USPP8804P - Chrysanthemum plant names Yellow Sarah - Google Patents
Chrysanthemum plant names Yellow Sarah Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USPP8804P USPP8804P US07/982,952 US98295292V US8804P US PP8804 P USPP8804 P US PP8804P US 98295292 V US98295292 V US 98295292V US 8804 P US8804 P US 8804P
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- sarah
- grown
- yellow
- spring
- salinas
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 241000723353 Chrysanthemum Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 5
- 230000017260 vegetative to reproductive phase transition of meristem Effects 0.000 abstract description 16
- 241001466077 Salina Species 0.000 abstract description 11
- 241000131317 Capitulum Species 0.000 abstract description 10
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 abstract description 10
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 abstract description 7
- 239000003630 growth substance Substances 0.000 abstract description 6
- 230000002062 proliferating effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 229910000906 Bronze Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000010974 bronze Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000007516 Chrysanthemum Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 241001573881 Corolla Species 0.000 description 2
- 240000001140 Mimosa pudica Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000011681 asexual reproduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013465 asexual reproduction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000009604 Chrysanthemum X morifolium Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000189548 Chrysanthemum x morifolium Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000218922 Magnoliophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001678 irradiating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000350 mutagenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001850 reproductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H6/14—Asteraceae or Compositae, e.g. safflower, sunflower, artichoke or lettuce
- A01H6/1424—Chrysanthemum
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H5/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H5/02—Flowers
Definitions
- the present invention comprises a new and distinct cultivar of Chrysanthemum, botanically known as Dendranthema grandiflora, and referred to by the cultivar name Yellow Sarah.
- Yellow Sarah, identified as 8497 (85-070G04), is a product of a mutation induction program.
- the new cultivar was discovered and selected by Cornelis P. VandenBerg on Nov. 13, 1989, in a controlled environment in Salinas, Calif. as one flowering plant within a flowering block established as rooted cuttings from stock plants which had been exposed as unrooted cuttings to an X-ray source of 1500 rads in Forty Myers, Fla. on Jun. 8, 1989.
- the irradiated parent cultivar was cultivar identified as Sarah, disclosed in U.S. Plant Pat. No. 7,586.
- Sarah is described as a spray pot mum and garden mum with a flat capitulum form; a quilled decorative capitulum type; a butterscotch-bronze ray floret color; diameter across face of capitulum of 63 to b 75 mm when fully opened; spreading and prolific branching pattern, with 7 to 10 branches after pinch; average natural season flower date of August 27 to September 4 in Salinas, Calif. and October 3 to 14 in Hightstown, N.J.; photoperiodic flowering response to short days in photoperiodic controlled flowering programs of 49 to 52 days; and durable, uniform performance.
- the above description of Sarah has a slightly wider range of values than disclosed in U.S. Plant Pat. No. 7,586 for Sarah, based on continued flower trials after the application for Sarah was filed.
- the irradiation program resulting in Yellow Sarah had as its primary objective the expansion of color ranges of the parent cultivar Sarah.
- the irradiation program comprised irradiating cuttings of the parent cultivar at irradiation levels of 1500, 1750 and 2000 rads. A total of 1111 cuttings harvested from a total of 225 irradiated plants were planted on Sep. 11, Sep. 4 and Aug. 21, 1989, respectively. Of these, 18 initial selections were made, which selections were then revegetated and reflowered. Four consecutive flowerings resulted in discarding 15 of the original 18 selections on Aug. 29, 1990. One selection, 8429, was reselected under code number 8497, while the original selection 8429 was discarded.
- the phenotype may vary significiantly with variations in environment such as temperature, light intensity and daylength, without, however, any variance in genotype.
- Branching pattern is spreading and prolific, with 7 to 10 breaks after pinch when grown outside under natural daylength in fall flowerings, and 5 to 6 breaks after pinch when grown in 10 cm pots for spring flowerings.
- the photo on sheet 1 is a color photograph of Yellow Sarah grown as a pinched garden mum under natural season outside conditions in Salinas, Calif., with the colors being as nearly true as possible with illustrations of this type.
- the photo on sheet 2 comprises a color photograph taken in a spring flowering program in Salinas, Calif., comparing Yellow Sarah (on left) to Sarah (on right). The siginficant differences in ray floret colors between the new cultivar and its parent will be readily apparent.
- Yellow Sarah Of the commercial cultivars known to the inventor, the most similar in comparison to Yellow Sarah is the parent cultivar Sarah. All traits of Yellow Sarah are similar to those of Sarah, except for the ray floret color. When grown under conditions other than high light and high temperature, the ray floret color of Yellow Sarah is yellow, while the ray floret color of Sarah is butterscotch-bronze. During high light and high temperatures in summer, Yellow Sarah substantially maintains its bright yellow color whereas the ray florets of Sarah fade from butterscotch-bronze (inside surface of tubes is 22A, with outside surface of tubes being closest to 20B) to almost yellow.
- Color (general tonality from a distance of three meters).--Yellow.
- Gynoecium --Present on both ray and disc florets.
- Branching pattern --Spreading and prolific, with 7 to 10 breaks after pinch when grown outside under natural daylength in fall flowerings, and 5 to 6 breaks after pinch when grown in 10 cm pots for spring flowerings.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
- Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
A Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Sarah particularly characterized by its flat capitulum form; quilled decorative capitulum type; yellow ray floret color; diameter across face of capitulum of 63 to 75 mm when fully opened; branching pattern is spreading and prolific, with 7 to 10 breaks after pinch when grown outside under natural daylength in fall flowerings, and 5 to 6 breaks after pinch when grown in 10 cm pots for spring flowerings; natural season flower date of August 27 when planting rooted cuttings on June 25 in Salinas, Calif., and October 12 to 14 when planting rooted cuttings June 15 in Hightstown, N.J.; Flowering response of 49 days after rooting in no light/no shade programs in spring in Salinas, Calif.; plant height of 25 to 33 cm when grown in fall under natural daylength with no growth regulators, and 18 to 20 cm when grown in 10 cm pots in spring with no growth regulator applications; and durable, uniform performance.
Description
The present invention comprises a new and distinct cultivar of Chrysanthemum, botanically known as Dendranthema grandiflora, and referred to by the cultivar name Yellow Sarah.
Yellow Sarah, identified as 8497 (85-070G04), is a product of a mutation induction program. The new cultivar was discovered and selected by Cornelis P. VandenBerg on Nov. 13, 1989, in a controlled environment in Salinas, Calif. as one flowering plant within a flowering block established as rooted cuttings from stock plants which had been exposed as unrooted cuttings to an X-ray source of 1500 rads in Forty Myers, Fla. on Jun. 8, 1989. The irradiated parent cultivar was cultivar identified as Sarah, disclosed in U.S. Plant Pat. No. 7,586. Sarah is described as a spray pot mum and garden mum with a flat capitulum form; a quilled decorative capitulum type; a butterscotch-bronze ray floret color; diameter across face of capitulum of 63 to b 75 mm when fully opened; spreading and prolific branching pattern, with 7 to 10 branches after pinch; average natural season flower date of August 27 to September 4 in Salinas, Calif. and October 3 to 14 in Hightstown, N.J.; photoperiodic flowering response to short days in photoperiodic controlled flowering programs of 49 to 52 days; and durable, uniform performance. The above description of Sarah has a slightly wider range of values than disclosed in U.S. Plant Pat. No. 7,586 for Sarah, based on continued flower trials after the application for Sarah was filed.
The irradiation program resulting in Yellow Sarah had as its primary objective the expansion of color ranges of the parent cultivar Sarah. The irradiation program comprised irradiating cuttings of the parent cultivar at irradiation levels of 1500, 1750 and 2000 rads. A total of 1111 cuttings harvested from a total of 225 irradiated plants were planted on Sep. 11, Sep. 4 and Aug. 21, 1989, respectively. Of these, 18 initial selections were made, which selections were then revegetated and reflowered. Four consecutive flowerings resulted in discarding 15 of the original 18 selections on Aug. 29, 1990. One selection, 8429, was reselected under code number 8497, while the original selection 8429 was discarded. Four selections, including the new reselection, were made PIs (Possible Introductions) after the fourth flowering on Aug. 29, 1990 and trialed for one year, ultimately resulting in discarding three of these four remaining selections and the decision to introduce the one remaining selection as Yellow Sarah.
The first act of asexual reproduction of Yellow Sarah was accomplished when vegetative cuttings were taken from the reselection on November 1990 in a controlled environment in Salinas, Calif., by technicians working under supervision of Cornelis P. VandenBerg.
Horticultural examination of controlled flowerings of successive plantings has shown that the unique combination of characteristics as herein disclosed for Yellow Sarah are firmly fixed and are retained through successive generations of asexual reproduction.
Yellow Sarah has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The phenotype may vary significiantly with variations in environment such as temperature, light intensity and daylength, without, however, any variance in genotype.
The following observations, measurements and comparisons describe plants grown in controlled open areas in Salinas, Calif., and in Hightstown, N.J. Rooted cuttings were established in soil and maintained outdoors under the natural temperatures and daylength prevailing during June through October. Spring flowerings were conducted in Salinas, Calif. under greenhouse conditions which approximate those generally used in commercial practice for small pot spring garden mum production.
The following traits have been repeatedly observed and are determined to be basic characteristics of Yellow Sarah, which, in combination, distinguish this chrysanthemum as a new and distinct cultivar:
1. Flat capitulum form.
2. Quilled decorative capitulum type.
3. Yellow ray floret color.
4. Diameter across face of capitulum of 63 to 75 mm when fully opened.
5. Branching pattern is spreading and prolific, with 7 to 10 breaks after pinch when grown outside under natural daylength in fall flowerings, and 5 to 6 breaks after pinch when grown in 10 cm pots for spring flowerings.
6. Natural season flower date of August 27 when planting rooted cuttings on June 25 in Salinas, Calif., and October 12 to 14 when planting rooted cuttings June 15 in Hightstown, N.J.
7. Flowering response of 49 days after rooting in no light/no shade programs in spring.
8. Plant height of 25 to 33 cm when grown in fall under natural daylength with no growth regulators, and 18 to 20 cm when grown in 10 cm pots in spring with no growth regulator applications.
9. Durable, uniform performance.
In the accompanying photographic drawings the photo on sheet 1 is a color photograph of Yellow Sarah grown as a pinched garden mum under natural season outside conditions in Salinas, Calif., with the colors being as nearly true as possible with illustrations of this type.
The photo on sheet 2 comprises a color photograph taken in a spring flowering program in Salinas, Calif., comparing Yellow Sarah (on left) to Sarah (on right). The siginficant differences in ray floret colors between the new cultivar and its parent will be readily apparent.
Of the commercial cultivars known to the inventor, the most similar in comparison to Yellow Sarah is the parent cultivar Sarah. All traits of Yellow Sarah are similar to those of Sarah, except for the ray floret color. When grown under conditions other than high light and high temperature, the ray floret color of Yellow Sarah is yellow, while the ray floret color of Sarah is butterscotch-bronze. During high light and high temperatures in summer, Yellow Sarah substantially maintains its bright yellow color whereas the ray florets of Sarah fade from butterscotch-bronze (inside surface of tubes is 22A, with outside surface of tubes being closest to 20B) to almost yellow.
In the following description color references are made to The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart. The color values were determined on plant material grown as a pinched garden mum grown under natural season outside conditions in Salinas, Calif. on Sep. 2, 1992.
Classification:
Botanical.--Dendranthema grandiflora cv Yellow Sarah.
Commercial.--Flat quilled decorative spray pot mum and garden mum.
A. Capitulum:
Form.--Flat.
Type.--Quilled decorative.
Diameter across face.--63 to 75 mm when fully opened.
B. Corolla of ray florets:
Color (general tonality from a distance of three meters).--Yellow.
Color (upper surface).--Center ray florets closest to 13B. Outer ray florets maturing to b 12B to 13C. Under low temperature conditions immature buds and underside of outer ray florets exhibit a slight bronzing.
Color (under surface).--12B to 13C.
Shape.--Tubular, straight.
C. Corolla of disc florets:
Color (mature).--14A to 14B.
Color (immature).--Closest to 14B, slightly tinged with 144C.
D. Reproductive organs:
Androecium.--Present on disc florets only; scant pollen.
Gynoecium.--Present on both ray and disc florets.
A. General appearance:
Height.--25 to 33 cm when grown in fall under natural daylength with no growth regulators, and 18 to 20 cm when grown in 10 cm pots in spring with no growth regulator applications.
Branching pattern.--Spreading and prolific, with 7 to 10 breaks after pinch when grown outside under natural daylength in fall flowerings, and 5 to 6 breaks after pinch when grown in 10 cm pots for spring flowerings.
B. Foliage:
Color (upper surface).--147A.
Color (under surface).--147B.
Shape.--See photograph.
Claims (1)
1. A new and distinct Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Sarah, as described and illustrated.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/982,952 USPP8804P (en) | 1992-11-30 | 1992-11-30 | Chrysanthemum plant names Yellow Sarah |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/982,952 USPP8804P (en) | 1992-11-30 | 1992-11-30 | Chrysanthemum plant names Yellow Sarah |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| USPP8804P true USPP8804P (en) | 1994-06-28 |
Family
ID=25529681
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/982,952 Expired - Lifetime USPP8804P (en) | 1992-11-30 | 1992-11-30 | Chrysanthemum plant names Yellow Sarah |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | USPP8804P (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPP9479P (en) * | 1994-07-12 | 1996-03-19 | Selection New Plant Sarl | Chrysanthemum plant named `Chakuse` |
| US20050183181P1 (en) * | 2004-02-12 | 2005-08-18 | Lintott Keith G. | Chrysanthemum plant named 'Peach Spider' |
| US20050183179P1 (en) * | 2004-02-12 | 2005-08-18 | Lintott Keith G. | Chrysanthemum plant 'Sunny Spider' |
| US20050183180P1 (en) * | 2004-02-12 | 2005-08-18 | Lintott Keith G. | Chrysanthemum plant named 'Canary Spider' |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4616099A (en) * | 1982-07-19 | 1986-10-07 | Sparkes A Graham | Family group of successive radiation induced chrysanthemum mutants named snapper |
| USPP7586P (en) * | 1989-12-29 | 1991-07-09 | Yoder Brothers, Inc. | Chrysanthemum plant named Sarah |
-
1992
- 1992-11-30 US US07/982,952 patent/USPP8804P/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4616099A (en) * | 1982-07-19 | 1986-10-07 | Sparkes A Graham | Family group of successive radiation induced chrysanthemum mutants named snapper |
| USPP7586P (en) * | 1989-12-29 | 1991-07-09 | Yoder Brothers, Inc. | Chrysanthemum plant named Sarah |
Non-Patent Citations (14)
| Title |
|---|
| Broertjes, 1966, "Mutation breeding of chrysanthemums", Euphytica, 15:156-162. |
| Broertjes, 1966, Mutation breeding of chrysanthemums , Euphytica, 15:156 162. * |
| Broertjes, et al., 1978, "Application of Mutation Breeding Methods in the Improvement of Vegetatively Propagated Crops", Elsevier Sci. Pub. Co., New York, pp. 162-175. |
| Broertjes, et al., 1978, Application of Mutation Breeding Methods in the Improvement of Vegetatively Propagated Crops , Elsevier Sci. Pub. Co., New York, pp. 162 175. * |
| Broertjes, et al., 1980, "Amutant of a mutual of a . . . Irradiation of progressiive radiation-induced mutants in a mutation breeding programme with Chrysanthemum morifolium", Euphytica 29:526-530. |
| Broertjes, et al., 1980, Amutant of a mutual of a . . . Irradiation of progressiive radiation induced mutants in a mutation breeding programme with Chrysanthemum morifolium , Euphytica 29:526 530. * |
| Chan, 1966, "Chrysanthemum and rose mutations induced by X-rays", Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc., pp. 613-620. |
| Chan, 1966, Chrysanthemum and rose mutations induced by X rays , Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc., pp. 613 620. * |
| Dowrich, et al., 1966, "The induction of mutations in Chrysanthemum using X-and gamma radiation", Euphytica, 15:204-210. |
| Dowrich, et al., 1966, The induction of mutations in Chrysanthemum using X and gamma radiation , Euphytica, 15:204 210. * |
| Gosling et al., "The Chrysanthemum Manual-6th edition", The National Chrysanthemum Society, London, Essex Telegraph Press, Ltd., pp. 329-336. |
| Gosling et al., The Chrysanthemum Manual 6th edition , The National Chrysanthemum Society, London, Essex Telegraph Press, Ltd., pp. 329 336. * |
| Searle, et al., 1968, "Chrysanthemum the Year Round", Blanford Press, London, pp. 27-29, 320-327. |
| Searle, et al., 1968, Chrysanthemum the Year Round , Blanford Press, London, pp. 27 29, 320 327. * |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPP9479P (en) * | 1994-07-12 | 1996-03-19 | Selection New Plant Sarl | Chrysanthemum plant named `Chakuse` |
| US20050183181P1 (en) * | 2004-02-12 | 2005-08-18 | Lintott Keith G. | Chrysanthemum plant named 'Peach Spider' |
| US20050183179P1 (en) * | 2004-02-12 | 2005-08-18 | Lintott Keith G. | Chrysanthemum plant 'Sunny Spider' |
| US20050183180P1 (en) * | 2004-02-12 | 2005-08-18 | Lintott Keith G. | Chrysanthemum plant named 'Canary Spider' |
| USPP16794P3 (en) | 2004-02-12 | 2006-07-11 | Cleangro, Ltd | Chrysanthemum plant named ‘Canary Spider’ |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| USPP8759P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Sandy | |
| USPP8804P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant names Yellow Sarah | |
| USPP7586P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Sarah | |
| USPP8292P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Regal Davis | |
| USPP8898P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Soft Lynn | |
| USPP7517P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Nicole | |
| USPP8808P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Blue Volare | |
| USPP8979P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Royal Lynn | |
| USPP7955P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Triumph | |
| USPP6938P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Red Remarkable | |
| USPP8607P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Barbara | |
| USPP8171P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Lynn | |
| USPP8988P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Christine | |
| USPP7790P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Cream Frolic | |
| USPP8178P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Denise | |
| USPP8609P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Tracy | |
| USPP7905P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Dark Triumph | |
| USPP9026P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Kimberly | |
| USPP8294P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Linda | |
| USPP8892P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Peachy Lynn | |
| USPP8610P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Chantal | |
| USPP9772P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Dreamy Tracy` | |
| USPP8059P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named White Diamond | |
| USPP8785P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Golden Grace | |
| USPP9145P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Sunny Linda |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: YODER BROTHERS, INC., OHIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:VANDENBERG, CORNELIS P.;REEL/FRAME:006349/0097 Effective date: 19921118 |