USPP10040P - Chrysanthemum plant named `Sandy Davis` - Google Patents
Chrysanthemum plant named `Sandy Davis` Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USPP10040P USPP10040P US08/605,612 US60561296V US10040P US PP10040 P USPP10040 P US PP10040P US 60561296 V US60561296 V US 60561296V US 10040 P US10040 P US 10040P
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- davis
- sandy
- capitulum
- days
- cuttings
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 241000723353 Chrysanthemum Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 9
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 abstract description 12
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 abstract description 9
- 241000131317 Capitulum Species 0.000 abstract description 8
- 230000017260 vegetative to reproductive phase transition of meristem Effects 0.000 abstract description 8
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 abstract description 7
- 235000005633 Chrysanthemum balsamita Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 4
- 241001466077 Salina Species 0.000 description 5
- 235000007516 Chrysanthemum Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 241001573881 Corolla Species 0.000 description 2
- 240000001140 Mimosa pudica Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000011681 asexual reproduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013465 asexual reproduction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910000906 Bronze Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000009604 Chrysanthemum X morifolium Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000189548 Chrysanthemum x morifolium Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000218922 Magnoliophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000010974 bronze Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000350 mutagenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001850 reproductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H6/14—Asteraceae or Compositae, e.g. safflower, sunflower, artichoke or lettuce
- A01H6/1424—Chrysanthemum
Definitions
- the present invention comprises a new and distinct cultivar of Chrysanthemum, botanically known as Dendranthema grandiflora, and referred to by the cultivar name Sandy Davis.
- Sandy Davis identified as 4498 (84-382H03), is a product of a mutation induction program.
- the new cultivar was discovered and selected by inventor Susan M. Polys on Aug. 29, 1991 in a controlled environment in Salinas, Calif. as one flowering plant within a flowering block established as rooted cuttings from stock plants which had been exposed as unrooted cuttings to an X-ray source of 1750 rads in Fort Myers, Fla. Mar. 20, 1991.
- the irradiated parent cultivar was the cultivar Orange Davis, disclosed in U.S. Plant Pat. No. 8,295 and described as a flat daisy spray pot mum with orange-bronze flower color.
- the irradiation program resulting in Sandy Davis had as its primary objective the expansion of color ranges of the cultivar Davis, disclosed in U.S. Plant Pat. No. 7,325, and the parent cultivar Orange Davis.
- the irradiation program comprised irradiation of cuttings of the parent cultivar at irradiation levels of 1500, 1750 and 2000 rads. A total of 1529 cuttings harvested from a total of 225 irradiated plants were planted on Jul. 8, 1991. Of these, 9 initial selections were made, which selections were then revegetated and reflowered. Three consecutive flowerings resulted in discarding all of the original 9 selections on May 1, 1992.
- the phenotype may vary significantly with variations in environment such as temperature, light intensity and daylength, without, however, any variance in genotype.
- Plant height, with 14 long days after sticking unrooted cuttings and with 1 to 2 applications of 2500 ppm B-9 SP ranges from 20 to 25 cm when grown as a pinched pot mum with 4 cuttings in a 15 cm pot.
- Branching pattern is spreading, each plant having 4 to 6 laterals after pinch.
- the most similar in comparison to Sandy Davis is the parent cultivar Orange Davis. All traits of Sandy Davis are similar to those of Orange Davis, except for the ray floret color and the flowering response to short days.
- the ray floret color of Sandy Davis (RHS 22A to 24B) is significantly lighter than the ray floret color of Orange Davis (RHS 34B, tinged with 178C to 179A).
- the flowering response to short days of Sandy Davis is 1 to 2 days slower than the flowering response of Orange Davis.
- Color (general tonality from a distance of three meters).--Yellow-orange.
- Gynoecium --Present on both ray and disc florets.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
- Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
Abstract
A Chrysanthemum plant named Sandy Davis particularly characterized by its flat capitulum flat capitulum form; daisy capitulum type; yellow-orange ray floret color; diameter across face of capitulum of 64 to 70 mm when fully opened, when grown as a pinched spray pot mum; photoperiodic flowering response of 58 to 63 days after start of short days; plant height, with 14 long days after sticking unrooted cuttings and with 1 to 2 applications of 2500 ppm B-9 SP ranges from 20 to 25 cm when grown as a pinched pot mum with 4 cuttings in a 15 cm pot; spreading branching pattern, each plant having 4 to 6 laterals after pinch; and recommended as a spray pot mum.
Description
The present invention comprises a new and distinct cultivar of Chrysanthemum, botanically known as Dendranthema grandiflora, and referred to by the cultivar name Sandy Davis.
Sandy Davis, identified as 4498 (84-382H03), is a product of a mutation induction program. The new cultivar was discovered and selected by inventor Susan M. Polys on Aug. 29, 1991 in a controlled environment in Salinas, Calif. as one flowering plant within a flowering block established as rooted cuttings from stock plants which had been exposed as unrooted cuttings to an X-ray source of 1750 rads in Fort Myers, Fla. Mar. 20, 1991. The irradiated parent cultivar was the cultivar Orange Davis, disclosed in U.S. Plant Pat. No. 8,295 and described as a flat daisy spray pot mum with orange-bronze flower color.
The irradiation program resulting in Sandy Davis had as its primary objective the expansion of color ranges of the cultivar Davis, disclosed in U.S. Plant Pat. No. 7,325, and the parent cultivar Orange Davis. The irradiation program comprised irradiation of cuttings of the parent cultivar at irradiation levels of 1500, 1750 and 2000 rads. A total of 1529 cuttings harvested from a total of 225 irradiated plants were planted on Jul. 8, 1991. Of these, 9 initial selections were made, which selections were then revegetated and reflowered. Three consecutive flowerings resulted in discarding all of the original 9 selections on May 1, 1992. Two codes were reselected prior to discarding the original code, and were maintained as PIs (Possible Introductions) and further trialed in Salinas, Calif. and Leamington Ontario, Canada, ultimately resulting in discarding one code on Oct. 11, 1994 and the decision to introduce the one remaining selection as Sandy Davis.
The first act of asexual reproduction of Sandy Davis was accomplished when vegetative cuttings were taken from the initial selection in November of 1991 in a controlled environment in Salinas, Calif. by technicians working under supervision of Susan M. Polys.
Horticultural examination of controlled flowerings of successive plantings has shown that the unique combination of characteristics as herein disclosed for Sandy Davis are firmly fixed and are retained through successive generations of asexual reproduction.
Sandy Davis has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The phenotype may vary significantly with variations in environment such as temperature, light intensity and daylength, without, however, any variance in genotype.
The following observations, measurements and comparisons describe plants grown in Salinas, Calif., and in Leamington, Ontario, Canada, under greenhouse conditions which approximate those generally used in commercial greenhouse practice.
The following traits have been repeatedly observed and are determined to be basic characteristics of Sandy Davis, which, in combination, distinguish this Chrysanthemum as a new and distinct cultivar:
1. Flat capitulum form.
2. Daisy capitulum type.
3. Yellow-orange ray floret color.
4. Diameter across face of capitulum of 64 to 70 mm when fully opened, when grown as a pinched spray pot mum.
5. Photoperiodic flowering response of 58 to 63 days after start of short days.
6. Plant height, with 14 long days after sticking unrooted cuttings and with 1 to 2 applications of 2500 ppm B-9 SP ranges from 20 to 25 cm when grown as a pinched pot mum with 4 cuttings in a 15 cm pot.
7. Branching pattern is spreading, each plant having 4 to 6 laterals after pinch.
8. Recommended as a spray pot mum.
The accompanying photographic drawing is a side view of Sandy Davis, grown as a spray pot mum with 4 cuttings in a 15 cm pot, with the colors being as nearly true as possible with illustrations of this type.
Of the commercial cultivars known to the inventor, the most similar in comparison to Sandy Davis is the parent cultivar Orange Davis. All traits of Sandy Davis are similar to those of Orange Davis, except for the ray floret color and the flowering response to short days. The ray floret color of Sandy Davis (RHS 22A to 24B) is significantly lighter than the ray floret color of Orange Davis (RHS 34B, tinged with 178C to 179A). The flowering response to short days of Sandy Davis is 1 to 2 days slower than the flowering response of Orange Davis.
In the following description color references are made to The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart. The color values were determined on plant material grown as a pinched pot mum with 4 cuttings in a 15 cm pot in Salinas, Calif. on May 22, 1995.
Classification
Botanical.--Dendranthema grandiflora cv Sandy Davis.
Commercial.--Flat daisy spray pot mum.
A. Capitulum:
Form.--Flat
Type.--Daisy.
Diameter across face.--64 to 70 mm when fully opened.
B. Corolla of ray florets:
Color (general tonality from a distance of three meters).--Yellow-orange.
Color (upper surface).--22A to 24B.
Color (under surface).--22A to 24B.
Shape.--Straight, oblong, slightly ribbed.
C. Corolla of disc florets:
Color (mature).--9A.
Color (immature).--144B.
D. Reproductive organs:
Androecium.--Present on disc florets only; no pollen.
Gynoecium.--Present on both ray and disc florets.
A. General appearance:
Height.--20 to 25 cm when grown as a pinched pot mum with 14 long days after sticking unrooted cuttings prior to start of short days and with 1 to 2 applications of 2500 ppm B-9 SP.
Branching pattern.--Spreading, with 4 to 6 laterals after pinch.
B. Foliage:
Color (upper surface).--147A.
Color (under surface).--147B.
Shape.--Deeply lobed and serrated.
Claims (1)
1. A new and distinct Chrysanthemum plant named Sandy Davis, as described and illustrated.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/605,612 USPP10040P (en) | 1996-02-22 | 1996-02-22 | Chrysanthemum plant named `Sandy Davis` |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/605,612 USPP10040P (en) | 1996-02-22 | 1996-02-22 | Chrysanthemum plant named `Sandy Davis` |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| USPP10040P true USPP10040P (en) | 1997-09-23 |
Family
ID=24424441
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/605,612 Expired - Lifetime USPP10040P (en) | 1996-02-22 | 1996-02-22 | Chrysanthemum plant named `Sandy Davis` |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | USPP10040P (en) |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4616099A (en) * | 1982-07-19 | 1986-10-07 | Sparkes A Graham | Family group of successive radiation induced chrysanthemum mutants named snapper |
| USPP8295P (en) * | 1991-07-30 | 1993-07-06 | Yoder Brothers, Inc. | Chrysanthemum plant named Orange Davis |
-
1996
- 1996-02-22 US US08/605,612 patent/USPP10040P/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4616099A (en) * | 1982-07-19 | 1986-10-07 | Sparkes A Graham | Family group of successive radiation induced chrysanthemum mutants named snapper |
| USPP8295P (en) * | 1991-07-30 | 1993-07-06 | Yoder Brothers, Inc. | Chrysanthemum plant named Orange Davis |
Non-Patent Citations (14)
| Title |
|---|
| Broertjes, 1966, "Mutation breeding of chrysanthemums", Euphytica, 15;156-162. |
| Broertjes, 1966, Mutation breeding of chrysanthemums , Euphytica, 15;156 162. * |
| Broertjes, et al., 1978, "Application of Mutation Breeding Methods in the Improvement of Vegetatively Propagated Crops", Elsevier Sci. Pub. Co., New York, pp. 162-175. |
| Broertjes, et al., 1978, Application of Mutation Breeding Methods in the Improvement of Vegetatively Propagated Crops , Elsevier Sci. Pub. Co., New York, pp. 162 175. * |
| Broertjes, et al., 1980, "A mutant of a mutant of a . . . Irradiation of Progressive radiation-induced mutants in a mutation breeding programme with Chrysanthemum morifolium", Euphytica, 29:525-530. |
| Broertjes, et al., 1980, A mutant of a mutant of a . . . Irradiation of Progressive radiation induced mutants in a mutation breeding programme with Chrysanthemum morifolium , Euphytica, 29:525 530. * |
| Chan, 1966, "Chrysanthemum and rose mutations induced by x-rays", Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc., pp. 613-620. |
| Chan, 1966, Chrysanthemum and rose mutations induced by x rays , Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc., pp. 613 620. * |
| Dowrick, et al., 1966, "The induction of mutations in chrysanthemum using x-and gamma radiation," Euphytica, 15:205-210. |
| Dowrick, et al., 1966, The induction of mutations in chrysanthemum using x and gamma radiation, Euphytica, 15:205 210. * |
| Gosling, ed., 1979, "The Chrysanthemum Manual-6th edition", The National Chrysanthemum Society, London, Essex Telegraph Press, Ltd. pp. 329-336. |
| Gosling, ed., 1979, The Chrysanthemum Manual 6th edition , The National Chrysanthemum Society, London, Essex Telegraph Press, Ltd. pp. 329 336. * |
| Searle, et al., 1968, "Chrysanthemums the Year Round", Blanford Press, London, pp.27-29, 320-327. |
| Searle, et al., 1968, Chrysanthemums the Year Round , Blanford Press, London, pp.27 29, 320 327. * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| USPP8759P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Sandy | |
| USPP8292P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Regal Davis | |
| USPP8808P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Blue Volare | |
| USPP8829P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Light Volare | |
| USPP8549P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Cherry Papillon | |
| USPP9455P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Blush | |
| USPP8610P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Chantal | |
| USPP10040P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Sandy Davis` | |
| USPP8345P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Red Delano | |
| USPP10680P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Plum Akron` | |
| USPP9702P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Bronze Cherie` | |
| USPP10571P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Red Akron` | |
| USPP8295P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Orange Davis | |
| USPP10037P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Golden El Paso` | |
| USPP9845P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `White Cherie` | |
| USPP10039P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Cream Blush` | |
| USPP8611P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Cream Chantal | |
| USPP8293P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant names Light Davis | |
| USPP9713P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Yellow Cherie` | |
| USPP9441P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `White Blush` | |
| USPP8097P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Coral Davis | |
| USPP9559P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Yellow Davis` | |
| USPP9772P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Dreamy Tracy` | |
| USPP8059P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named White Diamond | |
| USPP9585P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Fiery Barbara` |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: YODER BROTHERS, INC., OHIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:POLYS, SUSAN M.;REEL/FRAME:007883/0723 Effective date: 19960208 |