WO1996006674A1 - Process for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides - Google Patents

Process for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1996006674A1
WO1996006674A1 PCT/US1995/010585 US9510585W WO9606674A1 WO 1996006674 A1 WO1996006674 A1 WO 1996006674A1 US 9510585 W US9510585 W US 9510585W WO 9606674 A1 WO9606674 A1 WO 9606674A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
carbamate
effluent
ammonia
urea
ammonium
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1995/010585
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
John E. Hofmann
Original Assignee
Nalco Fuel Tech
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nalco Fuel Tech filed Critical Nalco Fuel Tech
Publication of WO1996006674A1 publication Critical patent/WO1996006674A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/86Catalytic processes
    • B01D53/8621Removing nitrogen compounds
    • B01D53/8625Nitrogen oxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2251/00Reactants
    • B01D2251/80Organic bases or salts

Definitions

  • the invention relates to selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of nitrogen oxides (NO x ) in combustion effluents.
  • SCR selective catalytic reduction
  • NO x nitrogen oxides
  • the invention provides a process which avoids problems with urea at low injection temperatures and achieves the advantages of ammonia as a NO x -reducing agent without requiring its use.
  • the invention eliminates reagent deposit on SCR catalysts while enabling improved ease and safety of transportation.
  • SCR selective catalytic reduction
  • SNCR selective noncatalytic reduction
  • SCR processes generally involve passing NO x -laden effluent with added ammonia across a catalyst bed, and are capable of achieving relatively high NO x reductions, but require the use of ammonia.
  • Ammonia is costly and can be dangerous.
  • ammonia is required to be transported and stored in the form of ammonia water, which in its most commonly utilized form is only about 25% ammonia and is sometimes as dilute as 10% ammonia.
  • the use of ammonia water for providing ammonia to facilitate catalytic NO x reduction can be impractical because of the increased costs of storage and transportation. In its anhydrous form, moreover, it requires pressure vessels and special handling. And, it is prudent to avoid the introduction of risk factors to facilities not familiar with them.
  • Urea is safer than ammonia, and has found wide acceptance in SNCR processes. Most SCR processes, however, operate at temperatures so low that the urea cannot enter the gas phase as either free radicals or simple gas molecules. It has been found that urea injected at low temperatures ahead of an SCR catalyst, can form deposits on the catalysts. These deposits reduce catalytic activity and can cause reduced NO x -reducing activity and the creation of ammonia slip.
  • What is desired is a process for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides which is able to economically achieve significant NO x reductions with ease of reagent transportation and storage, no catalyst fouling, high chemical utilization, and practical safety.
  • urea has been widely used since the disclosure by Arand, Muzio, and Sotter in U.S. Patent 4,208,386 and Arand, Muzio, and Teixeira in U.S. Patent 4,325,924.
  • ammonia Lion, U.S. Patent 3,900,554
  • urea hydrolysates e.g., von Harpe, et al., U.S. Patent 5,240,688
  • carbamate Hofmann, etal., U.S. Patent 4,997,631
  • carbamate as an intermediate in urea hydrolysis
  • the invention provides a process for the catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in a combustion effluent comprising: (a) directing the effluent through a passage including a catalysis zone containing a catalyst effective for reducing NO x in the presence of ammonia and oxygen; (b) introducing into the passage, an aqueous solution of a NO x -reducing agent consisting essentially of - ammonium carbamate, of the following formula 0
  • the solution is introduced into the effluent at a temperature of less than 1300°F but sufficient to essentially completely dissociate the carbamate and form gaseous ammonia prior to entrance into the catalysis zone and the effluent containing the ammonia enters the catalysis zone at a temperature effective to reduce the concentration of nitrogen oxides by selective catalytic reduction.
  • the carbamate is produced in equipment conventional for urea synthesis, but under conditions effective to maximize the production of ammonium carbamate and minimize the production of urea.
  • the carbamate will consist essentially of ammonium carbamate and contain no more than minimal amounts of urea.
  • the combined amount of urea and other nitrogenous species such as ammonium carbonate, ammonium bicarbonate, and the double salt of ammonium carbonate (often called commercial ammonium carbonate, NH 4 HCO 2 NH 2 COONH 4 ), is maintained at a level of less than about 10%, more preferably less than 6%, and most preferably less than 2%.
  • the carbamate is recovered from the process in the form of a solid.
  • the catalytic destruction of nitrogen oxides can be effected in the presence of ammonia while reducing or eliminating the need for the undesirable storage, handling, and transport of ammonia, ammonia water or other dilute aqueous chemical.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic representation of one embodiment of the invention wherein an aqueous solution of ammonium carbamate is introduce into a NO x -containing combustion effluent in a passage leading from a boiler and leading to a catalysis section; and
  • Figure 2 is an enlarged schematic view of a representative container means employed to transport the ammonium carbamate in dry or aqueous form, sealed from the atmosphere and to then receive make-up water and deliver a solution of the desired concentration to the effluent.
  • the invention which relates to the catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in a combustion effluent in the presence of ammonia by introducing into the NO x -laden effluent an aqueous solution of ammonium carbamate, to generate ammonia in the effluent, will be described with reference to the large utility boiler of the type shown as 100 in Figure 1 having a combustion zone 110 and a preferably skid-mounted container 10 as shown in Figure 2.
  • the source of NO x -containing effluent can be any combustor of any carbonaceous fuel - including an internal combustion engine such as those for fixed and mobile use powered by a suitable fuel such as gasoline, diesel fuel, heavy oil, alcohol, natural gas, or like fuel.
  • the container is illustrative of one means for transporting ammonium carbonate, while other forms and constructions are possible.
  • the container can be a replaceable cartridge which can be simply removably inserted in the supply line for NO x - reducing chemical between a source of water and means for injecting the solution into the effluent.
  • ammonium carbamate is produced in equipment conventional for urea synthesis, but under conditions effective to maximize the production of ammonium carbamate and minimize the production of urea and urea hydrolysis products other than the carbamate.
  • the carbamate will consist essentially of ammonium carbamate and contain no more than minimal amounts of urea.
  • the amount of urea and other nitrogenous species such as ammonium carbonate, ammonium bicarbonate, and the double salt of ammonium carbonate (often called commercial ammonium carbonate, NH 4 HCO 2 NH 2 COONH 4 ), is maintained at a combined level of less than about 10%, more preferably less than 6%, and most preferably less than 2%.
  • the carbamate is produced by combining liquid ammonia and liquid carbon dioxide at a pressure preferably above the critical pressure of ammonia, e.g., of from about 120 to about 200 atmospheres at a temperature of from about 135° to about 200° C, and then recovering the ammonium carbamate. Under these conditions, the reaction goes very rapidly and evolves large amounts of heat. When water is essentially excluded from the system, the production of urea and carbonates can be controlled to the low amounts preferred according to the invention.
  • ammonium carbamate can be shipped in dry form and, thereby, achieve savings in transportation costs because it is not necessary to ship it with large amounts of water.
  • One particularly advantageous procedure is to store the ammonium carbamate in dry form, such as in sealed container 10 as shown in the drawings.
  • water from a source 12 enters the container 10, preferably from the bottom, to take the carbamate 11 into solution for delivery via line 14 to passage 16.
  • the concentration of the solution can be controlled by suitable metering valves and, if desired, mixing elements within the container.
  • the solubility of the carbamate in water increases with temperature, varying from about 35% at O°C to about 75% at just under the boiling point.
  • the solution (aqueous solution) is introduced into the effluent at an effluent temperature wherein the ammonium carbamate readily converts to ammonia in order to facilitate the catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides.
  • Acceptable temperatures are those where the ammonium carbonate is not oxidized to NO x , e.g., as high as about 1950°F, but are preferably lower.
  • the effluent temperature is preferably less than 1300°F, and preferably within the range of from about 230° to about 1200°F at the point of introduction. More preferably, the effluent temperature is between about 500°F and about 1100°F. Most preferably, the effluent temperature at the point of introduction of the ammonium carbamate should be between about 550°F and about 950°F.
  • the point of introduction of the carbamate solution into the effluent should also be chosen so as to achieve essentially complete conversion of the ammonium carbamate to ammonia. This is assured by the provision of sufficient residence times and good mixing at the temperatures involved. Preferably, residence times of from about 0.5 to about 2 seconds are employed. If necessary, baffling or other structures can be added to assure good mixing.
  • the ammonia produced in situ is then utilized to selectively catalytically reduce the nitrogen oxides remaining in the effluent by passing the ammonia-containing effluent through a catalysis zone 18 comprising one or more catalyst sections 20 comprising a catalyst material effective for the reduction of nitrogen oxides in the presence of ammonia to further reduce the concentration of nitrogen oxides.
  • the ammonium carbamate solution may be at ambient temperature prior to introduction or, alternatively, it may be at or above its boiling point. In this way, the ammonium carbamate can flash off immediately upon introduction into the effluent, which might provide advantages in minimizing air requirements for atomization, etc.
  • the ammonium carbamate is introduced into the effluent in an amount sufficient to provide a molar ratio of the ammonia generated to the baseline nitrogen oxides level (by which is meant the pre- treatment level of NO x in the effluent) of about 0.8:1 to about 1.5:1. More preferably, treatment solution is introduced into the effluent to provide a molar ratio of ammonia to baseline nitrogen oxides of about 1 :1 to about 1.2:1 , most preferably about 1 :1.
  • the catalyst used is one capable of reducing the effluent nitrogen oxides concentration in the presence of ammonia.
  • These include, for instance, activated carbon, charcoal or coke, zeolites, vanadium oxide, tungsten oxide, titanium oxide, iron oxide, copper oxide, manganese oxide, chromium oxide, noble metals such as platinum group metals like platinum, palladium, rhodium, and indium, or mixtures of these.
  • Other catalyst materials conventional in the art and familiar to the skilled artisan can also be utilized. These catalyst materials are typically mounted on a support such as a ceramic substance, a zeolite, or a homogeneous monolith, although other art known supports can also be used.
  • Patent 4,393,031 disclose the catalytic reduction of NO x using platinum group metals and/or other metals such as titanium, copper, molybdenum, vanadium, tungsten, or oxides thereof with the addition of ammonia to achieve the desired catalytic reduction.
  • Ginger in U.S. Patent 4,268,488, discloses exposing a nitrogen oxides containing effluent to a first catalyst comprising a copper compound such as copper sulfate and a second catalyst comprising metal combinations such as sulfates of vanadium and iron or tungsten and iron on a carrier in the presence of ammonia.
  • a first catalyst comprising a copper compound such as copper sulfate and a second catalyst comprising metal combinations such as sulfates of vanadium and iron or tungsten and iron on a carrier in the presence of ammonia.
  • the ammonia-containing effluent is most preferably passed over the catalyst while the effluent is at a temperature between about 230°F and about 950°F, preferably at least 550°F. In this manner, the ammonia present in the effluent by the introduction of the ammonium carbamate solution most effectively facilitates the catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides.
  • the effluent will preferably contain an excess of oxygen, e.g., from about 1 to about 10%.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas After Treatment (AREA)

Abstract

Selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides (NOx) in combustion effluents utilizes ammonium carbamate to achieve the advantages of ammonia as an NOx-reducing agent, while improving ease and safety of transportation, and economy of operation. The carbamate (11) can be transported dry or in aqueous solution in a sealed container (10) and water (12) is passed through the container to make up the solution prior to introduction to an SCR reactor (18). The convenience of urea is achieved without the need for hydrolysis of the urea or the problems of catalytic fouling which might occur if that were not accomplished.

Description

DESCRIPTION
PROCESS FOR THE SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION OF NITROGEN OXIDES
Technical Field
The invention relates to selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of nitrogen oxides (NOx) in combustion effluents. In particular, the invention provides a process which avoids problems with urea at low injection temperatures and achieves the advantages of ammonia as a NOx-reducing agent without requiring its use. The invention eliminates reagent deposit on SCR catalysts while enabling improved ease and safety of transportation.
The problems with NOx production during the combustion of carbonaceous fuels are well documented and have been the cause of regulations in many countries throughout the world. The processes for reducing NOx can generally be segregated into two basic categories: selective and nonselective. Among the selective processes, selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is sometimes preferred over selective noncatalytic reduction (SNCR) processes in installations where relatively high percentage NOx reductions are required.
SCR processes generally involve passing NOx-laden effluent with added ammonia across a catalyst bed, and are capable of achieving relatively high NOx reductions, but require the use of ammonia. Ammonia is costly and can be dangerous. In some jurisdictions, ammonia is required to be transported and stored in the form of ammonia water, which in its most commonly utilized form is only about 25% ammonia and is sometimes as dilute as 10% ammonia. The use of ammonia water for providing ammonia to facilitate catalytic NOx reduction can be impractical because of the increased costs of storage and transportation. In its anhydrous form, moreover, it requires pressure vessels and special handling. And, it is prudent to avoid the introduction of risk factors to facilities not familiar with them.
Urea is safer than ammonia, and has found wide acceptance in SNCR processes. Most SCR processes, however, operate at temperatures so low that the urea cannot enter the gas phase as either free radicals or simple gas molecules. It has been found that urea injected at low temperatures ahead of an SCR catalyst, can form deposits on the catalysts. These deposits reduce catalytic activity and can cause reduced NOx-reducing activity and the creation of ammonia slip.
What is desired is a process for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides which is able to economically achieve significant NOx reductions with ease of reagent transportation and storage, no catalyst fouling, high chemical utilization, and practical safety.
Background Art
The art of selective gas phase NOx reduction has greatly advanced in the last twenty years. There are now available a wide variety of SCR and SNCR processes with chemicals specific to each. Techniques have been developed, inter alia, for SCR using ammonia with a variety of catalysts (e.g., Kato etal. in U.S. Patent 4,138,469 and Henke in U.S. Patent 4,393,031), hybrids of SCR and SNCR (e.g., Hofmann, etal., U.S. Patent 5,139,754), and multi-level SNCR injection (e.g., Epperly, et al., U.S. Patent 4,777,024)utilizing urea. But, unlike SNCR which can effectively utilize either urea, a hydrolyzate of urea or ammonia, SCR processes have been limited as a practical matter to ammonia or ammonia water.
Among the chemicals found useful for SNCR, urea has been widely used since the disclosure by Arand, Muzio, and Sotter in U.S. Patent 4,208,386 and Arand, Muzio, and Teixeira in U.S. Patent 4,325,924. In addition, ammonia (Lyon, U.S. Patent 3,900,554), urea hydrolysates (e.g., von Harpe, et al., U.S. Patent 5,240,688) and carbamate (Hofmann, etal., U.S. Patent 4,997,631 ) and carbamate as an intermediate in urea hydrolysis (Jones in U.S. Patent 5,281 ,403) have been identified as SNCR agents.
For SCR processes, however, urea has not received acceptance because it tends to foul the catalysts at the low temperatures typically involved, presumably due to the production of polymeric species which deposit on the catalyst surface and decrease its activity. Carbamates, other than due to their presence in relatively dilute, aqueous solutions of urea hydrolysates, have not been mentioned for use in SCR processes. And, when carbamates are produced during urea hydrolysis contain large amounts of other by products and are quite costly as compared to ammonia which is a raw material in urea production.
The manufacture of urea followed by its hydrolysis adds significant expense over the cost of ammonia, and the cost disadvantage attributable to shipping and storing ammonia, is somewhat offset. Moreover, as the carbamates - principally ammonium carbamate - are now shipped and handled in the art, they add difficulty as compared to urea, evolving an off odor in the dry form in ambient storage and exhibiting relatively low solubility in water at the lower end of the temperatures normally encountered.
Thus, as the art now stands, the most suitable chemical for SCR processes remains ammonia - just as it has for the past several decades - whether in gaseous form as traditionally employed or as an aqueous solution prepared by the complete hydrolysis of urea (e.g., Ebina, JP HEI 2-191,528). Unfortunately, the requirement that catalytic reactions be conducted in the presence of ammonia, means that a system for supplying ammonia gas safel to the effluent in the area of the catalyst must be developed and installed. This is not only expensive, but it does not eliminate the possibility of leakage and the associated health and safety problems.
The art is in need of a system which provides better safety than ammonia-SCR - without the problems caused by urea when injected at low temperatures typical of SCR.
Disclosure of Invention
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved NOx-reduction process which achieves effectiveness similar to that of ammonia-SCR processes, but without the need to ship either hazardous anhydrous ammoni or dilute aqueous solutions of it or other chemicals.
It is a further object of the invention to provide an improved method for reducing NOx by selective catalytic reduction, which eliminates the problems of ammonia and enables the use of a chemical as safe as urea without the problems of urea.
These and other objects are achieved by the invention which provides a process for the catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in a combustion effluent comprising: (a) directing the effluent through a passage including a catalysis zone containing a catalyst effective for reducing NOx in the presence of ammonia and oxygen; (b) introducing into the passage, an aqueous solution of a NOx-reducing agent consisting essentially of - ammonium carbamate, of the following formula 0
II
(NH2-C-OβNH4*)
wherein the solution is introduced into the effluent at a temperature of less than 1300°F but sufficient to essentially completely dissociate the carbamate and form gaseous ammonia prior to entrance into the catalysis zone and the effluent containing the ammonia enters the catalysis zone at a temperature effective to reduce the concentration of nitrogen oxides by selective catalytic reduction.
In the preferred embodiment, the carbamate is produced in equipment conventional for urea synthesis, but under conditions effective to maximize the production of ammonium carbamate and minimize the production of urea. Desirably, the carbamate will consist essentially of ammonium carbamate and contain no more than minimal amounts of urea. Preferably, the combined amount of urea and other nitrogenous species such as ammonium carbonate, ammonium bicarbonate, and the double salt of ammonium carbonate (often called commercial ammonium carbonate, NH4HCO2 NH2COONH4), is maintained at a level of less than about 10%, more preferably less than 6%, and most preferably less than 2%. Also preferably, the carbamate is recovered from the process in the form of a solid. These and all parts and percentages in this description are on a weight basis and are based on the weight of the composition at the stage of processing referred to.
By the use of the process of the present invention, the catalytic destruction of nitrogen oxides can be effected in the presence of ammonia while reducing or eliminating the need for the undesirable storage, handling, and transport of ammonia, ammonia water or other dilute aqueous chemical.
Brief Description of the Drawing
The invention will be better understood and its advantages will be more apparent when the following detailed description is read in light of the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of one embodiment of the invention wherein an aqueous solution of ammonium carbamate is introduce into a NOx-containing combustion effluent in a passage leading from a boiler and leading to a catalysis section; and
Figure 2 is an enlarged schematic view of a representative container means employed to transport the ammonium carbamate in dry or aqueous form, sealed from the atmosphere and to then receive make-up water and deliver a solution of the desired concentration to the effluent. Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
The invention, which relates to the catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in a combustion effluent in the presence of ammonia by introducing into the NOx-laden effluent an aqueous solution of ammonium carbamate, to generate ammonia in the effluent, will be described with reference to the large utility boiler of the type shown as 100 in Figure 1 having a combustion zone 110 and a preferably skid-mounted container 10 as shown in Figure 2.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art, however, that the source of NOx-containing effluent can be any combustor of any carbonaceous fuel - including an internal combustion engine such as those for fixed and mobile use powered by a suitable fuel such as gasoline, diesel fuel, heavy oil, alcohol, natural gas, or like fuel. The container is illustrative of one means for transporting ammonium carbonate, while other forms and constructions are possible. For example, the container can be a replaceable cartridge which can be simply removably inserted in the supply line for NOx- reducing chemical between a source of water and means for injecting the solution into the effluent.
In the preferred embodiment, ammonium carbamate is produced in equipment conventional for urea synthesis, but under conditions effective to maximize the production of ammonium carbamate and minimize the production of urea and urea hydrolysis products other than the carbamate. Desirably, the carbamate will consist essentially of ammonium carbamate and contain no more than minimal amounts of urea. Preferably, the amount of urea and other nitrogenous species such as ammonium carbonate, ammonium bicarbonate, and the double salt of ammonium carbonate (often called commercial ammonium carbonate, NH4HCO2 NH2COONH4), is maintained at a combined level of less than about 10%, more preferably less than 6%, and most preferably less than 2%.
In the preferred process, the carbamate is produced by combining liquid ammonia and liquid carbon dioxide at a pressure preferably above the critical pressure of ammonia, e.g., of from about 120 to about 200 atmospheres at a temperature of from about 135° to about 200° C, and then recovering the ammonium carbamate. Under these conditions, the reaction goes very rapidly and evolves large amounts of heat. When water is essentially excluded from the system, the production of urea and carbonates can be controlled to the low amounts preferred according to the invention.
It is an advantage of the invention that the ammonium carbamate can be shipped in dry form and, thereby, achieve savings in transportation costs because it is not necessary to ship it with large amounts of water. One particularly advantageous procedure is to store the ammonium carbamate in dry form, such as in sealed container 10 as shown in the drawings. At the site where the NOx reduction is to be performed, water from a source 12 enters the container 10, preferably from the bottom, to take the carbamate 11 into solution for delivery via line 14 to passage 16.
The concentration of the solution can be controlled by suitable metering valves and, if desired, mixing elements within the container. The solubility of the carbamate in water increases with temperature, varying from about 35% at O°C to about 75% at just under the boiling point. The relatively low solubility at low temperatures typically encountered in shipping, e.g., as low as -40° F, makes shipment in aqueous solution impractical in many instances; however, on the site of the NOx reduction process, the water can be heated to the desired degree to obtain the concentration of solution required. The solution (aqueous solution) is introduced into the effluent at an effluent temperature wherein the ammonium carbamate readily converts to ammonia in order to facilitate the catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides. Acceptable temperatures are those where the ammonium carbonate is not oxidized to NOx, e.g., as high as about 1950°F, but are preferably lower. The effluent temperature is preferably less than 1300°F, and preferably within the range of from about 230° to about 1200°F at the point of introduction. More preferably, the effluent temperature is between about 500°F and about 1100°F. Most preferably, the effluent temperature at the point of introduction of the ammonium carbamate should be between about 550°F and about 950°F.
The point of introduction of the carbamate solution into the effluent should also be chosen so as to achieve essentially complete conversion of the ammonium carbamate to ammonia. This is assured by the provision of sufficient residence times and good mixing at the temperatures involved. Preferably, residence times of from about 0.5 to about 2 seconds are employed. If necessary, baffling or other structures can be added to assure good mixing.
The ammonia produced in situ is then utilized to selectively catalytically reduce the nitrogen oxides remaining in the effluent by passing the ammonia-containing effluent through a catalysis zone 18 comprising one or more catalyst sections 20 comprising a catalyst material effective for the reduction of nitrogen oxides in the presence of ammonia to further reduce the concentration of nitrogen oxides.
The ammonium carbamate solution may be at ambient temperature prior to introduction or, alternatively, it may be at or above its boiling point. In this way, the ammonium carbamate can flash off immediately upon introduction into the effluent, which might provide advantages in minimizing air requirements for atomization, etc.
Advantageously, the ammonium carbamate is introduced into the effluent in an amount sufficient to provide a molar ratio of the ammonia generated to the baseline nitrogen oxides level (by which is meant the pre- treatment level of NOx in the effluent) of about 0.8:1 to about 1.5:1. More preferably, treatment solution is introduced into the effluent to provide a molar ratio of ammonia to baseline nitrogen oxides of about 1 :1 to about 1.2:1 , most preferably about 1 :1.
The catalyst used is one capable of reducing the effluent nitrogen oxides concentration in the presence of ammonia. These include, for instance, activated carbon, charcoal or coke, zeolites, vanadium oxide, tungsten oxide, titanium oxide, iron oxide, copper oxide, manganese oxide, chromium oxide, noble metals such as platinum group metals like platinum, palladium, rhodium, and indium, or mixtures of these. Other catalyst materials conventional in the art and familiar to the skilled artisan can also be utilized. These catalyst materials are typically mounted on a support such as a ceramic substance, a zeolite, or a homogeneous monolith, although other art known supports can also be used.
Among the useful catalysts are those described in the representative prior art processes below. Selective catalytic reduction processes for reducing NOx are well known and utilize a variety of catalytic agents. For instance, in European Patent Application WO 210,392, Eichholtz and Weiler discuss the catalytic removal of nitrogen oxides using activated charcoal or activated coke, with the addition of ammonia, as a catalyst. Kato et al. in U.S. Patent 4,138,469 and Henke in U.S. Patent 4,393,031 disclose the catalytic reduction of NOx using platinum group metals and/or other metals such as titanium, copper, molybdenum, vanadium, tungsten, or oxides thereof with the addition of ammonia to achieve the desired catalytic reduction.
Another catalytic reduction process is disclosed by Canadian Patent 1,100,292 to Knight which relates tot he use of a platinum group metal, gold, and/or silver catalyst deposited on a refractory oxide. Mori et al. in U.S. Patent 4,107,272 discuss the catalytic reduction of NOx using oxysulfur, sulfate, or sulfite compounds of vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, copper, and nickel with the addition of ammonia gas.
In a multi-phased catalytic system, Ginger, in U.S. Patent 4,268,488, discloses exposing a nitrogen oxides containing effluent to a first catalyst comprising a copper compound such as copper sulfate and a second catalyst comprising metal combinations such as sulfates of vanadium and iron or tungsten and iron on a carrier in the presence of ammonia.
The ammonia-containing effluent is most preferably passed over the catalyst while the effluent is at a temperature between about 230°F and about 950°F, preferably at least 550°F. In this manner, the ammonia present in the effluent by the introduction of the ammonium carbamate solution most effectively facilitates the catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides. The effluent will preferably contain an excess of oxygen, e.g., from about 1 to about 10%.
Use of the present invention with any of the above catalysts (the disclosure of which are specifically incorporated by reference) reduces or eliminates the requirement for the transport, storage and handling of large amounts of ammonia or ammonium water. Even where the inventive process does not provide all of the ammonia required for the catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides, the reduction of the amount needed still provides significant advantages in terms of both safety and cost. The above description is for the purpose of teaching the person of ordinary skill in the art how to practice the present invention and it is not intended to detail all of those obvious modifications and variations of it which will become apparent to the skilled worker upon reading the description. It is intended, however, that all such obvious modifications and variations be included within the scope of the present invention which is defined by the following claims. The claims cover the indicated components and steps in all arrangements and sequences which are effective to meet the objectives intended for the invention, unless the context specifically indicates the contrary.

Claims

1. A process for reducing nitrogen oxides in a combustion effluent by selective catalytic reduction, comprising:
(a) directing the effluent through a passage including a catalysis zone containing a catalyst effective for reducing NOx in the presence of ammonia and oxygen; and
(b) introducing into the passage, an aqueous solution of a NOx- reducing agent consisting essentially of ammonium carbamate, of the following formula
0
(NH2-C-O*NH4*)
wherein the solution is introduced into the effluent at a temperature sufficient to essentially completely dissociate the carbamate and form gaseous ammonia prior to entrance into the catalysis zone and the effluent containing the ammonia enters the catalysis zone at a temperature effective to reduce the concentration of nitrogen oxides by selective catalytic reduction.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the carbamate is produced in equipment conventional for urea synthesis, under conditions effective to maximize the production of ammonium carbonate and minimize the production of urea.
3. A process according to claim 2 wherein: the carbamate consists essentially of ammonium carbamate and contains a combined amount of urea and other nitrogenous species of the group of ammonium carbonate, ammonium bicarbonate, and the double salt of ammonium carbonate, of less than about 10%.
4. A process according to claim 3 wherein the combined level of urea and said nitrogenous species in said carbamate is less than 6%.
5. A process according to claim 2 wherein the carbamate is recovered from the process in the form of a solid.
6. A process of claim 1 , wherein the ammonium carbamate is introduced int the effluent at an effluent temperature between about 550°F and about 950°F.
7. A process of claim 1 , wherein the ammonium carbamate is introduced int the effluent in an amount sufficient to provide a molar ratio of ammonia to nitrogen oxides of about 0.8:1 to about 1.5:1.
8. A process according to claim 7 wherein the ammonium carbamate is introduced into the effluent at a point selected to provide a residence time o from about 0.5 to about 2 seconds prior to entrance into the catalysis zone.
9. A process of claim 7, wherein the effluent is at a temperature between about 230°F and about 950°F when the ammonia-containing effluent passe through said catalysis zone.
10. A process according to claim 1 wherein the carbamate is stored in a sealed container until utilized and then water is passed through the contain to dissolve carbamate and prepare a solution of effective concentration.
PCT/US1995/010585 1994-08-29 1995-08-21 Process for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides WO1996006674A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US29729294A 1994-08-29 1994-08-29
US08/297,292 1994-08-29

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1996006674A1 true WO1996006674A1 (en) 1996-03-07

Family

ID=23145691

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1995/010585 WO1996006674A1 (en) 1994-08-29 1995-08-21 Process for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides

Country Status (2)

Country Link
TW (1) TW278050B (en)
WO (1) WO1996006674A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6761868B2 (en) 2001-05-16 2004-07-13 The Chemithon Corporation Process for quantitatively converting urea to ammonia on demand
US6887449B2 (en) 2002-11-21 2005-05-03 The Chemithon Corporation Method of quantitatively producing ammonia from urea
EP2551009A1 (en) * 2011-07-29 2013-01-30 Deere & Company Diesel exhaust fluid formulation having a high ammonium content and a low freezing point
CN104128090A (en) * 2014-08-03 2014-11-05 长春市永畅实业有限责任公司 Reducing agent satisfying low temperature removal of nitrogen oxides of vehicles
CN104226108A (en) * 2013-06-17 2014-12-24 迪尔公司 diesel exhaust fluid formulation that reduces urea deposits in exhaust systems
US10695719B2 (en) 2016-12-01 2020-06-30 Loughborough University Producing ammonium carbamate and reducing nitrogen oxides

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5139754A (en) * 1989-09-12 1992-08-18 Fuel Tech, Inc. Catalytic/non-catalytic combination process for nitrogen oxides reduction

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5139754A (en) * 1989-09-12 1992-08-18 Fuel Tech, Inc. Catalytic/non-catalytic combination process for nitrogen oxides reduction

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
GRANT AND HACKH'S CHEMICAL DICTIONARY, Fifth Edition, 1987, page 612. *
KIRK OTHMER ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, Volume 23, October 1983, pages 551-552. *

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6761868B2 (en) 2001-05-16 2004-07-13 The Chemithon Corporation Process for quantitatively converting urea to ammonia on demand
US7008603B2 (en) 2001-05-16 2006-03-07 The Chemithon Corporation Process and apparatus for quantitatively converting urea to ammonia on demand
US6887449B2 (en) 2002-11-21 2005-05-03 The Chemithon Corporation Method of quantitatively producing ammonia from urea
EP2551009A1 (en) * 2011-07-29 2013-01-30 Deere & Company Diesel exhaust fluid formulation having a high ammonium content and a low freezing point
CN102895874A (en) * 2011-07-29 2013-01-30 迪尔公司 Diesel exhaust fluid formulation having a high ammonium content and a low freezing point
US8518354B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2013-08-27 Deere & Company Diesel exhaust fluid formulation having a high ammonium content and a low freezing point
CN102895874B (en) * 2011-07-29 2016-05-04 迪尔公司 There is high ammonium content and subzero diesel exhaust fluid preparation
CN104226108A (en) * 2013-06-17 2014-12-24 迪尔公司 diesel exhaust fluid formulation that reduces urea deposits in exhaust systems
CN104128090A (en) * 2014-08-03 2014-11-05 长春市永畅实业有限责任公司 Reducing agent satisfying low temperature removal of nitrogen oxides of vehicles
US10695719B2 (en) 2016-12-01 2020-06-30 Loughborough University Producing ammonium carbamate and reducing nitrogen oxides

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW278050B (en) 1996-06-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5286467A (en) Highly efficient hybrid process for nitrogen oxides reduction
US5240688A (en) Process for the in-line hydrolysis of urea
US4978514A (en) Combined catalytic/non-catalytic process for nitrogen oxides reduction
CA2312652C (en) Reduction of toxic substances in waste gas emissions
US6077491A (en) Methods for the production of ammonia from urea and/or biuret, and uses for NOx and/or particulate matter removal
EP1511553B1 (en) OXIDATION OF NOx'S WITH SODIUM CHLORITE IN COMBINATION WITH A THERMAL NOX REMOVAL PROCESS
CA2211554A1 (en) Process for purifying flue gas containing nitrogen oxides
WO1998022209A1 (en) SELECTIVE CATALYTIC NOx REDUCTION UTILIZING UREA WITHOUT CATALYST FOULING
US11060431B2 (en) Process and apparatus for reducing NOx emissions
US4146450A (en) Method for removing nitrogen oxides from nitrogen oxide-containing gases
WO1996006674A1 (en) Process for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides
CA2202905C (en) Process and installation for the treatment of effluents by oxidation in the presence of a heterogeneous catalyst
JPH1033947A (en) Removal of nitrogen oxide in exhaust gas
JPH09234340A (en) Purification of exhaust gas containing oxidizable nitrogen compound
CN107206315B (en) Low temperature urea-SCR operation in the presence of high sulfur flue gas
EP2942098A1 (en) Improved method and system for removing nitrite
AU4220593A (en) Process for the catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides
JPH09108537A (en) Reducing agent for removing nitrogen oxide and removing method for nitrogen oxide
Van Steenweghen et al. Green ammonia synthesis from stationary NO x emission sources on a catalytic lean NO x trap
KR101727923B1 (en) A SCR system employing urea slurry decomposition unit
US20230191325A1 (en) A process for the removal of nox and dinitrogen oxide in process off-gas
JP2000140864A (en) Treatment of ammonia-containing water
EP0609288B1 (en) A method of removing nitrogen oxides from a gas flow by using a combustion exchanger
JP3263968B2 (en) Treatment of wastewater containing nitrate
JPH0751536A (en) Denitration of combustion exhaust gas

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CN CZ HU KR PL SK

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase