US942621A - Building-block. - Google Patents

Description

. WILLIAM o.-D'ENIsor i, OF onEvELnNDHEIGHTsQ01110;AssIGNoR TO rm: .OHIIO oLAY COMPANY, OF qLEvELaND, onxoga oonronnrron or OHIO.

BUILDING-BLOCK.

i To all whom it. may concern;

Be it known 'that I, IVILLIIAM C. DimisoN, a citizen of the United "States, residing at Cleveland Heights, in theflcounty of Cuyahoga and .State of Ohio, have invented a certain new and useful Improvement in Building-Blocks, of which the following is a full,"clear, :and exact description, reference beinghad to the accompanying draw- The object of this invention is to provide a building block in a form possessing great adaptabillty in use and producing very strong wall. a

.My block is tongue projecting from the' side of the head,

which parts bear such relation to each other i that the blocks may be laid up to produce walls of varying thickness and also to re ceive header courses. where desired.

. My'blocks are hollow for cheapness and lightness, but are provided with-"webs so arranged that when the blocks-are built. into a wall the webs stand in jvertical tiers, whereby the strength of the wall to resist any crushing strain is enormously increased.

The system of heads and tongues also makes a continuous.interlock in .the courses and breaks the joint betweenthem, so that the wall is tighter and much stronger against" any lateral strain than the ordinary wall.

.It is .to be understood that, while the re-' lation which the tongue ofmy block and the head'bear to each other is of importance in producing the result I do, I do not intend to limit myself to any specific dimensions. The block may be made in any length and the head and tongue of any width or height. 'As, however, my blocks are of great value inproducing a backing wall for a facing-0f pressed'brickwhic'h should be interlocked thereto by headercourses, I find it preferable to so dimension my block as to cooperate withv standard bricks. Y

The invention comprises the 'block formed to givethe characteristics above mentioned,

as herein illustrated and hereinafter more definitely explained and summarized in the claims. I I

The invention includes also the combination with sucha block of a brick wall having a cooperating header course. I

In thedrawings', Figure I is a perspective view of my block; Figs. 2 and 3 are Specification of Letters Patent. 7

formed with ahead and a Patented Dec. 7, 1999.

Ap iflication filed October 1,1908. Serial No. 455 667. v

a c REISSUED vertical end views of Walls built upof my blocks and a facing course of brick. In Fig. 2 the'back wall provided by my blocks is approximately twice the width of the standard brick, while in Fig. 3 it is mately threetimes the width.

The length of my block may be anything desired. The width of the head and the width of the tongue are preferably approxibrick, wh1le the thickness of the tongue is preferably that of an ordinary brick and the head approximately twice that thickness.

In the drawings, reference character H (with orwithout exponents) indicates .the head, T thetongue and M the mortar.

A and B indicate the top and bottom walls of the head and G and D the vertical walls thereofx Similarly, E and F are the top and- -bottom of the tongue, G the outer wall thereof and I the inner partition or web. As will be seen, the tongue projects from the middle of the side D of the head. That is, the space betweenthe surface E and the surface A is the same as the space be- I tween the bottom surface F and the bottom surface 13.. The height G of the tongue is preferably that of a standard brick. The height of the head if the mortar were disre garded would be' twice that of the tongue;v but, owingto thecourses of mortar, as hereinafter explained, the height of the head is 1 preferably more than twice the;heigl1t of the tongue by the thickness of one course of mortar. The width of the head is preferably somewhat less than the width of the tongue, the web I and the wall G being preferably the same distance apart as are the walls C and D. The width of the'head is preferably. less than half the total width of the block by an amount correspondin to one course of mortar, while the widthof the tongue is preferably one course of mortar more than half the total width.

' Taking a concrete illustration and with out limiting myself to particular dimensions, it may be observed that a-standard brick is 2% high, 4 wide and 8); long. Accordingly, for cooperation with such bricks it would be convenient to make my brick of the following dimensions; length, say 12 inches, so as to break courses with the brick face, the height of the tongue 2%, height of the head twice this plus the thick ness of a mortar'course, that is, 5 inches; the

approxi- 60 width at a head D and the web I being inch, and theto-tal.

. the 'web' I ofthe tongue below the heads H of the course below it. This i -monly 'called an 8 inch blocks..-

my blo'cks ,one' above the other alternately, the head .of one block going over the tongue facing tongue 4% inches, the space between the wall widthof the block'being 8?; inches. Bricks of such dimensions may be very conveniently laid up with standard brick of the dimensions given.-

i shows a course -o f bricks backed up by what is comwall of my building In making such 8 inch wall, I place ofthe block below it and the tongue coming over thehead of the block below it. This brings-"the wall D of the head directly over If of the'tongue directly over the'wall D of the head below it, so

' J "represents a header coursein the faci j g wall. f This I accommodate in my backing 'wallby turning the building'blocks around so that the heads H of one course come over bringsthe two tongues T over the'otherrand leaves a space" between them sufficient for the header course J with the mortar M around it.

. 5 Fig. 3 illustrates my blocks-built up to' makeaso-called 12 inchbacking wall. 'I-Iere the. heads H are" normaliy;.-. one-;abovethe" other and the tongues. onejabove the. other,

To accommodate a header course :J of the i of. blocks farthest i itate" Wall, bringin' headH over the tongue T below it an "its tongue T? over the'= l 1ad II-below. it. Above this reversed course the blOCkSJTCOD tinue as below it. This reversedcourse leaves a space corresponding to three courses.

of the bricks J. The space'of two-of such courses I fill by a hollow block cor-re sponding to the head portion of riiy hlock fact, this block maybe providedbyfllsim-. f knocking off the tongue. from,my.b'lock.-"

ac'e'left between such block '-.H and the'head H below it is of the propersizeflfor- In P y The sp receiving the header course J with the can. respo ding mortar courses IT This 12 inch wall has sixupright lines of strain resisting' material, namel ,the outermost wallsv of the:

two sets of hea s H, the innermost walls of those heads and the intermediate tiers of webs I and walls of the tongues. These intermediate tiers it will be seen are somewhat staggered, but each web or well over- 4 inches, the width of the it and the web- I that with such a wall there are four upright tiers of strain-resistheads overlap. S

wall J, I reverse one of thejcourses;

laps the wall below it, so that the downward stress is amply provided for. My building block may be made of any suitable material, as clay, cement, concrete, etc. it is cheaply constructed and, as shown,

is extremely adaptable in its application.

wallsof varying thickness, so that itis not 1. Block's of'one shape are adapted .to produce facing wall J of a single,

necessary to keep in stock a number of shapes of blocks.

My block is much stronger in resisting downward strain.thanthe ordinary commercial-brick, while the overlapping shoulders provided by the heads and tongues give the w'alla lateral SlflffIlGSS' which is far in'excess of theiordinary wall. Anotheradvantage of a wall built of my b1ocks-'is' the non-conductivity thereof for moisture, heat, cold,

sound, etc. This is due to the overlapping of the air-containing heads and tongues of B5 my blocks, confined air being, of course,- an excellent. non-conductor.- All of the horizontal mortar joints. in my wall terminate opposite hollow spaces in the blocks, and hencexany passage ofmoisture, etc., along the moi"tar course, or through the blocks" themselves is interrupted. These features outside wall, or a partition wall. Fora par-g tition wall between different apartments, for

larly advantageous. I

I haveshown the wall made b my blocks in the form of a backing wall r a facing course. It is to be understood, however, that -:wa-1ls' and all laces where the appearance isnot-the contro ling factor. I have .shown it w'iththe facing walls to illustrate at once :its own construction and use and its combination'with the header courses of suchwalls.

;.,'.Having thus described my invention, I

; '1. A building block having a hollowrec tangular head, a hollow tongue extending from themid'dleof the. side of the head for a distance substantially equal to the dis- "tance across the head, the thickness of said, tongue being substantially half. the thick- I nes's ofthehead, and the wall of the head adjacent to the tongue extending continuously across the tongue to make a separating between them.

the head-,jtheside of the head adjacent to the tongue'forming one continuous alined wan across the end of the tongue, and an internal web within the ton ue parallel to substantially in line with the end wall at w make my wall ver'y desirable, whether as an.

example, the sound-proof feature is particuit may be used independently bf such course'- and will-frequently be so used in partition I buildingbl0ck','the combination of 'a hollow rectangular head, a hollow tongue extending from the middle of one side of section throughout.

the tongues to form a continuous series of supporting members. V

3. In a building block, the combination ofa comparatively long hollow head, rectangular both internally and externally in cross section, and a tongue projecting from one of the sides of the head and having parallel top and bottom faces whose distance apart is substantially half that of the distance betweenthe top and bottom 'faces of the head, the tongue being of the same length as the head and being hollow, the hollows of the head and tongue extending continuously from one end of the block .to the other and each being of substantially the same cross 4. In a building block, the combination of a hollow rectangular head, a hollow rectangular tongue projecting from the middle of the side of thehead, the'adjacent wall of the "head extendingcontinuously across the adjacent side of the tongue, the tongue having an internal web parallel-with and adjacent to the said wall of the head, the thickness of thetongue from to to bottom being substantially half that ot the corre spending dimension of the head, the width of the ton ue being equal to the Width of the head p us the distance between said internaljweb and the adjacent wall of thehead,,an d the length of the tongue being equalto the length of the head- 1 '5. In a building block, the combination of a hollow rectangular head, a hollow rectangular tongue projecting from the middle of the side of the head, the adjacent wall of" the head extending in one continuous plane across the adjacent side of the tongue, the tongue having an internal web parallel with and adjacent to the side wall of the head, 4Q

the thickness of the tongue from top to bottom being substantially half thecorresponding dimension of the head, the width of the tongue being equal to the width of the head plus the distance between the internal web and theadjacent Wall of the head, and the length of the tongue being equal to the length of the head, whereby said blocks may be set up in a wall either with the blocks alternately placed or with the headsalining and the tongues alining, in each case there being a continuous series of supporting members, one above the other, provided by the respective walls and Webs.

In testimony whereof, 'I hereunto ailix my signature in the presence of two Witnesses.

\VILLIAM C. DENISON,

Witnesses:

ALBERT H. BATES, CURT B. MUELLER.

Images