WO1991006466A1 - Roll damping system - Google Patents

Roll damping system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1991006466A1
WO1991006466A1 PCT/SE1990/000709 SE9000709W WO9106466A1 WO 1991006466 A1 WO1991006466 A1 WO 1991006466A1 SE 9000709 W SE9000709 W SE 9000709W WO 9106466 A1 WO9106466 A1 WO 9106466A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
rudder
roll
ship
signals
angle
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/SE1990/000709
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Claes KÄLLSTRÖM
Original Assignee
Sspa Maritime Consulting Ab
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sspa Maritime Consulting Ab filed Critical Sspa Maritime Consulting Ab
Publication of WO1991006466A1 publication Critical patent/WO1991006466A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B39/00Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude
    • B63B39/06Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude to decrease vessel movements by using foils acting on ambient water

Definitions

  • the present invention refers to motion stabilising systems and in particular to systems for reducing rolling motions of ships by utilizing active rudder control.
  • the US patent specification 4 380 206 describes a ship stabilization system, which utilizes the rudders to compen- sate for wind and wave induced roll motions, including a hydraulically actuated mechanism for controlling the posi ⁇ tion of the rudders; a pump coupled to the hydraulic mecha ⁇ nism for controlling the flow of hydraulic fluid; and a flow control device connected to the pump for controlling the flow rate of fluid through the pump.
  • the ship stabilization system also includes a first actua ⁇ tion device for translating helm steering command signals into control impulses for the the flow control device and a second actuation device for translating helm steering com- mand signals and roll reduction control signals into control impulses for the flow control device.
  • a coupler is connected to the first and second actuation devices and the flow control device for disengaging the first actuation device from the flow control device when the second actuation device is activated.
  • the object of the invention is to provide a system with improved signal processing compared to what is evident from the above cited US 4380 206 for reduction of wind and wave induced roll of ships in which system optimal course keeping is combined with optimal reduction of roll.
  • a second object of the invention is to provide an effective roll reducing system for various wheather situations and ship speeds.
  • a third object of the invention is to provide a cost effec- tive system which is simple to install on ships without additional reconstruction being necessary.
  • Fig. 1 is an outline over forces and moments which are used in a system according to the present invention
  • Fig. 2 is a control block diagram over a control system according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 3 is control diagram over a control system according to the invention in which particularly the filter function is illustrated;
  • Fig 4 is a function flow diagram over a control system according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 5 is a time diagram of a) rudder position ⁇ , b) roll angle rr and roll rate ⁇ rr of a ship caused only by rudder movement, c) roll angle ⁇ m of the ship caused only by waves and wind, d) total roll angle of the ship ⁇ rr + ⁇ w , e) resulting course of the ship;
  • Fig. 6 shows phase difference between rudder position ⁇ and roll velocity ⁇ rr at different frequencies of rudder activa- tion
  • Fig. 7 is a block diagram over the electronics in a control system according to the invention.
  • Fig. 1 With reference to Fig. 1 the basic principle is illustrated for roll damping with an active rudder. The moment created by the rudder movement is
  • Fig. 1 also illustrates the difference between roll dynamics and the yaw dynamics. This difference makes it possible to use high frequency rudder signals to damp the roll without affecting the course of the ship.
  • FIG 2 With reference to Fig 2 is shown a block diagram over the control functions in a first embodiment of the invention.
  • the following designations are given:
  • the blocks framed constitute the central unit C, of which
  • H is modified with respect to roll RR, yaw CG and velocity S, and the modified command ⁇ * c thereupon is transferred to the rudder motor SG.
  • a feature of the system is that steering commands are trans ⁇ mitted directly to the rudder motor if the roll damping system has been switched off maually by means of the switch S (see fig 2) or if a malfunction has been detected in the system. If large manaecutes are initiated the roll damping system is automatically switched off until the ship has resumed a steady course.
  • the roll reduction regulator is based on state feedback of and reconstruction of state variables ( ⁇ (n), ⁇ (n)) by means of a Kalman filter where ⁇ (n) is sampled roll angle velocity and ⁇ (n) sampled roll acceleration.
  • ⁇ (n) is sampled roll angle velocity and ⁇ (n) sampled roll acceleration.
  • the estimated states ( ⁇ (n), ⁇ (n)) are obtained with which thereafter a prediction is made of the roll angle of the ship.
  • An essential advantage of the Kalman filter is that it does not give any phase shift.
  • the regula ⁇ tor is adaptive in the sense that it adapts to the system, that is, it calculates new filter constants in reference to
  • DFI Cos(w/Ts)* DFI + Sin(w/Ts)/w*DDFI ...(4)
  • DDFI - Sin(w/Ts)* w * DDFI + Cos(w/Ts) * TempDFI ...(5)
  • the roll frequency is calculated as
  • w is used to change the coefficients in the filter and at the prediction of the rudder command.
  • the predictor P calculates the rudder order ⁇ c .
  • the maximum rudder angle which can be used for roll damping is calculated according the following:
  • FIG. 4 With reference to Fig. 4 is shown a somewhat simplified functional flow diagram over a control system according to a second embodiment of the invention intended for yachts, small fishing ships and the like.
  • FGS direction sensor type Fluxgate sensor
  • Fig. 4 The function of the system according to Fig. 4 is the same as that in Fig. 3 with the difference that the rudder order has been modified with the auto pilot order from the block AP according
  • the rudder order is converted to suitable signals in a block not shown for the steering motor on board the present ship.
  • FIG. 6 A practic design in hardware of the control system according to the embodiment in Fig. 4 is illustrated in Fig. 6.
  • the CPU- unit of the roll damping system is based on a 16 bit ⁇ - processor type M 68000.
  • the CPU - unit 20 is pro ⁇ vided with a series interface type RS-232C by means of which the system can be connected to a portable computer 10 and be programmed for measured (see Fig 5a and Fig 5b) and given ship parameters.
  • the control unit communicates directly with the I/O ports of the CPU-unit or by the A/D and D/A converter 2.
  • the control unit 1 in addition to the auto pilot contains a maneuvering panel with switch means for the system function and a dis ⁇ play for indication of course deviation, loading state and yaw radius.
  • the roll sensor 3 which detects the roll angle velocity of the ship comprises a solid state transducer.
  • the operation is in principle that of a gyro and based on a tuning fork which oscillates at its resonance frequency.
  • the tuning fork When the tuning fork is rotated about its symmetry axis the shanks will be deflected from the plane in which they are oscillating. This results in measurable elongations in the shanks perpendicular to the symmetry plane of the tuning fork generator.
  • the roll angle velocity is then derived from the elongations measured.
  • the roll sensor 3 of solid state type to a very little extent is affected by moving velocities or accelerations. This means that it can be installed generally in any place of the ship under the condition that the rotation sensitive axis is parallel with the roll axis of the ship.
  • This ad ⁇ vantageous property allows installation of the sensor in the control box for the system as a module. By providing the sensor module with a mechanical setting facility of the sensor axis it is possible to provide parallel alignment with the roll axis of the ship.
  • the signals from the sensor 3 are analogue to digital con- verted and are signal processed in digital form in the CPU- unit 20 by way of a filter program stored in an EPROM corre ⁇ sponding to the function diagram in Fig. 3 and related filter calculation algorithms (see page 6).
  • Analogue signals from a sensor for velocity 7, sensor 8 for rudder position, sensor for direction 11 and rudder command 9, are fed to an isolating unit 4 comprising opto couplers connected to the A/D - converter 2.
  • Digital rudder control signals ⁇ c are digital- analogue converted in the unit 2 and are converted in the converter 5 to appropriate control impulses for the rudder motor 6.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)
  • Other Liquid Machine Or Engine Such As Wave Power Use (AREA)
  • Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
  • Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)

Abstract

System for reducing wave and wind induced roll motion of a ship intended to be connected into the regular control system of the ship comprising a rudder motor (SG) for driving the rudder of the ship, which rudder is used both as steering means and for generating a rolling moment, said system comprising a central unit (C) which receives rudder angle signals from a steering wheel (H) and which central unit emits rudder driving signals to the rudder motor (SG) in response to said control and rudder angle signals. The central unit (C) comprises a roll sensor (RS) for generating a roll angle velocity signal (Ζ) which is brought to an adaptive discrete filter (F) for generation of reconstructed state variables for sampled roll angle velocity (Ζ(n)) and sampled roll acceleration (Ζ(n)) which by reconstruction in the filter estimated state variables (Ζ(n), Ζ(n)) are transferred to a predicting regulator (RG) for the rudder angle whereby said regulator in response to the filtered roll angle velocity signals generates a rudder driving signal to the rudder motor (SG) which gives the ship a roll moment of such amplitude and phase that the roll moment induced by wind and waves of the ship is substantially neutralized.

Description

ROLL DAMPING SYSTEM
Technical field
The present invention refers to motion stabilising systems and in particular to systems for reducing rolling motions of ships by utilizing active rudder control.
Background
By utilizing active rudder control most of the drawbacks are eliminated of conventional rolling damping systems such as active fins and tank systems. The technique to use the rudder of a ship for damping of wave and wind induced rol- ling is well known and early tests were carried out with simpler control systems constructed in analogue technique.
The results which were accomplished with this type of sys¬ tems have not always been successful owing to, the fact that more complex steering systems could not be implemented with the technique available at the present. In order to avoid any substantial influence on the yaw dynamics, the rudder can be moved outwards only during a short time, since other¬ wise the ship starts to yaw. The limited available rudder velocity also makes it necessary not to use too large rudder angles which in other case results in that the steering system comes out of phase and increases the roll angle.
The normally non linear properties of the steering system of every individual ship also constitutes a problem when desig¬ ning a rolling damping system with active rudder control as well as the adaption to different weather and loading situa¬ tions. Of the collected experiencies up to now of rudder stabilised systems, the importance of integrating the auto- pilot in the system has been recognized in order to obtain effective rolling damping and course keeping at the same time. Even in smaller ships such as yachts, fishing boats and the like there is a need to increase the comfort at rough seas. Experiments have shown that by means of active rudder con¬ trol a reduced roll from a state corresponding to Beaufort 5 down to only Beaufort 3 can be achieved. One of the pro¬ blems being the basis of the present invention is to provide a cost effective and reliable roll damping system which is combined with an autopilot comprising a direction sensor.
The state of art
The US patent specification 4 380 206 describes a ship stabilization system, which utilizes the rudders to compen- sate for wind and wave induced roll motions, including a hydraulically actuated mechanism for controlling the posi¬ tion of the rudders; a pump coupled to the hydraulic mecha¬ nism for controlling the flow of hydraulic fluid; and a flow control device connected to the pump for controlling the flow rate of fluid through the pump.
The ship stabilization system also includes a first actua¬ tion device for translating helm steering command signals into control impulses for the the flow control device and a second actuation device for translating helm steering com- mand signals and roll reduction control signals into control impulses for the flow control device. A coupler is connected to the first and second actuation devices and the flow control device for disengaging the first actuation device from the flow control device when the second actuation device is activated.
The roll reduction signal processed by the second actuation device consists of the instantaneous roll rate of the ship and the statistical gain factor representing the statistical average roll rate during a predetermined period of time according to: D = K * a'
K = 0,41 D'LIMIT / w0 E(a') a'= roll velocity D = rudder angle D' LIMIT = available rudder velocity w0= ship natural roll frequency E (a' ) = Expected absolute value of roll rate
The object of the invention is to provide a system with improved signal processing compared to what is evident from the above cited US 4380 206 for reduction of wind and wave induced roll of ships in which system optimal course keeping is combined with optimal reduction of roll.
A second object of the invention is to provide an effective roll reducing system for various wheather situations and ship speeds.
A third object of the invention is to provide a cost effec- tive system which is simple to install on ships without additional reconstruction being necessary.
The above objects are achieved according to the invention with a system with features according to the accompanying patent claims.
Description of the drawing
With reference to the accompanying drawing in the following a preferred embodiment of the present invention is descri¬ bed. In the drawing
Fig. 1 is an outline over forces and moments which are used in a system according to the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a control block diagram over a control system according to an embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 3 is control diagram over a control system according to the invention in which particularly the filter function is illustrated;
Fig 4 is a function flow diagram over a control system according to an embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 5 is a time diagram of a) rudder position δ, b) roll angle rr and roll rate Φrr of a ship caused only by rudder movement, c) roll angle Φm of the ship caused only by waves and wind, d) total roll angle of the ship Φrr + Φw, e) resulting course of the ship;
Fig. 6 shows phase difference between rudder position δ and roll velocity Φrr at different frequencies of rudder activa- tion;
Fig. 7 is a block diagram over the electronics in a control system according to the invention.
With reference to Fig. 1 the basic principle is illustrated for roll damping with an active rudder. The moment created by the rudder movement is
MR = L *
where L = the lifting force of the rudder, dR= the distance between the lifting force center and the roll center Rc of the ship. In Fig. 1 GA further is the designation for yaw arm and Gc yaw center. Fig. 1 also illustrates the difference between roll dynamics and the yaw dynamics. This difference makes it possible to use high frequency rudder signals to damp the roll without affecting the course of the ship.
With reference to Fig 2 is shown a block diagram over the control functions in a first embodiment of the invention. In the block diagram the following designations are given:
SP = ship
SG = rudder motor
R = rudder RP = rudder position sensor
S = velocity sensor
CG = course gyro
RR = roll action
The blocks framed constitute the central unit C, of which
AP = auto pilot
RG = regulator
F = filter
RS = roll sensor CU = control unit together constitute the part which is installed in addition to a conventional steering system.
A rudder command δc from the auto pilot or the steering wheel
H is modified with respect to roll RR, yaw CG and velocity S, and the modified command δ*c thereupon is transferred to the rudder motor SG.
A feature of the system is that steering commands are trans¬ mitted directly to the rudder motor if the roll damping system has been switched off maually by means of the switch S (see fig 2) or if a malfunction has been detected in the system. If large manaeuvres are initiated the roll damping system is automatically switched off until the ship has resumed a steady course.
With reference to Fig. 3 the roll reduction regulator is based on state feedback of and reconstruction of state variables (Φ(n), Φ(n)) by means of a Kalman filter where Φ (n) is sampled roll angle velocity and Φ (n) sampled roll acceleration. By means of reconstruction of the state vari- ~ -~- ables in the filter the estimated states (Φ(n),Φ(n)) are obtained with which thereafter a prediction is made of the roll angle of the ship. An essential advantage of the Kalman filter is that it does not give any phase shift. The regula¬ tor is adaptive in the sense that it adapts to the system, that is, it calculates new filter constants in reference to
Φ and Φ.
<? ~ I Φ is designated with DFI and Φ with DDFI the filter con¬ stants are given as
CalDFI = konst 1 + w /Ts * konst 2 (1)
CalDDFI = konst 3 + w /Ts * konst 3 ... (2)
where Cal means updating of the filter
Ts = the sampling frequency of the filter w = the present roll frequency * 2π
Since the discrete character of the filter the temporary variable
TempDFI =DFI ...(3) is formed.
The estimation of DFI och DDFI is carried out through the following algorithms
DFI = Cos(w/Ts)* DFI + Sin(w/Ts)/w*DDFI ...(4)
DDFI = - Sin(w/Ts)* w * DDFI + Cos(w/Ts) * TempDFI ...(5)
The control error = Error = R - DFI ... (6)
R = roll angle velocity = Φ is one of the input signals to the summing point SI i fig. 3.
The estimates of DFI = Φ och DDFI = Φ are obtained in the integration loop K2 - S2 - INT see Fig. 3. Corresponding algoritms are
DFI - DFI + CalDFI * Error ... (7)
DDFI = DDFI + CalDDFI * Error ... (8)
The roll frequency is calculated as
w = w + Calw * Error ...(9)
where Calw is calculated by means of DFI och DDFI.
w is used to change the coefficients in the filter and at the prediction of the rudder command.
When the ship runs at calm sea, the phase difference between the roll angle velocity and rudder angle δ by giving the rudder a reciprocating action at a number of different frequencies about the resonance frequency wε in the roll direction of the ship.
By recording the roll angle velocity Φ and rudder angle δ as a function of time a phase curve is obtained for the rudder angle - roll angle velocity dependence as a function of the period time, see Fig. 5a and 5b which illustrate the roll of the ship for a rudder frequency 1/T with a resulting phase shift of 0 between Φ_r._r and δ.
If the movement of the ship in the water is regarded as an activated pendulum system in a damping medium the forced oscillations from the rudder results in a amplitude and frequency response concerning roll of the ship corresponding to the system transfer function.
At the phase shift = 0 the natural oscillation period= Ts of the ship is obtained.
By entering the phase curve with the present roll period T an appropriate phase position of the rudder is obtained for the current condition.
The exact time for the rudder order is obtained by calcula¬ ting DFI and DDFI for the present phase angle + a rudder motor constant, Rkonst.
By means of DFI and DDFI the predictor P calculates the rudder order δc.
The maximum rudder angle which can be used for roll damping is calculated according the following:
δ naiMUM RUDDER = τ/4 * Rudder angle velocity ...(12)
That the rudder is not used more than the maximum time which the rudder can be used for roll damping without affecting the course is controlled according to the following: If rudder time > Max. rudder time, then rudder order is set = 0
With reference to Fig. 4 is shown a somewhat simplified functional flow diagram over a control system according to a second embodiment of the invention intended for yachts, small fishing ships and the like.
In Fig. 4 the blocks are designated according to the follo¬ wing: SP = Ship
RRS = Roll rate sensor
F s Adaptive filter w = Calculation of filter, filter coefficients
FST = Trimming MRR = recording av roll angle velocity och rudder angle
CPH = calculated phase curve
PHC = estimated phase curve
RPC = predicted rudder phase calculation
RAC = predicted rudder angle calculation RTC = predicted rudder time calculation
AP = auto pilot
ADD = summation point SM = steering motor
FGS = direction sensor type Fluxgate sensor
R = rudder
The function of the system according to Fig. 4 is the same as that in Fig. 3 with the difference that the rudder order has been modified with the auto pilot order from the block AP according
Rudder order = δc + Auto pilot order ... (13)
The rudder order is converted to suitable signals in a block not shown for the steering motor on board the present ship.
A practic design in hardware of the control system according to the embodiment in Fig. 4 is illustrated in Fig. 6. The CPU- unit of the roll damping system is based on a 16 bit μ - processor type M 68000. The CPU - unit 20 is pro¬ vided with a series interface type RS-232C by means of which the system can be connected to a portable computer 10 and be programmed for measured (see Fig 5a and Fig 5b) and given ship parameters.
The control unit communicates directly with the I/O ports of the CPU-unit or by the A/D and D/A converter 2. The control unit 1 in addition to the auto pilot contains a maneuvering panel with switch means for the system function and a dis¬ play for indication of course deviation, loading state and yaw radius.
The roll sensor 3 which detects the roll angle velocity of the ship comprises a solid state transducer. The operation is in principle that of a gyro and based on a tuning fork which oscillates at its resonance frequency. When the tuning fork is rotated about its symmetry axis the shanks will be deflected from the plane in which they are oscillating. This results in measurable elongations in the shanks perpendicular to the symmetry plane of the tuning fork generator. The roll angle velocity is then derived from the elongations measured.
The roll sensor 3 of solid state type to a very little extent is affected by moving velocities or accelerations. This means that it can be installed generally in any place of the ship under the condition that the rotation sensitive axis is parallel with the roll axis of the ship. This ad¬ vantageous property allows installation of the sensor in the control box for the system as a module. By providing the sensor module with a mechanical setting facility of the sensor axis it is possible to provide parallel alignment with the roll axis of the ship. The signals from the sensor 3 are analogue to digital con- verted and are signal processed in digital form in the CPU- unit 20 by way of a filter program stored in an EPROM corre¬ sponding to the function diagram in Fig. 3 and related filter calculation algorithms (see page 6).
Analogue signals from a sensor for velocity 7, sensor 8 for rudder position, sensor for direction 11 and rudder command 9, are fed to an isolating unit 4 comprising opto couplers connected to the A/D - converter 2.
Digital rudder control signals δc, see fig. 3, are digital- analogue converted in the unit 2 and are converted in the converter 5 to appropriate control impulses for the rudder motor 6.

Claims

1. System for reducing wave and wind induced roll motion of a ship intended to be connected into the regular control system of the ship comprising a rudder motor (SG) for dri¬ ving the rudder of the ship, which rudder is used both as steering means and for generating a rolling moment, said system comprising a central unit (C) which receives rudder angle signals from a steering wheel (H) and which central unit emits rudder driving signals to the rudder motor (SG) in response to said control and rudder angle signals, c h a r a c t e r i z e d t h e r e i n, that said central unit (C) comprises a roll sensor (RS) for generating a roll angle velocity signal (Φ) which is brought to an adaptive discrete filter (F) for generation of recon¬ structed state variables for sampled roll angle velocity (Φ(n)) and sampled roll acceleration (Φ(n)) which by recon¬ struction in the filter estimated state variables' (Φ(n),Φ(n)) are transferred to a predicting regulator (RG) for the rudder angle whereby said regulator in response to the filtered roll angle velocity signal generates a rudder driving signal to the rudder motor (SG) which gives the ship a roll moment of such amplitude and phase that the roll moment induced by wind and waves of the ship is substanti- ally neutralized.
2. System according to claim 1 , c h a r a c t e r i z e d t h e r e i n, that said regulator is connected to one of the inputs of a summing circuit (ADD) and the other input of which is con¬ nected to a direction sensor (CG) which generates signals in response to the movement direction of the ship whereby the output signal from said summing circuit constitutes a rudder drive signal for the rudder motor (SG) which gives the ship a roll moment at yaw of such amplitude and phase that the roll moment induced by wind and waves of the ship is sub¬ stantially neutralized.
3. System according to claim 1 or 2, c h a r a c t e r i z e d i n a CPU-unit (20) comprising a μ - processor which is provided with an interface (21) to receive instructions and data in serial form from a portable computer (10), said data compri¬ sing recorded values of the amplitude and frequency respon¬ se wit respect to roll when the rudder is activated with different frequencies higher and lower than the natural roll frequency of the ship.
PCT/SE1990/000709 1989-11-03 1990-11-02 Roll damping system WO1991006466A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE8903683-4 1989-11-03
SE8903683A SE465029B (en) 1989-11-03 1989-11-03 ROLL ATTACKING SYSTEM

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1991006466A1 true WO1991006466A1 (en) 1991-05-16

Family

ID=20377376

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/SE1990/000709 WO1991006466A1 (en) 1989-11-03 1990-11-02 Roll damping system

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (1) AU6711490A (en)
SE (1) SE465029B (en)
WO (1) WO1991006466A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0615339A1 (en) * 1993-03-11 1994-09-14 SANYO ELECTRIC Co., Ltd. Digital servo system
US5860842A (en) * 1994-06-16 1999-01-19 Gerd Schonrock Self-steering system for watercraft
US20090114137A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2009-05-07 Jan Alexander Keuning Ship
US8555734B2 (en) 2005-08-22 2013-10-15 Technology Investment Company Pty Ltd Stabilising means
RU2531999C1 (en) * 2013-03-01 2014-10-27 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт проблем управления им. В.А. Трапезникова Российской академии наук Hydrofoil ship faultless careen abatement
CN114245785A (en) * 2019-08-22 2022-03-25 西门子歌美飒可再生能源公司 Control system for stabilizing a floating wind turbine

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4380206A (en) * 1981-03-25 1983-04-19 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Ship roll stabilization system

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4380206A (en) * 1981-03-25 1983-04-19 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Ship roll stabilization system

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0615339A1 (en) * 1993-03-11 1994-09-14 SANYO ELECTRIC Co., Ltd. Digital servo system
US5860842A (en) * 1994-06-16 1999-01-19 Gerd Schonrock Self-steering system for watercraft
US8555734B2 (en) 2005-08-22 2013-10-15 Technology Investment Company Pty Ltd Stabilising means
US20090114137A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2009-05-07 Jan Alexander Keuning Ship
US20120266799A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2012-10-25 Jan Alexander Keuning Method For Maintaining The Heading Of A Ship
US8863678B2 (en) * 2006-06-30 2014-10-21 Technische Universiteit Delft Ship
US8881664B2 (en) * 2006-06-30 2014-11-11 Technische Universiteit Delft Method for maintaining the heading of a ship
RU2531999C1 (en) * 2013-03-01 2014-10-27 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт проблем управления им. В.А. Трапезникова Российской академии наук Hydrofoil ship faultless careen abatement
CN114245785A (en) * 2019-08-22 2022-03-25 西门子歌美飒可再生能源公司 Control system for stabilizing a floating wind turbine

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
SE8903683D0 (en) 1989-11-03
SE8903683L (en) 1991-05-04
AU6711490A (en) 1991-05-31
SE465029B (en) 1991-07-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10747226B2 (en) Adaptive autopilot control systems and methods
US10996676B2 (en) Proactive directional control systems and methods
Fossen et al. Nonlinear output feedback control of dynamically positioned ships using vectorial observer backstepping
Lee et al. Discrete-time quasi-sliding mode control of an autonomous underwater vehicle
Van Amerongen Adaptive steering of ships—A model reference approach
Hong et al. Depth control of an autonomous underwater vehicle, STARFISH
US5050086A (en) Aircraft lateral-directional control system
US7818108B2 (en) System of automatic control of maneuver of motor crafts, related method, and craft provided with the system
EP3241086B1 (en) Autopilot control system
JPS6347679B2 (en)
US4032093A (en) Adaptive energy management for vertical speed control of an aircraft
US11378984B2 (en) Vessel-azimuth control apparatus and azimuth controlling method
CN112650257A (en) Unmanned ship area maintaining control method and device
EP3241085A1 (en) Proactive directional control systems and methods
WO1991006466A1 (en) Roll damping system
Nguyen et al. Multi-operational controller structure for station keeping and transit operations of marine vessels
Holvik Basics of dynamic positioning
JPH11129978A (en) Oscillation restraining method of moored ship and device thereof
JP7154330B2 (en) Rocking control device and rocking control method for ship
Katebi et al. Integrated control, guidance and diagnosis for reconfigurable autonomous underwater vehicle control
CN117519183A (en) Fuzzy dynamic positioning control method for switching dynamic memory event trigger of unmanned ship
US4460964A (en) Multiaxis hardover protection apparatus for automatic flight control systems
US4136391A (en) Adaptive cargo landing system
He et al. Towards heading control of an autonomous sailing platform through weight balancing
González et al. An autonomous scale ship model for parametric rolling towing tank testing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU BB BG BR CA FI HU JP KP KR LK MC MG MW NO RO SD SU US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BF BJ CF CG CH CM DE DK ES FR GA GB GR IT LU ML MR NL SE SN TD TG

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA