US9958359B2 - Tire performance testing apparatus - Google Patents

Tire performance testing apparatus Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US9958359B2
US9958359B2 US14/898,703 US201414898703A US9958359B2 US 9958359 B2 US9958359 B2 US 9958359B2 US 201414898703 A US201414898703 A US 201414898703A US 9958359 B2 US9958359 B2 US 9958359B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
projection
tire
running surface
tire running
testing apparatus
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US14/898,703
Other versions
US20160131554A1 (en
Inventor
Koichi Usami
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bridgestone Corp
Original Assignee
Bridgestone Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bridgestone Corp filed Critical Bridgestone Corp
Assigned to BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION reassignment BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: USAMI, KOICHI
Publication of US20160131554A1 publication Critical patent/US20160131554A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US9958359B2 publication Critical patent/US9958359B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M17/00Testing of vehicles
    • G01M17/007Wheeled or endless-tracked vehicles
    • G01M17/02Tyres
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M17/00Testing of vehicles
    • G01M17/007Wheeled or endless-tracked vehicles
    • G01M17/02Tyres
    • G01M17/021Tyre supporting devices, e.g. chucks
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M17/00Testing of vehicles
    • G01M17/007Wheeled or endless-tracked vehicles
    • G01M17/04Suspension or damping
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M17/00Testing of vehicles
    • G01M17/007Wheeled or endless-tracked vehicles
    • G01M17/06Steering behaviour; Rolling behaviour
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M7/00Vibration-testing of structures; Shock-testing of structures
    • G01M7/08Shock-testing

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a tire performance testing apparatus capable of reproducing conditions in which a tire hits a projection after moving in the air while it runs on an actual road.
  • Patent Document 1 Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2006-30046
  • a projection herein refers to a projection protruding upward from the bottom of a pothole or the opening edge (rim) of the pothole.
  • the conventional performance test cannot reproduce the running conditions on an actual road having a pothole present therein, that is, the running conditions of a tire hitting the projection after getting airborne. Hence, the conventional performance test could not be a tire performance test in response to the running conditions on an actual road having potholes.
  • the present invention which can reproduce the running conditions on an actual road having a pothole, that is, the running conditions of a tire hitting the projection after moving in the air, provides a tire performance testing apparatus that can perform a tire performance evaluation in response to the running conditions on an actual road having a pothole therein.
  • a tire performance testing apparatus includes a tire running surface, a projection installing surface disposed on the front side of the end of the tire running surface in the traveling direction of a vehicle traveling on the tire running surface and positioned lower than the end of the tire running surface, and a projection disposed on the projection installing surface in such a manner as to protrude upward from the projection installing surface.
  • the distance between the end of the tire running surface and the projection is so set that the tire of a vehicle traveling on the tire running surface hits the projection after moving in the air away from the end of the tire running surface. Therefore, the running conditions on an actual road having a pothole therein can be reproduced, and thus a tire performance testing apparatus capable of performing a tire performance evaluation in response to the running conditions on an actual road having potholes can be realized.
  • FIG. 1 is a plan view showing a tire performance testing apparatus.
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing a tire performance testing apparatus.
  • FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view showing an example of a test using a tire performance testing apparatus.
  • FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view showing an example of a test using a tire performance testing apparatus.
  • a tire performance testing apparatus 1 includes a tire running surface 2 , a projection installing surface 3 , a projection 4 , a distance adjusting means 5 for adjusting the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 , a projection height adjusting means for adjusting the height of the projection 4 , and an angle adjusting means for adjusting the angle of intersection of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 with the traveling direction F of the vehicle.
  • the tire running surface 2 is formed by plate surfaces 23 , 23 , . . . of a plurality of plates 22 , 22 , . . . such as steel plates so disposed as to cover the top opening 24 of a pocket 21 dug in the ground 10 , such as a paved or dirt road for testing.
  • the projection installing surface 3 is formed by a plate surface 34 of a projection securing plate 33 fixed to a pocket bottom surface 32 of a pocket 31 formed by digging the ground 10 , for instance.
  • the projection securing plate 33 is formed by a circular plate, for instance.
  • the projection installing surface 3 is a surface located on the front side of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 in the traveling direction F of a not-shown vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 and lower than the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 .
  • pocket 21 and the pocket 31 are so formed as to be continuous with each other.
  • the projection 4 is installed on the projection installing surface 3 in such a manner that the upper edge 4 t facing the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 is in parallel with the projection installing surface 3 and extends in a direction intersecting the traveling direction F of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 .
  • the projection 4 is formed by one or more of metallic square bar member 40 having a square cross section, for instance. And the projection 4 is fixed to the projection installing surface 3 such that one square edge of the four peripheral square edges positioned in the uppermost position of the square bar member 40 becomes the above-mentioned upper edge 4 t .
  • the upper edge 4 t is preferably formed into a rounded shape by so-called chamfering, for instance.
  • the tire performance testing apparatus 1 is configured such that the projection installing surface 3 is disposed on the pocket bottom surface 32 positioned on the front side of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 in the traveling direction of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 .
  • This provides a difference in level between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection installing surface 3 , and the projection 4 is so installed as to protrude upward from the projection installing surface 3 .
  • there is a distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 such that the tire 9 (see FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 ) of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 hits the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 after passing the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and getting airborne.
  • a distance adjusting means 5 is a means so structured as to be capable of changing the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 by increasing or decreasing the plurality of plates 22 , 22 , . . . which form the tire running surface 2 .
  • the distance adjusting means 5 is so structured as to have mounting grooves 26 , 26 formed in a pair of plate members 27 , 27 disposed on a pair of mutually facing inner wall surfaces of the pocket 21 and the plurality of plates 22 , 22 , . . . which are detachably fitted to the mounting grooves 26 , 26 .
  • the tire running surface 2 is formed with a pair of edge ends 28 , 28 of each of the plurality of plates 22 , 22 , . . inserted into and supported by the mounting grooves 26 , 26 .
  • the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 can be changed by increasing or decreasing the plates 22 , 22 , . . . .
  • the projection height adjusting means is comprised of the above-mentioned plurality of square bar members 40 , 40 , . . . which are stacked with the surfaces thereof butting each other and joined detachably by a not-shown joining means. And the height of the projection 4 , which is the height from the projection installing surface 3 to the square edge 41 in the topmost position functioning as the upper edge 4 t of the square bar member 40 , can be adjusted by adjusting the number of the square bar members 40 , 40 , . . . to be stacked.
  • the height of the projection 4 is adjusted so that it is less than the height of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 , for instance.
  • the height of the projection 4 is chosen to be about the same as the height of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 , then it is possible to reproduce, by the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 , the opening edge of a pothole against which the tire of the vehicle passing over a pothole in an actual road bumps after moving in the air (the opening edge (rim) located on the front side of the opening edge of the pothole where the tire takes off in the traveling direction of the vehicle).
  • the height of the projection 4 is chosen to be less than the height of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 , then it is possible to reproduce, by the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 , a protrusion inside a pothole against which the tire of the vehicle passing over the pothole in an actual road bumps after moving in the air.
  • the angle adjusting means is constructed such that the above-described projection 4 is detachably installed on the projection installing surface 3 , for instance. As such, it is possible to change the angle of intersection of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 with the traveling direction F of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 .
  • the plate 22 constituting the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 is preferably so formed as to be parallel with the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 .
  • the dimension chosen for the level difference between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection installing surface 3 was 16 cm.
  • the total length of the performance testing apparatus was 3 m 50 cm, and the width dimension of the tire running surface 2 was 1 m.
  • the projection height adjusting means which consisted of 8 pieces of 2 cm-thick square bar member 40 , was so configured as to be able to increase or decrease the height of the projection 4 at intervals of 2 cm.
  • the height dimension from the projection installing surface 3 of the projection 4 to the upper edge 4 t could be set to 16 cm by stacking the 8 pieces of square bar member 40 , 40 , . . . with the surfaces thereof butting each other.
  • the upper edge 4 t could be set lower than the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 as shown in FIG. 3 , for instance. Also, the upper edge 4 t could be set on the same horizontal plane as the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 as shown in FIG. 4 .
  • the angle adjusting means was so configured as to be able to set the acute angle ⁇ of intersection of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 with the traveling direction F of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 (see FIG. 1 ) to 85 degrees, 75 degrees, 45 degrees, and 15 degrees.
  • the angle adjusting means can be realized, for example, by setting the installing positions for the projection 4 , in advance, which allows the setting of the acute angle ⁇ to 85 degrees, 75 degrees, 45 degrees, or 15 degrees, on the projection installing surface 3 of the projection securing plate 33 fixed to the pocket bottom surface 32 .
  • the angle adjusting means may be realized by an arrangement in which the circular plate constituting the projection installing surface 3 can rotate around the center of the circular plate.
  • the distance adjusting means 5 was so configured that the plate 22 forming the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 has the end 25 in parallel with the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 which is set to a desired acute angle ⁇ by the angle adjusting means, for instance.
  • the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 can be lengthened by reducing the number of plates 22 other than the plate 22 having the end 25 .
  • the distance adjusting means 5 may, for instance, be so configured that all the plates 22 , 22 , . . . forming the tire running surface 2 are square plates having the sides thereof perpendicular to the traveling direction F of the vehicle. In such a configuration, the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 can be lengthened by reducing the number of plates 22 from the side closer to the projection 4 . In this case, it should be noted that the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 along the traveling direction F of the vehicle varies with the position in the direction along the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 . This problem can be solved by taking care in each testing to have the vehicle run in the center of the tire running surface 2 .
  • A denotes the tire 9 running on the tire running surface 2
  • B the tire 9 hitting the projection 4 after getting airborne away from the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 .
  • a pinch cut is a fissure (cracking) that occurs when a carcass cord in the tire 9 is severed and a part of the sidewall of the tire 9 swells under the air pressure. This pinch cut is caused when the side rubber of the tire 9 is caught between the rim 9 a on which the tire 9 is fitted and the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 .
  • pinch cuts do not occur in the tire 9 when the tire 9 comes in contact with the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 after landing on the projection installing surface 3 after moving in the air away from the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 as shown in FIG. 3 .
  • pinch cuts occur in the tire 9 when the tire 9 comes in contact with the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 after moving in the air away from the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 as shown in FIG. 4 .
  • a tire performance testing apparatus 1 could be realized which can reproduce conditions likely to cause pinch cuts. And this made it possible to obtain various data useful in designing and manufacturing tires with durability causing no pinch cuts.
  • the tire 9 of a vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 gets airborne from the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and then hits the projection 4 .
  • the projection 4 it is possible to reproduce the same conditions as when the tire 9 of a vehicle passing over a pothole in an actual road hits a projection protruding upward from the bottom of the pothole or the rim (opening edge) of the pothole.
  • a distance adjusting means 5 is provided to adjust the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 .
  • a projection height adjusting means is provided to adjust the height of the projection 4 .
  • the projection 4 is installed on the projection installing surface 3 in such a manner that the upper edge 4 t thereof facing the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 is in parallel with the projection installing surface 3 and extends in a direction intersecting the traveling direction F of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 .
  • an angle adjusting means is provided to adjust the angle of intersection of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 with the traveling direction F of the vehicle.
  • the angle of intersection of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 with the traveling direction F of the vehicle can be changed easily, which makes it possible to reproduce the varied conditions of the projection inside of the pothole or the rim of the pothole present in the road. And this enables the tire performance evaluation to be carried out for the varied conditions of the projection inside of the pothole or the rim of the pothole present in the road.
  • the tire performance test using a tire performance testing apparatus 1 can produce various data useful in designing and manufacturing tires with durability that do not cause pinch cuts in the running on an actual road with pot holes present therein.
  • a plate surface 34 of a projection securing plate 33 such as a circular plate, for instance, is used to constitute a projection installing surface 3 .
  • fixing the projection 4 to the projection installing surface 3 or changing the angle of intersection of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 with the traveling direction F of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 can be performed easily and accurately.
  • cover supports 35 , 35 to support a not-shown cover plate may be provided on the inner walls facing each other of the pocket 31 such that the upper surface of the cover plate covering the top opening of the pocket 31 is positioned on the same plane with the tire running surface 2 . Then, with a projection installed on the upper surface of the cover plate, a tire performance test can be performed by reproducing the conditions in which a tire running on a road hits a projection protruding from the road surface.
  • a pocket bottom surface 32 of a pocket 31 formed by digging the ground 10 may be used as a projection installing surface 3 .
  • a projection 4 may be installed on the pocket bottom surface 32 functioning as the projection installing surface 3 .
  • a tire performance testing apparatus 1 may be so configured that the projection installing surface 3 is formed by a plate surface 34 of a projection securing plate 33 fixed to the ground 10 or by the ground 10 .
  • the tire running surface 2 may be formed in a position higher than the ground 10 .
  • the projection 4 may be secured to a projection installing surface 3 which is a surface located on the front side of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 in the traveling direction F of the vehicle and lower than the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 .
  • the upper edge of the projection 4 may be disposed in a position lower than the height of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 .
  • the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 may be changed by shifting the tire running surface 2 or the projection 4 .
  • the height of the projection 4 may be adjusted by preparing a plurality of projections 4 having different heights and switching among the projections 4 .
  • the tire performance testing apparatus places no particular limitations on the material and shape of the projection 4 . Also, there is no particular limitation on the shape of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 .
  • the tire performance testing apparatus may be so configured that the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 installed on the projection installing surface 3 is located higher than the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 .
  • the tire performance testing apparatus may be so configured that the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 installed on the projection installing surface 3 is located higher than the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 .

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Tires In General (AREA)

Abstract

A tire performance testing apparatus capable of reproducing conditions in which tire runs on actual road having a pothole, that is, conditions in which tire hits projection after moving in the air. The tire performance testing apparatus includes a tire running surface, a projection installing surface disposed on the front side of the end of the tire running surface in the traveling direction of a vehicle traveling on the tire running surface and positioned lower than the end of the tire running surface, and a projection disposed on the projection installing surface in such a manner as to protrude upward from the projection installing surface. And the distance between the end of the tire running surface and the projection is so set that the tire of a vehicle traveling on the tire running surface hits the projection after getting airborne away from the end of the tire running surface.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to a tire performance testing apparatus capable of reproducing conditions in which a tire hits a projection after moving in the air while it runs on an actual road.
BACKGROUND ART
There have been tire performance tests reproducing conditions in which a tire running on an actual road hits a projection. In one of such tests known, a projection is set on a tire running surface on which a tire runs, and the tire is made to climb over the projection (see Patent Document 1).
PRIOR ART DOCUMENT Patent Document
Patent Document 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2006-30046
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Problems to be Solved by the Invention
Actual roads may have potholes which are depression holes in the road surface. And when a vehicle passes over such a pothole, there occur conditions in which a tire after moving in the air (getting airborne) hits a projection. Note that a projection herein refers to a projection protruding upward from the bottom of a pothole or the opening edge (rim) of the pothole.
During the passage of the vehicle over a pothole like this, the suspension of the vehicle is extended while the tire is moving in the air. On the other hand, in a tire performance test as described above, the tire hits the projection on a tire running surface with the suspension of the vehicle contracted.
As described above, there exists a difference in the state of the suspension of the vehicle between the case where the tire hits a projection after moving in the air and the case where the tire hits a projection present on the tire running surface. The conventional performance test cannot reproduce the running conditions on an actual road having a pothole present therein, that is, the running conditions of a tire hitting the projection after getting airborne. Hence, the conventional performance test could not be a tire performance test in response to the running conditions on an actual road having potholes.
The present invention, which can reproduce the running conditions on an actual road having a pothole, that is, the running conditions of a tire hitting the projection after moving in the air, provides a tire performance testing apparatus that can perform a tire performance evaluation in response to the running conditions on an actual road having a pothole therein.
Means for Solving the Problem
A tire performance testing apparatus according to the present invention includes a tire running surface, a projection installing surface disposed on the front side of the end of the tire running surface in the traveling direction of a vehicle traveling on the tire running surface and positioned lower than the end of the tire running surface, and a projection disposed on the projection installing surface in such a manner as to protrude upward from the projection installing surface. And the distance between the end of the tire running surface and the projection is so set that the tire of a vehicle traveling on the tire running surface hits the projection after moving in the air away from the end of the tire running surface. Therefore, the running conditions on an actual road having a pothole therein can be reproduced, and thus a tire performance testing apparatus capable of performing a tire performance evaluation in response to the running conditions on an actual road having potholes can be realized.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a plan view showing a tire performance testing apparatus.
FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing a tire performance testing apparatus.
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view showing an example of a test using a tire performance testing apparatus.
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view showing an example of a test using a tire performance testing apparatus.
Hereinafter, the invention will be described based on preferred embodiments which do not intend to limit the scope of the claims of the present invention but exemplify the invention. All of the features and the combinations thereof described in the embodiments are not necessarily essential to the invention. The embodiments should be understood to include those consisting of selectively adopted features.
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION First Embodiment
As shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, a tire performance testing apparatus 1 includes a tire running surface 2, a projection installing surface 3, a projection 4, a distance adjusting means 5 for adjusting the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4, a projection height adjusting means for adjusting the height of the projection 4, and an angle adjusting means for adjusting the angle of intersection of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 with the traveling direction F of the vehicle.
The tire running surface 2 is formed by plate surfaces 23, 23, . . . of a plurality of plates 22, 22, . . . such as steel plates so disposed as to cover the top opening 24 of a pocket 21 dug in the ground 10, such as a paved or dirt road for testing.
The projection installing surface 3 is formed by a plate surface 34 of a projection securing plate 33 fixed to a pocket bottom surface 32 of a pocket 31 formed by digging the ground 10, for instance. The projection securing plate 33 is formed by a circular plate, for instance.
The projection installing surface 3 is a surface located on the front side of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 in the traveling direction F of a not-shown vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 and lower than the end 25 of the tire running surface 2.
It is to be noted that the pocket 21 and the pocket 31 are so formed as to be continuous with each other.
The projection 4 is installed on the projection installing surface 3 in such a manner that the upper edge 4 t facing the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 is in parallel with the projection installing surface 3 and extends in a direction intersecting the traveling direction F of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2.
The projection 4 is formed by one or more of metallic square bar member 40 having a square cross section, for instance. And the projection 4 is fixed to the projection installing surface 3 such that one square edge of the four peripheral square edges positioned in the uppermost position of the square bar member 40 becomes the above-mentioned upper edge 4 t. Note that the upper edge 4 t is preferably formed into a rounded shape by so-called chamfering, for instance.
More specifically, the tire performance testing apparatus 1 is configured such that the projection installing surface 3 is disposed on the pocket bottom surface 32 positioned on the front side of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 in the traveling direction of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2. This provides a difference in level between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection installing surface 3, and the projection 4 is so installed as to protrude upward from the projection installing surface 3. And there is a distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 such that the tire 9 (see FIG. 3 and FIG. 4) of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 hits the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 after passing the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and getting airborne. Thus there is a distance set between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4.
A distance adjusting means 5 is a means so structured as to be capable of changing the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 by increasing or decreasing the plurality of plates 22, 22, . . . which form the tire running surface 2. For example, the distance adjusting means 5 is so structured as to have mounting grooves 26, 26 formed in a pair of plate members 27, 27 disposed on a pair of mutually facing inner wall surfaces of the pocket 21 and the plurality of plates 22, 22, . . . which are detachably fitted to the mounting grooves 26, 26.
That is, according to the configuration provided with the distance adjusting means 5, the tire running surface 2 is formed with a pair of edge ends 28, 28 of each of the plurality of plates 22, 22, . . inserted into and supported by the mounting grooves 26, 26. And the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 can be changed by increasing or decreasing the plates 22, 22, . . . .
The projection height adjusting means is comprised of the above-mentioned plurality of square bar members 40, 40, . . . which are stacked with the surfaces thereof butting each other and joined detachably by a not-shown joining means. And the height of the projection 4, which is the height from the projection installing surface 3 to the square edge 41 in the topmost position functioning as the upper edge 4 t of the square bar member 40, can be adjusted by adjusting the number of the square bar members 40, 40, . . . to be stacked.
The height of the projection 4 is adjusted so that it is less than the height of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2, for instance.
If the height of the projection 4 is chosen to be about the same as the height of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2, then it is possible to reproduce, by the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4, the opening edge of a pothole against which the tire of the vehicle passing over a pothole in an actual road bumps after moving in the air (the opening edge (rim) located on the front side of the opening edge of the pothole where the tire takes off in the traveling direction of the vehicle).
Also, if the height of the projection 4 is chosen to be less than the height of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2, then it is possible to reproduce, by the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4, a protrusion inside a pothole against which the tire of the vehicle passing over the pothole in an actual road bumps after moving in the air.
The angle adjusting means is constructed such that the above-described projection 4 is detachably installed on the projection installing surface 3, for instance. As such, it is possible to change the angle of intersection of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 with the traveling direction F of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2.
It is to be noted that, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the plate 22 constituting the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 is preferably so formed as to be parallel with the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4. This makes the distance along the traveling direction F of the vehicle between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 exactly the same in any position along the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4. Therefore, even if there is some shift in the take-off position of the tire 9 of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 along the direction of the end 25 in each testing, the results will be obtained under the same testing conditions.
Specific Example
The dimension chosen for the level difference between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection installing surface 3 was 16 cm.
The total length of the performance testing apparatus was 3 m 50 cm, and the width dimension of the tire running surface 2 was 1 m.
The projection height adjusting means, which consisted of 8 pieces of 2 cm-thick square bar member 40, was so configured as to be able to increase or decrease the height of the projection 4 at intervals of 2 cm. In this case, the height dimension from the projection installing surface 3 of the projection 4 to the upper edge 4 t could be set to 16 cm by stacking the 8 pieces of square bar member 40, 40, . . . with the surfaces thereof butting each other. Thus it was possible to position the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 on the same horizontal plane.
With the projection height adjusting means provided, the upper edge 4 t could be set lower than the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 as shown in FIG. 3, for instance. Also, the upper edge 4 t could be set on the same horizontal plane as the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 as shown in FIG. 4.
The angle adjusting means was so configured as to be able to set the acute angle α of intersection of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 with the traveling direction F of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 (see FIG. 1) to 85 degrees, 75 degrees, 45 degrees, and 15 degrees. The angle adjusting means can be realized, for example, by setting the installing positions for the projection 4, in advance, which allows the setting of the acute angle α to 85 degrees, 75 degrees, 45 degrees, or 15 degrees, on the projection installing surface 3 of the projection securing plate 33 fixed to the pocket bottom surface 32. Otherwise, the angle adjusting means may be realized by an arrangement in which the circular plate constituting the projection installing surface 3 can rotate around the center of the circular plate.
The distance adjusting means 5 was so configured that the plate 22 forming the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 has the end 25 in parallel with the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 which is set to a desired acute angle α by the angle adjusting means, for instance. In this configuration, the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 can be lengthened by reducing the number of plates 22 other than the plate 22 having the end 25.
It is to be noted that the distance adjusting means 5 may, for instance, be so configured that all the plates 22, 22, . . . forming the tire running surface 2 are square plates having the sides thereof perpendicular to the traveling direction F of the vehicle. In such a configuration, the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 can be lengthened by reducing the number of plates 22 from the side closer to the projection 4. In this case, it should be noted that the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 along the traveling direction F of the vehicle varies with the position in the direction along the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4. This problem can be solved by taking care in each testing to have the vehicle run in the center of the tire running surface 2.
In a setting where the projection 4 is installed with the upper edge 4 t thereof positioned lower than the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 as shown in FIG. 3, tests were conducted with the height from the projection installing surface 3 to the upper edge 4 t being 6 cm, the acute angle α of the upper edge 4 t intersecting with the traveling direction F of the vehicle being 75 degrees, the traveling speed of the vehicle being 50 to 85 km, and the tire size being 195/70. As a result, no pinch cuts were observed to occur in the tire 9.
In a setting where the projection 4 is installed with the upper edge 4 t thereof positioned on the same horizontal plane with the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 as shown in FIG. 4, tests were conducted with the acute angle α of the upper edge 4 t intersecting with the traveling direction F of the vehicle being 75 degrees, the traveling speed of the vehicle being 65 km, and the tire size being 195/70. As a result, pinch cuts were observed to occur in the buttress region of the tire 9.
In FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, A denotes the tire 9 running on the tire running surface 2, and B the tire 9 hitting the projection 4 after getting airborne away from the end 25 of the tire running surface 2.
Note that a pinch cut is a fissure (cracking) that occurs when a carcass cord in the tire 9 is severed and a part of the sidewall of the tire 9 swells under the air pressure. This pinch cut is caused when the side rubber of the tire 9 is caught between the rim 9 a on which the tire 9 is fitted and the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4.
That is, according to the results of the tests, pinch cuts do not occur in the tire 9 when the tire 9 comes in contact with the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 after landing on the projection installing surface 3 after moving in the air away from the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 as shown in FIG. 3. And pinch cuts occur in the tire 9 when the tire 9 comes in contact with the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 after moving in the air away from the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 as shown in FIG. 4.
From this, it was found that when a vehicle passes over a pothole present in an actual road, pinch cuts seldom occur if the tire hits a projection inside the pothole or the opening edge of the pothole after landing on the projection installing surface 3 after moving in the air. Also, it was found that pinch cuts are likely to occur if the tire hits a projection inside the pothole or the opening edge of the pothole without landing on the projection installing surface 3 after getting airborne.
Accordingly, a tire performance testing apparatus 1 could be realized which can reproduce conditions likely to cause pinch cuts. And this made it possible to obtain various data useful in designing and manufacturing tires with durability causing no pinch cuts.
With the tire performance testing apparatus 1 of a structure as described above, the tire 9 of a vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 gets airborne from the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and then hits the projection 4. Hence, it is possible to reproduce the same conditions as when the tire 9 of a vehicle passing over a pothole in an actual road hits a projection protruding upward from the bottom of the pothole or the rim (opening edge) of the pothole.
In other words, it is possible to reproduce the running conditions of a tire on an actual road with a pothole therein, that is, the running conditions of a tire 9 hitting a projection 4 after moving in the air. And this enables a tire performance evaluation to be carried out in accordance with the running conditions of a tire on an actual road with a pothole therein.
Also, a distance adjusting means 5 is provided to adjust the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4. As a result, it is now possible to reproduce the varied sizes of the pothole present in a road. And this enables the tire performance evaluation to be carried out for the varied sizes of the pothole present in a road.
Also, a projection height adjusting means is provided to adjust the height of the projection 4. As a result, it is possible to reproduce the varied conditions of the projection inside of the pothole or the rim of the pothole present in a road. And this enables the tire performance evaluation to be carried out for the varied conditions of the projection inside of the pothole or the rim of the pothole present in the road.
Also, the projection 4 is installed on the projection installing surface 3 in such a manner that the upper edge 4 t thereof facing the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 is in parallel with the projection installing surface 3 and extends in a direction intersecting the traveling direction F of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2. As a result, it is possible to reproduce the varied conditions of the projection inside of the pothole or the rim of the pothole present in the road. And this enables the tire performance evaluation to be carried out for the varied conditions of the projection inside of the pothole or the rim of the pothole present in the road.
Furthermore, an angle adjusting means is provided to adjust the angle of intersection of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 with the traveling direction F of the vehicle. As a result, the angle of intersection of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 with the traveling direction F of the vehicle can be changed easily, which makes it possible to reproduce the varied conditions of the projection inside of the pothole or the rim of the pothole present in the road. And this enables the tire performance evaluation to be carried out for the varied conditions of the projection inside of the pothole or the rim of the pothole present in the road.
In other words, the tire performance test using a tire performance testing apparatus 1 can produce various data useful in designing and manufacturing tires with durability that do not cause pinch cuts in the running on an actual road with pot holes present therein.
Also, a plate surface 34 of a projection securing plate 33, such as a circular plate, for instance, is used to constitute a projection installing surface 3. As a result, fixing the projection 4 to the projection installing surface 3 or changing the angle of intersection of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 with the traveling direction F of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface 2 can be performed easily and accurately.
Also, cover supports 35, 35 to support a not-shown cover plate may be provided on the inner walls facing each other of the pocket 31 such that the upper surface of the cover plate covering the top opening of the pocket 31 is positioned on the same plane with the tire running surface 2. Then, with a projection installed on the upper surface of the cover plate, a tire performance test can be performed by reproducing the conditions in which a tire running on a road hits a projection protruding from the road surface.
Second Embodiment
A pocket bottom surface 32 of a pocket 31 formed by digging the ground 10 may be used as a projection installing surface 3. And a projection 4 may be installed on the pocket bottom surface 32 functioning as the projection installing surface 3.
Third Embodiment
A tire performance testing apparatus 1 may be so configured that the projection installing surface 3 is formed by a plate surface 34 of a projection securing plate 33 fixed to the ground 10 or by the ground 10. At the same time, the tire running surface 2 may be formed in a position higher than the ground 10. And the projection 4 may be secured to a projection installing surface 3 which is a surface located on the front side of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 in the traveling direction F of the vehicle and lower than the end 25 of the tire running surface 2. And the upper edge of the projection 4 may be disposed in a position lower than the height of the end 25 of the tire running surface 2.
With the tire performance testing apparatus 1 configured as described above, the distance between the end 25 of the tire running surface 2 and the projection 4 may be changed by shifting the tire running surface 2 or the projection 4.
Fourth Embodiment
The height of the projection 4 may be adjusted by preparing a plurality of projections 4 having different heights and switching among the projections 4.
It is to be noted that the tire performance testing apparatus according to the present invention places no particular limitations on the material and shape of the projection 4. Also, there is no particular limitation on the shape of the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4.
Also, the tire performance testing apparatus according to the present invention may be so configured that the upper edge 4 t of the projection 4 installed on the projection installing surface 3 is located higher than the end 25 of the tire running surface 2. In such a configuration, it is possible to reproduce a pothole present in an actual road whose rim the tire of the vehicle passing over the pothole hits after getting airborne is higher than the rim of the pothole from which the tire takes off. And this enables a tire performance evaluation to be carried out for the conditions where the tire runs over such a pot hole.
DESCRIPTION OF REFERENCE NUMERALS
  • 1 tire performance testing apparatus
  • 2 tire running surface
  • 3 projection installing surface
  • 4 projection
  • 4 t upper edge of projection
  • 5 distance adjusting means
  • 9 tire
  • 25 end of tire running surface

Claims (9)

The invention claimed is:
1. A tire performance testing apparatus comprising:
a discontinuous tire running surface formed by a plurality of plates;
a projection installing surface disposed on a front side of an end of the tire running surface in a traveling direction of a vehicle traveling on the tire running surface, the projection installing surface being positioned lower than the end of the tire running surface; and
a projection disposed on the projection installing surface such that: (i) the projection protrudes upward from the projection installing surface, (ii) a distance between the end of the tire running surface and the projection is set such that a tire of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface contacts the projection after becoming airborne from the end of the tire running surface, and (iii) an upper edge of the projection faces the end of the tire running surface.
2. The tire performance testing apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a plurality of square bar members to adjust a height of the projection.
3. The tire performance testing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the projection is formed by the plurality of square bars and installed on the projection installing surface in such a manner that the upper edge facing the end of the tire running surface is in parallel with the projection installing surface and extends in a direction intersecting the traveling direction of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface.
4. The tire performance testing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the projection is formed by a square bar and installed on the projection installing surface in such a manner that the upper edge facing the end of the tire running surface is in parallel with the projection installing surface and extends in a direction intersecting the traveling direction of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface.
5. The tire performance testing apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the projection is detachably installed on the projection installing surface to adjust an angle of intersection of the upper edge of the projection with the traveling direction of the vehicle.
6. The tire performance testing apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a plurality of mounting grooves in which the plurality of plates are detachably fitted to adjust the distance between the end of the tire running surface and the projection.
7. The tire performance testing apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the projection is formed by a square bar and installed on the projection installing surface in such a manner that the upper edge facing the end of the tire running surface is in parallel with the projection installing surface and extends in a direction intersecting the traveling direction of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface.
8. The tire performance testing apparatus according to claim 6, further comprising a plurality of square bar members to adjust a height of the projection.
9. The tire performance testing apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the projection is formed by the plurality of square bars and installed on the projection installing surface in such a manner that the upper edge facing the end of the tire running surface is in parallel with the projection installing surface and extends in a direction intersecting the traveling direction of the vehicle traveling on the tire running surface.
US14/898,703 2013-06-25 2014-05-13 Tire performance testing apparatus Active 2034-08-18 US9958359B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013132552A JP5600777B1 (en) 2013-06-25 2013-06-25 Tire performance test equipment
JP2013-132552 2013-06-25
PCT/JP2014/062703 WO2014208211A1 (en) 2013-06-25 2014-05-13 Tire performance testing device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160131554A1 US20160131554A1 (en) 2016-05-12
US9958359B2 true US9958359B2 (en) 2018-05-01

Family

ID=51840355

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/898,703 Active 2034-08-18 US9958359B2 (en) 2013-06-25 2014-05-13 Tire performance testing apparatus

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US9958359B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3015842B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5600777B1 (en)
CN (1) CN105339772B (en)
WO (1) WO2014208211A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106596143A (en) * 2016-12-12 2017-04-26 上海汽车集团股份有限公司 Tire road impact test device
CN114659806B (en) * 2022-03-29 2023-11-10 重庆长安汽车股份有限公司 Dust road for whole vehicle road test and test method

Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4002051A (en) 1974-05-18 1977-01-11 Maschinenfabrik Koppern & Co., Kg Method for determining the behavior of a shock absorber of a motor vehicle arranged in the wheel suspension and a jig for performing the method
JPS61254702A (en) 1985-04-30 1986-11-12 マツダ株式会社 Construction of test course for vehicle
JPH0645203Y2 (en) 1990-07-17 1994-11-16 動力炉・核燃料開発事業団 Depth measurement device for upper open box structure
DE4431794A1 (en) 1994-09-06 1996-03-07 Langlechner Richard Gmbh Method and device for determining the properties of shock absorbers installed in a motor vehicle
KR20050120262A (en) 2004-06-18 2005-12-22 한국타이어 주식회사 Dynamic impact load addition and impact tester of tire tread
JP2006030046A (en) 2004-07-20 2006-02-02 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Tire curbstone run-over testing method and device
KR20060041329A (en) 2004-11-08 2006-05-11 한국타이어 주식회사 Impact resistance force measuring apparatus of tire sidewall
US20060218999A1 (en) * 2005-04-05 2006-10-05 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Test apparatus for accelerated wheel and suspension component structural durability
EP1757918A1 (en) 2005-08-26 2007-02-28 Bose Corporation Vehicle suspension testing and demonstrating
JP2008026132A (en) 2006-07-20 2008-02-07 Bridgestone Corp Device and method for running test of vehicle
CN101187597A (en) 2006-11-20 2008-05-28 韩国轮胎株式会社 Impact force measuring apparatus of traveling tire
DE102007006041A1 (en) * 2006-12-22 2008-06-26 Daimler Ag Method for testing steering system of vehicle, during steering movement of vehicle against barrier, particularly curbstone, involves supporting curbstone adapter serving as barrier and is moved against vehicle
US20090000371A1 (en) * 2007-06-26 2009-01-01 The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. Tire characteristic judging method and tire characteristic judging device
KR20110065793A (en) 2009-12-10 2011-06-16 금호타이어 주식회사 Device for measuring impact force of tire
KR20120060562A (en) 2010-12-02 2012-06-12 한국타이어 주식회사 Vehicle tire impact test apparatus

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0645230Y2 (en) * 1989-02-14 1994-11-16 株式会社明電舎 Roller for chassis dynamometer

Patent Citations (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4002051A (en) 1974-05-18 1977-01-11 Maschinenfabrik Koppern & Co., Kg Method for determining the behavior of a shock absorber of a motor vehicle arranged in the wheel suspension and a jig for performing the method
JPS61254702A (en) 1985-04-30 1986-11-12 マツダ株式会社 Construction of test course for vehicle
JPH0645203Y2 (en) 1990-07-17 1994-11-16 動力炉・核燃料開発事業団 Depth measurement device for upper open box structure
DE4431794A1 (en) 1994-09-06 1996-03-07 Langlechner Richard Gmbh Method and device for determining the properties of shock absorbers installed in a motor vehicle
KR20050120262A (en) 2004-06-18 2005-12-22 한국타이어 주식회사 Dynamic impact load addition and impact tester of tire tread
JP2006030046A (en) 2004-07-20 2006-02-02 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Tire curbstone run-over testing method and device
KR20060041329A (en) 2004-11-08 2006-05-11 한국타이어 주식회사 Impact resistance force measuring apparatus of tire sidewall
US20070261469A1 (en) * 2005-04-05 2007-11-15 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Test apparatus for accelerated wheel and suspension component structural durability
US20060218999A1 (en) * 2005-04-05 2006-10-05 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Test apparatus for accelerated wheel and suspension component structural durability
EP1757918A1 (en) 2005-08-26 2007-02-28 Bose Corporation Vehicle suspension testing and demonstrating
US20070044537A1 (en) * 2005-08-26 2007-03-01 Knox Lawrence D Vehicle suspension testing and demonstrating
CN1920513A (en) 2005-08-26 2007-02-28 伯斯有限公司 Vehicle suspension testing and demonstrating
US7302825B2 (en) * 2005-08-26 2007-12-04 Bose Corporation Vehicle suspension testing and demonstrating
JP2008026132A (en) 2006-07-20 2008-02-07 Bridgestone Corp Device and method for running test of vehicle
CN101187597A (en) 2006-11-20 2008-05-28 韩国轮胎株式会社 Impact force measuring apparatus of traveling tire
DE102007006041A1 (en) * 2006-12-22 2008-06-26 Daimler Ag Method for testing steering system of vehicle, during steering movement of vehicle against barrier, particularly curbstone, involves supporting curbstone adapter serving as barrier and is moved against vehicle
US20090000371A1 (en) * 2007-06-26 2009-01-01 The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. Tire characteristic judging method and tire characteristic judging device
KR20110065793A (en) 2009-12-10 2011-06-16 금호타이어 주식회사 Device for measuring impact force of tire
KR20120060562A (en) 2010-12-02 2012-06-12 한국타이어 주식회사 Vehicle tire impact test apparatus

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Aug. 12, 2014 Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2014/062703.
Aug. 12, 2014 Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2014/062703.
Feb. 5, 2018 Search Report issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 2014800364699.
May 4, 2016 Extended Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 14818819.6.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2015007568A (en) 2015-01-15
JP5600777B1 (en) 2014-10-01
CN105339772B (en) 2019-02-12
EP3015842A1 (en) 2016-05-04
EP3015842A4 (en) 2016-06-01
EP3015842B1 (en) 2019-07-03
US20160131554A1 (en) 2016-05-12
WO2014208211A1 (en) 2014-12-31
CN105339772A (en) 2016-02-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101259286B1 (en) Pneumatic tire
US9481211B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
US11040578B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
KR20120122921A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2012250610A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP6092569B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2012121542A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP6009029B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
US10500900B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
AU2009318659B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
US9958359B2 (en) Tire performance testing apparatus
JP2010052698A (en) Tire
US9592706B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP5922745B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2013244854A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP5146476B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2013112294A (en) Pneumatic tire
CN109910522B (en) Pneumatic tire
JP7053352B2 (en) Pneumatic tires
JP5764026B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
US11179974B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP6712907B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2008114756A (en) Tire for agricultural machine
JP6204331B2 (en) tire
US11052709B2 (en) Pneumatic tire

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:USAMI, KOICHI;REEL/FRAME:037298/0025

Effective date: 20151211

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4