USH2039H1 - Clearing obstacles - Google Patents

Clearing obstacles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USH2039H1
USH2039H1 US08/896,922 US89692297A USH2039H US H2039 H1 USH2039 H1 US H2039H1 US 89692297 A US89692297 A US 89692297A US H2039 H USH2039 H US H2039H
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
explosive
obstacles
folded
plate member
plate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US08/896,922
Inventor
William H. Holt
Alexander G. Rozner
Bernard P. Howder
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
US Department of Navy
Original Assignee
US Department of Navy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by US Department of Navy filed Critical US Department of Navy
Priority to US08/896,922 priority Critical patent/USH2039H1/en
Assigned to NAVY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY reassignment NAVY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HOLT, WILLIAM H., HOWDER, BERNARD P., ROZNER, ALEXANDER G.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USH2039H1 publication Critical patent/USH2039H1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/20—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type
    • F42B12/22—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type with fragmentation-hull construction
    • F42B12/30—Continuous-rod warheads
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B1/00—Explosive charges characterised by form or shape but not dependent on shape of container
    • F42B1/02—Shaped or hollow charges
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B3/00—Blasting cartridges, i.e. case and explosive

Definitions

  • This invention relates to obstacle clearing or demolition using explosives.
  • Heavy obstacles such as concrete tetrahedrons are conventionally destroyed or cleared by placing haversack charges in close proximity to the obstacle and detonating the charges.
  • Light obstacles such as coils of barbed wire or concertina which may be intermingled with the heavy obstacles are cleared by placing bangalore torpedoes (metal tubes filled with explosive) under the wire and detonating so that the blast and fragments cut the wire. Clearing both heavy and light obstacles in the conventional way thus requires men to go into close physical proximity to the respective obstacles to place the explosive charges. This may be dangerous because of the presence of antipersonnel mines or for other reasons.
  • FIG. 1 is a longitudinal cross-sectional view of obstacle clearing apparatus embodying principles of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is an elevational view on line 2 — 2 of FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view on line 3 — 3 of FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic view of details of the folded continuous rod member of the apparatus of FIG. 1 .
  • FIGS. 5 and 6 are sequential views schematically illustrating operation of the apparatus of FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of a modified form of obstacle clearing apparatus embodying principles of the invention.
  • FIG. 8 is an elevational view on line 8 — 8 of FIG. 7.
  • Primed reference characters denote elements similar to those with the corresponding unprimed characters.
  • the obstacle clearing apparatus of FIGS. 1 and 2 is generally indicated at 10 and comprises a hollow cylindrical body member 12 that may take the form of a section of commercial PVC (polyvinyl chloride) pipe.
  • Body 12 has a fore side portion 14 , an aft side portion 16 , and additional side portions circumferentially around the cylinder of the pipe.
  • Apparatus 10 further comprises a flying metal plate member 18 mounted at the fore side portion of body 12 .
  • Flying metal plates and their power to breach holes in barriers of concrete and steel are known, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,524,546.
  • Such plates have a concave front face 20 , a convex rear face 22 , and a generally uniform thickness.
  • a layer of strong elastomeric material 24 covers rear face 22 of plate 18 .
  • Plate 18 is preferably made of copper.
  • Plate 18 is mounted on the fore side portion of body 12 .
  • An annular breakaway cap 26 threadedly engaged with threads formed on the outside of fore side body portion 14 has a radially inwardly projecting lip 27 that overlaps the outer periphery of plate 18 to hold the plate in position.
  • the cavity formed by the hollow interior of body 12 is packed with an explosive 28 for propelling plate 18 towards an obstacle to be cleared.
  • Rear side portion 16 of body 12 is closed by disk 30 that is held in place by an annular snap ring 32 .
  • Disk 30 has a central aperture for receiving a detonator 34 for detonating explosive 28 .
  • Hollow cylindrical fitting 36 is attached to closure disk 30 to aid in holding detonator 34 in position.
  • Embedded in explosive 28 is a continous rod member 38 that is folded into a multiplicity of accordion-like pleats (see also FIGS. 3, 4 ).
  • continuous rod 38 may be formed from a multiplicity of relatively short rod or picket members, as 40 , 42 , 44 that are arrayed in generally side-by-side disposition circumferentially around the core of the mass of explosive 28 and joined together in the manner now to be described.
  • Each picket has opposite end portions, and is joined at one end portion to the picket on one side, as picket 40 is joined to picket 42 at 46 in FIG. 4 .
  • Each picket is also joined at the other end portion to the picket on the opposite side, as picket 40 is joined to picket 44 at 48 .
  • picket 40 is joined to picket 44 at 48 .
  • the folded continous rod member expands towards a generally annular or hooplike configuration under radially outwardly applied forces generated by detonation of the explosive mass in which it is embedded.
  • FIG. 4 the pickets are shown partially expanded, to facilitate explanation.
  • obstacle clearing device 10 is positioned at a standoff distance (e.g. 10′) from the obstacles to be cleared which in this example include a concrete tetrahedron 50 protected by a coil of concertina wire 52 .
  • Device 10 is arranged with flying plate 18 pointed at tetrahedron 50 , and detonated. The flying plate shatters the tetrahedron, and under the forces generated by the explosion continous rod member 38 unfolds towards a generally curvilinear, hooplike configuration and in the process of so doing the rod member or fragments thereof cut concertina 52 .
  • a plurality of plate members 18 ′ are arrayed around the circumferential side portions of body 12 ′, held in place against the inside wall of body 12 ′ by the mass of explosive 28 ′ in which continuous rod member 38 ′ is embedded.
  • copper is the preferred material for plate 18 .
  • Purity is not critical, and commercial grade copper is well suited to the application.
  • Other relatively dense, ductile metals such as tantalum and lead are operable, but suffer from disadvantages such as high cost or contamination potential that are not present with copper.
  • the term “consisting essentially of copper” means pure copper and copper-base alloys containing at least about 90 w/o copper.
  • the thickness of plate 18 is preferably from about 0.125′′ to about 0.250′′.
  • Layer 24 of elastomeric material functions to prevent shattering of plate 18 in the explosion, and a plurality of materials including buna-N and silicone rubbers are suitable for the purpose.
  • the thickness of the elastomeric layer may for example be about 0.060′′ for a 12′′ diameter plate 0.250′′ thick.
  • Continous rod member 38 is preferably made of steel from about 0.25′′ to 0.50′′ in diameter, with welds forming the joints between adjacent pickets.
  • the folded rod array may be made by first making pairs of short rods or pickets with the pickets of each pair joined together at one end and arranging the pairs side by side with the joined ends together and with one picket of each pair on top of the other in the pair. Then the top picket is crossed over to the adjacent pair and welded to the bottom picket of that pair at the end opposite that at which the top picket is joined to the other picket in its own pair.
  • Each picket may for example be about 12′′ in length and it should be noted that when using the device of the present invention against light obstacles only, standoff distances may be much greater (e.g. 50-100′) depending upon the length and number of pickets in the array.
  • the explosive may be of any suitable, conventional high-energy type such as C-4 [about 91 w/o RDX (cyclotrimethylene trinitramine), 2.1 w/o rubber, 1.6 w/o oil and 5.3 w/o plasticizer.
  • the detonator may be a blasting cap of any suitable type of conventional design, electrically operated or otherwise.
  • the radius of curvature of the concave face of plate 18 should approximate the diameter of the plate.
  • a 3′′ diameter plate may have a radius of curvature of about 3.5′′.
  • Such a plate may be of about 0.125′′ thickness and weigh about 0.140 kg.
  • the radius of curvature of the aforementioned 12′′ plate may be from about 12′′ to 16′′. Plates may range in diameter from about 1.5′′ (weighing 60 g) to 22′′ (weighing 33 lb.) and larger.
  • the charge-to-mass ratio that is to say the ratio of the mass of explosive charge to that of the plate, should be from about 1:1 to about 4:1. The 1:1 level is satisfactory only for relatively soft (e.g. wood) obstacles. But using 66 pounds of explosive to propel the aforementioned 22′′, 33 lb. plate against a heavy concrete obstacle would produce satisfactory results.
  • the charge-to-mass ratio in such an arrangement is 2:1.
  • the shock wave front contacts the back side of the apex of the concave plate and causes it to bulge forwardly so that the concave face becomes convex as the plate is propelled toward the target by the explosive forces.
  • the bulging continues as the plate flies along its trajectory until the plate assumes the shape of a round-nosed, hollow tube that is open at the aft end.
  • the round nose is flattened and the annular tube walls impact the target.
  • the obstacle clearing device should be placed at a standoff distance from the obstacle that is at least 1.5 times the diameter of the plate.
  • the diameter of plate required to clear an obstacle will vary with the size of the obstacle and the larger the obstacle the larger the plate is required. Ideally, the plate diameter should approximate the size of the obstacle but plates of given diameter will destroy obstacles larger than themselves.
  • the clearing device may be positioned at a standoff distance from the obstacles, eliminating requirements for men to go into close proximity to place explosive charges. Moreover, one device can be employed against both light and heavy obstacles simultaneously or individually.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Drilling And Exploitation, And Mining Machines And Methods (AREA)

Abstract

System for clearing both light and heavy obstacles, in which one or more flying metal plates are propelled against heavy obstacles by explosive forces which also expand a folded continous rod member into a curvilinear, generally annular configuration that cuts through light obstacles such as concertina wire in the process of unfolding.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to obstacle clearing or demolition using explosives.
Heavy obstacles such as concrete tetrahedrons are conventionally destroyed or cleared by placing haversack charges in close proximity to the obstacle and detonating the charges. Light obstacles such as coils of barbed wire or concertina which may be intermingled with the heavy obstacles are cleared by placing bangalore torpedoes (metal tubes filled with explosive) under the wire and detonating so that the blast and fragments cut the wire. Clearing both heavy and light obstacles in the conventional way thus requires men to go into close physical proximity to the respective obstacles to place the explosive charges. This may be dangerous because of the presence of antipersonnel mines or for other reasons.
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved system for clearing obstacles that overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art. Additional objects and advantages of the invention will appear from the following detailed description which, together with the accompanying drawings, discloses a preferred embodiment of the invention for purposes of illustration only. For definition of the invention, reference will be made to the appended claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a longitudinal cross-sectional view of obstacle clearing apparatus embodying principles of the invention.
FIG. 2 is an elevational view on line 2—2 of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view on line 3—3 of FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a schematic view of details of the folded continuous rod member of the apparatus of FIG. 1.
FIGS. 5 and 6 are sequential views schematically illustrating operation of the apparatus of FIG. 1.
FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of a modified form of obstacle clearing apparatus embodying principles of the invention.
FIG. 8 is an elevational view on line 8—8 of FIG. 7.
Primed reference characters denote elements similar to those with the corresponding unprimed characters.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The obstacle clearing apparatus of FIGS. 1 and 2 is generally indicated at 10 and comprises a hollow cylindrical body member 12 that may take the form of a section of commercial PVC (polyvinyl chloride) pipe. Body 12 has a fore side portion 14, an aft side portion 16, and additional side portions circumferentially around the cylinder of the pipe.
Apparatus 10 further comprises a flying metal plate member 18 mounted at the fore side portion of body 12. Flying metal plates and their power to breach holes in barriers of concrete and steel are known, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,524,546. Such plates have a concave front face 20, a convex rear face 22, and a generally uniform thickness. A layer of strong elastomeric material 24 covers rear face 22 of plate 18. Plate 18 is preferably made of copper.
Plate 18 is mounted on the fore side portion of body 12. An annular breakaway cap 26 threadedly engaged with threads formed on the outside of fore side body portion 14 has a radially inwardly projecting lip 27 that overlaps the outer periphery of plate 18 to hold the plate in position. The cavity formed by the hollow interior of body 12 is packed with an explosive 28 for propelling plate 18 towards an obstacle to be cleared. Rear side portion 16 of body 12 is closed by disk 30 that is held in place by an annular snap ring 32. Disk 30 has a central aperture for receiving a detonator 34 for detonating explosive 28. Hollow cylindrical fitting 36 is attached to closure disk 30 to aid in holding detonator 34 in position.
Embedded in explosive 28 is a continous rod member 38 that is folded into a multiplicity of accordion-like pleats (see also FIGS. 3, 4). In practice, continuous rod 38 may be formed from a multiplicity of relatively short rod or picket members, as 40, 42, 44 that are arrayed in generally side-by-side disposition circumferentially around the core of the mass of explosive 28 and joined together in the manner now to be described. Each picket has opposite end portions, and is joined at one end portion to the picket on one side, as picket 40 is joined to picket 42 at 46 in FIG. 4. Each picket is also joined at the other end portion to the picket on the opposite side, as picket 40 is joined to picket 44 at 48. With side-by-side pickets joined in this way the folded continous rod member expands towards a generally annular or hooplike configuration under radially outwardly applied forces generated by detonation of the explosive mass in which it is embedded. In FIG. 4 the pickets are shown partially expanded, to facilitate explanation.
In operation (FIGS. 5, 6) obstacle clearing device 10 is positioned at a standoff distance (e.g. 10′) from the obstacles to be cleared which in this example include a concrete tetrahedron 50 protected by a coil of concertina wire 52. Device 10 is arranged with flying plate 18 pointed at tetrahedron 50, and detonated. The flying plate shatters the tetrahedron, and under the forces generated by the explosion continous rod member 38 unfolds towards a generally curvilinear, hooplike configuration and in the process of so doing the rod member or fragments thereof cut concertina 52.
In the modification of FIGS. 7-8, a plurality of plate members 18′ are arrayed around the circumferential side portions of body 12′, held in place against the inside wall of body 12′ by the mass of explosive 28′ in which continuous rod member 38′ is embedded. In this modification, there are two layers 54, 56 of plates for engaging a plurality of obstacles spaced around obstacle clearing device 10′.
As has been said, copper is the preferred material for plate 18. Purity is not critical, and commercial grade copper is well suited to the application. Other relatively dense, ductile metals such as tantalum and lead are operable, but suffer from disadvantages such as high cost or contamination potential that are not present with copper. As used herein, the term “consisting essentially of copper” means pure copper and copper-base alloys containing at least about 90 w/o copper. The thickness of plate 18 is preferably from about 0.125″ to about 0.250″. Layer 24 of elastomeric material functions to prevent shattering of plate 18 in the explosion, and a plurality of materials including buna-N and silicone rubbers are suitable for the purpose. The thickness of the elastomeric layer may for example be about 0.060″ for a 12″ diameter plate 0.250″ thick.
Continous rod member 38 is preferably made of steel from about 0.25″ to 0.50″ in diameter, with welds forming the joints between adjacent pickets. If desired, the folded rod array may be made by first making pairs of short rods or pickets with the pickets of each pair joined together at one end and arranging the pairs side by side with the joined ends together and with one picket of each pair on top of the other in the pair. Then the top picket is crossed over to the adjacent pair and welded to the bottom picket of that pair at the end opposite that at which the top picket is joined to the other picket in its own pair. Each picket may for example be about 12″ in length and it should be noted that when using the device of the present invention against light obstacles only, standoff distances may be much greater (e.g. 50-100′) depending upon the length and number of pickets in the array.
The explosive may be of any suitable, conventional high-energy type such as C-4 [about 91 w/o RDX (cyclotrimethylene trinitramine), 2.1 w/o rubber, 1.6 w/o oil and 5.3 w/o plasticizer. The detonator may be a blasting cap of any suitable type of conventional design, electrically operated or otherwise.
The radius of curvature of the concave face of plate 18 should approximate the diameter of the plate. For example, a 3″ diameter plate may have a radius of curvature of about 3.5″. Such a plate may be of about 0.125″ thickness and weigh about 0.140 kg. The radius of curvature of the aforementioned 12″ plate may be from about 12″ to 16″. Plates may range in diameter from about 1.5″ (weighing 60 g) to 22″ (weighing 33 lb.) and larger. The charge-to-mass ratio, that is to say the ratio of the mass of explosive charge to that of the plate, should be from about 1:1 to about 4:1. The 1:1 level is satisfactory only for relatively soft (e.g. wood) obstacles. But using 66 pounds of explosive to propel the aforementioned 22″, 33 lb. plate against a heavy concrete obstacle would produce satisfactory results. The charge-to-mass ratio in such an arrangement is 2:1.
It has been found that, when the explosion takes place, the shock wave front contacts the back side of the apex of the concave plate and causes it to bulge forwardly so that the concave face becomes convex as the plate is propelled toward the target by the explosive forces. The bulging continues as the plate flies along its trajectory until the plate assumes the shape of a round-nosed, hollow tube that is open at the aft end. Upon impact, the round nose is flattened and the annular tube walls impact the target. In order for there to be sufficent time for the flying plate to assume its round-nosed, hollow tube configuration, the obstacle clearing device should be placed at a standoff distance from the obstacle that is at least 1.5 times the diameter of the plate. The diameter of plate required to clear an obstacle will vary with the size of the obstacle and the larger the obstacle the larger the plate is required. Ideally, the plate diameter should approximate the size of the obstacle but plates of given diameter will destroy obstacles larger than themselves.
Clearing obstacles in accordance with the invention is highly advantageous. The clearing device may be positioned at a standoff distance from the obstacles, eliminating requirements for men to go into close proximity to place explosive charges. Moreover, one device can be employed against both light and heavy obstacles simultaneously or individually.

Claims (6)

What is claimed is:
1. Apparatus for clearing obstacles, comprising
a body member having a side portion and an internal cavity,
a metal plate member having a uniform thickness, a concave front face, and a convex rear face,
a layer of elastomeric material on the convex rear face, means mounting the plate member on the side portion of the body member,
explosive means in the cavity for propelling the plate member towards an obstacle,
folded continuous rod means contained within the body member contiguously to the explosive means for unfolding under forces generated by the explosive means to cut through obstacles, and
means for detonating the explosive means.
2. Apparatus as defined in claim 1, in which the metal plate member consists essentially of copper.
3. Apparatus as defined in claim 1, in which the body member has a plurality of side portions and a plate member mounted on each side portion.
4. Apparatus as defined in claim 1, in which the folded continuous rod means is embedded in the explosive means.
5. Apparatus as defined in claim 1, in which
the folded continous rod means comprises a plurality of side-by-side picket members having opposite end portions, and
means joining adjacent picket members to one another at their end portions for the folded rod means to expand towards a generally annular, curvilinear configuration under the forces generated by the explosive means.
6. Apparatus as defined in claim 1, in which the folded continuous rod means is arrayed in a circumferential direction around at least a portion of the explosive means.
US08/896,922 1997-07-18 1997-07-18 Clearing obstacles Abandoned USH2039H1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/896,922 USH2039H1 (en) 1997-07-18 1997-07-18 Clearing obstacles

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/896,922 USH2039H1 (en) 1997-07-18 1997-07-18 Clearing obstacles

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USH2039H1 true USH2039H1 (en) 2002-08-06

Family

ID=25407064

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/896,922 Abandoned USH2039H1 (en) 1997-07-18 1997-07-18 Clearing obstacles

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) USH2039H1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6668727B1 (en) * 2003-06-18 2003-12-30 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Explosively driven impactor grenade
US20060032391A1 (en) * 2004-08-13 2006-02-16 Brune Neal W Pyrotechnic systems and associated methods
US7284490B1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2007-10-23 Armtec Defense Products Co. Rod warhead systems and associated methods
US20070289474A1 (en) * 2006-04-07 2007-12-20 Armtec Defense Products Co. Ammunition assembly with alternate load path
US20090114111A1 (en) * 2007-10-26 2009-05-07 Andreas Heine Explosive charge
US20100274544A1 (en) * 2006-03-08 2010-10-28 Armtec Defense Products Co. Squib simulator
US8807038B1 (en) 2006-01-06 2014-08-19 Armtec Defense Products Co. Combustible cartridge cased ammunition assembly
US20160216081A1 (en) * 2013-10-23 2016-07-28 Mid-American Gunite, Inc. Dba Mid-American Group Entanglement obstacle
US11428511B2 (en) * 2017-03-31 2022-08-30 Linear Shaped Limited Linear shaped charge and structure

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6668727B1 (en) * 2003-06-18 2003-12-30 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Explosively driven impactor grenade
US7284490B1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2007-10-23 Armtec Defense Products Co. Rod warhead systems and associated methods
US20060032391A1 (en) * 2004-08-13 2006-02-16 Brune Neal W Pyrotechnic systems and associated methods
US20090223402A1 (en) * 2004-08-13 2009-09-10 Brune Neal W Pyrotechnic systems and associated methods
US8807038B1 (en) 2006-01-06 2014-08-19 Armtec Defense Products Co. Combustible cartridge cased ammunition assembly
US20100274544A1 (en) * 2006-03-08 2010-10-28 Armtec Defense Products Co. Squib simulator
US8430033B2 (en) * 2006-04-07 2013-04-30 Armtec Defense Products Co. Ammunition assembly with alternate load path
US7913625B2 (en) 2006-04-07 2011-03-29 Armtec Defense Products Co. Ammunition assembly with alternate load path
US20070289474A1 (en) * 2006-04-07 2007-12-20 Armtec Defense Products Co. Ammunition assembly with alternate load path
US7810431B2 (en) * 2007-10-26 2010-10-12 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Explosive charge
US20090114111A1 (en) * 2007-10-26 2009-05-07 Andreas Heine Explosive charge
US20160216081A1 (en) * 2013-10-23 2016-07-28 Mid-American Gunite, Inc. Dba Mid-American Group Entanglement obstacle
US9784537B2 (en) * 2013-10-23 2017-10-10 Mid-American Gunite, Inc. Entanglement obstacle
US11428511B2 (en) * 2017-03-31 2022-08-30 Linear Shaped Limited Linear shaped charge and structure

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5698814A (en) Hard target penetrator with multi-segmenting casing cutter
US4955939A (en) Shaped charge with explosively driven liquid follow through
CA2644646C (en) An explosive charge
KR100990443B1 (en) Projectiles possessing high penetration and lateral effect with integrated disintegration arrangement
US8375859B2 (en) Shaped explosive charge
US20090178548A1 (en) Detonation interrupter
US4854240A (en) Two-stage shaped charge projectile
USH2039H1 (en) Clearing obstacles
EP0706026B1 (en) Warhead for destruction of deeply buried and hardened targets
JP2004501339A (en) Self-propelled projectile with penetrating core
US6308634B1 (en) Precursor-follow through explosively formed penetrator assembly
US6467416B1 (en) Combined high-blast/anti-armor warheads
US8316772B1 (en) Wall breaching fragmentation warhead
US6868791B1 (en) Single stage kinetic energy warhead utilizing a barrier-breaching projectile followed by a target-defeating explosively formed projectile
US8297190B1 (en) Door breaching device with radially expandable explosive
WO2004070311A2 (en) Double explosively-formed ring (defr) warhead
GB2214618A (en) Elongate, flexible hollow charges
RU2327948C2 (en) Fragmentation beam projectile "otroch"
CN210426266U (en) Cloud explodes mine-sweeping bomb
US7284490B1 (en) Rod warhead systems and associated methods
USH344H (en) High velocity canting shaped charge warhead
CN209945155U (en) Cloud explodes mine sweeping device
CA1281213C (en) Method for explosively welding a tube to a tubesheet while preventing separation of cladding from the tubesheet
RU2172923C1 (en) Guided missile
RU2427789C2 (en) Tverich-5 fragmentation-beam shell

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: NAVY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOLT, WILLIAM H.;ROZNER, ALEXANDER G.;HOWDER, BERNARD P.;REEL/FRAME:008728/0850;SIGNING DATES FROM 19970623 TO 19970703

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE