USPP5897P - Strawberry Jewel - Google Patents
Strawberry Jewel Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USPP5897P USPP5897P US06/751,091 US75109185V US5897P US PP5897 P USPP5897 P US PP5897P US 75109185 V US75109185 V US 75109185V US 5897 P US5897 P US 5897P
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- mdus
- june
- mean
- fruit
- jewel
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 240000009088 Fragaria x ananassa Species 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 235000016623 Fragaria vesca Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000011363 Fragaria x ananassa Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 21
- 235000021028 berry Nutrition 0.000 description 16
- PCTMTFRHKVHKIS-BMFZQQSSSA-N (1s,3r,4e,6e,8e,10e,12e,14e,16e,18s,19r,20r,21s,25r,27r,30r,31r,33s,35r,37s,38r)-3-[(2r,3s,4s,5s,6r)-4-amino-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyloxan-2-yl]oxy-19,25,27,30,31,33,35,37-octahydroxy-18,20,21-trimethyl-23-oxo-22,39-dioxabicyclo[33.3.1]nonatriaconta-4,6,8,10 Chemical compound C1C=C2C[C@@H](OS(O)(=O)=O)CC[C@]2(C)[C@@H]2[C@@H]1[C@@H]1CC[C@H]([C@H](C)CCCC(C)C)[C@@]1(C)CC2.O[C@H]1[C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@H]1/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/[C@H](C)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)[C@H](C)OC(=O)C[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)CC[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)C[C@](O)(C[C@H](O)[C@H]2C(O)=O)O[C@H]2C1 PCTMTFRHKVHKIS-BMFZQQSSSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 7
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 6
- 210000003491 skin Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 239000000796 flavoring agent Substances 0.000 description 5
- 235000019634 flavors Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 241000220223 Fragaria Species 0.000 description 4
- 210000002615 epidermis Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000004209 hair Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 241001465180 Botrytis Species 0.000 description 2
- 241001164374 Calyx Species 0.000 description 2
- 208000035874 Excoriation Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 235000002245 Penicillium camembertii Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007170 pathology Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000035240 Disease Resistance Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101100386054 Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c) CYS3 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000082085 Verticillium <Phyllachorales> Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000005299 abrasion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000003118 aryl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000009508 confectionery Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000994 depressogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008635 plant growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 101150035983 str1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003462 vein Anatomy 0.000 description 1
Images
Definitions
- This invention is a new and distinct variety of strawberry (Fragaria ⁇ Ananassa) which is exceptional for its very attractive large fruit, all-around performance and good fruit quality.
- N.Y. 1324 has a moderately vigorous plant growth habit.
- the trifoliate leaves are borne on erect to semierect moderately stout petioles.
- the petioles are covered with a moderately dense coating of hairs which are generally perpendicular to the petiole epidermis or tending to tilt slightly toward the apical end.
- the leaflet shape is generally oval to round with approximately straight edges at the base subtending an obtuse angle.
- Leaflet margins are coarsely toothed.
- Leaflet upper epidermis is smooth, slightly ridged between lateral veins, dark green and lightly populated with hairs.
- the lower epidermis is smooth and light green with few hairs.
- N.Y. 1324 spreads by means of runners of moderate vigor and number, producing a matted row of medium plant density when that cultural method is used. It also appears well adapted to ribbon-row culture. Propagation is by means of the runner plants and by tissue culture. N.Y. 1324 is adapted to the Northeastern, Great Lakes and Midwestern regions of the United States. It is a hardy and consistent-cropping cultivar resistant to mildew and leaf spot but susceptible to verticillium wilt and red stele.
- the fruit of N.Y. 1324 ripens in mid-to-late-midseason.
- the primary and secondary berries are medium to large, bright red, glossy and blunt-conic to oblate in shape.
- Tertiary and quarternary berries are smaller and mostly round. Seeds are yellow and set flush with, or slightly raised above, the berry surface.
- the calyx is medium to large in size, attractive, medium green in color, slightly reflexed and set into a slightly depressed basal surface of the berry.
- the berry skin is better than average in abrasion resistance.
- the flesh is slightly firmer than average.
- the berry color is a bright red, corresponding to Red 46A of The Royal Horticultural Society (London) Colour Chart.
- the flavor is moderately sweet and slightly acid with some of the aromatic quality of its parent, ⁇ Holiday ⁇ . Picking ease is good, with the pedicel tending to snap cleanly a short distance below the calyx.
- Table 2 sets forth mean subjective fruit skin toughness scores. Traditional cultivars are underlined. Skin toughness was subjectively determined by rubbing the skin of several berries in the hand from each replicate of each genotype. Each plot at each harvest (replicate) was scored independently. Each genotype was rated 1 to 9 with ⁇ 9 ⁇ being most resistant to skin abrasion.
- Table 7 sets forth fruit rot incidence on strawberry cultivars and selections tested in 1978. Shown is the combined score for all rots (Botrytis, soft rots and white mold). Data supplied by Dr. H. S. Aldwinckle, Department of Plant Pathology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station.
- FIG. 1 Ribbon-row of ⁇ Jewel ⁇ in second year from planting.
- Plot is a single line of plants spaced 6" apart in the row and all runners kept removed.
- FIG. 2 Fruit of ⁇ Jewel ⁇ in a one-quart box. Note size of fruit, wedge-conic shape and glossy, attractive appearance.
- FIG. 3 Comparison of the fruit of ⁇ Jewel ⁇ with the corresponding color from The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart.
- N.Y. 1324 The most outstanding feature of N.Y. 1324 is its well-balanced, all-around performance. It combines good fruit size (Table 4), attractiveness (Table 5), quality (Table 6), tough skin (Table 2) and moderately firm flesh (Table 3). In addition, the fruit of N.Y. 1324 are better than average in resistance to various fruit rots (Table 7). Also, N.Y. 1324 has consistently been rated above most other cultivars in frozen fruit taste panel trials.
- N.Y. 1324 The plants of N.Y. 1324 have good hardiness and wide regional adaptation. Thirteen of sixteen cooperative testers from different regions rated N.Y. 1324 as above-average to outstanding for all of the following traits: yield, flavor, fruit size, appearance, firmness, keeping quality and foliar disease resistance.
Landscapes
- Lenses (AREA)
Abstract
A strawberry plant which has large fruit, all-around performance and good fruit quality.
Description
This invention is a new and distinct variety of strawberry (Fragaria×Ananassa) which is exceptional for its very attractive large fruit, all-around performance and good fruit quality.
This new cultivar was developed by the small fruits breeding program of the Department of Horticultural Sciences, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, N.Y. The cross was N.Y. 1221×`Holiday`, which was made in 1969. The specific clone was the sole selection of 292 seedlings from the cross and was selected in June 1971. It has been extensively tested under the number N.Y. 1324. In the fall of 1985, N.Y. 1324 will be named `Jewel`. ##STR1##
N.Y. 1324 has a moderately vigorous plant growth habit. The trifoliate leaves are borne on erect to semierect moderately stout petioles. The petioles are covered with a moderately dense coating of hairs which are generally perpendicular to the petiole epidermis or tending to tilt slightly toward the apical end. The leaflet shape is generally oval to round with approximately straight edges at the base subtending an obtuse angle. Leaflet margins are coarsely toothed. Leaflet upper epidermis is smooth, slightly ridged between lateral veins, dark green and lightly populated with hairs. The lower epidermis is smooth and light green with few hairs.
N.Y. 1324 spreads by means of runners of moderate vigor and number, producing a matted row of medium plant density when that cultural method is used. It also appears well adapted to ribbon-row culture. Propagation is by means of the runner plants and by tissue culture. N.Y. 1324 is adapted to the Northeastern, Great Lakes and Midwestern regions of the United States. It is a hardy and consistent-cropping cultivar resistant to mildew and leaf spot but susceptible to verticillium wilt and red stele.
The fruit of N.Y. 1324 ripens in mid-to-late-midseason. The primary and secondary berries are medium to large, bright red, glossy and blunt-conic to oblate in shape. Tertiary and quarternary berries are smaller and mostly round. Seeds are yellow and set flush with, or slightly raised above, the berry surface. The calyx is medium to large in size, attractive, medium green in color, slightly reflexed and set into a slightly depressed basal surface of the berry. The berry skin is better than average in abrasion resistance. The flesh is slightly firmer than average. The berry color is a bright red, corresponding to Red 46A of The Royal Horticultural Society (London) Colour Chart. The flavor is moderately sweet and slightly acid with some of the aromatic quality of its parent, `Holiday`. Picking ease is good, with the pedicel tending to snap cleanly a short distance below the calyx.
Table 1 sets forth mean maturity dates based on a 1982 field trial. Traditional cultivars are underlined. Mean date of harvest was calculated on a weighted basis. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, based on Waller and Duncan's BSD test, K=100.
Table 2 sets forth mean subjective fruit skin toughness scores. Traditional cultivars are underlined. Skin toughness was subjectively determined by rubbing the skin of several berries in the hand from each replicate of each genotype. Each plot at each harvest (replicate) was scored independently. Each genotype was rated 1 to 9 with `9` being most resistant to skin abrasion.
Table 3 sets forth mean Instron measurements from 1982 (firmest fruit listed first). Traditional cultivars are underlined. Each genotype mean score reflects the force required for the Instron probe to penetrate the flesh of undamaged berries. Twelve berries were tested of each genotype on the same day of harvest for each harvest date. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, based on Waller and Duncan's BSD test, K=100.
Table 4 sets forth mean berry weight of 29 strawberry genotypes based upon 1982 field trials. Traditional cultivars are underlined. Mean berry weight was determined by dividing total yield per plot by total number of berries per plot. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different based on Waller and Duncan's BDS test, K=100.
Table 5 sets forth mean subjective fruit appearance scores. Traditional cultivars are underlined. Berries were rated 1 to 9 with `9` being the most attractive. Each plot at each harvest (replicate) was scored independently. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, based upon Waller and Duncan's BSD test, K=100.
Table 6 sets forth mean subjective flavor scores. Traditional cultivars are underlined. Berries were rated 1 to 9 with `9` being best flavor. Each plot at each harvest (replicate) was scored independently. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, based on Waller and Duncan's BSD test, K=100.
Table 7 sets forth fruit rot incidence on strawberry cultivars and selections tested in 1978. Shown is the combined score for all rots (Botrytis, soft rots and white mold). Data supplied by Dr. H. S. Aldwinckle, Department of Plant Pathology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station.
TABLE 1 ______________________________________ Mean maturity date ofNY 1324 vs. other cultivars. Gentoype Mean Weighted Date of Harvest.sup.1 ______________________________________ `Earlidawn` June 23 A `Midland` June 24 AB NY 1402 June 25 ABC MDUS 4380 June 26 BCD `Lester` June 26 BCD MDUS 4355 June 26 BCD NY 1524 June 26 BCD MDUS 4774 June 26 BCD `Catskill` June 27 CDE NY 1560 June 27 CDEF `Honeoye` June 28 DEFG `Holiday` June 28 DEFG NY 1530 June 28 DEFG MDUS 4579 June 28 DEFGH `Raitan` June 28 DEFGHI NY 1570 June 29 EFGHIJ NY 1333 June 29 FGHIJK MDUS 4426 June 29 FGHIJK NY 1324 - `Jewel` June 30 GHIJKL NY 1529 July 1 HIJKLM NY 1368 July 1 HIJKLMN NY 1431 July 1 IJKLMN NY 1406 July 1 IJKLMN NY 1580 July 1 JKLMN `Allstar` July 1 JKLMN `Canoga` July 2 KLMN `Scott` July 2 LMN `Sparkle` July 3 MN NY 1482 July 4 N ______________________________________
TABLE 2 ______________________________________ Mean subjective fruit skin toughness scores forNY 1324 and other cultivars. Treatment Replicates Mean Score* ______________________________________ NY 1524 6 7.7 A NY 1529 5 7.6 AB NY 1324 - `Jewel` 5 7.4 AB NY 1530 6 7.2 ABC MDUS 4426 5 7.0 ABCD NY 1368 5 6.8 ABCDE MDUS 4579 5 6.8 ABCDE `Holiday` 8 6.8 ABCDE NY 1580 3 6.7 ABCDEF `Canoga` 4 6.5 ABCDEF `Scott` 8 6.5 BCDEF `Lester` 7 6.3 BCDEF `Allstar` 4 6.2 BCDEFG NY 1333 5 6.0 CDEFG NY 1406 9 5.9 DEFG MDUS 4355 6 5.8 DEFG MDUS 4774 5 5.6 EFGH NY 1482 4 5.5 EFGHI NY 1560 4 5.3 FGHI NY 1402 5 5.2 FGHI NY 1431 5 5.2 FGHI `Raritan` 7 5.0 GHI `Honeoye` 7 4.5 HIJ MDUS 4380 6 4.3 IJK `Sparkle` 5 3.8 JK `Earlidawn` 8 3.7 JK Midland 7 3.0 K NY 1570 1 2.0 KL `Catskill` 7 1.1 L ______________________________________
TABLE 3 ______________________________________ Mean firmness measurements forNY 1324 and other cultivars. Mean puncture force Genotype (daltons)* ______________________________________ NY 1570 65.8 A NY 1529 62.7 A MDUS 4579 57.6 A MDUS 4774 56.4 A NY 1524 53.9 AB NY 1530 46.9BC NY 1580 46.7BC NY 1560 46.1BCD `Holiday` 45.7CD `Canoga` 44.7CDE MDUS 4426 44.2CDE `Allstar` 39.3CDEF NY 1431 38.3DEFG `Scott` 37.6EFGH NY 1406 35.9FGHI NY 1324 - `Jewel` 33.5FGHIJ NY 1402 32.5FGHIJ NY 1333 30.8GHIJ NY 1482 30.1GHIJK MDUS 4380 30.0HIJK `Honeoye` 28.8IJK MDUS 4355 28.7IJK `Lester` 28.6IJK `Midland` 27.1JKL NY 1368 27.1JKL `Raritan` 25.9JKL `Earlidawn` 25.6JKL `Sparkle` 22.0KL `Catskill` 19.9L ______________________________________
TABLE 4 ______________________________________ Mean berry weight forNY 1324 and other cultivars Genotype Grams/berry* ______________________________________ NY 1524 14.4 A `Canoga` 13.7 AB `Allstar` 13.6 AB NY 1333 13.5 ABC MDUS 4426 13.4 ABC NY 1431 12.6 ABCD NY 1482 12.5 ABCD NY 1529 11.8 BCDE NY 1570 11.5 CDEF NY 1324 - `Jewel` 11.3 DEFG `Lester` 11.2 DEFG NY 1580 11.2 DEFG NY 1406 10.9 DEFGH NY 1368 10.8 DEFGHI `Holiday` 10.7 DEFGHIJ NY 1560 10.5 EFGHIJK MDUS 4579 10.2 EFGHIJKL `Honeoye` 10.0 EFGHIJKL MDUS 4380 10.0 EFGHIJKL NY 1402 10.0 EFGHIJKL MDUS 4774 9.7 FGHIJKL `Raritan` 9.3 GHIJKL `Scott` 9.1 HIJKL MDUS 4355 9.0 HIJKL `Catskill` 8.9 HIJKL NY 1530 8.8 IJKL `Midland` 8.7 JKL `Sparkle` 8.6 KL `Earlidawn` 8.3 L ______________________________________
TABLE 5 ______________________________________ Mean fruit appearance scores forNY 1324 and other cultivars. Genotype Replicates Mean Score* ______________________________________ NY 1333 5 7.6 A `Lester` 7 7.3 AB NY 1324 - `Jewel` 5 6.8 ABC NY 1524 6 6.5 ABCD NY 1530 6 6.3 ABCD MDUS 4355 6 6.3 ABCDE `Honeoye` 7 6.3 ABCDE NY 1529 5 6.2 ABCDEF MDUS 4380 6 6.2 BCDEF `Scott` 8 6.1 BCDEF NY 1368 5 6.0 BCDEF NY 1560 4 5.8 CDEF `Raritan` 7 5.7 CDEFG `Allstar` 4 5.5 CDEFG `Canoga` 4 5.5 CDEFG `Holiday` 8 5.5 CDEFG NY 1431 5 5.4 CDEFG NY 1530 3 5.3 CDEFG NY 1482 4 5.3 DEFG NY 1402 5 5.0 EFG NY 1406 9 4.9 FG MDUS 4774 5 4.8 FG `Earlidawn` 8 4.6 G MDUS 4426 5 4.2 G MDUS 4579 5 4.0 G `Midland` 7 4.0 G `Sparkle` 5 3.4 G NY 1570 2 3.0 GH `Catskill` 7 1.9 H ______________________________________
TABLE 6 ______________________________________ Mean flavor scores forNY 1324 and other cultivars. Treatment Replicates Mean Score* ______________________________________ `Lester` 7 6.3 A NY 1570 2 6.0 AB NY 1529 5 6.0 AB NY 1324 - `Jewel` 5 5.8 AB `Holiday` 8 5.8 AB NY 1368 5 5.6 AB NY 1560 4 5.5 AB `Sparkle` 5 5.4 AB NY 1524 6 5.3 AB `Raritan` 7 5.3 AB `Honeoye` 7 5.1 AB `Allstar` 4 5.0 AB `Canoga` 4 5.0 AB MDUS 4380 6 5.0 AB `Scott` 8 4.9 AB NY 1530 6 4.8 AB MDUS 4355 6 4.8 AB MDUS 4426 5 4.8 AB NY 1333 5 4.8 AB NY 1431 5 4.8 AB NY 1580 3 4.7 AB MDUS 4774 5 4.6B NY 1402 5 4.6B `Midland` 7 4.4B NY 1406 9 4.2B NY 1482 4 4.0B `Catskill` 7 4.0B MDUS 4579 5 3.8B `Earlidawn` 8 3.8B ______________________________________
TABLE 7 ______________________________________ Mean fruit rot scores forNY 1324 and other cultivars. Mean Number Cultivar or Selection Rotted Per 12 Reps. ______________________________________ Earlidawn 11.7 A 3 NY 1476 11.2 A 5 NY 1402 11.2 A 5 Vibrant 10.6 AB 5 Veestar 10.6 AB 5 NY 1477 10.4 AB 5 NY 1515 10.0ABC 3 NY 1531 9.8 ABC 5 NY 1530 9.8 ABC 5 NY 1415 9.8 ABC 5 NY 1287 9.8 ABC 5 NY 1475 9.4 ABCD 5 V6747R6 9.4 ABCD 5 Holiday 9.4 ABCD 5 MD 4359 (Lester) 9.2 ABCDE 5 NY 1529 9.0 ABCDEF 5 NY 1527 9.0 ABCDEF 4 NY 1261 9.0 ABCDEF 5 Surecrop 9.0 ABCDEF 5 NY 1366 8.0 ABCDEFG 3 NY 1264 8.0BCDEFG 4 Tenira 7.4CDEFG 5 NY 1285 7.2CDEFGH 5 NY 1524 7.0CDEFGH 3 NY 1431 7.0CDEFGH 5 NY 1368 7.0CDEFGH 5 NY 1333 6.8CDEFGH 5 NY 1362 (Canoga) 6.6DEFGH 5 NY 1384 6.4EFGH 5 Guardian 6.2FGH 5 NY 1324 - `Jewel` 5.8GH 5 NY 1406 5.2GH 5 NY 1404 4.8GH 5 NY 1409 (Honeoye) 4,4H 5 ______________________________________ Combined score for all rots (Botrytis, soft rots, and white mold). Data supplied by Dr. H. S. Aldwinckle, Department of Plant Pathology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station.
The following describes the accompanying photographs, documenting the unique features characterizing this new culture.
FIG. 1. Ribbon-row of `Jewel` in second year from planting. Plot is a single line of plants spaced 6" apart in the row and all runners kept removed.
FIG. 2. Fruit of `Jewel` in a one-quart box. Note size of fruit, wedge-conic shape and glossy, attractive appearance.
FIG. 3. Comparison of the fruit of `Jewel` with the corresponding color from The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart.
The most outstanding feature of N.Y. 1324 is its well-balanced, all-around performance. It combines good fruit size (Table 4), attractiveness (Table 5), quality (Table 6), tough skin (Table 2) and moderately firm flesh (Table 3). In addition, the fruit of N.Y. 1324 are better than average in resistance to various fruit rots (Table 7). Also, N.Y. 1324 has consistently been rated above most other cultivars in frozen fruit taste panel trials.
The plants of N.Y. 1324 have good hardiness and wide regional adaptation. Thirteen of sixteen cooperative testers from different regions rated N.Y. 1324 as above-average to outstanding for all of the following traits: yield, flavor, fruit size, appearance, firmness, keeping quality and foliar disease resistance.
Claims (1)
1. The new and distinct variety of strawberry herein described and illustrated and identified by the characters enumerated above.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US06/751,091 USPP5897P (en) | 1985-07-02 | 1985-07-02 | Strawberry Jewel |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US06/751,091 USPP5897P (en) | 1985-07-02 | 1985-07-02 | Strawberry Jewel |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| USPP5897P true USPP5897P (en) | 1987-03-10 |
Family
ID=25020445
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US06/751,091 Expired - Lifetime USPP5897P (en) | 1985-07-02 | 1985-07-02 | Strawberry Jewel |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | USPP5897P (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPP10191P (en) * | 1996-08-20 | 1998-01-13 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Strawberry plant called `MNUS 210` |
-
1985
- 1985-07-02 US US06/751,091 patent/USPP5897P/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPP10191P (en) * | 1996-08-20 | 1998-01-13 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Strawberry plant called `MNUS 210` |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| USPP9909P (en) | Strawberry plant named `PS-1031` | |
| USPP11279P (en) | Strawberry plant named `Mirador` | |
| USPP11277P (en) | Strawberry plant named `Captiva` | |
| USPP13525P3 (en) | Blackberry plant named ‘Pecos’ | |
| US20210400893A1 (en) | Lettuce variety '14rdsjv055-3' | |
| USPP27034P3 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘Scarlet’ | |
| USPP26974P3 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘Lucia’ | |
| US11470797B2 (en) | Watermelon variety ‘Cracker Jack’ | |
| USPP5897P (en) | Strawberry Jewel | |
| US5811642A (en) | Pumpkin variety RS1294 | |
| McIntosh | The Potato, Its History, Varieties, Culture Ad Diseases | |
| USPP8991P (en) | Strawberry Seneca | |
| Singh et al. | Some pollination problems in mango | |
| USPP10780P (en) | Strawberry plant named `PS-1150` | |
| USPP34615P2 (en) | Colocasia plant named ‘Waikiki’ | |
| USPP16571P3 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘Clancy’ | |
| Hiirsalmi | Breeding of highbush blueberry in Finland | |
| US11730101B1 (en) | Rumex plant named ‘DRUMFOHNID’ | |
| USPP34413P2 (en) | x Mangave plant named ‘Wingman’ | |
| US20230000035A1 (en) | Spotted watermelon plants | |
| USPP16480P3 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘L'Amour’ | |
| USPP10686P (en) | Strawberry plant named `PS-1269` | |
| USPP31446P2 (en) | Blackberry plant named ‘FNZ-6VB’ | |
| Maloney et al. | 'Seneca'Strawberry | |
| USPP10191P (en) | Strawberry plant called `MNUS 210` |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CORNELL RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC. EAST HILL PLAZA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:SANFORD, JOHN C.;OURECKY, DONALD K.;REICH, JACK E. II;REEL/FRAME:004427/0268;SIGNING DATES FROM 19850528 TO 19850617 |