WO1997011220A1 - Method of coating a hydrophobic fibrous material with an amphiphilic polyelectrolyte - Google Patents
Method of coating a hydrophobic fibrous material with an amphiphilic polyelectrolyte Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1997011220A1 WO1997011220A1 PCT/US1996/013618 US9613618W WO9711220A1 WO 1997011220 A1 WO1997011220 A1 WO 1997011220A1 US 9613618 W US9613618 W US 9613618W WO 9711220 A1 WO9711220 A1 WO 9711220A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- foam
- fibrous material
- nonwoven web
- polyelectrolyte
- amphiphilic
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06N—WALL, FLOOR, OR LIKE COVERING MATERIALS, e.g. LINOLEUM, OILCLOTH, ARTIFICIAL LEATHER, ROOFING FELT, CONSISTING OF A FIBROUS WEB COATED WITH A LAYER OF MACROMOLECULAR MATERIAL; FLEXIBLE SHEET MATERIAL NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06N3/00—Artificial leather, oilcloth or other material obtained by covering fibrous webs with macromolecular material, e.g. resins, rubber or derivatives thereof
- D06N3/02—Artificial leather, oilcloth or other material obtained by covering fibrous webs with macromolecular material, e.g. resins, rubber or derivatives thereof with cellulose derivatives
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06N—WALL, FLOOR, OR LIKE COVERING MATERIALS, e.g. LINOLEUM, OILCLOTH, ARTIFICIAL LEATHER, ROOFING FELT, CONSISTING OF A FIBROUS WEB COATED WITH A LAYER OF MACROMOLECULAR MATERIAL; FLEXIBLE SHEET MATERIAL NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06N3/00—Artificial leather, oilcloth or other material obtained by covering fibrous webs with macromolecular material, e.g. resins, rubber or derivatives thereof
- D06N3/0043—Artificial leather, oilcloth or other material obtained by covering fibrous webs with macromolecular material, e.g. resins, rubber or derivatives thereof characterised by their foraminous structure; Characteristics of the foamed layer or of cellular layers
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06N—WALL, FLOOR, OR LIKE COVERING MATERIALS, e.g. LINOLEUM, OILCLOTH, ARTIFICIAL LEATHER, ROOFING FELT, CONSISTING OF A FIBROUS WEB COATED WITH A LAYER OF MACROMOLECULAR MATERIAL; FLEXIBLE SHEET MATERIAL NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06N3/00—Artificial leather, oilcloth or other material obtained by covering fibrous webs with macromolecular material, e.g. resins, rubber or derivatives thereof
- D06N3/0056—Artificial leather, oilcloth or other material obtained by covering fibrous webs with macromolecular material, e.g. resins, rubber or derivatives thereof characterised by the compounding ingredients of the macro-molecular coating
- D06N3/0059—Organic ingredients with special effects, e.g. oil- or water-repellent, antimicrobial, flame-resistant, magnetic, bactericidal, odour-influencing agents; perfumes
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06N—WALL, FLOOR, OR LIKE COVERING MATERIALS, e.g. LINOLEUM, OILCLOTH, ARTIFICIAL LEATHER, ROOFING FELT, CONSISTING OF A FIBROUS WEB COATED WITH A LAYER OF MACROMOLECULAR MATERIAL; FLEXIBLE SHEET MATERIAL NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06N3/00—Artificial leather, oilcloth or other material obtained by covering fibrous webs with macromolecular material, e.g. resins, rubber or derivatives thereof
- D06N3/04—Artificial leather, oilcloth or other material obtained by covering fibrous webs with macromolecular material, e.g. resins, rubber or derivatives thereof with macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
- D06N3/042—Acrylic polymers
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a coated fibrous material.
- Polymers are used extensively to make a variety of products which include blown and cast films, extruded sheets, injection molded articles, foams, blow molded articles, extruded pipe, monofilaments, and fibrous materials such as nonwoven webs.
- Some of the polymers, such as polyolefins have no functionality (i.e., reactive groups) and are naturally hydrophobic, and for many uses these properties are either a positive attribute or at least not a disadvantage.
- polystyrene foams There are a number of uses for polymers, however, where their hydrophobic/nonfunctional nature either limits their usefulness or requires some effort to modify the surface characteristics of the shaped articles made therefrom.
- polyolefins such as polyethylene and polypropyl ⁇ ene
- polymeric fabrics which are employed in the construction of such disposable absorbent articles as diapers, feminine care products, incontinence products, training pants, wipes, and the like.
- Such polymeric fabrics often are nonwoven webs prepared by, for example, such processes as meltblowing, coforming, and spunbonding. Frequently, such polymeric fabrics need to be wettable by water. Wettability can be obtained by spraying or otherwise coating (i.e., surface treating or topically treating) the fabric with a surfactant solution during or after its formation, and then drying the web.
- topically applied surfactants are nonionic surfactants, such as polyethoxylated octylphenols and condensation products of propylene oxide with propylene glycol, by way of illustration only. These surfactants are effective in rendering normally hydrophobic polymeric fabrics wettable. However, the surfactant is readily removed from the fabric, often after only a single exposure to an aqueous liquid.
- depth-type filters generally are made from fibrous, porous, or caked media.
- Fibrous media con ⁇ stitute a layer, or mat, of numerous fine fibers (e.g. , fiber diameters ranging from 0.5 to 30 micrometers). These fibers are randomly oriented, thereby creating the numerous tortuous passages or pores in which the particles are trapped.
- Retention efficiency in conventional deep-bed filters is achieved by means of a series of low-efficiency particle captures.
- Adsorptive surface forces mocular and electros ⁇ tatic
- Such adsorptive surface forces may be achieved by introducing functional or ionic groups on the surfaces of the fibers of the filter media.
- Commonly used fibrous materials are cellulose, cotton, glass, and synthetics (e.g. rayon, polypropylene) .
- the present invention addresses some of the difficulties and problems discussed above by providing a method of coating a hydrophobic fibrous material with an amphiphilic polyelec ⁇ trolyte.
- the method involves coating the hydrophobic fibrous material with a foam composed of an amphiphilic polyelectro ⁇ lyte and water under conditions sufficient to substantially uniformly coat the hydrophobic fibrous material with the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte.
- the hydrophobic fibrous material generally is made from a synthetic hydrophobic polymer.
- Such polymers in general give contact angles with water of at least about 60° and typically have surface free energies of less than about 45 dynes/cm.
- Examples of such polymers include, by way of illustration only, aromatic polyesters, such as poly(ethyl ⁇ ene terephthalate) , and polyolefins, such as polyethylene and polypropylene.
- the hydrophobic fibrous material also may be a nonwoven web.
- the nonwoven web may a meltblown nonwoven web.
- the nonwoven web may be a spunbonded nonwoven web.
- the nonwoven web may be a coformed nonwoven web.
- the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte may be any material having both a plurality of polar, water-soluble groups and a plurality of nonpolar, water-insoluble groups.
- the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte may be a surfactant/polyelec- trolyte complex.
- the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte may be a polymeric surfactant.
- the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte may be a hydrophobized polyelectrolyte.
- the method involves: preparing an aqueous solution of an amphiphilic polyelec ⁇ trolyte; generating a foam from the aqueous solution; and coating the hydrophobic fibrous material with the foam under conditions sufficient to substantially uniformly coat the hydrophilic fibrous material with the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte.
- the conditions sufficient to substantially uniformly coat the hydrophilic fibrous material with the amphiphilic polyelectro ⁇ lyte typically include: coating the nonwoven with the foam described above; vacuum extracting the coated nonwoven web; nipping the vacuum-extracted coated nonwoven web; and drying the nipped nonwoven web.
- the method of the present invention converts normally hydrophobic surfaces to hydrophilic or wettable surfaces. In addition, such method permits further surface modifications to be carried out, if desired. For example, compounds which aid or promote skin wellness and having the appropriate functional groups may be associated with the surfaces of fibrous materials adapted to be used in such disposable absorbent products as diapers, feminine care products, and incontinent products.
- a desired outward orientation of the hydrophobic groups of the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte is obtained in a foam since the hydrophobic groups are oriented towards air and, as a consequence, can directly interact with a hydrophobic polymer surface, whereas, in an aqueous solution, the hydrophilic groups are oriented towards the water phase while the hydrophobic groups are oriented away from the water phase, which means that a reorienta ⁇ tion of the polyelectrolyte has to occur for the hydrophobic groups to be able to interact with a hydrophobic polymer surface.
- hydrophobic fibrous material means any fibrous material which is hydrophobic, i.e., not wettable with water.
- the fibrous material may be a woven or nonwoven web or fabric.
- a nonwoven web it may be made by any process known to those having ordinary skill in the art. Such processes include, for example, meltblowing, coforming, spunbonding, hydroentan- gling, carding, air-laying, wet spinning, dry spinning, solution spinning, and wet-forming.
- a nonwoven web desirably will be formed by such well- known processes as meltblowing, coforming, spunbonding, and the like. By way of illustration only, such processes are exemplified by the following references:
- meltblowing references include, by way of example, U.S. Patent Nos. 3,016,599 to R. W. Perry, Jr., 3,704,198 to
- references i.e., references disclosing a meltblowing process in which fibers or particles are com ⁇ mingled with the meltblown fibers as they are formed
- (c) spunbonding references include, among others, U.S. Patent Nos. 3,341,394 to Kinney, 3,655,862 to Dorschner et al., 3,692,618 to Dorschner et al., 3,705,068 to Dobo et al., 3,802,817 to MatSUki et al., 3,853,651 to Porte, 4,064,605 to Akiyama et al., 4,091,140 to Harmon, 4,100,319 to Schwartz, 4,340,563 to Appel and Morman, 4,405,297 to Appel and Mor an, 4,434,204 to Hartman et al., 4,627,811 to Greiser and Wagner, and 4,644,045 to Fowells.
- the hydrophobic fibrous material typically will be made of a synthetic hydrophobic polymer.
- Such polymers in general give contact angles with water of at least about 60° and typically have surface free energies of less than about 45 dynes/cm.
- Examples of such polymers include, by way of illustration only, aromatic polyesters, polyolefins, poly ⁇ tetrafluoroethylene, poly(methyl methacrylate) , poly(vinyli ⁇ dene fluoride) , polyamides, and polystyrenes.
- Aromatic polyesters include, by way of example only, poly(ethylene terephthalate) , poly(tetramethylene terephthal ⁇ ate) , poly(cyclohexane-l,4-dimethylene terephthalate), and thermotropic liquid crystalline such as the copolymers of hydroxybenzozic acid and hydroxynaphthoic acid.
- polyolefins examples include, again by way of illustration only, polyethylene, polypropylene, poly(l- butene) , poly(2-butene) , poly(l-pentene) , poly(2-pentene) , poly(3-methy1-1-pentene) , poly(4-methy1-1-pentene) , and the like.
- such term is meant to include blends of two or more polyolefins and random and block copolymers prepared from two or more different unsaturated monomers. Because of their commercial importance, the most preferred polyolefins are polyethylene and polypropylene.
- Polyamides include, by way of example only, poly(6- aminocaproic acid) (nylon 6) , poly(hexamethylene sebacamide) (nylon 6,10), and poly(octamethylene suberamide) (nylon 8,8).
- amphiphilic polyelectrolyte is used herein to mean any material having both a plurality of polar, water- soluble groups and a plurality of nonpolar, water-insoluble groups.
- the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte may a surfactant/polyelectrolyte complex.
- the surfactant may be either cationic or anionic. When the surfactant is cationic, the polyelectrolyte will be anionic. Similarly, when the surfactant is anionic, the polyelectrolyte will be cationic.
- the polyelectrolyte portion of a surfactant/polyelectro- lyte complex may be natural or synthetic.
- Natural polyelec- trolytes include, by way of illustration only, polysac ⁇ charides, such as chitosan, glycol chitosan, cellulose, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, and sodiumcarboxymethylhydroxyethy1- cellulose; dextran sulfates; hyaluronic acid; heparin, chondroitin sulfate, and poly(galacturonic acid).
- Synthetic polyelectrolytes include, also by way of illustration only, poly(acrylic acid) , poly(methacrylic acid) , poly(ethylenesulfonic acid), poly(vinylsulfonic acid), poly(styrenesulfonic acid) , poly(vinylphenylsulfuric acid) phenol ester, maleic acid/alkene copolymer, maleic acid/vinyl alkyl ether copolymer, poly(glutamic acid) , polylysine, poly(vinyl amine) , polyethyleneimine, poly(viny1-4-alkylpyri- dinium salt), poly(methylene)-N,N-dimethylpiperidinium salt, poly(vinylbenzyltrimethylammonium salt), poly(dimethyldiallyl- ammonium chloride), poly(N,N,N' ,N'-tetramethy1-N- ⁇ -xylylene- propylenediammoniumchloride)
- a synthetic polyelectro ⁇ lyte may have a weight-average molecular weight of from about 5,000 to about 1,000,000 Daltons.
- the poly- electrolyte may have a weight-average molecular weight of from about 20,000 to about 100,000 Daltons.
- surfactants which may be used in a surfactant/polyelec- trolyte complex are well known to those having ordinary skill in the art.
- Such surfactants include anionic and cationic surfactants, examples of which include, by way of illustration only, quaternary amine salts, such as dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride, didodecyldimethylammonium bromide, hexadecyltri ⁇ methylammonium chloride, cetyldimethylethylammonium bromide, tallowtrimethylammonium chloride, methyl bis(2-hydroxyethyl)- cocoammonium chloride, methyldodecylbenzyltrimethylammonium chloride, lauryldimethylbenzylammonium chloride, octyl- phenoxyethoxyethyldimethylbenzyl ammonium chloride, 2- hydroxyethylbenzylstearylimidazolinium chloride, die
- surfactants include, by way of illustration only, amines and amine derivatives, such as Q-tetradecylamine, cocoamine, hydrogenated tallow amine, soya amine, dimethyl octadecylamine, poly(oxyethylene) stearyl amine, poly(oxy- ethylene) coco amine, octadecylamine acetate, sodium car- boxymethylnonylhydroxyethyl imidazolinium hydroxide, disodium- N-lauryl- ⁇ -imino dipropionate, cetyl betaine, myristamido- propyl betaine, and N-lauryl sarcosine.
- amines and amine derivatives such as Q-tetradecylamine, cocoamine, hydrogenated tallow amine, soya amine, dimethyl octadecylamine, poly(oxyethylene) stearyl amine, poly(oxy- ethylene) coco amine, oct
- the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte may be a polymeric surfactant, such as hydrophobically modified poly(acrylic acid) (partial esterification with long chain aliphatic alcohols) , poly(methyl vinyl ether/ aleic an ⁇ hydride) , polystyrene-block-poly(2-vinylpyridine) , hydroxy ⁇ ethyl cellulose reacted with a lauryl dimethylammonium substituted epoxide (Polyquarternium-24® and Quatrisoft®, Amerchol Corporation, Edison, NewJersey) , partially alkylated poly(vinyl pyridine), poly(oxyethylene)-alkyl glycol copoly ⁇ mers, and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)/polyalkene copolymers.
- a polymeric surfactant such as hydrophobically modified poly(acrylic acid) (partial esterification with long chain aliphatic alcohols) , poly(methyl vinyl ether
- the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte may be a protein.
- the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte may be an associative thickener. See, for example, J. E. Glass, Editor, "Polymers In Aqueous Media. Performance Through Association,” Advances in Chemistry Series 223, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C, 1989.
- the method of the present invention involves coating the hydrophobic fibrous material with a foam composed of an amphiphilic polyelectrolyte and water under conditions sufficient to substantially uniformly coat the hydrophilic substrate with the amphiphilic polyelec- trolyte.
- foams maximizes exposure of the hydrophobic regions of the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte to the hydrophobic fibrous material surfaces, thereby promoting the homogeneity and durability of the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte coatings on the fibrous material.
- the generation of foams is believed to maximize these hydrophobic interactions by increasing the surface area of the air/solution interface, in which the amphiphilic polyelectrolytes orient their hydrophobic groups away from the aqueous solution and toward air and, consequent ⁇ ly, toward the surfaces of the hydrophobic fibrous material.
- the foam is generated from a solution of the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte in water.
- the solution may contain other materials, such as acids or bases which may be needed to ionize weak polyelectrolytes or surfactants based on amines or carboxylic acids; small particles with absorbent properties, such as zeolites and activated carbon; dyes; metal salts having bioactivity; and minor amounts of water-miscible organic solvents.
- the foam employed to coat the hydrophobic fibrous material will be relatively unstable.
- the term "relatively unstable" means only that the foam collapses on the fibrous material, either spontaneously or as a result of a subsequent action.
- the foam may be destabilized by the presence of the fibrous material.
- the foam may be destabilized by shear forces.
- Shear forces may be generated, for example, by nipping the fibrous material after applying the foam. Shear forces also may be generated by applying the foam to the fibrous material and then vacuum extracting the foam through the material, resulting in an even distribution throughout the material. If desired, the fibrous material may be nipped after the vacuum extracting step to remove excess fluid and also aid in collapsing the foam.
- the present invention is further de ⁇ cribed by the examples which follow. Such examples, however, are not to be construed as limiting in any way either the spirit or the scope of the present invention.
- the hydrophobic fibrous materials employed were 0.5 ounce per square yard or osy (about 17 grams per square meter or gsm) polypropylene meltblown nonwoven webs and 0.8 osy (about 27 gsm) polypropylene spunbonded nonwoven webs. Both materials were prepared in accordance with known procedures. In addition, all percents are percents by weight, unless indicated otherwise.
- Quatrisoft® LM200 is a hydrophobically-modified, cationic cellulosic polymer. Chemically, it is Polyquarternium-24 hydroxyethyl cellulose reacted with a lauryl dimethylammonium substituted epoxide (Amerchol Corporation, Edison, New Jersey) . It was used as a model material to investigate foam coating methods. Quatrisoft® LM200 combines the properties of a surfactant/polymer mixture and displays some of their properties. When dissolved in water, it self-associates by hydrophobic interactions, producing structures exhibiting high viscosity. This type of structure also has the ability to solubilize water-insoluble materials, including dyes, and produces very stable foams.
- a solution of 1.5 percent Quatrisoft® LM200 was prepared for initial investigations of foam generation.
- a mixture of 1.5 g Quatrisoft® and 100 ml of deionized water was tumbled for one hour in a Glas-Col Laboratory Rotator (Catalog No. RD 4512, Glas-Col, Terre Haute, Illinois) on the #5 setting.
- Ten ml of the resulting solution was placed in a 25-50 micrometer glass frit while air was passed through it to generate a foam (liquid blow-through method) .
- a second method which gave a more stable foam employed a hand mixer to whip 50 ml of the 1.5 percent solution for one minute.
- Foams also were prepared from .5 percent and 1.0 percent Quatrisoft® solutions using the two methods described above to determine the best concentration and method for preparation of the most stable foam.
- the hand mixer produced the best foam and was used to prepare the foams for the remaining experiments.
- Quatrisoft® produced a very stable foam when agitated with a hand mixer at the "whip" setting.
- the liquid blow- through method generated bubbles that were much more airy and polyhedral in shape than with the hand mixer. All three solutions produced stable foams using the hand mixer. No preferential concentration of solids in the Quatrisoft® foam was observed. That is, the 1.5 percent Quatrisoft® solution resulted in a foam which also had a solids content of 1.5 percent.
- the viscosities of the Quatrisoft® solutions were determined using a Brookfield Model DVII+ viscometer with a spindle number of cp-41 and a spindle speed of 100 rpm (Brookfield Engineering Laboratory, Inc., Stoughton, Mas ⁇ sachusetts).
- the viscosities for the 0.5 percent, 1.0 percent, and 1.5 percent solutions were 3.8 x IO 3 Pa s, 13.0 x 10 '3 Pa s, and 36.1 x 10 '3 Pa s, respectively.
- the surface tensions were 58.2 x 10 '5 N, 57.3 x 10 '5 N, and 56.4 x 10 '5 N, respectively) .
- Iodine vapor resulted in the staining of poly ⁇ electrolytes (primarily quartemized species) on the surfaces of the fibers of the nonwoven webs.
- poly ⁇ electrolytes primarily quartemized species
- the 1.5 percent solution resulted in the most promising foam coating; i.e., it provided the best coverage.
- the lower concentrations did not coat the material as uniformly and consistently as shown through iodine staining and optical microscopy. However, none of the coatings were uniformly present on all of the fibers.
- Example 1 the procedure of Example 1 was repeated, followed by nipping after application of the foam.
- a foam was prepared from a solution of 1.5 percent Quatrisoft® by means of the hand mixer on the "whip" setting.
- the 100 mil foam thickness was applied as described above to a seven inch-diameter piece of meltblown web using a Pacific® Scientific doctor blade.
- the foam-coated sample was nipped in an Atlas Laboratory Wringer having a 30-lb (13.6-kg) nip setting (Atlas Electric Devices Company, Chicago, Illinois) and then placed in an oven at 77°C for 45 minutes.
- the foam coatings then were characterized by means of iodine staining. Again, coatings were nonuniform and substantially absent from the underside of the fibers.
- Nipping was used in conjunction with the vacuum extrac ⁇ tion to eliminate excess foam on the fibers and to yield a more even coating distribution.
- the coated and nipped samples were dried in an oven at 77 ⁇ C for 45 minutes. Coverage was again assessed via iodine staining.
- the glass frit eliminated much of the excess foam observed with the Buchner funnel above the holes of the funnel and provided more uniform coverage.
- the samples were observed to have uniform coverage on both sides of the web as well as the interior of the web.
- the spunbonded web was used in further experiments because the fibers were much larger than those on the meltblown web and could be viewed through the optical microscope to more easily observe the foam coatings on individual fibers.
- Doctor blade at 100 mil (about 2.5 mm), vacuum extrac ⁇ tion, nipped at 30 lb (about 13.6 kg), dried in a convection oven at 72°C for 5 minutes, iodine stained for 5 minutes.
- Sample G Doctor blade at 100 mil (about 2.5 mm), vacuum extrac ⁇ tion, nipped at 30 lb (about 13.6 kg), dried in a convection oven at 72°C for 10 minutes, iodine stained for 5 minutes.
- Doctor blade at 100 mil (about 2.5 mm), vacuum extrac- tion, nipped at 30 lb (about 13.6 kg), dried in a convection oven at 72°C for 15 minutes, iodine stained for 5 minutes.
- the Quatrisoft® foams were very stable, apparently as a result of the high solution viscosity.
- the foams did not spontaneously collapse on drying in the petri dishes or on the spunbonded web. In each case the dried foam retained its original bubble shape. In such cases, a physical collapsing of the foam through, for example, nipping is necessary.
- Example 3 The procedure of Example 3 was repeated in order to evaluate the effect of foam thickness on coating quality. Foam thicknesses of 100 mil (about 2.5 mm) and 50 mil (about 1.2 mm) were coated on separate spunbonded nonwoven web samples by means of a doctor blade, followed by vacuum extraction, nipping at 30 lb (about 13.6 kg), and drying in a convection oven at 72°C The uniformity of each coating was assessed by means of iodine staining.
- Example 3 The procedure of Example 3 was repeated to permit a comparison of foam coating with solution coating.
- a first sample of the spunbonded nonwoven web was coated with a solution containing 0.5 percent Quatrisoft® by vacuum extraction. The sample then was nipped as described earlier and dried at 72°C for 45 minutes in a convection oven. After nipping, the sample had a wet add-on of 100 percent.
- a second sample of the spunbonded web was coated with foam prepared from a 1.5 percent solution of Quatrisoft® as already described (doctor blade at 100 mil or about 2.5 mm, vacuum extraction, nipping at 30 lb (about 13.6 kg), and drying in a convection oven at 72°C) .
- the durability of the solution and foam coatings was assessed by iodine staining and wettability to sessile drops.
- the wettability of the treated samples was measured by placing drops of water on a surface of each sample. If the drops of water were absorbed into the material, the treated sample was considered wettable.
- the durability of the surface treatments or coatings was assessed by soaking the treated sample in 100 ml of water for 30 minutes and then allowing it to dry in the convection oven at 72°C for 30 minutes. Iodine staining and wettability by drops of water were used to evaluate the coating's durability to this water soak.
- the solution-coated first sample did not show as complete coverage of the fibers as did the second, foam-coated sample. There were patches of areas on the solution-treated sample that did not have any coating present.
- Durability studies also showed the efficacy of using foam coating over solution coating. After rinsing the samples in water, Quatrisoft® remained on the surfaces of the fibers. There was a decrease in the amount of Quatrisoft®, but foam- coated samples retained greater levels of coating after a water rinse than solution-coated samples. Wettability studies also showed the efficacy of using foam coatings. Following rinsing, the foam-treated sample continued to be wettable. Water wettability was decreased significantly for the solu ⁇ tion-treated sample.
- Polyelectrolyte/surfactant complexes were also sec ⁇ gated.
- the complexes were prepared from a polyacrylic acid having a weight-average molecular weight of 50,000 daltons (obtained as a 25 percent by weight aqueous pH 7 solution from Polysciences, Warrington, Pennsylvania) and didodecyl- dimethylammoniumbromide (AldrichChemical Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and J.T. Baker, Phillipsburg, New Jersey) .
- Solutions having molar ratios of polyacrylic acid (polyelec ⁇ trolyte or P) to didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (surfactant or S) of 100:1, 50:1, 20:1, 10:1, and 5:1 were prepared as summarized below.
- the viscosity of the solution was 2.7 x 10 '5 N and its surface tension was 38.4 x 10 '3 Pa s.
- the viscosity and surface tension of the solution were 3.2 x 10 '5 N and 31.7 x IO "3 Pa ⁇ .
- the viscosity of the solution was 2.2 x 10 '5 N and its surface tension was 31.8 x 10 '3 Pa s.
- the hand mixer did not produce suffic ⁇ iently stable foams to permit the subsequent application of foam to a substrate. Accordingly, the liquid blow-through method described in Example 1 was employed to generate the foams.
- Foams were generated from Solutions A and D and placed on a polypropylene film.
- the coated films were observed under the stereo microscope while drying with the heat gun at 260 ⁇ C
- the foams collapsed on the film, apparently because of the low visco ⁇ ity of the solutions from which the foams were gener ⁇ ated.
- Foams were prepared from all five solutions.
- the foams were applied as described in Example 1 to 2.25-inch (about 5.7-cm) diameter samples of the spunbonded nonwoven web, followed by vacuum extraction, nipping at 30 lbs (about 13.6 kg), and drying in a convection oven at 72°C for 30 minutes.
- the foam coatings were compared to solution coatings with characterization by iodine staining and microscopy.
- the less viscous polyelectrolyte/surfactant solutions were found to provide a less stable foam that readily collapsed on a substrate, including both film and fibers.
- the collapsing of the foams resulted in better coverage on the PP fibers.
- Control solution had a low viscosity but produced a relatively stable foam using the liquid blow-through method.
- foam prepared from the Control did not provide the necessary functionality for coating durability that a polyelectrolyte/ ⁇ urfactant complex provided.
- Solution D generated the best foam.
- Solution A did not contain suffi ⁇ cient surfactant to produce a sufficiently stable foam;
- Solution E was not used because it formed a precipitate.
- the polyelectrolyte/surfactant complex demonstrated an enriched concentration of solids in the foam; e.g., with Solution D, 2.6 percent solids in the foam compared to 1.4 percent solids in the solution.
- the polyelectrolyte/surfactant complex solutions generally produce a sufficiently stable foam to coat the spunbonded nonwoven web samples. Iodine staining indicated that foam coatings using Solution D provided uniform coverage of web fibers, while Solution A foam did not substantially coat the fibers. Iodine staining, however, does not confirm the presence of the polyelectrolyte on the surfaces of the fibers. The presence of the polyelectrolyte was confirmed by attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. A strong absorbance at 1545 cm ' and a lesser one at 1400 cm '1 were indicative of a carboxylic acid salt anion (COO ) .
- the attenuated total reflectance Fourier-trans- form infrared spectroscopy was carried out by placing the sample to be analyzed on the top surface of a ZnSe crystal with a face angle of 45°. The estimated depth of penetration was approximately 2 micrometers (Nicolet Model 740 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrophotometer with a SpectraTech Horizontal ATR Accessory) .
- Coatings made from Solution D produced the best in ⁇ dividual fiber coverage with an increase in uniformity. Durability tests showed that the such coatings remained on the fibers after water rinsing. Solution D, applied as a solution and not as a foam, did not show much decrease in coating after rinsing with water, but the solution gave an uneven coating.
- the reduction in surface tension of water after exposure to a treated sample was measured by first determining the surface tension of 75 ml of water in a 100 ml beaker. The surface tension of the water then was measured after a treated sample was soaked for 30 minutes.
- the surface tension reduction studies indicated that water wettability occurs without water surface tension reduction for materials treated with a Solution D foam coating. Materials treated with the Control (surfactant alone) foam and solution both wet upon soaking in water. The levels of these coatings were not reduced considerably by soaking, but water wettability occurred by means of surface tension reduction. This demonstrate ⁇ the efficacy of using a polyelectrolyte/sur- factant complex for providing a modified polymer surface for wettability without surface tension reduction in contrast to traditional surfactant treatments.
- amphiphilic polyelec ⁇ trolyte may be present in the solution from which a foam is produced.
- more than one surfactant and/or more than one polyelectrolyte may be employed when the amphiphilic polyelectrolyte is a surfactant/polyelectrolyte complex.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Treatments For Attaching Organic Compounds To Fibrous Goods (AREA)
- Laminated Bodies (AREA)
- Chemical Or Physical Treatment Of Fibers (AREA)
- Nonwoven Fabrics (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU68570/96A AU6857096A (en) | 1995-09-22 | 1996-08-22 | Method of coating a hydrophobic fibrous material with an amphiphilic polyelectrolyte |
MXPA/A/1998/001610A MXPA98001610A (en) | 1995-09-22 | 1998-02-27 | Method for covering a hydrophobic fibrous material with an anfifil polyelectrolyte |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US420295P | 1995-09-22 | 1995-09-22 | |
US60/004,202 | 1995-09-22 | ||
US64679996A | 1996-05-21 | 1996-05-21 | |
US08/646,799 | 1996-05-21 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1997011220A1 true WO1997011220A1 (en) | 1997-03-27 |
Family
ID=26672745
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1996/013618 WO1997011220A1 (en) | 1995-09-22 | 1996-08-22 | Method of coating a hydrophobic fibrous material with an amphiphilic polyelectrolyte |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU6857096A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2228603A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1997011220A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0857229B1 (en) * | 1995-10-26 | 2003-04-09 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Method of applying chemical charge modifiers to a substrate and article thereof |
US7196022B2 (en) | 2001-12-20 | 2007-03-27 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Products for controlling microbial generated odors |
WO2011014215A1 (en) | 2009-07-31 | 2011-02-03 | Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company | Process using polypropylene or poly (ethylene co propylene) succinimide as antifouling additive in petroleum refinery processes |
US8070914B2 (en) | 2003-02-07 | 2011-12-06 | Kemira Oyj | Anionic functional promoter and charge control agent with improved wet to dry tensile strength ratio |
WO2016057324A1 (en) * | 2014-10-06 | 2016-04-14 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Foam to deliver textile effect additives on fibrous articles |
US11123236B2 (en) | 2017-10-30 | 2021-09-21 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Absorbent assemblies and absorbent articles including a hydrophobically modified polymer |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4000028A (en) * | 1973-04-24 | 1976-12-28 | Rohm And Haas Company | Method of making absorbent pads |
US4645789A (en) * | 1984-04-27 | 1987-02-24 | Personal Products Company | Crosslinked carboxyl polyelectrolytes and method of making same |
US4944963A (en) * | 1985-06-28 | 1990-07-31 | Mcneil-Ppc, Inc. | In situ crosslinking of polyelectrolytes |
JPH05329183A (en) * | 1992-05-28 | 1993-12-14 | New Oji Paper Co Ltd | Manufacture of surface material for sanitary object |
EP0587071A1 (en) * | 1992-09-08 | 1994-03-16 | Gkss-Forschungszentrum Geesthacht Gmbh | Polyelectrolyte composite membrane |
WO1996012058A1 (en) * | 1994-10-12 | 1996-04-25 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Method of applying a protein coating to a substrate and article thereof |
-
1996
- 1996-08-22 CA CA 2228603 patent/CA2228603A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1996-08-22 AU AU68570/96A patent/AU6857096A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1996-08-22 WO PCT/US1996/013618 patent/WO1997011220A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4000028A (en) * | 1973-04-24 | 1976-12-28 | Rohm And Haas Company | Method of making absorbent pads |
US4645789A (en) * | 1984-04-27 | 1987-02-24 | Personal Products Company | Crosslinked carboxyl polyelectrolytes and method of making same |
US4944963A (en) * | 1985-06-28 | 1990-07-31 | Mcneil-Ppc, Inc. | In situ crosslinking of polyelectrolytes |
JPH05329183A (en) * | 1992-05-28 | 1993-12-14 | New Oji Paper Co Ltd | Manufacture of surface material for sanitary object |
EP0587071A1 (en) * | 1992-09-08 | 1994-03-16 | Gkss-Forschungszentrum Geesthacht Gmbh | Polyelectrolyte composite membrane |
WO1996012058A1 (en) * | 1994-10-12 | 1996-04-25 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Method of applying a protein coating to a substrate and article thereof |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
DATABASE WPI Section PQ Week 9403, Derwent World Patents Index; Class P32, AN 94-021958, XP002022467 * |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0857229B1 (en) * | 1995-10-26 | 2003-04-09 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Method of applying chemical charge modifiers to a substrate and article thereof |
US7196022B2 (en) | 2001-12-20 | 2007-03-27 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Products for controlling microbial generated odors |
US8070914B2 (en) | 2003-02-07 | 2011-12-06 | Kemira Oyj | Anionic functional promoter and charge control agent with improved wet to dry tensile strength ratio |
US8425724B2 (en) | 2003-02-07 | 2013-04-23 | Kemira Oyj | Anionic functional promoter and charge control agent with improved wet to dry tensile strength ratio |
WO2011014215A1 (en) | 2009-07-31 | 2011-02-03 | Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company | Process using polypropylene or poly (ethylene co propylene) succinimide as antifouling additive in petroleum refinery processes |
WO2016057324A1 (en) * | 2014-10-06 | 2016-04-14 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Foam to deliver textile effect additives on fibrous articles |
US11123236B2 (en) | 2017-10-30 | 2021-09-21 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Absorbent assemblies and absorbent articles including a hydrophobically modified polymer |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
MX9801610A (en) | 1998-08-30 |
CA2228603A1 (en) | 1997-03-27 |
AU6857096A (en) | 1997-04-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6060410A (en) | Coating of a hydrophobic polymer substrate with a nonstoichiometric polyelectrolyte complex | |
EP2071072B1 (en) | Treatment composition for textile products | |
KR20010022085A (en) | Method and Composition for Treating Substrates for Wettability | |
US5320903A (en) | Modified cellulose regenerated fiber comprising chitosan particles | |
JPH09503829A (en) | Non-woven fabric with durable wettability | |
WO2008015138A2 (en) | Composition for improving wettability of surfaces | |
NO144492B (en) | MIXING THAT CAN MAKE WATER SWALLOWABLE ARTICLES | |
US4065598A (en) | Process for polymeric modification of a fiber | |
AU633677B2 (en) | Improved polyester articles | |
WO1997011220A1 (en) | Method of coating a hydrophobic fibrous material with an amphiphilic polyelectrolyte | |
AU2016340032A1 (en) | Process for providing water repellency | |
US5998023A (en) | Surface modification of hydrophobic polymer substrate | |
US6245837B1 (en) | Use of a linear synthetic polymer to improve the properties of a cellulose shaped body derived from a tertiary amine oxide process | |
Kampeerapappun | Preparation characterization and antimicrobial activity of electrospun nanofibers from cotton waste fibers | |
MXPA98001610A (en) | Method for covering a hydrophobic fibrous material with an anfifil polyelectrolyte | |
CA2208496C (en) | Coating of a hydrophobic polymer substrate with a nonstoichiometric polyelectrolyte complex | |
Kundu et al. | Characterization of grafted jute fiber by optical and scanning electron microscopy | |
JP2802988B2 (en) | Modified cellulose regenerated fiber | |
JP4667239B2 (en) | Hydrophilic polyolefin material and method for producing the same | |
Warburton Jr et al. | Acrylic Soil Release Polymers. | |
Ghalab et al. | Improving of silk printability by atmospheric air plasma treatment | |
JP2000220028A (en) | Water-soluble thermoplastic polyvinyl alcohol filament excellent in shape retaining property | |
JP2001303450A (en) | Hydrophilic polyester fiber and hydrophilic nonwoven fabric by using the same | |
DE1469403C (en) | Methods for modifying the surface of thread, fibers and fabrics | |
JPH10245782A (en) | Modified fiber product |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE HU IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): KE LS MW SD SZ UG AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: PA/a/1998/001610 Country of ref document: MX |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2228603 Country of ref document: CA Ref country code: CA Ref document number: 2228603 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |