USPP11438P - Strawberry variety named `Mira` - Google Patents
Strawberry variety named `Mira` Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USPP11438P USPP11438P US09/084,137 US8413798V US11438P US PP11438 P USPP11438 P US PP11438P US 8413798 V US8413798 V US 8413798V US 11438 P US11438 P US 11438P
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- mira
- kent
- honeoye
- fruit
- medium
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 235000011363 Fragaria x ananassa Nutrition 0.000 title description 8
- 235000016623 Fragaria vesca Nutrition 0.000 title description 6
- 244000307700 Fragaria vesca Species 0.000 title 1
- 240000009088 Fragaria x ananassa Species 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 24
- 208000035240 Disease Resistance Diseases 0.000 abstract description 3
- 235000012976 tarts Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 6
- 241001164374 Calyx Species 0.000 description 5
- 241000220223 Fragaria Species 0.000 description 5
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 241001486234 Sciota Species 0.000 description 3
- 235000021028 berry Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 3
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000522452 Phytophthora fragariae Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241001465180 Botrytis Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000123650 Botrytis cinerea Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001468265 Candidatus Phytoplasma Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000461780 Diplocarpon Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000221785 Erysiphales Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001294742 Podosphaera macularis Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001421802 Ramularia grevilleana Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000007011 Robinson annulation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000796 flavoring agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019634 flavors Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004209 hair Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000001717 pathogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010076 replication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000017260 vegetative to reproductive phase transition of meristem Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H6/74—Rosaceae, e.g. strawberry, apple, almonds, pear, rose, blackberries or raspberries
- A01H6/7409—Fragaria, i.e. strawberries
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H5/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H5/08—Fruits
Definitions
- the present invention includes a new and distinct cultivar of Fragaria ananassa known by the varietal name ⁇ Mira ⁇ , originally designated as "K84-5".
- the new variety resulted from a cross performed in 1982 between the unpatented cultivars ⁇ Scott ⁇ and ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ .
- the new variety first fruited at the Robinsons Corner research field of the Atlantic Food and Horticultural Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in Chester Basin, Nova Scotia, Canada in 1984.
- the new variety was first asexually reproduced by runners in 1985 at the Atlantic Food and Horticultural Research station in Kentville, Nova Scotia, Canada.
- the new variety is typical of short-day varieties and produces fruit over a four week period in northern temperate climates.
- ⁇ Mira ⁇ ripens in the mid-late season, and the pattern of production is similar to the standard variety ⁇ Kent ⁇ but three to five days later.
- ⁇ Mira ⁇ has a yield substantially greater than the varieties ⁇ Annapolis ⁇ (unpatented), ⁇ Cavendish ⁇ (the subject of U.S. Application Ser. No. 08/535,610, filed Sep. 8, 1995), ⁇ Blomidon ⁇ (unpatented), and ⁇ Bounty ⁇ (unpatented) and a yield equal to ⁇ Kent ⁇ (unpatented).
- ⁇ Mira ⁇ is superior to ⁇ Kent ⁇ because of improvements in the uniformity of ⁇ Mira's ⁇ fruit shape and, unlike ⁇ Kent ⁇ , the fruit color of ⁇ Mira ⁇ does not darken excessively when over-ripe or after storage.
- Classification The new variety is botanically classified as Fragaria ananassa and commercially classified as a short-day strawberry.
- Plant and foliage When propagated in the nursery, ⁇ Mira ⁇ has similar runner production to the unpatented variety ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ but produces more runners than ⁇ Kent ⁇ .
- the leaf color of ⁇ Mira ⁇ and ⁇ Kent ⁇ are medium green while ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ leaves are darker green.
- Comparative statistics for foliar characteristics, including leaflet measurements, serration description, and petiole pubescence are given in Table 1. Individual central (terminal) leaflets of ⁇ Mira ⁇ are slightly longer and more narrow than those of ⁇ Kent ⁇ and ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ .
- the leaflet shape of ⁇ Mira ⁇ is more ovate and less rounded than those of ⁇ Kent ⁇ and ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ .
- the leaflet serrations of ⁇ Mira ⁇ and ⁇ Kent ⁇ are semi-pointed whereas they are more rounded for ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ .
- the serration at the tip of the central leaflet is small for ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ but medium in size for ⁇ Mira ⁇ and ⁇ Kent ⁇ .
- the leaf and petiole pubescence for ⁇ Mira ⁇ , ⁇ Kent ⁇ , and ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ are similar with the exception that ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ has more hairs on the leaflets.
- Blooming characteristics The length of bloom for ⁇ Mira ⁇ and ⁇ Kent ⁇ is about three weeks when grown in Kentville, Nova Scotia, Canada in a matted row cultural system. Flowering for both ⁇ Mira ⁇ and ⁇ Kent ⁇ typically begins on June 1 and ends on June 21 of each year.
- ⁇ Mira ⁇ has a much higher level of resistance to red stele root rot (Phytophthora fragariae) than ⁇ Kent ⁇ and ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ and these varieties' reaction to distinct races of the pathogen are given in Table 2.
- ⁇ Mira ⁇ is resistant to race A-1, A-2, and A-3 while ⁇ Kent ⁇ and ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ are susceptible to these races.
- ⁇ Mira ⁇ and ⁇ Kent ⁇ are moderately resistant to powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca macularis) but ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ is susceptible.
- ⁇ Mira ⁇ and ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ are moderately resistant to leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana) and common leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae) but ⁇ Kent ⁇ is susceptible to both.
- ⁇ Kent ⁇ and ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ are resistant to green petal phytoplasma and ⁇ Mira ⁇ is moderately resistant.
- ⁇ Mira ⁇ and ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ are less affected by fruit rot (Botrytis cinerea) than ⁇ Kent ⁇ .
- Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA banding patterns with primers UBC59, UBC76, UBC85, UBC100 and UBC287 distinguished ⁇ Mira ⁇ from seven other strawberry varieties including ⁇ Scott ⁇ and ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ , the parents of ⁇ Mira ⁇ as shown in Table 3.
- the banding pattern of ⁇ Mira ⁇ with primers UBC59, UBC85, and UBC100 was distinct from the other varieties.
- the primer UBC100 produced a distinct pattern for all eight varieties.
- Flower and fruit production characteristics Comparative statistics for flower and fruit characteristics near mid-season, including fruit color, are given for the three cultivars in Table 4.
- Flowers of ⁇ Mira ⁇ and ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ are positioned even with the foliar canopy but flowers of ⁇ Kent ⁇ are above the canopy.
- Flowers of ⁇ Mira ⁇ and ⁇ Kent ⁇ are medium in size and smaller than for ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ .
- Calyx size, as measured with a leaf area meter, is smaller for ⁇ Mira ⁇ and ⁇ Kent ⁇ than for ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ .
- the calyx coloration of ⁇ Mira ⁇ is medium green.
- the position of the calyx on a raised neck for ⁇ Mira ⁇ is in contrast to the other two varieties which have a position even with the top of the berry.
- ⁇ Mira ⁇ berries pick with a much longer stem than for ⁇ Kent ⁇ and ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ .
- the fruit shape of ⁇ Mira ⁇ is conic comparted to short-conic for ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ and ovoid for ⁇ Kent ⁇ , as confirmed by the length/width ratios.
- the seeds of ⁇ Mira ⁇ are more deeply indented than those of the other two varieties. Berries of all three varieties are moderately firm but ⁇ Mira ⁇ has tougher skin.
- the exterior fruit color of ⁇ Mira ⁇ and ⁇ Kent ⁇ is more toward orange while ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ is more toward purple as reflected in hue angle.
- ⁇ Mira ⁇ has a lighter interior than the other two varieties.
- the flesh coloration of ⁇ Mira ⁇ is about RHS 41 A, becoming progressively lighter in coloration towards the core.
- the exterior hue angle changed -6% for ⁇ Mira ⁇ , -28% for ⁇ Kent ⁇ , and -17% for ⁇ Honeoye ⁇ indicating that ⁇ Mira ⁇ holds its color well in storage while the other varieties darken.
- ⁇ Mira ⁇ has been widely tested for several years. As shown in Table 5, ⁇ Mira ⁇ typically yields equal to ⁇ Kent ⁇ (the high yield standard variety in the trials). The percent of fruit classified as unmarketable is typically lower for ⁇ Mira ⁇ than ⁇ Kent ⁇ due to the greater resistance of ⁇ Mira ⁇ to Botrytis fruit rot. The fruit of ⁇ Mira ⁇ are slightly smaller (by weight) than ⁇ Kent ⁇ and the season of harvest is consistently later than ⁇ Kent ⁇ . Subjectively, ⁇ Mira ⁇ has a flavor similar to ⁇ Kent ⁇ , but more tart. ⁇ Mira ⁇ fruit will be acceptable for the fresh market and attractive to growers because of high productivity and disease resistance. ⁇ Mira ⁇ produces abundant runners in the nursery and is readily propagated by conventional field techniques.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
An ananassa type strawberry plant characterized by its high productivity and high disease resistance. The cultivar is suited for propagation in the field and produces slightly tart fruit which is acceptable for the fresh market.
Description
The present invention includes a new and distinct cultivar of Fragaria ananassa known by the varietal name `Mira`, originally designated as "K84-5". The new variety resulted from a cross performed in 1982 between the unpatented cultivars `Scott` and `Honeoye`. The new variety first fruited at the Robinsons Corner research field of the Atlantic Food and Horticultural Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in Chester Basin, Nova Scotia, Canada in 1984. The new variety was first asexually reproduced by runners in 1985 at the Atlantic Food and Horticultural Research station in Kentville, Nova Scotia, Canada. Since 1992, propagules of the new variety have been tested at the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada research centers in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Buctouche, New Brunswick and Fredericton, New Brunswick, all of Canada and at the Newfoundland Department of Agriculture field site at Pynn's Brook, Newfoundland, Canada and has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive propagation.
The new variety is typical of short-day varieties and produces fruit over a four week period in northern temperate climates. `Mira` ripens in the mid-late season, and the pattern of production is similar to the standard variety `Kent` but three to five days later. `Mira` has a yield substantially greater than the varieties `Annapolis` (unpatented), `Cavendish` (the subject of U.S. Application Ser. No. 08/535,610, filed Sep. 8, 1995), `Blomidon` (unpatented), and `Bounty` (unpatented) and a yield equal to `Kent` (unpatented). The appearance of `Mira` is superior to `Kent` because of improvements in the uniformity of `Mira's` fruit shape and, unlike `Kent`, the fruit color of `Mira` does not darken excessively when over-ripe or after storage.
The accompanying photographic drawing illustrates the characteristic fruit and foliage of the new variety `Mira`, with the color being as nearly true as possible with color illustrations of this type.
The following detailed description sets forth the characteristics of the new cultivar. Color references are made to The R.H.S. Colour Chart of The Royal Horticultural Society of London and were also determined using a Minolta Colorimeter.
Classification: The new variety is botanically classified as Fragaria ananassa and commercially classified as a short-day strawberry.
Plant and foliage: When propagated in the nursery, `Mira` has similar runner production to the unpatented variety `Honeoye` but produces more runners than `Kent`. The leaf color of `Mira` and `Kent` are medium green while `Honeoye` leaves are darker green. Comparative statistics for foliar characteristics, including leaflet measurements, serration description, and petiole pubescence are given in Table 1. Individual central (terminal) leaflets of `Mira` are slightly longer and more narrow than those of `Kent` and `Honeoye`. Hence, the leaflet shape of `Mira` is more ovate and less rounded than those of `Kent` and `Honeoye`. The leaflet serrations of `Mira` and `Kent` are semi-pointed whereas they are more rounded for `Honeoye`. The serration at the tip of the central leaflet is small for `Honeoye` but medium in size for `Mira` and `Kent`. The leaf and petiole pubescence for `Mira`, `Kent`, and `Honeoye` are similar with the exception that `Honeoye` has more hairs on the leaflets.
TABLE 1
______________________________________
Foliar characteristics for
`Mira`, `Kent`, and `Honeoye`
Cultivar
Foliar Character
`Mira` `Kent` `Honeoye`
______________________________________
Central leaflet
Length (mm)
mean 84.2 82.5 83.8
range 68-100 72-100 65-97
Width (mm)
mean 68.4 72.3 70.3
range 56-85 60-87 55-87
Length/width ratio
1.23 1.14 1.19
Truss length (cm)
28.9 30.6
No. leaflets/leaf
3 3 3
Leaf convexity
flat flat flat
Serrations
Number moderate moderate many
Shape semi-pointed
semi-pointed
semi-round
Tip serration size
medium medium small
Leaf pubescence
sparse sparse medium
Petiole pubescence
Density sparse sparse sparse
Direction perpendicular
perpendicular
perpendicular
Leaf Color
Upper surface
Green Group Green Group
137A-137B 137A
Lower surface
Green Group Green Group
138B 138B
______________________________________
Blooming characteristics: The length of bloom for `Mira` and `Kent` is about three weeks when grown in Kentville, Nova Scotia, Canada in a matted row cultural system. Flowering for both `Mira` and `Kent` typically begins on June 1 and ends on June 21 of each year.
Disease resistance: `Mira` has a much higher level of resistance to red stele root rot (Phytophthora fragariae) than `Kent` and `Honeoye` and these varieties' reaction to distinct races of the pathogen are given in Table 2. `Mira` is resistant to race A-1, A-2, and A-3 while `Kent` and `Honeoye` are susceptible to these races. `Mira` and `Kent` are moderately resistant to powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca macularis) but `Honeoye` is susceptible. `Mira` and `Honeoye` are moderately resistant to leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana) and common leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae) but `Kent` is susceptible to both. `Kent` and `Honeoye` are resistant to green petal phytoplasma and `Mira` is moderately resistant. `Mira` and `Honeoye` are less affected by fruit rot (Botrytis cinerea) than `Kent`.
TABLE 2 ______________________________________ Resistance of `Mira`, `Kent`, and `Honeoye` to races of Phytophthora fragariae (red stele root rot). Cultivar Race `Mira` `Kent` `Honeoye` ______________________________________ A-1 R S S A-2 R S S A-3 R S S A-4 R S or I S A-5 S S S A-6 MR S or I S A-7 S S S ______________________________________ S = susceptible; I = intermediate; MR = moderately resistant; R = resistant
Genetic fingerprinting of leaf extracts: Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA banding patterns with primers UBC59, UBC76, UBC85, UBC100 and UBC287 (all available from the University of British Columbia, Nucleic Acid-Protein Service Unit) distinguished `Mira` from seven other strawberry varieties including `Scott` and `Honeoye`, the parents of `Mira` as shown in Table 3. The banding pattern of `Mira` with primers UBC59, UBC85, and UBC100 was distinct from the other varieties. The primer UBC100 produced a distinct pattern for all eight varieties. This testing was done in the Biotechnology Laboratory of the Atlantic Food and Horticultural Research Centre following the techniques of Levi et al., Identification of Strawberry Genotypes and Evaluation of their Genetic Relationships Using Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Analysis, Adv. In Strawberry Research, 13:36-39 (1994).
TABLE 3
______________________________________
Genetic fingerprinting of `Mira` and seven other
strawberry varieties by Random Amplified Polymorphic
DNA. Bands from reliable polymorphic RAPD fragments
from three replications are represented as 0 = absent or 1 = present.
Primer
UBC59 UBC76 UBC85 UBC100 UBC287
Band Number for each primer and DNA pattern
Variety 12345 123 123 12345 123
______________________________________
Mira 00111 a 100 a 111 a 00111 a
010 a
Scott 10010 b 100 a 100 b 00010 b
010 a
Honeoye 10011 c 000 b 010 c 10100 c
011 b
Totem 10001 d 100 a 000 d 11110 d
101 c
Annapolis
01111 e 101 c 010 c 11101 e
011 b
Cavendish
11011 f 101 c 000 d 11100 f
111 d
Blomidon
11111 g 101 c 010 c 11010 g
011 b
Kent 11111 g 100 a 011 e 10110 h
011 b
______________________________________
Flower and fruit production characteristics: Comparative statistics for flower and fruit characteristics near mid-season, including fruit color, are given for the three cultivars in Table 4. Flowers of `Mira` and `Honeoye` are positioned even with the foliar canopy but flowers of `Kent` are above the canopy. Flowers of `Mira` and `Kent` are medium in size and smaller than for `Honeoye`. Calyx size, as measured with a leaf area meter, is smaller for `Mira` and `Kent` than for `Honeoye`. The calyx coloration of `Mira` is medium green. The position of the calyx on a raised neck for `Mira` is in contrast to the other two varieties which have a position even with the top of the berry. `Mira` berries pick with a much longer stem than for `Kent` and `Honeoye`. The fruit shape of `Mira` is conic comparted to short-conic for `Honeoye` and ovoid for `Kent`, as confirmed by the length/width ratios. The seeds of `Mira` are more deeply indented than those of the other two varieties. Berries of all three varieties are moderately firm but `Mira` has tougher skin. The exterior fruit color of `Mira` and `Kent` is more toward orange while `Honeoye` is more toward purple as reflected in hue angle. `Mira` has a lighter interior than the other two varieties. The flesh coloration of `Mira` is about RHS 41 A, becoming progressively lighter in coloration towards the core. After a 7 day period of storage, the exterior hue angle changed -6% for `Mira`, -28% for `Kent`, and -17% for `Honeoye` indicating that `Mira` holds its color well in storage while the other varieties darken.
TABLE 4
______________________________________
Flower and fruit charcateristics for
`Mira`, `Kent`, and `Honeoye`
Cultivar
Character `Mira` `Kent` `Honeoye`
______________________________________
Flower position
even above even
(relative to leaf canopy)
Flower truss length
medium-long
medium-long
short-
medium
Number of flowers per truss
11.1 11.2
(average)
Flower size (diameter)
medium medium medium-
(32.7 mm) (32.4 mm) large
Flower color white white
Petal spacing touching overlapping
touching
Calyx area (cm.sup.2)
3.8 3.9 6.3
Calyx position raised neck
even even
Fruit stem length
very long medium medium
Fruit shape
length/width ratio
1.00 0.76 0.97
subjective conic ovoid short-
conic
Seed position indent even slight
indent
Fruit firmness (N)
4.6 4.8 5.2
Skin toughness (g)
15.3 6.2 9.2
Color (R.H.S. Colour CHart)
Fruit exterior Red Group Red Group
42A 46A
Fruit interior Red Group Red Group 44B
41A
Color (Minolta Colorimeter)
Fruit exterior
hue angle 27.9 29.1 24.8
chroma 45.9 38.9 37.8
lightness 36.2 37.1 32.3
Fruit interior
hue angle 50.2 47.3 44.2
chroma 23.8 28.1 34.6
lightness 63.0 55.0 56.1
______________________________________
Production characteristics: `Mira` has been widely tested for several years. As shown in Table 5, `Mira` typically yields equal to `Kent` (the high yield standard variety in the trials). The percent of fruit classified as unmarketable is typically lower for `Mira` than `Kent` due to the greater resistance of `Mira` to Botrytis fruit rot. The fruit of `Mira` are slightly smaller (by weight) than `Kent` and the season of harvest is consistently later than `Kent`. Subjectively, `Mira` has a flavor similar to `Kent`, but more tart. `Mira` fruit will be acceptable for the fresh market and attractive to growers because of high productivity and disease resistance. `Mira` produces abundant runners in the nursery and is readily propagated by conventional field techniques.
TABLE 5
______________________________________
Performance of `Mira` and `Kent` for 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996
averaged over four sites: Kentville, NS; Charlottetown, PEI;
Boctouche, NB; and Pynn's Brook Nfld. Plants were grown in matted
rows and three blocks of 3 m long rows were harvested at each site.
Total Yield % yield SIze Mean harvest
(t/ha) unmarketable
(g/fruit) (day of year)
______________________________________
1993
`Mira` 19.3 6.2 13.7 208.1
`Kent` 21.1 9.0 14.5 205.7
1994
`Mira` 24.7 14.2 12.0 199.9
`Kent` 25.0 18.8 12.3 198.8
1995
`Mira` 23.8 8.0 13.4 199.0
`Kent` 21.5 10.2 13.9 197.0
1996
`Mira` 16.1 11.8 9.8 198.3
`Kent` 19.3 11.4 10.4 197.3
______________________________________
Claims (1)
1. A new and distinct variety of strawberry plant substantially as shown and described.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/084,137 USPP11438P (en) | 1998-05-26 | 1998-05-26 | Strawberry variety named `Mira` |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/084,137 USPP11438P (en) | 1998-05-26 | 1998-05-26 | Strawberry variety named `Mira` |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| USPP11438P true USPP11438P (en) | 2000-07-11 |
Family
ID=22183105
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/084,137 Expired - Lifetime USPP11438P (en) | 1998-05-26 | 1998-05-26 | Strawberry variety named `Mira` |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | USPP11438P (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20050251886P1 (en) * | 2004-05-06 | 2005-11-10 | Shahrokh Khanidazeh | Strawberry plant named 'Orleans' |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPP8623P (en) * | 1992-06-19 | 1994-03-01 | Plantas De Navarra, S.A. | Strawberry plant named Cartuno |
| USPP10460P (en) * | 1996-04-22 | 1998-06-23 | Khanizadeh; Shahrokh | `Joliette` strawberry |
-
1998
- 1998-05-26 US US09/084,137 patent/USPP11438P/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPP8623P (en) * | 1992-06-19 | 1994-03-01 | Plantas De Navarra, S.A. | Strawberry plant named Cartuno |
| USPP10460P (en) * | 1996-04-22 | 1998-06-23 | Khanizadeh; Shahrokh | `Joliette` strawberry |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| UPOV ROM GTITM Computer Database, 1998/04, GTIJOUVE Retrieval Software, Citation for Mira . * |
| UPOV-ROM GTITM Computer Database, 1998/04, GTIJOUVE Retrieval Software, Citation for `Mira`. |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20050251886P1 (en) * | 2004-05-06 | 2005-11-10 | Shahrokh Khanidazeh | Strawberry plant named 'Orleans' |
| USPP17670P3 (en) * | 2004-05-06 | 2007-05-01 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada | Strawberry plant named ‘Orleans’ |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| USPP33737P2 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawEightyFour’ | |
| USPP30851P2 (en) | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyEight’ | |
| USPP29728P2 (en) | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ | |
| USPP11554P (en) | Strawberry plant named `Alta Vista` | |
| USPP27711P3 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ | |
| USPP8649P (en) | Strawberry plant called `Key Largo` | |
| USPP34441P2 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawNinetyOne’ | |
| USPP34776P2 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawNinetyNine’ | |
| USPP35909P2 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawOneHundredFour’ | |
| USPP11438P (en) | Strawberry variety named `Mira` | |
| USPP20394P3 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘VALOR’ | |
| USPP22781P2 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘Puget Crimson’ | |
| USPP21415P3 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘Reliance’ | |
| USPP11110P (en) | Strawberry plant named `Cavendish` | |
| USPP37098P2 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘HOB-391’ | |
| USPP30213P2 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘Archer’ | |
| USPP17312P2 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘PS-5016’ | |
| USPP37184P2 (en) | Fragaria plant named ‘Eves Gloria’ | |
| USPP10780P (en) | Strawberry plant named `PS-1150` | |
| US20030046739P1 (en) | Strawberry variety named 'Sable' | |
| USPP33636P2 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘Cordial’ | |
| USPP32221P3 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘CIVRH612’ | |
| USPP21381P3 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘Eves Delight’ | |
| USPP12067P2 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘Schwartze’ | |
| USPP32535P2 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘Dickens’ |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ATLANTIC FOOD AND HORTICULTURE RESEARCH CENTRE, AG Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:JAMIESON, ANDREW R.;NICKERSON, NANCY L.;CRAIG, DONALD L.;REEL/FRAME:009206/0586 Effective date: 19980519 |