USRE26261E - Anodic prevention of hydrogen embrittlement of metals - Google Patents
Anodic prevention of hydrogen embrittlement of metals Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USRE26261E USRE26261E US26261DE USRE26261E US RE26261 E USRE26261 E US RE26261E US 26261D E US26261D E US 26261DE US RE26261 E USRE26261 E US RE26261E
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- hydrogen
- anodic
- solution
- hydrogen embrittlement
- metal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 title description 56
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 title description 56
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title description 52
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 title description 52
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 title description 52
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 title description 8
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 title description 5
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N acetic acid Chemical compound CC(O)=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 24
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 23
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 19
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-N phosphoric acid Chemical compound OP(O)(O)=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 16
- NLHHRLWOUZZQLW-UHFFFAOYSA-N acrylonitrile Chemical compound C=CC#N NLHHRLWOUZZQLW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 13
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 11
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 11
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 11
- 229910000147 aluminium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 7
- XFXPMWWXUTWYJX-UHFFFAOYSA-N cyanide Chemical compound N#[C-] XFXPMWWXUTWYJX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 4
- YZCKVEUIGOORGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydrogen atom Chemical group [H] YZCKVEUIGOORGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000001105 regulatory Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- NNFCIKHAZHQZJG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium cyanide Chemical compound [K+].N#[C-] NNFCIKHAZHQZJG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminum Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 231100000078 corrosive Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 231100001010 corrosive Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000002431 hydrogen Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 125000004435 hydrogen atoms Chemical group [H]* 0.000 description 2
- -1 hydrogen ions Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002194 synthesizing Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004580 weight loss Effects 0.000 description 2
- ARUVKPQLZAKDPS-UHFFFAOYSA-L Copper(II) sulfate Chemical class [Cu+2].[O-][S+2]([O-])([O-])[O-] ARUVKPQLZAKDPS-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910001209 Low-carbon steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N arsenic Chemical compound [As] RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052785 arsenic Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000004210 cathodic protection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005039 chemical industry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001311 chemical methods and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 1
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003487 electrochemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004070 electrodeposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006056 electrooxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009713 electroplating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury Chemical compound [Hg] QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052753 mercury Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002825 nitriles Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005500 petroleum industry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005554 pickling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003334 potential Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002028 premature Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004321 preservation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011253 protective coating Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003464 sulfur compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23F—NON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
- C23F13/00—Inhibiting corrosion of metals by anodic or cathodic protection
- C23F13/005—Anodic protection
Definitions
- This invention relates to the prevention of metal failurcs due to absorption of hydrogen and consequent embrittlement of the metal.
- Hydrogen embrittlemcnt results when atomic hydrogen passes freely through the lattice of the metal, until it combines to form molecular hydro gen or compounds in voids or at grain boundaries within the metal which develop pressure in the metallic voids. These pressures weaken the metal so that it becomes brittie and eventually cracks.
- the major metal requiring protection against hydrogen embrittlement is steel.
- Steel process vessels and storage tanks are widely used in the chemical and petroleum industries, and hydrogen embrittlement of such vessels has been prevented in some cases by using a protective coating which separates the steel from the electroylte. This procedure is expensive and is only as reliable as the coating.
- hydrogen embrittlement can sometimes be prevented by using other metals.
- aluminum or stainless steel may be substituted for steel, but this may be prohibitively expensive.
- Other metallics which are sometimes susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement include the hardenable grades of stainless steel, copper and its alloys, and aluminum.
- Another object is to protect metallic structures and objects by preventing electrochemical deposition of hydrogen on metallic surfaces of these structures and objects.
- a further object is to overcome the normal electrochemical potentials which are generated when metallic surfaces are in contact with corrosive solutions which tend to deposit hydrogen by rendering these surfaces sufficient. ly anodic to a cathode.
- An additional object is to maintain metallic surfaces, particularly steel, at an anodic electrical potential relative to a solution in contact with the surface, thereby preventing hydrogen embrittlement of the metal
- the vessel wall is maintained anodic in charge, which is the reverse of cathodic protection systems now in fairly common use.
- the method of the present invention will usually cause an induced electrochemical corrosion, however, current density is regulated so that this corrosion is of a low order of magnitude and can be tolerated, while the far more serious problem of hydrogen evolution and subsequent rapid failure due to embrittlement is eliminated.
- the vessel wall is anodic in electrical potential relative to the solution, it becomes impossible for hydrogen to deposit on the wall since any tendency for hydrogen ions to lose their charge and form hydrogen atoms is artificially reversed by the strong anodic or positive potential of the wall.
- negatively charged particles are preferentially discharged against the wall rather than against hydrogen ions, and no hydrogen film can form on the metallic surface of the wall.
- the magnitude of the anodic potential required for the prevention of hydrogen deposition and consequent metal embrittlement is a function of the operating condition encountered.
- the magnitude of anodic potential required must be empirically determined for each application.
- sufiicient electric potential is applied to the metallic structure being protected from hydrogen embrittlement, to maintain all local areas of the surface at a positive potential.
- the required minimum voltage potential between the solution and any point on the surface of the structure to be protected will be on the order of 0.8 volt. That is, every point on the surface will be maintained positive by at least 0.8 volt relative to a copper-saturated copper sulfate half cell in the electolyte. Excessive voltage is undesirable, since it will not produce any further protection and will also cause additional induced corrosion.
- This system may be applied to vessels which are also coated, thus providing protection against hydrogen embrittlement at breaks in the coating. It should be noted that coated metallic surfaces require considerably less amperage for protection than comparable uncoated surfaces.
- the method of the present invention was utilized at a commercial chemical plant engaged in the production of acrylonitrile.
- the typical hydrogen embrittlement which took place thus resulted in a deterioration and failure of the vessel walls.
- the acrylonitrile contained slight amounts of potassium cyanide, acetic acid and phosphoric acid as principle impurities, with a total impurity content of about 6%.
- the vessel walls were made anodic with controlled amounts of electrical current, which completely eliminated hydrogen deposition and prevented any subsequent hydrogen embrittlement.
- a minimum current density of milliamperes per squire foot was maintained on that portion of the surface of the vessel in contact with the crude acrylonitrile.
- the voltage required to maintain this current density was a function of the resistivity of the solution which varied with impurity content and other operating factors. An operating voltage range between about 1 to 10 volts was generally employed. This applied electrical potential also caused an acid to form which was corrosive. However, this induced corrosion amounted to only 0.0025 inch/year and was thus an insignificant development which was readily tolerated since hydrogen embrittlement had been eliminated. The service life of the protected process vessels was thus greately extended.
- a quantitative laboratory study of the effectiveness of the anodic protection method was also made, based on the effectiveness of the aforementioned industrial application.
- a synthetic crude acrylonitrile solution was prepared, containing 600 cc. acrylonitrile plus 14 grams each of potassium cyanide and acetic acid, 1 cc. of phosphoric acid, and 4 cc. water.
- One steel test piece was unprotected, while the other was connected to a duriron cathode immersed in the solution so that an electrical potential was generated and maintained by galvanic action which kept the second test piece anodic in potential relative to the solution.
- the two test pieces were removed from the solution and weighed to determine whether the electrically induced corrosion was of appreciable magnitude.
- the protected piece had a weight loss of 0.2136 gram, which corresponded to a corrosion rate of 0.009 inch/year.
- the unprotected piece had a weight loss of 0.2396 gram, which corresponded to a slightly higher corrosion rate of 0.010 inch/year.
- no increase in corrosion rate was caused by the anodic protection method.
- the two test pieces were then qualitatively tested for hydrogen absorption by immersion in hot oil and observation of hydrogen evolution. At the elevated temperature, any hydrogen present is driven off as bubbles. No absorbed hydrogen was observed from the protected test piece, while the unprotected piccc showed considerable evolution of bubbles of hydrogen. Thus the anodic protection procedure had effectively prevented hydrogen absorption in this test case, with negligible induced corrosion.
- the method of the present invention should be distinguished from anodic protection technology of the prior art such as US. Patent No. 2,377,792 in which anodic potential is employed to preserve protective oxide films on materials such as stainless steel. in these cases a different phenomenon and mechanism is involved, since film preservation by anodic protection as practiced in the prior art is dircceted to prevention of corrosion by chemical attack and subsequent total metal wastage. It should be noted that the prior :art did not comprehend the utilization of anodic protection against hydrogen embrittlement, since in numerous instances such as the aforementioned acrylonitrile application the conventional chemical type of corrosion is not serious. Thus in such cases where conventional corrosion phenomena are not serious problems, but hydrogen embrittlement is a problem, application of anodic protection has heretofore not been comprehended by the prior art.
- the method of preventing hydrogen deposition on ferrous metal surfaces in contact with an acrylonitrile solution containing cyanide, acetic acid and phosphoric acid impurities which comprises immersing an inert electrical conductor in said acrylonitrile solution, and establishing an electrical potential in the range of 1 to 10 volts between said conductor and said ferrous metal surface, whereby said surface is maintained continuously anodic in electrical potential relative to said solution, said electrical potential serving to establish a current density such that the ferrous metal surface is continuously dissolved into said solution by induced corrosion, said induced corrosion being of a small and essentially negligible order of magnitude.
- the method of preventing hydrogen embrittlement of a ferrous metal by preventing hydrogen deposition on the surface of said ferrous metal, said ferrous metal surface being in contact with a solution contaminated with dissolved cyanide, acetic acid and phosphoric acid which comprises immersing an inert electrical conductor in said solution, establishing an electrical potential between said ferrous metal surface and said conductor, whereby said ferrous metal surface is maintained continuously anodic in electrical potential relative to said solution, said electrical potential serving to establish a current density such that the ferrous metal surface is continuously dissolved into said solution by induced corrosion, said induced corrosion being of a small and essentially negligible order of magnitude.
Description
United States Patent 26,261 ANODIC PREVENTION OF HYDROGEN EMBRITTLEMENT OF METALS Spencer W. Shepard, Plainfield, and Charles K. Aldrich, Buttzville, N.J., assignors to Chemical Construction Corporation, New York, N.Y., a corporation of Delaware No Drawing. Original No. 3,147,204, dated Sept. 1, 1964, Ser. No. 10,861, Feb. 25, 1960. Application for reissue June 9, 1965, Ser. No. 462,769
7 Claims. (Cl. 204-447) Matter enclosed in heavy brackets appears in the original patent but forms no part of this reissue specification; matter printed in italics indicates the additions made by reissue.
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE Hydrogen embrittlement of ferrous metal surfaces in contact with process solutions containing cyanide, acetic acid and phosphoric acid impurities, such as crude acrylonitrile solution produced by acrylo-nitrile synthesis, is prevented by immersing an inert electrical conductor in the process solution and establishing an electrical potential between the conductor and the ferrous metal surface, so as to continuously maintain the ferrous metal surface anodic in electrical potential relative to the process solution, with the electrical potential serving to establish a current density such that the ferrous metal surface is continuously dissolved in the solution by a small and essentially negligible amount of induced corrosion.
This invention relates to the prevention of metal failurcs due to absorption of hydrogen and consequent embrittlement of the metal.
It has been found that hydrogen absorption by metals in contact with fluids which commonly cause hydrogen embrittlement is prevented by maintaining an electrical potential between this metal and another metal immersed in the fluid and functioning as a cathode. In this manner, the metal to be protected is maintained sufficiently anodic so that local cathodes can no longer form on its surface, with the fluid acting as an electroylte in the electrical system. The current is usually an impressed electromotive force, but could also be a galvanic current if the electrochemical potential of the two metals is sufficiently far apart. In general, this invention protects metals from the hydrogen embrittlement that commonly occurs where fluids are being handled or stored which tend to form films that allow or encourage the deposition of atomic hydrogen which forms on cathodic areas during the normal corrosion process. Hydrogen embrittlemcnt results when atomic hydrogen passes freely through the lattice of the metal, until it combines to form molecular hydro gen or compounds in voids or at grain boundaries within the metal which develop pressure in the metallic voids. These pressures weaken the metal so that it becomes brittie and eventually cracks.
The problem of hydrogen embrittlement is widely prevalent in the chemical and petroleum industry. Where this type of metal deterioration takes place, sudden cataclysmic cracking of vessels may occur without any prior warning. Thus hydrogen embrittlement may be distinguishcd from the more common corrosion situation in which there is a gradual failure due to metal wastage or other surface attack. Hydrogen cmbrittlement results from the actual absorption of hydrogen, usually atomic hydrogen, which is formed on metallic surfaces that become cathodic due to electrochemical processes of corrosion. Uusually the corrosion itself is not a serious problem, however, the film of hydrogen deposited on the metal surface forms gaseous compounds with non-metallics in the grain boundaries of the metal. Thus the hydrogen penetrates through the metal surface and is absorbed into the metal crystalline structure, resulting in deterioration of the strength of the metal due to em brittlement, and eventual failure of the chemical process vessel or other apparatus formed of the metal. Usually this failure is a sudden cracking or collapse, with attendant disastrous effects.
The major metal requiring protection against hydrogen embrittlement is steel. Steel process vessels and storage tanks are widely used in the chemical and petroleum industries, and hydrogen embrittlernent of such vessels has been prevented in some cases by using a protective coating which separates the steel from the electroylte. This procedure is expensive and is only as reliable as the coating. As an alternative, hydrogen embrittlement can sometimes be prevented by using other metals. In some cases aluminum or stainless steel may be substituted for steel, but this may be prohibitively expensive. Other metallics which are sometimes susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement include the hardenable grades of stainless steel, copper and its alloys, and aluminum.
Although hydrogen embrittlement is widely encountered, in general this phenomenon occurs most frequently in systems involving weakly acid or alkaline solutions contaminated with sulfur compounds, cyanides, or compounds of arsenic or mercury. These contaminants are fairly widespread, especially in the petroleum and chemical industries, thus numerous industrial systems may be protected by the method of the present invention. Without so limiting the invention, it appears from a theorteical standpoint that hydrogen embrittlement occurs where the aforementioned contaminants are present because the natural surface film which forms on the steel surface is modified or eliminated due to chemical action of the contaminants, thus permitting hydrogen penetration into the metal. Of course, hydrogen embrittlement can sometimes be prevented by the elimination of these contaminants from the system or by the addition of air. However, these procedures are seldom feasible and are usually quite expensive. Hydrogen embrittlement has also been known to occur in metal pickling installations, such as where steel springs are processed. In such cases the springs which are produced are usually subject to premature failure and other defects.
It is an obpect of the present invention to prevent hydrogen embrittlement of metals.
Another object is to protect metallic structures and objects by preventing electrochemical deposition of hydrogen on metallic surfaces of these structures and objects.
A further object is to overcome the normal electrochemical potentials which are generated when metallic surfaces are in contact with corrosive solutions which tend to deposit hydrogen by rendering these surfaces sufficient. ly anodic to a cathode.
An additional object is to maintain metallic surfaces, particularly steel, at an anodic electrical potential relative to a solution in contact with the surface, thereby preventing hydrogen embrittlement of the metal These and other objects of the present invention will become apparent from the description which follows. In the present invention, a metallic object, such as a steel vessel or other container holding a solution which tends to deposit hydrogen on the vessel surface by electrochemical reaction is protected against subsequent hydrogen embrittlement of the metal in a novel manner. An electrical potential of suitable magnitude is maintained between the vessel wall and the solution. This potential is established by immersing a suitable cathode in the solution, and providing an electrical circuit between the vessel wall and the cathode using direct electric current from an external source. Thus the vessel wall is maintained anodic in charge, which is the reverse of cathodic protection systems now in fairly common use. The method of the present invention will usually cause an induced electrochemical corrosion, however, current density is regulated so that this corrosion is of a low order of magnitude and can be tolerated, while the far more serious problem of hydrogen evolution and subsequent rapid failure due to embrittlement is eliminated. Since the vessel wall is anodic in electrical potential relative to the solution, it becomes impossible for hydrogen to deposit on the wall since any tendency for hydrogen ions to lose their charge and form hydrogen atoms is artificially reversed by the strong anodic or positive potential of the wall. Thus negatively charged particles are preferentially discharged against the wall rather than against hydrogen ions, and no hydrogen film can form on the metallic surface of the wall.
The magnitude of the anodic potential required for the prevention of hydrogen deposition and consequent metal embrittlement is a function of the operating condition encountered. Thus the magnitude of anodic potential required must be empirically determined for each application. In any case, sufiicient electric potential is applied to the metallic structure being protected from hydrogen embrittlement, to maintain all local areas of the surface at a positive potential. In general. the required minimum voltage potential between the solution and any point on the surface of the structure to be protected will be on the order of 0.8 volt. That is, every point on the surface will be maintained positive by at least 0.8 volt relative to a copper-saturated copper sulfate half cell in the electolyte. Excessive voltage is undesirable, since it will not produce any further protection and will also cause additional induced corrosion.
This system may be applied to vessels which are also coated, thus providing protection against hydrogen embrittlement at breaks in the coating. It should be noted that coated metallic surfaces require considerably less amperage for protection than comparable uncoated surfaces.
The method of the present invention was utilized at a commercial chemical plant engaged in the production of acrylonitrile. Much difliculty had been encoutered due to hydrogen embrittlement of steel vessels, since the acrylonitrile solution containing cyanide, acetic acid and phosphoric acid impurities reacted with the metal vessel walls to produce a hydrogen film which in turn formed gaseous compounds with non-metallics in the grain boundaries of the metal. The typical hydrogen embrittlernent which took place thus resulted in a deterioration and failure of the vessel walls. The acrylonitrile contained slight amounts of potassium cyanide, acetic acid and phosphoric acid as principle impurities, with a total impurity content of about 6%.
The vessel walls were made anodic with controlled amounts of electrical current, which completely eliminated hydrogen deposition and prevented any subsequent hydrogen embrittlement. A minimum current density of milliamperes per squire foot was maintained on that portion of the surface of the vessel in contact with the crude acrylonitrile. The voltage required to maintain this current density was a function of the resistivity of the solution which varied with impurity content and other operating factors. An operating voltage range between about 1 to 10 volts was generally employed. This applied electrical potential also caused an acid to form which was corrosive. However, this induced corrosion amounted to only 0.0025 inch/year and was thus an insignificant development which was readily tolerated since hydrogen embrittlement had been eliminated. The service life of the protected process vessels was thus greately extended.
A quantitative laboratory study of the effectiveness of the anodic protection method was also made, based on the effectiveness of the aforementioned industrial application. A synthetic crude acrylonitrile solution was prepared, containing 600 cc. acrylonitrile plus 14 grams each of potassium cyanide and acetic acid, 1 cc. of phosphoric acid, and 4 cc. water. Two test pieces of mild steel, each having 0.88 square decimeter of surface area, were immersed in this solution for a five day test period. One steel test piece was unprotected, while the other was connected to a duriron cathode immersed in the solution so that an electrical potential was generated and maintained by galvanic action which kept the second test piece anodic in potential relative to the solution. After the five day test period the two test pieces were removed from the solution and weighed to determine whether the electrically induced corrosion was of appreciable magnitude. The protected piece had a weight loss of 0.2136 gram, which corresponded to a corrosion rate of 0.009 inch/year. The unprotected piece had a weight loss of 0.2396 gram, which corresponded to a slightly higher corrosion rate of 0.010 inch/year. Thus it is evident that, within the limits of experimental accuracy, no increase in corrosion rate was caused by the anodic protection method. The two test pieces were then qualitatively tested for hydrogen absorption by immersion in hot oil and observation of hydrogen evolution. At the elevated temperature, any hydrogen present is driven off as bubbles. No absorbed hydrogen was observed from the protected test piece, while the unprotected piccc showed considerable evolution of bubbles of hydrogen. Thus the anodic protection procedure had effectively prevented hydrogen absorption in this test case, with negligible induced corrosion.
The method of the present invention should be distinguished from anodic protection technology of the prior art such as US. Patent No. 2,377,792 in which anodic potential is employed to preserve protective oxide films on materials such as stainless steel. in these cases a different phenomenon and mechanism is involved, since film preservation by anodic protection as practiced in the prior art is dircceted to prevention of corrosion by chemical attack and subsequent total metal wastage. It should be noted that the prior :art did not comprehend the utilization of anodic protection against hydrogen embrittlement, since in numerous instances such as the aforementioned acrylonitrile application the conventional chemical type of corrosion is not serious. Thus in such cases where conventional corrosion phenomena are not serious problems, but hydrogen embrittlement is a problem, application of anodic protection has heretofore not been comprehended by the prior art.
We claim:
1. In the process of acrylonitrile synthesis, the method of preventing hydrogen deposition on ferrous metal surfaces in contact with an acrylonitrile solution containing cyanide, acetic acid and phosphoric acid impurities, which comprises immersing an inert electrical conductor in said acrylonitrile solution, and establishing an electrical potential in the range of 1 to 10 volts between said conductor and said ferrous metal surface, whereby said surface is maintained continuously anodic in electrical potential relative to said solution, said electrical potential serving to establish a current density such that the ferrous metal surface is continuously dissolved into said solution by induced corrosion, said induced corrosion being of a small and essentially negligible order of magnitude.
2. Method of claim 1, in which said electrical potential is regulated to a magnitude at which an average current density of about 5 milliamperes per square foot is maintained on said surface.
3. The method of preventing hydrogen embrittlemcnt of a ferrous metal by preventing hydrogen deposition on the surface of said ferrous metal, said ferrous metal surface being in contact with a solution containing dissolved cyanide, acetic acid and phosphoric acid, which comprises immersing an inert electrical conductor in said solution, establishing an electrical potential between said ferrous metal surface and said conductor, whereby said ferrous metal surface is maintained continuously anodic in electrical potential relative to said solution, said elcctrical potential serving to establish a current density such that the ferrous metal surface is continuously dissolved insto said solution by induced corrosion, said induced corrosion being of a small and essentially negligible order of magnitude.
4. The method of claim 3, in which said electrical potential is in the range of about 1 to volts.
5. The method of claim 3, in which said electrical potential is regulated to a magnitude at which an average current density of about 5 milliamperes per square foot is maintained on said surface.
6. The method of claim 3, in which said solution containing dissolved cyanide, acetic acid and phosphoric acid principally comprises an acrylonitrile solution.
7. The method of preventing hydrogen embrittlement of a ferrous metal by preventing hydrogen deposition on the surface of said ferrous metal, said ferrous metal surface being in contact with a solution contaminated with dissolved cyanide, acetic acid and phosphoric acid, which comprises immersing an inert electrical conductor in said solution, establishing an electrical potential between said ferrous metal surface and said conductor, whereby said ferrous metal surface is maintained continuously anodic in electrical potential relative to said solution, said electrical potential serving to establish a current density such that the ferrous metal surface is continuously dissolved into said solution by induced corrosion, said induced corrosion being of a small and essentially negligible order of magnitude.
References Cited The following references, cited by the Examiner, are of record in the patented file of this patent or the original patent.
UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,485,436 3/1924 Slepian 204- 1,513,824 11/1924 Kasley 204-140 1,663,564 3/1928 Rich 204-140 1,731,269 10/1929 Rich 204-140 1,825,477 9/1931 Reichart 204-147 2,057,274 10/1936 Mayhew 204-140 2,360,244 10/1944 McAuneny 204-147 2,377,792 6/1945 Lawrence et a1. 204-147 2,576,680 11/1951 Guitton 204-147 2,726,204- 12/1955 Park 204-72 2,886,497 5/1959 Butler 204-1.1 3,147,204 9/1964 Shepard et a1. 204-147 OTHER REFERENCES Edeleanu: Metallurgia, September 1954, pp 113-116.
Evans: Metallic Corrosion Passivity and Protection (1948), pp. 848S.
Field et al.: Electro-Plating, 1930, Pitman, pp. 77 79.
Metals & Alloys, vol. 19, 1944, pp. 172 and 174.
Taylor: Iron and Steel, vol. 17, July 1944, pp. 525- 527.
US. National Bureau of Standards Circular No. 511, pp. 11-14, Sept. 24, 1951.
JOHN H. MACK, Primary Examiner. HOWARD S. WILLIAMS, Examiner.
T. TUNG, Assistant Examiner.
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
USRE26261E true USRE26261E (en) | 1967-09-05 |
Family
ID=2095734
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US26261D Expired USRE26261E (en) | Anodic prevention of hydrogen embrittlement of metals |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | USRE26261E (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4970783A (en) * | 1989-12-14 | 1990-11-20 | Ford Motor Company | Method of making split remateable connecting rod portions |
-
0
- US US26261D patent/USRE26261E/en not_active Expired
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4970783A (en) * | 1989-12-14 | 1990-11-20 | Ford Motor Company | Method of making split remateable connecting rod portions |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Harsimran et al. | Overview of corrosion and its control: A critical review | |
Makhlouf | Intelligent stannate-based coatings of self-healing functionality for magnesium alloys | |
US2444174A (en) | Galvanic coating process | |
Burleigh | Corrosion of aluminum and its alloys | |
Hancock et al. | The inhibition of the corrosion of iron in neutral and alkaline solutions. I | |
US3147204A (en) | Anodic prevention of hydrogen embrittlement of metals | |
USRE26261E (en) | Anodic prevention of hydrogen embrittlement of metals | |
Vaughan et al. | Corrosion of Ti-2 and Ti-7 relevant to nickel acid leach chemistry | |
Schafer et al. | On the role of the oxygen concentration cell in crevice corrosion and pitting | |
US2404031A (en) | Corrosion preventing electrode | |
Gedvillo et al. | Effect of hydroquinone and pyrocatechin on the corrosion and electrochemical behavior of steel in a model concrete pore liquid | |
US4154791A (en) | Inhibition of corrosive attack by sulfuric acid on carbon steel | |
US3730856A (en) | Electrolytic preparation of valve group metal equipment for use in chemical plants | |
Sedriks et al. | Stress corrosion cracking and corrosion behavior of titanium in methanol solutions: effect of metal ions in solution | |
Spacht | The corrosion resistance of aluminum and its alloys. | |
Akimov | Factors influencing corrosion | |
Islam et al. | ‘Improving Corrosion Resistance in Magnesium and its alloys | |
JPS5887281A (en) | Preventing method for crevice corrosion of joined metallic surface | |
US3651189A (en) | Water treatment process | |
JPS619584A (en) | Method for preventing stress corrosion cracking of apparatus made of austenite cast iron | |
US3956095A (en) | Sacrificial anode | |
Rhee et al. | Electrochemical Study of Aluminum Alloys as a Sacrificial Anode of Offshore Steel Structures | |
Islam | Corrosion And Its Effect: A Critical Appraisal | |
JPH0261080A (en) | Cathodic protection method for stainless steel | |
Riaz et al. | Analysis of Tafel polarization scans of Magnesium-Steel galvanic couple under different corrosive environments at various temperatures |