USPP9077P - Chrysanthemum plant named Cherry Emily - Google Patents
Chrysanthemum plant named Cherry Emily Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
 - USPP9077P USPP9077P US08/151,974 US15197493V US9077P US PP9077 P USPP9077 P US PP9077P US 15197493 V US15197493 V US 15197493V US 9077 P US9077 P US 9077P
 - Authority
 - US
 - United States
 - Prior art keywords
 - grown
 - emily
 - spring
 - flowerings
 - under natural
 - Prior art date
 - Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
 - Expired - Lifetime
 
Links
- 241000723353 Chrysanthemum Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 5
 - 230000017260 vegetative to reproductive phase transition of meristem Effects 0.000 abstract description 21
 - 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 abstract description 12
 - 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 abstract description 10
 - 241001466077 Salina Species 0.000 abstract description 10
 - 241000131317 Capitulum Species 0.000 abstract description 9
 - 239000003630 growth substance Substances 0.000 abstract description 5
 - 230000002062 proliferating effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
 - 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
 - 235000007516 Chrysanthemum Nutrition 0.000 description 2
 - 241001573881 Corolla Species 0.000 description 2
 - 230000011681 asexual reproduction Effects 0.000 description 2
 - 238000013465 asexual reproduction Methods 0.000 description 2
 - 235000009604 Chrysanthemum X morifolium Nutrition 0.000 description 1
 - 244000189548 Chrysanthemum x morifolium Species 0.000 description 1
 - 241000218922 Magnoliophyta Species 0.000 description 1
 - 240000001140 Mimosa pudica Species 0.000 description 1
 - 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
 - 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
 - 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
 - 230000001678 irradiating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
 - 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
 - 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
 - 231100000350 mutagenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
 - 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 1
 - 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 1
 - 230000001850 reproductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
 - 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
 - 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 1
 - 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 1
 
Images
Classifications
- 
        
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 - A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
 - A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
 - A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
 - A01H6/14—Asteraceae or Compositae, e.g. safflower, sunflower, artichoke or lettuce
 - A01H6/1424—Chrysanthemum
 
 - 
        
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
 - A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
 - A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
 - A01H5/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
 - A01H5/02—Flowers
 
 
Definitions
- the present invention comprises a new and distinct cultivar of Chrysanthemum, botanically known as Dendranthema grandiflora, and referred to by the cultivar name Cheery Emily.
 - Cheery Emily identified as 8476 (87-284A01), is a product of a mutation induction program.
 - the new cultivar was discovered and selected by Cornelis P. VandenBerg on Jun. 22, 1990, in a controlled environment in Salinas, Calif. as one flowering plant within a flowering block established as rooted cuttings from stock palnts which had been exposed as unrooted cuttings to an X-ray source of 2000 rads in Fort Myers, Fla. on Nov. 30, 1989.
 - the irradiated parent cultivar was the cultivar identified as Emily, disclosed in U.S. Plant Pat. No.
 - the irradiation program resulting in Cheery Emily had as its primary objective the expansion of color ranges of the parent cultivar Emily.
 - the irradiation program comprised irradiating cuttings of the parent cultivar at irradiation levels of 1750 and 2000 rads. A total of 1073 cuttings harvested from a total of 150 irradiated plants were planted on Apr. 23 and 16, 1990, respectively. Of these, 17 initial selections were made, which selections were then revegetated and reflowered. Three consecutive flowerings resulted in discarding 12 of the original 17 selections on Mar. 5, 1991. The remaining five selections were maintained as PIs (Possible Introductions) and further trailed in Salinas, Calif., Hightstown, N.J.
 - Cheery Emily has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions.
 - the phenotype may vary slignificantly with variations in environment such as temperature, light intensity and daylength, without, however, any variation in genotype.
 - Branching pattern is spreading and prolific, with 8 to 9 breaks after pinch when grown outside under natural daylength in fall flowerings, and 6 to 7 breaks after pinch when grown in 10 cm pots for spring flowerings.
 - the accompanying photographic drawing is a color photograph of Cheery Emily grown as a pinched garden mum under natural season outside conditions in Salinas, Calif., with the colors being as nearly true as possible with illustrateations of this type. Plants were grown outside and dug and transplanted into 15 cm bulb pans at flowering time for photography purposes.
 - Cheery Emily Of the commercial cultivars known to the inventor, the most similar in comparison to Cheery Emily is the parent cultivar Emily.
 - the ranges of values for Cheery Emily are much marrower than the ranges of values given for Emily. This is based on the fact that Emily was flowered over many years, while Cheery Emily was flowered over a period of only one and a half years.
 - most traits of Cheery Emily are similar to those of Emily, except for the ray floret color.
 - the ray floret color of Cheery Emily is mauve-red, with a darker center of the flower, while the ray floret color of emily is light pink with a darker center of the flower.
 - Color (general tonality from a distance of three meters).--mauve-red with slightly darker center of the flower.
 - Gynoecium --Present on both ray and disc florets.
 - Branching pattern --Spreading and prolific, with 8 to 9 breaks after pinch when grown outside under natural daylength in fall flowerings, and 6 to 7 breaks after inch when grown in 10 cm pots for spring flowerings.
 - Shape --Relatively small, shallow lobes, and slightly serrated.
 
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
 - Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
 - Physiology (AREA)
 - Botany (AREA)
 - Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
 - Environmental Sciences (AREA)
 - Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
 - Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
 
Abstract
A Chrysanthemum plant named Cheery Emily particularly characterized by its flat capitulum form; decorative capitulum type with many disc florets, especially in spring flowerings; mauve-red ray floret color, with slightly darker center of the flower; diameter across face of capitulum of 57 to 70 mm when fully opened; branching pattern is spreading and prolific, with 8 to 9 breaks after pinch when grown outside under natural daylength in fall flowerings, and 6 to 7 breaks after pinch when grown in 10 cm pots for spring flowerings; natural season flower date of August 13 to 19 when planting rooted cuttings on June 21 to 23 in Salinas, Calif., and of September 15 when planting rooted cuttings June 11 in Hightstown, N.J.; flowering response of 45 to 49 days after rooting in no light/no shade programs in spring; plant height of 38 cm when grown in fall under natural daylength with no growth regulators in New Jersey, 23 to 25 cm when grown in fall under natural daylength in california, and 23 to 25 cm when grown in 10 cm pots in spring with 0 to 2 applications of 2500 ppm B-9 SP; and durable, uniform performance.
  Description
The present invention comprises a new and distinct cultivar of Chrysanthemum, botanically known as Dendranthema grandiflora, and referred to by the cultivar name Cheery Emily.
    Cheery Emily, identified as 8476 (87-284A01), is a product of a mutation induction program. The new cultivar was discovered and selected by Cornelis P. VandenBerg on Jun. 22, 1990, in a controlled environment in Salinas, Calif. as one flowering plant within a flowering block established as rooted cuttings from stock palnts which had been exposed as unrooted cuttings to an X-ray source of 2000 rads in Fort Myers, Fla. on Nov. 30, 1989. The irradiated parent cultivar was the cultivar identified as Emily, disclosed in U.S. Plant Pat. No. 7,754, and described as a garden mum with a flat decorative flower with many disc florets; light pink ray floret color, with darker center of the flower; diameter across face of capitulum of 57 to 70 mm when fully opened; spreading and prolific branching pattern, with 8 to 9 breaks after pinch when grown outside under natural daylength in fall flowerings, and 6 to 7 breaks after pinch when grown in 10 cm pots for spring flowerings; natural season flowering date of August 13 to 25 when planting rooted cuttings June 21 to 23 in Salinas, Calif., and September 16 to 29 when planting rooted cuttings June 15 to June 18 in Hightstown, N.J.; flowering response of 45 to 48 days after rooting in no light/no shade programs in spring; plant height of 36 to 38 cm when grown in fall under natural daylength with no growth regulators in New Jersey, of 23 to 25 cm when grown in fall under natural daylenth with no growth regulators in California, and of 20 to 25 cm when grown in 10 cm pots in spring with 0 to 2 applications of 2500 ppm B-9 SP. The ranges of measurements or Emily given here are somewhat wider than the measurements described in the plant patent for Emily. This is based on continuing flowering trials of Emily after filing the plant patent application for Emily.
    The irradiation program resulting in Cheery Emily had as its primary objective the expansion of color ranges of the parent cultivar Emily. The irradiation program comprised irradiating cuttings of the parent cultivar at irradiation levels of 1750 and 2000 rads. A total of 1073 cuttings harvested from a total of 150 irradiated plants were planted on Apr. 23 and 16, 1990, respectively. Of these, 17 initial selections were made, which selections were then revegetated and reflowered. Three consecutive flowerings resulted in discarding 12 of the original 17 selections on Mar. 5, 1991. The remaining five selections were maintained as PIs (Possible Introductions) and further trailed in Salinas, Calif., Hightstown, N.J. and Leamington, Ontario, Canada, utimately resulting in the decision to discardcode 8492 on Oct, 1, 1992, to discard code 8484 on Nov. 4, 1992 and to introduce selection 8476 as Cherry Emily, selection 8484 as Blushing Emily and selection 8486 as Harvest Emily. Blushing Emily and Harvest Emily are disclosed in pending application Ser. Nos. 08/151,975 and 08/151,973, respectively.
    The first act of asexual reproduction of Cheery Emily was accomplished when vegetative cuttings were taken from the initial selection in August 1990 in a controlled environment in Salinas, Calif., by technicians working under supervision of Cornelis P. VandenBerg.
    Horticultural examination of controlled flowerings of successive plantings has shown that the unique combination of characteristics as herein disclosed for Cherry Emily are firmly fixed and are retained through successive generations of asexual reproduction.
    Cheery Emily has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The phenotype may vary slignificantly with variations in environment such as temperature, light intensity and daylength, without, however, any variation in genotype.
    The following observations, measurements and comparisons describe plants grown in controlled open areas in Salinas, Calif., and in Hightstown, N.J. Rooted cuttings were established in soil and maintained outdoors under the natural temperature and daylength prevailing during June through October. Spring flowerings were conducted in Salinas, Calif. under greenhouse conditions which approximate those generally used in commercial greenhouse practice or small pot spring garden mum production.
    The following traits have been repeatedly observed and are determined to be basic characteristics of Cheery Emily, which, in combination, distinguish this Chrysanthemum as a new and distinct cultivar;
    1. Flat capitulum form.
    2. Decorative capitulum type with may disc florets, especially in spring flowerings.
    3. Mauve-red ray floret color, with slightly darker center of the flower.
    4. Diameter across face of capitulum of 57 to 70 mm when fully opened.
    5. Branching pattern is spreading and prolific, with 8 to 9 breaks after pinch when grown outside under natural daylength in fall flowerings, and 6 to 7 breaks after pinch when grown in 10 cm pots for spring flowerings.
    6. Natural season flower date of August 13 to 19 when planting rooted cuttings on June 21 to 23 in Salinas, Calif., and of September 15 when planting rooted cuttings June 11 in Hightstown, N.J.
    7. Flowering response of 45 to 49 days after rooting in no light/no shade programs in spring.
    8. Plant height of 38 cm when grown in fall under natural daylength with no growth regulators in New Jersey, 23 to 25 cm when grown in fall under natural daylength in California, and 23 to 25 cm when grown in 10 cm pots in spring with 0 to 2 applications of 2500 ppm B-9 SP.
    9. Durable, uniform performance.
    
    
    The accompanying photographic drawing is a color photograph of Cheery Emily grown as a pinched garden mum under natural season outside conditions in Salinas, Calif., with the colors being as nearly true as possible with ilustrations of this type. Plants were grown outside and dug and transplanted into 15 cm bulb pans at flowering time for photography purposes.
    
    
    Of the commercial cultivars known to the inventor, the most similar in comparison to Cheery Emily is the parent cultivar Emily. In the above description of Cheery Emily the ranges of values for Cheery Emily are much marrower than the ranges of values given for Emily. This is based on the fact that Emily was flowered over many years, while Cheery Emily was flowered over a period of only one and a half years. most traits of Cheery Emily are similar to those of Emily, except for the ray floret color. The ray floret color of Cheery Emily is mauve-red, with a darker center of the flower, while the ray floret color of emily is light pink with a darker center of the flower.
    In the following description color references are made to The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart. The color values were determined on plant material grown as a pinched garden mum grown under natural season outside conditions in Salinas, Calif. on Aug. 16, 1993.
    Classification:
    Botanical.--Dendranthema gradiflora cv Cheery Emily.
    Commercial.--Flat decorative spray pot mum and garden mum.
    A. Capitulum:
    Form.--Flat
    Type.--Decorative, with many disc florets, especially in spring flowerings.
    Diameter across face.--57 to 70 mm when fully opened.
    B. Corolla of ray florets:
    Color (general tonality from a distance of three meters).--mauve-red with slightly darker center of the flower.
    Color (upper surface).--Between 180C and 181B to 181C; center of capitulum is slightly darker, between 180B and 181B.
    Color (under surface).--179C, longitudinal center of the petals strongly overlaid with 180B.
    Shape.--Flat, straight, rounded petal tip.
    C. Corolla of disc florets:
    Color (mature).--6B.
    Color (immature).--2A, overlaid with 144B.
    D. reproductive organs:
    Androecium.--Present on disc florets only, moderate pollen.
    Gynoecium.--Present on both ray and disc florets.
    A. General Appearance:
    Height.--38 cm when grown in fall under natural daylength with no growth regulators in New Jersey, 23 to 25 cm when grown in fall under natural daylength in California, and 23 to 25 cm when rown in 10 cm pots in spring with 0 to 2 applications of 2500 ppm B-9 SP.
    Branching pattern.--Spreading and prolific, with 8 to 9 breaks after pinch when grown outside under natural daylength in fall flowerings, and 6 to 7 breaks after inch when grown in 10 cm pots for spring flowerings.
    B. Foliage:
    Color (upper surface).--147A.
    Color (under surface).--147B.
    Shape.--Relatively small, shallow lobes, and slightly serrated.
    
  Claims (1)
1. A new and distinct Chrysanthemum plant named Cheery Emily, as described and illustrated.
    Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title | 
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/151,974 USPP9077P (en) | 1993-11-15 | 1993-11-15 | Chrysanthemum plant named Cherry Emily | 
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title | 
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/151,974 USPP9077P (en) | 1993-11-15 | 1993-11-15 | Chrysanthemum plant named Cherry Emily | 
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date | 
|---|---|
| USPP9077P true USPP9077P (en) | 1995-03-14 | 
Family
ID=22541056
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date | 
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/151,974 Expired - Lifetime USPP9077P (en) | 1993-11-15 | 1993-11-15 | Chrysanthemum plant named Cherry Emily | 
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link | 
|---|---|
| US (1) | USPP9077P (en) | 
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4616099A (en) * | 1982-07-19 | 1986-10-07 | Sparkes A Graham | Family group of successive radiation induced chrysanthemum mutants named snapper | 
- 
        1993
        
- 1993-11-15 US US08/151,974 patent/USPP9077P/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
 
 
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4616099A (en) * | 1982-07-19 | 1986-10-07 | Sparkes A Graham | Family group of successive radiation induced chrysanthemum mutants named snapper | 
Non-Patent Citations (14)
| Title | 
|---|
| Broertjes et al., 1980 "A mutant of a . . . Irradiation of progressive radiation-induced mutants in a mutation breeding programme with Chrysanthemum morifolium", Euphytica, 29:526-530. | 
| Broertjes et al., 1980 A mutant of a . . . Irradiation of progressive radiation induced mutants in a mutation breeding programme with Chrysanthemum morifolium , Euphytica, 29:526 530. * | 
| Broertjes, 1966, "Mutation breeding of Chrysanthemums", Euphytica, 15:156-162. | 
| Broertjes, 1966, Mutation breeding of Chrysanthemums , Euphytica, 15:156 162. * | 
| Broertjes, et al., 1978, "Application of Mutation Breeding Methods In The Improvement of Vegetatively Propagated Crops"m, Elsevier Sci. pub. Co., New York, pp. 162-175. | 
| Broertjes, et al., 1978, Application of Mutation Breeding Methods In The Improvement of Vegetatively Propagated Crops m, Elsevier Sci. pub. Co., New York, pp. 162 175. * | 
| Chan, 1966 "Chrysanthemum and rose mutations induced by X-rays", Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc., pp. 613-620. | 
| Chan, 1966 Chrysanthemum and rose mutations induced by X rays , Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc., pp. 613 620. * | 
| Dowrick, et al., 1966 "The induction of mutations in Chrysanthemum using X-and gamma radiation", Euphytica, 15:204-210. | 
| Dowrick, et al., 1966 The induction of mutations in Chrysanthemum using X and gamma radiation , Euphytica, 15:204 210. * | 
| Gosling, ed., 1979, "The Chrysanthemum Manual-6th edition", The National Chrysanthemum Society, London, Essex Telegraph Press, Ltd., pp. 329-336. | 
| Gosling, ed., 1979, The Chrysanthemum Manual 6th edition , The National Chrysanthemum Society, London, Essex Telegraph Press, Ltd., pp. 329 336. * | 
| Searle, et al., 1968, "Chrysanthemums The Year Round", Blanford Press, London, pp. 27-29, 320-327. | 
| Searle, et al., 1968, Chrysanthemums The Year Round , Blanford Press, London, pp. 27 29, 320 327. * | 
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title | 
|---|---|---|
| USPP8759P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Sandy | |
| USPP8898P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Soft Lynn | |
| USPP7517P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Nicole | |
| USPP8804P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant names Yellow Sarah | |
| USPP8979P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Royal Lynn | |
| USPP8808P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Blue Volare | |
| USPP8829P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Light Volare | |
| USPP9077P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Cherry Emily | |
| USPP9075P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Harvest Emily | |
| USPP9074P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Blushing Emily | |
| USPP8892P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Peachy Lynn | |
| USPP8877P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Radiant Lynn | |
| USPP7790P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Cream Frolic | |
| USPP8980P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Sunny Denise | |
| USPP6938P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Red Remarkable | |
| USPP9585P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Fiery Barbara` | |
| USPP8987P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Jennifer | |
| USPP9772P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Dreamy Tracy` | |
| USPP9145P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Sunny Linda | |
| USPP8785P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Golden Grace | |
| USPP8758P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Cream Nicole | |
| USPP8757P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Nicole | |
| USPP9126P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Warm Megan | |
| USPP8981P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Autumn Denise | |
| USPP7955P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Triumph | 
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description | 
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment | 
             Owner name: YODER BROTHERS, INC., OHIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:VANDENBERG, CORNELIS P.;REEL/FRAME:006786/0902 Effective date: 19931103  |