USRE43147E1 - Abnormality detection and surveillance system - Google Patents
Abnormality detection and surveillance system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USRE43147E1 USRE43147E1 US12/466,350 US46635009A USRE43147E US RE43147 E1 USRE43147 E1 US RE43147E1 US 46635009 A US46635009 A US 46635009A US RE43147 E USRE43147 E US RE43147E
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- movement
- surveillance system
- individual
- movements
- video
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/18—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength
- G08B13/189—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems
- G08B13/194—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems
- G08B13/196—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems using television cameras
- G08B13/19602—Image analysis to detect motion of the intruder, e.g. by frame subtraction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/18—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength
- G08B13/189—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems
- G08B13/194—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems
- G08B13/196—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems using television cameras
- G08B13/19602—Image analysis to detect motion of the intruder, e.g. by frame subtraction
- G08B13/19608—Tracking movement of a target, e.g. by detecting an object predefined as a target, using target direction and or velocity to predict its new position
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/18—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength
- G08B13/189—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems
- G08B13/194—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems
- G08B13/196—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems using television cameras
- G08B13/19602—Image analysis to detect motion of the intruder, e.g. by frame subtraction
- G08B13/19613—Recognition of a predetermined image pattern or behaviour pattern indicating theft or intrusion
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/18—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength
- G08B13/189—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems
- G08B13/194—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems
- G08B13/196—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems using television cameras
- G08B13/19639—Details of the system layout
- G08B13/19641—Multiple cameras having overlapping views on a single scene
- G08B13/19643—Multiple cameras having overlapping views on a single scene wherein the cameras play different roles, e.g. different resolution, different camera type, master-slave camera
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/18—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength
- G08B13/189—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems
- G08B13/194—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems
- G08B13/196—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems using television cameras
- G08B13/19697—Arrangements wherein non-video detectors generate an alarm themselves
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N5/00—Details of television systems
- H04N5/76—Television signal recording
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N7/00—Television systems
- H04N7/18—Closed-circuit television [CCTV] systems, i.e. systems in which the video signal is not broadcast
- H04N7/188—Capturing isolated or intermittent images triggered by the occurrence of a predetermined event, e.g. an object reaching a predetermined position
Definitions
- This invention generally relates to surveillance systems, and more particularly, to trainable surveillance systems which detect and respond to specific abnormal video and audio input signals.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,737,847 issued to Araki et al. discloses an improved abnormality surveillance system wherein motion sensors are positioned within a protected area to first determine the presence of an object of interest, such as an intruder.
- zones having prescribed “warning levels” are defined within the protected area. Depending on which of these zones an object or person is detected in, moves to, and the length of time the detected object or person remains in a particular zone determines whether the object or person entering the zone should be considered an abnormal event or a threat.
- a preferred embodiment of the herein disclosed invention involves a surveillance system having at least one primary video camera for translating real images of a zone into electronic video signals at a first level of resolution and means for sampling movements within the zone from the video camera output. These elements are combined with means for electronically comparing the sampled movements with known characteristics of movements which are indicative of individuals engaged in criminal activity and means for determining the level of such criminal activity. Associated therewith are means for activating at least one secondary sensor and associated recording device having a second higher level of resolution, said activating means being in response to determining a predetermined level of criminal activity.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of the video, analysis, control, alarm and recording subsystems of an embodiment of this invention
- FIG. 2A illustrates a frame K of a video camera's output of a particular environment, according to the invention, showing four representative objects (people) A, B, C, and D, wherein objects A, B and D are moving in a direction indicated with arrows, and object C is not moving;
- FIG. 2B illustrates a frame K+5 of the video camera's output. according to the invention, showing objects A, B, and D are stationary, and object C is moving;
- FIG. 2C illustrates a frame K+10 of the video camera's output, according to the invention, showing the current location of object A, B, C, D, and E;
- FIG. 2D illustrates a frame K+11 of the video camera's output, according to the invention, showing object B next to object C, and object E moving to the right;
- FIG. 2E illustrates a frame K+12 of the video camera's output, according to the invention, showing a potential crime taking place between objects B and C;
- FIG. 2F illustrates a frame K+13 of the video camera's output, according to the invention, showing objects B and C interacting;
- FIG. 2G illustrates a frame K+15 of the video camera's output, according to the invention, showing object C moving the right and object B following;
- FIG. 2H illustrates a frame K+16 of the video camera's output, according to the invention, showing object C moving away from a stationary object B;
- FIG. 2I illustrates a frame K+17 of the video camera's output, according to the invention, showing object B moving towards object C;
- FIG. 3A illustrates a frame of a video camera's output, according to the invention, showing a “two on one” interaction of objects (people) A, B, and C;
- FIG. 3B illustrates a later frame of the video camera's output of FIG. 3A , according to the invention, showing objects A and C moving towards object B;
- FIG. 3C illustrates a later frame of the video camera's output of FIG. 3B , according to the invention, showing objects A and C moving in close proximity to object B;
- FIG. 3D illustrates a later frame of the video camera's output of FIG. 3C , according to the invention, showing objects A and C quickly moving away from object B;
- FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram of a conventional word recognition system which may be employed in the invention.
- the picture input means 10 may be any conventional electronic picture pickup device operational within the infrared or visual spectrum (or both) including a vidicon and a CCD/TV camera of moderate resolution, e.g., a camera about 11 ⁇ 2 inches in length and about 1 inch in diameter, weighing about 3 ounces, including for particular deployment a zoom lens attachment.
- This device is intended to operate continuously and translate the field of view (“real”) images within a first observation area into conventional video electronic signals.
- a high rate camera/recorder up to 300 frames/see (similar to those made by NAC Visual Systems of Woodland Hills, Calif., SONY and others) may be used as the picture input means 10 . This would enable the detection of even the very rapid movement of body parts that are indicative of criminal intent, and their recording, as hereinbelow described. The more commonly used camera operates at 30 frames per second and cannot capture such quick body movement with sufficient resolution.
- Picture input means 10 instead of operating continuously, may be activated by an “alert” signal from the processor of the low resolution camera or from the audio/word recognition processor when sensing a suspicious event.
- Picture input means 10 contains a preprocessor which normalizes a wide range of illumination levels, especially for outside observation.
- the preprocessor emulates a vertebrate's retina, which has a an efficient and accurate normalization process.
- One such preprocessor (VLSI retina chip) is fabricated by the Carver Meade Laboratory of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, Calif. Use of this particular preprocessor chip will increase the automated vision capability of this invention whenever variation of light intensity and light reflection may otherwise weaken the picture resolution.
- the signals from the picture input means 10 are converted into digitized signals and then sent to the picture processing means 12 .
- the processor means controlling each group of cameras will be governed by an artificial intelligence system, based on dynamic pattern recognition principles, as further described below.
- Picture processing means 12 includes an image raster analyzer which effectively segments each image to isolate each pair of people.
- the image raster analyzer subsystem of picture processing means 12 segments each sampled image to identify and isolate each pair of objects (or people), and each “two on one” group of three people separately.
- the “two on one” grouping represents a common mugging situation in which two individuals approach a victim, one from in front of the victim and the other from behind.
- the forward mugger tells the potential victim that if he does not give up his money, (or watch, ring, etc.) the second mugger will shoot him, stab or otherwise harm him.
- the group of three people will thus be considered a potential crime in progress and will therefore be segmented and analyzed in picture processing means.
- the essence of the zoom system is to vary the focal length such that an object being observed will be focused and magnified at its image plane.
- an automatic version of the zoom system once an object is in the camera's field-of-view (FOV), the lens moves to focus the object onto the camera's image plane.
- An error signal which is used to correct the focus by the image planes is generated by a CCD array into two halves and measuring the difference, segmenting in each until the object is at the center. Dividing the CCD array into more than two segments, say four quadrants, is a way to achieve automatic centering, as is the case with mono-pulse radar. Regardless of the number of segments, the error signal is used to generate the desired tracking of the object.
- the zoom with input from the segmentation subsystem of the picture analysis means 12 will focus on the object closest to the right hand side of the image plane, and then proceed to move the focus to the left, focusing on the next object and on the next sequentially.
- the automatic zoom can more naturally choose to home-in on the person with the brightest emission or reflection, and then proceed to the next brightness and so forth. This would be a form of an intensity/time selection multiplex zoom system.
- the relative positioning of the input camera with respect to the area under surveillance will effect the accuracy by which the image raster analyzer segments each image.
- the height of the input camera is preferably sufficient to minimize occlusion between the input camera and the movement of the individuals under surveillance.
- Each image frame segment, once digitized, is stored in a frame by frame memory storage of picture processing means 12 .
- Each frame from the picture input means 10 is subtracted from a previous frame already stored in processing means 12 using any conventional differencing process.
- the differencing process involving multiple differencing steps takes place in the processing section 12 .
- the resulting difference signal (outputted from the differencing sub-section of means 12 ) of each image indicates all the changes that have occurred from one frame to the next. These changes include any movements of the individuals located within the segment and any movements of their limbs, e.g., arms.
- a collection of differencing signals for each moved object of subsequent sampled frames of images allows a determination of the type, speed and direction (vector) of each motion involved, processing which will extract acceleration, i.e., note of change of velocity: and change in acceleration with respect to time (called “jerkiness”), and correlating this with stored signatures of known physical criminal acts.
- subsequent differencing signals may reveal that an individual's arm is moving to a high position, such as the upper limit of that arm's motion, i.e., above his head) at a fast speed. This particular movement could be perceived, as described below, as a hostile movement with a possible criminal activity requiring the expert analysis of security personnel.
- the intersection of two tracks indicates the intersection of two moved objects.
- the intersecting objects in this case, could be merely the two hands of two people greeting each other, or depending on other characteristics, as described below, the intersecting objects could be interpreted as a fist of an assailant contacting the face of a victim in a less friendly greeting.
- the intersection of two tracks immediately requires further analysis and/or the summoning of security personnel. But the generation of an alarm, fight and sound devices located, for example, on a monitor will turn a guard's attention only to that monitor, hence the labor savings.
- friendly interactions between individuals is a much slower physical process than is a physical assault vis-a-vis body parts of the individuals involved. Hence, friendly interactions may be easily distinguished from hostile physical acts using current low pass and high pass filters, and current pattern recognition techniques based on experimental reference data.
- a sensor suite When a large number of sensors (called a sensor suite) are distributed over a large number of facilities, for example, a number of ATMs (automatic teller machines), associated with particular bank branches and in a particular state or states and all operated under a single bank network control, then only one monitor is required.
- ATMs automated teller machines
- optical flow computation A commercially available software tool may enhance object-movement analysis between frames (called optical flow computation).
- optical flow computation specific (usually bright) reflective elements, called farkles, emitted from the clothing and/or the body parts of an individual of one frame are subtracted from a previous frame.
- the bright portions will inherently provide sharper detail and therefore will yield more accurate data regarding the velocities of the relative moving objects.
- Additional computation as described below, will provide data regarding the acceleration and even change in acceleration or “jerkiness” of each moving part sampled.
- the physical motions of the individuals involved in an interaction will be detected by first determining the edges of the of each person imaged. And the movements of the body parts will then be observed by noting the movements of the edges of the body parts of the individuals involved in the interaction.
- the differencing process will enable the determination of the velocity and acceleration and rate of acceleration of those body parts.
- the now processed signal is sent to comparison means 14 which compares selected flames of the video signals from the picture input means 10 with “signature” video signals stored in memory 16 .
- the signature signals are representative of various positions and movements of the body ports of an individual having various levels of criminal intent. The method for obtaining the data base of these signature video signals in accordance with another aspect of the invention is described in greater detail below.
- an output “alert” signal is sent from the comparison means 14 to a controller 18 .
- the controller 18 controls the operation of a secondary, high resolution picture input means (video camera) 20 and a conventional monitor 22 and video recorder 24 .
- the field of view of the secondary camera 20 is preferably at most, the same as the field of view of the primary camera 10 , surveying a second observation area.
- the recorder 24 may be located at the site and/or at both a law enforcement facility (not shown) and simultaneously at a court office or legal facility to prevent loss of incriminating information due to tampering.
- the purpose of the secondary camera 20 is to provide a detailed video signal of the individual having assumed criminal intent and also to improve false positive and false negative performance. This information is recorded by the video recorder 24 and displayed on a monitor 22 . An alarm bell or light (not shown) or both may be provided and activated by an output signal from the controller 20 to summon a supervisor to immediately view the pertinent video images showing the apparent crime in progress and access its accuracy.
- a VCR 26 is operating continuously (using a 6 hour loop-tape, for example).
- the VCR 26 is being controlled by the VCR controller 28 .
- All the “real-time” images directly from the picture input means 10 are immediately recorded and stored for at least 6 hours, for example.
- a signal from the controller 18 is sent to the VCR controller 28 changing the mode of recording from tape looping mode to non-looping mode.
- the tape will not re-loop and will therefore retain the perhaps vital recorded video information of the surveyed site, including the crime itself, and the events leading up to the crime.
- the video signal may also be transmitted to a VCR located elsewhere; for example, at a law enforcement facility and, simultaneously to other secure locations of the Court and its associated offices.
- each sampled frame of video is “segmented” into parts relating to the objects detected therein.
- the video signal derived from the vidicon or CCD/TV camera is analyzed by an image raster analyzer. Although this process causes slight signal delays, it is accomplished nearly in real time.
- a high resolution camera may not be required or otherwise used.
- the resolution provided by a relatively simple and low cost camera may be sufficient.
- the length of frame intervals between analyzed frames may vary. For example, in a high risk area, every frame from the CCD/TV camera may be analyzed continuously to ensure that the maximum amount of information is recorded prior to and during a crime. In a low risk area, it may be preferred to sample perhaps every 10 frames from each camera, sequentially.
- the system would activate an alert mode wherein the system becomes “concerned and curious” in the suspicious actions and the sampling rate is increased to perhaps every 5 frames or even every frame.
- an alert mode wherein the system becomes “concerned and curious” in the suspicious actions and the sampling rate is increased to perhaps every 5 frames or even every frame.
- the entire system may be activated wherein both audio and video system begin to sample the environment for sufficient information to determine the intent of the actions.
- FIG. 2 several frames of a particular camera output are shown to illustrate the segmentation process performed in accordance with the invention.
- the system begins to sample at frame K and determines that there are four objects (previously determined to be people, as described below), A-D located within a particular zone being policed. Since nothing unusual is determined from the initial analysis, the system does not warrant an “alert” status. People A, B, and D are moving according to normal, non-criminal intent, as could be observed.
- a crime likelihood is indicated when frames K+10 through K+13 are analyzed by the differencing process. And if the movement of the body parts indicate velocity, acceleration and “jerkiness” that compare positively with the stored digital signals depicting movements of known criminal physical assaults, it is likely that a crime is in progress here.
- An alarm is generated the instant any of the above conditions is established.
- This alarm condition will result in sending in police or Guards to the crime site, activating the high resolution CCD/TV camera to record the face of the person committing the assault, a loud speaker being activated automatically, playing a recorded announcement warning the perpetrator the seriousness of his actions now being undertaken and demanding that he cease the criminal act. After dark a strong light will be turned on automatically.
- the automated responses will be actuated the instant an alarm condition is determined by the processor. Furthermore, an alarm signal is sent to the police station, and the same video signal of the event is transmitted to a court appointed data collection office, to the Public Defender's office and the District Attorney's Office.
- the above described Abnormality Detection System includes an RF-ID (Radio Frequency Identification) tag or card to assist in the detection and tracking of individuals within the field of view of a camera.
- RF-ID Radio Frequency Identification
- Such cards or tags could be used by authorized individuals to respond when queried by the RF interrogator.
- the response signal of the tags propagation pattern which is adequately registered with the video sensor.
- the card or tag, when sensed in video, would be assumed friendly and authorized. This information would simplify the segmentation process.
- each RF-ID card will be turned ON, when a positive response to an interrogation signal is established.
- the light will appear on the computer generated grid (also on the screen of the monitor) and the intersection of tracks clearly indicated, followed by their physical interaction. But also noted will be the intersection between the tagged and the untagged individuals. In all of such cases, the segmentation process will be simpler.
- the applications of the present invention include banks, ATMs, hotels, schools, residence halls and dormitories, office and residential buildings, hospitals, sidewalks, street crossings, parks, containers and container loading areas, shipping piers, train stations, truck loading stations, airport passenger and freight facilities, bus stations, subway stations, theaters, concert halls, sport arenas, libraries, churches, museums, stores, shopping malls, restaurants, convenience stores, bars, coffee shops gasoline stations, highway rest stops, tunnels, bridges, gateways, sections of highways, toll booths, warehouses, and depots, factories and assembly rooms, law enforcement facilities including jails. Any location or facility, civilian or military, requiring security would be a likely application.
- a tiny CCD/TV camera hidden in the ceiling or the rearview mirror of the car, and focussed through a pin hole lens to the driver's seat may be connected to the video processor to record the face of the drive.
- the camera is triggered by the automatic word recognition processor that will identify the well known expressions commonly used by the car-jacker.
- the video picture will be recorded and then transmitted via cellular phone in the car. Without a phone, the short video recording of the face of the car-jacker will be held until the car is found by the police, but now with the evidence (the picture of the car-jacker) in hand.
- the security personnel manning the monitors are alerted only to video images which show suspicious actions (criminal activities) within a prescribed observation zone.
- the security personnel are therefore used to access the accuracy of the crime and determine the necessary actions for an appropriate response.
- computers to effectively filter out all normal and noncriminal video signals from observation areas, fewer security personnel are required to survey and “secure” a greater overall area (including a greater number of observation areas, i.e., cameras).
- a battery operated portable version of the video system would automatically identify known objects in its field of view and a speech synthesizer would “say” the object. For example, “chair”, “table”, etc. would indicate the presence of a chair and a table.
- At least two and perhaps three cameras are used simultaneously to cover the area. Should one camera sense a first level of criminal action, the other two could be manipulated to provide a three dimensional perspective coverage of the action.
- the three dimensional image of a physical interaction in the policed area would allow observation of a greater number of details associated with the steps: accost, threat, assault, response and post response.
- the conversion process from the two dimensional image to the three dimensional image is achieved by use of the known Radon transform.
- both video and acoustic information is sampled and analyzed.
- the acoustic information is sampled and analyzed in a similar manner to the sampling and analyzing of the above-described video information.
- the audio information is sampled and analyzed in a manner shown in FIG. 4 , and is based on prior alt.
- ASR Automatic Speech Recognition
- a conventional automatic word recognition system including an input microphone system 40 , an analysis subsystem 42 , a template subsystem 44 , a pattern comparator 46 , and a post-processor and decision logic subsystem 48 .
- the acoustic/audio policing system will begin sampling all (or a selected portion) of nearby acoustic signals.
- the acoustic signals will include voices and background noise.
- the background noise signals are generally known and predictable, and may therefore be easily filtered out using conventional filtering techniques.
- the expected noise signals are unfamiliar speech, automotive related sounds, honking, sirens, the sound of wind and/or rain.
- the microphone input system 40 pick-up the acoustic signals and immediately filter out the predictable background noise signals and amplify the remaining recognizable acoustic signals.
- the filtered acoustic signals are analyzed in the analysis subsystem 42 which processes the signals by means of digital and spectral analysis techniques.
- the output of the analysis subsystem is compared in the pattern comparater subsystem 46 with selected predetermined words stored in memory in 44 .
- the post processing and decision logic subsystem 48 generates an alarm signal, as described below.
- the templates 44 include perhaps about 100 brief and easily recognizable terse expressions, some of which are single words, and are commonly used by those intent on a criminal act.
- Some examples of commonly used word phrases spoken by a criminal to a victim prior to a mugging include: “Give me your money”, “This is a stick-up”, “Give me your wallet and you won't get hurt” . . . etc.
- commonly used replies from a typical victim during such a mugging may also be stored as template words, such as “help”, and certain sounds such as shrieks, screams and groans, etc.
- the output of the word recognition system shown in FIG. 4 is used as a trigger signal to activate a sound recorder, or a camera used elsewhere in the invention, as described below.
- the preferred microphone used in the microphone input subsystem 40 is a shot-gun microphone, such as those commercially available from the Sennheiser Company of Frankfurt, Germany. These microphone have a super-cardioid propagation pattern. However, the gain of the pattern may be too small for high traffic areas and may therefore require more than one microphone in an array configuration to adequately focus and track in these areas.
- the propagation pattern of the microphone system enables better focusing on a moving sound source (e.g., a person walking and talking)
- a conventional directional microphone may also be used in place of a shot-gun type microphone, such as those made by the Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan. Such directional microphones will achieve similar gain to the shot-gun type microphones, but with a smaller physical structure.
- a feedback loop circuit (not specifically shown) originating in the post processing subsystem 48 will direct the microphone system to track a particular dynamic source of sound within the area surveyed by video cameras.
- An override signal from the video portion of the present invention will activate and direct the microphone system towards the direction of the field of view of the camera.
- the video system will control the audio recording system towards the scene of interest.
- the audio system will direct appropriate video cameras to visually cover and record the apparent source of the sound.
- HMM hidden Markov model
- ANN artificial neural network
- the HMM applies probabilistic statistical procedure in recognizing words.
- an estimate is made of the means and covariance of the probabilistic model of each word, e.g., those words which are considered likely to be uttered in an interaction.
- the various ways which any given word is pronounced permits the spectral parameters of the word to be an effective describer of the model.
- the steps involved in recognizing an input of an unknown word consists of computing the likelihood that the word was generated by each of the models developed during the training. The word is considered as “recognized” when its model gives the highest score.
- the evaluation of conditional probabilities of one particular unit followed by the same or another word unit is also part of the computation.
- the HMM system employed with the present invention allows both the audio and video systems to operate quickly and use HMM probability statistics to predict future movements or words based on an early recognition of initial movements and word stems.
- the HMM system may be equally employed in the video recognition system. For example, if a person's arm quickly moves above his head, the HMM system may determine that there is a high probability that the arm will quickly come down, perhaps indicating a criminal intent.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
- Closed-Circuit Television Systems (AREA)
- Alarm Systems (AREA)
Abstract
A surveillance system having at least one primary video camera for translating real images of a zone into electronic video signals at a first level of resolution. The system includes means for sampling movements of an individual or individuals located within the zone from the video signal output from at least one video camera. Video signals of sampled movements of the individual is electronically compared with known characteristics of movements which are indicative of individuals having a criminal intent. The level of criminal intent of the individual or individuals is then determined and an appropriate alarm signal is produced.
Description
This invention generally relates to surveillance systems, and more particularly, to trainable surveillance systems which detect and respond to specific abnormal video and audio input signals.
Today's surveillance systems vary in complexity, efficiency and accuracy. Earlier surveillance systems use several closed circuit cameras, each connected to a devoted monitor. This type of system works sufficiently well for low-coverage sites, i.e., areas requiring up to perhaps six cameras. In such a system, a single person could scan the six monitors, in “real” time, and effectively monitor the entire (albeit small) protected area, offering a relatively high level of readiness to respond to an abnormal act or situation observed within the protected area. In this simplest of surveillance systems, it is left to the discretion of security personnel to determine, first, if there is any abnormal event in progress within the protected area, second, the level of concern placed on that particular event, and third, what actions should be taken in response to the particular event. The reliability of the entire system depends on the alertness and efficiency of the worker observing the monitors.
Many surveillance systems, however, require the use of a greater number of cameras (e.g., more than six) to police a larger area, such as at least every room located within a large museum. To adequately ensure reliable and complete surveillance within the protected area, either more personnel must be employed to constantly watch the additionally required monitors (one per camera), or fewer monitors may be used on a simple rotation schedule wherein one monitor sequentially displays the output images of several cameras, displaying the images of each camera for perhaps a few seconds. In another prior art surveillance system (referred to as the “QUAD” system), four cameras are connected to a single monitor whose screen continuously and simultaneously displays the four different images. In a “quaded quad” prior art surveillance system, sixteen cameras are linked to a single monitor whose screen now displays, continuously and simultaneously all sixteen different images. These improvements flow fewer personnel to adequately supervise the monitors to cover the larger protected area.
These improvements, however, still require the constant attention of at least one person. The above described multiple-image/single screen systems suffered from poor resolution and complex viewing. The reliability of the entire system is still dependent on the alertness and efficiency of the security personnel watching the monitors. The personnel watching the monitors are still burdened with identifying an abnormal act or condition shown on one of the monitors, determining which camera, and which corresponding zone of the protected area is recording the abnormal event, determining the level of concern placed on the particular event, and finally, determining the appropriate actions that must be taken to respond to the particular event.
Eventually, it was recognized that human personnel could not reliably monitor the “real-time” images from one or several cameras for long “watch” periods of time. It is natural for any person to become bored while performing a monotonous task, such as staring at one or several monitors continuously, waiting for something unusual or abnormal to occur, something which may never occur.
As discussed above, it is the human link which lowers the overall reliability of the entire surveillance system. U.S. Pat. No. 4,737,847 issued to Araki et al. discloses an improved abnormality surveillance system wherein motion sensors are positioned within a protected area to first determine the presence of an object of interest, such as an intruder. In the system disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 4,737,847, zones having prescribed “warning levels” are defined within the protected area. Depending on which of these zones an object or person is detected in, moves to, and the length of time the detected object or person remains in a particular zone determines whether the object or person entering the zone should be considered an abnormal event or a threat.
The surveillance system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,737,847 does remove some of the monitoring responsibility otherwise placed on human personnel; however, such a system can only determine an intruder's “intent” by his presence relative to particular zones. The actual movements and sounds of the intruder are not measured or observed. A skilled criminal could easily determine the warning levels of obvious zones within a protected area and act accordingly; spending little time in zones having a high warning level, for example.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a surveillance system which overcomes the problems of the prior art.
It is another object of the invention to provide such a surveillance system wherein a potentially abnormal event is determined by a computer prior to summoning a human supervisor.
It is another object of the invention to provide a surveillance system which compares specific measured movements of a particular person or persons with a trainable, predetermined set of “typical” movements to determine the level and type of a criminal or mischievous event.
It is another object of this invention to provide a surveillance system which transmits the data from various sensors to a location where it can be recorded for evidentiary purposes. It is another object of this invention to provide such a surveillance system which is operational day and night.
It is another object of this invention to provide a surveillance system which can cull out real-time events which indicate criminal intent using a weapon, by resolving the low temperature of the weapon relative to the higher body temperature and by recognizing the stances taken by the person with the weapon.
It is yet another object of this invention to provide a surveillance system which eliminates or reduces the number of TV monitors and guards presently required to identify abnormal events, as this system will perform this function in near real time.
The content of the following references is hereby incorporated by reference.
1. Motz L. and L. Bergstein “Zoom Lens Systems”, Journal of Optical Society of America, 3 papers in Vol. 52, 1992.
2. D. G. Aviv, “Sensor Software Assessment of Advanced Earth Resources Satellite Systems”, ARC Inc. Report #70-80-A, pp. 2-107 through 2-119; NASA contract NAS-1-16366.
3. Shio, A. and J. Sklansky “Segmentation of People in Motion”, Proc. of IEEE Workshop on Visual Motion, Princeton, N.J., October 1991.
4. Agarwal. R. and J Sklansky “Estimating Optical Flow from Clustered Trajectory Velocity Time”.
5. Suzuki, S. and J Sklansky “Extracting Non-Rigid Moving Objects by Temporal Edges”, IEEE, 1992, Transactions of Pattern Recognition.
6. Rabiner, L. and Biing-Hwang Juang “Fundamental of Speech Recognition”, Pub. Prentice Hall, 1993, (p.434-495).
7. Weibel, A. and Kai-Fu Lee Eds. “Readings in Speech Recognition”, Pub. Morgan Kaaufman, 1990 (p.267-296).
8. Rabiner L. “Application of Voice Processing to Telecommunication”, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 82, No. 2, February, 1994.
A preferred embodiment of the herein disclosed invention involves a surveillance system having at least one primary video camera for translating real images of a zone into electronic video signals at a first level of resolution and means for sampling movements within the zone from the video camera output. These elements are combined with means for electronically comparing the sampled movements with known characteristics of movements which are indicative of individuals engaged in criminal activity and means for determining the level of such criminal activity. Associated therewith are means for activating at least one secondary sensor and associated recording device having a second higher level of resolution, said activating means being in response to determining a predetermined level of criminal activity.
Referring to FIG. 1 , the picture input means 10, may be any conventional electronic picture pickup device operational within the infrared or visual spectrum (or both) including a vidicon and a CCD/TV camera of moderate resolution, e.g., a camera about 1½ inches in length and about 1 inch in diameter, weighing about 3 ounces, including for particular deployment a zoom lens attachment. This device is intended to operate continuously and translate the field of view (“real”) images within a first observation area into conventional video electronic signals.
Alternatively, a high rate camera/recorder, up to 300 frames/see (similar to those made by NAC Visual Systems of Woodland Hills, Calif., SONY and others) may be used as the picture input means 10. This would enable the detection of even the very rapid movement of body parts that are indicative of criminal intent, and their recording, as hereinbelow described. The more commonly used camera operates at 30 frames per second and cannot capture such quick body movement with sufficient resolution.
Picture input means 10, instead of operating continuously, may be activated by an “alert” signal from the processor of the low resolution camera or from the audio/word recognition processor when sensing a suspicious event.
Picture input means 10 contains a preprocessor which normalizes a wide range of illumination levels, especially for outside observation. The preprocessor emulates a vertebrate's retina, which has a an efficient and accurate normalization process. One such preprocessor (VLSI retina chip) is fabricated by the Carver Meade Laboratory of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, Calif. Use of this particular preprocessor chip will increase the automated vision capability of this invention whenever variation of light intensity and light reflection may otherwise weaken the picture resolution.
The signals from the picture input means 10 are converted into digitized signals and then sent to the picture processing means 12. The processor means controlling each group of cameras will be governed by an artificial intelligence system, based on dynamic pattern recognition principles, as further described below. Picture processing means 12 includes an image raster analyzer which effectively segments each image to isolate each pair of people. The image raster analyzer subsystem of picture processing means 12 segments each sampled image to identify and isolate each pair of objects (or people), and each “two on one” group of three people separately.
The “two on one” grouping represents a common mugging situation in which two individuals approach a victim, one from in front of the victim and the other from behind. The forward mugger tells the potential victim that if he does not give up his money, (or watch, ring, etc.) the second mugger will shoot him, stab or otherwise harm him. The group of three people will thus be considered a potential crime in progress and will therefore be segmented and analyzed in picture processing means.
With respect to a zoom lens system useful as an element in the picture input means 10, the essentials of the zoom lens subsystem are described in three papers written by L. Motz and L. Bergstein, in an article titled “Zoom Lens Systems” in the Journal of Optical Society of America, Vol. 52, April, 1992. This article is hereby incorporated by reference.
The essence of the zoom system is to vary the focal length such that an object being observed will be focused and magnified at its image plane. In an automatic version of the zoom system, once an object is in the camera's field-of-view (FOV), the lens moves to focus the object onto the camera's image plane. An error signal which is used to correct the focus by the image planes is generated by a CCD array into two halves and measuring the difference, segmenting in each until the object is at the center. Dividing the CCD array into more than two segments, say four quadrants, is a way to achieve automatic centering, as is the case with mono-pulse radar. Regardless of the number of segments, the error signal is used to generate the desired tracking of the object.
In a wide field-of-view (WFOV) operation, there may be more than one object, thus special attention is given to the design of the zoom system and its associated software and firmware control. Assuming three objects, as is the “two on one” potential mugging threat described above, and that the three persons are all in one plane, one can program a shifting from one object to the next, from one face to another face, in a prescribed sequential order. Moreover, as the objects move within the WFOV they will be automatically tracked in azimuth and elevation. In principle, the zoom would focus on the nearest object, assuming that the mount of light on each object is the same so that the prescribed sequence starting from the closes object will proceed to the remaining objects from, for example, right to left.
However, when the three objects are located in different planes, but still within the camera's WFOV, the zoom, with input from the segmentation subsystem of the picture analysis means 12 will focus on the object closest to the right hand side of the image plane, and then proceed to move the focus to the left, focusing on the next object and on the next sequentially.
In all of the above cases, the automatic zoom can more naturally choose to home-in on the person with the brightest emission or reflection, and then proceed to the next brightness and so forth. This would be a form of an intensity/time selection multiplex zoom system.
The relative positioning of the input camera with respect to the area under surveillance will effect the accuracy by which the image raster analyzer segments each image. In this preferred embodiment, it is beneficial for the input camera to view the area under surveillance from a point located directly above, e.g., with the input camera mounted high on a wall, a utility tower, or a traffic light support tower. The height of the input camera is preferably sufficient to minimize occlusion between the input camera and the movement of the individuals under surveillance.
Once the objects within each sampled video frame are segmented (i.e., detected and isolated), an analysis is made of the detailed movements of each object located within each particular segment of each image, and their relative movements with respect to the other objects.
Each image frame segment, once digitized, is stored in a frame by frame memory storage of picture processing means 12. Each frame from the picture input means 10 is subtracted from a previous frame already stored in processing means 12 using any conventional differencing process. The differencing process involving multiple differencing steps takes place in the processing section 12. The resulting difference signal (outputted from the differencing sub-section of means 12) of each image indicates all the changes that have occurred from one frame to the next. These changes include any movements of the individuals located within the segment and any movements of their limbs, e.g., arms.
Referring to FIG. 3 . a collection of differencing signals for each moved object of subsequent sampled frames of images (called a “track”) allows a determination of the type, speed and direction (vector) of each motion involved, processing which will extract acceleration, i.e., note of change of velocity: and change in acceleration with respect to time (called “jerkiness”), and correlating this with stored signatures of known physical criminal acts. For example, subsequent differencing signals may reveal that an individual's arm is moving to a high position, such as the upper limit of that arm's motion, i.e., above his head) at a fast speed. This particular movement could be perceived, as described below, as a hostile movement with a possible criminal activity requiring the expert analysis of security personnel.
The intersection of two tracks indicates the intersection of two moved objects. The intersecting objects, in this case, could be merely the two hands of two people greeting each other, or depending on other characteristics, as described below, the intersecting objects could be interpreted as a fist of an assailant contacting the face of a victim in a less friendly greeting. In any event, the intersection of two tracks immediately requires further analysis and/or the summoning of security personnel. But the generation of an alarm, fight and sound devices located, for example, on a monitor will turn a guard's attention only to that monitor, hence the labor savings. In general however, friendly interactions between individuals is a much slower physical process than is a physical assault vis-a-vis body parts of the individuals involved. Hence, friendly interactions may be easily distinguished from hostile physical acts using current low pass and high pass filters, and current pattern recognition techniques based on experimental reference data.
When a large number of sensors (called a sensor suite) are distributed over a large number of facilities, for example, a number of ATMs (automatic teller machines), associated with particular bank branches and in a particular state or states and all operated under a single bank network control, then only one monitor is required.
A commercially available software tool may enhance object-movement analysis between frames (called optical flow computation). With optical flow computation, specific (usually bright) reflective elements, called farkles, emitted from the clothing and/or the body parts of an individual of one frame are subtracted from a previous frame. The bright portions will inherently provide sharper detail and therefore will yield more accurate data regarding the velocities of the relative moving objects. Additional computation, as described below, will provide data regarding the acceleration and even change in acceleration or “jerkiness” of each moving part sampled.
The physical motions of the individuals involved in an interaction, will be detected by first determining the edges of the of each person imaged. And the movements of the body parts will then be observed by noting the movements of the edges of the body parts of the individuals involved in the interaction. The differencing process will enable the determination of the velocity and acceleration and rate of acceleration of those body parts.
The now processed signal is sent to comparison means 14 which compares selected flames of the video signals from the picture input means 10 with “signature” video signals stored in memory 16. The signature signals are representative of various positions and movements of the body ports of an individual having various levels of criminal intent. The method for obtaining the data base of these signature video signals in accordance with another aspect of the invention is described in greater detail below.
If a comparison is made positive with one or more of the signature video signals, an output “alert” signal is sent from the comparison means 14 to a controller 18. The controller 18 controls the operation of a secondary, high resolution picture input means (video camera) 20 and a conventional monitor 22 and video recorder 24. The field of view of the secondary camera 20 is preferably at most, the same as the field of view of the primary camera 10, surveying a second observation area. The recorder 24 may be located at the site and/or at both a law enforcement facility (not shown) and simultaneously at a court office or legal facility to prevent loss of incriminating information due to tampering.
The purpose of the secondary camera 20 is to provide a detailed video signal of the individual having assumed criminal intent and also to improve false positive and false negative performance. This information is recorded by the video recorder 24 and displayed on a monitor 22. An alarm bell or light (not shown) or both may be provided and activated by an output signal from the controller 20 to summon a supervisor to immediately view the pertinent video images showing the apparent crime in progress and access its accuracy.
In still another embodiment of the invention, a VCR 26 is operating continuously (using a 6 hour loop-tape, for example). The VCR 26 is being controlled by the VCR controller 28. All the “real-time” images directly from the picture input means 10 are immediately recorded and stored for at least 6 hours, for example. Should it be determined that a crime is in progress, a signal from the controller 18 is sent to the VCR controller 28 changing the mode of recording from tape looping mode to non-looping mode. Once the VCR 26 is changed to a non-looping mode, the tape will not re-loop and will therefore retain the perhaps vital recorded video information of the surveyed site, including the crime itself, and the events leading up to the crime.
When the non-looping mode is initiated, the video signal may also be transmitted to a VCR located elsewhere; for example, at a law enforcement facility and, simultaneously to other secure locations of the Court and its associated offices.
Prior to the video signals being compared with the “signature” signals stored in memory, each sampled frame of video is “segmented” into parts relating to the objects detected therein. To segment a video signal, the video signal derived from the vidicon or CCD/TV camera is analyzed by an image raster analyzer. Although this process causes slight signal delays, it is accomplished nearly in real time.
At certain sites, or in certain situations, a high resolution camera may not be required or otherwise used. For example, the resolution provided by a relatively simple and low cost camera may be sufficient. Depending on the level of security for the particular location being surveyed, and the time of day, the length of frame intervals between analyzed frames may vary. For example, in a high risk area, every frame from the CCD/TV camera may be analyzed continuously to ensure that the maximum amount of information is recorded prior to and during a crime. In a low risk area, it may be preferred to sample perhaps every 10 frames from each camera, sequentially.
If, during such a sampling, it is determined that an abnormal or suspicious event is occurring, such as two people moving very close to each other, then the system would activate an alert mode wherein the system becomes “concerned and curious” in the suspicious actions and the sampling rate is increased to perhaps every 5 frames or even every frame. As described in greater detail below, depending on the type of system employed (i.e., video only, audio only or both), during such an alert mode, the entire system may be activated wherein both audio and video system begin to sample the environment for sufficient information to determine the intent of the actions.
Referring to FIG. 2 , several frames of a particular camera output are shown to illustrate the segmentation process performed in accordance with the invention. The system begins to sample at frame K and determines that there are four objects (previously determined to be people, as described below), A-D located within a particular zone being policed. Since nothing unusual is determined from the initial analysis, the system does not warrant an “alert” status. People A, B, and D are moving according to normal, non-criminal intent, as could be observed.
A crime likelihood is indicated when frames K+10 through K+13 are analyzed by the differencing process. And if the movement of the body parts indicate velocity, acceleration and “jerkiness” that compare positively with the stored digital signals depicting movements of known criminal physical assaults, it is likely that a crime is in progress here.
Additionally, if a high velocity of departure is indicated when person C moves away from person B, as indicated in frames K+15 through K+17, a larger level of confidence, is attained in deciding that a physical criminal act has taken place or is about to.
An alarm is generated the instant any of the above conditions is established. This alarm condition will result in sending in Police or Guards to the crime site, activating the high resolution CCD/TV camera to record the face of the person committing the assault, a loud speaker being activated automatically, playing a recorded announcement warning the perpetrator the seriousness of his actions now being undertaken and demanding that he cease the criminal act. After dark a strong light will be turned on automatically. The automated responses will be actuated the instant an alarm condition is determined by the processor. Furthermore, an alarm signal is sent to the police station, and the same video signal of the event is transmitted to a court appointed data collection office, to the Public Defender's office and the District Attorney's Office.
As described above, it is necessary to compare the resulting signature of physical body parts motion involved in a physical criminal act, that is expressed by specific motion characteristics (i.e., velocity, acceleration, change of acceleration), with a set of signature files of physical criminal acts, in which body parts motion are equally involved. This comparison, is commonly referred to as pattern matching and is part of the pattern recognition process.
Files of physical criminal acts, which involve body parts movements such as hands, arms, elbows, shoulder, head, torso, legs, and feet, can be reviewed to ascertain this pattern. In addition, a priority can be set by experiments and simulations of physical criminal acts gathered from “drama” that are enacted by professional actors, the data gathered from experienced muggers who have been caught by the police as well as victims who have reported details of their experiences will help the actors perform accurately. Video of their motions involved in these simulated acts can be stored in digitized form and files prepared for signature motion of each of the body parts involved, in the simulated physical criminal acts.
In another embodiment, the above described Abnormality Detection System includes an RF-ID (Radio Frequency Identification) tag or card to assist in the detection and tracking of individuals within the field of view of a camera. Such cards or tags could be used by authorized individuals to respond when queried by the RF interrogator. The response signal of the tags propagation pattern which is adequately registered with the video sensor. The card or tag, when sensed in video, would be assumed friendly and authorized. This information would simplify the segmentation process.
A light connected to each RF-ID card will be turned ON, when a positive response to an interrogation signal is established. The light will appear on the computer generated grid (also on the screen of the monitor) and the intersection of tracks clearly indicated, followed by their physical interaction. But also noted will be the intersection between the tagged and the untagged individuals. In all of such cases, the segmentation process will be simpler.
There are many manufacturers of RF-ID cards and Interrogators, three major ones are, The David Samoff Research Center of Princeton, N.J., AMTECH of Dallas, Tex. and MICRON Technology of Boise, Id.
The applications of the present invention include banks, ATMs, hotels, schools, residence halls and dormitories, office and residential buildings, hospitals, sidewalks, street crossings, parks, containers and container loading areas, shipping piers, train stations, truck loading stations, airport passenger and freight facilities, bus stations, subway stations, theaters, concert halls, sport arenas, libraries, churches, museums, stores, shopping malls, restaurants, convenience stores, bars, coffee shops gasoline stations, highway rest stops, tunnels, bridges, gateways, sections of highways, toll booths, warehouses, and depots, factories and assembly rooms, law enforcement facilities including jails. Any location or facility, civilian or military, requiring security would be a likely application.
Further applications of this invention are in moving platforms: automobiles, trucks, buses, subway cars, train cars, both freight and passenger, boats, ships (passenger and freight), tankers, service and construction vehicles, on and off-road, containers and their carriers, and airplanes, and also in equivalent military and sensitive mobile platforms.
As a deterrence to car-jacking a tiny CCD/TV camera hidden in the ceiling or the rearview mirror of the car, and focussed through a pin hole lens to the driver's seat, may be connected to the video processor to record the face of the drive. The camera is triggered by the automatic word recognition processor that will identify the well known expressions commonly used by the car-jacker. The video picture will be recorded and then transmitted via cellular phone in the car. Without a phone, the short video recording of the face of the car-jacker will be held until the car is found by the police, but now with the evidence (the picture of the car-jacker) in hand.
In this present surveillance system, the security personnel manning the monitors are alerted only to video images which show suspicious actions (criminal activities) within a prescribed observation zone. The security personnel are therefore used to access the accuracy of the crime and determine the necessary actions for an appropriate response. By using computers to effectively filter out all normal and noncriminal video signals from observation areas, fewer security personnel are required to survey and “secure” a greater overall area (including a greater number of observation areas, i.e., cameras).
It is also contemplated that the present system could be applied to assist blind people “see”. A battery operated portable version of the video system would automatically identify known objects in its field of view and a speech synthesizer would “say” the object. For example, “chair”, “table”, etc. would indicate the presence of a chair and a table.
Depending on the area to be policed, it is preferable that at least two and perhaps three cameras (or video sensors) are used simultaneously to cover the area. Should one camera sense a first level of criminal action, the other two could be manipulated to provide a three dimensional perspective coverage of the action. The three dimensional image of a physical interaction in the policed area would allow observation of a greater number of details associated with the steps: accost, threat, assault, response and post response. The conversion process from the two dimensional image to the three dimensional image is achieved by use of the known Radon transform.
In the extended operation phase of the invention as more details of the physical variation of movement characteristics of physical threats and assaults against a victim and also the speaker independent (male, female of different ages groups) and dialect independent words and terse sentences, with corresponding responses, will enable automatic recognition of a criminal assault, without he need of guard, unless required by statutes and other external requirements.
In another embodiment of the present invention, both video and acoustic information is sampled and analyzed. The acoustic information is sampled and analyzed in a similar manner to the sampling and analyzing of the above-described video information. The audio information is sampled and analyzed in a manner shown in FIG. 4 , and is based on prior alt.
The employment of the audio speech band, with its associated Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system, will not only reduce the false alarm rate resulting from the video analysis, but can also be used to trigger the video and other sensors if the sound threat predates the observed threat.
Referring to FIG. 4 , a conventional automatic word recognition system is shown, including an input microphone system 40, an analysis subsystem 42, a template subsystem 44, a pattern comparator 46, and a post-processor and decision logic subsystem 48.
In operation, upon activation, the acoustic/audio policing system will begin sampling all (or a selected portion) of nearby acoustic signals. The acoustic signals will include voices and background noise. The background noise signals are generally known and predictable, and may therefore be easily filtered out using conventional filtering techniques. Among the expected noise signals are unfamiliar speech, automotive related sounds, honking, sirens, the sound of wind and/or rain.
The microphone input system 40 pick-up the acoustic signals and immediately filter out the predictable background noise signals and amplify the remaining recognizable acoustic signals. The filtered acoustic signals are analyzed in the analysis subsystem 42 which processes the signals by means of digital and spectral analysis techniques. The output of the analysis subsystem is compared in the pattern comparater subsystem 46 with selected predetermined words stored in memory in 44. The post processing and decision logic subsystem 48 generates an alarm signal, as described below.
The templates 44 include perhaps about 100 brief and easily recognizable terse expressions, some of which are single words, and are commonly used by those intent on a criminal act. Some examples of commonly used word phrases spoken by a criminal to a victim prior to a mugging, for example, include: “Give me your money”, “This is a stick-up”, “Give me your wallet and you won't get hurt” . . . etc. Furthermore, commonly used replies from a typical victim during such a mugging may also be stored as template words, such as “help”, and certain sounds such as shrieks, screams and groans, etc.
The specific word templates, from which inputed acoustic sounds are compared with, must be chosen carefully, taking into account the particular accents and slang of the language spoken in the region of concern. Hence, a statistical averaging of the spectral content of each word must be used.
The output of the word recognition system shown in FIG. 4 is used as a trigger signal to activate a sound recorder, or a camera used elsewhere in the invention, as described below.
The preferred microphone used in the microphone input subsystem 40 is a shot-gun microphone, such as those commercially available from the Sennheiser Company of Frankfurt, Germany. These microphone have a super-cardioid propagation pattern. However, the gain of the pattern may be too small for high traffic areas and may therefore require more than one microphone in an array configuration to adequately focus and track in these areas. The propagation pattern of the microphone system enables better focusing on a moving sound source (e.g., a person walking and talking) A conventional directional microphone may also be used in place of a shot-gun type microphone, such as those made by the Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan. Such directional microphones will achieve similar gain to the shot-gun type microphones, but with a smaller physical structure.
A feedback loop circuit (not specifically shown) originating in the post processing subsystem 48 will direct the microphone system to track a particular dynamic source of sound within the area surveyed by video cameras.
An override signal from the video portion of the present invention will activate and direct the microphone system towards the direction of the field of view of the camera. In other words, should the video system detect a potential crime in progress, the video system will control the audio recording system towards the scene of interest. Likewise, should the audio system detect words of an aggressive nature, as described above, the audio system will direct appropriate video cameras to visually cover and record the apparent source of the sound.
A number of companies have developed very accurate and efficient, speaker independent word recognition systems based on a hidden Markov model (HMM) in combination with an artificial neural network (ANN). These companies include IBM of Armonk, N.Y., AT&T Bell Laboratories, Kurtzwell of Cambridge, Mass. and Lernout and Hauspie of Belgium.
Put briefly, the HMM applies probabilistic statistical procedure in recognizing words. In the training steps, an estimate is made of the means and covariance of the probabilistic model of each word, e.g., those words which are considered likely to be uttered in an interaction. The various ways which any given word is pronounced, permits the spectral parameters of the word to be an effective describer of the model. The steps involved in recognizing an input of an unknown word consists of computing the likelihood that the word was generated by each of the models developed during the training. The word is considered as “recognized” when its model gives the highest score. Finally, since the words are composed of word units, the evaluation of conditional probabilities of one particular unit followed by the same or another word unit is also part of the computation.
The resulting list of potential words is considerably shorter than the entire list of all spoken words of the English language. Therefore, the HMM system employed with the present invention allows both the audio and video systems to operate quickly and use HMM probability statistics to predict future movements or words based on an early recognition of initial movements and word stems.
The HMM system may be equally employed in the video recognition system. For example, if a person's arm quickly moves above his head, the HMM system may determine that there is a high probability that the arm will quickly come down, perhaps indicating a criminal intent.
While certain embodiments of the invention have been described for illustrative purposes, it is to be understood that there may be various other modifications and embodiments within the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
Claims (20)
1. A surveillance system, comprising:
a) a video camera for translating real images of an area into electronic video signals;
b) means for sampling movements of an individual located within the area from said electronic video signals of said video camera;
c) means for electronically comparing said sampled movements with predetermined characteristics of movements;
d) means for predicting future movements of said individual based on said electronic comparing means of said sampled movements; and
e) means for generating a signal responsive to predetermined predicted future movements.
2. The surveillance system in accordance with claim 1 , wherein said signal generating means activates a video signal recorder for recording said video signals from said camera.
3. The surveillance system in accordance with claim 1 , wherein said signal generating means activates a microphone for receiving audible information of said individual located in said area.
4. The surveillance system in accordance with claim 1 , wherein said signal generating means activates at least one high resolution camera.
5. A surveillance system, comprising:
a video camera capable of generating electronic video signals based on real images of an area viewed by the video camera, the electronic video signals comprising a first resolution;
a movement sampler capable of sampling movements of at least one individual in the generated electronic video signals;
a movement comparer capable of comparing sampled movements of the at least one individual with predetermined movement characteristics;
a future movement predictor capable of predicting future movements of the at least one individual based on the compared sampled movements of the at least one individual with the predetermined movement characteristics; and
an alert signal generator capable of generating an alert signal responsive to predicted future movements.
6. The surveillance system according to claim 5, wherein the alert signal generator generates an alert signal that is capable of activating a video signal recorder coupled to the electronic video signals.
7. The surveillance system according to claim 5, further comprising a video signal recorder capable of recording the electronic video signals.
8. The surveillance system according to claim 5, wherein the alert signal generator generates an alert signal that is capable of activating a microphone that is capable of receiving audible information corresponding to the area viewed by the video camera.
9. The surveillance system according to claim 8, further comprising an audio processor capable of filtering out predictable background audible information and capable of amplifying remaining audible information.
10. The surveillance system according to claim 8, further comprising an audio processor capable of recognizing speech in the received audible information.
11. The surveillance system according to claim 5, wherein the alert signal generator generates an alert signal that is capable of activating a second video camera capable of generating electronic video signals based on real images of the area viewed by the second video camera, the electronic video signals generated by the second video camera comprising a second resolution that is greater than the first resolution.
12. The surveillance system according to claim 11, wherein the future movement predictor predicts future movements of the at least one individual further based on at least one characteristic of a track associated with the at least one individual.
13. The surveillance system according to claim 12, wherein the at least one characteristic of the track comprise a movement type, a movement speed, a movement direction, a movement acceleration, a movement change in speed, a movement change in direction, or a movement change in acceleration, or combinations thereof.
14. The surveillance system according to claim 5, wherein the future movement predictor predicts future movements of the at least one individual further based on at least one characteristic of a track associated with the at least one individual.
15. The surveillance system according to claim 14, wherein the at least one characteristic of the track comprise a movement type, a movement speed, a movement direction, a movement acceleration, a movement change in speed, a movement change in direction, or a movement change in acceleration, or combinations thereof.
16. The surveillance system according to claim 5, wherein the future movement predictor is further capable of analyzing detailed movements of the at least one individual with respect to at least one other individual or at least one object, or combinations thereof.
17. The surveillance system according to claim 5, wherein the video camera is further capable of varying a focal length of the video camera in response to a video signal of the at least one individual.
18. The surveillance system according to claim 5, wherein the movement comparer is capable of pattern matching the at least one sampled movement to a known movement pattern that is indicative of an individual having criminal intent.
19. The surveillance system according to claim 18, wherein the future movement predictor predicts future movements of the at least one individual further based on at least one sampled movement matching the known movement pattern that is indicative of an individual having criminal intent.
20. The surveillance system according to claim 19, wherein the at least one sampled movement that matches the known movement pattern that is indicative of an individual having criminal intent comprises a characteristic comprising a movement type, a movement speed, a movement direction, a movement acceleration, a movement change in speed, a movement change in direction, or a movement change in acceleration, or combinations thereof.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/466,350 USRE43147E1 (en) | 1995-01-03 | 2009-05-14 | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
US13/361,438 USRE44527E1 (en) | 1995-01-03 | 2012-01-30 | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/367,712 US5666157A (en) | 1995-01-03 | 1995-01-03 | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
US12/466,350 USRE43147E1 (en) | 1995-01-03 | 2009-05-14 | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/367,712 Reissue US5666157A (en) | 1995-01-03 | 1995-01-03 | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/367,712 Continuation US5666157A (en) | 1995-01-03 | 1995-01-03 | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
USRE43147E1 true USRE43147E1 (en) | 2012-01-31 |
Family
ID=45508283
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/367,712 Ceased US5666157A (en) | 1995-01-03 | 1995-01-03 | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
US12/466,350 Expired - Lifetime USRE43147E1 (en) | 1995-01-03 | 2009-05-14 | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
US13/361,438 Expired - Lifetime USRE44527E1 (en) | 1995-01-03 | 2012-01-30 | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/367,712 Ceased US5666157A (en) | 1995-01-03 | 1995-01-03 | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/361,438 Expired - Lifetime USRE44527E1 (en) | 1995-01-03 | 2012-01-30 | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US5666157A (en) |
IL (1) | IL116647A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1997042764A1 (en) |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9076212B2 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2015-07-07 | The Queen's Medical Center | Motion tracking system for real time adaptive imaging and spectroscopy |
US9305365B2 (en) | 2013-01-24 | 2016-04-05 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking moving targets |
US9606209B2 (en) | 2011-08-26 | 2017-03-28 | Kineticor, Inc. | Methods, systems, and devices for intra-scan motion correction |
US9717461B2 (en) | 2013-01-24 | 2017-08-01 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking and compensating for patient motion during a medical imaging scan |
US9734589B2 (en) | 2014-07-23 | 2017-08-15 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking and compensating for patient motion during a medical imaging scan |
US9782141B2 (en) | 2013-02-01 | 2017-10-10 | Kineticor, Inc. | Motion tracking system for real time adaptive motion compensation in biomedical imaging |
US9943247B2 (en) | 2015-07-28 | 2018-04-17 | The University Of Hawai'i | Systems, devices, and methods for detecting false movements for motion correction during a medical imaging scan |
US9984154B2 (en) | 2015-05-01 | 2018-05-29 | Morpho Detection, Llc | Systems and methods for analyzing time series data based on event transitions |
US10004462B2 (en) | 2014-03-24 | 2018-06-26 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for removing prospective motion correction from medical imaging scans |
US10327708B2 (en) | 2013-01-24 | 2019-06-25 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking and compensating for patient motion during a medical imaging scan |
US10716515B2 (en) | 2015-11-23 | 2020-07-21 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking and compensating for patient motion during a medical imaging scan |
WO2021076523A1 (en) * | 2019-10-13 | 2021-04-22 | eConnect, Inc. | Intelligent visual human behvior prediction |
Families Citing this family (295)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5910854A (en) | 1993-02-26 | 1999-06-08 | Donnelly Corporation | Electrochromic polymeric solid films, manufacturing electrochromic devices using such solid films, and processes for making such solid films and devices |
JPH08214201A (en) * | 1994-11-28 | 1996-08-20 | Canon Inc | Image pickup device |
US6028626A (en) * | 1995-01-03 | 2000-02-22 | Arc Incorporated | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
US5666157A (en) | 1995-01-03 | 1997-09-09 | Arc Incorporated | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
US6891563B2 (en) | 1996-05-22 | 2005-05-10 | Donnelly Corporation | Vehicular vision system |
US7542035B2 (en) * | 1995-11-15 | 2009-06-02 | Ford Oxaal | Method for interactively viewing full-surround image data and apparatus therefor |
DE19601005A1 (en) * | 1996-01-15 | 1997-07-17 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Process for the detection of moving objects in successive images |
US5969755A (en) * | 1996-02-05 | 1999-10-19 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Motion based event detection system and method |
KR100213055B1 (en) * | 1996-07-27 | 1999-08-02 | 윤종용 | Recording media saving type recording method of a supervisory system |
US5953055A (en) * | 1996-08-08 | 1999-09-14 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for detecting and analyzing a queue |
CA2269778A1 (en) * | 1996-09-16 | 1998-03-19 | Advanced Research Solutions, Llc | Data correlation and analysis tool |
JPH10150656A (en) * | 1996-09-20 | 1998-06-02 | Hitachi Ltd | Image processor and trespasser monitor device |
US6035341A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 2000-03-07 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Multimedia data analysis in intelligent video information management system |
EP1450276A3 (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 2007-08-08 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Intelligent video information management system |
US6031573A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 2000-02-29 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Intelligent video information management system performing multiple functions in parallel |
US5917958A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 1999-06-29 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Distributed video data base with remote searching for image data features |
US5875305A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 1999-02-23 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Video information management system which provides intelligent responses to video data content features |
US5884042A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 1999-03-16 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Data identification in an intelligent video information management system |
AU7947501A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 2002-01-03 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Intelligent video information management system |
US5974235A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 1999-10-26 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Apparatus having flexible capabilities for analysis of video information |
US5875304A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 1999-02-23 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | User-settable features of an intelligent video information management system |
US5886738A (en) * | 1996-11-21 | 1999-03-23 | Detection Dynamics Inc. | Apparatus within a street lamp for remote surveillance |
US6462775B1 (en) | 1996-11-21 | 2002-10-08 | Detection Dynamics, Inc. | Apparatus within a street lamp for remote surveillance having directional antenna |
US5973732A (en) * | 1997-02-19 | 1999-10-26 | Guthrie; Thomas C. | Object tracking system for monitoring a controlled space |
US5943140A (en) | 1997-03-14 | 1999-08-24 | Monroe; David | Method and apparatus for sending and receiving facsimile transmissions over a non-telephonic transmission system |
JP3812985B2 (en) * | 1997-04-04 | 2006-08-23 | 富士通株式会社 | Automatic monitoring device |
US6173284B1 (en) * | 1997-05-20 | 2001-01-09 | University Of Charlotte City Of Charlotte | Systems, methods and computer program products for automatically monitoring police records for a crime profile |
US6172605B1 (en) * | 1997-07-02 | 2001-01-09 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Remote monitoring system and method |
US6091771A (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2000-07-18 | Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Inc. | Workstation for video security system |
US6097429A (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2000-08-01 | Esco Electronics Corporation | Site control unit for video security system |
US6069655A (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2000-05-30 | Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Inc. | Advanced video security system |
US6124886A (en) | 1997-08-25 | 2000-09-26 | Donnelly Corporation | Modular rearview mirror assembly |
US6172613B1 (en) | 1998-02-18 | 2001-01-09 | Donnelly Corporation | Rearview mirror assembly incorporating vehicle information display |
US8294975B2 (en) | 1997-08-25 | 2012-10-23 | Donnelly Corporation | Automotive rearview mirror assembly |
US6326613B1 (en) | 1998-01-07 | 2001-12-04 | Donnelly Corporation | Vehicle interior mirror assembly adapted for containing a rain sensor |
AU9369398A (en) * | 1997-10-20 | 1999-05-10 | Industrial Research Limited | An improved surveillance system |
WO1999027488A1 (en) * | 1997-11-25 | 1999-06-03 | Currency Systems International | Commercial currency destruction |
US5940118A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 1999-08-17 | Nortel Networks Corporation | System and method for steering directional microphones |
US6690268B2 (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2004-02-10 | Donnelly Corporation | Video mirror systems incorporating an accessory module |
US6278377B1 (en) | 1999-08-25 | 2001-08-21 | Donnelly Corporation | Indicator for vehicle accessory |
US8288711B2 (en) | 1998-01-07 | 2012-10-16 | Donnelly Corporation | Interior rearview mirror system with forwardly-viewing camera and a control |
US6445287B1 (en) | 2000-02-28 | 2002-09-03 | Donnelly Corporation | Tire inflation assistance monitoring system |
CA2341161A1 (en) * | 1998-01-12 | 1999-07-15 | Raytheon Company | Apparatus and method for selection of circuit in multi-circuit communications device |
US6636748B2 (en) * | 1998-01-12 | 2003-10-21 | David A. Monroe | Method and apparatus for image capture, compression and transmission of a visual image over telephone or radio transmission system |
CA2341159A1 (en) | 1998-01-12 | 1999-07-15 | David Monroe | Apparatus for capturing, converting and transmitting a visual image signal via a digital transmission system |
US7184074B1 (en) * | 1998-01-20 | 2007-02-27 | Rolf Jansen | Tractor/trailer back up kit |
KR100457506B1 (en) | 1998-02-25 | 2005-01-17 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Monitoring system and method thereof using pc having screen acquisition board |
US6420975B1 (en) | 1999-08-25 | 2002-07-16 | Donnelly Corporation | Interior rearview mirror sound processing system |
US6329925B1 (en) | 1999-11-24 | 2001-12-11 | Donnelly Corporation | Rearview mirror assembly with added feature modular display |
US6693517B2 (en) | 2000-04-21 | 2004-02-17 | Donnelly Corporation | Vehicle mirror assembly communicating wirelessly with vehicle accessories and occupants |
US6477464B2 (en) | 2000-03-09 | 2002-11-05 | Donnelly Corporation | Complete mirror-based global-positioning system (GPS) navigation solution |
GB2337146B (en) * | 1998-05-08 | 2000-07-19 | Primary Image Limited | Method and apparatus for detecting motion across a surveillance area |
DE19827835B4 (en) * | 1998-06-23 | 2012-01-19 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Image transmission method and apparatus |
US20030067542A1 (en) | 2000-10-13 | 2003-04-10 | Monroe David A. | Apparatus for and method of collecting and distributing event data to strategic security personnel and response vehicles |
US20030061325A1 (en) * | 2001-09-21 | 2003-03-27 | Monroe David A. | Method and apparatus for interconnectivity between legacy security systems and networked multimedia security surveillance system |
US20040068583A1 (en) * | 2002-10-08 | 2004-04-08 | Monroe David A. | Enhanced apparatus and method for collecting, distributing and archiving high resolution images |
US20020097322A1 (en) * | 2000-11-29 | 2002-07-25 | Monroe David A. | Multiple video display configurations and remote control of multiple video signals transmitted to a monitoring station over a network |
US20020170064A1 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2002-11-14 | Monroe David A. | Portable, wireless monitoring and control station for use in connection with a multi-media surveillance system having enhanced notification functions |
US7576770B2 (en) * | 2003-02-11 | 2009-08-18 | Raymond Metzger | System for a plurality of video cameras disposed on a common network |
US6970183B1 (en) * | 2000-06-14 | 2005-11-29 | E-Watch, Inc. | Multimedia surveillance and monitoring system including network configuration |
US7057647B1 (en) * | 2000-06-14 | 2006-06-06 | E-Watch, Inc. | Dual-mode camera system for day/night or variable zoom operation |
US7640083B2 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2009-12-29 | Monroe David A | Record and playback system for aircraft |
US7428002B2 (en) * | 2002-06-05 | 2008-09-23 | Monroe David A | Emergency telephone with integrated surveillance system connectivity |
US7228429B2 (en) * | 2001-09-21 | 2007-06-05 | E-Watch | Multimedia network appliances for security and surveillance applications |
US7023913B1 (en) * | 2000-06-14 | 2006-04-04 | Monroe David A | Digital security multimedia sensor |
US6853302B2 (en) * | 2001-10-10 | 2005-02-08 | David A. Monroe | Networked personal security system |
US7634662B2 (en) * | 2002-11-21 | 2009-12-15 | Monroe David A | Method for incorporating facial recognition technology in a multimedia surveillance system |
US20080201505A1 (en) * | 2003-01-08 | 2008-08-21 | Monroe David A | Multimedia data collection device for a host with a single available input port |
US20030202101A1 (en) * | 2002-04-29 | 2003-10-30 | Monroe David A. | Method for accessing and controlling a remote camera in a networked system with multiple user support capability and integration to other sensor systems |
US7131136B2 (en) * | 2002-07-10 | 2006-10-31 | E-Watch, Inc. | Comprehensive multi-media surveillance and response system for aircraft, operations centers, airports and other commercial transports, centers and terminals |
US20030025599A1 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2003-02-06 | Monroe David A. | Method and apparatus for collecting, sending, archiving and retrieving motion video and still images and notification of detected events |
US7197228B1 (en) | 1998-08-28 | 2007-03-27 | Monroe David A | Multifunction remote control system for audio and video recording, capture, transmission and playback of full motion and still images |
US6628835B1 (en) * | 1998-08-31 | 2003-09-30 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method and system for defining and recognizing complex events in a video sequence |
US7533806B1 (en) | 1998-10-09 | 2009-05-19 | Diebold, Incorporated | Reading of image data bearing record for comparison with stored user image in authorizing automated banking machine access |
US7900823B1 (en) | 1998-10-09 | 2011-03-08 | Diebold, Incorporated | Banking system controlled by data bearing records |
US7229012B1 (en) | 1998-10-09 | 2007-06-12 | Diebold, Incorporated | System and method for capturing and searching image data associated with transactions |
US7147147B1 (en) | 2005-07-18 | 2006-12-12 | Diebold, Incorporated | System and method for capturing and searching image data associated with transactions |
US6583813B1 (en) * | 1998-10-09 | 2003-06-24 | Diebold, Incorporated | System and method for capturing and searching image data associated with transactions |
US7583290B2 (en) * | 1998-10-09 | 2009-09-01 | Diebold, Incorporated | Cash dispensing automated banking machine with improved fraud detection capabilities |
US7389914B1 (en) | 1998-10-09 | 2008-06-24 | Diebold, Incorporated | Method of capturing and communicating correlated data of check transaction at card reading automated banking machine |
US20030034874A1 (en) * | 1998-10-29 | 2003-02-20 | W. Stephen G. Mann | System or architecture for secure mail transport and verifiable delivery, or apparatus for mail security |
US6515586B1 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2003-02-04 | Intel Corporation | Tactile tracking systems and methods |
US6545601B1 (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2003-04-08 | David A. Monroe | Ground based security surveillance system for aircraft and other commercial vehicles |
US6518881B2 (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2003-02-11 | David A. Monroe | Digital communication system for law enforcement use |
US6333759B1 (en) | 1999-03-16 | 2001-12-25 | Joseph J. Mazzilli | 360 ° automobile video camera system |
US6285297B1 (en) * | 1999-05-03 | 2001-09-04 | Jay H. Ball | Determining the availability of parking spaces |
WO2000068908A1 (en) * | 1999-05-07 | 2000-11-16 | Safety Adherence Technology (Pty) Ltd | Surveillance system |
GB9918248D0 (en) | 1999-08-04 | 1999-10-06 | Matra Bae Dynamics Uk Ltd | Improvements in and relating to surveillance systems |
US6424370B1 (en) * | 1999-10-08 | 2002-07-23 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Motion based event detection system and method |
US6954859B1 (en) | 1999-10-08 | 2005-10-11 | Axcess, Inc. | Networked digital security system and methods |
US6421080B1 (en) | 1999-11-05 | 2002-07-16 | Image Vault Llc | Digital surveillance system with pre-event recording |
US6401066B1 (en) | 1999-11-09 | 2002-06-04 | West Teleservices Holding Company | Automated third party verification system |
US7130800B1 (en) | 2001-09-20 | 2006-10-31 | West Corporation | Third party verification system |
US7206746B1 (en) | 1999-11-09 | 2007-04-17 | West Corporation | Third party verification system |
US6461872B1 (en) * | 1999-11-17 | 2002-10-08 | General Electric Company | Poly(1,4-ethylene-2-piperazone) composition, method for production of a poly(1,4-ethylene-2-piperazone) composition, TCE-detecting method and sensor |
US7042492B2 (en) * | 1999-12-10 | 2006-05-09 | The Stanley Works | Automatic door assembly with video imaging device |
US6707486B1 (en) * | 1999-12-15 | 2004-03-16 | Advanced Technology Video, Inc. | Directional motion estimator |
US6819353B2 (en) | 1999-12-23 | 2004-11-16 | Wespot Ab | Multiple backgrounds |
US6774905B2 (en) | 1999-12-23 | 2004-08-10 | Wespot Ab | Image data processing |
SE519700C2 (en) * | 1999-12-23 | 2003-04-01 | Wespot Ab | Image Data Processing |
US7479980B2 (en) * | 1999-12-23 | 2009-01-20 | Wespot Technologies Ab | Monitoring system |
US6940998B2 (en) * | 2000-02-04 | 2005-09-06 | Cernium, Inc. | System for automated screening of security cameras |
DE20102477U1 (en) * | 2000-02-22 | 2001-05-03 | Wincor Nixdorf Gmbh & Co Kg | Device for protecting self-service machines against manipulation |
US7480149B2 (en) | 2004-08-18 | 2009-01-20 | Donnelly Corporation | Accessory module for vehicle |
US7167796B2 (en) | 2000-03-09 | 2007-01-23 | Donnelly Corporation | Vehicle navigation system for use with a telematics system |
US7370983B2 (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2008-05-13 | Donnelly Corporation | Interior mirror assembly with display |
US20060063752A1 (en) * | 2000-03-14 | 2006-03-23 | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma Gmbh & Co. Kg | Bicyclic heterocycles, pharmaceutical compositions containing them, their use, and processes for preparing them |
US6396408B2 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2002-05-28 | Donnelly Corporation | Digital electrochromic circuit with a vehicle network |
US6671389B1 (en) | 2000-04-27 | 2003-12-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for detecting digital camera failure |
US6646676B1 (en) | 2000-05-17 | 2003-11-11 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Networked surveillance and control system |
US7868912B2 (en) * | 2000-10-24 | 2011-01-11 | Objectvideo, Inc. | Video surveillance system employing video primitives |
US9892606B2 (en) | 2001-11-15 | 2018-02-13 | Avigilon Fortress Corporation | Video surveillance system employing video primitives |
US8564661B2 (en) | 2000-10-24 | 2013-10-22 | Objectvideo, Inc. | Video analytic rule detection system and method |
US8711217B2 (en) | 2000-10-24 | 2014-04-29 | Objectvideo, Inc. | Video surveillance system employing video primitives |
US7839926B1 (en) | 2000-11-17 | 2010-11-23 | Metzger Raymond R | Bandwidth management and control |
US20070107029A1 (en) * | 2000-11-17 | 2007-05-10 | E-Watch Inc. | Multiple Video Display Configurations & Bandwidth Conservation Scheme for Transmitting Video Over a Network |
US7698450B2 (en) * | 2000-11-17 | 2010-04-13 | Monroe David A | Method and apparatus for distributing digitized streaming video over a network |
US7255451B2 (en) | 2002-09-20 | 2007-08-14 | Donnelly Corporation | Electro-optic mirror cell |
US7581859B2 (en) | 2005-09-14 | 2009-09-01 | Donnelly Corp. | Display device for exterior rearview mirror |
ATE363413T1 (en) | 2001-01-23 | 2007-06-15 | Donnelly Corp | IMPROVED VEHICLE LIGHTING SYSTEM |
US8180643B1 (en) | 2001-02-15 | 2012-05-15 | West Corporation | Script compliance using speech recognition and compilation and transmission of voice and text records to clients |
US7191133B1 (en) * | 2001-02-15 | 2007-03-13 | West Corporation | Script compliance using speech recognition |
US7739115B1 (en) | 2001-02-15 | 2010-06-15 | West Corporation | Script compliance and agent feedback |
US7664641B1 (en) | 2001-02-15 | 2010-02-16 | West Corporation | Script compliance and quality assurance based on speech recognition and duration of interaction |
US7966187B1 (en) | 2001-02-15 | 2011-06-21 | West Corporation | Script compliance and quality assurance using speech recognition |
US7472824B2 (en) | 2001-03-19 | 2009-01-06 | Diebold Self-Service Systems Division Of Diebold, Incorporated | Automated banking machine processing system and method |
US7424175B2 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2008-09-09 | Objectvideo, Inc. | Video segmentation using statistical pixel modeling |
US20030083822A2 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2003-05-01 | Psychogenics, Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring behavior informatics |
US20030040925A1 (en) * | 2001-08-22 | 2003-02-27 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Vision-based method and apparatus for detecting fraudulent events in a retail environment |
US7728870B2 (en) * | 2001-09-06 | 2010-06-01 | Nice Systems Ltd | Advanced quality management and recording solutions for walk-in environments |
US6559769B2 (en) * | 2001-10-01 | 2003-05-06 | Eric Anthony | Early warning real-time security system |
US20030095180A1 (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2003-05-22 | Montgomery Dennis L. | Method and system for size adaptation and storage minimization source noise correction, and source watermarking of digital data frames |
US6873261B2 (en) * | 2001-12-07 | 2005-03-29 | Eric Anthony | Early warning near-real-time security system |
US6819758B2 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2004-11-16 | West Corporation | Method, system, and computer-readable media for performing speech recognition of indicator tones |
US6845215B1 (en) | 2002-01-09 | 2005-01-18 | James Greenwold | Body-carryable, digital storage medium, audio/video recording assembly |
WO2003065084A1 (en) | 2002-01-31 | 2003-08-07 | Donnelly Corporation | Vehicle accessory module |
US20040075547A1 (en) * | 2002-02-12 | 2004-04-22 | Vojtech George L | Commandable covert surveillance system |
US6804331B1 (en) | 2002-03-27 | 2004-10-12 | West Corporation | Method, apparatus, and computer readable media for minimizing the risk of fraudulent receipt of telephone calls |
US6862343B1 (en) | 2002-03-27 | 2005-03-01 | West Corporation | Methods, apparatus, scripts, and computer readable media for facilitating secure capture of sensitive data for a voice-based transaction conducted over a telecommunications network |
CN100369487C (en) | 2002-04-25 | 2008-02-13 | 松下电器产业株式会社 | Object detection device, object detection server, and object detection method |
US7860222B1 (en) | 2003-11-24 | 2010-12-28 | Securus Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for acquiring, accessing, and analyzing investigative information |
US6918674B2 (en) | 2002-05-03 | 2005-07-19 | Donnelly Corporation | Vehicle rearview mirror system |
US6937702B1 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2005-08-30 | West Corporation | Method, apparatus, and computer readable media for minimizing the risk of fraudulent access to call center resources |
EP1514246A4 (en) | 2002-06-06 | 2008-04-16 | Donnelly Corp | Interior rearview mirror system with compass |
US7329013B2 (en) | 2002-06-06 | 2008-02-12 | Donnelly Corporation | Interior rearview mirror system with compass |
DE10225023A1 (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2004-01-15 | Diehl Munitionssysteme Gmbh & Co. Kg | Monitoring methods in a means of transportation |
US7403967B1 (en) | 2002-06-18 | 2008-07-22 | West Corporation | Methods, apparatus, and computer readable media for confirmation and verification of shipping address data associated with a transaction |
US6873256B2 (en) | 2002-06-21 | 2005-03-29 | Dorothy Lemelson | Intelligent building alarm |
US7190809B2 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2007-03-13 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Enhanced background model employing object classification for improved background-foreground segmentation |
US6778085B2 (en) * | 2002-07-08 | 2004-08-17 | James Otis Faulkner | Security system and method with realtime imagery |
US8111289B2 (en) * | 2002-07-15 | 2012-02-07 | Magna B.S.P. Ltd. | Method and apparatus for implementing multipurpose monitoring system |
TWI238392B (en) * | 2002-09-02 | 2005-08-21 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Optical information storage medium and method of and apparatus for recording and/or reproducing information on and/or from the optical information storage medium |
US7310177B2 (en) | 2002-09-20 | 2007-12-18 | Donnelly Corporation | Electro-optic reflective element assembly |
WO2004103772A2 (en) | 2003-05-19 | 2004-12-02 | Donnelly Corporation | Mirror assembly for vehicle |
EP1543358A2 (en) | 2002-09-20 | 2005-06-22 | Donnelly Corporation | Mirror reflective element assembly |
WO2004045215A1 (en) * | 2002-11-12 | 2004-05-27 | Intellivid Corporation | Method and system for tracking and behavioral monitoring of multiple objects moving throuch multiple fields-of-view |
US7221775B2 (en) * | 2002-11-12 | 2007-05-22 | Intellivid Corporation | Method and apparatus for computerized image background analysis |
US7634334B2 (en) * | 2002-11-22 | 2009-12-15 | Monroe David A | Record and playback system for aircraft |
US6791603B2 (en) | 2002-12-03 | 2004-09-14 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Event driven video tracking system |
WO2004051590A2 (en) * | 2002-12-03 | 2004-06-17 | 3Rd Millennium Solutions, Ltd. | Surveillance system with identification correlation |
US7643168B2 (en) * | 2003-01-03 | 2010-01-05 | Monroe David A | Apparatus for capturing, converting and transmitting a visual image signal via a digital transmission system |
JP4568009B2 (en) * | 2003-04-22 | 2010-10-27 | パナソニック株式会社 | Monitoring device with camera cooperation |
US7529424B2 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2009-05-05 | Grandeye, Ltd. | Correction of optical distortion by image processing |
US7528881B2 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2009-05-05 | Grandeye, Ltd. | Multiple object processing in wide-angle video camera |
US20100002070A1 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2010-01-07 | Grandeye Ltd. | Method and System of Simultaneously Displaying Multiple Views for Video Surveillance |
US20050007453A1 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2005-01-13 | Yavuz Ahiska | Method and system of simultaneously displaying multiple views for video surveillance |
US7450165B2 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2008-11-11 | Grandeye, Ltd. | Multiple-view processing in wide-angle video camera |
US20040223054A1 (en) * | 2003-05-06 | 2004-11-11 | Rotholtz Ben Aaron | Multi-purpose video surveillance |
US20050028215A1 (en) * | 2003-06-03 | 2005-02-03 | Yavuz Ahiska | Network camera supporting multiple IP addresses |
US7286157B2 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2007-10-23 | Intellivid Corporation | Computerized method and apparatus for determining field-of-view relationships among multiple image sensors |
US7446924B2 (en) | 2003-10-02 | 2008-11-04 | Donnelly Corporation | Mirror reflective element assembly including electronic component |
US20050075836A1 (en) * | 2003-10-03 | 2005-04-07 | Jason Arthur Taylor | Forensic person tracking method and apparatus |
US7346187B2 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2008-03-18 | Intellivid Corporation | Method of counting objects in a monitored environment and apparatus for the same |
US7280673B2 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2007-10-09 | Intellivid Corporation | System and method for searching for changes in surveillance video |
US7308341B2 (en) | 2003-10-14 | 2007-12-11 | Donnelly Corporation | Vehicle communication system |
US7127083B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2006-10-24 | Vidient Systems, Inc. | Video surveillance system with object detection and probability scoring based on object class |
US7136507B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2006-11-14 | Vidient Systems, Inc. | Video surveillance system with rule-based reasoning and multiple-hypothesis scoring |
US7148912B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2006-12-12 | Vidient Systems, Inc. | Video surveillance system in which trajectory hypothesis spawning allows for trajectory splitting and/or merging |
US7088846B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2006-08-08 | Vidient Systems, Inc. | Video surveillance system that detects predefined behaviors based on predetermined patterns of movement through zones |
NZ536913A (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2006-09-29 | Safehouse Internat Inc | Displaying graphical output representing the topographical relationship of detectors and their alert status |
GB2408884B (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2009-02-25 | Safehouse Internat Inc | Detecting activity in image frames |
US7664292B2 (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2010-02-16 | Safehouse International, Inc. | Monitoring an output from a camera |
AU2004233453B2 (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2011-02-17 | Envysion, Inc. | Recording a sequence of images |
US20050200486A1 (en) * | 2004-03-11 | 2005-09-15 | Greer Richard S. | Patient visual monitoring system |
US7893985B1 (en) | 2004-03-15 | 2011-02-22 | Grandeye Ltd. | Wide angle electronic camera with improved peripheral vision |
US8427538B2 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2013-04-23 | Oncam Grandeye | Multiple view and multiple object processing in wide-angle video camera |
US7366359B1 (en) | 2004-07-08 | 2008-04-29 | Grandeye, Ltd. | Image processing of regions in a wide angle video camera |
WO2006040687A2 (en) | 2004-07-19 | 2006-04-20 | Grandeye, Ltd. | Automatically expanding the zoom capability of a wide-angle video camera |
US20060062478A1 (en) * | 2004-08-16 | 2006-03-23 | Grandeye, Ltd., | Region-sensitive compression of digital video |
US8860780B1 (en) | 2004-09-27 | 2014-10-14 | Grandeye, Ltd. | Automatic pivoting in a wide-angle video camera |
US9141615B1 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2015-09-22 | Grandeye, Ltd. | Interactive media server |
AR048477A1 (en) * | 2004-11-19 | 2006-05-03 | Alusud Argentina S R L | PICO VERTEDOR OF THE TYPE EMPLOYED IN BOTTLES CONTAINERS OF LIQUID SUBSTANCES WITH VARIABLE VISCOSITY DEGREE |
US8256821B2 (en) | 2004-12-15 | 2012-09-04 | Magna Donnelly Engineering Gmbh | Accessory module system for a vehicle window |
US7894531B1 (en) | 2005-02-15 | 2011-02-22 | Grandeye Ltd. | Method of compression for wide angle digital video |
JP4345692B2 (en) * | 2005-02-28 | 2009-10-14 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing system, information processing apparatus and method, and program |
JP4702598B2 (en) * | 2005-03-15 | 2011-06-15 | オムロン株式会社 | Monitoring system, monitoring apparatus and method, recording medium, and program |
EP2328131B1 (en) * | 2005-03-25 | 2012-10-10 | Sensormatic Electronics LLC | Intelligent camera selection and object tracking |
US7339607B2 (en) * | 2005-03-25 | 2008-03-04 | Yongyouth Damabhorn | Security camera and monitor system activated by motion sensor and body heat sensor for homes or offices |
US8139896B1 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2012-03-20 | Grandeye, Ltd. | Tracking moving objects accurately on a wide-angle video |
US20060236375A1 (en) | 2005-04-15 | 2006-10-19 | Tarik Hammadou | Method and system for configurable security and surveillance systems |
US7626749B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2009-12-01 | Donnelly Corporation | Vehicle mirror assembly with indicia at reflective element |
US20070090972A1 (en) * | 2005-06-10 | 2007-04-26 | Monroe David A | Airborne digital video recorder |
US7822224B2 (en) | 2005-06-22 | 2010-10-26 | Cernium Corporation | Terrain map summary elements |
US7944468B2 (en) * | 2005-07-05 | 2011-05-17 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Automated asymmetric threat detection using backward tracking and behavioral analysis |
US9036028B2 (en) | 2005-09-02 | 2015-05-19 | Sensormatic Electronics, LLC | Object tracking and alerts |
US8508607B2 (en) * | 2005-09-06 | 2013-08-13 | Its-7 | Method and system for a programmable camera for configurable security and surveillance systems |
JP5061444B2 (en) * | 2005-09-20 | 2012-10-31 | ソニー株式会社 | Imaging apparatus and imaging method |
EP1949666B1 (en) | 2005-11-01 | 2013-07-17 | Magna Mirrors of America, Inc. | Interior rearview mirror with display |
US8723951B2 (en) * | 2005-11-23 | 2014-05-13 | Grandeye, Ltd. | Interactive wide-angle video server |
JP4442571B2 (en) * | 2006-02-10 | 2010-03-31 | ソニー株式会社 | Imaging apparatus and control method thereof |
EP1841166A1 (en) * | 2006-03-28 | 2007-10-03 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Subject identification |
CN101467454A (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2009-06-24 | 科汀科技大学 | Virtual observer |
JP2009533778A (en) | 2006-04-17 | 2009-09-17 | オブジェクトビデオ インコーポレイテッド | Video segmentation using statistical pixel modeling |
US7825792B2 (en) * | 2006-06-02 | 2010-11-02 | Sensormatic Electronics Llc | Systems and methods for distributed monitoring of remote sites |
US7671728B2 (en) * | 2006-06-02 | 2010-03-02 | Sensormatic Electronics, LLC | Systems and methods for distributed monitoring of remote sites |
ES2320826B1 (en) * | 2006-12-27 | 2010-02-25 | Universidad Nacional De Educacion A Distancia (Uned) | PROCEDURE TO DESCRIBE THE GEOMETRIC BEHAVIOR OF HUMANS ON A SCENE CATCHED BY AN ARTIFICIAL VISION SYSTEM, BASED ON A MODEL OF BLOCKS AND, SPECIAL, ORIENTED TO THE VIDEO-SURVEILLANCE TASK. |
US8588464B2 (en) * | 2007-01-12 | 2013-11-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Assisting a vision-impaired user with navigation based on a 3D captured image stream |
US8295542B2 (en) | 2007-01-12 | 2012-10-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adjusting a consumer experience based on a 3D captured image stream of a consumer response |
US8269834B2 (en) | 2007-01-12 | 2012-09-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Warning a user about adverse behaviors of others within an environment based on a 3D captured image stream |
US7667596B2 (en) * | 2007-02-16 | 2010-02-23 | Panasonic Corporation | Method and system for scoring surveillance system footage |
JP5121258B2 (en) * | 2007-03-06 | 2013-01-16 | 株式会社東芝 | Suspicious behavior detection system and method |
US9135807B2 (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2015-09-15 | Seth Cirker | Mobile wireless device with location-dependent capability |
US8749343B2 (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2014-06-10 | Seth Cirker | Selectively enabled threat based information system |
US20100019927A1 (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2010-01-28 | Seth Cirker | Privacy ensuring mobile awareness system |
US7595815B2 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2009-09-29 | Kd Secure, Llc | Apparatus, methods, and systems for intelligent security and safety |
EP2163095A4 (en) * | 2007-06-09 | 2011-05-18 | Sensormatic Electronics Llc | System and method for integrating video analytics and data analytics/mining |
US8123419B2 (en) | 2007-09-21 | 2012-02-28 | Seth Cirker | Privacy ensuring covert camera |
WO2009045218A1 (en) | 2007-10-04 | 2009-04-09 | Donovan John J | A video surveillance, storage, and alerting system having network management, hierarchical data storage, video tip processing, and vehicle plate analysis |
US8013738B2 (en) | 2007-10-04 | 2011-09-06 | Kd Secure, Llc | Hierarchical storage manager (HSM) for intelligent storage of large volumes of data |
US20090213123A1 (en) * | 2007-12-08 | 2009-08-27 | Dennis Allard Crow | Method of using skeletal animation data to ascertain risk in a surveillance system |
ES2334617B1 (en) * | 2008-02-13 | 2011-02-10 | Jose Juan Blanch Puig | SYSTEM AND PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING THE ACTIVITY OF A PERSON IN AN ENCLOSURE, AND SENSOR TO DETECT A PERSON IN A DEFAULT AREA. |
US8154418B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2012-04-10 | Magna Mirrors Of America, Inc. | Interior rearview mirror system |
US9487144B2 (en) | 2008-10-16 | 2016-11-08 | Magna Mirrors Of America, Inc. | Interior mirror assembly with display |
US8570374B2 (en) | 2008-11-13 | 2013-10-29 | Magna Electronics Inc. | Camera for vehicle |
EP2211319B1 (en) * | 2009-01-27 | 2012-10-03 | Research In Motion Limited | A method and handheld electronic device for detecting and providing notification of a device drop |
US8044818B2 (en) * | 2009-01-27 | 2011-10-25 | Research In Motion Limited | Method and handheld electronic device for detecting and providing notification of a device drop |
WO2010124062A1 (en) | 2009-04-22 | 2010-10-28 | Cernium Corporation | System and method for motion detection in a surveillance video |
EP2276007A1 (en) * | 2009-07-17 | 2011-01-19 | Nederlandse Organisatie voor toegepast -natuurwetenschappelijk onderzoek TNO | Method and system for remotely guarding an area by means of cameras and microphones. |
US9544379B2 (en) | 2009-08-03 | 2017-01-10 | Wolfram K. Gauglitz | Systems and methods for event networking and media sharing |
US10574614B2 (en) | 2009-08-03 | 2020-02-25 | Picpocket Labs, Inc. | Geofencing of obvious geographic locations and events |
US20120229633A1 (en) * | 2011-03-10 | 2012-09-13 | Thomas J Boucino | Security System and Method for Network Equipment Rack Having Camera |
KR101799443B1 (en) * | 2011-05-02 | 2017-11-20 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method for surveying watching of video content, Broadcasting receiving apparatus and Server thereof |
US9286516B2 (en) | 2011-10-20 | 2016-03-15 | Xerox Corporation | Method and systems of classifying a vehicle using motion vectors |
US10289917B1 (en) * | 2013-11-12 | 2019-05-14 | Kuna Systems Corporation | Sensor to characterize the behavior of a visitor or a notable event |
US20140218515A1 (en) * | 2013-02-04 | 2014-08-07 | Systems Engineering Technologies Corporation | Immediate action system |
US8971581B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-03-03 | Xerox Corporation | Methods and system for automated in-field hierarchical training of a vehicle detection system |
US9171213B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-10-27 | Xerox Corporation | Two-dimensional and three-dimensional sliding window-based methods and systems for detecting vehicles |
WO2014174796A1 (en) * | 2013-04-23 | 2014-10-30 | 日本電気株式会社 | Information processing system, information processing method and storage medium |
JP6443330B2 (en) | 2013-04-23 | 2018-12-26 | 日本電気株式会社 | Information processing system, information processing method, and program |
US20150185731A1 (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2015-07-02 | Hyundai Motor Company | Work-in-process inspection system using motion detection, and method thereof |
PL406971A1 (en) | 2014-01-28 | 2015-08-03 | Politechnika Poznańska | Method for analyzing of people behaviour in the intelligent monitoring system and the intelligent system of monitoring |
US9195669B2 (en) | 2014-02-26 | 2015-11-24 | Iboss, Inc. | Detecting and managing abnormal data behavior |
US9710708B1 (en) * | 2014-03-24 | 2017-07-18 | Vecna Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for autonomously recognizing at least one object in an image |
US20160110791A1 (en) | 2014-10-15 | 2016-04-21 | Toshiba Global Commerce Solutions Holdings Corporation | Method, computer program product, and system for providing a sensor-based environment |
CN107000981B (en) * | 2014-11-26 | 2020-05-05 | 奥的斯电梯公司 | Elevator safety and control system based on passenger movement |
US10062411B2 (en) * | 2014-12-11 | 2018-08-28 | Jeffrey R. Hay | Apparatus and method for visualizing periodic motions in mechanical components |
US20160217588A1 (en) | 2014-12-11 | 2016-07-28 | Jeffrey R. Hay | Method of Adaptive Array Comparison for the Detection and Characterization of Periodic Motion |
WO2016112052A1 (en) | 2015-01-05 | 2016-07-14 | Picpocket, Inc. | Use of a dynamic geofence to control media sharing and aggregation associated with a mobile target |
US10043146B2 (en) * | 2015-02-12 | 2018-08-07 | Wipro Limited | Method and device for estimating efficiency of an employee of an organization |
JP6708385B2 (en) * | 2015-09-25 | 2020-06-10 | キヤノン株式会社 | Discriminator creating device, discriminator creating method, and program |
US10190914B2 (en) * | 2015-12-04 | 2019-01-29 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Motion detection for A/V recording and communication devices |
US10325625B2 (en) * | 2015-12-04 | 2019-06-18 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Motion detection for A/V recording and communication devices |
US20190208168A1 (en) * | 2016-01-29 | 2019-07-04 | John K. Collings, III | Limited Access Community Surveillance System |
US10408625B2 (en) | 2016-04-19 | 2019-09-10 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Vision-assist systems with room scanners to detect and notify users of out-of-order room states |
US10579879B2 (en) * | 2016-08-10 | 2020-03-03 | Vivint, Inc. | Sonic sensing |
US10810441B2 (en) | 2016-08-16 | 2020-10-20 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying hierarchical structures of members of a crowd |
US11545013B2 (en) * | 2016-10-26 | 2023-01-03 | A9.Com, Inc. | Customizable intrusion zones for audio/video recording and communication devices |
US12096156B2 (en) | 2016-10-26 | 2024-09-17 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Customizable intrusion zones associated with security systems |
US10891839B2 (en) | 2016-10-26 | 2021-01-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Customizable intrusion zones associated with security systems |
US10708547B2 (en) | 2016-11-11 | 2020-07-07 | Nio Usa, Inc. | Using vehicle sensor data to monitor environmental and geologic conditions |
US10694357B2 (en) | 2016-11-11 | 2020-06-23 | Nio Usa, Inc. | Using vehicle sensor data to monitor pedestrian health |
US10410064B2 (en) | 2016-11-11 | 2019-09-10 | Nio Usa, Inc. | System for tracking and identifying vehicles and pedestrians |
US10455353B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2019-10-22 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Device, method, and system for electronically detecting an out-of-boundary condition for a criminal origanization |
US10477343B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2019-11-12 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Device, method, and system for maintaining geofences associated with criminal organizations |
US10691950B2 (en) * | 2017-03-10 | 2020-06-23 | Turing Video, Inc. | Activity recognition method and system |
US11475671B2 (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2022-10-18 | Turing Video | Multiple robots assisted surveillance system |
EP3673469A1 (en) | 2017-12-04 | 2020-07-01 | Siemens Mobility GmbH | Automated detection of an emergency situation of one or more persons |
US10274979B1 (en) * | 2018-05-22 | 2019-04-30 | Capital One Services, Llc | Preventing image or video capture of input data provided to a transaction device |
US10510239B1 (en) * | 2018-06-14 | 2019-12-17 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for managing alert notifications from a secured area |
US11734688B2 (en) * | 2018-06-29 | 2023-08-22 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System to determine group association between users |
US10824935B2 (en) * | 2018-10-17 | 2020-11-03 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | System and method for detecting anomalies in video using a similarity function trained by machine learning |
US11423551B1 (en) | 2018-10-17 | 2022-08-23 | Rdi Technologies, Inc. | Enhanced presentation methods for visualizing motion of physical structures and machinery |
US10438010B1 (en) | 2018-12-19 | 2019-10-08 | Capital One Services, Llc | Obfuscation of input data provided to a transaction device |
US10733457B1 (en) | 2019-03-11 | 2020-08-04 | Wipro Limited | Method and system for predicting in real-time one or more potential threats in video surveillance |
US11151387B2 (en) * | 2019-04-05 | 2021-10-19 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Camera system to detect unusual activities |
US11402487B2 (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2022-08-02 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Joint radon transform association |
US11373103B2 (en) * | 2019-05-28 | 2022-06-28 | Accenture Global Solutions Limited | Artificial intelligence based system and method for predicting and preventing illicit behavior |
US11132562B2 (en) | 2019-06-19 | 2021-09-28 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Camera system to detect unusual circumstances and activities while driving |
US11587384B1 (en) | 2019-12-13 | 2023-02-21 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Group determination and association |
US11373317B1 (en) | 2020-01-24 | 2022-06-28 | Rdi Technologies, Inc. | Measuring the speed of rotation or reciprocation of a mechanical component using one or more cameras |
US10943441B1 (en) | 2020-06-05 | 2021-03-09 | Bank Of America Corporation | Image processing system and method for detecting errors in an ATM terminal |
US11282213B1 (en) | 2020-06-24 | 2022-03-22 | Rdi Technologies, Inc. | Enhanced analysis techniques using composite frequency spectrum data |
US11322182B1 (en) | 2020-09-28 | 2022-05-03 | Rdi Technologies, Inc. | Enhanced visualization techniques using reconstructed time waveforms |
US11750639B2 (en) | 2021-04-05 | 2023-09-05 | Bank Of America Corporation | ATM-based anomaly and security threat detection |
CN113486777B (en) * | 2021-07-02 | 2024-07-02 | 北京一维大成科技有限公司 | Behavior analysis method and device of target object, electronic equipment and storage medium |
Citations (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4337482A (en) | 1979-10-17 | 1982-06-29 | Coutta John M | Surveillance system |
US4692806A (en) | 1985-07-25 | 1987-09-08 | Rca Corporation | Image-data reduction technique |
US4737847A (en) | 1985-10-11 | 1988-04-12 | Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. | Abnormality supervising system |
US5091780A (en) | 1990-05-09 | 1992-02-25 | Carnegie-Mellon University | A trainable security system emthod for the same |
US5097328A (en) | 1990-10-16 | 1992-03-17 | Boyette Robert B | Apparatus and a method for sensing events from a remote location |
US5126577A (en) | 1991-06-27 | 1992-06-30 | Electro-Optical Industries, Inc. | Infrared target plate handling apparatus with improved thermal control |
US5283644A (en) | 1991-12-11 | 1994-02-01 | Ibaraki Security Systems Co., Ltd. | Crime prevention monitor system |
US5396252A (en) | 1993-09-30 | 1995-03-07 | United Technologies Corporation | Multiple target discrimination |
US5512942A (en) | 1992-10-29 | 1996-04-30 | Fujikura Ltd. | Anomaly surveillance device |
US5519669A (en) | 1993-08-19 | 1996-05-21 | At&T Corp. | Acoustically monitored site surveillance and security system for ATM machines and other facilities |
US5546072A (en) | 1994-07-22 | 1996-08-13 | Irw Inc. | Alert locator |
US5666157A (en) | 1995-01-03 | 1997-09-09 | Arc Incorporated | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
US5747719A (en) | 1997-01-21 | 1998-05-05 | Bottesch; H. Werner | Armed terrorist immobilization (ATI) system |
US5809161A (en) * | 1992-03-20 | 1998-09-15 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation | Vehicle monitoring system |
US6028626A (en) | 1995-01-03 | 2000-02-22 | Arc Incorporated | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
Family Cites Families (40)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS58109373A (en) | 1981-12-24 | 1983-06-29 | フジテツク株式会社 | Detector for abnormality in elevator cage |
US4679077A (en) | 1984-11-10 | 1987-07-07 | Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. | Visual Image sensor system |
JPS61260391A (en) | 1985-05-14 | 1986-11-18 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Monitor/controller |
JPH0628449B2 (en) | 1985-12-10 | 1994-04-13 | 松下電工株式会社 | Intrusion monitoring device |
JPH0782595B2 (en) | 1986-03-24 | 1995-09-06 | 松下電工株式会社 | Image recognition type wide area monitoring system |
JPH01244598A (en) | 1988-03-25 | 1989-09-28 | Toshiba Corp | Picture supervisory equipment |
JPH01251195A (en) | 1988-03-31 | 1989-10-06 | Toshiba Corp | Monitor |
DE3832353A1 (en) | 1988-09-23 | 1990-04-05 | Nolde Sylvia | Expanding the function of monitoring devices in shops and department stores |
JPH02151996A (en) | 1988-12-03 | 1990-06-11 | Toshiba Corp | Room entry control system |
GB8925298D0 (en) | 1989-11-09 | 1990-08-08 | Marconi Gec Ltd | Object tracking |
US5099322A (en) | 1990-02-27 | 1992-03-24 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Scene change detection system and method |
JPH0410099A (en) | 1990-04-27 | 1992-01-14 | Toshiba Corp | Detector for person acting suspiciously |
JPH0460880A (en) | 1990-06-29 | 1992-02-26 | Shimizu Corp | Moving body discrimination and analysis controlling system |
US5243418A (en) | 1990-11-27 | 1993-09-07 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Display monitoring system for detecting and tracking an intruder in a monitor area |
JP3093346B2 (en) | 1991-08-16 | 2000-10-03 | 株式会社東芝 | Moving object detection device |
JPH04257190A (en) | 1991-02-08 | 1992-09-11 | Toshiba Corp | Moving body tracking and display device |
JPH04273689A (en) | 1991-02-28 | 1992-09-29 | Hitachi Ltd | Monitoring device |
JPH0512578A (en) | 1991-06-28 | 1993-01-22 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Invasion monitoring device |
JPH0514892A (en) | 1991-06-28 | 1993-01-22 | Toshiba Corp | Image monitor device |
GB2257598B (en) | 1991-07-12 | 1994-11-30 | Hochiki Co | Surveillance monitor system using image processing |
JPH0564199A (en) | 1991-08-29 | 1993-03-12 | Pioneer Electron Corp | Picture monitor |
EP0603276B1 (en) | 1991-09-12 | 1999-08-18 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Image analyser |
JP3034101B2 (en) | 1991-11-22 | 2000-04-17 | 大倉電気株式会社 | Method and apparatus for identification using motion vector |
GB2292040B (en) | 1992-03-24 | 1996-04-10 | Sony Uk Ltd | Motion analysis of moving images |
ATE186142T1 (en) | 1992-04-06 | 1999-11-15 | Siemens Ag | METHOD FOR RESOLVING CLUSTERS OF MOVING SEGMENTS |
EP0567059B1 (en) | 1992-04-24 | 1998-12-02 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Object recognition system using image processing |
JPH0628449A (en) | 1992-07-08 | 1994-02-04 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Image synthesizing device |
JP2978374B2 (en) | 1992-08-21 | 1999-11-15 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Image processing device, image processing method, and control device for air conditioner |
JPH06119564A (en) | 1992-10-02 | 1994-04-28 | Toshiba Corp | Suspicious person detecting system |
US5387768A (en) | 1993-09-27 | 1995-02-07 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator passenger detector and door control system which masks portions of a hall image to determine motion and court passengers |
JPH06251159A (en) | 1993-03-01 | 1994-09-09 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Operation recognizing device |
JPH06266840A (en) | 1993-03-11 | 1994-09-22 | Hitachi Ltd | Status detector for moving object |
US6167143A (en) | 1993-05-03 | 2000-12-26 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Monitoring system |
DE4314483A1 (en) | 1993-05-03 | 1994-11-10 | Philips Patentverwaltung | Surveillance system |
IT1270521B (en) | 1993-05-14 | 1997-05-06 | Michael Josef Lantschner | METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF IRREGULAR DISCONTINUOUS MOVEMENTS OF A PERSON AND SYSTEM FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION. |
US5555512A (en) | 1993-08-19 | 1996-09-10 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Picture processing apparatus for processing infrared pictures obtained with an infrared ray sensor and applied apparatus utilizing the picture processing apparatus |
US5396284A (en) | 1993-08-20 | 1995-03-07 | Burle Technologies, Inc. | Motion detection system |
US5416711A (en) | 1993-10-18 | 1995-05-16 | Grumman Aerospace Corporation | Infra-red sensor system for intelligent vehicle highway systems |
US5473364A (en) | 1994-06-03 | 1995-12-05 | David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc. | Video technique for indicating moving objects from a movable platform |
US6050369A (en) | 1994-10-07 | 2000-04-18 | Toc Holding Company Of New York, Inc. | Elevator shaftway intrusion device using optical imaging processing |
-
1995
- 1995-01-03 US US08/367,712 patent/US5666157A/en not_active Ceased
-
1996
- 1996-01-01 IL IL11664796A patent/IL116647A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1996-05-09 WO PCT/US1996/008674 patent/WO1997042764A1/en active Application Filing
-
2009
- 2009-05-14 US US12/466,350 patent/USRE43147E1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2012
- 2012-01-30 US US13/361,438 patent/USRE44527E1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4337482A (en) | 1979-10-17 | 1982-06-29 | Coutta John M | Surveillance system |
US4692806A (en) | 1985-07-25 | 1987-09-08 | Rca Corporation | Image-data reduction technique |
US4737847A (en) | 1985-10-11 | 1988-04-12 | Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. | Abnormality supervising system |
US5091780A (en) | 1990-05-09 | 1992-02-25 | Carnegie-Mellon University | A trainable security system emthod for the same |
US5097328A (en) | 1990-10-16 | 1992-03-17 | Boyette Robert B | Apparatus and a method for sensing events from a remote location |
US5126577A (en) | 1991-06-27 | 1992-06-30 | Electro-Optical Industries, Inc. | Infrared target plate handling apparatus with improved thermal control |
US5283644A (en) | 1991-12-11 | 1994-02-01 | Ibaraki Security Systems Co., Ltd. | Crime prevention monitor system |
US5809161A (en) * | 1992-03-20 | 1998-09-15 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation | Vehicle monitoring system |
US5512942A (en) | 1992-10-29 | 1996-04-30 | Fujikura Ltd. | Anomaly surveillance device |
US5519669A (en) | 1993-08-19 | 1996-05-21 | At&T Corp. | Acoustically monitored site surveillance and security system for ATM machines and other facilities |
US5396252A (en) | 1993-09-30 | 1995-03-07 | United Technologies Corporation | Multiple target discrimination |
US5546072A (en) | 1994-07-22 | 1996-08-13 | Irw Inc. | Alert locator |
US5666157A (en) | 1995-01-03 | 1997-09-09 | Arc Incorporated | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
IL116647A (en) | 1995-01-03 | 1999-03-12 | Aviv David G | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
US6028626A (en) | 1995-01-03 | 2000-02-22 | Arc Incorporated | Abnormality detection and surveillance system |
US5747719A (en) | 1997-01-21 | 1998-05-05 | Bottesch; H. Werner | Armed terrorist immobilization (ATI) system |
Non-Patent Citations (24)
Title |
---|
Agarwal et al. "Estimating Optical Flow from Clustered Trajectory Velocity Time" Pattern Recognition, 1992. vol. I. Conference A: Computer Vision and Applications, Proceedings., 11th IAPR International Conference on Aug. 30-Sep. 3, 1992, pp. 215-219. |
Aviv "New on-board data processing approach to achieve large compaction," SPIE, 1979, vol. 180, pp. 48-55. |
Bergstein et al. "Four-Component Optically Compensated Varifocal System," Journal of the Optical Society of America, Apr. 1962, vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 376-388. |
Bergstein et al. "Three-Component Optically Compensated Varifocal System," Journal of the Optical Society of America, Apr. 1962, vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 363-375. |
Bergstein et al. "Two-Component Optically Compensated Varifocal System," Journal of the Optical Society of America, Apr. 1962, vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 353-362. |
D.G. Aviv, "On Achieving Safer Streets," Library of Congress, TXU 545 919, Nov. 23, 1992, 7 pages. |
D.G. Aviv, "The 'Public Eye' Security System," Library of Congress, TXU 551 435, Jan. 11, 1993, 13 pages. |
International Search Report for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US1996/08674, dated Sep. 17, 1996. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 08/367,712, mailed Dec. 24, 1996. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 08/898,470, mailed Mar. 1, 1999. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,340, mailed Jul. 18, 2011. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 08/367,712, mailed Jul. 24, 1996. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 08/898,470, mailed Oct. 1, 1998. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,340, mailed Apr. 18, 2011. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,340, mailed Aug. 30, 2010 (Restriction Requirement). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,340, mailed Mar. 11, 2010. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,340, mailed Nov. 8, 2010. |
Rabiner "Applications of Voice Processing to Telecommunications," Proceedings of the IEEE, Feb. 1994, vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 199-228. |
Rabiner "The Role of Voice Processing in Telecommunications," 2nd IEEE Workshop on Interactive Voice Technology for Telecommunications Applications (IVTTA94) Sep. 1994, 8 pages. |
Rabiner et al. "Fundamental of Speech Recognition," Prentice Hall International, Inc., Apr. 12, 1993, pp. 434-495. |
Shio et al. "Segmentation of People in Motion," Visual Motion, 1991., Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Oct. 7-9, 1991, pp. 325-332. |
Suzuki et al. "Extracting Non-Rigid Moving Objects by Temporal Edges,"Pattern Recognition, 1992. vol. I. Conference A: Computer Vision and Applications, Proceedings., 11th IAPR International Conference on Aug. 30-Sep. 3, 1992, pp. 69-73. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,340, filed May 14, 2009, Aviv. |
Weibel et al. "Readings in Speech Recognition," Morgan Kaufam, May 15, 1990 pp. 267-296. |
Cited By (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9867549B2 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2018-01-16 | The Queen's Medical Center | Motion tracking system for real time adaptive imaging and spectroscopy |
US9138175B2 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2015-09-22 | The Queen's Medical Center | Motion tracking system for real time adaptive imaging and spectroscopy |
US10869611B2 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2020-12-22 | The Queen's Medical Center | Motion tracking system for real time adaptive imaging and spectroscopy |
US9076212B2 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2015-07-07 | The Queen's Medical Center | Motion tracking system for real time adaptive imaging and spectroscopy |
US10663553B2 (en) | 2011-08-26 | 2020-05-26 | Kineticor, Inc. | Methods, systems, and devices for intra-scan motion correction |
US9606209B2 (en) | 2011-08-26 | 2017-03-28 | Kineticor, Inc. | Methods, systems, and devices for intra-scan motion correction |
US9607377B2 (en) | 2013-01-24 | 2017-03-28 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking moving targets |
US9717461B2 (en) | 2013-01-24 | 2017-08-01 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking and compensating for patient motion during a medical imaging scan |
US9779502B1 (en) | 2013-01-24 | 2017-10-03 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking moving targets |
US9305365B2 (en) | 2013-01-24 | 2016-04-05 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking moving targets |
US10327708B2 (en) | 2013-01-24 | 2019-06-25 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking and compensating for patient motion during a medical imaging scan |
US10339654B2 (en) | 2013-01-24 | 2019-07-02 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking moving targets |
US9782141B2 (en) | 2013-02-01 | 2017-10-10 | Kineticor, Inc. | Motion tracking system for real time adaptive motion compensation in biomedical imaging |
US10653381B2 (en) | 2013-02-01 | 2020-05-19 | Kineticor, Inc. | Motion tracking system for real time adaptive motion compensation in biomedical imaging |
US10004462B2 (en) | 2014-03-24 | 2018-06-26 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, methods, and devices for removing prospective motion correction from medical imaging scans |
US9734589B2 (en) | 2014-07-23 | 2017-08-15 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking and compensating for patient motion during a medical imaging scan |
US10438349B2 (en) | 2014-07-23 | 2019-10-08 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking and compensating for patient motion during a medical imaging scan |
US11100636B2 (en) | 2014-07-23 | 2021-08-24 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking and compensating for patient motion during a medical imaging scan |
US9984154B2 (en) | 2015-05-01 | 2018-05-29 | Morpho Detection, Llc | Systems and methods for analyzing time series data based on event transitions |
US10839009B2 (en) | 2015-05-01 | 2020-11-17 | Smiths Detection Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing time series data based on event transitions |
US10660541B2 (en) | 2015-07-28 | 2020-05-26 | The University Of Hawai'i | Systems, devices, and methods for detecting false movements for motion correction during a medical imaging scan |
US9943247B2 (en) | 2015-07-28 | 2018-04-17 | The University Of Hawai'i | Systems, devices, and methods for detecting false movements for motion correction during a medical imaging scan |
US10716515B2 (en) | 2015-11-23 | 2020-07-21 | Kineticor, Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for tracking and compensating for patient motion during a medical imaging scan |
WO2021076523A1 (en) * | 2019-10-13 | 2021-04-22 | eConnect, Inc. | Intelligent visual human behvior prediction |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
IL116647A (en) | 1999-03-12 |
WO1997042764A1 (en) | 1997-11-13 |
USRE44527E1 (en) | 2013-10-08 |
IL116647A0 (en) | 1996-05-14 |
US5666157A (en) | 1997-09-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
USRE44527E1 (en) | Abnormality detection and surveillance system | |
USRE44225E1 (en) | Abnormality detection and surveillance system | |
Elharrouss et al. | A review of video surveillance systems | |
US7683929B2 (en) | System and method for video content analysis-based detection, surveillance and alarm management | |
US20040240542A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for video frame sequence-based object tracking | |
Crocco et al. | Audio surveillance: A systematic review | |
US7542588B2 (en) | System and method for assuring high resolution imaging of distinctive characteristics of a moving object | |
KR101644443B1 (en) | Warning method and system using prompt situation information data | |
US20190082149A1 (en) | System and method for gate monitoring during departure or arrival of an autonomous vehicle | |
US7535353B2 (en) | Surveillance system and surveillance method | |
US20080309761A1 (en) | Video surveillance system and method with combined video and audio recognition | |
US20070035622A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for video surveillance | |
JP2000244897A (en) | State recognition system and state recognition display generation method | |
WO2021095351A1 (en) | Monitoring device, monitoring method, and program | |
CN105100700A (en) | Target tracking device using handover between cameras and method thereof | |
US20190208168A1 (en) | Limited Access Community Surveillance System | |
CN113920660B (en) | Safety monitoring method and system suitable for safety storage equipment | |
Park et al. | Sound learning–based event detection for acoustic surveillance sensors | |
JP7533632B2 (en) | Information processing device, information processing method, and program | |
Ho et al. | Public space behavior modeling with video and sensor analytics | |
KR20160086536A (en) | Warning method and system using prompt situation information data | |
Flammini et al. | Challenges and emerging paradigms for augmented surveillance | |
US20240062636A1 (en) | System and method for identifying a weapon, and tracking and generating an alert in response to the weapon identification | |
Francisco et al. | Thermal imaging for law enforcement and security: post 9-11 | |
De Jesus et al. | Multisensorial modular system of monitoring and tracking with information fusion techniques and neural networks |