Single mismatches, or base-substitutions, near the site of cleavage can completely eliminate catalytic activity of a ribozyme.
Seven basic varieties of naturally-occurring enzymatic RNAs are known presently. Each can catalyze the hydrolysis of RNA phosphodiester bonds in trans (and thus can cleave other RNA molecules) under physiological conditions. Table I summarizes some of the characteristics of these ribozymes. In general, enzymatic nucleic acids act by first binding to a target RNA. Such binding occurs through the target binding portion of an enzymatic nucleic acid which is held in close proximity to an enzymatic portion of the molecule that acts to cleave the target RNA. Thus, the enzymatic nucleic acid first recognizes and then binds a target RNA through complementary base-pairing, and once bound to the correct site, acts enzymatically to cut the target RNA. Strategic cleavage of such a target RNA will destroy its ability to direct synthesis of an encoded protein. After an enzymatic nucleic acid has bound and cleaved its RNA target, it is released from that RNA to search for another target and can repeatedly bind and cleave new targets . In one of the preferred embodiments of the inventions herein, the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule is formed in a hammerhead or hairpin motif, but may also be formed in the motif of a hepatitis Δ virus, group I intron, group II intron or RNaseP RNA (in association with an RNA guide sequence) or Neurospora VS RNA.
Examples of such hammerhead motifs are described by Dreyfus, supra, Rossi et al . , 1992, AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses 8, 183; of hairpin motifs by Hampel et al. , EP0360257, Hampel and Tritz, 1989 Biochemistry 28, 4929, Feldstein et al . , 1989, Gene 82, 53, Haseloff and Gerlach, 1989, Gene, 82, 43, and Hampel et al . , 1990 Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 299; of the hepatitis Δ virus motif is described by Perrotta and Been, 1992 Biochemistry 31, 16; of the RNaseP motif by Guerrier- Takada et al., 1983 Cell 35, 849; Forster and Altman, 1990, Science 249, 783; Li and Altman, 1996, Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 835; Neurospora VS RNA ribozyme motif is described by Collins (Saville and Collins, 1990 Cell 61, 685-696; Saville and Collins, 1991 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8826-8830; Collins and Olive, 1993 Biochemistry 32, 2795-2799; Guo and Collins, 1995, EMBO. J. 14, 363); Group II introns are described by Griffin et al . , 1995, Chem. Biol. 2, 761; Michels and Pyle, 1995, Biochemistry 34, 2965; and of the Group I intron by Cech et al . , U.S. Patent 4,987,071. These specific motifs are not limiting in the invention and those skilled in the art will recognize that all that is important in an enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of this invention is that it has a specific substrate binding site which is complementary to one or more of the target gene RNA regions, and that it have nucleotide sequences within or surrounding that substrate binding site which impart an RNA cleaving activity to the molecule.
The enzymatic nucleic acid molecules of the instant invention will be expressed within cells from eukaryotic promoters [e.g. , Gerlach et al. , International PCT Publication No. WO 91/13994; Edington and Nelson, 1992, in Gene Regulation: Biology of Antisense RNA and DNA, eds . R. P. Erickson and J. G. Izant, pp 209-221, Raven Press, NY.; Atkins et al . , International PCT Publication No. WO 94/00012; Lenee et al., International PCT Publication Nos. WO 94/19476 and WO 9503404, Atkins et al., 1995, J. Gen. Virol. 76, 1781-1790; McElroy and Brettell, 1994, TIBTECH 12, 62; Gruber et al., 1994, J^ Cell. Biochem. Suppl . 18A, 110 (Xl-406)and Feyter et al., 1996, Mol. Gen. Genet. 250, 329-338; all of these are incorporated by reference herein] . Those skilled in the art will realize from the teachings herein that any ribozyme can be expressed in eukaryotic plant cells from an appropriate promoter. The ribozymes expression is under the control of a constitutive promoter, a tissue- specific promoter or an inducible promoter. To obtain the ribozyme mediated modulation, the ribozyme RNA is introduced into the plant. There are also numerous ways to transform plants; plants can be transformed using the gene gun (US Patents 4,945,050 to Cornell and 5,141,131 to DowElanco) ; plants may be transformed using Agrobacterium technology, see US Patent 5,177,010 to University of Toledo, 5,104,310 to Texas A&M, European Patent Application 0131624B1, European Patent Applications 120516, 159418B1 and 176,112 to Schilperoot, US Patents 5,149,645, 5,469,976, 5,464,763 and 4,940,838 and 4,693,976 to Schilperoot, European Patent Applications 116718, 290799, 320500 all to MaxPlanck, European Patent Applications 604662 and 627752 to Japan Tobacco, European Patent Applications 0267159, and 0292435 and US Patent 5,231,019 all to Ciba Geigy, US Patents 5,463,174 and 4,762,785 both to Calgene, and US Patents 5,004,863 and 5,159,135 both to Agracetus; whiskers technology, see US Patents 5,302,523 and 5,464,765 both to Zeneca; electroporation technology, see WO 87/06614 to Boyce Thompson Institute, 5,472,869 and 5,384,253 both to Dekalb, WO9209696 and W09321335 both to PGS; all of which are incorporated by reference herein in totality. In addition to numerous technologies for transforming plants, the type of tissue which is contacted with the foreign material (typically plasmids containing RNA or DNA) may vary as well. Such tissue would include but would not be limited to embryogenic tissue, callus tissue type I and II, and any tissue which is receptive to transformation and subsequent regeneration into a transgenic plant. Another variable is the choice of a selectable marker. The preference for a particular marker is at the discretion of the artisan, but any of the following selectable markers may be used along with any other gene not listed herein which could function as a selectable marker. Such selectable markers include but are not limited to chlorosulfuron, hygromyacin, PAT and/or bar, bromoxynil, kanamycin and the like. The bar gene may be isolated from Strptomuces, particularly from the hygroscopicus or viridochromogenes species. The bar gene codes for phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) that inactivates the active ingradient in the herbicide bialaphos phosphinothricin (PPT) . Thus, numerous combinations of technologies may be used in employing ribozyme mediated modulation.
The ribozymes may be expressed individually as monomers, i.e., one ribozyme targeted against one site is expressed per transcript. Alternatively, two or more ribozymes targeted against more than one target site are expressed as part of a single RNA transcript. A single RNA transcript comprising more than one ribozyme targeted against more than one cleavage site are readily generated to achieve efficient modulation of gene expression. Ribozymes within these multimer constructs are the same or different. For example, the multimer construct may comprise a plurality of hammerhead ribozymes or hairpin ribozymes or other ribozyme motifs. Alternatively, the multimer construct may be designed to include a plurality of different ribozyme motifs, such as hammerhead and hairpin ribozymes. More specifically, multimer ribozyme constructs are designed, wherein a series of ribozyme motifs are linked together in tandem in a single RNA transcript. The ribozymes are linked to each other by nucleotide linker sequence, wherein the linker sequence may or may not be complementary to the target RNA. Multimer ribozyme constructs (polyribozymes) are likely to improve the effectiveness of ribozyme-mediated modulation of gene expression.
The activity of ribozymes can also be augmented by their release from the primary transcript by a second ribozyme (Draper et al . , PCT WO 93/23569, and Sullivan et al. , PCT WO 94/02595, both hereby incorporated in their totality by reference herein; Ohkawa, J. , et al., 1992, Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser., 27, 15-6; Taira, K. , et al . , 1991, Nucleic Acids Res., 19, 5125-30; Ventura, M. , et al. , 1993, Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 3249-55; Chowrira et al. , 1994 J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25856).
Ribozyme-mediated modulation of gene expression can be practiced in a wide variety of plants including but not limited to potato, lettuce spinach, cabbage, brussel sprouts, arugula, kale, collards, chard, beet, turnip, sweet potato and turfgrass. Following are a few non- limiting examples that describe the general utility of ribozymes in modulation of gene expression.
Thus, in one instance, the invention concerns compositions (and methods for their use) for the modulation of genes involved in the biosynthesis of undesirable alkaloid compounds in plants. This is accomplished through the inhibition of genetic expression, with ribozymes, which results in the reduction or elimination of certain gene activities in plants, such as solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase. Such activity is reduced in plants, such as potato and other solanaceous plants. These endogenously expressed ribozyme molecules contain substrate binding domains that bind to accessible regions of the target RNA. The RNA molecules also contain domains that catalyze the cleavage of RNA. The RNA molecules are preferably ribozymes of the hammerhead or hairpin motif. Upon binding, the ribozymes cleave the target mRNAs, preventing translation and protein accumulation. In the absence of the expression of the target gene, and/or if the level of expression of the target gene is significantly reduced, levels of undesirable alkaloids is reduced or inhibited. Specific examples are provided below in the Tables III and IV.
In one aspect, the ribozymes have binding arms which are complementary to the substrate sequences in Tables III and IV. Those in the art will recognize that while such examples are designed to one gene RNA (solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase) of one plant (e.g. , potato) , similar ribozymes can be made complementary to other genes in other plant's RNA. By complementary is thus meant that the binding arms of the ribozymes are able to interact with the target RNA in a sequence- specific manner and enable the ribozyme to cause cleavage of a plant mRNA target. Examples of such ribozymes are typically sequences defined in Tables III and IV. The active ribozyme typically contains an enzymatic center equivalent to those in the examples, and binding arms able to bind plant mRNA such that cleavage at the target site occurs. Other sequences may be present which do not interfere with such binding and/or cleavage.
In another instance, the invention features compositions (and methods for their use) for the modulation of genes involved in the flower formation in plants. This is accomplished through the inhibition of genetic expression, with ribozymes, which results in the reduction or elimination of certain gene activities in plants, such as citrate synthase. Such activity can be reduced in plants, such as lettuce, spinach, cabbage, brussel sprouts, arugula, kale, collards, chard, beet, turnip, potato, sweet potato and turfgrass. These endogenously expressed ribozyme molecules contain substrate binding domains that bind to accessible regions of the target RNA. The RNA molecules also contain domains that catalyze the cleavage of RNA. The RNA molecules are preferably ribozymes of the hammerhead or hairpin motif.
Upon binding, the ribozymes cleave the target mRNAs, preventing translation and protein accumulation. In the absence of the expression of the target gene, and/or if the level of expression of the target gene is significantly reduced, levels of undesirable alkaloids is reduced or inhibited. Specific examples are provided below in the Tables V and VI. In a non-limiting example, ribozymes have binding arms which are complementary to the substrate sequences shown in Tables V and VI are disclosed. Those in the art will recognize that while such examples are designed to one gene RNA (citrate synthase) of one plant (e.g. , potato) , similar ribozymes can be made complementary to other genes in other plant's RNA. By complementary is thus meant that the binding arms of the ribozymes are able to interact with the target RNA in a sequence-specific manner and enable the ribozyme to cause cleavage of a plant mRNA target. Examples of such ribozymes are typically sequences defined in Tables V and VI. The active ribozyme typically contains an enzymatic center equivalent to those in the examples, and binding arms able to bind plant mRNA such that cleavage at the target site occurs. Other sequences may be present which do not interfere with such binding and/or cleavage.
The sequences of the ribozymes that are particularly useful in this study, are shown in Tables III-VI.
Those in the art will recognize that ribozyme sequences listed in the Tables are representative only of many more such sequences where the enzymatic portion of the ribozyme (all but the binding arms) is altered to affect activity. For example, stem-loop II sequence of hammerhead ribozymes listed in Table III and V (5'- GGCGAAAGCC-3 ' ) can be altered (substitution, deletion, and/or insertion) to contain any sequences, preferably provided that a minimum of a two base-paired stem structure can form. Similarly, stem-loop IV sequence of hairpin ribozymes listed in Table IV and VI (51- CACGUUGUG-3' ) can be altered (substitution, deletion, and/or insertion) to contain any sequence, preferably provided that a minimum of a two base-paired stem structure can form. Such ribozymes are equivalent to the ribozymes described specifically in the Tables. Preferably, the recombinant vectors capable of stable integration into the plant genome and selection of transformed plant lines expressing the ribozymes are expressed either by constitutive or inducible promoters in the plant cells. Once expressed, the ribozymes cleave their target mRNAs and reduce alkaloid production in their host cells. The ribozymes expressed in plant cells are under the control of a constitutive promoter, a tissue-specific promoter or an inducible promoter.
Modification of undesirable alkaloid profile is an important application of nucleic acid-based technologies which are capable of reducing specific gene expression. A high level of undesirable alkaloid compounds is undesirable in plants that produce products of commercial importance. In preferred embodiments, hairpin and hammerhead ribozymes that cleave solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl- transferase RNA are described. Those of ordinary skill in the art will understand from the examples described below that other ribozymes that cleave target RNAs required for solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase activity may now be readily designed and are within the scope of the invention.
Modification of flower formation is an important application of nucleic acid-based technologies which are capable of reducing specific gene expression. In preferred embodiments, hairpin and hammerhead ribozymes that cleave potato citrate synthase RNA are described. Those of ordinary skill in the art will understand from the examples described below that other ribozymes that cleave target RNAs required for potato citrate synthase activity may now be readily designed and are within the scope of the invention
While specific examples to potato RNA are provided, those in the art will recognize that the teachings are not limited to potato. Furthermore, the same or equivalent target may be used in other plant species. The complementary arms suitable for targeting the specific plant RNA sequences are utilized in the ribozyme targeted to that specific RNA. The examples and teachings herein are meant to be non-limiting, and those skilled in the art will recognize that similar embodiments can be readily generated in a variety of different plants to modulate expression of a variety of different genes, using the teachings herein, and are within the scope of the inventions.
Standard molecular biology techniques were followed in the examples herein. Additional information may be found in Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. , and Maniatis, T. (1989), Molecular Cloning a Laboratory Manual, second edition, Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Examples
Example 1: Identification of Potential Ribozyme Cleavage Sites for solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase
Approximately 353 HH ribozyme cleavage sites and approximately 20 HP sites were identified in the potato solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase RNA. A HH site consists of a uridine and any nucleotide except guanosine (UH) . Tables III and IV have a list of HH and HP ribozyme cleavage sites. The numbering system starts with 1 at the 5 ' end of a solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase RNA having the sequence shown in Moehs et al. , supra.
Ribozymes, such as those listed in Tables III and IV, can be readily designed and synthesized to such cleavage sites with between 5 and 100 or more bases as substrate binding arms (see Figs. 1 - 5). These substrate binding arms within a ribozyme allow the ribozyme to interact with their target in a sequence- specific manner.
Example 2: Selection of Ribozyme Cleavage Sites for solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase
The secondary structure of solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase RNA was assessed by computer analysis using algorithms, such as those developed by M. Zuker (Zuker, M., 1989 Science, 244, 48-52). Regions of the mRNA that did not form secondary folding structures with RNA/RNA stems of over eight nucleotides and contained potential hammerhead ribozyme cleavage sites were identified.
Example 3 : Hammerhead and Hairpin Ribozymes for solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase
Hammerhead (HH) and hairpin (HP) ribozymes are subjected to analysis by computer folding and the ribozymes that had significant secondary structure are rejected.
The ribozymes are chemically synthesized. The general procedures for RNA synthesis have been described previously (Usman et al. , 1987, J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 109, 7845-7854 and in Scaringe et al., 1990, Nucl. Acids Res., 18, 5433-5341; Wincott et al . , 1995, Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 2677) . Small scale syntheses are conducted on a 394 Applied Biosystems, Inc. synthesizer using a modified 2.5 μmol scale protocol with a 5 in coupling step for alkylsilyl protected nucleotides and 2.5 min coupling step for 2' -O-methylated nucleotides. Table II outlines the amounts, and the contact times, of the reagents used in the synthesis cycle. A 6.5-fold excess (163 μL of 0.1 M = 16.3 μmol) of phosphoramidite and a 24-fold excess of S-ethyl tetrazole (238 μL of 0.25 M = 59.5 μmol) relative to polymer-bound 5 ' -hydroxyl was used in each coupling cycle. Average coupling yields on the 394, determined by colorimetric quantitation of the trityl fractions, was 97.5-99%. Other oligonucleotide synthesis reagents for the 394: Detritylation solution was 2% TCA in methylene chloride (ABI) ; capping was performed with 16% N-Methyl imidazole in THF (ABI) and 10% acetic anhydride/10% 2,6- lutidine in THF (ABI); oxidation solution is 16.9 mM I2,
49 mM pyridine, 9% water in THF (Millipore) . B & J Synthesis Grade acetonitrile is used directly from the reagent bottle. S-Ethyl tetrazole solution (0.25 M in acetonitrile) was made up from the solid obtained from American International Chemical, Inc.
Deprotection of the RNA is performed as follows. The polymer-bound oligoribonucleotide, trityl-off, is transferred from the synthesis column to a 4 mL glass screw top vial and suspended in a solution of methylamine (MA) at 65°C for 10 min. After cooling to -20°C, the supernatant is removed from the polymer support. The support is washed three times with 1.0 mL of EtOH:MeCN:H2θ/3: 1: 1, vortexed and the supernatant is then added to the first supernatant. The combined super- natants, containing the oligoribonucleotide, are dried to a white powder.
The base-deprotected oligoribonucleotide is resuspended in anhydrous TEAΗF/NMP solution (250 μL of a solution of 1.5 L N-methylpyrrolidinone, 750 μL TEA and 1.0 mL TEA»3HF to provide a 1.4 M HF concentration) and heated to 65°C for 1.5 h. The resulting, fully deprotected, oligomer is quenched with 50 mM TEAB (9 mL) prior to anion exchange desalting.
For anion exchange desalting of the deprotected
® oligomer, the TEAB solution is loaded onto a Qiagen 500 anion exchange cartridge (Qiagen Inc.) that is prewashed with 50 mM TEAB (10 mL) . After washing the loaded cartridge with 50 mM TEAB (10 mL) , the RNA is eluted with 2 M TEAB (10 mL) and dried down to a white powder.
Inactive hammerhead ribozymes are synthesized by substituting a U for G5 and a U for A 4 (numbering from
(Hertel, K. J. , et al. , 1992, Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 3252) .
The hairpin ribozymes are synthesized as described above for the hammerhead RNAs .
Ribozymes can also synthesized be from DNA templates using bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase (Milligan and Uhlenbeck, 1989, Methods Enzymol. 180, 51) .
Ribozymes are purified by gel electrophoresis using general methods or are purified by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC; See Wincott et al. , 1996, supra, the totality of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference) and were resuspended in water. The sequences of the chemically synthesized ribozymes used in this study are shown below in Tables III and IV.
Example 4 : Construction of Ribozyme expressing transcription units for solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl- transferase
Ribozymes targeted to cleave solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase RNA can be endogenously expressed in plants, either from genes inserted into the plant genome (stable transformation) or from episomal transcription units (transient expression) which are part of plasmid vectors or viral sequences. These ribozymes can be expressed via RNA polymerase I, II, or III plant or plant virus promoters (such as CaMV) . Promoters can be either constitutive, tissue specific, or developmentally expressed.
Example 5: Identification of Potential Ribozyme Cleavage Sites for potato citrate synthase
Approximately 398 HH ribozyme cleavage sites and approximately 25 HP sites were identified in the potato citrate synthase RNA. A HH site consists of a uridine and any nucleotide except guanosine (UH) . Tables V and VI have a list of HH and HP ribozyme cleavage sites.
Ribozymes, such as those listed in Tables III and IV, can be readily designed and synthesized to such cleavage sites with between 5 and 100 or more bases as substrate binding arms (see Figs. 1 - 5) . These substrate binding arms within a ribozyme allow the ribozyme to interact with their target in a sequence- specific manner.
Example 6: Selection of Ribozyme Cleavage Sites for potato citrate synthase
The secondary structure of potato citrate synthase RNA was assessed by computer analysis using algorithms, such as those developed by M. Zuker (Zuker, M. , 1989 Science, 244, 48-52) . Regions of the mRNA that did not form secondary folding structures with RNA/RNA stems of over eight nucleotides and contained potential hammerhead ribozyme cleavage sites were identified. Example 7 : Hammerhead and Hairpin Ribozymes for potato citrate synthase
Hammerhead (HH) and hairpin (HP) ribozymes are subjected to analysis by computer folding and the ribozymes that had significant secondary structure are rejected.
The ribozymes are synthesized as described above. The sequences of the chemically synthesized ribozymes used in this study are shown below in Tables V and VI.
Example 8 : Construction of Ribozyme expressing transcription units for potato citrate synthase
Ribozymes targeted to cleave potato citrate synthase RNA can be endogenously expressed in plants, either from genes inserted into the plant genome (stable transformation) or from episomal transcription units (transient expression) which are part of plasmid vectors or viral sequences. These ribozymes can be expressed via RNA polymerase I, II, or III plant or plant virus promoters (such as CaMV) . Promoters can be either constitutive, tissue specific, or developmentally expressed.
Example 9: Plant Transformation and Construction
There are several methods to genetically engineer plants (for a review see Gasser et al., 1989 Science 244, 1293-1299; Potrykus, 1991 Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 205-225; Gasser and Fraley, 1992 Scientific American June 1992 pp 62-69) . These methods can be used to introduce the above ribozymes directly or via exression vectors. These methods include the following: Helium blasting involves accelerating suspended DNA- coated gold particles towards and into prepared tissue targets. The device used was an earlier prototype to the one described in a DowElanco U.S. Patent (#5,141,131) which is incorporated herein by reference, although both function in a similar manner. The device consists of a high pressure helium source, a syringe containing the DNA/gold suspension, and a pneumatically-operated multipurpose valve which provides controlled linkage between the helium source and a loop of pre-loaded DNA/gold suspension. Prior to blasting, tissue targets are covered with a sterile 104 micron stainless steel screen, which holds the tissue in place during impact. Next, targets are placed under vacuum in the main chamber of the device. The DNA-coated gold particles are accelerated at the target 4 times using a helium pressure of 1500 psi. Each blast delivered 20 μl of DNA/gold suspension. Immediately post-blasting, the targets are placed back on maintenance medium plus osmoticum for a 16 to 24 hour recovery period.
Particle Bombardment-mediated transformation
(Gordon-Kam et al., 1990 The Plant Cell 2, 603-618; Potrykus, 1991 Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 205-225; Gasser and Fraley, 1992 Scientific American June 1992 pp 62-69; Vain et al., 1993 Plant Cell Rep. 12, 84-88; Weymann et al., 1993 In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 29P, 33-37) : This strategy involves bombardment of plant cells with minute (1-2 microns in diameter) metal particles (for example tungsten or gold particles) using a "gene" gun (also referred to as "Biolistics" or "particle" gun) . The metal particles, coated with genetic material (ribozyme or ribozyme encoding plasmids) , can penetrate the cell wall, without causing any irreversible damage to the cell, and deliver the genetic material to the cytoplasm.
Electroporation-mediated transformation (Fromm et al., 1986 Nature 319, 791-793; Rhodes et al., 1988 Science 240, 204-207; Potrykus, 1991 Annu. Rev. Plant
Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 205-225; Gasser and Fraley,
1992 Scientific American June 1992 pp 62-69; D'Halluin et al., 1992 The Plant Cell 4, 1495-1505; Sukhapinda et al . ,
1993 Plant Cell Rep. 13, 63-68; Laursen et al., 1994 Plant Mol. Biol. 24, 51-61) : This technique involves permeabilizing the target cell membrane by using short high voltage electric pulses. Nucleic acids (ribozyme encoding plasmids) can pass through a permeabilized cell membrane and potentially integrate into the host genome resulting in a transformed phenotype. Electroporation can be carried out on (a) plant protoplasts, plant cells lacking a cell wall, (Fromm et al., 1986 Nature 319, 791- 793; Rhodes et al . , 1988 Science 240, 204-207; Sukhapinda et al., 1993 Plant Cell Rep. 13, 63-68); (b) cultured cells ( Laursen et al., 1994 Plant Mol. Biol. 24, 51-61); (c) Plant tissue (D'Halluin et al., 1992 The Plant Cell 4, 1495-1505).
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation : This method uses a disarmed (disease causing genes are deleted) species of Agrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rizogenes (Potrykus, 1991 Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 205-225; Gasser and Fraley, 1992 Scientific American June 1992 pp 62-69) . This organism transfers part of its DNA into plant cells (T-DNA) . Ribozyme genes can be cloned into T-DNA fragments and Agrobacterium containing the recombinant T-DNA can be generated. Agrobacterium will infect and release the recombinant T- DNA into maize cells. The integration of T-DNA into host DNA will result in a transformed phenotype.
Other Uses: Potential usefulness of sequence-specific enzymatic nucleic acid molecules of the instant invention might have many of the same applications for the study of RNA that DNA restriction endonucleases have for the study of DNA (Nathans, D. and Smith, H. 0., (1975) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 44:273). For example, the pattern of restriction fragments could be used to establish sequence relationships between two related plant RNAs, and large plant RNAs could be specifically cleaved to fragments of a size more useful for study. The ability to engineer sequence specificity of the ribozyme is ideal for cleavage of RNAs of unknown sequence.
Ribozymes of this invention may be used as tools to examine genetic drift and mutations within plant cells. The close relationship between ribozyme activity and the structure of the target RNA allows the detection of mutations in any region of the molecule which alters the base-pairing and three-dimensional structure of the target RNA. By using multiple ribozymes described in this invention, one may map nucleotide changes which are important to RNA structure and function in vitro, as well as in cells and tissues. Cleavage of target RNAs with ribozymes may be used to inhibit gene expression and define the role (essentially) of specified gene products in the synthesis of undesirable alkaloids in plants. In this manner, other genetic targets may be defined as important mediators of alkaloid production. These experiments will lead to better modifications of the alkaloid production by affording the possibility of combinational concepts (e.g., multiple ribozymes targeted to different genes intermittent treatment with combinations of ribozymes and/or other chemical or biological molecules) . Other in vitro uses of ribozymes of this invention are well known in the art, and include detection of the presence of mRNA associated with undesirable alkaloid production condition. Such RNA is detected by determining the presence of a cleavage product after treatment with a ribozyme using standard methodology. Other embodiments are within the following claims.
Table I
Table I:
Characteristics of naturally occurring ribozymes
Group I Introns • Size: -150 to >1000 nucleotides.
• Requires a U in the target sequence immediately 5' of the cleavage site.
• Binds 4-6 nucleotides at the 5' -side of the cleavage site. • Reaction mechanism: attack by the 3' -Oil of guanosine to generate cleavage products with 3' -OH and 5'- guanosine .
• Additional protein cofactors required in some cases to help folding and maintainance of the active structure t1].
• Over 300 known members of this class. Found as an intervening sequence in Tetrahymena thermophila rRNA, fungal mitochondria, chloroplasts, phage T4, blue- green algae, and others. • Major structural features largely established through phylogenetic comparisons, mutagenesis, and biochemical studies [2f 3] #
• Complete kinetic framework established for one ribozyme [4,5,6,7] • Studies of ribozyme folding and substrate docking underway [8,9,10]_
• Chemical modification investigation of important residues well established [H'12]_
• The small (4-6 nt) binding site may make this ribozyme too non-specific for targeted RNA cleavage, however, the Tetrahymena group I intron has been used to repair a "defective" β-galactosidase message by the ligation Table I
of new β-galactosidase sequences onto the defective message [13] .
RNAse P RNA (Ml RNA) • Size: -290 to 400 nucleotides.
• RNA portion of a ubiquitous ribonucleoprotein enzyme.
• Cleaves tRNA precursors to form mature tRNA [1 ] .
• Reaction mechanism: possible attack by M +-0H to generate cleavage products with 3 ' OH and 5 ' -phosphate . • RNAse P is found throughout the prqkaryotes and eukaryotes. The RNA subunit has been sequenced from bacteria, yeast, rodents, and primates.
• Recruitment of endogenous RNAse P for therapeutic applications is possible through hybridization of an External Guide Sequence (EGS) to the target RNA
• Important phosphate and 2' OH contacts recently identified [17,18]
Group II Introns • Size: >1000 nucleotides.
• Trans cleavage of target RNAs recently demonstrated [19,20].
• Sequence requirements not fully determined.
• Reaction mechanism: 2 ' -OH of an internal adenosine generates cleavage products with 3' -OH and a "lariat" RNA containing a 3' -5' and a 2' -5' branch point.
• Only natural ribozyme with demonstrated participation in DNA cleavage [21,22] j_n addition to RNA cleavage and ligation. • Major structural features largely established through phylogenetic comparisons [23] . Table I
• Important 2' OH contacts beginning to be identified [24]
• Kinetic framework under development [ 5]
Neurospora VS RNA
• Size: ~144 nucleotides.
• Trans cleavage of hairpin target RNAs recently demonstrated [26]
• Sequence requirements not fully determined. • Reaction mechanism: attack by 2 ' -OH 5' to the scissile bond to generate cleavage products with 2 ',3' -cyclic phosphate and 5 ' -OH ends.
• Binding sites and structural requirements not fully determined. • Only 1 known member of this class. Found in Neurospora VS RNA.
Hammerhead Ribozyme (see text for references) • Size: -13 to 40 nucleotides.
• Requires the target sequence UH immediately 5' of the cleavage site.
• Binds a variable number nucleotides on both sides of the cleavage site. • Reaction mechanism: attack by 2 ' -OH 5' to the scissile bond to generate cleavage products with 2 ',3 '-cyclic phosphate and 5 ' -OH ends .
• 14 known members of this class. Found in a number of plant pathogens (virusoids) that use RNA as the infectious agent.
• Essential structural features largely defined, including 2 crystal structures [] Table I
• Minimal ligation activity demonstrated (for engineering through in vitro selection) []
• Complete kinetic framework established for two or more ribozymes [] . • Chemical modification investigation of important residues well established [].
Hairpin Ribozyme
• Size: -50 nucleotides. • Requires the target sequence GUC immediately 3' of the cleavage site.
• Binds 4-6 nucleotides at the 5' -side of the cleavage site and a variable number to the 3'- side of the cleavage site. • Reaction mechanism: attack by 2 ' -OH 5' to the scissile bond to generate cleavage products with 2 ',3 '-cyclic phosphate and 5 ' -OH ends.
• 3 known members of this class. Found in three plant pathogen (satellite RNAs of the tobacco ringspot virus, arabis mosaic virus and chicory yellow mottle virus) which uses RNA as the infectious agent.
• Essential structural features largely defined [27,28,29,30]
• Ligation activity (in addition to cleavage activity) makes ribozyme amenable to engineering through in vitro selection [31]
• Complete kinetic framework established for one ribozyme [31] .
• Chemical modification investigation of important residues begun [33,34] Table I
Hepatitis Delta Virus (HDV) Ribozyme
• Size: -60 nucleotides.
• Trans cleavage of target RNAs demonstrated [31] .
• Binding sites and structural requirements not fully determined, although no sequences 5' of cleavage site are required. Folded ribozyme contains a pseudoknot structure [36] .
• Reaction mechanism: attack by 2 ' -OH 5' to the scissile bond to generate cleavage products with 2, 3 '-cyclic phosphate and 5 ' -OH ends.
• Only 2 known members of this class. Found in human HDV.
• Circular form of HDV is active and shows increased nuclease stability [37]
1. Mohr, G.; Caprara, M.G.; Guo, Q. ; Lambowitz, A.M. Nature, 370,147-150. (1994) .
2. Michel, Francois; Westhof, Eric. Slippery substrates. Nat. Struct. Biol. (1994), 1(1), 5-7. 3_ Lisacek, Frederique; Diaz, Yolande; Michel,
Francois. Automatic identification of group I intron cores in genomic DNA sequences. J. Mol. Biol. (1994), 235(4), 1206-17.
4. Herschlag, Daniel; Cech, Thomas RCatalysis of RNA cleavage by the Tetrahymena thermophila ribozyme. 1.
Kinetic description of the reaction of an RNA substrate complementary to the active site. Biochemistry (1990), 29(44), 10159-71.
5. Herschlag, Daniel; Cech, Thomas RCatalysis of RNA cleavage by the Tetrahymena thermophila ribozyme. 2.
Kinetic description of the reaction of an RNA substrate Table I
that forms a mismatch at the active site. Biochemistry (1990), 29(44), 10172-80.
6. Knitt, Deborah S.; Herschlag, Daniel. pH Dependencies of the Tetrahymena Ribozyme Reveal an Unconventional Origin of an Apparent pKa . Biochemistry (1996), 35(5), 1560-70.
7. Bevilacqua, Philip C; Sugimoto, Naoki; Turner, Douglas HA mechanistic framework for the second step of splicing catalyzed by the Tetrahymena ribozyme. Biochemistry (1996), 35(2), 648-58.
8. Li, Yi; Bevilacqua, Philip C; Mathews, David; Turner, Douglas HThermodynamic and activation parameters for binding of a pyrene-labeled substrate by the Tetrahymena ribozyme: docking is not diffusion- controlled and is driven by a favorable entropy change. Biochemistry (1995), 34(44), 14394-9.
9. Banerjee, Aloke Raj; Turner, Douglas HThe time dependence of chemical modification reveals slow steps in the folding of a group I ribozyme. Biochemistry (1995), 34(19), 6504-12. 0. Zarrinkar, Patrick P.; Williamson, James R., The P9.1-P9.2 peripheral extension helps guide folding of the Tetrahymena ribozyme. Nucleic Acids Res. (1996), 24(5), 854-8. 11. Strobel, Scott A.; Cech, Thomas RMinor groove recognition of the conserved G.mtdot.U pair at the Tetrahymena ribozyme reaction site. Science (Washington, D.C.) (1995), 267(5198), 675-9.
12. Strobel, Scott A.; Cech, Thomas RExocychc Amine of the Conserved G.cntdot.U Pair at the Cleavage Site of the Tetrahymena Ribozyme Contributes to 5 ' -Splice Site Selection and Transition State Stabilization. Biochemistry (1996), 35(4), 1201-11. Table I
13. Sullenger, Bruce A.; Cech, Thomas R. , Ribozyme- mediated repair of defective mRNA by targeted trans- splicing. Nature (London) (1994), 371(6498), 619-22.
14. Robertson, H.D.; Altman, S . ; Smith, J.D. J. Biol. Chem., 247, 5243-5251 (1972).
15. Forster, Anthony C; Altman, Sidney. External guide sequences for an RNA enzyme. Science (Washington, D.C, 1883-) (1990), 249(4970), 783-6.
16. Yuan, Y.; Hwang, E. S.; Altman, S. Targeted cleavage of mRNA by human RNase P. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA (1992) 89, 8006-10.
17. Harris, Michael E.; Pace, Norman R. , Identification of phosphates involved in catalysis by the ribozyme RNase P RNA. RNA (1995), 1(2), 210-18. 18. Pan, Tao; Loria, Andrew; Zhong, Kun. Probing of tertiary interactions in RNA: 2 ' -hydroxylbase contacts between the RNase P RNA and pre-tRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. (1995), 92(26), 12510-14.
19. Pyle, Anna Marie; Green, Justin B., Building a Kinetic Framework for Group II Intron Ribozyme Activity: Quantitation of Interdomain Binding and Reaction Rate. Biochemistry (1994), 33(9), 2716-25. 0. Michels, William J. Jr.; Pyle, Anna Marie. Conversion of a Group II Intron into a New Multiple- Turnover Ribozyme that Selectively Cleaves
Oligonucleotides: Elucidation of Reaction Mechanism and Structure/Function Relationships. Biochemistry (1995), 34(9), 2965-77.
21. Zimmerly, Steven; Guo, Huatao; Eskes, Robert; Yang, Jian; Perlman, Philip S . ; Lambowitz, Alan M. , A group 11 intron RNA is a catalytic component of a DNA Table I
endonuclease involved in intron mobility. Cell (Cambridge, Mass.) (1995), 83(4), 529-38.
22. Griffin, Edmund A., Jr.; Qin, Zhifeng; Michels, Williams J. , Jr.; Pyle, Anna Marie. Group II intron ribozymes that cleave DNA and RNA linkages with similar efficiency, and lack contacts with substrate 2 ' -hydroxyl groups. Chem. Biol. (1995), 2(11), 761-70.
23. Michel, Francois; Ferat, jean Luc. Structure and activities of group II introns. Annu. Rev. Biochem. (1995), 64, 435-61.
24. Abramovitz, Dana L.; Friedman, Richard A.; Pyle, Anna Marie. Catalytic role of T-hydroxyl groups within a group II intron active site. Science (Washington, D.C.) (1996), 271(5254), 1410-13. 25. Daniels, Danette L.; Michels, William J. , Jr.; Pyle, Anna Marie. Two competing pathways for self- splicing by group II introns: a quantitative analysis of in vitro reaction rates and products. J. Mol. Biol. (1996), 256(1), 31-49. 26. Gu0 / Hans c. τ.; Collins, Richard A. , Efficient trans-cleavage of a stem-loop RNA substrate by a ribozyme derived from Neurospora VS RNA. EMBO J. (1995) , 14(2), 368-76.
27. Hampel, Arnold; Tritz, Richard; Hicks, Margaret; Cruz, Phillip. 'Hairpin' catalytic RNA model: evidence for helixes and sequence requirement for substrate RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. (1990), 18(2), 299-304.
28. Chowrira, Bharat M. ; Berzal-Herranz, Alfredo; Burke, John MNovel guanosine requirement for catalysis by the hairpin ribozyme. Nature (London) (1991), 354(6351), 320-2. Table I
29. Berzal-Herranz, Alfredo; Joseph, Simpson; Chowrira, Bharat M. ; Butcher, Samuel E.; Burke, John M., Essential nucleotide sequences and secondary structure elements of the hairpin ribozyme. EMBO J. (1993), 12(6), 2567-73.
30. Joseph, Simpson; Berzal-Herranz, Alfredo; Chowrira, Bharat M. ; Butcher, Samuel E., Substrate selection rules for the hairpin ribozyme determined by in vitro selection, mutation, and analysis of mismatched substrates. Genes Dev. (1993), 7(1), 130-8.
31. Berzal-Herranz, Alfredo; Joseph, Simpson; Burke, John Min vitro selection of active hairpin ribozymes by sequential RNA-catalyzed cleavage and ligation reactions. Genes Dev. (1992), 6(1), 129-34. 32. Hegg, Lisa A.; Fedor, Martha J. , Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Intermolecular Catalysis by Hairpin Ribozymes. Biochemistry (1995), 34(48), 15813-28.
33. Grasby, Jane A.; Mersmann, Karin; Singh, Mohinder; Gait, Michael J., Purine Functional Groups in Essential Residues of the Hairpin Ribozyme Required for Catalytic Cleavage of RNA. Biochemistry (1995), 34(12), 4068-76.
34. Schmidt, Sabine; Beigelman, Leonid; Karpeisky, Alexander; Usman, Nassim; Sorensen, Ulrik S.; Gait, Michael J. , Base and sugar requirements for RNA cleavage of essential nucleoside residues in internal loop B of the hairpin ribozyme: implications for secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res. (1996), 24(4), 573-81.
35. Perrotta, Anne T.; Been, Michael D. , Cleavage of oligoribonucleotides by a ribozyme derived from the hepatitis delta, virus RNA sequence. Biochemistry (1992), 31(1), 16-21. Table I
36. Perrotta, Anne T . ; Been, Michael DA pseudoknot- like structure required for efficient self-cleavage of hepatitis delta virus RNA. Nature (London) (1991), 350(6317), 434-6. 37. Puttaraju, M. ; Perrotta, Anne T . ; Been, Michael DA circular trans-acting hepatitis delta virus ribozyme. Nucleic Acids Res. (1993), 21(18), 4253-8.
Table II: 2.5 μmol RNA Synthesis Cycle
Reagent Equivalents Amount Wait
Time* Phosphoramidites 6.5 163 μL 2.5
S-Ethyl Tetrazole 23.8 238 μL 2.5
Acetic Anhydride 100 233 μL 5 sec
N-Methyl Imidazole 186 233 μL 5 sec
TCA 83.2 1.73 mL 21 sec Iodine 8.0 1.18 mL 45 sec
Acetonitrile NA 6.67 mL NA
* Wait time does not include contact time during delivery.
Table I I I
Table III: Solanidine glucosyltransferase Hammerhead
Ribozyme and Target Sequences
Nt. Substrate Ribozyme Position
13 UCUUGGGUA GUAAAAAU AϋUUUUAC CUGAUGA X GAA ACCCAAGA
16 UGGGUAGUA AAAAUGGU ACCAUUUU CUGAUGA X GAA ACUACCCA
25 AAAAUGGUA GCAACCUG CAGGUUGC CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAUUUU
49 GGCGAAAUC CUCCAUGU ACAUGGAG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUCGCC
52 GAAAUCCUC CAUGUUCU AGAACAUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGGAUUUC
58 CUCCAUGUU CUUUUCCU AGGAAAAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUGGAG
59 UCCAUGUUC uuuuccuu AAGGAAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AACAUGGA
61 CAUGUUCUU uuccuucc GGAAGGAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAACAUG
62 AUGUUCUUU uccuuccc GGGAAGGA CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAACAU
63 UGUUCUUUU ccuucccu AGGGAAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAAGAACA
64 GUUCUUUUC cuucccuu AAGGGAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAGAAC
67 cuuuuccuu cccuucuu AAGAAGGG CUGAUGA X GAA AGGAAAAG
68 uuuuccuuc CCUUCUUA UAAGAAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGGAAAA
72 ccuucccuu CUUAUCCG CGGAUAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AGGGAAGG
73 cuucccuuc UUAUCCGC GCGGAUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAGGGAAG
75 ucccuucuu AUCCGCUG CAGCGGAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGAAGGGA
76 CCCUUCUUA UCCGCUGG CCAGCGGA CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAAGGG
78 CUUCUUAUC CGCUGGUC GACCAGCG CUGAUGA X GAA AUAAGAAG
86 CCGCUGGUC AUUUCAUC GAUGAAAU CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAGCGG
89 CUGGUCAUU UCAUCCCA UGGGAUGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGACCAG
90 UGGUCAUUU CAUCCCAU AUGGGAUG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGACCA
91 GGUCAUUUC AUCCCAUU AAUGGGAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUGACC
94 CAUUUCAUC CCAUUAGU ACUAAUGG CUGAUGA X GAA AUGAAAUG
99 CAUCCCAUU AGUUAACG CGUUAACU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGGGAUG
100 AUCCCAUUA GUUAACGC GCGUUAAC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGGGAU
103 CCAUUAGUU AACGCCGC GCGGCGUU CUGAUGA X GAA ACUAAUGG
104 CAUUAGUUA ACGCCGCA UGCGGCGU CUGAUGA X GAA AACUAAUG
118 GCAAGGCUA UUCGCCUC GAGGCGAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCCUUGC
120 AAGGCUAUU CGCCUCCC GGGAGGCG CUGAUGA X GAA AUAGCCUU
121 AGGCUAUUC GCCUCCCG CGGGAGGC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUAGCCU
126 AUUCGCCUC CCGGGUGU ACACCCGG CUGAUGA X GAA AGGCGAAU
135 CCGGGUGUU AAAGCCAC GUGGCUUU CUGAUGA X GAA ACACCCGG
136 CGGGUGUUA AAGCCACA UGUGGCUU CUGAUGA X GAA AACACCCG
147 GCCACAAUC CUCACUAC GUAGUGAG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUGUGGC
150 ACAAUCCUC ACUACCCC GGGGUAGU CUGAUGA X GAA AGGAUUGU
154 UCCUCACUA CCCCUCAU AUGAGGGG CUGAUGA X GAA AGUGAGGA
160 CUACCCCUC AUAAUGCC GGCAUUAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGGGGUAG
163 CCCCUCAUA AUGCCUUA UAAGGCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGAGGGG
170 UAAUGCCUU ACUUUUUA UAAAAAGU CUGAUGA X GAA AGGCAUUA
171 AAUGCCUUA CUUUUUAG CUAAAAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGGCAUU
174 GCCUUACUU UUUAGAUC GAUCUAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGUAAGGC
175 CCUUACUUU UUAGAUCU AGAUCUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUAAGG
176 CUUACUUUU UAGAUCUA UAGAUCUA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAGUAAG
177 UUACUUUUU AGAUCUAC GUAGAUCU CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAGUAA
178 UACUUUUUA GAUCUACU AGUAGAUC CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAAGUA
182 UUUUAGAUC UACUAUUG CAAUAGUA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUAAAA
184 UUAGAUCUA CUAUUGAC GUCAAUAG CUGAUGA X GAA AGAUCUAA
187 GAUCUACUA UUGACGAU AUCGUCAA CUGAUGA X GAA KGUAGAUC
189 UCUACUAUU GACGAUGA UCAUCGUC CUGAUGA X GAA AUAGUAGA
201 GAUGAUGUU CGAAUUUC GAAAUUCG CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUCAUC Table I I I
Nt. Substrate Ribozyme Position
202 AUGAUGUUC GAAUUUCC GGAAAUUC CUGAUGA X GAA AACAUCAU
207 GUUCGAAUU UCCGGAUU AAUCCGGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCGAAC
208 UUCGAAUUU CCGGAUUU AAAUCCGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUCGAA
209 UCGAAUUUC CGGAUUUC GAAAUCCG CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUUCGA
215 UUCCGGAUU UCCCAUUU AAAUGGGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCCGGAA
216 UCCGGAUUU CCCAUUUC GAAAUGGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUCCGGA
217 CCGGAUUUC CCAUUUCU AGAAAUGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUCCGG
222 UUUCCCAUU UCUAUCGU ACGAUAGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGGGAAA
223 UUCCCAUUU CUAUCGUA UACGAUAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGGGAA
224 UCCCAUUUC UAUCGUAA UUACGAUA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUGGGA
226 CCAUUUCUA UCGUAACU AGUUACGA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAAAUGG
228 AUUUCUAUC GUAACUAU AUAGUUAC CUGAUGA X GAA AUAGAAAU
231 UCUAUCGUA ACUAUUAA UUAAUAGU CUGAUGA X GAA ACGAUAGA
235 UCGUAACUA UUAAAUUC GAAUUUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGUUACGA
237 GUAACUAUU AAAUUCCC GGGAAUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUAGUUAC
238 UAACUAUUA AAUUCCCC GGGGAAUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAUAGUUA
242 UAUUAAAUU CCCCUCUG CAGAGGGG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUAAUA
243 AUUAAAUUC CCCUCUGC GCAGAGGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUUAAU
248 AUUCCCCUC UGCUGAAG CUUCAGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGGGGAAU
258 GCUGAAGUU GGGUUGCC GGCAACCC CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUCAGC
263 AGUUGGGUU GCCUGAAG CUUCAGGC CUGAUGA X GAA ACCCAACU
276 GAAGGAAUU GAGAGCUU AAGCUCUC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCCUUC
284 UGAGAGCUU UAACUCUG CAGAGUUA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCUCUCA
285 GAGAGCUUU AACUCUGC GCAGAGUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGCUCUC
286 AGAGCUUUA ACUCUGCC GGCAGAGU CUGAUGA X GAA AAAGCUCU
290 CUUUAACUC UGCCACUU AAGUGGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGUUAAAG
298 CUGCCACUU CACCUGAA UUCAGGUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGUGGCAG
299 UGCCACUUC ACCUGAAA UUUCAGGU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUGGCA
313 AAAUGCCUC AUAAAAUU AAUUUUAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGGCAUUU
316 UGCCUCAUA AAAUUUUU AAAAAUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGAGGCA
321 CAUAAAAUU UUUUAUGC GCAUAAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUUAUG
322 AUAAAAUUU UUUAUGCU AGCAUAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUUUAU
323 UAAAAUUUU UUAUGCUC GAGCAUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUUUUA
324 AAAAUUUUU UAUGCUCU AGAGCAUA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAUUUU
325 AAAUUUUUU AUGCUCUU AAGAGCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAAUUU
326 AAUUUUUUA UGCUCUUU AAAGAGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAAAUU
331 UUUAUGCUC UUUCUCUU AAGAGAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCAUAAA
333 UAUGCUCUU UCUCUUCU AGAAGAGA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGCAUA
334 AUGCUCUUU CUCUUCUA UAGAAGAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAGCAU
335 UGCUCUUUC UCUUCUAC GUAGAAGA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAGAGCA
337 CUCUUUCUC UUCUACAA UUGUAGAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAAAGAG
339 cuuucucuu CUACAAAA UUUUGUAG CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGAAAG
340 uuucucuuc UACAAAAG CUUUUGUA CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAGAAA
342 UCUCUUCUA CAAAAGCC GGCUUUUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGAAGAGA
361 UGGAAGAUA AAAUUCGU ACGAAUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUUCCA
366 GAUAAAAUU CGUGAACU AGUUCACG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUUAUC
367 AUAAAAUUC GUGAACUC GAGUUCAC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUUUAU
375 CGUGAACUC CGUCCUGA UCAGGACG CUGAUGA X GAA AGUUCACG
379 AACUCCGUC CUGAUUGC GCAAUCAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACGGAGUU
385 GUCCUGAUU GCAUUUUU AAAAAUGC CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAGGAC
390 GAUUGCAUU UUUUCUGA UCAGAAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGCAAUC
391 AUUGCAUUU UUUCUGAU AUCAGAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGCAAU
392 UUGCAUUUU UUCUGAUA UAUCAGAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUGCAA
393 UGCAUUUUU UCUGAUAU AUAUCAGA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAUGCA
394 GCAUUUUUU CUGAUAUG CAUAUCAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAAUGC
395 CAUUUUUUC UGAUAUGU ACAUAUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAAAUG
400 UUUCUGAUA UGUACUUC GAAGUACA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAGAAA Table I I I
Nt. Substrate Ribozyme Position
404 UGAUAUGUA CUUCCCUU AAGGGAAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUAUCA
407 UAUGUACUU CCCUUGGA UCCAAGGG CUGAUGA X GAA AGUACAUA
408 AUGUACUUC CCUUGGAC GUCCAAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUACAU
412 ACUUCCCUU GGACAGUA UACUGUCC CUGAUGA X GAA AGGGAAGU
420 UGGACAGUA GAUAUUGC GCAAUAUC CUGAUGA X GAA ACUGUCCA
424 CAGUAGAUA UUGCUGAU AUCAGCAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUACUG
426 GUAGAUAUU GCUGAUGA UCAUCAGC CUGAUGA X GAA AUAUCUAC
438 GAUGAGCUU CACAUCCC GGGAUGUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGCUCAUC
439 AUGAGCUUC ACAUCCCU AGGGAUGU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGCUCAU
444 CUUCACAUC CCUCGUAU AUACGAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AUGUGAAG
448 ACAUCCCUC GUAUUUUG CAAAAUAC CUGAUGA X GAA AGGGAUGU
451 UCCCUCGUA UUUUGUAC GUACAAAA CUGAUGA X GAA ACGAGGGA
453 CCUCGUAUU UUGUACAA UUGUACAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUACGAGG
454 CUCGUAUUU UGUACAAU AUUGUACA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUACGAG
455 UCGUAUUUU GUACAAUU AAUUGUAC CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUACGA
458 UAUUUUGUA CAAUUUGU ACAAAUUG CUGAUGA X GAA ACAAAAUA
463 UGUACAAUU UGUCUGCU AGCAGACA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUGUACA
464 GUACAAUUU GUCUGCUU AAGCAGAC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUGUAC
467 CAAUUUGUC UGCUUACA UGUAAGCA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAAAUUG
472 UGUCUGCUU ACAUGUGC GCACAUGU CUGAUGA X GAA AGCAGACA
473 GUCUGCUUA CAUGUGCU AGCACAUG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGCAGAC
482 CAUGUGCUA CAGCAUUA UAAUGCUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGCACAUG
489 UACAGCAUU AUGCACAA UUGUGCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGCUGUA
490 ACAGCAUUA UGCACAAC GUUGUGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGCUGU
501 CACAACCUU AAGGUUUA UAAACCUU CUGAUGA X GAA AGGUUGUG
502 ACAACCUUA AGGUUUAC GUAAACCU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGGUUGU
507 CUUAAGGUU UACAGACC GGUCUGUA CUGAUGA X GAA ACCUUAAG
508 UUAAGGUUU ACAGACCU AGGUCUGU CUGAUGA X GAA AACCUUAA
509 UAAGGUUUA CAGACCUC GAGGUCUG CUGAUGA X GAA AAACCUUA
517 ACAGACCUC ACAAGCAG CUGCUUGU CUGAUGA X GAA AGGUCUGU
529 AGCAGCCUA AUCUAGAC GUCUAGAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGGCUGCU
532 AGCCUAAUC UAGACGAA UUCGUCUA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAGGCU
534 CCUAAUCUA GACGAAUC GAUUCGUC CUGAUGA X GAA AGAUUAGG
542 AGACGAAUC UCAAAGUU AACUUUGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCGUCU
544 ACGAAUCUC AAAGUUUC GAAACUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AGAUUCGU
550 CUCAAAGUU UCGUGGUU AACCACGA CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUUGAG
551 UCAAAGUUU CGUGGUUC GAACCACG CUGAUGA X GAA AACUUUGA
552 CAAAGUUUC GUGGUUCC GGAACCAC CUGAUGA X GAA AAACUUUG
558 UUCGUGGUU CCUGGUUU AAACCAGG CUGAUGA X GAA ACCACGAA
559 UCGUGGUUC CUGGUUUA UAAACCAG CUGAUGA X GAA AACCACGA
565 UUCCUGGUU UACCUGAU AUCAGGUA CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAGGAA
566 UCCUGGUUU ACCUGAUG CAUCAGGU CUGAUGA X GAA AACCAGGA
567 CCUGGUUUA CCUGAUGA UCAUCAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAACCAGG
579 GAUGAGAUA AAGUUCAA UUGAACUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUCAUC
584 GAUAAAGUU CAAGUUAU AUAACUUG CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUUAUC
585 AUAAAGUUC AAGUUAUC GAUAACUU CUGAUGA X GAA AACUUUAU
590 GUUCAAGUU AUCCCAAC GUUGGGAU CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUGAAC
591 UUCAAGUUA UCCCAACU AGUUGGGA CUGAUGA X GAA AACUUGAA
593 CAAGUUAUC CCAACUGA UCAGUUGG CUGAUGA X GAA AUAACUUG
610 CAGAUGAUC UGAGAAAG CUUUCUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAUCUG
620 GAGAAAGUC GGAUGACC GGUCAUCC CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUUCUC
639 AAGACUGUU UUUGACGA UCGUCAAA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAGUCUU
640 AGACUGUUU UUGACGAA UUCGUCAA CUGAUGA X GAA AACAGUCU
641 GACUGUUUU UGACGAAU AUUCGUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAACAGUC
642 ACUGUUUUU GACGAAUU AAUUCGUC CUGAUGA X GAA AAAACAGU
650 UGACGAAUU GCUCGAAC GUUCGAGC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCGUCA
654 GAAUUGCUC GAACAAGU ACUUGUUC CUGAUGA X GAA AGCAAUUC Table I I I
Nt. Substrate Ribozyme Position
663 GAACAAGUU GAAGAUUC GAAUCUUC CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUGUUC
670 UUGAAGAUU CGGAGGAA UUCCUCCG CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUUCAA
671 UGAAGAUUC GGAGGAAC GUUCCUCC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUCUUCA
686 ACGAAGCUA UGGCAUUG CAAUGCCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCUUCGU
693 UAUGGCAUU GUUCAUGA UCAUGAAC CUGAUGA X GAA AUGCCAUA
696 GGCAUUGUU CAUGAUAC GUAUCAUG CUGAUGA X GAA ACAAUGCC
697 GCAUUGUUC AUGAUACA UGUAUCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AACAAUGC
703 UUCAUGAUA CAUUUUAU AUAAAAUG CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAUGAA
707 UGAUACAUU UUAUGAGC GCUCAUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGUAUCA
708 GAUACAUUU UAUGAGCU AGCUCAUA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGUAUC
709 AUACAUUUU AUGAGCUA UAGCUCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUGUAU
710 UACAUUUUA UGAGCUAG CUAGCUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAUGUA
717 UAUGAGCUA GAACCUGC GCAGGUUC CUGAUGA X GAA AGCUCAUA
728 ACCUGCAUA UGUUGACU AGUCAACA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGCAGGU
732 GCAUAUGUU GACUACUA UAGUAGUC CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUAUGC
737 UGUUGACUA CUACCAGA UCUGGUAG CUGAUGA X GAA AGUCAACA
740 UGACUACUA CCAGAAAU AUUUCUGG CUGAUGA X GAA AGUAGUCA
749 CCAGAAAUU AAAGAAAC GUUUCUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUCUGG
750 CAGAAAUUA AAGAAACC GGUUUCUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUUCUG
766 CAAAAUGUU GGCAUUUU AAAAUGCC CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUUUUG
772 GUUGGCAUU UUGGUCCG CGGAO-AA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGCCAAC
773 UUGGCAUUU UGGUCCGC GCGGACCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGCCAA
774 UGGCAUUUU GGUCCGCU AGCGGACC CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUGCCA
778 AUUUUGGUC CGCUCUCU AGAGAGCG CUGAUGA A GAA ACCAAAAU
783 GGUCCGCUC UCUCAUUU AAAUGAGA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCGGACC
785 UCCGCUCUC UCAUUUUG CAAAAUGA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGCGGA
787 CGCUCUCUC AUUUUGCA UGCAAAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGAGCG
790 UCUCUCAUU UUGCAUCC GGAUGCAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGAGAGA
791 CUCUCAUUU UGCAUCCA UGGAUGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGAGAG
792 UCUCAUUUU GCAUCCAA UUGGAUGC CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUGAGA
797 UUUUGCAUC CAAAUCCG CGGAUUUG CUGAUGA X GAA AUGCAAAA
803 AUCCAAAUC CGUAGUAA UUACUACG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUGGAU
807 AAAUCCGUA GUAAGGAA UUCCUUAC CUGAUGA X GAA ACGGAUUU
810 UCCGUAGUA AGGAACUA UAGUUCCU CUGAUGA X GAA ACUACGGA
818 AAGGAACUA AUUUCUGA UCAGAAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGUUCCUU
821 GAACUAAUU UCUGAGCA UGCUCAGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAGUUC
822 AACUAAUUU CUGAGCAU AUGCUCAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUAGUU
823 ACUAAUUUC UGAGCAUA UAUGCUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUUAGU
831 CUGAGCAUA ACAACAAU AUUGUUGU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGCUCAG
845 AAUGAGAUU GUUAUAGA UCUAUAAC CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUCAUU
848 GAGAUUGUU AUAGAUUG CAAUCUAU CUGAUGA X GAA ACAAUCUC
849 AGAUUGUUA UAGAUUGG CCAAUCUA CUGAUGA X GAA AACAAUCU
851 AUUGUUAUA GAUUGGUU AACCAAUC CUGAUGA X GAA AUAACAAU
855 UUAUAGAUU GGUUGAAU AUUCAACC CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUAUAA
859 AGAUUGGUU GAAUGCAC GUGCAUUC CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAAUCU
876 AGAAACCUA AAUCGGUU AACCGAUU CUGAUGA X GAA AGGUUUCU
880 ACCUAAAUC GGUUCUCU AGAGAACC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUAGGU
884 AAAUCGGUU CUCUAUGU ACAUAGAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACCGAUUU
885 AAUCGGUUC UCUAUGUA UACAUAGA CUGAUGA X GAA AACCGAUU
887 UCGGUUCUC UAUGUAUC GAUACAUA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAACCGA
889 GGUUCUCUA UGUAUCUU AAGAUACA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGAACC
893 CUCUAUGUA UCUUUCGG CCGAAAGA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUAGAG
895 CUAUGUAUC UUUCGGAA UUCCGAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUACAUAG
897 AUGUAUCUU UCGGAAGC GCUUCCGA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAUACAU
898 UGUAUCUUU CGGAAGCA UGCUUCCG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAUACA
899 GUAUCUUUC GGAAGCAU AUGCUUCC CUGAUGA X GAA AAAGAUAC Table III
Nt. Substrate Ribozyme Position
912 GCAUGGCUA GAUUUCCU AGGAAAUC CUGAUGA X GAA AGCCAUGC
916 GGCUAGAUU UCCUGAGA UCUCAGGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUAGCC
917 GCUAGAUUU CCUGAGAG CUCUCAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUCUAGC
918 CUAGAUUUC CUGAGAGC GCUCUCAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUCUAG
941 AAUGAAAUA GCCCAAGC GCUUGGGC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUCAUU
951 CCCAAGCUC UGGAUGCU AGCAUCCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCUUGGG
960 UGGAUGCUU CAAAUGUU AACAUUUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGCAUCCA
961 GGAUGCUUC AAAUGUUC GAACAUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGCAUCC
968 UCAAAUGUU CCUUUCAU AUGAAAGG CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUUUGA
969 CAAAUGUUC CUUUCAUU AAUGAAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AACAUUUG
972 AUGUUCCUU UCAUUUUU AAAAAUGA CUGAUGA X GAA AGGAACAU
973 UGUUCCUUU CAUUUUUG CAAAAAUG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGGAACA
974 GUUCCUUUC AUUUUUGU ACAAAAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAAGGAAC
977 CCUUUCAUU UUUGUAUU AAUACAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGAAAGG
978 CUUUCAUUU UUGUAUUG CAAUACAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGAAAG
979 UUUCAUUUU UGUAUUGA UCAAUACA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUGAAA
980 UUCAUUUUU GUAUUGAG CUCAAUAC CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAUGAA
983 AUULJUUGUA UUGAGGCC GGCCUCAA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAAAAAU
985 UUUUGUAUU GAGGCCUA UAGGCCUC CUGAUGA X GAA AUACAAAA
993 UGAGGCCUA AUGAAGAA UUCUUCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGGCCUCA
1009 AACGGCGUC GUGGUUGC GCAACCAC CUGAUGA X GAA ACGCCGUU
1015 GUCGUGGUU GCCAGUUG CAACUGGC CUGAUGA X GAA ACCACGAC
1022 UUGCCAGUU GGUAAUUU AAAUUACC CUGAUGA X GAA ACUGGCAA
1026 CAGUUGGUA AUUUAGAG CUCUAAAU CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAACUG
1029 UUGGUAAUU UAGAGGAC GUCCUCUA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUACCAA
1030 UGGUAAUUU AGAGGACA UGUCCUCU CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUACCA
1031 GGUAAUUUA GAGGACAA UUGUCCUC CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUUACC
1044 ACAAGACUA AAAAGGGU ACCCUUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AGUCUUGU
1053 AAAAGGGUU UGUACAUC GAUGUACA CUGAUGA X GAA ACCCUUUU
1054 AAAGGGUUU GUACAUCA UGAUGUAC CUGAUGA X GAA AACCCUUU
1057 GGGUUUGUA CAUCAAAG CUUUGAUG CUGAUGA X GAA ACAAACCC
1061 UUGUACAUC AAAGGGUG CACCCUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGUACAA
1073 GGGUGGGUC CCACAGCU AGCUGUGG CUGAUGA X GAA ACCCACCC
1082 CCACAGCUU ACGAUCAU AUGAUCGU CUGAUGA X GAA AGCUGUGG
1083 CACAGCUUA CGAUCAUG CAUGAUCG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGCUGUG
1088 CUUACGAUC AUGGAACA UGUUCCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCGUAAG
1098 UGGAACAUU CAGCAACA UGUUGCUG CUGAUGA X GAA AUGUUCCA
1099 GGAACAUUC AGCAACAG CUGUUGCU CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGUUCC
1114 AGGCGGGUU CAUGACUC GAGUCAUG CUGAUGA X GAA ACCCGCCU
1115 GGCGGGUUC AUGACUCA UGAGUCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AACCCGCC
1122 UCAUGACUC AUUGUGGU ACCACAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGUCAUGA
1125 UGACUCAUU GUGGUACU AGUACCAC CUGAUGA X GAA AUGAGUCA
1131 AUUGUGGUA CUAAUUCG CGAAUUAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACCACAAU
1134 GUGGUACUA AUUCGGUU AACCGAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGUACCAC
1137 GUACUAAUU CGGTJUCUG CAGAACCG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAGUAC
1138 UACUAAUUC GGUUCUGG CCAGAACC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUAGUA
1142 AAUUCGGUU CUGGAAGC GCUUCCAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACCGAAUU
1143 AUUCGGUUC UGGAAGCC GGCUUCCA CUGAUGA X GAA AACCGAAU
1154 GAAGCCAUC ACUUUUGG CCAAAAGU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGGCUUC
1158 CCAUCACUU UUGGCGUG CACGCCAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGUGAUGG
1159 CAUCACUUU UGGCGUGC GCACGCCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUGAUO
1160 AUCACUUUU GGCGUGCC GGCACGCC CUGAUGA X GAA AAAGUGAU
1175 CCAAUGAUA ACAUGGCC GGCCAUGU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAUUGG
1187 UGGCCACUU UAUGCUGA UCAGCAUA CUGAUGA X GAA AGUGGCCA
1188 GGCCACUUU AUGCUGAU AUCAGCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUGGCC
1189 GCCACUUUA UGCUGAUC GAUCAGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAGUGGC
1197 AUGCUGAUC AAUUCUAC GUAGAAUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAGCAU Table I I I
Nt. Substrate Ribozyme Position
1201 UGAUCAAUU CUACAACG CGUUGUAG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUGAUCA
1202 GAUCAAUUC UACAACGA UCGUUGUA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUGAUC
1204 UCAAUUCUA CAACGAGA UCUCGUUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGAAUUGA
1217 GAGAAGGUA GUCGAGGU ACCUCGAC CUGAUGA X GAA ACCUUCUC
1220 AAGGUAGUC GAGGUUAG CUAACCUC CUGAUGA X GAA ACUACCUU
1226 GUCGAGGUU AGGGGAUU AAUCCCCU CUGAUGA X GAA ACCUCGAC
1227 UCGAGGUUA GGGGAUUG CAAUCCCC CUGAUGA X GAA AACCUCGA
1234 UAGGGGAUU GGGAAUCA UGAUUCCC CUGAUGA X GAA AUCCCCUA
1241 UUGGGAAUC AAAAUCGG CCGAUUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCCCAA
1247 AUCAAAAUC GGGAUAGA UCUAUCCC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUUGAU
1253 AUCGGGAUA GAUGUAUG CAUACAUC CUGAUGA X GAA AUCCCGAU
1259 AUAGAUGUA UGGAAUGA UCAUUCCA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUCUAU
1274 GAAGGGAUU GAGAUCAC GUGAUCUC CUGAUGA X GAA AUCCCUUC
1280 AUUGAGAUC ACGGGCCC GGGCCCGU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUCAAU
1292 GGCCCUGUA AUAGAAAG CUUUCUAU CUGAUGA X GAA ACAGGGCC
1295 CCUGUAAUA GAAAGCGC GCGCUUUC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUACAGG
1310 GCCAAGAUU AGAGAAGC GCUUCUCU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUUGGC
1311 CCAAGAUUA GAGAAGCA UGCUUCUC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUCUUGG
1322 GAAGCAAUU GAGAGACU AGUCUCUC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUGCUUC
1331 GAGAGACUA AUGAUCAG CUGAUCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGUCUCUC
1337 CUAAUGAUC AGUAAUGG CCAUUACU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAUUAG
1341 UGAUCAGUA AUGGUUCU AGAACCAU CUGAUGA X GAA ACUGAUCA
1347 GUAAUGGUU CUGAGGAA UUCCUCAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAUUAC
1348 UAAUGGUUC UGAGGAAA UUUCCUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AACCAUUA
1358 GAGGAAAUU AUAAAUAU AUAUUUAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUCCUC
1359 AGGAAAUUA UAAAUAUU AAUAUUUA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUUCCU
1361 GAAAUUAUA AAUAUUAG CUAAUAUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUAAUUUC
1365 UUAUAAAUA UUAGGGAU AUCCCUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUAUAA
1367 AUAAAUAUU AGGGAUAG CUAUCCCU CUGAUGA X GAA AUAUUUAU
1368 UAAAUAUUA GGGAUAGA UCUAUCCC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUAUUUA
1374 UUAGGGAUA GAGUAAUG CAUUACUC CUGAUGA X GAA AUCCCUAA
1379 GAUAGAGUA AUGGCUAU AUAGCCAU CUGAUGA X GAA ACUCUAUC
1386 UAAUGGCUA UGAGCAAA UUUGCUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCCAUUA
1401 AAAUGGCUC AGAAUGCA UGCAUUCU CUGAUGA X GAA AGCCAUUU
1426 AGGUGGAUC UUCGUGGA UCCACGAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCCACCU
1428 GUGGAUCUU CGUGGAAC GUUCCACG CUGAUGA X GAA AGAUCCAC
1429 UGGAUCUUC GUGGAACA UGUUCCAC CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAUCCA
1440 GGAACAAUC UCACUGCU AGCAGUGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUGUUCC
1442 AACAAUCUC ACUGCUCU AGAGCAGU CUGAUGA X GAA AGAUUGUU
1449 UCACUGCUC UCAUUCAA UUGAAUGA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCAGUGA
1451 ACUGCUCUC AUUCAACA UGUUGAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGCAGU
1454 GCUCUCAUU CAACAUAU AUAUGUUG CUGAUGA X GAA AUGAGAGC
1455 CUCUCAUUC AACAUAUC GAUAUGUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGAGAG
1461 UUCAACAUA UCAAGAAU AUUCUUGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGUUGAA
1463 CAACAUAUC AAGAAUUA UAAUUCUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUAUGUUG
1470 UCAAGAAUU AUAAUCUU AAGAUUAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCUUGA
1471 CAAGAAUUA UAAUCUUA UAAGAUUA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUCUUG
1473 AGAAUUAUA AUCUUAAU AUUAAGAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUAAUUCU
1476 AUUAUAAUC UUAAUUAG CUAAUUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAUAAU
1478 UAUAAUCUU AAUUAGUU AACUAAUU CUGAUGA X GAA AGAUUAUA
1479 AUAAUCUUA AUUAGUUG CAACUAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAUUAU
1482 AUCUUAAUU AGUUGAAG CUUCAACU CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAAGAU
1483 UCUUAAUUA GUUGAAGA UCUUCAAC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUAAGA
1486 UAAUUAGUU GAAGACAG CUGUCUUC CUGAUGA X GAA ACUAAUUA
1499 ACAGAAAUA AGUCCUUG CAAGGACU CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUCUGU
1503 AAAUAAGUC CUUGCAUU AAUGCAAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUAUUU
1506 UAAGUCCUU GCAUUGUA UACAAUGC CUGAUGA X GAA AGGACUUA Table I I I
Nt . Substrate Ribo zyme Position
1511 CCUUGCAUU GUAACAUG CAUGUUAC CUGAUGA X GAA AUGCAAGG
1514 UGCAUUGUA ACAUGGUG CACCAUGU CUGAUGA X GAA ACAAUGCA
1534 GUGUGUGUU UUUUUUCC GGAAAAAA CUGAUGA X GAA ACACACAC
1535 UGUGUGUUU UUUUUCCA UGGAAAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AACACACA
1536 GUGUGUUUU UUUUCCAC GUGGAAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAACACAC
1537 UGUGUUUUU UUUCCACU AGUGGAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAACACA
1538 GUGUUUUUU UUCCACUU AAGUGGAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAACAC
1539 UGUUUUUUU UCCACUUA UAAGUGGA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAAACA
1540 GUUUUUUUU CCACUUAA UUAAGUGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAAAAC
154 1 UUUUUUUUC CACUUAAU AUUAAGUG CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAAAAA
1546 UUUCCACUU AAUAAAAU AUUUUAUU CUGAUGA X GAA AGUGGAAA
1547 UUCCACUUA AUAAAAUG CAUUUUAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUGGAA
1550 CACUUAAUA AAAUGAAG CUUCAUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAAGUG
1579 GGAUGGAUC UUAACUUU AAAGUUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCCAUCC
1581 AUGGAUCUU AACUUUAA UUAAAGUU CUGAUGA X GAA AGAUCCAU
1582 UGGAUCUUA ACUUUAAA UUUAAAGU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAUCCA
1586 UCUUAACUU UAAAAAAA UUUUUUUA CUGAUGA X GAA AGUUAAGA
1587 CUUAACUUU AAAAAAAA UUUUUUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUUAAG
1588 UUAACUUUA AAAAAAAA uuuuuuuu CUGAUGA X GAA AAAGUUAA
Where "X" represents stem II region of a HH ribozyme (Hertel et al . , 1992 Nucleic Acids Res. 20 3252). The length of stem II may be > 2 base-pairs.
Table IV: Solanidine glucosyltransferase Hairpin
Ribozyme and Target Sequences
79 AUGACC AGAA GAUA ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA UAUCC GCU GGUCAU
211 UGGGAA AGAA GGAA ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA UUCCG GAU UUCCCA
249 AACUUC AGAA GAGG ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA CCUCϋ GCU GAAGUU
376 AAUCAG AGAA GAGU ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA ACUCC GUC CUGAUU
381 AAUGCA AGAA GGAC ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA GUCCU GAU UGCAUU
429 AAGCUC AGAA GCAA ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA UUGCO GAU GAGCUU
468 CAUGUA AGAA GACA ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA UGUCU GCU UACAUG
511 UGUGAG AGAA GUAA ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA UUACA GAC CUCACA
524 AGAUUA AGAA GCUU ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA AAGCA GCC UAAUCU
570 UAUCUC AGAA GGUA ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA UACCU GAU GAGAUA
603 CAGAUC AGAA GUCA ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA OGACA GAU GAUCUG
621 UUGGUC AGAA GACU ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA AGUCG GAU GACCAA
636 GUCAAA AGAA GUCU ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA AGACU GUU UUUGAC
779 UGAGAG AGAA GACC ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA GGUCC GCU CUCUCA
881 AUAGAG AGAA GAUU ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA AAUCG GUU CUCUAU
1019 AUUACC AGAA GGCA ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA UGCCA GUU GGUAAU
1078 AUCGUA AGAA GUGG ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA CCACA GCU UACGAU
1139 UUCCAG AGAA GAAU ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA AUUCG GUU CUGGAA
1193 GAAUUG AGAA GCAU ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA AUGCO GAU CAAUUC
1445 AAUGAG AGAA GUGA ACCAGAGAAACACACGUUGUGGUACAUUACCUGGUA UCACU GCU CUCAUU Table V
Table V: Potato Citrate Synthase Hammerhead Ribozyme and Target Sequences
Nt. Substrate Ribozyme Position
9 UUUUUCGUU CCAUCAGC GCUGAUGG CUGAUGA X GAA ACGAAAAA
10 UUUUCGUUC CAUCAGCC GGCUGAUG CUGAUGA X GAA AACGAAAA
14 CGUUCCAUC AGCCUACU AGUAGGCU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGGAACG
20 AUCAGCCUA CUUGAGAU AUCUCAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AGGCUGAU
23 AGCCUACUU GAGAUGUA UACAUCUC CUGAUGA X GAA AGUAGGCU
31 UGAGAUGUA UUCCCACU AGUGGGAA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUCUCA
33 AGAUGUAUU CCCACUGG CCAGUGGG CUGAUGA X GAA AUACAUCU
34 GAUGUAUUC CCACUGGU ACCAGUGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUACAUC
43 CCACUGGUA AAAGUUAA UUAACUUU CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAGUGG
49 GUAAAAGUU AAUUUUUU AAAAAAUU CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUUUAC
50 UAAAAGUUA AUUUUUUU AAAAAAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AACUUUUA
53 AAGUUAAUU UUUUUGAU AUCAAAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAACUU
54 AGUUAAUUU UUUUGAUU AAUCAAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUAACU
55 GUUAAUUUU UUUGAUUU AAAUCAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUUAAC
56 UUAAUUUUU UUGAUUUU AAAAUCAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAUUAA
57 UAAUUUUUU UGAUUUUC GAAAAUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAAUUA
58 AAUUUUUUU GAUUUUCG CGAAAAUC CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAAAUU
62 UUUUUGAUU UUCGCGAG CUCGCGAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAAAAA
63 UUUUGAUUU UCGCGAGC GCUCGCGA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUCAAAA
64 UUUGAUUUU CGCGAGCA UGCUCGCG CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUCAAA
65 UUGAUUUUC GCGAGCAA UUGCUCGC CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAUCAA
80 AAUGGUGUU CUACCGUA UACGGUAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACACCAUU
81 AUGGUGUUC UACCGUAG CUACGGUA CUGAUGA X GAA AACACCAU
83 GGUGUUCUA CCGUAGCG CGCUACGG CUGAUGA X GAA AGAACACC
88 UCUACCGUA GCGUUUCG CGAAACGC CUGAUGA X GAA ACGGUAGA
93 CGUAGCGUU UCGUUGCU AGCAACGA CUGAUGA X GAA ACGCUACG
94 GUAGCGUUU CGUUGCUG CAGCAACG CUGAUGA X GAA AACGCUAC
95 UAGCGUUUC GUUGCUGU ACAGCAAC CUGAUGA X GAA AAACGCUA
98 CGUUUCGUU GCUGUCAA UUGACAGC CUGAUGA X GAA ACGAAACG
104 GUUGCUGUC AAAGCUCC GGAGCUUU CUGAUGA X GAA ACAGCAAC
111 UCAAAGCUC CGCUCUCG CGAGAGCG CUGAUGA X GAA AGCUUUGA
116 GCUCCGCUC UCGAGCGG CCGCUCGA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCGGAGC
118 UCCGCUCUC GAGCGGUC GACCGCUC CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGCGGA
126 CGAGCGGUC CAACAGUC GACUGUUG CUGAUGA X GAA ACCGCUCG
134 CCAACAGUC AAAUGUUA UAACAUUU CUGAUGA X GAA ACUGUUGG
141 UCAAAUGUU AGCAAUUC GAAUUGCU CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUUUGA
142 CAAAUGUUA GCAAUUCU AGAAUUGC CUGAUGA X GAA AACAUUUG
148 UUAGCAAUU CUGUGCGC GCGCACAG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUGCUAA
149 UAGCAAUUC UGUGCGCU AGCGCACA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUGCUA
162 CGCUGGCUU CAAGUCCA UGGACUUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGCCAGCG
163 GCUGGCUUC AAGUCCAA UUGGACUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGCCAGC
168 CUUCAAGUC CAAACCUC GAGGUUUG CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUGAAG
176 CCAAACCUC UUCCGGUC GACCGGAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGGUUUGG
178 AAACCUCUU CCGGUCUU AAGACCGG CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGGUUU
179 AACCUCUUC CGGUCUUG CAAGACCG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAGGUU
184 CUUCCGGUC UUGAUCUG CAGAUCAA CUGAUGA X GAA ACCGGAAG
186 UCCGGUCUU GAUCUGCG CGCAGAUC CUGAUGA X GAA AGACCGGA
190 GUCUUGAUC UGCGUUCU AGAACGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAAGAC
196 AUCUGCGUU CUGAGCUG CAGCUCAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACGCAGAU
197 UCUGCGUUC UGAGCUGG CCAGCUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AACGCAGA
207 GAGCUGGUA CAAGAAUU AAUUCUUG CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAGCUC Table V
Nt. Substrate Ribo∑ y e Position
215 ACAAGAAUU GAUUCCUG CAGGAAUC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCUUGU
219 GAAUUGAUU CCUGAACA UGUUCAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAAUUC
220 AAUUGAUUC CUGAACAA UUGUUCAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUCAAUU
235 AACAGGAUC GCCUGAAA UUUCAGGC CUGAUGA X GAA AUCCUGUU
249 AAAAAGAUC AAGUCAGA UCUGACUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUUUUU
254 GAUCAAGUC AGAUAUGA UCAUAUCU CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUGAUC
259 AGUCAGAUA UGAAAGGU ACCUUUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUGACU
268 UGAAAGGUU CAAUUGGG CCCAAUUG CUGAUGA X GAA ACCUUUCA
269 GAAAGGUUC AAUUGGGA UCCCAAUU CUGAUGA X GAA AACCUUUC
273 GGUUCAAUU GGGAACAU AUGUUCCC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUGAACC
282 GGGAACAUC ACAGUUGA UCAACUGU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGUUCCC
288 AUCACAGUU GAUAUGGU ACCAUAUC CUGAUGA X GAA ACUGUGAU
292 CAGUUGAUA UGGUUCUU AAGAACCA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAACUG
297 GAUAUGGUU CUUGGUGG CCACCAAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAUAUC
298 AUAUGGUUC UUGGUGGA UCCACCAA CUGAUGA X GAA AACCAUAU
300 AUGGUUCUU GGUGGAAU AUUCCACC CUGAUGA X GAA AGAACCAU
326 GACAGGAUU ACUGUGGA UCCACAGU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCCUGUC
327 ACAGGAUUA CUGUGGAA UUCCACAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUCCUGU
340 GGAAACCUC AUUACCUU AAGGUAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGGUUUCC
343 AACCUCAUU ACCUUGAC GUCAAGGU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGAGGUU
344 ACCUCAUUA CCUUGACC GGUCAAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGAGGU
348 CAUUACCUU GACCCUGA UCAGGGUC CUGAUGA X GAA AGGUAAUG
366 GAGGGAAUU CGCUUCCG CGGAAGCG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCCCUC
367 AGGGAAUUC GCUUCCGG CCGGAAGC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUCCCU
371 AAUUCGCUU CCGGGGGU ACCCCCGG CUGAUGA X GAA AGCGAAUU
372 AUUCGCUUC CGGGGGUU AACCCCCG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGCGAAU
380 CCGGGGGUU GUCUAUAC GUAUAGAC CUGAUGA X GAA ACCCCCGG
383 GGGGUUGUC UAUACCUG CAGGUAUA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAACCCC
385 GGUUGUCUA UACCUGAA UUCAGGUA CUGAUGA X GAA AGACAACC
387 UUGUCUAUA CCUGAAUG CAUUCAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AUAGACAA
405 CAAAAGGUA UUACCUGC GCAGGUAA CUGAUGA X GAA ACCUUUUG
407 AAAGGUAUU ACCUGCAG CUGCAGGU CUGAUGA X GAA AUACCUUU
408 AAGGUAUUA CCUGCAGC GCUGCAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUACCUU
437 UGAGCCCUU GCCUGAAG CUUCAGGC CUGAUGA X GAA AGGGCUCA
448 CUGAAGGUC UUCUCUGG CCAGAGAA CUGAUGA X GAA ACCUUCAG
450 GAAGGUCUU CUCUGGCU AGCCAGAG CUGAUGA X GAA AGACCUUC
451 AAGGUCUUC UCUGGCUU AAGCCAGA CUGAUGA X GAA AAGACCUU
453 GGUCUUCUC UGGCUUCU AGAAGCCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAAGACC
459 CUCUGGCUU CUUUUAAC GUUAAAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AGCCAGAG
460 UCUGGCUUC UUUUAACA UGUUAAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAGCCAGA
462 UGGCUUCUU UUAACAGG CCUGUUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAAGCCA
463 GGCUUCUUU UAACAGGA UCCUGUUA CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAAGCC
464 GCUUCUUUU AACAGGAA UUCCUGUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAAGAAGC
465 CUUCUUUUA ACAGGAAA UUUCCUGU CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAGAAG
482 GGUGCCAUC AAAAGAGC GCUCUUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGGCACC
499 AAGUGAAUU CAAUUGUC GACAAUUG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCACUU
500 AGUGAAUUC AAUUGUCU AGACAAUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUCACU
504 AAUUCAAUU GUCUCAGG CCUGAGAC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUGAAUU
507 UCAAUUGUC UCAGGAAU AUUCCUGA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAAUUGA
509 AAUUGUCUC AGGAAUUG CAAUUCCU CUGAUGA X GAA AGACAAUU
516 UCAGGAAUU GCAGAGUC GACUCUGC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCCUGA
524 UGCAGAGUC GGGCAUCA UGAUGCCC CUGAUGA X GAA ACUCUGCA
531 UCGGGCAUC AUAUCCCU AGGGAUAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGCCCGA
534 GGCAUCAUA UCCCUGAU AUCAGGGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGAUGCC
536 CAUCAUAUC CCUGAUCA UGAUCAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AUAUGAUG
543 UCCCUGAUC AUCAUGUA UACAUGAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAGGGA
546 CUGAUCAUC AUGUAUAC GUAUACAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGAUCAG Table V
Figure imgf000056_0001
Table V
Nt. Substrate Ribozyme Position
831 CUUGGUUUC AGUAGCUC GAGCUACU CUGAUGA X GAA AAACCAAG
835 GUUUCAGUA GCUCUGAA UUCAGAGC CUGAUGA X GAA ACUGAAAC
839 CAGUAGCUC UGAAAUGC GCAUUUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCUACUG
855 CAUGAACUU CUUAUGAG CUCAUAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AGUUCAUG
856 AUGAACUUC UUAUGAGG CCUCAUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUUCAU
858 GAACUUCUU AUGAGGCU AGCCUCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGAAGUUC
859 AACUUCUUA UGAGGCUC GAGCCUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAAGUU
867 AUGAGGCUC UAUGUAAC GUUACAUA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCCUCAU
869 GAGGCUCUA UGUAACAA UUGUUACA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGCCUC
873 CUCUAUGUA ACAAUACA UGUAUUGU CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUAGAG
879 GUAACAAUA CACAGUGA UCACUGUG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUGUUAC
889 ACAGUGAUC AUGAAGGU ACCUUCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCACUGU
901 AAGGUGGUA AUGUCAGU ACUGACAU CUGAUGA X GAA ACCACCUU
906 GGUAAUGUC AGUGCUCA UGAGCACU CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUUACC
913 UCAGUGCUC ACACCGGU ACCGGUGU CUGAUGA X GAA AGCACUGA
922 ACACCGGUC ACUUGGUU AACCAAGU CUGAUGA X GAA ACCGGUGU
926 CGGUCACUU GGUUGCUA UAGCAACC CUGAUGA X GAA AGUGACCG
930 CACUUGGUU GCUAGUGC GCACUAGC CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAAGUG
934 UGGUUGCUA GUGCUUUG CAAAGCAC CUGAUGA X GAA AGCAACCA
940 CUAGUGCUU UGUCUGAU AUCAGACA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCACUAG
941 UAGUGCUUU GUCUGAUC GAUCAGAC CUGAUGA X GAA AAGCACUA
944 UGCUUUGUC UGAUCCUU AAGGAUCA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAAAGCA
949 UGUCUGAUC CUUACCUC GAGGUAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAGACA
952 CUGAUCCUU ACCUCUCC GGAGAGGU CUGAUGA X GAA AGGAUCAG
953 UGAUCCUUA CCUCUCCU AGGAGAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGGAUCA
957 CCUUACCUC UCCUUUGC GCAAAGGA CUGAUGA X GAA AGGUAAGG
959 UUACCUCUC CUUUGCUG CAGCAAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGGUAA
962 CCUCUCCUU UGCUGCUG CAGCAGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGGAGAGG
963 CUCUCCUUU GCUGCUGC GCAGCAGC CUGAUGA X GAA AAGGAGAG
973 CUGCUGCUU UGAAUGGU ACCAUUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCAGCAG
974 UGCUGCUUU GAAUGGUU AACCAUUC CUGAUGA X GAA AAGCAGCA
982 UGAAUGGUU UAGCCGGA UCCGGCUA CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAUUCA
983 GAAUGGUUU AGCCGGAC GUCCGGCU CUGAUGA X GAA AACCAUUC
984 AAUGGUUUA GCCGGACC GGUCCGGC CUGAUGA X GAA AAACCAUU
996 GGACCACUU CAUGGUUU AAACCAUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGUGGUCC
997 GACCACUUC AUGGUUUA UAAACCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUGGUC
600 UUCAUGGUU UAGCCAAU AUUGGCUA CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAUGAA
1004 UCAUGGUUU AGCCAAUC GAUUGGCU CUGAUGA X GAA AACCAUGA
1005 CAUGGUUUA GCCAAUCA UGAUUGGC CUGAUGA X GAA AAACCAUG
1012 UAGCCAAUC AGGAAGUU AACUUCCU CUGAUGA X GAA AUUGGCUA
1020 CAGGAAGUU UUGCUAUG CAUAGCAA CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUCCUG
1021 AGGAAGUUU UGCUAUGG CCAUAGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AACUUCCU
1022 GGAAGUUUU GCUAUGGA UCCAUAGC CUGAUGA X GAA AAACUUCC
1026 GUUUUGCUA UGGAUAAA UUUAUCCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCAAAAC
1032 CUAUGGAUA AAAUCUGU ACAGAUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUCCAUAG
1037 GAUAAAAUC UGUUGUAG CUACAACA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUUAUC
1041 AAAUCUGUU GUAGAAGA UCUUCUAC CUGAUGA X GAA ACAGAUUU
1044 UCUGUUGUA GAAGAAUG CAUUCUUC CUGAUGA X GAA ACAACAGA
1065 GAGAACAUU UCCAAAGA UCUUUGGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGUUCUC
1066 AGAACAUUU CCAAAGAG CUCUUUGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGUUCU
1067 GAACAUUUC CAAAGAGC GCUCUUUG CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUGUUC
1079 AGAGCAGUU GAAAGACU AGUCUUUC CUGAUGA X GAA ACUGCUCU
1088 GAAAGACUA UGUUUGGA UCCAAACA CUGAUGA X GAA AGUCUUUC
1092 GACUAUGUU UGGAAAAC GUUUUCCA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUAGUC
1093 ACUAUGUUU GGAAAACA UGUUUUCC CUGAUGA X GAA AACAUAGU
1103 GAAAACAUU GAACAGUG CACUGUUC CUGAUGA X GAA AUGUUUUC
1119 GGCAAGGUU GUCCCUGG CCAGGGAC CUGAUGA X GAA ACCUUGCC Table V
Nt. Substrate Ribo∑ .yme Position
1122 AAGGUUGUC CCUGGUUU AAACCAGG CUGAUGA X GAA ACAACCUU
1129 UCCCUGGUU UUGGACAU AUGUCCAA CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAGGGA
1130 CCCUGGUUU UGGACAUG CAUGUCCA CUGAUGA X GAA AACCAGGG
1131 CCUGGUUUU GGACAUGG CCAUGUCC CUGAUGA X GAA AAACCAGG
1143 CAUGGAGUU CUGCGAAA UUUCGCAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACUCCAUG
1144 AUGGAGUUC UGCGAAAG CUUUCGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AACUCCAU
1158 AAGACUGUA CCAAGAUA UAUCUUGG CUGAUGA X GAA ACAGUCUU
1166 ACCAAGAUA UACAUGCC GGCAUGUA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUUGGU
1168 CAAGAUAUA CAUGCCAG CUGGCAUG CUGAUGA X GAA AUAUCUUG
1184 GAGAGAGUU CGCUAUGA UCAUAGOG CUGAUGA X GAA ACUCUCUC
1185 AGAGAGUUC GCUAUGAA UUCAUAGC CUGAUGA X GAA AACUCUCU
1189 AGUUCGCUA UGAAGCAU AUGCUUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCGAACU
1198 UGAAGCAUU UGCCUGAA UUCAGGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGCUUCA
1199 GAAGCAUUU GCCUGAAG CUUCAGGC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGCUUC
1210 CUGAAGAUC CACUGUUU AAACAGUG CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUUCAG
1217 UCCACUGUU UCAACUGG CCAGUUGA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAGUGGA
1218 CCACUGUUU CAACUGGU ACCAGUUG CUGAUGA X GAA AACAGUGG
1219 CACUGUUUC AACUGGUU AACCAGUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAACAGUG
1227 CAACUGGUU UCAAAACU AGUUUUGA CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAGUUG
1228 AACUGGUUU CAAAACUC GAGUUUUG CUGAUGA X GAA AACCAGUU
1229 ACUGGUUUC AAAACUCU AGAGUUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAACCAGU
1236 UCAAAACUC UACGAAGU ACUUCGUA CUGAUGA X GAA AGUUUUGA
1238 AAAACUCUA CGAAGUUU AAACUUCG CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGUUUU
1245 UACGAAGUU UUCCUCCU AGGAGGAA CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUCGUA
1246 ACGAAGUUU UCCUCCUG CAGGAGGA CUGAUGA X GAA AACUUCGU
1247 CGAAGUUUU CCUCCUGU ACAGGAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AAACUUCG
1248 GAAGUUUUC CUCCUGUU AACAGGAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAAACUUC
1251 GUUUUCCUC CUGUUCUU AAGAACAG CUGAUGA X GAA AGGAAAAC
1256 CCUCCUGUU CUUACAGA UCUGUAAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACAGGAGG
1257 CUCCUGUUC UUACAGAA UUCUGUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AACAGGAG
1259 CCUGUUCUU ACAGAACU AGUUCUGU CUGAUGA X GAA AGAACAGG
1260 CUGUUCUUA CAGAACUU AAGUUCUG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAACAG
1268 ACAGAACUU GGCAAAGU ACUUUGCC CUGAUGA X GAA AGUUCUGU
1277 GGCAAAGUU AAAACCUU AAGGUUUU CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUUGCC
1278 GCAAAGUUA AAACCUUG CAAGGUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AACUUUGC
1285 UAAAACCUU GGCCAAAU AUUUGGCC CUGAUGA X GAA AGGUUUUA
1296 CCAAAUGUU GAUGCCCA UGGGCAUC CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUUUGG
1316 UGGUGUGUU GUUGAACU AGUUCAAC CUGAUGA X GAA ACACACCA
1319 UGUGUUGUU GAACUAUU AAUAGUUC CUGAUGA X GAA ACAACACA
1325 GUUGAACUA UUAUGGUU AACCAUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGUUCAAC
1327 UGAACUAUU AUGGUUUA UAAACCAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUAGUUCA
1328 GAACUAUUA UGGUUUAA UUAAACCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUAGUUC
1333 AUUAUGGUU UAACUGAA UUCAGUUA CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAUAAU
1334 UUAUGGUUU AACUGAAG CUUCAGUU CUGAUGA X GAA AACCAUAA
1335 UAUGGUUUA ACUGAAGC GCUUCAGU CUGAUGA X GAA AAACCAUA
1349 AGCAAGAUA UUAUACGG CCGUAUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUUGCU
1351 CAAGAUAUU AUACGGUC GACCGUAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUAUCUUG
1352 AAGAUAUUA UACGGUCC GGACCGUA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUAUCUU
1354 GAUAUUAUA CGGUCCUC GAGGACCG CUGAUGA X GAA AUAAUAUC
1359 UAUACGGUC CUCUUUGG CCAAAGAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACCGUAUA
1362 ACGGUCCUC UUUGGCGU ACGCCAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGGACCGU
1364 GGUCCUCUU UGGCGUAU AUACGCCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGGACC
1365 GUCCUCUUU GGCGUAUC GAUACGCC CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAGGAC
1371 UUUGGCGUA UCAAGAGC GCUCUUGA CUGAUGA X GAA ACGCCAAA
1373 UGGCGUAUC AAGAGCUC GAGCUCUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUACGCCA
1381 CAAGAGCUC UUGGCAUU AAUGCCAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCUCJUG
1383 AGAGCUCUU GGCAUUUG CAAAUGCC CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGCUCU Table V
Nt. Substrate Ribo∑ .yme Position
1389 CUUGGCAUU UGCUCUCA UGAGAGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGCCAAG
1390 UUGGCAUUU GCUCUCAG CUGAGAGC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGCCAA
1394 CAUUUGCUC UCAGCUAA UUAGCUGA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCAAAUG
1396 UUUGCUCUC AGCUAAUU AAUUAGCU CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGCAAA
1401 UCUCAGCUA AUUUGGGA UCCCAAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGCUGAGA
1404 CAGCUAAUU UGGGACCG CGGUCCCA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAGCUG
1405 AGCUAAUUU GGGACCGA UCGGUCCC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUAGCU
1417 ACCGAGCUC UUGGAUUG CAAUCCAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCUCGGU
1419 CGAGCUCUU GGAUUGCC GGCAAUCC CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGCUCG
1424 UCUUGGAUU GCCGCUAG CUAGCGGC CUGAUGA X GAA AUCCAAGA
1431 UUGCCGCUA GAGAGGCC GGCCUCUC CUGAUGA X GAA AGCGGCAA
1449 AAGAGUGUC ACAAUGGA UCCAUUGU CUGAUGA X GAA ACACUCUU
1464 GAGUGGCUU GAGAACCA UGGUUCUC CUGAUGA X GAA AGCCACUC
1491 GCAUGAAUU GUUUGAAA UUUCAAAC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCAUGC
1494 UGAAUUGUU UGAAAUCU AGAUUUCA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAAUUCA
1495 GAAUUGUUU GAAAUCUC GAGAUUUC CUGAUGA X GAA AACAAUUC
1501 UUUGAAAUC UCGCGAGC GCUCGCGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUCAAA
1503 UGAAAUCUC GCGAGCAU AUGCUCGC CUGAUGA X GAA AGAUUUCA
1512 GCGAGCAUA AAACACAA UUGUGUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGCUCGC
1524 CACAAUGUA UAAUCUCU AGAGAUUA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUUGUG
1526 CAAUGUAUA AUCUCUAU AUAGAGAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUACAUUG
1529 UGUAUAAUC UCUAUGAA UUCAUAGA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAUACA
1531 UAUAAUCUC UAUGAAUA UAUUCAUA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAUUAUA
1533 UAAUCUCUA UGAAUAAU AUUAUUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGAGAUUA
1539 CUAUGAAUA AUUGCUUG CAAGCAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCAUAG
1542 UGAAUAAUU GCUUGACA UGUCAAGC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAUUCA
1546 UAAUUGCUU GACAAAGC GCUUUGUC CUGAUGA X GAA AGCAAUUA
1558 AAAGCACUC CUUUCUUG CAAGAAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AGUGCUUU
1561 GCACUCCUU UCUUGGGG CCCCAAGA CUGAUGA X GAA AGGAGUGC
1562 CACUCCUUU CUUGGGGG CCCCCAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGGAGUG
1563 ACUCCUUUC UUGGGGGA UCCCCCAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAGGAGU
1565 UCCUUUCUU GGGGGACA UGUCCCCC CUGAUGA X GAA AGAAAGGA
1578 GACAAGAUA GGUCGGCC GGCCGACC CUGAUGA X GAA AUCUUGUC
1582 AGAUAGGUC GGCCCUUC GAAGGGCC CUGAUGA X GAA ACCUAUCU
1589 UCGGCCCUU CAAUGGGU ACCCAUUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGGGCCGA
1590 CGGCCCUUC AAUGGGUU AACCCAUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGGGCCG
1598 CAAUGGGUU AACGAACU AGUUCGUU CUGAUGA X GAA ACCCAUUG
1599 AAUGGGUUA ACGAACUU AAGUUCGU CUGAUGA X GAA AACCCAUU
1607 AACGAACUU CAGUUCAA UUGAACUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGUUCGUU
1608 ACGAACUUC AGUUCAAA UUUGAACU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUUCGU
1612 ACUUCAGUU CAAACUUC GAAGUUUG CUGAUGA X GAA ACUGAAGU
1613 CUUCAGUUC AAACUUCA UGAAGUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AACUGAAG
1619 UUCAAACUU CACUGAAU AUUCAGUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGUUUGAA
1620 UCAAACUUC ACUGAAUU AAUUCAGU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUUUGA
1628 CACUGAAUU UGUGUGAA UUCACACA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCAGUG
1629 ACUGAAUUU GUGUGAAU AUUCACAC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUCAGU
1638 GUGUGAAUU GUAUGGUU AACCAUAC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCACAC
1641 UGAAUUGUA UGGUUUCU AGAAACCA CUGAUGA X GAA ACAAUUCA
1646 UGUAUGGUU UCUCGAGA UCUCGAGA CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAUACA
1647 GUAUGGUUU CUCGAGAC GUCUCGAG CUGAUGA X GAA AACCAUAC
1648 UAUGGUUUC UCGAGACU AGUCUCGA CUGAUGA X GAA AAACCAUA
1650 UGGUUUCUC GAGACUUG CAAGUCUC CUGAUGA X GAA AGAAACCA
1657 UCGAGACUU GUCCUGAA UUCAGGAC CUGAUGA X GAA AGUCUCGA
1660 AGACUUGUC CUGAAUUU AAAUUCAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACAAGUCU
1667 UCCUGAAUU UUGAACUU AAGUUCAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCAGGA
1668 CCUGAAUUU UGAACUUA UAAGUUCA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUCAGG
1669 CUGAAUUUU GAACUUAG CUAAGUUC CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUUCAG Table V
Nt. Substrate Ribo∑ .yme Position
1675 UUUGAACUU AGUCUAGU ACUAGACU CUGAUGA X GAA AGUUCAAA
1676 UUGAACUUA GUCUAGUG CACUAGAC CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUUCAA
1679 AACUUAGUC UAGUGGAU AUCCACUA CUGAUGA X GAA ACUAAGUU
1681 CUUAGUCUA GUGGAUUC GAAUCCAC CUGAUGA X GAA AGACUAAG
1668 UAGUGGAUU CAUUUUUC GAAAAAUG CUGAUGA X GAA AUCCACUA
1689 AGUGGAUUC AUUUUUCU AGAAAAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAUCCACU
1692 GGAUUCAUU UUUCUUCA UGAAGAAA CUGAUGA X GAA AUGAAUCC
1693 GAUUCAUUU UUCUUCAU AUGAAGAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGAAUC
1694 AUUCAUUUU UCUUCAUU AAUGAAGA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAUGAAU
1695 UUCAUUUUU CUUCAUUC GAAUGAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAUGAA
1696 UCAUUUUUC UUCAUUCC GGAAUGAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAAAAUGA
1698 AUUUUUCUU CAUUCCGA UCGGAAUG CUGAUGA X GAA AGAAAAAU
1699 uuuuucuuc AUUCCGAA UUCGGAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAAAAA
1702 UUCUUCAUU CCGAAUUC GAAUUCGG CUGAUGA X GAA AUGAAGAA
1703 UCUUCAUUC CGAAUUCC GGAAUUCG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGAAGA
1709 UUCCGAAUU CCUCACAC GUGUGAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUCGGAA
1710 UCCGAAUUC CUCACACG CGUGUGAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUCGGA
1713 GAAUUCCUC ACACGCUG CAGCGUGU CUGAUGA X GAA AGGAAUUC
1724 ACGCUGAUC CAGCAUGU ACAUGCUG CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAGCGU
1733 CAGCAUGUA AAAAUUAA UUAAUUUU CUGAUGA X GAA ACAUGCUG
1739 GUAAAAAUU AAUAGGUC GACCUAUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUUUAC
1740 UAAAAAUUA AUAGGUCA UGACCUAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUUUUA
1743 AAAUUAAUA GGUCAAUG CAUUGACC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAAUUU
1747 UAAUAGGUC AAUGCUAU AUAGCAUU CUGAUGA X GAA ACCUAUUA
1754 UCAAUGCUA UUAAUCGC GCGAUUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AGCAUUGA
1756 AAUGCUAUU AAUCGCGU ACGCGAUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUAGCAUU
1757 AUGCUAUUA AUCGCGUU AACGCGAU CUGAUGA X GAA AAUAGCAU
1760 CUAUUAAUC GCGUUCUU AAGAACGC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAAUAG
1765 AAUCGCGUU CUUGGUUG CAACCAAG CUGAUGA X GAA ACGCGAUU
1766 AUCGCGUUC UUGGUUGC GCAACCAA CUGAUGA X GAA AACGCGAU
1768 CGCGUUCUU GGUUGCCA UGGCAACC CUGAUGA X GAA AGAACGCG
1772 UUCUUGGUU GCCAUUAG CUAAUGGC CUGAUGA X GAA ACCAAGAA
1778 GUUGCCAUU AGACUUGU ACAAGUCU CUGAUGA X GAA AUGGCAAC
1779 UUGCCAUUA GACUUGUG CACAAGUC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUGGCAA
1784 AUUAGACUU GUGAAUGA UCAUUCAC CUGAUGA X GAA AGUCUAAU
1795 GAAUGACUU CCUUUGCU AGCAAAGG CUGAUGA X GAA AGUCAUUC
1796 AAUGACUUC CUUUGCUG CAGCAAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AAGUCAUU
1799 GACUUCCUU UGCUGGAA UUCCAGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AGGAAGUC
1800 ACUUCCUUU GCUGGAAA UUUCCAGC CUGAUGA X GAA AAGGAAGU
1811 UGGAAAGUU AGUAAUCG CGAUUACU CUGAUGA X GAA ACUUUCCA
1812 GGAAAGUUA GUAAUCGG CCGAUUAC CUGAUGA X GAA AACUUUCC
1815 AAGUUAGUA AUCGGCUG CAGCCGAU CUGAUGA X GAA ACUAACUU
1818 UUAGUAAUC GGCUGAUU AAUCAGCC CUGAUGA X GAA AUUACUAA
1826 CGGCUGAUU CACGCAAU AUUGCGUG CUGAUGA X GAA AUCAGCCG
1827 GGCUGAUUC ACGCAAUA UAUUGCGU CUGAUGA X GAA AAUCAGCC
1835 CACGCAAUA AACUGCAA UUGCAGUU CUGAUGA X GAA AUUGCGUG
1845 ACUGCAAUU GUGUAGUU AACUAC C CUGAUGA X GAA AUUGCAGU
1850 AAUUGUGUA GUUUCUUA UAAGAAAC CUGAUGA X GAA ACACAAUU
1853 UGUGUAGUU UCUUAAAU AUUUAAGA CUGAUGA X GAA ACUACACA
1854 GUGUAGUUU CUUAAAUU AAUUUAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AACUACAC
1855 UGUAGUUUC UUAAAUUU AAAUUUAA CUGAUGA X GAA AAACUACA
1857 UAGUUUCUU AAAUUUGC GCAAAUUU CUGAUGA X GAA AGAAACUA
1858 AGUUUCUUA AAUUUGCU AGCAAAUU CUGAUGA X GAA AAGAAACU
1862 UCUUAAAUU UGCUAAUU AAUUAGCA CUGAUGA X GAA AUUUAAGA
1863 CUUAAAUUU GCUAAUUC GAAUUAGC CUGAUGA X GAA AAUUUAAG
1867 AAUUUGCUA AUUCUUAU AUAAGAAU CUGAUGA X GAA AGCAAAUU
1870 UUGCUAAUU CUUAUUUG CAAAUAAG CUGAUGA X GAA AUUAGCAA Table V
Figure imgf000061_0002
Where "X" represents stem II region of a HH ribozyme (Hertel et al., 1992 Nucleic Acids Res. 20 3252). The length of stem II may be > 2 base-pairs.
Table VI: Potato Citrate Synthase Hairpin Ribozyme and Target Sequences
Figure imgf000061_0001

Claims

Claims
1. An enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity, wherein said nucleic acid molecule modulates the expression of a plant gene involved in the biosynthesis of alkaloid compounds.
2. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim
1, wherein said plant is a solanaceous plant.
3. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim
2, wherein said plant is selected from a group consisting of potato, tomato, pepper, eggplant and ditura.
4. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 1, wherein said nucleic acid is in a hammerhead configuration .
5. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 1, wherein said nucleic acid is in a hairpin configuration.
6. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 1, wherein said nucleic acid is in a hepatitis δ virus, group I intron, group II intron, VS nucleic acid or RNaseP nucleic acid configuration.
7. The enzymatic nucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said nucleic acid comprises between 12 and 100 bases complementary to RNA of said gene.
8. The enzymatic nucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said nucleic acid comprises between 14 and 24 bases complementary to RNA of said gene.
9. The enzymatic nucleic acid of claim 4, wherein said hammerhead comprises a stem II region of length greater than on equal to two base-pairs.
10. The enzymatic nucleic acid of claim 5, wherein said hairpin comprises a stem II region of length between three and seven base-pairs.
11. The enzymatic nucleic acid of claim 5, wherein said hairpin comprises a stem IV region of length greater than or equal to two base-pairs.
12. The enzymatic nucleic acid of claim 1, wherein said gene is solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase.
13. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 12, wherein said nucleic acid specifically cleaves any of sequences shown in Table III, wherein said nucleic acid is in a hammerhead configuration.
14. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 12, wherein said nucleic acid specifically cleaves any of sequences shown in Table IV, wherein said nucleic acid is in a hairpin configuration.
15. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of any of claims 13 or 14, consisting essentially of one or more sequences selected from the group shown in Tables III and IV.
16. A plant cell comprising the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 1.
17. A transgenic plant and the progeny thereof, comprising the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 1.
18. An expression vector comprising nucleic acid encoding the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 1, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of that enzymatic nucleic acid molecule within a plant cell.
19. An expression vector comprising nucleic acid encoding a plurality of enzymatic nucleic acid molecules of claim 1, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said enzymatic nucleic acid molecules within a plant cell.
20. A plant cell comprising the expression vector of claim 18.
21. A plant cell comprising the expression vector of claim 19.
22. A transgenic plant and the progeny thereof, comprising the expression vector of claim 18.
23. A transgenic plant and the progeny thereof, comprising the expression vector of claim 19.
24. A method for modulating expression of an gene in a plant by administering to said plant the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 1.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein said plant is a potato plant.
26. The method of claim 24, wherein said gene is solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase.
27. The expression vector of claim 18, wherein said vector comprises: a) a transcription initiation region; b) a transcription termination region; c) a gene encoding at least one said enzymatic nucleic acid molecule; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said enzymatic molecule within said plant cell.
28. The expression vector of claim 18, wherein said vector comprises: a) a transcription initiation region; b) a transcription termination region; c) an open reading frame; d) a gene encoding at least one said enzymatic nucleic acid molecule, wherein said gene is operably linked to the 3 '-end of said open reading frame; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region, said open reading frame and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said enzymatic molecule within said plant cell.
29. The expression vector of claim 18, wherein said vector comprises: a) a transcription initiation region; b) a transcription termination region; c) an intron; d) a gene encoding at least one said enzymatic nucleic acid molecule; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region, said intron and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said enzymatic molecule within said plant cell .
30. The expression vector of claim 18, wherein said vector comprises: a) a transcription initiation region; b) a transcription termination region; c) an intron; d) an open reading frame; e) a gene encoding at least one said enzymatic nucleic acid molecule, wherein said gene is operably linked to the 3 ' -end of said open reading frame; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region, said intron, said open reading frame and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said enzymatic molecule within said plant cell.
31. A transgenic plant comprising nucleic acid molecule encoding for an enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity, wherein said nucleic acid molecule modulates the expression of a gene involved in the biosynthesis of alkaloid in said plant .
32. The transgenic plant of Claim 31, wherein said gene is solanidine UDP-glucose glucosyl-transferase.
33. The transgenic plant of Claim 31, wherein the plant is transformed with Agrobacterium, bombarding with DNA coated microprojectiles, whiskers, or electro- poration.
34. The transgenic plant of Claim 33, wherein said bombarding with DNA coated microprojectiles is done with the gene gun.
35. The transgenic plant of Claim 31, wherein said plant contains a selectable marker selected from the group consisting of chlorosulfuron, hygromycin, bar gene, bromoxynil, and kanamycin and the like.
36. The transgenic plant of Claim 31, wherein said nucleic acid is operably linked to a promoter selected from the group consisting of octopine synthetase, the nopaline synthase, the manopine synthetase, cauliflower mosaic virus (35S) ; ribulose-1, 6-biphosphate (RUBP) carboxylase small subunit (ssu) , the beta-conglycinin, the phaseolin promoter, napin, gamma zein, globulin, the ADH promoter, heat-shock, actin, and ubiquitin.
37. The transgenic plant of Claim 31, said enzymatic nucleic acid molecule is in a hammerhead, hairpin, hepatitis Δ virus, group I intron, group II intron, VS nucleic acid or RNaseP nucleic acid configuration
38. The transgenic plant of Claim 31, wherein said enzymatic nucleic acid with RNA cleaving activity encoded as a monomer.
39. The transgenic plant of Claim 31, wherein said enzymatic nucleic acid with RNA cleaving activity encoded as a multimer.
40. The transgenic plant of Claim 31, wherein the nucleic acids encoding for said enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity is operably linked to the 3' end of an open reading frame.
41. An enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity, wherein said nucleic acid molecule modulates the expression of a plant gene involved in the flower formation.
42. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 41, wherein said plant is a potato plant.
43. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 41, wherein said plant is selected from a group consisting of Lettuce, spinach, cabbage, brussel sprouts, arugula, kale, collards, chard, beet, turnip, sweet potato and turfgrass.
44. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 41, wherein said nucleic acid is in a hammerhead configuration.
45. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 41, wherein said nucleic acid is in a hairpin configuration.
46. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 41, wherein said nucleic acid is in a hepatitis δ virus, group I intron, group II intron, VS nucleic acid or RNaseP nucleic acid configuration.
47. The enzymatic nucleic acid of claim 41, wherein said nucleic acid comprises between 12 and 100 bases complementary to RNA of said gene.
48. The enzymatic nucleic acid of claim 41, wherein said nucleic acid comprises between 14 and 24 bases complementary to RNA of said gene.
49. The enzymatic nucleic acid of claim 44, wherein said hammerhead comprises a stem II region of length greater than on equal to two base-pairs.
50. The enzymatic nucleic acid of claim 45, wherein said hairpin comprises a stem II region of length between three and seven base-pairs.
51. The enzymatic nucleic acid of claim 45, wherein said hairpin comprises a stem IV region of length greater than or equal to two base-pairs.
52. The enzymatic nucleic acid of claim 41, wherein said gene is citrate synthase.
53. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 52, wherein said nucleic acid specifically cleaves any of sequences shown in Table V, wherein said nucleic acid is in a hammerhead configuration.
54. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 52, wherein said nucleic acid specifically cleaves any of sequences shown in Table VI, wherein said nucleic acid is in a hairpin configuration.
55. The enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of any of claims 53 or 54, consisting essentially of one or more sequences selected from the group shown in Tables V and VI.
56. A plant cell comprising the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 41.
57. A transgenic plant and the progeny thereof, comprising the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim
41.
58. An expression vector comprising nucleic acid encoding the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 41, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of that enzymatic nucleic acid molecule within a plant cell.
59. An expression vector comprising nucleic acid encoding a plurality of enzymatic nucleic acid molecules of claim 41, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said enzymatic nucleic acid molecules within a plant cell.
60. A plant cell comprising the expression vector of claim 58.
61. A plant cell comprising the expression vector of claim 59.
62. A transgenic plant and the progeny thereof, comprising the expression vector of claim 58.
63. A transgenic plant and the progeny thereof, comprising the expression vector of claim 59.
64. A method for modulating expression of an gene in a plant by administering to said plant the enzymatic nucleic acid molecule of claim 41.
65. The method of claim 64, wherein said plant is a potato plant.
66. The method of claim 64, wherein said gene is citrate synthase.
67. The expression vector of claim 58, wherein said vector comprises: a) a transcription initiation region; b) a transcription termination region; c) a gene encoding at least one said enzymatic nucleic acid molecule; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said enzymatic molecule within said plant cell.
68. The expression vector of claim 58, wherein said vector comprises: a) a transcription initiation region; b) a transcription termination region; c) an open reading frame; d) a gene encoding at least one said enzymatic nucleic acid molecule, wherein said gene is operably linked to the 3 ' -end of said open reading frame; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region, said open reading frame and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said enzymatic molecule within said plant cell.
69. The expression vector of claim 58, wherein said vector comprises: a) a transcription initiation region; b) a transcription termination region; c) an intron; d) a gene encoding at least one said enzymatic nucleic acid molecule; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region, said intron and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said enzymatic molecule within said plant cell.
70. The expression vector of claim 58, wherein said vector comprises: a) a transcription initiation region; b) a transcription termination region; c) an intron; d) an open reading frame; e) a gene encoding at least one said enzymatic nucleic acid molecule, wherein said gene is operably linked to the 3 ' -end of said open reading frame; and wherein said gene is operably linked to said initiation region, said intron, said open reading frame and said termination region, in a manner which allows expression and/or delivery of said enzymatic molecule within said plant cell.
71. A transgenic plant comprising nucleic acid molecule encoding for an enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity, wherein said nucleic acid molecule modulates the expression of a gene involved in flower formation in said plant.
72. The transgenic plant of Claim 71, wherein said gene is citrate synthase.
73. The transgenic plant of Claim 71, wherein the plant is transformed with Agrobacterium, bombarding with DNA coated microprojectiles, whiskers, or electro- poration.
74. The transgenic plant of Claim 73, wherein said bombarding with DNA coated microprojectiles is done with the gene gun.
75. The transgenic plant of Claim 71, wherein said plant contains a selectable marker selected from the group consisting of chlorosulfuron, hygromycin, bar gene, bromoxynil, and kanamycin and the like.
76. The transgenic plant of Claim 71, wherein said nucleic acid is operably linked to a promoter selected from the group consisting of octopine synthetase, the nopaline synthase, the manopine synthetase, cauliflower mosaic virus (35S) ; ribulose-1, 6-biphosphate (RUBP) carboxylase small subunit (ssu) , the beta-conglycinin, the phaseolin promoter, napin, gamma zein, globulin, the ADH promoter, heat-shock, actin, and ubiquitin.
77. The transgenic plant of Claim 71, said enzymatic nucleic acid molecule is in a hammerhead, hairpin, hepatitis δ virus, group I intron, group II intron, VS nucleic acid or RNaseP nucleic acid configuration
78. The transgenic plant of Claim 71, wherein said enzymatic nucleic acid with RNA cleaving activity encoded as a monomer.
79. The transgenic plant of Claim 71, wherein said enzymatic nucleic acid with RNA cleaving activity encoded as a multimer.
80. The transgenic plant of Claim 71, wherein the nucleic acids encoding for said enzymatic nucleic acid molecule with RNA cleaving activity is operably linked to the 3' end of an open reading frame.
PCT/US1998/000738 1997-01-28 1998-01-14 Compositions and method for modulation of alkaloid biosynthesis and flower formation in plants WO1998032843A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU59183/98A AU5918398A (en) 1997-01-28 1998-01-14 Compositions and method for modulation of alkaloid biosynthesis and flower formation in plants

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US3654597P 1997-01-28 1997-01-28
US3659997P 1997-01-28 1997-01-28
US60/036,545 1997-01-28
US60/036,599 1997-01-28
US08/979,416 1997-11-26
US97941697A 1997-11-27 1997-11-27

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1998032843A2 true WO1998032843A2 (en) 1998-07-30
WO1998032843A3 WO1998032843A3 (en) 1998-11-19

Family

ID=27365053

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1998/000738 WO1998032843A2 (en) 1997-01-28 1998-01-14 Compositions and method for modulation of alkaloid biosynthesis and flower formation in plants

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU5918398A (en)
WO (1) WO1998032843A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000039146A1 (en) * 1998-12-24 2000-07-06 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Miniribozymes active at low magnesium ion concentrations

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997010328A2 (en) * 1995-07-13 1997-03-20 Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Compositions and method for modulation of gene expression in plants

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997010328A2 (en) * 1995-07-13 1997-03-20 Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Compositions and method for modulation of gene expression in plants

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BOROVKOV, A.Y. ET AL.: "Effect of expression of UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase ribozyme and antisense RNAs on the enzyme activity and carbohydrate composition on field-grown transgenic potato plants." J. PLANT PHYSIOL., vol. 147, 1996, pages 644-651, XP002068476 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000039146A1 (en) * 1998-12-24 2000-07-06 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Miniribozymes active at low magnesium ion concentrations
US6828148B2 (en) 1998-12-24 2004-12-07 Gene Shears Pty. Limited Miniribozymes active at low magnesium ion concentrations

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1998032843A3 (en) 1998-11-19
AU5918398A (en) 1998-08-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6350934B1 (en) Nucleic acid encoding delta-9 desaturase
AU6761796A (en) Compositions and method for modulation of gene expression in plants
JP3046318B2 (en) Ribozyme
US5804683A (en) Deprotection of RNA with alkylamine
AU654330B2 (en) Trans-splicing ribozymes
US5977343A (en) Synthesis, deprotection, analysis and purification of RNA and ribozymes
US6353098B1 (en) Synthesis, deprotection, analysis and purification of RNA and ribozymes
US6183959B1 (en) Method for target site selection and discovery
Saville et al. RNA-mediated ligation of self-cleavage products of a Neurospora mitochondrial plasmid transcript.
JP2005517450A (en) RNA interference-mediated target discovery and target evaluation using short interfering nucleic acids (siNA)
US5686599A (en) Synthesis, deprotection, analysis and purification of RNA and ribozymes
IE67652B1 (en) A multifunctional RNA having self-processing activity the preparation thereof and the use thereof
Symons et al. Ribozymes
US5519164A (en) Expression of a multigene RNA having self-splicing activity
WO1998032843A2 (en) Compositions and method for modulation of alkaloid biosynthesis and flower formation in plants
Kwon et al. Ribozyme mediated targeting of cucumber mosaic virus RNA 1 and 2 in transgenic tobacco plants
PERRIMAN et al. A ribozyme that enhances gene suppression in tobacco protoplasts
JPH03108484A (en) Rna having endoribonuclease activity for mrna of nature gene and its production and plant application
KR100240356B1 (en) Expression of a multigene rna with self-splicing activity
NZ235789A (en) Rna having endonuclease and antisense activity, genes encoding it and use
Tabler Antisense RNA in plants: A tool for analysis and suppression of gene function
Tsutsumi et al. Suppression of α-amylase gene expression by antisense oligodeoxynucleotide in barley cultured aleurone layers
AU6129000A (en) Compositions and method for mudulation of gene expression in plants
RU2144080C1 (en) Ribosime, method of inactivation of rna-target, method of ribosime preparing
Gerlach et al. Use of plant virus satellite RNA sequences to control gene expression

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AU CA JP MX

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AU CA JP MX

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
CFP Corrected version of a pamphlet front page
CR1 Correction of entry in section i

Free format text: PAT. BUL. 30/98 UNDER (30) REPLACE "24.11.97" BY "26.11.97"

NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 1998532032

Format of ref document f/p: F

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: CA