WO1986003442A1 - Electric-resistance seam-welding method - Google Patents

Electric-resistance seam-welding method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1986003442A1
WO1986003442A1 PCT/JP1984/000583 JP8400583W WO8603442A1 WO 1986003442 A1 WO1986003442 A1 WO 1986003442A1 JP 8400583 W JP8400583 W JP 8400583W WO 8603442 A1 WO8603442 A1 WO 8603442A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
welding
weldability
tin
thickness
welding method
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP1984/000583
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Makoto Kabasawa
Moriaki Ono
Original Assignee
Nippon Kokan Kabushiki Kaisha
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to JP58103886A priority Critical patent/JPS59229290A/en
Application filed by Nippon Kokan Kabushiki Kaisha filed Critical Nippon Kokan Kabushiki Kaisha
Priority to GB08612297A priority patent/GB2178682B/en
Priority to CH3144/86A priority patent/CH668930A5/en
Priority to PCT/JP1984/000583 priority patent/WO1986003442A1/en
Priority to DE19843490793 priority patent/DE3490793T1/de
Publication of WO1986003442A1 publication Critical patent/WO1986003442A1/en
Priority to US07/394,143 priority patent/US5064982A/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K11/00Resistance welding; Severing by resistance heating
    • B23K11/08Seam welding not restricted to one of the preceding subgroups
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K11/00Resistance welding; Severing by resistance heating
    • B23K11/06Resistance welding; Severing by resistance heating using roller electrodes
    • B23K11/061Resistance welding; Severing by resistance heating using roller electrodes for welding rectilinear seams
    • B23K11/062Resistance welding; Severing by resistance heating using roller electrodes for welding rectilinear seams for welding longitudinal seams of tubes
    • B23K11/063Lap welding
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K11/00Resistance welding; Severing by resistance heating
    • B23K11/16Resistance welding; Severing by resistance heating taking account of the properties of the material to be welded
    • B23K11/163Welding of coated materials

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a welding method in which an electric current range for welding is expanded in electric resistance seam welding of a can body using a difficult-to-weld material, for example, tenfly steel. It is a thing.
  • the copper wire resistance seam welding method is used to connect the copper wires ( 2 ) wound around the upper and lower electrode electrodes ( 3 ).
  • the longitudinal edge of the can body plate (1) which has been formed into a tubular shape in advance, is passed while being overlapped with a predetermined width, and the overlapping portion of the can body plate (1) is passed through the upper and lower roller electrodes (3).
  • pressure and current are applied via the copper wire (2), and welding is performed continuously for 1 to 1 due to electric resistance heat generated at the overlapped portion.
  • the vertical edge of the can body (1) is connected to the guide groove using a Z-shaped guide bar ( 4 ). ⁇ People are superimposed on each other. This overlapping width is determined by the Z-shaped guide bar (4) where the vertical portions are overlapped, and the can body diameter determining hole disposed around the upper and lower electrodes (electrodes). ? It is determined .
  • the quality of the welds depends on the joint strength, airtightness and It is evaluated based on the appearance properties. Bonding strength and airtightness are problems related to leakage of the contents.To satisfy these characteristics, it is necessary that the heat generated by electric resistance at the bonding interface exceeds a certain limit. . From this, the minimum value of the welding current is determined. In addition, it is necessary that burrs exist as the appearance properties. Normally, after welding, the seam weld is covered with a protective paint.However, the presence of burrs can cause problems with paint application, 3 ⁇ 4D, and exposed parts that are not covered with paint.
  • the contents do not react with the burrs and change quality, and the burrs may peel off from the can body and be mixed into the contents. .
  • the burrs molten metal scattered from the seam weld and adhered near the seam weld.
  • the heat generated at the junction interface it is necessary that the heat generated at the junction interface be below a certain limit. From this, the maximum value of the welding current is determined.
  • the proper current value range for welding is a range where the value obtained by subtracting the lower limit current value from the upper limit current value is a positive value i, and the quality of the weldability of the container material depends on the width of this proper current value range. Is determined.
  • the steel material for containers used in this welding method is required to be excellent in various properties such as corrosion resistance, workability, paintability, etc. required for steel plates for containers, and also excellent in weldability.
  • soldering cans titanium adhesion of 2.8 f / rri or more
  • new materials steel materials
  • soldering cans and thinner cans are obtained!
  • the appropriate current value range is wide and the weldability is extremely good.
  • a part of the thin solder and the tin-free steel have a narrower welding current range than the solder can and have poor weldability.
  • Tin-free steel is liable to generate burrs during welding, and if the welding current is reduced to suppress the formation of pallets, the joint strength and adhesion will not be sufficient. You.
  • the surface of the overlapped portion and the edge of the blank, which is to be overlapped is exposed beforehand by exposing almost the entire iron surface by mechanical means such as a zipper. Electric resistance seam welding was being performed.
  • mechanical means increase the number of work steps, and further increase the number of work steps.9
  • the fine powder removed is not completely removed from the steel sheet surface and reattached, causing various inconveniences in the subsequent steps.
  • the exposed surface of the iron after removing the surface coating has disadvantages such as lack of corrosion and impaired appearance. For this reason, tin-free steel is still in use in canned food cans.
  • the present invention solves the above-mentioned drawbacks, and performs any special pretreatment of a material for food containers, which is difficult to weld by electric resistance seam such as tin-free steel. Not easily It is intended to provide an electric resistance seam welding method that enables welding.
  • the present invention relates to an electric resistance seam welding method for a hard-to-weld steel plate!
  • the steel sheet has a coating layer of a metal and an intermetallic compound harder than tin as a coating layer, and the thickness of the steel sheet is in a range usually used as a material for cans, that is, 0.5 or less.
  • the overlapping width of the steel sheet is more than 2.0 times the sheet thickness and less than 2.4 times.
  • FIG. 1 is an illustration of the copper wire resistance seam welding method
  • Fig. 2 is an illustration of the copper wire resistance seam welding method shown in Fig. 1
  • Fig. 5 Fig. 4 is an explanatory view of the welding condition of the seam welded part of the tin free steel.
  • Figs. 4 and 5 show the material plates for the tin free steel.
  • FIG. 4 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between a ratio of a thickness to an overlap width and a welding current.
  • (1) can body plate, (2) copper wire, (3) roller electrode, (4) Z-shaped guide bar, (5) ground iron part, (6) ...
  • the hydrated oxide of the chemical conversion coating is an electrical insulator
  • the tin on the base is soft and the electrode
  • the chemical conversion coating easily breaks and disperses, and a large energized area can be obtained. Therefore, electric resistance heat is generated uniformly at the joint interface, and a high-temperature softening region is obtained in a sufficiently wide range while molten metal is generated.Pressure welding is performed at the joint interface due to large plastic flow. And a good seam is obtained.
  • the tin free steel which has poor weldability, is located under the chemical conversion coating ( 7 ), as shown in the schematic diagram of the seam weld formation in Fig. 3. Since the metal cup (6) is extremely hard compared to tin, the chemical conversion coating is not sufficiently ruptured by pressurization of the electrode.9 The current flows locally and unevenly during welding. become . Therefore, the molten metal (9) is formed at a relatively low current value. However, since the high-temperature softening region is not sufficiently formed, and the effect of confining the molten metal by plastic flow is weak, the molten metal is easily scattered and the barrier (10) Will form. However, it became clear that the joint strength and airtightness could be obtained relatively easily even by local joining.
  • the inventor of the present invention believes that it is effective to increase the force for suppressing the scattering of molten metal in order to improve the weldability of difficult-to-weld materials. Therefore, optimization of the seam welded shape (overlap width) was studied.
  • the superposition width that has been used conventionally is more than a4, observation and 0.8 Nada!
  • the weldability when using these overlapping widths is described below! ).
  • the overlapping width is 0.4 rinsing, the seam welded portion will overlap the material thickness. It's too small to fit together j? However, the effect of suppressing the scattering of the molten metal is weak, and the weldability is reduced.
  • the overlapping width is 0.0 baskets
  • the overlapping margin is large and the force per unit area decreases, so that the generation of molten metal due to local heat generation is promoted, and Good joints can be obtained because the ability to suppress the scattering of molten metal is weak.
  • the overlap width tends to be smaller than the conventional 0.4 haze. As a result, reducing the overlapping width is not an effective measure to reduce the force for suppressing the scattering of the molten metal. In the present invention, it was found that the weldability was significantly improved by setting the ratio of the overlap width to the material thickness to be more than 2.0 times and less than 2.4 times.
  • the thickness of the material is 0.22
  • the tin free steel metal chrome amount: 150 / r hydrated oxidation
  • temper T — 4 temper T — 4 as the original plate
  • the material TFS is tin-free steel of the chromium type, and the material LTS has a tin adhesion of 0.55 f / rri.
  • the numbers in the table are the ratios of the overlap width to the material thickness, and the weldability evaluation results are indicated by ⁇ and X.
  • indicates that the appropriate current range is 300 A or more and the weldability is good, ⁇ indicates that the appropriate current range is more than 0 A and less than 500 A, and X indicates the appropriate current range if the weldability is slightly better. Is negative
  • GMFI GMFI
  • the appropriate range of the material thickness to which the welding method of the present invention is applied is more than 0.2 mm and less than 0.25 lord.
  • Table 2 shows the welding test results when various materials were welded with a copper wire resistance seam welding method when the material thickness was 0.22 leakage and the electrode pressing force was 40 k. .
  • Fig. 5 shows the results of welding experiments using a steel stapling with an overlap width of 0.3, 0.55 inversion, 0.40 basket, 0.45 mm, and 0.50 haze. Shown in Fig. 5 shows the relationship between the ratio of the overlap width to the material thickness and the lower limit current a and the upper limit current b of the welding current, as in Fig. 4.
  • the region c is the proper current range. In this case as well, if the overlap width exceeds 2.0 times, and if it is less than 2.4 times, a sufficiently wide welding appropriate current range can be obtained.
  • the material TFS is a chrome-type tin-free steel.
  • the numbers in the table are the ratios of the overlap width to the material plate thickness, and the results of the weldability evaluation are indicated by ⁇ ; X.
  • indicates that the appropriate current range is 500 mm or more and the weldability is good, indicates that the appropriate current range is more than 0 A and is less than 500 A, and that the weldability is somewhat good. Negative weldability is poor.
  • container materials with localized and non-uniform electrical resistance heat generation are considered to have inferior weldability to soldering cans.
  • the plating metal is harder than tin or when the chemical conversion coating is thick, the weldability is reduced, but the present invention is effective for all such materials. .
  • Table 4 shows the results when the material thickness is so-called, 0.25 leakage, 0.52 basket, and D-welding of various materials using the copper wire resistance seam welding method. The results of the welding test are shown. Table 4
  • the materials used for this welding were E 2.8 Z 2.8 for soldering cans with tin adhesion of 2.8 f / rri, and LTS and Ni for ignition with 0.55 f tin adhesion.
  • This is a tin-free steel TFS of the same steel and chrome type.
  • the ratio of the overlap width to the material thickness exceeds 2.0 times and less than 2.4 times, a sufficiently wide appropriate current range is obtained for all materials regardless of the material thickness. Have.
  • the electric resistance seam welding method of the present invention is used. Is useful for extending the proper current range of difficult-to-weld materials! ), It is suitable for manufacturing welding cans using difficult-to-weld materials that have not been conventionally used for canned foods, such as tin-free steel.

Abstract

This electric-resistance seam-welding method for welding difficult-to-weld steel plate suppresses the generation of burrs. The steel plate has coating layers of a metal harder than tin and an intermetallic compound. The thickness of the steel plate is not more than 0.5 mm. The overlap width of the steel plate is greater than 2.0 times the plate thickness, but is less than 2.4 times the plate thickness. The weldable current range of steel plate can be increased by this means.

Description

明 細 書  Specification
電気抵抗 シ ー ム溶接法  Electric resistance seam welding method
技 術 分 野  Technical field
こ の発明は 、 難溶接材、 例えばテ ン フ リ ー ス チ ー ル 、 を 使用 した缶胴の電気抵抗 シ ー ム溶接に おい て、 溶接適 正電流範囲 を 拡大させた溶接法に 関す る も ので あ る 。  The present invention relates to a welding method in which an electric current range for welding is expanded in electric resistance seam welding of a can body using a difficult-to-weld material, for example, tenfly steel. It is a thing.
背 景 技 術  Background technology
近年、 食品容器の製缶方式の多様化に よ i 、 缶の製造 法 と して電気抵抗 シ ― ム 溶接法、 例えば銅 ワ イ ヤ抵抗 シ ― ム溶接法、 が著 し く 発展 して き ている 。  In recent years, due to the diversification of food container canning methods i, electric resistance seam welding, for example, copper wire resistance seam welding, has been remarkably developed as a method for manufacturing cans. ing .
銅 ワ イ ヤ抵抗 シ ― ム 溶接法は 、 第 1 図に示す よ う に、 上下に配置さ れた 口 ー ラ 電極(3)にそれぞれ巻 き つけ られ た銅 ワ イ ヤ(2)間 を 、 予め筒状に 成形 した缶胴板(1)の縦縁 部 を 所定の幅で重ね合わせつつ通過させ、 その際、 缶胴 板(1)の重ね合わせ部を 上下 ロ ー ラ 電極(3)に よ っ て 、 銅 ヮ ィ ャ(2)を 介 して加圧、 通電させ、 こ の重ね合わせ部の電 気抵抗発熱に よ 1? 連続的に溶接を 行なわせる 方法で あ る 。 As shown in Fig. 1, the copper wire resistance seam welding method is used to connect the copper wires ( 2 ) wound around the upper and lower electrode electrodes ( 3 ). The longitudinal edge of the can body plate (1), which has been formed into a tubular shape in advance, is passed while being overlapped with a predetermined width, and the overlapping portion of the can body plate (1) is passed through the upper and lower roller electrodes (3). In this method, pressure and current are applied via the copper wire (2), and welding is performed continuously for 1 to 1 due to electric resistance heat generated at the overlapped portion.
こ こ で缶胴部(1)の縦縁部は 、 第 2 図に示す よ う に 、 断 面形状力 Z 形を した ガ イ ドバ ー(4) を 用 い て、 その ガ イ ド 溝へ揷人する こ と に よ 重ね合わさ れる 。 こ の重ね合わ せ幅は 縦緣部を 重ね合わせる Z 形 ガ イ ド バ ー(4) と 、 上下 の 口 一 ラ 電極 )の周 囲に配置された缶胴 口径決定用 口 一 ル と に よ ]? 決定される 。 Here, as shown in Fig. 2, the vertical edge of the can body (1) is connected to the guide groove using a Z-shaped guide bar ( 4 ).揷 People are superimposed on each other. This overlapping width is determined by the Z-shaped guide bar (4) where the vertical portions are overlapped, and the can body diameter determining hole disposed around the upper and lower electrodes (electrodes). ? It is determined .
溶接部の品質は シ ー ム溶接部の接合強度、 気密性及び 外観性状によ 評価される。 接合強度及び気密性は、 内容 物の漏洩にかかわる問題であ i? 、 これ らの特性を満足させ る ためには、 接合界面で電気抵抗発熱が、 ある限界値以上 ある こ と が必要である。 こ の こ とか ら溶接電流の最小値が 決定される。 又外観性状と してはバ リ が存在 し いこ とが 必要である。 通常、 溶接後、 シ ― ム溶接部を保護塗料で被 覆するが、 バ リ が存在する と塗料塗布の障害と ¾ D 、 また 塗料で被覆され い露出部分を生 じ、 さ らに こ の よ う ¾缶 胴を使用する と、 内容物がバ リ と反応 して変質するばか で く 、 バ リ が缶胴か ら剥離 して、 内容物内に混入するお それがあるか らである。 バ リ は溶融金属がシ ― ム溶接部か 'ら飛散 し、 シ 一 ム溶接部附近に付着 した も のである。 パ リ が存在 し いためには、 接合界面で電気抵抗発熱が、 ある 限界値以下である こ と が必要である。 このこ とから溶接電 流の最大値が決定される。 - こ の シ ー ム溶接部の品質を評価する接合強度、 気密性及 び外観性能か ら決定される溶接電流の最小値及び最大値を 各 々 下限電流値、 上限電流値と 定義する と 、 溶接の適正電 流値範囲は上限電流値か ら下限電流値を差 し引いた値が正 の値の範囲であ i 、 容器用素材の溶接性の良否は この適正 電流値範囲の広さ に よって決定される。 The quality of the welds depends on the joint strength, airtightness and It is evaluated based on the appearance properties. Bonding strength and airtightness are problems related to leakage of the contents.To satisfy these characteristics, it is necessary that the heat generated by electric resistance at the bonding interface exceeds a certain limit. . From this, the minimum value of the welding current is determined. In addition, it is necessary that burrs exist as the appearance properties. Normally, after welding, the seam weld is covered with a protective paint.However, the presence of burrs can cause problems with paint application, ¾D, and exposed parts that are not covered with paint. When using a can body, the contents do not react with the burrs and change quality, and the burrs may peel off from the can body and be mixed into the contents. . In the burrs, molten metal scattered from the seam weld and adhered near the seam weld. In order for no pallets to exist, it is necessary that the heat generated at the junction interface be below a certain limit. From this, the maximum value of the welding current is determined. -If the minimum and maximum values of the welding current determined from the joint strength, airtightness, and appearance performance for evaluating the quality of this seam weld are defined as the lower limit current value and upper limit current value, respectively, The proper current value range for welding is a range where the value obtained by subtracting the lower limit current value from the upper limit current value is a positive value i, and the quality of the weldability of the container material depends on the width of this proper current value range. Is determined.
こ の溶接法に用い られる容器用鋼材は、 容器用鋼板に要 求される耐食性、 加工性、 塗装性等の諸性能に優れている と と も に溶接性に優れている こ と が要求される。 容器用鋼材と しては従来 よ 半田づけ缶用ぶ き (錫 付着量 2. 8 f/rri以上) が主流を 占めて き たが、 近年新素 材 (鋼材) が開発されてい る 。 こ れ ら の素材を 電気抵抗 シ - ム溶接法の対象 と した場.合に、 半田づけ缶用ぶ り き 及び薄めつ き ぶ !) き の一部は適正電流値範囲が広 く 、 溶 接性は極めて良好である。 しか し、 薄めつ き ぶ き の一 部及びティ ン フ リ 一ス チ ー ルは半田づけ缶用ぶ i き と比 較 して溶接適性電流値範囲が狭 く 、 溶接性が劣る。 The steel material for containers used in this welding method is required to be excellent in various properties such as corrosion resistance, workability, paintability, etc. required for steel plates for containers, and also excellent in weldability. You. As a container steel material, soldering cans (tin adhesion of 2.8 f / rri or more) have been the mainstream, but new materials (steel materials) have been developed in recent years. When these materials are subjected to the electric resistance seam welding method, soldering cans and thinner cans are obtained! In some cases, the appropriate current value range is wide and the weldability is extremely good. However, a part of the thin solder and the tin-free steel have a narrower welding current range than the solder can and have poor weldability.
テ ィ ン フ リ 一 ス チ ー ルは溶接の際にバ リ を発生 し易 く 、 パ リ の生成を抑えるために溶接電流値を小とする と接合 強度、 密着性が十分でな く な る。  Tin-free steel is liable to generate burrs during welding, and if the welding current is reduced to suppress the formation of pallets, the joint strength and adhesion will not be sufficient. You.
そ こ で従来は、 重ね合わせ部 と ¾ る べ き ブ ラ ン ク端縁 部の表面被覆を ヮ ィ ャ ブラ シ等の機械的手段に よ って予 め鉄面をほぼ全面露出させた後に電気抵抗シ ー ム溶接を 行っていた。 しか し、 これ らの機械的手段では作業工程 がー工程増え、 さ らに削 ]9 除去 した微粉が鋼板表面か ら 完全に排除され'ず再付着 して、 以後の工程に種 々不都合 を生じさせる 。 又表面被覆除去後の鉄露出面は »食性が な く 、 外観を損ねる等の欠点を 有 している。 こ のためテ ィ ン フ リ — ス チ ー ルは未だに食品缶詰の缶には使用され ている い状態に ある。  Conventionally, the surface of the overlapped portion and the edge of the blank, which is to be overlapped, is exposed beforehand by exposing almost the entire iron surface by mechanical means such as a zipper. Electric resistance seam welding was being performed. However, these mechanical means increase the number of work steps, and further increase the number of work steps.9 The fine powder removed is not completely removed from the steel sheet surface and reattached, causing various inconveniences in the subsequent steps. Give rise. Moreover, the exposed surface of the iron after removing the surface coating has disadvantages such as lack of corrosion and impaired appearance. For this reason, tin-free steel is still in use in canned food cans.
この発明は 、 上述の欠点を解決 して、 例えばテ ィ ン フ リ — ス チ ー ル の よ う る電気抵抗シ ー ム溶接困難 食品容 器用素材を何等特別の前処理を行な う こ と な く 、 容易に 溶接可能と した電気抵抗シ ー ム溶接法を提供する こ と を 目 的とする も のである。 The present invention solves the above-mentioned drawbacks, and performs any special pretreatment of a material for food containers, which is difficult to weld by electric resistance seam such as tin-free steel. Not easily It is intended to provide an electric resistance seam welding method that enables welding.
発 明 の 開 示  Disclosure of the invention
この発明は 、 難溶接鋼板の電気抵抗シ ― ム溶接法に関 する も のであ !) 、 該鋼板は、 錫よ 硬い金属およ び金属 間化合物を被覆層 と して有 し、 該鋼板の板厚は通常缶用 素材と して使用される範囲す わち 0. 5 濯以下であ 、 該鋼板の重ね合わせ幅が板厚の 2. 0倍を超え、 2. 4倍未 満と してある。 この こ と に よ って、 上記鋼板の溶接適正 電流範囲を拡大 し、 バ リ の発生を抑制 して、 溶接性を 向 上させる。  The present invention relates to an electric resistance seam welding method for a hard-to-weld steel plate! The steel sheet has a coating layer of a metal and an intermetallic compound harder than tin as a coating layer, and the thickness of the steel sheet is in a range usually used as a material for cans, that is, 0.5 or less. However, the overlapping width of the steel sheet is more than 2.0 times the sheet thickness and less than 2.4 times. As a result, the appropriate current range for welding the above steel sheet is expanded, the occurrence of burrs is suppressed, and the weldability is improved.
図 面 の 簡 単 な 説 明  Brief explanation of drawings
第 1 図は銅 ワ イ ヤ抵抗シ ― ム溶接法の説明図、 第 2図 は第 1 図の銅 ワ イ ャ抵抗シ ― ム溶接法の Z 型ガ イ ドバ ー の説明図、 第 5 図はテ ィ ン フ リ ー ス チ ー ル の シ ー ム溶接 部の溶接状況の説明図、 第 4 図およ び第 5 図はテ ィ ン フ リ — ス チ ー ルに関 して材料板厚と 重ね合わせ幅 と の比と . 溶接電流 と の関係を示 した特性図である。  Fig. 1 is an illustration of the copper wire resistance seam welding method, Fig. 2 is an illustration of the copper wire resistance seam welding method shown in Fig. 1, and Fig. 5 Fig. 4 is an explanatory view of the welding condition of the seam welded part of the tin free steel. Figs. 4 and 5 show the material plates for the tin free steel. FIG. 4 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between a ratio of a thickness to an overlap width and a welding current.
(1)…缶胴板、 (2)…銅ワ イ ヤ 、 (3)… ロ ー ラ電極、 (4)… Z 型ガ ィ ド バ ― 、 (5)…地鉄部、 (6)…金属ク ロ ム層、 (7)…水 和酸化ク ロ ム層、 (8)…溶接電流経路、 (9)…溶融金属、  (1) can body plate, (2) copper wire, (3) roller electrode, (4) Z-shaped guide bar, (5) ground iron part, (6) ... Metal chromium layer, (7) hydrated chromium oxide layer, (8) welding current path, (9) molten metal,
(10)…バ リ 、 (a)…下限電流値、 (b)…上限電流値、 (c)…適正 電流値範囲。 (10)… Vari, (a)… Lower limit current value, (b)… Upper limit current value, (c)… Appropriate current value range.
発明を実施するための最良の形態 一 ΟΙΛ*--- BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION ΟΙΛ * ---
"" こ の発明の発明者は難溶接材の溶接の問題点解決のた め に 、 溶接性についての溶接現象面か らの解明 を 行なつ た。 その結果, 以下の こ と が明 らか と な った。 "" The inventor of the present invention elucidated the weldability from the viewpoint of welding phenomena in order to solve the problem of welding difficult-to-weld materials. As a result, the following became clear.
溶接性の良好な半田づけ缶用ぶ D き の場合、 化成処理 被膜の水和酸化ク 口 ム が電気的絶縁物で ある に も かかわ らず、 下地の錫が軟 らかいため電極の加 EEに よ ] 容易に 化成処理被膜が破壊、 分散し 、 大 き な通電面積が得 られ る 。 そ こ で、 接合界面では均一に電気抵抗発熱 し、 溶融 金属が生成 し い う ち に高温軟化領域が十分広い範囲で 得 られ、 大 き な塑性流動に よ i 接合界面で圧接が行な わ れて、 良好 ¾継 目 が得 られ る。  In the case of soldering cans with good weldability, despite the fact that the hydrated oxide of the chemical conversion coating is an electrical insulator, the tin on the base is soft and the electrode The chemical conversion coating easily breaks and disperses, and a large energized area can be obtained. Therefore, electric resistance heat is generated uniformly at the joint interface, and a high-temperature softening region is obtained in a sufficiently wide range while molten metal is generated.Pressure welding is performed at the joint interface due to large plastic flow. And a good seam is obtained.
—方 、 溶接性の劣る テ ィ ン フ リ ー ス チ ー ルは 、 第 3 図 に模式的に示 した シ ― ム 溶接部形成状況の如 く 、 化成処 理被膜(7)の下地に ある金属 ク 口 ム (6)が錫 と 比較 して極め て硬いため 、 電極の加圧に よ る 化成処理被膜の破壌が不 十分 と 9 、 溶接時に 電流は局部的かつ不均一に流れる こ と に な る 。 こ のため比較的低い電流値で溶融金属(9)が 形成さ れ る 。 しか しな が ら高温軟化領域が十分形成され てお らず、 塑性流動に よ る 形状的 溶融金属の閉 じ込め 効果が弱いため 、 溶融金属 ^容易に飛散 して、 バ リ (10)を 形成 して しま う 。 しか し接合強度、 気密性は 局部的接合 に よ って も 比較的容易に得 られ る こ と が明 らか と な った。 On the other hand, the tin free steel, which has poor weldability, is located under the chemical conversion coating ( 7 ), as shown in the schematic diagram of the seam weld formation in Fig. 3. Since the metal cup (6) is extremely hard compared to tin, the chemical conversion coating is not sufficiently ruptured by pressurization of the electrode.9 The current flows locally and unevenly during welding. become . Therefore, the molten metal (9) is formed at a relatively low current value. However, since the high-temperature softening region is not sufficiently formed, and the effect of confining the molten metal by plastic flow is weak, the molten metal is easily scattered and the barrier (10) Will form. However, it became clear that the joint strength and airtightness could be obtained relatively easily even by local joining.
難溶接材の溶接性を 向上させる 対策 と して、 従来は局 部発熱に よ る溶融金属の生成を 防止する ために 、 材料表 面の化成処理被覆量 (金属ク ロ ム 量、 水和酸化 ク ロ ム量) の低減に よ る も のが主で あ る 。 As a measure to improve the weldability of difficult-to-weld materials, a conventional material list was used to prevent the generation of molten metal due to local heat generation. This is mainly due to the reduction in the amount of surface chemical conversion coating (the amount of chromium metal and chromium hydrate oxide).
こ の発明の発明者は 、 前記溶接現象の解明の結果、 難 溶接材の溶接性を 向上させ るため には溶融金属の飛散を 抑制する 力 を 増大させる こ と が有効 ¾手段 と ¾ う る と 考察 して、 シ ― ム溶接部形状 (重ね合わせ幅) の適正化 を検討 した。  As a result of elucidating the welding phenomena, the inventor of the present invention believes that it is effective to increase the force for suppressing the scattering of molten metal in order to improve the weldability of difficult-to-weld materials. Therefore, optimization of the seam welded shape (overlap width) was studied.
従来使用 されて き た重ね合わせ幅は a 4 簡 、 ό 觀及 び 0. 8 灘以上で あ !) 、 これ らの重ね合わせ幅を 用いた場 合の溶接性は 以下に述べる 通 !) で あ る。 例えば、 材料板 厚 0. 2 2 濯 のテ ィ ン フ リ 一 ス チ ー ル を 使用 した場合に、 重ね合わせ幅が 0. 4 濯 では 材料板厚に対 して シ ー ム溶接 部の重ね合わせ代が小さ過 ぎる こ と に よ j? 、 溶融金属の 飛散を抑制す る効力が弱 く 、 溶接性は 低下す る 。 重 ね合わせ幅が 0. 0 籠 の場合では 重ね合わせ代が大 き く D 過 ぎて 、 単位面積当 ) の力が減少す るため、 局部発熱 に よ る溶融金属の生成を 助長 し、 かつ溶融金属の飛散を 抑制する 力が弱い こ と か ら 良好な接合部が得 られるい。  The superposition width that has been used conventionally is more than a4, observation and 0.8 Nada! The weldability when using these overlapping widths is described below! ). For example, when using a fin-free steel with a material thickness of 0.22 rinsing, if the overlapping width is 0.4 rinsing, the seam welded portion will overlap the material thickness. It's too small to fit together j? However, the effect of suppressing the scattering of the molten metal is weak, and the weldability is reduced. When the overlapping width is 0.0 baskets, the overlapping margin is large and the force per unit area decreases, so that the generation of molten metal due to local heat generation is promoted, and Good joints can be obtained because the ability to suppress the scattering of molten metal is weak.
重ね合わせ幅には あ る適正値が存在す る こ と が推定さ れる が、 一般に溶接性を 向上させる ため に、 シ ー ム溶接 部の重ね合わせ代を 小さ く する のが得策 と して、 重ね合 わせ幅 を 従来の 0. 4 霞 よ ]9 小さ く する傾向がある 。 し力 し 力 ら 、 重ね合わせ幅を 小さ く する こ と は 、 溶融金属 の飛散を 抑制す る 力 を 弱め る こ と に ¾ 得策では な い。 本発明においては 、 材料板厚に対する重ね合わせ幅の 比を 2. 0倍を超え 2. 4倍未満にする こ と に よって溶接性 が著 し く 向上する こ と を知った。 It is presumed that there is a certain appropriate value for the overlap width, but in general, it is advisable to reduce the overlap allowance of the seam welded part in order to improve weldability. The overlap width tends to be smaller than the conventional 0.4 haze. As a result, reducing the overlapping width is not an effective measure to reduce the force for suppressing the scattering of the molten metal. In the present invention, it was found that the weldability was significantly improved by setting the ratio of the overlap width to the material thickness to be more than 2.0 times and less than 2.4 times.
す わち、 材料板厚が 0. 2 2 翻 で 、 調質度 T — 4 を原 板 と したテ ィ ン フ リ ー ス チ ー ル (金属ク ロ ム 量 1 5 0 /r 水和酸化ク 口 中のク 口 ム 量 3 0 ) を 用いて、 銅 ヮ ィ ャ抵抗シ ― ム溶接法に よ ]9 、 溶接速度 4 5 /分、 電極 加圧力 4 0 /、 重ね合わせ幅 0. 4 0. 4 5 0. 5 0. 5 5 0. 0 濯 で溶接を行って溶接性を調べた。 この結 果、 第 4 図に示すデー タ が得 られた。 第 4 図は重ね合わ せ幅 と材料板厚の比と溶接電流の下限電流 a 及び上限'電 流 b の関係を示 した も ので ある。 第 4 図において下限電 流 a 及び上限電流 b にかこ ま れた領域 c が適正電流範囲 で ある。  In other words, the thickness of the material is 0.22, and the tin free steel (metal chrome amount: 150 / r hydrated oxidation) with temper T — 4 as the original plate is used. Using the copper wire resistance seam welding method, using the amount of the hole in the hole 30), the welding speed 45 / min, the electrode pressure 40 /, and the overlapping width 0.4. Welding was performed with a 0.45 0.5. 5 0.5. 50.0 rinse to examine weldability. As a result, the data shown in Fig. 4 was obtained. Fig. 4 shows the relationship between the overlap width and the material thickness, and the lower limit current a and the upper limit current b of the welding current. In FIG. 4, the region c surrounded by the lower limit current a and the upper limit current b is the appropriate current range.
これに よ !) 、 従来、 溶接不能と いわれたテ ィ ン フ リ ー ス チ ー ル で 、 材料板厚に対する 重ね合わせ幅の比が 2倍 を超え、 2. 4倍未満に制御する こ と に よ !) 十分広い適正 電流範囲、 すなわち外部的 要因を考慮 して少 く と も 5 0 0 A 以上が得 られる こ と が判明 した。  This is it! In the case of tin free steel, which was previously considered to be non-weldable, the ratio of the overlap width to the material thickness was controlled to more than 2 times and less than 2.4 times! ) It was found that a sufficiently wide appropriate current range, that is, at least 500 A or more can be obtained in consideration of external factors.
又、 溶接は高温の変形抵抗低下部分で生 じる も のであ Ϊ) . 溶接の良否は シ 溶接部形状 と温度分布の両者が 影響する も の と 考え られ、 温度分布は材料板厚に依存す るため、 前記適正重 ¾合わせ幅に対する材料板厚の適用 範囲の妥当性について調べた結果を 表 1 に示す。 表 1 In addition, welding occurs in the area where the deformation resistance decreases at high temperatures.) The quality of welding is considered to be affected by both the shape of the weld and the temperature distribution, and the temperature distribution depends on the material thickness. For this reason, Table 1 shows the results of an investigation on the adequacy of the applicable range of the material plate thickness with respect to the above-mentioned appropriate lamination width. table 1
Figure imgf000010_0001
表 1 に おいて 、 材料 T F S は ク ロ ム タ イ プの テ ィ ン フ リ — ス チ ー ルであ ] 、 材料 L T S は錫付着量が 0.5 5 f/rri のぶ J き である。 表中の数字は材料板厚に対する重ね合 わせ幅の比であ 、 溶接性評価結果は〇, X で示 し た。 〇は適正電流範囲が 3 0 0 A以上で溶接性良好の場 合、 は適正電流範囲が 0 A を超え 5 0 0 A未満の場合 で、 溶接性がやや良好の場合、 Xは適正電流範囲が負と
Figure imgf000010_0001
In Table 1, the material TFS is tin-free steel of the chromium type, and the material LTS has a tin adhesion of 0.55 f / rri. The numbers in the table are the ratios of the overlap width to the material thickness, and the weldability evaluation results are indicated by で and X. 〇 indicates that the appropriate current range is 300 A or more and the weldability is good, は indicates that the appropriate current range is more than 0 A and less than 500 A, and X indicates the appropriate current range if the weldability is slightly better. Is negative
、 溶接性が不良の場合である。 '  This is the case where the weldability is poor. '
( GMFI この結果、 この発明の溶接法が適用される材料板厚の 適正範囲は 0. 2 鲫を超え、 0. 2 5 卿未満である こ と が判 明 した。 (GMFI As a result, it has been found that the appropriate range of the material thickness to which the welding method of the present invention is applied is more than 0.2 mm and less than 0.25 lord.
表 2 に材料板厚が 0. 2 2 漏 の場合の各種材料を銅 ヮ ィ ャ抵抗シ ー ム溶接法に よ ]? 、 電極加圧力 4 0 k で溶接 し た場合の溶接試験結果を示す。 Table 2 shows the welding test results when various materials were welded with a copper wire resistance seam welding method when the material thickness was 0.22 leakage and the electrode pressing force was 40 k. .
表 2 オーバ一 Table 2 Over
顶飄 適正電流 重ね^ *確 下限電流  顶 Easy appropriate current overlap ^ * accuracy lower limit current
材 料 ラップ幅  Material Wrap width
靈 A A A 材料板厚  Rei A A A Material thickness
E 2.8/2.8 4 Π0 3100 1000 E 2.8 / 2.8 4 Π0 3100 1000
L T S 5250 2800 450  L T S 5250 2800 450
N iメツキ 5200 2050 550 Ni Metsuki 5200 2050 550
丄 t> D 6 U 0 c n U O 1 U . nU b cr  丄 t> D 6 U 0 c n U O 1 U .nU b cr
E 2.8/2.8 4250 5200 Ί 050 E 2.8 / 2.8 4250 5200 Ί 050
L T S 5400 2850 550  L T S 5400 2850 550
0,50 2.27 0,50 2.27
N i ツキ 3500 2750 550 N i Tsuki 3500 2750 550
T F S 27 U U 2260 440  T F S 27 U U 2260 440
E 2.8/2.8 4Ί 50 5550 800 E 2.8 / 2.8 4Ί 50 5550 800
L T S 2950 2900 50  L T S 2950 2900 50
0.55 2.50 0.55 2.50
N iメツキ 2800 2800 0 N i Mekki 2800 2800 0
T F S 2500 2580 120  T F S 2500 2580 120
E 2.8/2.8 5500 5050 450  E 2.8 / 2.8 5500 5050 450
L T S  L T S
0.40 2700 2750 0  0.40 2700 2750 0
1.82 1.82
N iメツキ 2550 2000 0 N i Mekki 2550 2000 0
T F S 2000 2250 0  T F S 2000 2250 0
E 2.8/2.8 5700 5400 300 E 2.8 / 2.8 5700 5400 300
L T S 2850 2950  L T S 2850 2950
0.60 0  0.60 0
2.75 2.75
N iメツキ 2800 2850 0 N i Mekki 2800 2850 0
T F S 2550 2550 0 こ の溶接に使用 した材料は、 錫付着量が 2. 8 Wの半 田づけ缶用ぶ !) き E 2. 8 ノ 2. 8 , 鍚付着量が 0.55 /vi のぶ き L T S , Niをめつ き した鋼材及びク ロ ム タ イ プ のテ ィ ン フ リ ー スチ ー ル T F S である。 こ こで材料板厚 に対する重ね合わせ幅の比が 2. 0 倍を超え、 2. 4 倍未満 の場合は、 いずれの材料において も十分広い溶接適正電 流範囲を有する。 TFS 2550 2550 0 The material used for this welding was a tin can with a 2.8 W tin deposit! 2.8 ノ 2.8 鍚 ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ 鍚 ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ 鍚 ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ ぶ 鍚 鍚 ぶ 鍚 ぶ. Here, when the ratio of the overlap width to the material thickness exceeds 2.0 times and is less than 2.4 times, all materials have a sufficiently wide welding appropriate current range.
次に、 溶接の良否は シ ー ム溶接部形状、 電極加 EE力及 び材料板厚が影響する も の と考え られる。 溶接性向上に は電極加圧力の増加が著 し く 寄与する点に着目 し、 電極 加圧力を 4 0 /か ら 5 0 / に増加させ、 材料板厚 0.1 ό 爾 の テ ィ ン フ リ ー ス テー ルを 用いて、 重ね合わせ幅 0. 3 篇 、 0. 5 5 翻 、 0. 4 0 籠 、 0. 4 5 mm 、 0. 5 0 霞 で溶接実 験を実施 した結果を第 5 図に示す。 第 5 図は第 4 図 と 同 様重ね合わせ幅 と 材料板厚の比 と 、 溶接電流の下限電流 a 及び上限電流 b の関係を示 したも のであ 、 下限電流 a と上限電流 b にかこ ま れた領域 c が適正電流範囲であ る。 こ の場合も 重ね合わせ幅が 2. 0 倍を超え、 2. 4倍未 満の場合は十分広い溶接適性電流範囲が得 られる。  Next, the quality of welding is considered to be affected by the shape of the seam weld, the electrode EE force, and the material thickness. Focusing on the fact that an increase in the electrode pressing force contributes significantly to the improvement of weldability, the electrode pressing force was increased from 40 / to 50 /, and a fin free with a material thickness of 0.1 mm was used. Fig. 5 shows the results of welding experiments using a steel stapling with an overlap width of 0.3, 0.55 inversion, 0.40 basket, 0.45 mm, and 0.50 haze. Shown in Fig. 5 shows the relationship between the ratio of the overlap width to the material thickness and the lower limit current a and the upper limit current b of the welding current, as in Fig. 4. The region c is the proper current range. In this case as well, if the overlap width exceeds 2.0 times, and if it is less than 2.4 times, a sufficiently wide welding appropriate current range can be obtained.
次に材料板厚を広範囲に変化させて溶接実験を実施 し、 材料板厚の適用範囲を調べた。 その結果を 表 3 に示す。  Next, welding experiments were conducted with a wide range of material thicknesses, and the applicable range of material thicknesses was examined. The results are shown in Table 3.
OMFI O 3¾98AViDd i f/ OMFI O 3¾98AViDd if /
CNJCNJ
Figure imgf000014_0001
Figure imgf000014_0001
n n
1 δ 1 δ
表 5 において、 材料 T F S は ク ロ ム タ イ プの テ ィ ン フ リ — ス チ ー ルである。 表中の数字は材料板厚に対する重 ね合わせ幅の比であ 、 溶接性評価結果は〇; Xで 示 した。 〇は適正電流範囲が 5 0 0 Α 以上で溶接性良好 の場合、 は適正電流範囲が 0 A を超え 5 0 0 A未満の 場合で、 溶接性はやや良好の場合、 Xは適正電流範囲が 負と な 溶接性が不良の場合で ある。  In Table 5, the material TFS is a chrome-type tin-free steel. The numbers in the table are the ratios of the overlap width to the material plate thickness, and the results of the weldability evaluation are indicated by 〇; X. 〇 indicates that the appropriate current range is 500 mm or more and the weldability is good, indicates that the appropriate current range is more than 0 A and is less than 500 A, and that the weldability is somewhat good. Negative weldability is poor.
こ の結果、 鋼板の重ね合わせ幅が材料板厚の 2. 0倍を 越え、 2. 4倍未満の場合には通常缶用素材 と して用い ら れるすべての材料板厚、 すなわち材料板厚 0. 5 麵以下に 対 して溶接性向上が認め られる こ と が明 らか と るった。 するわち鋼板の重ね合わせ幅 と 材料板厚と の比が上記範 囲内に あれば溶接性の向上は材料板厚に依存 しな いこ と が判明 した。  As a result, when the overlapping width of the steel sheets exceeds 2.0 times the material thickness and is less than 2.4 times, all the material thicknesses usually used as can materials, that is, the material thicknesses It was clarified that the weldability was improved for 0.5% or less. In other words, it was found that the improvement in weldability does not depend on the material thickness if the ratio of the overlap width of the steel sheet to the material thickness is within the above range.
半田づけ缶用ぶ i9 き に比較 して、 電気抵抗発熱が局所 化かつ不均一と る容器用素材は溶接性が半田づけ缶用 ぶ き ょ i 劣る と 考え られる。 例えば、 めっき 金属が錫 よ i 硬い場合、 ある いは化成処理被覆が厚い場合に、 溶 接性の低下が知 られているが、 この発明は この よ う な材 料すべてに有効な も のである。  Compared with soldering cans, container materials with localized and non-uniform electrical resistance heat generation are considered to have inferior weldability to soldering cans. For example, it is known that when the plating metal is harder than tin or when the chemical conversion coating is thick, the weldability is reduced, but the present invention is effective for all such materials. .
表 4 に材料板厚力 s o. 1 ό 誦 、 0. 2 2 漏 、 0. 5 2 籠 の場 合の各種材料を銅 ワ イ ャ抵抗シ ― ム溶接法に よ D 溶接 し た場合の溶接試験結果を示す。 表 4 Table 4 shows the results when the material thickness is so-called, 0.25 leakage, 0.52 basket, and D-welding of various materials using the copper wire resistance seam welding method. The results of the welding test are shown. Table 4
Figure imgf000016_0001
こ の溶接に使用 した材料は、 錫付着量が 2. 8 f/rriの半 田づけ缶用ぶ き E 2. 8 Z 2. 8 , 錫付着量が 0.55 f の ぶ き L T S , Ni を めつ き した鋼材及びク ロ ム タ イ ブの テ ィ ン フ リ ー スチ ー ル T F S である。 こ こで材料板厚に 対する重ね合わせ幅の比が 2. 0 倍を超え、 2. 4倍未満の 場合は、 材料板厚に依 らず、 いずれの材料においても十 分広い適正電流範囲を有する。
Figure imgf000016_0001
The materials used for this welding were E 2.8 Z 2.8 for soldering cans with tin adhesion of 2.8 f / rri, and LTS and Ni for ignition with 0.55 f tin adhesion. This is a tin-free steel TFS of the same steel and chrome type. Here, if the ratio of the overlap width to the material thickness exceeds 2.0 times and less than 2.4 times, a sufficiently wide appropriate current range is obtained for all materials regardless of the material thickness. Have.
産業上の利用分野  Industrial applications
以上述べた よ う に、 この発明の電気抵抗 シ ー ム溶接法 Ο Μ は難溶接材の適正電流範囲を拡大させるのに有用であ !) 、 例えばテ ィ ン フ リ 一ス チ ー ルの よ う に従来食品缶詰の缶 に使用されなかった難溶接材を使用 して溶接缶を製造す る のに適 してい る 。 As described above, the electric resistance seam welding method of the present invention is used. Is useful for extending the proper current range of difficult-to-weld materials! ), It is suitable for manufacturing welding cans using difficult-to-weld materials that have not been conventionally used for canned foods, such as tin-free steel.

Claims

請 求 の 範 囲 The scope of the claims
錫 よ 硬い金属および金属間化合物を被覆層 と して有 する難溶接鋼板の電気抵抗シ ー ム溶接法において、 該鋼 板の板厚を 0. 5 濯以下と し、 該鋼板の重ね合わせ幅を板 厚の 2. 0 倍を超え、 2. 4倍未満と してある こ と を特徴 と する電気抵抗 シ ― ム溶接法。  In an electric resistance seam welding method for a hard-to-weld steel sheet having a coating layer of a metal and an intermetallic compound harder than tin, the thickness of the steel sheet is set to 0.5 rinse or less, and the overlapping width of the steel sheet is set. The electrical resistance seam welding method is characterized in that the thickness is more than 2.0 times and less than 2.4 times the sheet thickness.
PCT/JP1984/000583 1983-06-10 1984-12-10 Electric-resistance seam-welding method WO1986003442A1 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP58103886A JPS59229290A (en) 1983-06-10 1983-06-10 Electric resistance seam welding method
GB08612297A GB2178682B (en) 1983-06-10 1984-12-10 Electric resistance seam welding method
CH3144/86A CH668930A5 (en) 1983-06-10 1984-12-10 Welding method of joint by electrical resistance.
PCT/JP1984/000583 WO1986003442A1 (en) 1983-06-10 1984-12-10 Electric-resistance seam-welding method
DE19843490793 DE3490793T1 (en) 1983-06-10 1984-12-10
US07/394,143 US5064982A (en) 1983-06-10 1989-08-16 Electric resistance seam welding method

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP58103886A JPS59229290A (en) 1983-06-10 1983-06-10 Electric resistance seam welding method
PCT/JP1984/000583 WO1986003442A1 (en) 1983-06-10 1984-12-10 Electric-resistance seam-welding method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1986003442A1 true WO1986003442A1 (en) 1986-06-19

Family

ID=26425084

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP1984/000583 WO1986003442A1 (en) 1983-06-10 1984-12-10 Electric-resistance seam-welding method

Country Status (5)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS59229290A (en)
CH (1) CH668930A5 (en)
DE (1) DE3490793T1 (en)
GB (1) GB2178682B (en)
WO (1) WO1986003442A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6092088A (en) * 1983-10-24 1985-05-23 Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> Electric resistance seam welding method
EP0761368B1 (en) * 1995-08-09 2000-02-02 Elpatronic Ag Welding method for coated sheets, especially tin-plated sheets
EP0802011A3 (en) * 1996-04-19 1998-02-04 Elpatronic Ag Method for joining two metal foils
GB9626065D0 (en) * 1996-12-16 1997-02-05 Metal Box Plc Measurement of welds

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5733110B2 (en) * 1979-08-06 1982-07-15

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2559671C2 (en) * 1975-03-19 1982-08-12 Opprecht, Paul, 8962 Bergdietikon, Aargau Device for semi-automatic or fully automatic electrical resistance longitudinal seam-pinch seam welding of can bodies
EP0023753B1 (en) * 1979-08-06 1985-08-14 Toyo Seikan Kaisha Limited Method and apparatus of making welded metallic can bodies
JPS57174468A (en) * 1981-04-18 1982-10-27 Hokkai Can Co Ltd Welded can body

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5733110B2 (en) * 1979-08-06 1982-07-15

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS59229290A (en) 1984-12-22
GB8612297D0 (en) 1986-06-25
GB2178682A (en) 1987-02-18
DE3490793T1 (en) 1987-01-29
CH668930A5 (en) 1989-02-15
GB2178682B (en) 1988-11-02
JPS6324795B2 (en) 1988-05-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3225346B1 (en) Method of arc-welding zn plated steel sheets
CN107427950A (en) The method for the metal_based material being not directly welded to one another using sept welding
WO1986003442A1 (en) Electric-resistance seam-welding method
US4652715A (en) Method of making a welded can body
US2170019A (en) Method of welding
US5064982A (en) Electric resistance seam welding method
JPS6068253A (en) Easy-open end made of steel through ultrasonic welding
JP3212136B2 (en) Can body having a welding can body
JP2687799B2 (en) Laminated steel plate for welding cans
JP3181410B2 (en) Tin Free Steel Can Body Welding Method
JP7335196B2 (en) Manufacturing method of resistance welded member
JPS6092088A (en) Electric resistance seam welding method
JPS632712B2 (en)
JPS6330998B2 (en)
JP2580923B2 (en) Laminated steel sheet for welding can and method for producing the same
JP3281562B2 (en) High-speed non-polishing welding method for tin-free steel sheet
JP4980411B2 (en) Welding method for Ni-plated steel sheet
JPH061346A (en) Can with welded body
JPH061348A (en) Can with welded body
JP2784710B2 (en) Surface-treated steel sheet for cans excellent in weldability and method for producing welded can using the same
JPH061347A (en) Can with welded body
JPS59209490A (en) Welded can body
JPS5832576A (en) Welding method
JPH0243588B2 (en)
JPH067948A (en) Manufacture of can shell

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE GB US

RET De translation (de og part 6b)

Ref document number: 3490793

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19870129

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 3490793

Country of ref document: DE