WO1998012348A9 - Microbial monitoring device - Google Patents
Microbial monitoring deviceInfo
- Publication number
- WO1998012348A9 WO1998012348A9 PCT/US1997/016496 US9716496W WO9812348A9 WO 1998012348 A9 WO1998012348 A9 WO 1998012348A9 US 9716496 W US9716496 W US 9716496W WO 9812348 A9 WO9812348 A9 WO 9812348A9
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- fluorescent
- fluorescent compound
- compound
- matrix
- respiring
- Prior art date
Links
- 230000000813 microbial Effects 0.000 title description 11
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 claims abstract description 70
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 68
- MYMOFIZGZYHOMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N oxygen Chemical compound O=O MYMOFIZGZYHOMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 68
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 68
- 239000007850 fluorescent dye Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 44
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 230000001678 irradiating Effects 0.000 claims abstract 10
- 230000003115 biocidal Effects 0.000 claims description 36
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 21
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 21
- 229920001296 polysiloxane Polymers 0.000 claims description 20
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000003242 anti bacterial agent Substances 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000000845 anti-microbial Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 229920002379 silicone rubber Polymers 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 229940068911 CHLORIDE HEXAHYDRATE Drugs 0.000 claims description 5
- VOAPTKOANCCNFV-UHFFFAOYSA-M chloride;hexahydrate Chemical compound O.O.O.O.O.O.[Cl-] VOAPTKOANCCNFV-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000001066 destructive Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004945 silicone rubber Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- FCNCGHJSNVOIKE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 9,10-Diphenylanthracene Chemical compound C1=CC=CC=C1C(C1=CC=CC=C11)=C(C=CC=C2)C2=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 FCNCGHJSNVOIKE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M chloride anion Chemical compound [Cl-] VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920001971 elastomer Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000005060 rubber Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052707 ruthenium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 claims 4
- GTOFXGPXYNYBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 2-ethylhexanoate;ruthenium(3+) Chemical compound [Ru+3].CCCCC(CC)C([O-])=O.CCCCC(CC)C([O-])=O.CCCCC(CC)C([O-])=O GTOFXGPXYNYBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 claims 1
- 239000005092 Ruthenium Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 38
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 description 22
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 21
- JFPVXVDWJQMJEE-IZRZKJBUSA-N (6R,7R)-3-[(carbamoyloxy)methyl]-7-[(2Z)-2-(furan-2-yl)-2-(methoxyimino)acetamido]-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid Chemical compound N([C@@H]1C(N2C(=C(COC(N)=O)CS[C@@H]21)C(O)=O)=O)C(=O)\C(=N/OC)C1=CC=CO1 JFPVXVDWJQMJEE-IZRZKJBUSA-N 0.000 description 15
- 229960001668 Cefuroxime Drugs 0.000 description 15
- WZOZEZRFJCJXNZ-ZBFHGGJFSA-N Cefoxitin Chemical compound N([C@]1(OC)C(N2C(=C(COC(N)=O)CS[C@@H]21)C(O)=O)=O)C(=O)CC1=CC=CS1 WZOZEZRFJCJXNZ-ZBFHGGJFSA-N 0.000 description 13
- 229960002682 Cefoxitin Drugs 0.000 description 13
- 229940064005 Antibiotic throat preparations Drugs 0.000 description 12
- 229940083879 Antibiotics FOR TREATMENT OF HEMORRHOIDS AND ANAL FISSURES FOR TOPICAL USE Drugs 0.000 description 12
- 229940042052 Antibiotics for systemic use Drugs 0.000 description 12
- 229940042786 Antitubercular Antibiotics Drugs 0.000 description 12
- 229940093922 Gynecological Antibiotics Drugs 0.000 description 12
- 229940024982 Topical Antifungal Antibiotics Drugs 0.000 description 12
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 12
- 229940079866 intestinal antibiotics Drugs 0.000 description 12
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 12
- 229940005935 ophthalmologic Antibiotics Drugs 0.000 description 12
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 12
- MYSWGUAQZAJSOK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ciprofloxacin Chemical compound C12=CC(N3CCNCC3)=C(F)C=C2C(=O)C(C(=O)O)=CN1C1CC1 MYSWGUAQZAJSOK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 230000003377 anti-microbal Effects 0.000 description 11
- 229960003405 ciprofloxacin Drugs 0.000 description 11
- 230000036284 oxygen consumption Effects 0.000 description 11
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 10
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000036091 Metabolic activity Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000003260 fluorescence intensity Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000002609 media Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000002503 metabolic Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000000741 silica gel Substances 0.000 description 8
- 229910002027 silica gel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- ROFVEXUMMXZLPA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,2'-bipyridyl Chemical compound N1=CC=CC=C1C1=CC=CC=N1 ROFVEXUMMXZLPA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 239000012085 test solution Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000003287 optical Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000010791 quenching Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000001974 tryptic soy broth Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229920004482 WACKER® Polymers 0.000 description 5
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 239000002480 mineral oil Substances 0.000 description 5
- 235000010446 mineral oil Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 230000000171 quenching Effects 0.000 description 5
- 210000004369 Blood Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- ARUVKPQLZAKDPS-UHFFFAOYSA-L Copper(II) sulfate Chemical compound [Cu+2].[O-][S+2]([O-])([O-])[O-] ARUVKPQLZAKDPS-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- GEHJYWRUCIMESM-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium sulfite Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]S([O-])=O GEHJYWRUCIMESM-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910000365 copper sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 4
- YMWUJEATGCHHMB-UHFFFAOYSA-N methylene dichloride Chemical compound ClCCl YMWUJEATGCHHMB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000003638 reducing agent Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 4
- 201000008827 tuberculosis Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 241000186365 Mycobacterium fortuitum Species 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003466 anti-cipated Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229940079593 drugs Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000005497 microtitration Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000036740 Metabolism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241000589517 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Species 0.000 description 2
- 229940055023 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012298 atmosphere Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001580 bacterial Effects 0.000 description 2
- LSNNMFCWUKXFEE-UHFFFAOYSA-M bisulfite Chemical compound OS([O-])=O LSNNMFCWUKXFEE-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- RGVBVVVFSXWUIM-UHFFFAOYSA-M bromo(dimethyl)sulfanium;bromide Chemical compound [Br-].C[S+](C)Br RGVBVVVFSXWUIM-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N diethyl ether Chemical compound CCOCC RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910001882 dioxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000000975 dye Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003269 fluorescent indicator Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000007791 liquid phase Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035786 metabolism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006011 modification reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 2
- ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenol Chemical compound OC1=CC=CC=C1 ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- CTYRPMDGLDAWRQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenyl hydrogen sulfate Chemical compound OS(=O)(=O)OC1=CC=CC=C1 CTYRPMDGLDAWRQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000002285 radioactive Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035812 respiration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000029058 respiratory gaseous exchange Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000010265 sodium sulphite Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004450 types of analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011179 visual inspection Methods 0.000 description 2
- BRDIFBARJKLSSY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,3,4-triphenyl-2H-tetrazol-2-ium;chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].C1=[NH+]N(C=2C=CC=CC=2)N(C=2C=CC=CC=2)N1C1=CC=CC=C1 BRDIFBARJKLSSY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZKHQWZAMYRWXGA-KQYNXXCUSA-N Adenosine triphosphate Chemical compound C1=NC=2C(N)=NC=NC=2N1[C@@H]1O[C@H](COP(O)(=O)OP(O)(=O)OP(O)(O)=O)[C@@H](O)[C@H]1O ZKHQWZAMYRWXGA-KQYNXXCUSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 1
- 229920002799 BoPET Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 241000589562 Brucella Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000272184 Falconiformes Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000001554 Hemoglobins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010054147 Hemoglobins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- LFVCYTJPUAPLPW-ZBNNRPBOSA-N Isonarif Chemical compound NNC(=O)C1=CC=NC=C1.O([C@](C1=O)(C)O/C=C/[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H](OC(C)=O)[C@H](C)[C@H](O)[C@H](C)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)\C=C\C=C(C)/C(=O)NC2=C(O)C=3C(O)=C4C)C)OC)C4=C1C=3C(=O)\C2=C\NN1CCN(C)CC1 LFVCYTJPUAPLPW-ZBNNRPBOSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005041 Mylar™ Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000283898 Ovis Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000282320 Panthera leo Species 0.000 description 1
- 231100000614 Poison Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- PLXBWHJQWKZRKG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Resazurin Chemical compound C1=CC(=O)C=C2OC3=CC(O)=CC=C3[N+]([O-])=C21 PLXBWHJQWKZRKG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 231100000765 Toxin Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000007983 Tris buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003848 UV Light-Curing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001070 adhesive Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001355 anti-mycobacterial Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009635 antibiotic susceptibility testing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003926 antimycobacterial agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000149 argon plasma sintering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009640 blood culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002815 broth microdilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002939 deleterious Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent Effects 0.000 description 1
- DHCWLIOIJZJFJE-UHFFFAOYSA-L dichlororuthenium Chemical compound Cl[Ru]Cl DHCWLIOIJZJFJE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- IAZDPXIOMUYVGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N dimethylsulphoxide Chemical compound CS(C)=O IAZDPXIOMUYVGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 201000009910 diseases by infectious agent Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000890 drug combination Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005281 excited state Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001747 exhibiting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011049 filling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001917 fluorescence detection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004941 influx Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002452 interceptive Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009629 microbiological culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001264 neutralization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- IAYPIBMASNFSPL-UHFFFAOYSA-N oxane Chemical compound C1CO1 IAYPIBMASNFSPL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000001139 pH measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008363 phosphate buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002631 rtv silicone Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000002791 soaking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001519 tissues Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000003440 toxic substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003053 toxin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108020003112 toxins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- HNVRWFFXWFXICS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tris(2,2'-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) Chemical class C=1C=CC=[N]2C=1C1=CC=CC=[N]1[Ru+2]132([N]2=CC=CC=C2C2=CC=CC=[N]23)[N]2=CC=CC=C2C2=CC=CC=[N]12 HNVRWFFXWFXICS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SJFYGUKHUNLZTK-UHFFFAOYSA-L tris(2,2'-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) dichloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].C=1C=CC=[N]2C=1C1=CC=CC=[N]1[Ru+2]132([N]2=CC=CC=C2C2=CC=CC=[N]23)[N]2=CC=CC=C2C2=CC=CC=[N]12 SJFYGUKHUNLZTK-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 108010050327 trypticase-soy broth Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000005429 turbidity Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007738 vacuum evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000052 vinegar Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002076 α-tocopherol Substances 0.000 description 1
- GVJHHUAWPYXKBD-IEOSBIPESA-N α-tocopherol Chemical compound OC1=C(C)C(C)=C2O[C@@](CCC[C@H](C)CCC[C@H](C)CCCC(C)C)(C)CCC2=C1C GVJHHUAWPYXKBD-IEOSBIPESA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000004835 α-tocopherol Nutrition 0.000 description 1
Definitions
- Another popular method for antimicrobic susceptibility testing is the broth micro-dilution method, such as the Sceptor® System for identification and antimicrobic susceptibility testing of organisms (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrumentation Systems, Sparks, MD).
- the system uses a disposable plastic panel having a plurality of low volume cupulas (ca. 0.4 ml per cupula), each containing a different test compound or a different concentration of a test compound dried on the cupula surface.
- the organism to be tested is suspended in the desired testing medium, and aliquots are delivered to the individual cupulas of the test panel.
- the reagent dried on the panel dissolves in the sample, and the system is then incubated overnight (18 to 24 hrs.) to allow sufficient time for the organisms to interact with the reagent and for visible growth to appear.
- the panel is subsequently examined visually for the presence or absence of growth, thereby obtaining information on the susceptibility ofthe organism undergoing testing. Additional wells aid in identifying the organism.
- this test method suffers from the drawback of also requiring a long incubation period.
- apparatus utilizing light scattering optical means have been used to determine susceptibility by probing the change in size or number of microorganisms in the presence of various antimicrobic compounds.
- Commercial instruments utilizing these principles are exemplified by the Vitec System (BioMerieux Corp.). This system claims to yield information on antimicrobic susceptibility of microorganisms within 6 hours for many organism and drug combinations. Other combinations can require as long as 18 hours before the antimicrobic susceptibility ofthe organism can be determined by this machine.
- Clifton monitored the oxygen consumption of microorganisms over a period of several days using a Warburg flask in 1937. This method measured the change in oxygen concentration in a slow and cumbersome manner.
- Clark electrode a newer electrochemical device, is also commonly used to measure dissolved oxygen.
- Clark electrode consumes oxygen during use (thereby reducing the oxygen available to the microorganisms) and the "standard" size electrode is typically used only to measure volumes of 100 mis or greater to prevent the electrode from interfering with the measurements.
- a “miniature” Clark electrode has been described, but this electrode is a complicated multi-component part which must, also, be in contact with the solution to be measured. While an oxygen permeable membrane can be used to prevent the electrode components of the device from interacting with the constituents of the test solution, the oxygen must still equilibrate between the test solution and the measurement system and is consumed once it passes the membrane.
- Optical systems which can yield oxygen concentration data, have been developed to overcome the shortcomings of the Clark electrode systems.
- the main advantage of such optical methods is that the instrumentation required to determine quantitative value does not itself make physical contact with the test solution.
- Optical techniques allowing both colorimetric and fluorometric analyses for oxygen to be carried out rapidly and reproducibly are known, and costs for such analyses are often quite low.
- luminescent techniques for the determination of oxygen have been described which are based on the ability of oxygen to quench the fluorescence or phosphorescence emissions of a variety of compounds.
- such methods have not been adapted to microbial monitoring.
- Ahnell in U.S. Pat. No. 4,152,213, discloses a system for analysis by monitoring the vacuum produced by growing organisms in a closed head space above a test sample.
- U.S. 4,116,775 to Charles et. al is an example of the use of optical means based on the increase in turbidity or optical density of a growing microbial culture for the detection and monitoring of bacterial growth.
- a combined electro-optical measurement of birefringence of a test solution containing microorganisms is described in EPO 0092958 (Lowe and Meltzer).
- MDR Multiple Drug Resistant
- Mycobactertum tuberculosis is a slow growing species. Generally, at three to five weeks of growth on solid or liquid media are required to produce enough cell mass for identification and susceptibility testing.
- the most commonly used susceptibility method for TB is the Modified Proportion Method (NCCLS M24-T). This method requires an additional three to four weeks of growth before the results are available.
- the total elapsed time for a find report is typical two months and may be as much as three months.
- the BACTEC 460 instrument (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin
- the BACTEC method detects the presence of mycobacteria by their production of radioactive CO2.
- the BACTEC system can also detect resistant organisms by their continuing production of radioactive CO2 in the presence of antimycobacterial drugs.
- the processes of the instant invention use a fluorescence detection system wherein the fluorescing sensor compound is one which exhibits a quantifiable degree of quenching when exposed to oxygen.
- the sensor compound may be brought into contact with the test sample (either directly or separated by an oxygen permeable membrane) and the fluorescence is measured or observed visually with appropriate aids.
- an increase in fluorescence is indicative of respiring aerobic microorganisms, which utilize (and thereby reduce) the oxygen in the sample.
- the sensor need not be in direct contact with the test sample. The only requirement is that the test sample and sensor are in a container substantially isolated from atmospheric oxygen so that the sensor can react to the presence/absence of oxygen in the container.
- the system can, thus, be used to detect a variety of respiring microorganisms. It is further anticipated that this system can be used to detect the presence of O2 dependent compositions such as enzymes.
- Figure 1 graphically depicts intensity of fluorescence as a function of time for indicators in contact with broth containing organisms and broth containing no organisms.
- Figure 2 graphically depicts the intensity of fluorescence as a function of time for indicators in contact with broth inoculated with different concentrations of microorganisms.
- Figure 3 graphically depicts the intensity of fluorescence as a function of time for indicators in contact with broth inoculated with the same number of organisms but containing different concentrations of phenol.
- Figure 4 graphically depicts the intensity of fluorescence as a function of time for indicators in contact with broth inoculated with the same number of organisms but containing different amounts of copper sulfate.
- Figure 5 A graphically depicts the fluorescence, as a function of indicators in contact with broth inoculated with the same concentration of microorganisms but different concentrations of cefuroxime. Some wells were covered with mineral oil to prevent oxygen from diffusing into the wells. The fluorescence is given as a percent of growth control
- Figure 5B graphically depicts the fluorescence as a percent of the growth control in wells that are overlaid with oil or left open and measured at several different times.
- Figure 6 graphically depicts the intensity of fluorescence of indicators in blood culture bottles when measured continuously over 16 hours. The arrows indicate the times when samples were removed in order to quantify the concentration of organisms present.
- Figure 7 depicts the data collected in the BACTEC® instrument indicating the change in fluorescence intensity indicative ofthe growth of P. aeruginosa
- Figure 8 depicts the data collected in the BACTEC® instrument indicating the change in fluorescence intensity indicative of the growth of M. fortuitum.
- Figure 9 depicts the data collected in the BACTEC® instrument indicating the change in fluorescence intensity indicative of the growth of E. coli.
- the process of this invention presents a quick, easy, and unambiguous method for the measurement and/or detection of respiring aerobic microorganisms by measurement or visual observation of fluorescence.
- the fluorescent sensor compound is irradiated with light containing wavelengths which cause it to fluoresce, and the fluorescence is measured by any standard means, or evaluated visually.
- the fluorescent compound must be one which exhibits a large quenching upon exposure to oxygen at concentration ordinarily found in the test liquids (generally 0.4%). While virtually any such compound can be used, preferred fluorescent compounds of this invention are tris-2,2'-bipyridyl ruthenium (II) salts, especially the chloride hexahydrate salt (Ru(BiPy)3Cl2), tris-4,7-diphenyl-l,10-phenanthroline ruthenium (II) salts, especially the chloride (salt Ru(DPP)3Cl2), and 9,10- diphenyl anthracene (DP A).
- tris-2,2'-bipyridyl ruthenium (II) salts especially the chloride hexahydrate salt (Ru(BiPy)3Cl2)
- tris-4,7-diphenyl-l,10-phenanthroline ruthenium (II) salts especially the chloride (salt Ru(DPP
- the fluorescent compound must be placed in chemical communication with the oxygen of the test sample to exhibit the quenching. This can be achieved by placing the compound directly in contact with the sample. However, in a preferred embodiment the compound and sample are separated from each other by the interposition of a membrane embedding material permeable to oxygen, and relatively impermeable to the other sample components, between them, thereby preventing the interaction of the sample and the compound. Neither the fluorescent compound nor the membrane in which the fluorescent compound is embedded need be in direct contact with the test sample, broth, or fluid, (the compound and sample must be substantially isolated from atmospheric oxygen, thereby preventing any false reading due to the presence of atmospheric oxygen) but still permitting reaction of the compound to the presence or absence of oxygen as a result of respiration of microorganisms.
- the system can be allowed to interact unobserved for a predetermined amount of time after which the presence or absence of fluorescence is observed and compared to appropriate control samples, yielding results that are often obtained with a single such observation.
- a particular benefit of this system is that the measurement of fluorescence is non-destructive and if after a period of time (e.g. 4 hours) the results are non-conclusive, the system can be re-incubated and read again at a later time. Further, while it is anticipated that the results will be compared with reagent controls, such is by no means necessary, and it is postulated that, by appropriate choice of fluorescent compounds, a skilled technician or technologist would be capable of independently determining whether the results indicate the presence of microbial activity.
- the detection of fluorescent intensity can be performed by any means ordinarily used for such measurements, e.g. a fluorometer.
- the fluorescent intensity can be observed visually and, optionally, compared with a reagent control (e.g. a system containing no live organisms or a system with no added test chemicals).
- a reagent control e.g. a system containing no live organisms or a system with no added test chemicals.
- the fluorescent compound is chosen such that it will exhibit little or no fluorescence in the presence of oxygen. This obviates the need for a control, as the person performing the test would interpret any appreciable fluorescence (i.e. beyond that of any nominal background fluorescence) as indicative ofthe presence of microbial activity. Such results can be obtained by a fluorometer or other measurement means, or preferably, visual inspection, and provide a quick, qualitative estimate of such activity.
- Preferred fluorescent compounds for this embodiment include Ru(BiPy)3 ⁇ 2 and Ru(DPP)3Cl 2 .
- the apparatus comprises a sample containing reservoir, or more commonly a plurality of identical reservoirs adapted to contain a test sample and other such liquid and soluble components (e.g. nutrients, etc.) as may be required by the particular application.
- the reservoirs also provide a fluorescent indicator element which monitors the oxygen levels of the solution.
- the indicator element of this invention uses a fluorescent compound known to show a large quenching of its fluorescent emission when exposed to oxygen.
- the fluorescent compound can be mixed and distributed throughout a plastic or rubber phase that is permeable to oxygen gas but relatively impermeable to water and non-gaseous solutes. Silicone rubber is a particularly useful material for this application.
- the oxygen sensitive fluorophore can be in a microencapsulated form or in the form of granules of an oxygen permeable material. It is also anticipated that the fluorophore can be contained within a separately manufactured component such as a bead, disc, or prongs which can be separately introduced into the test solution.
- the use of prongs is particularly advantageous as such prongs can be attached to a lid or other device to permit easy manipulation.
- a plurality of prongs can be attached to a single membrane, or other cover and thereby be maintained in an appropriate orientation such that they can simultaneously be placed into the reservoirs of a base containing a plurality of sample reservoirs.
- the prongs can be made impermeable to the indicator molecules and to microorganisms in the sample, but permeable to oxygen.
- the fluorophore can also be in a liquid phase separated from the solution being analyzed by a membrane that is impermeable to the indicator molecules and to microorganisms in the sample but which is permeable to oxygen. Additionally, less- sensitive sensors can be fabricated by using less O2 permeable polymers or by using compounds with shorter excited-state lifetimes.
- the methods of this invention can be used to test the susceptibility of a microorganism to a compound, such as an antibiotic, which is capable of severely inhibiting the growth and or the metabolic activity of organisms.
- a compound such as an antibiotic
- the increase in fluorescent signal normally caused by the organism will be suppressed in the presence of such compounds.
- the behavior of the fluorescent signal from a reservoir will demonstrate the ability of the test component to negatively effect the normal oxygen consumption ofthe organism added to the reservoir.
- any of the embodiments discussed above may be utilized so that the sensor, fluorescent compound, or the membrane in which it is embedded need not be in direct contact with the test sample, fluid, or broth in which the microorganisms may be present.
- the sensor, compound or membrane in which it is embedded need only be in the same container with the test sample, fluid or broth and that they be substantially isolated from atmospheric oxygen to function as an indicator of the presence or absence of respiring microoganisms.
- the fluorescent compound tris 4,7-diphenyl-l,10- phenanthroline ruthenium (II) chloride (Ru(DPP)3Cl2) was synthesized using the procedure of Watts and Crosby (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93, 3184(1971)). A total of 3.6 mg of the compound was dissolved in 2.0 ml dimethyl sulfoxide (D-5879, Sigma Chemical St. Louis MO) and the resultant solution was then added slowly, with stirring, to 1300 ml silicone rubber forming solution (Water Based Emulsion #3-5024, Dow Corning Midland MI).
- a 35 microliter aliquot of the mixture was subsequently dispensed into each well of a 96 well, flat bottom, white microtiter tray (#011-010-7901, Dynatech Chantilly VA), and the system was subsequently cured overnight in a low humidity (less than 25% RH), 60°C incubator.
- the trays were washed by either soaking or by filling and emptying each well several times with each of the following reagents; a) absolute ethanol, b) 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.2, c) hot distilled water (about 45°C) and d) ambient temperature distilled water.
- a Broth A consisting of 35% Mueller Hinton II (BBL #124322, BD Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville MD), 15% Brucella (BBL #11088), and 50% distilled water, was dispensed into each well of the tray, and the tray was then placed in a glove box containing the desired concentration of oxygen, mixed with nitrogen to obtain a total pressure of 1 atm. The tray was kept in the glove box for at least 24 hours, after which it was covered with an adhesive backed mylar sheet and removed.
- the fluorescent emissions of the fluorescent compound in the bottom of each well of the tray was then measured using a Perkin-Elmer LS-5B equipped with a microtiter reader attachment at the following instrument settings: 485nm excitation wavelength, 550nm cut-on filter in the emission window, lOnm excitation slit, and a
- EXAMPLE 2 Use of Indicator System to Measure Relative O2 Concentration Produced by a Reducing Agent The O2 concentration in wells of an Indicator Microtiter tray produced as in
- Example 1 was varied by the addition of a strong reducing agent, sodium sulfite (which reduces O2 content).
- a strong reducing agent sodium sulfite (which reduces O2 content).
- a 150 microliter aliquot of the reducing agent (at concentrations ranging from O to 1083 parts per million (ppm) sulfite ion in water) was pipetted into wells of the tray. Each well was allowed to react for 30 minutes, open to the atmosphere, and the fluorescence of the indicators measured in a Fluoroskan II Fluorometer (Flow Laboratories, McLean VA), having an excitation bandpass filter at a wavelength of 460 nm and an emission cut-on filter at 570 nm. The results are presented in Table 2.
- the wells containing the highest concentrations of reducing agent have the highest fluorescence intensity, thus demonstrating the relationship between O2 concentration and fluorescence.
- a change in the starting concentration ofthe organism by a factor of 10 caused a delay of about 1 hour for the fluorescence in the well to exceed 2000 fluorescence units. It is postulated that this delay is due in part to the fact that the system is open to the atmosphere. Oxygen in the air can and does freely diffuse into the medium in an attempt to replace that consumed by the microorganisms. It is further postulated that only when the organisms are present in or have multiplied to sufficient numbers and are metabolically active enough to consume oxygen at a rate approximating or faster than the rate at which oxygen diffuses into the test solution, will the fluorescent signal generated by the indicator element in the bottom ofthe reservoir show an increase.
- EXAMPLE 5 Preparation of an Indicator Microtitration Tray with an Alternate Fluorescent Indicating Molecule
- a 96 well Microtiter tray was produced essentially as in Example 1, except that tris-(2,2' bipyridyl)-ruthenium (II) chloride hexahydrate (Aldrich Chemical Company, Milwaukee, WI) [Ru(BiPy)3Cl2] was substituted for Ru(DPP)3Cl2 in the silicone mixture.
- a second tray containing 9,10-diphenyl anthracene (DP A) was also prepared. All wells were charged with 150 ul of 1 x 10 ⁇ CFU/ml E. coli (ATCC #25922) in broth. Table 3 lists the results at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours after addition of organisms.
- Example 1 To demonstrate that the fluorophore can function when embedded in a different matrix, a 96 well Microtiter tray was produced essentially as in Example 1.
- 10 ul of white SWS-960 RTV silicone (Wacker Silicones, Adrian MI) containing 10 milligrams of Ru(DPP)3Cl2 per liter was dispensed into each well of the tray and allowed to cure. No wash steps were performed on the resultant tray.
- Table 3 As in Example 1, wells containing 150 ul of 1 x 10? CFU/ml E. coh (ATCC #25922) in broth had a much greater fluorescent intensity after several hours at 37° Centigrade.
- a suspension containing about 3 x 10 ⁇ CFU/ml, of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC #10145) in Broth A was prepared using an A-Just nephelometer. A total of 150 ul ofthe suspension was placed in each well ofthe indicator trays prepared as in Example 1 ; these suspensions were then diluted with solutions of phenol or copper sulfate (which are deleterious to microbial growth) to a final concentration of 1.5 x 10 8 CFU/ml. The trays were incubated at 37°C and their fluorescence measured in a Fluoroskan II at 10 minute intervals. Figures 3 and 4 show the effect of phenol and copper sulfate on the response of the system.
- the E. coli was sensitive to ciprofloxacin and low fluorescence counts were observed.
- the E. coli was resistant to the concentrations of cefuroxime and high fluorescence counts were observed.
- the E. coh was resistant to the 0.5, 1, and 2 ug/ml concentrations of cefoxitin and high counts were observed, but it was sensitive to the higher concentrations of cefoxitin and low counts were observed for 4 and 8 ug/ml.
- EXAMPLE 9 Effect of Antibiotics on the Oxygen Consumption of E. coli with Ru(BiPy)3 ⁇ 2 Fluorescence Indicator
- a 0.5 McFarland suspension of E. coli (ATCC #25922) in Broth A was prepared using an A-Just nephelometer. The suspension was diluted to 1 X 10? CFU/ml in wells of an indicator tray prepared as in Example 5 (Ru(BiPy)3Cl2 indicator) containing the antibiotics ciprofloxacin, cefoxitin and cefuroxime at final concentrations of 0.5 to 8 ug/ml. The trays were incubated at 37 °C for 4 hours and their fluorescence measured in a Fluoroskan II fluorometer. The results are listed in Table 5. Table 5
- the coli is sensitive to ciprofloxacin and low fluorescence counts were observed.
- the E. coli is resistant to these concentrations of cefuroxime and high fluorescence counts were observed.
- the E. coli is resistant to the 0.5, 1, and 2 ug/ml concentrations of cefoxitin, high counts were observed; it was sensitive to higher concentrations of cefoxitin and lower counts were observed for 4 and 8 ug/ml.
- Ru(BiPy)3Cl2 can also be used in a fluorescence indicator.
- EXAMPLE 10 Effect of Antibiotics on the Oxygen Consumption of Microorganisms Using DPA Fluorescence Indicator
- the E. coli is sensitive to ciprofloxacin and low fluorescence counts were observed.
- the E. coli is resistant to these concentrations of cefuroxime and high fluorescence counts were observed.
- the coli is resistant to the 0.5, 1, 2 ug/ml concentration of cefoxitin, high counts were observed; it was sensitive to higher concentrations and lower counts were observed for 4 and 8 ug/ml as in Examples 8 and 9, indicating that DPA is also useful as a fluorescence indicator.
- a 96 well indicator microtiter tray was produced substantially as in Example 1. Duplicate wells in the tray were supplemented with the antibiotic cefuroxime in the concentration range of 0.25 to 32 ug/ml. One hundred and fifty microliters of a suspension of E. coli (ATCC #11775) was added to the wells to yield about 3 x 10 ⁇ CFU/ml. One of each duplicate well was overlaid with mineral oil to inhibit diffusion of oxygen into the wells, the other duplicate was left open to the air. The tray was incubated at 37°C for 5 hours, the fluorescence was measured in a Fluoroskan II fluorometer and that fluorescence was compared with the average of several wells containing no antibiotic to yield a percent ofthe growth control at each antibiotic concentration.
- Figure 5A shows the behavior of the open and covered wells at five hours as a function of cefuroxime concentration.
- Figure 5B shows the change in fluorescence of the growth control wells when open or overlaid with mineral oil.
- the "closed system" overlaid with mineral oil did not show an effect on oxygen consumption by the 4 and 8 ug/ml concentrations of antibiotic while those wells with no mineral oil showed correctly that this organism is sensitive to cefuroxime at these concentrations. This difference is due, presumably to the time lag needed for the antibiotic to affect the organism; it is believed that during this time the oxygen is brought to an artificially low level by the ongoing metabolic activity of the organisms.
- the sample reservoir permits the influx of oxygen.
- Indicator trays were prepared using the same fluorescent compound and silicone as in Example 1. However, the trays were made of clear plastic and the wells had round bottoms (#4-3918-2, BD Labware Lincoln Park NJ). Two nanograms of Ru(DPP)3 ⁇ 2 in 10 ul of silicone were placed in each well of the tray and no wash steps were performed. Samples of Ps. aeruginosa (BDMS Culture collection #N111) and E. coli (ATCC #25922) were diluted to Broth A (see Example 1) 1 x 10?
- Tissue culture flasks (Falcon #3084, BD Labware, Lincoln Park NJ) were prepared with one side coated with 3 mis of Dow Corning Water-based Emulsion containing 68 ng of Ru(DPP)3 ⁇ 2- The flasks were sterilized using ethylene oxide.
- One hundred thirty five mis of TSB broth (BBL #11768) containing about 0.05 CFU/ml E. coli (ATCC #25922) and 15 mis of defibrinated sheep blood was added to one ofthe flasks.
- a control flask contained 135 mis of TSB and 15 mis of blood but no organisms.
- the caps of the flasks were loosened to allow air circulation and the flasks were incubated at 37°C in an upright position.
- a fiber optic probe allowed the fluorescence from the flasks to be measured by a Perkin Elmer LS-5B spectrofluorometer located several feet from the incubator.
- the fluorometer measured the flasks at 485 nm excitation wavelength with a 10 nm slit width and a 550 nm cut-on emission filter.
- a strip chart was attached to the fluorometer and the fluorescence monitored continuously for 16 hours. At 7.5, 10.5 and 16 hours during the incubation period a 100 ul aliquot was removed from the test flask, diluted 1 : 100 in sterile TSB and 100 ul of the dilution was spread on each of three TSA plates to determine the number of CFU/ml present in the flask. The results are graphically depicted in Figure 6.
- the non-invasive techniques of this invention can be used for the detection of organisms in blood, a very critical and demanding task.
- the flask contained a very cloudy and turbid solution which is continuously monitored for sixteen hours, and measurement of fluorescence showed a direct correlation to the growth of organisms. This growth was readily detected by 11 hours, when the concentration of organisms had just exceeded l ⁇ 6 CFU/ml.
- EXAMPLE 15 Indicator Coated on the Spherical Ends of FAST Tray Lid Prongs This example monitored bacterial respiration with oxygen indicators coated on the spherical ends of FASTT tray (Becton Dickinson) lid prongs. Three different indicators were evaluated.
- the first indicator prepared was a mixture of 1 ml of 2 mg/ml dichloromethane solution of Ru(DPP)3 ⁇ 2 and 10 ml Dow-Corning 3-5024 water-based silicone emulsion.
- the spherical ends of FAST tray lid prongs were dipped into a shallow reservoir of the indicator solution, removed, placed prong side down in a rack, and allowed to cure by evaporation.
- the second indicator was prepared by mixing 3 mL Wacker SWS-960 clear silicone dispersion, 6 mL petroleum ether, and 0.5 mL of the 2 mg/mL dichloromethane solution of Ru(DPP)3Cl2- The spherical ends of FAST fray lid prongs were coated with this indicator in the same manner as with the first indicator and allowed to cure by evaporation of the solvents and reaction with atmospheric moisture.
- the third indicator was prepared in the same manner as the second but Wacker SWS-960 white silicone was used.
- a 1 x 10 7 CFU/mL suspension of E. coh ATCC #25922 in Mueller Hinton broth was prepared; 150 microliter aliquots were pipetted into the odd numbered rows of a microtiter tray, while 150 microliter aliquots of uninoculated Mueller Hinton broth were pipetted into the wells of the even numbered columns.
- the lids containing the indicator coated prongs were placed on the frays.
- the lidded trays were placed in a 37°C high humidity incubator for 3 hours.
- the trays were placed on a transparent glass plate.
- a mirror was positioned below the glass plate in such a manner that the bottom of the tray was visible in the mirror.
- a 365 nm ultraviolet source which evenly illuminated the entire tray was positioned about one inch from the top of the tray.
- a box with a small window through which the mirror could be seen, was placed over the assembly to block room light, and a 550 nm cut-on filter was placed in the box window. With this assembly the fluorescence from the indicator coated spherical ends of the FAST tray lid prongs could be visualized through the tray bottom.
- Table 9 contains the results of visual observations of the frays evaluated in this manner.
- Wacker Clear Some visible difference between prongs immersed in inoculated and uninoculated wells. Difference much less observable than with Dow-Coming indicator.
- EXAMPLE 16 Indicators Consisting of Ru(DPP)3Cl2 Adsorbed on Silica Gel Particles Embedded in UV Cured Silicone Rubber Indicators were prepared by adsorbing Ru (DPP)3 ⁇ 2 onto silica gel particles and embedding these particles into Loctite Nuva-Sil silicone rubbers.
- a variety of indicators were prepared using silica gel particles of different mesh sizes, different amounts of adsorbed fluorophore, different ratios of silica gel to silicone, and two types of Loctite Nuva-Sil (Nuva-Sil 5091 and Nuva-Sil 5147). Table 10 contains the characteristics ofthe indicators prepared and the visual results obtained from the indicators in contact with microorganism suspensions. An exemplary procedure used for the preparation ofthe indicators is presented below.
- Test vials 80 mL volume containing 60 mL of media and oxygen sensor (OS) were inoculated with the following organisms: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mycobacterium fortuitum and Escherichia coli.
- the vials were connected to 80 mL vials without broth with oxygen impermeable rubber tubing.
- the vials were then entered into adjacent stations in a BACTEC® 9240 instrument. Data was collected on the two vials over a 50 hour period. The results of these tests are presented in Figures 7 through 9.
- Figure 7 depicts the data collected in the BACTEC® instrument indicating the change in fluorescence intensity indicative of the growth of P. aeruginosa.
- Figure 8 depicts the data collected in the BACTEC® instrument indicating the change in fluorescence intensity indicative of the growth of M. fortuitum.
- Figure 9 depicts the data collected in the BACTEC® instrument indicating the change in fluorescence intensity indicative of the growth of E. coli.
- the bold line in these figures represent the data collected in the vials containing broth; the light lines represent the data collected by the sensor that is not in direct contact with the liquid broth.
- oxygen consumption was observed in the vials without broth.
- the pattern of oxygen consumption exhibited in these vials indicates logarithmic oxygen consumption which is indicative of microbial growth.
- the data shows that the OS was used for the detection of microbial growth in the absence of direct broth to sensor contact.
- the detection delays observed in the vials without media are related to this particular test configuration.
- One having ordinary skill in this art would be able to optimize the parameters of the system, by of example and not limitation, such as, by reducing the headspace volume and oxygen concentration would result in improved sensitivity and make the measurements made without direct contact of liquid broth (gas phase) more comparable with the measurements made with contact of the liquid broth (liquid phase).
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method for detecting the presence of respiring microorganisms in a fluid. The method will consist of the following steps: (i) placement of said fluid in a container in which said fluid is substantially isolated from atmospheric oxygen. A sensor will then be placed within said container, but not in direct contact with said fluid, which sensor composition will consist of fluorescent compounds that exhibits a reduction in fluorescent intensity when irradiated with light containing wavelengths; (ii) irradiating said sensor composition with light containing wavelengths will cause said fluorescent compound to fluoresce; (iii) measuring or visually observing the fluorescent light intensity from said fluorescent compound while irradiating said sensor compound with said light; (iv) comparing said measurement to that of a control not containing a respiring microorganism, wherein said control is selected from the group consisting of: a reagent control not in contact with respiring microorganisms and a calculated threshold, wherein change in fluorescent intensity relative to the fluorescent intensity of the control is indicative of the presence of respiring microorganisms; and (v) in the event that no such increase is measured or observed, repeat steps (ii), (iii) and (iv) as needed, to detect the presence of respiring microorganisms in said fluid.
Description
MICROBIAL MONITORING DEVICE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This application is a continuation-in-part of United States Serial Number 08/025,899, filed on March 3, 1993 - which is continuation of 07/687,359, filed on April 18, 1991.
2. Description of Related Art
Our environment contains a multitude of microorganisms with which we are continuously interacting. These interactions can be beneficial, i.e., fermentations to produce wine, vinegar or antibiotics; neutral; or even harmful, as in the case of infectious diseases. The ubiquitous presence of these microorganisms, thus, creates a continuing need for the detection, identification and study of the presence and metabolic activity of such microorganisms.
While the science of microbiology has changed significantly in the last 25 years, many procedures for the detection, identification and analysis of the behavior of microorganisms are still time consuming. For example, in the area of antimicrobic susceptibility testing nearly half of all testing in hospitals in the United States still use the Bauer-Kirby Disc Method. This method uses the presence or absence of visible growth of the microorganisms to indicate the efficacy of an antimicrobic compound, and generally requires an 18 to 24 hour incubation period to allow for microorganism growth before a result can be obtained. A decrease in the time required to obtain such antimicrobic susceptibility information is needed.
Another popular method for antimicrobic susceptibility testing is the broth micro-dilution method, such as the Sceptor® System for identification and antimicrobic susceptibility testing of organisms (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrumentation Systems, Sparks, MD). The system uses a disposable plastic panel
having a plurality of low volume cupulas (ca. 0.4 ml per cupula), each containing a different test compound or a different concentration of a test compound dried on the cupula surface. The organism to be tested is suspended in the desired testing medium, and aliquots are delivered to the individual cupulas of the test panel. The reagent dried on the panel dissolves in the sample, and the system is then incubated overnight (18 to 24 hrs.) to allow sufficient time for the organisms to interact with the reagent and for visible growth to appear. The panel is subsequently examined visually for the presence or absence of growth, thereby obtaining information on the susceptibility ofthe organism undergoing testing. Additional wells aid in identifying the organism. However, this test method suffers from the drawback of also requiring a long incubation period.
One approach to the reduction of the incubation time is to monitor metabolic activity of the microorganisms, rather than growth of colonies. Many approaches have been reported in the attempt to rapidly and accurately monitor such metabolic activity.
For example, apparatus utilizing light scattering optical means have been used to determine susceptibility by probing the change in size or number of microorganisms in the presence of various antimicrobic compounds. Commercial instruments utilizing these principles are exemplified by the Vitec System (BioMerieux Corp.). This system claims to yield information on antimicrobic susceptibility of microorganisms within 6 hours for many organism and drug combinations. Other combinations can require as long as 18 hours before the antimicrobic susceptibility ofthe organism can be determined by this machine.
Additionally, modifications of the Bauer-Kirby procedure have been developed which allow certain samples to be read in four to six hours. However, such a system is "destructive" in nature, requiring the spraying of a developing solution of a color forming dye onto the test plate. Re-incubation and reading at a later time is, thus, not possible and if the rapid technique fails, the experiment cannot be continued for a standard evaluation at a later time.
A biolu inescent method based on the quantity of ATP present in multiplying organisms has been described as yielding results of antimicrobic susceptibility
testing in four and half hours for certain compositions (Wheat et al.). However, the procedure tends to be cumbersome and broad applicability has not been shown.
Other approaches have involved monitoring of microbial oxygen consumption by the measurement of pH and/or hemoglobin color change, or by the use of dyes such as triphenyltetrazolium chloride and resazurin, that change color in response to the total redox potential ofthe liquid test medium.
The monitoring of the consumption of dissolved oxygen by microorganisms, as a marker of their metabolism, has been studied for many years. For example, CE.
Clifton monitored the oxygen consumption of microorganisms over a period of several days using a Warburg flask in 1937. This method measured the change in oxygen concentration in a slow and cumbersome manner.
The "Clark" electrode, a newer electrochemical device, is also commonly used to measure dissolved oxygen. Unfortunately, the Clark electrode consumes oxygen during use (thereby reducing the oxygen available to the microorganisms) and the "standard" size electrode is typically used only to measure volumes of 100 mis or greater to prevent the electrode from interfering with the measurements.
A "miniature" Clark electrode has been described, but this electrode is a complicated multi-component part which must, also, be in contact with the solution to be measured. While an oxygen permeable membrane can be used to prevent the electrode components of the device from interacting with the constituents of the test solution, the oxygen must still equilibrate between the test solution and the measurement system and is consumed once it passes the membrane.
Optical systems which can yield oxygen concentration data, have been developed to overcome the shortcomings of the Clark electrode systems. The main advantage of such optical methods is that the instrumentation required to determine quantitative value does not itself make physical contact with the test solution. Optical techniques allowing both colorimetric and fluorometric analyses for oxygen to be carried out rapidly and reproducibly are known, and costs for such analyses are often quite low. For example, several luminescent techniques for the determination of oxygen have been described which are based on the ability of oxygen to quench the fluorescence or phosphorescence emissions of a variety of
compounds. However, such methods have not been adapted to microbial monitoring.
Other systems have been described that provide information on the presence, identity and antimicrobic susceptibility of microorganisms in a period of eight hours or less. Wilkins and Stones in U.S. Patent No. 4,200,493 disclose a system that uses electrodes and a high impedance potentiometer to determine the presence of microorganisms. In U.S. 3,907,646 Wilkins et al disclose an analytical method which utilizes the pressure changes in the headspace over a flask associated with microbial growth for the detection and surveillance of the organisms. U.S. 4,220,715 to Ahnell, discloses a system wherein the head space gas above a test sample is passed through an external oxygen detector for determination of the presence of microorganisms. Ahnell, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,152,213, discloses a system for analysis by monitoring the vacuum produced by growing organisms in a closed head space above a test sample. U.S. 4,116,775 to Charles et. al is an example of the use of optical means based on the increase in turbidity or optical density of a growing microbial culture for the detection and monitoring of bacterial growth. A combined electro-optical measurement of birefringence of a test solution containing microorganisms is described in EPO 0092958 (Lowe and Meltzer).
The increased incidence of tuberculosis and the recent emergence of Multiple Drug Resistant (MDR) strains threatens the ability to control this disease. Therefore, when a strain is resistant to two or more drugs, such as rifampin and isoniazid, the course of treatment increases from 6 months to 24 months, and the cure rate decreases from almost 100% to less than 60%.
Mycobactertum tuberculosis (TB) is a slow growing species. Generally, at three to five weeks of growth on solid or liquid media are required to produce enough cell mass for identification and susceptibility testing. The most commonly used susceptibility method for TB is the Modified Proportion Method (NCCLS M24-T). This method requires an additional three to four weeks of growth before the results are available. The total elapsed time for a find report is typical two months and may be as much as three months.
The BACTEC 460 instrument (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin
Lakes, NJ) can reduce these times considerably. The BACTEC method detects the
presence of mycobacteria by their production of radioactive CO2. The BACTEC system can also detect resistant organisms by their continuing production of radioactive CO2 in the presence of antimycobacterial drugs.
It becomes apparent that a wide variety of methods have been applied to the detection and the antibiotic susceptibility testing of microorganisms. Many of these methods can only yield useful data when monitored by instruments dedicated to this task. Thus there exists a need for a system which can allow determinations of the presence and behavior of microorganisms without the requirement of dedicated instrumentation. Further there exists a need for a system that will allow the determination of the effect of a compound such as an antibiotic on a sample of microorganisms in a short time that does not significantly alter the behavior of the microorganisms.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide an improved means to detect the presence of, and to evaluate the metabolic activity of, microorganisms present in a liquid or semi-solid media. It is further an object of this invention to provide a microbial monitoring device or system which can be simply read and visually inteφreted, and which permits results to be obtained in a shorter time period than previously attainable, nominally 6 hours or less. Additionally, it is an object of the invention to provide a means for detection and/or monitoring the activity of oxygen consuming enzymes or enzyme systems without the use of dedicated instrumentation.
The above and related objects are realized by the processes of the instant invention. These processes use a fluorescence detection system wherein the fluorescing sensor compound is one which exhibits a quantifiable degree of quenching when exposed to oxygen. In one embodiment, the sensor compound may be brought into contact with the test sample (either directly or separated by an oxygen permeable membrane) and the fluorescence is measured or observed visually with appropriate aids. In another embodiment, an increase in fluorescence is indicative of respiring aerobic microorganisms, which utilize (and thereby reduce) the oxygen in the sample.
The sensor need not be in direct contact with the test sample. The only requirement is that the test sample and sensor are in a container substantially isolated from atmospheric oxygen so that the sensor can react to the presence/absence of oxygen in the container.
The system can, thus, be used to detect a variety of respiring microorganisms. It is further anticipated that this system can be used to detect the presence of O2 dependent compositions such as enzymes.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
Figure 1 graphically depicts intensity of fluorescence as a function of time for indicators in contact with broth containing organisms and broth containing no organisms.
Figure 2 graphically depicts the intensity of fluorescence as a function of time for indicators in contact with broth inoculated with different concentrations of microorganisms.
Figure 3 graphically depicts the intensity of fluorescence as a function of time for indicators in contact with broth inoculated with the same number of organisms but containing different concentrations of phenol.
Figure 4 graphically depicts the intensity of fluorescence as a function of time for indicators in contact with broth inoculated with the same number of organisms but containing different amounts of copper sulfate.
Figure 5 A graphically depicts the fluorescence, as a function of indicators in contact with broth inoculated with the same concentration of microorganisms but different concentrations of cefuroxime. Some wells were covered with mineral oil to prevent oxygen from diffusing into the wells. The fluorescence is given as a percent of growth control
Figure 5B graphically depicts the fluorescence as a percent of the growth control in wells that are overlaid with oil or left open and measured at several different times.
Figure 6 graphically depicts the intensity of fluorescence of indicators in blood culture bottles when measured continuously over 16 hours. The arrows indicate the times when samples were removed in order to quantify the concentration of organisms present.
Figure 7 depicts the data collected in the BACTEC® instrument indicating the change in fluorescence intensity indicative ofthe growth of P. aeruginosa
Figure 8 depicts the data collected in the BACTEC® instrument indicating the change in fluorescence intensity indicative of the growth of M. fortuitum.
Figure 9 depicts the data collected in the BACTEC® instrument indicating the change in fluorescence intensity indicative of the growth of E. coli.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
The process of this invention presents a quick, easy, and unambiguous method for the measurement and/or detection of respiring aerobic microorganisms by measurement or visual observation of fluorescence. The fluorescent sensor compound is irradiated with light containing wavelengths which cause it to fluoresce, and the fluorescence is measured by any standard means, or evaluated visually.
The fluorescent compound must be one which exhibits a large quenching upon exposure to oxygen at concentration ordinarily found in the test liquids (generally 0.4%). While virtually any such compound can be used, preferred fluorescent compounds of this invention are tris-2,2'-bipyridyl ruthenium (II) salts, especially the chloride hexahydrate salt (Ru(BiPy)3Cl2), tris-4,7-diphenyl-l,10-phenanthroline ruthenium (II) salts, especially the chloride (salt Ru(DPP)3Cl2), and 9,10- diphenyl anthracene (DP A).
The fluorescent compound must be placed in chemical communication with the oxygen of the test sample to exhibit the quenching. This can be achieved by placing the compound directly in contact with the sample. However, in a preferred embodiment the compound and sample are separated from each other by the
interposition of a membrane embedding material permeable to oxygen, and relatively impermeable to the other sample components, between them, thereby preventing the interaction of the sample and the compound. Neither the fluorescent compound nor the membrane in which the fluorescent compound is embedded need be in direct contact with the test sample, broth, or fluid, (the compound and sample must be substantially isolated from atmospheric oxygen, thereby preventing any false reading due to the presence of atmospheric oxygen) but still permitting reaction of the compound to the presence or absence of oxygen as a result of respiration of microorganisms.
The system can be allowed to interact unobserved for a predetermined amount of time after which the presence or absence of fluorescence is observed and compared to appropriate control samples, yielding results that are often obtained with a single such observation. A particular benefit of this system, is that the measurement of fluorescence is non-destructive and if after a period of time (e.g. 4 hours) the results are non-conclusive, the system can be re-incubated and read again at a later time. Further, while it is anticipated that the results will be compared with reagent controls, such is by no means necessary, and it is postulated that, by appropriate choice of fluorescent compounds, a skilled technician or technologist would be capable of independently determining whether the results indicate the presence of microbial activity.
The detection of fluorescent intensity can be performed by any means ordinarily used for such measurements, e.g. a fluorometer. Alternatively, the fluorescent intensity can be observed visually and, optionally, compared with a reagent control (e.g. a system containing no live organisms or a system with no added test chemicals). Thus, the methods can be utilized to both provide a quantitative measurement of relative activity, using a fluorometer, or a more qualitative estimate of such activity, by visual inspection.
In a preferred embodiment of this invention, the fluorescent compound is chosen such that it will exhibit little or no fluorescence in the presence of oxygen. This obviates the need for a control, as the person performing the test would interpret any appreciable fluorescence (i.e. beyond that of any nominal background fluorescence) as indicative ofthe presence of microbial activity. Such results can be obtained by a fluorometer or other measurement means, or preferably, visual
inspection, and provide a quick, qualitative estimate of such activity. Preferred fluorescent compounds for this embodiment include Ru(BiPy)3θ2 and Ru(DPP)3Cl2.
It has also been found that for systems where the compound or compound embedded membrane is in contact with the fluid, test sample, or broth, while the test can be run in systems isolated from atmospheric oxygen, accurate results can also be obtained when the system is left exposed to atmospheric oxygen. In fact, this is desirable when the organisms are to be incubated for periods of time exceeding 2 hours, as they would otherwise tend to consume all the dissolved oxygen in the system and subsequently generate a false reading. Thus, the system of this invention is quite versatile, and can be used in a wide array of conditions.
A further benefit of the instant invention is that a unitized apparatus can be constructed. Briefly, the apparatus comprises a sample containing reservoir, or more commonly a plurality of identical reservoirs adapted to contain a test sample and other such liquid and soluble components (e.g. nutrients, etc.) as may be required by the particular application. The reservoirs also provide a fluorescent indicator element which monitors the oxygen levels of the solution. The indicator element of this invention uses a fluorescent compound known to show a large quenching of its fluorescent emission when exposed to oxygen.
In a preferred embodiment of this invention, the fluorescent compound can be mixed and distributed throughout a plastic or rubber phase that is permeable to oxygen gas but relatively impermeable to water and non-gaseous solutes. Silicone rubber is a particularly useful material for this application. When a test solution containing microorganisms is placed in such a sample reservoir, the metabolic activity of the organisms causes a reduction in the level of dissolved oxygen in the sample, and the sample will yield a higher fluorescent signal upon excitation. Sample liquids not containing microorganisms will not show a decrease in their oxygen levels and will only show low levels of fluorescence due to high oxygen quenching of fluorescence.
Alternatively, the oxygen sensitive fluorophore can be in a microencapsulated form or in the form of granules of an oxygen permeable material. It is also anticipated that the fluorophore can be contained within a separately manufactured
component such as a bead, disc, or prongs which can be separately introduced into the test solution. The use of prongs is particularly advantageous as such prongs can be attached to a lid or other device to permit easy manipulation. In a preferred embodiment, a plurality of prongs can be attached to a single membrane, or other cover and thereby be maintained in an appropriate orientation such that they can simultaneously be placed into the reservoirs of a base containing a plurality of sample reservoirs. By choice of appropriate materials, the prongs can be made impermeable to the indicator molecules and to microorganisms in the sample, but permeable to oxygen.
The fluorophore can also be in a liquid phase separated from the solution being analyzed by a membrane that is impermeable to the indicator molecules and to microorganisms in the sample but which is permeable to oxygen. Additionally, less- sensitive sensors can be fabricated by using less O2 permeable polymers or by using compounds with shorter excited-state lifetimes.
Further, the methods of this invention can be used to test the susceptibility of a microorganism to a compound, such as an antibiotic, which is capable of severely inhibiting the growth and or the metabolic activity of organisms. The increase in fluorescent signal normally caused by the organism will be suppressed in the presence of such compounds. The behavior of the fluorescent signal from a reservoir will demonstrate the ability of the test component to negatively effect the normal oxygen consumption ofthe organism added to the reservoir.
In addition, any of the embodiments discussed above may be utilized so that the sensor, fluorescent compound, or the membrane in which it is embedded need not be in direct contact with the test sample, fluid, or broth in which the microorganisms may be present. In such case, the sensor, compound or membrane in which it is embedded need only be in the same container with the test sample, fluid or broth and that they be substantially isolated from atmospheric oxygen to function as an indicator of the presence or absence of respiring microoganisms.
EXAMPLES
The following examples illustrate certain preferred embodiments of the instant invention but are not intended to be illustrative of all embodiments.
EXAMPLE 1. Preparation of an O2-Sensitive Indicator Microtitration Tray
The fluorescent compound tris 4,7-diphenyl-l,10- phenanthroline ruthenium (II) chloride (Ru(DPP)3Cl2) was synthesized using the procedure of Watts and Crosby (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93, 3184(1971)). A total of 3.6 mg of the compound was dissolved in 2.0 ml dimethyl sulfoxide (D-5879, Sigma Chemical St. Louis MO) and the resultant solution was then added slowly, with stirring, to 1300 ml silicone rubber forming solution (Water Based Emulsion #3-5024, Dow Corning Midland MI). A 35 microliter aliquot of the mixture was subsequently dispensed into each well of a 96 well, flat bottom, white microtiter tray (#011-010-7901, Dynatech Chantilly VA), and the system was subsequently cured overnight in a low humidity (less than 25% RH), 60°C incubator. After curing, the trays were washed by either soaking or by filling and emptying each well several times with each of the following reagents; a) absolute ethanol, b) 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.2, c) hot distilled water (about 45°C) and d) ambient temperature distilled water.
Subsequently, 150 microliters of a Broth A, consisting of 35% Mueller Hinton II (BBL #124322, BD Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville MD), 15% Brucella (BBL #11088), and 50% distilled water, was dispensed into each well of the tray, and the tray was then placed in a glove box containing the desired concentration of oxygen, mixed with nitrogen to obtain a total pressure of 1 atm. The tray was kept in the glove box for at least 24 hours, after which it was covered with an adhesive backed mylar sheet and removed.
The fluorescent emissions of the fluorescent compound in the bottom of each well of the tray was then measured using a Perkin-Elmer LS-5B equipped with a microtiter reader attachment at the following instrument settings: 485nm excitation wavelength, 550nm cut-on filter in the emission window, lOnm excitation slit, and a
5nm emission slit. The results are presented in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Fluorescence of Tray Equilibrated with Various
Oxygen Gas Levels Tray Average Reading % Oxygen in Mixture
(balance Nitrogen)
1 803 0.00
2 759 0.28
3 738 0.53
4 524 2.45
55 448844 3.40
6 445 5.35
7 208 20.9
As shown, it can be observed that indicators in wells in trays equilibrated in atmospheric air (Tray 7) displayed a much lower fluorescent signal than wells equilibrated with gas mixtures containing lower concentrations of oxygen (Trays 1- 6). This indicates that the fluorescent emission of the fluorescent indicator compound embedded in the silicone rubber is related to oxygen concentration and that the system can be easily equilibrated with changing oxygen levels. The system allowed 96 sample wells (containing 0.1-0.3 ml sample) to be contained in a single unit that is easily manipulated.
EXAMPLE 2. Use of Indicator System to Measure Relative O2 Concentration Produced by a Reducing Agent The O2 concentration in wells of an Indicator Microtiter tray produced as in
Example 1 was varied by the addition of a strong reducing agent, sodium sulfite (which reduces O2 content). A 150 microliter aliquot of the reducing agent (at concentrations ranging from O to 1083 parts per million (ppm) sulfite ion in water) was pipetted into wells of the tray. Each well was allowed to react for 30 minutes, open to the atmosphere, and the fluorescence of the indicators measured in a Fluoroskan II Fluorometer (Flow Laboratories, McLean VA), having an excitation bandpass filter at a wavelength of 460 nm and an emission cut-on filter at 570 nm. The results are presented in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Effect of Sodium Sulfite on Fluorescence ppm sulfite ion Fluorescence Intensity*
0 3090
65 3513
163 3545
325 4033
542 11571
1083 11863
*Mean of 4 wells
As shown, the wells containing the highest concentrations of reducing agent (and, consequently, the lowest O2 concentration) have the highest fluorescence intensity, thus demonstrating the relationship between O2 concentration and fluorescence.
EXAMPLE 3. Use of Indicator System to Determine the Presence of a Microorganism
A 0.5 McFarland suspension of E. coh (ATCC #25922), containing about 1.5 x lθ8 CFU/ml, was prepared using an A- Just nephelometer (Abbott Labs, Chicago
LL). The suspension was diluted to about 1 x 10? CFU/ml in Broth A (see Example
1). A 150 microliter aliquot of this suspension was placed into indicator tray wells prepared as in Example 1, and subsequently incubated at 37°C. At intervals, the fluorescence was measured in a Fluoroskan II fluorometer over the period of 1 - 3 1/2 hours. An increased fluorescence signal was observed over time as shown in
Figure 1. The fluorescence signal from wells containing no organisms showed very little change. The wells containing organisms were significantly brighter when visually observed under a UV light source. Thus, it appears that the metabolic activity of the organisms in the wells caused the fluorescence signal to increase (presumably by decreasing the O2 concentration).
EXAMPLE 4. Dependence of Fluorescence Change on Organism Concentration
A 0.5 McFarland suspension of E. coh (ATCC #25922) in sterile trypticase soy broth (TSB, BBL #11768) was made using an A- Just nephelometer (Abbott
Labs. Chicago IL). A series of E. coli suspensions ranging from 1 x 10? CFU/ml to
about 10 CFU/ml were made by making serial dilutions. A 200 microliter aliquot of each suspension was placed into 8 wells of an indicator tray prepared as in Example 1. The tray was then incubated at 37°C and the fluorescence measured every 30 minutes in a Fluoroskan II fluorometer. The fluorescence of the 8 wells were averaged and corrected by subtracting the background fluorescence of a sterile TSB well. The change in fluorescence over time is shown in Figure 2.
As shown, a change in the starting concentration ofthe organism by a factor of 10 (one log unit) caused a delay of about 1 hour for the fluorescence in the well to exceed 2000 fluorescence units. It is postulated that this delay is due in part to the fact that the system is open to the atmosphere. Oxygen in the air can and does freely diffuse into the medium in an attempt to replace that consumed by the microorganisms. It is further postulated that only when the organisms are present in or have multiplied to sufficient numbers and are metabolically active enough to consume oxygen at a rate approximating or faster than the rate at which oxygen diffuses into the test solution, will the fluorescent signal generated by the indicator element in the bottom ofthe reservoir show an increase.
EXAMPLE 5. Preparation of an Indicator Microtitration Tray with an Alternate Fluorescent Indicating Molecule A 96 well Microtiter tray was produced essentially as in Example 1, except that tris-(2,2' bipyridyl)-ruthenium (II) chloride hexahydrate (Aldrich Chemical Company, Milwaukee, WI) [Ru(BiPy)3Cl2] was substituted for Ru(DPP)3Cl2 in the silicone mixture. A second tray containing 9,10-diphenyl anthracene (DP A) was also prepared. All wells were charged with 150 ul of 1 x 10^ CFU/ml E. coli (ATCC #25922) in broth. Table 3 lists the results at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours after addition of organisms.
TABLE 3
Fluorescence Counts for Devices with Different Fluorophores
Fluorescent Compound Silicone O hr. l hr. 2 hr. 3 hr. 4 hr.
Ru(DPP)3Cl2 (Ex. 3) A 2300 2315 2560 8329 9000
Ru(BiPy)3Cl2 (Ex. 5) A 2866 ~ 3449 3951 4109
DPA (Ex. 5) A 1300 ~ 1385 1456 1572
Ru(DPP)3Cl2 (Ex. 6) B — 995 4334 3775 3508
A = Dow-Corning 3-5024 water-based silicone B = Wacker white SWS-960+ silicone
As shown, both fluorescent sensor compounds exhibited large increases with fluorescence over time, indicating their suitability for use in this system.
EXAMPLE 6. Preparation of an Indicator Microtitration Tray Using an Alternative Silicone
To demonstrate that the fluorophore can function when embedded in a different matrix, a 96 well Microtiter tray was produced essentially as in Example 1. In this experiment, 10 ul of white SWS-960 RTV silicone (Wacker Silicones, Adrian MI) containing 10 milligrams of Ru(DPP)3Cl2 per liter was dispensed into each well of the tray and allowed to cure. No wash steps were performed on the resultant tray. The results are presented in Table 3. As in Example 1, wells containing 150 ul of 1 x 10? CFU/ml E. coh (ATCC #25922) in broth had a much greater fluorescent intensity after several hours at 37° Centigrade.
EXAMPLE 7. Effect of Toxic Substances on the Oxygen Consumption of Microorganisms
A suspension containing about 3 x 10^ CFU/ml, of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC #10145) in Broth A was prepared using an A-Just nephelometer. A total of 150 ul ofthe suspension was placed in each well ofthe indicator trays prepared as in Example 1 ; these suspensions were then diluted with solutions of phenol or copper sulfate (which are deleterious to microbial growth) to a final concentration of 1.5 x 108 CFU/ml. The trays were incubated at 37°C and their fluorescence measured in a Fluoroskan II at 10 minute intervals. Figures 3 and 4 show the effect of phenol and copper sulfate on the response of the system.
As shown, at high levels of additives, growth was suppressed and the fluorescence did not increase with time. Wells containing phenol at 1 gram liter or more, and copper sulfate at greater than 500 mg/liter, had no increase in fluorescence signal at times less than two hours, indicating absence of actively metabolizing organisms. Thus, measurement of oxygen consumption can be used to probe the metabolism of the organisms.
EXAMPLE 8. Effect of Antibiotics on E. cpji.
A 0.5 McFarland suspension of E. coli (ATCC #25922) in Broth A (see Example 1) was prepared using an A-Just nephelometer. The suspension was diluted to 1 x 10?
CFU/ml in wells of an indicator tray prepared as in Example 1 containing the antibiotics
ciprofloxacin, cefoxitin and cefuroxime at final concentrations of 0.5 to 8 ug/ml. The trays were incubated at 37°C for 4 hours and their fluorescence measured in a Fluoroskan II fluorometer. The results are presented in Table 4.
TABLE 4
Fluorescence from an Indicator Tray Containing
E. coH and Antibiotics
Relative Fluorescence at 4 hrs.
Antibiotic Concentration (ug/mL1) Ciprofloxacin Cefuroxime Cefoxitin
0.5 2537 7902 8181
1 2621 7983 8270
2 2461 7161 7120 4 2527 7598 3692 8 2424 6469 2974
As shown at all concentrations, the E. coli was sensitive to ciprofloxacin and low fluorescence counts were observed. The E. coli was resistant to the concentrations of cefuroxime and high fluorescence counts were observed. The E. coh was resistant to the 0.5, 1, and 2 ug/ml concentrations of cefoxitin and high counts were observed, but it was sensitive to the higher concentrations of cefoxitin and low counts were observed for 4 and 8 ug/ml. Thus, there is a correlation between the fluorescence and antibiotic concentration, demonstrating that the system of this invention can be used to assess the effects of antimicrobics and to determine the minimum effective concentration compositions.
EXAMPLE 9. Effect of Antibiotics on the Oxygen Consumption of E. coli with Ru(BiPy)3θ2 Fluorescence Indicator
A 0.5 McFarland suspension of E. coli (ATCC #25922) in Broth A (see Example 1) was prepared using an A-Just nephelometer. The suspension was diluted to 1 X 10? CFU/ml in wells of an indicator tray prepared as in Example 5 (Ru(BiPy)3Cl2 indicator) containing the antibiotics ciprofloxacin, cefoxitin and cefuroxime at final concentrations of 0.5 to 8 ug/ml. The trays were incubated at 37 °C for 4 hours and their fluorescence measured in a Fluoroskan II fluorometer. The results are listed in Table 5.
Table 5
Fluorescence from an Indicator Tray Containing E. coli and Antibiotics Relative Fluorescence at 4 hrs. Antibiotic Concentration ug/mL Ciprofloxacin Cefuroxime Cefoxitin
0.5 507 1155 1171
1 428 1539 1491
2 308 1183 1338 4 403 1170 832 8 323 1194 559
As shown, as in Example 8, at these concentrations the coli is sensitive to ciprofloxacin and low fluorescence counts were observed. The E. coli is resistant to these concentrations of cefuroxime and high fluorescence counts were observed. The E. coli is resistant to the 0.5, 1, and 2 ug/ml concentrations of cefoxitin, high counts were observed; it was sensitive to higher concentrations of cefoxitin and lower counts were observed for 4 and 8 ug/ml. Thus, the results indicated that Ru(BiPy)3Cl2 can also be used in a fluorescence indicator.
EXAMPLE 10. Effect of Antibiotics on the Oxygen Consumption of Microorganisms Using DPA Fluorescence Indicator
A 0.5 McFarland suspension of E. coli (ATCC #25922) in Broth A was prepared using an A-Just nephelometer. The suspension was diluted to 1 x 10^ CFU/ml in wells of an indicator tray prepared as in Example 5 (DPA indicator) containing the antibiotics ciprofloxacin, cefoxitin and cefuroxime at final concentrations of 0.5 to 8 ug/ml. The trays were incubated at 37°C for 4 hours and their fluorescence measured in a Fluoroskan II. The results are presented in Table 6.
Table 6
Fluorescence from an Indicator Tray Containing
E. coli and Antibiotics
Relative Fluorescence at 4 hrs.
Antibiotic
Concentration (ug/mL Ciprofloxacin Cefuroxime Cefoxitin
0.5 91 183 192
1 109 197 173
2 94 195 164
4 74 160 101
8 68 161 95
As shown, at these concentrations the E. coli is sensitive to ciprofloxacin and low fluorescence counts were observed. The E. coli is resistant to these concentrations of cefuroxime and high fluorescence counts were observed. The
coli is resistant to the 0.5, 1, 2 ug/ml concentration of cefoxitin, high counts were observed; it was sensitive to higher concentrations and lower counts were observed for 4 and 8 ug/ml as in Examples 8 and 9, indicating that DPA is also useful as a fluorescence indicator.
EXAMPLE 11. Effect of Open and Closed Systems on Oxygen Measurements
A 96 well indicator microtiter tray was produced substantially as in Example 1. Duplicate wells in the tray were supplemented with the antibiotic cefuroxime in the concentration range of 0.25 to 32 ug/ml. One hundred and fifty microliters of a suspension of E. coli (ATCC #11775) was added to the wells to yield about 3 x 10^ CFU/ml. One of each duplicate well was overlaid with mineral oil to inhibit diffusion of oxygen into the wells, the other duplicate was left open to the air. The tray was incubated at 37°C for 5 hours, the fluorescence was measured in a Fluoroskan II fluorometer and that fluorescence was compared with the average of several wells containing no antibiotic to yield a percent ofthe growth control at each antibiotic concentration. Figure 5A shows the behavior of the open and covered wells at five hours as a function of cefuroxime concentration. Figure 5B shows the change in fluorescence of the growth control wells when open or overlaid with mineral oil.
The "closed system" overlaid with mineral oil did not show an effect on oxygen consumption by the 4 and 8 ug/ml concentrations of antibiotic while those wells with no mineral oil showed correctly that this organism is sensitive to cefuroxime at these concentrations. This difference is due, presumably to the time lag needed for the antibiotic to affect the organism; it is believed that during this time the oxygen is brought to an artificially low level by the ongoing metabolic activity of the organisms.
Thus, to utilize the invention with optimum sensitivity for the detection of the effect of toxins on organisms, the sample reservoir permits the influx of oxygen.
EXAMPLE 12. The Effect of Sample Volume on Indicator Trays
A 0.5 McFarland suspension of E. coli (BDMS Culture collection #7133) was diluted to 1 x 107 CFU/ml in Broth A. Different volumes (from 10 ul to 300 ul) of the diluted suspension were placed into wells of an indicator tray produced as in Example 1. The tray was incubated at 37°C and the fluorescence measured in a Fluoroskan II at 30 minute intervals. Fluorescence from the same volume of sterile broth was subtracted to give the fluorescence change cause by the microorganism. The results are presented in Table 7. Table 7
Effect of Sample Volume on Indicator Tray Fluorescence
Relative Fluorescence
Sample Volume ( \) Ohr. lhr. 2hr. 2.5hr. 3hr. 3.5hr. 4hr.
10 0 0 0 0 0 4 139
20 0 0 275 795 814 1218 1958
40 0 245 683 1883 2108 2613 3240
60 0 80 1559 3497 4847 6226 6827
80 0 82 1798 5340 8333 8810 8801
100 0 31 1848 5952 7672 7962 7961
125 0 103 2798 6286 7580 7852 7852
150 0 32 2539 6005 6568 6759 6886
175 0 51 2574 6149 6993 6987 6798
200 0 59 2376 5355 5742 5944 5826
250 0 115 2172 5373 5695 5822 5759
300 0 107 2538 4650 4727 4825 4778
Briefly, it was observed that those wells with 40 ul or less of sample showed less than 1/2 the increase in relative signal observed in wells with 80 ul or more at times of 2 hours or more. It is believed that in the wells containing 40 ul or less, too little volume was present for the organisms to effectively consume oxygen faster than it could diffuse into the small volumes of sample.
EXAMPLE 13. Use of Indicator System Without a Fluorometer
Indicator trays were prepared using the same fluorescent compound and silicone as in Example 1. However, the trays were made of clear plastic and the wells had round bottoms (#4-3918-2, BD Labware Lincoln Park NJ). Two nanograms of Ru(DPP)3θ2 in 10 ul of silicone were placed in each well of the tray and no wash steps were performed. Samples of Ps. aeruginosa (BDMS Culture collection #N111) and E. coli (ATCC #25922) were diluted to Broth A (see Example 1) 1 x 10? CFU/ml in Broth A containing either 0 to 32 ug/ml cefuroxime, 0.12 to 8 ug/ml ciprofloxacin or 0 to 32 ug/ml cefoxitin and charged to the trays. The trays were incubated for 4 hours at 37°C and subsequently placed on the stage of an ultraviolet transilluminator (#TX-365A, Spectronics Corp., Westbury, NY) which served as an excitation source. The resulting fluorescence was observed from directly above the trays at a distance of 1 foot through a 550 cut-on filter (#LL-550- S-K962, Corion, Holliston, MA). It was readily observed that wells which contained either no antibiotics or concentrations of antibiotics that did not affect the organisms demonstrated a high level of fluorescence. Wells with either no organisms or higher antibiotic levels had a much lower level of fluorescence. The lowest concentration of antibiotic to significantly lower the fluorescent emissions for each organism is shown in Table 8 along with the MIC concentration determined using an overnight microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test.
TABLE 8
Fluorescence Results Obtained Without Use of an Instrument
MIC
Cefuroxime Ciprofloxacin Cefoxitin
Visual Reference Visual Reference Visual Reference
Ps. aeruginosa >64 >64 1 0.5 >64 >64
E. coli #25922 16 8 <0.12 <0.12 8 4
EXAMPLE 14. Use of Indicator to Detect the Presence of a Low Level of Bacteria In a Medium Containing Blood
Tissue culture flasks (Falcon #3084, BD Labware, Lincoln Park NJ) were prepared with one side coated with 3 mis of Dow Corning Water-based Emulsion containing 68 ng of Ru(DPP)3θ2- The flasks were sterilized using ethylene oxide. One hundred thirty five mis of TSB broth (BBL #11768) containing about 0.05 CFU/ml E. coli (ATCC #25922) and 15 mis of defibrinated sheep blood was added to one ofthe flasks. A control flask contained 135 mis of TSB and 15 mis of blood but no organisms. The caps of the flasks were loosened to allow air circulation and the flasks were incubated at 37°C in an upright position. A fiber optic probe allowed the fluorescence from the flasks to be measured by a Perkin Elmer LS-5B spectrofluorometer located several feet from the incubator. The fluorometer measured the flasks at 485 nm excitation wavelength with a 10 nm slit width and a 550 nm cut-on emission filter. A strip chart was attached to the fluorometer and the fluorescence monitored continuously for 16 hours. At 7.5, 10.5 and 16 hours during the incubation period a 100 ul aliquot was removed from the test flask, diluted 1 : 100 in sterile TSB and 100 ul of the dilution was spread on each of three TSA plates to determine the number of CFU/ml present in the flask. The results are graphically depicted in Figure 6.
As shown, the non-invasive techniques of this invention can be used for the detection of organisms in blood, a very critical and demanding task. The flask contained a very cloudy and turbid solution which is continuously monitored for sixteen hours, and measurement of fluorescence showed a direct correlation to the growth of organisms. This growth was readily detected by 11 hours, when the concentration of organisms had just exceeded lθ6 CFU/ml.
EXAMPLE 15. Indicator Coated on the Spherical Ends of FAST Tray Lid Prongs This example monitored bacterial respiration with oxygen indicators coated on the spherical ends of FASTT tray (Becton Dickinson) lid prongs. Three different indicators were evaluated.
The first indicator prepared was a mixture of 1 ml of 2 mg/ml dichloromethane solution of Ru(DPP)3θ2 and 10 ml Dow-Corning 3-5024 water-based silicone emulsion. The spherical ends of FAST tray lid prongs were dipped into a shallow
reservoir of the indicator solution, removed, placed prong side down in a rack, and allowed to cure by evaporation. The second indicator was prepared by mixing 3 mL Wacker SWS-960 clear silicone dispersion, 6 mL petroleum ether, and 0.5 mL of the 2 mg/mL dichloromethane solution of Ru(DPP)3Cl2- The spherical ends of FAST fray lid prongs were coated with this indicator in the same manner as with the first indicator and allowed to cure by evaporation of the solvents and reaction with atmospheric moisture. The third indicator was prepared in the same manner as the second but Wacker SWS-960 white silicone was used.
A 1 x 107 CFU/mL suspension of E. coh ATCC #25922 in Mueller Hinton broth was prepared; 150 microliter aliquots were pipetted into the odd numbered rows of a microtiter tray, while 150 microliter aliquots of uninoculated Mueller Hinton broth were pipetted into the wells of the even numbered columns. The lids containing the indicator coated prongs were placed on the frays. The lidded trays were placed in a 37°C high humidity incubator for 3 hours.
Following the three hour incubation, the trays were placed on a transparent glass plate. A mirror was positioned below the glass plate in such a manner that the bottom of the tray was visible in the mirror. A 365 nm ultraviolet source which evenly illuminated the entire tray was positioned about one inch from the top of the tray. A box, with a small window through which the mirror could be seen, was placed over the assembly to block room light, and a 550 nm cut-on filter was placed in the box window. With this assembly the fluorescence from the indicator coated spherical ends of the FAST tray lid prongs could be visualized through the tray bottom. Table 9 contains the results of visual observations of the frays evaluated in this manner.
TABLE 9
Visual Observations of Indicator Coated Lid Prongs Viewed Through Tray Bottoms
Silicone Observations
Dow-Corning Very bright fluorescence from spheres immersed in organism containing wells. Very weak fluorescence from prongs in uninoculated wells.
TABLE 9 (continued)
Visual Observations of Indicator Coated Lid Prongs Viewed Through Tray Bottoms
Wacker Clear Some visible difference between prongs immersed in inoculated and uninoculated wells. Difference much less observable than with Dow-Coming indicator.
Wacker White Very bright fluorescence from spheres immersed in inoculated wells, intensity about equal to Dow-Coming indicator. Some weak fluorescence from spheres in uninoculated wells.
Thus, all three indicator systems produced desirable results, with the Dow Coming and Wacker White exhibiting much more distinguishable differences between the inoculated and uninoculated wells.
EXAMPLE 16. Indicators Consisting of Ru(DPP)3Cl2 Adsorbed on Silica Gel Particles Embedded in UV Cured Silicone Rubber Indicators were prepared by adsorbing Ru (DPP)3θ2 onto silica gel particles and embedding these particles into Loctite Nuva-Sil silicone rubbers. A variety of indicators were prepared using silica gel particles of different mesh sizes, different amounts of adsorbed fluorophore, different ratios of silica gel to silicone, and two types of Loctite Nuva-Sil (Nuva-Sil 5091 and Nuva-Sil 5147). Table 10 contains the characteristics ofthe indicators prepared and the visual results obtained from the indicators in contact with microorganism suspensions. An exemplary procedure used for the preparation ofthe indicators is presented below.
Ten grams of 100-200 mesh Davisil silica gel (Aldrich, Milwaukee, WI) was weighed into a 500 mL round bottom evaporation flask. Forty three milliliters of a
0.14 mg/mL ethanol solution of Ru(DPP)3Cl2 was pipetted into the flask. The ethanol was removed by rotary vacuum evaporation resulting in the adsorption of
the Ru(DPP)3Cl2 on the silica gel at a concentration of 0.6 mg Ru(DPP)3Cl2/gm silica gel. Four grams of this silica gel were mixed with 16 g Loctite Nuva-Sil 5091 (Loctite, Newington, CT) resulting in a 20% w/w silica/silicone ratio. Twenty-five microliter aliquots of this mixture were pipetted into the wells of a microtiter tray. The silicone was cured by exposure to high intensity ultraviolet radiation for 15 seconds in a Loctite Zeta 7200 UV curing chamber. The other indicators in Table 10 were similarly prepared.
To evaluate the indicators, 150 microliters of a 1 x 107 CFU/mL suspension of E. coh (ATCC #25922 in Mueller Hinton II broth (BBL) was pipetted into selected wells of the microtiter tray; uninoculated broth was pipetted into other wells. The tray was incubated in a high humidity 35°C incubator for 3 hours. To visualize the fluorescence from the indicator the tray was placed on the stage of a 365 nm UV fransilluminator; the fluorescence from the indicator was observed from above through a 550 nm cut-on filter. A "+" sign in the Response column of Table 10 indicates that a visibly discernible increased fluorescence was observed from the wells containing the organism.
TABLE 10
Indicator Formulations and Responses mg
Size RufDPP Cb/g Silica Wt % Silica Silicone ResDonse
60-100 0.2,0.4,0.6 5,10,20 5091,5147 +*
100-200 0.2,0.4,0.6 5,10,20 5091,5147 +*
200-425 0.2,0.4,0.6 5,10,20 5091,5147 +*
^Represents result from all 18 trials (9 each for Silicone 5091 and 5147).
In replicate trials utilizing wells with no microorganisms, the indicators displayed little or no light (although at higher (0.6 mg/gm) concentrations of indicator, a dim fluorescence was noted).
It is apparent that many modifications and variations of this invention as hereinabove set forth may be made without departing from the spirit and scope hereof. The specific embodiments described are given by way of example only and the invention is limited only by the terms ofthe appended claims.
EXAMPLE 17. Oxygen sensor not in direct contact with sample fluid
Test vials (80 mL volume) containing 60 mL of media and oxygen sensor (OS) were inoculated with the following organisms: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mycobacterium fortuitum and Escherichia coli. The vials were connected to 80 mL vials without broth with oxygen impermeable rubber tubing. The vials were then entered into adjacent stations in a BACTEC® 9240 instrument. Data was collected on the two vials over a 50 hour period. The results of these tests are presented in Figures 7 through 9. Figure 7 depicts the data collected in the BACTEC® instrument indicating the change in fluorescence intensity indicative of the growth of P. aeruginosa. Figure 8 depicts the data collected in the BACTEC® instrument indicating the change in fluorescence intensity indicative of the growth of M. fortuitum. Figure 9 depicts the data collected in the BACTEC® instrument indicating the change in fluorescence intensity indicative of the growth of E. coli. For each of the figures the bold line in these figures represent the data collected in the vials containing broth; the light lines represent the data collected by the sensor that is not in direct contact with the liquid broth. In all three cases, oxygen consumption was observed in the vials without broth. The pattern of oxygen consumption exhibited in these vials indicates logarithmic oxygen consumption which is indicative of microbial growth.
The data shows that the OS was used for the detection of microbial growth in the absence of direct broth to sensor contact. The detection delays observed in the vials without media are related to this particular test configuration. One having ordinary skill in this art would be able to optimize the parameters of the system, by of example and not limitation, such as, by reducing the headspace volume and oxygen concentration would result in improved sensitivity and make the measurements made without direct contact of liquid broth (gas phase) more comparable with the measurements made with contact of the liquid broth (liquid phase).
Claims
1. (amended) A method for detecting the presence of respiring microorganisms in a fluid comprising: (i) placing said fluid in a container in which said fluid is substantially isolated from atmospheric oxygen and placing within said container, but not in direct contact with said fluid, a sensor composition which comprises a fluorescent compound that exhibits a reduction in fluorescent intensity, when irradiated with light containing wavelengths which cause said compound to fluoresce, upon exposure to oxygen, wherein the presence ofthe sensor composition is non-destructive to the microorganism;
(ii) irradiating said sensor composition with light containing wavelengths which cause said fluorescent compound to fluoresce;
(iii) measuring or visually observing the fluorescent light intensity from said fluorescent compound while irradiating said sensor compound with said light;
(iv) comparing said measurement to that of a control not containing a respiring microorganism, wherein said control is selected from the group consisting of: a reagent control not in contact with respiring microorganisms and a calculated threshold, wherein change in fluorescent intensity relative to the fluorescent intensity ofthe control is indicative ofthe presence of respiring microorganisms;
(v) in the event that no such increase is measured or observed, repeat steps (ii), (iii), and (iv) as needed, to detect the presence of respiring microorganisms in said fluid.
2. The method of Claim 1 wherein said fluorescent compound is contained within a matrix which is relatively impermeable to water and non-gaseous solutes, but which has a high permeability to oxygen.
3. The method of Claim 2 wherein said matrix is a rubber or plastic matrix.
4. The method of Claim 2 wherein said matrix is a silicone rubber matrix.
5. The method of Claim 2 wherein said fluorescent compound is adsorbed on solid silica particles.
6. The method of Claim 1 wherein said fluorescent compound is a tris-4, 7-diphenyl- 1 , 10-phenanthroline ruthenium (IΙ)salt.
7. The method of Claim 6 wherein said fluorescent compound is tris-4,7- diphenyl-l,10-phenanthroline mthenium (II) chloride.
8. The method of Claim 1 wherein said fluorescent compound is a tris-2,
2'-bipyridyl mthenium (II) salt.
9. The method of Claim 8 wherein said fluorescent compound is tris-2,2'- bipyridyl mthenium (II) chloride hexahydrate.
10. The method of Claim 1 wherein said fluorescent compound is 9, 10- diphenyl anthracene.
11. (amended) A method for determining the effects of an antibiotic or antimicrobial composition on a respiring microorganism comprising:
(i) preparing a broth of said microorganism:
(ii) placing said broth in a container in which said broth is substantially isolated from atmospheric oxygen and placing within said container, but not in direct contact with said broth, a sensor composition which comprises a fluorescent compound that exhibits a reduction in fluorescent intensity, when irradiated with light containing wavelengths which cause said compound to fluoresce, upon exposure to oxygen, wherein the presence ofthe sensor composition is non-destructive to the microorganism;
(iii) admixing with said broth, a quantity of said antibiotic or antimicrobial composition;
(iv) irradiating said sensor composition with light containing wavelengths which cause said fluorescent compound to fluoresce;
(v) measuring or visually observing the fluorescent light intensity from said fluorescent compound while irradiating said sensor compound with said light; and
(vi) comparing said measurement to that of a control wherein said control is selected from the group consisting of: a reagent control not in contact with a respiring microorganism or the antibiotic or antimicrobial composition, a reagent control in contact with a respiring microorganism but not in contact with the antibiotic or antimicrobial composition and a calculated threshold, wherein a change in fluorescent intensity relative to the control is indicative ofthe susceptibility or resistivity ofthe microorganisms to the quantity of said antibiotic or antimicrobial composition; and
(vii) in the event that no such change is measured or observed, repeat steps (iv), (v) and (vi) as needed to determine the effects ofthe antibiotic or antimicrobial on the respiring microorganisms.
12. The method of Claim 11 wherein said fluorescent compound is contained within a matrix which is impervious to water and non-gaseous solutes, but which has a high permeability to oxygen.
13. The method of Claim 12 wherein said matrix is a mbber or plastic matrix.
14. The method of Claim 12 wherein said mbber to plastic matrix is a silicone mbber matrix.
15. The method of Claim 12 wherein said fluorescent compound is adsorbed on solid silica particles.
16. The method of Claim 11 wherein said fluorescent compound is a tris- 4,7-diphenyl-l, 10-phenanthroline mthenium (II) salt.
17. The method of Claim 16 wherein said fluorescent compound is tris-4,7- diphenyl- 1, 10-phenanthroline mthenium (II) chloride.
18. The method of Claim 11 wherein said fluorescent compound is a tris-2, l'-bipyridyl mthenium (II) salt.
19. The method of Claim 18 wherein said fluorescent compound is tris- 2,2'-bipyridyl mthenium (II) chloride hexahydrate.
20. The method of Claim 18 wherein said fluorescent compound is 9, 10- diphenyl anthracene.
21. A method for detecting the presence of respiring microorganisms in a fluid comprising:
(i) placing said fluid in a container in which said fluid is substantially isolated from atmospheric oxygen and placing within said container, but not in direct contact with said fluid, a fluorescent sensor composition which comprises a fluorescent compound selected from the group consisting of tris-4, 7- diphenyl-1, 10-phenanthroline-mthenium (II) chloride and tris-2, 2'-bipyridyl mthenium (II) chloride hexahydrate, wherein the presence ofthe sensor composition is non-destructive to the microorganism;
(ii) irradiating said sensor composition with light containing wavelengths which cause said fluorescent compound to fluoresce;
(iii) measuring or visually observing the fluorescent light intensity from said fluorescent compound while irradiating said sensor compound with said light ;
(iv) comparing said measurement to that of a control, wherein said control is selected from the group consisting of: a reagent confrol not in contact with respiring microorganisms and a calculated threshold, wherein change in fluorescent intensity relative to the fluorescent intensity ofthe control is indicative ofthe presence of respiring microorganisms; and
(v) in the event that no such increase is measured or observed, repeat steps (ii), (iii), and (iv) as needed to detect the presence of respiring microorganisms in said fluid.
22. The method of Claim 21 wherein said fluorescent compound is contained within a matrix which is relatively impermeable to water and non-gaseous solutes, but which has a high permeability to oxygen.
23. The method of Claim 22 wherein said matrix is a mbber or plastic matrix.
24. The method of Claim 22 wherein said matrix is a silicone mbber matrix.
25. The method of Claim 22 wherein said fluorescent compound is adsorbed on solid silica particles.
26. A method of determining the effect of an antibiotic or antimicrobial composition on a respiring microorganism comprising:
(i) preparing a broth of said microorganism:
(ii) placing said broth in a container in which said broth is substantially isolated from atmospheric oxygen and placing within said container, but not in direct contact with said broth, a sensor composition which comprises a fluorescent compound selected from the group consisting of tris-4, 7-diphenyl-l, 10- phenanthroline-ruthenium (II) chloride and tris-2, 2'-bipyridyl mthenium (II) chloride hexahydrate, wherein the presence ofthe sensor composition is nondestructive to the microorganism;
(iii) admixing with said broth a quantity of said antibiotic or antimicrobial composition;
(iv) irradiating said sensor composition with light containing wavelengths which cause said fluorescent compound to fluoresce;
(v) measuring or visually observing the fluorescent light intensity from said fluorescent compound while irradiating said sensor compound with said light;
(vi) comparing said measurement to that of a confrol, wherein said control is selected from the group consisting of a reagent control not in contact with a respiring microorganism or the antibiotic or antimicrobial composition, a reagent control in contact with a respiring microorganism but not in contact with the antibiotic or antimicrobial composition and a calculated threshold, wherein a change in fluorescent intensity relative to the control is indicative ofthe susceptibility or resistivity ofthe microorganisms to quantity ofthe antibiotic or antimicrobial composition; and
(vii) in the event that no such change is measured, repeat steps (iv), (v), and (vi) as needed to detect the presence of respiring microorganisms in said fluid.
27. The method of Claim 26 wherein said fluorescent compound is contained within a matrix which is relatively impermeable to water and non-gaseous solutes, but which has a high permeability to oxygen.
28. The method of Claim 27 wherein said matrix is a mbber or plastic matrix.
29. The method of Claim 27 wherein said matrix is a silicone mbber matrix.
30. The method of Claim 27 wherein said fluorescent compound is adsorbed on solid silica particles.
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU44839/97A AU4483997A (en) | 1996-09-18 | 1997-09-18 | Microbial monitoring device |
CA002264272A CA2264272A1 (en) | 1996-09-18 | 1997-09-18 | Microbial monitoring device |
JP51484198A JP2002501363A (en) | 1996-09-18 | 1997-09-18 | Microbial monitoring method |
EP97943349A EP1021557A1 (en) | 1996-09-18 | 1997-09-18 | Microbial monitoring device |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US71555796A | 1996-09-18 | 1996-09-18 | |
US08/715,557 | 1996-09-18 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1998012348A1 WO1998012348A1 (en) | 1998-03-26 |
WO1998012348A9 true WO1998012348A9 (en) | 1998-08-20 |
Family
ID=24874543
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1997/016496 WO1998012348A1 (en) | 1996-09-18 | 1997-09-18 | Microbial monitoring device |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1021557A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2002501363A (en) |
AU (1) | AU4483997A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2264272A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1998012348A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6395506B1 (en) * | 1991-04-18 | 2002-05-28 | Becton, Dickinson And Company | Device for monitoring cells |
US5998517A (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 1999-12-07 | Becton, Dickinson And Company | Composition for the detection of microorganisms in a sample |
US6432697B1 (en) * | 2000-02-03 | 2002-08-13 | Becton, Dickinson And Company | Transparent sample container |
EP1134583A1 (en) * | 2000-03-17 | 2001-09-19 | Nederlandse Organisatie voor toegepast-natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO | Measuring metabolic rate changes |
US20050059140A1 (en) * | 2003-09-12 | 2005-03-17 | Andrea Liebmann-Vinson | Methods of surface modification to enhance cell adhesion |
US20110208432A1 (en) * | 2008-02-19 | 2011-08-25 | Patrick Shawn Beaty | Systems and methods for presumptive identification of microorganism type in a culture |
JP5616797B2 (en) * | 2008-02-19 | 2014-10-29 | ベクトン・ディキンソン・アンド・カンパニーBecton, Dickinson And Company | System and method for qualifying cultures as positive for microorganisms with high reliability |
US8613158B2 (en) | 2008-04-18 | 2013-12-24 | Ball Horticultural Company | Method for grouping a plurality of growth-induced seeds for commercial use or sale based on testing of each individual seed |
JP5901689B2 (en) * | 2014-05-07 | 2016-04-13 | ベクトン・ディキンソン・アンド・カンパニーBecton, Dickinson And Company | System and method for tentative identification of microbial species in culture |
RU2576030C1 (en) * | 2015-03-04 | 2016-02-27 | Сергей Дмитриевич Иванов | Method for detecting danger of microbiological water pollution |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA1261717A (en) * | 1982-12-23 | 1989-09-26 | John R. Bacon | Method and apparatus for oxygen determination |
US4945060A (en) * | 1988-03-15 | 1990-07-31 | Akzo N. V. | Device for detecting microorganisms |
ATE132537T1 (en) * | 1990-03-29 | 1996-01-15 | Avl Photronics Corp | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES IN A SAMPLE |
AU647609B2 (en) * | 1991-04-18 | 1994-03-24 | Becton Dickinson & Company | Microbial monitoring device |
-
1997
- 1997-09-18 JP JP51484198A patent/JP2002501363A/en not_active Ceased
- 1997-09-18 AU AU44839/97A patent/AU4483997A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-09-18 WO PCT/US1997/016496 patent/WO1998012348A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1997-09-18 CA CA002264272A patent/CA2264272A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-09-18 EP EP97943349A patent/EP1021557A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5567598A (en) | Microbial monitoring device | |
US6900030B2 (en) | Device for monitoring cells | |
US5164301A (en) | Process and kit for detecting microbial metabolism | |
US5064756A (en) | Microbial susceptibility assay using 7-n-(aminoacyl)-7-amido-4-methylcoumarins | |
US6989246B2 (en) | Sensor formulation for simultaneously monitoring at least two components of a gas composition | |
Thom et al. | Factors affecting the selection and use of tetrazolium salts as cytochemical indicators of microbial viability and activity | |
US5079144A (en) | Microorganism testing with a hydrolyzable fluorogenic substrate | |
EP0446972B1 (en) | Device and methods for detecting microorganisms | |
AU616957B2 (en) | Device for enhancing fluorescence and kinetics and methods of using the device | |
WO1998012348A9 (en) | Microbial monitoring device | |
EP1021557A1 (en) | Microbial monitoring device | |
Brouwer | Testing for chemical toxicity using bacteria: An undergraduate laboratory experiment | |
US4340671A (en) | E. coli sensitivity broth | |
US6509166B1 (en) | Detection and quantification of one or more target analytes in a sample using spatially localized analyte reproduction | |
WO1986000340A1 (en) | Processes and materials for carrying out microchemical and microbiological tests | |
Goldschmidt et al. | New methods for microbiological analysis of food | |
Williams et al. | Rapid microbial detection and enumeration using gel microdroplets and colorimetric or fluorescence indicator systems | |
GB2409519A (en) | Microorganism detector | |
JP2002500020A (en) | A rapid method for assessing the inhibition and killing of anaerobic bacteria by toxic compounds. | |
Badalyan | Sensor platform for rapid detection and quantification of indicator and pathogenic bacteria on food contact surfaces | |
EP0877093A1 (en) | Medium for blood culture and method of detection and identification of microorganism | |
Rogers et al. | Identification of bacteria by rapid spectrophotofluorometric methods | |
WO2001090402A1 (en) | New method and device | |
Chun et al. | Immobilization of Photobacterium phosphoreum for monitoring of toxic substances |